8.4.3a_Transient_Behavior_of_a_High_Speed_Tunnel Diode_Switching_Circuit_1963 8.4.3a Transient Behavior Of A High Speed Tunnel Diode Switching Circuit 1963

8.4.3a_Transient_Behavior_of_a_High_Speed_Tunnel-Diode_Switching_Circuit_1963 8.4.3a_Transient_Behavior_of_a_High_Speed_Tunnel-Diode_Switching_Circuit_1963

User Manual: 8.4.3a_Transient_Behavior_of_a_High_Speed_Tunnel-Diode_Switching_Circuit_1963

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 12

Download8.4.3a_Transient_Behavior_of_a_High_Speed_Tunnel-Diode_Switching_Circuit_1963 8.4.3a Transient Behavior Of A High Speed Tunnel-Diode Switching Circuit 1963
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
-

.

-

~'

-~J''''' :.~;..t>.~'

.

'.'

'

"t'

•

~-.

>.

~~.

' . ,

.-.

~ ~:

<'

:~

•

'

~.

'I~

•

'/t.

~:;;,

• _

~ ..~.,~

A STUDY OF THE TRANSIENT BEHAVIOR OF A HIGH SPEED
TUNNEL-DIODE SWITCHING CIRCUIT USING AN ANALOG COMPUTER

by
GEORGE HANNAUER
Electronic Associates, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

Section
I

ANALYSIS OF SWITCHING CIRCUIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

II

THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

III

THE COMPUTER PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

Solving for the Derivatives il and i2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Generation of the Characteristic Curve . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Circuit Diagram, Figure 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potentiometer Sheet, Figure 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Amplifier Sheet, Figure 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Tables.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5
5
6
7
8
8

a.
b.
c.

Summary of Variables, Table 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary of Units Used, Table 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Summary of Parameter Values. Table 4. . . . . . . . ..

9
9
9

Static Check Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9

IV

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

10

V

REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . ..

12

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.

G.

Printe d in U. S. A.

1

Bulletin Number ALAC- 6348

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section

Page

I

ANALYSIS OF SWITCHING cmCUIT .•.••••••••••••••

1

IT

THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL ..••••.•..•.•••••.••

3

ill

THE COMPUTER PROGRAM ••••••••••••••••••.••

3

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

Solving for the Derivatives 11 and 12 • •
Generation of the Characteristic Curve
Circuit Diagram, Figure 4 • • • • • • • •
Potentiometer Sheet, Figure 5. • • • • •
Amplifier Sheet, Figure 6. • • • • • • • •

•
•
•
•
•

3
4
5
6
7

F.

Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

a.
b.
c.

Summary of Variables, Table 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Summary of Units Used, Table 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Summary of Parameter Values, Table 4 • • • • • • • •

8
8
8

Static Check Calculations ••• ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

8

IV

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS ••••••••••••••••••••

9

V

REFERENCES • • • • • • • • . . • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • •

10

G.

•
.
•
•
•

.
•
•
•
•

.
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

.
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

.
•
•
•
•

A STUDY OF THE TRANSIENT BEHAVIOR OF A HIGH SPEED
TUNNEL-DIODE SWITCHING CIRCUIT USING AN ANALOG COMPUTER

by
GEORGE HANNAUER
Electronic Associates, Inc.

Assume V+ and V_are initially zero and that V +
gradually increases while V_decreases, such that
V+ + V_ = O. Then the operating point of each
diode will move from the origin in Figure 2 along
the characteristic curve toward the peak. The voltage at the junction will remain zero, as before.
After the peak has been passed, the voltages and
currents for the two diodes should remain identical (by symmetry), and the voltage at the junction
should remain zero. However, since the diodes
are now in their negative resistance region, this
equilibrium will prove extremely unstable.

I. ANALYSIS OF SWITCHING CIRCUIT

The switching circuit is best understood by reference to the simplified schematic drawing in Figure 1. The voltages V+ and V_are bias voltages
provided by an external source, and are assumed
to be equal in magnitude and opposite in polarity.
The tunnel diodes TD1 and TD2 are identical. If
no inputs or loads are connected to the circuit,
the same current will flow through both diodes.
If the volt-ampere curve of the diodes always exhibits a positive resistance characteristic, the
voltage drops across the diodes will be identical,
and the voltage at the juncture of the diodes will
be zero.

