D DP3 Proceedings Nairobi2014 EN
User Manual: D-DP3
Open the PDF directly: View PDF 
.
Page Count: 53
| Download | |
| Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
SSATP Annual Meeting 2014 October 31 | Nairobi, Kenya SSATP Annual Meeting 2014 SSATP Annual Meeting 2014 Proceedings Nairobi, Kenya January 2015 The SSATP is an international partnership to facilitate policy development and related capacity building in the transport sector in Africa. Sound policies lead to safe, reliable, and cost-effective transport, freeing people to lift themselves out of poverty and helping countries to compete internationally. ******* The SSATP is a partnership of 40 African countries: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe 8 Regional Economic Communities: CEEAC, CEMAC, COMESA, EAC, ECOWAS, IGAD, SADC & UEMOA 2 African institutions: UNECA, AU/NEPAD Financing partners for the Second Development Plan: European Commission (main donor), Austria, France, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, Islamic Development Bank, African Development Bank, and World Bank (host) Many public and private national and regional organizations ******* The SSATP gratefully acknowledges the contributions and support of member countries and its partners. ******* This paper is a product of the SSATP. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the SSATP or the World Bank. The SSATP does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the SSATP or the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © January 2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington D.C 20433 USA. The text of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit issues, without special permission provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission to reproduce portions for resale or commercial purposes should be sent to the SSATP Program Manager at the address above. The SSATP encourages dissemination of its work and normally gives permission promptly. The Program Manager would appreciate receiving a copy of the document that uses this publication for its source sent in care of the address above. Contents Abbreviations _______________________________________________________ vii 1. Introduction __________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Context and Objectives ______________________________________________ 1 1.2. Participation in the Annual Meeting____________________________________ 2 2. SSATP Working Groups and REC-TCC ____________________________ 3 2.1. Urban Mobility and Accessibility Working Group _________________________ 3 2.2. Integration, Connectivity, Cohesion Working Group _______________________ 7 2.3. Road Safety Working Group __________________________________________ 8 2.4. REC-TCC _________________________________________________________ 12 2.5. Joint Session _____________________________________________________ 14 3. General Assembly ____________________________________________ 17 3.1. DP2 Progress _____________________________________________________ 17 3.2. DP3 Governance __________________________________________________ 18 3.3. DP3 and 2015 Work Program ________________________________________ 18 3.4. Miscellaneous ____________________________________________________ 20 Annexes Annex A. Program of the Urban Mobility & Accessibility Workshop _________________ 21 Annex B. Program of the REC-TCC Meeting____________________________________ 22 Annex C. Program of the General Assembly ___________________________________ 23 Annex D. DP3 Results Framework ___________________________________________ 25 Annex E. List of Participants to the Urban Mobility Workshop _____________________ 37 Annex F. List of Participants to the REC-TCC Meeting ____________________________ 39 Annex G. List of Participants to the SSATP General Assembly _____________________ 41 v ABBREVIATIONS AFD AfDB ASTF AUC CMA CoP DP2 DP3 DRC EAC ECOWAS FESARTA GA GIZ ICA IGAD JICA MDG NCTTCA OSBP PPP REC REC-TCC RTC SDG SECO SSA SSATP TFF UNECA UNEP UN Habitat WAEMU French Development Agency African Development Bank Africa Sustainable Transport Forum African Union Commission Corridor management authorities Community of practice SSATP Second Development Plan (2008-2011) SSATP Third Development Plan (2014-2018) Democratic Republic of Congo East African Community Economic Community of West African States Federation of Eastern and Southern African Road Transport Associations General Assembly German International Development Agency Infrastructure Consortium for Africa Intergovernmental Authority on Development Japan International Cooperation Agency Millennium Development Goal Northern Corridor Transit Transport Coordination Committee One-stop border post Public Private Partnership Regional economic community Transport Coordination Committee of the Regional Economic Communities Regional Trade corridors Sustainable Development Goal Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Transport Policy Program Trade Facilitation Facility United Nations Economic Commission for Africa United Nations Environment Programme United Nations Human Settlement Programme West Africa Economic and Monetary Union vii viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Context and Objectives The General Assembly of the Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP) was held in Nairobi, Kenya, on October 31, 2014. It was preceded by meetings of the SSATP working groups on urban mobility and on integration, connectivity and cohesion together with the Transport Coordination Committee of the Regional Economic Communities (REC-TCC) on October 27, 2014. These events took place around the first Conference of the Africa Sustainable Transport Forum (ASTF) on October 28 to 30. The Conference was sponsored by the SSATP together with the Government of Kenya through the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Bank and the United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UNHabitat). The proceedings of the ASTF are the subject of a separate document. The objectives of the meetings on October 27 were: Urban mobility working group: validate the urban mobility and accessibility policy paper prepared by the SSATP; REC-TCC: Reach a consensus among stakeholders on its role and institutional framework; and review the lessons learnt through the regional 1 integration activities of the current SSATP Second Development Plan (DP2), notably on the trucking industry and the transport observatories; Urban mobility and integration, connectivity and cohesion working groups: define the work program of the SSATP Third Development Plan (DP3) for 2015; and review the governance of the SSATP during the DP3. The road safety pillar of the DP3 was discussed in Addis Ababa in June 2014 prior to the October meetings. The outcomes of the discussions were presented during the General Assembly and are included in the proceedings. The objectives of the SSATP General Assembly on October 31 were: 1.2. Endorse the annual report of the DP2; Endorse the statutes and the governance framework of the SSATP for the DP3; Endorse the 2015 work program of the SSATP DP3; Illustrate the need to proactively drive the sustainable transport agenda and point out the critical roles of SSATP and its key stakeholders: the ministers of transport. Participation in the Annual Meeting Overall, 25 ministers and delegates from 42 countries, three regional economic communities, one African organization, the private sector, seven development partners and representatives from academia, civil society and NGOs attended the events during the week including the Africa Sustainable Transport Forum. Participants in the ASTF represented both the transport and the environment sectors. Participants in the SSATP events represented the transport sector with experts attending the working groups and the ministers and other members in accordance with the SSATP statutes attending the SSATP General Assembly. The list of participants is attached in Annex F. 2 2. SSATP WORKING GROUPS AND REC-TCC 2.1. Urban Mobility and Accessibility Working Group Urban Mobility and Accessibility Policy Paper The working group reviewed the urban mobility and accessibility policy paper prepared by the SSATP based on literature review, data collection in 20 cities, field visits in eight cities and stakeholder consultation. A first version of the paper was discussed during the stakeholders’ workshop organized by the SSATP in Dakar in December 2013. After the workshop, significant work was done in particular to structure the recommendations into a clear understandable and easy to use framework. The paper identified ten key issues that impact on accessibility and mobility in the context of strong growth of urban areas in Africa. 