AMA Scope Of Practice Response Letter Joint Pharmacy Organization View Series PLHR4M

User Manual: View Series PLHR4M

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 3

DownloadAMA Scope Of Practice Response Letter  Joint Pharmacy Organization View Series PLHR4M
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
April 16, 2010

Michael D. Maves, M.D., M.B.A.
Executive Vice President, CEO
American Medical Association
515 N. State St.
Chicago, IL 60654
Re: American Medical Association (AMA) Scope of Practice Data
Series: Pharmacists

Dear Dr. Maves:
The American Pharmacists Association (APhA) collaborated with the American
Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP), American College of Clinical
Pharmacy (ACCP), Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE),
American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP), National Alliance of State
Pharmacy Associations (NASPA), and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy
(NABP) to formulate the following response to the AMA Scope of Practice Data
Series: Pharmacists document. We were invited to provide requested input to the
AMA and to clarify any inaccuracies in the document. We conducted a thorough
analysis that resulted in the recommendations attached to this letter.
After reviewing the AMA Scope of Practice Data Series: Pharmacists document,
the collaborating organizations are deeply concerned with the accuracy and
completeness of the information presented. Today physicians and pharmacists are
collaborating to enhance patient care in innovative and effective ways. This
document is a regression and contrary to the recommendations and policy
pronouncements of the Institute of Medicine (IOM), the Patient-Centered Primary
Care Collaborative (PCPCC), the Joint Commission, the Association of Academic
Health Centers (AHC), and numerous other groups that support more and better
inter-professional collaboration to improve patient care.
We have serious concerns about the portrayal within the document of pharmacists’
scope of practice, the provision of collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM)
services, and the education and training of pharmacists. The suggestion in the
document -- that the evolving scope of practice of pharmacists serves primarily to
“compensate” for increased automation and utilization of pharmacy technicians -- is
simply wrong. Rather, pharmacy practice is being driven by substantial and
important changes in pharmacists’ education and training over the past two decades
to meet the needs of patients in using medications safely and more effectively. This
training allows pharmacists to engage in services for which they have the specific
education, training, and regulatory authority to positively impact patient outcomes,
especially with regard to the management of medication therapy and the unmet
needs of patients.

It is within the scope of practice in all 50 states for pharmacists in all practice settings to obtain
medication histories, review the patient’s medications to identify medication-related problems, to
engage collaboratively with physicians to resolve identified problems, educate the patient about
proper use of medications, encourage adherence with prescribed medications, and document and
communicate information and recommendations to other providers on the patient’s health care team.
These medication therapy management activities are part of a pharmacist’s responsibility to ensure
optimal therapeutic outcomes for the patients they serve. Recognition of these services is missing in
the AMA document.
We have major concerns that the CDTM descriptions in the document inaccurately equate (and
therefore confuse) the practice of collaborative drug therapy management -- an inherently interprofessional and interdependent practice activity -- with “efforts” to expand the scope of practice of
pharmacists into areas that are suggested to be exclusive to the practice of medicine. We
acknowledge the long-held view of AMA and others that the practice of medicine is quite expansive,
with a wide range of patient care activities and domains serving as its framework. However, that
does not mean that the performance of any one of those myriad functions or patient care activities by
another health professional who is appropriately educated and licensed to perform that function,
somehow constitutes the “practice of medicine.” There is substantial overlap in the regulated scopes
of practice of health care professionals. That does not make a physician a nurse if he/she performs a
service/task that is in the scope of practice of a nurse any more than it makes a pharmacist a
physician if he/she performs a service/task that also falls within the scope of practice of a physician.
The document omitted numerous changes in practice and training, including the most recent version
of the accreditation standards for the education of doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students that have
been in place since July 1, 2007. The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), the
nationally recognized body that accredits degree programs of colleges and schools of pharmacy,
maintains rigorous requirements for didactic and experiential education and training of pharmacists.
ACPE undertakes this important role in collaboration with the entire pharmacy profession to ensure
that education and training programs, both pre and post-licensure, are designed to equip pharmacists
with the knowledge, skills, and behaviors to provide the full range of professional services within
their regulated scope of practice. Furthermore, with the move to the PharmD degree, the experiential
component of pharmacists’ education has been greatly expanded. This experiential component now
includes required learning experiences throughout the curriculum and advanced pharmacy practice
experiences with diverse patient populations in the final year of training. Completely ignored in the
document is the fact that many medical and pharmacy school curricula are being revised to facilitate
the education and training of medical students and student pharmacists together, using collaborative
team-based models of care.
Patients today have important and increasing concerns about the safety and appropriate use of their
medications. Practically every week, the lay press examines incidents in which patients have either
been harmed by the therapy they receive or have failed to achieve the desired therapeutic results. The
AMA could better serve the public and its members by issuing resource guides on how physicians
and pharmacists can collaborate to better assure that the medication therapy provided in both the
hospital and in the community results in optimal medication therapy outcomes. The tone of the AMA
document suggests a concern by the authors that pharmacists are expanding their practice to usurp
roles traditionally served by physicians. On the contrary, pharmacists are filling roles today that
were largely unmet and that support the health care team in a patient centered model.

In closingg, the collab
borating orgaanizations strrongly urge the AMA too correct thee identified errors
e
noted in the AMA Sccope of Pracctice Data Series:
S
Pharrmacists docuument. We are unclearr how
broadly thhe documentt has been cirrculated, andd for what purrpose. We assk that AMA
A share the reevised
documentt with errata and revisionns noted withh at least as broad
b
an auddience as the original andd with
the requeest that the inaccurate version be destroyed to
t avoid miisinformationn. All signnatory
organizattions are com
mmitted to prroductive diaalogue with AMA,
A
and we
w look forwaard to that att your
earliest opportunity.
o
Our collabboration wouuld intend too advance thhe ability off pharmacistss and
physicianns to work in
n a team-bassed approachh for optimizzed medicatiion use and improved patient
care. If you
y have any
y questions or require any additionaal informatioon, please coontact Thom
mas E.
Menighaan at 202-429
9-7567 or tm
menighan@aaphanet.org.

Sincerelyy,

Thomas E.
E Menighan, B.Pharm., M.B.A.,
M
FAPhA
Johnn Feather, Ph.D., CAE
Execcutive Directoor and CEO
Ameerican Societyy of Consultannt Pharmacistts

L Maine, Ph.D
D., R.Ph.
Lucinda L.
AACP, Exxecutive Vicee President &CEO
&

Michael S.
S Maddux, Ph
harm.D., FCC
CP
Executivee Director
Americann College of Clinical
C
Pharm
macy

Peter A. Vlasses,
V
Pharrm.D.
Executivee Director
Accreditaation Council for
Pharmacyy Education

men Catizonee, M.S., R.Ph., D.Ph.
Carm
Execcutive Directoor
National Associattion of Boardds of Pharmaccy

Rebeecca P. Sneadd, R.Ph.
Execcutive Vice President & CE
EO
National Alliancee of State Phaarmacy
Assoociations



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.4
Linearized                      : Yes
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 4.0-c316 44.253921, Sun Oct 01 2006 17:14:39
Format                          : application/pdf
Title                           : Microsoft Word - AMA Scope of Practice Response Letter Final Joint Pharmacy Organization Letter
Creator                         : jowen
Create Date                     : 2010:04:16 14:35:19-04:00
Creator Tool                    : PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2
Modify Date                     : 2010:04:16 14:35:19-04:00
Producer                        : Acrobat Distiller 8.0.0 (Windows)
Document ID                     : uuid:9715fc66-2710-405c-bf03-74dad43cfec8
Instance ID                     : uuid:368f4c31-361c-403a-b4db-67b9b225dd1b
Page Count                      : 3
Author                          : jowen
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu