MCO 3000.13 MARINE CORPS READINESS REPORTING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 3000

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON

WASHINGTON,

DC

20350-3000

MCO

3000.13

paR

30

Jul

2010

MARINE

CORPS

ORDER

3000.13

From:

Commandant

of

the

Marine

Corps

To:

Distribut

ion

List

Subj:

MARINE

CORPS

READINESS REPORTING

STANDARD

OPERATING

PROCEDURES

(SOP)

Ref:

(a)

CJCSI

3401.02A,

"Global

Status

of

Resources

and

Training

System

(GSO

RTS),"

June

12,

2008

Encl:

(b)

CJCSM

3150.02A,

"Global

Status

of

Resources

and

Training

System

(G

SORTS

)

,"

Apr

il

29,

2004

(NO

TAL

)

(c)

DOD

Directive

7730

.

65,

"Department

of

Defense

Readiness

Reporting

System

(DRRS)

,"

April

23,

2007

(d)

MCO

5311.1D

(e)

MCO

3400.3F

(f)

MCO

3000.11D

(g)

MCO

1553.3A

(h)

MCO

3500.26A

(i)

MCO

3125.1B

(j)

MCO

3500.14

(

k)

NAVMC

3500

.14B

(1)

NAVMC

3500

.1

8A

(m)

NAVMC

3500.70

(n)

SECNAV

M-5210.1

(1)

Marine

Corps

Readiness

Reporting

SOP

Guidance

Reports

Required:

I.

Defense

Readiness

Reporting

System

-

Marine

Corps

(Re

port

Control

Symbol

EXEMPT)

,

par.

4.a.

(2)

1.

Situation.

To

promulgate

policies

and

procedures

for

reporting

readiness

on

Marine

Corps

organizations.

This

Order

amplifies

the

policies,

procedures

and

reporting

requirements

delineated

in

references

(a)

through

(d)

.

2.

Cancellation.

MCO

P3000.13D

and

Interim

Defense

Readiness

Reporting

System

(DRRS)

Policy

&

Procedures

for

Marine

Corps

Units

and

Installations.

DISTRIBUTION

STATEMENT

A:

Approved

for

public

release;

distribution

is

unlimi

ted

.

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

3.

Mission.

This

Order

provides

policy

and

procedures

for

reporting

readiness

for

units,

selected

installations,

and

other

organizations

in

the

Marine

Corps

per

references

(a)

through

(n).

Procedural

"how

to"

guidance

is

contained

in

the

appendices.

4.

Execution

a.

Commander's

Intent

and

Concept

of

Operations

(1)

Commander's

Intent.

The

Marine

Corps

will

meet

its

Title

10

Readiness

reporting

responsibilities

by

providing

both

capability

and

resource

to

meet

Service

and

Department

of

Defense

(DOD)

requirements.

(2)

Concept

of

Operations.

The

Marine

Corps

will

maintain

a

single,

uniform

system

for

the

preparation,

approval,

and

maintenance

of

a

readiness

reporting

system.

This

reporting

requirement

is

exempt

from

reports

control

per

reference

(n),

part

IV,

paragraph

7.h.

Future

enhancements

to

the

Defense

Readiness

Reporting

System

Marine

Corps

(DRRS-MC)

in

support

of

evolving

DOD

requirements

will

be

captured

in

subsequent

changes

to

this

Order.

b.

Subordinate

Element

Missions

(1)

Deputy

Commandant

for

Plans,

Policy

and

Operations

(DC

PP&O)

(a)

Establish

Service

policy,

procedures,

training,

and

guidance

on

unit

readiness

reporting.

(b)

In

coordination

with

DC

I&L,

establish

Service

policy,

procedures,

and

guidance

on

installation

readiness

reporting

in

DRRS-MC.

(c)

Maintain

DRRS-MC

per

applicable

Joint

and

DoD

directives.

(d)

Coordinate

proposed

Service

policies

and

procedures

with

other

Services,

Combatant

Commands,

the

Joint

Staff,

Defense

Information

Systems

Agency

(DISA),

Deputy

Under

Secretary

of

Defense

(Readiness),

and

the

Office

of

the

Secretary

of

Defense.

2

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(e)

Develop

and

review

every

four

years

mission

statements

and

core

mission

essential

task

lists

(METLs)

for

ground

combat

element

organizations

that

DC

PP&O

is

assigned

Marine

Air

Ground

Task

Force

(MAGTF)

advocacy.

Develop

and

review

standards

used

for

MET

assessment.

Provide

METs

and

standards

to

DC,

CD&I

and

COMMMARFORCOM.

(f)

Register

units,

organizations,

and

installations

in

DRRS-MC.

Coordinate

with

DC

I&L

on

which

installations

will

be

designated

to

report

in

DRRS-MC.

(g)

Integrate

USMC

readiness

initiatives

and

serve

as

the

functional

advocate

for

DRRS-MC.

(h)

Coordinate

the

activation,

deactivation,

and

reassignment

of

Marine

Corps

units

with

the

Deputy

Commandant,

Combat

Development

&

Integration

(CD&I),

Total

Force

Structure

Division

(TFSD)

(i)

Post

and

maintain

an

updated

DRRS-MC

User's

Guide

on

PP&O's

portal

for

force

and

supporting

establishment

commanders.

(2)

Deputy

Commandant,

Installations

and

Logistics

(DC,

I&L)

(a)

In

coordination

with

DC

PP&O,

establish

Service

policy,

procedures,

and

guidance

on

installation

readiness

reporting

in

DRRS-MC.

(b)

Coordinate

proposed

Service

installation

reporting

policies

and

procedures

with

other

Services,

Combatant

Commands,

the

Joint

Staff,

Defense·

Information

Systems

Agency

(DISA),

and

the

Office

of

the

Secretary

of

Defense.

(c)

Coordinate

the

designation

and

registration

of

selected

installations

to

report

in

DRRS-MC

with

DC

PP&O

and

DC

CD&I.

(d)

Integrate

USMC

readiness

initiatives

relative

to

installations.

(e)

Develop

and

review

every

four

years

mission

statements

and

core

mission

essential

task

lists

(METLs)

for

logistic

combat

element

organizations

and

installations

that

DC

I&L

is

assigned

MAGTF

advocacy.

Develop

and

review

standards

3

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

used

for·MET

assessment.

Provide

METs

and

standards

to

DC,

CD&I

and

COMMMARFORCOM.·

(f)

Identify

the

readiness

reportable

ground

principal

end

items

(PEI)

and

mission

essential

equipment

(MEE)

selected

for

readiness

reporting.

(3)

Deputy

Commandant,

Aviation

(a)

Coordinate

with

PP&O

on

policy,

procedures,

and

guidance

for

aviation

unit

readiness

reporting.

(b)

Develop

and

review

every

four

years

mission

statements

and

core

mission

essential

task

lists

(METLs)

for

aviation

combat

element

organizations

that

DC

Aviation

is

assigned

MAGTF

advocacy.

Develop

and

review

standards

used

for

MET

assessment.

Provide

METs

and

standards

to

DC,

CD&I

and

COMMMARFORCOM.

(4)

Deputy

Commandant,

Combat

Development

&

Integration

(CD&I)

(a)

Manage,

coordinate,

maintain,

and

serve

as

the

primary

review

authority

of

the

Marine

Corps

Task

List

(MCTL)

and

update

it

as

required.

Provide

periodic

examination

of

the

MCTL

to

reflect

installation

METLs,

Unit

Core

METLs,

Named

Operation

METLs,

and

Concept

Plan/Operation

Plan

(CONPLAN/OPLAN)

METLs.

Define

doctrinal

tasks

and

support

operational

reporting

requirements.

(b)

Coordinate

the

activation,

deactivation,

and

reassignment

of

Marine

Corps

units

and

installations

with

PP&O

and

I&L.

(c)

Develop

and

review

every

four

years

mission

statements

and

core

mission

essential

task

lists

(METLs)

for

command

element

organizations

that

DC

CD&I

is

assigned

MAGTF

advocacy.

Develop

and

review

standards

used

for

MET

assessment.

(d)

Assist

Deputy

Commandants,

Advocates

and

the

Marine

Corps

Component

Commanders

(MARFORs)

in

the

development

of

Common

Core

METLs

with

conditions

and

standards

for

all

like-

type

units

and

installations.

(e)

Establish

and

maintain

a

Service

organizational

database

for

unit.METs

and

associated

standards.

4

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(f)

Incorporate

standardized

Unit

Core

METLs

and

associated

training

standards

in

Ground

and

Aviation

T&R

Manuals.

(g)

Identify,

develop,

fund

and

administer

an

online

distance

learning

(DL)

DRRS-MC

training

course.

Obtain

input

from

PP&O

(POR) ,

Advocates,

the

MARFORs,

and

Commanders

of

designated

Marine

Corps

installations

regarding

DL

course

requirements.

(5)

Commanding

General,

Marine

Corps

Forces

Command

(MARFORCOM)

(a)

Support

the

development

and

periodic

review

of

common

Core

METs

and

associated

standards

for

all

like-type

conventional

units.

(b)

Coordinate

with

DC

CD&I

to

load

Core

METs

and

associated

standards

for

like-type

conventional

units

into

the

Service

organizational

MET

database.

(c)

Develop

templates

for

unit

Named

Operations

and

OPLAN/CONPLAN METLs.

(d)

Integrate

Named

Operation

and

OPLAN/CONPLAN

METL

development

into

force

sourcing

actions.

(6)

Marine

Corps

Component

Commanders

(MARFORCOM,

MARFORPAC,

MARFORSOC,

MARFORCENT,

MARFOREUR,

MARFORSOUTH,

MARFORSTRAT,

MARFORNORTH,

MARFORAF,

MARFORCYBERCOM,

MARFORKOREA,

MARFORRES)

(a)

Inform

the

supporting

MARFOR

(MARFORCOM,

MARFORPAC,

MARFORRES,

MARFORSOC)

when

OPLAN/CONPLAN

assessment

requires

assigned

units

to

develop

and

report

against

OPLAN/CONPLAN METLs.

MARFORSOC

is

the

exception,

when

they

provide

forces

to

Theater

Special

Operations

Commands

(TSOCs).

reporting

validity.

(b)

Establish

procedures

to

monitor

the

readiness

of

subordinate

units

for

accuracy,

timeliness,

and

Direct

corrective

action

as

required.

(c)

Support

subordinate

Operation

and

OPLAN/CONPLAN METLs.

and

MARFORCOM

if

such

METLs

need

to

units'

development

of

Named

Inform

HQMC

(PP&O),

MCCDC,

become

the

focus

of

resourcing

and

training

efforts

instead

of

Core

Unit

METLs.

5

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

6.

Command

and

Signal

a.

Command.

This

Order

is

applicable

to

the

Marine

Corps

Total

Force.

b.

Signal.

This

Order

.i}

)~:;;;:

:,gned

T.

D.

WALDHAUSER

Deputy

Commandant

for

Plans,

Policies

and

Operations

DISTRIBUTION:

PCN

10203045300

Copy

to:

8145001

USCINCSTRATACOM/J3

(10)

Joint

Staff

USCINCCENT/ccj3

(10)

J-1

USCINCEUCOM/ECJ3-FD

(10)

J-38

USCINCTRANSCOM/DOCR

(10)

J-6I

USCINCPACCOM/J34

(10)

J-7/EAD/JDED

USCINCSOUTHCOM/SCJ3-0POS-JOC

(10)

DISA/JSSC

(1) USCINCSPACECOM/J-3CO

(10)

CSA/DAMO-ODR

(5)USCINCSOCOM/J3

(10)

CSAF/XOOOC

(5) USJTFORCESCMD/J331

(10)

CNO/OP642E (5)

7

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(d)

Integrate

Named

Operation

and

OPLAN/CONPLAN

METLs

into

unit

deployment

orders

as

appropriate.

(e)

Support

DRRS-MC

development,

testing

and

training.

(7)

Marine

Corps

Forces

Special

Operations

Command

(MARFORSOC)

(a)

Support

the

development

and

periodic

review

of

common

Core

METs

and

associated

standards

for

special

operations

units.

(b)

Coordinate

with

CD&I

to

load

common

Core

METs

and

associated

standards

for

all

like-type

special

operations

units

into

the

Service

organizational

MET

database.

(c)

Develop

templates

for

special

operations

unit

Named

Operation

and

OPLAN/CONPLAN METLs.

(d)

Support

DRRS-MC

development,

testing,

and

training.

(8)

U.S.

Marine

Corps

Bases

Atlantic

and

Pacific

(a)

Supervise

DRRS-MC

reporting

for

selected

installations

upon

direction

of

HQMC,

I&L.

(b)

Coordinate

DRRS-MC

development,

testing,

and

training

for

subordinate

installations.

(9)

Reporting

Units,

Organizations,

and

Installations.

Assess

their

organizations

in

DRRS-MC.

5.

Administration

and

Logistics

a.

Recommendations

concerning

the

contents

of

this

Order

may

be

forwarded

to

CMC

PP&O

(POR)

via

the

appropriate

chain-of-

command.

b.

Records

created

as

a

result

of

this

directive

shall

include

records

management

requirements

to

ensure

the

proper

maintenance

and

use

of

records,

regardless

of

format

or

medium,

to

promote

accessibility

and

authorized

retention

per

the

approved

records

schedule

and

reference

(n).

6

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

LOCATOR

SHEET

SUbj:

MARINE

CORPS

READINESS REPORTING STANDING OPERATING

PROCEDURES

(SHORT

TITLE:

MARINE

CORPS

READINESS SOP)

LOCATION:

(Indicates

the

location(s)

of

copy(ies)

of

this

Order.)

8

RECORD

OF

CHANGES

Log

completed

change

action

as

indicated.

Change

Date

of

Date

Number

Change

Entered

9

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Signature

of

Person

Incorporated

Change

IDENTIFICATION

Chapter

1

1.

2.

3.

4.

5 .

6 .

7 .

8 .

9.

10.

11.

Table

1-1

Chapter

2

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7 .

Figure

2-1

Table

2-1

Chapter

3

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

•

TABLE

OF

CONTENTS

TITLE

READINESS

OVERVIEW

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

PAGE

Purpose

............................

1-1

Policy

.............................

1-1

Background

.........................

1-1

Scope

..............................

1-2

Reporting

Organizations

............

1-2

Core

and

Assigned

Readiness

Assessments

........................

1-2

Reporting

Occasions

................

1-3

Reporting

Channels

.................

1-5

Security

Classification

............

1-6

Release

and

Access

to

Reports

......

1-7

Codes

for

Report

Submissions

.......

1-7

Reporting

Occasions

................

1-3

PERSONNEL

Purpose

............................

2-1

Policy

.............................

2-1

Scope

..............................

2-1

Reporting

Requirements

.............

2-1

Task

Organization

..................

2-3

Personnel

Remaining

Behind

From

Deployment

.........................

2-3

Employ/Deploy

Codes

................

2-3

Personnel

Percentages

..............

2-1

P-Ratings

..........................

2-2

EQUIPMENT

Purpose

............................

3-1

Policy

.............................

3-1

Scope

..............................

3-1

Reporting

Requirements

.............

3-1

Reportable

Equipment

...............

3-1

S-Rating:

Equipment

And

Supplies

...

3-2

10

IDENTIFICATION

7.

8.

9.

10.

Table

3-1

Table

3-2

Chapter

4

l.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6 .

Chapter

5

l.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6 .

Table

5-1

Chapter

6

l.

2.

3.

4.

Table

6-1

Table

6-2

TITLE

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

PAGE

R-Rating:

Equipment

Condition

......

3-3

Task

Organization

..................

3-4

Equipment

Remaining

Behind

From

Deployment

.........................

3 - 4

Employ/Deploy

Codes

................

3-4

Equipment

and

Supplies

(S-Rating)

.........................

3-2

Equipment

Condition

(R-Rating)

.....

3-3

MET

ASSESSMENTS

Purpose

............................

4-1

Policy

.............................

4-1

Scope

..............................

4-1

MET

Assessment

.....................

4-1

Assessment

Definitions

.............

4-2

Required

Remarks

...................

4 - 3

TRAINING

Purpose

............................

5-1

Policy

.............................

5-1

Scope

..............................

5-1

Training

(T-Rating)

...............

5-1

Mandatory

Training

Remarks

.........

5-1

Training

Reason

Codes

..............

5-2

T-Rating

Calculation

...............

5-1

CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL,

AND

NUCLEAR

(CBRN) DEFENSE

Purpose

............................

6-1

Policy

.............................

6-1

Scope

..............................

6-1

Reporting

Requirements

.............

6-1

CBRN

Defense

Equipment

S-Ratings

...

6-2

CBRN

Defense

Training

T-Rating

.....

6-2

11

IDENTIFICATION

Chapter

7

1.

2.

3 .

4.

5 .

Appendix

A

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6 .

7.

8 .

Figure

A-1

Appendix

B

1.

2.

3 .

4.

5.

6.

7.

Figure

B-1

Appendix

C

1.

TITLE

COMMANDER'S

ASSESSMENTS

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

PAGE

Purpose

............................

7-1

Policy

.............................

7-1

Scope

..............................

7-1

Reporting

Requirements

.............

7-1

Guided

Remarks

.....................

7-4

PERSONNEL

PROCEDURES

Purpose

............................

A-1

Assembly

of

Personnel

Information

........................

A-1

Personnel

Location

.................

A-1

Type

Personnel

Codes

(TPERS)

.......

A-1

Personnel

Adjustments

for

Task

Organization

.......................

A-1

Mandatory

Personnel

Remarks

........

A-2

Personnel

Reason

Codes

.............

A-3

Employ/Deploy

Codes

................

A-3

Personnel

Task

Organization

Adjustments

........................

A-2

EQUIPMENT

PROCEDURES

Purpose

............................

B-1

Assembly

of

Equipment

Information

........................

B-1

MEE

Location

.......................

B-1

Equipment

Adjustments

for

Task

Organization:

S-Ratings

............

B-1

Mandatory

Equipment

Remarks

........

B-1

Equipment

Reason

Codes

.............

B-2

Employ/Deploy

Codes

................

B-2

Equipment

Task

Organization

Adjustments

........................

B-2

MET

ASSESSMENT

Purpose

............................

C-1

12

IDENTIFICATION

2.

3.

Table

C-1

Appendix

D

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Appendix

1.

2.

3.

Table

E-1

Table

E-2

Table

E-3

Table

E-4

Table

E-5

E

Appendix

F

1.

2.

3.

4.

Figure

F-1

Figure

F-2

Figure

F-3

TITLE

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

PAGE

Assembly

of

Information

............

C-1

MET

Assessment

Guidance

............

C-1

MET

Assessment

Guidance

............

C-1

CHEMICAL,

BIOLOGICAL,

RADIOLOGICAL

AND

NUCLEAR

DEFENSE

(CBRN)

READINESS

REPORTING

PROCEDURES

Purpose

............................

D-1

Procedures

.........................

D-1

CBRN

Defense

Equipment

(S-Rating)

..

D-1

CBRN

Defense

Training

(T-rating)

...

D-4

CBRN

Defense

Overall

Readiness

Level

..............................

D-4

CBRN

Forecast

......................

D-4

COMMANDER'S

ASSESSMENT

PROCEDURES

Purpose

............................

E-1

Reporting

Procedures

...............

E-1

Mandatory

Remarks

..................

E-4

C-Level

Definitions

................

E-1

C-Level

Reason

Codes

...............

E-2

Assessment

Correlation

.............

E-2

PCTEF

Definitions

..................

E-3

Mission

Capability

Assessment

Guidance

...........................

E-3

WORKSHEETS

Purpose

............................

F-1

Personnel

Worksheet

................

F-1

Equipment

Worksheet

................

F-3

CBRN

Defense

Worksheet

.............

F-6

Personnel

Worksheet

................

F-3

Equipment

Worksheet

................