3 Recommendations to address these issues aim at achieving a vision of sustainable mobility and accessibility with well-performing transport systems in urban areas providing all inhabitants adequate access to essential services and social and economic opportunities, a key contribution to decent living conditions: 4 • Users and economic stakeholders have universal access to an efficient transport system, are aware of their rights and obligations when using public space, are conscious of the risks and effects of their travelling, especially those related to public health and the environment, and are provided with the possibility to participate/contribute to the development of the transport system. • The urban territory is laid out in such a way as to bolster accessibility, quality of life, economic competitiveness and social inclusion, while at the same time preserving natural resources. Urban form and land use minimize the number of passenger and commercial trips, travel distances; as well as all costs associated with transport infrastructure and transport services. • Public space allocated to mobility is equitably shared among the various transport modes, with particular care given to pedestrians and public transport services. In the developing areas of the agglomeration, enough public space is allocated for predictable increase in traffic volumes for all transport modes, and for parking needs. • Transport infrastructure (roads, streets, railways, bus-exclusive infrastructure, waterways, transport interchanges, etc.) allows for safe and efficient travel (continuity and fluidity), while at the same time preserving the surrounding living environment. Transport infrastructure is resilient to climate change. • Transport services are efficient and financially viable, and provide access for all to the entire urbanized territory, in particular for the most vulnerable users. • Safe and clean vehicles display low energy consumption and low carbon emissions, and reduce road safety-related risks to vehicle occupants and to all other users. • All above mentioned components maximize positive social and economic impacts while minimizing negative impacts, thanks to coherent, efficient and well-funded interventions and regulation ensured by knowledgeable and accountable public institutions serving the general interest. In order to give effect to this vision, the EASI conceptual framework for action has been developed to ground and guide public action towards enhanced accessibility and sustainable mobility in African urban areas. The framework integrates two main dimensions: the governance system and the urban transport system itself. Synthetized by the verb “Enable”, the first component of the framework focuses on the enabling environment for a sound urban transport governance system. The other three elements of the framework are “Avoid”, “Shift” and “Improve”, and they refer to the main levers of intervention on the urban transport system. The four elements are associated to the following set of objectives: • ENABLE - To establish an efficient and responsible governance system, capable of anticipating needs, guiding action and ensuring integrated management and development of the urban transport system. • AVOID - To minimize the need for individual motorized travel and promote public transport and non-motorized mobility through better urban forms and land use. • SHIFT - To increase or maintain the modal shares of public transport and non-motorized transport modes, such as walking and cycling. • IMPROVE - To improve the efficiency and safety of transport modes while minimizing their environmental footprint. The EASI conceptual framework is schematically presented below. Figure 1: EASI, a conceptual framework to steer public action towards sustainable accessibility and mobility in African urban areas 5 A set of 20 policy recommendations has been then developed associated to the framework aimed at policy and decision-makers in charge of urban areas and transport systems in Africa. With more than 40 participants, the working group confirmed the pertinence of the EASI concept and its applicability to urban areas in Africa. SSATP will now finalize the paper and disseminate it to stakeholders. The proposed work program for the Third Development Plan of the SSATP will focus on the policy recommendations proposed in support of the EASI concept. 2015 Work Program The working group identified priorities for 2015 within the 4-year program developed around the EASI concept. The program is built around a sub-set of seven policy recommendations selected based on their consistence with the vision underpinning the DP3, the mission of the SSATP, the field of interventions of the SSATP in the policy development cycle, and their relevance and added value in terms of most effective outcomes, best complementarity with other programs/initiatives and visible impact within the limited timeframe of the DP3. Reviewing the 4-year program, the working group commented that it may be overambitious and that it should be reviewed regularly and adjusted as necessary. The working group recognized that the four aspects of the EASI framework are important for SSATP but that the “Enable” component should be given priority in the early years of the DP3. In particular there is a strong demand for activities which strengthen management capacity. The following five activities were recommended as priority for 2015: • Develop and publish guidelines to support the establishment of an entity in charge of urban transport planning, management and coordination with all stakeholders. • Develop and publish guidelines to support the establishment of sustainable financing mechanisms for urban transport systems. • Develop and publish guidelines to support planning and implementation of efficient traffic and parking management. Knowledge creation Capacity Building • Guidance on the establishment of a multimodal approach to the development and management of urban transport systems (1-2 cities). Advocacy & Dissemination • Organize a conference and workshop cycle to build ownership of policy measures and support the dissemination of the guidelines and the results of research projects. 