Figure 1. Simplified Schematic for Tunnel-Diode
Switching Circuit

Suppose, for instance, that the circuit is unbalanced by a small positive voltage at the input
terminal. Then tunnel diode #2 will have a slightly
greater voltage across it than tunnel diode #1, and
as the bias voltage increases, tunnel diode #2 will
pass its peak first. Further increases in the voltage across TD2 will result in a decrease in the
current through it, and hence a decrease in the
current through TD1 as well. Since TDI is still
in its positive resistance region, a decrease in
its current will decrease its voltage drop, increasing the voltage drop across TD2 (since the tunnel
diodes are acting as a voltage divider, and the
sum of their voltage drops must equal 2V +). It
follows that TD2 will move rapidly through its
negative resistance region, at a speed limited only
by circuit reactances, and stabilize somewhere
in the positive resistance region above 300 millivolts, while TDI stabilizes in the positive resistance region below 60 millivolts.

The characteristic curve of a typical tunnel diode
is given in Figure 2. Note that the slope is negative over the greater portion of the operating
range (from about 60 to 300 millivolts). The existence of this negative resistance region means that
the equilibrium described in the preceding paragraph will be unstable. A very slight disturbance
will upset the summetry described above, causing
a very much larger voltage to appear across one
diode than across the other. This sensitivity to
small input disturbances enables the circuit to
function as a high-gain high-speed switch.

Since most of the voltage drop between the two
bias sources appears across TD2, it follows that
the voltage at the junction (the output voltage) will
be positive. A positive input voltage will therefore
produce a positive output voltage. The output voltage will be of the same order of magnitude as the
bias voltage V+, while the input voltage need only
be large enough to overcome any inherent imbalance in the diode characteristics. The input voltage can thus be made very small, and the gain of
the circuit is limited only by the closeness of the
match between diode characteristics and between

TDI
Vin

V out

~TD2---~ LOAD
V-

1

.......

en
~

en
a..

0

>

IJJ
...J
CD

10

-

I-

0::
IJJ

W
0::
0::

I:)

:z

6

:)

0...

U

:2:
0

IJJ
0

u

4

r---I

~

....
0

L--I

50

...J
...J

«

0::

~

«

2

0

5

30

20

...J
IJJ
Z

:z 10

:)

I-

0

0
0

50

100

150

250

200

300

Vo = TUNNEL DIODE VOLTAGE
0

+1

+2

+3

+4

[VO/50]

+5
t

+6

350

400

450

500

( MILLIVOLTS)
+7

+8

. +9

+10

COMPUTER VARIABLE ( VOLTS)

Figure 2. Tunnel-Diode Characteristic Curve

the positive and negative power supplies. If the
input and output voltages are equal in magnitude,
as is the case with cascaded logic elements of
similar design, high gain means that very large
resistors can be used, resulting in very large
fan-in and fan-out figures.

be large enough to unbalance a symmetric circuit.
If all components were perfectly matched, the
slightest input disturbance would unbalance the
circuit in the proper direction, and the theoretical
gain would be infinite. In practice, the gain will be
limited by component tolerances. An estimate of
the gain (or, equivalently, the fan-in/fan-out capability) of the circuit can be made from a static
analysis of the tunnel-diode characteristic and a
knowledge of circuit tolerances. Such an analysis
has been made by Chow (4) who predicted large
gains for closely matched diodes.

In high-speed logic and arithmetic circuits, the
voltages V+ and V_will be out-of-phase alternating voltages with approximately sinusoidal waveshapes, D-C levels will be superimposed on these
sinusoids and, in most applications, this bias will
just equal the amplitude of oscillation assuring
that the bias voltages do not change sign. The
alternating bias voltages will then serve as a
"clock," supplying the necessary timing signals
for high-speed arithmetic and logic. An output
can be obtained only during that part of the bias
cycle when the bias voltage is large enough to
switch one of the diodes into its negative resistance region.
The attractiveness of this circuit for digital applications lies in the fact that the input need only

The above analysis is essentially static. For design purposes, a dynamiC analysis, which takes
circuit reactances into account, is necessary for
at least two reasons:
1. A knowledge of the switching time is necessary to determine the maximum clock frequency (i.e., the maximum rate of information transfer) at which the system can be
operated.
2

2. Since the circuit contains two negative-resistance elements, it may well prOve unstable.
Instead of the switching behavior described
above, the system may break into oscillations.

=

VI

.

(5)

2

I -I
1 Dl

(6)

1

(7)

2

I -I
2 D2
f(V D )
1

(8)

1

f(V D )
2

(9)

= (I1-I2+Iin)RL
V
out

(10)

IC
=

IC

ID

=

ID
2

2

12 r 2+L 212 -M \+VD2-Vout

R.

(11)

In

Equation 11 was omitted for the purposes of this
simulation, and replaced by the assumption that the
input current lin was constant, Values from 0.5
up to 2.0 rna, were tried. The assumption of constant input current implies a constant-current
source, which is not very realistic. This simplification is not necessary, and equation 11 could be
programmed directly by adding one additional summer and one inverter to the analog circuit, The
simplification was made in the present study so
that the results could be compared directly with
Herzog's digital solution (Ref. 2), since Herzog
also made this assumption.

The equations describing the system are given below. These equations are straightforward applications of Kirchoff's laws and the known properties
of resistors, capaCitors, and inductors, They may
be written down immediately upon inspection of
Figure 3,

-V

V. -V
In out

Equations 1 and 2 are Kirchoff voltage equations
for the two major loops, Equation 3 is simply the
statement that the bias or "clock" voltages are
out-of-phase sinusoids with DC levels superimposed, Equations 4 and 5 state the basic voltampere relation of a capacitor, and 6 and 7 are
Kirchoff current equations, Equations 8 and 9 state
the characteristic relation between voltage and
current in the tunnel diodes (see Figure 2). On the
computer, these curves will be represented by
function generators. Equations 10 and 11 are, of
course, statements of Ohm's Law.

II, THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL

(2)

= -

VD

Experimentation with the actual circuit is possible, but extremely difficult due to the high frequencies inVOlved (the range of clock frequencies
to be investigated is from 100 to 1000 mc.). The
basic Simplicity of the equivalent circuit makes
it easy to write equations to describe the system
and thus study the mathematical model (the equations) rather than the system itself,

(1)

(3)

1
I
C2 C2

1

.

Figure 3. Equivalent Circuit Showing Reactances

. .
.
•

EDC-A sin wt

(4)

In

II r 1+ L1 11- M 12+VD +V out

=

1
I
C 1 C1

1.

VI

2

= -

VD

Both the stability and the switching time will depend
primarily on the inevitable circuit reactances. Figure 3 shows the equivalent circuit for the system,
with circuit reactances and external loading taken
into account. The prinCipal reactances involved are
lead inductance and case inductance (which may be
lumped together) and diode shunt capacitance. Provision is also included for coupling the leads together with mutual'inductance, which would correspond to dressing the power supply leads close
together during construction. A moderate amount
of coupling proves to have a beneficial effect on
switching time when the circuit is operated at
high frequencies.

-V

III. THE COMPUTER PROGRAM

1

A. Solving for the Derivatives i1 and i2
The first step in deriving a computer program is
3

to solve all differential equations for the highest
derivatives. This has already been done in equations 4 and 5, but equations 1 and 2 contain the
derivatives i1 and i 2 , and each ~erivat~ve appears
in both equations. To solve for 11 and 12, we must
treat these as a simultaneous system of two equations in two unknowns. This system maybe solved
by determinants, but the resulting computer circuit would be unnecessarily complex. A far simpler
approach is to solve equation 1 for i1 and equation
2 for i 2 , giving
•
1
•
I =-(V-I r+MI-V -V )
1
L1 1 1 1
2 D lout

i2

1
L2

= -(-V

•
-I r +MI·-V +V )
2 2 2
1 D2 out

t:ional power. This expression, which was obtained
. from a separate digital computer run by curvefitting, can be programmed with standard subroutines.
On an analog computer,
the best approach is
straightforward use of a standard function generator. The diode function generator (DFG) uses biased
diode networks to approximate a curve by straightline segments. On the TR-48 variable-breakpoint
DFG, eleven segments are available. The breakpoints (corners) of the curve may be varied so as
to group many short straight-line segments together where the graph curves most sharply and
use fewer segments where the graph is straighter.
In this way, an over-all accuracy of about 1% is
maintained for this particular curve.