F-5

CBRN

Equipment

Worksheet

...........

F-6

13

IDENTIFICATION

Appendix

G

Table

G-1

Table

G-2

Table

G-3

Table

G-4

Table

G-S

Table

G-6

Table

G-7

Appendix

H

Appendix

I

TITLE

READINESS

TABLES

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

PAGE

Reason

Codes

.......................

G-1

Current

Status

and

Activity

Codes

..............................

G- 6

Type

Personnel

Code

Descriptions

...

G-7

Deployable

Personnel

...............

G-8

Non-deployable

Personnel

...........

G-9

Percentage

Employed/Deployed

.......

G-10

Major

Commands/Reporting

Organizations

......................

G-11

ABBREVIATIONS

GLOSSARY

l4

Chapter

1

Readiness

Overview

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

Chapter

outlines

general

policy

for

operational

readiness

reporting.

It

includes

information

on

which

organizations

report,

reporting

occasions,

reporting

channels,

security,

and

the

release

of

readiness

data

outside

of

the

Marine

Corps.

2.

Policy.

Reference

(a)

contains

the

general

provisions,

detailed

instructions,

and

formats

to

submit

readiness

data

in

support

of

joint

requirements.

Supplemental

instructions

are

provided

by

this

Order.

This

Order

is

the

governing

authority

for

all

Marine

Corps

readiness

reporting

requirements.

Development

or

use

of

any

additional

software,

reporting

formats,

local

standards

or

definitions

within

any

part

of

readiness

reporting

requires

prior

authorization

from

DC

PP&O

(POR) .

3.

Background

a.

Readiness.

Readiness

is

defined

as

the

ability

of

U.S.

military

forces

to

fight

and

meet

the

demands

of

the

national

military

strategy.

Readiness

is

the

synthesis

of

two

distinct

but

interrelated

levels.

(1)

Unit

Readiness.

The

ability

to

provide

capabilities

'required

by

the

combatant

commanders

to

execute

their

assigned

missions.

This

is

derived

from

the

ability

of

each

unit

to

deliver

the

outputs

for

which

it

was

designed.

Unit

readiness

is

reported

by

the

military

services.

(2)

Joint

Readiness.

This

is

the

combatant

commander's

(CCDR's)

or

Joint

Task

Force

(JTF)

Commander's

ability

to

integrate

and

synchronize

ready

combat

and

support

forces

to

execute

assigned

missions.

Accurate

and

timely

unit

readiness

reports

are

essential

for

Joint

Readiness

reporting.

b.

Legal

Requirement

To

Report

Readiness.

Title

10,

section

153a.3.C.,

United

States

Code

(USC)

directs

the

Chairman

of

the

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff

to

advise

the

Secretary

of

Defense

on

critical

deficiencies

and

strengths

in

force

capabilities

identified

during

the

preparation

and

review

of

contingency

plans.

Title

10,

section'l17,

USC

directed

the

Secretary

of

Defense

to

establish

a

comprehensive

readiness

reporting

system

that

would

measure

in

an

objective,

accurate,

and

timely

manner

1-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

the

capability

of

the

u.s.

military

to

carry

out

the

National

Security

Strategy,

Defense

Planning

Guidance,

and

the

National

Military

Strategy.

Title

10,

section

5042b.2,

U.S.C.

directs

Headquarters,

Marine

Corps,

to

investigate

and

report

upon

their

efficiency

and

preparation

to

support

military

operations

by

combatant

commanders.

c.

Uses.

Readiness

information

supports

in

priority

order:

crisis

response

planning,

deliberate

or

peacetime

planning,

and

management

responsibilities

to

organize,

train,

and

equip

combat-ready

forces

for

the

unified

commands.

Readiness

reporting

information

is

also

used

in:

Service

testimony,

reports

to

Congress,

the

Chairman

of

the

Joint

Chief

of

Staff's

Readiness

System

and

other

venues.

4.

Scope.

This

Order

applies

to

all

Marine

Corps

readiness

reporting

organizations.

5.

Reporting

Organizations

a.

Organizations

Required

to

Report.

Combat,

combat

support,

and

combat

service

support

units

of

the

Marine

Air

Ground

Task

Forces

(MAGTFs), MARFORs,

and

designated

organizations

and

installations

will

report

their

readiness.

Each

type

of

organization

is

deployable,

designed

for

warfighting,

or

provides

support

to

the

warfighting

Marine.

These

will

include

designated

task

organized

units.

b.

Organizations

Not

Under

MARFOR

Operational

Control.

Marine

Corps

organizations

passed

OPCON

to

a

non-Marine

Corps

command

will

submit

their

reports

through

DRRS-MC.

This

applies

to

units

in

contingency

operations

and

aviation

squadrons

participating

in

Navy

carrier

integration.

c.

Non-Marine

Corps

Organizations

OPCON

to

Marine

Organizations.

Those

organizations

will

report

their

readiness

per

their

channels,

not

in

DRRS-MC.

Exceptions

may

be

requested

of

PP&O, POR,

through

the

chain

of

command.

d.

Readiness

Reporting

Organizations.

Only

organizations

designated

by

PP&O,

POR

will

submit

readiness

reports.

Requests

for

organizations

to

report

in

DRRS-MC

will

be

forwarded

to

PP&O,

POR

through

the

chain

of

command.

6.

Core

and

Assigned

Readiness

Assessments.

The

readiness

reporting

system

allows

commanders

of

reporting

organizations

to

uniformly

determine

and

accurately

report

their

organizations'

1-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

ability

to

accomplish

the

core

(wartime)

mission

for

which

the

organization

was

designed

via

a

C-level

and

core

mission

capability

assessment.

When

applicable,

commanders

will

also

capture

their

organizations'

ability

to

accomplish

assigned

missions

via

the

Percent

Effective

(PCTEF)

level

and

an

assigned

mission

capability

assessment.

All

these

assessments

can

be

captured

in

a

single

report.

a.

C-Level

and

PCTEF

Assessments.

Both

assessments

indicate

the

degree

to

which

a

unit

has

achieved

prescribed

levels

of

fill

for

personnel

and

equipment,

the

materiel

condition

of

available

equipment,

and

the

training

proficiency

status

of

the

unit.

C-level

and

PCTEF

are

discussed

in

Chapter

7.

b.

Core

and

Assigned

Mission

Capability

Assessments.

The

most

significant

aspect

of

readiness

reporting

is

the

requirement

for

Commanders

to

assess

their

organizations'

capabilities

to

accomplish

their

mission

essential

tasks

(METs)

to

specified

conditions

and

standards.

Those

assessments

are

then

used

by

Commanders

to

assess

their

organizations'

capabilities

to

accomplish

their

missions.

These

assessments

are

discussed

in

Chapter

4.

7.

Reporting

Occasions.

Reports

will

be

submitted

within

24

hours

of

the

occasions

listed

in

Table

1-1

for

the

organizations

specified.

Units

will

continue

to

report

when

deployed

for

training,

deployed

in

response

to

a

crisis,

deployed

in

execution

of

an

OPLAN,

and

in

combat.

occasions

that

require

the

report

to

include

PCTEF/assigned

mission

capability

assessments

are

shown

in

the

right

most

column

of

Table

1-1.

Table

1-1

--Reporting

Occasions

occasion

Units

MARFOR

Installations

PCTEF/

Assign

Msn

30

days

since

last

X X

report

90

days

since

last

X

report

Activation

or

X X X

deactivation

Change

in

C-Level

X

Change

in

Percent

X X

Effective

(PCTEF)

1-3

Enclosure

(1)

Change

in

core

Mission

Assessment

(Yes,

Qualified

Yes,

No)

Change

in

assigned

Mission

Assessment

(Yes,

Qualified

Yes,

No)

Change

in

Administrative

Control

(ADCON)

or

Operational

Control

(OPCON)

Change

of

location

of

command

element

Change

of

geographic

location

of

unit's

personnel

or

equipment

(e.g.

mobilized

reserve

unit's

arrival

at

Site

of

Initial

Activation,

a

unit's

arrival

at

CAX,

or

arrival

overseas)

Employed

in

support

of

an

in-lieu

mission

(one

that

does

not

match

the

core

mission)

Assignment

to

Named

Operations

(e.g.

Operation

Iraqi

Freedom)

or

Operational

Plan/Concept

Plan

(OPLAN/CONPLAN)

by

D-

90

Assignment

to

Security,

Transition,

and

Reconstruction

(SSTR)

mission

X

1-4

X X

X

X X

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

X

Enclosure

(1)

Receipt

of

an

order

to

execute

any

of

these

missions:

homeland

defense,

homeland

security,

peacekeeping,

peace

enforcement,

humanitarian

assistance,

consequence

management,

counter-

drug,

civil

disturbance,

and

natural

disaster

relief

(including

wildfire

fighting)

Receipt

of

an

alert,

formal

warning,

or

execute

order

for

deployment

or

NLT

90

days

prior

to

deployment,

whichever

comes

first

12

months

prior

to

a

Reserve

unit's

planned

activation

date

Mobilization

of

Reserve

unit

X X

X

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

X

a.

Increased

Reporting

Frequency.

The

Chairman

of

the

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff

may

require

organizations

to

report

more

frequently.

Combatant

commanders

may

require

assigned

units,

or

units

over

whom

they

exercise

OPCON,

to

report

more

frequently.

DC

PP&O,

and

Marine

Forces

(MARFORs)

may

also

require

increased

reporting

frequency

and

more

detailed

remarks

to

provide

updated

information

for

crisis

planning.

b.

Reporting

Intervals.

MARFORs

may

set

submission

dates,

within

the

reporting

occasions,

to

stagger

the

reporting

intervals

for

organizations

OPCON

to

them

(e.g.

battalions

report

on

1

st

of

month,

regiments

report

on

10th

of

month)

.

8.

Reporting

Channels.

Readiness

reports

are

the

responsibility

of

the

organization

commander

and

must

reflect

the

commander's

best

military

judgment

regarding

the

organization's

readiness.

Organizations

submit

their

reports

1-5

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

directly

into

DRRS-MC,

and

the

use

of

DRRS-MC

software

is

mandatory.

Coordination

of

readiness

issues

with

higher,

supported,

and

supporting

commands

ensures

a

shared

understanding

of

unit

capabilities

and any

support

that

may

be

required.

Commanders

and

staffs

must

avoid

actions

which

may

impair

the

submission

of

timely,

accurate,

and

complete

readiness

assessments

by

subordinate

organizations.

Higher

headquarters

will

not

require

higher

level

review

of

reports

prior

to

submission

or

direct

minimum

levels

of

reported

readiness.

a.

Edit

of

Reports.

Report

originators

will

be

notified

of

reports

processed

and

errors

detected.

Erroneous

reports

will

be

corrected

and

resubmitted

within

24

hours

of

notification.

b.

Review

of

DRRS-MC

Data.

DRRS-MC

resource

data

is

maintained

in

the

GSORTS

database

by

the

Defense

Information

Systems

Agency.

Resource

data

and

mission

and

MET

assessments

can

be

accessed

through

DRRS-MC

with

the

Marine

Readiness

Management

Output

Tool

(MRMOT).

Reporting

organizations

at

all

levels

must

develop

an

audit

program

to

periodically

check

readiness

reports

for

accuracy.

Higher

headquarters

are

not

authorized

to

change

subordinate

organization

readiness

reports,

except

to

correct

computation

errors

or

administrative

errors.

9.

Security

Classification

a.

The

classification

of

readiness

data

will

be

based

on

the

highest

classified

item

in

the

report.

Top

Secret

information

will

not

be

reported.

Protection

of

classified

information

shall

be

per:

DOD

Instruction

5200.01

(DOD

Information

Security

Program

and

Protection

of

Sensitive

Compartmented

Information;

SECNAVINST

5510.36A),

Department

Of

The

Navy

(DON)

Information

Security

Program

(ISP)

Instruction;

and

the

Chairman

of

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff

Manual

on

GSORTS

(CJCSM

3150.02A).

b.

The

policy

guidance

contained

in

this

paragraph

is

specifically

applicable

to

reports

that

are

submitted

in

compliance

with

the

provisions

of

this

Order

and

to

information

contained

in

or

extracted

from

those

reports

following

their

submission.

The

provisions

of

this

paragraph

are

not

applicable

to

information

regarding

personnel

status,

equipment

status,

or

training

status

of

organizations,

people

or

equipment

that

resides

in

or

is

derived

from

other

databases

or

systems.

1-6

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

c.

Confidential.

C-level,

PCTEF,

and

core/assigned

capability

mission

assessments

for

a

battalion,

squadron,

installation

or

smaller

unit

are

confidential.

d.

Secret.

C-level,

PCTEF,

and

core/assigned

capability

mission

assessments

for

organizations

larger

than

a

battalion,

squadron,

or

installation

are

secret.

e.

Top

Secret.

Top

secret

information

will

not

be

included

in

readiness

reports.

10.

Release

and

Access

to

Reports.

Marine

Corps

readiness

information

will

not

be

released

outside

the

Department

of

Defense

without

the

written

approval

of

PP&O, POR.

Outside

agencies

with

a

valid

need-to-know

and

the

appropriate

clearance

should

submit

requests

to

PP&O, POR.

11.

Codes

for

Report

Submissions.

Appendix

G

contains

codes

for

readiness

report

submissions

that

are

not

contained

in

the

other

chapters

and

appendices.

1-7

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

2

Personnel

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

chapter

outlines

policy

for

personnel

reporting.

2.

Policy.

Reporting

of

personnel

to

determine

a

Personnel-

rating

(P-rating)

is

based

on

the

unit's

ability

to

provide

deployable,

military

occupational

specialty

(MOS)

qualified

personnel

to

accomplish

its

missions.

It

is

one

of

the

four

measured

areas

that

are

factors

in

determining

a

unit's

C-

level.

P-ratings

may

also

be

used

as

part

of

the

standards

for

a

unit's

METs.

Reportable

personnel

will

be

accounted

for

by

only

one

organization

at

a

time.

3.

Scope.

This

section

applies

to

Marine

Corps

readiness

reporting

units,

not

installations

or

MARFORs.

Intermediate

level

commands

will

provide

a

sUbjective

assessment

of

their

personnel

resource

rating

based

upon

the

resource

ratings

of

subordinate

units.

4.

Reporting

Requirements.

Personnel

readiness

policy

is

explained

in

this

chapter.

Personnel

guidance

on

reporting

procedures,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

are

contained

in

Appendix

A.

a.

P-Rating.

Units

will

determine

the

P-rating

based

on

the

lower

percentage

of

the

PERSONNEL

STRENGTH

and

MOS

FILL

calculations.

Figure

2-1

depicts

the

formulas

for

calculating

these

percentages;

Task

organized

units

and

units

detaching

personnel

to

task

organized

units

will

comply

with

paragraph

5

of

this

chapter

when

calculating

personnel

percentages.

Table

2-1

depicts

how

the

percentages

determine

the

P-rating.

The

P-rating

will

be

calculated

as

of

the

time

of

the

report

and

will

not

be

a

future

projection.

P-ratings

of

less

than

1

require

reason

codes

and

remarks

per

Appendix

A .

.

Figure

2-1.--Personnel

Percentages

Personnel

Strength

Percentage

(Assigned

Strength

-

Nondeployables/Structure

Strength)

X

100

MOS

Fill

Percentage

(MOS

Fill

-

Nondeployables/Structure

Strength)

X

100

2-1

Enclosure

(1)

Rule

P1

Personnel

£.90%

Strength

MOS

Fill

2:,85%

Table

2-1.--P

Ratings

P2 P3

80-89% 70-79%

75-84% 65-74%

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

P4

<70%

<65%

b.

Structure

Strength.

The

Total

Force

Structure

Management

System

(TFSMS)

is

the

authoritative

source

for

obtaining

a

unit's

table

of

organization

(T/O)

Structure

Strength

data;

minus

any

individual

mobilization

augmentation

(IMA)

billets

or

unfilled

Navy

billets

identified

with

a

"M"

code

(medical

billets

to

be

augmented

by

the

hospital

staff).

Site

support

personnel

will

not

be

counted

in

Reserve

units.

Task

organized

units

will

obtain

their

personnel

Structure

Strength

from

the

unit's

manning

documents.

Task

organized

units

and

the

units

providing

personnel

to

task

organized

units

will

adjust

their

Structure

Strength

per

paragraph

5

of

this

chapter.

Occasionally,

the

majority

of

a

unit

will

deploy,

but

still

retain

personnel

at

their

home

station.

Those

units

will

compute

their

structure

strength

per

paragraph

6

of

this

chapter.

c.

Assigned

Strength.

The

Marine

Corps

Total

Force

Structure

System

(MCTFS)

is

the

authoritative

source

for

unit

personnel

status,

which

should

be

used

to

help

determine

the

Assigned

Strength.

Reporting

units

will

list

their

entire

assigned

strength,

minus

any

contingency

billets

(read

as

a

"C"

type

billet

on

a

unit's

T/O)

or

unfilled

Navy

billets

identified

with

an

"M"

code

(medical

billets

to

be

augmented

by

the

hospital

staff).

Task

organized

units

and

the

units

providing

personnel

to

task

organized

units

will

adjust

their

Assigned

Strength

per

paragraph

5

of

this

chapter.

Units

that

are

deployed,

but

still

retain

personnel

at

home

station

will

compute

their

assigned

strength

per

paragraph

6

of

this

chapter.

d.

MOS

Fill.

The

MOS

FILL

is

determined

by

taking

the

number

of

personnel

matched

against

T/O

line

number

billets

by

MOS.

A

unit

will

report

Marines

filling

T/O

billets

using

either

a

primary

or

additional

MOS,

but

not

both.

One

Marine

cannot

fill

two

billet

lines,

even

if

that

Marine

has

two

MOSs.

Each

person

will

be

aligned

with

a

specific

T/O

line

number

by

MOS,

and

the

rank

may

vary

one

above

or

one

below

that

listed

in

the

T/O,

if

it's

the

same

MOS.

Marines

assigned

to

billets

such

as

Scout

Sniper,

will

use

their

2-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

primary

MOS

with

a

necessary

skill

designator

to

match

against

the

unit's

T/O

(i.e.,

0369

with

a

billet

MOS

of

8541

Scout

Sniper).

In

cases

where

line

numbers

require

more

than

one

MOS,

each

MOS

must

match

to

count

as

an

MOS

match.

e.

Non-Deployable

Personnel.

The

criteria

for

determining

a

non-deployable

status

and

the

codes

for

listing

them

are

depicted

in

Tables

G-4

and

G-5.

f.

Critical

MOSs.

Units

will

identify

the

three

most

critical

PMOSs

that

have

the

largest

detrimental

impact

on

the

unit's

readiness

per

Appendix

A.

5.

Task-Organization.

Task

organized

units

gaining

personnel

and

the

units

providing

them

personnel

will

adjust

their

personnel

quantities.

Coordination

must

occur

between

the

task

organized

and

providing

units

to

avoid

double

counting

of

personnel.

Remarks

explaining

the

personnel

adjustments

will

remain

in

the

task

organized

and

providing

units'

reports

until

the

detachments

are

returned

to

the

providing

units

or

transferred

elsewhere.

a.

Task

Organized

Units

Gaining

Personnel.

Task

organized

units

that

receive

detachments

of

personnel

will

increase

their

Assigned

Strength,

Structure

Strength,

and

MOS

Fill

quantities.

b.

Units

Providing

Personnel

to

Task

Organized

Units.

The

Assigned

Strength

and

MOS

Fill

quantities

will

be

subtracted

from

the

providing

unit(s).

Do

not

subtract

the

Structure

Strength

from

the

providing

unit.

6.

Personnel

Remaining

Behind

From

Deployment.

When

an

active

duty

unit

deploys

and

has

personnel

that

still

belong

to

the

unit

remaining

behind,

the

commander

will

still

consider

them

in

the

P-rating

calculation

and

C-level

assessment.

They

will

not

be

considered

in

PCTEF,

assigned

MET

and

mission

assessments.

If

some

of

these

personnel

are

subsequently

transferred

to

another

unit,

their

quantity

is

removed

from

the

assigned

strength,

not

the

structure

strength.

This

policy

is

not

applicable

to

Reserve

units,

because

remain

behind

personnel

are

transferred

to

another

unit

upon

deployment.

7.

Employ/Deploy

Codes.

When

five

percent

(5%)

or

more

of

a

unit's

personnel

are

detached

to

deploy

with

another

unit,

the

2-3

Enclosure

(1)

Mea

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

providing

unit

will

use

the

employ/deployed

codes

from

Appendix

G,

Table

G-6

to

report

the

percentage

deployed.

2-4

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

3

Equipment

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

chapter

outlines

policy

for

equipment

reporting

for

both

equipment

and

supplies

on

hand

(S-rating),

and

equipment

condition

(R-rating).

The

S-rating

is

a

materiel

measurement

of

an

organization's

possessed

equipment

quantity

against

its

designed

requirement.

The

R-rating

indicates

the

materiel

condition

of

the

organization's

possessed

equipment.

2.

Policy.

Reporting

on

equipment

to

determine

a

S-rating

and

a

R-rating

is

based

on

the

unit's

ability

to

provide

the

quantities

and

quality

of

equipment

to

accomplish

its

missions.

The

Sand

R

ratings

are

two

of

the

four

measured

areas

that

are

factors

in

determining

a

unit's

C-level.

Sand

R-ratings

may

also

be

used

as

part

of

the

conditions

for

an

organization's

METs.

Equipment

will

be

accounted

for

by

only

one

organization

at

a

time,

and

the

present

materiel

status,

not

future

projections,

will

be

used.

Active

and

Reserve

units

will

compute

their

Sand

R-ratings

in

the

same

way.

3.

Scope.

This

section

applies

to

Marine

Corps

readiness

reporting

units.

It

does

not

apply

to

installations

or

MARFORs.

Intermediate

level

commands

will

provide

a

subjective

assessment

of

their

equipment

ratings

based

upon

their

subordinate

units'

S

and

R

ratings.

4.

Reporting

Requirements.

Materiel

readiness

policy

is

explained

in

this

chapter.

Materiel

guidance

on

reporting

procedures,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

are

contained

in

Appendix

B.

5.

Reportable

Equipment.

Selected

pieces

of

equipment

are

designated

to

accurately

capture

the

equipment

readiness

of

Marine

Corps

units.

The

selected

equipment

is

reported

as

either

mission

essential

equipment

(MEE)

or

principal

end

items

(PEl)

.

a.

Ground

Equipment.

Reference

(f)

defines

MEE

and

PEl

for

ground

equipment

and

sets

forth

the

procedures

for

updating

them.

Updated

MEE

and

PEl

are

published

in

Marine

Corps

Bulletin

3000.

b.

Aircraft

and

Aviation

Support

Equipment.

Flying

squadrons,

to

include

MEU(ACE)

designated

squadrons,

will

consider

their

aircraft

as

MEE

when

calculating

their

Sand

R-

3-1

Enclosure

(1)

Meo

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

ratings.

Flying

squadrons

will

not

calculate

aviation

support

equipment

as

PEl.

MALS

will

calculate

Sand

R-ratings

using

aviation

support

equipment

as

PEl.

6.

S-Rating:

Equipment

and

Supplies.

Units

will

calculate

a

S-

rating

as

of

the

time

of

the

report

and

report

the

lowest

S-

rating

between

the

MEE

and

PEl

calculations.

Task

organized

units

and

units

detaching

equipment

to

task

organized

units

will

comply

with

paragraph

8

of

this

chapter

when

calculating

S-

ratings.

Table

3-1

depicts

the

criteria

for

these

calculations.

Table

3-1

--Equipment

and

Supplies

(S-Rating)

Rule

Sl

S2

S3

S4

1.

Mission

Essential

Equipment

(MEE)

Total

Service-selected

mission-essential

>90%

80-89%

65-79%

<65%

-

equipment

possessed

divided

by

prescribed

wartime

requirements

[UTR]

T.otal

In

Reporting

Status

aircraft

>90%

80-89%

60-79%

<60%

-

possessed

divided

by

prescribed

wartime

requirement

(PMAA)

2.

Support

Equipment

(PEl)

Total

Service-selected

principal

end-items

>90%

80-89%

65-79%

<65%

-

possessed

divided

by

prescribed

wartime

requirement

[UTR]

a.

Prescribed

Wartime

Requirement.

The

Total

Force

Structure

Management

System

(TFSMS)

is

the

authoritative

source

for

obtaining

a

unit's

table

of

equipment

(TIE)

data

for

ground

equipment.

The

TIE

prescribed

wartime

requirement

appears

in

the

AAO

column,

which

will

be

changed

in

the

future

to

read

Unit

TIE

Requirement

(UTR).

The

Primary

Mission

Authorized

Aircraft

(PMAA)

quantity

is

the

prescribed

wartime

requirement

for

tactical

aircraft.

The

PMAA

is

published

in

the

Marine

Aviation

Plan.

Task

organized

units

will

use

their

sourcing

document

or

equipment

density

list

(EDL)

for

their

prescribed

wartime

3-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

requirement.

The

prescribed

wartime

requirement

for

aviation

support

equipment

comes

from

the

Support

Equipment

Resources

Management

Information

System

(SERMIS).

b.

Possessed

Equipment.

Ground

and

aviation

supply

regulations

determine

the

possession

status

of

equipment.

Excess

possessed

equipment

(quantities

above

the

prescribed

PEl

and

MEE

wartime

requirement)

will

not

be

used

to

calculate

the

S

or

R-ratings

for

non-intermediate

units,

but

will

be

mentioned

in

the

report's

remarks.

c.

Intermediate

Level

Commands.

Intermediate

commands

should

consider

the

impact

of

any

excess

equipment

in

their

subordinate

units

when

making

a

subjective

S-rating

assessment.

7.

R-Rating:

Equipment

Condition.

Units

will

calculate

a

R-

rating

as

of

the

time

of

the

report

and

report

the

lowest

R-

rating

between

the

MEE

and

PEl

calculations.

Applicable

maintenance

directives

determine

a

mission

capable

status.

Excess

possessed

equipment

(quantities

above

the

prescribed

wartime

requirement)

will

not

be

used

in

the

R-rating.

Further

guidance

on

aircraft

status

is

defined

in

OPNAVINST

5442.4

and

OPNAVINST

4790.2.

Table

3-2

depicts

the

criteria

for

the

R-

rating

calculations.

Table

3-2

--Equipment

Condition

(R-Rating)

Rule

Rl

R2

R3

R4

1.

Mission

Essential

Equipment

(MEE)

Total

Service-selected

mission-essential

equipment

available

and

>90%

70-89%

60-69%

<60%

-

"mission

capable"

divided

by

total

possessed

Total

In

Reporting

Status

aircraft

mission

>75%

60-74%

50-59%

<50%

-

capable

divided

by

total

aircraft

In

Reporting

Status

3-3

Enclosure

(1)

2.

Principal

End

Item

(PEl)

Total

Service-selected

principal

end-items

available

and

mission

capable

divided

by

the

total

possessed

>90%

70-89%

...

60-69%

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

<60%

8.

Task

Organization.

Task

organized

units

and

the

units

providing

them

equipment

will

adjust

their

equipment

quantities

as

described

below.

Coordination

must

occur

between

the

task

organized

and

providing

units

to

avoid

double

counting

of

equipment.

The

adjustments

will

remain

in

the

task

organized

and

providing

units'

reports

until

the

detachments

are

returned

to

the

providing

units

or

transferred

elsewhere.

a.

Task

Organized

Units

Gaining

Equipment.

Task

organized

units

that

receive

detachments

of

equipment

will

increase

their

possessed

and

prescribed

wartime

requirement

quantities.

b.

Units

Providing

Equipment

to

Task

Organized

Units.

The

possessed

quantities

will

be

subtracted

from

the

providing

unit(s).

Do

not

subtract

the

prescribed

wartime

requirement

quantities.

9.

Equipment

Remaining

Behind

From

Deployment.

When

an

active

duty

unit

deploys

and

has

equipment

that

still

belongs

to

the

unit

remaining

behind,

the

commander

will

still

include

that

equipment

in

the

Sand

R-rating

calculations

and

the

C-Ievel

assessment.

They

will

not

be

considered

in

PCTEF

or

assigned

MET

and

mission

assessments.

This

policy

is

not

applicable

to

Reserve

units,

because

remain

behind

equipment

is

transferred

to

another

unit

when

they

deploy.

10.

Employ/Deploy

Codes.

When

five

percent

(5%)

or

more

of

a

unit's

equipment

is

detached

to

deploy

with

another

unit,

the

providing

unit

will

use

the

employ/deployed

codes

from

Appendix

G,

Table

G-6

to

report

the

percentage

deployed.

3-4

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

4

MET

Assessments

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

chapter

outlines

policy

for

assessing

mission

essential

tasks

(METs).

2.

Policy.

METs

will

be

developed

per

references

(g)

and

(h)

Core

METs

are

published

within

Training

and

Readiness

manuals

and

form

the

foundation

for

a

community's

T&R

standards.

A

mission

essential

task

list

(METL)

contains

the

list

of

a

command's

essential

tasks

with

appropriate

conditions

and

performance

standards

to

assure

successful

mission

accomplishment.

The

assessment

of

METs

will

be

based

on

the

organization's

present

state,

not

a

future

projection.

Guidance

on

MET

assessment

procedures

is

contained

in

Appendix

C.

3.

Scope.

All

readiness

reporting

units

(including

intermediate

commands),

installations,

and

MARFORs

will

assess

their

METs.

4.

MET

Assessment

a.

General.

A

MET

is

an

event

in

which

a

unit

or

organization

must

be

proficient

to

be

capable

of

accomplishing

an

appropriate

portion

of

its

wartime

mission.

All

readiness

reporting

Marine

Corps

organizations

will

have

a

mission

essential

task

list

(METL).

Assessments

at

all

levels

will

include

evaluations

of

the

resources

available

and

training

readiness

to

perform

METs

to

prescribed

standards.

The

assessments

will

assist

the

commander

in

determining

the

organization's

ability

to

execute

core

and

assigned

missions.

Reference

(h)

provides

a common

language

that

commanders

can

use

to

document

their

warfighting

requirements

as

METs.

The

METs

in

reference

(h)

are

architecturally

linked

to

the

Universal

Joint

Task

List

(UJTL),

which

includes

strategic-national,

strategic-

theater,

and

operational

level

of

war

tasks

used

by

joint

task

forces

and

Combatant

Commanders.

b.

Types

of

MET

Assessments.

Commanders

will

assess

METs

for

three

types

of

missions:

Core,

assigned

Major

Operational

Plans/Concept

Plans

(OPLANs/CONPLANs),

and

assigned

Named

Operations.

(1)

Core

METs.

Core

METs

define

the

design

capabilities

of

a

unit

and

are

developed

using

tasks

documented

in

the

Marine

Corps

Task

List

(MCTL),

reference

(h).

Core

METs

are

reflected

4-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

in

the

T&R

manuals

and

provide

the

foundation

for

a

community's

T&R

standards.

The

conditions

and

standards

for

training

to

Core

METs

are

reflected

by

events

which

serve

as

the

measures

to

gauge

readiness

against

the

performance

of

the

task.

Personnel

and

equipment

standards

for

Core

METs

are

developed

by

DC

CD&I

Total

Force

Structure

and

can

be

found

within

the

Service

organizational

MET

database.

Core

METs

are

standardized

for

all

units

of

the

same

type

and

are

used

to

develop

the

community's

T&R

Manual.

Core

METs

form

the

basis

for

the

METL

and

additional

METs

are

added

or

refined

as

required.

Units

without

approved

Core

METs

will

establish

their

own

(with

conditions

and

standards),

based

on

established

doctrine,

METLs

of

similar

units,

higher

headquarters'

METLs,

and

Marine

Corps

publications.

The

MCTL

contains

Marine

Corps

tasks

approved

by

Marine

Corps

Combat

Development

Command,

Combat

Development

and

Integration

(MCCDC,

CD&I).

(2)

Major

OPLAN/CONPLAN METs.

Major

OPLANs/CONPLANs

are

plans

that

require

level

four

detail

(established

Time-Phased

Force

&

Deployment

Data

(TPFDD»,

per

the

Contingency

Planning

Guidance.

When

tasked

by

higher

headquarters,

units

that

have

been

assigned

in

support

of

major

OPLANs/CONPLANs

will

use

OPLAN/CONPLAN

specific

METs

and

will

report

their

readiness

to

support

these

missions.

The

commander

checks

the

baseline

METL

derived

from

core

tasks

and

adjusts

to

add,

delete,

and/or

modify

METs

as

appropriate

during

mission

assessment

of

the

warplan.

The

supported

Marine

Corps

Component

Commanders

are

the

approving

authorities

for

OPLAN/CONPLAN

specific

METs

for

their

major

subordinate

units,

and

will

ensure

unit

METLs

support

Combatant

Commander

capability

requirements.

U.S.

Marine

Corps

Forces

Command

will

develop

and

maintain

METL

templates

for

various

missions

(e.g.,

provisional

security

operations)

to

support

this

process.

(3)

Named

Operation

METs. Named

operations

are

those

operations

designated

as

such

by

the

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff

(e.g.

Operation

IRAQI FREEDOM).

They

will

be

assessed

when

25

percent

or

more

of

a

unit

deploys

or

prepares

to

deploy

in

support

of

a

named

operation.

Core

METs, OPLAN/CONPLAN METs,

METL

templates,

and

deployment

guidance

provide

the

basis

for

the

development

and

refinement

of

named

operation

METs. When

such

an

operation

or

deployment

requires

specific

or

additional

skills,

the

commander

revises

the

unit's

METL

accordingly

and

submits

to

the

level

of

command

for

approval.

5.

Assessment

Definitions.

The

Commander

will

assess

his

METs

as

Yes,

Qualified

Yes,

or

No.

The

definitions

for

those

4-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

assessments

are

below.

Table

C-1

in

Appendix

C

provides

more

in-depth

information

to

assist

with

MET

assessment.

a.

Yes

"Y"

Assessment.

The

organization

can

accomplish

the

task

to

standard

under

the

specified

conditions.

A "Y"

assessment

should

reflect

demonstrated

performance

in

training

or

operations

whenever

possible.

A "Y"

assessment

indicates

an

organization

possesses

the

necessary

resources

or

those

resources

explicitly

identified

in

its

MET

to

allow

it

to

execute

when

ordered.

b.

Qualified

Yes

"Q"

Assessment.

The

organization

is

expected

to

accomplish

the

task

to

standard

under

most

conditions,

but

this

performance

has

not

been

observed

or

demonstrated

in

training

or

operations.

Organizations

assessing

their

task

as

"Q"

may

be

employed

for

those

tasks.

The

unit

possesses

the

necessary

resources

or

those

resources

have

been

explicitly

identified

to

the

organization

to

allow

it

to

execute

when

ordered.

c.

No "N"

Assessment.

The

organization

is

unable

to

accomplish

the

task

to

standard

at

this

time.

6.

Required

Remarks.

If

any

METs

are

assessed

as

"No",

explain

the

capability

shortfall,

as

well

as

the

resources,

training,

or

forces

required

to

resolve

the

shortfall.

Address

any

standards

assessed

as

not

meeting

required

criteria.

EXAMPLE:

"80%

TRAINED

TO

STANDARD,

NOT

ABLE

TO

TRAIN

TO

AMPHIB

OPS UNTIL

DEC

WHEN

AMPHIB

SHIPS

AVAIL.

ABLE

PERFORM

AMPHIP PORTION

OF

MSN

AFTER

THIS

TRNG."

4-3

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

5

Training

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

chapter

outlines

policy

for

reporting

training

(T-rating).

2.

Policy.

The

T-rating

is

one

of

the

four

measured

areas

that

are

factors

in

determining

a

unit's

C-level.

The

determination

of

a

T-level

will

be

based

on

the

unit's

present

state,

not

a

future

projection.

3.

Scope.

(including

MARFORs.

T-ratings

will

be

calculated

only

by

units

intermediate

level

commands),

not

by

installations

or

4.

Training

(T-Rating).

The

T-rating

is

an

assessment

of

the

unit's

training

to

accomplish

its

designed

mission.

a.

Units,

to

include

intermediate

level

units,

will

base

their

T-rating

on

the

percentage

of

their

core

METs

trained

to

standard

using

Table

5-1

as

a

reference.

For

example,

if

a

battalion

was

trained

to

standard

in

four

of

its

five

METs,

it

would

have

a

T-rating

of

T-2

(80%).

Table

5-1

--T-Rating

Calculation

.

Rule

T1 T2 T3 T4

Percentage

of

Core

METs

Trained

to

~85%

70-84%

55-69%

<55%

Standard

b.

Aviation

Units.

For

aviation

units

guided

by

references

(i)

through

(k),

the

T-rating

reported

will

be

the

lower

of

the

Combat

Leadership

assessment

or

the

Training

Percentage.

5.

Mandatory

Training

Remarks.

Report

the

exact

percentage

of

METs

trained

to

standard,

list

the

METs

not

trained

to

standard

and

their

impact

on

readiness,

and

provide

amplifying

remarks

outlining

the

support

needed

to

improve

training.

EXAMPLE:

"80%

TRAINED

TO

STANDARD,

NOT

ABLE

TO

TRAIN

TO

AMPHIB

OPS UNTIL

DEC

WHEN

AMPHIB

SHIPS

AVAIL.

ABLE

PERFORM

AMPHIP PORTION

OF

MSN

AFTER

THIS

TRNG."

6.

Training

Reason

Codes.

Enter

the

Training

Reason

Codes

from

Appendix

G,

Table

G-1

to

explain

the

unit's

T-rating

when

it

is

less

than

1.

5-1

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

6

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Chemical,

Biological,

Radiological,

and

Nuclear

(CBRN)

Defense

1.

Purpose.

This

Chapter

outlines

policy

for

reporting

CBRN

Defense

readiness.

2.

Policy.

Reference

(a)

requires

unit

commanders

to

provide

a

subjective

assessment

of

their

unit's

readiness

to

accomplish

its

mission

under

CBRN

conditions.

The

CBRN

Defense

assessment

is

a

separate

assessment

based

on

the

reported

levels

of

CBRN

equipment

and

training.

As

a

separate

reporting

requirement,

the

CBRN

Defense

assessment

does

not

directly

influence

or

contribute

to

a

unit's

overall

C-level

calculations;

however,

a

commander

may

subjectively

change

the

unit's

overall

reported

C-

level

and

core

mission

assessment

when

a

CBRN

deficiency

or

asset

directly

impacts

the

unit's

ability

to

carry

out

its

wartime

mission.

CBRN

will

be

assessed

in

each

readiness

report.

3.

Scope.

This

Chapter

pertains

to

units.

Installations

and

MARFORs

will

not

report

CBRN

defense

readiness.

4.

Reporting

Requirements.

CBRN

Defense

readiness

policy

is

explained

in

this

chapter.

Guidance

on

reporting

procedures,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

are

contained

in

Appendix

D.

a.

Overall

CBRN

Level.

Units

will

determine

the

Overall

CBRN

Level

based

on

reported

ratings

of

CBRN

defense

equipment

and

CBRN

training.

The

Overall

CBRN

Level

will

not

be

higher

than

the

lowest

of

the

ratings

for

CBRN

defense

equipment

and

CBRN

training.

b.

CBRN

Defense

Equipment

(S-rating).

Marine

Corps

CBRN

defense

equipment

is

managed

by

MARCORSYSCOM

as

a

Centrally

Managed

Program

under

the

Program

Manager

for

Combat

Support

Equipment

(PM

CSE).

PM

CSE

is

responsible

for

ensuring

the

Marine

Corps

CBRN

equipment

inventory

is

sufficient

to

support

readiness.

PM

CSE

assesses

the

Marine

Corps

CBRN

equipment

for

deficiencies

and

coordinates

all

readiness

issues

with

DC

PP&O

(POR)

and

DC

CD&I.

DC

CD&I

is

the

Marine

Corps'

Advocate

for

CBRN

Defense.

MARCORLOGCOM

stores,

maintains

and

issues

the

Marine

Corps'

CBRN

equipment

within

the

Consolidated

Storage

Program

(CSP)

at

distributed

Unit

Issue

Facilities

(UIF)

and

Individual

Issue

Facilities

(IIF).

The

Marine

Corps'

Centralized

Management

of

CBRN

defense

equipment

eliminated

the

unit

commanders'

responsibility

to

fund

for

and

sustain

CBRN

6-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

defense

equipment.

When

shortages

exist,

the

consolidation

of

CBRN

equipment

within

the

CSP

allows

the

Marine

Corps

to

rapidly

shift

CBRN

assets

to

support

deploying

units.

This

ability

to

support

units

from

a

centralized

pool

of

equipment

ensures

deploying

units

are

fully

equipped

with

the

best

CBRN

equipment

in

the

inventory.

Garrison

units

should

request

equipment

data

for

their

CBRN

equipment

rating

from

the

CBRN

officer

or

staff

noncommissioned

officer

within

the

chain

of

command.

Determine

the

CBRN

equipment

rating

using

the

procedures

in

Appendix

D

and

Table

6-1.

Table

6-1.--CBRN

Defense

Equipment

S-Rating

Rule

Sl

S2 S3 S4

Aggregate

average

of

total

serviceable

selected

CBRN

90-100% 80-89% 65-79% 0-65%

Equipment

possessed

divided

by

total

required

quantity

c.

CBRN

Defense

Training

(T-rating).

CBRN

training

requirements

are

per

references

(e),

(1),

and

(m).

The

CBRN

T-

rating

is

an

assessment

of

the

unit's

training

to

accomplish

its

designed

mission

under

CBRN

conditions.

It

considers

the

accomplishment

of

required

individual

and

unit

training.

All

units

will

base

their

CBRN

T-rating

on

the

percentage

of

their

core

METs

trained

to

standard

under

CBRN

conditions

within

the

past

12

months.

Determine

the

CBRN

T-rating

using

the

procedures

in

Appendix

D

and

Table

6-2.

Table

6-2

--CBRN

Defense

Training

T-Rating

Rule

Tl

T2 T3 T4

Percentage

of

METs

Trained

to

Standard

under

CBRN

85-100% 70-84% 55-69%

0-55%

conditions

in

the

past

12

months

6-2

Enclosure

(1)

Chapter

7

Commander's

Assessments

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

chapter

outlines

policy

for

the

Commander's

readiness

assessment

of

his/her

organization.

2.

Policy.

The

commander's

assessments

encompass

the

C-Ievel

and

capability

assessments

for

the

organization's

core

mission,

as

well

as

the

PCTEF

and

capability

assessments

for

assigned

mission(s).

The

commander's

assessments

will

be

based

on

the

organization's

present

state,

not

a

future

projection.

Remarks

will

provide

additional

information,

such

as

projected

changes

in

readiness.

3.

Scope.

C-Ievel

and

PCTEF

will

be

calculated

only

by

units

(including

intermediate

level

commands),

not

installations

or

MARFORs

All

Marine

Corps

readiness

reporting

organization

commanders

will

make

capability

assessments

of

their

core

and

assigned

missions.

4.

Reporting

Requirements.

Policy

regarding

the

commander's

assessments

is

explained

in

this

chapter.

Reporting

procedures,

guidance,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

for

the

Commander's

assessments

are

contained

in

Appendix

E.

The

operational

readiness

of

Marine

Corps

organizations

is

directly

impacted

by

their

capabilities,

resourcing,

and

training.

Accurate

assessments

by

commanders

are

essential

for

helping

the

Marine

Corps,

combatant

commands,

and

the

Department

of

Defense

understand

their

capability

to

accomplish

tactical,

operational,

and

strategic

goals.

a.

C-Level

Assessment

(1)

The

C-Ievel

reflects

the

status

of

the

selected

unit

resources

measured

against

the

resources

required

to

undertake

the

core

mission

for

which

the

unit

is

task

organized

or

designed.

The

C-Ievel

also

reflects

the

condition

of

available

equipment,

personnel,

and

unit

training

status.

C-Ievels,

by

themselves,

do

not

project

a

unit's

combat

performance

once

committed

to

combat.

The

five

C-Ievels

and

their

definitions

are

listed

in

Table

E-1.

Units

will

not

report

C-5,

unless

directed

to

do

so

by

DC

PP&O.

(2)

The

overall

C-Ievel

will

equate

to

the

lowest

rating

of

any

of

the

unit's

individually

measured

resource

and

training

ratings

(P,

R, S

or

T) .

7-1

Enclosure

(1)

(3)

C-5

Level

Ratings

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(a)

The

exception

to

the

above

policy

is

for

units

reporting

C-5.

C-5

is

used

for

units

undergoing

CMC

directed

resource

actions

and

the

changes

in

their

resource

and

training

ratings

(P,

S,

R,

and

T)

should

be

tracked

with

the

appropriate

numeric

ratings

of

1

through

4.

(b)

Units

reporting

C-5

will

remain

C-5

until

all

ratings

(P,

S,

R,

and

T)

are

3

or

higher,

unless

directed

otherwise

by

PP&O, POR. A

rating

of

C-5

does

not

prevent

the

deployment

of

ready

detachments

from

the

unit.

(4)

Subjective

C-Level

Changes

(a)

The

commander

may

subjectively

raise

or

lower

the

C-Ievel.

In

determining

the

need

for

a

subjective

upgrade

or

downgrade

of

the

C-Ievel,

the

commander

will

determine

whether

the

subjectively

changed

C-Ievel

would

be

in

consonance

with

the

C-Ievel

definitions

listed

in

Appendix

E,

Table

E-l.

For

instance,

units

missing

important

personnel

or

equipment

should

be

guarded

against

a

subjective

upgrade

to

C-l.

permit

a

and

T) .

(b)

A

sUbjective

change

of

the

C-Ievel

does

not

change

to

the

resource

and

training

ratings

(P,

R, S

They

will

be

reported

without

adjustment.

(c)

A

subjective

change

of

the

C-Ievel

results

in

the

requirement

to

submit

a

Reason

Code

(Appendix

E,

Table

E-2)

and

a

mandatory

remark.

(5)

Forecast

C-Ievel

and

Date.

The

commander

will

report

any

forecasted

increase

or

decrease

in

the

unit's

C-Ievel

with

the

date

of

the

forecasted

change.

Remarks

explaining

the

projected

increase

or

decrease

in

readiness

are

required.

Explain

why,

if

a

forecasted

change

or

date

is

not

possible.

(6)

C-Level

and

Core

Mission

Capability

Assessments.

These

assessments

should

correlate.

Appendix

E,

Table

E-3

provides

guidance.

(7)

C-Level

Reason

Codes

and

mandatory

remarks

are

contained

in

Appendix

E.

Remarks

are

required

for

all

C-Ievel

assessments.

7-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

b.

PCTEF

Assessment.

PCTEF

ratings

are

calculated

like

C-

level

ratings.

PCTEF

levels

and

their

definitions

are

contained

in

Table

E-4.

(1)

A

commander's

evaluation

of

the

unit's

ability

to

perform

the

assigned

mission

cannot

be

based

solely

on

P,

S,

R,

and

T-ratings.

The

cumulative

effect

of

these

measured

areas,

with

other

important

factors,

could

have

a

positive

or

negative

implication

on

the

unit's

ability

to

execute

its

assigned

mission.

For

the

commander

to

assess

the

unit's

current

military

capability

to

respond

to

the

full

spectrum

of

designated

mission

requirements,

the

commander

must

consider

additional

factors.

Although

not

all

inclusive,

other

factors

for

the

commander

to

consider

are:

personnel

turnover,

availability

of

ranges

and

training

areas,

installation

support,

operational

tempo,

exercises,

and

leadership.

(2)

If

the

unit

has

more

than

one

assigned

mission,

then

the

assigned

mission

the

unit

is

focusing

on

for

training

and

execution

will

be

the

basis

for

the

PCTEF

assessment.

(3)

The

PCTEF

assessment

will

not

necessarily

correlate

with

the

unit's

overall

C-Ievel.

For

instance,

if

an

infantry

battalion

is

assigned

a

humanitarian

assistance

mission,

PCTEF

will

capture

an

assessment

against

the

humanitarian

assistance

mission

while

the

overall

C-Ievel

will

assess

the

unit's

ability

to

execute

its

core

mission.

If

the

assigned

mission

is

the

same

as

the

core

mission,

the

C-Ievel

and

PCTEF

assessments

should

be

the

same.

(4)

PCTEF

reporting

occasions

are

shown

in

Table

1-1.

(5)

The

PCTEF

level

should

correlate

with

capability

assessments

for

assigned

missions

as

depicted

in

Appendix

E,

Table

E-3.

c.

Core

and

Assigned

Mission

Capability

Assessments

(1)

Commanders

will

assess

the

capability

of

their

organizations

to

execute

their

core

and

assigned

(OPLAN/CONPLAN

and

Named

Operation)

missions

using

a

Yes

(Y),

Qualified

Yes

(Q),

and

No (N)

criteria

based

on

their

assessed

METs

for

those

missions.

The

mission

assessments

will

consider

the

missions

as

a

whole

and

should

reflect

the

Commander's

military

experience

and

judgment

on

all

the

tasks

and

factors

that

affect

the

organization's

ability

to

meet

mission

objectives.

Table

E-5

7-3

Enclosure

(1)

Mca

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

contains

the

definitions

and

guidelines

for

the

Y, Q,

and

N

mission

assessment

criteria.

(2)

Core

and

assigned

mission

capability

assessments

should

align

respectively

with

C-Level

and

PCTEF

assessments

as

depicted

in

Appendix

E,

Table

E-3.

5.

Guided

Remarks.

If

not

stated

in

other

remarks,

Commanders

should

provide

amplifying

remarks

for

the

following

instances

to

assist

with

resourcing,

training,

and

force

management

decisions:

a.

Explain

Change

in

C-Level

and/or

PCTEF

Since

Last

Report.

what

caused

the

change

since

the

last

report.

b.

Identify

key

readiness

degraders

within

each

section

of

the

report

(Personnel,

Equipment,

Training,

CBRN,

etc).

c.

State

what

actions

are

being

taken

to

mitigate

readiness

degraders.

d.

State

what

assistance

is

needed

from

higher

headquarters.

7-4

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Appendix

A

Personnel

Procedures

1.

Purpose.

This

appendix

provides

the

procedures

to

calculate

personnel

readiness.

Policy

information

on

personnel

readiness

is

contained

in

Chapter

2.

Assembly

of

Personnel

Information.

Personnel

information

should

be

consolidated

by

the

personnel

officer

(G-l/S-l)

and

provided

to

the

Marine

assembling

the

readiness

report.

The

completion

of

a

personnel

worksheet

is

recommended

prior

to

starting

the

report.

Samples

of

personnel

worksheets

are

contained

in

Appendix

F.

3.

Personnel

Location.

Personnel

locations

will

be

reported

using

standard

geographical

location

(GEOLOC)

codes

or

ship

UICs

for

personnel

embarked

aboard

ships.

Units

with

assigned

personnel

at

more

than

one

location

will

report

the

personnel

data

for

each

geographic

location.

4.

Type

Personnel

Codes

(TPERS).

by

type

codes

as

defined

in

Table

(MC)

for

commissioned

and

warrant

Personnel

are

reported

G-3.

Use

the

same

code

officers.

Refer

to

the

glossary

in

Appendix

I

for

definitions

of

personnel

reporting

terms.

5.

Personnel

Adjustments

for

Task

Organization.

The

policy

for

personnel

adjustments

of

assigned

and

structured

quantities

is

provided

in

paragraph

6,

chapter

2,

in

this

Order.

Task

organized

units

gaining

personnel

will

add

assigned

strength,

structured

strength,

and

MOS

Fill

quantities.

The

Assigned

Strength

and

MOS

Fill

quantities

will

be

subtracted

from

the

providing

unit(s).

Figure

A-I

provides

an

example

of

these

adjustments

with

an

artillery

battalion

providing

a

battery

of

134

personnel

to

form

a

battalion

landing

team.

A-I

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Figure

A-1.--Personnel

Task

Organization

Adjustments

Artillery

Battalion

550

600

Prior

to

Task

Organization

Infantry

Battalion

Assigned

Strength

Structured

Strength

After

Task

Organization

748

760

A

battery

of

134

Marines

and

Sailors

detached

to

the

battalion

landing

team

Artillery

Battalion

416

600

Assigned

Strength

Structured

Strength

Battalion

Landing

Team

882

894

6.

Mandatory

Personnel

Remarks.

Mandatory

remarks

and

examples

are:

a.

Assigned

Strength

(ASGD)

Remark.

Identify

changes

due

to

assigned

strength.

EXAMPLE

REMARK

OF

UNIT PROVIDING

PERSONNEL:

"ASGD

Bn

decreased

by

detaching

B

Battery

to

BLT

1/2;

7/125/0/2

MC/ME/NC/NE".

b.

Structure

Strength

(STRUC)

Remark.

Identify

changes

due

to

structure

strength.

EXAMPLE

REMARK

OF

TASK

ORGANIZED

UNIT GAINING PERSONNEL: "BLT

STRUC

increased

by

attaching

a

battery

from

1/10;

to

1/2;

7/125/0/2

MC/ME/NC/NE" .

c.

Critical

MOSs.

Identify

the

three

critical

PMOSs

that

have

the

largest

detrimental

impact

on

the

unit's

readiness

and

explain

why

they

were

selected

and

the

impact

they

have.

Up

to

ten

primary

MOSs

can

be

entered

as

critical

MOSs

in

DRRS-MC.

d.

P-Level

is

Not

1.

Explain

why

and

the

impact.

EXAMPLE

REMARK:

"Detached

a

battery

to

1/2

and

cannot

fully

support

an

infantry

regiment

with

fire

support."

e.

Employed/Deployed

Personnel.

State

the

percentage

of

personnel

employed

or

deployed

when

five

percent

(5%)

or

more

of

a

unit's

personnel

are

detached

to

another

unit.

A-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

7.

Personnel

Reason

Codes.

Enter

the

Personnel

Reason

Codes

from

Table

G-1

to

explain

the

unit's

status

when

the

P-level

is

less

than

1.

8.

Employ/Deploy

Codes.

If

these

codes

were

used,

state

the

percentage

of

personnel

employed/deployed

to

other

units.

A-3

Enclosure

(1)

Appendix

B

Equipment

Procedures

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

appendix

provides

procedures,

guidance,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

for

reporting

equipment.

Policy

information

on

equipment

readiness

is

contained

in

Chapter

3.

2.

Assembly

of

Equipment

Information.

Equipment

information

should

be

consolidated

by

the

Logistics

Officer

(G-4/S-4)

with

the

support

of

the

supply

and

maintenance

officers.

The

completion

of

an

equipment

worksheet

is

recommended

prior

to

starting

the

report.

3.

MEE

Location.

MEE

located

away

from

the

unit

will

have

its

quantities

and

location

reported.

Report

the

location

using

standard

geographical

location

(GEOLOC)

codes

or

ship

UICs

for

equipment

embarked

aboard

ships.

4.

Equipment

Adjustments

for

Task

Organization:

S-Ratings.

The

policy

for

materiel

adjustments

of

possessed

and

prescribed

wartime

requirement

quantities

is

provided

in

Chapter

3,

paragraph

8

in

this

Order.

The

task

organized

units

receiving

equipment

will

add

the

possessed

and

prescribed

wartime

requirement

quantities.

The

units

providing

the

equipment

to

the

task

organized

unit

will

subtract

only

the

possessed

quantities,

not

the

prescribed

wartime

requirement

quantities.

Figure

B-1

provides

an

example

of

these

adjustments

with

an

artillery

battalion

providing

a

battery

of

6

howitzers

to

form

a

battalion

landing

team.

The

same

procedure

would

be

followed

to

illustrate

an

aviation

unit

chopping

aircraft

to

support

a

MEU

deployment.

5.

Mandatory

Equipment

Remarks.

Mandatory

remarks

and

examples

are:

a.

Sand/or

R-Rating

Not

1.

Explain

why,

what

the

impact

is

on

the

unit's

mission(s),

what

is

being

done

to

correct

the

problem

and

what

assistance

is

required.

EXAMPLE:

MALS-XX

HAS

ONLY

70%

OF

ITS

IMRL;

REMAINDER

SHIPPED

TO

OEF. CRITICAL

IMRL

GEAR

COMING

FROM

MALS-YY

BY

1 DEC,

WHICH

WILL

ENABLE

UNIT

TO

PROVIDE

MINIMAL

SUPPORT

TO

MAG."

b.

Aircraft

Out

of

Reporting

Status.

State

the

quantities

and

status.

EXAMPLE:

"2

ACFT

AT

SDLM,

1

ACFT

AT

MALS

FOR

DEPOT

REPAIR. "

B-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

c.

Reserve

Units'

Training

Allowances

(T/A).

Selected

Marine

Corps

Reserve

units

will

report

the

percentage

of

their

T/A

that

is

on-hand.

This

calculation

is

not

the

same

as

the

S-

rating.

Figure

B-l.--Equipment

Task

Organization

Adjustments

Artillery

Battalion

18

howitzers

=

18

howitzers

Prior

to

Task

Organization

Possessed

Prescribed

wartime

requirement

Infantry

Battalion

o

After

Task

Organization

A

battery

of

howitzers

detached

to

the

battalion

landing

team

Artillery

Battalion

12

18

Possessed

Prescribed

wartime

Requirement

Battalion

Landing

Team

6

6.

Equipment

Reason

Codes.

Enter

the

Equipment

Reason

Codes

from

Appendix

G,

Table

G-l

to

explain

the

unit's

status

when

the

Sand/or

R-rating

are

not

1.

7.

Employ/Deploy

Codes.

If

these

codes

were

used,

state

the

percentage

of

equipment

employed/deployed

to

other

units.

B-2

Enclosure

(1)

1.

Purpose.

METs.

Policy

Chapter

4.

Appendix

C

MET

Assessment

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

This

appendix

provides

the

procedures

to

assess

information

on

MET

assessments

is

provided

in

2.

Assembly

of

Information.

MET

assessment

information

should

be

consolidated

by

the

Operations

Officer

(G-3/S-3),

with

the

support

of

the

Personnel

(G-1/S-1),

Squadron

Maintenance

Department,

and

Logistics

(G-4/S-4)

Officers

to

provide

resource

information

regarding

MET

conditions.

3.

MET

Assessment

Guidance.

Guidance

on

the

MET

assessment

definitions

is

listed

below

and

depicted

in

Figure

C-1.

Based

on

the

commander's

assessment

of

MET

performance

standards,

the

commander

will

conduct

his

MET

Assessment

by

checking

Resourced,

Trained,

and

Observed

as

appropriate.

The

relationship

between

these

three

selections

will

drive

the

MET

Assessment

of

Y/Q/N.

a.

Resourced.

The

organization

meets

standards

for

personnel,

equipment,

and

subordinate

forces

for

the

task.

The

resources

are

in

possession

or

have

been

explicitly

identified

to

the

organization

to

allow

it

to

execute

when

ordered.

b.

Trained.

The

organization

meets

established

training

standards

for

the

task.

c.

Observed.

The

organization

has

demonstrated,

in

training

or

operations,

the

ability

to

produce

the

task's

output

measures

to

standard.

An

organization

observed

successfully

meeting

MET

performance

standards

will

be

considered,

and

marked,

"Trained"

during

the

MET

assessment.

Table

C-1.--MET

Assessment

Guidance

Resourced

Trained

Observed

MET

Assessment

(Y~Yes,

Q~Qualified

Yes,

N~No)

-V

Y

-V -V

Q

-V

N

-V -V

Q

-V

N

C-1

Enclosure

(1)

Appendix

D

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Chemical,

Biological,

Radiological,

and

Nuclear

Defense

(CBRN)

Readiness

Reporting

Procedures

1.

Purpose.

This

appendix

provides

procedures,

mandatory

remarks,

and

reason

codes

used

to

calculate

and

report

CBRN

defense

readiness.

Policy

on

CBRN

defense

is

provided

in

Chapter

6.

2.

Procedures.

Commanders

will

assess

the

availability

and

condition

of

equipment

and

unit

training

conducted

as

it

pertains

to

CBRN

Defense.

The

unit

CBRN

Defense

Officer/Chief

is

responsible

for

advising

the

Commander

on

the

unit's

CBRN

readiness

level

and

for

calculating

the

CBRN

S-rating,

T-rating

and

Overall

C-level.

Remarks

are

required

for

all

CBRN

C-levels

to

clarify

the

Commander's

assessment.

As

applicable,

a

forecast

improvement

/

downturn

date,

reason

codes,

and

remarks

will

accompany

the

assessment

when

the

assessment

is

made

and

the

S-rating

or

T-rating

are

not

1.

3.

CBRN

Defense

Equipment

(S-Rating)

The

CBRN

Equipment

Worksheet

found

in

Appendix

F

is

used

to

determine

the

CBRN

equipment

S-rating.

These

steps

will

help

with

completing

the

worksheet.

a.

Data.

Two

data

elements

are

required

to

complete

the

worksheet;

(1)

Unit's

Approved

Acquisition

Objective

(AAO)

For

Applicable

Items.

The

Unit

AAO

can

be

found

in

the

unit's

Table

of

Organization

and

Equipment

(TO&E)

for

the

current

fiscal

year

as

maintained

in

the

Total

Force

Structure

Management

System

(TFSMS).

The

AAO

column

in

TFSMS

will

be

changed

to

read

the

Unit

T/E

Requirement

(UTR).

(2)

Quantity

of

Serviceable

CBRN

Equipment

On-hand.

b.

CBRN

Readiness

Calculator.

A

CBRN

Readiness

Calculator

that

greatly

reduces

the

time

required

to

determine

the

CBRN

Equipment

rating,

eliminates

the

need

to

perform

manual

calculations,

and

provides

the

same

results

as

the

Worksheet

is

maintained

by

Marine

Corps

Systems

Command

and

is

available

for

use

at

https:

//

ips.usmc.mil

/

sites

/

mcsccbrn

/

default

.

aspx

.

It

is

recommended

for

use

due

to

its

efficiency

and

because

its

equipment

data

is

kept

current.

D-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

c.

Worksheet

Procedures.

Manual

procedures

for

the

CBRN

Equipment

Rating

Worksheet

follow.

(1)

Authorized

Column.

Record

the

Unit

AAO

Quantities

from

the

TFSMS

generated

unit

TO&E

report

for

the

current

FY.

(2)

Serviceable-On

Hand

Column.

Record

the

actual

quantity

of

serviceable

equipment

the

unit

has

on

hand

to

include

equipment

issued

to

individuals

in

the

unit.

(3)

Percent

On

Hand

Column.

Calculate

the

Percent

On

Hand

for

each

item

as

"Serviceable

On

Hand"

nearest

whole

number.

or

90%.

follows;

"Authorized"

divided

by

equals

the

"Percent

On

Hand".

Round

to

For

example;

90

divided

by

100

equals

0.9

(4)

Rating

Column.

Apply

the

appropriate

rating

from

Table

6-1.

(5)

Overall

CBRN

Sense

Rating.

The

overall

CBRN

Sense

rating

is

the

average

of

four

Sense

capability

area

ratings:

Chemical

Detection

Rating,

Biological

Detection

Rating,

Radiological/Nuclear

Detection

Rating,

and

CBRN

Detection

Equipment

Rating.

Spaces

are

provided

on

the

worksheet

to

record

the

four

Sense

capability

area

ratings

and

the

Overall

CBRN

Sense

Rating.

(a)

Chemical

Detection

Rating.

Determine

the

number

by

averaging

the

chemical

detection

equipment

ratings

from

the

Rating

Column.

(b)

Biological

Detection

Rating.

The

Marine

Corps

has

not

fielded

a

biological

detection

capability,

so

there

are

no

AAOs

for

such

equipment

loaded

in

TFSMS.

Units

will

enter

"4"

in

the

space

provided,

until

the

Marine

C6rps

requirement

for

a

biological

detection

system

has

been

met.

(c)

Radiological/Nuclear

Detection

Rating.

Determine

the

number

by

averaging

the

radiological/nuclear

detection

equipment

ratings

from

the

Rating

Column.

(d)

CBRN

Detection

Rating.

Determine

the

number

by

averaging

the

CBRN

detection

equipment

ratings

from

the

Rating

Column.

D-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(6)

CBRN

Shield

Overall

Rating.

The

rating

is

based

on

separate

assessments

of

Ground

and

Aviation

CBRN

defense

equipment.

It

is

the

lower

of

the

Ground

Equipment

Rating

or

the

Aviation

Equipment

Rating,

which

are

described

below.

(a)

Ground

Equipment

Rating.

Average

all

the

ratings

in

the

Rating

Column

under

Ground

Equipment.

Compare

the

average

ground

equipment

rating

to

the

ground

equipment

ratings

for

the

equipment

identified

with

an

asterisk.

The

equipment

associated

with

the

asterisks

directly

support

individual

survival

in

a

CBRN

environment.

A

shortage

of

any

one

of

the

items

with

an

asterisk

will

reduce

the

overall

S-

rating

to

no

higher

than

the

lowest

asterisk

rating.

Enter

the

lowest

rating

from

the

average

rating

for

the

ground

equipment

or

the

asterisk

ratings

in

the

space

provided

for

the

overall

Ground

Equipment

Rating.

(b)

Aviation

Equipment

Rating.

This

equipment

is

managed

by

the

Navy

and

there

are

no

AAOs.

So

the

CBRN

equipment

required

to

support

aircrews

must

be

a

subjective

assessment.

If

the

Aviation

Equipment

Rating

is

lower

than

the

ground

equipment

rating,

the

lower

rating

will

be

entered

in

the

space

provided

for

the

Subjective

S-rating.

(7)

CBRN

Sustain

Rating.

Calculate

the

rating

column

for

each

piece

'of

equipment

and

determine

their

average.

Compare

this

average

to

the

sustain

equipment

ratings

for

the

asterisk

items.

If

any

of

the

asterisk

ratings

are

lower

than

the

average,

the

lowest

asterisk

rating

is

used

for

the

overall

CBRN

Sustain

Rating.

If

none

of

the

asterisk

ratings

are

lower

than

the

sustain

equipment

average,

the

average

is

used

for

the

overall

CBRN

sustain

Rating.

The

asterisk

equipment

directly

support

individual

survival

in

a

CBRN

environment.

A

shortage

of

anyone

of

these

items

will

reduce

the

overall

S-rating

to

no

higher

than

the

lowest

asterisk

rating.

(8)

CBRN

Medical.

The

Medical

Logistics

(MedLog)

Companies

are

the

only

units

that

report

CBRN

medical

readiness

while

in

garrison.

(a)

Calculate

the

Percent

On

Hand

for

each

item.

The

CBRN

Medical

Rating

will

be

the

average

of

the

three

items,

unless

one

of

the

asterisk

items

is

lower.

If

the

latter

occurs,

use

the

lowest

highlighted

rating.

(b)

Deploying

units

report

CBRN

medical

readiness

when

they

draw

their

Authorized

Medical

Allowance

List

(AMAL)

D-3

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

from

MedLog.

Such

units

will

subjectively

assess

their

CBRN

medical

items

when

deployed

to

a

CBRN

threat

area

and

enter

that

subjective

assessment

in

the

space

provided

for

the

CBRN

Medical

Subjective

Rating.

(9)

CBRN

Equipment

Rating.

Average

the

four

CBRN

Capability

Area

Ratings:

CBRN

Sense,

CBRN

Shape,

CBRN

Shield,

CBRN

Sustain,

and

CBRN

Medical.

Compare

the

average

rating

to

the

overall

CBRN

Shield

Rating.

The

lower

of

the

two

ratings

is

the

CBRN

Equipment

Rating.

Enter

the

CBRN

Equipment

Rating

in

the

space

provided

at

the

top

of

the

worksheet

under

Calculated.

(10)

Subjective

Ratings.

When

the

individual

preparing

the

worksheet

believes

the

calculated

ratings

do

not

accurately

reflect

the

unit's

CBRN

equipment

readiness,

the

Subjective

Ratings

should

be

filled

in

for

CBRN

Sense,

CBRN

Shape,

CBRN

Shield,

CBRN

Sustain,

CBRN

Medical,

and

the

CBRN

Equipment

S-

Rating.

The

unit

commander

will

decide

whether

to

report

the

calculated

or

subjective

ratings.

4.

CBRN

Defense

Training

(T-Rating).

The

CBRN

T-rating

is

determined

in

the

same

manner

as

the

T-rating

described

in

Chapter

5,

paragraph

4

for

all

core

METs

trained

for

CBRN

conditions

within

the

past

12

months.

Accomplishment

of

required

individual

and

unit

CBRN

training

will

be

considered

when

applying

the

subjective

rating.

5.

CBRN

Defense

Overall

Readiness

Level.

The

lower

of

the

CBRN

Defense

Equipment

and

CBRN

Defense

Training

ratings

is

used

for

the

Overall

CBRN

Defense

Readiness

level.

Provide

a

reason

code

from

Appendix

G

when

the

overall

CBRN

level

is

not

CBRN-l.

6.

CBRN

Forecast.

The

commander

will

state

in

the

remarks

a

forecasted

improvement/downturn

date

when

the

overall

CBRN

rating

is

less

than

CBRN-l

and

briefly

explain

what

is

required

to

return

the

unit

to

CBRN-l.

When

determining

an

improvement/downturn

date

is

not

possible,

state

so

and

provide

the

reason

why.

D-4

Enclosure

(1)

Appendix

E

Commander's

Assessment

Procedures

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

appendix

provides

reporting

procedures,

guidance,

reason

codes,

and

mandatory

remarks

for

reporting

the

Commander's

assessments.

Policy

information

on

Commanders'

assessments

is

contained

in

Chapter

7.

2.

Reporting

Procedures

a.

C-Level

Assessment.

The

five

C-Ievels

and

their

definitions

are

listed

in

Table

E-1.

Units

will

not

report

C-5,

unless

directed

to

do

so

by

DC

PP&O

or

a

Marine

Corps

Bulletin

5400.

Table

E-1.--C-Level

Definitions

C-Level

Definition

C-1

The

unit

possesses

the

required

resources

and

is

trained

to

undertake

the

full

wartime

mission(s)

for

which

it

is

organized

or

designed.

The

resource

and

training

area

status

will

neither

limit

flexibility

in

methods

for

mission

accomplishment

nor

increase

vulnerability

of

unit

personnel

and

equipment.

The

unit

does

not

require

any

compensation

for

deficiencies.

C-2

The

unit

possesses

the

required

resources

and

is

trained

to

undertake

most

of

the

wartime

mission(s)

for

which

it

is

organized

or

designed.

The

resource

and

training

area

status

may

cause

isolated

decreases

in

flexibility

in

methods

for

mission

accomplishment,

but

will

not

increase

vulnerability

of

the

unit

under

most

envisioned

operational

scenarios.

The

unit

would

require

little,

if

any,

compensation

for

deficiencies.

C-3

The

unit

possesses

the

required

resources

and

is

trained

to

undertake

many,

but

not

all,

portions

of

the

wartime

mission(s)

for

which

it

is

organized

or

designed.

The

resource

or

training

area

status

will

result

in

significant

decreases

in

flexibility

for

mission

accomplishment

and

will

increase

vulnerability

of

the

unit

under

many,

but

not

all,

envisioned

operational

scenarios.

The

unit

would

require

significant

compensation

for

deficiencies.

C-4

The

unit

requires

additional

resources

or

training

to

undertake

its

wartime

mission(s),

but

it

may

be

directed

to

undertake

portions

of

its

wartime

mission(s)

with

resources

on

hand.

E-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

C-5

The

unit

is

undertaking

a

CMC-directed

resource

action

and

is

not

prepared,

at

this

time,

to

undertake

the

wartime

mission(s)

for

which

it

is

organized

or

designed.

(1)

C-Level

Reason

Codes.

A

C-level

reason

code

is

mandatory

when

the.C-level

is

not

lor

when

the

Commander

subjectively

changes

the

unit

C-level

per

his/her

judgment.

The

"X"

code

for

a

Subjective

C-level

change

has

precedence

over

the

other

codes

and

should

be

used

first,

if

applicable.

These

codes

are

contained

in

Table

E-2.

Table

E-2.--C-Level

Reason

Codes

CODE

DEFINITION

P

Personnel

S

Equipment

and

Supplies

On-hand

R

Equipment

Condition

T

Training

X

Commander's

Subjective

Judgment

(Explanatory

remarks

are

required.

)

N

Not

Available

(CMC

directed)

(2)

Assessment

Correlation.

Use

Table

E-3

to

ensure

that

C-level

and

PCTEF

assessments

correlate

respectively

with

core

and

assigned

mission

capability

assessments.

Table

E-3

--Assessment

Correlation

C-Level/

Mission

PCTEF

Capability

Assessment

C-1

y

or

Q

.

C-2

Y

or

Q

C-3

N

C-4

N

C-5

N

b.

PCTEF

Assessment

(1)

Calculating

Resource

and

Training

Ratings.

These

ratings

will

be

calculated

in

the

same

manner

as

the

ratings

for

a

C-level.

Chapter

2

addresses

personnel

ratings,

Chapter

3

addresses

equipment

ratings,

and

Chapter

5

addresses

training

ratings.

E-2

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(2)

PCTEF

Levels.

Table

E-4

contains

definitions

for

the

different

PCTEF

levels.

PCTEF

does

not

have

a

level

S.

Table

E-4.--PCTEF

Definitions

PCTEF PCTEF

Definitions

Level

1

unit

has

full

flexibility

and

will

not

need

extraordinary

assistance

to

carry

out

mission.

2

Unit

may

encounter

isolated

decreases

in

Flexibili

ty,

but

vulnerability

will

usually

be

acceptable

relative

to

mission

criticality.

3

Unit

will

encounter

significant

decreases

in

flexibility

and

increased

vulnerability

may

be

unacceptable

relative

to

mission

criticality.

4

Mission

success

is

possible

for

certain

isolated

scenarios,

but

flexibility

will

be

severely

restricted.

c.

Core

and

Assigned

Mission

Capability

Assessments.

These

assessments

will

be

made

using

a

Yes

(Y),

Qualified

Yes

(Q),

and

No

(N)

criteria.

The

definition

of

that

criteria

and

the

guidance

for

assignment

are

contained

in

Table

E-S.

Table

E-S.--Mission

Capability

Assessment

Guidance

Assessment

Definition

Guidance

Yes

(Y)

The

organization

can

The

majority

of

the

METs

accomplish

the

mission

to

are

assessed

as

Yes

and

conditions

and

prescribed

the

remaining

METs

are

standards

assessed

as

Qualified

Yes

Qualified

The

organization

can

The

majority

of

the

METs

Yes

(

Q)

accomplish

the

mission

to

are

assessed

as

standard

under

most

Qualified

Yes

and

the

conditions,

but

this

remaining

METs

are

performance

has

not

been

assessed

as

Yes

observed

or

demonstrated

in

training

or

operations.

A

"Qualified

yes"

equates

to

a

"Yes"

in

that

it

sends

the

message

the

organization

is

prepared

to

conduct

the

mission

under

the

prescribed

conditions

and

standards.

No (N)

The

organization

cannot

A No

MET

assessment

will

accomplish

the

mission

to

normally

preclude

a

E-3

Enclosure

(1)

the

standards

and

conditions

prescribed

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

mission

assessment

of

Yes.

The

Commander

must

make

a

judgment

if

the

mission

can

still

be

accomplished

if

a

MET

is

assessed

as

No

3.

Mandatory

Remarks.

General

remarks

required

of

all

C-Ievel,

PCTEF,

core,

and

assigned

mission

capability

assessments

to

help

higher

headquarters

understand

the

organization's

mission,

readiness,

and

capabilities.

Remarks

specific

to

certain

assessments

are

listed

below.

a.

General

(1)

The

Commander's

remarks

should

explain,

in

succinct

and

easily

understood

terms,

the

"bottom

line"

assessment

of

organization's

capability

to

carry

out

its

missions.

This

is

especially

important

for

intermediate

commands,

which

must

not

simply

repeat

data

and

remarks

from

subordinate

units.

(2)

Identify

changes

to

the

unit's

tasking,

organization,

or

renaming

of

the

unit

due

to

operational

requirements.

EXAMPLE:

"3RD

MAR

REGT

REDESIGNATED

AS

SP

A.

II

\

MAGTF

(3)

Describe

readiness

issues

in

sufficient

detail

to

support

corrective

action

and

prioritization

of

resources.

Key

information

needed

from

each

Commander

are

resources

and

capabilities

needed

for

the

unit

to

be

a 1

or

Y

and

length

of

time

required

to

train

to

the

unit's

METs

once

the

resources

are

on

hand.

(4)

Intermediate

level

units

will

highlight

subordinate

unit

issues

and

shortfalls

and

state

actions

taken

to

assist

them.

b.

C-Level

and

PCTEF

Remarks

(1)

When

the

C-Level/PCTEF

Is

Other

Than

1.

Clarify

impact

the

resource

and

training

ratings

have

on

the

ability

of

the

unit

to

carry

out

its

core

and

assigned

missions.

(2)

Forecast

C-Level/PCTEF

Changes.

State

the

dates

when

the

C-Ievel

and/or

PCTEF

are

anticipated

to

change,

state

why,

and

state

the

predicted

level

(1-5).

E-4

Enclosure

(1)

(3)

C-5

Units.

State

why

the

unit

is

C-5.

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(4)

Subjective

Change

in

C-Level.

Identify

the

reason

and

provide

supporting

comments.

(5)

units

with

remain

behind

personnel

and/or

equipment

will

explain

the

impact

on

the

core

mission.

(6)

State

the

P,

S,

R,

and

T

ratings

for

the

PCTEF

assessment.

E-5

Enclosure

(1)

Appendix

F

Worksheets

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

1.

Purpose.

This

appendix

provides

worksheets

to

assist

with

assembling

a

readiness

report.

Their

use

is

optional.

2.

Personnel

Worksheet.

It

should

be

the

responsibility

of

the

unit's

Personnel

Section

(S-l)

to

provide

an

accurate

worksheet.

Guidance

for

completing

this

work

sheet,

Figure

F-1

is:

a.

Use

Current

Fiscal

Year

T/O

to

Determine

Structure

Strength.

Use

the

current

fiscal

year

T/O

from

the

TFSMS

to

analyze

the

T/O

and

document

correct

quantities

for

each

type

personnel

(TPERS)

(see

Table

G-3).

Enter

the

T/O

unit

identification

code

and

fiscal

year

on

the

worksheet.

b.

Determine

Assigned

Strength

by

Person.

Each

person

assigned

to

the

unit

will

fill

a

T/O

billet

per

TPERS;

for

example

30/165/1/5

means

30

MC,

165

ME,

1 NC,

and

5 NE.

This

is

the

Assigned

Strength.

Align

each

person

to

a

specific

T/O

line

number

by

MOS,

one

up

or

one

down

in

rank,

if

in

the

same

MOS.

c.

Determine

the

Unit's

Task

Organization.

Subtract

or

add

to

STRUC

and

ASGD

by

TPERS.

Enter

unit

STRUC

numbers

on

worksheet

with

the

geolocation

code

and

the

correct

STRUC

and

ASGD

mandatory

remarks.

d.

lAs,

and

JMDs.

subtract

these

personnel

from

the

ASGD

strength

only,

because

they

are

considered

not

available

for

deployment

with

the

parent

unit.

e.

Make

the

STRUC

numbers

the

second

entry

requirement

on

the

worksheet.

Then

account

for

these

with

correct

STRUC

and

ASGD

remarks

for

task

organization.

These

remarks

must

be

accurate

and

formatted

properly

to

capture

task

organization

impacts.

f.

Determine

the

non-deployables

by

TPERS

(Table

G-3)

and

the

reasons

codes

(Table

G-5).

Total

by

TPERS

and

place

in

the

Non-Deployable

column

at

the

present

location

code

(PRGEO) TPERS

locations.

Place

Non-Deployable

numbers

by

category

in

the

column;

Legal,

Admin,

etc.

F-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

g.

Determine

how

many

locations

are

active

for

training

or

other

missions

for

unit

personnel.

Make

the

appropriate

geolocation

Code

entries

for

affected

TPERS

under

the

first

entered

geolocation

in

the

location

column.

h.

Determine

how

many

of

each

TPERS

are

at

each

PEGEO

location.

Make

the

appropriate

number

entries

by

TPERS

for

each

location

listed

under

MC/ME/NC/NE.

Subtract

these

from

the

ASGD

totals

by

TPERS

arrived

at

in

step

"b".

Assume

all

personnel

at

away

locations

are

deployable

and

MOS

qualified,

subtracting

the

away

assigned

number

equally

from

the

deployed

and

MOS-Fill

totals

respectively.

After

all

locations

are

subtracted,

what

remains

should

be

the

correct

number

of

personnel

assigned

for

each

PRGEO

TPERS

"ASGD"

and

MOS-Fill

entry.

i.

Subtract

each

TPERS

non-deployable

total

from

the

remaining

PRGEO

ASGD

numbers.

The

remaining

number

represents

the

number

for

each

TPERS

category

that

is

entered

into

the

Deployable

column.

j.

Using

the

TPERS

totals

for

MOS-Fill,

subtract

away

location

numbers

from

each

PRGEO

TPERS.

The

remaining

number

is

entered

into

the

appropriate

PRGEO

TPERS

in

the

MOS-Fill

column.

k.

Add

each

column

and

determine

unit

totals

for

STRUC, ASGD,

Deployable,

Non-Deployable

and

MOS-Fill.

These

should

match

the

original

totals.

If

not,

find

the

error

in

math.

1.

Discuss

with

the

S-l

section

what

MOS'

have

the

largest

operational

impact

of

those

shortages

to

determine

which

MOS'

should

be

categorized

as

"Critical."

Enter

these

in

the

worksheet

space.

m.

Using

the

totals,

determine

the

P-Rating

(per

Figure

2-1

and

Table

2-1).

If

not

P-l,

determine

the

correct

Personnel

reason

code

and

recommended

mandatory

remarks

from

the

S-l.

The

worksheet

should

now

be

complete,

accurate,

and

telling

the

personnel

"rest

of

the

story.

"

F-2

Enclosure

(1)

Figure

F-l.

--Personnel

USMC

, ,,'.

,t'

\;,

,',.'

....

..

.

,"

t."

ITOTALS

CROSS

CHECR

"GURES,

ASGD

..

DEPLOYABLE +

MON

DEPLOYABLE,

STRlJ'C

=

Tic

C>I

OR

C-I

ADJUSTMENTS

MOS'S:

INOTE:

MJS

fill

will

only

include

personnel

which

possess

MOS

of

TIc

assigned.

SORTS MANDATORY REMARKS I

FOR EACH

RRPORT

WHILE THESE REMAIN

Attached

or

Detached.

Worksheet

.

'.

·'·'i

.

'-

....

\:'

Meo

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

..

:"

STRENGTH

.,

FILL

TOTALS

BY

TPERS

I I I I

NON·DEPLOYABLES

IMC

~

IME

NC

NE

··.··.·~I

Ex:

"INCREASED

OR

DECREASED

PROM

OR

TO

UNIT

BY

Me/ME/Ne/NE"

I.E.

INCREASED

2/15/0/1

FM

20

LAR

OR

"DECREASED

BY

2/20/0/1

TO

MSSG-22."

STRUC;

IASGO'

IpEGEO' Temp

location

by

TPERS

MC/KB/NC/NE

P-RATING:

(SORTS

Generated-

Fill

and

Sheet

is

CLASSIPIED)

INOTE,

K~ON

COOE'F.

T'T"

NOT

C-1.

, REKABK,

P<RE'

-

,.onOE

OETAHS

ON

REASON

lSI

.oR

(DO

NOT

USE

THE

REASON

CODE

DESCRIPTIONS)

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER DATE

3.

Equ~pment

Worksheet.

It

should

be

the

respons~b~l~ty

of

the

unit's

Logistics

Section

(S-4)

to

provide

an

accurate

worksheet.

Guidance

for

completing

this

work

sheet,

Figure

F-2

is:

F-3

Enclosure

(1)

a.

S-Rating

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(1)

Rollup

on

TAMCN

(ROT).

ROT

occurs

when

"S"

ratings

are

calculated

for

individual

TAMCNs

at

any

organizational

level.

For

individual

TAMCNs,

net

excess

(possessed

quantities

above

the

wartime

requirement)

is

subtracted

from

the

possessed

quantity

when

determining

the

numerator

for

calculating

the

"S"

rating.

Note:

Quantities

above

the

wartime

requirement

will

be

annotated

in

DRRS-MC

under

the

column

"EXCESS."

The

EXCESS

data

is

informational

only

and

not

used

to

calculate

the

s-rating.

(2)

Rollup

Across

TAMCNs

(RAT).

RAT

occurs

when

"S"

ratings

are

calculated

for

mUltiple

TAMCNs. When

calculating

"S"

ratings

across

TAMCNs,

excesses

for

one

TAMCN

must

not

compensate

for

deficiencies

in

other

TAMCNs,

since

including

excesses

would

artificially

inflate

the

"8"

rating.

Before

calculating

"S"

ratings

across

TAMCNs,

individual

TAMCN

excesses

must

be

computed

using

the

ROT

rule.

The

individual

TAMCN

net

excess'

are

added,

and

the

sum

of

all

net-excess

for

all

TAMCNs

is

subtracted

from

the

total

on-hand

of

all

TAMCNs

being

computed

to

determine

the

numerator

for

computing

the

"s"

rating

across

TAMCNs.

The

formula

is:

On-hand

minus

net

excess

divided

by

requirement.

(3)

The

second

step

is

to

compare

the

MEE

and

PEl

percentages

derived

in

the

first

step.

Units

will

select

the

S-rating

for

the

designated

MEE

or

selected

PEl

with

the

lowest

percentage

(see

Table

3-1).

b.

Equipment

Condition

(R-rating)

Computations.

Chapter

3

and

Appendix

B

outline

equipment

condition

calculations

and

associated

status

rating.

The

R-rating

is

computed

separately

for

MEE

and

PEl

items.

Computation

steps

are:

(1)

Subtract

the

total

number

of

dead-lined

items

from

the

total

number

of

possessed

(in

reporting

status)

items.

(2)

Divide

the

above

quantity

by

the

total

possessed

(in

reporting

status)

quantity

of

items

(see

Table

3-2)

.

F-4

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

(3)

Compare

the

percentages

for

MEE

and

PEl

derived

in

steps

(1)

and

(2)

and

use

the

lowest

one

to

determine

the

R-rating

per

Table

3-2.

Figure

F

2.

-Equi"m",.,t-

Worksheet

USMC EQUIPMENT WORKSHEET

ESSENTIAL

EQUIPMENT

(MEE)

TIE

AUTHORIZED (MEPSA) ONLY REPORT

AT

THE

Hqtrs

(PRGEO)

TYPE

ImpSA

MEPSD ImORC

,.

.~

IMBPrIO

. '( .

)TALS

ALL

TYPES

0'

'

BY

UN<T

MO'T

BE RECOROEO

AB'

>VE

"<T

AS

A MEQPT

10

CODE

fI:~

LIKE

ITEMS

TOGETHER

AND ADD

UP

UNIT

TOTALS

IN

MEPSA

AND

MEORC

COLUMNS

ONCE

TO

AID

IN

ENTRY.

ADD

UNIT

TOTALS PER

MEQPT

ITEM

ON

ONLY

ONE

LINE

ENTRY

END

ITEMS

(PEI)

:

TIE

AUTHORIZED:

(LM2-MEE=

PEl)

POSSESSED:

---

DEADLlNED:

---

PEI

SHORTAGES

PEI

DEADLINED

_,'f

..

-:'

TAMcH<±?/~1::

'l'/XiiAtlTHi'

OK-;'HANIi'~~'

D~~:m.x6

INoTE.

""

TEA,."

AND/OR

DEADLINES

WHICH

CAUSE

GREATEST

DEGRADATION

TO

UNIT

READINESS

C-RATINGS:

,-

___

R-

__

(SORTS

Generated)

IF

C-LEVEL ENTERED,

SHEET

IS

CLASSIFIlttl!

I

~~~:",

,E'RAT).

EQOIP

MEE

,

PE1_

CONDITION (ERRAl') ,

MEE

,

PEl

---'

NQTE.

MANDATORY

REASON

CODE

I~

~~,~NOT

C:l

::!::

I'

....

I

ESRAT.

MAKE

A

REMARK

~

~DED

DR

GIVEN

MEa""

,U

~OTMER

SDRTS

UN"

EXlIMPLE::

MEQPT

1IDJ. INCREASED 2 AAVC7

FROM

1/23

"""""'.

ESRES -PROVIDE DETAILS

ON

REASON

(S)

FOR DEGRADATION.

PEl

EQUIPMENT.

SHORTAGES

READ

TAM/TE/OH: " (DO

NOT

USE

THE

REASON

CODE

DESCRIPTIONS)

ARE

NOTED

IN

REMARKS

BY

lYPE

AND

NUMBER

REMARK;

2RRES • PROVIDE DETAILS

ON

REASON

(S)

FOR

DEGRADATION.

PEl

EQUIPMENT DEADLINES

READ

TAM/OH/DL: "

(DO

NOT

USE

THE

REASON

CODE

DESCRIPTIONS)

G·4/MMO SIGNATURE DATE

F-S

Enclosure

(1)

Mca

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

4.

CBRN

Defense

Worksheet.

Using

the

CBRN

Readiness

Calculator

will

greatly

reduce

the

time

required

to

determine

the

overall

S-rating,

eliminates

the

need

to

perform

manual

calculations,

and

provides

the

same

results

as

the

CBRN

Equipment

Worksheet.

It

is

available

for

use

at

https:

//

ips.usmc.mil

/si

tes

/

mcsccbrn/default.aspx

.

If

the

Calculator

will

not

be

used,

unit

CBRN

personnel

will

use

the

worksheet

in

Figure

F-3

to

calculate

the

CBRN

Defense

equipment

rating.

Apply

criteria

from

tables

6- 1

to

assign

the

rating,

and

use

codes

from

Appendix

G

to

provide

justification

and

amplifying

remarks

as

required.

; I

Ratin

CBRN Sense

CBRN Shield

F-6

Worksheet

I I

Authorized Serviceable Percent

Authorized

Enclosure

(1)

CBRN Sustain

CBRN Medical

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Serviceable Percent

Note

1.

All

Joint

Service

Lightweight

Integrated

suit

Technology

coats

and

trousers

are

being

replaced

by

the

Universal

Camouflage

pattern.

Therefore,

only

the

TAMCNs

for

the

Universal

Camouflage

pattern

are

included

in

the

calculator.

Units

will

enter

the

totals

for

the

two

old

pattern

AAOs

in

the

appropriate

Universal

Camouflage

pattern

Authorized

cell.

The

Serviceable

On

Hand

is

the

total

coats/trousers

regardless

of

the

camouflage

pattern.

Note

2.

Refer

to

the

appropriate

resource

area

below

to

determine

the

AAO/Authorized

quantity

for

this

item.

F-7

Enclosure

(1)

CODE

POI

P03

P04

P06

P07

POS

P09

Pll

P13

P14

P15

P16

PIS

P19

P20

P21

P22

P23

P24

P26

P27

P2S

P29

P31

P32

P33

P34

P35

P36

P37

P40

P41

PUP

CODE

S03

S04

Appendix

G

Readiness

Tables

Table

G-1

--Reason

Codes

PERSONNEL

DEFINITION

Casualties

MOS

Imbalances

Not

MOS

Qualified

Organization

Decommissioning/Deactivating

Organization

In

Rotational

Deployment

Organization

Recently

Activated/Reorganized

Personnel

Deployed

Personnel

Shortage

Personnel

Shortage-Arrnor

MOS

Personnel

Shortage-Artillery

MOS

Personnel

Shortage-Combat

Crews

Personnel

Shortage-Crew

Chief

Personnel

Shortage-Engineer

MOS

Personnel

Shortage

Enlisted

Personnel

Shortage-Enlisted

Combat

Crews

Personnel

Shortage-Ground

Officer

Personnel

Shortage

Infantry

MOS

Personnel

Shortage-Instructor

Personnel

Shortage-Instructor,

Air

Crew

Personnel

Shortage-Maintenance

Personnel

Shortage-Navigator/Observer

Personnel

Shortage-NCO,

(E-4

To

E-5)

Personnel

Shortage-NCO/Petty

Officer

E-5

To

E-9

Personnel

Shortage-NCO,

Staff

NCO

(E-6

To E 9)

Personnel

Shortage-Officer

Personnel

Shortage-Officer,

Naval

Flight

Personnel

Shortage--O-l

To

0-3

Personnel

Shortage

0-4

To

0-6

Personnel

Shortage-Pilot

Personnel

Shortage-Qualified

To

Perform

MOS/NEC/AFSC

Duties

To

Which

Assigned

Subordinate

Organization

Detached

Personnel

Shortage-Fuel

Shortage

Reserved

For

Use

In

SECRN

Field

Only

And

Only

When

Commander's

Judgement

Changes

C-Level

EQUIPMENT

AND

SUPPLIES

ON

HAND

DEFINITION

Aircraft

In

Storage

Aircraft

Not

Fully

Equipped

MCO

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

G-1

Enclosure

(1)

S06

S10

Sl1

S13

S14

S15

S16

S17

S18

S19

S21

S22

S24

S25

S28

S29

S31

S32

S33

S34

S35

S36

S37

S38

S39

S40

S41

S42

S43

S45

S54

S55

S56

SUP

CODE

ROO

R01

R03

R07

R09

R11

R12

R13

R18

R21

Aircraft

Operational

Loss

Ammunition

Unserviceable/Suspended

Awaiting

Critical

Modification

Equipment

In

Administrative

Storage

Equipment

Removed

Missiles

Inoperative

Obsolete

Equipment

Organization

Decommissioning/Deactivating

Organization

Recently

Activated/Reorganized

Radar

Equipment

Unavailable

Subordinate

Organization

Detached

Shortage-Ammunition

Shortage-Attached

Element

Shortage

Communications

Equipment

Shortage-Engineering

Equipment

Shortage-General

Supply

Equipment

Shortage

Repair

Parts/Sales

(Allowance

List

Item)

Shortage-Repair

Parts

(Not

Allowance

List

Item)

Shortage-Repair

Parts

(Mount

Out)

Shortage-Repair

Parts

(OPSTK)

Shortage-Secondary

Repairable

Shortage

Special

Supply

Equipment

.

Shortage-Stock

Supply

Shortage-Supply

(Marine

Corps)

Shortage

Supply

(Navy)

Shortage-Supporting

Equipment

Shortage-Test

Equipment

Shortage-Table

Of

Equipment

Shortage-Vehicle(s)

Shortage/Offload-Aircraft

Aircraft

Combat

Loss

Missiles

Unserviceable

Insufficient

Fuel

Reserved

For

Use

In

SECRN

Field

Only

And

Only

When

Judgement

Raised

Overall

C-Level

EQUIPMENT CONDITION

DEFINITION

Equipment

Condition

Degradations-Fuel

Shortage

Aircraft

Grounded

Safety

Flight

Aircraft,

Scheduled

Depot

Level

Maintenance

(SDLM)

Converison

Damage-Battle/Combat

Damaged/Inoperative-Aircraft

Arresting

Gear

Damaged/Inoperative-Aircraft

Catapults

Damaged/Inoperative

ECM

Damaged/Inoperative-Equipment

Meo

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

Commander's

G-2

Enclosure

(1)

R22

R23

R24

R25

R28

R31

R32

R33

R35

R39

R40

R45

R46

R51

R54

R59

R61

R62

R63

R64

R65

R66

R67

R68

R69

R70

R71

R72

R73

R74

R75

R76

R77

R78

R79

R80

R81

R82

R84

R87

R89

R90

R91

R92

R93

R94

Meo

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

Damaged/Inoperative-Equipment,

Communications

Damaged/Inoperative-Equipment,

Electric

Power

Generating

Damaged/Inoperative-Equipment,

Engineering

Damaged/lnoperative-Equipment,Fire

Control

Damaged/Inoperative-Launcher,

Missile

Damaged/Inoperative-Radar

Damaged/Inoperative-Radar,

Fire

Control

Damaged/Inoperative-Radar,

Search

Damaged/Inoperative-System,

Data

Damaged/Inoperative-System,

Missile

Fire

Control

Damaged/Inoperative-System,

Navigation

Darnaged/lnoperative-Vehicle(s)

Damaged/lnoperative-Weapons(s)

Equipment,

Obsolete

Equipment

Shortage

Installing

Field

Changes/Alterations/Modifications

Maintenance-In

Progress,

Extensive

Field

Maintenance-Scheduled

Maintenance-Unscheduled

Modification-Aircraft

Not

Mission

Capable

Maintenance

(NMCM)--Aircraft

Communications

Not

Mission

Capable

Maintenance

(NMCM)--Aircraft

Navigational

Not

Mission

Capable

Maintenance

(NMCM)--Aircraft

Instruments

Not

Mission

Capable

Maintenance

(NMCM)--Aircraft

Navigational

System

Not

Mission

Capable

Maintenance

(NMCS)

Aircraft

Utilities

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

--

Aircraft

Weapons

Control

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

--

Above

Organizational

Maintenance

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

--

Aircraft

Airframe

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

--

Aircraft

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)--

Aircraft

Communications

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)--

Aircraft

Instruments

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

Aircraft

Navigational

System

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)

--

Aircraft

Utilites

Not

Mission

Capable

Suppply

(NMCS)--

Aircraft

Weapons

Control

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

(NMCS)--

Organizational

Maintenance

Organization

Decommissioning/Deactivating

Organization

In

Rotational

Deployment

Overhaul-Aircraft

Overhaul-Weapons

Repair

Attached

Organizations's

Equipment

Repair-Electric

Repair

Equipment

Repair-Field

Maintenance

Repair

Lack

Proper

Tools

To

Perform

Repair-Organizational

Maintenance

Repair-Weapons

G-3

Enclosure

(1)

R9S

R97

R98

R99

RUP

CODE

T01

T02

T03

T04

TOS

T07

T08

T09

T10

Tll

T12

T13

T14

TIS

T16

T17

T21

T22

T23

T24

T2S

T26

T28

T29

T30

T31

T32

T33

T3S

T36

T37

T38

T39

T40

T41

T42

T43

CBRN

Equipment

Incomplete

Modification-Missile

Not

Mission

Capable

Supply

Overhaul-Missile

Or

Obsolete

(NMCS)

--

Missile

Meo

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Reserved

For

Use

In

SECRN

Field

Only

And

Only

When

Commanders's

Judgement

Raised

Overhall

C-Level

TRAINING

DEFINITION

Administrative

Deadline

Equipment

Deadline

Rate

Of

Major

Communications/Electronic

Items

Restricts

Training

Inadequate-Onboard

Training

Devices

Inadequate-Range

Services

Inadequate

School

Quotas

Inadequate-Training

Ammunition

Inadequate-Training

Areas

Incomplete

Exercise/Inspections

Incomplete-Firing/Proficiency

Tests

Insufficient-Crews

Not

Category

1

Insufficient-Crews

Not

Category

1,

Enlisted

Insufficient-Flight

Operations

Marine

Air

Control

Squadrons

(MACS)

Insufficient-Flight

Operations

Marine

Air

Traffic

Control

Unit

(MATCU)

Insufficient-Funding

Insufficient-Naval

Flights

Officers

Not

Category

1

Insufficient-Pilots

Not

Category

1

MOS

Imbalances

Naval

Aviation

Training

Operations

(NATOPS)

Qualifications

Operational

Commitments

Organization

Activating

Organization

Decommissioning/Deactivating

Organization

In

Rotational

Deployment

Personnel

Turnover

Excessive

Shortage-Amphibious

Shipping

Shortage-Crew

Chief

Shortage-Equipment

Shortage-Instructor

Shortage-Instructor,

Pilot/Aircrew

Shortage-NCO,

Senior

Shortage-Officer,

Qualified

Shortage-Personnel

Shortage-Technical

Skill

Personnel

Squad/Crew

Qualification

Low

Tests-Unsatisfactory

C-Level

Training

Incomplete

Training

In.complete-Air

Warfare

(ARW)

G-4

Enclosure

(1)

T44

T52

T55

T56

T57

T58

T59

T64

T68

TUP

CODE

TNA

TNB

TNC

TND

TNE

TNF

TNG

TNH

TNI

TNJ

TNK

TNL

TNN

TNO

TNP

TNQ

Training

Incornplete-Antiair

Warfare

Training

Incomplete

Special

Warfare

(AAW)

(SPW)

Meo

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Training

Incomplete

Subordinate

Organization(s)

Standyby

Status

Training

Incomplete-Teams

Training

Incomplete-Fuel

Shortage

Personnel

Shortage-Combat

Crews

Personnel

Shortage-Crew

Chief

Casualties

Insufficient-Flights

Hours

Reserved

For

Use

In

SECRN

Field

Only

And

Only

When

Commander's

Judgement

Raised

Overall

C-Level

CBBH

-

~BAIHING

CODES

DEEINI:I:IQH

Insufficient

Individual

Protective/Survival

Measures

Training

Insufficient

Unit

Mission

Oriented

Task

Training

Insufficient

CBRN

Team

Training

Insufficient

CBRN

Officer/Specialist

Training

Insufficient

MOPP

Conditioning

Training

Insufficient

Personnel

Completing

The

Mask

Confidence

Exercise

SHORTAGE

OF

TRAINED DEVICES/ASSETS

SHORTAGE

OF

TRAINED

NBC

TEAM

MEMBERS

PERSONNEL

SHORTAGE

NBC

DEFENSE OFFICER

PERSONNEL

SHORTAGE

-

NBC

DEFENSE

SPECIALIST

NON-MISSION

CAPABLE

DURING

RECENT

NBC

MCCRES/ORE/EVALUATION

ENVIRONMENTAL

RESTRICTIONS

ON

TRAINING

HIGH

TEMPERATURE

TRAINING RESTRICTIONS

INADEQUATE

TRAINING

AMMUNITION

-

CS

CAPSULES/GRENADES

INADEQUATE

SCHOOL

QUOTAS

NEW

EQUIPMENT TRAINING

NOT

RECEIVED

All

acronyms

are

identified

in

CJCSM

3150.02

G-5

Enclosure

(1)

CQIlE.

AC

DE

ER

NP

RD

UM

XX

CQIlE.

CA

CD

CJ

CM

CS

DA

DR

OP

RF

CQIlE.

CV

CQIlE.

NA

TB

TR

TU

TW

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Table

G-2

--Current

Status

And

Activity

Codes

ADMIHIS~BA~IYE

CA~EGORV

DEEIHI~IQH

In

Process

Of

Activating/Rebuilding

From

CADRE

In

Process

Of

Deactivating/Reducing

to

CADRE

En

Route

Active

ORG

In

CADRE

Status

In

Process

Or

Reactivating

Organization

Not

Manned

Or

Equipped,

But

Required

In

The

Wartime

Structure

Organization

Noneffective/NO

Assets

(Resulting

From

Hostile

Action)

QFERATloNAL

DEE:IHI~IQN

Actual

Combat

Civil

Disturbance

Contingency/Joint

Operation

(Short

Of

Actual

Combat/Combat

Support)

Organization

Performing

Classified

Mission

Combat

Support

Deployment

Alert/Redeployment

Alert

Disaster

Relief

Organization

Performing

Normal

Operational

Mission

(Short

Of

Actual

Combat)

*

(note:

Use

Only

When A

More

Specific

Code

Is

Not

Available)

Ready/Alert

Force

(Alert

Contingency

MAGTF,

Ready

MEU,

Alert

CBIRF,

etc.

)

MAINTENANCE

CE:e::IHI~IQN

Organization

Major

Equipment

~BAIHING

DE:e::IHI~IQH

RESERVE

COMPONENT

ORGANIZATION TRAINING

OTHER

THAN

ANNUAL

ACTIVE

DUTY

FOR

TRAINING

ANNUAL

ACTIVE

DUTY

FOR

TRAINING

FOR

RESERVE

COMPONENT

ORGANIZATION

UNDERGOING

TRAINING

ORGANIZATION

WITH

THE

ASSIGNED MISSION

OF

TRAINING

OTHER

ORGANIZATIONS/INDIVIDUALS

ORGANIZATIONS

WITH

PRIMARY

TASKING

AS

TRAINING UNIT

THAT

COULD

BE

TASKED

TO

PERFORM

A

WARTIME

MISSION

G-6

Enclosure

(1)

CQIlE

NA

TB

~BAIHIHG

DEFINI~IQH

Reserve

Componet

Organization

Training

Other

Active

Duty

For

Training

Annual

Active

Duty

For

Training

For

Reserve

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Than

Annual

Component

Organization

Table

G-3

--Type

Personnel

Code

Descriptions

CODE

DEFINITION

AC

USA

Commissioned

Office

AE

USA

Enlisted

CP

CIV

Personnel

CQ

CIV

EMP

(Non-US

Citizen)

CS

CIV

EMP

(US

Citizen)

EC

USCG

Commissioned

Officer

EE

USCG

Enlisted

FC

USAF

Commissioned

Officer

FE

UASF

Enlisted

MC

USMC

Commissioned

Officer/Warrant

Officer

ME

USMC

Enlisted

NC

USN

corrunissioned

Officer

NE

USN

Enlisted

NM

USN

Midshipmen

ZA

Foreign

Officers

ZC

Foreign

CIV

Personnel

ZE

Foreign

Enlisted

G-7

Enclosure

(1)

Table

G-4

--Deployable

Personnel

Deployable

Personnel

On

duty

in

a

billet

that

serves

the

overall

the

command;

to

include

personnel

attending

command

schools

Temporary

Additional

Duty

(TAD)

Fleet

Assistance

Program

(FAP)

Terminal

leave

voluntary

request

to

transfer

at

Service

limit)

Annual

leave

Deferred

hostile

fire

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

mission

of

local

FMCR

(not

Restricted

as

result

of

nonjudicial

punishment

Assigned,

but

not

departed

for

station

(PCS)

Insufficient

security

clearance

Exceptional

family

member

Request

retirement

Retirement

approved

(voluntary

request,

not

at

Service

limits)

Request

transfer

to

FMCR

Transfer

to

FMCR

approved

(voluntary

request,

not

at

Service

limits)

Request

resignation

Resignation

Approved

G-8

Enclosure

(1)

Table

G-5

--Nondep1oyab1e

Personnel

Nondeployable

Personnel

Medical

HIV

positive

Undergoing

level

III

alcohol

treatment

Sick

in

hospital

Mea

3000.13

30

Ju1 2010

Not

physically

qualified

(medical,

dental,

panorex)

Pregnancy

(after

determination

by

proper

authority)

Postpartum

(up

to

six

months

after

delivery)

Dental

Class

3

or

4

Physical

Evaluation

Board

determination

Administrative

End

of

active

service

(EAS)

within

7

days

Home

awaiting

orders

(PEB)

Mandatory

retirement

Terminal

leave--mandatory

retirement

Home

awaiting

administrative

discharge

other

than

for

expiration

of

enlistment

or

fulfillment

of

service

obligation

Unauthorized

absence

Absentee

or

deserter

Captured

or

prisoner

of

war

Missing

in

action

Sole

surviving

son

or

daughter

Hazardous

area

restrictions

Legal

Confined

awaiting

trial

by

general

court

martial

Confined

serving

sentence

of

trial

by

general

court

martial

Confined

awaiting

action

by

higher

authority

Involuntary

hold

beyond

EAS

as

a

special

or

summary

court

martial

prisoner

On

leave

awaiting

results

of

apellate

review

In

the

hands

of

civilian

authorities

G-9

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

Commander's

Call

Confined

awaiting

trail

by

summary

courtmartial

Confined

serving

sentence

by

summary

court

martial

Confined

awaiting

trail

by

special

court

martial

Confined

serving

sentence

by

special

court

martial

In

the

hands

of

military

authorities

Sick

in

quarters

Sick

in

dispensary

Under

investigation

by

military

or

civilian

authorities

Administrative/legal

hold

Light

duty

(1-30

days)

Physical

remedial

program

Temporary

limited

duty

Probation

Other

Undergoing

primary

MOS

training/school

Humanitarian

transfer

Humanitarian

temporary

additional

duty

Hardship

discharge

approved

lA,

JMD

Assigned

as

Individual

Augmentee

external

to

MAGTF

Assigned

as

Joint

Military

Duty

external

to

MAGTF

Table

G-6.--Percentage

Employed/Deployed

CODE

PERCENT

DEFINITION

0

5-15

Percentage

of

Personnel

Unmavailab1e

Due

to

E

16-25

Detachments

Assigned

to

Other

Unit(s)

(e.g.

26-35

F

MEU)

G

36-75

G-10

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Table

G-7

--Major

Commands/Reporting

Organizations

SEBYICE

lU.C

DE[IHI~IQN

CODES

JOINT

DJJ010

Joint

Staff

USN

NOOOll

Chief

Of

Naval

Operation

NOOO60

Commander,

U.S.

Fleet

Forces

Command

NOOO61

Commander,

U.S.

Naval

Forces,

Europe

NOOO70

Commander,

U.S.

Pacific

Fleet

USMC

MS4000

Headquarters,

U.S.

Marine

Corps

(HQMC)

M19000

I

Marine

Expeditionary

Force

(1

MEF)

M20000

Marine

Forces

Command

(MARFORCOM)

M20002

Marine

Forces

Southern

Command

(MARFORSOUTHCOM)

M2001S

Marine

Forces

Reserve

(MARFORRES)

M20020

Marine

Forces

Pacific

(MARFORPAC)

M200S0

Marine

Forces

Northern

Command

(MARFORNORTHCOM)

M20400

Marine

Forces

Africa

Command

(MARFORAFRICOM)

M20S00 Marine

Forces

Central

Command

(MARFORCENTCOM)

M20600 Marine

Forces

European

Command

(MARFOREUCOM)

M20700

Marine

Forces

Strategic

Command

(MARFORSTRATCOM)

M20BOO

Marine

Forces

Korea

(MARFORKOREA)

M20900

Marine

Forces

Special

Operations

Command

(MARFORSOC)

M20120

III

Marine

Expeditionary

Force

(III

MEF)

M20130

II

Marine

Expeditionary

Force

(II

MEF)

M30600

Marine

Forces

Cyberspace

Command

(MARFORCYBERCOM)

G-ll

Enclosure

(1)

AAO

ACE

ACGEO

ACITY

ACTIV

ADATE

ADCON

ADS

AMAL

ANAME

ANMCC

ARRDT

AUTODIN

BIDE

C-level

CADAT

CARAT

CARF

CATLIMIT

CAX

CBD

CBDRT

CBRN

CBIRF

CBTCDR

CD&I

CE

CG

CINC

CMC

CO

COAFF

COCOM

COMMARFOR

CONPLAN

CREAL

CREWA

CREWF

CRMRC

CRMRD

Appendix

H

Abbreviations

approved

acquisition

objective

aviation

combat

element

extended

active

duty

location

extended

active

duty

activity

current

status

and

activity

code

extended

active

duty

date

administrative

control

authoritative

data

source

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

authorized

medical

allowance

list

abbreviated

organization

name

field

alternate

national

military

command

center

destination

arrival

date

automatic

digital

network

basic

identity

data

element

category

level

forecasted

date

of

change

forecasted

category

level

change

~ombat

active

replacement

factor

category

level

limitation

combined

arms

exercise

chemical

and

biological

defense

chemical

biological

defense

readiness

training

chemical

biological

radiological,

and

nuclear

chemical

biological

incident

response

force

combatant

commander

combat

development

&

integration

command

element

commanding

general

commander

in

chief

commandant

of

the

marine

corps

commanding

officer

country

or

international

affiliation

field

combatant

commander

marine

forces

concept

plan

primary

duty

crew

allocated

primary

duty

crews

authorized

primary

duty

crews

--

formed

primary

duty

crews

mission-ready

primary

duty

crews

mission-ready

H-l

conventional

dual

CRMRN

CRMRO

CRO

CS

CSE

CSERV

CSP

CSS

CSSE

C2

C4I

DECL

DEPS

DETA

DEFCON

DEPDT

DEPLOY

DFCON

DIO

DISA

DL

DMDC

DRRS

DTG

DOD

EAD

EDL

EMBRK

EQCONDN

EQSUPPLY

EDL

ERRAT

ERRES

ESORTS

ESRAT

ESRES

EXER

FAP

FLAG

FORDV

FORECAST

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

primary

duty

crews

mission-ready

--nuclear

primary

duty

crews

mission-ready

--

other

command

reporting

organization

combat

support

combat

support

equipment

combatant

command

or

Service

command

combat

support

equipment

combat

service

support

combat

service

support

element

command

and

control

command,

control,

communications,

computers

and

intelligence

downgrade

and

declassification

deployable

strength

estimated

time

of

arrival

at

destination

defense

readiness

condition

origin

departure

date

deployment

status

defense

condition

drrs

integration

office

defense

information

systems

agency

distance

learning

defense

manpower

data

center

defense

readiness

reporting

system

date-time

group

department

of

defense

extended

active

duty

equipment

density

list

organization

embarked

equipment

condition

rating

equipment

and

supplies-on-hand

rating

(set)

equipment

density

list

measured

resource

area

rating

for

equipment

condition

primary

reason

r-rating

not

r-1

enhanced

status

of

resources

and

training

system

equipment

and

supplies-on-hand

primary

reason

S-rating

not

S-l

exercise

identifier

fleet

assistance

program

organic

unit

established

equipment

foreign

origin

forecasted

category

level

H-2

FTP

GAINING

GCE

GELOC

GCCS-J

GCCS-M

GCC

RWG

GCMD

GEOFILE

GEOLOC

GENTEXT

GMT

GSORTS

BQMC

IA

lAW

IIF

IFF

lMA

IMRL

INTR

JCS

JMD

JOPES

JTF

LABEL

LIM

LNAME

LOSING

MAGTF

MAJOR

MALS

MARDIV

MARES

MARFOR

MARFORCOM

MARFORRES

MAW

MCTFS

MET

file

transfer

protocol

gaining

command

ground

combat

element

geo-Iocation

code

MCO

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

global

command

and

control

system

-

joint

global

command

and

control

system

--

maritime

global

command

and

control

readiness

working

group

gaining

command

geo-Iocation

code

file

geographic

location

code

general

text

greenwich

mean.

time

global

status

of

resources

and

training

system

headquarters,

u.s.

marine

corps

individual

augmentee

in

accordance

with

individual

issue

facility

identification,

friend

or

foe

individual

mobilization

augmentee

individual

material

readiness

list

interested

command

joint

chiefs

of

staff

joint

manning

document

joint

operation

planning

and

execution

system

joint

task

force

data

element

label

category

level

limitation

organization

long

name

losing

organization

set

marine

air-ground

task

force

major

unit

indicator

field

marine

aviation

logistics

squadron

marine

division

marine

corps

automated

readiness

evaluation

system

marine

forces

marine

forces

command

marine

forces

reserve

marine

aircraft

wing

marine

corps

total

force

structure

system

mission

essential

task

B-3

METL

MOB

COM

MC

MCTL

MCGERR

MCO

MCREM-R

MCTIMS

MDATE

ME

MEB

MEE

MEF

MEL

MENAM

MEORC

MEORD

MEORO

MEPSA

MEPSD

MEQLOCN

MEQPT

MEREC

MEREP

METs

METL

METAL

MEU

MEU(SOC)

MJCOM

MMO

MODFG

MODLOC

MOS

MSC

MSGID

MTT

MWSG

MEPSD

N/A

NC

mission

essential

task

list

mobilization

command

marine

commissioned

marine

corps

task

list

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

marine

corps

ground

equipment

resource

reporting

system

marine

corps

order

marine

corps

readiness

equipment

module-

reserves

marine

corps

training

information

management

system

scheduled

mobilization

day

marine

enlisted

marine

expeditionary

brigade

mission

essential

equipment

marine

expeditionary

force

mission

equipment

list

major

equipment

name

major

equipment

operationally

ready

-

conventional

major

equipment

operationally

ready

dual

major

equipment

operationally

ready

other

major

equipment

authorized

major

equipment

possessed

major

equipment

and

crew

status

major

equipment

identification

major

equipment

- -

reconnaissance

capability

major

equipment

identification

report

mission

essential

task(s)

mission

essential

task

list

major

equipment

allocated

marine

expeditionary

unit

marine

expeditionary

unit

(special

operations

capable)

major

command

code

maintenance

management

officer

modified

location

flag

modified

location

military

occupational

specialty

major

subordinate

command

message

identifier

mobile

training

team

marine

wing

support

group

mee

possessed

not

applicable

navy

commissioned

H-4

NCA

NCO

NE

NEWLOC

NEWTREAD

NMCC

NMCM

NORAD

OPCON

OPER

OPLAN

OPTAR

ORGLOCN

OSD

OVERALL

OVRRD

P-rating

PCS

PCTEF

PEl

PEGEO

PERSONEL

PERSTREN

PICDA

PLA

PLETD

PM

PMA

PMAA

POINT

POSTR

PRRAT

PRRES

PRGEO

PUIC

R-rating

RAS-IT

RAS-OT

RAT

RDATE

READY

REASN

RECON

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

national

command

authority

noncommissioned

officer

navy

enlisted

new

location

new

type

report

national

military

command

center

not

mission

capable

maintenance

north

american

aerospace

defense

command

operational

control

operation

identifier

operation

plan

operating

target

organization

and

location

office

of

the

secretary

of

defense

overall

c-Ievel

override

sequence

number

personnel

rating

permanent

change

of

station

percent

effective

principal

end

items

personnel

geographic

location

code

personnel

level

(set)

personnel

strength

date

of

change

of

personnel

information

plain

language

address

estimated

time

of

departure

from

present

location

program

manager

primary

mission

area

primary

mission

aircraft

authorization

geographic

coordinates

possessed

strength

measured

area

level

for

personnel

primary

reason

p-Ievel

not

p-1

present

location

code

parent

organization's

unit

identifier

equipment

condition

rating

readiness

assessment

system

input

tool

readiness

assessment

system

output

tool

rollup

across

tamcns

release

date

from

extended

active

duty

current

overall

category

level

primary

reason

unit

is

not

c-1

reconnaissance

H-5

RBE

REVAL

RICDA

RLIM

ROH

ROT

RPTDUIC

RPTNORG

RPTOR

S-rating

SAR

SBRPT

SCLAS

SDLM

SECRN

SEQNO

SHIPLOCN

SIA

SIPRNET

SNM

SOCEX

SOP

SORTS

T-rating

TAD

TA

TIE

TARGT

TDA

TDATE

TDEPS

TDY

TEGEO

TERRN

TFSD

TPERS

TRAINING

TRANSFER

TREAD

TRGEO

TRRAT

TRRES

T&R

remain

behind

element

registration

validity

field

date

of

change

of

category

information

reason

for

category

level

limitation

regular

overhaul

rollup

on

tamcn

reported

unit

identification

reporting

organization

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

reporting

organization

field

in

rptnorg

set

equipment

and

supplies-on-hand

rating

search

and

rescue

subordinate

reporting

organization

security

classification

of

the

entire

report

scheduled

depot

level

maintenance

secondary

reason

organization

not

c-1

sequence

number

of

report

ship

location

site

of

initial

activation

secret

internet

protocol

routing

network

system

notification

message

special

operations

capable

exercise

standing

operating

procedures

status

of

resources

and

training

system

training

rating

temporary

additional

duty

training

allowance

table

of

equipment

targeted

command

unit

identification

code

table

of

distributions

and

allowances

effective

date

of

transfer

tasked

deployable

strength

temporary

duty

temporary

location

code

tertiary

reason

organization

not

c-1

total

force

structure

division

type

of

personnel

training

rating

unit

transfer

set

type

of

report

destination

location

measured

resource

area

rating

for

training

field

primary

reason

measured

resource

area

rating

for

training

not

at

c-1

training

and

readiness

H-6

TSOC

TTs

UDC

UDP

UIC

UIF

ULC

UNTL

US

USMC

USMTF

UTC

UTM

UTR

theater

special

operations

command

training

teams

unit

descriptor

code

unit

deployment

program

unit

identification

code

unit

issue

facility

unit

level

code

universal

naval

task

list

united

states

united

states

marine

corps

united

states

message

text

format

unit

type

code

Unit

Training

Management

Unit

Table

of

Equipment

Requirement

H-7

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Appendix

1

Glossary

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

approved

acquisition

objective

(AAO).

The

quantity

of

an

item

authorized

for

peacetime

and

wartime

requirements

to

equip

and

sustain

the

Marine

Corps

per

current

DOD

policies

and

plans.

assigned.

1.

To

place

units

or

personnel

in

an

organization

where

such

placement

is

relatively

permanent,

and/or

where

such

organization

controls

and

administers

the

units

or

personnel

for

the

primary

function,

or

greater

portion

of

the

functions,

of

the

unit

or

personnel.

2.

To

detail

individuals

to

specific

duties

or

functions

where

such

duties

or

functions

are

primary

and/or

relatively

permanent.

assigned

mission.

The

mission

which

an

organization/unit

is

tasked

to

carry

out.

Note:

an

assigned

mission

may

also

match

the

unit's

wartime

mission,

i.e.,

purpose

for

which

the

unit

was

designed.

Note:

PCTEF

is

the

assigned

mission

assessment.

assigned

mission

essential

tasks.

The

METL

tasks

developed

by

the

unit

commander

based

on

the

mission

that

the

unit

has

been

directed

to

plan

for

or

undertake.

assigned

mission

capability/readiness

assessment.

A

commander's

evaluation

on

their

organization's

ability

to

accomplish

the

mission(s)

for

which

it

was

tasked.

assigned

strength.

The

number

of

personnel

assigned

to

the

organization,

whether

they

are

present

or

not.

ad

hoc

unit.

A

unit

formed

to

perform

a

particular

mission

in

support

of

specific

operation

without

consideration

of

wider

Service

application.

attachment.

1.

The

placement

of

units

or

personnel

in

an

organization

where

such

placement

is

relatively

temporary.

2.

The

detailing

of

individuals

to

specific

functions

where

such

functions

are

secondary

or

relatively

temporary,

e.g.,

attached

for

quarters

and

rations;

attached

for

flying

duty.

authoritative

organization

(AO).

An

organization

with

oversight

authority

at

the

appropriate

level

for

the

organizing,

training,

and

equipping

of

a

unit.

Generally,

for

Service

units

this

is

the

Service

Headquarters;

for

Agencies,

the

Office

of

the

1-1

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

Director

of

the

Agency;

for

Joint

units

of

a

Combatant

Command

(such

as

Standing

Joint

Force

Headquarters-Core

Element),

CCDR.

authoritative

data

source

(ADS).

A

recognized

or

official

data

production

with

a

designated

mission

statement

or

source/product

to

publish

reliable

and

accurate

data

for

subsequent

use

by

customers.

Note:

an

ADS

may

be

the

functional

combination

of

multiple,

separate

data

sources.

authorized

strength.

The

number

of

billets

or

spaces

authorized

for

the

organization

by

manpower

documents,

a

joint

manning

document,

or

by

an

approved

DOD

budget.

aviation

support

equipment.

All

equipment

required

to

make

an

aeronautical

system,

command

and

control

system,

support

system,

subsystem

or

end

item

of

equipment

operational

in

its

intended

environment.

c-level.

The

C-level

reflects

the

status

of

the

selected

unit

resources

measured

against

the

resources

required

to

undertake

the

wartime

missions

for

which

the

unit

is

organized

or

designed.

The

C-level

also

reflects

the

condition

of

available

equipment,

personnel,

and

unit

training

status.

C-levels,

by

themselves,

do

not

project

a

unit's

combat

performance

once

committed

to

combat.

combatant

command.

A command

with

a

broad

continuing

mission

under

a

single

commander

and

composed

of

significant

assigned

components

of

two

or

more

Military

Departments.

The

organization

is

established

and

so

designated

by

the

President,

through

the

Secretary

of

Defense

with

the

advice

and

assistance

of

the

Chairman

of

the

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff.

Also

called

unified

combatant

command.

combat-essential

equipment.

The

primary

weapon

system(s)

or

Service-designated

items

of

gear

assigned

to

a

unit

to

accomplish

its

wartime

mission.

combat

leadership.

Tactical

leaders

who

provide

the

commander

the

leadership

skills

and

qualities

required

to

execute

the

unit

METL

and

project

combat

power.

Note:

Combat

Leadership

assessment

is

applicable

to

the

entire

unit

T-rating

assessment

and

is

not

tied

specifically

to

individual

METs.

combat

support

unit.

combat

support

to

the

Those

elements

that

primarily

provide

combat

forces

and

that

are

a

part,

or

1-2

Enclosure

(1)

Mca

3000.13

30

Ju1

2010

prepared

to

become

a

part,

of

a

theater,

command,

or

task

force

formed

for

combat

operations.

combat

service

support

unit.

Those

elements

whose

primary

missions

are

to

provide

service

support

to

combat

forces

and

which

are

part,

or

prepared

to

become

a

part,

of

a

theater,

command,

or

task

force

formed

for

combat

operations.

See

also

operating

forces;

service

troops;

troops.

commander's

assessment.

A

subjective

evaluation

by

commanding

officer's

on

the

unit's

ability

to

execute

the

currently

assigned

mission.

This

assessment

is

also

known

as

Percent

Effective

(PCTEF).

composite

report.

A

report

submitted

by

a

major

unit

providing

an

overall

assessment

based

on

condition

of

subordinate

measured

units

and

their

ability

to

operate

together.

core

mission.

or

organized.

thing.

Fundamental

mission

for

which

a

unit

was

designed

Core,

designed,

and

wartime

missions

are

the

same

core

mission

essential

tasks

(METs).

The

basic

capabilities

which

an

organization

was

organized

or

designed

to

perform.

They

draw

from

tasks

published

in

MCO

3500.26

,

Marine

Corps

Task

List

(MCTL),

which

serves

as

the

authoritative

Marine

Corps

pUblication

on

Marine

Corps

tasks.

core

mission

essential

task

list

(METL)

A

standardized

approved

list

of

specified

tasks

a

unit

is

designed

or

organized

to

perform.

Selected

tasks

are

drawn

from

the

Marine

Corps

Task

List

(MCTL)

and

are

standardized

by

type

unit.

critical

MOSs.

Those

specialties

that

directly

affect

the

unit's

ability

to

undertake

its

mission.

deploy.

The

horne

station

relocation

of

forces,

personnel,

or

to

meet

operational

requirements.

equipment

from

designed

mission.

Fundamental

mission

for

which

a

unit

was

designed

or

organized.

Core,

wartime,

and

designed

missions

are

the

same

thing.

detachment.

1.

A

part

of

a

unit

separated

from

its

main

organization

for

duty

elsewhere.

2.

A

temporary

military

or

naval

unit

formed

from

other

units

or

parts

of

units.

1-3

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

end-item.

A

final

combination

of

end

products,

component

parts,

and/or

materials

that

is

ready

for

its

intended

use;

e.g.,

ship,

tank,

mobile

machine

shop,

aircraft.

enhanced

status

of

resources

and

training

system

(ESORTS).

Automated

near

real-time

readiness

reporting

system

that

provides

resource

standards

and

current

readiness

status

for

operational

forces

and

defense

support

organizations

in

terms

of

their

ability

to

perform

their

mission

essential

tasks.

Establishes

a

relationship

between

resource

and

training

inputs

and

readiness

to

perform

a

specific

MET

based

on

standards

established

by

the

parent

DOD

Component.

(DODD

7730.65)

equipment

condition

rating

(R-rating).

A

rating

which

indicates

the

materiel

condition

of

the

organization's

on-hand

equipment.

equipment

density

list

(EDL).

A

unit's

list

of

combat,

combat

support,

and

combat

service

support

equipment

authorized/required

for

operations.

equipment

and

supplies

on

hand

rating

(S-rating).

A

rating

based

on

a

materiel

measurement

of

an

organization's

on-hand

posture

against

its

designed

requirement.

individual

material

readiness

list

(1MRL). A

consolidated

list

showing

items

and

quantities

of

certain

aviation

support

equipment

required

for

material

readiness

of

the

activity

to

which

the

list

applies.

individual

mobilization

augmentee.

An

individual

member

of

the

Selected

Marine

Corps

Reserve

who

receives

training

and

is

pre-

assigned

to

fill

individual

military

billets

which

augment

active

component

structure

and

missions

of

the

Marine

Corps,

Department

of

Defense

and

other

departments

or

agencies

of

the

U.S.

Government

to

meet

requirements

of

the

organization

to

support

mobilization

requirements,

contingency

operations,

or

other

specialized

or

technical

requirements.

in-lieu

of

mission.

A

mission

that

is

different

from

the

designed

(core/wartime)

mission.

An

example

is

a

tank

battalion

executing

as

a

MAGTF

headquarters.

in

reporting

status.

Aircraft

is

in

the

inventory

system

and

it

requires

subsystem

capability

impact

reporting

(SC1R)

documentation.

1-4

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

installations.

A

grouping

of

facilities,

located

in

the

same

vicinity,

which

support

particular

functions.

Installations

may

be

elements

of

a

base.

intermediate

level

commands.

They

include

Marine

Expedition.ary

Forces,

Marine

Expeditionary

Brigades

(when

deployed),

Marine

Expeditionary

Units,

Marine

Divisions,

Marine

Aircraft

Wings,

Marine

Logistics

Groups,

Regiments,

Marine

Aircraft

Groups

and

Marine

Expeditionary

Force

Headquarters

Groups.

interface

control

document.

A

memorandum

of

agreement/

understanding

(MOA/MOU)

established

between

organizations

that

outlines

intersystem-access

authorizations

to

applications

and

data

base

information.

joint

readiness.

The

combatant

commander's

or

Joint

Task

Force

Commander's

ability

to

integrate

and

synchronize

ready

combat,

and

support

forces

to

conduct

assigned

missions

Marine

automated

readiness

evaluation

system

(MARES)

It

is

a

command

information

system

with

an

overall

objective

to

provide

information

concerning

ground

equipment

status

of

MARFOR

units

and

selected

commands.

MARES

retrieves,

integrates,

and

processes

unit-provided

supply

and

maintenance

management

data.

It

reflects

the

actual

operational

status

of

reportable

mission-essential

equipment

(MEE)

and

principal

end

items

(PEl),

end

item

ground

equipment

possessed

(on-hand)

by

reporting

units.

Marine

Corps

total

force

structure

system

(MCTFS).

The

authoritative

source

for

unit

personnel

status,

and

used

to

determine

Assigned

Strength.

It

also

records,

processes,

and

maintains

personnel

and

pay

data

for

all

active,

reserve,

and

retired

personnel.

measured

unit.

Combat,

combat

support,

and

combat

service

support

units

of

the

operating

forces,

including

Active,

National

Guard,

Reserve

and

provisional

units,

apportioned

to

or

deployed

in

support

of

an

OPLAN, a

CONPLAN,

a

SlOP,

a

Service

war-planning

document,

or

assigned

in

the

'Forces

For

Unified

Commands'

document

are

designated

as

measured

units.

Provisional,

task-organized

and

"ad

hoc"

combat,

combat

support,

and

combat

service

support

units

of

each

Service,

combatant

command

are

also

designated

as

measured

units.

1-5

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

military

occupational

specialty

(MOS).

The

grouping

of

duty

positions

requiring

similar

qualifications

and

the

performanced

of

closely

mission.

1.

The

task,

together

with

the

purpose,

that

clearly

indicates

the

action

to

be

taken

and

the

reason

therefore.

2.

In

common

usage,

especially

when

applied

to

lower

military

units,

a

duty

assigned

to

an

individual

or

unit;

a

task.

mission

capability

assessment.

The

commander's

assessment

of

his

organization's

ability

to

accomplish

its

mission.

mission

capable

aircraft.

Aircraft

that

is/are

able

to

perform

at

least

one

and

potentially

all

of

its

missions.

mission

essential

equipment

(MEE).

MEE

are

items

of

equipment

whose

availability

is

essential

and

indispensable

for

the

execution

of

the

mission

of

the

unit

in

support

of

a

combatant

commander.

Items

designated

as

MEE

are

of

such

importance

that

they

are

subject

to

continuous

monitoring

throughout

the

DoD

Note:

MEE

is

reportable

in

MARES.

However,

final

decision

for

MEE

lies

with

the

Joint

Staff.

mission

essential

task.

An

activity

(task)

selected

by

a

commander,

deemed

critical

to

mission

accomplishment.

Essential

is

defined

as

absolutely

necessary;

indispensible;

critical.

mission

essential

task

list

(METL).

The

command's

list

of

METs

(tasks,

conditions,

and

standards)

considered

essential

for

accomplishment

of

the

unit's

missions.

MOS

fill.

The

number

of

personnel

matched

against

the

T/O

line

number

billets

by

MOS

(using

the

primary

or

secondary

MOS

but

not

both)

.

named

operations.

Named

operations

are

those

operations

designated

as

such

by

the

Joint

Chiefs

of

Staff,

e.g.

Operation

IRAQI

FREEDOM.

The

METs

for

Named

Operations

are

also

known

as

assigned

mission

METLs.

non-deployable

personnel.

Personnel

assigned

to

a

reporting

unit

that

are

not

physically

present,

cannot

be

present

within

the

prescribed

response

time,

or

are

restricted

from

deploying

or

employing

with

the

unit.

Note:

non-deployable

service

members

degrade

a

unit's

personnel

strength.

Non-deployable

personnel

are

identified

by

the

types

of

personnel

using

non-

deployable

codes.

I-6

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

out

of

reporting

status.

Aircraft

is

in

the

inventory

reporting

system,

but

does

not

require

subsystem

capability

impact

reporting

documentation.

partial

unit

deployment.

An

element

that

deploys

separately

from

its

parent

unit.

It

is

applicable

when

a

unit

deploys

only

a

part

or

portion

of

its

mission

capability

to

support

an

operation.

It

applies

to

small

unit

elements

that

are

not

registered

in

GSORTS

separately

from

their

parent

unit.

percent

effective

(PCTEF).

The

current

percent

of

effectiveness

of

the

organization.

Commander's

subjective

assessment

of

the

unit's

ability

to

execute

its

currently

assigned

mission.

Note:

It

is

referred

to

as

the

assigned

mission

assessment

in

DRRS-MC.

personnel

available.

Personnel

are

considered

available

if

they

are

assigned

to

a

reporting

unit,

are

physically

present

or

can

be

present

within

the

prescribed

response

time,

and

are

not

restricted

from

deploying

or

employing

with

the

unit

for

any

reason.

personnel

rating

(P-Rating).

A

personnel

resource

rating

determined

by

the

lowest

percentage

between

personnel

strength

and

MOS

fill.

possessed/on-hand

strenqth.

Total

number

of

military

personnel

physically

present

with

an

organization

(including

personnel

present

for

temporary

duty)

.

principal

end

items

(PEls).

Ground

equipment

that

has

been

nominated

by

either

DC

I&L,

MARFORS

or

supporting

commands

i.e.

LOGCOM,

SYSCOM

as

reportable

in

the

Marine

Corps

Automated

Readiness

Evaluation

System

(MARES).

PEls

are

equipment

whose

serviceability/operational

capability

do

not

undergo

frequent

inspection

or

can

not

be

readily

replaced

by

the

unit's

first

source

of

supply.

PEl's

have

been

designated

as

combat

essential

in

the

Total

Force

Structure

Management

Information

System

(TFSMIS),

and

are

of

sufficient

range

to

provide

an

adequate

measure

of

overall

equipment

status

or

capability

for

MARFORs.

provisional

unit.

A

Service

or

combatant

commander

directed

temporary

assembly

of

personnel

and

equipment

organized

for

a

limited

period

of

time

for

accomplishment

of

a

specific

mission.

1-7

Enclosure

(1)

MCO

3000.13

30

Jul

2010

readiness.

The

ability

of

u.s.

military

forces

to

fight

and

meet

the

demands

of

the

national

military

strategy.

Readiness

is

the

synthesis

of

two

distinct

but

interrelated

levels.

registered

unit.

Active,

National

Guard,

and

Reserve

forces

apportioned

to

CJCS/combatant

command

directed

OPLANs, CONPLANs,

a

SlOP,

Service

war

planning

documents,

or

assigned

in

the

'Forces

For

Unified

Commands'

document.

These

units

are

created

in

the

system

database

with

a

unique

unit

identification

code

(UIC)

and

a

basic

identity

data

element

(BIDE)

set

describing

the

unit.

remain

behind

personnel

(RBP)/equipment

(RBE).

Note:

Personnel

that

remain

behind;

mayor

may

not

be

in

a

non-deployable

status.

RBE

mayor

may

not

impact

a

unit's

ability

to

carry

out

its

designed

mission.

resource

ratings.

Three

criteria

on

personnel

and

materiel

resources

(P,

S,

and

R

ratings)

used

by

reporting

units

to

help

determine

an

overall

readiness

level.

s-rating.

reporting

The

equipment

and

supplies

resource

rating

used

by

units

to

help

determine

an

overall

readiness

level.

standard

depot

level

maintenance

(SDLM).

Aircraft

or

equipment

that

are

enroute

to,

awaiting,

or

undergoing

repair

at

a

depot.

structured

strength.

The

wartime

manpower

requirements

for

an

organization

shown

on

Service

documents

(TFSMS).

subordinate

unit

standards.

Those

criterion

that

reflect

capabilities

required

by

subordinate

organizations

in

order

for

the

higher

level

unit

to

perform

specific

tasks.

support

equipment.

One

of

the

two

major

MCO 3000.13 MARINE CORPS READINESS REPORTING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 3000

Navigation menu

Versions of this User Manual:

Views

Navigation