BBT 2204 IS Project 1 Ation Marking Guide BBT2204 M.

User Manual:

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 3

Page 1 of 3
FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
BACHELOR OF BUSINESS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
FINAL DOCUMENTATION MARKING GUIDE
BBT 2204: IS PROJECT 1
DURATION: August 2018 to November 2018
Student Number
Student Name
Project Title: ___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Area of assessment
Potential
Score
Actual
Score
Problem statement and objectives
15
- Is there a clear identification of a specific problem?
- Are the objectives S.M.A.R.T?
- Are the objectives developmental (as opposed to consequential or
goal-based objectives)?
- Are the objectives incremental?
- Do the objectives support the achievement of the project’s aim?
Contribution of the project
5
- Has the significance of the project and justification for undertaking
the project been clearly explained?
Literature Review
10
- Has the objective-literature mapping (Literature Review sections to
address each Specific Objective) been done correctly?
- Does the literature review analyse what has been done before in
relation to the project, what has not been done (the gap), and what the
project proposes to do to address the gap?
- Has adequate literature been reviewed?
Familiarity with the System Development Methodology (SDM) applied
10
- Is there a specification of a clear choice between either SSAD or
OOAD?
o (If SSAD) Does the SDM portray a sequential process?
o (If OOAD) Does the SDM portray an incremental and
iterative process?
Page 2 of 3
- Has the choice of the SDM been justified?
- Have all the stages of the proposed SDM been fully explained?
- Is the SDM proposed appropriate for the project?
- Does the project Gantt chart correspond with the proposed SDM?
- Is there a description of the method proposed to be used to gather the
functional and non-functional requirements?
- Is there a complete list and description of all the design diagrams
drawn in Chapter 4? That is, either SSAD-related design diagrams
(use case diagram, Level 0 & Level 1 DFD, ERD/EERD, database
schema, and GUI designs) or OOAD-related design diagrams (use
case diagram, class diagram, sequence diagram, database schema,
and GUI designs)
- Has a system architecture diagram been drawn to define the structure,
behaviour, and views of the proposed system?
Justification of tools chosen
5
- Is there an acceptable justification for each tool proposed to be used
in the development of the Information System? E.g. choice of IDE,
choice of programming language, choice of DBMS, etc.
- Has the proposed Information System’s domain of execution (e.g.
mobile-based, web-based, desktop application, etc.) been correctly
identified and justified?
- Is there a logical mapping from the Title, to the objectives, to the
Literature Review topics, to the methodology, and lastly to the
proposed tools to be used?
Analysis
10
- Do the functional and non-functional requirements, specified in the
analysis section, support the solution to the problem?
Design (Either SSAD or OOAD without mixing the two approaches)
20
Structured System Analysis &
Design (SSAD)
1.Is the design approach process-
oriented?
2.Is the use case diagram present
and correct?
3.Is the DFD (level 0 and level 1)
present and correct?
4.Is the ERD or EERD present and
correct?
5.Is the database schema present
and correct?
6.Are the GUI designs of forms and
reports (mockups/wireframes)
present and appropriate?
Information System testing and implementation
10
- Are the test cases S.M.A.R.T. and present?
- Have all the functional requirements been tested?
- Is there a user manual that specifies how to install and use the
system?
Page 3 of 3
Please provide further feedback for the candidate:
Examiner (signature): _____________________________ Date: _________________
Conclusion and recommendations for future work
5
- Does the conclusion provided highlight the main contributions of the
project?
- Does the documentation specify opportunities/recommendations to
extend/improve the project further?
Academic writing standard and general formatting of documentation
10
- Is the language standard used relative to the level of learning?
- Is the narration style formal and third person in nature?
- Has the APA referencing style been correctly applied?
- Is there editorial completeness of the documentation? i.e. no spelling
mistakes, no typing errors, and no grammatical mistakes
- Is the general presentation of the documentation appropriately
formatted, organized and neat?
TOTAL
100

Navigation menu