(1 *)

(2*)

TABLE 1
SETUP TABLE FOR VARIABLE DFG

These equations give i1 in terms of i2 and vice
versa. Programming them directly leads to an
algebraic loop (a loop with no integrators), and
since this is a two-amplifier loop, positive feedback is present. For stability, we must have a
loop gain of less than one (Ref 5). By inspection
of the circuit, it is easily seen that the loop gain
is M2 /L1 1,2' Since this is always less than one
on physical grou~ds, t~e loop is stable and the
correct values of 11 and 12 may be obtained without
determinants (Reference 6).
B. Generating the Characteristic Curve

INPUT (VOLTS)

OUTPUT (VOLTS)

0.00
0.35
0.85
1. 10
1. 45
2.85
3.85
6.20
7.90
8.55
9.00
9.50

0.00
5.81
9.34
9.93
9.36
3.67
1. 69
0.89
1.56
3.20
6.75
12.00

The tunnel-diode characteristic in Figure 2 presents a problem in function generation no matter
which simulation method is used. On adigitalcomputer, the function values can be stored in main
memory in tabular form, perhaps with an interpolation subroutine to fill in the gaps between tabulated values. If enough values and/or a sufficiently
sophisticated interpolation scheme are stored, a
tremendous demand is made upon the memory, If
the digital computer is not called upon to solve the
dynamic equations as well, this is an acceptable
technique. This was the approach used by Axelrod
(3). The simulation was essentially analog, with the
digital cOP.juter serving only as 11 function generator.

Table 1 gives the appropriate breakpoints and the
corresponding function values. Note that one of the
DFG's must accept the input -VDl/50 and produce
the output + ID1/5. Its input-output graph will look
like Figure 2 reflected around the vertical axis.
The appropriate table is obtained from Table 1 by
making all the input voltages negative. The second
DFG accepts positive inputs and produces negative
outputs; its graph looks like Figure 2 reflected
around the horizontal axis.

Herzog (4) uses a digital computer for the entire
problem. The characteristic curve is represented
by an analytic expression of four terms involving
a polynomial, two exponential functions and afrac-

The volt-ampere curve in Figure 2 requires very
sharp changes of slope. Since these sharp slopes
exceed the capabilities of the DFG, apotentiometer
must be placed in the feedback path of the output
amplifier to increase the gain of the DFG.

4

I
100C I /3

-10 TEST

~
/10/3

I

-10

04

+10 TEST

+1

02

")---.------110

-10 TEST

--L

+10

eC

; r - - - - ' - - - - / II

~

R

-10 TEST

r2 /10
L-~------------~16~------------------------~

I

IOOC 2 /3

Figure 4. Analog Computer Circuit Diagram

ELECTRONIC
EDUCATION

TR-48

a

ASSOCIATES
TRAINING

INC.
GROUP

POTENTIOMETER ASSIGNMENT SHEET

POO- P29

b/llfn~

DATE

PROBLEM
SETTING
STATIC
CHECK

PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION

POT
NO

02

2 L, /5
2L·L/5
'l M/5

03

2M/5"

04

I/IO{J

05
06

1/ RL
I IN /50

07

I/IOOC,

08

1/100 Cl (3
I.('A07

00
01

09
10

-

f-.-

II

W/f3
w/(3

12

___4-1/3

13

~

--

SETTING
RUN
NUMBER I

NOTES

POT
NO

.160 +0.166

00

-0.1340·00
0.00
-0· 20
-0.02
+0.20

01

-0.97

07

+0.97
-6.40
-1·88

08

·160
0.000
0·000
.020
.125
.020
.200
.200
.640
.188

B

STATIC
CHECK
OUTPUT
V0LTAGE

Tu~N5:l= DIQQE

02
03
04
05
06

ARTIFICIAL

I.e.

TEST ONI.Y

09
10

·188 -1,20
·800 +0.83
·800 -0·67

II
12
13
14

14
15

rl/IO

.300 -1.50

15

16

rl. /10
A/500
Eoc /500

·300 +1.50
·250 +1.60

16

17
18

,260

·260 -2.60

17
18

19

19

1/50 I 1(0)
I/SO Ill. (0) I
Iisoo VOl (0)
I/SOO IVp2. (0) I

20
21
22

r-

23

.500 -5.00
.500 +5.00

20

·100 t1.00

22

.100 -/.00

23

21

24

24

25

'Izo

.050

+0.49

25

26

'/lO

.050 -0.49

26

27

27

28

28

l><

SWITCH

# I

LEFT

29

M654

Figure 5. Potentiometer Assignment Sheet
6

ELECTRONIC ASSOCIATES INC.
EDUCATION a TRAINING GROUP
TR -48 AMPLIFIER ASSIGNMENT SHEET

DATE

_--=b...L..I---,'IL-0_3_ _ _ _ __

AOO- A23
PROBLEM

_TlJ..!Uo.!.!N~N!.:!..IE=...!-L~D~I~Q~D..!:::E'___ _

STATIC CHECK
AMP
NO.

OUTPUT
VARIABLE

FB

CALCUl.ATED
CHECK PT.

OUTPUT

t9.84

01

H

+ID,/5

02

I

+t

03

-

- 10 sin

04

H

- 11 /200

+1 ·0375

05

H

+ 12./ 200

- 0.8375

06

J
j

-10 cos

wt

tl.20 -10.00

tlO sin

wt

+1.88 +6·40

07
08

+0.20 +10.00

.

wt

-6.40

use

INPUT
RESISTORS WITH

PART OF DFG

09

H

-I Dl /5

-g.84-

10

-

-Ills

-5.00

II

-

+Il/S

+5.00

12

2:

+ Iel/S

-4.84-

13

I

-Ic2. /5

+4.84-

14

/

-VDI /50

f

+V0 2 Iso

15

.

+9.68 -1.00

-9.68 +1.00

16

2

VJ.. _-'1'1
50- 50

17

H

-VOUT/SO

-0.16

18

-

V2/SO

-1.00

f
I

+II/S

-8.30 +5.00

-I2/5

t6.10 -5.00

+1.00

19
20
21

OUTPUT
USE INPUT
REOSISTOR5 WITH 04-

PART OF DFG

00

NOTES

MEASURED
CHECI( PT.

22
23
M653

Figure 6. Amplifier Assignment Sheet
7

OJ

TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF VARIABLES
Original
Variable

Max Value

Scale factor

: Scaled Variable

500 mv

1
Volt/mv
50

J~
l50

50 rna

1
5

Volt/rna

Tl
l5

I

50 rna

1
5

Volt/rna

~~

I]

2000 mains

1
200

50 rna

1
5

{3

Volt/mains

= +50

rJC

8 ohms
C2

10- 2 nanofarads

L2 = 0.4 nanohenry

For static check calculations, convenient values are
selected for all integrator output signals (in this
case II, 12, VDl' and VD2) and for the driving functions, VI, V2 , and lin' These values may be chosen
arbitrarily, but they should be small enough to
avoid amplifier overloads and large enough to provide amplifier output signals that can be measured
with reasonable accuracy. The values cho sen were:

VD2

iJ

r 2 = 3 ohms

M

~v'LT

I.

1. 0 mao

A

130 millivolts

Edc

130 millivolts

f

150 megacycles/second = 0.15 cycles/nanosecond

w

27rf = 0.9425 radians/no S.

G. Sun1mary of Static Check Conditions

12 = +25 rna.

]

TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF PARAMETERS

The use of the somewhat unusual units for
inductance and capf!-citance gu~rantees that
the equations I = CV and V = LI will hold in
this system of units.

VDl = +50 mv.

D

5 seconds machine time
1 nanosecond problem time

Voltage: millivolts
Current: milliamps
Resistance: ohms
Inductance: nanohenries (10- 9 henry)
Capacitance: nanofarads (10- 9 farad)
Time: nanoseconds (10- 9 sec)

II = +25 rna.

;L200

~Il
:l?

Volt/rna

TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF UNITS OF
MEASUREMENT USED

Note:

. [1

V]

In

mv.