6 2.2. Integration, Connectivity, Cohesion Working Group The integration, connectivity, cohesion Pillar of the DP3 has three objectives: (i) promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation for corridor development at country and regional levels; (ii) develop capacity among institutions (RECs, countries, corridors, industry associations, etc.) for inclusive policy dialogue on regional integration; and (iii) promote efficient logistics services. The activities will consist of assessments and case studies, reviews of capacity building needs and capacity building support, dissemination of best practices and advocacy and support to knowledge application. The working group prioritized the work program for 2015 starting from the programs of the RECs and the corridor management authorities (CMAs), to ensure that policies developed under the DP3 will be then actually implemented through the ongoing programs. The second parameter in the choice of priority activities was the geographical coverage and the need to involve all regions of Africa to ensure sustained interest of regional economic communities (RECs) and CMAs. In particular, more consultation is needed with West and North Africa. The meeting also suggested targeting implementation of the pillar during a 2-year rather than a 3-year period. The following expressions of interest were received during the meeting: • The East African Community (EAC) has identified the need to evaluate the impact of the construction of the one-stop border post (OSBP) at Rusumo and Namanga funded by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). The evaluation ex-ante could be based on assumptions of improvements in terms of traffic and time and cost of cross-border movements. A more comprehensive methodology would be proposed including monitoring requirements to evaluate the impact ex-post when actual data become available after construction. • The Intergovernmental Authority on development (IGAD) reminded that SSATP had included support to the Djibouti corridor under the current Second Development Plan but no work was carried out. SSATP will contact IGAD to identify the specific needs and the support that can be provided under the DP3. • The Northern Corridor Transit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) would like support to integrate the load control charter outcomes into its observatory, and in its Strategic Plan. This is a continuation of the support provided to EAC and NCTTCA under the current Second Development Plan. 7 • EAC requested assistance in managing public private partnerships (PPPs) for road infrastructure development and also for performance-based contracting for roads. This type of activity is not included under the DP3, but the African Development Bank indicated that this is an area where it could provide support. While more work is needed to finalize the work program, the following guiding structure was agreed: The meeting designated a task force 1 to finalize the work program in consultation with the RECs, CMAs, AUC, Infrastructure Consortium for Africa (ICA) and regional organizations by mid-December. Policy and Strategy Formulation Regional Integration Institutions Review of Strategic Plans of Regional Integration Institutions Support Development of Corridor Management Institutions (several potential regions) Efficient Logistics OSBP: economic impact, reform and operations Continue Transport Observatory work Review practice of Economic Development Corridor (Nacala) 2.3. Regional Coordination / knowledge sharing (REC TCC) Reform , modernization and professionalization of trucking services Road Safety Working Group The objectives of the road safety pillar of the DP3 are to: (i) enable the African Union Commission (AUC) and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) to encourage countries to achieve the goals of the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety and Africa Road Safety Plan of Action 2011-2020; (ii) promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation at country level; (iii) stimulate good practice in Road Safety Management (Pillar one of the UN Decade of action) by promoting systematic implementation of the Africa Plan of Action; and (iv) better integrate road safety policy and pillar-based interventions in locally and externally funded road developments. 1 Barney Curtis (FESARTA), Stefan Atchia and Tapio Naula (African Development Bank), Olivier Hartmann (SSATP) 8 The activities will be concentrated in the following four main areas that are necessary to achieve results. Road safety policies and strategies Monitoring of Decade of Action and Road safety Africa Action Plan Road safety management Road safety in road infrastructure investments Results The 2015 work program will focus on creating knowledge, advocacy and building capacity to prepare knowledge application the subsequent years. The following table presents the 2015 work program based on the priorities expressed by stakeholders during the June 2014 meeting in Addis Ababa. Objective Enable AUC & UNECA to inspire countries to achieve UN Decade of Action and Africa Plan of Action 2011-2020 Road Safety goals; Results (i) Africa road safety action plan reviewed by the African Ministers of Transport to achieve the objectives of the Decade of Action (ii) African road safety observatory operational (iii)Regional road safety observatory operational in one REC (iv) Road safety monitoring and evaluation strategies and systems prepared in six countries Outputs Activities Knowledge Creation Advocacy / Knowledge Capacity Dissemination Application Building . Prepare continental monitoring Country analysis of reports on progress in the reporting status, implementation of the Africa road actions, and progress safety Action Plan .Prepare regional reports from Observatory reporting Observatory observatories system reporting system adopted Prepare community of practice COP reporting system (COP) reports 9 Activities Establish a continental monitoring and evaluation system Knowledge Creation Identification of data observatory needs Analysis and resolution of issue of data harmonization Establish regional monitoring and evaluation system Consultations with AUC, UNECA and others on choice of regions, host, role, structure and sustainability of observatory Prepare guidelines for establishment of a country-wide road safety monitoring and evaluation system .Assessment of road safety data management capacity of candidate countries Outputs Advocacy / Dissemination Consultation with stakeholders on the terms OR, structure and sustainability of the observatory Prepare guidelines for establishment of a country-wide road safety monitoring and evaluation system Knowledge Application Capacity Building Dissemination Guidelines for establishment of a country-wide road safety monitoring and evaluation system Objective Promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation at country level Results Three countries (including at least one city) adopt policies and strategies that are prepared or revised to reflect the aspirations of the Africa road safety action plan Outputs Activities Knowledge Creation Advocacy / Knowledge Capacity Dissemination Application Building Road safety management Road safety management capacity review for three capacity review candidate countries/cities Draft road safety policy Observatory reporting Reviews of road safety and strategy system policy and strategy for three candidate countries/cities 10 Objective Stimulate good practice in Road Safety Management (Pillar one of UN Decade of Action) by promoting systematic implementation of the Africa Plan of Action Results Increase in the number of African countries with fully empowered cross-sectoral lead agencies. Creation of a regional association of lead agencies Outputs Activities Knowledge Advocacy / Knowledge Capacity Building Creation Dissemination Application Review of the status on the Prepare capacity Consultation and creation of road safety lead development plan for dissemination agencies by countries road safety lead agencies Study to develop criteria for gauging the effectiveness of existing lead agencies Prepare policy notes on the creation of lead agencies Prepare guidance note on creation of a lead agencies regional association o Assist three countries create lead agencies Assist three countries raise the profile of existing lead agency to crosssectoral level Stakeholder consultations Stakeholder consultations Stakeholder consultations Assistance to countries to raise profile of their agencies Objective Better integration of road safety policy and pillar-based interventions in locally and externally funded road developments Results Internal guidelines issued by development partners on inclusion of road safety interventions in regional corridors projects. Guidelines issued by ARMFA to member countries on support towards road safety Guidelines adopted by Road Funds Guidelines issued by municipalities on support towards road safety Outputs Activities Knowledge Creation Advocacy / Knowledge Capacity Dissemination Application Building Review of the road safety Report on the review of Field visits and content of the transport pipeline projects beneficiary consultations pipeline projects (development partners) Preparation of operational Stakeholder guidelines consultations Development cooperation partners ARMFA and cities 11 2.4. REC-TCC The session reviewed the lessons from the recent SSATP work on corridor observatories and trucking services. The session also discussed the role and structure of the REC-TCC. Institutionalization of the REC-TCC The REC-TCC was created in 2005 with two objectives: knowledge sharing and coordination of regional integration programs. The meeting in Nairobi discussed the achievements in those two areas. It found that knowledge sharing was successful and beneficial although resource constraints forced to reduce over the years the amount of time allocated to sharing of knowledge in the meetings. On the other side, regional coordination was less successful because of the uneven participation of the RECs themselves in the REC-TCC, the meetings being more regularly attended by corridor management authorities, the private sector, representatives from regional programs and development partners. The meeting recommended in the future to strengthen the knowledge sharing aspects of the REC-TCC by disseminating information on regional integration programs and good practices across the stakeholders. Rather than organizing costly bi-annual meetings, it was suggested to use ICT to organize more frequent meetings based on the demand (webinars, virtual meetings, etc.) The following needs for further exchange of experiences were identified: tools for the transport observatories (SSATP Transport Observatory Guidelines notably); and experience of corridors and industry organizations in using the information from observatories in the policy dialogue. The form of webinars targeting a wider audience will be experimented for these exchanges. The meeting recognized the need for coordination, and distinguished two levels of coordination: regional, and continental. The RECs may give priority to the coordination within their own regions and not among RECs. Some RECs have developed successful coordination mechanisms, notably the EAC with MoUs with Corridor Management Institutions. At continental level, coordination exists through the Program for Infrastructure Development in Africa of the African Union Commission. The Chair of the REC-TCC was mandated to approach all RECs to discuss their views on the coordinating role of the REC-TCC, taking into 12 consideration that in itself, exchange and sharing of experience plays an important role in the coordination of the nature of the response to regional integration challenges across RECs. Corridor observatories Corridor performance monitoring is important to guide the policy dialogue and to improve corridor efficiency. Setting up corridor observatories provides the monitoring capacity but using the results of the observatories to further the policy dialogue requires in general the existence of corridor management institutions, which are not yet in place in some regions or for some corridors. Monitoring data can be obtained from two main sources. Data provided by public agencies such as ports and customs, or by private logistics operators are available continuously and can be used to analyze trends, to benchmark performance and identify issues. Dedicated surveys provide the additional information that is necessary for a deepened analysis and a detailed understanding of specific issues. This emerging dual model of monitoring is used by the NCTTCA. Reporting mechanisms can be used as instruments to engage with regulatory institutions as practiced for road blocks and delays by IRTG in West Africa or for non-tariffs barriers by FESARTA and Borderless Alliance. They can also feed into operational entities such as for the weekly meetings of the port community in Kenya or into policy agencies (Regional Economic Communities or corridor management authorities). Trucking Services The session illustrated how surveys are useful as an entry point for the development of trucking policies. Surveys enable a better understanding of the constraints for the operators, and the impact on their profitability, and therefore on costs and prices. In East Africa, the surveys carried out by the Corridor Management Authorities with the support of TFF-SSATP became the foundation for a dialogue between the East African Community, the Northern Corridor Transportation and Transit Coordination Authority, the government of Kenya and the trucking industry. The dialogue culminated in the signing of a self-regulatory axle load charter for Kenya with efforts underway to replicate the charter in other countries along the Northern corridor and other EAC countries. Similar surveys in West Africa are used to underpin the dialogue on the professionalization of the trucking industry in support of the programs developed by the West Africa Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). 13 2.5. Joint Session The joint session with both working groups reviewed the new governance framework proposed for the DP3. The framework has been designed based on the lessons learned from the mid-term review of the current development plan and reflects six guiding principles: ownership and inclusiveness, demand-driven program, focus on results, sustainability, transparency and accountability. In particular, as practiced since 2012, the representation of countries in the governance framework of the SSATP has been elevated at the level of Permanent Secretaries or equivalent in the Ministries in charge of transport. This allows inputs into the program from representatives who have the mandate and the authority to decide on policies and strategies in the transport sector in Africa and also provides a relay for the program to feed into policies and strategies developed by the countries. Other changes in the governance framework compared to the current development plan are an increased number of African representatives in the Executive Committee of the SSATP, an independent panel of experts to assess the performance of the program and the actual achievements compared to the objectives of the results framework, and the creation of thematic working groups to be the working counterpart to the SSATP team. The governance structure is detailed in the statutes of the program and is summarized in the following figure. Figure 2: Governance structure of the DP3 14 The roles of the various components of the governance structure will be: General Assembly: approve the statutes, endorse SSATP members, endorse development plans, work programs and annual reports. Outside the General Assembly, its members will also have an important role to champion the SSATP products as inputs into the development of policies and strategies. Members of the General Assembly will designate their representatives in the working groups. Executive Committee: approve development plans, annual work programs and budgets, oversee DP3 implementation and report to the General Assembly on activities of the committee and achievements of the SSATP. The members of the Executive Committee are expected to be the champion of the SSATP within their constituencies and also with other potential financiers of the program. Independent Panel of Experts: evaluate the results of the DP3 compared to the results framework and advise the Executive Committee on consistency between the vision, mission, strategic orientations and actual activities and results. The members of the panel report to the Executive Committee. Working groups: identify annual work programs, advise the SSATP Program Management Team at all stages of product developments from planning until completion, convene in-country/region events to present and discuss knowledge generated by the SSATP. The session also discussed the proposed changes in the definition of SSATP membership. Under the previous development plans, membership was based on the expression of support to the declaration adopted by the Ministers of Transport during the 2005 SSATP annual meeting. Under the DP3, membership is proposed to become the expression of an interest in the themes of the DP3 and a commitment to act at some level (from awareness creation to implementation of policies) in the policy areas developed by the SSATP. Membership means the right to vote in the SSATP General Assembly, to be a core member of the SSATP working groups, to benefit from SSATP support through the activities of the program and in particular during knowledge application and capacity development activities, and to attend SSATP events as sponsored participant. 15 Parties interested in becoming members of SSATP (and eligible in accordance with the SSATP statutes) would express their commitment covering the following areas: 16 confirm knowledge of SSATP mission and support to its mission; confirm knowledge of the DP3 and understanding of its goal: “efficient, safe and sustainable transport for the people in Africa”; identify specific areas of interest in the DP3; confirm understanding of the terms of reference of the working groups and commitment to contribute; agree to have an advocacy role or make use of SSATP products; and agree to define annually how the commitment is implemented in the area(s) of interest 3. GENERAL ASSEMBLY The General Assembly (GA) was a critical milestone for both the DP2 and the DP3 with the presence of 12 ministers and 25 countries. This was the first opportunity since the Bamako meeting in 2005 to have the ministers of transport around a table discussing the SSATP, countries being represented usually at the level of Permanent Secretaries or equivalent. The interest shown by the ministers and the pertinence of the comments and recommendations, similarly to the high level of discussions during the Africa Sustainable Transport Forum during the week, bode well with regard to the support from the countries to the policy agenda of the DP3 and their commitment to act and achieve results in the focus areas of the program. The GA reviewed the progress in the implementation of the DP2 during the past year since the 2013 annual meeting in Dakar, the governance framework and the statutes for the DP3 and the proposed work program for the DP3 in 2015. 3.1. DP2 Progress The GA endorsed the progress report of the DP2 with the following comments: The progress should be presented in comparison to the results framework of the program. This has been done in the 6-months progress reports and will be added in the annual reporting. SSATP should consider disseminating among its members products in the focus areas of the SSATP but originating outside the program. This would be indeed the objective of the SSATP Community of Practice launched prior to the October annual meeting. The islands members of the Indian Ocean Commission requested a better integration with the SSATP. SSATP will explore with the members of the commission how to respond to this request. 17 3.2. SSATP should provide support to SSATP representatives in the General Assembly and the working groups to carry out country/regional activities which result from being members of the SSATP.SSATP should consider playing a role in the monitoring and evaluation of results of policies promoted by the SSATP. Results are indeed the measure of the relevance of the SSATP and the policies it promotes. Implementation of the recommendation will be discussed within the working groups. DP3 Governance The GA endorsed the proposed governance framework for the DP3 and the SSATP statutes with the following comments: 3.3. Ownership of the SSATP is critical for the success of the program. SSATP should work with the countries to increase the institutional anchorage of the program in the countries. Linking this recommendation to the sustainability guiding principle of the SSATP, this institutional anchorage should use as much as possible coordination mechanisms which may exist already in the focus areas of the SSATP. This is the case in many countries with trade facilitation committees which could become the coordination committee for the integration, connectivity and cohesion pillar of the DP3. In the road safety area, many countries have also such coordination mechanisms. In the urban mobility area, an objective of the DP3 is to strengthen coordination which if often weak. This recommendation will be included in the agenda of the SSATP working groups. Answering to a question from one country, the SSATP team clarified that each member of the General Assembly designates her or his representatives in the working groups. DP3 and 2015 Work Program The GA endorsed the preliminary work program for the DP3 during 2015. Some additional work is required and the SSATP team will consult with the working groups in the coming months to finalize the list of activities. One participant commented on the importance of Monitoring and Evaluation, in particular the progress in the policy areas of the DP3 beyond the countries or regions where SSATP is directly involved, and recommended to replicate the M&E activities of the road safety pillar in the two other pillars of the DP3. In response to other comments, the SSATP management team confirmed that the integration, connectivity and cohesion pillar includes 18 activities to promote efficient logistics in addition to the work on the management and institutional aspects of corridors. One participant commented that the countries are experiencing capacity constraints at policy level following road sector reforms in the past and that SSATP could advise countries on how to rebuild this capacity. The team also confirmed that the geographic scope of the pillar will be established based on the demands received from the countries and regional institutions. The relationship between the Africa Sustainable Transport Forum (ASTF) and the SSATP should be clarified as both cover similar areas. The institutional framework for the ASTF is being finalized and this should help clarify the role that SSATP can play in support of the forum. Participants requested to receive the final version of the results framework of the DP3 as elements were still discussed during the working groups at the beginning of the week. The framework is provided in Annex D to the proceedings. Box 1: Road management and rural transport The question was asked about the absence of road management and rural transport in the DP3, two areas where SSATP has been heavily involved in the past. The SSATP Program Manager explained that the decision had been taken during the DP2 to give the leadership to the African organizations in these sectors. As the policy principles in both areas are well defined, the added value for continuing SSATP involvement in policy development in road management and rural transport is relatively low compared to the focus areas of the DP3 where SSATP can have a greater transformational impact. However, the SSATP Program Manager recognized that the institutional memory of the road management reforms is starting to disappear, that some countries are questioning the rationale for the institutional framework that resulted from the reforms and that a new advocacy effort should take place to avoid a reversal of the reforms. This should be accompanied by efforts to build capacity in the Ministries in charge of roads in the area of policy development as this has often been ignored at the time reforms were implemented. Similarly, the road management institutions should start a new round of reforms to improve their performance as some may be gradually operating in a routine mode closer to the bureaucracies that they were supposed to replace. The time has come to modernize these institutions with a greater emphasis on good governance, transparency and accountability, and more modern management methods. The SSATP Program Manager expressed the concern that the rural transport policy principles developed by the SSATP have been adopted in a few countries only in Africa. As a result, most countries don’t have appropriate rural transport policies and poor rural accessibility remains a critical obstacle to economic development, touching the poorest populations in the countries and in particular women. There is a need to understand why these policy principles are not adopted and what actions need to be taken to make actual progress in the rural transport policy area. SSATP would be interested to contribute to the reflection if countries are willing to launch an initiative in this area. The Second Africa Access Program being launched by DFID may be the opportunity for such initiative. 19 In terms of timetable, the DP3 is expected to be launched during the second quarter of 2015 after the closing of the DP2 and implementation to start mid-2015. Several participants confirmed their support to the SSATP and expressed their intention to capitalize on the SSATP work at country or regional level. As a demonstration of this commitment, five countries volunteered to become champions in the following two areas of the DP3: • Urban mobility: Senegal, Nigeria and Côte d’Ivoire; • Road safety: Lesotho and Cameroon. The SSATP management team will contact the champions and coordinate with them the launching of the DP3. Further contacts will be taken with the members of the integration, connectivity, cohesion working group as part of the process to finalize the work program of this pillar. 3.4. Miscellaneous The General Assembly welcomed Tunisia as the 40th member of the SSATP. The SSATP Program Manager explained that the decision to hold the General Assembly in Kenya was taken to have a synergy with the ASTF in addition to reducing costs. This gave the opportunity to members of the SSATP working groups to attend the ASTF and at the same time to the ASTF to reach a larger community of transport practitioners. This is the reason why the General Assembly did not take place in Nigeria who, in 2013 in Dakar, volunteered to host the GA in 2014 and confirmed their expression of interest later. For 2015, no decision on the location of the General Assembly has been taken. This will be coordinated with the ASTF, potential other events with the option also of being organized separately. 20 ANNEXES Annex A. Program of the Urban Mobility & Accessibility Workshop MONDAY OCTOBER 27 9 :30 am Introduction and Welcome Plenary Session Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 9:45am Session I: Presentation of the policy paper on urban mobility andaccessibility in urban areas in Africa Martin Stucki, Transitec 10 :15am Session 2: Introduction to the discussions Roger Gorham, World Bank Session 3: Plenary Session: Policy recommendations and strategic options (four half hour sessions) 10 :30am Roger Gorham, World Bank Martin Stucki, Transitec 12:30pm Lunch break Session 4: Strategy for the urban mobility and accessibility pillar of the DP3 Roger Gorham, World Bank 2:00pm Session 5: Identification of priorities for 2015 – Designation of pillar champion(s) Roger Gorham, World Bank Plenary session with the Transport Coordination Committee of the Regional Economic Communities 3:30pm Session 6: DP3 governance terms of reference of working groups and countries ‘ commitment Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 4:15pm Closing and conclusions Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 21 Annex B. Program of the REC-TCC Meeting 9 :30 am Introduction and Welcome Plenary Session Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 9:45am Session I: Role of the REC-TCC Stefan Atchia, African Development Bank 10 :45am Session 2: Transport Observatories Aloys Rusagara, , Northern Corridor Transit and Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Session 3: Trucking Services Edy Kokouvi Anthony, Abidjan-Lagos Coordination Organization 11 :45am Barney Curtis, FESARTA Aloys Rusagara, NCTTA Olivier Hartmann, SSATP 12:30pm Lunch break Session 4: Strategy for the integration, connectivity, cohesion pillar of the DP3 Olivier Hartmann, SSATP 2:00pm 22 Session 5: Identification of priorities for 2015 – Designation of pillar champion(s) Olivier Hartmann, World Bank Plenary session with SSATP Urban Mobility and Accessibility Working Group 3:30pm Session 6: Governance of DP3 REC’s Commitment Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 4:15pm Closing and conclusions Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager Annex C. Program of the General Assembly Introduction and Welcome Mr. Nduva Muli, Principal Secretary, State Department for Transport, Ministry of Transport, Kenya 9 :30 am Jean Kizito Kabanguka, Acting Chair of the SSATP Board, Manager of the Transport Department (Central & West Africa), African Development Bank Paolo Cicarelli, Representative of SSATP donors Head of Unit – Water, Energy, Infrastructure, European Commission Supee Teravaninthorn, World Bank Representative, Host of the SSATP Practice Manager, Transport and ICT Global Practice, World Bank 10:00am Presentation of DP2 Annual Report Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager 10 :30am SSATP Statutes and Governance Framework for the DP3 Jean-Noel Guillossou, SSATP Program Manager SSATP Work Program Rapporteurs 11 :30am Transport Coordination Committee of the Regional Economic communities SSATP Working Group on Road Safety SSATP Working Group on Urban Mobility and Accessibility 12:30pm Lunch break 2:00pm Ministerial Session: The Path to Success H.E. Engineer Michael Kamau, Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure, Ministry of Transport, Kenya 3:00pm Closing and conclusions Tour de table from donors Next General Assembly H.E. Engineer Michael Kamau, Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure, Ministry of Transport, Kenya 23 Annex D. DP3 Results Framework Pillar A – Integration, Connectivity and Cohesion Objective/Outcome Promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation for corridor development at country and regional levels Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Risk: No downstream implementation of strategies Continental Free Trade Agreements (CFTA) Indicators Mitigation: partnership with development partners Intermediate Outcome 1 2 Consensus built on the strategic orientations for integrated corridor development Consensus built on strategic orientations for performance based corridor development plans Indicators 3 One REC having adopted a holistic and multimodal approach in planning and executing integrated corridor development 4 One REC having adopted strategies for performance-based corridor development Means of Verification RECs, Countries and Corridor decisions Risks and Mitigation Risk: SSATP resources will be too limited to fund application of concept of integrated corridor development. Mitigation: Partnership with development partners; careful targeting of RECs/countries based on commitment and readiness Risk: Lack of inclusive policy dialogue on corridor performance Mitigation: Activities related to objective 2 Outputs Assessment of corridor development approaches in Africa/review of REC/corridor strategic development plans Preparation of technical notes on knowledge gaps, assessment and dissemination of experience and good practices and promotion of integrated corridor development and performance-based corridor development Program to promote integrated corridor development and performance-based corridor development Indicators Assessment of strategic plans in RECs and corridor authorities carried out Case study of integrated corridor development in Africa Review of international good practices Stakeholders’ meetings to advocate integrated corridor development and performancebased corridor development approaches Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation SSATP Publications and progress reports 25 Objective/Outcome Develop capacity among institutions2 for inclusive policy dialogue on regional integration Indicators One institution meeting capacity criteria (must be sustainable, inclusive, and have monitoring and diagnosis tools) Means of Verification Institution Charters Risks and Mitigation Risk: Formal existence but no real means for implementation Mitigation: capacity building Intermediate Outcome 1. Capacity building to ensure that institutions are: sustainable, inclusive, and have adequate monitoring and diagnosis tools. 2. Continental framework for cooperation in place through the REC-TCC Capacity development plan prepared in one institution including financing framework with composition of institution reflecting diversity of stakeholders (control agencies / logistics operators, traders / agricultural producers, CSO) Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Budget of the institutions Risk: Lack of political will Decision of the institutions Capacity of the Governments to contribute to institutions Transport Observatories Reports Mitigation: Advocacy Indicators on corridor performance published One institution has agreed to host the REC-TCC Capacity review of regional integration institutions, including funding needs and ways to involve stakeholders Decision Outputs Assistance for establishment and expansion of Transport Observatories Support to regional coordination mechanism Indicators Means of Verification Capacity review and capacity development plan approved by one institution with funding framework for the institution identified and strategies prepared to engage, involve and inform stakeholders Two Regional Economic Communities with unit created with corridor performance monitoring responsibility Study report 2 REC-TCC meetings per year during four years Report from RECs/corridor authorities 2 Risks and Mitigation Decision by the institution Institutions refer to RECs, Corridor authority, National Facilitation Committees (aligned on a corridor), Industry associations (national or regional federations 26 Objective/Outcome Promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation for corridor development at country and regional levels Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Risk: No downstream implementation of strategies Continental Free Trade Agreements (CFTA) Indicators Mitigation: partnership with development partners Intermediate Outcome 5 6 Consensus built on the strategic orientations for integrated corridor development Consensus built on strategic orientations for performance based corridor development plans 7 One REC having adopted a holistic and multimodal approach in planning and executing integrated corridor development 8 One REC having adopted strategies for performance-based corridor development Indicators Means of Verification RECs, Countries and Corridor decisions Risks and Mitigation Risk: SSATP resources will be too limited to fund application of concept of integrated corridor development. Mitigation: Partnership with development partners; careful targeting of RECs/countries based on commitment and readiness Risk: Lack of inclusive policy dialogue on corridor performance Mitigation: Activities related to objective 2 Outputs Assessment of corridor development approaches in Africa/review of REC/corridor strategic development plans Preparation of technical notes on knowledge gaps, assessment and dissemination of experience and good practices and promotion of integrated corridor development and performance-based corridor development Program to promote integrated corridor development and performance-based corridor development Indicators Assessment of strategic plans in RECs and corridor authorities carried out Case study of integrated corridor development in Africa Review of international good practices Stakeholders’ meetings to advocate integrated corridor development and performancebased corridor development approaches Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation SSATP Publications and progress reports 27 Objective/Outcome Promote efficient logistics services Indicators Decrease of total logistic cost on selected corridors Means of Verification Data collected by Transport Observatories Risks and Mitigation Risk: Increase in input costs may distort the results Mitigation: adjust with evolution of prices Intermediate Outcome Regulatory framework in place per type of logistic service: Trucking services C&F Terminal operators Rural logistics Railways Inland waterways Control agencies (Customs) Single Windows Indicators Number of countries having adopted revised regulatory framework Means of Verification RECs / Countries gazettes Risks and Mitigation Risk: Reluctance of operators / agencies to revise regulatory framework Mitigation: Political economy analysis assessing willingness / identifying champions to initiate reform Advocacy work on the cost of inaction Outputs A case study for each type of logistics service:: 1. Analysis of the problems 2. Preparation of reform scenarios and review of options 3. Quantification of the cost of inaction 4. Political Economy analysis 5. Assessment of capacity development / training needs for operators Indicators Three case studies carried out. Each case study covers: Analysis of the problems Preparation of reform scenarios and review of options Quantification of the cost of inaction Political Economy analysis Assessment of capacity development/training needs for operators 28 Means of Verification Decisions from REC/countries Risks and Mitigation Pillar B – Urban Transport and Mobility Pillar B is based on the urban mobility and accessibility policy developed during the SSATP Second Development Plan. The goal of the policy is the transport target to support Sustainable Development Goal 11 - Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. While the policy has four objectives (Enable/Avoid/Shift/Improve), countries and municipalities are expected to adopt a holistic approach and implement all aspects of the policy. As a result, indicators were not identified for each objective of the policy but will measure how the policy as a whole is adopted and implemented. Objective/Outcome Secure universal access by sustainable transport for urban populations by 2030 Indicators As defined in the SDGs Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation United Nations report on progress in achieving the SDGs Intermediate Outcome ENABLE ‐ National and urban decision makers and technical staff aim at adopting, and are capable of putting in place sustainable urban transport planning, monitoring, coordination, and financing mechanisms AVOID - Urban decision makers and technical staff have knowledge of and start to apply urban forms that minimize the need for motorized transport and favor public and non-motorized transport SHIFT - Urban decision makers and technical staff have knowledge of and have competently completed preliminary steps towards adopting and implementing sound integrated multimodal urban mobility plans with particular emphasis on the promotion of non-motorized transport modes and the restructuring of informal public transport services IMPROVE - Urban decision makers and technical staff have knowledge of and have competently completed preliminary steps towards adopting and implementing key measures needed to improve