Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide For The 2019 & 2020 National TSA Conferences HS Competitve

User Manual:

Open the PDF directly: View PDF .
Page Count: 340

Download
Open PDF In Browser	View PDF

Technology Student Association
(TSA)

HIGH SCHOOL
COMPETITIVE
EVENTS GUIDE
for the 2019 and 2020
National TSA Conferences

with Correlations to
Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Standards

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TSA is grateful to many people for their advice and expertise in developing the competitive events program over the
years. The organization especially appreciates the volunteer efforts of the members of the Competition Regulations
Committee (CRC), noted below, who have written and refined the event specifications that appear in this guide.

Frank D. Calfee, Tennessee

Sid Rader, Virginia

Leigh Davis, Tennessee

Kristin Rausch, Texas

Hal Harrison, South Carolina

Tony Raymond, Colorado

Laura Hummell, Pennsylvania

Tara Royal, Texas

Emily McAdams, North Carolina

Andy Stephenson, Kentucky

Valerie McCauley, Oklahoma

Wanda Walker, Tennessee

Dale Moll, Pennsylvania

Matt Walton, Virginia

Natalie Norman, North Carolina

Bud Worley, Texas

Steve Price, Georgia

COPYRIGHT 2018—Technology Student Association. Twelfth Edition
All rights reserved. This guide was developed by the TSA Competition Regulations Committee and sanctioned by the
TSA, Inc. Board of Directors. Unless otherwise indicated in this guide, no part may be reproduced in any form or by any
means without written permission from the executive director of the Technology Student Association.
For more information, please contact:
Technology Student Association
1904 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191-1540
phone 703.860.9000 • toll free 888.860.9010 • fax 703.758.4852
general@tsaweb.org • TSAweb.org

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
TSA, THE ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
TSA Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Who Are TSA Members? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
The Role of Competitive Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
About This Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . 5
Levels of Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
General Rules and Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
National TSA Conference Dress Code and
Official Conference Attire Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Competition Regulations Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Rules Interpretation Panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Event Coordinator Reminders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Event Proposal Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

HIGH SCHOOL COMPETITIVE EVENTS
3D Animation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Animatronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Architectural Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Biotechnology Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Board Game Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Chapter Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Children’s Stories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Coding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture . . . . . . . . 103
Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering . . . . . . . . . 111
Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) . . . . . . . . . . . 119
Debating Technological Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Digital Video Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Dragster Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Engineering Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Essays on Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Extemporaneous Speech . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

LEAP PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Fashion Design and Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

High School LEAP Report Competition
Engagement Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Flight Endurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
Forensic Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193

LEAP Legacy Chapter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher . . . . . . . . 201

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING,
AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION . . 15

Music Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209

Science Content Standards (Grades 9-12) . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Technology Content Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
(ABET, Inc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

On Demand Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Photographic Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
Prepared Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Promotional Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis) . . . . . . . 249

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics �������� 22

Software Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257

TSA AND CAREERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

System Control Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275

Structural Design and Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

Career Clusters® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Technology Bowl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285

TSA Competitions and the Career Clusters® . . . . . . . . . . 27

Technology Problem Solving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
Transportation Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301

HIGH SCHOOL COMPETITIVE EVENTS . . . . . 29

Video Game Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309

Competitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Webmaster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317

Competitive Events Eligibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
TSA Competitive Events Rating Form/Rubric . . . . . . . . 32

FORMS APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TSA, THE ORGANIZATION
TSA MISSION

The Technology Student Association (TSA) enhances
personal development, leadership, and career
opportunities in STEM, whereby members apply and
integrate these concepts through intra-curricular activities,
competitions, and related programs.

WHO ARE TSA MEMBERS?

TSA is devoted exclusively to the needs of students
engaged in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM). Open to those who are enrolled
in or who have completed technology and engineering
courses, TSA has 250,000 middle and high school
student members across the country. TSA is supported
by educators, parents, and business leaders who believe
in the need for a technologically literate society. TSA
members learn through exciting competitive events,
leadership opportunities, and membership activities.
It is the intent of TSA to involve as many different TSA
members as possible in competitive events and provide
recognition in a setting of fair play practices using TSA
event guidelines.
Explore what TSA has to offer by using this guide and
by visiting TSAweb.org for information. With competitive
events that range from video game design to structural
engineering and much more, there is something to
capture the imagination of—and bring out the best in—all
students. We hope that with teacher guidance, students
will enjoy the challenge of TSA’s competitive events at
local, state, regional, and national TSA conferences.
The competitions in this guide support a broad spectrum
of goals related to STEM curriculum. They also promote
leadership skills and a focus on future career choices.

THE ROLE OF COMPETITIVE EVENTS

To follow its mission, TSA offers stimulating competitive
events and recognition in both technology and
leadership arenas. TSA believes that by participating in
carefully designed competitions, students learn to do
their best, thereby becoming “winners” whether or not
they place in a competition. Many teachers find TSA’s
competitive events provide an excellent motivational tool
in the academic environment.

Every two years, TSA’s competitive events are reviewed
and revised by the Competition Regulations Committee
(CRC), a standing group of technology amd engineering
educators with hands-on classroom experience. The
Technology Student Association (TSA) High School
Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 & 2020 National
TSA Conferences is the result of the work of CRC
managers, competitive event coordinators, teachers,
proposals of numerous TSA state and chapter advisors,
and students that make TSA competitive events current
and dynamic. The guide presents rules and regulations
for all National TSA Conference competitive events; a
view of each event’s connection to STEM standards; and
suggested careers. Relevant for all levels of competition
(state delegations may choose to adopt the national
guidelines for state-level competitions), the guide
provides an excellent motivational tool for curricular study
and activities in the classroom.

ABOUT THIS GUIDE

With the publication of the 2019 & 2020 TSA High School
Competitive Events Guide, come the following changes:
1. The format of this guide has been streamlined to
help competitors and advisors know and clearly
understand the TSA Conference General Rules and
Regulations, and the procedures, regulations, and
evaluation criteria for each event.
2. General rules that apply to all participants across
every competitive event are no longer identified in
each competition’s regulations. Therefore it is critical,
and a personal responsibility of each competitive
event participant and advisor, to read and fully
adhere to the TSA Conference General Rules and
Regulations. As an example, should a competitive
event require a written test to be taken, there is no
longer a specific reminder in the event guidelines for
participants to bring their own pencil to the event.
3. Every event’s guidelines have been revised in some
form, whether in content or in format.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM
LEVELS OF COMPETITION
A. The breakdown of grades noted below is used
to designate levels for competition entries.
Each level has its own unique competitive events
guide.
• Middle School/Junior High School level—
Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
• High School level—Grades 9, 10, 11, 12
• Ninth graders must compete at the level in which
the chapter affiliates.
• If the ninth grade is housed in a high school,
grades 9-12, ninth grade students must compete
in high school events.
• If the ninth grade is housed in a school of grades
6-9 or 7-9, ninth grade students must compete
in middle school events.
B. If the school has a K-12 configuration, or a
configuration other than the examples above, national
TSA should be contacted for clarification and approval
regarding the appropriate school level designation.

GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

NOTE: General rules and regulations apply to all
competitive events and are in addition to each event’s
specific guidelines.
A. Affiliation and Membership
1. TSA members, advisors, and chapters must
be currently affiliated with TSA to enter any
competitive event.
2. TSA membership rights extend through the year of
graduation.
3. Students who graduate mid-year may compete
at the National TSA Conference that immediately
follows their end-of-year graduation.
B. Conference Registration, Attendance, and
Participation in Events
1. Anyone who wishes to attend the conference
must complete conference registration.

2. Students must be registered and be in attendance
with an adult chaperone at the National TSA
Conference in order to enter and become a
semifinalist or finalist in any event.
3. All adult advisors, chaperones, and student
participants must be in attendance for the entire
conference.
4. National TSA Conference registrants must wear
conference identification badges at all times.
5. The TSA competitive event limit is six (6) events
per conference participant—individual and team
events combined.
6. Team events:
a. All team members must be affiliated with the
same chapter.
b. To enter a team event, the chapter designates
only that it is participating; names of the
individual team members are not required.
c. Unless otherwise designated in a competition’s
eligibility guideline, the maximum size of a team
is six (6) members.
C. Student Responsibilities for Competitions
1. It is the individual responsibility of each participant
to obtain all rules and guidelines for competitive
events.
2. Lack of knowledge or understanding about a
particular event is neither reason nor excuse
for an individual to request an accommodating
adjustment or change.
3. Students and advisors must routinely check the
TSA website, TSAweb.org, for updated information
about TSA general rules and competitive event
guidelines.
4. Students who participate in any TSA competitive
event are responsible for knowing all updates,
changes, and clarifications related to that event.
D. Competition Entries
1. Entries must be started and completed during the
current school year.
2. Entries may be submitted for one (1) year, and one (1)
competition only. An infraction of this rule results in
disqualification.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM

3. All entries requiring documentation materials
(comprising a “portfolio”) must be secured in a
clear front report cover (visit this site for a sample
report cover), unless otherwise indicated in an
event's regulations.
4. All entries must be in English.
5. Students must check in and pick up their event
entries at the times and places stated in the
conference program, or as announced during the
National TSA Conference.
6. For any competition that involves the use of a
pencil (e.g., for taking a written test, for producing
required sketches), participants must provide—and
bring to the test site two (2) pencils, either:
• sharpened standard #2/HB grade with an
eraser, or
• #2 mechanical with an eraser
7. Entry content:
a. National TSA provides guidelines for individual
and team entry content but does not bear
responsibility for content choices made by
participants.
b. Entries are evaluated on the basis of an event’s
official rating form/rubric.
8. Projects and/or products:
a. Unless otherwise specified in a specific event’s
regulations, no identifying information—other
than a student or team identification number—
is to be included on an entry.
i. Events that require submission of a Plan
of Work Log should include indication of
student initials only.
b. Unless otherwise noted, for all events that
require a display, the size of the display may
not exceed 15" deep x 3' wide x 4' high.
9. TSA may choose to keep National TSA
Conference student entries.
a. Such entries may be used by national TSA for
promotional purposes. Should that occur, credit
for any such entry would be noted by TSA.

E. Citations, References, and Copyrighted Material
1. For all applicable competitive events, citations
or references must follow Modern Language
Association (MLA) style.
2. All entries must be the original work of the student
participant or student team.
3. All ideas, text, images, and sound from other
sources must be cited.
4. If copyrighted material is used, written permission
must be included.
a. An internet search about copyrighted material
and copyright fair use is recommended if ideas,
text, images, or sound from other sources is
incorporated into an event entry.
b. For information about the use of the TSA logo,
see TSAweb.org.
5. Failure to follow any of the above procedures
results in disqualification.
F. Prohibited Materials, References, and Images
1. Hazardous materials, chemicals, lighted or open
flames, combustibles, wet cell batteries, and other
similar substances are not allowed at the National
TSA Conference.
2. Competition entries or presentations by
participants must not include racial or ethnic
slurs/symbols, reference to gang affiliation, or
vulgar, violent, subversive, or sexually suggestive
language or images.
3. Entries or presentations may not promote products
that students may not legally buy, such as tobacco,
alcohol, or illegal drugs.
4. Images of guns, knives, or other weapons are
prohibited.
5. Failure to follow any of the above procedures
results in disqualification.
G. TSA Liability
1. TSA is not responsible or liable for any personal
property, equipment, or materials brought to the
National TSA Conference for use by a participant
or attendee.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM

H. Event Scheduling Conflicts
1. When an event scheduling conflict could prevent
an individual from participating in an event, the
individual has the right to decide which event is
eliminated from their schedule.
I. Emergencies
1. Team member substitution may be allowed, if
approved by the event manager and coordinator,
should a documented emergency arise in team
events that involves written and semifinalist
segments.
2. Competitive Event Change Requests:
a. Should a change be requested for any reason
after the stated conference registration
deadline, a $50 change fee will be charged per
person per event, if the change is approved.
b. Only competitors registered by the conference
registration deadline will be eligible for change
requests.
c. TSA reserves the right to approve or not
approve a requested change.
d. Fees must be paid by credit card, check, or
cash prior to any change being made.
e. No changes will be made once competitions
start.
J. Event Judging

K. Rules Violations and Disqualifications
1. A rules violation that gives a contestant an unfair
advantage will result in a twenty percent (20%)
deduction of the total possible points in either a
preliminary or semifinalist round, as applicable.
2. The coordinator or manager of an event has the
right to disqualify a contestant when this type of
incident occurs.
3. The event coordinator and manager must sign off
on both a twenty percent (20%) deduction and a
disqualification.
L. Semifinalists
1. All competitive events will have a minimum of
twelve (12) semifinalists.
2. Semifinalists (individuals or teams, as applicable)
will compete against one another to determine the
top ten (10) finalists in an event.
3. All members of a semifinalist team will participate
in the semifinalist portion of an event, unless
otherwise noted in the event’s regulations.
M. Electronic Devices
1. Recording devices are not allowed in certain
competitive events.
2. CRC manager and event coordinator approval is
required before any event may be recorded.

1. All events are judged in accordance with the
stated event criteria noted in this competitive
events guide.

3. All electronic devices—including but not limited
to, cell phones, iPads/tablets, electronic readers,
smart watches, etc.—must be turned off unless
otherwise noted in specific event regulations.

2. The decisions of judges related to competitive
events are final.

4. No electronic communication devices of any kind
are permitted during competition.

3. Concern about any event during the National TSA
Conference should be submitted in writing to the
Rules Interpretation Panel (RIP) at the conference.
4. The RIP will render a decision at the conference.
5. The decisions of the RIP at the conference are
final. (For more information, refer to the Rules
Interpretation Panel section.)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM

NATIONAL TSA CONFERENCE DRESS
CODE AND OFFICIAL CONFERENCE ATTIRE
GUIDELINES
A. Chapter and state advisors, parents, and chaperones
are responsible for seeing that all TSA student
members wear TSA competition, general session, or
casual attire as occasions may require.
B. Everyone who is registered for the conference—
including parents, guests, and children—must comply
with the TSA Dress Code.*
C. TSA attire may be purchased online via the SHOP tab
on the TSA website, or click on this link to the
TSA Store.
D. TSA competition, general session, and casual attire
are considered appropriate dress for conference
activities and public appearances.
E. Because adults (advisors, parents, and guests) serve
as role models at TSA conferences and activities,
they are expected to dress appropriately for all TSA
occasions they attend.
F. Students must adhere to the TSA Dress Code
requirements as listed in this section and on the
TSA website.
G. When students compete in any competitive event
they must wear competition attire.
H. Students not in appropriate competition attire when
they compete may be allowed to participate in an
event, but they will lose twenty percent (20%) of the
total possible points per round.

COMPETITION ATTIRE
1. Shirt: official royal blue TSA shirt
2. Pants or skirt: gray
3. Shoes: black dress shoes worn with black or dark
blue socks, hosiery (optional);
• open-toed shoes or sandals are acceptable
• unacceptable: athletic shoes; flip-flops; military
boots; or work boots
4. Also required for the middle school or high school
level Chapter Team event only (but may be worn
for other competitions if preferred by participants):
• Blazer: navy blue with official TSA patch
• Tie: official TSA tie (males)
Females are not penalized for wearing the
official TSA tie to Chapter Team or any other
competitive event

GENERAL SESSION ATTIRE
1. Shirt: The official TSA shirt (royal blue) is preferred;
button-down shirt; polo/golf shirt
• Unacceptable: T-shirts; halter tops; tank tops
2. Dress, skirt, or pants
• Unacceptable: jeans; baggy pants; exterior
pocket pants; shorts
3. Shoes: dress shoes worn with dark socks or
hosiery (optional); open-toed shoes or sandals are
acceptable
• Unacceptable: athletic shoes; flip-flops; military
boots; or work boots

CASUAL ATTIRE
1. Appropriate t-shirts, shorts, or jeans
2. Casual attire may not be worn at competitions or
general sessions

*Awards Ceremony
Registered parents, guests, and children who are not
compliant with TSA General Session Attire and who wish
to attend the Awards Ceremony, may be asked to sit in a
designated section, if permitted entry.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM

COMPETITION REGULATIONS COMMITTEE
The Competition Regulations Committee (CRC) is
charged with reviewing TSA’s competitive events,
updating them as necessary, and presiding over
the competitive events at the annual National TSA
Conference. The all-volunteer CRC is composed of
dedicated STEM teachers and education professionals
from across the country who have made major
commitments to create and maintain the high quality of
national TSA’s competitive events.

• Questions about specific events may be addressed to
event coordinators or event managers.
• Ideas and feedback regarding events are always
welcome. Guidelines and forms can be found in the
appendix of this guide for proposing a new event and
for suggesting revisions to existing events.

RULES INTERPRETATION PANEL

EVENT COORDINATOR REMINDERS

TSA is grateful for the support of its event coordinators,
many of whom are advisors attending the conference
with students from their chapters. The busy schedules of
these individuals prompt the reminders that follow.
A. Competitive event coordinators must be present for
a mandatory coordinator’s meeting on the first day of
the conference.
B. Competitive event coordinators must be present for
conference event check-in and check-out if they are
coordinating an event in which these activities take
place.
1. Generally speaking, “check-in” is on the evening of
registration day, and “check-out” is held on the day
before the awards ceremony.
2. Tentative schedule information is available before
the conference on TSAweb.org.

The Rules Interpretation Panel (RIP)—a group of at
least three (3) CRC members—monitors and oversees
competitive events during the National TSA Conference.
The panel provides a means by which chapter advisors
may express grievances and concerns about conference
situations that pertain to events, and ensures continuity
from year to year for competitive event rules and
regulations.

C. The CRC, which consists of all the event managers,
is available throughout the conference to support
coordinators as they supervise competitive events.

RIP GRIEVANCE PROCESS

B. From those ten (10) finalists, first (1st), second (2nd), and
third (3rd) place awards are presented to the individual
or team representative, as determined for each event.
Rankings beyond third (3rd) place are not announced
at the awards ceremony.

1. Chapter or state advisors express concern about a
rule to the CRC team.
2. The RIP panel will meet to discuss and analyze the
advisor’s concern; the advisor may be asked to
submit a formal grievance in writing using the RIP
Grievance form (see Forms Appendix).

AWARDS
A. At the conference awards ceremony, the top ten (10)
finalists in each event are identified in random order
and called to the stage for recognition.

C. A list of the top ten (10) finalists for each event is
available on TSAweb.org shortly after the conference.

3. The formal grievance is submitted by a chapter
advisor, with approval from the state advisor.
4. It is the intent of the panel to resolve any
grievances at the conference and provide a
written response to the advisor.
5. All decisions made by the panel are final.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS PROGRAM

EVENT PROPOSAL INFORMATION

As technology changes and technology education
attempts to keep pace and reflect these changes, new
TSA events are added, some are revised, and others
are dropped. TSA chapter advisors, state advisors, and
others are encouraged to submit proposals for new
events.
The following topics reflect potential areas for
development:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Lasers/satellites/radar
Cloud computing
Engineering
Mobile apps
3D printing
STEM
Transportation technology
Economic development
Environmental technology
Future technology
Innovative power sources
21st-century technology
Biotechnology problem solving
Leadership development
Electronic publishing
Data management
Social media marketing
Green technology
Manufacturing technology
Cybersecurity
Information Technology

An event proposal submitted for consideration must
include these elements:
• Overview (description of the event and participant
expectations)
• Eligibility for entry
• Limitations (such as time or entry submission
requirements)
• Specific regulations
• Required personnel
• Standards alignment with STEM standards
Formative ideas are welcome, but the more complete the
event proposal the less likely it will be misinterpreted. The
CRC acknowledges all submissions, and each is given
consideration for possible inclusion in a competitive
events guide. Once submitted, ideas and events
become the property of national TSA. Proposals must be
submitted by August 15th, 2019 in order to be considered
for the next high school guide.
Proposals must include the submitter’s name and
complete contact information. Proposals may be
mailed to CRC, c/o National TSA, 1904 Association Drive,
Reston, VA 20191-1540, or emailed in a Word file
attachment to general@tsaweb.org.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

LEAP PROGRAM
LEAP REPORT

The 2019 & 2020 TSA High School Competitive Events
Guide integrates TSA’s leadership program, Leadership.
Education. Achievement. Personal Growth. (LEAP), at
the high school level.
The purpose of LEAP is to encourage participants to be
the best member they can be, as they seek knowledge
about themselves, the organization, and their community,
while demonstrating leadership. Based on the Student
Leadership Challenge* (SLC), high school participants are
asked to learn the SLC Practices and Behaviors, apply
what they have learned, and respond in written form.
During the course of preparing for, and participating in
a TSA competitive event, participants will study the SLC
Practices with their related Behaviors, and put them into
practice. In addition, participants will be asked to apply
the SLC Practices and Behaviors to a leadership activity
unrelated to a competitive event, bringing real world
applications to the SLC leadership principles.
To embrace the LEAP criteria and the impact that the SLC
Practices and Behaviors can have on the development
of student leadership, LEAP is integrated into each TSA
competition as part of the official rules and rubric in the
competitive events guide. Participants must use the SLC
resources, in addition to other LEAP resources on the
TSA website, as they complete the competitive event
LEAP Report requirement for all TSA competitions.
TSA believes that acquiring leadership skills is critical
to the success of young people in the 21st century. The
SLC lesson plans found on the TSA website provide TSA
advisors with a source for teaching, and students with an
opportunity to practice these crucial skills.

• The LEAP Report replaces the previous LEAP
Leadership Resume requirement.
• Participants are required to learn the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.
• Participants will apply what they have learned by
demonstrating the behaviors of three (3) or more SLC
Practices in relation to their competitive event(s) and
non-competitive event leadership activities.
• All participants will complete a LEAP Report, and
semifinalists will participate in a five (5) minute LEAP
interview.
• A LEAP Report is required for all competitive events
and must be submitted either 1) at event check-in, or
2) when participants arrive at an event at a designated
time, whichever applies.
• The LEAP Report is a required document that must be
submitted as part of the Go/No Go Specifications for
every high school event.
• LEAP Reports will be judged as part of the semifinal
round in each event, with some exceptions. Refer
to each event’s Procedure section to learn when
LEAP Reports and interviews will be conducted and
evaluated.
Find the LEAP Report form in the Forms Appendix of this
guide or click on the link below:
LEAP Report Template
Click below for additional resources:
High School LEAP Report Competition Engagement
Regulations
*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student
Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered
trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

HIGH SCHOOL LEAP REPORT
COMPETITION ENGAGEMENT
F. Documentation

OVERVIEW

While working on competitive events, participants will
learn and refer to The Student Leadership Challenge
Five Practices for Becoming an Exemplary Leader
(SLC)*. Then, participants will develop, demonstrate,
and document leadership skills and behaviors related
to the Five Practices. In addition, participants will repeat
the same steps in developing, demonstrating, and
documenting skills and behaviors for non-competitive
event leadership activities and experiences.

REGULATIONS
A. LEAP Reports are required for all high school events
as part of the “Go/No Go” Specifications.
B. Participants who do not submit a LEAP Report for an
event will not be eligible to compete in that event.
C. LEAP Reports will be submitted based on each
event’s schedule and procedures.
D. Participants must use the official LEAP Report
template provided on the TSA website.
E. Formatting
1. Reports must be typewritten using the official LEAP
Report template.
2. The participant or team identification number may
be typewritten or handwritten.
3. Reports must be submitted in a SINGLE sheet
protector, with Page 1 facing out on the front side,
and Page 2 facing out on the back side.

1. A specific number of bullet points is not required;
however, participants must be thorough in
identifying and explaining the leadership behaviors
and skills that they developed, demonstrated, and
documented.
2. Participants must use the SLC Practices, Behaviors,
and LEAP resources when developing and
documenting activities and experiences.
3. Multiple competitive events (individual or team)
may NOT be addressed in a single LEAP Report.
Each event must have a separate and unique
LEAP Report.
4. Participants must use student initials only in the
documentation and may not use student names.
Participants who use student names anywhere
on the document will incur a rules violation, and a
20% point deduction will be assessed in the rubric.
5. Competitive Event Leadership Experiences
a. Select three (3) or more of the SLC Practices
(SLC resources).
b. List bullet points of the actions, roles, and
responsibilities and note how the SLC
Behaviors were applied throughout the specific
competitive event process.
c. The information provided must be related only
to a specific competitive event.
6. General Leadership Experiences
a. Select three (3) or more leadership categories.
b. List bullet points of the actions, roles, and
responsibilities and note how the SLC
Behaviors were applied throughout the
leadership experience.
c. The information provided must be related only
to the selected leadership category.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

HIGH SCHOOL LEAP REPORT COMPETITION ENGAGEMENT

G. LEAP Interview
1. Semifinalists will sign-up for an interview time
at the time and place stated in the conference
program.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview.
3. For events with an existing semifinalist section,
the LEAP Interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinal round of the event and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
4. For all other events, the LEAP Interview will be
conducted in a separate LEAP semifinalist portion
and will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.
NOTE: There are some exceptions in which
all participants will be interviewed. See event
guidelines for the procedure followed.

EVALUATION

Semifinalists will be evaluated on the content and quality
of both the LEAP Report and interview. Refer to the
official rating form of each event for more information.
*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student
Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered
trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER
REGULATIONS

OVERVIEW

A. Chapters complete a LEAP Legacy Portfolio that
consists of a cover page, activities template, and
supporting documents, which are submitted
electronically by chapter advisors via
www.submittable.com.
B. Portfolio submissions are evaluated by judges
secured by national TSA.
C. Based on minimum qualifying scores, one (1) middle
school and one (1) high school per state will be
selected as semifinalists.
D. Ten (10) middle school chapters and ten (10) high
school chapters will be selected to advance as
national semifinalists.
E. National semifinalist chapters compete as participants
in the TSA Meet and Greet event at the annual
National TSA Conference.
F. First through third (1st - 3rd) place middle and high
school chapters will receive $1,000, $500, and $250,
respectively.
G. First through third (1st - 3rd) place chapter winners also
will receive trophies on stage at the National TSA
Conference awards ceremony.
Find the forms below in the Forms Appendix of this
guide, or click on the links below:
LEAP Legacy Chapter Program Guidelines
LEAP Legacy Chapter Portfolio
LEAP Legacy Chapter Evaluation Rubric
Click on the links below for additional resources:
LEAP Legacy Chapter – Sample Activities
LEAP Legacy Chapter Activity Summary and Evidence
Sample
*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student
Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered
trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY,
ENGINEERING, AND
MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION
In recent years, not only educators, but also political, civic,
and industry leaders have pushed for a greater emphasis
on STEM education in schools. These groups feel that
in order for our nation to be competitive and vibrant, our
young people must have competency in the 21st century
skills afforded through STEM fields. TSA promotes a
vision of students literate in these fields and believes
competitions within this guide help make that vision a
reality.
STEM education is not just an isolated and discreet
acquisition of STEM knowledge and skills. Rather, STEM
education demands the interweaving and application of
these academic fields for the purpose of comprehending,
communicating, and solving problems. Indeed, it is now
commonly accepted that to understand (and apply) any
one of these STEM areas, one must, at the same time,
have a grasp of and apply the others. For example, to
design and engineer with any degree of complexity,
one also must be familiar with technology, mathematics,
and science. To practice science, one must have a firm
knowledge of mathematics and technology.
Beyond necessity, there is another reason for STEM
education in our schools and why the TSA program
of activities inherently aligns with STEM goals. This
reason revolves around teaching and learning, and
what motivates students. STEM education is intrinsically

exciting, rewarding, and meaningful for instructors
and students alike. It is TSA's belief that, as with STEM
education, TSA activities provide the same kind of
stimulation, challenge, and relevancy for all involved.
Deserving of mention are two other essential areas
imbedded in most of TSA’s competitive events—art
and ethics. It is difficult to design without considering
aesthetics, and it is irresponsible to create without
contemplating ethical consequences. When students
participate in TSA competitions, they find they must not
only embrace the value of design when they compete,
they also must envision and assess the effects of what
they develop.
The competitions found in this guide provide a handson venue for learning about STEM. By participating
in TSA’s competitive events, students gain a broader
understanding of these content areas while experiencing
the satisfaction that comes from applying them to real life,
problem solving situations.
This section of the guide includes commonly accepted
national standards for the areas of science, technology,
and mathematics, as well as the Accreditation Board
for Engineering and Technology (ABET, Inc.) criteria for
accrediting higher education engineering programs. As
you make use of these materials, keep in mind that their
power and beauty lie in their synergistic nature.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

SCIENCE CONTENT STANDARDS (GRADES 9–12)
A. Unifying concepts and processes
1. Systems, order, and organization

Students should develop an understanding of:

2. Evidence, models, and explanation

1. Energy in the earth system

3. Change, constancy, and measurement

2. Geochemical cycles

4. Evolution and equilibrium

3. Origin and evolution of the earth system

5. Form and function

4. Origin and evolution of the universe

B. Science as inquiry

F. Science and technology

Students should develop:

1. Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry

1. Abilities of technological design

2. Understandings about scientific inquiry

2. Understandings about science and technology

C. Physical science

G. Science in personal and social perspectives

Students should develop an understanding of:

1. Structure of atoms

1. Personal and community health

2. Structure and properties of matter

2. Population growth

3. Chemical reactions

3. Natural resources

4. Motions and forces

4. Environmental quality

5. Conservation of energy and the increase in
disorder

5. Natural and human-induced hazards

6. Interactions of energy and matter
D. Life science

6. Science and technology in local, national, and
global challenges
H. History and nature of science

Students should develop an understanding of:

1. The cell

1. Science as a human endeavor

2. Molecular basis of heredity

2. Nature of scientific knowledge

3. Biological evolution

3. Historical perspectives

4. Independence of organisms
5. Matter, energy, and organization in living systems
6. Behavior of organisms

E. Earth and space science

The standards listed above are reprinted with permission
from National Science Education Standards, 1996, by the
National Academy of Sciences, courtesy of the National
Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENCE CONTENT STANDARDS
Event

Standard Number

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 H1 H2 H3
X

Animatronics

Architectural Design

Biotechnology Design

Board Game Design

Chapter Team

X
X

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering
Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

Debating Technological Issues

Engineering Design

Essays on Technology

Extemporaneous Speech

Fashion Design and Technology
Flight Endurance

Music Production

On Demand Video

Photographic Technology

Prepared Presentation

X
X

Technology Bowl

Technology Problem Solving

Transportation Modeling

Video Game Design

Webmaster

X
X

X
X
X

X
X

Structural Design and Engineering

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

Software Development

X
X

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

Forensic Science

Promotional Design

Dragster Design

Digital Video Production

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture

System Control Technology

Children’s Stories
Coding

X
X

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D Animation

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

TECHNOLOGY CONTENT STANDARDS
Standard 1:

Students will develop an understanding
of the characteristics and scope of
technology.

Standard 12: Students will develop the abilities to use
and maintain technological products and
systems.

Standard 2:

Students will develop an understanding of
the core concepts of technology.

Standard 13: Students will develop the abilities to assess
the impact of products and systems.

Standard 3:

Students will develop an understanding of
the relationships among technologies and
the connections between technologies
and other fields of study.

Standard 14: Students will develop an understanding
of and be able to select and use medical
technologies.

Standard 4:

Students will develop an understanding of
the cultural, social, economic, and political
aspects of technology.

Standard 5:

Students will develop an understanding
of the effects of technology on the
environment.

Standard 6:

Students will develop an understanding of
the role of society in the development and
use of technology.

Standard 7:

Students will develop an understanding of
the influence of technology on history.

Standard 8:

Students will develop an understanding of
the attributes of design.

Standard 9:

Students will develop an understanding of
engineering design.

Standard 10: Students will develop an understanding of
the role of troubleshooting, research and
development, invention and innovation,
and experimentation in problem solving.
Standard 11:

Students will develop the abilities to apply
the design process.

Standard 15: Students will develop an understanding of
and be able to select and use agricultural
and related biotechnologies.
Standard 16: Students will develop an understanding of
and be able to select and use energy and
power technologies.
Standard 17: Students will develop an understanding of
and be able to select and use information
and communication technologies.
Standard 18: Students will develop an understanding
of and be able to select and use
transportation technologies.
Standard 19: Students will develop an understanding
of and be able to select and use
manufacturing technologies.
Standard 20: Students will develop an understanding of
and be able to select and use construction
technologies.
These technology content standards are noted in
Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the
Study of Technology (ITEEA/ITEA, 2000/2002/2007) and
are used with permission. (www.iteea.org)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENCE CONTENT STANDARDS
Event

Standard Number

X
X

Animatronics
Architectural Design

Biotechnology Design

Board Game Design

Chapter Team

X
X

Children’s Stories

Coding

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

Debating Technological Issues

X
X

Digital Video Production

X
X

Dragster Design

Engineering Design

Essays on Technology

Extemporaneous Speech

X
X

Forensic Science

X
X

Prepared Presentation

Promotional Design

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

Software Development

System Control Technology

X
X

Video Game Design

Webmaster

X
X
X

Technology Bowl
Technology Problem Solving

Structural Design and Engineering

X
X

On Demand Video
X

X
X

Photographic Technology

X
X

Music Production

Flight Endurance

Transportation Modeling

X
X

Fashion Design and Technology

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D Animation

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS
(Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [ABET, Inc.])
Engineering programs must have documented student
outcomes that prepare graduates to attain the program
educational objectives.
Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus
any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the
program.
A. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science
and engineering
B. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well
as to analyze and interpret data

The outcomes listed are found in the 2016-2017 Criteria
for Accrediting Engineering Programs and used
with permission from the Engineering Accreditation
Commission of ABET, Inc.
Access the 2018-2019 Criteria for Accrediting
Engineering Programs for the latest outcomes.
(The outcomes were designed for higher education
engineering programs, but they are relevant for middle
school and high school level engineering-related
courses.)

C. An ability to design a system, component, or process
to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such
as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,
health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability
D. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams
E. An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering
problems
F. An understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
G. An ability to communicate effectively
H. The broad education necessary to understand the
impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,
environmental, and social context
I. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage
in life-long learning
J. A knowledge of contemporary issues
K. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS (ABET, INC.)
Standard

Event

Standard Letter

A
X

Animatronics

B. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
interpret data

Architectural Design

Biotechnology Design

C. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs

Board Game Design

D. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams

Children’s Stories

E. An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems

Coding

X
X

Chapter Team
X

X
X

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture

G. An ability to communicate effectively

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering

H. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of
engineering in global and social contexts

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

A recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long
learning

Digital Video Production

A knowledge of contemporary issues

Dragster Design

Engineering Design

Essays on Technology

An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

K. An ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering
tools necessary for engineering practice.

Debating Technological Issues

Fashion Design and Technology

X
X

Forensic Science

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

X
X

On Demand Video

X
X

Prepared Presentation
Promotional Design

Music Production
Photographic Technology

X
X

Extemporaneous Speech
Flight Endurance

X
X

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

X
X

Software Development

Structural Design and Engineering

System Control Technology

Technology Bowl

Technology Problem Solving

Transportation Modeling

X
X

Video Game Design

Webmaster

X
X

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D Animation

A. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and
engineering

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL MATHEMATICS
A. Numbers and operations

E. Data analysis and probability

1. Understand numbers, ways of representing
numbers, relationships among numbers and
number systems

1. Formulate questions that can be addressed with
data and collect, organize and display relevant
data to answer them

2. Understand meanings of operations and how they
relate to one another

2. Select and use appropriate statistical methods to
analyze data

3. Compute fluently and make reasonable estimates

3. Develop and evaluate inferences and predictions
that are based on data

B. Algebra
1. Understand patterns, relations, and functions
2. Represent and analyze mathematical situations
and structures using algebraic symbols
3. Use mathematical models to represent and
understand quantitative relationships
4. Analyze change in various contexts
C. Geometry
1. Analyze characteristics and properties of twoand three-dimensional geometric shapes and
develop mathematical arguments about geometric
relationships
2. Specify locations and describe spatial
relationships using coordinate geometry and other
representational systems
3. Apply transformations and use symmetry to
analyze mathematical situations
4. Use visualization, spatial reasoning and geometric
modeling to solve problems
D. Measurement
1. Understand measurable attributes of objects and
the units, systems and processes of measurement
2. Apply appropriate techniques, tools and formulas
to determine measurements

4. Understand and apply basic concepts of
probability
F. Problem solving
1. Build new mathematical knowledge through
problem solving
2. Solve problems that arise in mathematics and in
other contexts
3. Apply and adapt a variety of appropriate strategies
to solve problems
4. Monitor and reflect on the process of mathematical
problem solving
G. Reasoning and proof
1. Recognize reasoning and proof as fundamental
aspects of mathematics
2. Make and investigate mathematical conjectures
3. Develop and evaluate mathematical arguments
and proofs
4. Select and use various types of reasoning and
methods of proof
H. Communication
1. Organize and consolidate mathematical thinking
through communication
2. Communicate mathematical thinking coherently
and clearly to peers, teachers and others
3. Analyze and evaluate the mathematical thinking
and strategies of others
4. Use the language of mathematics to express
mathematical ideas precisely

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

I. Connections
1. Recognize and use connections among
mathematical ideas
2. Understand how mathematical ideas interconnect
and build on one another to produce a coherent
whole
3. Recognize and apply mathematics in contexts
outside of mathematics
J. Representation
1. Create and use representations to organize,
record, and communicate mathematical ideas
2. Select, apply, and translate among mathematical
representations to solve problems
3. Use representations to model and interpret
physical, social and mathematical phenomena
Reprinted with permission from Principles and Standards
for School Mathematics, copyright 2000 by the National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). All rights
reserved.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Event

Standard Number

A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 C4 D1 D2 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 H1 H2 H3 H4 I1

3D Animation
Animatronics
Architectural Design

Biotechnology Design

Board Game Design

J1 J2 J3

X
X

Chapter Team
Children’s Stories
Coding

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

Debating Technological Issues

Digital Video Production

Dragster Design
Engineering Design

Essays on Technology

X
X
X

X
X

Extemporaneous Speech
Fashion Design and Technology
Flight Endurance

Forensic Science

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

Music Production

On Demand Video

Prepared Presentation

Promotional Design

X
X

System Control Technology

Technology Bowl

Technology Problem Solving
Transportation Modeling
Video Game Design
Webmaster

X
X

Software Development
Structural Design and Engineering

Photographic Technology

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

X
X

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) INTEGRATION

24
PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL MATHEMATICS

TSA AND CAREERS
Choosing a career is one of the more important decisions
made in life. This section of the guide may help students
focus on career areas that appeal to them in the world
of work, as well as show them how their involvement in
TSA’s program of activities has the ability to guide them
toward those areas.
Career Clusters® are categories of similar occupations
and industries. The Career Clusters® chart was
developed by the U.S. Department of Education to
organize career planning and help schools better
prepare learners for their futures. The Career Clusters®
chart offers general information about career categories
and work opportunities prominent in those areas.
The TSA Competitions and the Career Clusters® grid
illustrates the interconnectedness between individual
TSA competitions and the 16 Career Clusters®. Use these
together as a starting point to help your students become
informed about careers and develop a plan to reach their
life goals.

The Career Clusters® brand logo and its extensions are the property of
the National Career Technical Education Foundation, as managed by
NASDCTEc.

16 CAREER CLUSTERS®
A.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

AGRICULTURE, FOOD & NATURAL RESOURCES
Agribusiness Systems
Animal Systems
Environmental Service Systems
Food Products & Processing Systems
Natural Resources Systems
Plant Systems
Power, Structural & Technical Systems Architecture &
Construction

B.
•
•
•

ARCHITECTURE & CONSTRUCTION
Construction
Design/Pre-Construction
Maintenance/Operations

C.
•
•
•
•
•
•

ARTS, A/V TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNICATIONS
A/V Technology & Film
Journalism & Broadcasting
Performing Arts
Printing Technology
Telecommunications
Visual Arts

D.
•
•
•
•
•

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Administrative Support
Business Information Management
General Management
Human Resources Management
Operations Management

E.
•
•
•

EDUCATION & TRAINING
Administration & Administrative Support
Professional Support Services
Teaching/Training

F.
•
•
•
•
•

FINANCE
Accounting
Banking Services
Business Finance
Insurance
Securities & Investments

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TSA AND CAREERS

G.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Foreign Service
Governance
National Security
Planning
Public Management & Administration
Regulation
Revenue & Taxation

H.
•
•
•
•
•

HEALTH SCIENCES
Biotechnology Research & Development
Diagnostic Services
Health Informatics
Support Services
Therapeutic Services

I.
•
•
•
•

HOSPITALITY & TOURISM
Lodging
Recreation, Amusements & Attractions
Restaurants & Food/Beverage Services
Travel & Tourism

J.
•
•
•
•
•

HUMAN SERVICES
Consumer Services
Counseling & Mental Health Services
Early Childhood Development & Services
Family & Community Services
Personal Care Services

K.
•
•
•
•

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Information Support & Services
Network Systems
Programming & Software Development
Web & Digital Communications

L. LAW, PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONS &
SECURITY
• Correction Services
• Emergency & Fire Management Services
• Law Enforcement Services
• Legal Services
• Security & Protective Services
M. MANUFACTURING
• Health, Safety & Environmental Assurance
• Logistics & Inventory Control
• Maintenance, Installation & Repair
• Manufacturing Production Process Dev.
• Production
• Quality Assurance
N.
•
•
•
•
•

MARKETING
Marketing Communications
Marketing Management
Marketing Research
Merchandising
Professional Sales

O. SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING &
MATHEMATICS
• Engineering & Technology
• Science & Mathematics
P.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS
Facility & Mobile Equipment Maintenance
Health, Safety & Environmental Management
Logistics Planning & Management Services
Sales & Service
Transportation Operations
Transportation Systems/Infrastructure
Planning, Management & Regulation
Warehousing & Distribution Center Operations

© 2016, The Career Clusters®. All rights reserved.
More information on the Career Clusters® can be found at www.careertech.org.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TSA AND CAREERS

TSA COMPETITIONS AND THE 16 CAREER CLUSTERS®
Event

Cluster letter

3D Animation

Animatronics
Architectural Design

Biotechnology Design

X
X

Board Game Design

X
X

Chapter Team

Children’s Stories

X
X

Coding

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture

Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

Digital Video Production

X
X

Essays on Technology

Extemporaneous Speech

Fashion Design and Technology

X
X

X
X
X

Flight Endurance

Forensic Science

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

On Demand Video

Promotional Design

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

X
X
X
X

Structural Design and Engineering

Software Development

Prepared Presentation

Music Production
Photographic Technology

Dragster Design
Engineering Design

Debating Technological Issues

X
X

System Control Technology
Technology Bowl

Technology Problem Solving

Transportation Modeling
Video Game Design

Webmaster

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

HIGH SCHOOL
COMPETITIVE
EVENTS

COMPETITIONS

NEW EVENTS
• Board Game Design
• Forensic Science

REVISIONS
• Every event’s guidelines have been
revised in some form, whether in
content or in format.
• In addition to specific event
guidelines, all advisors and
participants must read the General
Rules and Regulations in this guide.
• Every two years the specifics of
many events are changed, keeping
the competitions dynamic!

3D Animation
Animatronics
Architectural Design
Biotechnology Design
Board Game Design
Chapter Team
Children’s Stories
Coding
Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Architecture
Computer-Aided Design (CAD), Engineering
Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
Debating Technological Issues
Digital Video Production
Dragster Design
Engineering Design
Essays on Technology
Extemporaneous Speech
Fashion Design and Technology
Flight Endurance
Forensic Science
Future Technology and Engineering Teacher
Music Production
On Demand Video
Photographic Technology
Prepared Presentation
Promotional Design
Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)
Software Development
Structural Design and Engineering
System Control Technology
Technology Bowl
Technology Problem Solving
Transportation Modeling
Video Game Design
Webmaster

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPETITIVE EVENTS ELIGIBILITY
2019 & 2020 HIGH SCHOOL COMPETITIONS

ELIGIBILITY

3D Animation

three (3) teams of two to six (2-6) members per state

Animatronics

one (1) team per chapter

Architectural Design

one (1) team, or one (1) individual, per chapter

Biotechnology Design

three (3) teams per state, two to six (2-6) members per team

Board Game Design

one (1) team of two to six (2-6) members per chapter

Chapter Team

one (1) team of six (6) members per chapter

Children’s Stories

one (1) team, or one (1) individual, per chapter

Coding

one (1) individual or one (1) team of two to three (2-3) members per chapter

CAD, Architecture

two (2) individuals per state

CAD, Engineering

two (2) individuals per state

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)

one (1) team of two (2) members per chapter

Debating Technological Issues

three (3) teams of two (2) members per state

Digital Video Production

three (3) teams per state; an individual may participate solo in this team event

Dragster Design

two (2) individuals per chapter, one (1) entry each

Engineering Design

three (3) teams of three (3) or more members per state

Essays on Technology

three (3) individuals per state

Extemporaneous Speech

three (3) individuals per state

Fashion Design and Technology

three (3) teams of two to four (2-4) members per state

Flight Endurance

two (2) individuals per chapter, one (1) entry each

Forensic Science

one (1) team of two (2) members per chapter

Future Technology and Engineering Teacher

three (3) individuals per chapter

Music Production

three (3) teams per state; an individual may participate solo in this team event

On Demand Video

one (1) team of two (2) or more members per chapter

Photographic Technology

one (1) individual per chapter

Prepared Presentation

three (3) individuals per state

Promotional Design

three (3) individuals per state, one (1) entry each

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis)

three (3) teams per state; an individual may participate solo in this team event

Software Development

one (1) team per chapter

Structural Design and Engineering

one (1) team of two (2) members per chapter

System Control Technology

one (1) team of three (3) members per state, one (1) entry per team

Technology Bowl

one (1) team of three (3) members per chapter

Technology Problem Solving

one (1) team of two (2) members per chapter

Transportation Modeling

one (1) individual per chapter

Video Game Design

three (3) teams per state, with a minimum of two (2) members per team

Webmaster

one (1) team of three to five (3-5) members per chapter

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TSA COMPETITIVE EVENTS
RATING FORM/RUBRIC
The Technology Student Association (TSA) High School
Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 & 2020 National
TSA Conferences contains a rating form (rubric) for each
competition. Rubrics are embraced by STEM educators
because they provide a way to evaluate performance.
The use of descriptors for each criterion being measured
in a rubric increases consistency and a greater
understanding of the evaluation process. The TSA
rating form/rubric provides a way for TSA members to
better prepare for competitions; for advisors to carefully
assist them in the process; and for judges to effectively
evaluate participants and their entries.

GO/NO GO SPECIFICATIONS

• Each competitive event has a Go/No Go Specifications
checklist placed at the beginning of the official event
rating form/rubric.
• Specifications in the checklist are required and must
be met, or the individual or team will not be allowed to
compete in the event.
• Refer to each competitive event’s official rating form/
rubric for details.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D ANIMATION
OVERVIEW

Participants demonstrate their knowledge of 3D
animation technology and design skills to creatively
solve the challenge posted on the national TSA website
under Competitions/Themes and Problems. Semifinalists
participate in an onsite competition in which they further
demonstrate their 3D design skills and proficiency in 3D
animation technology.

ELIGIBILITY

Participants are limited to two (2) teams of two to six (2-6)
members per state.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. All components of the chapter’s entry must be
finished and accessible via the Internet by 11:59 pm
Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on May 15th.
2. Note: After 11:59 pm on May 15th changes must not
be made to the video entry. Should changes or
updates to the video be made after the deadline,
those changes are not considered.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will report to the time and place
stated in the conference program to pick up the
onsite problem.
2. Semifinalists will have 24-hours, beginning at the
time the prompt is picked up, to complete the
animation.
3. Each semifinalist team will participate in an
interview about the team’s entry and design
process, with a duration of approximately five (5)
minutes.
4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required.

PROCEDURE
PRE-CONFERENCE/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Teams submit their entire entry electronically via
www.submittable.com as a single, multipage PDF
document, including the LEAP Report, and the URL
of the animation as an UNLISTED YouTube video.
The URL must point to the unlisted YouTube video
of the team’s entry.
2. Teams must follow the SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
for online entry submission on the TSA website
under Themes/Problems/3D Animation. Failure to
follow these instructions may result in the entry not
being judged.
3. Email verification of each team’s entry is made
immediately upon completion of the entry
submission process.
4. Entries will be evaluated by judges, and a list of
twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random order) will
be posted onsite at the National TSA Conference.
NOTE: This procedure applies to the national TSA
competition only — entry procedures for state
conferences are handled by each state.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report to the location stated
in the conference program to receive the onsite
assignment.
2. The event coordinator distributes the materials,
information, directions, and deadlines to each
team.
3. At the time of pickup of the onsite assignment,
teams will sign up for an interview time.
4. Participants supply any and all equipment
necessary to perform the onsite task.
5. Participants will have 24 hours to complete the
onsite assignment.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D ANIMATION

6. At the conclusion of the 24 hours, participants will
turn in their final animation in video format (MP4,
MOV, or AVI format, etc.) on a USB flash drive or
external hard drive at the time and place stated in
the conference program.

7. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); one (1) page

7. Semifinalist teams then report to the place stated
in the conference program for their interview.
Judges will interview each semifinalist team, for no
more than five (5) minutes, about the team’s entry
and design process.

9. Completed and signed Student Copyright
Checklist; one (1) page

8. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
9. Semifinalist teams must NOT leave any equipment
with the judges, other than the USB flash drive or
external hard drive containing their assignment.
10. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants must submit their entry in a video format
that is readable across multiple platforms (Apple,
Windows, etc.) as an UNLISTED YouTube video, with
corresponding documentation for preliminary judging.
B. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and submitted as a single, multipage PDF
document including the LEAP Report, with pages in
this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, the year, and the team identification
number; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Description of final design; one (1) page
5. Storyboard; pages as needed
6. List of hardware and software used; one (1) page

8. References cited; pages as needed

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Participants do not bring their equipment to the onsite
assignment pick up.
B. Semifinalist teams will receive a design problem that
must be completed within the allotted 24 hours.
C. Semifinalist teams will each have a five (5)-minute
interview with the judges about their project with an
additional five (5) minutes for a LEAP interview.
D. Semifinalist teams must transfer the final rendered
animation in video format (MP4, MOV, AVI, etc.) onto a
USB flash drive or external hard drive, and turn it in at
the time and place stated in the conference program.
1. The judges will only view the final rendered
animation from the USB flash drive or external hard
drive.
2. Semifinalist teams must not bring their equipment
to the onsite assignment pickup or leave their
equipment with the judges after the interview.
3. Semifinalist teams may pick up their USB flash
drive or external hard drive at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
E. LEAP Requirements
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D ANIMATION

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The quality of the portfolio
2. The design quality of the 3D animation
3. The solution to the design problem

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The design quality of the team’s solution to the
onsite problem
2. The team’s response to the event-specific
interview
3. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
LEAP interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event has connections to the STEM areas of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

Graphic designer
Animator
Art director
Film and video editor

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Participant/Team ID# ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������

3D ANIMATION

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary
(9-10 points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record
the scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the
right. The X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for
determining the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an
X1 criterion = 7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14
points.) A score of zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for
any criterion is not met.

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Documentation is present in a single, multi-page PDF
Video is viewable via an unlisted YouTube video
Completed Student Copyright Checklist is present
Completed LEAP Report is present
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio

The portfolio is unorganized and/or
missing three or more components.

The portfolio includes most
components and is generally
organized.

All components of the portfolio
are included, and content and
organization are clearly evident.

Description

The description of the final design
is unclear.

The description of the final design is
explained appropriately.

The description of the final design is
clear and concisely written.

Storyboarding and
planning

The storyboard is present but it is
sloppy; it is apparent the storyboard
was not utilized in the creation of
the animation.

The storyboard is drawn
appropriately and generally
correlates with the completed
animation; there is some evidence
the storyboard was referred to
during the creation of the animation.

The storyboard is fully developed
and includes camera/light directions;
the storyboard is of exceptional
aesthetic and artistic quality and
clearly correlates to the animation;
there is clear evidence the
storyboard was used extensively
during the project development for
goal setting, organization, and taskassignment.

Plan of Work log

The log is poorly organized and/or
incomplete.

The log is adequately detailed and
organized, and it contains most of
the required components.

The log is well-documented,
and it contains all of the required
components.

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (40 points)

3D ANIMATION

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Aesthetics and
artisanship

Project lacks neatness; animation is
extremely choppy; miscellaneous
strands/strokes float around the
project; parts are disconnected and/
or are out of place; overall project
is jumpy.

Project is mostly neat; there are
one or two elements that are
disconnected, free-floating, or out of
place; project is mostly smooth, with
a few jumpy parts.

Project is very neat; there are no
elements that are disconnected
or out of place; project moves
smoothly and cleanly with little to no
jumpy parts.

Modeling and
surfacing

There are errors in the overall
object construction; objects are
inappropriate for the assignment;
appropriate surfacing is not used in
the overall assignment.

Most objects are well formed with
few mistakes; objects are mostly
believable and appropriate for
the assignment; most surfaces
seem real and appropriate for the
intended objects.