8

1 2

Try M = 0 for first run. Probable maximum value around O. 2
nanohenry.

VI = +50 mv.

VI = L1 i1 - Mi2

lin = + 1.0 mao

-V2 = L2i2 -Mil
Solving by determinants:

Parameter values are the same as those for the
first run. The values for all variables may be calculated from equations 1 - 10. These values are
given below.

= +49.2

ID1 = +49.2 mao

ID2

IC1 = -24.2 mao

IC2 = -24.2 mao

= -207.50 milliamps/nanosecond

12

= -167.50 milliamps/nanosecond.

.

L L _M 2
1 2

h =.0.4
nanohenry and M = 0.2 nanohenry, then II = 12
+ 250.0 milliamps/nanosecond.
The output of amplifier 04 should be -i l /200 = -1.25
volts, and the output of amplifier 05 should be + 1.25
volts.
IV. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

= -2420 millivolts/nanosecond

.II

1

If we let VI = 50 mv, V2 = -50 mv, Ll =

mao

The derivatives may be calculated from equations
1 *, 2*, 4, and 5. These are:

VD2

1 2

L 1 L 2 -M

Vout = +8 mv.

"D1 =

-L V +MV

•
V1 L 2-MV 2
II =
2

The switching transients and output wave shape s for
constant input current are shown ih Figures 7 and
8. Note in particular that at 300 megacycles the
output voltage goes through an initial oscillation before switching. The output is high for only a short
period of time late in the bias cycle. At 150 megacycles, the output rises much more sharply and
gives a good waveshape.

All variables that have been calculated can now be
translated into amplifier output voltages. These
voltages appear on the amplifier assignment sheet.
They may be checked against values calculated on
the circuit diagram (to check the programming and
scaling) and later checked against actual measured
voltages on the computer (to check the patching
and the functioning of the components). The checkpoints should also be calculated and measured for
integrators. (The checkpoint of an integrator is
minus the sum of its input voltages. It may be read
out by patching the summing junction of the integrator temporarily to the summing junction of a
summing amplifier that is not being used in the
problem). These calculated values are also tabulated in the amplifier assignment sheet.

200

100

f:z 150mc

BIAS VOLTAGE_

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

time - nanoseconds

The initial condition voltages marked "Test" are
for static test purposes only, and not forthe actual
run. They should be removed prior to the first run.

Figure 7. Output Wave shape of Switching Circuit
at 150 Megacycle Clock Frequency

Note that the static test value of the mutual ind1lctance M is zero. This value was chosen to break
the algebraic loop in the static test mode, since
otherwise it would be very hard to troubleshoot.
However, this static test value does not check the
algebraic loop itself, and a supplementary test
should be included with M f. O. For this supplementary test, we may as well assume that the artificial initial conditions on voltages and currents
are zero, since this part of the circuit has already
been checked by the main static check. Eqaations
1 and 2 then become:

200

100

2

3

4

6

7

time - nanoseconds

Figure 8. Output Wave shape at 300 Megacycle
Clock Frequency
9

B

only 50 milliseconds -- effectively zero solution
time as far as the operator is concerned.

Operation at 300 megacycles is possible, but marginal. Further experimentation with the model indicates that for reliable operation with sufficiently
large fan in/fan out capability the circuit should not
be operated above about 200 or 250 megacycles.

c. Even more important than running time per se is
the time required to obtain meaningful and useful
results. The output of the analog unit is a continuous
graph, drawn in ink on 11 x 17" paper . . . a form
of output which an engineer can readily observe and
interpret. By contrast, the digital results were obtained from an on-line printer, and considerable
manual effort was required to translate these results into graphical form.

It is significant that a preliminarypencil-and-paper

analysis indicated that the system ought to operate
at frequencies up to 1000 megacycles. A circuit
designed to operate at this frequency would not function properly and would be extremely hard to
troubleshoot, due to the circuit loading of the measuring devices. The computer solution facilitates
fundamental understanding of the nature of the
switching process, as well as providing actual solutions. The ease of parameter changing on the
analog computer makes it especially easy to investigate the trade-off between gain (Le. fan in/fan
out capability) and frequency.

Of course, on-line devices are available for producing graphical readout from a digital computer.
Some of Herzog's graphical results were obtained
by oscilloscope photography. Although this method
eliminates the tedium of point-plotting, it ismessy
and time-consuming, and offers limited resolution.
Perhaps the best form of readout (certainly the
most convenient) involves the use of a digital-toanalog converter and an analog X- Y plotter. While
this method is acceptable, it requires expensive
conversion eqUipment to translate the data into
analog voltages for plotting. Such conversion equipment is unnecessary with the TR-48 computer since
the signal is an analog voltage in the first place.

The results agree quite well with Herzog's digital
simulation, using the Edsac II computer at Cambridge University, and for further analysis of the
results, the reader is referred to Herzog's paper
(2). It is instructive to compare the two simulations from the point of view of flexibility and convenience.
a, The digital program requires the equations to
be written as a set of first-order equations, solved
for the highest derivatives, and t11en converted into
algebraic equations by the Runge-Kutta or a'similar integration scheme. While standard software
is available in many installations to simplify this
task, it is completely eliminated in an analog similation, since the analog solves differential equations ~ differential equations,
b. The running time for the Edsac II was, according to Herzog, about three minutes per solution, as
opposed to 25 seconds on the TR-48 computer -- a
speed advantage of seven to one. Nothingprecludes
running even faster than this, since the components
are operating well within their frequency-response
limitations. The solution also can be run in repetitive operation, in which case the solution takes

d. Since only about half of the computing capacity
of the TR-48 computer is used, the simulation can
easily be expanded to take additional effects into
account. Herzog's equations assumed a constant
current input and ignored the fact that the load is
not purely resistive. These simplifications could
easily be removed on an analog simulation by
addition of a few more amplifiers and potentiometers.
On a digital computer, any additional
complexity in the equations would increase the
running time.
An attractive alternative, for example, would be to
simulate an additional tunnel-diode circuit on the
analog computer and feed the output of the first
into the second. This would enable the designer to
determine how flat the output wave shape of the first
cirCuit would have to be in order to trigger the
second successfully.

V. REFERENCES

1. Gibson, J.J. "An Analysis of the Effects of Reactances on the Performance of the Tunnel-Diode Balanced Pair Logic Circuit" RCA Review, December, 1962, p. 457.
~'o.~~rzog,

G.B. "Tunnel-Diode Balanced Pair Switching Analysis" RCA Review, June, 1962, Vol. XXIII,

3. Axelrod, Barber and Rosenheim "&>me New High-Speed Tunnel-diode Logic Circuits" mM Journal
April, 1962.
'

4. Chow, W.F. "TWillel-Diode Digital Circuits" IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers Vol EC 9
September, 1960, page 295.
'
•
,
5. Rogers, A.E. and T.W. Connolly, "Analog Computation in Engineering Design" McGraw-Hill 1960
Chapter 6,
'
,
6. Hannauer, G., "Algebraic Loops", E&T Memo #22, Electronic ASSOCiates, Inc., P.O. Box 582, Princeton, N.J,

r

10

ELECTRONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Long Branch, New Jersey

ADVANCED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATION SERVICES/ANALOG COMPUTERS/HYBRID ANALOG-DIGITAL COMPUTATION EQUIPMENT/SIMULATION SYSTEMS/
SCIENTIFIC AND LABORATORY INSTRUMENTS/INDUSTRIAL PROCESS CONTROl SYSTEMS/PHOTOGRAMMETRIC EQUIPMENT/RANGE INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS/TEST
AND CHECK-OUT SYSTEMS/MILITARY AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVElOPMENT SERVICES/FIELD ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES.



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.3
Linearized                      : No
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 4.2.1-c043 52.372728, 2009/01/18-15:56:37
Create Date                     : 2014:12:14 18:44:05-08:00
Modify Date                     : 2014:12:14 18:07:31-08:00
Metadata Date                   : 2014:12:14 18:07:31-08:00
Producer                        : Adobe Acrobat 9.55 Paper Capture Plug-in
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:61d3c5d7-4f8d-7748-ac1f-dd9d3cf31d23
Instance ID                     : uuid:0399babc-9cc7-ad49-aa17-9a5d85103639
Page Layout                     : SinglePage
Page Mode                       : UseNone
Page Count                      : 12
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu