Table Of Contents Point 5 System C.5 5Step Risk Assessment Process

User Manual: Point 5 System C.5

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 20

C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
C-TPAT
5 Step Risk Assessment
Process
Guide
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
2
Table of Contents
Page
5 Step Risk Assessment Process - Introduction 3
Definition of Terms 4
Security Risk Rating 6
5 Step Risk Assessment Process Overview 8
Attachments
Step 1 - Attachment A 9
Example of Mapping Cargo Flow and Business Partners
Step 2Conducting a Threat Assessment
Attachment B Sample Risk Assessment Resource List 10
Attachment C Sample Threat Assessment 12
Step 3 - Attachment D 13
Sample Vulnerability Assessment
Step 4Attachment E 19
Sample Risk Assessment Action Plan/Follow-up
Step 5 - Attachment F 20
Documenting Risk Assessment Process
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
3
5 Step Risk Assessment Process
Introduction
In order to assist C-TPAT Partners with conducting a risk assessment of their
international supply chain(s) in accordance with C-TPAT minimum security criteria, the
5 Step Risk Assessment Process is recommended.
This reference guide contains some of the basic tools, resources, and examples C-TPAT
partners should consider using when conducting a risk assessment on their international
supply chain(s). The information contained herein is intended to serve as a guide, and is
not “all inclusive” of what should be included in an international supply chain security
risk assessment.
The 5 Step Risk Assessment Process includes:
1. Mapping Cargo Flow and Identifying Business Partners (directly or indirectly
contracted)
2. Conducting a Threat Assessment focusing on: Terrorism, Contraband Smuggling,
Human Smuggling, Organized Crime, and conditions in a country/region which
may foster such threats and rate threat – High, Medium, Low
3. Conducting a Vulnerability Assessment in accordance with C-TPAT Minimum
Security Criteria and rate vulnerability – High, Medium, Low
4. Preparing an Action Plan
5. Documenting How Risk Assessments are Conducted
It is understood that some C-TPAT members may have numerous supply chains which
may present a monumental task when conducting a comprehensive security risk
assessment of their international supply chains. Therefore, it is recommended for
C-TPAT members to identify their “High Risk” supply chains by conducting a threat
assessment at the point of origin/region and where the cargo is routed/transshipped, and
then conduct a comprehensive security vulnerability assessment of those supply chains.
Conversely, if supply chains involve a limited number of business partners or related
business partners, their supply chain security risk assessment may not require such
extensive efforts.
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
4
Risk Assessment Process
Definition of Terms
The definition of terms below is intended as a guide when examining the roles of parties
involved in the international supply chain.
Instruments of International Traffic (IIT): Containers, trailers, flatbeds, unit load
devices (ULDs), lift vans, cargo vans, shipping tanks, bins, skids, pallets, caul boards,
cores for textile fabrics, or other specialized containers arriving (loaded or empty) in use
or to be used in the shipment of merchandise in international trade.
International Supply Chain Security: Encompasses securing all of the following
processes from the cargo’s point of origin (factory/farm) until its arrival and distribution
in the United States: Procurement, Production, Packing, Staging/Storing,
Loading/Unloading, Transportation, and Document Preparation.
International Supply Chain Security Risk Assessment: Process of identifying the
security threats, vulnerabilities, and weaknesses throughout the international supply chain
and prescribing corrective actions with follow-up procedures to ensure weaknesses have
been mitigated.
Loading/Unloading: Placing cargo in/on or taking cargo out/off of an IIT, including
containers, trailers, vessels, planes etc.
Mapping Cargo Flow/Parties Involved: Method of identifying all parties involved and
their prospective roles in the following processes throughout the international supply
chain: Procurement, Production, Packing, Staging/Storing, Loading/Unloading, and
Document Preparation of cargo destined for the United States. All partners involved both
directly and indirectly in exportation/movement of the goods from the point of origin to
the importer’s distribution center must be included. Some examples of parties involved
in the international flow of cargo include, but are not limited to, the following:
factories
farms
suppliers
export packing facilities
buying/selling agents
trading companies
freight forwarders
non-vessel operated common carriers (NVOCCs)
inland truck/rail carriers
warehouse/consolidation/deconsolidation facilities
feeder vessels
rail depots
trailer/container yards
shipyards
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
5
local drayage companies
international air/rail/sea/truck carriers
Customs brokers.