All objects are well formed, with no
mistakes; objects and surfaces are
believable and appropriate for the
assignment.

Camera and
lighting techniques

Lighting or camera techniques are
poorly used in the overall animation;
shadows are non-existent or are
distracting.

Camera techniques and lighting
are used, but they may be minimal
or may not enhance the overall
animation; they adequately add to
the 3D quality; shadows are mostly
realistic, and camera movements
are satisfactory.

There is evidence of advanced
and effective camera movements;
effective lighting techniques are
used to enhance the overall look
and mood of the animation.

Creativity/originality

There is little original thought
or creativity in the design and
production to solve the challenge.

There is some evidence of
creativity/originality in the animation.

There is strong evidence of
an animation that is fresh and
personally creative; project has its
own look and feel, and it completely
stands out as original.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ANIMATION (40 points)

ANIMATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (80 points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Sketches and
planning

The sketches are present but they
are sloppy; it is apparent that little
planning was utilized in the creation
of the animation.

The sketches are drawn
appropriately and generally
correlate with the completed
animation; there is some evidence
the sketches were referred to during
the construction of the animation.

The sketches are fully developed, of
good quality, and the final product
closely represents the planning
sketches.

Modeling and
surfacing

There are errors in the overall
object construction; objects are
inappropriate for the assignment;
appropriate surfacing is not used in
the overall assignment.

Most objects are well formed with
few mistakes; objects are mostly
believable and appropriate for
the assignment; most surfaces
seem real and appropriate for the
intended objects.

All objects are well formed, with no
mistakes; objects and surfaces are
believable and appropriate for the
assignment.

CRITERIA

(X2)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PROJECT (80 points)

3D ANIMATION

SEMIFINAL PROJECT (80 points) – continued
Camera and
lighting techniques

Lighting or camera techniques are
poorly used in the overall animation;
shadows are non-existent or are
distracting.

There is evidence of advanced
and effective camera movements;
effective lighting techniques are
used to enhance the overall look
and mood of the animation.

Creativity/originality

There is little original thought
or creativity in the design and
production to solve the challenge.

There is some evidence of
creativity/originality in the animation.

There is strong evidence of
an animation that is fresh and
personally creative; project has its
own look and feel, and it completely
stands out as original.

(X2)

SEMIFINAL PROJECT SUBTOTAL (80 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Interview

Team shows little knowledge of 3D
design concepts or tools; only one
team member participates in the
interview.

Team shows adequate knowledge
of 3D design concepts and tools;
both team members participate in
the interview.

Team shows exceptional knowledge
of 3D animation and design tools;
team members contribute equally
during the interview.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/
or incorporate SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of SLC Practices and
Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X2)

(18 points;
10% of the total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (38 points)

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (38 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (198 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D ANIMATION

3D ANIMATION
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges
1. Preliminary round: Two (2) or more to judge online
entries
2. Semifinal round: Two (2) or more

RESPONSIBILITIES
PRE-CONFERENCE/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Review entries as they are submitted to the
designated online storage utility (Submittable).
2. Entry submission is allowed only until 11:59 p.m.
(PDT) on May 15th.
3. Manage communication and pre-conference
evaluation.
4. Judges independently assess the entries to
determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/ assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
5. On the first full day of competition, post a list of the
twelve (12) semifinalists in random order.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges and review the time
limits, procedures, and regulations and clear up
any questions or misunderstandings.
2. Meet with all the participants at the scheduled time
and location to deliver the event-specific criteria.
Ensure that all participants understand regulations
regarding equipment allowed, behavior, deadlines,
and submission requirements.
3. Each semifinalist team will sign up for a specific
interview time at the onsite assignment pickup.
Inform teams that they are to return fifteen (15)
minutes before their scheduled interview time.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

3D ANIMATION

4. Judges independently assess each semifinalist
team’s project and interview.
a. They may take notes, but evaluation occurs
only after all team members have left the event
room.
b. The LEAP interview will be conducted as
part of the semifinalist presentation/interview
and will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.
5. Manage completion of the interviews.
6. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
7. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and
discuss and break any ties that affect the top
three (3) placements. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
8. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
9. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS
OVERVIEW

Animatronics refers to a robotic device that emulates a
human or an animal, or brings an inanimate object “to
life.” Teams will produce an animatronics device complete
with an appropriate display. The animatronics device
must use control technology in its performance and fulfill
the requirements of the theme to communicate, entertain,
inform, demonstrate and/or illustrate a topic, idea, subject,
or concept. Sound, lights, and surrounding environment
are to accompany the device. The design problem for
the current school year will be posted on the national
TSA website under Competitions/Themes and Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team per chapter may participate; one (1) entry per
team.

TIME LIMITS
1. Participants are given five (5) minutes to set up
their equipment prior to their presentation.
2. The presentation must last no longer than nine (9)
minutes.
a. The presentation time begins when students
present background information about the
project and must conclude on or before the
nine (9)-minute time limit.
b. Five (5) points will be deducted for every thirty
(30) seconds over the time limit.
c. The judges’ interview is not considered part of
the presentation time.
3. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants will check-in, sign up for a setup time,
and submit a LEAP Report at the time and place
stated in the conference program. No animatronics
devices are required during signup/check-in.
2. At check-in, each team will select an initial
presentation time from the available times posted.
When selecting a demonstration time, teams
should avoid conflicts with other events for which
team members are registered.
3. Participants report for the presentation/interview
at the selected demonstration time with the
animatronics device and display. Only three (3)
team members are allowed to set up equipment,
present the project, and participate in the eventspecific interview.
4. Judges independently assess the entries.
5. A list of twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random
order) will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams report to the event area at the
time and place stated in the conference program
to sign-up for an interview time.
2. Semifinalist teams may be represented by no
more than three (3) team members.
3. Semifinalist teams will respond to interview
questions related to their LEAP Report.
4. Judges independently evaluate each team’s LEAP
Report and interview.
5. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.
6. No more than three (3) team members pick up
their entry from the display area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS

REGULATIONS

2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. The display may not exceed 15" deep x 3' wide x 4' high.
The device may extend beyond the dimensions of the
display during the demonstration.
B. The animatronics device must have three (3) or more
separate movements.
1. An exterior shell or skin is required. It must be
removable in order to show the judges the internal
components of the project.

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
1. Device performance
2. Device artisanship
3. The team’s presentation and response to the
event-specific interview questions

2. Fluid power, gearing systems, linkages, and/or
cabling systems, etc., should be incorporated to
aid in the movement of the device.
C. Sound, lights, and sensors must be used in the project
model.
D. Control technology must be used during the
performance.
E. Fluid power MUST be used to aid in the movement
of the animatronics device. If no fluid power is used, a
ten (10)-point deduction will be incurred.
F. A wet cell battery may not be used in the animatronics
device.
G. The animatronics device may use AC power, but the
team will only have access to an AC outlet during the
demonstration/presentation.

4. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information

NOTES

Learn more about animatronics by visiting the following:
www.roborobotics.com/Animatronics/Animatronics.html
www.animalmakers.com
www.garnerholt.com
www.dreamation.com/Animatronics.htm

STEM INTEGRATION

H. Should the device suggest anything that is
inappropriate by language, sound, or movement,
immediate disqualification will result.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

I. A team that fails to appear for its demonstration
forfeits evaluation.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The semifinalist LEAP interview may include no more
than three (3) team members.
B. LEAP Requirements

•
•
•
•
•

Amusement park robotics maintenance engineer
Electronics technician
Film industry special effects engineer
Industrial designer
Toy developer

1. Team members document the leadership skills
the team has developed and demonstrated while
working on this event, and on a non-competitive
event leadership experience.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Skins/shells are removable.
Interior skeleton and mechanism are accessible for
inspection.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Team seems unprepared and
unorganized for the presentation/
interview, with an illogical
explanation of the project.

Team is prepared for the interview
and is somewhat organized in its
presentation to judges; team’s
presentation thesis is, for the most
part, logical and/or clear.

Team’s presentation/interview
with judges is well organized; the
interview is concise and logical,
with a clear explanation of the
development of the project.

Knowledge

Team members seem to have little
understanding of the concepts
in their project; vague interview
answers are provided.

Team members have a generalized
understanding of the concepts
discussed and answer questions
adequately.

Evidence is clear that team
members have a thorough
understanding of the concepts
discussed; they answer questions
thoroughly.

Articulation

The presentation and interview
provide an unclear, unorganized,
and or illogical description of the
project.

The presentation and interview offer
a somewhat logical and easy-tounderstand project description.

The presentation/interview provides
a clear, concise, and easy-to-follow
description of the project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/or
uncertain in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the delivery.

The team is somewhat well-spoken
and clear in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
an acceptable delivery.

The team is well-spoken and
distinct in its presentation/interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective delivery.

Team participation

Only one person in the group
communicates with judges; there is
little or no participation from other
team members.

Team members all participate
to some extent and seem to
understand the concepts.

Team members seem to fully
understand the concepts and share
an equal role in the interview.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DEMONSTRATION INTERVIEW (50 points)

DEMONSTRATION INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (50 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Creativity

Model lacks creativity; very few or
no design principles are integrated
in the model.

Some elements of creativity are
evident, and most essential design
principles are included and used
somewhat effectively.

Model exudes creativity; essential
design principles and elements are
integrated.

Aesthetics and
artisanship

Work is unorganized and/or sloppy;
model seems to be an afterthought
and/or thrown together.

Some layout and design principles
are integrated into the model, and
aesthetics are adequate.

There is exemplary use of layout
and design principles; artistic and
aesthetic values are incorporated.

Originality

Model lacks imagination, originality,
and artistic detail.

Model is somewhat innovative.

Model is inspiring, inventive, and
resourceful.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

MODEL APPEARANCE (30 points)

MODEL APPEARANCE SUBTOTAL (30 points)

Skin and skeletal function: There is no point value for the skin and skeletal function of the animatronics model. The model’s skin must be
removable in order to reveal skeletal function and mechanics located beneath the skin. If the skin is not removable then the entry will not be
evaluated.

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Sound inclusion

There is little or no sound included,
or the design suggests that
the inclusion of sound was an
afterthought to the model.

Sound is included, and it somewhat
contributes to the overall function of
the model.

The inclusion of sound is creative
and effectively contributes to the
design and performance of the
model.

Light inclusion

Light is minimal, or the design
suggests that the inclusion of lights
was an afterthought to the model.

Light is included, and it somewhat
contributes to the overall function of
the model.

The inclusion of a light creatively and
effectively contributes to the model’s
design and performance.

Sensor inclusion

Sensors are included minimally,
or the design suggests that the
inclusion of sensors was an
afterthought to the model.

Sensors are included, and they
somewhat contribute to the overall
function of the model.

The inclusion of sensors (and the
interactivity that sensors allow) in
the model is creative and effectively
contributes to its design and
performance.

Control technology
(X1)

Little control technology is used
during the performance.

Some basic control technology is
used during the performance.

Advanced control technology is
used during the performance; the
model is fully autonomous.

Fluid power system
inclusion

A fluid power system is included, but
it functions inadequately or not at all.

A fluid power system is included,
and it contributes somewhat to the
overall function of the model.

The inclusion of a fluid power
system(s) and the fluidity of
movement that this system(s)
provides in an animatronics model
creatively and effectively contribute to
the model’s design and performance.

Use of gears,
linkages, cabling,
etc.

The use of gears, linkages,
cabling, etc. is minimally apparent
or improperly incorporated into
the model; the team shows little
understanding of how to properly
use these systems in the model.

Most gears, linkages, cabling
systems, etc. are incorporated
and used properly in the model;
there is evidence of an adequate
understanding of the systems.

Efficient and varied use of gears,
linkages, cabling systems, etc. is
apparent and properly incorporated
in the model; there is evidence of
a complete understanding of these
systems.

(X1)

MODEL FUNCTION SUBTOTAL (60 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores in the
column spaces below.

MODEL FUNCTION (60 points)

ANIMATRONICS

TIME DEDUCTIONS
A five-(5) point deduction will be incurred for every thirty (30)-second interval over the allotted time. Multiply the number of intervals by
five (5) and record the total deduction in the column to the right.
# of intervals X 5 = ______________ (total deduction)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (140 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if
any, attempts are made to identify
and/or incorporate SLC Practices
and Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of SLC Practices and
Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (14 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (14 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the semifinalist sections above) must be initialed by the evaluator,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (14 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (154 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS

ANIMATRONICS
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistant for check-in, one (1)
C. Timekeeper, one (1)
D. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE

5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges and review the time
limits, procedures, and regulations and clear up
any questions or misunderstandings. If questions
arise that cannot be answered, speak to the CRC
event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in entries and collect LEAP Reports at the
time and place noted in the conference program.
2. Have each team sign up for a specific time for
its presentation/interview (within the time frame
designated for the event).
a. Once each team has scheduled a presentation/
interview time, make sure that the participants
understand that they are to return fifteen (15)
minutes before their scheduled presentation/
interview time.
b. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list
may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
c. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by
events beyond participant control.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Conduct the event-specific interview.
2. Judges independently assess each team’s
demonstration presentation/interview.

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

3. Judges may take notes, but scoring occurs only
after all team members have left the event room.

2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ranking of the twelve (12)
semifinalists.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ANIMATRONICS
6. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges and review the time
limits, procedures, and regulations and clear up
any questions or misunderstandings.
2. Each semifinalist team will sign up for a specific
time for its interview (within the time frame
designated for the event). Inform teams that they
are to return fifteen (15) minutes before their
scheduled interview time.
3. Manage the LEAP interviews.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties that affect the top three
(3) placements. (Determine the procedure for
breaking ties before the onsite competition begins.
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OVERVIEW

Participants develop a set of architectural plans and
related materials in response to an annual architectural
design challenge and construct a physical, as well as a
computer-generated model, to accurately depict their
design. Participants must demonstrate an understanding
of and aptitude for architectural design, the development
of plans, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEED) applications through construction and renovation,
and modeling techniques and practices. The design
problem for the current school year will be posted on the
national TSA website under Competitions/Themes and
Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team, or one (1) individual, per chapter may
participate; one (1) entry per team or individual.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The documentation portfolio of the entry must be
finished and accessible via the Internet by 11:59 pm
Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on May 15th.
2. After 11:59 pm on May 15th changes must not be
made to the portfolio. Should changes or updates
to the portfolio be made after the deadline, those
changes are not considered.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The semifinalist presentation/interview time will be
limited to ten (10) minutes.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRE-CONFERENCE/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants access the design problem for the
specific year’s challenge found on the national
TSA website and work to complete their entry
according to the event regulations.
2. Participants submit their documentation portfolio
entry electronically via www.submittable.com as
a single, multipage PDF document, including the
LEAP Report.
3. Participants must follow the SPECIFIC
INSTRUCTIONS for online entry submission
on the TSA website under Themes/Problems/
Architectural Design. Failure to follow these
instructions may result in the entry not being
judged.
4. Email verification of each participant’s entry is
made immediately upon completion of the entry
submission process.
5. Entries are evaluated by judges.
6. Onsite at the conference, participants submit their
physical model at event check-in.
7. A list of twenty-four (24) participants will be posted
on the first full day of the conference, whose
models will be judged onsite at the conference to
determine the twelve (12) semifinalists. No more
than two (2) team members submit and place the
model for judging.
8. Models are evaluated by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
9. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

An individual or team LEAP Report is required for this
event and must be submitted at event check-in (see
LEAP Program).

NOTE: This procedure applies to the national TSA
competition only — entry procedures for state
conferences are handled by each state.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will sign up for a presentation/
interview time and arrive at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
2. The individual semifinalist or two (2)
representatives from each semifinalist team report
to the event area at the time and designated
location.
3. Semifinalists will use their models and
documentation for reference during the
presentation/interview process.
4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview.
5. No more than two (2) team members pick up the
team’s entry from the display area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Documentation materials (comprising “an electronic/
digital portfolio”) are required and must be submitted
in a single, multipage PDF document.
1. Participants must turn in their documentation
portfolio online for preliminary judging (see
Procedures 2 and 3).
2. Participants must have a USB flash drive copy
of their portfolio with them at the conference
as a back-up and for use in the semifinalist
presentation, should they advance to that level.
3. The documentation must include the following
single 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
a. LEAP Report
b. Title page with the event title, the conference
city and state, and the year; one (1) page
c. Table of contents; pages as needed
d. A description of the individual/team’s
interpretation of the design challenge and
an explanation of the style and merits of the
design concepts; one (1) page

e. List and description of each of the construction
systems (any and all that apply) and their
incorporation and application to the solution:
building codes, building permits, construction
methods and materials, electrical wiring,
plumbing, HVAC, and site requirements;
maximum of six (6) pages.
f. A LEED assessment for the project, according
to the USGBC standards for green building;
one (1) or more pages
g. A schedule of finish materials for all exterior
and interior surfaces of the architectural design
(this is not a list of the model construction
materials); one (1) page
h. A complete set of reproduction copies of the
original hand drawings and printer/plottergenerated copies of CAD drawings (i-iii below)
must be submitted with the model.
i. Each drawing should be shown on
maximum sheet cut size B (11" x 17"), with the
appropriate scale noted on the drawing.
ii. A copy of each drawing also must be
included on the flash drive.
iii. Drawings must be appropriately scaled to fit
the PDF format required for submission.
1. original floor plan/s
2. sectional detail drawing
3. foundation plan
4. roof plan
5. assembly plan with necessary onsite
instructions
i. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for
the event, as noted by date, task, time involved,
team member responsible, and comments (see
Forms Appendix or TSA website); pages as
needed
j. Mentorship Verification form; participants are
required to seek the mentorship of an architect
or other professional involved with construction
and renovation (see Mentorship Verification
form); one (1) page

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

k. A 3-D modeling/rendering drawing of the
individual/team’s final design with appropriate
details included; drawing sheet size B, 11" x 17";
one (1) page. Drawing must be appropriately
scaled to fit the PDF format required for
submission.

B. LEAP Requirements
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.

l. List of resources/references; pages as needed
B. Model:

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

1. The architectural model must be placed on a site
board, the size of which will be posted along with
the annual problem each year on the TSA website.
2. Model construction concepts, materials,
techniques, and applications:
a. Balsa wood, illustration board, or similar
materials are suggested (but not limited to) for
use as interior walls, exterior walls, and roof
construction.
b. Foam core board that is ½" thick or greater is
recommended for use as the site board for the
model.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The digital portfolio
2. The design process
3. The architectural model

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The quality of the event-specific interview

c. Dowels may be used to represent columns or
circular components.
3. Participants should pay close attention to the scale
of all materials as they relate to the scale of the
model.
4. The model may not include any electrical or
battery-powered enhancements.
5. No glass or liquid may be used as part of any
model.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Semifinalists will answer event-specific questions
about their design and solution to the yearly design
challenge using both their documentation portfolio
and model as illustrations.

2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
semifinalist interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Appraiser
Architect
Construction manager
Interior designer
Urban and regional planner

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

HIGH SCHOOL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
MENTORSHIP VERIFICATION
I certify that I have served as a mentor to the student(s) named below.

Student(s) involved (please print)

Signature of student(s)

Date

TSA chapter advisor (printed name and signature)

Date

Name of mentor (please print)

Occupation (please print)

Employer (please print)

Signature of mentor

Date

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
Participant/Team ID# ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������

ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank and
place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Online documentation is present.
Model is present and submitted on a site board (specific
only for the 24 pre-qualified entries).
Drawings are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Portfolio is unorganized and/or is
missing three or more components.

Portfolio has most components
and is generally organized; it has
sufficient content.

All components are included in the
portfolio; content and organization
are excellent.

Description of
design interpretation

The description of the design and
style is unclear or vague.

The description of the design and
explanation of the style are included;
they are adequately presented.

The description and merits of the
design and explanation of the style
are clear, effective, and convincing.

Construction
systems

There is little or no evidence of
attention to the various construction
systems.

Most, but not all, construction
systems are addressed; they are
generally well presented.

All applicable construction systems
are addressed, clearly documented,
and well presented.

Schedule of finish
materials

Many elements of the interior and
exterior finish schedules are missing
or incomplete.

Most, but not all, elements of the
interior and exterior finish schedules
are included.

All interior and exterior finish
schedules/materials are detailed
and explained clearly.

LEED Assessment

Only a minor attempt has been
made to incorporate a LEED
assessment of the design.

Many, but not all, aspects of a LEED
assessment of the design are
provided and documented.

A complete and accurate LEED
assessment of the design is
included.

Drawings
(X2)

A few of the required drawings
are present, but they are lacking in
quality.

Most, but not all, of the required
drawings are included and are in the
proper format.

All required drawings are included
and in the proper format.

Resources/
references

There is little or no effort to provide
resources and references.

Resources and references
included are generally presented
appropriately.

There is clear evidence of the
appropriate use of applicable
resources and references.

Plan of Work log

The Plan of Work log lacks major
elements of documentation.

The Plan of Work log is somewhat
complete and generally reflects the
time and work necessary for the
project.

The Plan of Work log completely
and accurately reflects the time and
work necessary for the project.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (90 points)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (90 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Effectiveness of
design

The design is ineffective in meeting
the needs of the challenge.

The design is somewhat effective in
meeting the needs of the challenge.

The design is clearly effective in
meeting the needs of the challenge.

Access and flow

The design reflects an ineffective
traffic flow pattern and/or use
of space to gain access to the
structure.

The design reflects a somewhat
effective traffic flow pattern and use
of space to access the structure.

The design presents a clear,
effective traffic flow pattern and full
consideration of the use of space.

Aesthetic appeal

There is little evidence of
consideration of aesthetics and curb
appeal in the design.

There is some evidence that
aesthetics and curb appeal have
been considered in the design.

There is clear evidence that
aesthetics and curb appeal are fully
and effectively integrated into the
design.

Creativity and
innovation

The design lacks originality and
exhibits few, if any, creative and/or
innovative applications.

Some unique, innovative, and
creative concepts are incorporated
in the overall design.

Unique, creative, and innovative
approaches are fully incorporated
into the design.

CRITERIA

(X2)
(X1)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DESIGN CHALLENGE (50 points)

DESIGN CHALLENGE SUBTOTAL (50 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Quality of
construction

Construction is of poor quality
and appearance, with little or no
attention to neatness.

Construction is somewhat neat
and has appropriate quality and
appearance.

Construction is of excellent quality
and exemplary appearance.

Use of materials

The choice of materials is ineffective
and inadequate for the type and
scale needed.

There is effective choice of materials
and some attention to scale.

There is effective and excellent use
of materials and accurate choice of
scale.

Design
representation

The model is ineffective in depicting
the requirements of the design
challenge.

The model is somewhat effective in
depicting the requirements of the
design challenge.

The model clearly and effectively
incorporates and depicts all aspects
of the design challenge.

Assembly plan/site
board

The assembly plan and site board
are ineffective in portraying the
assembly and set-up of the structure
onsite.

The assembly plan and site
board are somewhat effective in
representing most aspects of the
assembly and set-up of the structure
onsite.

The assembly plan and site board
effectively depict all elements of the
onsite assembly and set-up.

(X2)
(X1)

(X2)

MODEL SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (210 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

MODEL (70 points)

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participant(s) seems unorganized
and unprepared for the
presentation/interview.

Participant(s) is/are generally
prepared/organized in the overall
presentation/interview.

The presentation/interview is logical,
well organized, and easy to follow.

Knowledge

Participant(s) seems to have little
understanding of the concepts of the
design challenge; vague answers to
interview questions are provided.

An understanding of the concepts of
the design challenge, and answers
to questions, are adequate.

There is clear evidence of a
thorough understanding of the
design challenge; questions are
answered well.

Articulation

The presentation and interview
provide an unclear, unorganized, and
or illogical description of the project.

The presentation and interview offer
a somewhat logical and easy-tounderstand project description.

The presentation/interview provides
a clear, concise, and easy-to-follow
description of the project.

Delivery

The team/individual is verbose and/
or uncertain in the presentation/
interview; participant posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the delivery.

The team/individual is somewhat
well-spoken and clear in the
presentation/interview; participant
posture, gestures, and eye contact
result in an acceptable delivery.

The team/individual is well-spoken and
distinct in the presentation/interview;
participant posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective delivery.

Team participation

The full team/invidivual
communicates with judges.

Most members of the team
participate and generally seem to
understand the event.

All team members participate with
mutual understanding of the event
and respond effectively to questions.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are not clearly communicated, lack
detail, and/or are unconvincing;
few, if any, attempts are made to
identify and/or incorporate the SLC
Practices and Behaviors.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
adequately communicated, include
some detail, are clear, and/or are
generally convincing; identification
and/or incorporation of the SLC
Practices and Behaviors is adequate.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fully-detailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

(27 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW (87 points)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (87 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (87 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (297 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistants for check-in, two (2)
C. Judges:
1. Pre-conference judges for portfolios remote
judging, two (2) or more
2. Onsite for second–half of the preliminary round for
displays, two (2) or more
3. Semifinalist interviews, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. Results envelope
7. Envelope for LEAP Reports
8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables for entries
C. Tables and chairs for judges

RESPONSIBILITIES
PRE-CONFERENCE/PRELIMINARY ROUND, REMOTE
1. Review entries as they are submitted to the
designated online storage utility (Submittable).
2. Entry submission is allowed only until 11:59 p.m.
(PDT) on May 15th.
3. Manage communication and pre-conference
evaluation.
4. Judges independently assess the entries to
determine the twenty-four (24) participants for
onsite model judging.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designate time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is
being held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Place an entry number label in the upper righthand corner of each display and around the
documentation flash drive.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
PRELIMINARY ROUND, ONSITE
1. Judges independently evaluate the entries (top 24
models) to determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Conduct semifinalist interviews.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
3. Judges evaluate the entries.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ranking of the ten (10)
finalists and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN
OVERVIEW

Participants will create a display to teach a biotechnology
topic and demonstrate understanding of it through
documented research, the development of a solution,
a display (including a model or prototype [optiona]), and
an effective multimedia presentation. Participants may
choose to recreate or simulate research that previously
has been performed within the scientific community. The
display must be presented in a fashion that teaches the
topic to an elementary school audience.
The topic for the current school year will be posted
on the TSA website under Competitions/Themes and
Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team, or one (1) individual per chapter may
participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. Semifinalists are allowed up to ten (10) minutes to
give a presentation, which is followed questions
from judges.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP REPORT

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Report).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Team members select and research a
contemporary biotechnology issue related to the
current year’s designated topic. Resources may
include but are not limited to books, interviews,
websites, magazines, professional journals, etc.
2. Team members then prepare their documentation,
display, and multimedia presentation according to
the event regulations.
3. Participants check in their entries and submit a
LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program. No more than two (2) team
members set up the display.
4. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
5. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Two (2) representatives from each semifinalist
team, with their multimedia presentation, report to
the event area at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Semifinalist team representatives give a brief
presentation and answer questions from judges.
Up to ten (10) minutes will be provided for the
presentation; with a few minutes more for
questions from judges.
3. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Students must understand the fundamental concepts
and principles of the contemporary biotechnology
topic. Research on a problem within that topic should
focus on significant impacts (opportunities and risks)
on the environment, economy, and society, as well as
any important ethical considerations.
B. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and should be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Definition and explanation of the problem; one (1)
page
5. An explanation of the chosen solution, and other
possible solutions and why they were rejected;
maximum three (3) pages
6. A scenario of possible real-life applications; one (1)
page
7. Supplementary information such as logs, graphs,
sketches, drawings, illustrations, photographs, etc.;
maximum four (4) pages
8. A print-out of the accompanying multimedia
presentation (printed with three [3] slides per page,
recommended); pages as needed
9. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); one (1) page
10. A minimum of three (3) different types of resources,
such as books, interviews, professional journals,
websites, magazines, etc. All must be cited using
Modern Language Association (MLA) format;
pages as needed.
11. A USB flash drive of the team’s multimedia
presentation. The USB flash drive and the
multimedia presentation become the property of
TSA.

C. Display guidelines are as follows:
1. The size of the display may not exceed 15" deep x
3' wide x 4' high.
2. A model or prototype is optional.
3. Power
a. AC electricity may not be used.
b. Dry cell or photo-voltaic cells may be used for
power, if desired.
c. Any power source used must fit within the
maximum display area.
4. If operating instructions are necessary, they must
be clearly displayed.
5. No harmful or illegal substances, viruses, live
plants, or animals may be used as a part of the
display. No potentially dangerous processes may
be demonstrated or included as part of the display.
6. The display must be presented as if it were in
a children’s museum that is geared towards
educating children in the 5th grade or younger.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Each team must be prepared to send two (2)
representatives to the semifinalist portion of the
event, in which the representatives give a multimedia
presentation.
B. The presentation explains the team’s selection of the
problem and its solution and is not to exceed ten (10)
minutes. Judges then ask questions.
1. The two (2) semifinalist team representatives
MUST bring a laptop computer for their multimedia
presentation.
2. Projection equipment will not be permitted.
3. Only power will be provided.
C. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted as part of the semifinalist
presentation/interview.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The portfolio
2. The display

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The event-specific presentation/interview
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event has connections to the STEM standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Bioinformatics processor
Food scientist
Microbiologist
Radiographer
Quality control analyst

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY
DESIGN

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Documentation is present.
Display is present.
Multimedia presentation is present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Portfolio is unorganized and/
or missing three (3) or more
components.

Portfolio has most components and
is generally organized.

Portfolio is missing no components
and is clearly well organized.

Definition and
explanation of
problem and
solution(s)

The definition and explanation of
the problem and/or solution(s) to the
problem are unclear.

The definition and explanation of
the problem and/or solution(s) to the
problem are generally clear.

A clear and concise definition
and explanation of the problem
and solution(s) to the problem are
evident.

Research base

The research is inadequate, and/
or very few credible sources are
referenced.

The research has been conducted
appropriately, with some credible
sources cited.

There is a comprehensive research
base with credible sources cited.

Supplementary
information
(X1)

Supplementary information does not
help clarify documentation, or it is of
little significance to the problem.

Supplementary information is
appropriate and adds to the
documentation by providing clarity
to the problem.

Supplementary information is of
excellent quality and clarifies the
problem and solution(s).

Quality and
effectiveness

The work is sloppy and
disorganized, as if thrown together.

The work is mostly organized and of
sufficient quality.

The work is well organized and of
exceptional quality.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (50 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (50 points)

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Communication of
problem

The problem is difficult to
understand as communicated and is
presented in an illogical manner.

The problem is communicated
adequately, and thoughts are
somewhat organized and/or
concise.

The problem is communicated in
an organized, clear, and concise
manner.

Communication of
solution

The solution is difficult to
understand as communicated, is
presented in an illogical manner and
is not focused on an audience of a
5th grade level or younger.

The solution is communicated
adequately, thoughts are somewhat
organized and/or concise, and the
solution is somewhat focused on
an audience of a 5th grade level or
younger.

The solution is communicated in
an organized, clear, and concise
manner and is clearly focused on
an audience of a 5th grade level or
younger.

Creativity

The work lacks creativity, with
little or no integration of design
principles.

Some creative elements are
included, and essential design
principles and elements are used
somewhat effectively.

The work exudes creativity, and
essential design principles and
elements are integrated.

Aesthetics and
artisanship

The work is unorganized and
sloppy, and the display seems to be
an afterthought.

The work is organized, with
essential design principles
presented in a logical format.

The work reflects an exemplary use
of layout and design principles to
logically communicate important
data.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

(X2)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DISPLAY (60 points)

DISPLAY SUBTOTAL (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (110 points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participants seem unorganized and
unprepared for the presentation/
interview, with an illogical
explanation of the problem and
solution.

Participants are generally prepared
for the presentation/interview;
explanation of problem and solution
are communicated and generally
organized.

The presentation/interview is
logical, well organized, and easy to
follow; the problem and solution are
communicated in an organized and
concise manner.

Articulation

The presentation/interview is
full of illogical thoughts that lack
clarity, and/or there is insufficient
information provided describing the
project.

The presentation/interview is
somewhat logical, generally easy
to follow, and/or there is sufficient
information provided describing the
project.

The presentation/interview is
clear, concise, and there is ample
information provided describing the
project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/or
uncertain in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the delivery.

The team is somewhat well-spoken
and clear in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
an acceptable delivery.

The team is well-spoken and
distinct in its presentation/interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective delivery.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION (77 points)

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION (77 points) – continued
Knowledge

Participants seem to have little
understanding of the concepts in
their project; answers to questions
may be vague.

Participants exhibit an
understanding of the concepts in
their project.

Participants show clear evidence
of a thorough understanding of the
project.

Team participation

The majority of the presentation/
interview is made by one member
of the team; the partner(s) may be
disengaged.

Team members generally are
engaged in the process, though
one member may take on more
responsibility than the other(s).

All team members are actively
involved in the presentation/
interview and responses to
questions.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent

(X2)

(X1)

(17 points;
10% of total
event points)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (77 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (187 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistants for check-in, two (2)
C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

4. Inspect the area in which the displays are
being placed for appropriate set-up, including
appropriate number and size of tables.
5. At least one hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries and collect LEAP Reports at
the time stated in the conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

7. Envelope for LEAP Reports

4. Place an entry number in the upper right-hand
corner of each portfolio and display.

8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

5. Position entries for evaluation and viewing.

B. Tape measure for judges
C. Stopwatch
D. Display tables for entries (minimum width 18")
E. Table and chairs for judges and two (2) semifinalist
team representatives
F. A 50' extension cord AND a power strip (for
semifinalist interviews)

6. Secure the entries in the designated area.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently assess the entries to
determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

RESPONSIBILITIES

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points or

AT THE CONFERENCE

b. To disqualify the entry

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room to obtain the coordinator’s
packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
3. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC room for posting.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BIOTECHNOLOGY DESIGN
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the presentations are to
take place. Ensure that there is a table and seating
for participants and judges.
2. Meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the semifinalist presentations begin.
3. Conduct semifinalist presentations/interviews.
a. Judges should be sure to ask questions.
b. The LEAP interview will be conducted as
part of the semifinalist presentation/interview
and will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN
OVERVIEW

Participants develop, build, and package a board game
that focuses on the subject of their choice. The game
should be interesting, exciting, visually appealing,
and intellectually challenging. Each team will have to
design the packaging, instructions, pieces, and/or cards
associated with creating and piloting a new board
game. Semifinalists for the event will set up the game,
demonstrate how the game is played, and explain the
game’s features.

ELIGIBILITY

3. Entries are evaluated by the judges. Neither
students nor advisors are present at this time.
4. A list of twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random
order) will be posted.

One (1) team per chapter may participate, one (1) entry
each.

3. Semifinalist teams will answer questions about
the documentation, the game’s purpose, value,
design, rules, and development process.

TIME LIMITS

4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist interview.

1. Semifinalists are allowed five (5) minutes to setup
the game and five (5) minutes to repackage the
game.
2. Semifinalists participate in an event-specific
interview that lasts approximately five to ten (5-10)
minutes.
3. Semifinalists participate in a LEAP interview that
lasts an additional five (5) minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. In preparation for the event (and throughout the
game development), teams design, create, and
document the game entry.
2. Teams submit the completed board game,
documentation, and team LEAP Report at the time
and place stated in the conference program. No
more than two (2) team members may drop off the
team’s entry.

5. Judges independently assess the entries,
including each team’s LEAP Report.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.
7. No more than three (3) team members pick up
their entry from the display area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants design, create and package an entirely
original board game, complete with instructions on
how to play, including all parts, pieces and/or cards
needed to play the game.
B. Board game:
1. The physical board game should be of high quality
and designed for the intended age group.
2. The packaged game must be no larger than
12" x 18" x 3".
a. The game must be designed, engineered,
created, and packaged solely by the team.
b. The materials used in packaging and
manufacturing the game are to be determined
by the team.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN

3. Game instructions
a. must be clear, understandable, and ageappropriate

d. Overview of the game; one (1 page)

b. must be included in both the packaged game
and in the documentation portfolio

e. Intended audience (age range and number
of players) and a game description/reasoning
behind the choice of audience; one (1 page)

c. must explain the rules in explicit detail

f. Game Instructions (pages as needed)

d. The team must determine which format best
presents the game’s instructions.

g. Description of the processes used to create the
game and components; two (2 pages)

4. The game must be able to be set up within five (5)
minutes of opening the package.

h. Engineered drawings of parts/game/packaging
(pages as needed)

5. Once evaluation of the game is complete, a player
(judge) must be able to repackage it within five (5)
minutes.

i. Cost summary for created game; one (1)

6. The game must include original work of the
team. Work that is not created by the team must
have proper documentation, showing copyright
permissions and/or license for usage in the game
segment.

k. A completed Student Copyright Checklist (see
Forms Appendix)

c. Table of Contents; one (1 page)

j. A completed Plan of Work Log (see Forms
Appendix); pages as needed

l. References/research sources; one (1) page

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Two to three (2-3) members of each semifinalist team
will report to the event area at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
B. Team members will demonstrate set up and playing of
the game, and explain the game’s features.
C. Team members will participate in an event-specific
interview following the game’s demonstration.
D. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted as part of semifinalist
presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The portfolio
2. The game and packaging aesthetics, quality
of the game components, ease of setup/take
down, quality of the packaging, and ease of
understanding the rules

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The demonstration of the rules, game features,
and playing of the game
2. The event-specific interview
3. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event has connections to the STEM areas of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

This competition has connections to one or more of the
career areas:
•
•
•
•
•

Product/packaging design
Board game designer
Electronic game designer
Electronic game technician
Technical writer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
USB Portfolio is present
Packaged board game is present
Completed LEAP Report is present
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Portfolio is unorganized and/or
missing three or more components.

Portfolio is organized adequately,
with most, if not all, components
present.

No components are missing in
the portfolio, and content and
organization are clearly evident.

Overview of the
game

The overview and purpose of the
game are unclear.

The overview and purpose of the
game are generally clear.

The overview clearly explains the
purpose of the game and how the
game is played.

Intended Audience

The intended audience and
reasoning behind the game are not
clear and/or are poorly supported.

The intended audience and
reasoning behind the game are
clear and generally supported.

The intended audience is clearly
expressed and reasoning behind
game play is well supported.

Game Instructions

The instructions for the game are
not clear for the intended age
range.

The instructions for the game are
generally clear for the intended age
range.

The instructions for the game are
clearly understandable for the age
range intended.

Description of
Processes

The processes used to create the
game are not clearly described
and/or are missing four (4) or more
aspects of the creation of the game.

The description for the creation of
the game and the aspects of the
game creation are generally clear.

The processes used to create the
game are clearly described and
explain all aspects of the game
creation.

Engineering
Drawings

Four (4) or more engineered
drawings for all parts, game boards,
and packaging are missing and/or
are of poor quality.

One to three (1-3) engineered
drawings for all parts, game boards,
and packaging are missing or are of
adequate quality.

Engineered drawings for all parts,
game boards, and packaging are
present and are of excellent quality.

Cost Summary

Cost breakdown for the game is
missing or two (2) or more of the
following categories are incomplete:
quantity of materials used, cost of
materials, and/or total cost of the
project.

Cost breakdown for the game is
present and generally clear with
minor information missing for the
following categories: quantity of
materials used, cost of materials,
and/or total cost of the project.

Complete cost breakdown for the
game, including the quantity of the
materials used, cost of the materials,
and total cost of the project are
present, complete, and clearly
identified.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (70 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (70 points)

BOARD GAME DESIGN

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Appearance

Three (3) or more elements of the
packaging look unfinished, are not
aesthetically appealing, and are not
retail ready.

One to two (1-2) elements of the
packaging look unfinished, are not
aesthetically appealing, and are not
retail ready.

Packaging appearance is retail
ready and aesthetically pleasing.

Functionality/
Durability

Packaging is missing three (3) or
more necessary components for
game play, and/or one to five (1-5)
necessary parts are not reusable or
sturdy.

Packaging is missing one to two
(1-2) necessary components for
game play, and/or one to two (1-2)
necessary parts are not reusable or
sturdy.

Packaging is reusable and meets all
needs for the game. Construction
of the packaging is complete and
sturdy.

Incorporation of
Rules

Rules of the game are not integrated
as part of the packaging, and/or the
rules are lacking in durability and
quality.

Rules of the game are not fully
integrated as part of the packaging
design; rules are adequate in
durability and quality.

Rules are an integrated part of the
packaging and are of exceptional
durability and quality.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PACKAGING (30 points)

PACKAGING SUBTOTAL (30 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Appearance

Three (3) or more elements of the
game look unfinished; game is not
aesthetically appealing or retail
ready

One to two (1-2) elements of the
game look unfinished; game is
adequately aesthetically appealing
and retail ready.

Game looks finished, is aesthetically
appealing, and is retail ready.

Functionality/
Durability

Game is missing three (3) or
more necessary components for
game play, and/or one to five (1-5)
necessary parts are not reusable or
sturdy.

Game is missing one to two
(1-2) necessary components for
game play, and/or one to two (1-2)
necessary parts are not reusable or
sturdy.

Game has all necessary
components for game play, and
game pieces are all reusable and
sturdy.

Game Set up

Total game setup time is over 11
minutes, and/or game setup and/
or take down is longer than 6:01
minutes.

Total game setup time is 10-11
minutes, and/or game setup and/or
take down is five to six (5-6) minutes.

Total game setup and total game
take down are under five (5)
minutes.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

BOARD GAME (30 points)

BOARD GAME SUBTOTAL (30 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (130 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Theme of game

The theme of the game is not
addressed and/or was unclear.

The theme of the game is
adequately addressed.

The theme of the game is clearly
expressed and easily interpreted.

Age of audience

The intended age range of the
game is not addressed and the
description of the audience was not
appropriate.

The intended age range of the
game is addressed but one to three
(1-3) elements of the description did
not match the game.

The age range of the intended
audience is clearly addressed and
the description of the audience
matched the game.

Presentation of
Rules

Rules are confusing and difficult for the
audience to understand; more than five
(5) questions clarifying the rules are
asked in order to start the game play.

Rules are somewhat clear for the
audience to understand; game play
requires less than four (4) questions
to clarify the rules.

Rule are clearly explained and
game play is easily started after
presentation of rules, with no
clarifying questions needed.

Demonstration of
game play

Game play is confusing and
unorganized. How players win or
lose is not addressed.

Game play is somewhat confusing
but organized. How players win or
lose is somewhat addressed.

Various scenarios of the game are
addressed and explained. How players
win or lose is clearly explained.

Engagement and
participation

The team must be prompted to
provide answers and information;
a clear team leader dominates
the interview, while other team
members are unresponsive.

Team members generally answer
questions with responses of
acceptable length and depth;
most team members participate
adequately in the interview and
engage the judges when answering
questions.

All team members contribute in the
interview; while there may be a clear
team leader, all members provide
appropriate substantive material to the
conversation; the team engages the
judges in the interview, which becomes
less of a question and answer session
and more of a conversation about
the topic and solution.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail, are
clear, and/or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation of
the SLC Practices is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/ or
incorporation of the SLC Practices is
excellent.

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

(18 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL DEMONSTRATION/INTERVIEW (68 points)

SEMIFINAL DEMONSTRATION/INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (68 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the semifinalist sections above) must be initialed by the evaluator,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (68 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add the PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL and the SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL.

TOTAL (198 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN

BOARD GAME DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal Round, two (2) or more
C. Assistants for check-in, one (1)

5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Each entry must include the participants’
identification number in the upper right-hand
corner of the entry.
5. Position the entries for evaluation and viewing.
6. Secure the entries in the designated area.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently assess the entries.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
5. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
final presentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

BOARD GAME DESIGN
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the demonstrations/
interviews are to take place. Ensure that there is a
table and seating for the interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the event begins.
3. Conduct semifinalist demonstrations/interviews
using the same official rating form used for the
preliminary round.
4. Judges should be sure to ask event-specific
interview questions. The LEAP interview will be
conducted as part of this interview and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM
OVERVIEW

iii. Teams are penalized five (5) points per thirty
(30) seconds by each judge for going over
the time allotted for the oral performance,
based on the following scale:

Teams take a written parliamentary procedures test in
order to qualify for the semifinals, in which they complete
an opening ceremony, items of business, parliamentary
actions, and a closing ceremony within a specified time
period.

ELIGIBILITY
1. One (1) team of six (6) members per chapter may
participate.
2. Team members do not have to be elected officers
of the local chapter.
3. Team members who take the written test and
advance to the semifinalist portion of the event
must be the same six (6) members.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND: All teams are allowed one (1)
hour to complete a written parliamentary procedures test.
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams have fifteen (15) minutes with
no penalty and up to seventeen (17) minutes
with penalty (see below) to complete required
parliamentary actions, items of business, set-up
time, and a presentation.
a. The time begins when the team is handed
the prompt; the time ends when the gavel is
rapped to close the meeting, or at seventeen
(17) minutes.
b. At that point the LEAP interview will be
conducted for a maximum of five (5) minutes.
c. The secretary will then have five (5) additional
minutes to complete the minutes of the
meeting.

Time over
fifteen
(15) minutes

Penalty

15:01 to 15:30
15:31 to 16:00
16:01 to 16:30
16:31 to 17:00

five (5) points per evaluator
ten (10) points per evaluator
fifteen (15) points per evaluator
twenty (20) points per evaluator

2. The LEAP interview will last a maximum of five (5)
additional minutes and will be conducted
immediately following the semifinalist performance
and prior to the time when the secretary
completes the minutes of the meeting.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire, with additional requirements that
apply for the Chapter Team event, is required. Refer to
the National TSA Dress Code section of this guide or the
TSA website.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Teams report for the written test at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
2. Teams must submit a LEAP Report prior to taking
the test.

i. After the five (5) minutes is over, the
secretary must turn in their team's minutes,
regardless if they are completed.
ii. No team may go beyond seventeen (17)
minutes.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

3. A written parliamentary procedures test is
administered at the same time to all team
members.
a. Each individual on the team will take the written
test. All six (6) members must be present to
take the test.
b. All six (6) of the individual written test scores will
be averaged together to determine the team’s
score.
4. Twelve (12) teams with the highest averaged
scores are selected as semifinalists for the oral
presentation.
5. A semifinalist list in random order is posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams report for oral presentations
at the time and place stated in the conference
program.
2. Each team follows the procedure for opening and
closing a local chapter meeting.
3. Each team follows an order of business to dispose
of five (5) given parliamentary actions provided by
the event coordinator and then closes the meeting
according to the prescribed procedure.
4. There is a possibility for three (3) additional actions
to be demonstrated for bonus points. If the actions
are demonstrated correctly, then bonus points will
be awarded.
5. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following the semifinalist performance.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Teams consist of a president, vice president,
secretary, treasurer, reporter, and sergeant‑at‑arms.
B. Team members take the written test individually.
These same six (6) team members will compete in
the semifinalist portion of the event, should the team
qualify.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The semifinalist portion of the event includes the call
to order, pledge to the flag, roll call, order of business,
and closing ceremony.
1. Written materials, other than those provided by
national TSA, may not be taken to the event room.
2. A set of secretary’s minutes, a treasurer’s report,
a copy of the TSA creed, and a list of five (5)
parliamentary actions are provided by the event
coordinator when the team members enter the
performance room.
3. The event coordinator also will supply each team
with paper, six (6) pens, a calculator, and six (6) 3" x
5" notecards.
4. A timepiece may be used by the team, if desired.
B. Meeting Setup
1. Officer symbols and a gavel are placed on a long
table with the United States flag standing to the
right of the president’s rostrum and the host state
flag to the left.
2. The president’s rostrum should be centered
between the two (2) flags.
3. The symbols of the officers should be placed in
front of the respective officers.
4. The host state banners are optional and do not
add to or subtract from a team’s scores.
C. For the parliamentary actions, the Sergeant-at-Arms
will receive and distribute six (6) index cards, each
with the name of an office on one side and the five (5)
actions of parliamentary procedure on the other side,
with each office responsible for the required action
indicated on the card.
1. Official timing begins as soon as the parliamentary
actions are provided and will stop at the team’s
final gavel to end the meeting.
2. Five (5) points will be deducted for every thirty
(30)-second interval over the allotted time (see
TIME LIMITS).
3. Concerning the reading of the TSA creed by the
secretary during the closing ceremony, a chapter
has the option to recite the creed using one (1) or
more of its team members.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

D. Bonus points will be awarded for additional motions
and parliamentary actions by the officers, other than
the president.
E. At the conclusion of the oral presentation, and after
the LEAP interview, each team secretary has five (5)
minutes to write a copy of chapter minutes that will be
submitted to a judge. The coordinator will begin timing
the five (5) minutes when the secretary is seated at
the area designated for the writing of the minutes.
F. All materials given to team members, as well as the
chapter minutes and a completed treasurer’s report,
must be handed to the judges before the team leaves
the room.
1. No reference should be made to a team’s school,
chapter name, city, or state.
2. The state name on a TSA patch is acceptable.
G. Any semifinalist team that fails to appear at the
designated time is placed at the end of the list and
allowed to participate at the discretion of the judges
and event coordinator if time permits.
H. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted as part of semifinalist
presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Scores on a test of fifty (50) questions determine
the semifinalist teams for the oral presentation.
a. Each team’s average written test score is used
to determine the twelve (12) semifinalist teams.
b. A team’s average test score is included in the
final results.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The demonstration of a chapter business meeting
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

NOTE

There are a number of ways to learn about parliamentary
procedure. The standard reference is Robert’s Rules of
Order, Newly Revised. Information about parliamentary
procedure websites may be found online at www.
rulesonline.com/parliamentary_procedure_websites.htm.
For writing proper minutes, also refer to Robert’s Rules of
Order, Newly Revised.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, and Engineering.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

Careers will vary, based on the student’s area of interest.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

CHAPTER TEAM OFFICIAL MINUTES
Team ID number������������������������������������������������������������������������������

Date________________________________________________________________________________________

Location of conference�������������������������������������������������������������������������
Use the back of this page, if necessary.

Secretary’s signature__________________________________________________ Date____________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

CHAPTER TEAM TREASURER’S REPORT
Team ID number������������������������������������������������������������������������������

Date________________________________________________________________________________________

Location of conference�������������������������������������������������������������������������

Balance as of ________________

$___________________

Receipts:

Total receipts

$___________________

Expenditures:

Total expenses

$___________________

Balance as of ________________ , 2018

$___________________

Submitted by_________________________________________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

CHAPTER OPENING AND CLOSING CEREMONIES
OPENING CEREMONY

At the prescribed time for meetings, the president assumes his/her position behind the rostrum in the front center of the
room. Other officers are seated to the left and right of the president. They are seated in the following order from stage left
to right: vice president, treasurer, secretary, president, reporter, and sergeant‑at‑arms.

HOST STATE BANNER (OPTIONAL)
U.S. FLAG SGT.‑AT‑ARMS REPORTER PRESIDENT SECRETARY TREASURER VICE PRES. STATE FLAG
(OFFICERS FACING AUDIENCE)
AUDIENCE

President:

(raps gavel twice) Will the meeting please come to order. Mr./Ms. Sergeant‑at‑Arms, are all the
officers in their places?

Sergeant‑at‑Arms:

They are, Mr./Ms. President.

President:

(raps gavel three [3] times for assembly to rise) Mr./Ms. Sergeant‑at‑Arms, please lead the assembly in
the Pledge to the Flag of the United States of America.

Sergeant‑at‑Arms:

(leads Pledge to the Flag)

President:

(raps once and assembly is seated) Mr./Ms. Secretary, will you please call the roll.

Secretary:

Mr./Ms. Sergeant‑at‑Arms.

Sergeant‑at‑Arms:

Present. The symbol of my office is the “hearty handshake” (officer points to symbol), and it is my
responsibility to see that the assembly is comfortable and properly welcomed. It is also my duty to
serve as doorkeeper for this organization.

Secretary:

Mr./Ms. Reporter.

Reporter:

Present. The symbol of my office is the beacon tower (officer points to symbol), and it is my
duty to see that our school, community, and national association have a complete report of our
organization’s activities.

Secretary:

Mr./Ms. President.

President:

Present. The symbol of my office is the gavel (officer points to symbol). The duties vested in me
by my office are to preside at all regular and special meetings of this organization and to promote
cooperation in carrying out the activities and work of our organization. Mr./Ms. Secretary.

Secretary:

Present. The symbol of my office is the pen (officer points to symbol), and it is my responsibility to see
that accurate and proper records are kept of all business and correspondence of this association.
Mr./Ms. Treasurer.

Treasurer:

Present. The symbol of my office is a balanced budget (officer points to symbol), and it is the duty
of my office to keep accurate records of all funds and see that our financial obligations are met
promptly.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM
Secretary:

Mr./Ms. Vice President.

Vice President:

Present. The symbol of my office is a star (officer points to symbol), and it is the duty of my office to
see that we always have a strong membership, a good work program, and are alert to the welfare of
our chapter.

Secretary:

Mr./Ms. President, all officers are present and in their place.

President:

Mr./Ms. Sergeant‑at‑Arms, do we have guests present?

Sergeant‑at‑Arms:

(If so, introduce guest[s]. If not, state the following:) No, Mr./Ms. President.

President:

Mr./Ms. Secretary, we are ready to transact our business.

Teams dispose of the assigned business following the suggested order of business.

CLOSING CEREMONY
President:

(raps three [3] times; assembly rises) Mr./Ms. Secretary, will you please (read) or (lead us in) the TSA
Creed.

Secretary:

(recites the TSA Creed) (When presented at state and national competitions, the creed may be
presented using a more original method.)

President:

Will the assembly repeat the TSA Motto after me. (motto is spoken) Does anyone know of any reason
why this assembly should not adjourn? If not, I will entertain a motion to adjourn. (following motion to
adjourn, a second, and a vote) I now declare this meeting adjourned until a special meeting is called
or until our next regular meeting. (raps once with gavel)

SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS FOR CHAPTER MEETINGS
1. The president calls the meeting to order with opening ceremonies.
2. Roll call is taken and a quorum is established.
3. The secretary reads the minutes of the previous meeting. Any necessary corrections and/or additions are made
and the minutes are approved as read or corrected.
4. The treasurer’s report is received as read and placed on file, subject for audit.
5. The chairperson calls for committee and officer reports, as necessary. If a committee has no report, it should so
state.
6. Unfinished business is addressed.
7. New business is addressed.
8. The program, if any, is held at this time. The chairperson presides with the assistance of the program chairperson or
the committee chairperson.
9. Announcements.
10. Adjournment with closing ceremonies.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Record the scores of the six (6) team members in the boxes below. Calculate the average of their scores. Divide the average by five (5) for the
score that the team will receive out of ten (10) points. Record the score in the column space to the right.
#1

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

TEAM WRITTEN TEST (10 points)

TEAM WRITTEN TEST SUBTOTAL (10 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

PREPARATION FOR MEETING (30 points)
Official attire/poise

Appearance is untidy; grooming is
lacking; clothing is not consistent in
coloration and visual appearance;
shoes are the wrong color; poise
and confidence are missing.

Overall appearance is neat and
consistent; grooming is good,
and professional appearance is
adequate.

Overall appearance is cohesive,
polished, and businesslike.

Placement of flags
and officer symbols;
officer seating

Flags are not placed in the correct
order; and/or officer symbols are not
in the correct order; and/or are not
aligned properly on the table; and/
or not all officers are seated in the
proper arrangement, resulting in a
sloppy and haphazard appearance.

Placements and seating are generally
businesslike and professional, with
some inconsistencies (e.g., flags
are in the correct order but are not
aligned with other aspects of the
officer gear; and/or several of the
officer symbols are in proper order,
but some are misaligned; and/or
officers are seated properly, but
some chairs are misaligned, etc.).

Flags are completely aligned and
in proper order and placement;
officer gear is placed in the correct
order and in proper alignment on
the table; the seating arrangement
is precise, businesslike, and
professional.

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores in the
column spaces below.

BUSINESS MEETING DEMONSTRATION (190 points)

CHAPTER TEAM

BUSINESS MEETING DEMONSTRATION (190 points) – continued
KNOWLEDGE OF TSA (20 points)
Opening ceremony

Many items of sequence and order
are incorrect and officers make
several mistakes.

Officers make few, if any, sequence
and order mistakes, resulting in a
fairly smooth opening ceremony.

The opening is smooth and efficient;
the opening ceremony progresses
as it should.

Closing ceremony

Officers make several mistakes;
creed recitation is sloppy, and the
overall effort is unpolished.

Appropriate procedures are
followed, with some mistakes made
(e.g., creed recitation).

The closing is outstanding, with no
mistakes; the presentation is highly
polished.

(X1)

KNOWLEDGE OF PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE (140 points)
Voting procedures

Several obvious mistakes are made
in voting procedures.

Few mistakes are made in voting
procedures.

All voting procedures are correct,
smooth, and efficient.

Debate

(exclude president)
(X3)

Only a few officers participate
effectively in the debate, which is
loosely presented.

Most officers participate in the
debate process and are somewhat
convincing.

All officers participate in and present
a highly cohesive debate.

Parliamentary
actions

Only one of the required actions is
completed correctly.

At least three of the actions are
completed correctly, with adequate
effort.

All five actions are completed
correctly, with notable and inspiring
effort.

Communication

Communication is unclear; some
mumbling occurs and/or voices are
too loud or too soft; and/or problems
occur with verbal expression (e.g.,
grammar, sentence structure).

Communication is generally clear,
with appropriate volume of voices
and only minor problems with
articulation or verbal expression.

Communication is clear, concise,
and easy to understand; voices are
well modulated, and speakers are
articulate.

Treasurer’s report

The report is incorrect or not
complete; math and spelling errors
are evident.

The report generally is correct and
complete, with few math and/or
spelling errors.

The report is correct and complete,
with no math or spelling errors.

Chapter minutes

The format of the minutes is
incorrect or not complete; grammar
and spelling errors are evident.

The format of the minutes is
generally correct and complete, with
few grammar and/or spelling errors.

The minutes are formatted correctly,
are complete, and have no grammar
or spelling errors.

(X1)

(X5)
(X2)

(X1)

(X2)

BUSINESS MEETING DEMONSTRATION SUBTOTAL (190 points)

BONUS
For additional
motions and
parliamentary
actions

One (1) additional action is
completed correctly.

Two (2) additional actions are
completed correctly.

Three (3) additional actions are
completed correctly.

(by officers other
than the president)
(X2)

TIME DEDUCTIONS (NO TEAM MAY GO BEYOND 17 MINUTES)
A five-(5) point deduction will be incurred for every thirty (30)-second interval over the allotted time. Multiply the number of intervals by
five (5) and record the total deduction in the column to the right.
# of intervals X 5 = ______________ (total deduction)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/
or incorporate SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (22 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/ or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (22 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (22 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (242 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM

CHAPTER TEAM
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

AT THE CONFERENCE

B. Judges, two (2) or more
C. Assistants, two (2) or more for the written test and
two (2) or more for the oral presentations
D. Timekeeper

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Copies of parliamentary procedures written test
5. Opening and closing ceremonies script
6. List of parliamentary actions; one (1) copy for each
semifinalist team and copies for the judges
7. Copies of secretary’s minutes
8. Copies of treasurer’s report template
9. Copies of the Chapter Team Official Minutes
template
10. Paper, pens, one (1) calculator, and six (6) 3" x 5"
note cards, per team
11. Results envelope with coordinator forms
12. Envelopes for LEAP Reports
13. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

B. Officer’s symbols and gavel

5. Administer the written test.

C. United States flag

6. Determine team scores.

D. State flag (optional)

7. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

E. Stopwatches
F. Table rostrum, if available
G. One (1) long table or two (2) tables, and six (6) chairs
for team members
H. One (1) table and three (3) chairs for judges

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHAPTER TEAM
8. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Check in semifinalists at the time stated in the
conference program. Inform the teams of their
order of performance and review the procedure to
be followed.

7. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists. Any ties
should be broken by using the teams’ written test
scores.
8. Complete and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
9. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

2. When the team enters the oral performance room,
the materials (secretary’s minutes, copy of Chapter
Team Official Minutes form for secretary’s minutes,
a treasurer’s report, a copy of the TSA creed, and
a list of parliamentary actions) are provided to the
president. At this point, begin the allotted time.
3. The event coordinator or an assistant is
responsible for introducing each team by entry
number only when the previous team has finished
its presentation.
4. Teams may take chapter paraphernalia (officer
symbols and gavel only) into the performance
room if desired, or they may use what is provided
by the event coordinator.
5. Conduct the LEAP interview.
a. The LEAP interview will be conducted
immediately following the semifinalist
performance and will last a maximum of five (5)
additional minutes.
b. After the LEAP interview the secretary will have
five (5) additional minutes to complete the
minutes from the meeting.
6. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES
OVERVIEW

Participants create an illustrated children’s story of high
artistic, instructional, and social value. The narrative may
be written in prose or poetry and take the form of a fable,
adventure story, or other structure. The physical story
book should be of high quality, designed to meet the
year’s given theme, which will be posted on the national
TSA website under Competitions/Themes and Problems.
The story must have a Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics (STEM) focus. There are many themes
to consider. For example, from the sciences one could
create a story about dinosaurs, the oceans or their
extraordinary sea life, a single cell animal, or our solar
system and beyond. From technology and engineering
one could concentrate on the impacts of technology in
our lives, or the environment, the building of ancient and
contemporary monuments, or how something works.
From mathematics one could write about numbers and
shapes and the many mathematical designs found in
nature and the industrial world.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams or three (3) individuals per state may
participate.

TIME LIMITS
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Twelve (12) minutes per team are allowed to read
the story and share the illustrations with judges.
2. An additional five (5) minutes is allotted to answer
judges’ questions.
3. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes and will be conducted immediately
following the semifinalist reading/interview.

LEAP

An individual or team LEAP Report is required for this
event and must be submitted at event check-in (see
LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRE-CONFERENCE
1. In preparation for the event (and throughout the
story development), participants research writing
and illustrating children’s books and literature, as
well as the creation of storybooks similar to the
annual design challenge (e.g., pop-ups, interactive
books, etc.).
2. Participants develop a high-quality children’s
storybook with illustrations.
3. Participants “field test” their storybook and
document outcomes and findings.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their storybooks, USB drive,
and a LEAP Report at the time and place stated in
the conference program.
a. NOTE: A documentation portfolio and
storybook must be submitted together in order
for the entry to be judged.
b. No more than two (2) team members drop off
the team’s entry.
2. Storybooks and portfolios are reviewed by judges.
Neither students nor advisors are present at this
time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random
order) will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams report to the event area at the
time and place stated in the conference program
to sign-up for a reading and interview time.
Teams must arrive on time for the semifinal round,
according to their sign-up time.
2. Semifinalist teams will be represented by no more
than two (2) members.
3. One (1) member will be the team’s reader, who will
read the story to the judges.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES

4. Both members will participate in the interview
process following the reading of the story, as well
as, the LEAP interview.
5. No more than two (2) team members pick up the
team’s entry from the display area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the conference award ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. The team will submit a portfolio as a single, multipage PDF document on a USB flash drive, along with
a hard copy of the storybook, at the time and place
designated in the conference program.
B. Storybook:
1. Participants design and create an entirely original
storybook, complete with narrative and illustrations
to meet the annual design challenge.
2. The physical storybook should be of high quality,
designed to meet the age group for which it is
intended.
3. Together with the storybook, the narrative and
accompanying illustrations should result in
an experience that delights, enlightens, and
contributes to the wholesome development of a
child.
4. The storybook and narrative with accompanying
illustrations should take between five (5) and ten
(10) minutes to read and view.

9. There must be a minimum of seven (7) illustrations
that enhance the story and deepen the child’s
understanding and enjoyment of the reading
experience.
a. An illustration on the book’s cover may count
as one (1) of the required seven (7) illustrations.
The team may use the cover illustration within
the story as well.
b. All illustrations MUST be original, freehand,
and/or computer-generated drawings made by
the team member(s).
c. All computer-generated work MUST be
developed from primitive lines and shapes and
be the sole work of the team members(s).
d. Physical or computer templates, previously
existing drawings, characters, backgrounds,
etc., are NOT PERMITTED.
10. Copyrighted material is NOT permitted.
11. The physical storybook must be the original
work of the team members. The book must
be designed, engineered, created, and bound
together solely by the team.
12. Pre-manufactured parts/kits for special interactive
features (e.g. lights/sounds, finger puppets, etc.)
may be included in the construction of the book.
13. If narrative or illustrations appear in the story
and they are not authored by one of the team
members, the team will be disqualified.
14. Photographs used as illustrations are not
permitted.

5. The maximum reading time is twelve (12) minutes.
There is not a minimum length assigned to the
reading time.

15. No professional binding is allowed.

6. The physical storybook must not exceed 12" x 12"
when closed.

17. The story must be no more than fifteen hundred
(1500) words.

7. There is no limit on the number of inside pages
(may be one or two-sided).
8. The team must determine which format best
presents the team’s narrative and illustrations.

16. Photographic verification of the book construction
process must be included in the portfolio.

a. There will be a five (5)-point deduction for
every one hundred (100) words over the fifteen
hundred (1500) word limit.
b. Stories containing two thousand (2000) or
more words will be disqualified.
c. There is no minimum number of words required.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES

C. Documentation/Portfolio:
1. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”)
are required and must be submitted as a single,
multi-page PDF document on a USB flash drive
and submitted with the hard copy storybook.
2. The USB flash drive and its contents become
the property of TSA for communication purposes
only. Publishing rights remain with the authors and
illustrators.
3. No identifying information other than a team/
student identification number is to appear
anywhere on the portfolio or storybook.
4. The portfolio must include the following pages in a
single, multi-page PDF document in this order:
a. LEAP Report
b. Title page with the title of the story, the event
title, the conference city and state, the year;
and the team/individual chapter identification
number; one (1) page
c. Table of contents; pages as needed
d. Purpose of story; one (1) page, to include:
i. Story’s intent
ii. Summary of story line and theme
iii. Intended audience (age, gender,
demographics, and special disabilities, if any)
iv. Word count—number of words comprising
the story’s narrative
e. A summary indicating the academic, as well as
ITEEA standards, used in the creation of the
final project; one (1) page.
f. Photographic verification of book construction
and binding; pages as needed
g. A Plan of Work log (see Forms Appendix) that
describes the development of the narrative,
illustrations, and physical storybook; pages as
needed
i. The Plan of Work log must include a summary
of the storybook’s assessment during a “field
test” with a group of children within the age
group specified in the current year’s theme
which is posted on the TSA website under
Competitions\Themes and Problems.

ii. A “field test” is a reading of the storybook
to a group of children in the intended target
age range, similar to the process outlined in
the semifinal round.
iii. A minimum of two (2) “field tests” must be
conducted.
iv. As part of evaluation, the storybook’s “field
tests” will be measured to ensure that the
book will meet the physical demands of the
age group for which it was intended, and
assess the quality and impact of the story,
illustrations, and the book overall.
v. Participants must document each field test
and record outcomes and findings.
vi. Each field test must also be documented
through photographs (recognizable
individuals must sign a release and consent
form, or have their faces obscured).
vii. Each “field test” must be signed off on by
the chapter advisor.
viii. The Plan of Work Log must be signed off on
by the chapter advisor.
h. Research summary: A written summary of
the research, writing strategies, problems
encountered, and solutions developed in the
writing and illustrating of the story; one (1) page
i. Project summary: A written summary of the
research regarding the creation of storybooks
similar to the annual design challenge (e.g.
paper folding, interactive features in books,
etc.). The summary must include the process
and challenges the team encountered and the
solutions developed in overcoming them; one
(1) page
j. A list of tools, software (if any), and techniques
used in the creation of the physical storybook
and illustrations, not to exceed one (1) page
k. References/research sources; one (1) page

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES

SEMIFINAL ROUND

STEM INTEGRATION

A. Two (2) members of each semifinalist team will report
to the event area at the time and place stated in the
conference program to sign up for a reading and
interview time.

Depending upon the subject written about, this event
may align to one or more STEM areas. Please refer
to the STEM Integration section of this guide for more
information.

B. The team’s reader will be given up to twelve (12)
minutes to read the story to the judges.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

C. The other team member must be prepared to discuss
illustrations included in the story.
D. Both team members will participate in the interview
process (lasting up to five [5] minutes) following the
reading of the story.
E. The LEAP Report

•
•
•
•
•
•

Writer
Illustrator
Educator
Editor
Publisher
Graphic artist

1. Teams document the leadership skills they have
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted as part of the semifinalist
presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The portfolio
2. The story (narrative and illustrations)
3. The physical storybook

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The reading of the book and interview
2. The LEAP requirements and interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Portfolio (a single [multi-page] document in PDF
format) is present on a flash drive.
Storybook is present.
The story is no more than 2,000 words (verified in
documentation).
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Purpose of story
(X1)

The story’s intent, story-line, and
theme are poorly explained, and/
or the intended audience is not
identified.

The story’s intent, story-line, and
theme are adequately explained;
the target audience is identified.

The story’s intent, storyline, and
theme, are complete and well
explained; the target audience is
identified along with additional
information, including age,
demographics, gender, special
abilities, etc.

Word Count

Word count is not provided.

Word count is provided.

Standards summary

A summary indicating the academic
and ITEEA standards is not
complete or is not included.

A summary indicating the academic
and ITEEA standards is included.

A detailed summary of academic
and ITEEA standards is included
along with a description of how they
are addressed through the project.

Photographic
verification of the
book’s construction

Photographic verification of book
construction and binding is not
provided or does not fully illustrate
the process.

Photographic verification of
book construction and binding is
provided.

Photographic verification of
book construction and binding is
provided; photos are captioned and
illustrate the entire process.

Field test
documentation
and photographic
verification

Photographic verification of field
tests of the book are not included;
there is little or no documentation
regarding outcome of field tests;
fewer than two field tests were
conducted.

Photographic verification of field
tests of the book are included; there
is adequate information included
regarding outcome of tests; two field
tests were conducted.

Photographic verification of field
tests of the book are included;
multiple field tests are documented;
photos are captioned; there is
detailed information regarding the
outcome of field tests; two or more
field tests were conducted.

Plan of Work log

The log is poorly organized and/or
incomplete.

The log is adequately detailed
and organized and contains all the
required components, including a
recording of the periodic readings
to children.

The log is well documented
and contains all the required
components, with special attention
given to periodic readings to
children.

(X1)
(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (90 points)

CHILDREN’S STORIES

DOCUMENTATION (90 points) – continued
Summary of
Research
(X1)

The summary of the research,
design, and writing process is
poorly done and/or is incomplete;
there are few references listed
and/or the references listed show
little relevance to the books goals/
objectives.

The summary of the research,
design, and writing process is
generally clear and complete;
there are a sufficient number of
references listed; the quality is
good.

The summary of the research,
design, and writing process is
extremely well written, detailed,
clear, and complete; there are many
high quality references listed and
they reflect research in writing and
illustrating for children and child
development.

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (90 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Story narrative

The narrative is poorly written;
there is little apparent purpose; it
is lacking a coherent theme and
storyline.

The narrative’s purpose is generally
clear, with a focused theme and
storyline; the narrative has good
pacing and development of
characters and/or events.

The narrative is extremely well
written, with a clear purpose; the
storyline is fast paced and exciting;
the details are rich and enchanting.

Illustrations

Artisanship of the illustrations
reflects little technical skill and/
or adds little value to the story’s
narrative, storyline, and/or theme.

Artisanship of most illustrations
reflects good technical skill;
illustrations add to the story’s
narrative, story-line, and theme.

Artisanship of illustrations is
excellent, reflecting sophisticated
technical skills; illustrations enhance
the story’s narrative, story-line,
and theme, and they are of high
aesthetic quality.

Impact

The story (narrative, with the
illustrations) is lacking in purpose
and coherence; it is not very
interesting; the story lacks artistic,
and/or instructional, and/or social
value.

The story (narrative, with the
illustrations) reflects a purpose and
coherence throughout most of
the work; the story reflects artistic,
instructional, and social value;
it is generally compelling and
entertaining.

The story (narrative, with the
illustrations) is beautifully told; it
is compelling, entertaining, and
purposeful, and it reflects high
artistic, instructional, and social
value.

(X3)

(X4)

STORYBOOK SUBTOTAL (100 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________
Story length violation: For stories exceeding 1,500 words, a deduction of 5 points will be incurred for every 100 words
more than 1,500 up to 2,000. Stories of 2000 words or greater will be disqualified. Example: 1600 – 1699 words - 5 points;
1700 – 1799 words - 10 points; 1800 – 1899 words - 15 points; 1900 – 1999 words - 20 points; 2000 words and above, disqualified.

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (190 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

STORYBOOK (100 points)

CHILDREN’S STORIES

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Story’s reading

The story’s reading is lackluster;
the reader shows little enthusiasm;
the delivery is halting and difficult
to understand; the story is read too
quickly to permit viewing of the
illustrations.

The story’s reading is generally
good; the reading is clear and
usually well paced and enthusiastic;
sufficient time is given for reflection
on the illustrations.

The story’s reading is exemplary;
the reading is clear, well paced, and
enthusiastic; sufficient time is given
to reflect upon and appreciate the
illustrations.

Interview

Responses to the judges’ questions
are incomplete and/or poorly
articulated; responses show little
understanding of the research or
development of the project.

Most of the judges’ questions are
answered with articulation and show
some understanding of most of the
concepts addressed.

Responses to judges’ questions
are detailed and articulate; the
answers reflect a high degree of
understanding of the development
of children’s literature, including
the artistic and technical concepts
in both writing and illustrating for
children.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/ or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(X2)

(22 points;
10% of the total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL READING AND INTERVIEW (52 points)

SEMIFINAL READING AND INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (52 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (52 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (242 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES

CHILDREN’S STORIES
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more for portfolio
judging
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more for semifinalist
readings/interviews
C. Assistants for check-in, two (2)

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Each entry must include the participant’s
identification number in the upper right-hand
corner of the entry.
5. Position the entries for evaluation and viewing.
6. Secure the entries in the designated area.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently assess the entries.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these on the
rating form.
3. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
5. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
semifinal presentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CHILDREN’S STORIES
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the readings/interviews
are to take place. Ensure that there is a table and
seating for the interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the event begins.
3. Conduct semifinalist readings/interviews using the
same official rating form used for the preliminary
round. Judges should be sure to ask interview
questions.
4. Conduct the LEAP interview. The LEAP interview
will be conducted immediately following the
semifinalist reading/interview and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these on the
rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure for
breaking ties before the onsite competition begins.
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CODING
OVERVIEW

Participants respond to an annual coding-related design
challenge by developing a software program that will
accurately address an onsite problem in a specified,
limited amount of time. Specific elements to be used,
such as the programming language, operating system, or
application programming interface (API), will be released
onsite. Every effort will be made to support a wide variety
of programming languages, and the specific languages
that will be allowed each year will be posted on the TSA
website under Competitions/Themes and Problems.
Completed solutions will be objectively measured to
determine the best and most effective solution for the
stated problem.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) individual, or one (1) team of two (2) members per
chapter may participate; one (1) entry per individual or
team.

TIME LIMITS
1. The allotted time for the design and construction
of the solution is two (2) hours.
2. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

An individual or team LEAP Report is required for this
event and must be submitted at event check-in (see
LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
Participants must submit a LEAP Report prior to
receiving the onsite problem.
2. The problem, evaluation criteria, and materials are
distributed.

3. Participants design and present a solution to the
problem.
4. Each solution is tested and presented to the
judges as soon as possible after the coding phase
is completed.
5. Judges independently assess the entries.
6. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for,
and participate in, a semifinalist LEAP interview.
2. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants in this event should concentrate their
efforts prior to the competition on researching,
understanding, and practicing all aspects of the
coding process, software development, operating
systems, programming languages, etc.
B. The specific languages permitted in the onsite
competition will be posted each year on the TSA
website under Competitions/Themes and Problems.
C. All work must be completed in the event area during
the time specified for the event.
D. Individual participants, or each team, must bring
1. one (1) laptop or other device (ex: Microsoft
Surface Pro), capable of networking via Wi-Fi, and
running solely on battery power for up to two (2)
consecutive hours
2. one (1) spare battery
3. pencils and paper
E. External keyboards, monitors, and mice are not
permitted.
F. Printed reference materials are not allowed.
G. Participants will NOT have access to the Internet
during the event.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CODING

H. Participants do NOT have access to electrical power/
outlets during the event.
I. Participants must have all software development
tools needed for the competition downloaded and
accessible on their laptop or other device.
J. Participants may only use the permissible
programming language’s standard library during the
onsite competition. No third-party libraries may be
used.
K. Participants will be presented with a series of coding
problems that must be completed onsite at the
conference.
L. All solutions must be tested, demonstrated, and
presented by participants in front of the judges
exclusively through electronic submission and
evaluation.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The successful completion of the problems and
the time in which it takes individuals or teams to
complete all the challenges.
2. A finite measure will be defined in the problem
and will be used to determine the best solution.
a. Second-best attempts or other objective criteria
are used to break ties when possible.
b. Only as a last resort will subjective criteria, such
as originality, be used to evaluate solutions.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The content and quality of the LEAP Report and interview
will be evaluated.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

RESOURCES

The USA Computing Olympiad website and the ACMICPC International website are helpful resources for the
Coding event. Additional resources that can be used to
prepare for the event are listed below:

2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview.

icpc.baylor.edu/compete/preparation

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

www.usaco.org/index.php?page=contests

www.codechef.com
blog.hackerearth.com/2013/09/competitiveprogramming-getting-started_11.html
www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-strategy-to-improvemy-skills-in-competitive-programming-in-2-3-months

STEM INTEGRATION

Depending upon the subject of the problem, this event
may align to one or more STEM areas.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
• Computer software engineer
• Mathematician

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CODING

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Code Quality

The logic of the code cannot be
followed or is difficult to follow; no
comments or very few comments
are present in the code.

The logic of the code is sometimes
easy to follow by reading through
submitted source files; some
comments are present, but
comments are not always present
where necessary

The logic of the code is easy to
follow by reading through the
submitted source files; sections
where logic may be unavoidably
difficult to follow are commented
appropriately.

Use of Standard
Libraries

The solutions do not appropriately
use standard libraries for the
language in which they are written;
solutions attempt to use or import
third party libraries

The solutions attempt to use
standard libraries available or
sometimes use standard libraries
available for the language in which
they are written.

The solutions make appropriate use
of the standard libraries available
for the language in which they are
written; no attempt is made to use or
import a third-party library.

(X2)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT (30 points)

SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT SUBTOTAL (30 points)

TESTING OF SOLUTION (60 points)
Evaluation: A finite unit of measure, such as elapsed time, linear distance, and/or strength, etc., is used to determine ranking.
1st: 60 Points

2nd: 55 Points

3rd: 50 Points

4th: 45 Points

5th: 40 Points

6th: 35 Points

7th: 30 Points

8th: 25 Points

9th: 20 Points

10th: 15 Points

11th: 10 Points

12th: 5 Points

TESTING OF SOLUTION SUBTOTAL (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (90 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CODING

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are adequately communicated,
include some detail, are clear,
and/or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation of
the SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fully-detailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (9 points)

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (9 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (9 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (99 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

100

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CODING

CODING EVENT
COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
a. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
b. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
c. Assistants for set-up, monitoring, and clean-up
of onsite activity, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. Results envelope with coordinator forms
7. Envelopes for LEAP Reports
8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for participants
C. Tables and chairs for judges, to be used for
information distribution and evaluation
D. A copy of a well-written, technologically appropriate
problem for each participant/team that can be
objectively measured
E. Adequate conditions, tools, materials, monitoring, and
testing devices for the problem
F. Stopwatch or clock for timekeeper

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with judges to review time limits, procedures,
and regulations. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
event begins.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors and checking the entry list.
2. Collect LEAP Reports.
3. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
4. Participants registered but not present may be
disqualified.
5. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
6. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
7. Check tools, materials, and monitoring and testing
devices.
8. Once participants/teams are seated and general
announcements have been given, distribute and
review the problem and start the time.
9. Judges and monitors observe the entire
development phase, with judges measuring
solutions as soon as appropriate.
10. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or

2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

b. To disqualify the entry

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

101

CODING
11. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists
and discuss and break any ties. (Determine the
procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
12. Submit semifinalist results and all related forms in
the results envelope to the CRC room.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Meet with semifinalists at the time and place stated
in the conference program to allow them to sign
up for a LEAP interview time.
2. Inspect the area in which the LEAP interviews will
take place. Ensure that there is a table and seating
for participants and judges.
3. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
semifinalist interviews begin.
4. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ranking of the ten (10)
finalists and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

102

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD),
ARCHITECTURE
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use complex
computer graphic skills, tools, and processes to develop
representations of architectural subjects such as
foundation and/or floor plans, and/or elevation drawings,
and/or details of architectural ornamentation or cabinetry.

ELIGIBILITY

Two (2) individuals per state may participate. Participants
may compete in either CAD, Architecture or CAD,
Engineering, not both events.

TIME LIMITS
1. Forty-five (45) minutes is allowed for set-up time.
2. Four (4) hours is allowed for participants to develop
drawing(s).
3. One (1) hour is allotted for the final evaluation.
4. All individuals will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

5. Participants work independently, without
assistance from judges, teachers, fellow
participants, other students, or observers.
6. Participants are advised to save their work on their
hard drives every fifteen (15) minutes.
7. At the end of the session, participants save their
work on their hard drives and on a USB flash drive.
8. One (1) additional hour is spent interviewing the
participants and evaluating the entries from each
participant’s computer monitor.
9. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the event-specific interview.
10. A list of twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random
order) will be posted.
11. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated by in the conference program to
pick up their equipment.
12. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the award ceremony.

REGULATIONS

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
1. Participants bring their own computer systems (see
Regulation A) to the event area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
2. Participants must submit a LEAP Report prior to
receiving the design problem.
3. Each participant, with one (1) assistant (an instructor,
fellow student, or adult chaperone), is allowed to
set up and test the equipment. At the end of the
forty-five (45)-minute set-up period, assistants are
required to leave the area.
4. Participants are given a design problem to solve in
a four (4)-hour work session.

A. Participants provide their own systems, including
1. hardware (only one [1] CPU and one [1] monitor),
capable of reading a USB flash drive; laptops are
recommended
2. software
3. one (1) USB flash drive
4. power strip/surge protector
5. reference materials
B. A table, chair, sketching paper, and electricity will be
supplied for each participant.
C. Participants are required to provide their own pencils.
D. Participants are not permitted to share solutions to
problems, reference materials, hardware, or software.
E. Participants identify their work using only their student
identification number.
F. USB flash drives, and the work they contain, become
the property of TSA.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

103

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE

G. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview, which will be conducted as part of eventspecific interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
1. Entries are evaluated on screen according to the
criteria on the official rating form.
2. The LEAP requirements and interview will also be
evaluated.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

104

Architect
Automobile designer
CAD professional
Machine designer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CAD, ARCHITECTURE

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Design

The layout and design of the
drawing as presented do not create
an effective model for the problem
assigned.

The layout and design of the
drawing as presented create a
somewhat effective model for the
problem assigned.

The layout and design of the
drawing completely and effectively
model the problem assigned.

Functionality

The design as drawn is impractical,
disorganized, and lacks directional
flow.

The design is somewhat practical in
directional flow and organization.

The design is clearly effective,
practical, and functional.

Originality

The design drawing provides few,
if any, attempts at originality or
deviation from the traditional.

The design drawing attempts to be
somewhat creative and shows some
evidence of being non-traditional.

The design drawing provides a
unique and creative quality of
newness that departs from tradition.

Aesthetics

The design is unappealing and fails
to capture the observer’s attention.

The design is somewhat pleasing
and appealing and attempts to
capture the observer’s attention.

The overall design is pleasing and
appealing and effectively draws
attention to its appearance/beauty.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM (40 points)

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM SUBTOTAL (40 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Views

The correct views have not been
selected and/or used throughout
the drawing process and final layout.

Most of the views that have been
selected and used are correct and
in the proper layout format.

All of the views that have been
selected and used are correct and
in the proper layout.

Detailing

Many of the details are missing or
incorrectly placed.

Most of the details are included and
correctly placed.

All the necessary details are
included and placed correctly.

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

LAYOUT (60 points)

105

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE

LAYOUT (60 points) – continued
Lettering

The choice of font style, size, color,
and application is inappropriate for
the drawing assignment.

The choice of font style, size, color,
and application is appropriate, with
few inconsistencies/variations.

The choice of appropriate font style,
size, color, and application is clearly
evident and applied consistently.

Dimensioning

Many of the necessary dimensions
are missing and/or are incorrectly
placed.

Most of the necessary dimensions
are included and/or are correctly
placed.

All necessary dimensions are
included and correctly placed.

Scale

The scale selected for the drawings
is incorrect and improperly noted.

The scale selected for most aspects
of the drawings is correct and
properly noted.

The scale selected for all aspects of
the drawings is correct and properly
noted.

(X1)

LAYOUT SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Use of symbols

Many, if not most, of the symbols
selected and used are incorrect.

Most of the symbols selected
and used are correct and/or
appropriately placed.

All of the symbols selected and
used are correct and appropriately
placed.

Appropriate
standards

There is little or no evidence of
an appropriate application of
architectural standards in the
completed design and drawings.

There is some evidence of
an appropriate application of
architectural standards in the
completed design and drawings.

There is clear evidence of an
effective and appropriate application
of architectural standards in the
completed design and drawings.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION (20 points)

ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION SUBTOTAL (20 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

CAD functions

There is little evidence of an
understanding and application of
CAD functions.

There is evidence of a general
understanding and effective
application of CAD functions.

A complete and effective
understanding and application of
CAD functions is evident.

CAD features

There is little evidence of an
understanding and application of
CAD special features.

There is a general understanding
and application of CAD special
features.

There is a complete understanding
and application of the various
special features of CAD.

(X1)

SOFTWARE UTILIZATION SUBTOTAL (20 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

106

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOFTWARE UTILIZATION (20 points)

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s efforts are
adequately communicated, include
some detail, are clear, and/or are
generally convincing; identification
and/or incorporation of the
SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (14 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (14 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (154 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

107

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges, two (2) or more
C. Assistants, one (1)

5. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with judges to review time limits, procedures,
and regulations. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
event begins.

D. Statement of problem as a hard-copy sketch, pages
as needed.

7. At the end of the forty-five (45)-minute set-up time,
non-participants are required to leave the event
area.

RESPONSIBILITIES

8. Review with the participants the time limits,
procedures, regulations, and protocol of the event.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and check the contents of
the coordinator’s packet.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.

9. Remind participants to save their work at regular
time intervals.
10. Distribute copies of the CAD problem. Answer any
appropriate questions concerning the problem.
11. Begin the event and announce the ending time.
12. During the event, the judges and assistants
monitor and evaluate participant progress and
work.
13. Announce the time remaining to work at one (1)
hour, thirty (30) minutes, fifteen (15) minutes, and
five (5) minutes before time is called.
14. When time is called, participants stop and save
their work on their hard drives and on their USB
flash drives.

108

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ARCHITECTURE
15. Collect the entries, checking to be sure each one
is labeled with the student’s identification number.
16. Participants remain at their computers for up
to one (1) hour as evaluation of the entries is
completed.
17. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
18. Judges independently assess the entries.
19. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
20.Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists and
ten (10) finalists, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
21. Submit semifinalist and finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
22.If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

109

110

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD),
ENGINEERING
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use complex
computer graphic skills, tools, and processes to develop
three (3)-dimensional representations of engineering
subjects such as a machine part, tool, device, or
manufactured product.

ELIGIBILITY

Two (2) individuals per state may participate. Participants
may compete in either CAD, Architecture or CAD,
Engineering, not both events.

REGULATIONS

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

A. Participants provide their own systems, including
1. hardware (only one [1] CPU and one [1] monitor),
capable of reading a USB flash drive; laptops are
recommended

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

2. software

PROCEDURE

4. power strip/surge protector

1. Participants bring their own computer systems (see
Regulation A) to the event area at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
2. Participants must submit a LEAP Report prior to
receiving the design problem.
3. Each participant, with one (1) assistant (an instructor,
fellow student, or adult chaperone), is allowed to
set up and test the equipment. At the end of the
forty-five (45)-minute set-up period, assistants are
required to leave the area.
4. Participants are given a design problem to solve in
a four (4)-hour work session.

3. one (1) USB flash drive
5. reference materials
B. A table, chair, sketching paper, and electricity will be
supplied for each participant.
C. Participants are required to provide their own pencils.
D. Participants are not permitted to share solutions to
problems, reference materials, hardware, or software.
E. Participants identify their work using only their student
identification number.
F. USB flash drives, and the work they contain, become
the property of TSA.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

111

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

112

Engineer
Automobile designer
CAD professional
Machine designer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

CAD, ENGINEERING

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Design

The layout and design of the
drawing as presented do not create
an effective model for the problem
assigned.

The layout and design of the
drawing as presented are somewhat
effective in modeling the problem
assigned.

The layout and design of the
drawing completely and effectively
model the problem assigned.

Functionality

The design as drawn lacks order of
direction and is impractical.

The design is somewhat practical
in directional flow and overall
organization.

The design is completely effective,
practical, and functional.

Originality

The design drawing provides no
quality of newness or deviation from
tradition.

The design drawing shows some
attempt to be creative and less nontraditional.

The design drawing provides a
unique and creative quality of
newness that departs from tradition.

Aesthetics

The design is unappealing and fails
to capture the observer’s attention.

The design is somewhat pleasing
and appealing and attempts to
capture the observer’s attention.

The design as drawn is pleasing
and appealing and effectively draws
attention to its appearance/beauty.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM (40 points)

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM SUBTOTAL (40 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Correct geometry

The correct views and orientation
have not been selected or used
throughout the drawing process and
final layout.

Most of the views and orientation
selected and used are correct and
in the proper layout format.

All of the views and orientation that
have been selected and used are
correct and in the proper layout.

Detailing

Many of the details are missing or
placed incorrectly.

Most of the details are included and
are correctly placed.

All necessary details are included
and are placed correctly.

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

LAYOUT (60 points)

113

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING

LAYOUT (60 points) – continued
Lettering

The choice of font style, size, color,
and application is inappropriate for
the drawing assignment.

The choice of font style, size, color,
and application is appropriate, with
few inconsistencies/variations.

The choice of appropriate font style,
size, color, and application is clearly
evident and applied consistently.

Dimensioning

Many of the necessary dimensions
are missing and/or placed
incorrectly.

Most of the required dimensions are
included and placed correctly.

All of the necessary dimensions are
included and correctly placed.

Scale

The scale selected for the drawings
is incorrect and not properly noted.

The scale selected for most aspects
of the drawings is correct and
properly noted.

The scale selected for all aspects of
the drawings is correct and properly
noted.

(X1)

LAYOUT SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Application of
practices

Many, if not most, of the engineering
practices selected and used are
incorrectly applied.

Most of the engineering practices
selected and used are correctly
applied.

All of the engineering practices
selected and used are correctly and
appropriately applied.

Appropriate use of
conventions

There is little or no evidence of an
effective application of engineering
conventions in the completed
design and drawings.

There is some evidence of an
effective application of engineering
conventions in the completed
design and drawings.

There is clear evidence of an
effective and knowledgeable
application of engineering
conventions in the completed
design and drawings.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ENGINEERING APPLICATION (20 points)

ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBTOTAL (20 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

CAD functions

There is little evidence of an
understanding and application of
CAD functions.

There is evidence of a general
understanding and effective
application of CAD functions.

A complete and effective
understanding and application of
CAD functions is evident.

CAD features

There is little evidence of
understanding and application of
CAD special features.

There is a general understanding
and application of CAD special
features.

There is complete understanding
and application of the various
special features of CAD.

(X1)

114

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOFTWARE UTILIZATION (20 points)

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (14 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (14 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (154 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

115

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING EVENT
COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges, two (2) or more
C. Assistants, one (1)

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and check the contents of
the coordinator’s packet.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with judges to review time limits, procedures,
and regulations. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
event begins.

116

PRELIMINARY/SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. As participants arrive, check the coordinator’s
report and assign participants to work stations.
2. Collect LEAP Reports.
3. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
4. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
5. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
6. Allow forty-five (45) minutes for participants
and their assistants (no more than one [1] per
participant) to set up equipment.
7. At the end of the forty-five (45)-minute set-up time,
non-participants are required to leave the event
area.
8. Review with the participants the time limits,
procedures, regulations, and protocol of the event.
9. Remind participants to save their work at regular
time intervals.
10. Distribute copies of the CAD problem. Answer any
appropriate questions concerning the problem.
11. Begin the event and announce the ending time.
12. During the event, the judges and assistants
monitor and evaluate participant progress and
work.
13. Announce the time remaining to work at one (1)
hour, thirty (30) minutes, fifteen (15) minutes, and
five (5) minutes before time is called.
14. When time is called, participants stop and save
their work on their hard drives and on their USB
flash drives.
15. Collect the entries, checking to be sure each one
is labeled with the student’s identification number.
16. Participants remain at their computers for up
to one (1) hour as evaluation of the entries is
completed.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD), ENGINEERING
17. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
18. Judges independently assess the entries.
19. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
20.Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists and
ten (10) finalists, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
21. Submit semifinalist and finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
22.If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

117

118

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER INTEGRATED
MANUFACTURING (CIM)
OVERVIEW

Participants design, fabricate, and use Computer
Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) to create a product
that will showcase the current year’s theme found on
the national TSA website under Competitions/Themes
and Problems. The product may use additive and/or
subtractive manufacturing of any traditional, Computer
Numerical Control (CNC), 3D printing, or laser technology
available. Documentation, one (1) completed sample,
and one (1) set of manufactured parts are checked in and
evaluated. Semifinalist teams assemble their entry and
give a live promotional sales pitch to judges.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of two to six (2-6) individuals per chapter
may participate, one (1) entry per team.

TIME LIMITS
1. Semifinalists will deliver a sales pitch lasting up
to two (2) minutes, during which time each team
member will demonstrate the product.
Note: Exceeding the two (2)-minute time limit
results in a deduction of five (5) points for every
fifteen (15) seconds over the limit.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part
of the semifinalist demonstration and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Teams check in their documentation, product,
manufactured pieces of their entry, and a LEAP
Report for evaluation during check-in at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
2. Entries are evaluated and semifinalist teams are
determined.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists, in random order,
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams report at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
2. Each team will make a sales pitch about their
product to “potential buyers” (judges and the
audience) in the room.
3. The sales pitch will begin on the timekeeper’s
signal.
4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist demonstration (sales pitch).
5. The top ten (10) finalists will announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and should be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; one (1) page

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

119

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)

4. A working drawing of the parts manufactured.
a. The parts must be clearly labeled and include
dimensions, with an identifying leader and a
label, as shown in a parts list.
b. A bill of materials also must be included on the
working drawing.
c. The paper size is 11" x 17", folded, with the
drawing facing out and placed in the portfolio;
one(1) page
5. An isometric assembly drawing showing the
promotional product and all its parts; the paper
size is 11" x 17", folded, with the drawing facing out
and placed in the portfolio; one (1) page
6. Detail drawings of each part manufactured should
be labeled to match the items in the parts list (from
the working drawing). The paper size is 8½" x 11";
pages as needed (to show all machined parts)
7. Photographic images (actual photographs,
not renderings) of designs tested, with a three
(3)-sentence descriptive caption per image of
what was improved or proved by the testing of the
design; two (2) pages maximum
8. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); pages as needed
9. Proof (receipts) that the material cost for fabricated
parts is no more than five dollars ($5.00)
B. Materials
1. The sample work pieces will contain the
subtractive and/or additive (CNC/3D printing)
machined parts of the promotional product.
2. The major and minor parts of the entry must fit into
an 11" x 17" x 3" frame, with no stacking of parts.
Parts may not be connected.
3. The assembled product must be accurate
and within tolerances + or - .0625 or 1⁄₁₆" of the
dimensions provided in the documentation
drawings and in the fabricated parts.

120

4. Fabricated parts
a. The finished product must not exceed the
dimensions 7" x 7" x 7".
b. Three (3) major parts are required; major
parts are those with drawings that have been
manufactured.
c. Plastic, wood, or metal may be used for any of
the parts for the promotional product.
d. Machined parts submitted for judging must be
removed from the waste stock.
e. Parts may be finished (i.e., painted or sanded), if
necessary.
5. Stock fasteners may be used, provided they can
be installed with the tools in the tool box; they may
include, but are not limited to:
a. Nuts
b. Washers
c. Screws
d. Wing nuts
e. Other fasteners that can be attached with the
tools in the tool box

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Sales pitch session
1. Team members will present a two (2)-minute sales
pitch about their promotional product.
2. The team will explain the production cost per unit,
the materials used to make the product, and price
breaks of units based on purchase.
3. No electronic devices may be used in the sales
pitch.
4. A promotional flyer or brochure may be given to
judges as part of the sales pitch; the brochure size
is limited to one double-sided page on 8½" x 11"
paper.
5. Exceeding the two (2)-minute limit results in a
deduction of five (5) points for every fifteen (15)
seconds over the limit.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)

B. Failure to meet the guidelines
1. A 20% deduction of the total possible points will
be made for failure to meet one (1) qualification.
2. If an entry fails to meet two (2) qualification
regulations, it will be removed from competition.
3. The coordinator may stop a demonstration if a
safety issue becomes evident.
C. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills they have
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted as part of the semifinalist
presentation/interview and will last a maximum of
five (5) additional minutes.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
1. The documentation
2. The component analysis
3. The LEAP requirements
4. The sales pitch/demonstration (semifinalists only)
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

Commercial and industrial designer
Engineer
Mechanical engineer
CNC programmer or operator

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

121

COMPUTER INTEGRATED
MANUFACTURING (CIM)
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10 points)
performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the scores earned for
the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The X1 or X2 notation in the
criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining the points earned. (Example: an
“adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion = 7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an
X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance
for any criterion is not met.

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items
below are present; indicate presence with a check
mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item
blank and place a check mark in the box labeled
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED box, the entry is not to be judged.
Sample product is present.
Manufactured parts are present.
Documentation is present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is unorganized and
three or more components or
sections are missing.

The portfolio is generally well
organized and may be missing only
one or two components or sections.

The portfolio is exceptionally well
organized and contains all required
components or sections.

Work piece layout
drawing

The work piece layout drawing is
poorly executed, with key elements
missing.

The work piece layout drawing
is included but missing some
elements.

The work piece layout drawing is
complete and correctly executed,
with all elements included.

Isometric assembly
drawing

The isometric assembly drawing
is not complete, with many of the
required elements missing.

The isometric assembly drawing
is present, but it is missing several
required key elements.

The isometric assembly drawing
is complete and correct, with all
required elements included.

Detail drawings
(X1)

The detail drawings are not
complete, with many of the required
elements missing.

The detail drawings are present but
may be missing several required
key elements.

The detail drawings are complete
and correct, with all required
elements included.

Design
photographs

Only one photograph of designs
tested is included.

Two photographs of designs tested
are included.

More than two photographs of
designs tested are included.

Descriptions/
analysis

There is little description of the
design testing process and analysis.

One description of design testing
and analysis is included.

Several descriptions of design
testing and analysis are included.

Plan of Work log

The Plan of Work log is not
complete.

The Plan of Work log is included and
mostly complete.

The Plan of Work log is complete
and fully documents project work.

Theme

The effort is basic, with only a loose
association to the product theme.

The effort adequately addresses the
product theme.

The effort to address the product
theme exceeds expectations.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

(X2)
(X1)
(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (100 points)

122

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (100 points)

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Additive or
subtractive
manufacturing
piece

The overall dimensions are .25(¼)
inches greater or less than the size
specified on the layout drawing.

The overall dimensions are .125(⅛)
inches greater or less than the size
specified on the layout drawing.

The overall dimensions are the
correct size, as specified on the
layout drawing.

Product cost sheet

The product cost sheet has few
parts of the finished product broken
down individually; the cost is more
than $5 per product.

The product cost sheet has most
parts of the finished product broken
down individually; the cost is $5 or
less per product.

The product cost sheet has each
part of the finished product broken
down individually with material
amount and the amount used; the
cost is $5 or less per product.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

COMPONENT ANALYSIS (40 points)

(X3)
(X1)

COMPONENT ANALYSIS SUBTOTAL (40 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (140 points)

SEMIFINAL QUALIFICATION REGULATIONS
Place an x in the noncompliant or compliant box, as appropriate for each regulation. If one regulation is noncompliant, a deduction of 20% of
the total possible points will apply (see rules violations box).

Regulation

Noncompliant

Compliant

Team of two

Only one (1) team member is present.

At least two (2) team members are present.

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participants seem unorganized
and unprepared for the sales pitch/
demonstration; illogical explanation
of the project is presented.

Participants are generally prepared
for the sales pitch/demonstration;
explanation of the project is
communicated and generally
organized.

The sales pitch/demonstration is
logical, well organized, and easy
to follow; the project concept is
communicated in a concise manner.

Knowledge

Participants seem to have little
understanding of the concepts in
their project; answers to questions
may be vague.

Participants exhibit an
understanding of the concepts in
their project.

Participants show clear evidence
of a thorough understanding of the
concepts in their project.

Articulation

The sales pitch is full of illogical
thoughts that lack clarity.

The sales pitch is somewhat logical
and easy-to-understand and follow.

The sales pitch provides a clear,
concise, and easy-to-follow
description of the project.

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW (69 points)

123

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW (69 points) – continued
Delivery

The sales pitch is full of illogical
thoughts that lack clarity, and/
or there is insufficient information
provided describing the project.

The sales pitch is somewhat
logical, easy-to-follow, and/or there
is sufficient information provided
describing the project.

The sales pitch is clear, concise, and
there is ample information provided
describing the project.

Team participation

The majority of the delivery is made
by one member of the team; the
partners may be disengaged from
the sales pitch.

Team members generally are
engaged in the process, though
one member may take on more
responsibility than the others.

Team members are actively involved
in the sales pitch and responses to
interview questions; there is shared
responsibility on the part of team
members.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of SLC Practices and
Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(19 points;
10% of total
event points)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (69 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (69 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (209 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

124

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
C. Timekeeper, one (1)
D. Assistants at check-in, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. Results envelope
7. Stopwatch
8. Envelope for LEAP Reports
9. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for check-in assistants, the timer,
judges, and the event coordinator
C. Tables for display of entries; chairs for each team
member

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

4. Inspect the area in which the portfolios are being
placed for appropriate set-up including sufficient
number and size of tables.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Each entry must include the team’s identification
number in the upper right-hand corner of the entry.
5. Position the entries for evaluation and viewing.
6. Secure the entries in the designated area.

2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

3. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.

4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
5. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
final presentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

125

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING (CIM)
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the sales pitches/
interviews are to take place. Ensure that there is a
table and seating for the interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the event begins.
3. Conduct the sales pitch demonstration sessions.
The LEAP interview will be conducted as part
of the semifinalist demonstration and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

126

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES
OVERVIEW

The skill of debating is essential for government,
business, and technology leaders as our society faces
new challenges in areas such as medicine, space
exploration, pollution, global warming, economics,
manufacturing, and agriculture. Tied to these challenges
is the necessity for proficiency in science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Developing
debate and communication skills in students, in
conjunction with a focus on topics related to STEM, is an
effective way to increase technological literacy.
In this event, team members work together to prepare for
a debate against a team from another chapter. The teams
will be instructed to take either the Pro or Con side of a
selected subtopic.
The theme (and subtopics) for this event will be posted
on the national TSA website under Competitions/Themes
and Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams of two (2) individuals per state may
participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. For the debate, see Preliminary Round, Procedure
2.6 for time limits.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following each semifinalist debate round and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes (per team).

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants research all subtopics and should be
prepared to debate any of the subtopics from both
Pro and Con views.
a. All participants will be assigned the same
subtopic.
b. A new subtopic may be assigned for the
semifinals, and all participants will debate that
new subtopic.
2. Pre-debate meeting
a. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program to
receive an assigned debate time, a subtopic,
general directions, and information from the
judging team.
b. Failure of participants to attend this meeting will
result in disqualification.
c. This meeting will be held for both preliminary
heats and the semifinal portion of the event.
d. Participants will be reminded in this meeting to
not state their individual or school name in the
presence of judges.
e. Teams must submit a LEAP Report at the predebate meeting in order to compete.
3. Each team reports to the preparation room fifteen
(15) minutes before the scheduled debate time.
4. One (1) minute before teams are instructed to
report to the presentation room, each team will be
informed of the view (Pro or Con) of the issue it will
present to the judges.
5. Once the teams are informed of the view they are
to take, they will be escorted to the debate room.
6. Order of debate format:

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

a. Pro Speaker (maximum of 2 minutes)
b. Con Speaker (maximum of 2 minutes)
c. Break (1 minute)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

127

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

d. Pro Cross Examination of Con
(maximum of 2 minutes)
e. Con Cross Examination of Pro
(maximum of 2 minutes)
f. Break (1 minute)
g. Pro Rebuttal (maximum of 2 minutes)
h. Con Rebuttal (maximum of 2 minutes)
7. During cross-examination, the team answering the
questions remains seated.
8. The escort will introduce the Pro team by
identification number and the team will be
instructed to sit to the left side of the podium.
a. The first speaker should sit next to the podium.
b. At this time, participants will present their
schedule card and reference summary to the
judges.
9. The Con team will be introduced by identification
number and will be instructed to sit to the right
side of the podium.
a. The first speaker should sit next to the podium.
b. At this time, participants will present their
schedule card and reference summary to the
judges.
10. When the judges and teams are ready, the Pro
speaker will be instructed to move to the podium
and begin.
a. Timing starts when the speaker begins.
b. After one (1) minute and forty-five (45) seconds,
the timer will hold up a 4" x 6" card that reads
“15 seconds.”
c. Penalty points will be deducted if a speaker
exceeds the allotted time.
11. When the Pro speaker is finished and has been
seated, the Con speaker will move to the podium
and begin, according to the same procedure
noted above.

12. When the Con speaker is finished and has been
seated, the timer will announce a one (1)-minute
conference period in which both teams may
prepare their questions for cross examination.
13. At the conclusion of the one (1)-minute conference
period, the timer will announce that the conference
period is over and the Pro questioning speaker will
approach the podium.
a. Timing starts when the speaker begins.
b. After one (1) minute and forty-five (45) seconds,
the timer will hold up a 4" x 6" card that reads
“15 seconds.”
c. If the con team is in the process of answering
a question, the team may finish its answer,
provided it does not exceed an additional 15
seconds beyond the allotted two (2) minutes. At
this time, the team will be cut off by the timer.
14. When the Pro questioning speaker is seated,
the Con questioning speaker will approach the
podium.
a. Timing starts when the speaker begins.
b. After one (1) minute and forty-five (45) seconds,
the timer will hold up a 4" x 6" card that reads
“15 seconds.”
c. If the pro team is in the process of answering
a question, the team may finish its answer,
provided it does not exceed an additional 15
seconds beyond the allotted two (2) minutes. At
this time, the team will be cut off by the timer.
15. At the conclusion of the cross examination, the
teams will be given a one (1) minute conference
break to prepare their rebuttals.
16. The timer will announce the end of the conference
break and the Pro rebuttal speaker will approach
the podium.
a. Timing starts when the speaker begins.
b. After one (1) minute and forty-five (45) seconds
the timer will hold up a 4" x 6" card that reads
“15 seconds.”
c. Penalty points will be deducted if a speaker
exceeds the allotted time.

128

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

17. When the Pro rebuttal speaker is finished and has
been seated, the Con rebuttal speaker will move
to the podium and begin, according to the same
procedure noted above in Procedure 16.
18. When the Con rebuttal speaker is finished and
has been seated, the timer will announce to both
teams that they may leave the debate room.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants must debate the current year’s selected
subtopic, as assigned at the conference.
B. Pre-written notes may be used. Notes must be written
on 3" x 5" notecards.

19. If there is an odd number of teams entered in the
event, one team will debate twice, based on a
random drawing for teams that wish to go twice.
(Note that the coordinator may not force a team to
go twice if it does not wish to do so.)

C. Handwritten notes may be taken during the debate.

20.If a team debates twice, it may or may not have the
same side of the debate.

F. Participants are not allowed to hear the debates of
other teams, aside from the team they are debating.

a. The team will also be required to provide
an additional copy of the Resource List (see
Regulation M) to the judges.
b. The highest score of the twice-debating team
will be used as its score.
21. If preliminary heats are used, twelve (12)
semifinalists will be posted in random order.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will report to the event area at the
time and place stated in the conference program
to receive an assigned debate time, as well
as general directions and information from the
judging team. Note that a different subtopic from
the preliminary round may or may not be used.
2. Each team reports to the preparation room at its
assigned time.
3. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take place
immediately following each semifinalist debate
round.
4. Preliminary round, Procedures 4-18 will be followed
to determine the ten (10) finalists.
5. Room set-up:
Pro Team
Judge

Podium
Timer

Con Team
Judge

D. A three (3)-ring binder of reference materials, as noted
on the summary provided to the judges, may be used
during the debate.
E. No audio-visual materials of any type may be used.

G. Participants may use their own stopwatches to
time themselves. These may only be traditional
stopwatches; cell phone stop watches are NOT
ALLOWED.
H. No observers or assistants are allowed in the
preparation room.
I. No observers are allowed to view the preliminary
heats.
J. Teams are penalized five (5) points for speaking over
the allotted time.
K. Participants must both present at different times
during the debate. Only one (1) speaker per side is
allowed at the podium at any time.
L. Cross examination (questioning) of the opposing team
is to remain civil. Any aggressive behavior, belittling
of opponents, or shouting will result in immediate
disqualification of the offending team.
M. Each team is required to submit a summary of
references (used to prepare for the event) on an
8½" x 11" sheet of paper; both sides of the paper
may be used.
1. The event title, the event’s yearly topic, and a line
for the entry number must be printed at the top of
the front side of the paper.
2. The reference summary must be typewritten
(handwritten is not acceptable).
3. Font size must not be less than 10 point.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

129

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

4. MLA format must be used to cite sources.
5. References for all three (3) subtopics are to be
submitted on one (1) sheet of paper, not a separate
sheet for each subtopic.
6. The summary of references must be given to the
judges at both preliminary heats and semifinalist
rounds.
7. Not having a summary of references will result in a
rules violation deduction.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
(In addition to the Preliminary Round regulations)
A. Observers are allowed in the debate room during the
semifinalist debates.
1. No audio or visual recording devices are allowed.
2. No talking or gesturing is permitted.
3. Observers are not allowed to enter or leave during
a debate.
4. There is no applause until the debate is
completed.
B. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills they have
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted immediately following
each semifinalist debate round.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
1. The team’s knowledge of a selected subtopic
2. The team’s communication ability (i.e., the use of
debate and presentation skills)
3. The LEAP requirements and interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

130

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DEBATING
TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10 points)
performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the scores earned for
the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The X1 or X2 notation in the
criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining the points earned. (Example: an
“adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion = 7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2
criterion = 14 points.) A score of zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for
any criterion is not met.

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Points of argument

Team does not get the attention
of the audience, and/or does not
outline points clearly.

Team makes an effort to grab
the attention of the audience;
previewing points are somewhat
organized in a logical manner.

Introduction uses an attention
getter, clearly states the thesis,
and previews main points of the
argument; the team is cognizant of
the audience.

Organization

The main idea may not be focused
or developed; the introduction is
undeveloped; transitions may be
needed.

The main idea is adequately
presented, but the organizational
structure may need to be
strengthened; ideas are generally
developed and flow smoothly.

The main idea is clearly presented,
well-developed, and firmly
supported.

Topic knowledge

The team does not have a grasp
of the information; inaccurate,
generalized, or inappropriate
supporting material is used; there is
an over-dependence on notes.

The team has a partial grasp of the
information; supporting material is
adequate and the team is at ease.

The team has a clear grasp of
information; citations are introduced
and attributed accurately; the team
demonstrates full knowledge, with
explanations and elaboration, of the
subject area.

Delivery

Delivery detracts from the message;
eye contact may be very limited;
presenter may tend to look at the
floor, mumble, speak inaudibly,
fidget, or read from notecards;
gestures and movements may be
jerky or excessive.

Delivery generally seems effective,
however, use of volume, eye
contact, vocal control, etc., may
not be consistent; some hesitancy
may be observed; vocal tone, facial
expressions, and/or other nonverbal
expressions do not detract from the
message.

Delivery is extemporaneous,
natural, confident, and enhances
the message; posture, eye
contact, smooth gestures, facial
expressions, volume, pace, etc.,
indicate confidence, a commitment
to the topic, and a willingness to
communicate.

Cross Examination

Questions posed to the opposing
team show a minimal knowledge of
the subtopic and do not leave much
room for discussion.

Questions posed to the opposing
team show an adequate knowledge
of the subtopic and prompt
reasonable discussion.

Questions posed to the opposing
team show excellent knowledge of
the subtopic and prompt eloquent
discussion.

Question
Responses

The team’s responses are minimally
sourced and do not fully answer the
questions posed.

The team’s responses are
moderately sourced and mostly
answer the questions posed.

The team’s responses are fully
sourced and completely answer the
questions posed.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DEBATE (110 points)

131

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

DEBATE (110 points) – continued
Rebuttal

Rebuttal is unorganized, unclear,
and/or incoherent; rebuttal includes
no counter to points made from the
opposing team.

Rebuttal is somewhat organized,
and it creates a mostly logical
counter to the opposing team’s
points.

Rebuttal is logical, concise, and
creative; counter arguments from
the opposing team are incorporated
in the rebuttal in a unique and
interesting way.

Voice and language

Language choices may be limited,
peppered with slang or jargon, too
complex, or too dull; language is
questionable or inappropriate for
the audience.

Language used is mostly
appropriate, respectful, or
inoffensive; word choices are
adequate.

Language is familiar to the audience,
appropriate for the setting, and free
of bias; word choices are vivid and
precise.

Group member
participation

One team member speaks for the
initial, cross examination, question
responses, and the rebuttal; the
other team member is disengaged.

Each team member speaks in the
debate—one for the initial portion
and the other for the rebuttal; during
questioning, both team members
have adequate knowledge of
the topic and subtopic and share
ownership equally.

Each team member speaks
eloquently in the debate—one for
the initial portion of the debate
and the other for the rebuttal;
during questioning, both team
members show clear understanding,
knowledge, and ownership of the
topic and subtopic.

(X1)

DEBATE SUBTOTAL (110 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the semifinalist section) must be initialed by the evaluator,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________
Time violation (a deduction of five [5] points total will be incurred for exceeding the debate time limit). Record the deduction in the
space to the right.

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (110 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (11 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (11 points)

132

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (11 points)

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (121 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

133

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

10. Results envelope

A. Event coordinator

11. Envelope for LEAP Reports

B. Judges

12. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

1. Preliminary round of debates, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round of debates, two (2) or more; these
judges should not judge the preliminary round of
debates
C. Timekeeper/Announcers
1. Preliminary round of debates, one (1) timekeeper/
announcer per heat room; timekeepers may serve
as judges
2. Semifinal round of debates, one (1) timekeeper/
announcer per heat room; timekeepers may serve
as judges
D. Escorts for moving teams from preparation room to
debate room
1. Preliminary round, one (1) per heat room; escorts
may not serve as judges
2. Semifinal round, one (1) escort

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Signs that read “DEBATE in PROGRESS” for all
rooms, as needed
6. One (1) stopwatch for each debate room
7. A 4" x 6" card with the message “15 seconds”
written on the card, one (1) card for each debate
room
8. Two (2) 3" x 5" cards with “Pro” written on the card;
two (2) 3" x 5" cards with “Con” written on the card;
and one (1) 3" x 5" card with “2 minutes” written on
it for each debate room
9. Copies of schedule cards

134

B. Podium for each debate room
C. One (1) table and two (2) chairs for the Pro side and
one (1) table and two (2) chairs for the Con side for
each debate room
D. One (1) table and three (3) chairs for judges and
timekeeper/announcer for each debate room; one (1)
chair in the back of the room for the escort
E. Chairs for observers during the semifinalist debate
round
F. Three (3) tables and three (3) chairs in the preparation
room for event personnel and participants

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.
4. Inspect the area in which the debates will take
place for appropriate set-up including sufficient
number and size of tables.
5. Develop a heat schedule, taking into consideration
the number of preparation and debate rooms, the
number of entries, and the time allotted for the
event. Twenty (20) minutes should be allowed for
each debate.
6. Develop a semifinalist schedule, taking into
account the number of semifinalists and the time
allotted for the event. Twenty (20) minutes should
be allowed for each semifinalist debate. Include
an additional ten (10) minutes per round to allow
for each team to participate (individually) in the
semifinalist LEAP interview immediately following
their semifinalist debate (maximum of five [5]
minutes per team).

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES
7. From the list of subtopics, choose one subtopic
that will be used for each round. One (1) subtopic
may be chosen for the preliminary heats and a
different subtopic for the semifinalist round. The
subtopic chosen must apply for all teams.
8. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Gather with the participants at the scheduled time
and place noted in the conference program for a
pre-event meeting.
2. At this meeting, take attendance, collect LEAP
Reports, review rules and procedures, provide
directions and information, and announce the
selected subtopic that all participants will present
on in the first round.
3. Teams who do not submit the required team LEAP
Report are not permitted to compete.
4. Only one (1) team member needs to attend this
meeting. Failure of a team representative to attend
this meeting will result in disqualification. The
coordinator may:
a. allow participants to select a debate time, or
b. pre-assign times and inform the participants of
the schedule
5. Begin the event by checking in the participants
when they arrive at the preparation room at their
scheduled time.
6. When two (2) teams and a debate room are
available, have one (1) team draw one (1) or two (2)
schedule cards (one [1] card will have Pro written
on it and the other card will have Con written on it).
a. The view a team selects will apply for the entire
event.
b. Each team, with the coordinator’s assistance,
will complete the remaining information on the
card.
c. This card, along with a team’s reference
summary, will be given to the judges once a
team has entered the debate room.

7. Record the view each team is presenting on the
scheduling sheet.
8. Have the escort take the teams to the debate
room.
9. The escort will announce to the judges the
identification number of the Pro team first and then
the Con team.
a. Each team will then sit on a designated side of
the podium.
b. The judges will need to record each team’s
identification number on the judge’s evaluation
sheet.
10. The escort should remain in the debate room until
the end of the debate, when s/he will escort each
team from the room. This process of escorting
teams into and then out of the debate room for
competition will take place until all teams have
participated.
11. If there is an odd number of teams entered in this
event (see Procedure 19), teams will be randomly
selected to determine the team that will debate
twice. If a team debates twice, its highest score will
be used to determine placement.
12. When the timekeeper/announcer has confirmed
that the teams and judges are ready to begin,
s/he will instruct the Pro speaker to approach the
podium and begin.
13. The timing of each debate will start when the
speaker begins; however, if there are any
unreasonable delays, the speaker will be warned
by the timer and timing will begin.
14. Timing of the conference break will start once the
Con speaker has completed the presentation.
The timekeeper will inform the teams that they are
in the conference break and will also inform the
teams when the period is over.
15. Once the conference break is over, the Pro cross
examination speaker will approach the podium
and begin, followed by the Con cross examination
speaker.
16. Timing of the second conference break will
begin once the Con cross examination speaker is
seated.
17. Once the second conference break is over, the
Pro rebuttal speaker will approach the podium and
begin, followed by the Con rebuttal speaker.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

135

DEBATING TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES
18. When the Con rebuttal speaker is finished,
s/he should return to his/her seat. The timekeeper
will collect the summary of references from
both teams. When the evaluators are ready, the
timekeeper will announce to the teams that they
are to leave the room and they will be escorted
out by the escort.
19. The judges will inform the escort when they are
ready for a new set of teams so that the escort
may return to the preparation room.
20.Following the last team’s presentation, the judges
will complete the scoring, making adjustments for
time penalties.
21. For participants who violate the rules, the decision
either to
a. deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. to disqualify the entry must be discussed and
verified with the judges, event coordinator, and
a CRC manager.

4. For participants who violate the rules, the decision
either to
a. deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. to disqualify the entry must be discussed and
verified with the judges, event coordinator, and
a CRC manager.
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ranking of the ten (10)
finalists, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
22.Following the preliminary heats, judges determine
twelve (12) semifinalist teams and submit the
results to the CRC for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At the time and place stated in the conference
program, meet with semifinalists to review
scheduling and procedures.
2. Follow procedures as above for the semifinalist
round of debates. The semifinalist LEAP interviews
will take place immediately following each
semifinalist debate and will last a maximum of five
(5) minutes per team.
3. All communication related to judges and
participants during the debate should be handled
by the timekeeper.

136

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use digital video
skills, tools, and processes to communicate, entertain,
inform, analyze, or illustrate the given year’s theme.
An extremely powerful and ubiquitous medium, video
technology has great potential, strengths, and limitations
that should be understood by all.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams per state may participate; an individual
may participate solo in this team event.

TIME LIMITS
1. The video must not exceed three (3) minutes in
length.
a. If it is over three (3) minutes, a time violation of
five (5) points will be assessed.
b. Time starts with the first image or sound and
continues until the last sound or image ends.
2. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entries and submit a
LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted by the CRC.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
semifinalist LEAP interview.
2. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Videos
1. Must be submitted on a USB flash drive in MP4
format.
2. Must not exceed three (3) minutes in length. If a
video exceeds three (3) minutes, a time violation
will be assessed.
3. May be an individual or team project.
4. All video footage must be the original work of the
team.
5. All ideas, text, images, and sound from other
sources must be properly cited.
6. If copyrighted material is used, proper written
permission must be included. NOTE: The video
production product will not be judged if copyright
procedures are not followed.
B. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and must be placed in a multi-page, singlefile PDF on a USB drive, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the title of the video,
the conference city and state, and the year; one (1)
page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Purpose and description of the video; one (1) page
5. Team’s self-evaluation of the video, using criteria
from the official rating form; one (1) page
6. Hand sketched storyboard; pages as needed
7. Digital video script; pages as needed

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

137

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION

8. List of hardware and software used in the
development of the video; one (1) page
9. List of references that includes sources for
materials (copyrighted and non-copyrighted);
pages as needed

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Evaluation will be based on the video footage and
on the accompanying documentation.

11. Completed and signed Student Copyright
Checklist (see Forms Appendix or TSA website)

2. Depending on the stated purpose, videos are
judged on story concept, artistic and/or social
value, audio and camera techniques, transitions,
and pace, as well as technical attributes, creativity
and organization, and the overall effect.

12. Signed consent forms for all video participants
(see Forms Appendix or TSA website)

3. Portfolios must be complete, well-written, and
professional in organization and appearance.

10. Permission letters for copyrighted material
(including clips and images); pages as needed

13. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); one (1) page

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The content and quality of the LEAP Report and interview
will be evaluated.

14. USB flash drive should be submitted secured in
the documentation portfolio.

Refer to the official rating form for more information.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills they
have developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview, which will last a maximum of five (5)
minutes.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

Audio/video operator or technician
Cinematographer
Film/video editor
Screen editor

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

138

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DIGITAL VIDEO
PRODUCTION

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Video is readable/playable on judge’s device.
Documentation is present as a PDF file/USB.
Student Copyright Checklist and release forms are
present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is completely
unorganized and/or is missing three
(3) or more components.

The portfolio is missing two (2)
components and/or is loosely
organized.

The portfolio is clearly organized
and has either one or no missing
components.

Purpose and
description

The purpose and description of
the video are unclear and hard to
visualize.

The purpose and description of
the video are clear, and they are
generally concisely written.

The documentation provides a clear
and concisely written purpose and
description that interests the reader.

Storyboard

The hand-sketched storyboard
and script are sloppy, appear to be
thrown together as an after-thought,
and/or do not correlate with the
video.

The storyboard and script are
drawn appropriately and generally
correlate with the completed video.

The storyboard and script are of
exceptional aesthetic and artistic
quality, and they clearly correlate
with the video.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PREPRODUCTION DOCUMENTATION (30 points)

PREPRODUCTION DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (30 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Video

The video shots have obvious
problems with focus, steadiness,
and framing.

The video shots are clearly focused
and framed, but there is limited use
of close-ups.

The video is enhanced by steady,
creative shots; and it incorporates
excellent use of close-ups.

Audio

The audio quality is poor, a result
of primary use of the on-camera
microphone for recording.

The audio quality is clear, with good
levels, and reflects the correct
use of microphones and audio
techniques.

The audio quality is excellent, with
use of additional audio clips/cues
that enhance the video production.

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

VIDEO PRODUCTION (70 points)

139

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION

VIDEO PRODUCTION (70 points) – continued
Lighting

The video reflects poor ambient
lighting choices and/or the use of
heavy back-lighting.

The video reflects adequate lighting
on subjects and the proper use of
lighting techniques.

The video reflects an excellent
and creative use of lighting, which
propels the story emotionally.

Continuity and
pacing

The sequencing is confusing or
incomprehensible; shots are left on
too long, and edit points/transitions
are “glitchy.”

The pace and timing are well
structured; the shots move along,
helping to tell the story, and there is
moderate use of transitions.

The shots are logically paced
and move the story along in an
interesting way, with excellent and
purposeful use of transitions.

Creativity and
originality

There is little original thought
or creativity in the design and
production, resulting in what
appears to be a simple piecing
together of events.

The video reflects original thought
and creative elements that
are effectively expressed and
highlighted.

Originality and creativity are at the
forefront of the video, with thematic
elements incorporated in a highly
authentic way.

Video effectiveness

The work does not meet the project
goals, has an unclear message, and
reflects sloppy work.

The topic is presented with some
insight, and the video meets most
project goals.

The video is focused, with a clear
message and a rich variety of
supporting material.

(X1)

(X2)

VIDEO PRODUCTION SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________
Time violation (a deduction of five (5) points total will be incurred for exceeding the three (3)-minute limit for the length of the video).
Record the deduction in the space to the right.

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (100 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are adequately communicated,
include some detail, are clear,
and/or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation of
the SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fully-detailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (10 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (10 points)

140

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (10 points)

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (110 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

141

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. One (1) stopwatch per team of judges
6. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
7. Results envelope
8. Envelope for LEAP Reports
9. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for judges
C. Computers capable of reading a USB, as needed
D. Extension cords (25' minimum length), as needed

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Place an identification number on each USB drive.
Secure the entries in the designated area.
2. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
5. In order to compete, participants must be on the
entry list or must have approval of the CRC.
6. Each group of judges determines the top five (5)
entries from that group. (The number of evaluator
groups depends on the number of entries.
Typically, there are two [2] evaluators for every
twenty [20] entries.) The top five (5) entries
from each group are forwarded to the event
coordinator.
7. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

E. Power bars with surge protection, as needed

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or

RESPONSIBILITIES

b. To disqualify the entry

AT THE CONFERENCE

c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and check the contents of
the coordinator’s packet.

8. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists and
discuss and break any ties.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

9. The coordinator notes the semifinalists (there may
be more than twelve [12]) for further evaluation and
LEAP interviews.

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.

10. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.

142

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Meet with semifinalist teams at the time and place
stated in the conference program to allow them to
sign up for a semifinalist LEAP interview time.
2. Inspect the area in which the LEAP interviews will
take place. Ensure that there is a table and seating
for participants and judges.
3. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
semifinalist interviews begin.
4. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ranking of the ten (10)
finalists and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. Return all USBs, computers, portfolios, extension
cords, and supplies to the CRC room.
9. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

143

144

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DRAGSTER DESIGN
OVERVIEW

SEMINFINAL ROUND

Participants design, produce a working drawing for,
and build a CO2-powered dragster according to stated
specifications, using only certain materials.

1. The top sixteen (16) dragster builders will report
to the track at the posted time for a five (5)-minute
interview immediately followed by the LEAP
interview (maximum of five [5] additional minutes).

ELIGIBILITY

2. The top sixteen (16) entries race in a doubleelimination format to earn points for the race
portion of the event.

TIME LIMITS

3. Drawing, design, and body finish points are
combined with race points to determine the final
standings.

Two (2) individuals per chapter, one (1) entry per individual.

The top sixteen (16)-qualifying dragster builders will
participate in a five (5)-minute car builder interview and
a LEAP interview, which will last a maximum of five (5)
additional minutes.

4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their dragster, drawing, and
LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges to determine
safety on the track.
3. Safe dragsters race for qualifying time on the same
lane of the raceway.
4. The top sixteen (16) qualifying entries, based on
the time trials, are evaluated against the criteria for
this event.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants must check the national TSA website
under Competitions/Themes and Problems for the
current year’s design challenge specifications.
B. Drawings:
1. The two (2)-view (top and side) drawing with metric
dimensions is made on drawing paper no larger
than 11" x 17" in size.
2. Drawings are developed using standard
engineering practices and procedures.
3. The drawing may be produced using traditional
drafting methods or CAD.
4. The title block includes only the participant’s
identification number, which is assigned at
registration time and is placed on the entry and
drawing during check-in.
C. Dragsters that do not meet the below specifications/
tolerances are disqualified from the race.

5. Dragsters that do not meet event regulations
are disqualified and lower qualifying cars are
moved up until sixteen (16) dragsters that meet
specifications are determined.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

145

DRAGSTER DESIGN

Dragster body
MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

1. One (1)-piece, all-wood construction; any type of lamination results in disqualification. No add-ons such as body
strengtheners, fenders, plastic canopy, exhausts, or air foils may be attached to or enclosed within the vehicle.
Fiberglass and shrink wrap are considered body strengtheners and cannot be used on the car body for any reason.
Decals may be used for decoration only; they may not be used to gain an aerodynamic advantage, i.e., decals
cannot cover the exterior axle holes or be used to cover open areas of the body. Two (2) or more like or unlike
pieces of wood glued together are not considered one (1)-piece, all-wood construction.
2. Body length

(2019) 295mm
(2020) 210mm

(2019) 305mm
(2020) 220mm

3. Body height with wheels
4. Body mass (completed car without CO2)
5. Body width at the point the axles pass through the body, front and back

75mm
(2019) 55g
(2020) 30g

N/A

35mm

42mm

6. Vehicle total width (including wheels).

90mm

Axles/axle holes/wheelbase
MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

2. Bottom of axle hole or bearing above bottom of car body.
(NOTE: This will be only be measured at the side surfaces of the wood
car body at the axle hole.)

5mm

10mm

3. Axle hole from front and rear of car

9mm

100mm

105mm

270mm

MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

1. Dragsters must have two (2) axles per car, no more.

4. Wheelbase (axle distance apart at farthest points)
5. Bearings, bushings and lubricants may be used.
6. Glue may be used to secure bearings to body.

Spacer washers/clips

1. Spacer washers

2. Axle clips

3. Silicone or any other type of glue/adhesive may not be used in place of wheel clips to hold wheels or axles in place.

146

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DRAGSTER DESIGN

Power plant (CO2 cartridge hole)
MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

1. The power plant hole must be at the farthest point at the rear of the car and must be drilled parallel to the racing surface
to assure proper puncture of the CO2 cartridge. A minimum of 3mm thickness around the entire power plant hole
must be maintained on the dragster for safety. The inside of the power plant hole must not be intentionally painted.
2. Hole depth
3. Safety zone thickness

45mm

55mm

3mm

4. Chamber diameter

19mm

20mm

5. Lowest point of chamber diameter to race surface (with wheels)

26mm

40mm

MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

Screw eyes

1. Dragsters must have two (2) screw eyes (no more) per car that meet tolerances. Screw eyes must not make contact
with the racing surface. The track string must pass through both screw eyelets, which are located on the center line
of the bottom of the car. Glue may be used to reinforce the screw eyes. It is the responsibility of the car designer/
engineer to see that the screw eye holes are tightly closed to prevent the track string from slipping out. As with all
adjustments, this must be done prior to event check-in.
2. Inside diameter
3. Distance apart (at farthest points)

3mm

5mm

150mm

270mm

MINIMUM

MAXIMUM

Wheels

1. A dragster must have four (4) wheels, no more.
a. Two (2) wheels must meet the requirements in #2 and #3 below.
b. The other two (2) wheels must meet the requirements in #4 and #5 below.
c. All four (4) wheels must touch the racing surface at the same time.
d. All wheels must roll.
e. Wheels must be made entirely from plastic.
f. Dimensions must be consistent for the full circumference of each wheel.
g. Measurement represents the FULL surface contact point where wheel makes contact with the track.
2. Front diameter

32mm

37mm

3. Front width (at surface contact point)

1.5mm

5mm

4. Rear diameter

35mm

40mm

5. Rear width (at full, unbroken, surface contact point)

12mm

18mm

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

147

DRAGSTER DESIGN

SEMINFINAL ROUND

EVALUATION

A. Race

1. Points earned through car design and appearance

1. The official distance between the start line and the
finish line on the race track is twenty (20) meters.

2. Accuracy and quality of the drawing

2. No repair or maintenance is allowed after the
entries have been registered.

4. Placement in the double elimination onsite race

3. Any entry damaged during the race is evaluated
by the event coordinator to determine whether or
not the vehicle is allowed to race again.
4. In the event that the vehicle is damaged by
conference personnel, the event coordinator rules
as to whether or not the vehicle may be repaired
by the student entering the vehicle. This is the
only reason a student is allowed to touch his/her
vehicle after registration.
5. Undamaged wheels that come off during the
event may be replaced as determined by the
event coordinator.
6. Damaged wheels may not be replaced.
7. All CO2 cartridges for the race are provided by
national TSA.

3. Points earned from the (top 16) interviews
5. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Automotive designer
Automotive modeler
Industrial designer
Industrial engineer
Race car engineer

B. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills they
have developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview, which will last a maximum of five (5)
minutes.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

148

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DRAGSTER DESIGN

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Vehicle meets specifications described in Regulations.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Dragster body
production quality

Dragster exhibits poor production
quality, with a crude and rough
surface and little or no attention to
detail.

Dragster shows evidence of
proper production techniques;
it is adequate but may need
improvement.

Dragster displays excellent
production techniques, with obvious
attention to detail and quality.

Body paint/finish

Surface preparation is inadequate;
the body is unprimed, with poorly
applied final finish.

Dragster body is painted and
finished adequately.

Dragster body finish is exemplary;
body is smooth, shiny, and exhibits
quality.

Vehicle assembly

Dragster exhibits poor or sloppy
assembly of parts (wheels are loose,
screw eyes are loose and/or not
level, etc.).

Dragster is well assembled, with
adequate attention to detail.

Dragster is properly assembled,
with obvious evidence of attention
to detail.

Drawing scale and
dimensioning
(X1)

The drawing is present, but is not
to scale; dimensions are missing, or
dimensioning is poorly done.

The drawing is acceptable and to
scale; it is a close representation of
the vehicle, but some dimensions
may be missing.

The drawing is exemplary,
exact, and includes all pertinent
dimensions.

Drawing completion
and quality

The drawing is sloppy, missing parts,
and lacking quality.

The drawing is complete, and the
quality is adequate.

The drawing is complete and
precise, and of exceptional quality.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DRAGSTER CONSTRUCTION (50 points)

DRAGSTER CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL (50 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (50 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

149

DRAGSTER DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Car builder
interview

The participant demonstrates very
limited knowledge of and has
difficulty articulating how the car was
produced or decisions made during
the production; there are signs of
the student not being involved in the
dragster production.

The participant demonstrates
some knowledge of the dragster
production and has adequate
knowledge of some processes
or reasoning behind the vehicle
design.

The participant demonstrates
competence and knowledge related
to the design and production of
the vehicle; the student is able to
articulate “reasoning” behind the
decisions made.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing. Few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s efforts are
adequately communicated, include
some detail, are clear, and/or are
generally convincing. Identification
and/or incorporation of the
SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing. Identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X2)

(13 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (33 points)

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (33 points)

RACE (55 points)
1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th & 6th

7th & 8th

9th-12th

13th – 16th

55 Points

50 Points

45 Points

40 Points

35 Points

30 Points

25 Points

15 Points

RACE SUBTOTAL (55 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (138 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

150

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DRAGSTER DESIGN

DRAGSTER DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges, two (2) or more
C. Recorder for double elimination chart, (one) 1
D. Assistants, two (2)

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet and box, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Time trial record sheet
6. Qualifier interview time slot sheet
7. Double elimination bracket chart
8. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
9. Results envelope
10. Envelope for LEAP Reports
11. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

M. When using a computer controlled track, provide
the proper computer for the software being used, all
necessary connections, and a printer. This equipment
is placed on the official timekeeper’s table.
N. Provide for a display of time trial and race brackets.
O. Ultraviolet ink and light to mark cars and check for
cars that have been previously entered..

RESPONSIBLITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. Check-in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.

C. Metric scientific scales (triple beam balance or digital)

6. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.

D. Mono-filament fishing line (suggested between 30
and 50 pound); four (4) pre-tied: two (2) on track and
two (2) reserve, for the track

7. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

E. Race track set, including a starting gate and a finish
gate, with a digital timer and winning lane indicator
F. Padding for the finish gate

8. Check to see that each entry drawing includes
the participant’s identification number in the upper
right-hand corner of the paper.

G. Extra vehicles to test and demonstrate the track

9. Place an entry number on each entry.

H. Race brackets for placement of the semifinalists

10. Position each entry (dragster and drawing) for
evaluation and viewing.

B. CO2 cartridges

I. Tables for the display of cars and for evaluation
J. Table at the starting line, for arranging and holding
cars prior to the races
K. Table at the finish gate for the placement of cars after
the races and to hold eliminated cars
L. Table for the official timekeeper

11. Secure the entries in the designated area.
12. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

151

DRAGSTER DESIGN
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Assist judges with evaluation of the design,
drawing, and construction categories.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Begin the time trials at the scheduled time.
a. Every race-worthy car should be tested.
b. Students do not have to be present.
c. Public viewing is allowed.
d. Each car is timed in the same lane.
e. Cars are timed only once.
f. It is important that each car be positioned as
well as possible in the starting gate.
4. Position a judge at the starting gate to ensure that
all cars are positioned in the starting gate correctly.
5. Position another judge at the finish line.
6. If there is a misfire or if a time is not properly
recorded, a rerun may be ordered at the discretion
of the event coordinator.
7. Record preliminary times on a time trial record
sheet.
8. Place each car in the double elimination race
bracket (see sample) according to the rank of its
qualifying time.
9. Judges verify that the top sixteen (16) qualifying
cars meet Regulation C specifications.
10. Entries that do not meet specifications are
removed.
11. Cars that are damaged or broken during the
qualifying round are deemed non-raceable and
also are removed.

152

12. Only raceable cars, as determined by the judges,
are allowed to compete for the semifinalist
category.
13. Lower qualifying cars are moved up until there are
sixteen (16) legal semifinalists.
14. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Post the top sixteen (16) cars with interviews times.
2. Car builders will report to the track at the posted
time for a five (5)-minute car builder interview and
a LEAP interview, which will last a maximum of five
(5) additional minutes.
3. Conduct interviews with the qualifying top sixteen
(16) car builders.
4. Begin the semifinals at the scheduled time.
5. Run the semifinalist race. A sample doubleelimination bracket follows.
6. Only the sixteen (16) qualifying cars are raced.
7. Students do not have to be present.
8. Public viewing is allowed.
9. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form
10. Judges use qualifying times to break any ties
among the sixteen (16) qualifying cars.
11. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room. If necessary, manage security and the
removal of materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

DRAGSTER DESIGN

RACE BRACKET FOR 16-CAR DOUBLE ELIMINATION

LOSERS WINNERS
1
16
9

8
L1 Loser

12
5
13

4
L2 Loser

3
14

L5 Loser

6
Loser
of this
game
comes
in 3rd
place

L3 Loser

L7 Loser

L4 Loser

CHAMPION

10
15

Winner of Loser’s Bracket

L6 Loser

Winner of Loser’s Bracket must beat
Winner of Winner’s Bracket twice

Winner of this Game Goes to Winner’s Bracket

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

153

154

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ENGINEERING DESIGN
OVERVIEW

The National Academy of Engineering has identified
fourteen (14) paramount current and emerging societal
challenges that engineering can play a major role in
solving. Through research and critical problem-solving,
teams will develop a solution to a grand challenge
posted on the national TSA website under Competition
Themes/Problems.
The solution offered will be informed and designed by
precise problem definition, thorough research, creativity,
experimentation (when possible), and the development
of documents and appropriate models (mathematical,
graphical, and/or physical prototype/model). Semifinalist
teams will present and defend their proposed solution
to a panel of judges. The semifinalist presentation will
be in the format of a poster session (the poster will be
contained in a display).

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams of three to six (3-6) members per state
may participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. Semifinalist teams will be given ten (10) minutes to
present and defend their proposals to judges.
2. Judges may ask questions during the team’s
presentation and may question each team for an
additional five (5) minutes at the conclusion of the
presentation.
3. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Teams check in their entries at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
a. portfolio in pdf format on two [2] USB flash
drives
b. poster
c. physical model display, or visual representation,
d. LEAP Report
2. No more than two (2) team members set up the
display.
3. Portfolios will be evaluated to determine the top
twenty-four (24) entries.
a. Only the top twenty-four (24) displays will then
be evaluated to determine the twelve (12)
semifinalists.
b. Neither students nor advisors are present at
this time.
4. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Three (3) representatives from each semifinalist
team report to the event area for the interview
at the time and place stated in the conference
program.
2. Each semifinalist team explains its research and
solution for the challenge. Semifinalist teams
will use a poster to assist in the defense and
explanation of their proposed solution.
3. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take place as
part of the semifinalist presentation/interview.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

155

ENGINEERING DESIGN

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Teams must demonstrate a firm understanding of the
challenge and problem they are addressing. A team’s
entry must reflect thorough and serious research, as
well as a creative and plausible solution.
B. A team’s solution must include likely impacts to the
environment, economy, and society, as well as any
important ethical considerations, and/or political
ramifications.
C. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and must be submitted on two (2) USB flash
drives in PDF format, and include the following single
sided 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the challenge listed, event title, the
conference city and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Definition of the challenge/problem; one (1) page
5. Explanation of importance: Explain why the
problem is important to society and describe the
necessary scientific and technical concepts, as
well as current issues related to the challenge;
two (2) pages
6. Pages titled “Problem Solution”: Present the
solution for the identified problem, with support
from scientific concepts and principles drawn
from evidence. Mathematical and graphic models
should be included as necessary, as well as
photographs of any physical models developed;
seven (7) pages, maximum

D. The size of the display may not exceed 15" deep x 3'
wide x 4' high.
E. A free-standing poster is required. The height and
width of the poster must be within the limits of the
display.
F. A physical model/s (or prototype/s) is/are required
and must remain within the display limits at all times
(including during judging).
G. If the display or physical model/s or prototype/s
require power, they must be powered by dry cell(s) or
photo-voltaic cells.
1. The power supply must fit inside the display area.
2. All power must be off once the team has
completed set-up.
3. Complete instructions must be provided for the
judges to press one (1) button or flip one (1) switch
to turn on the power supply for judging.
H. No harmful or illegal substances are permitted. No
viruses, live plants, or animals are permitted. No
dangerous processes, experiments, or physical
models may be displayed or demonstrated.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Each team must be prepared to send three (3)
representatives to a semifinalist poster presentation
and interview.
B. During the semifinalist presentation and interview,
each team will be given ten (10) minutes to present
and defend its entry to the judges.

7. Patent Application: to include specification,
drawing, and oath or declaration (refer to
www.uspto.gov)

1. Judges may ask questions during the team’s
presentation for purposes of improved clarity and
understanding and may also ask questions for an
additional five (5) minutes at the conclusion of the
presentation.

8. Plan of Work log that covers the life of the project
including date, task, time involved, team member
responsible, and comments (see Forms Appendix
or TSA website); pages as needed

2. During the presentation/interview teams will be
expected to use their posters to enhance and
explain their proposed solution/s to the challenge
and problem addressed.

9. Page(s) titled “References and Resources” that cite
books, interviews, professional journals, websites,
etc., using Modern Language Association (MLA)
style; pages as needed

156

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ENGINEERING DESIGN

C. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills they have
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Portfolios, which will be evaluated to determine
the top twenty-four (24) entries. Only the top
twenty-four (24) displays will then be evaluated to
determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
2. The model or prototype display
3. The poster

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Event-specific presentation/interview
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Civil engineer
Environmental scientist
Health and safety specialist
Manufacturing consultant
Mechanical engineer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

157

ENGINEERING DESIGN
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Portfolio is present (two [2] USB flash drives)
Meets size constraints.
Physical model or prototype is present.
Free-standing poster is present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Portfolio is unorganized and/or is
missing three or more components.

Portfolio has most components and
is generally organized.

Portfolio has all required
components and is well organized.

Problem definition

The problem is not clearly written or
defined; the problem does not fall
within the grand challenge selected.

The problem is somewhat clearly
written and defined.

The problem is clearly written,
concise, and well defined; the
problem falls within the grand
challenge selected.

Explanation of
importance

There is little evidence of research;
there is a lack of understanding of
the issues cited.

There is some evidence of research;
an adequate understanding of the
issues is present.

Thorough research is clearly evident
with a firm understanding of the
issues established.

Problem solution

A very brief explanation of the final
solution is presented; there is a lack
of creativity; descriptions are weak.

An adequate description of the
solution is presented and supported
by some amount of research and
evidence; the solution is somewhat
creative.

The solution is supported by the
research gathered and scientific and
engineering evidence; the solution
is plausible and creative.

Patent application

The patent application is
incomplete, poorly worded, or
missing.

The patent application is complete,
but adequately worded, with
somewhat effective drawings.

The patent application is complete
and effective in presenting the
inventor’s product design.

Plan of Work log

The log is poorly organized and/or
incomplete.

The log is adequately detailed,
organized, and contains most of the
required components.

The log is very well done
and contains all the required
components.

References and
resources

There are few references listed,
and/or references listed show little
relevance to the project’s goal.

There are a sufficient number and
quality of references listed.

Many quality references are listed,
reflecting research in the areas
covered.

CRITERIA

(X1)
(X1)

(X2)
(X4)

(X2)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (120 points)

158

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (120 points)

ENGINEERING DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Aesthetics

The poster design is unattractive
in appearance and shows a lack of
understanding of graphic design
principles.

The poster design is somewhat
attractive and shows an adequate
understanding of the use of graphic
design principles.

The poster is of professional quality
with an exemplary use of graphic
design principles.

Use of mathematical
models, graphic
models, and/or
physical models
(if included)

Models are confusing and do
not represent and/or support the
proposed problem solution.

Models provide adequate
representation and support of the
proposed problem solution.

Models provide excellent
representation and support of the
proposed problem solution.

Overall impact

The poster information and models
do not detail or enhance the
essential components of the team’s
problem identification and solution.

The poster information and models
somewhat detail and enhance the
essential components of the team’s
problem identification and solution.

The poster information and models
greatly detail and enhance the
essential components of the team’s
problem identification and solution.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DISPLAY (POSTER AND MODELS) (50 points)

(X1)

(X3)

DISPLAY SUBTOTAL (50 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (170 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Team seems unprepared and
unorganized for the presentation/
interview, with an illogical
explanation of the project.

Team is prepared for the interview
and is somewhat organized in its
presentation to judges; team’s
presentation thesis is, for the most
part, logical and/or clear.

Team’s presentation/interview
with judges is well organized; the
interview is concise and logical,
with a clear explanation of the
development of the project.

Knowledge

Team members seem to have little
understanding of the concepts
in their project; vague interview
answers are provided.

Team members have a generalized
understanding of the concepts
discussed and answer questions
adequately.

Evidence is clear that team
members have a thorough
understanding of the concepts
discussed; they answer questions
thoroughly.

Articulation

The presentation and interview
provide an unclear, unorganized,
and or illogical description of the
project.

The presentation and interview offer
a somewhat logical and easy-tounderstand project description.

The presentation/interview provides
a clear, concise, and easy-to-follow
description of the project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/or
uncertain in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the delivery.

The team is somewhat well-spoken
and clear in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
an acceptable delivery.

The team is well-spoken and
distinct in its presentation/ interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective delivery.

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW (127 points)

159

ENGINEERING DESIGN

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW (127 points) – continued
Team participation

Only one person in the group
communicates with judges; there is
little or no participation from other
team members.

Team members all participate
to some extent and seem to
understand the concepts.

Team members seem to fully
understand the concepts and share
an equal role in the interview.

Poster presentation

The presentation shows a lack of
understanding and knowledge of
the problem and the team’s solution
to it.

The presentation gives a general
understanding and knowledge of
the problem and the team’s solution
for it.

The presentation shows a great
understanding and articulation of
the problem and the team’s solution
for it; team members make excellent
use of the poster to feature or
explain complex information.

Responses to
judges’ questions

The team’s answers to questions
reflect a lack of understanding and
sophistication; only one or two team
members contribute.

The team’s answers to questions
reflect an adequate degree of
understanding and sophistication;
team members all participate
somewhat.

The team’s answers to questions
reflect a high degree of
understanding and sophistication;
team members participate equally.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(X3)

(X2)

(27 points;
10% of total
event points)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (127 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (127 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (297 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

160

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ENGINEERING DESIGN

ENGINEERING DESIGN EVENT COORDINATOR
INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:

1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge

4. Place an entry number on each portfolio (USB flash
drive), poster, and model (if included).

2. TSA Event Coordinator Report

5. Secure the entries in the designated area.

3. Stick on labels for entries
4. Envelopes for portfolio flash drives
5. List of judge/assistants
6. Pre-populated flash drives for judge
7. One (1) stopwatch per team of judge
8. Results envelope
9. Envelope for LEAP Reports
10. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Table and chairs for semifinalist presentation

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently review and assess all
portfolios to determine the top twenty-four (24)
entries.
2. Only the top twenty-four (24) displays will then
be evaluated to determine the twelve (12)
semifinalists.
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
4. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
5. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
6. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
final presentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

161

ENGINEERING DESIGN
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the presentations/
interviews are to take place. Ensure that there is a
table and seating for the interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
before the event begins.
3. The twelve (12) semifinalist teams report at the time
and location stated in the conference program for
their presentation/interview and LEAP interview.
4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the regular event presentation/interview and will
last a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

162

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY
OVERVIEW

Participants will write a research-based essay, using two
(2) or more sources provided onsite, that makes insightful
connections about a current technological topic.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) individuals per state are allowed to participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. The allotted time to complete the essay is two (2)
hours.
2. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
2. Participants must submit a LEAP Report prior to
receiving the writing prompt.
3. Participants prepare essays using a laptop
computer (provided by participants).
4. Essays will be submitted in PDF format on a
clean (unused) USB flash drive, provided by the
participant.
5. Participants will be provided with a prompt and
two (2) or more articles on a current technological
topic.

8. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
9. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted by the CRC.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants are responsible for bringing a fullycharged laptop computer complete with software
necessary to produce and convert documents for the
final presentation. Participants who report without a
laptop will not be permitted to compete.
B. National TSA will NOT provide access to the Internet.
All participants must download any and all software/
programs onto their laptops prior to the event. Using a
hotspot for this event will not be allowed.
C. No power sources will be provided for participants.
The laptop computer must be capable of being used
for the entire two (2) hour time frame of the event,
without needing a power source.
D. Participants are responsible for bringing a clean
(unused) USB flash drive to the event room.
1. Flash drives must not contain any other
documents, images, etc.
2. Flash drives will not be returned to participants.
3. Participants who report without a flash drive will
not be permitted to compete.

6. Time begins after participants have received all
materials.

E. Only participants are allowed in the event area.
Should a participant finish before the allotted time
expires, the participant is allowed to leave quietly but
may not re-enter the event room.

7. After two (2) hours, participants stop writing. Each
participant turns in an essay not exceeding three
(3) typed pages, and one (1) works-cited page.

F. Each entry must have only the participant
identification number noted and centered directly
below the title of the essay.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

163

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY

G. The length of the essay is limited to three (3) typed
pages, single-spaced. The list of references is not
included in the three (3) pages.
H. All essays must adhere to the following criteria:
1. 11pt Arial or Calibri font
2. One inch (1") margins on all sides
3. Single (normal) spacing

EVALUATION
1. The criteria listed on the official rating form
2. The LEAP requirements
Please refer to the official rating form for more
information.

STEM INTEGRATION

I. With the essay, participants must turn in a one (1)-page
typed bibliography, using proper MLA bibliography
format.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

J. Essays must be submitted with a bibliography and in
PDF format. Entries not following these guidelines will
not be scored.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

K. All essays and USB drives become the property of
TSA and will not be returned.
L. LEAP Requirements
1. Participants document the leadership skills they
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

•
•
•
•
•

Economist
Engineer
Research technician
Scientist
echnical writer

2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

164

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ESSAYS ON
TECHNOLOGY

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
The participant has a fully charged laptop computer.
The participant has a flash drive.
The entry is submitted in PDF format with a bibliography.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Thesis

The thesis is not a complete thought
and/or is inappropriate for the essay;
the title and thesis do not correlate
with one another, or the thesis lacks
creativity.

The thesis is evident and the idea
behind it is somewhat concise
and fairly creative; the essay title
correlates with the thesis.

The thesis is well structured,
concise, positioned appropriately,
and creative; the essay title is
authentic and correlates well with
the thesis.

Introduction
paragraph

The introduction explains the
background but may lack detail;
it does not help to establish the
writer’s position.

The introduction creates interest
and generally states the position.

A well-developed introduction
engages the reader and creates
interest; the introduction states a
significant and compelling position.

Supporting
paragraphs

Paragraphs lack main points to
support the thesis, and/or there is a
poor development of ideas.

Paragraphs include main points
that are related to the thesis, with
adequate supporting details and a
fairly well-developed narrative.

Paragraphs provide well-developed
main points directly related to the thesis;
supporting examples are concrete
and detailed; the narrative presents a
consistent and effective point of view.

Concluding
paragraph

The conclusion is recognizable, but
it does not effectively summarize
the topic.

The conclusion generally
summarizes the topic and restates
the thesis.

The conclusion wraps up the point
of the essay and creatively restates
the thesis.

Organization

There is no discernible organization;
transitions are not present.

A logical progression of ideas is
evident; transitions are present
throughout the essay.

The essay conveys a logical
progression of ideas, with a clear
structure that enhances the thesis;
transitions are mature and graceful.

Style

The style is confusing and hard to
follow; it contains fragments and/or
run-on sentences; word choice is
simple, ordinary, and/or uncompelling.

The style is clear, sentences are
somewhat expressive, and word
choice is appropriate.

The style is smooth, skillful and
coherent; sentences are strong and
expressive, with varied structure; word
choice is appropriate and mature.

Mechanics

The essay contains distracting errors
in punctuation, grammar, and spelling.

Punctuation, spelling, and grammar
are generally correct, with few errors.

Punctuation, spelling, and grammar
are correct with no errors evident.

Research base

The essay lacks an adequate
research base and/or uses minimal
support from articles.

The research base is adequate, with
support from articles.

The essay conveys a detailed
research base that includes
comprehensive support from articles.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

(X2)
(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ESSAY (110 points)

165

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY

ESSAY (110 points) – continued
Works cited
(X1)

References are not used effectively,
and/or they are not cited using
proper MLA format.

Most sources cited are used
effectively and help to support the
essay topic.

The essay incorporates multiple
sources that are credible,
appropriate, and support the topic.

ESSAY SUBTOTAL (110 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the semifinalist section) must be initialed by the evaluator,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (110 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (11 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (11 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (121 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

166

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) for every twenty (20)
entries for the first reading
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more for the reading of
the top-rated twenty (20) essays
3. Timekeeper

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.
4. Inspect the area in which the event will take place
for appropriate set-up including sufficient number
and size of tables.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN

1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge

1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.

2. TSA Event Coordinator Report

2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.

3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stopwatch
6. Zip-lock snack bags – one (1) for each participant’s
USB flash drive
7. Results envelope
8. Envelope for LEAP Reports

3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Place an entry number on each USB flash drive.

PRELIMINARY ROUND

C. Tables and chairs for participants

1. Instruct participants that they must have their
participant identification number only centered
directly below the title of the essay. No other
identifying information can be included.

D. Securable room (preferable) for the duration of the
event

2. Remind the participants to leave a one inch (1")
margin on all sides of the essay.

E. Two (2) or more articles on a current technological
topic; one (1) set per participant and one (1) set per
judge

3. Remind participants to single space their work
using an 11pt Arial or Calibri font and to submit
only three (3) essay pages, plus a single page for
references.

RESPONSIBILITIES

4. Remind participants that they must save their work
in PDF format on a flash drive.

9. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for judges

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

5. Distribute both the prompt and the articles on a
current technological topic to all participants. The
prompt will indicate the topic and instructions for
composing an essay related to the articles.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

167

ESSAYS ON TECHNOLOGY
6. Instruct participants that those who finish before
time is called must submit their work (on the flash
drive) and leave quietly.
7. Five (5) minutes before the two (2) hours is up,
make an announcement that participants have five
(5) minutes to complete their essays. Exactly two
(2) hours after beginning, call time and collect the
flash drives from participants.
8. Supervise and assist the judges during the reading
of the essays. Each entry must be read and
evaluated independently.
9. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.

5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

10. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
11. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
12. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
final presentation.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Meet with semifinalists at the time and place stated
in the conference program to allow them to sign
up for a semifinalist LEAP interview time.
2. Inspect the area in which the semifinalist LEAP
interviews are to take place. Ensure that there is a
table and seating for participants and evaluators.
3. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
semifinalist presentations begin.
4. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.

168

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to verbally
communicate their knowledge of technology or TSA
subjects. Participants give a three-to-five (3-5) minute
speech fifteen (15) minutes after having drawn a card on
which a technology or TSA topic is written.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program to
sign up for a time and submit a LEAP Report.

ELIGIBILITY

2. At his/her assigned time, each participant draws
three (3) cards, each containing one (1) topic, from
a box and selects one (1) topic from the three (3) on
which to speak. The cards with the unused topics
are returned to the box.

TIME LIMITS

3. Preparation

Three (3) individuals per state may participate.

A. Preliminary Round:
1. Each speech must be between three and five (3-5)
minutes.
2. Participants will be penalized one (1) point per ten
(10) seconds for speaking over five (5) minutes or
under three (3) minutes.
3. Time commences when the speaker begins
talking and concludes at the end of the speech.
B. Semifinal Round: The LEAP interview will take place
immediately following each semifinalist speech and
will last a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

a. After having selected a topic, the first
participant enters a preparation room separate
from the speech delivery room and is given
fifteen (15) minutes to prepare a speech.
b. Seven (7) minutes after the first participant
enters the preparation room, the second
participant enters the preparation room, goes
to a different section, and begins his/her
speech preparation, again with fifteen (15)
minutes to prepare a speech.
c. Each participant, in turn, is allowed to enter the
preparation room at seven (7)-minute intervals,
thus enabling a consistent flow of participants
to speak before the judges in a timely fashion.
(This allows for one [1] minute to enter the room
and announce the entry number, up to five [5]
minutes for the presentation, and one [1] minute
to exit the room.)
4. The event coordinator introduces each participant
(using the participant identification number only)
according to the order in which participants appear
on the sign-up sheet.
5. The timekeeper visually notifies the speaker of
the time remaining by using six (6) separate cards.
Each of the six (6) 5" x 7" notecards has a “time
remaining in minutes” number on it (4, 3, 2, 1, ½,
and 0), and each is shown in descending order
to the participant by the timekeeper during the
speech.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

169

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH

6. After speaking, the participant returns the topic
card to the judges so that it can be returned to the
topic box.

3. Observers are NOT allowed to enter or leave
during a speech.
4. There is no applause until the speech has
concluded.

7. Judges independently evaluate each speech.
8. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program to
sign up for a time.

E. Participants are penalized by each judge one (1) point
per ten (10) seconds for speaking over five (5) minutes
or under three (3) minutes.
F. Semifinal Round only: LEAP Requirements
1. Participants document the leadership skills the
team has developed and demonstrated while
working on this event, and on a non-competitive
event leadership experience.

2. Semifinalist preparation and speaking follow the
same guidelines as above, using a different set of
topics.

2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.

3. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take place
immediately following each semifinalist speech.

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY AND SEMIFINAL ROUNDS
A. No reference is to be made concerning the name of
the participant or his/her school.

EVALUATION
1. The quality of the speech

B. Each speech must be the result of the participant’s
own effort.

2. The degree to which the content matches the
selected topic

C. Notes:

3. Adherence to the time limits

1. No reference materials or devices may be used or
brought to the preparation room.

4. The LEAP requirements and interview
(seminfinalists only)

2. Any notes for speaking must be written during the
fifteen (15)-minute preparation period.

Refer to the official rating form for more information.

3. Each participant will be provided a maximum of
three (3) 3" x 5" blank notecards.

STEM INTEGRATION

4. Although participants are permitted to use notes
when speaking, it should be noted that deductions
in scoring could be made for this practice if the
use of notes detracts from the effectiveness of the
speech.
D. Observers:
1. No observers are allowed in the event or
preparation rooms during preliminary heats,
although they are allowed to sit in the audience of
the performance during the semifinal round.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Advertising executive
Public speaker
Politician
Sales and marketing executive
Teacher

2. No talking or gesturing is permitted.

170

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

EXTEMPORANEOUS
SPEECH

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Completed LEAP Report is present
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

The speech is unorganized and
difficult to follow or understand.

The speech is somewhat organized
and generally can be followed and
understood.

The speech is well organized
and easy to follow; the delivery is
exceptional.

Knowledge

Minimal knowledge of the subject
is evident in the speech; the
participant does not convey an
understanding of the topic.

Adequate knowledge of the
subject is evident, and the speaker
relates and conveys a general
understanding of the topic.

Complete knowledge and
understanding of the topic and
the development of a theme are
conveyed through content of the
speech.

Voice and
articulation

The presenter conveys an
inconsistent use of proper grammar,
word pronunciation, and acceptable
tone and pitch.

The presenter generally uses
proper grammar and pronunciation,
and varies the use of tone and pitch.

Smooth and effective articulation,
proper grammar, correct
pronunciation, and varied tone and
pitch are evident throughout the
speech.

Stage presence

The presenter’s appearance
is unprofessional, sloppy, and
inappropriate.

The presenter’s appearance
is adequate, appropriate, and
somewhat professional.

The presenter’s appearance is
appropriate, professional, and
polished.

Impact

The speech is unconvincing,
uninteresting, and lacks compelling
and attention-holding details.

The speech is somewhat convincing
and emphasizes several details;
it adequately holds the attention
of the audience and remains
interesting.

The speech is completely
convincing, full of emphasis, and
holds the attention and interest of
the audience.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

(X3)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SPEECH (80 points)

SPEECH SUBTOTAL (80 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

171

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH

One (1) point per ten (10)-second interval is to be deducted for speaking under the three (3) minutes or over the five (5) minutes allotted
for the speech. Time commences when the participant begins speaking
Presentation Delivery Time

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

TIME DEDUCTIONS

TOTAL TIME DEDUCTION
PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (80 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (8 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (8 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (8 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (88 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

172

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

AT THE CONFERENCE

B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round of speeches, two (2) or more per
heat/event room
2. Semifinalist speeches, two (2) or more
C. Timekeepers, one (1) per heat/event room
D. Monitors, one (1) per event room

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.
4. Inspect the areas in which the heats will be
conducted for appropriate set-up including
sufficient number and size of tables.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Collect LEAP Reports from participants during the
initial event sign-ups at the time and place stated
in the conference program.

C. Stopwatch, one (1) per heat/event room and two (2)
per preparation room

2. Participants who do not submit the required
individual LEAP Report are not permitted to
compete.

D. 5" x 7" notecards for “time remaining in minutes”
numbers (see Procedure E), six (6) per heat/event
room

3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.

E. Table and chairs for judges and the timekeeper

4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

F. Chairs for audience (semifinalist round only)
G. 3" x 5" blank notecards, three (3) per participant
H. 3" x 5" topic cards—a minimum of fifteen (15) different
topics from which to select
I. Tables and chairs in the preparation room

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Manage the smooth flow of participants according
to these procedures:
a. After having selected a topic, the first
participant enters a preparation room that is
separate from the speech delivery room and is
given fifteen (15) minutes to prepare a speech.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

173

EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH
b. Seven (7) minutes after the first participant
enters the preparation room, the second
participant enters the preparation room, goes
to a different section, and is given fifteen (15)
minutes to prepare a speech.
c. Each participant, in turn, is allowed to enter the
preparation room at seven (7)-minute intervals,
thus enabling a consistent flow of participants
to speak before the judges in a timely fashion.
(This allows for one [1] minute to enter the room
and announce the entry number, up to five [5]
minutes for the presentation, and one [1] minute
to exit the room.)
2. When the participants have finished, each judge
records the scores, consulting the timekeeper’s
record. The timekeepers notify judges of any time
under three (3) minutes or over five (5) minutes for
which deductions should be made.
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
4. If heats are used, judges determine twelve (12)
semifinalists and discuss and break any ties
5. Semifinalists will be posted by the CRC.
6. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
semifinalist presentations begin.
2. Meet with semifinalists at the time and place stated
in the conference program to allow them to sign
up for a semifinalist LEAP interview time.
3. Repeat the preliminary round process to
determine the finalists.
4. Include an additional five (5) minutes per time
slot (semifinalist round only) to allow for each
semifinalist to participate in a semifinalist LEAP
interview immediately following his/her semifinalist
presentation.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

7. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each
participant’s final presentation

174

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
OVERVIEW

Humans need protection from weather, environmental
factors, occupational hazards, and other adversarial
conditions. TSA members will demonstrate an
understanding of and expertise in using research and
design to convey a wearable technology concept.
Participants have the opportunity to research, design,
and create a portfolio and wearable prototype that reflect
the current year’s published theme. Twelve (12) qualifying
semifinalist teams participate in an onsite presentation/
interview in which they present their garment designs to
the judges.
The theme for the current year will be published on the
national TSA website, under Competitions/Themes and
Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams of two to four (2-4) members per state
may participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. Semifinalists will be allowed ten (10) minutes for
a presentation/interview. A deduction of five
(5) points will be incurred for exceeding the
presentation/interview time limit.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following the semifinalist presentation/interview
and will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entry and submit
LEAP Reports at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will sign up for times for their
presentation/interview. These sessions are closed
and will take place with judges only.
2. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
3. Semifinalists use this assigned time to present their
designs and answer questions from the judges.
4. Models will be present and wearing the prototypes
designed by the team.
5. During the semifinalist round, participants will be
allowed:
a. ten (10) minutes to complete the presentation/
interview, with two [2] minutes for setup
b. three [3] minutes for the actual presentation,
three [3] minutes for the interview
c. two [2] minutes for removal of items
d. Points will be deducted from a team’s score
for exceeding the ten (10)-minute time frame
allowed for the semifinalist round.
6. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following the semifinalist presentation/interview.
7. Final evaluation by judges takes place immediately
following the completion of the presentation.
8. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

175

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants will use a 32-quart plastic storage box to
submit their portfolio, patterns, and any prototypes
that are not placed on hangers or on mannequins.
B. Portfolio
1. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”)
are required and should be placed and secured
in a clear front report cover. (The portfolio must be
submitted with the patterns and prototype.) The
report cover must include the following singlesided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
a. LEAP Report
b. Title page with the event title, the conference
city and state, and the year; one (1) page
c. Table of contents; one (1) page
d. Literature research summary; two (2) pages
e. Interpretation of theme; two (2) pages
f. Explanation of the design and construction of
the prototypes, textiles used, notions needed,
sewing/construction techniques used, etc.; two
(2) pages
g. Design process sketches (hand-drawn); five (5)
pages
h. Computer-drawn final design print-outs; five (5)
pages
i. References /resources; two (2) pages
C. Patterns
1. Full-sized student-made pattern(s) must be
included.
2. Patterns must be made of appropriate lightweight
vellum paper.
3. Patterns must NOT be purchased.
D. Prototypes (garments)
1. Any type of prototype (garment) that is typical
of responsible clothing design and creation is
considered appropriate.
2. The purchase/use of special textiles (water/
fireproof materials, etc.) is not required.

176

3. Information about textiles must be used in the
research/design portfolio, but the prototype does
not have to be constructed using these materials.
4. Prototypes for preliminary judging must be put
on hangers (if applicable), or on dressmaker
mannequins.
5. If the prototype is not a garment that can be
placed on a hanger or mannequin, then it must
be placed in the container with the portfolio and
patterns.
6. The prototypes must be presentation quality.
7. All designs and prototypes/garments should
be appropriate for viewing at the National TSA
Conference.
8. The portfolio and patterns must accompany the
prototypes.
E. Any portfolio or garment that depicts inappropriate or
unacceptable designs will be disqualified.
F. All patterns and prototypes must be designed,
sketched, computer-drawn, developed, and sewn by
participants.
G. All garments must be the original work of the
participants.
H. Only the required number of prototypes (garments)
are to be submitted for evaluation. Additional items,
including accessories and other garments, may be
used only in the semifinalist presentation and may not
be submitted for preliminary judging.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The semifinalist portion of the event evaluates the
quality of the team’s presentation, as well as the
team’s knowledge and expertise pertaining to the
entry in the following areas: overall prototype design
and originality, research, theme, interpretation,
construction/sewing techniques, and use of
appropriate textiles/materials in the design.
B. Each semifinalist team must have access to student
TSA member models and the team-created
prototypes in order to compete in the semifinals.
Models must be members of the team’s TSA chapter.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

C. LEAP Requirements
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
1. Points earned for the portfolio, patterns, and
prototypes
2. The content and quality of the LEAP report
and interview, and a presentation/interview
(semifinalists only)
3. Points earned for the semifinalist presentation/
interview will be added to the portfolio score
to determine the final ranking of the top ten (10)
finalists.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Fashion layout editor
Fashion magazine editor
Fashion Merchandiser
Model
Tailor

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

177

FASHION DESIGN
AND TECHNOLOGY

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Portfolio is present.
Patterns are present.
Prototypes are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Some parts of the portfolio are
missing; the portfolio is unorganized,
messy, and lacks quality.

Most components of the portfolio
are present, organized, and
adequate in quality.

All components of the portfolio are
included; strong effort and quality of
work are evident.

Summary of
research
(X1)

The summary is too brief and/
or lacks the appropriate details
expected for the event.

The summary of the research is
sufficient; most of the key details are
included.

The summary is organized, clear,
and concise, with appropriate and
necessary details included.

Interpretation of
theme

The interpretation of the theme is
very weak and unconvincing.

The interpretation of the theme
is clear, with some appropriate
justification.

The interpretation of the theme is
clear, concise, and thorough, with
convincing justification.

Explanation of
garment prototypes

The explanation is unclear, poorly
organized, and/or does not
accurately describe the garment
prototypes.

The explanation is loosely
organized, with adequate attempts
to describe the garment prototypes
and their production.

The explanation is clear, concise,
and/or demonstrates extensive
knowledge of garment prototypes
and production.

Design process
sketches

Sketches are poorly executed and/
or lack necessary details in the
design process.

Sketches are complete as drawn
and include most notations and
references to the design process.

Sketches are well executed,
organized, and clearly represent the
design process.

Computer drawings
for final design

Computer drawings fail to accurately
portray the final design; there are
major omissions of important details.

Computer drawings somewhat
accurately illustrate the final
design, with many important details
included.

Computer drawings of the final
design are clear, accurate, and
effectively portray the final product.

Resources/
references

Research is inadequate, with
very few credible resources
and references provided and/or
documented.

Research is adequate, with most
important resources and references
adequately documented.

Research is comprehensive, and
all resources and references are
properly documented.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (90 points)

178

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (90 points)

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Two or more
hand-made
garment patterns

Patterns are poorly constructed,
and/or are missing key components.

Patterns are generally well
constructed; some key attributes
and designs are included.

Patterns are designed to detail
standards and are of production
quality.

Creativity, originality,
and difficulty

Patterns lack creativity, and/
or originality, and/or difficulty in
execution.

Patterns are of good quality and
demonstrate some degree of
difficulty and originality.

Patterns are of industry standard;
they clearly demonstrate originality,
creativity, and skill.

(X2)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PATTERNS (30 points)

PATTERNS SUBTOTAL (30 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Proper sewing/
construction
techniques used/
evident

Prototype construction fails to
meet accepted standards and/or
techniques of construction..

Prototype construction meets
acceptable standards and
construction techniques.

Prototype construction is of high
quality and indicates use of a variety
of appropriate techniques.

Use of notions

Little or no use of notions is evident
in the garments.

An adequate choice and variety of
notions are appropriately used in
the garments.

An excellent choice and variety of
notions are used that enhance the
overall appearance and quality of
the garments.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

QUALITY OF GARMENTS (30 points)

(X2)

(buttons, zippers,
snaps, embroidery,
embellishments, etc)
(X1)

PATTERNS SUBTOTAL (30 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (150 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participants seem unorganized and
unprepared for the presentation.

Participants are generally prepared
for the presentation.

The presentation is logical, well
organized, and easy to follow.

Knowledge

Participants seem to have little
understanding of the concepts in
their project; answers to questions
may be vague.

Participants exhibit an adequate
understanding of the concepts in
their project.

Participants show clear evidence
of a thorough understanding of the
project.

(X1)

(X2)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION (70 points)

179

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION (70 points) – continued
Articulation

The presentation provides an
unclear, unorganized, and/or illogical
description of the project.

The presentation offers a somewhat
logical and easy-to-understand
project description.

The presentation provides a
clear, concise, and easy-to-follow
description of the project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/or
uncertain in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the interview.

The team is somewhat well-spoken
and distinct in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture
gestures, and eye contact are
acceptable.

The team is well-spoken and
distinct in its presentation/interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective interview.

Quality of prototype
on model

The prototype does not appear
to fit and/or is inappropriate for
the person modeling (color, style,
textures, etc).

The prototype fits neatly and is
generally well-made for the person
modeling.

The prototype clearly is made and
designed for the model—fitting
nicely, with appropriate style, colors,
textures, etc.

(X1)

(X2)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Time violation (a deduction of five (5) points total will be incurred for exceeding the semifinalist presentation time limit). Record the
deduction in the space to the right.

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (22 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing. Identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (22 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (92 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (242 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

180

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judge:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
3. Timekeeper

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. Stopwatch, one (1)
7. Results envelope
8. Racks for hanging garments
9. Tables for entries
10. Envelope for LEAP Reports
11. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for judges
C. Chairs for audience
D. One (1) table, approximately six feet (6') long, for
judges

4. Inspect the area in which the event is being
held and check for appropriate set-up including
sufficient number and size of tables.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Collect entries and LEAP Reports from participants
at the time and place stated in the conference
program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently evaluate each entry.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Judges determine twelve (12) semifinalists and
discuss and break any ties.
4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.
5. Create and post a semifinalist sign-up sheet for
each team’s presentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

181

FASHION DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Conduct semifinalist presentations.
2. Allow the first team to enter the event room, and
provide two (2) minutes for set-up of materials.
3. The event coordinator or assistant introduces the
team by entry number only.
4. No nametags or clothing that give any indication of
the hometown, school, or chapter are allowed.
5. Each team will be allowed three (3) minutes for
the presentation and three (3) minutes to answer
interview questions.
6. Each team is allowed two (2) minutes to remove all
materials.
7. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following the semifinalist presentation/interview
and will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.
8. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
9. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
10. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
11. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

182

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FLIGHT ENDURANCE
OVERVIEW

Participants analyze flight principles with a rubber bandpowered model aircraft. Participants have the opportunity
to build, fly, and adjust (trim) a model to make long
endurance flights inside a contained airspace. Models
must be of fixed-wing design and comply with all event
specifications. Rotary-wing aircraft and aerostat (lighter
than air) aircraft are NOT permitted.

ELIGIBILITY

Two (2) individuals per chapter may participate, one (1)
entry per individual.

TIME LIMITS
1. Participants are provided a minimum of thirty (30)
minutes for trim flights at the event site.
2. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

5. In an orderly fashion, participants wind their
models and proceed to a group timer for
permission to fly.
6. Participants place their models on the floor and
wait for the release signal from the timer. Timing
begins when the model rises off the ground.
7. Flight time ends when models hit the floor/ground
or when they come to rest on an obstruction.
8. The timekeeper will record two (2) official flight
times for each participant.
9. Immediately following the second flight, the
participant will hand his/her motor to the judge for
weighing.
10. Portfolios and models will be placed on flight
boxes for judging.
11. Judges will begin with the top flight times and
will evaluate models, portfolios, and flight boxes
until the top (12) twelve semifinalists have been
determined.
12. Semifinalists will be posted (in random order) by
the CRC.

SEMIFINAL ROUND

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
semifinalist LEAP interview.

PROCEDURE

2. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

ATTIRE

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report at the time and place stated in
the conference program to sign up for flight heats
and submit a LEAP Report.
2. Participants arrive at the competition site for trim
flying during the time designated for their heat.
Time allotted for the trim portion of the event
may be extended according to the number of
participants and site scheduling.
3. Participants have two (2) opportunities to fly their
models for official times.
4. Participants attend a pilot’s meeting to review the
sequence for making the official flights.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Flight Endurance is an individual event.
1. No one may assist the participant in any way
during either trim or official flights.
2. Violation of this regulation will result in
disqualification.
B. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and must be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

183

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

1. LEAP Report

6. A technical review of the flight log that explains
the trim adjustments and modifications required
to improve endurance. Experts from the Academy
of Model Aeronautics (AMA) and the National
Free Flight Society (NFFS) may scrutinize this
information for validity.

2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. A flight log (see official sample that follows), with
the previous ten (10) flights signed off on by the
participant’s advisor.

7. A graphic flow chart with pictures and design
principles used in building and adjusting the model
plane used for successful flights

4. The technical attributes of the design and a
description and identification of parts
5. The modifications and an explanation of why each
was developed

8. Scaled engineered drawings of all structural parts
of the plane

Flight Log:
Participant ID#:
Flight #

Dates:
# of winds

Time aloft

Flight pattern

Trim adjustment

Advisor sign off

#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10

184

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

C. The model and its parts must be contained in a flight
box that does not exceed 25cm x 40cm x 60cm.
Flight box hardware, such as hinges, handles, and
wheels, are not measured.

25
40

a. Models are weighed without motors attached.
b. Clay is permitted for trim ballast.
c. Model is weighed with clay ballast.

6. Model weight: minimum of 7.0 grams, maximum of
21.0 grams.

D. Models that violate any part of Regulation C will be
disqualified.
E. Models:
1. Models are to be made of any materials that
are typically found in model construction. This
includes, but is not limited to: wood, foam, foam
board, and plastics.
a. Hardeners are permitted but are not required.
b. The use of any materials that are deemed
unsafe will not be tested and will be
disqualified.
2. Models must use commercially available “fix-pitch”
propeller or “fixed-pitch” propeller assembly:
minimum of 140mm to a maximum of 170mm in
diameter.
a. Propellers may be trimmed, shaped, balanced,
or re-pitched, but must remain fixed in pitch.
b. Variable-pitch propellers and/or mechanisms
are NOT permitted.
3. Fuselage dimension: minimum of 325mm in
length, measured with prop assembly attached.
4. Wingspan: maximum of 45cm horizontally
projected, wing chord 9cm projected.
5. Rubber motor: maximum weight of motor is 1.50
grams, including the O-rings.
a. No length measurement is made.
b. Spare motors are allowed during the official
flights.
c. Two (2) rubber O-rings may be used on the
rubber motor loop for easier handling of wound
motors.

7. Steel wire may be used only for the propeller shaft,
motor hook, landing gear, and the connection
between fuselage and tail. Small plastic tubes,
such as coffee stirrers, may be used.
8. The two (2) wheels must be a minimum of 15mm in
diameter, made of plastic or wood, and they must
roll freely by the weight of the plane on a smooth
surface.
F. Acceptable flight support equipment includes the
following:
1. Mechanical rubber motor winders or batterypowered motor winders may be used. No ACpowered winders are allowed.
2. A winding stooge may be used to anchor the
model while the motor is being wound. A person
may not serve as a winding stooge.
3. A poster board launching platform will be
provided.
G. When at rest, the landing gear must support the
model without the fuselage and/or propeller touching
the floor or launching pad.
H. Only minor repairs are allowed during trim and time
trials.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills the
team has developed and demonstrated while
working on this event, and on a non-competitive
event leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

185

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

EVALUATION
1. The duration of flight
a. A bonus of ten (10) seconds is added to the
flight time per flight if the model successfully
lands on its wheels and comes to a rest on
them.
b. Ties are broken by determining the longest
single flight time.
2. The documentation
3. The flight log
4. The LEAP requirements and interview
(semifinalists only)
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

NOTES

Two organizations—the Academy of Model Aeronautics
(AMA) and the National Free Flight Society (NFFS)—
welcome your inquiries and offer suggestions, help,
and technical information concerning model aircraft and
flight technology.
Contact the AMA: www.modelaircraft.org.
Contact NFFS: www.freeflight.org.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
• Aeronautical engineer
• Aircraft systems engineer
• Physics teacher

186

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Portfolio is present.
Model is present.
Flight box is present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Portfolio is unorganized and/or
missing three or more components.

Portfolio is organized adequately,
with most, if not all, components
present.

No components are missing in
the portfolio, and content and
organization are clearly evident.

Technical attributes

Attributes of the design are very
sketchy in nature.

Attributes of the design are included
and adequately reflect basic
knowledge of flight design.

Clear and precise attributes of
the design are given; an in-depth
knowledge of flight design is
exhibited.

Description and
identification of
parts
(X1)

The majority of the parts are not
described, sourced, or identified
accurately; scaled engineered
drawings are incomplete or missing.

Most parts are described and
sourced accurately; scaled
engineered drawings include most
details.

All parts are described and
sourced completely and accurately;
engineering drawings are complete.

Modifications and
technical review of
flight log

Only one modification is noted,
and/or an explanation of why the
modification was made is missing.

Modifications are given with
adequate explanations for how they
improved flight endurance.

Modifications and an explanation of
why they were made are provided;
a clear and precise explanation
for how they improved the flight
endurance is provided.

Graphic flow chart

Graphic flow chart is unclear; the
majority of the design principles
are not addressed or are missing;
pictures are missing.

Graphic flow chart is partially clear;
most of the design principles are
addressed and/or present; some
pictures are missing.

Graphic flow chart is clearly
followed; all design principles are
addressed; no pictures are missing.

Flight log

The flight log is incomplete; the
advisor’s signature is not included.

The flight log is generally complete;
the advisor’s signature is present.

The flight log is complete, with the
advisor’s signature; a thorough
understanding of the flight log’s
purpose is evident.

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (60 points)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (60 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

187

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

FLIGHT TIMES (60 points)
Flight times recorded to the nearest tenth (.1) of a second.

Duration of flight #1

Seconds

Duration of flight #2

Seconds

Landing bonus – add ten (10) seconds for each successful landing

Seconds

Total flight scores (combine flight #1, flight #2, and bonus for landing/s)

Seconds

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th & 6th

7th & 8th

9th-12th

13th – 16th

60 Points

55 Points

50 Points

45 Points

40 Points

35 Points

30 Points

20 Points

SUBTOTAL FLIGHT SCORE (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (120 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (12 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (132 points)

188

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (12 points)

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (132 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

189

FLIGHT ENDURANCE

FLIGHT ENDURANCE
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

AT THE CONFERENCE

B. Assistants, two (2) or more
C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal found, two (2) or more
D. Timekeepers, two (2)

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.
4. Inspect the area in which the event will take place
for appropriate set-up.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in participants, collect LEAP Reports, and
evaluate models for special compliance during
the scheduled trim session (completed flight log is
inspected).
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Secure models in the holding area so that they
remain safe until the scheduled time for the official
flights.

J. Stopwatches, three (3)
K. Electronic gram scale (to .01 gram)

190

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FLIGHT ENDURANCE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Distribute a list of entrants assigned to each
designated judge/timer.
2. Each flight is recorded to the nearest one-tenth (.1)
of a second.
3. After the second flight, the times are added
together.
4. Up to three (3) groups may fly simultaneously in
the assigned area for the event, with consideration
for the safety of the models and participants.
5. Models and flight boxes of all participants are
checked again. Models showing deviations may
be disqualified.
6. Judges independently assess each entry and
determine twelve (12) semifinalists.
7. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. to deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. to disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these on the
rating form.
8. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the interviews are to take
place. Ensure that there is a table and seating for
participants and judges.
2. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
semifinalist presentations begin.
3. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these on the
rating form.
5. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists, and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

191

192

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORENSIC SCIENCE
OVERVIEW

Participants take a written test of basic forensic science
theory to qualify as semifinalists. Semifinalist teams will
examine a mock crime scene and demonstrate their
knowledge of forensic science and crime scene analysis.
Participants will be expected to survey the scene and
use proper techniques to collect evidence from the
mock crime scene. Teams will then collect their data and
perform a detailed written analysis of the crime scene.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of two (2) individuals per chapter may
participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. One (1) hour is allotted to complete the written test.
2. Semifinalists are allotted twenty (20) minutes to
review the crime scene and gather evidence.
Time commences when all participants are in the
crime scene room and concludes after twenty (20)
minutes.
3. An additional twenty (20) minutes is allowed for
semifinalist teams to write their analysis. Time
begins when a team enters the analysis room and
concludes at the end of twenty (20) minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Team members report for the written test at the
time and place stated in the conference program,
and submit their team LEAP Report.
2. A written forensic science test is administered to
all team members at the same time.
3. Twelve (12) teams with the highest averaged
scores are selected as semifinalists for the onsite
problem.
4. A list of twleve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams report to sign up for a time slot
for the onsite problem at the time and place stated
in the conference program.
2. Each team will be given a copy of the onsite
problem to solve and is required to:
a. Demonstrate three to four (3-4) techniques/
procedures for evidence collection using their
toolkits.
b. Write an analysis of the crime scene (see Mock
Crime Scene Analysis form).
3. Semifinalists will be judged on their LEAP Report
and interview.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Team members take the written test individually.
B. These same two (2) team members will compete in
the semifinalist round, should the team qualify.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. No reference may be made concerning the name of
the team, the team members, or their school.
B. Team members are to write their team identification
number in the top right corner of the written analysis.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

193

FORENSIC SCIENCE

C. Each written analysis must be the result of the team’s
own effort.

H. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills they
have developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

D. No reference materials may be used during this event.
E. No observers are allowed in the event or preparation
rooms during the event.

2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.

F. Teams are required to bring their own toolkit.
Required tools:
1. roll of string

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

2. safety glasses (2 pairs)
3. tape measure (10 m)
4. lift backing cards (with scale)
5. tweezers
6. scissors

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The written test scores of the individual team
members (scored will be averaged and recorded
as a single team score on the rubric).

7. crime scene template
8. flashlight
9. pen or fine point marker (for labeling)

2. Twelve (12) teams with the highest scores will
be selected as the semifinalists for the onsite
problem.

10. pencils
11. duster and dust (for fingerprinting)
12. fingerprint lifting tape (or clear packing tape, NOT
Scotch tape)

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. A team’s performance on the onsite problem

Optional tools:

2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview

13. Clipboard(s)
14. Blank sheets of paper (for note taking)
G. In order to provide a written report/analysis for the
onsite problem, participants must be able to complete
(at a minimum) the following:
1. Collection of fingerprints

Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event has connections to the STEM areas of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

2. Collection of trace evidence
3. Creation of a proportional drawing that accurately
represents the crime scene. Note: The crime
scene template in the toolkit may be used to
create the drawing, but the drawing does not need
to be to scale.
4. Blood spatter pattern analysis

194

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

This competition connects to one or more of the
careers below:
•
•
•
•

Crime scene investigator
Forensic anthropologist
Forensic pathologist
Forensic engineering scientist

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

HIGH SCHOOL FORENSIC SCIENCE
MOCK CRIME SCENE ANALYSIS
Use the space below to record/describe the processes/techniques used
to collect evidence from the mock crime scene and any applicable conclusions.

Submitted by:

Competitor signature

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

195

FORENSIC SCIENCE

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

WRITTEN TEST SCORE (50 points)
Average of the two team member's written test scores.

WRITTEN TEST SCORE SUBTOTAL (50 points)

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (50 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Primary survey/
walkthrough

No initial survey is conducted; no
verbal or written attempt is made to
document/record the crime scene;
furniture or other items are touched
or moved.

A partial attempt at an initial survey
is made; there is some evidence of
a verbal assessment of the scene,
and a few notes are taken; minor
disruption is made to the crime
scene.

A thorough survey of the scene is
conducted to prioritize evidence
collection; verbal assessment of the
scene is made and notes are taken;
no furniture or items are moved.

Processing the
scene

Little to no investigation of the scene
is evident; no sketches or diagrams
are created; proper procedure is
not followed for evidence collection,
and/ or there are obvious signs of
contamination.

A mostly thorough investigation of
the scene is conducted and some
sketches or diagrams are created;
proper procedure is followed for
most of the evidence collection,
and there are limited signs of
contamination.

A thorough investigation of the
scene is conducted and sketches
or diagrams are created; proper
procedure is followed for evidence
collection, and there are no obvious
signs of contamination.

Evidence collection

Three or more pieces of evidence
are missing, and/or some of the
collected items are not those
specified.

Most pieces of evidence from the
team’s materials list are included
and are correct.

All pieces of evidence in the team’s
materials list are included and are
correct.

(X1)

(X2)

196

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ANALYSIS OF CRIME SCENE (80 points)

FORENSIC SCIENCE

ANALYSIS OF CRIME SCENE (80 points) – continued
Technique

Little to no indication of proper
technique is used in collecting the
evidence.

Some indication of proper technique
is used in collecting the evidence.

Proper technique is used in
collecting most or all of the
evidence.

Crime scene
analysis

Written analysis is weak and/ or
contains personal theories or
conclusions; analysis does not
clearly provide a detailed summary
of the scene, processing, and
evidence collection.

Written analysis is somewhat
complete and contains limited
personal theories or conclusions;
analysis provides a somewhat
detailed summary of the scene,
processing, and evidence collection.

Written analysis is strong and does
not contain personal theories
or conclusions; analysis clearly
provides a detailed summary

(X2)

ANALYSIS OF CRIME SCENE SUBTOTAL (80 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and are
unconvincing; few, if any, attempts
are made to identify and incorporate
the SLC Practices.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some
detail, are clear, and are generally
convincing; identification and
incorporation of the SLC Practices
are satisfactory.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP REPORT (13 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and
incorporation of the SLC Practices
are excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP REPORT SUBTOTAL (13 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (93 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (143 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

197

FORENSIC SCIENCE

FORENSIC SCIENCE
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
C. Timekeepers for recording start/stop times, one (1) per
event room
D. Monitors, one (1) per event room

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Results envelope with coordinator forms
6. Envelopes for LEAP Reports
7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Stopwatches for timekeepers, one (1) per room
C. Blank Mock Crime Scene Analysis forms
D. Tables and chairs in the analysis room
E. Copies of the semifinalist problem, (1) one per team
and (1) per judge
F. Required evidence for the mock crime scene (based
on the semifinalist problem)

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors and checking the entry list.
2. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
5. Monitor the one (1)-hour written test.
6. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

RESPONSIBILITIES

7. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.

AT THE CONFERENCE

8. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC for posting.

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and check the contents of
the coordinator’s packet.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

198

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORENSIC SCIENCE
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Set up the mock crime scene in the designated room
one (1) hour prior to the semifinalist sign-up time.
2. Facilitate semifinalist sign-up times at the designated
location.
a. This may be the same room used for teams to write
their analysis.
b. Sign-ups should not take place in the same room
that is prepared for the crime scene.
3. When each team enters the crime scene room,
distribute the problem.
4. Time begins when the problem is handed to each
team.
5. Allow twenty (20) minutes for each team to review the
crime scene in order to collect items, data, and/or other
information necessary for preparing an analysis.
6. At the end of the twenty (20)-minute period, escort
each team to the room designated for writing the
analysis.
7. Provide twenty (20) minutes for each team to complete
the written crime scene analysis.
8. Collect all materials, including any notes, prior to
dismissing the participants.
9. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists. Any ties should
be broken by using the highest average team score on
the written test.
10. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed and
verified with the judges, event coordinator, and CRC
manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total possible
points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC manager
must all initial either of these actions on the rating
form.
11. Review and submit the finalist results and all related
items/forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
12. Manage security and removal of all materials from the
crime scene area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

199

200

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND
ENGINEERING TEACHER
OVERVIEW

While the need for student proficiency in technology
(as one area of STEM) is increasing, the number of
qualified technology education teachers is decreasing.
To help address this imbalance, this event will encourage
participants to 1) investigate technology education
preparation programs in higher education, and 2) test
their potential as a future technology educator.

ELIGIBILITY

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. In preparation for this event, participants
thoroughly research and select two (2) accredited
colleges or universities that offer technology
education teacher preparation programs.
2. Each participant will submit his/her portfolio and
a LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.

Two (2) individuals per chapter may participate.

3. Entries will be reviewed by judges. Neither
students nor advisors are present at this time.

TIME LIMITS

4. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

1. Semifinalists will make a presentation of no more
than ten (10) minutes in length.
2. A maximum of three (3) minutes will be allowed for
set-up.
3. After the presentation, the participant must remove
all materials within two (2) minutes.
4. One (1) point will be deducted for each ten
(10)-second interval over the allotted time for the
presentation, set up, and/or clean-up.
5. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part
of the semifinalist presentation and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes following
the participant’s clean-up.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Each semifinalist will sign up for a scheduled time
to present his/her lesson plan/activity.
2. The event coordinator will introduce each
participant by identification number only and in
order of scheduled times.
3. Each time slot includes three (3) minutes for set
up and two (2) minutes to remove materials/
equipment.
4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation.
5. Portfolios will be retrieved by the event coordinator
and provided to the event semifinalists during
semifinals. All other portfolios should be picked up
at the time and location listed in the conference
program.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

201

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Research Summary
1. Using no more than two (2) pages, one (1) side only,
participants summarize the information derived
from the research about each of the colleges or
universities and their technology amd engineering
education programs.
2. Participants should take into consideration
geographic location and environment, academic
requirements, cost, campus life, setting, and the
size and housing facilities of each school.
3. Advice from parents, family members, guidance
counselors, and technology and engineering
teachers is recommended, as is a search on the
Internet of colleges and universities that offer
technology and engineering education degree
programs
B. Essay

D. The research summaries, essay, and lesson plan/
activity must be the result of the participant’s own efforts
and not purchased or open source material. General
content from either may be used, but it must be cited.
E. All parts of the entry must be contained in the
documentation.
F. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and should be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference
city and state, the year, and the participant’s
identification number; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. College research summaries; one (1) page
maximum for each college
5. College essay; one (1) page
6. Lesson plan/activity; pages as needed

1. Each participant must complete an essay, one (1)
page (single-sided), explaining why s/he is a good
candidate to become a technology education
teacher.

SEMIFINAL ROUND

2. Personality traits, goals, and interests should be
included in the essay.

A. Topics for the lesson plan/activity must correlate to the
ITEEA standards for technological literacy.

3. The essay must be similar to a college application
essay.
4. The essay must be typewritten and free of spelling
and grammatical errors.
C. Lesson Plan
1. A lesson plan describing the rationale, goals and
objectives, standards correlation, and a description
of the lesson and activity—including assessment—
must be submitted.
2. The lesson plan must be clearly labeled with the
grade level for which it is intended.
3. The ITEEA Standards for Technological Literacy
must be used. Available online at www.iteea.org/
Publications/StandardsOverview.aspx

7. Copies of handouts; pages as needed
8. References and resources; pages as needed

1. Use the International Technology and Engineering
Educators Association ITEEA website at
www.iteea.org/Publications/StandardsOverview.aspx.
2. Topics also must reflect Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) initiatives
and integration.
3. Lesson plans/activities that explore knowledge,
creativity, and skills in the following areas are
suggested:
a. Medical technology
b. Agricultural and biotechnology
c. Power and energy technology
d. Information and communication technology
e. Transportation technology
f. Manufacturing technology
g. Construction technology

202

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER

B. Copies of the lesson plan and of all handouts,
materials, and resources must be prepared and
distributed to the judges, who will act as students in
the classroom.
C. Audio-visual materials such as charts, graphs, posters,
displays, flip charts, transparencies, and models may
be included.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The portfolio
2. The developed lesson plan/activity

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The presentation of the lesson

D. Any audio visual equipment required for the
presentation must be provided by the participant,
including

2. The appropriateness of the lesson/activity for the
designated grade level
3. The poise of the participant during the
presentation

1. power strip with surge protector
2. an extension cord

4. The interaction of the participant with the students
(judges acting as students)

E. Activities that typically would follow the teaching
lesson will be described by the presenter near the
conclusion of the ten (10)-minute lesson.

5. The enthusiasm and motivation of the participant
6. The LEAP Report and interview

F. Participants are not allowed to watch or hear the
presentations of other participants.

Refer to the official rating form for more information.

G. Participants are encouraged to interact with the
judges, who will act as students in the classroom.

STEM INTEGRATION

H. One (1) point will be deducted for each ten (10)-second
interval over the allotted time for the presentation, set
up, and/or clean-up.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics .

I. The LEAP Report

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

1. Participants document the leadership skills they
have developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of their LEAP Report as part of their eventspecific presentation/interview.

•
•
•
•

Technology education teacher
STEM teacher
University professor
Professional development trainer

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

203

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY
AND ENGINEERING
TEACHER
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Two (2) college Technology Education Teacher
Training Programs research summaries are present.
A college essay is present.
An original, complete lesson plan is present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is unorganized and/or
is missing a number of components.

The portfolio is adequate, with most
components included.

The portfolio is completely
organized and contains all
components.

College search
summaries

Only one (1) college technology
education program is identified; the
summary is inadequate.

Two college technology education
programs are adequately
summarized.

Two college technology education
programs are documented, with
excellent summaries.

College essay

The essay is too short, and/or
not typewritten and printed, and/
or poorly written, and/or there are
many spelling and grammatical
errors.

The essay is generally well written,
typewritten and printed, and the
correct length, but it contains
several spelling and grammatical
errors.

The essay is well written, typewritten
and printed, the correct length, and
contains no spelling or grammatical
errors.

Lesson plan
components

The lesson plan is missing several
of the stated components, including
the standards correlation and/or
instructional design focus; it is not
creative or unique.

The lesson plan includes all of
the stated components, and it is
adequately organized, with an
instructional design focus; it has
some unique and creative aspects.

The lesson plan includes all of
the stated components; it is well
organized and has an instructional
design focus; it is creative and
unique.

Handouts

Handouts are poorly developed and
do not have an impact on the lesson
and activity.

Handouts are relatively well
developed and have some impact
on the lesson and activity.

The handouts are effective and
greatly impact the lesson and
activity.

Resources and
references

A minor attempt is made to
document resources and
references.

Several resources and references
are documented.

There is clear evidence of
many applicable resources and
references.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (70 points)

204

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (70 points)

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (70 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

The presentation lacks organization;
it is difficult to follow or understand.

The presentation is somewhat
organized.

The presentation is clearly
organized and easy to follow; it
flows smoothly to the conclusion.

Introduction
(X1)

The introduction is weak, with little
effort made to emphasize the topic
and/or to generate interest and
enthusiasm for the topic.

Sufficient effort is evident in the
introduction, which somewhat
creates a level of interest.

The introduction is effective,
stimulating, and creates interest on
the part of observers.

Instructional
competence

The presenter’s delivery of content
lacks confidence.

The presenter’s delivery of content
is generally professional and
enthusiastic.

The presenter’s delivery of content
is professional, enthusiastic,
confident, and full of personality.

Voice/language
(X1)

The participant conveys an
inconsistent use of proper grammar,
word pronunciation, and acceptable
pitch and tone.

The participant generally uses
proper grammar and pronunciation,
and varies the use of tone and pitch.

The participant uses smooth
and effective articulation, proper
grammar, correct pronunciation, and
varied tone and pitch throughout the
presentation.

Innovation/
creativity

The presentation fails to convey
innovation or originality.

The presentation is somewhat
original and innovative in its delivery
and topic development.

The presentation is imaginative and
innovative in its delivery and topic
development.

Knowledge

Minimal knowledge of the subject
is evident in the presentation; the
content does not relate to the topic,
and/or the participant does not
convey an understanding of the
topic.

Knowledge of the subject is
evident, and the presenter relates
and conveys a somewhat clear
understanding of the topic.

Complete knowledge and
understanding of the subject
and relationship to the topic
are conveyed throughout the
introduction.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors excellent.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)
(X1)

(15 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION (85 points)

SEMIFINAL PRESENTATION SUBTOTAL (85 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

205

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER

TIME DEDUCTIONS
A one (1)-point deduction will be incurred for each ten (10)-second interval over the allotted times for set up, presentation, or clean up.
Total time for presentation
Total time for set-up
Total time for clean up
Presentation deduction
Set-up deduction
Clean up deduction

TOTAL TIME DEDUCTION
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

CRITERIA
For the inclusion
of audio/visual
materials in the
presentation

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Audio/visuals are included, but
they only slightly enhance the
presentation.

Audio/visual materials are varied
and moderately enhance the
presentation.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

BONUS

Appropriate materials and
audiovisuals are used and
effectively enhance the
presentation.

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (85 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add the PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL and the SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL.

TOTAL (165 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

206

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
C. Assistants, two (2)

5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet judges/assistants to review time
limits, procedures, regulations, and all other details
related to the event. If questions arise that cannot
be answered, speak to the event manager before
the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Participants check in portfolios. The entry number
sticker should be placed in the upper right-hand
corner of the portfolio’s cover and LEAP Reports.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges read, individually evaluate entries, and
determine twelve (12) semifinalists.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and a CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Review and submit semifinalist results to the CRC
for posting.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is
being held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

207

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING TEACHER
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists sign up for an interview at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
2. Make sure the presentation room is set up
correctly.
3. The coordinator will retrieve the semifinalists
portfolios and provide them to the semifinalists
during the semifinalist lesson/activity presentations.
4. Conduct the semifinalist presentations.
5. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part
of the semifinalist presentation and will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and a CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
8. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
9. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

208

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

MUSIC PRODUCTION
OVERVIEW

Modern music production has become integrated
with technology in a synthesis of technical, artistic,
and creative skills. Exploring the link between original,
creative ideas and the tools used to implement them
increases the development of a person’s technical and
expressive abilities.
Participants produce an original musical piece that
is designed to be played during the National TSA
Conference closing general session. The musical
piece should be energizing, interesting, and of a spirit
consistent with the Technology Student Association.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams per state may participate. Teamwork is
strongly encouraged, but an individual may participate
solo in this team event.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The musical piece must be more than one (1)
minute and less than three (3) minutes in length.
2. There will be a five (5)-point deduction for each
five (5) seconds under the one (1)-minute minimum
and a five (5)-point deduction for each 15 seconds
over the three (3)-minute maximum length.
3. The time starts with the first sound and continues
until the last sound ends.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists are interviewed for up to ten (10)
minutes to explain the technical aspects and
creative process of their work.
2. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation/interview and will last
a maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

An individual or team LEAP Report is required for this
event and must be submitted at event check-in (see
LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entries (portfolio, CD,
and LEAP Report) at the time and place stated in
the conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. No more than two (2) representatives from each
semifinalist team may report to the event area for
the interview at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Each semifinalist team explains its portfolio and
musical piece to the judges and discusses the
purpose, value, and creative process of its work.
3. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist presentation.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. All musical pieces must be submitted on audio CD.
B. Lyrics may accompany the musical piece but are not
required.
C. The musical piece must be greater than one (1) minute
and less than three (3) minutes in length.
1. There will be a five (5)-point deduction for each
five (5) seconds under the one (1)-minute minimum
and a five (5)-point deduction for each 15 seconds
over the three (3)-minute maximum length.
2. There will be a five (5)-point deduction for each
fifteen (15) seconds over the three (3)-minute
maximum length.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

209

MUSIC PRODUCTION

D. All entries become the property of TSA for non-profit
promotional purposes and will not be returned after
judging.
E. All musical pieces must be the original work of the
team and must have been completed within the
current school year.
F. Free, non-copyrighted sounds, loops, or other musical
elements may be incorporated into musical pieces.
The sources of these elements and the way in which
they are used in the musical piece must be described
in the portfolio, and the track list must illustrate these
elements.
G. Each actual instrument, voice, and/or synthesized
instrument track used in the final music piece must be
illustrated in a timeline format in the portfolio.
H. Where applicable, all ideas, sounds, and loops from
other sources must be cited. If copyrighted material
is used, proper written permission must be included
(see the Student Copyright Checklist). NOTE: Failure
to follow this procedure results in disqualification.
I. The CD and documentation materials are turned in to
the event coordinator at the time and place stated in
the conference program. The documentation portfolio
should be complete, well written, and professional in
organization and appearance

210

J. Documentation materials (comprising a “portfolio”) are
required and should be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the title of the musical piece, the
event title, the conference city and state, and the
year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); one (1) page
5. Purpose and description of the musical piece; one
(1) page
6. Self-evaluation of the piece using criteria from the
official rating form; one (1) page
7. Lyrics; pages as needed (not required)
8. Audio composition track list: Each actual
instrument, voice, and/ or synthesized instrument
track used in the final music piece must be
illustrated graphically using a timeline format similar
to that shown below.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

MUSIC PRODUCTION

9. When musical elements are used that were NOT
created by the team, the source, effects applied,
the way each element was incorporated into the
song, and how each element corresponds to the
musical piece’s track list must be included; pages
as needed. Failure to include this section results in
disqualification.

SEMIFINAL ROUND

10. List of hardware, software, and instruments used in
the development of the musical piece; one (1) page

STEM INTEGRATION

11. List of references that includes sources for
materials (non-copyrighted); pages as needed
12. Completed Student Copyright Checklist, as
applicable (see Forms Appendix or TSA website)

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. LEAP Requirements
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

1. The event-specific presentation and interview
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

This event aligns with the STEM educational of Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Artist
Audio designer or engineer
Audio operator or technician
Broadcast technician
Music composer

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The musical piece
2. The accompanying documentation
3. Depending upon the stated purpose, musical
pieces are judged on coherence, style, creativity,
and artisanship, as well as technical attributes,
creativity, organization, and their overall effect.
4. Additionally, the musical piece and portfolio should
reflect familiarity with the technologies used in
musical production.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

211

MUSIC PRODUCTION

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
The portfolio is present.
The track timeline is included in the portfolio and
meets the required format.
The CD is present and plays on a standard CD player.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is unorganized and/or
missing three or more components.

The portfolio is adequately
organized and includes most, if not
all, components.

All components of the portfolio are
included, and the organization of the
content is clearly evident.

Purpose and
description

An unclear purpose and description
of the music production idea and
generation are provided.

The purpose and description are
explained adequately.

A clear and concisely written
purpose and description of the
music production are included.

Plan of Work log
and self-evaluation

The Plan of Work log and/or selfevaluation are incomplete, and/or
missing key components.

The Plan of Work log and/or selfevaluation are somewhat complete
and incorporate reflections and
efforts of the team.

A complete and concisely written
Plan of Work log and self-evaluation
are provided and incorporate the
efforts and reflections of the team.

Track timeline

The track timeline is incomplete
and/or not created correctly; the
timeline does not correlate with the
actual music production.

The track timeline is largely
complete and attempts to correlate
with the actual music production.

The track timeline is of exemplary
quality; it correlates completely with
the music production and is easy to
follow.

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)

212

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (40 points)

MUSIC PRODUCTION

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Creativity and
uniqueness

The musical idea is overly familiar or
is a cliché; no variety or exploration
of musical elements (range, timbre,
dynamics, tempo, rhythm, and
melody) are evident.

The work involves some original
aspects or manipulations of musical
ideas; it explores and includes at
least one or more musical elements.

The piece includes highly original,
unusual, or imaginative musical
ideas; it explores and includes at
least two or more musical elements.

Artisanship

The piece gives no sense of a
completed musical idea; there is
no clear beginning, middle, or end
section; the form appears random,
rather than organized.

One musical element has been
used to organize the musical
ideas and overall form, which are
somewhat coherent.

The piece presents at least one
complete musical idea; the piece
has a coherent and organized form
with a clear beginning, middle, and
end; musical elements are used
to organize the musical ideas and
form.

Energy and style

The piece lacks liveliness, vitality,
and vigor; there is no flair, elegance,
or grace to the form.

The piece generates an initial
level of energy that appeals to
the listener; the style is somewhat
distinctive.

The liveliness and forcefulness of
the piece excite the listener; the
style is truly unique and electrifying.

Appropriateness

The musical idea or concept is not
appropriate and acceptable for use
in the event.

The musical idea or concept
presented is acceptable and
somewhat fitting.

The musical idea or concept
presented is fitting and serves as
an excellent example of the type of
work expected.

Overall appeal

The work does not present an
effective general impression; the
musical ideas do not hold the
listener’s interest.

The work includes some
interesting musical ideas; the
general impression is pleasant and
moderately effective.

There is strong, interesting, and
effective audio appeal; the work
is designed to be enjoyed by the
listeners.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(X2)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

MUSICAL PIECE (60 points)

MUSICAL PIECE SUBTOTAL (60 points)

TIME DEDUCTIONS
There will be a five (5) point deduction for each fifteen (15) seconds under the minimum time or each fifteen (15) seconds over the
maximum time allowed for the visualization.
Total time under

Five (5)-second intervals under

Under time deduction

Total time over

Fifteen (15)-second intervals over

Over time deduction

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (100 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

213

MUSIC PRODUCTION

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

The team/individual seems
unprepared and unorganized for the
interview.

The team/individual is adequately
prepared and organized for the
interview.

The interview with judges is logically
organized and impressive.

Knowledge

The team/individual seems to have
very little understanding of the
concepts and gives vague interview
answers.

The team/individual has a
generalized understanding of the
concepts discussed and answers
questions well.

There is clear evidence of a
thorough understanding of the
concepts discussed.

Articulation

The interview is full of illogical
thoughts that lack understanding
and clarity.

The interview is somewhat logical,
clear, and concise.

A concise, logical, and clear
explanation of the entry is given in
the interview.

Delivery

The team/individual is verbose
and/or uncertain in the interview;
posture, gestures, and lack of eye
contact diminish the delivery.

The team/individual is somewhat
well-spoken and clear in the
interview; posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in an acceptable
delivery.

The team/individual is well-spoken
and distinct in the interview; posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
a polished, natural, and effective
delivery.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are adequately communicated,
include some detail, are clear,
and/or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation of
the SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fully-detailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(14 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (54 points)

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (54 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (54 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add the PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL and the SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL.

TOTAL (154 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

214

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

MUSIC PRODUCTION

MUSIC PRODUCTION EVENT COORDINATOR
INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. One (1) stopwatch per group of judges
7. Results envelope
8. Envelope for LEAP Reports
9. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for judges
C. CD player capable of playing an audio CD, as needed
D. Extension cords (25' minimum length), as needed
E. Power bar with surge protection, as needed

5. At least one (1) hour before the event is set to
begin, meet with judges/assistants to review time
limits, procedures, and regulations. If questions
arise that cannot be answered, speak to the event
manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries and collect LEAP Reports at
the time stated in the conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Place an entry number on each CD and in the
upper right-hand corner of the portfolio. Secure
the entries in the designated area.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently assess the entries.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. The number of judges depends on the number of
entries. There are two (2) judges for every twenty
(20) entries for the first evaluation round.
4. Judges review the entries, to determine twelve (12)
semifinalists. The semifinalist list is posted.

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

215

MUSIC PRODUCTION
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists report at the time and location stated
in the conference program to be interviewed.
2. Semifinalists are interviewed for up to ten (10)
minutes to explain the technical aspects and
creative process of their work. The LEAP interview
will be conducted as part of the semifinalist
event interview and will last a maximum of five (5)
additional minutes.
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
4. Judges independently assess the semifinalists,
discuss and break any ties, and determine ten (10)
finalists. (Determine the procedure for breaking
ties before the onsite competition begins.)
5. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
6. Take all CDs, portfolios, extension cords, and
supplies to the CRC room. Return all equipment to
the appropriate personnel.

216

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ON DEMAND VIDEO
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use video skills,
tools, and processes to communicate, entertain, inform,
analyze and/or illustrate a topic, idea, subject, or concept.
An extremely powerful and ubiquitous medium, video
production has great potential, strengths, and limitations
that should be understood by all.
Participants write, film, and edit a sixty (60)-second video
during the National TSA Conference in this onsite event.
Required criteria, such as props and a line of dialogue,
make the competition more challenging and will be
revealed at the event orientation meeting.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
2. Participants must submit a LEAP Report prior
to receiving the onsite problem materials and
information.
3. The event coordinator distributes the materials,
information, directions, and deadlines to each
team.
4. Each team supplies its own video production and
editing equipment to complete its production.

One (1) team of two to six (2-6) members per chapter may
participate, one (1) entry per team.

5. Each team will be responsible for uploading their
video solution as well as a completed Student
Copyright Checklist to an internet server as
determined at the conference.

TIME LIMITS

6. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.

ELIGIBILITY

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The video must be no longer than sixty (60)
seconds in length. A deduction of five (5) points
will be incurred for exceeding the time limit.
2. Participants have forty-eight (48) hours, beginning
at the event orientation meeting, to complete the
entire production.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
semifinalist LEAP interview.
2. Judges evaluate the interviews.
3. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

7. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted by the CRC.

A. Video entries must be submitted in MP4 format
suitable for being played in VLC Media Player.
1. For more information regarding VLC Media Player,
visit www.videolan.org.

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

2. Teams are strongly encouraged to view their
completed entry in VLC Media Player before
online submission to be sure their video plays as
designed.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

217

ON DEMAND VIDEO

3. The completed Student Copyright Checklist must
be submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF)
suitable for viewing in Adobe Acrobat Reader.

on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview, which will be conducted as part of the
semifinalist presentation.

4. Failure to include the Student Copyright Checklist
will result in disqualification.
5. National TSA will NOT provide wireless Internet.
Students may provide Internet access using a
hotspot from a mobile device.
B. Participants film their footage, which must be
appropriate for the TSA community, only at officially
sanctioned conference locations, as described by the
event coordinator.
1. Teams are not allowed to film in sleeping rooms,
restrooms, restaurants, or elevators/escalators.

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
The completed video production.

2. Participants may not disturb any event in progress,
enter a restricted evaluation area, interrupt a
conference function, or participate in behavior
unbecoming of a conference participant.

1. Depending on the stated purpose, videos are
judged on story concept, artistic and/or social
value, camera technique, transition and video
pace, as well as technical attributes, creativity and
organization, and the overall effect of the solution.

3. At the event meeting, the event coordinator will
explain any further filming restrictions on the
specific property.

2. The video also must incorporate the specified
prop(s) and dialogue presented during the event
meeting.

4. Failure to follow these instructions will result in
disqualification.
C. All entries become the property of TSA and will not be
returned after judging.
D. Teams may use no more than one (1) video camera for
the video production.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The content and quality of the LEAP Report and interview.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

E. Teams must edit their projects on a nonlinear editing
system or their camera. Teams are responsible for
providing their own editing equipment.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

F. All video footage must be the original work of the
team and must have been completed during the
event timeline.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

G. Where applicable, all ideas, test images and sound
from other sources must be cited. Copyrighted
materials may NOT be used. NOTE: Failure to follow
this procedure results in disqualification.

•
•
•
•
•
•

Actor
Audio/video operator or technician
Cinematographer
Film/video editor
Screen editor
Script writer

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working

218

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ON DEMAND VIDEO

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank and
place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
The video is included, in the correct format and is capable
of being played using VLC Media Player.
Student Copyright Checklist is included and in the correct
format.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Camera handling

Serious problems with focus,
steadiness, and framing are evident.

Most shots are clearly focused and
framed, with adequate close-ups
included.

Steady and creative shots that
enhance the video are utilized, and
excellent close-ups are included.

Lighting

Numerous shots are improperly lit;
bleaching, shadows, or unbalanced
conditions may be evident in some
shots; there is no evidence of an
attempt to correct problems.

Most shots are properly lit, either
through ambient lighting or the
use of techniques to correct poor
lighting conditions.

All shots are well lit, either through
ambient lighting or the use of
techniques to correct poor lighting
conditions.

Audio

Audio may be unclear, distorted,
or washed out from poor signal-tonoise ratio; there is evidence of the
use of a built-in camera microphone
that detracts from the message.

The audio is clear, with
consideration given to a good
signal-to-noise ratio; background or
ambient noise may occasionally be
a distraction.

The audio is clear and recorded
with good signal-to-noise ratio,
displaying skillful microphone
choice, placement, and technique.

Continuity and
pacing

The story sequencing is confusing;
shots are too long or “clipped,” with
edit points appearing “glitchy.”

The pace and timing are well structured; clips move along and tell the
story, with moderate use of transitions.

Shots logically pace the story along in
an interesting way, with an excellent
and purposeful use of transitions.

Video effectiveness
(X2)

The video does not meet project
goals, presents an unclear message,
and/or is sloppy overall.

The video topic is presented with
insights; the video adequately
meets the objective.

The video is clearly focused, with a
rich variety of supporting material.

Aesthetics and
artisanship

The work is unorganized and
sloppy.

The work provides an organized
and logical presentation of essential
issues.

The work provides an exemplary use
of layout and design principles to
logically communicate important data.

Use of required
props

Props incorporated in the video
appear as an afterthought.

Props incorporated in the video
add some artistic value and tend to
further the plot.

Props are integral to the
production’s plot and artistic value.

Use of required
dialogue

The line of dialogue is not well incorporated in the production, and/or the
dialogue is not in sync with the plot.

The line of dialogue is adequately
incorporated and somewhat
essential to the production’s plot.

The line of dialogue is
communicated effectively and is
integral to the production’s plot.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PRODUCTION (100 points)

PRODUCTION SUBTOTAL (100 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

219

ON DEMAND VIDEO

Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________
A time violation (a deduction of five [5] points) will be incurred for exceeding the sixty (60)-second time limit for the length of the
video. Record the deduction in the space to the right.

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (100 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (10 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing. Identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (110 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

220

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

ON DEMAND VIDEO

ON DEMAND VIDEO
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

EVENT CHECK-IN/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Prior to the event meeting, the coordinator should
tour the conference facilities and develop a list
of restricted areas and/or specific restrictions
for the event. This list should be shared with the
event manager prior to the event meeting. The
coordinator should mention at the event meeting
that teams must be courteous to all guests in
common areas or designated filming areas.
2. Meet with all participants at the scheduled time
and location to deliver the event-specific criteria,
including required props and dialogue.
a. Ensure that all participants understand
regulations regarding equipment allowed,
behavior, deadlines, and submission
requirements.
b. Collect the LEAP Reports from each team.
c. Anyone reporting who is not on the
coordinator’s report may check in only after
official notification is received from the CRC.
d. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by
events beyond participant control.
3. At least one (1) hour before the judging is
scheduled to begin, meet with judges/assistants to
review time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.
4. Judges independently evaluate the entries.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

221

ON DEMAND VIDEO
6. Each group of evaluators averages its scores to
determine the top five (5) entries from that group.
The number of evaluator groups depends on the
number of entries. In this case, there are two (2) or
more evaluators for every twenty (20) entries. The
top five (5) entries from each group advance to the
semifinalist round.
7. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
items/forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
8. Semifinalists will be posted by the CRC.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the interviews are to take
place. Ensure that there is a table and seating for
participants and judges
.
2. Meet with semifinalist judges to review the LEAP
Judging Protocol. If questions arise that cannot
be answered, speak to the event manager before
semifinalist interviews begin.
3. Evaluation of the semifinalist event entries can
take place at a separate time (before/after the
interviews) in order to allow time for judges to view
and score the videos/documentation.
4. Conduct semifinalist LEAP interviews. Interviews
should be a maximum of five (5) minutes in length.
5. Judges independently assess the semifinalist
entries.
6. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
7. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
8. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
9. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

222

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to demonstrate
understanding of and expertise in using photographic
and imaging technology processes to convey a
message. Semifinalists record images and then utilize
graphic editing software to prepare a solution to an
onsite challenge. The current year’s theme will be posted
on the TSA website under Competitions/Themes and
Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) individual per chapter may participate; one (1)
entry per individual.

TIME LIMITS

Semifinalists will be allowed two (2) hours to complete
the first stage, and two (2) hours to complete the second
stage of the semifinalist round.
Semifinalists also participate in a LEAP interview that lasts
five (5) minutes.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entry and submit a
LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges. Neither students
nor advisors are present at this time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program, with
all of the required equipment and software noted
in the event Regulations.
2. During the semifinalist round, participants will
rotate through a series of stations where they will
perform tasks to demonstrate their knowledge
and skills of the use of photographic equipment
and techniques, such as lighting equipment (e.g.,
continuous lighting kit [such as the one shown
here: https://amzn.to/2v0RYx8m or equivalent,
provided by National TSA] and/or off-camera flash
units [provided by the participant]), as well as their
creativity in staging and photographing a subject in
a studio-like environment.
3. As part of the station rotation, semifinalists will
also participate in an interview which will include
questions regarding LEAP.
4. Semifinalists will be given 30 minutes at each
station to set up lights and camera, position their
subject, and take their photographs, or do their
interview.
5. At the end of the allotted time, competitors will
rotate to the next station. Once a competitor has
completed his or her time in a station, s/he may not
revisit it.
6. When the first two (2) hours of the contest have
elapsed, competitors will move to their editing
computers and will have two (2) hours to select
and edit ONE (1) photo from each station to submit
for judging.
7. The original photos, along with their edited
versions are to be placed in a multimedia
presentation and saved to two USB flash drives for
judging.
8. At the conclusion of the allotted editing time, the
multimedia presentation is to be saved to both
USB flash drives and the drives are to be turned
into the event coordinator for judging.
9. Judges independently assess the entries,
including each participant’s LEAP Report.
10. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

223

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants prepare a photographic portfolio
addressing the annual theme posted on the national
TSA website.
B. Participants must submit their photographic images
and required documentation as a single, multi-page
PDF document on a USB flash drive at the time and
place designated in the conference program
C. The USB flash drive must be labeled with the name
of the competition (PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY)
and the participant’s identification number.
D. The entry must contain: Five (5) separate images,
each no larger than 8" x 10" or no smaller than 3" x 5".
1. Of the five (5) images, two (2) must be color
images, two (2) must be black and white images,
and one (1) image can be of the participant’s
choice.
2. Note: Sepia tones, blue tones, or coloring of any
type, other than black and white, are counted as
color images.
E. Subjects for each of the images may include (but are
not limited to) action shots, still-lifes, product shots,
portraits, special effects shots (composites, successive
printing, ghost images, sandwiching, silhouettes, etc.),
wildlife, landscapes, etc.
F. All images submitted for judging must be the sole
work of the individual participant; this includes images
used in special effects photography.
G. Any image submitted that combines images must
have the unaltered images included in the Resources/
References section of the entry.
H. Each image (none larger than 8" x 10") must be
included in the single, multi-page PDF document.
I. ALL recognizable individuals (i.e., face is visible)
selected and pictured in the images must give their
written consent before the images can be used in this
event.

224

J. All consent forms must be included in the single,
multi-page PDF documentation portfolio as described
below. NOTE: If consent forms are missing, the entry
will not be judged.
K. Each image submitted should include a typewritten
statement no longer than one-half (½) page in length
(typewritten in a san serif, 12-point font [such as Arial or
Calibri] for readability) with the following information:
1. Camera make (Nikon, Canon, Panasonic, Sony,
etc.)
2. Camera model (CoolPix, Rebel, 5D, etc.)
3. F-stop at which the photograph was taken
4. Exposure time
5. ISO speed
6. Focal length
7. A brief description of the image, how the
photographer interprets it to meet the challenge
criteria, and what edits were made to the original
image to arrive at the final product. This statement
should NOT appear on the same page as the final
image.
8. Include detailed information about the process/
special effects applied to the image.
L. The single, multi-page PDF document must be a
finished size of 8½" x 11" with the pages arranged in
this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Color Image #1 – a single color image no larger
than 8" x 10" and no smaller than 3" x 5"; one (1)
page
5. A written statement about Color Image #1
containing the information detailed in Regulation K;
one (1) page
6. Color Image #2 – a single color image no larger
than 8" x 10" and no smaller than 3" x 5"; one (1)
page

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

7. A written statement about Color Image #2
containing the information detailed in Regulation K;
one (1) page
8. Black and White Image #1 – a single black and
white image no larger than 8" x 10" and no smaller
than 3" x 5"; one (1) page
9. A written statement about Black and White Image #1
containing the information detailed in Regulation K;
one (1) page
10. Black and White Image #2 – a single black and
white image no larger than 8" x 10" and no smaller
than 3" x 5"; one (1) page
11. A written statement about Black and White
Image #2 containing the information detailed in
Regulation K; one (1) page
12. Student’s Choice Image – image should be no
larger than 8" x 10" and no smaller than 3" x 5"; one
(1) page
13. A written statement about Student’s Choice Image
containing the information detailed in Regulation K;
one (1) page
14. Consent forms – Recognizable individuals (i.e.,
face is visible) selected and pictured in the images
must give their written consent before the images
can be used in this event; failure to provide
consent forms for recognizable individuals will
result in disqualification.
15. List of resources and references used. Photos
used in special effects photos (composite images,
ghosted images, etc.) are to be placed in this
section and should note the associated photo;
pages as needed.
M. All prints used in Photographic Technology should
be appropriate for viewing at the National TSA
Conference. Any entry that includes images depicting
inappropriate or unacceptable behavior will result in
disqualification.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Semifinalists are required to provide their own camera
equipment, including:
1. A tripod
2. Portable, off-camera flash unit (e.g., a speedlight)
3. Cameras must have a timer feature and/or remote
trigger, off camera flash capability, and the ability to
be mounted to a tripod.
4. Cell phone cameras are not permitted.
B. Semifinalists may bring any other related accessories
that they feel they may need (i.e., filters, reflectors,
extra batteries, etc.) to use in the onsite competition.
C. Semifinalists must also bring a computer (laptop is
preferred) with graphic editing software installed.
D. Participants will use the graphic editing software
(e.g., Lightbox, Photoshop, Fireworks, etc.), to edit
their images. Semifinalists should edit the images as
necessary to achieve the desired result.
E. Each semifinalist must have a method to transfer the
images to the computer for editing (such as a media
reader).
F. No internet access will be provided, nor will
competitors be allowed to bring and/or use
mobile hotspots to access the internet during the
competition.
G. Semifinalists must bring two (2) USB flash drives to
compete in the semifinal round of the event.
H. Each USB flash drive must be labeled with the
participant’s identification number and the name of
the competition.
I. Examples of tasks that participants may be asked to
perform include, but are not limited to: photographing
a product for commercial use, green screen shots,
macro photography, portraiture, or staging a still life
photo using provided materials.
1. Where required by the onsite challenge, lighting
kits (with the exception of off-camera flash units),
backdrops, props and models will be provided by
TSA.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

225

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

J. Semifinalists should edit the image as necessary
to achieve the desired result; a copy of the original
image and the edited copy must be saved to both
USB flash drives.

EVALUATION
1. Points earned for the required images and
documentation (preliminary and semifinal rounds)
2. Scores on required images and the
documentation portfolio determine the twelve (12)
semifinalists.

K. When preparing their multimedia presentation,
semifinalists must include the following information:
1. Camera make (Nikon, Canon, Panasonic, Sony, etc.)

3. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview

2. Camera model (CoolPix, Rebel, 5D, etc.)
3. F-stop at which each photograph was taken

4. Points earned through the onsite event determine
the final ranking

4. Exposure time of each photograph
5. ISO speed of each photograph
6. Focal length of the lens for each photograph
7. For each image presented, participants must also
write a brief statement (one to two sentences
in length) on how the photographer believes
the image meets the challenge (e.g., “I chose a
standard formal portrait style in black and white to
focus attention on the subject’s face.”).
a. The statement must also include the edits
made to the original image to arrive at the final
image.
b. This statement should NOT appear on the
same page/slide as the image.

Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Advertising or public relations executive
Graphic designer
Photographer
Publisher
Sales manager

c. The text should be in a san-serif, 12-point font
(such as Arial or Calibri) for easy readability.
L. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview, which will be conducted as part of the
semifinalist presentation.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

226

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PHOTOGRAPHIC
TECHNOLOGY

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Portfolio (a single [multi-page] document in PDF format
is present on the flash drive
Consent forms are present in the portfolio (if necessary)
Portfolio contains the correct number of images (none
larger than 8" x 10")
Resources/References list is present in the portfolio
Completed LEAP Report is present
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Principles and
elements of design
and composition
and creativity

There is little or no evidence of an
understanding or creative use of
compositional elements (line, shape,
form, value, space, texture, color,
framing, emphasis, balance, unity,
contrast, movement/rhythm and
pattern/repetition).

Images demonstrate some
knowledge and creative use of
compositional elements (line, shape,
form, value, space, texture, color,
framing, emphasis, balance, unity,
contrast, movement/rhythm and
pattern/repetition).

Images clearly demonstrate
excellent and creative use of a
variety of compositional elements
(line, shape, form, value, space,
texture, color, framing, emphasis,
balance, unity, contrast, movement/
rhythm and pattern/ repetition).

Technical quality

Photos are out of focus; blurriness
is unintentional and does not
contribute to the overall composition;
photos display incorrect exposure
values, white balance, and/or
range of tones; there is little or no
consideration given to lighting and/
or special effects.

Photos are in focus; photos display
correct exposure values, white
balance, and/or range of tones;
images exhibit some attention to
lighting and/or the use of special
effects.

Photo subject(s) are in sharp focus;
blurriness is used effectively to
enhance the composition; photos
display correct exposure values,
white balance, and/or range of
tones; images are enhanced by
attention to lighting and/or the use
of special effects.

Emotional Impact

The images are flat and lack
emotional depth; viewers are not
drawn into the scene; images do not
clearly convey the theme/challenge.

The images show some emotional
depth; viewers make an emotional
connection with the images/pictures
and are drawn into the scene or
learn something from the subject(s);
images convey the competition
theme/challenge.

The images show emotional
depth; viewers make an instant
emotional connection with the
pictures and are drawn into the
scene or learn something from the
subject(s); images cleary convey the
competition theme/challenge.

Written statements

A written statement may or may
not accompany each photo, and/or
the statement includes only some
of the photo’s meta data (camera
make/model, f/stop, exposure time,
ISO speed, focal length), and/or
an explanation of the relevance of
the image to the challenge is not
present and/or is written poorly.

A written statement accompanies
each photo; the statement includes
most of the photo’s meta data
(camera make/model, f/stop,
exposure time, ISO speed, focal
length); an explanation of the
relevance of the image to the
challenge is included.

A written statement accompanies
each photo; the statement includes
the photo’s meta data (camera
make/model, f/stop, exposure
time, ISO speed, focal length); an
explanation of the relevance of the
image to the challenge is presented
in a clear and concise manner.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PORTFOLIO (60 points)

227

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

PORTFOLIO (60 points) – continued
Resources/
References
(X2)

A reference list is present, but
graphic and/or software packages
used are not mentioned, and/or
MLA format is not used, and/or the
citations are inadequate.

A reference list is present and the
primary software packages used are
included; MLA format is used for an
adequate number of resources.

Detailed and concise resources/
references are provided; all
software packages used are
included; MLA format is used for the
citations.

PORTFOLIO SUBTOTAL (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (60 points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Principles and
elements of design/
composition and
creativity

Technical skill

Participants do not demonstrate
knowledge of and understanding
of how to utilize photographic
equipment and techniques such
as lighting equipment, and/
or off-camera flash, or do not
use it altogether in the onsite
challenge; participants show little
or no creativity in stanging and
photographing subjects.

Participants demonstrate some
knowledge of and understanding
of how to utilize photographic
equipment and techniques such
as lighting equipment, and/or offcamera flash, or use it only minimally
in the onside challenge; participants
show some creativity in stanging
and photographing subjects.

Participants clearly demonstrate
knowledge and understanding
of how to utilize photographic
equipment and techniques such
as lighting equipment, and/or offcamera flash and use it creatively
in the onsite challenge; participants
show creativity in stanging and
photographing subjects; participants
show a high level of skill in the use
of the tools to create high quality
images.

Technical quality

Photos are out of focus; blurriness
is unintentional and does
not contribute to the overall
composition; photos display
incorrect exposure values, white
balance, and/or range of tones;
there is little or no consideration
given to lighting and/or special
effects.

Photos are in focus; photos display
correct exposure values, white
balance, and/or range of tones;
images exhibit some attention to
lighting and/or the use of special
effects.

Emotional Impact

The images are flat and lack
emotional depth; viewers are not
drawn into the scene; images do not
clearly convey the theme/challenge.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

228

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL CHALLENGE (60 points)

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

SEMIFINAL CHALLENGE (60 points) – continued
Written Statements
(X1)

SEMIFINAL CHALLENGE SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are not clearly communicated, lack
detail, and/or are unconvincing; few,
if any, attempts are made to identify
and/or incorporate the Student
Leadership Challenge Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fullydetailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (12 points)

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (72 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (132 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

229

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistants for check-in, two (2)
C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round for portfolios, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing

EVENT CHECK-IN

1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge

1. Check in the entries and collect LEAP Reports at
the time stated in the conference program.

2. TSA Event Coordinator Report

2. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.

3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stick-on labels for entries, as needed
6. Results envelope
7. Envelope for LEAP Reports
8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables for entries
C. Tables and chairs for judges
D. Semifinalist event information sheet
E. Event time line and presentation schedule
F. LED projector and laptop with appropriate software to
review semifinalist presentations

230

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.

3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Collect entries for evaluation and secure them in
the designated area.
5. Place an entry number on the protective sleeve
holding the USB flash drive, or the flash drive itself.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Judges independently assess the entries.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Judges determine twelve (12) semifinalists.
4. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC room for posting.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Perform basic set up of equipment necessary for
the completion of the semifinal task and distribute
the description of the Photographic Technology
semifinalist assignment, specific instructions, and
timeline to each semifinalist.
2. At the completion of the semifinalist round, collect
USB flash drives. Ensure that each is properly
marked with the participant’s identification number.
3. Immediately following the collection of flash drives,
each semifinalist will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.
4. Following completion of the second stage of this
round, judges evaluate the entries.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

231

232

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PREPARED PRESENTATION
OVERVIEW

2. Participants report to the designated area to
receive the assigned topic for the presentation.
The assigned topic will be given to the participants
at one (1) hour intervals based on the participant’s
presentation time.

ELIGIBILITY

3. Participants report to the holding area, as stated in
the conference program, fifteen (15) minutes prior
to the assigned presentation time.

Participants have the opportunity to develop and deliver
an oral presentation using a digital slide deck on an
assigned topic provided onsite.

Three (3) individuals per state may participate.

TIME LIMITS
1. Each presentation must be no less than three (3)
minutes and no more than five (5) minutes.
2. A maximum of five (5) minutes is allowed for set-up.
3. At the conclusion of a presentation, participants
must have all devices ready to exit the room within
three (3) minutes.
4. A time deduction (noted in the rubric) will be
incurred for not adhering to any time designations/
restrictions.
5. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take
place immediately following each semifinalist
presentation and will last a maximum of five (5)
minutes.

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in.

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program to
sign up for a presentation time and submit a LEAP
Report.

4. The event coordinator introduces each participant
by number and in order of scheduled times. The
schedule allows time for set-up and removal of
equipment.
5. A list of twleve (12) semifinalists (in random order) is
posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program. Each
semifinalist will sign up for a presentation time.
2. Semifinalists will present on the same topic as in
the preliminary round and will follow the same
presentation procedure as above.
3. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take
place immediately following each semifinalist
presentation.
4. Judges independently assess each participant’s
presentation, including the LEAP Report.
5. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND/SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Each presentation must be the result of the
participant’s own efforts.
B. The topic for the Prepared Presentation event is given
to participants twenty-four (24) hours prior to their
presentation time.
C. The presentation must include the use of a digital
slide deck.
D. The slide deck must include a minimum of five (5)
slides.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

233

PREPARED PRESENTATION

E. Participants are not allowed to hear other participants’
presentations.

K. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

F. It is the participant’s responsibility to provide any
audio/visual equipment needed for the presentation,
including a laptop computer and projector. If a
participant is using equipment that requires electricity,
s/he must bring a 25' extension cord.
G. Participants will not be permitted to compete without
an electronic device for presentation.

2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content and quality of the LEAP Report as part of
the LEAP interview, which will be conducted as
part of the semifinalist presentation.

H. A table (approximately six feet [6'] long) and a
projection screen will be provided by national TSA for
participant use, as needed.

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

I. Participant scores are penalized one (1) point per ten
(10)-second interval for speaking over or under the
allotted time.

EVALUATION
1. The quality of the presentation

1. The same penalty is used for set-up and
takedown.
2. Set-up time begins when the participant is called
into the room and ends when the participant is
ready to deliver the presentation; takedown time
begins when the presentation is concluded and
ends when the participant has all devices ready to
exit the room.
3. The presentation time starts when the presentation
begins and ends when the presentation is
concluded.
J. No observers are allowed in the event or preparation
rooms during heats, although they are allowed to sit in
the audience of the performance during the finals.
1. No talking or gesturing is permitted.
2. Observers are NOT allowed to enter or leave
during a presentation.

2. Appropriate use of a slide deck
3. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Broadcast media specialist
Lawyer
Management consultant
Motivational speaker
Public relations executive

3. There is no applause until the presentation has
concluded.
4. No form of visual recording (such as photographic
or video) or audio recording by any observer
(including family, friends, or advisors of the
participants) is permitted.

234

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PREPARED
PRESENTATION

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
A slide deck is present.
Items required to execute the slide deck are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Introduction

The introduction is weak, with little
effort made to highlight and/or
generate interest and enthusiasm
for the topic.

The introduction is adequate and
creates a general level of interest.

The introduction is effective,
stimulating, and inspires observers.

Body

The body of the presentation is
poorly organized; the content does
not properly cover or represent the
topic theme.

The body of the presentation is
somewhat clear and effective and
creates an interesting premise.

The body of the presentation
speech is clear, effective, and
delivered in an exceptionally
interesting manner; the presentation
is memorable.

Conclusion

The conclusion fails to summarize
or clarify the information provided in
the presentation.

The conclusion adequately
summarizes the content and theme
of the presentation topic.

The conclusion is effective,
interesting, and memorable; it fully
brings finality to the presentation.

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (30 points)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (30 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Appearance

Participant’s appearance is
unprofessional, sloppy, and
inappropriate.

Participant’s appearance is
adequate, appropriate, and
somewhat professional.

Participant’s appearance is
exceptional, appropriate, and
professional.

Confidence

Participant appears nervous during
presentation; poor posture, poor
eye contact, and lack of confidence
are evident.

Participant is generally poised,
displays eye contact, and is
confident, with little sign of
nervousness.

Participant “commands” the room,
and is exceptionally poised,
confident, and positive.

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

STAGE PRESENCE (30 points)

235

PREPARED PRESENTATION

STAGE PRESENCE (30 points) – continued
Articulation
(X1)

Participant conveys an inconsistent
use of proper grammar, word
pronunciation, and acceptable pitch
and tone.

Participant generally uses proper
grammar and pronunciation, and
varies the use of tone and pitch.

Smooth and effective articulation,
proper grammar, correct
pronunciation, and varied tone and
pitch are used throughout the speech.

STAGE PRESENCE SUBTOTAL (30 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Effectiveness
and quality of
presentation

The presentation is poorly
prepared, not interesting, and not
representative of the stated theme.

The presentation is adequate,
and the observer can generally
understand the theme.

The presentation is exceptional and
memorable; the observer can easily
understand and relate to the theme.

Organization

The presentation is difficult to follow
or understand.

The presentation is adequately
organized and delivered.

The presentation is organized and easy
to follow; the delivery is exceptional.

Quality of the slide
deck

The presentation slide deck is
of minimal quality; slides are
unprofessional and/or inappropriate
and do not enhance the content
of the presentation; the participant
does not have the minimum number
of slides required.

The presentation slide deck is
adequate; the slides generally relate
to the theme of the presentation; the
participant has used the minimum
number of slides required.

The slide deck is exceptional and
enhances the theme and content of
the presentation without distracting
the observers from the overall
content of the presentation; the
participant exceeds the minimum
number of slides required.

Use of the slide
deck

The participant reads from the
slide deck; the use of the slide
deck detracts from the overall
presentation; the participant struggles
with transitions between slides while
delivering the presentation.

The participant tends to rely on
the slide deck for much of the
presentation; the participant
adequately handles transitions
between slides while delivering the
presentation.

The participant effectively uses the
slide deck to enhance the overall
presentation; transitions between
slides are smooth, effective, and
well-timed.

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

ORGANIZATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

236

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

ORGANIZATION (40 points)

PREPARED PRESENTATION

TIME DEDUCTIONS
One (1) point per ten (10)-second interval is to be deducted for speaking under the three (3) minutes or over the five (5) minutes allotted
for the presentation. The same one (1)-point per ten (10)-second interval penalty applies to more than five (5) minutes for set up and
three (3) minutes for take down. Presentation time commences when the presenter begins speaking.
Total time for presentation

Presentation deduction

Total time for set-up

Set-up deduction

Total time for take down

Take down deduction

TOTAL TIME DEDUCTIONS

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (100 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (10 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (10 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

237

PREPARED PRESENTATION

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (110 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

238

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PREPARED PRESENTATION

PREPARED PRESENTATION
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

AT THE CONFERENCE

B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more per heat/event
room
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more, preferably those
who did NOT judge the initial round
C. Timekeeper, one (1) per heat/event room for the
preliminary round and one (1) for the semifinal round

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stopwatch, one (1) per event room
6. Results envelope
7. Envelope for LEAP Reports
8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Prepared sign-up list indicating ten (10)-minute
intervals for each preliminary heat to accommodate all
registered participants
C. Prepared sign-up list indicating fifteen (15)-minute
intervals for the semi-finalist round
D. Assigned theme (to be distributed twenty-four [24]
hours before the assigned presentation time), one (1)
copy per participant and judge
E. Tables and chairs for two (2) judges and one (1)
timekeeper per heat/event room
F. Chairs for audience for semifinalist round
G. Table for participant use, approximately 6' long, one (1)
per heat/event room

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being
held for appropriate set-up, including room size,
chairs, tables, screens, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems. Set up the
projection screen.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time and check
the entry list.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Collect LEAP Reports from participants during the
initial event time sign-ups at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
5. Participants will sign up for heats according to the
time provided in the conference program.
6. Participants who do not report to sign up for heats
may be disqualified. Any exceptions must be
approved by the CRC.

H. Projection screen, one (1) per heat/event room
I. Podium, one (1) per heat/event room

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

239

PREPARED PRESENTATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants will report to the designated time and
place stated in the conference program to receive
the topic for presentation.
2. Topics will be given to participants twenty-four (24)
hours prior to presentation times.
3. At the scheduled time, take the first participant to
the event room and provide five (5) minutes for
set-up of equipment.
4. The event coordinator or assistant introduces each
participant by entry number only. No nametags
that give any indication of the hometown, school,
or chapter are allowed.
5. Approximately every ten (10) minutes, the
coordinator or designated assistant sends a
participant to the event coordinator or assistant in
the event room.
6. The participant is allowed three (3) minutes to
remove all equipment.
7. Following the last participant’s presentation, the
judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists,
making adjustments for time penalties.
8. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
9. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC room for posting.

240

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being
held for appropriate set-up, including room size,
chairs, tables, screens, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems. Set up the
projection screen.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.
3. Repeat the presentation process in the preliminary
round for scoring the semifinal round.
4. Include an additional five (5) minutes per time
slot (semifinalist round only) to allow for each
semifinalist to participate in the semifinalist LEAP
interview immediately following their semifinalist
presentation.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and
their ranking, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use computerized
graphic communications layout and design skills in the
production of a promotional resource for TSA.
Participants produce an original multi-piece marketing
folder to be used for TSA chapter recruitment, or as an
introductory packet for new TSA advisors/teachers. This
promotional pocket folder should be mailable and would
include four to five (4-5) separate and different items. The
folder must contain items that provide details about TSA,
its history, its co-curricular relationship with Engineering
and Technology pathway courses, its membership
guidelines and instructions for joining, the competitive
events program, signature events, service projects, STEM
connections, leadership training activities, and sample
chapter membership recruitment items. Promotional
Folder content examples might include: a pamphlet,
post card, letter, small poster, business card, and a PDF
of a color graphic for branding promotional gifts. The
complete Promotional Folder must demonstrate a unity of
design that repeats throughout the included items.
Semifinalists respond to an onsite problem with a solution
that demonstrates their ability to use a computer to
design and edit materials for in-house publication.

ELIGIBILITY

LEAP

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entries and submit a
LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Entries are reviewed by judges.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program for
the onsite component of the event.
2. Semifinalists are provided with an onsite
publishing problem.
3. A final color output of each semifinalist entry is
saved as a PDF file, turned in on a USB flash drive,
and judged.

Three (3) individuals per state may participate, one (1)
entry per individual.

4. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take place
immediately following the completion of the onsite
portion of the event.

TIME LIMITS

5. Judges independently assess the entries,
including each semifinalist’s LEAP Report and
interview.

1. Semifinalists have a thirty (30)-minute set-up time
before the onsite portion of the event, and two (2)
hours to complete the onsite problem.
2. The semifinalist LEAP interview will take place
immediately following the completion of the onsite
portion of the event and will last a maximum of five
(5) minutes.

6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

241

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Each entry must include a student-designed standard
two-pocket folder.
1. The folder may be produced by the participant or
purchased from an office supply store.
2. The folder must be made of cardstock with a
cover image (either printed directly to the cover or
printed on a separate sheet of paper, then glued
to it to simulate the look of the final project).
3. The folder must include two pockets, and a
business card slit.
4. The folder must include 4-5 printed promotional
publication items (chosen by the designer).
5. One of the submitted items must be the folder that
contains the rest of the portfolio. The folder must
measure 9½" x 12" closed, and 19" x 12" open.
B. The printed items contained in the folder must follow
the below guidelines:
1. The printed items contained in the folder should
be designed in color (three [3] minimum) on white
8½" x 11" paper (maximum size).
2. Colored paper, preprinted, or designed paper may
not be used.
3. Clip art may be used, however, no templates may
be used.
4. If it is determined that the product submitted is a
template, the entry will be disqualified.
5. Items that may be considered for the additional
three (3) or four (4) portfolio items might include: a
pamphlet, post card, letter, small poster, business
card, PDF of graphic for branding promotional gifts,
such as mugs or a t-shirt; (these actual items are
not submitted).
6. The complete packet should demonstrate a unity
of design that repeats throughout the portfolio.
7. The content of all items must be appropriate for
viewing at the National TSA Conference. Any entry
that includes images depicting sex, drugs, tobacco,
alcohol, gangs, cults, etc., will be disqualified.

242

8. The folder containing all the elements is identified
using only the participant’s identification number.
9. Entries should not include any other identifying
information. (The name of the chapter may only be
identified when the challenge calls for promotion
of the local chapter, as in fundraising.)
10. These items must be included in the folder:
a. Proof of permission to use copyrighted
image(s) must be included (see Student
Copyright Checklist in the Forms Appendix or
on the TSA website).
b. A release form must be present if photographs
of individuals are used (see Photo Consent and
Release form).
c. Clipart must be documented. Failure to do so
results in disqualification. (No permission is
needed for the use of the TSA logo by affiliated
chapters.) Refer to the TSA Branding Guide on
the TSA website.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Semifinalists supply their own computer work station
with USB port, power strip/surge protector, extension
cord, and software for the onsite portion of the event.
1. A laptop computer is recommended.
2. Any semifinalist who does not provide these items
will not be allowed to compete in the onsite event.
B. The purpose of the onsite entry is to create a printable
product.
C. Clip art may be used.
D. No templates may be used.
E. All onsite work is developed, saved as a PDF file
on a USB flash drive, and submitted using only the
participant’s identification number.
F. Semifinalists leave the event room only with
permission from the event coordinator.
G. The onsite entry should be saved and submitted
when the work is completed and/or when time
elapses.
H. All entries become the property of TSA and will not be
returned after judging.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN

I. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Semifinalists will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
The promotional folder cover and contents
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The semifinalist problem
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event has connections to the STEM standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Advertising executive
Graphic designer
Marketing manager
Printer
Public relations manager

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

243

PROMOTIONAL
DESIGN

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Entry is submitted in the designated folder
(9½" x 12" when closed).
Entry contains the required four to five (4-5) items.
No obvious templates are present in the entry.
All permission forms are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

STATIC ENTRY (110 points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Appropriateness of
graphic design

The design has little connection to
or is inadequate in conveying the
essence of the design challenge;
logo(s) are poorly placed or of poor
quality.

The design has a general
connection to the challenge; logo(s)
are present.

The design is appropriate
and effectively addresses the
theme; logo(s) are present and
appropriately placed.

First impressions

The design is messy and/
or damaged, and leaves an
unfavorable impression.

The design is neat, with adequate
attention to detail.

The design is eye-catching and
compelling; attention to detail is very
evident.

Use of color

The graphic has less than three
colors; colors used clash or distract
from the graphic.

The graphic has three colors, and
they generally work well together.

The effective choice of colors
creates an appealing graphic.

Fonts

Font choice, size, and placement
are ineffective in creating an
aesthetically pleasing design.

Font choice and size are
appropriate and incorporated
somewhat effectively in the design.

Font choice and size are
appropriate, and the location of text
is effectively incorporated in the
aesthetics of the design.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(sharp, clean edges
of graphics and
fonts; entry is clear
of smudges, smears,
pencil or other
extraneous marks)
(X1)
(X1)

(readable, have eye
appeal, appropriate
dimension and
placement)
(X1)

PROMOTIONAL FOLDER COVER SUBTOTAL (40 points)

244

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PROMOTIONAL FOLDER COVER (Cover Graphic) (40 points)

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Appropriateness of
graphic products

The included graphic products have
little connection to the intent of the
folder’s target audience.

The included graphic products
are appropriate to the intended
audience and have generally useful
content.

The included graphic products
clearly connect with the intention
of the promotional packet and its
intended audience, providing useful,
related content

Unity of design
(X1)

The complete packet has little
obvious unity of design throughout
the included items.

The complete packet demonstrates
a general sense of unity of design
throughout the included items.

The complete packet demonstrates
an obvious unity of design that
repeats throughout the included
items.

Incorporation of
graphic design
principles

The included graphic products
incorporate or embody few, if any, of
the design principles.

The included graphic products
are somewhat pleasing but may
be missing one or two design
principles; the products have a
layout that is generally aesthetically
pleasing.

The included graphic products are
clearly unique and aesthetically
pleasing, with all graphic design
principles incorporated in the overall
design and layout.

Grammar/spelling

Many misspelled words are present,
and grammar is poor.

Spelling and grammar are mostly
correct.

Proper grammar and spelling are
evident.

Graphic images

Images have little connection to the
essence of the challenge; logo(s)
are poorly placed or of poor quality.

Images have general connections to
the challenge; logo(s) are present.

Images are appropriate and
effectively address the challenge;
logo(s) are present and
appropriately placed.

Use of color

Graphic has less than three colors;
colors used clash or distract from
the graphic.

Graphic has three colors, and they
generally work well together.

The effective choice of colors
creates an appealing graphic.

Fonts

Font choice, text size, and
placement are ineffective in creating
an aesthetically pleasing design.

Font choice is appropriate and
incorporated somewhat effectively
in the design.

Font choice and size are
appropriate, and the location of text
is effectively incorporated in the
aesthetics of the design.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(alignment, contrast,
unity, white space,
balance, and
proportion)
(X1)
(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

(readable, have eye
appeal, appropriate
dimension and
placement)
(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PROMOTIONAL FOLDER CONTENTS (70 points)

PROMOTIONAL FOLDER CONTENTS SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (110 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

245

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Layout and design

The design inadequately incorporates
the design principles of alignment,
consistancy, contrast, unity, or white space.

The design incorporates most
design principles; overall layout is
generally aesthetically pleasing.

An aesthetically pleasing design is
provided, with all design principles
incorporated in the layout and design.

Solution to project

Three or more attributes of the
solution’s criteria are missing.

Most attributes of the solution’s
criteria are included.

All attributes of the solution’s criteria
are evident.

Effectiveness

The solution inadequately conveys
the intended message, and/or it
contains unrelated text/graphics.

The solution conveys the intended
message appropriately, and it uses
text and/or graphics generally well.

The solution’s message is easily understood and interpreted, with exceptional
use of related graphics and text.

Originality

The finished product is ordinary,
plain, and unimaginative in design.

The finished product shows some
effort to be imaginative and original.

The final product is truly unique and
shows creativity.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL PROBLEM (40 points)

SEMIFINAL PROBLEM SUBTOTAL (40 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing. Few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (15 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing. Identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (15 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (55 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (165 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

246

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

2. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
4. Place an entry number in the upper right-hand
corner of the portfolio.
5. Secure the entries in the designated area.

6. Results envelope

a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or

7. Envelope for LEAP Reports

b. To disqualify the entry

8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries and collect LEAP Reports at
the time stated in the conference program.

3. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
4. Review and submit semifinalist results and all
related items/forms to the CRC for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area(s) in which the onsite activity is
being held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with your judges for the onsite activity to
review time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.
3. Semifinalists report for the onsite problem.
4. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors and checking the entry list.
a. All semifinalists and judges should be in the
room at this time.
b. Semifinalists not present may be disqualified.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

247

PROMOTIONAL DESIGN
5. Judges monitor the participants during the onsite
activity.
6. Each participant (using his/her individual
identification number) will save the final product in
a PDF file on a USB flash drive.
7. Immediately following the collection of flash drives,
each semifinalist will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.
8. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
9. Judges will determine the ten (10) finalists and
their ranking, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
10. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
11. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the area.

248

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL
VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)
OVERVIEW

Scientific and Technical Visualization (SciVis) is the
representation of complex scientific and/or technical
concepts in a visual form. Participants use either 2D or
3D computer graphics tools and design processes to
communicate, inform, analyze, and/or illustrate a STEM
topic, idea, subject, or concept.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams per state may participate, one (1) entry
per team; a team of one (1) individual is allowed.
NOTE: Collaborative work as a team is strongly
encouraged.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The visualization is to be two to four (2-4) minutes
in length. There will be a five (5)-point deduction
for each fifteen (15) seconds under two (2) minutes
or over four (4) minutes.
2. The visualization time length is calculated from the
start of the first image or sound to the end of the
last image or sound.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists will be interviewed by the judges
about their entry for a maximum of ten (10) minutes.
2. The semifinalist LEAP interview will be conducted
immediately following the event-specific interview
and will last a maximum of five (5) additional
minutes.

LEAP

An individual or team LEAP Report is required for this
event and must be submitted at event check-in (see
LEAP Program).

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. No more than two (2) representatives from each
semifinalist team may report to the event area for
the interview at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Each semifinalist team answers questions
about their portfolio from the judges, discussing
the purpose, value, research and design, and
development process of its work.
3. The semifinalist LEAP interview will be conducted
immediately following the event-specific interview.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. All entries must be the original work of the participant
or team.
1. Where applicable, all ideas, text, images, and
sound from other sources must be cited.
2. If copyrighted material is used, proper written
permission must be included.
3. Failure to follow this procedure results in
disqualification.
B. All entries become the property of TSA and will not be
returned after judging.
C. Documentation:

ATTIRE
TSA competition attire is required for this event.

1. A USB flash drive must be submitted with the
documentation materials at check-in.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

249

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

2. Documentation materials (comprising a “portfolio”)
are required and must be secured in a clear front
report cover. The report cover must include the
following single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this
order:
a. USB flash drive (containing the visualization) in
a secure holder or sealed sleeve at the front of
the portfolio.
b. LEAP Report
c. Title page with the event title, the conference
city and state, and the year; one (1) page

D. Visualization:
1. Visualizations must be turned in on a USB flash
drive in either an MPEG or Quick Time file format.
2. A PowerPoint presentation or PowerPoint slide
show are not acceptable formats for this event.
3. Each visualization must advance automatically
once it has been opened and started by the
judges. A splash screen is acceptable, provided
the “PLAY” command is easily visible.

d. Table of contents; pages as needed

4. The visualization may be an animation, such as a
biological cell dividing or a group of static images
that explain the concept.

e. Purpose of visualization; one (1) page

5. No posters or models will be accepted.

f. Hand-sketched storyboard that documents
the flow and progression of the visualization
with written notes; special effects, audio cues,
dialogue, transitions, and scene duration
should be incorporated into the storyboard;
pages as needed

6. Live action video is not allowed, including
“whiteboard” style entries.

g. Written description of what the visualization
illustrates or demonstrates; one (1) page
h. List of references that includes sources for
materials, copyrighted and otherwise; pages as
needed. (The term “Fair Use” and similar terms
are not acceptable citations when creating the
list of references.)
i. Permission letters for copyrighted material;
pages as needed
j. List of software and hardware used in the
development of the visualization; one (1) page
k. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for
the event, as noted by date, task, time involved,
the initials of the team member(s) responsible,
and comments (see Forms Appendix or TSA
website); pages as needed
l. Completed and signed Student Copyright
Checklist (see Forms Appendix or TSA
website); one (1) page

7. All work must be included in the portfolio and on a
USB flash drive.
8. The visualization is not to be under two (2) or over
four (4) minutes in length.
9. There will be a five (5)-point deduction for each
fifteen (15) seconds under the minimum time or for
each fifteen (15) seconds over the maximum time.
10. Sound may accompany the visualization.
11. Absolutely no purchased content may be used in
any part of the visualization. (Purchased content
includes, but is not limited to, texture, models, and
royalty free music.)

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The semifinalist team may involve no more than
two (2) members in the event-specific and LEAP
interview.
B. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills they
have developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP
interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

250

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The portfolio
2. The visualization

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The event-specific interview
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report
and interview

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

Computer animator
Game designer
Instructional technologist
Software engineer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

251

SCIENTIFIC AND
TECHNICAL
VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

The portfolio is present.
The USB flash drive is present.
The visualization is playable.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10 points)
performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the scores earned for
the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The X1 or X2 notation in the
criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining the points earned. (Example: an
“adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion = 7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an
X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance
for any criterion is not met.

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is unorganized and/or
missing three or more components.

The portfolio has most components
and is adequately organized.

All components are present, and
content and organization are clearly
evident.

Purpose and
description

The purpose and description of the
visualization idea generation are
unclear.

The purpose and description
are explained appropriately and
adequately.

The purpose and description of the
visualization are clear and concisely
written, and compelling.

Storyboard

The storyboard is sloppy, seems to
have been thrown together after
the creation of the visualization,
and/or it does not correlate with the
visualization.

The storyboard is drawn
appropriately and largely correlates
with the completed visualization.

The storyboard is of exceptional
aesthetic and artistic quality
and clearly correlates with the
visualization, including timings.

CRITERIA

(X1)

(X2)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)

252

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (40 points)

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Communication of
visualization

It is difficult to understand the
concept being communicated; an
illogical explanation is presented.

The concept is communicated
generally adequately.

The concept is communicated in
an organized, clear, and concise
manner.

Creativity

The visualization lacks creativity; no,
or very few, design principles are
integrated in the visualization.

Some elements of creativity are
expressed, with most design
principles integrated.

The visualization exudes creativity;
essential design principles and
elements are integrated.

Aesthetics and
artisanship

Unorganized, sloppy work is
evident; the visualization seems to
be an afterthought and/or thrown
together.

A largely organized presentation
of layout and design principles is
evident.

An exemplary use of layout and
design principles to logically
communicate important data is
evident.

Graphical
representations

Graphical representations do not
help to clarify visualization, or they
are of little significance to the
project.

Graphical representations are
appropriate and help supplement
the visualization by providing clarity
to the project.

Graphical representations are of
excellent quality; and clarify abstract
concepts.

Originality

The visualization lacks imagination,
originality, and artistic detail.

The visualization is somewhat
effective, inventive, and inspiring.

The visualization is inspiring,
inventive, resourceful, and
motivating.

(X2)
(X2)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

VISUALIZATION (70 points)

VISUALIZATION SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

TOTAL TIME DEDUCTION

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (110 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

253

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

The team/individual seems
unprepared and unorganized for the
interview.

The team/individual is somewhat
prepared and organized in its
interview.

The team is well-prepared and any
questions asked by judges are
answered concisely.

Knowledge

The team/individual seems to have
little understanding of its chosen
topic.

The team/individual has a
generalized understanding of its
chosen topic.

There is clear evidence of a
thorough understanding of the
chosen topic.

Articulation

The interview is full of illogical
thoughts that lack clarity.

The interview is somewhat logical,
and/or clear, and concise.

A concise, logical, clear explanation
of the entry is given.

Delivery

The team/individual is verbose
and/or uncertain in the interview;
posture, gestures, and lack of eye
contact diminish the delivery.

The team/individual is somewhat
well-spoken and clear in the
interview; posture gestures, and
eye contact result in an acceptable
delivery.

The team/individual is well-spoken
and distinct in the interview; posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
a polished, natural, and effective
delivery.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The individual’s or team’s efforts
are adequately communicated,
include some detail, are clear,
and/or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation of
the SLC Practices and Behaviors is
adequate.

The individual’s or team’s efforts are
clearly communicated, fully-detailed,
and convincing; identification and/
or incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

(16 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (66 points)

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (66 points)
Time violation (a deduction of five (5) points total will be incurred for exceeding the semifinalist presentation time limit). Record the
deduction in the space to the right.

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (66 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (176 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

254

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistant for check-in, one (1)
C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more for initial review
of entries. If more than 20 entries, provide 2
additional evaluators to conduct heats.
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more for interviews

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judge/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Results envelope
6. Envelope for LEAP Reports
7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables for entries
C. Tables and chairs for initial judges
D. Tables and chairs for semifinalist judges and
participants
E. Extension cords and power-bars with protection for
judges, as needed

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Check in the entries at the time stated in the
conference program.
2. Notify the event manager immediately of any team
that is not on the coordinator’s report.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The number of judges depends upon the number
of entries. Heats of 20 entries may be used at the
coordinator’s discretion.
2. Judges independently assess the entries.
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and a CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

4. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalist
teams.

2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

5. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see
that enough judges and assistants have been
scheduled.

6. Create semifinalist sign-up sheet for each team’s
presentation.

4. Inspect the area in which the portfolios are being
placed for appropriate set-up including sufficient
number and size of tables.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

255

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL VISUALIZATION (SCIVIS)
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the interviews are to take
place. Ensure that there is a table and seating for
the interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.
3. Semifinalists report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
4. Each semifinalist team signs up for an interview
time about its visualization.
5. During the interview, the semifinalist team
representatives will explain their work and answer
any questions the judges may ask.
6. As part of the semifinalist interview, semifinalists
will participate in a LEAP interview that will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.
7. Judges independently assess the twelve (12)
semifinalists.
8. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and a CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
9. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and
their ranking, and discuss and break any ties.
(Determine the procedure for breaking ties before
the onsite competition begins.)
10. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
11. Collect all USB flash drives and portfolios and give
them to the event manager.
12. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
equipment and materials from the area.

256

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW

Participants have the opportunity to use knowledge of
cutting-edge technologies, algorithm design, problemsolving principles, effective communication, and
collaborative teamwork to design, implement, test, and
document a software development project. The project
should have educational or social value.

ELIGIBILITY

5. Teams will remove their project and equipment from
the area at the completion of their presentation.
6. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
semifinalist LEAP interview.

One (1) team per chapter may participate.

2. Judges independently evaluate the LEAP Report
and interview.

TIME LIMITS

3. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

1. Teams are allowed up to five (5) minutes for their
presentation.
2. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Teams submit their documentation, sign up for a
presentation time, and submit LEAP Reports at the
time and place stated in the conference program.
2. Teams report to the event area at the time and
place stated in the conference program for their
scheduled presentation.
3. Teams will give a live demonstration of the
functionality of their project, describe the design
process, and discuss the value of the project. No
more than three (3) team members may present to
the judges, for up to five (5) minutes.
4. Judges may ask questions after the presentation
is finished.

2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; pages as needed
4. Research about the problem; one (1) page
5. Description of the team’s project, including:
a. the problem
b. solution for the problem
c. an explanation of the project’s educational and
social value; up to two (2) pages
6. Plan of Work log that indicates preparation for the
event, as noted by date, task, time involved, team
member(s) responsible, and comments (see Forms
Appendix or TSA website); one (1) page
7. Documentation of the use of a software
development process, including the following:
a. Project requirements; one (1) page
b. High-level software design; one (1) page
c. Testing, including code output and desired
results; pages as needed

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

257

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

d. End-user product documentation; pages as
needed
8. Team’s self-evaluation (of its work) and the project’s
future prospects; one (1) page

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The quality of work

9. List of references used for the project

2. The overall benefit showcased in the participant
portfolio

10. A completed copy of the Student Copyright
Checklist (see Forms Appendix or TSA website)

3. The technical skill exhibited in the project

B. All portfolios and presentations become the property
of TSA and will not be returned after the event.
C. Teams must provide all necessary hardware to
demonstrate their project.
1. This may include a laptop computer, mobile
device(s), computer mouse, and/or 20' extension
cord.

4. The ability to demonstrate and describe the team’s
software design process
5. How well the problem identified is solved by the
software project

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The content and quality of the LEAP Report and interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

2. The setup should not exceed 2' x 2' x 2'.
D. National TSA will NOT provide wireless Internet.
Students may provide Internet access using a hotspot
from a mobile device, however, students should
have an alternate presentation plan in case access is
unavailable.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
• Graphic designer
• Software engineer

1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

258

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SOFTWARE
DEVELOPMENT

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Portfolio is present.
Student Copyright Checklist is present and complete.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is unorganized
and/or is missing three or more
components.

The portfolio is somewhat
organized; most components are
adequate.

The portfolio is organized,
complete, and includes all required
components.

Research

The research is inadequate, and/
or very few credible sources are
referenced.

The research is adequate, and it
includes a few credible sources.

The research is comprehensive, and
credible resources are included.

Description of
project

A description of the project,
including an explanation of the
problem and the solution for the
problem, is poorly presented.

A description of the project, with an
explanation of the problem and its
solution, is adequate.

A description of the project is clear,
concise, and fully addresses the
problem and solution.

Plan of Work log
and self-evaluation

The Plan of Work log and the selfevaluation are incomplete and/or
missing key components.

The Plan of Work log and selfevaluation are mostly complete, but
they may be overgeneralized.

The Plan of Work log and the
self-evaluation are complete and
concisely written; they include the
reflections of all team members.

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (40 points)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (40 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Software coding
practices

The project is inadequately
developed in terms of general
software coding practices
(requirements, design,
implementation, and testing).

The project is developed following
most general software coding
practices (requirements, design,
implementation, and testing).

The project is extremely well
developed and followed
general software coding
practices (requirements, design,
implementation and testing).

Complexity

The software design exhibits little
complexity; it appears as a “bare
bones” effort.

The software design exhibits some
degree of complexity.

The software design is complex,
resulting in a highly functional
product.

(X2)

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOFTWARE DESIGN (60 points)

259

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

SOFTWARE DESIGN (60 points) – continued
Creativity

The work lacks creativity; it is
evident there was little original
thought in developing the project.

Some elements of creativity are
expressed; the solution is somewhat
original.

The work exudes creativity; the
product is highly original.

Technical skill

Little technical skill is exhibited in
the software; the levels of software
development are not fluid and/or
are illogical.

A beyond-basic degree of technical
skill is exhibited in the software’s
design and construction; the
software flows somewhat effectively
from level to level.

The software exhibits mastery of
software design skill that few at this
level possess; the software flow is
constant and logical.

Effectiveness

The software design does not
appropriately provide a solution to
the intended problem.

The design loosely provides a
solution to the intended problem,
but it doesn’t fully address the
problem presented.

The solution to the problem is clear
in the software design; the solution
is at the forefront of software
creation.

(X1)

SOFTWARE DESIGN SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

The team seems unprepared and
unorganized for the presentation
and questions from judges.

The team is prepared for its
presentation to judges and answers
questions adequately.

The team’s presentation is logical,
organized, and effective; the team
answers judges’ questions well.

Knowledge

Team members seem to have very
little understanding of the concepts
in their project; they provide vague
answers to judges’ questions.

All team members have a general
understanding of the concepts
discussed and answer questions
adequately.

There is clear evidence that all
team members have a thorough
understanding of the concepts
presented in their project.

Articulation

The team’s presentation is full
of illogical thoughts that lack
understanding and clarity.

The team’s presentation is
somewhat logical, clear, and
concise.

The team provides a concise,
logical, and clear explanation of its
project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/or
uncertain in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and lack of eye contact
diminish the delivery.

The team is somewhat well-spoken
and clear in its presentation/
interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
an acceptable delivery.

The team is well-spoken and
distinct in its presentation/interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
eye contact result in a polished,
natural, and effective delivery.

Team participation

Only one team member
communicates with judges; there
is no participation from other team
members.

Team members participate generally
equally and adequately understand
the concepts of the project.

All team members fully understand
the concepts of the project and
share an equal role in answering
judges’ questions.

Software
demonstration

Team members are unable to
successfully demonstrate their
software product.

Team members are able to partially
demonstrate the functionality of their
software product.

Team members are successful
and effective in their project
demonstration.

(X1)

PRESENTATION SUBTOTAL (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (160 points)

260

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PRESENTATION (60 points)

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (16 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (16 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (16 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (176 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

261

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:

1. Check in the entries and LEAP Reports at the time
stated in the conference program.
2. Anyone reporting who is not on the coordinator’s
report may check in only after official notification is
received from the CRC.
3. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge

4. Place an entry number in the upper right-hand
corner of each portfolio.

2. TSA Event Coordinator Report

5. Position entries for evaluation and viewing by
judges.

262

EVENT CHECK-IN

6. Secure the entries in the designated area.
7. Inspect the area in which the presentations are to
be held. There must be a table and seating for at
least five (5) people.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Conduct presentations. Judges should be sure to
ask questions.
2. Judges independently evaluate the entries.
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty (20%) of the total possible
points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
4. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
5. Review and submit the semifinalist results and any
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area in which the interviews are to
take place. Ensure there is a table and seating for
interviews.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review time limits,
procedures, and regulations. If questions arise that
cannot be answered, speak to the event manager
begore the event begins.
3. Semifinalists will participate in a LEAP interview
that will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty (20%) of the total possible
points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
5. Judges determine the top ten (10) finalists in rank
order, and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
7. Manage security and the removal of materials from
the area.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

263

264

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND
ENGINEERING
OVERVIEW

Participants work as a team to build a designated
structure. Teams apply the principles of structural design
and engineering through research, design, construction,
destructive testing, and assessment to determine the
design efficiency of the structure.
Details about the structure and information related to it
will be posted on the TSA website under Competitions/
Themes and Problems. The onsite semifinalist problem
will be a variation of the pre-conference problem posted
on the TSA website.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of two (2) members per chapter is allowed to
participate, one (1) entry per team.

SAFETY EYEWEAR
1. Participants are required to wear safety-approved
eyewear during the onsite phase of this event.
2. Prescription eyewear will need to have side
shields to be considered safety eyewear.
3. Should a team member remove the eyewear and
fail to replace it, s/he will be reminded once.
4. If there is a second infraction, the team will be
asked to leave the competition.
5. Sunglasses are not suitable.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
Pre-built structures must be started and completed during
the current school year.
SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Onsite structures must be started, completed, and
checked in during the three (3) hours allowed for
design and construction.

2. Semifinalist participants with time conflicts must
present a written explanation of the conflict to
the event coordinator at least one (1) hour before
the construction time noted in the conference
schedule. Work must begin during the time
scheduled for the event.
3. During the construction time, each team will
participate in a LEAP interview that will last a
maximum of five (5) minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
PRE-BUILT STRUCTURE REGULATIONS
A. The structure and documentation portfolio must be
submitted at the designated time and place noted in
the conference program.
B. Documentation materials (comprising “a portfolio”) are
required and should be secured in a clear front report
cover. The report cover must include the following
single-sided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:
1. LEAP Report
2. Title page with the event title, the conference city
and state, and the year; one (1) page
3. Table of contents; one (1) page
4. All work must be completed by the team members
only, and then verified by the team’s chapter
advisor using the Team Verification form, found on
the TSA website under Competitions/Themes and
Problems; one (1) page.
5. Students must complete and provide a copy of the
Analysis and Assessment form, found on the TSA
website under Competition Themes and Problems,
for their submitted structural design; one (1) page.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

265

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

C. Teams must provide a full-size, three (3)-view (front,
top, and right end) drawing (hand or computergenerated) of their structure.

ONSITE DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF PRE-BUILT
STRUCTURES PROCEDURE
A. Open viewing of the onsite destructive testing of prebuilt structures is allowed.
B. All structures will be assessed (using the evaluation
rubric) prior to the onsite destructive testing.
C. Destructive testing will be completed using structural
testing equipment, as designated by TSA.
D. When the destructive testing is completed, a list of
twenty (20) semifinalist teams will be posted.
E. The twenty (20) semifinalist teams will take part in the
onsite problem, which will feature the construction
and destructive testing of a structure similar to the preconference structure.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
SEMIFINALIST ONSITE CONSTRUCTION AND
DESTRUCTIVE TESTING PROCEDURE
A. Twenty (20) semifinalist teams, of two (2) members
each, report to the event area at the time and place
stated in the conference program.
B. Participants must provide and wear safety glasses for
this portion of the event.
C. Participants are required to provide their own tool box.

i. Straight pins
ii. Clamps
iii. Tape
f. A cutting surface that prevents table-top
marring (required)
g. Rulers, straightedges, and/or measuring scales
h. Abrasives sheets, sponges, boards
i. Marking devices (pens, pencils, etc.) and
sharpener
j. Sheet of wax paper, as large as is needed for
the competition (required)
k. Pliers, wrenches, nut drivers, as needed
l. Safety glasses and side shields, (required)
m. Jigs and fixtures to assist with assembly and
construction
D. Teams will be issued a packet of construction
materials to use for fabrication of the designated
structure. These materials will be withheld until the
team’s design drawing is complete.
1. Planning and fabrication supplies (these materials
may not be part of the structure submitted for
testing):
a. Drawing paper with ¼" or ⅛" grids for sketching
the structure
b. Pin board

1. The tool box must include identification (school
name, address, and advisor cell phone number).

c. A sheet of wax paper

2. It must not exceed twenty (20) inches (508 mm)
length x ten (10) inches (254 mm) width x ten (10)
inches (254 mm) height

E. Teams will be seated by a monitor.

3. The box must contain all items needed to fabricate
the solution. The following is a suggested list (note
that some items are required):
a. Cutting devices; NONE may be electric
b. Adhesives
c. Aerosol and electric applicators are not
allowed
d. A bottle of Uncure or Debonder is
recommended

266

e. Temporary fastening devices

d. Structure label
F. The design problem will be explained and a list
of directions for the construction process will be
provided.
G. Teams will be allowed thirty (30) minutes to review the
problem and create a sketch/drawing of their solution.
H. During the building of the team’s structure,
construction regulations must be observed.
I. Participants may leave early, but they must complete
check-out as directed.
J. All work stops at the coordinator’s signal.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

K. Teams return all supplied items as directed, and clean
and clear their work stations.
L. Teams must identify their structure with only their team
identification number, using the label provided.
M. During the construction time, each team will
participate in a LEAP interview that will last a maximum
of five (5) minutes.
N. Structures are allowed to dry in a secure area until
destructive testing time.
O. Structures are checked for rules violations and
weighed before testing.
P. Destructive testing is completed by judges and is
open for spectator viewing.
Q. When all testing is completed, the greatest failure
weight of all tested structures is recorded on the
rating form, the efficiency rating of individual structures
is calculated, and ranking is determined.
R. Teams that fail to comply with the coordinator or
monitor directions, after one (1) warning, will be issued
a penalty of 20% of the team’s total score.
S. Videotaping of the destructive testing of a structure is
permitted, but only by a participant or representative
of a respective team.
T. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION OF STRUCTURES
A. All structures are weighed before testing and the
weight is recorded on the scoring rubric.

C. A specific testing block or attachment may be
necessary, depending on the nature of the onsite
problem. Any special or unusual configurations for the
attachment will be posted with the design problem on
the TSA website.
D. An increasing load is applied to the structure via the
test block or attachment until the structure fails.
E. The failure weight is recorded on the evaluation
rubric. (The failure weight is the greatest weight
recorded during testing before the failure of the
structure.)
F. The efficiency is determined by the failure weight x
4.54, divided by the weight of the structure in grams.
G. The efficiency is rounded off to three (3) decimal
places and recorded on the evaluation rubric.
H. Each team’s assessment form is reviewed.
I. The highest numeric efficiency determines the winner.
In case of an efficiency tie, the greatest weight held
by the tied entries will determine the winner.
J. Failure to comply: If a structure fails to comply with any
regulation, a penalty reduction of 20% of the greatest
weight held in the competition is subtracted from the
team’s failure weight. (This penalty factor will not be
determined until all structures have been tested.)

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Architect
Civil engineer
Engineering technician
Mathematician
Structural iron and steel work technician

B. A designated structural testing device will be used for
testing each structure.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

267

STRUCTURAL DESIGN
AND ENGINEERING
2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Team of two is present.
The structure is present and identified.
The Team Verification form is complete and present.
The Analysis and Assessment form is complete and
present.
Drawings are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
There are no unapproved laminations present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

PRE-BUILT STRUCTURE (Construction)
Indicate N for noncompliant or C for compliant, for each regulation in the Construction section. One noncompliant mark will result in a 20% deduction;
two noncompliant marks will result in disqualification.

Regulation

Noncompliant

Compliant

Length of structure

The length of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
length.

The length of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction length.

Width of structure

The width of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
width.

The width of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction width.

Height of structure

The height of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
height.

The height of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction height.

Placement on
abutment

The structure cannot be appropriately placed on the
abutment.

The structure can be appropriately placed on the
abutment.

Internal clearance

The testing apparatus and rod cannot be placed
and passed through the center of the structure to
allow for testing.

The testing apparatus and rod pass freely through
the center of the structure to allow for testing.

Other Construction
Regulation
Other Construction
Regulation

DISQUALIFIED
PRE-BUILT STRUCTURE APPROVED FOR TESTING

268

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
PRE-BUILT STRUCTURE (Construction) – continued
Record the mass (weight) of the structure (in grams) prior to testing.
Record the failure weight in pounds.
Record the maximum failure rate for all tested structures.
If only one construction regulation is noncompliant, record a deduction of 20% of the maximum failure weight.
Adjusted failure weight
Determine the efficiency (shown to three decimal places) by multiplying the failure weight (or adjusted
failure weight, as applicable) by 4.54 and then dividing by the mass (weight) of the structure.

PRE-BUILT STRUCTURE TOTAL POINTS

Go/No Go Specifications
There are no unapproved laminations present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

ONSITE STRUCTURE (Qualification)
For the Onsite STRUCTURE: Indicate N for noncompliant or C for compliant, in the Qualification and Construction sections below. In the Qualification
section, one noncompliant mark will result in disqualification. In the Construction section, one noncompliant mark will result in a 20% deduction; two
noncompliant marks will result in disqualification.

Regulation

Noncompliant

Compliant

Team of two

Only one team member is present.

Both team members are present.

Safety eyewear

Warnings about eyewear are issued.

No warnings about eyewear are issued.

Structure
identification

The identification sticker is not attached.

The identification sticker is attached.

Tools and fabrication
supplies

Inappropriate tools or supplies are brought to the
event.

Appropriate tools and supplies are brought to the
event.

Placement on
abutment

The structure cannot be appropriately placed on the
abutment.

The structure can be appropriately placed on the
abutment.

Internal clearance

The testing apparatus and rod cannot be placed
and passed through the center of the structure to
allow for testing.

The testing apparatus and rod pass freely through
the center of the structure to allow for testing.

Construction pins

Pins are still in place when the structure is submitted.

All pins have been removed from the structure.

Other Construction
Regulation
Other Construction
Regulation

TOTAL

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

269

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
ONSITE STRUCTURE (Construction)
Regulation

Noncompliant

Compliant

Length of structure

The length of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
length.

The length of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction length.

Width of structure

The width of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
width.

The width of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction width.

Height of structure

The height of the structure is greater or less than the
designated tolerance of the assigned construction
height.

The height of the structure is within the designated
tolerance of the assigned construction height.

DISQUALIFIED
Onsite structure approved for testing
Record the mass (weight) of the structure (in grams) prior to testing.
Record the failure weight in pounds.
Record the maximum failure rate for all tested structures.
If only one construction regulation is noncompliant, record a deduction of 20% of the maximum failure weight.
Adjusted failure weight
Determine the efficiency (shown to three decimal places) by multiplying the failure weight (or adjusted
failure weight, as applicable) by 4.54 and then dividing by the mass (weight) of the structure.

ONSITE STRUCTURE TOTAL POINTS

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(X2)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (20 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

270

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (20 points)

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

271

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Construction monitor, one (1) per twenty teams
C. A timekeeper
D. Judges:
1. to evaluate pre-built structures, two (2) or more, as
necessary
2. to qualify structures after onsite construction, two
(2) or more
3. Destructive test judges, two (2) or more
a. One (1) to weigh the structure, record structure
weight, and record failure weight
b. One (1) to bring the structure to the testing
location, position the structure on the testing
device, operate the tester, and then remove
and store the structure following testing

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy each for the
coordinator and judges

d. Label for structure
2. Balsa strips and sheets, as specified in the
problem statement (on the national TSA website)
3. Card stock, as specified in the problem statement
(on the national TSA website)
4. Instructions
C. Testing equipment, provided by TSA
D. Evaluation and recording equipment
1. Gram scale (3-decimal place calculation)
2. Tape measure or 2' rule
3. Evaluation gauges
E. The testing equipment, selected by the event
coordinator, provides a downward pull or force, and
records the peak force in pounds.
F. Site requirements:
1. Construction session
a. Tables and chairs suitable for cutting and gluing

3. List of judges/assistants

b. Work area, at least 2' x 3' for each team
(suggested space is two [2] teams per 6' x 2' or
8' x 2' table)

4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges

c. One (1) chair per participant

5. Results envelope

d. Tables for equipment check-out and check-in

6. Envelope for LEAP Reports

e. Tables and chairs for judges

7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

f. Secured area for drying of entries and storage
of supplies

2. TSA Event Coordinator Report

B. Semifinalist team packets provided by TSA containing
construction materials and instructions
1. Construction tools per team, to be used and
returned to the event coordinator or helpers after
constructions:
a. Pin board as supplied, but generally a one-foot
by two-foot (1' x 2') piece of fiber or foam board
b. Grid paper with ¼" x ¼" or ⅛" x ⅛" grid on 17"
x 22" paper for structure sketch (to remain with
the completed structure when turned in)

272

c. Wax paper to cover the pin board (to remain
with the completed structure when turned in)

2. Testing session:
a. Tables for storage of structures
b. Table for weighing
c. Table for testing
d. Table for recording
e. Tables for storage of failed structures
f. Chairs for spectators
g. Barricade to separate testing area from
spectators

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

RESPONSIBILITIES
PRE-CONFERENCE
1. Prepare the structure problem statement (including
any necessary related information such as
materials to be used for pre-built structures) for
posting on the TSA website.
2. Prepare the onsite structure problem statement.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Check to see that all event equipment and
materials have been secured.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Set up check-in for testing of pre-built structures.
2. Check in the pre-built entries, the portfolios
and the LEAP Reports at the time stated in the
conference program.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.

PRELIMINARY ROUND/PRE-BUILT STRUCTURES
1. Coordinate and manage the onsite testing of prebuilt structures, the recording of results, and the
determination of the twenty (20) semifinalist teams.
2. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry

c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
3. Review and submit semifinalist results to the CRC
for posting.
4. Assemble semifinalist packets of construction
materials and directions for the twenty (20) onsite
semifinalist teams.

SEMIFINAL ROUND/ONSITE CONSTRUCTION
1. This portion of the event is not open to spectators.
No individuals other than participants and event
personnel will be allowed in the construction area.
2. Check-in will begin at the time noted in the
conference program and will continue until all
teams arriving on time have been checked in and
seated. The event will begin at the posted time.
3. Both members of a team must be present during
check-in.
4. No team is allowed to begin late unless its
members have complied with the following:
Participants with time conflicts must present a
written explanation of the conflict to the event
coordinator at least one (1) hour before the
construction time noted in the conference
program. Work must begin during the time frame
scheduled for the event.
5. Assign team construction locations.
6. When all teams are seated, distribute instructions
and review these, as well as any details for the
assigned structure.
7. Teams will be allowed a maximum of three (3)
hours to complete their structure. Thirty (30)
minutes of this time is allotted for completing the
design drawing, and two and one-half (2.5) hours,
is allotted for actual construction.
8. When a team notifies a monitor that the required
sketch is complete, and the monitor confirms this,
the team will receive a materials packet and may
begin the onsite construction phase of the event.
9. No additional supplies are provided during the
event.
10. Call time at the end of the allotted three (3) hour
time frame. All teams must stop working at this
point.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

273

STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
11. Immediately following the completion of the
semifinalist structures, each semifinalist team
will participate in a LEAP interview that will last a
maximum of five (5) minutes.
12. Establish the procedure for check-in and recording
of finished structures, designate an area for
storage, and allow for the return of construction
materials.

TEAM CHECK-OUT
1. Teams must leave their work space clean. Failure
to do so will result in a 20% penalty deduction.
2. Teams will check in excess supplies as directed by
the monitors.
3. Teams place their structures in the storage area
with the sketch as directed by the monitor. The
structure must be identified with the team number
only (using the label provided in the materials
packet).
4. Once check-in is complete, all participants leave
the competition area.
5. The structures are secured by the monitor and
allowed to dry for a minimum of twelve (12) hours.

EVALUATION
1. Check all structures for regulations compliance.
Structures that are in compliance will be tested
without penalty.
a. Weigh all structures before testing and record
the weight on the evaluation rubric.
b. Use the testing device, designated by TSA, to
test each structure. (A specific testing block or
attachment for the structure may be necessary
for the onsite problem.)
c. Apply an increasing load to the structure, via
the test block or attachment, until the structure
fails.
d. Record the greatest failure weight on the rubric.
This weight is the greatest weight recorded (of
all the tested structures) during testing before
failure of the structure.

f. The highest numeric efficiency determines
the winner. In the case of an efficiency tie, the
greatest weight held by the tied entries will
determine the winner.
2. Structures will not be tested if:
a. Two (2) or more construction regulations are
found to be non-compliant before testing.
b. The structure cannot be placed on the tester.
c. The testing attachment cannot be properly
placed within or on the structure.
d. Straight pins are left in the structure.
e. There is a failure to wear safety eyewear.
f. Laminations contain more than two (2) pieces
or members that are face to face in the same
grain direction.
3. Structures with one (1) construction regulation noncompliance mark will be tested, but a 20% penalty
will be noted on the rating form. (The penalty, a
20% reduction of the greatest weight held in the
competition, is subtracted from the team’s failure
weight. This penalty factor will not be determined
until all structures have been tested.)
4. Manage, with assistance from evaluators, the
destructive testing of all structures that were not
officially tested due to non-compliance.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
6. Review and submit the finalist results and all other
items/forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
7. Semifinalist teams may pick up their structures at a
time designated by the event coordinator.

e. Determine each structure’s efficiency by the
greatest failure weight x 4.54, divided by the
weight of the structure in grams; round off
the efficiency to three (3) decimal places and
record it on the rubric.

274

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
OVERVIEW

Participants work as part of a team onsite to develop
a computer-controlled model-solution to a problem,
typically one from an industrial setting. Teams analyze the
problem, build a computer-controlled mechanical model,
program the model, explain the program and mechanical
features of the model-solution, and leave instructions for
judges to operate the device.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of three (3) members per state may
participate, one (1) entry per team.

TIME LIMITS
1. The competition consists of three phases.
a. Phase 1: one (1)-hour setup
b. Phase 2: fifteen (15)-minute analysis
c. Phase 3: two and one half (2.5) hours for
problem solution
2. The team’s captain will be given one (1) hour to set
up the team’s equipment and reference materials.
3. Following the set-up time, teams will be given
fifteen (15) minutes for problem analysis.
4. Following the problem analysis time, teams are
provided two and one-half (2.5) hours for model
development and programming.
5. All students will participate in a LEAP and problem
solution interview at the conclusion of their
programming.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. An orientation meeting for teams will take place
at the beginning of the set-up time. Each team
selects a team captain prior to the orientation
meeting.
2. The captain checks in and submits a LEAP Report
for the team during the set-up time meeting by
submitting his/her participant identification number
and the team’s identification number for the written
and model portions of the event.
3. The problem and the inventor’s log are presented
to teams at the beginning of the fifteen (15)-minute
problem analysis session prior to model-building.
Teams must complete their description or
interpretation of the problem during this time.
4. Each team is given a maximum of two and onehalf (2½) hours to construct a model that simulates
realistic industrial processes to program the model,
to test the solution, to describe the program and
mechanical features of the model-solution, and to
complete directions for judges to use to activate
the model.
5. When finished, teams save their programs and
leave them on-screen in operable form with the
ability to be reset.
a. Before leaving the event room, teams
demonstrate the operation of the model with
judges present. Judges may ask questions
during the demonstration.
b. After judges have observed the operation of a
team’s model, the team leaves the room. The
coordinator determines the amount of time
permitted for the team’s demonstration based
on the number of teams and the complexity of
the problem.
c. Evaluation of the solutions takes place without
the teams present.
6. Team members will participate in an onsite LEAP
interview during the project demonstration period.
7. Judges independently assess the entries,
including each team’s LEAP Report.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

275

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

8. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the conference awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Each team provides pencils and scrap paper along
with its own materials kit, software, and laptop
computer.
B. No reference materials or building cards are allowed.
C. Each team’s material kit must be appropriate to build
a system that can identify, secure, and move objects,
and has light and/or sound outputs.
D. A problem will be developed based on the
assumption that every material kit will contain at least:
1. Optical sensors, two (2)
2. Touch sensors, two (2)
3. Motors, two (2)
4. Audio AND light outputs, two (2) each
5. Gears, wheels, and axles appropriate to build a
motorized vehicle and/or conveyor belt
6. Balls, blocks, and pegs that can be used as objects
to be moved and manipulated
7. Velcro, tape, clamps and other materials to secure
or move the above objects (balls, blocks, and
pegs)
E. Participants provide their own hardware and software
systems.
F. The following definitions are an integral part of the
event regulations:
1. Repeatability—the device is programmed to reset
automatically.
2. Functional control—the device/model must
accomplish the task in an efficient manner and be
user friendly.

G. Programs must be written completely onsite.
Use or modification of any programs written prior
to the competition will result in disqualification.
Example Problem
An example of a problem for this event is provided
below to help students understand and interpret a
typical issue common to industry that might be used
at a national conference.
A manufacturing company has asked your
engineering firm to design an important component in
its manufacturing process. The company specializes
in the production of cylindrical items. Its manufacturing
line is getting “jammed” because multiple cylindrical
items are making their way to stations that can handle
only one item at a time. Your design must include a
“hopper” that will store items as they wait to make
their way to a station. When a station is empty, a
light should turn on; this will indicate to an operator
to press a button that will send one cylinder into the
station. After ten (10) seconds, the item will need to be
moved to the next hopper, leaving the station empty
and signaling the operator to send in another cylinder.
Example Requirements
• A minimum of three (3) cylindrical items of consistent
size and shape must be included.
• A hopper must store these items until a button is
pushed.
• Only one item can advance when the button is
pushed.
• Ten (10) seconds must pass with the item at a station
before it is moved to the next hopper.
• A light must signal the operator when the station is
empty.
• No additional cylinder can be sent to a station if a
cylinder already is in place.

3. Model-solution—the physical device must simulate
the realistic processes used in industry.
4. Conservation of materials—the model reflects the
best use of materials to solve the problem, without
being overbuilt.

276

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

H. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills developed
and demonstrated while working on this event,
and on a non-competitive event leadership
experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the semifinalist LEAP
interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The team’s written work
2. Model function
3. Programming structure and efficiency
4. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
• CNC programmer
• Computer programmer
• Robotics engineer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

277

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY INVENTOR’S LOG
TEAM CAPTAIN ID #

Use only the space provided. The description/interpretation of the problem must be completed DURING the problem
analysis session.
Description or interpretation of the given problem:

The two parts below are to be completed AFTER the problem analysis session.
Description of the team solution (explain the unique features of the program and model):

Directions to evaluators to start the system:

278

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SYSTEM CONTROL
TECHNOLOGY

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Completed LEAP Report is present
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Description of
problem

The description is incomplete, and/
or it is illogical and unorganized; the
description is simply a restatement
of the problem’s guidelines.

The description includes a logical,
but only general, understanding of
the problem’s guidelines; it restates
the guidelines with an overall
understanding of the problem.

An organized, logical, and concise
description of the problem is
provided; it includes all major
aspects of the problem’s guidelines,
as well as original thoughts.

Description
of solution
and activation
instructions

The team’s solution has little
correlation with the final system
creation; the solution is illogical in
terms of the problem’s guidelines;
the directions to activate the
solution are included, but they are
incomplete.

The team’s solution correlates
generally with the final system
creation; adequate directions to
activate the solution are included.

A strong correlation between the
team’s written solution and final
system creation is provided; the
description of the solution is written
clearly and concisely; instructions for
the solution are included and written
concisely.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

INVENTOR’S LOG (20 points)

INVENTOR’S LOG SUBTOTAL (20 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Realistic simulation

The simulation is not realistic; it has
an abstract design that would be
largely ineffective in its intended
environment.

The simulation is somewhat realistic
and logically designed; it may be
adequately effective in its intended
environment.

The simulation is realistic and is
similar to a system that would
be effective in its intended
environment.

Dependability of
solution

The solution is not constructed with
dependability in mind; when the
system is operated, construction
pieces fall off, etc.

Most of the parts of the solution are
well constructed and dependable.

Every component of the solution is
well constructed and dependable;
practical construction techniques
have been used.

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM (60 points)

279

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM (60 points) – continued
Conservation of
materials

An inefficient use of construction
materials is obvious; too many
unnecessary materials are
incorporated into the design.

Most of the components of
the solution are designed
with conservation in mind; the
construction is generally adequate.

All components of the solution
are designed and assembled with
conservation of materials in mind;
the construction is elegant and not
overbuilt.

Solution to problem

The solution is missing three or
more attributes/criteria, and several
do not function as intended.

The solution includes most
attributes/criteria, and they function
adequately.

The solution includes all attributes/
criteria listed in the design
details, and all attributes function
appropriately and correctly.

Ingenuity and
creativity

The solution and design are
unauthentic, complex, and/or do not
function as a system.

The solution has some original ideas
in its design, and its construction is
adequate.

The solution is truly unique and
authentic; its construction is concise
and designed with simplicity.

(X1)

(X2)

(X1)

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Programming
efficiency

The software used to program
the system is overly complex and
inefficient; advanced programming
techniques, which would have
simplified programming specific
tasks, are not included.

The programming software is
efficient, with some advanced
features that simplify the solution’s
criteria and/or attributes.

A concise and logical programming
application is used that incorporates
advanced features to simplify the
solution’s criteria and/or attributes.

Program structure

The programming structure is
illogical, unorganized, or overly
complicated and/or complex; the
program does not reset.

There is evidence of an organized
programming structure and
adequate use of sub-routines; the
program resets.

The programming structure is
concise and predictable; there is
appropriate use of sub-routines
where needed; the program resets.

(X1)

PROGRAMMING STRUCTURE SUBTOTAL (20 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (100 points)

280

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

PROGRAMMING STRUCTURE (20 points)

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

LEAP INTERVIEW (10 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (10 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (10 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (110 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

281

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY EVENT
COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more
C. Assistants, two (2)

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of evaluators/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Stopwatch, one (1)
6. Written problem, one (1) copy per team and judge
7. Inventor’s log, one (1) copy per team
8. Power strips with surge protectors, and extension
cords, as needed
9. Results envelope
10. Envelope for LEAP Reports
11. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Large room to accommodate a first place team from
every state and affiliated country
C. One (1) table and three (3) chairs per team

RESPONSIBILITIES
AT THE CONFERENCE

282

4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to distribute
materials and to review time limits, procedures,
and regulations. If questions arise that cannot be
answered, speak to the event manager before the
event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors, checking the entry list, and collecting
LEAP Reports from each team.
2. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Late entries are considered on a case-by-case
basis and only when the delay is caused by events
beyond participant control.
5. Secure participants’ equipment in the area
designated.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. At the orientation meeting obtain the team/chapter
identification numbers from each team captain.
2. Judges must be present at the orientation
meeting.
3. Review the time limits, procedure, and regulations
with team captains.

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

4. Distribute the problem and Inventor’s Log to teams
at the beginning of the event.

2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.

5. Teams have fifteen (15) minutes to complete their
interpretation of the problem in the Inventor’s Log.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

6. Each team is given two and one-half (2½) hours to
complete the remaining portions of the event.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

SYSTEM CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
7. Teams must demonstrate that their device/model
is operable and has the ability to reset prior to
leaving.
a. Judges must observe this portion and may ask
a few questions.
b. Judges may take notes, but evaluation occurs
only after all teams have left the event room.
8. The LEAP interview will last a maximum of five (5)
minutes.
9. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
10. Judges determine the top ten (10) finalists in rank
order, and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
11. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

283

284

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY BOWL
OVERVIEW

Participants demonstrate their knowledge of TSA and
concepts addressed in the technology content standards
by completing a written, objective test; semifinalist teams
participate in question/response, head‑to‑head team
competition.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of three (3) members per chapter may
participate.
Teams that take the written test and advance to the
semifinalist portion of the event must be comprised of the
same three (3) members.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. One (1) hour is allowed for the written test.
2. This test is administered at the same time to all
participants.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Teams selected as semifinalists must be available
as scheduled for oral competition, as well as the
LEAP interview that will be conducted prior to the
start of the semifinalist tournament and will last a
maximum of five (5) minutes.
2. Teams will participate in a multi-round oral
competition.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Report).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area at the time
and place stated in the conference program.
Teams must submit a LEAP Report prior to taking
the written test.
2. Participants follow the specific regulations and
adhere to the directions provided onsite by the
event coordinator.
3. Each team is assigned a number by the event
coordinator. This number establishes the initial
order of participation in the oral portion of the
event.
4. All team members take the written exam.
5. The sixteen (16) top‑scoring teams qualify as
semifinalists.
6. A semifinalist list (in random order) is posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The LEAP interviews will be conducted by a panel
of judges after the semifinalist list is posted.
2. All team members must be present for the LEAP
interviews.
3. Semifinalist team members and their advisor report
to the oral event area holding room at the time and
place stated in the conference program.
4. When instructed to do so, two (2) teams enter
the event area and are seated according to
instructions.
5. Teams are paired using the semifinalist team
bracket.
6. Questions are drawn from a card file resource
bank.
7. If equipment malfunctions, a question that is being
considered at that time automatically is eliminated.
If equipment malfunctions three (3) times, time is
called by the event coordinator to set up back-up
equipment. After equipment has been set up and
tested, the event continues from the point where it
stopped.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

285

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

8. Once a team is eliminated, it is out of the oral
competition except for the round in which the third
and fourth positions are determined.
9. The top ten (10) finalist teams will be announced
during the conference awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND/WRITTEN EXAM
A. Scan-type forms are furnished by the event
coordinator.
B. Participants must provide their own pencils for the
test.
C. Participant identification numbers (assigned during
conference registration) must be entered on the scan
form in the space indicated.
D. Participants must stop work immediately when time is
called.
E. Should a participant complete the test before the time
is allocated, the participant holds the test and remains
seated quietly without distracting others. Failure to do
so results in disqualification of the participant.

F. Teams are asked twelve (12) questions one of which is
a bonus question.
1. The questions will be selected by the coordinator
and manager of the event.
2. The last question of every round is the bonus
question.
3. Questions, to include the bonus question, may not
be discussed by teams.
4. If a team answers the bonus question correctly,
they are given an additional question to answer.
The team may discuss this question.
5. If the bonus question is not answered correctly,
participants are not given an additional question.
6. The team member who “buzzes in” to answer
a question has five (5) seconds to answer the
question without discussion.
7. After a question is read, competing teams have ten
(10) seconds to answer. If neither team can answer
the question, then another question is read.

F. All tests must be turned in before leaving the test
area.

8. If a team member buzzes in before a question is
finished being read, the reader ceases reading
and the team member must give the exact answer
as printed on the answer card.

G. The average of the scores of all three (3) team
members determines team ranking.

9. If the answer is incorrect, the reader will read the
entire question for the opposing team.

SEMIFINAL ROUND/ORAL COMPETITION
A. Sixteen (16) teams, based upon the written test results,
are selected as semifinalists.
B. All three (3) members of a semifinalist team must be
available to participate at the scheduled time for the
oral competition portion of the event.
C. If a team or member is late for participation, that team
forfeits and is eliminated from competition.

G. Teams that leave the holding room before being
called for competition are eliminated.
H. Teams may visit with other teams in the holding room.
I. No advisors or visitors may enter the holding room.
J. Team members may not enter the oral event area
as spectators until after their team has been entirely
eliminated from competition.

D. No transmitting or recording devices are permitted to
assist in answering a question in the event area.
E. No prompting is permitted.

286

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

K. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills developed
and demonstrated while working on this event,
and on a non-competitive event leadership
experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the semifinalist LEAP
interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

EVALUATION
A. Preliminary round/written exam: Scores on a test of
fifty (50) multiple choice questions will determine the
semifinalist teams for the oral competition portion of
the event.
B. Semifinal round/oral competition: A team’s score is
derived from the total number of correct answers to
the questions asked.
1. For each correct answer, the team receives ten (10)
points.
2. Twelve (12) questions are asked per round; no
questions are repeated in another round.
3. In case of a tie, three (3) additional questions and
bonus questions are asked.
a. If a tie exists after the first tiebreaker round,
then three (3) additional questions and bonus
questions are asked.
b. This procedure continues until the tie is broken.
4. A correct answer will give the team ten (10) points,
and an incorrect answer will result in a loss of five
(5) points.
5. Bonus questions are worth fifteen (15) points.
C. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

287

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Competition Round ID#_______________________________

Team #_________________(A) Team #_________________(B)

Team A
Average

WRITTEN TEST (50 points)
Record the written test scores of each of the three (3) team members (for team A and B) in the boxes below to determine the team
average. Record the team average in the column space to the right.

Team member 1

(A)

(B)

Team member 2

(A)

(B)

Team member 3

(A)

Team B
Average

Scorekeeper’s Signature �����������������������������������������������������������������������������

(B)

WRITTEN TEST SUBTOTAL (50 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (50 points)

SEMIFINAL ROUND – LEAP INTERVIEW (20 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(X2)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify
and/or incorporate the SLC
Practices and Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include
some detail, are clear, and/
or are generally convincing;
identification and/or incorporation
of the SLC Practices and
Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (20 points)

288

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10 points) performance levels as a guideline,
record the scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column
is a multiplier factor for determining the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion = 7 points; an
“adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any
criterion is not met.

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Mark an X in the box beside the team that gives the correct response to the question and an O beside the team that gives an
incorrect response. Record the scores for each response in the column to the right.

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

10.

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

11.

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

12.

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

Bonus question
Additional question

(+15 for answering the bonus question correctly;
no penalty for answering the bonus question incorrectly)
(+5 for answering the additional question correctly;
no penalty for answering the additional question incorrectly)

Team # ___________________________________

Points

Team # ___________________________________

Question #

Team B
Average

SEMIFINAL ROUND – ORAL COMPETITION

Team A
Average

ORAL COMPETITION (135 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

289

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Competition Round ID# ������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Team #_________________________________________(A) Team #_________________________________________(B)
Scorekeeper’s Signature �����������������������������������������������������������������������������

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

_________

Team #

+10 for correct, -5 for incorrect response

_________

Team #

Tie Breaker Questions

TIE BREAKER QUESTIONS SUBTOTAL
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (155 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (205 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

290

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY BOWL
SINGLE ELIMINATION TOURNAMENT CHART – SEEDED 16 PLAYER FIELD

1
16
9
8
12

Loser to
Consolation
Game

5
13
4
3

CHAMPION

14
11
6
7

Loser to
Consolation
Game

10
15

Second

Consolation Game

Third

Note to evaluators: This is a single elimination format (semifinalist teams ONLY).
Team 1

Team 9

Team 2

Team 10

Team 3

Team 11

Team 4

Team 12

Team 5

Team 13

Team 6

Team 14

Team 7

Team 15

Team 8

Team 16

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

291

TECHNOLOGY BOWL

TECHNOLOGY BOWL
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Timer for written exam, one (1)
C. Proctors for written exam, four (4)
D. Timekeeper for oral competition, one (1)
E. Scorekeeper for oral competition, one (1)
F. Moderator for oral competition, one (1)

7. Stopwatch for timekeeper
8. 5" x 8" question cards selected from the
technology bowl test bank, with questions and the
acceptable answer(s) clearly typed

G. Judges, for semifinal LEAP Report evaluation,
two (2)

RESPONSIBILITIES

H. Assistants for oral competition, two (2)

AT THE CONFERENCE

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of event judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Copies of the written test (coded A or B), one (1)
for each participant (these tests must be returned
immediately following the event)
6. Results envelope with coordinator forms
7. Envelopes for LEAP Reports
8. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Written test
1. Stopwatch for timekeeper
2. Tables and chairs or tablet armchairs to
accommodate all participants
3. Scan machine and forms
C. Oral competition
1. Table and chairs for the event judges
2. Two (2) tables and six (6) chairs for the event team,
facing the moderator and audience
3. Tech Bowl bracket
4. List of chapters for the event
5. Buzzer system and controls

292

6. A printed sign (to be placed outside the oral
competition room) stating that no filming, taking of
photos, or use of any electronic recording devices
will be allowed in the competition room

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is to be held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

EVENT CHECK-IN/PRELIMINARY ROUND/
WRITTEN EXAM
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors and checking the entry list.
2. Collect LEAP Reports.
3. All participants and event judges should be in the
room at this time.
4. In order to compete, participants must be on the
entry list or must have approval of the CRC.
5. Distribute the scan forms to the participants.
a. Direct participants to fill in their participant
identification number and test code letter in the
appropriate spaces.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY BOWL
b. Provide an opportunity for any questions about
the scan form.
6. Pass out the written test with the help of the
proctors (tests are coded A or B).
a. Participants seated next to each other should
not have the same coded test; tests should be
alternated A, B, A, B, and so on.
b. Instruct the participants to keep the tests face
down until they are directed to turn them over
and begin.
7. Acting as the timer and with proctors positioned
around the event room, direct the participants to
turn their test over, place their code number and
the code letter found on the test on their scan
form, and begin.
8. Exactly one (1) hour from the time that the
participants begin the test, call time.
a. Direct students to check out with a test proctor
once they are finished with their test.
b. Proctors should collect all tests and then
students should immediately leave the testing
room.

SEMIFINAL ROUND/ORAL COMPETITION
1. Run the oral component of the event as described
in the Procedure section.
2. Determine the ten (10) finalists. Judges discuss
and break any ties that affect the top three (3)
placements. (Determine the procedure for
breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
4. Review and submit the finalist results, including a
ranking of the ten (10) finalists, and all related forms
in the results envelope to the CRC room.

c. If a line forms students must remain completely
silent. Any talking will result in a zero score for
their test.
9. Determine the individual winners of the written
exam.
10. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
11. Determine the sixteen (16) semifinalist teams based
on team members averaged score on the written
test.
12. Prepare a list of the sixteen (16) semifinalist teams
and submit it to the CRC for posting.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

293

294

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING
OVERVIEW

Participants use their skills in problem solving to develop
a finite solution to the stated problem provided onsite.
Participants work as a team to provide the best solution,
which is measured objectively.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of two (2) members per chapter may
participate.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
The allotted time for design and construction of the
solution is two (2) hours.
SEMIFINAL ROUND
Semifinalist teams will participate in a LEAP interview that
will last a maximum of five (5) minutes.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for an
interview time.
2. Semifinalists participate in a LEAP interview.
3. Judges independently evaluate the LEAP Report
and interview.
4. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
A. All work must be completed in the event area during
the time specified for the event.
B. Specific materials related to the onsite problem will be
provided by TSA.
C. Only the materials issued to each team by the event
coordinator, or the items that participants are required to
bring, may be used in the development of the solution.
D. Participants are required to provide their own tool box

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

1. Must include identification (school name, address,
and advisor cell phone number)

ATTIRE

2. Must not exceed twenty (20) inches (508 mm)
length x ten (10) inches (254 mm) width x ten (10)
inches (254 mm) height.

PROCEDURE

3. Must contain all items needed to fabricate the
solution/entry. The following is a suggested list,
with some required materials indicated:

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants report to the event area and submit
a LEAP Report at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. The problem, evaluation criteria, and materials are
distributed.
3. Teams are allowed two (2) hours to design and
construct a solution.
4. Each solution is tested as soon as possible after the
construction phase is completed. (Some problems
may require teams to be present for testing.)
5. A list of twelve (12) semifinalist teams (in random
order) will be posted.

a. Cutting devices; NONE may be electric
b. Adhesives
i. aerosol and electric applicators are not allowed
ii. a bottle of Uncure or Debonder is
recommended
c. Temporary fastening devices
i. straight pins
ii. clamps
iii. tape; unless otherwise stipulated in the
problem statement given at the competition
d. A cutting surface that prevents table top
marring (required)
e. Rulers, straightedges, and/or measuring scales

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

295

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING

f. Abrasive sheets/sandpaper, sanding sponges,
sanding boards i.e. emory boards or similar
g. Marking devices (pens, pencils, etc.) and
sharpener

G. Sharing tools between teams is not permitted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report

h. Sheet of wax paper, as large as is needed for
the competition

1. Teams document the leadership skills that they
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

i. Pliers, wrenches, nut drivers, as needed
j. Safety glasses and side shields (required)

2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report.

4. Participants are required to provide and wear
safety-approved eyewear for this event.

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

a. Prescription eyewear will need to have side
shields to be considered safety eyewear.
b. Should a team member remove his/her eyewear,
s/he will be reminded once to replace it.
c. If there is a second infraction, the team will be
asked to leave the competition.

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Each team’s solution is evaluated objectively.

d. Sunglasses are not suitable eyewear.
a. one (1) roll ¾" masking tape

2. A finite measure, such as elapsed time, horizontal
or vertical distance, and/or strength, is used to
determine the best solution.

b. twelve (12) 3" x 5" index cards

3. Solution designs will be used to break ties.

c. twelve (12) Popsicle sticks

4. Only as a last resort does the event coordinator
use subjective measurement, such as originality, to
evaluate solutions.

5. Each team is required to bring the following items:

d. six (6) 8½" x 11" sheets of printer paper
(20-pound bond)
e. fifteen (15) sheets of 8½" x 11" cardstock
(65-pound weight)
f. six (6) standard drinking straws, straws (shall be
no larger than 1/4" diameter x 9" in length)
g. six (6) Styrofoam trays; trays should be no
larger than 7" x 10"; foam core board or similar
materials are not allowed. Perform an Internet
search for ‘Standard Supermarket Food Trays’
to meet this requirement.
E. Participants without a toolbox will not be allowed to
compete.
F. Once tool box sizes are evaluated, teams will selfexamine their competitor’s tools and materials
using the Verifications sheet provided by the event
coordinator. If there is a dispute, a judge will be
summoned to determine a final ruling. Any disallowed
tools or materials will be held by the event coordinator
until the contest is complete.

296

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The content and quality of the LEAP Report and interview
will be evaluated.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•

Computer software engineer
Mathematician
Criminal investigator
Air traffic controller

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY
PROBLEM SOLVING

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
Students have safety eyewear.
The toolkit is present.
Additional required items are present.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

TESTING OF SOLUTION (60 points)
Evaluation: A finite unit of measure, such as elapsed time, linear distance, and/or strength, etc., is used to determine ranking..
1st: 60 Points

2nd: 55 Points

3rd: 50 Points

4th: 45 Points

5th: 40 Points

6th: 35 Points

7th: 30 Points

8th: 25 Points

9th: 20 Points

10th: 15 Points

11th: 10 Points

12th: 5 Points

TESTING OF SOLUTIONS SUBTOTAL (60 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (60 points)

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview
(10% of total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (6 points)

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (6 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

297

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (6 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (66 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

298

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

AT THE CONFERENCE

B. Assistants for set-up, monitoring, and clean-up of
onsite activity, two (2) or more per 100 teams

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.

1. Depending on the problem, one of the assistants
may need to serve as timekeeper.

2. Report to the CRC room and check the contents of
the coordinator’s packet.

2. Not all assistants are needed for set-up and cleanup, but all are needed while the onsite activity is
being held.

3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.

C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Identification tags or stick-on labels to identify
entries
6. Stopwatch
7. Results envelope
8. Envelope for LEAP Reports
9. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables and chairs for participants
C. Tables and chairs for judges, to be used for tools/
materials distribution and evaluation
D. Well-written, technologically appropriate problem that
can be objectively measured; one (1) copy per team
and judge
E. Adequate conditions, tools, materials, monitoring, and
testing devices for the problem

4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Begin the event at the scheduled time by closing
the doors and checking the entry list.
2. All participants and judges should be in the room
at this time.
3. Anyone reporting who is not on the entry list may
check in only after official notification is received
from the CRC.
4. Distribute materials as appropriate, prior to the
start of the event.
5. Each team will display its tools using the tool
template (paper template) provided, as necessary.
a. Only tools displayed will be permitted.
b. Tool boxes must be removed from a team’s
work table prior to when participants begin the
design and construction of the solution.
6. Once teams are seated (checked against the entry
list) and general announcements have been made,
the event problem will be distributed, reviewed,
and time will be started.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

299

TECHNOLOGY PROBLEM SOLVING
7. Judges and monitors observe the entire
construction phase, with judges measuring
solutions as soon as appropriate.

6. Review and submit the finalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.

8. Judges will collect the solution design when the
team’s solution is submitted for testing.

7. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

9. Judges will use the designs to break any ties in
order to determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
10. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
11. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related forms in the results envelope to the CRC
room.
12. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges/assistants to review
time limits, procedures, and regulations. If
questions arise that cannot be answered, speak to
the event manager before the event begins.
2. Conduct the LEAP interviews.
3. Judges will independently evaluate the LEAP
requirements.
4. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
5. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)

300

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TRANSPORTATION MODELING
OVERVIEW

Using only designated materials and following required
specifications, participants research, design, and produce
a scale model of a vehicle that fits the annual design
problem, which is posted on the TSA website under
Competitions/Themes and Problems. The entry must take
appearance and realism into consideration.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) individual per chapter may participate, one (1)
entry per individual.

TIME LIMITS

Semifinalists participate in a LEAP interview that lasts five
(5) minutes.

LEAP REPORT/INTERVIEW

An individual LEAP Report is required for this event and
must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants check in their entries and submit
LEAP Reports at the time and place stated in the
conference program.
2. Judges review entries. Neither students nor
advisors are present at this time.
3. A list of twelve (12) semifinalists (in random order)
will be posted.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
LEAP interview.
2. Judges independently evaluate the LEAP Report
and interview.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Entries must include a scale model, a display, and
documentation (a portfolio).
B. The model, display and documentation must meet the
following specifications:

Model
1. The scale model must accurately reflect the annual
design problem.
2. The model must be designed and produced as
original work by the student during the current
school year.
3. The model may be made from wood or it may be
3D-printed.
4. Using commercially produced (store-bought)
model vehicle body parts (including hoods,
fenders, wings, propellers, frames, etc.) is
prohibited.
5. It is permissible to use pre-manufactured parts
such as body strengtheners, tires and wheels,
plastic canopy, exhausts, mirrors, head and tail
lights, windshields, and antennae.
a. These parts may be attached to or enclosed
within the vehicle and may be constructed from
materials other than wood, excluding glass or
liquids. These parts must be fastened securely.
b. It is also permissible to use 3D printers in the
production of the parts of this model.
6. The finished vehicle must fit inside the display
space of 16" x 16" x 16".
7. The themed vehicle model must have an actual
length that measures at least six inches (6").
8. The designer must choose a scale for the vehicle
so that it meets regulations and must be specified
in the notebook.
9. Wheels: Dimensions should be consistent with the
scale of the body. Wheels must roll.

3. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

301

TRANSPORTATION MODELING

Display

j. Documentation for this event must not include
the name of the chapter or state

1. The model must be presented for evaluation on a
display not to exceed 16" tall x 16" deep x 16" long
(including the model).

k. All ideas, text, or images from sources other
than the designer must be cited
l. Cited works should be in MLA format

2. The portfolio is not considered part of the display
but is placed with it at its side.
3. No electrical access will be provided by TSA for
displays.
4. Use of dry cell batteries is permissible, but they
must be contained within the stated display space.

m. Pages that are 11" x 17" in size should be folded
to fit in the notebook

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. The LEAP Report
1. Participants document the leadership skills
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

Documentation
1. Documentation materials (comprising a “portfolio”)
are required and should be secured in a clear front
report cover.

2. Participants will respond to questions about the
content of the LEAP Report.

2. In addition to the 11" x 17" pages noted below, the
report cover must include the following singlesided, 8½" x 11" pages, in this order:

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

a. LEAP Report
b. Title page with the event title, the conference
city and state, and the year; a picture of the
vehicle may be included as well; one (1) page
c. Table of contents; pages as needed
d. Description of designer’s vehicle, making note
of the scale used, inspiration for the choice
and design of the vehicle, research about the
history and evolution of the original vehicle, and
design elements that set the vehicle apart from
others (e.g. fuel used, unique features); one (1)
page
e. Photo examples of current or past vehicles that
are similar to the current year’s theme or that
inspired the entry; one (1) page

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The quality of the notebook
2. The model
3. The display

SEMIFINAL ROUND
The quality and content of the LEAP Report and interview.
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

STEM INTEGRATION

f. Concept drawings/detailed sketches or 3D
CAD modeling; two (2) pages (11" x 17" size)

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

g. Photos of the clay, foam, wax, or 3D-printed
mock-up; one (1) page

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

h. Final technical illustrations (orthographic); two
(2) pages (11" x 17" size)
i. Photos of the production of the model; one
page

302

EVALUATION

•
•
•
•
•

Automotive designer
Automotive engineer
Digital modeling technician
Industrial designer
Industrial engineer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TRANSPORTATION
MODELING

Go/No Go Specifications

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Vehicle scale model is present.
The model is made of appropriate materials.
The portfolio is present.
The display size is no more than 16" x 16" x 16".
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Production quality

The model exhibits poor production
quality; the surface is rough; there is
little or no attention to detail.

There is some evidence of proper
production techniques; the model
appearance is adequate.

The model demonstrates excellent
production techniques with obvious
effort and attention to detail.

Paint and finish
(X1)

Surface imperfections are evident;
the model is sticky, and/or the
painting quality is low.

The quality of the painted surface is
acceptable, with some imperfections
visible.

The painted surface is exceptional,
with little or no visible imperfections.

Appropriate to
designated problem

The model does not relate to the
stated annual design theme.

The model generally relates to the
stated annual design theme.

The model effectively represents
and portrays the stated annual
design theme.

Details

There is a very weak and limited
attempt to include identifying
characteristics and/or additional parts
to help create a realistic appearance.

The model includes some
identifying characteristics and/or
additional parts that give it a sense
of realism.

The model displays exemplary effort
to include identifying characteristics
and/or additional parts that give it a
realistic appearance.

Display

The quality of the display is
poor, and/or it exceeds the size
requirements.

The display is adequately created
and meets the size specifications.

The display is exemplary, includes
eye-catching details, and meets the
size specifications.

(X1)

(X1)
(X1)

(X1)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

MODEL AND DISPLAY (50 points)

MODEL AND DISPLAY SUBTOTAL (50 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

303

TRANSPORTATION MODELING

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

The portfolio is missing several
components, and/or it is
unorganized; it is messy and lacks
quality.

Most components are included
in the portfolio; it is adequately
organized.

All portfolio components are
included and completely organized;
effort and quality of work are
evident.

Vehicle description

The description is inadequate;
research references are lacking; the
scale is incomplete.

The description is adequate,
research is evident with some
documentation, and the scale is
stated and accurate.

An excellent description is included,
with necessary research referenced
to support the model solution; the
scale is stated and accurate.

Concept drawings,
detailed sketches,
or 3D CAD
modeling

The drawings are not to scale,
and/or the the quality is poor,
and/or there are missing parts and
dimensions; the drawings are not on
11" x 17" paper.

The drawings are acceptable,
true to scale, and representative
of the vehicle, with some details/
dimensions included; the drawings
are produced on 11" x 17" paper.

The drawings are accurate and
complete; they include all necessary
details/dimensions and are drawn
on 11" x 17" paper.

Photo examples of
current/past similar
vehicles

There is only one photo example of
current or past similar vehicles.

There are two or three photo
examples of current or past similar
vehicles.

There are a number of photo
examples of current or past similar
vehicles, showing that in-depth
research was done.

Photos of clay,
foam, wax, or
3D-printed model

There is only one photograph of the
clay/foam or wax model included.

Two or three photographs of
the clay/foam or wax model are
included, but more are needed to
adequately document the model.

There are a number of photographs
included that effectively document
the preliminary clay/foam/wax
model.

Final technical
illustrations

Orthographic plans are poorly
executed, and/or the plans are not
on 11" x 17" paper.

Adequate orthographic plans are
included; the plans are on 11" x 17"
paper.

Complete orthographic plans are
included; they are of excellent
quality on 11" x 17" paper.

Photos of
production of the
model

Only one photograph of the model
production is included.

Two or three photographs of the
model production are included, but
they are not enough to provide full
documentation.

The photographs included fully and
effectively document and describe
the model production process.

(X1)

(orthographic plans)
(X1)

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (120 points)

304

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (70 points)

TRANSPORTATION MODELING

CRITERIA
LEAP Report/
Interview

(10% of the total
event points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The individual’s efforts are not
clearly communicated, lack detail,
and/or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW (12 points)

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the
SLC Practices and Behaviors is
excellent.

SEMIFINAL LEAP INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (12 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points in the semifinalist sections above) must be initialed by the evaluator,
coordinator, and manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (12 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (132 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

305

TRANSPORTATION MODELING

TRANSPORTATION MODELING
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Assistants, two (2)
C. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Results envelope
6. Envelope for LEAP Reports
7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol

PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. When it is necessary to move models, only judges
and official personnel should handle the models.
Extreme care should be taken to avoid damage to
the entries.
2. Judges independently evaluate the entries.

RESPONSIBILITIES

3. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:

AT THE CONFERENCE

a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or

1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area(s) in which the event is being held
for appropriate set-up, including room size, chairs,
tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event manager of
any potential problems.
5. At least one (1) hour before the event is set to
begin, meet with judges/assistants to review time
limits, procedures, and regulations. If questions
arise that cannot be answered, speak to the event
manager before the event begins.

b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
4. Judges determine the twelve (12) semifinalists.
5. Review and submit the semifinalist results and all
related items/forms in the results envelope to the
CRC room for posting.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At least one (1) hour before the event is set to
begin, meet with judges/assistants to review time
limits, procedures, and regulations. If questions
arise that cannot be answered, speak to the event
manager before the event begins.
2. Semifinalist teams will report at the time and place
stated in the conference program to sign up for a
semifinalist LEAP interview.

306

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

TRANSPORTATION MODELING
3. The LEAP interview will last a maximum of five (5)
minutes.
4. Judges independently evaluate the LEAP Report
and interview.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must initial either of these actions on
the rating form.
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists in rank
order and discuss and break any ties. (Determine
the procedure for breaking ties before the onsite
competition begins.)
7. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
8. At the designated time, return models, displays,
and portfolios to student owners after verifying
official conference identification.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

307

308

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

VIDEO GAME DESIGN
OVERVIEW

Video game design demands the use of complex
intellectual, artistic, and technical skills. Once learned,
these skills may be applied in many other high
technology occupations within the sciences, technology,
and the arts.
Participants develop a video game that focuses on the
subject of their choice. The game must be interesting,
exciting, visually appealing, and intellectually challenging.
The game must have high artistic, educational, and social
value.
The game and all required documentation must be
submitted — and will be evaluated — online, preconference. Semifinalist teams (list posted at the
conference) participate in an onsite interview to
demonstrate the knowledge and expertise they gained
during the development of the game.
The theme of the current year’s game will be posted on
the national TSA website under Competition Themes/
Problems.

ELIGIBILITY

Three (3) teams per state may participate.

TIME LIMITS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. All components of the chapter’s entry, including
the website address (URL) for the entry, must be
finished, submitted, and accessible via the Internet
by 11:59 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on May
15th.
2. Entries received, or changes made to submitted
entries after this deadline will not be judged.
3. Email verification of each team’s entry will be made
by June 10th.
4. The game submitted for evaluation must be
greater than three (3) minutes in length of play and
must be interactive.

5. A deduction of five (5) points total will be incurred
for a game that completes under the three
(3)-minute time minimum.
6. The timing of the game segment starts with the
first image or sound presented.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalists participate in an onsite interview that
lasts approximately five to ten (5-10) minutes.
2. As part of each semifinalist interview, each team
will participate in a LEAP interview that will last a
maximum of five (5) additional minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants design, create, provide documentation
for, and submit the game entry and the team LEAP
Report by 11:59 p.m. (PDT) on May 15th (see Time
Limits). The game may be an online based game,
or one that is a downloadable *.exe file.
2. Submission information will be provided on the
TSA website under Competition/Themes and
Problems.
3. All questions pertaining to Video Game Design
should be emailed to the event coordinator or the
event manager.
4. Entries are reviewed by judges prior to the
National TSA Conference.
5. A semifinalist list of twelve (12) teams (in random
order) will be posted at the conference on the first
full day of competition.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

309

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams sign up for an interview time
on the date and time noted in the conference
program.

1. LEAP Report

2. Two (2) team members from each semifinalist team
report to the event area.

2. A completed Student Copyright Checklist (see
Forms Appendix)

3. Semifinalist teams will have a chance to answer
questions about their documentation, game,
the game’s purpose, value, design, rules, and
development process.

3. A hand-drawn storyboard, which depicts the
design concept of the video game; pages as
needed

4. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist interview.
5. Judges independently assess the entries,
including the team’s LEAP Report.
6. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced during
the awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. The game and required documentation must be
located online and accessible for evaluation. The
game may be an online based game, or one that is a
downloadable *.exe file.
B. The URL must point to the team’s entry.
C. The game must be entertaining, exciting, and
challenging and have artistic, social, and educational
value.
D. Game instructions must be clear and understandable.
E. Entries must be a team project.
F. Judges must be able to play the game to the third
(3rd) level.
G. The game must include original work of the team.
1. Game architecture, game engines, graphics, and
sounds may be used from other sources.
2. Work that is not created by the team must have
proper documentation, showing copyright
permissions and/or license for usage in the game
segment.

310

H. The required documentation (noted below) must be
submitted with the game URL address in the form of a
PDF attachment:

4. Purpose and description of the game, the target
audience, and a detailed explanation of how to
play the game, including a list of control functions;
two (2) pages
5. A completed Plan of Work log (see Forms
Appendix); pages as needed
6. Permission letters for the use of copyrighted
material; pages as needed (if applicable)
I. Required documentation becomes the property of
TSA.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Two (2) team members participate in a semifinal
interview.
B. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
has developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.
2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted immediately following the
event-specific interview.
3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The quality of the required documentation
2. The game’s aesthetics, flow, story, content, sound
(preferred but not required), and characters
3. The first three (3) levels of the game
4. Up to fifteen (15) bonus points may be added by
the judges for exceptional game features, or for
content showing exemplary educational and social
value.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. A semifinalist interview
2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

NOTES

The Video Game Design submission procedure noted
in this guide applies to entries for the National TSA
Conference only, and not TSA state conferences.

STEM INTEGRATION

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT
•
•
•
•
•

Animator
Computer programmer
Electronic game designer
Electronic game technician
Writer

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

311

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Judges: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points), or exemplary (9-10
points) performance levels as a guideline in the rating form, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the right. The
X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor for determining
the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion =
7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2 criterion = 14 points.) A score of
zero (0) is acceptable if the minimal performance for any criterion is not met.

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Portfolio
components

Not all portfolio pages are included,
and/or the pages are unorganized.

Most portfolio elements are included
and organized.

Outstanding organization skills are
evident in the preparation of the
portfolio, which contains all required
elements.

Game directions
and control function

The game explanation is difficult
to follow; functions provided are
illogical or incorrect.

The game directions can be
followed, but at times they do not
sync with overall workings of the
game; most control functions are
adequate.

The game explanation is easy to
follow, and control functions are
well-matched for the game.

Plan of Work log

Plan of Work log is incomplete and
inaccurate.

Plan of Work log is included and
mostly addresses participation of all
team members.

Plan of Work log is complete and
shows participation of all members.

CRITERIA

(X1)

DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL (30 points)

312

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

DOCUMENTATION (30 points)

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Creativity and
artisanship

The game lacks creativity; poor
artisanship and development are
evident.

The game exhibits adequate
creativity and artisanship.

The game is highly creative and
well-crafted.

Technical skill

The game lacks originality and
shows few technical skills.

The game is original and shows
some evidence of programming
skills.

The game is original, highly
artistic, and shows evidence of
programming skills.

Storyline/flow of the
game

The game follows little or no story
line; there is limited logical flow to
the game.

The game follows a story line and
flows adequately from one scene/
level to another.

The game is well-organized and
flows smoothly from one scene/level
to the next.

Overall appeal

Playing the game is not enjoyable;
interacting in game play is a
struggle, due to the game’s illogical
sequencing.

The game is somewhat interesting,
easy, and enjoyable to play; most
design concepts are incorporated.

The game is innovative and
entertaining; design principles are
incorporated, which make playing
the game easy and enjoyable.

(X2)
(X2)

(X1)

(X2)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

GAME DESIGN (70 points)

GAME DESIGN SUBTOTAL (70 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

CRITERIA
Bonus Points

Unique and
exceptional features
(X1)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

The game demonstrates some
unique and exceptional features
and/or exemplary educational value.

The game is very good but limited in
uniqueness.

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

BONUS (15 points)

The game is outstanding and
unique.

BONUS SUBTOTAL (15 points)

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (115 points)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

313

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

CRITERIA

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participants seem unorganized and
unprepared for the interview; an
illogical explanation of the game is
presented.

Participants are generally prepared
for the interview; explanation of
the game is communicated and
generally organized.

The interview is logical, wellorganized, and easy to follow; the
game explanation is communicated
in an organized and concise
manner.

Team participation

The majority of the delivery is made
by one member of the team; the
partner(s) may be disengaged in the
interview.

Team members generally are
engaged in the interview, though
one member may take on more
responsibility that the other(s).

All team members are actively
involved in the interview and
responses to the questions; there is
shared responsibility among team
members.

Knowledge

Participants seem to have little
understanding of the concepts in
their project; answers to questions
may be vague.

Participants exhibit an
understanding of the concepts in
the project.

Participants show clear evidence of
a thorough understanding of their
project.

LEAP Report/
Interview

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing. Few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The individual’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing. Identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

(X1)

(15 points;
10% of total
event points)

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (45 points)

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (45 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (45 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (160 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

314

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

VIDEO GAME DESIGN

VIDEO GAME DESIGN
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round, two (2) or more for preconference judging
2. Semifinal Round, two (2) or more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Results envelope with coordinator forms
6. Envelopes for LEAP Reports
7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. Tables for entries
C. One (1) extension cord for the semifinalist evaluation
team
D. One (1) power bar with surge protection for
semifinalists, as needed
E. Laptop computer with high speed Internet capability
F. Tables and chairs for event coordinator, semifinalist
judges, and participants

RESPONSIBILITIES
PRE-CONFERENCE/PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Review entries as they are submitted to the
designated online storage utility.
2. Entry submission is allowed only until 11:59 p.m.
(PDT) on May 15th.
3. Send email verification to all entrants by June 10th.
4. Manage communication and pre-conference
evaluation (at least two [2] or more judges should
be recruited earlier in the year).

5. At least five (5) days prior to the National TSA
Conference, make accessible the online storage
utility link for Video Game Design entries.
6. Collect completed rating forms electronically and
bring them to the conference on a flash drive.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
5. On the first full day of competition, post a list of the
twelve (12) semifinalists in random order.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. At least one (1) hour before the event is scheduled
to begin, meet with judges and review the time
limits, procedures, and regulations and clear up
any questions or misunderstandings.
2. Semifinalist teams report to the event area at the
time and place noted in the conference program
to sign up for an interview time.
3. Distribute the event-specific interview guidelines.
4. Manage completion of the onsite interviews.
5. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator,
and CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct twenty percent (20%) of the total
possible points in this round or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

315

VIDEO GAME DESIGN
6. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties that affect the top three (3)
placements.(Determine the procedure for breaking
ties before the onsite competition begins.)
7. Submit the finalist results and all related forms in
the results envelope to the CRC room.

316

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

WEBMASTER
OVERVIEW

Participants are required to design, build, and launch a
website that features the school’s career and technology/
engineering program, the TSA chapter, and the
chapter’s ability to research and present a given topic
pertaining to technology (referred to as the “design
brief”). Semifinalists participate in an onsite interview to
demonstrate the knowledge and expertise gained during
the development of the website — with an emphasis
on web design methods and practices, as well as their
research for the annual design topic. The topic for the
current year will be posted on the TSA website under
Competitions/Themes and Problems.

5. Semifinalists participate in an onsite interview that
lasts approximately five to ten (5-10) minutes.
6. As part of the semifinalist interview, each
semifinalist team will participate in a LEAP
interview that will last a maximum of five (5)
additional minutes.

LEAP

A team LEAP Report is required for this event and must
be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

ATTIRE

TSA competition attire is required for this event.

ELIGIBILITY

One (1) team of three to five (3-5) members per TSA
chapter may participate, one (1) entry per team.

TIME LIMITS
1. The Universal Resource Locator (URL) and all
components of the chapter’s entry must be
submitted to webentry@tsaweb.org by 11:59 pm
Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on May 15th.
a. Note: After 11:59 pm on May 15th changes
should not be made to the website.
b. If a team makes changes or updates to the
entry after the submission deadline, those
changes are not considered.
c. The URL must point to the main web page
of the career and technology/engineering
program or TSA chapter portion of the team
entry.
d. Email verification of each team’s entry is made
by June 10th.
NOTE: This procedure applies to the national TSA
competition only — entry procedures for state
conferences are handled by each state.

PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. Participants obtain the event design brief from
the national TSA website. (Criteria for the middle
school and high school events are different.)
2. All questions pertaining to Webmaster must be
emailed to the event coordinator, whose email
address can be found in the Directory section of
the TSA website.
3. During the current school year, participants design
an original website that must feature the following
components:
a. the school’s career and technology/
engineering program,
b. the TSA chapter, and
c. the chapter’s solution to the design brief
4. A LEAP Report must be submitted with the event
entry (in PDF format). The document must be
submitted as an attachment to the email containing
the chapter’s entry (URL).
5. The entries are evaluated prior to the National TSA
Conference so that judges have ample opportunity
to review them online.
6. A semifinalist list of twelve (12) teams (in random
order) will be posted at the National TSA
Conference one (1) day prior to the interview.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

317

WEBMASTER

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Semifinalist teams must sign up for an interview
time. The specific place and time for interview
scheduling is posted in the conference program.
Each team must report back to the event area at
the appropriate time.
2. Semifinalist teams will answer questions about
their entry.
3. The LEAP interview will be conducted immediately
following the event-specific interview.
4. Judges independently assess the interviews,
including each team’s LEAP Report.
5. The top ten (10) finalists will be announced at the
awards ceremony.

REGULATIONS
PRELIMINARY ROUND
A. Participants must launch their entry on a web server
that can be accessed via the Internet 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, 52 weeks per year.
B. All portions of the website entry must be the original
work of the team members.
C. Created entirely during the current school year, each
website entry must consist of:
1. Original web pages that promote the school’s
career and technology/engineering program
(i.e., career and technology/engineering classes
offered at the school, course summaries, digital
images that showcase the school technology/
engineering laboratory, teacher contact
information, etc.)
2. Original web pages that promote the school’s TSA
chapter (e.g., logo, motto, creed, officers, photos,
chapter activities including school and community
service projects)
3. Original web pages that specifically display the
chapter’s solution to the design brief

4. Career and technology/engineering courses and
program pages
a. This section has no minimum or maximum
number of pages.
b. The main page for this section must contain
a link to the TSA chapter main page and the
design brief main page.
5. TSA chapter pages
a. This section has no minimum or maximum
number of pages.
b. The main page for this section must contain a
link to the design brief main page.
6. Design brief pages
a. This section has no minimum or maximum
number of pages.
b. A page within this section must contain a link
to the TSA chapter’s main page and the career
and technology education program’s main
page.
D. Framework systems, such as Drupal, Joomla,
Wordpress, Bootstrap, or other currrent technologies
may be used; however, pre-built templates and
themes for these sites are not permissible. If a
framework system is used, a statement affirming
that the template or theme used on the framework
was built by the team must be posted on an “About”
section or page. Any resources, such as references
used must be cited properly and all attributions must
be posted on an “About” section or page that is easy
to locate.
E. Template engine websites, such as, but not limited to,
Webs, Wix, and Weebly are NOT permitted.
F. If copyrighted material, such as text, images, or sound
from other sources is used, proper written permission
must be included. Use the Student Copyright
Checklist (see Forms Appendix or TSA website),
which must be completed, signed, and included in a
separate PDF file with the entry.
G. All entries are viewed with reasonably current
versions of Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla
Firefox, and/or Safari. Each entry also may be viewed
with various tablet and mobile devices.

318

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

WEBMASTER

SEMIFINAL ROUND
A. Each chapter selects up to five (5) team members to
represent the chapter in the onsite interview.

2. The content and quality of the LEAP Report and
interview
Refer to the official rating form for more information.

B. The LEAP Report
1. Teams document the leadership skills the team
developed and demonstrated while working
on this event, and on a non-competitive event
leadership experience.

STEM INTEGRATION

2. Teams will respond to questions about the content
of the LEAP Report as part of the LEAP interview,
which will be conducted immediately following the
event-specific interview.

CAREERS RELATED TO THIS EVENT

3. Specific LEAP Report regulations can be found in
the LEAP Program section of this guide and on the
TSA website.

This event aligns with the STEM educational standards of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

•
•
•
•

Computer engineer
Webmaster
Website designer
Web technician

EVALUATION
PRELIMINARY ROUND
1. The team’s entry, targeting overall design and
originality, career and technology/engineering
content, and local chapter information
2. The scope and sequence of the design brief
solution
3. The website’s compatibility with different browsers
and screen resolutions
4. The appropriate use of new Internet and webbased applications

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. The event-specific interview and the team’s
knowledge and expertise pertaining to the entry in
the following areas:
a. overall website design and originality
b. career and technology/engineering program
c. TSA chapter information
d. design brief
e. website compatibility with different browsers,
monitor resolution, plug-ins, etc.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

319

WEBMASTER

2019 & 2020 OFFICIAL RATING FORM

HIGH SCHOOL

Go/No Go Specifications
• Before judging the entry, ensure that the items below are
present; indicate presence with a check mark in the box.
• If an item is missing, leave the box next to the item blank
and place a check mark in the box labeled ENTRY NOT
EVALUATED.
• If a check mark is placed in the ENTRY NOT EVALUATED
box, the entry is not to be judged.
TSA chapter content is present.
The design brief solution is present.
The website is compatible with different browsers,
screen resolutions, and mobile devices.
Completed LEAP Report is present.
ENTRY NOT EVALUATED

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Layout and
navigation

The web pages are cluttered and
confusing; it is often difficult to
locate important elements; the
navigation structure is unclear,
unintuitive, and ineffective in getting
users to relevant information.

The web pages have a reasonably
usable layout, and all major
elements can be found; the design
is generally pleasing to view; the
navigation structure is generally
effective and intuitive, and provides
reasonable ability to navigate the
website.

The layout is exceptionally
user-friendly; the relationship of
elements and content are effective
and attractive to the viewer; the
navigation structure is highly
intuitive, and provides efficient
access to all pertinent information
on the website.

Graphics and color
scheme

Graphic content is nonexistent or
of low quality and questionable
relation to the topic; colors are of
poor contrast and detract from the
user experience.

Graphic content effectively
relates to the purpose of the site,
provides enhancement to the user
experience, and is of acceptable to
good quality; the color scheme is
effective and does not detract from
the viewer’s experience.

Graphics are well-used, of high
quality, and clearly enhance
the user experience; interactive
elements effectively engage the
user; the color scheme is attractive,
appropriate, and clearly enhances
the viewing experience.

Function and
compatibility

There are several broken links and
images, and/or the website does
not render properly on multiple
browsers.

There are no broken images, and/or
few, if any, broken links; the website
renders properly on most major
browsers.

There are no broken images or
links; the web site renders properly
on most major browsers and is
usable on mobile devices.

Spelling and
grammar

There are numerous spelling and
grammatical errors.

There are only a few spelling and/or
grammatical errors.

There are few, if any, spelling and
grammatical errors.

CTE program
content

The existence of the CTE program
is presented, but little detailed
information is provided.

A listing of classes, modules,
teachers, and student activities is
generally present.

Classes and modules are described,
teacher backgrounds are detailed,
and student projects are well
presented.

TSA chapter
content

The existence of the TSA chapter
is presented, but little detailed
information is given.

Basic information, such as TSA
motto, creed, chapter and history,
competition, and activity information
is generally present.

Information on TSA, competitions,
activities, community service
projects, awards, and other activities
is presented in detail.

CRITERIA

(X2)

(X1)

(X2)

320

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

WEBSITE (130 points)

WEBMASTER

WEBSITE (130 points) – continued
Design brief
solution

The design brief solution is
addressed, but not in great detail;
it is generally ineffective, and/or
missing many parts of the required
research and presentation.

(X3)

The design brief solution is
generally well presented; it
addresses most major parts of the
required research and presentation.

The design brief solution is well
presented, well researched, and
highly effective; all expected
components are present, and
additional, unrequired elements
that enhance the final product are
incorporated.

WEBSITE SUBTOTAL (130 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

PRELIMINARY SUBTOTAL (130 points)

Minimal performance

Adequate performance

Exemplary performance

1-4 points

5-8 points

9-10 points

Organization

Participants seem unorganized and
unprepared for the interview.

Participants are generally prepared
and are somewhat organized for the
interview.

Participants’ interview is organized,
logical, and easy to follow.

Knowledge

Team members seem to have little
understanding of their project;
answers are vague, short, and/or
incomplete.

Team members have a general
understanding of their project, and
adequately discuss their process
and solution to the challenge.

There is clear evidence that the
team members have a thorough
understanding of their project and
design procedure.

Articulation

The interview provides an unclear,
unorganized, and or illogical
description of the project.

Participants exhibit an
understanding of the concepts in
the project.

Participants show clear evidence of
a thorough understanding of their
project.

Delivery

The team is verbose and/
or uncertain in its interview;
participants’ posture, gestures, and
lack of eye contact diminish the
interview.

The team is somewhat wellspoken and distinct in its interview;
participants’ posture gestures, and
eye contact are acceptable in the
interview.

The team is well-spoken and distinct
in its interview; participants’ posture,
gestures, and eye contact result in
a polished, natural, and effective
interview.

Engagement and
participation

The team must be prompted to
provide answers and information;
a clear team leader dominates
the interview, while other team
members are unresponsive.

Team members generally answer
questions with responses of
acceptable length and depth;
most team members participate
adequately in the interview and
engage the judges when answering
questions.

All team members contribute in the
interview; while there may be a clear
team leader, all members provide
appropriate substantive material to
the conversation; the team engages
the judges in the interview, which
becomes less of a question and
answer session and more of a
conversation about the topic and
solution.

CRITERIA

(X1)

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Record scores
in the column
spaces below.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (68 points)

321

WEBMASTER

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW (68 points) – continued
LEAP Report/
Interview
(18 points;
10% of total
event points)

The team’s efforts are not clearly
communicated, lack detail, and/
or are unconvincing; few, if any,
attempts are made to identify and/or
incorporate the SLC Practices and
Behaviors.

The team’s efforts are adequately
communicated, include some detail,
are clear, and/or are generally
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is adequate.

The team’s efforts are clearly
communicated, fully-detailed, and
convincing; identification and/or
incorporation of the SLC Practices
and Behaviors is excellent.

SEMIFINAL INTERVIEW SUBTOTAL (68 points)
Rules violations (a deduction of 20% of the total possible points for the above sections) must be initialed by the judge, coordinator, and
manager of the event. Record the deduction in the space to the right.
Indicate the rule violated: ______________

SEMIFINAL SUBTOTAL (68 points)

To arrive at the TOTAL score, add any subtotals and subtract rules violation points, as necessary.

TOTAL (198 points)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:________________________________________________

322

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

WEBMASTER

WEBMASTER
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES

A. Event coordinator

PRE-CONFERENCE

B. Judges:
1. Preliminary round for pre-conference evaluation of
websites, two (2) or more
2. Semifinal round, semifinalist interviews, two (2) or
more

MATERIALS
A. Coordinator’s packet, containing:
1. Event guidelines, one (1) copy for the coordinator
and for each judge
2. TSA Event Coordinator Report (Entries are
evaluated before the conference and only
scores of the semifinalists are needed onsite.
These scores and any other materials required
for judging are brought to the conference by the
coordinator.)
3. List of judges/assistants
4. Pre-populated flash drives for judges
5. Results envelope
6. Envelope for LEAP Reports
7. LEAP Interview Judging Protocol
B. List of questions for onsite interview
C. One to three (1-3) laptop computers, with high speed
Internet access, and loaded with reasonably current
versions of Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla
Firefox, and/or Safari. A mobile device, such as a
smartphone or tablet, is also desirable.
D. Evaluation of Webmaster entries takes place
before the conference so that judges can post the
conference semifinalist list on the first full day of the
National TSA Conference and have plenty of time for
the onsite interviews.

1. Review entries as they are received by
webentry@tsaweb.org. Entries are allowed only
until 11:59 pm Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) on
May 15th. Send email verification to all entrants
by June 10th.
2. Compile all team LEAP Reports for use in the
onsite semifinalist round at the National TSA
Conference.
3. Manage communication and pre-conference
evaluation of entries (at least two [2] judges are
recruited earlier in the year).
4. Collect completed entry scores, and have these
scores at the conference.

AT THE CONFERENCE
1. Attend the mandatory coordinator’s meeting at the
designated time and location.
2. Report to the CRC room and obtain the
coordinator’s packet; check the contents.
3. Review the event guidelines and check to see that
enough judges/assistants have been scheduled.
4. On the first full day of competition, at least
one (1) day prior to the interview portion of the
event, have the CRC post a list of the twelve (12)
semifinalists in random order.

SEMIFINAL ROUND
1. Inspect the area or room in which the event is to
be held for appropriate set-up, including room
size, chairs, tables, outlets, etc. Notify the event
manager of any potential problems.
2. At least one (1) hour before the event is to begin,
meet with semifinalist judges to review the time
limits, procedures, and regulations. If questions
arise that cannot be answered, speak to the event
manager before the event begins.
3. Distribute guidelines for the interview to the
judges.
4. Semifinalist teams report to the event area and
sign up for an interview time.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

323

WEBMASTER
5. Manage completion of the onsite interviews.
6. Decisions about rules violations must be discussed
and verified with the judges, event coordinator and
CRC manager to determine either:
a. To deduct 20% of the total possible points or
b. To disqualify the entry
c. The event coordinator, judges, and CRC
manager must all initial either of these actions
on the rating form.
7. The LEAP interview will be conducted as part of
the semifinalist interview and will last a maximum
of five (5) additional minutes.
8. Judges determine the ten (10) finalists and discuss
and break any ties. (Determine the procedure
for breaking ties before the onsite competition
begins.)
9. Review and submit the finalist results and all items/
forms in the results envelope to the CRC room.
10. If necessary, manage security and the removal of
materials from the event area.

324

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORMS
APPENDIX

325

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Date

Task

Time involved

Advisor signature _________________________________________________________

Team member
responsible
(student initials)

Comments

FORMS APPENDIX

326

TECHNOLOGY STUDENT ASSOCIATION PLAN OF WORK

FORMS APPENDIX

STUDENT COPYRIGHT CHECKLIST
(for students to complete and advisors to verify)

1) Does your solution to the competitive event integrate any music?

YES

If NO, go to question 2.
If YES, is the music copyrighted?

YES

If YES, move to question 1A. If NO, move to question 1B.
1A) Have you asked for author permission to use the music in your solution and included that permission (letter/form)
in your documentation? If YES, move to question 2. If NO, ask for permission (OR use royalty free/your own original
music) and if permission is granted, include the permission in your documentation.
1B) Is the music royalty free, or did you create the music yourself? If YES, cite the royalty free music OR your original
music properly in your documentation.
CHAPTER ADVISOR: Sign below if your student has integrated any music into his/her competitive event solution.
I, ______________________________ (chapter advisor), have checked my student’s solution and confirm that the
use of music is done so with proper permission and is cited correctly in the student’s documentation.
2) Does your solution to the competitive event integrate any graphics?

YES

If NO, go to question 3.
If YES, is the graphic copyrighted, registered and/or trademarked?
If YES, move to question 2A. If NO, move to question 2B.
2A) Have you asked for author permission to use the graphic in your solution and included that permission (letter/form)
in your documentation? If YES, move to question 3. If NO, ask for permission (OR use royalty free/your own original
graphic) and if permission is granted, include the permission in your documentation.
2B) Is the graphic royalty free, or did you create your own graphic? If YES, cite the royalty free graphic OR your own
original graphic properly in your documentation.
CHAPTER ADVISOR: Sign below if your student has integrated any graphics into his/her competitive event solution.
I, ______________________________ (chapter advisor), have checked my student’s solution and confirm that the
use of graphics is done so with proper permission and is cited correctly in the student’s documentation.
3) Does your solution to the competitive event use another’s thoughts or research?

YES

If NO, this is the end of the checklist.
If YES, have you properly cited other’s thoughts or research in your documentation? If YES, this is the end of the
checklist.
If NO, properly cite the thoughts/research of others in your documentation.
CHAPTER ADVISOR: Sign below if your student has integrated any thoughts/research of others into his/her
competitive event solution.
I, ______________________________ (chapter advisor), have checked my student’s solution and confirm that
the use of the thoughts/research of others is done so with proper permission and is cited correctly in the student’s
documentation.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

327

FORMS APPENDIX

PHOTO/FILM/VIDEO CONSENT AND RELEASE
I hereby give permission for images of my child or myself (as applicable), captured during Technology Student Association
(TSA) activities through video/film, photo or digital camera, to be used solely for the purposes of TSA promotional
materials and publications, and I waive any rights of compensation or ownership thereto.

Name of minor in images (please print)

Name of minor’s parent/guardian (please print)

Name of adult in images (please print)

Parent/guardian or adult’s signature (as applicable)

Date

328

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORMS APPENDIX

EVENT REVISION SUGGESTION
As TSA expands in membership and participation in competitive events increases, parts of some competitive events may
need revision. Also, whenever guidelines are misinterpreted, they are revised for better clarity. TSA encourages revision
input so that competitive events continue to improve. Please use this form for comments. (Use one form for each suggestion.)

Event title____________________________________________________________________________________
Note a reference to the exact section and page number in 2019 & 2020 Technology Student Association High School
Competitive Events Guide.
State your suggestion. Be very specific. List exactly what should be deleted, replaced, and/or added to the event rule or
procedure.
Provide a rationale. List the pros and cons from a personal viewpoint.
Are any STEM areas addressed by this change? Explain.

Signature

Date

State advisor’s signature

Date

State

Zip

Address

City

Include signatures of two people from different TSA chapters who support the suggestion.

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Mail to: CRC, c/o National TSA, 1904 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191-1540
Email to: general@tsaweb.org

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

329

FORMS APPENDIX

RULES INTERPRETATION PANEL GRIEVANCE
Site of National TSA Conference___________________________________________________________________
Advisor’s name________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter name_________________________________________________________________________________
School name__________________________________________________________________________________
Competitive event (including level)__________________________________________________________________
Student or team identification number_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF CONCERN (Please print or type.)

Signature

Date

Signature of state advisor

Date

The decisions of the Rules Interpretation Panel (RIP) at the national conference are final.

330

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORMS APPENDIX

RULES INTERPRETATION PANEL
RESPONSE TO GRIEVANCE
PANEL MEMBERS

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Signaturer

Date

Site of National TSA Conference___________________________________________________________________
Date________________________________________________________________________________________
Competitive event (including level)__________________________________________________________________
Student or team identification number_______________________________________________________________
Advisor’s name________________________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF RESPONSE

The decisions of the Rules Interpretation Panel (RIP) at the national conference are final.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

331

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

The Student Leadership Challenge*
Practices

Behaviors

Competitive Event

Participant/Team ID#

Leadership Experiences

Follow through on promises and commitments
Set a personal example through actions

Model
the
Way

Align others with principles and standards
Seek feedback about impact of actions
Make sure teammates support common values
Talk about values and principles
Look ahead and communicate future ideas
Describe ideal capabilities

Inspire
a Shared
Vision

Talk about how future could be improved
Be upbeat and positive
Communicate purpose and meaning
Show others how their interests can be realized
Challenge current skills and abilities
Break projects into smaller do-able portions

Challenge
the
Process

Search for innovative ways to improve
Ask “What can we learn?”
Take initiative in experimenting
Help others try out new ideas
Foster cooperative relationships with others
Actively listen to diverse viewpoints

Enable
Others
to Act

Treat others with respect
Support the decisions other people make
Give people freedom and choice
Provide leadership opportunities for others
Praise people
Encourage others

Encourage
the
Heart

Express appreciation for people’s contributions
Publicly recognize alignment with values
Celebrate accomplishments
Creatively recognize people’s contributions

*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

FORMS APPENDIX

332

LEAP Report – Competition Engagement (HS)
Competitive Event Leadership Experiences

LEAP Report – Competition Engagement (HS)
General Leadership Experiences

The Student Leadership Challenge*
Practices and Behaviors
Model the Way

Leadership
Roles

Leadership Experiences

Participant/Team ID#

Follow through on promises and commitments
Set a personal example through actions
Align others with principles and standards
Seek feedback about impact of actions
Make sure teammates support common values
Talk about values and principles
Describe ideal capabilities
Talk about how future could be improved
Be upbeat and positive
Communicate purpose and meaning
Show others how their interests can be realized
Challenge current skills and abilities

Challenge
the Process

Community
Service/
Volunteer
Experiences

Inspire a
Shared Vision

Look ahead and communicate future ideas

Break projects into smaller do-able portions
Search for innovative ways to improve
Ask “What can we learn?”
Take initiative in experimenting

Leadership
Development

Enable Others
to Act

Help others try out new ideas
Foster cooperative relationships with others
Actively listen to diverse viewpoints
Treat others with respect
Support the decisions other people make
Give people freedom and choice
Provide leadership opportunities for others

College
Career
Planning

Encourage
the Heart

Praise people
Encourage others
Express appreciation for people’s contributions
Publicly recognize alignment with values
Celebrate accomplishments
Creatively recognize people’s contributions

333

FORMS APPENDIX

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

Leadership
Categories

Competitive Event

FORMS APPENDIX

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER
RECOGNITION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

OVERVIEW

LEAP Legacy Chapter is a comprehensive leadership
recognition program offered to middle and high school
chapters as an optional national TSA activity that includes
a competition component. Chapters (in a team of three
to ten members) demonstrate – and are evaluated on –
their involvement in LEAP activities related to The Student
Leadership Challenge-Five Practices for Becoming an
Exemplary Leader (SLC-five practices)* modules. Chapter
semifinalists compete as participants in the TSA Meet and
Greet event at the annual National TSA Conference.
TSA members are encouraged to use the free Student
Leadership Challenge (SLC) sample resources found on
the TSA website when participating in the LEAP Legacy
Chapter recognition program. These free resources
are applicable to all LEAP activities. Complete Student
Leadership Challenge publications are available for
purchase, but not required for participation in any aspect
of LEAP.

CHAPTER PARTICIPATION
A. Chapters submit a LEAP Legacy Chapter portfolio
(see Portfolio section) to national TSA by March 31st.
B. Portfolios will be evaluated by judges secured by
national TSA. Judges will not evaluate portfolios
submitted from their home state. Based on minimum
qualifying scores, one middle school and one high
school per state will be selected as semifinalists.
Ten middle school chapters and ten high school
chapters will be selected to advance as national
semifinalists and will be notified of their standing
by May 1st. Portfolios that do not meet the minimum
qualifying score will not advance to the semifinalist
round, even if there are no other portfolios from an
individual state.

334

C. National semifinalists are expected to attend the
National TSA Conference at their own expense to
participate in the TSA Meet and Greet event, where
they will have the opportunity to showcase their
leadership activities and achievements to conference
attendees. LEAP Legacy Chapter semifinalists will
be judged anonymously at the Meet and Greet and
ten finalists and their rank will be determined. First
through third place middle school and high school
chapters will receive $1,000, $500, and $250,
respectively. They also will receive trophies on stage
at the awards ceremony.

PORTFOLIO

Chapters document their leadership activities in a
portfolio consisting of a Cover Page, Activity Summary
and Evidence, and supporting documents. The portfolio
provides information about the leadership activities in
which chapters have participated.
A. Portfolios that are incomplete or submitted incorrectly
will not be evaluated.
B. All content/activities provided must have been
completed during the past twelve months. For
example, if a chapter has not yet competed in their
state conference as of March 31st, they may cite
activities related to the most recent state conference
(within the last 12 months.)
C. Portfolios will be submitted electronically by the TSA
chapter advisor via submittable.com no later than
March 31st each year. Portfolios should not be mailed
to the national TSA office. Portfolio submissions
received via US mail or express mail will not be
evaluated.
D. General portfolio formatting requirements (Cover
Page, Activity Summary and Evidence)
1. Participants must use the official Cover Page and
Activity Summary and Evidence templates.
2. All portfolio content must be typed.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

FORMS APPENDIX
E. Portfolio content
1. Cover Page
The Cover Page of the portfolio should include the
following:
a. Chapter name and level (middle school or high
school)
b. Number of participating students
c. School name and address
d. Chapter advisor name and email address
e. Other general information
2. Activity Summary and Evidence
Referencing the LEAP Legacy Chapter Activities
Summary and Evidence Sample and the
Evaluation Rubric, chapters will list their actions/
roles/responsibilities on the Activity Summary
and Evidence template using the five Student
Leadership Challenge practices:
• Model the Way
• Inspire a Shared Vision

TSA MEET AND GREET (NATIONAL
SEMIFINALIST ROUND)
A. National TSA will secure judges to evaluate the
portfolios of LEAP Legacy Chapter submissions to
TSA and determine the ten (10) middle school and
the ten (10) high school national finalists. LEAP Legacy
Chapter national semifinalists will be notified by
national TSA by May 1st.
B. A maximum of two (2) student members may
represent their LEAP Legacy Chapter during the
Meet and Greet event. Chapters may rotate members
throughout the duration of the Meet and Greet.
C. Guidelines for table top displays and/or presentation
materials for the Meet and Greet will be provided to
LEAP Legacy Chapter national semifinalists.
D. LEAP Legacy Chapter national semifinalists are
judged anonymously at the Meet and Greet and the
ten (10) finalists and their rank will be determined.
E. Chapters may participate in LEAP Legacy Chapter
annually if they choose, even if they have won in a
prior year.

• Challenge the Process
• Enable Others to Act
• Encourage the Heart
3. Supporting Documents
Supporting documents must accompany the
completed Activity Summary and Evidence
template and serve as evidence of the chapter’s
LEAP Legacy Chapter activities. A minimum
of two (2) activities with two (2) corresponding
evidence-supporting documents for each Student
Leadership Challenge practice must be provided.
Supporting document file names must reference
the Student Leadership Challenge practice they
support. For example, documents provided as
evidence for activities that support the Model
The Way practice, could be named MTW1, MTW2
and so forth. Please ensure that the file names
of documents clearly indicate which Student
Leadership Challenge practice are supported.

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER NATIONAL
PARTICIPANTS AND FINALISTS WILL ALSO
RECEIVE THE FOLLOWING:
A. First through third (1st–3rd) place national finalist LEAP
Legacy Chapter middle schools and high schools
(chapters) will receive cash awards of $1,000, $500,
and 250, respectively. They also will receive finalist
pins and trophies on stage at the National TSA
Conference Awards Ceremony.
B. School names of semifinalists will be posted on
the TSA website and listed in the National TSA
Conference program.
C. A letter of congratulations and a LEAP Legacy
Chapter certificate will be sent to each finalist
chapter’s school.

*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student
Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered
trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

335

FORMS APPENDIX

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER

PORTFOLIO COVER PAGE
Chapter/school:________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter level (middle school or high school):__________________________________________________________
Number of student participants:____________________________________________________________________
School address:_______________________________________________________________________________
City/state/zip:_________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter advisor:_______________________________________________________________________________
Chapter advisor’s email address:___________________________________________________________________
Summarize – in 100 words or less – the chapter’s activities for the LEAP Legacy Chapter program:

Required Signatures

336

Chapter President_____________________________________________________

Date ������������������

Chapter Advisor______________________________________________________

Date____________________

Principal____________________________________________________________

Date ������������������

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER

ACTIVITY SUMMARY AND EVIDENCE SAMPLE
Student Leadership
Challenge Behaviors*

LEAP Legacy
Chapter Activities

Supporting Documents

Follow through on promises and commitments
Set a personal example through actions

MODEL
THE WAY

INSPIRE A SHARED
VISION

Talk about how future could be improved
Be upbeat and positive
Communicate purpose and meaning
Show others how their interests can be realized

PRACTICE

Challenge current skills and abilities
Break projects into smaller do-able portions

CHALLENGE THE
PROCESS

ENABLE OTHERS
TO ACT

Treat others with respect
Support the decisions other people make
Give people freedom and choice
Provide leadership opportunities for others
Praise people
Encourage others

ENCOURAGE
THE HEART

Express appreciation for people’s contributions
Publicly recognize alignment with values
Celebrate accomplishments
Creatively recognize people’s contributions

337

FORMS APPENDIX

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

The Student Leadership Challenge:
Five Practices For Becoming
an Exemplary Leader*

The Student Leadership
Challenge: Five Practices
For Becoming an
Exemplary Leader*

LEAP
Criteria

PRACTICE

GOALS

MODEL THE WAY

ALIGNMENT

VALUES AND
PRINCIPLES

Minimal Performance
1-4 Points

Adequate Performance
5-8 Points

Exemplary Performance
9-10 Points

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to set goals
and follow through with actions.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts)
of efforts to set goals and follow
through with actions.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support) of efforts to set goals
and follow through with actions.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to align with
others and seek feedback.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts to align
with others and seek feedback.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; written/video evidence)
of efforts to align with others and
seek feedback.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to establish
common values and principles.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor accounts and TSA peer
accounts written evidence) of efforts
to establish common values and
principles.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support, published evidence) of
efforts to establish common values
and principles.

Score

SUBTOTALS (30 pts)

The Student Leadership
Challenge: Five Practices
For Becoming an
Exemplary Leader*

LEAP
Criteria

ENVISION

PRACTICE

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

EVALUATION RUBRIC

INSPIRE A
SHARED VISION

AQUIRE

COMMUNICATE

Minimal Performance
1-4 Points

Adequate Performance
5-8 Points

Exemplary Performance
9-10 Points

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to prepare
for future activities and identify ideal
capabilities.

Provided adequate evidence
(e.g. state advisor and TSA peer
accounts) of efforts to prepare for
future activities and identify ideal
capabilities.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support) of efforts to prepare
for future activities and identify ideal
capabilities.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts/actions
taken to learn new things in order to
accomplish the activity.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts/actions
taken to learn new things in order to
accomplish the activity.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; written/video evidence)
of efforts/actions taken to learn new
things in order to accomplish the
activity.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to
communicate with others.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts to
communicate with others.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; published evidence) of
efforts to communicate with others.

SUBTOTALS (30 pts)

Score

FORMS APPENDIX

338

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER

EVALUATION RUBRIC

PRACTICE

LEAP
Criteria

Minimal Performance
1-4 Points

Adequate Performance
5-8 Points

Exemplary Performance
9-10 Points

INNOVATION

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to engage in
an activity that has not been done
before by the participating chapter or
other TSA chapters.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts)
of efforts to engage in an activity that
has not been done before by the
participating chapter or other TSA
chapters.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support) of efforts to engage in
an activity that has not been done
before by the participating chapter or
other TSA chapters.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to seek
projects that require experimentation.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts to seek
projects that require experimentation.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; written/video evidence)
of efforts to seek projects that require
experimentation.

CHALLENGE
THE PROCESS
INQUIRY

Score

SUBTOTALS (20 pts)

The Student Leadership
Challenge: Five Practices
For Becoming an
Exemplary Leader*

LEAP
Criteria

PRACTICE

EMPATHY
ENABLE OTHERS
TO ACT
COLLABORATION

Minimal Performance
1-4 Points

Adequate Performance
5-8 Points

Exemplary Performance
9-10 Points

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to actively
listen to diverse viewpoints and
support diverse ideas.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts)
of efforts to actively listen to diverse
viewpoints and support diverse ideas.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support) of efforts to actively
listen to diverse viewpoints and
support diverse ideas.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to support
the decisions other people make,
give people freedom and choice,
and provide leadership opportunities
for others.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts to support
the decisions other people make,
give people freedom and choice and
provide leadership opportunities for
others.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; written/video evidence)
of efforts to support the decisions
other people make, give people
freedom and choice and provide
leadership opportunities for others.

SUBTOTALS (20 pts)

Score

339

FORMS APPENDIX

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

The Student Leadership
Challenge: Five Practices
For Becoming an
Exemplary Leader*

LEAP
Criteria

ADVOCACY

PRACTICE

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 and 2020 National TSA Conferences

EVALUATION RUBRIC

ENCOURAGE THE
HEART
RECOGNITION

Minimal Performance
1-4 Points

Adequate Performance
5-8 Points

Exemplary Performance
9-10 Points

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to publicly
support a cause of need within a
community.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts)
of efforts to publicly support a cause
of need within a community.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support) of efforts to publicly
support a cause of need within a
community.

Provided minimal evidence
(e.g. personal accounts, written
confirmation) of efforts to express
appreciation and creatively recognize
the contributions of others, as well as
celebrate their accomplishments.

Provided adequate evidence (e.g.
state advisor and TSA peer accounts,
written evidence) of efforts to express
appreciation and creatively recognize
the contributions of others, as well as
celebrate their accomplishments.

Provided exemplary evidence (e.g.
external accounts of expert feedback
and support; written/video evidence)
of efforts to express appreciation and
creatively recognize the contributions
of others, as well as celebrate their
accomplishments.

Score

SUBTOTALS (20 pts)

TOTAL (120 pts)

Comments:

I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JUDGE
Printed name:______________________________________ Signature:__________________________________________________________________________
*Copyright ©2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the Leadership Challenge®. The Student Leadership Challenge® and The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership® are registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. www.studentleadershipchallenge.com.

FORMS APPENDIX

340

LEAP LEGACY CHAPTER

Source Exif Data:

File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.7
Linearized                      : No
Encryption                      : Standard V4.4 (128-bit)
User Access                     : Print, Copy, Fill forms, Extract, Print high-res
Author                          : Technology Student Association (TSA)
Create Date                     : 2018:09:01 22:39:25-04:00
Modify Date                     : 2018:09:02 22:15:33-04:00
Subject                         : High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 & 2020 National TSA Conferences
Has XFA                         : No
Language                        : en
Tagged PDF                      : Yes
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.6-c015 84.159810, 2016/09/10-02:41:30
Metadata Date                   : 2018:09:02 22:15:33-04:00
Creator Tool                    : Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Macintosh)
Instance ID                     : uuid:df6bfebc-0740-0845-9291-40745110a93a
Original Document ID            : adobe:docid:indd:a0f199cb-eb8e-11dc-b6b0-95129ea71155
Document ID                     : xmp.id:b9d2185b-612e-49ce-8c9e-6fe5a1644eea
Rendition Class                 : proof:pdf
Derived From Instance ID        : xmp.iid:ad35dd6e-5bee-42fb-a051-6557a07727e1
Derived From Document ID        : xmp.did:D2C46589A59EE511A36B92457A277651
Derived From Original Document ID: adobe:docid:indd:a0f199cb-eb8e-11dc-b6b0-95129ea71155
Derived From Rendition Class    : default
History Action                  : converted
History Parameters              : from application/x-indesign to application/pdf
History Software Agent          : Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Macintosh)
History Changed                 : /
History When                    : 2018:09:01 22:39:25-04:00
Format                          : application/pdf
Title                           : Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 & 2020 National TSA Conferences
Creator                         : Technology Student Association (TSA)
Description                     : High School Competitive Events Guide for the 2019 & 2020 National TSA Conferences
Producer                        : Adobe PDF Library 15.0
Trapped                         : False
State                           : 1
Version                         : 1.1
Slug Family                     : Proxima Nova
Slug Version                    : 3.014
Slug Outline File Size          : 0
Slug Foundry                    : --
Slug Font Kind                  : OpenType - PS
Slug Checksum                   : 2824824708
Slug Post Script Name           : ProximaNova-Regular
Slug Font Sense 12 Checksum     : 2824824708
Page Layout                     : TwoPageRight
Page Mode                       : UseOutlines
Page Count                      : 340

EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Technology Student Association (TSA) High School Competitive Events Guide For The 2019 & 2020 National TSA Conferences HS Competitve

Navigation menu

Versions of this User Manual:

Views

Navigation