Packing: Encompasses both packing the goods for export into non-reusable containers
and reusable instruments of international traffic (IIT). It includes but is not limited to
placing goods in/on pallets, cartons, cardboard boxes, crates, bins, or other specialized
containers. It also entails bundling, wrapping, shrink-wrapping, and other types of
packaging.
Procurement: Ordering products or services from business partners in the international
supply chain. Raw materials that go into making the exported products are excluded
from this process. These products only pertain to finished cargo/raw material that will be
exported to the United States. Services include indirect procurement methods for goods
shipped to the United States such as buying agents and trading companies.
Production: Making, growing/harvesting, or assembling products to be exported to the
United States.
Risk Rating: Assigning numerical values to threats and vulnerabilities identified during
a supply chain security risk assessment (e.g. 1-Low, 2-Medium, and 3-High).
Staging/Storing: Placing products and/or IITs at a location of “rest” prior to or during
movement to the United States. This includes any warehousing/consolidation/deconsolidation of
goods and/or facilities where goods wait to be loaded onto another transit mode such as a rail
depot or shipyard in the country of origin or other countries the goods may transit through on the
way to the United States.
Supply Chain Security Action Plan: Identifies security weaknesses and vulnerabilities
found during the risk assessment process for a business partner. The plan assigns
responsibility for corrective actions/mitigation strategies (internal and external),
establishes deadlines/timeframes, documents evidence of actions taken, outlines
processes used to verify actions have been taken, and delineates the final outcome.
Transportation: Movement of cargo throughout the international supply chain.
Transporting the goods for export to the United States includes any domestic legs of the
goods’ journey in the country of origin to the Port of Export, from the Port of Export to
any countries that the goods may transit through, to the US Port of Entry, and to the US
domestic distribution center.
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
6
Security Risk Rating
Each C-TPAT partner is responsible for establishing its own overall Security Risk Rating
System based on its business model. It is understood that businesses use various
methodologies for rating risk within their international supply chains. However, the
following “Risk Ratingsare recommended when examining security threats and
vulnerabilities within the international supply chain.
Threat Assessment
There are many “Open Sources” which provide information on threats within the
international supply chain. After conducting research, it is recommended to assign a
threat risk rating based on the following.
1 - Low Risk - No recent incidents/intelligence/information
2 - Medium Risk – No recent incidents/some intelligence/information on possible activity
3 - High Risk – Recent incidents and intelligence/information
A Score of 3 in any of the following areas would deem the supply chain “High Risk”
1) Terrorism
2) Contraband Smuggling
3) Human Smuggling
4) Organized Crime
Vulnerability Assessment
One method that may be used to conduct a vulnerability assessment is sending security
surveys to Business Partners who are not eligible or do not participate in the C-TPAT
program. Security surveys should be based on the process performed by the business
partner in the international supply chain (e.g. Procurement, Production, Packing, Storage,
Loading/Unloading, Transportation, and Document Preparation). Questions should ask
the business partner to describe security measures used, and not only be “Yes/No”
questions. The survey should address whether or not a system of checks, balances, and
accountability are in place, particularly in areas of Securing Instruments of International
Traffic, Tracking and Monitoring Cargo, Seal Security, and Business Partner Screening
(sub-contracted).
The following is a recommended risk rating of vulnerabilities for C-TPAT minimum-
security criteria categories: Business Partner Requirements, Securing Instruments of
International Traffic, Procedural Security, Physical Security, Physical Access Controls,
Personnel Security, Security and Threat Awareness Training, and Information
Technology Security.
C-TPAT Training Seminar
March 2010
7
1 - Low Risk - Meets all applicable Minimum Security Criteria (Musts and Shoulds)
2 - Medium Risk - Meets all applicable “Musts” Minimum Security Criteria, but does not
meet all “Shoulds”
3 - High Risk – Does not meet all “Must” Minimum Security Criteria
For example,
1) If all “Musts” for Procedural Security were met, the risk rating for that category
would be “1-Low risk.”
2) If all “Musts” were met for Procedural Security and “Shoulds” were not met, the
rating would be “2-Medium Risk.”
3) If one “Must” is not met for Procedural Security, then it would be rated a “3-High
Risk,” because a supply chain security measure is only as strong as its weakest
link.
Post Incident Analysis and Risk Rating
Based on a study conducted by the C-TPAT Program in June 2009 on factors which
contributed to Security Breaches, the following data should be taken into consideration
when conducting a Security Vulnerability Assessment.
34% Conveyance Security: Conveyances not inspected
35% Business Partner Requirements: Failure to Screen Business Partners
41% Instruments of International Traffic (containers, trailers, pallets, etc.
not secured/properly inspected prior to loading
44% Seal Controls: Lack of Seal Procedures
53% Transportation Monitoring: Inadequate Transportation Monitoring
68% Security Procedures not followed (lack of checks, balances, accountability)
90% - Involved “trucks” as the mode of transportation for breached cargo
5 Step Risk Assessment Process
Step Process Description Methods Resources
1 Map Cargo Flow and
Business Partners
Identify ALL parties involved in the following
processes:
1) Procurement
2) Production
3) Packing
4) Storage
5) Loading/Unloading
6) Transportation
7) Document Preparation
1) Request information from supply chain partners
2) Review documentation (BOLs, manifests,
invoices, etc.) to determine routing
3) On site visits/audits of the supply chain
See Attachment A:
Example of Mapping Cargo Flow,
Identifying Business Partners, and
Processes
2 Conduct Threat Assessment
Identify and rate the risk of threat (High, Medium,
Low) for the country and region for each
international supply chain, using the following (at a
minimum):
1) Terrorism (political, bio, agro, cyber)
2) Contraband Smuggling
3) Human Smuggling
4) Organized Crime
5) Conditions fostering above threats
1) Open source internet information (government
and private organizations)
2) Representative/Contacts “on the ground” at
origin
3) Law enforcement (foreign/domestic), local state,
federal/national
4) Trade and security organizations
5) Assigned C-TPAT SCSS
See Attachments B:
Threat Assessment Resource List
Attachment C:
Threat Assessment Example
3 Conduct Vulnerability
Assessment
For all business partners in the international supply
chain (directly contracted or sub-contracted):
1) Identify the process they perform
2) Verify partners meet applicable minimum
security criteria
3) Rate their compliance within each
applicable minimum-security criteria
category (High, Medium, Low)
1) SVI Number/C-TPAT Membership
2) Membership in “Mutual Recognition Program”
3) Security Surveys
4) Site visits by company representative
5) Site visits by overseas personnel/agents
6) Business reports
7) Security certifications covering C-TPAT
minimum-security criteria
8) 3rd party supply chain security assessments
See Attachment D:
Vulnerability Assessment
Using C-TPAT
Minimum-Security Criteria
4 Prepare Action Plan
Establish a corrective action plan to address gaps or
vulnerabilities found in business partner’s security
programs.
1) Word Document
2) Excel Spreadsheet
3) Project Management Software
See Attachment E:
Action Plan and Follow-Up
5 Document How Risk
Assessments are Conducted
A description of the company’s approach, policies,
and procedures for conducting an international
supply chain security risk assessment.
1) Document company’s Policy for conducting
International Supply Chain Security Risk
Assessment
2) Document Procedures used to conduct
International Supply Chain Security Risk
Assessments
See Attachment F Documenting
Risk Assessment Process, Policies,
and Procedures
8
9
Attachment A - Example of Cargo Flow and Partners - Ocean Cargo - LCL
Step 1 - Sample - Map Cargo Flow, Identify Partners, and Processes
Notes: Ensure partners map out all variations of a supply chain - For example, FCL vs. LCL; From one factory to various ports of export; From one factory using different modes of
transportation (Air vs. Sea); Any other potential variations that would alter the movement of cargo or the individuals involved in the process. Always remember - "Freight at Rest is
Freight at Risk".
Sub-contracting increases risk within a supply chain, particularly where security requirements have not been conveyed or verified.
Partner
Cargo Movement - if applicable
Known Details About Provider
Days Cargo
is "At
Rest" at
this stage
Transport
Mode
If entity physically
handles cargo, who
selects them as a
provider?
XYZ Manufacturer Production, Packing,
Document Preparation Point of Departure Location: City 123, Country Origin; Years doing
business with - 22; Family Owned and Operated 0 N/A
Export Broker/FF Prepares Documentation
for Export N/A Unknown NA N/A
Foreign Inland
Carrier ABC Inland Transporation Picks up cargo from factory and
Consolidator EFG
Location: City 123, Country Origin; Contracted by
factory -
in Business 22 years; Parent Company
C-TPAT in USA
0 Truck
Consolidator
LMNOP
Unloading, Storage,
Loading
Unloads cargo from inland truck carrier,
stores LCL, loads with other customers'
cargo
Location City 123, Country Origin; Contracted by
factory - in business 2 years 2 N/A
Inland Carrier JKL Inland Transporation Picks up cargo from consolidator and
transports to Port of Export
Location: City 123, Country Origin; Contracted by
factory; in business 22 years; Parent Company
C-TPAT in USA
0 Truck
Port Terminal -
Origin Storage Receives and stores container in container
yard until ready to go on vessel
Location: City 456, Country Origin; operated by
government body; MTSA/ISPS Compliant 4 N/A
Sea Carrier Transportation Transports cargo from port of lading
Location: City 456; Country Origin;
Parent Company C-TPAT in USA 3 Vessel
Port Terminal -
Transit Country Storage Receives offloaded container at country of
transshipment
Location: City 183, Transit Country; unknown;
Unknown MTSA/ISPS Compliant 10 N/A
Sea Carrier Transportation Transports cargo from country of
transshipment Location: City, New Country; unknown 10 Vessel
Port Terminal - USA Storage Unloads cargo from Sea Carrier's vessel
and stores until domestic transport picks up Location: City 42, USA ; MTSA/ISPS Compliant 2 N/A
Domestic Drayage
Carrier Picks up Transportation Picks up cargo from terminal Unknown 0 Truck
Consolidator/
Deconsolidator
Unloading, Storage,
Loading
Receives LCL Cargo, consolidates, ships to
destination Location: City 42, USA - Cross dock facility 1 N/A
Long Haul Carrier Transportation Transports cargo to distribution center Location: City, USA - Unknown 0 Truck
U.S. Distribution
Center/Consignee Unloading Receives cargo Location: City 53, USA 2 N/A
10
Attachment B
RISK ASSESSMENT RESOURCE LIST*
Customs & Border Protection: www.cbp.gov
CIA – The World Fact Book:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/
Information Technology Security: http://www.us-cert.gov/nav//nt01/
Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft/Data Breach:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/idtheft/
Licensed Freight Forwarders/NVOCC/OTI/Terminal Operators:
http://www.fmc.gov/
U.S. Department of State - Terrorist Threats/Country Information:
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/pa/pa_1161.html
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Check Carriers:
http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-security.htm
Manufacturer Seal Requirements – U.S./Mexico FAST:
http://www.customs.gov/xp/cgov/trade/cargo_security/ctpat/fast/us_mexico/mexico_
manuf/manuf_seal_requirements.xml
Global Security Newswire is now available: http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/
7 Signs of Terrorism: http://www.homelandresponder.org/pages/7signs.html
State Dept. Overseas Security Advisory Council: www.osac.gov
National Cargo Security Association:
www.tncsa.org
FBI Infrastructure Security: www.infragard.net
International Chamber of Commerce:
www.icc-ccs.org
Cargo Security Alliance: www.securecargo.org
U.S. Department of Commerce: www.commerce.gov
International Maritime Organization:
www.imo.org
11
Department of Transportation:
www.phmsa.dot.gov
ASIS International: www.asisonline.org
World Bank:
Web.worldbank.org
Transported Asset Protection Association: www.tapaonline.org
Business Alliance for Secure Commerce:
www.wbasco.org
Department of Homeland Security Crisis Management Planning:
www.ready.gov
Information Systems Audit and Control Association:
www.isaca.org
Department of Homeland Security:
www.dhs.gov
International Container Owners Association:
www.containerownersassociation.org
U.S. Postal Service:
www.usps.com/communications/news/security/mailcenter
Supply Chain Information Sharing and Analysis:
https://secure.sc-investigate.net/SC-ISAC/
*Note: C-TPAT partners should also consult with local law enforcement when
conducting threat assessments. In addition, there are many private for profit
organizations who offer security risk assessment services.
This list is not all inclusive and is not meant to be an endorsement of any organization
or service.
12
Attachment C
Step 2: Sample Threat Assessment
1 - Low Risk - No recent activity/intelligence/information
2 - Medium Risk – No recent incidents/some intelligence/information on possible activity
3 - High Risk – Recent incidents and intelligence/information
Note: For C-TPAT Purposes a "3" for any of the Threat Risk Factors below would result in a "High Risk" rating for the supply chain
Partner: Factory-Supplier ABC
Location: Country X, Y, Z
Region: Region J-K
Threat Risk Factor
Risk Rating:
1-Low - - NA/No
2-
Medium
3-High
Incidents/Information
Activity
Source
Terrorism (Political, Bio, Agro, Cyber) 3
2009, 2010 - Recent domestic bombings
and violence against U.S. based interests
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Contraband Smuggling
3
2005-Present - location known for
narcotics exports and weapons smuggling
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Human Smuggling
1
2000-2005 - numerous incidents of
human smuggling; none since 2005
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Organized Crime 1
1998-2003 - Drug cartels operating
throughout country/ region
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Conditions within a country which may foster any
of the aforementioned threats (e.g. poverty, social
unrest, political instability).
2
Demographics - 35% population lives in
poverty; a few social movements
underway with anti-western sentiments
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Other: Theft, Pilferage, Hijacking, Piracy, IPR,
Piracy 2
2007 – Incidents of piracy along shipping
route; none reported since late 2007
Name of news publication, government site, open
source information, intel service, etc.
Overall Threat Risk Rating = 3
13
Vulnerability Assessment
Attachment D
Partner Name: Supply Chain Process: Transportation
Security Point Of Contact: Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Country Location: Region: Instruments of International Traffic Used:
Sample Risk Ratings: 1 - Low Meets/Exceeds all Minimum Security Criteria (MSC - Musts and Shoulds) 2-Medium Meets "Musts" not all "Shoulds" 3 - Does not meet all "Musts" criteria N/A - Not applicable. Note:
If a "Must" criterion is not met in a category, the score for the entire category should be "3".
Processes/Roles Performed (including responsibility for sub-contracting) - Note: 1 business partner may perform multiple roles: For example, the factory may not only produce, but they may pack, load, and transport
cargo. The key is to ensure that each process is secured in the supply chain.
Effective Security System = Meeting all MSC + Oversight + Accountability + Checks and Balances
Supply Chain Process
C-TPAT Security
Criteria -
Determine as
applicable to
process
C-TPAT Sub-Criteria
(Note-Some applicable sub-
criteria may not be listed -
must be tailored for each
supply chain)
M-
M
ust
S-
Should
Method to Verify
Adherence
Vulnerabilities
Identified
Sub-
Category
Risk
Rating
Category
Risk
Rating
Best Practices Identified
Transportation/Movement - (Note: 85%+ Cargo
disruption occurs in transit)
Business Partner
Requirements -
Sub Contracting
Screens sub-contracted
source M
Does not verify
references. Contracts
with lowest bidder
Unknown business
partner/security
procedures
3 3
14
Transportation/Movement -cont'd
C-TPAT Certified (if
eligible) M Does not verify Failure to adhere to
C-TPAT MSC 3
Verifies adherence to C-
TPAT Criteria (if not
eligible)
M Does not verify Failure to adhere to
C-TPAT MSC 3
Participate in security
program administered by
foreign customs
administration
S Does not verify Failure to adhere to
C-TPAT MSC 3
Sub-contracting
requirements M Does not have any
No leverage to
enforce C-TPAT
MSC
3
Securing
Instruments of
International
Traffic
Transportation Monitoring M Visit
Does not actively
monitor GPS to
know where drivers
are at all times; sub-
contractor procedures
unknown
3
3
Seal Inspections in transit M Reviewed Drivers'
Logs None 1
Container inspections in
transit M
Reviewed drivers'
Inspection Sheets post
trip
None 1
Written procedures
stipulating how seals are
controlled and affixed -
meeting all C-TPAT
requirements
M
Reviewed written
procedures submitted
and found in
compliance with C-
TPAT
None 1
15
Procedural
Security
Procedures to report
anomalies to law
enforcement
M Reviewed written
procedures None 1
Ensure accurate, complete,
legible information M
Documented
Procedures reviewed
and verified
None 1
1
Documents/Information
protected against exchange,
loss, erroneous information
M
Documented
Procedures reviewed
and verified
None 1
Process to resolve overages,
shortages M
Documented
Procedures reviewed
and verified
None 1
Procedures to ensure
information is reported
accurately and timely
M
Documented
Procedures reviewed
and verified
None 1
Physical Security
(as applicable)
External Fences / Barriers S Site Visit None 1
2
Internal Fences / Barriers S N/A N/A N/A
Gates/Gate Houses M Site Visit None 1
16
Parking S Site Visit None 1
Building Construction M Site Visit None 1
Locking Devices M Site Visit None 1
Lighting M Site Visit None 1
Video Surveillance S N/A N/A N/A
Alarm Systems S Site Visit
No alarm system -
Intrusion may go
undetected despite
guard on duty
3
Physical Access
Controls
Restricted Access to
conveyance and container
during transit
Employee Access Controls
17
Visitor Access Controls
Vendor / Contractor Access
Controls
Delivery Access Controls
Challenging and Removing
Unauthorized Persons
Access Device Control
(Badges, Keys, etc.) issuance
/ removal by management
and must be documented
Access Termination
Procedures
Compliant with MTSA /
ISPS
Personnel Security
Screen prospective
employees who transport
cargo
18
Security and
Threat Awareness
Training
Aware of the procedures to
address a situation and report
it
Specialized training seal
controls, container, and
conveyance inspections
Dispatcher tracking /
monitoring
Threat Awareness Training
Information
Technology
(As applicable)
Restricted access to
automated transportation
monitoring systems (GPS);
Password Changes, etc.
Oversight
System to Audit / Test all
security measures related to
transportation process
19
Attachment E
Step 4 - Sample Risk Assessment - Action Plan and Follow-Up
Supply Chain Partner Name: Factory XYZ
Site/Location:
Point Of Contact Name: Phone Number: E-Mail
Supply Chain Process
C-TPAT
Criteria
Vulnerability
Identified
Corrective Action(s)
Required/Mitigation
Strategy
Responsible
Company
POC
Responsible
Partner
POC
Progress
Review
Date
Corrective
Action
Deadline
Evidence
Action
Taken
Verified
By and
Date
Outcome
Procurement
Production
Packing
Loading/Unloading/
Stuffing/Sealing
Storage/Staging -
Product, Conveyance,
Container, Shipping
Instruments (Pallets,
Boxes, Bags, etc.)
Transportation
Document
Preparation
20
Attachment F
Step 5
Documenting
Risk Assessment Process
(Policy & Procedures)
A company’s documented risk assessment process (e.g. policies and procedures) should
contain at minimum the following information:
1) Date Risk Assessment Process established
2) Identify parties responsible for keeping the process up-to-date, including “back-
up” persons
3) When risk assessments must be conducted (e.g. new supplier or service provider
overseas)
4) How often risk assessments must be conducted (e.g. as circumstances dictate or at
a minimum annually for most C-TPAT partners (quarterly basishighway
carriers)
5) Required frequency of review/updates to process/policies/procedures (e.g.
annually, bi-annually, as needed, etc. to the risk assessment policy/procedure)
6) How Threat Assessments of the International Supply Chain are to be conducted
(e.g. sources used to determine threat – see examples on Threat Assessment
Resource sheet provided)
7) How Vulnerability Assessments on the International Supply Chain are to be
conducted (e.g. send surveys, site visits, C-TPAT Status, participation in a foreign
supply chain security program)
8) How follow-up is conducted on “action items” (e.g. site visits may be required in
some cases, in others documentation/photographs may be submitted)
9) Process for training key individuals who are responsible for the processes
10) Management oversight and accountability for ensuring the process is carried out
consistently and effectively

Navigation menu