traffic conditions in African cities 29 Indicators Means of Verification Number of references to SSATP best practice standards in official documents regarding the creation of an urban transport planning, monitoring and coordination agency, the establishment of financing mechanisms for urban transport, the adoption of urban forms that minimize the need for motorized transport, the preparation of integrated multimodal urban mobility plans, the improvement of non-motorized transport modes, the restructuring and modernization of informal public transport operators, and the adoption of sound traffic and parking policies. Baseline: 0; Target: 15 references (one for any of the seven topics of the DP3) Official documents provided by SSATP coordinators and members of SSATP urban mobility and accessibility working groups Number of urban areas where the preparation of strategies for either the creation of an urban transport planning, monitoring, and coordination agency in a major urban area, or the establishment of financing mechanisms for urban transport, or better integration of land use and transport, or the elaboration of an integrated multimodal urban mobility plan, or the design of a program for improving non-motorized transport modes, or the restructuring and modernization of informal public transport operator, or the improvement of traffic and parking conditions has been initiated and SSATP best practice standards have been used. Strategy documents provided by SSATP coordinators and members of SSATP urban mobility and accessibility working groups Baseline: 0; Target: 10 urban areas Number of urban areas where sound programs for either the creation of an urban transport planning, monitoring, and coordination agency, or the establishment of financing mechanisms for urban transport, or the improvement of non-motorized transport modes, or the restructuring and modernization of informal public transport operators have been drafted with support from SSATP best practice standards and submitted to the highest decision making authorities, or where the elaboration of an integrated multimodal urban mobility plan or a traffic and parking management program has started with support from SSATP best practice standards. Baseline: 0; Target: 3 urban areas 30 Program documents provided by SSATP coordinators and members of SSATP urban mobility and accessibility working groups Risks and Mitigation Outputs Knowledge creation & dissemination: 1 Best practices standards Indicators Number of virtual meetings of work groups. Baseline : 0; Target : 20 Publication of best practice standards. Baseline : 0; Target : 6 Publication of research papers and strategy notes on urban form and land use. Baseline : 0; Target : 4 Means of Verification Minutes of meetings Best practices documents published by SSATP and available on its website Research papers and strategy notes published by SSATP and available on its website Risks and Mitigation Knowledge creation & dissemination: 2 Advocacy and dissemination workshops Indicators Means of Verification Number of decision makers and technical staff that have attended SSATP workshops. Baseline : 0; Target : 400 Risk and Mitigation Proceedings of workshops Knowledge creation & dissemination: 3 SSATP e-platform Indicators Means of Verification Number of entries on urban mobility CoP (community of practices). Baseline : 0; Target : 100 Risk and Mitigation Participants registered in the CoP Capacity Building: 1 Implementation documents adapted to the specific context, for the establishment of urban transport agencies, the setting up of financial systems, and the restructuring of informal public transport services Indicators Means of Verification Implementation documents completed. Baseline : 0; Target : 5 Risk and Mitigation Implementation documents available on SSATP website Capacity Building: 2 Strategy notes presenting issues related to, and key features of, sound integrated multimodal urban mobility plans and traffic management plans, as well as the terms of reference to prepare these plans Indicators Strategy notes completed. Baseline : 0; Target : 4 Means of Verification Risk and Mitigation Strategy notes available on SSATP website Capacity Building: 3 Increased capability of technical staff on these subjects Indicators Number of decision makers and technical staff that have been actively involved. Baseline : 0; Target : 100 Means of Verification Risk and Mitigation Proceedings of workshops Capacity Building: 4 Training events Indicators Number of decision makers and technical staff that have attended SSATP workshops. Baseline : 0; Target : 150 Means of Verification Risk and Mitigation Proceedings of workshops 31 Pillar C – Road Safety Objective / Outcome Enable AUC & UNECA to inspire countries to achieve UN Decade of Action and Africa Plan of Action 2011-2020 Road Safety goals Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Indicators of UN Decade of Action and African road safety action plan as they exist AUC reports to Conference of African Ministers of Transport 2015 and beyond Risk: Lack of intermediate indicators to measure progress towards objectives. Mitigation: SSATP will propose appropriate intermediate indicators. Intermediate Outcome Knowledge and understanding of status and prospects of attaining road safety goals in Africa strengthened Indicators Africa road safety action plan reviewed by the African Ministers of Transport to achieve the objectives of the Decade of Action Means of Verification Decisions at Conferences of African Ministers of Transport Risks and Mitigation Risk: Timing of conferences and reports not coinciding. Mitigation: SSATP will organize workshops of key stakeholders including AUC and UNECA. Outputs Progress monitored at continental, regional and country levels in the implementation of the Africa road safety Action Plan Country analysis of reporting status, actions, and progress Indicators Continental, regional and country reports Number of country assessments Action plans adopted to collect indicators Means of Verification Country reports and their analysis is available Government decisions Risks and Mitigation Risk: Not enough information available from countries. Mitigation: (from Objective 2): SSATP to work closely with the national road safety coordination structures in each country to develop and implement road safety data management systems. Intermediate Outcome Framework in place for monitoring progress of UN Decade of Action and Africa Plan of Action 2011-2020 Indicators African road safety observatory operational Regional road safety observatory operational in one REC Road safety monitoring and evaluation strategies and systems available in six countries 32 Means of Verification Decisions to create continental and regional observatories Annual reports prepared at continental, regional and country levels Risks and Mitigation Outputs Road safety data that observatories need have been identified Road safety data are harmonized Road safety data management capacity and needs assessed at country, regional and continental level Assessment of road safety data management and monitoring and evaluation system at continental level, for one REC and in three countries Guidelines for establishment of a country-wide road safety monitoring and evaluation system Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Assessment reports Guidelines published by SSATP Objective / Outcome Promote effective policy and strategy formulation and implementation at country level Indicators Recorded stabilization of road crashes in three countries Means of Verification Country reports Risks and Mitigation Risk: Countries and agencies may lack the capacity to implement the recommended changes Mitigation: SSATP to prepare specific country capacity development programs Intermediate Outcome Country road safety policies and strategies better aligned to the UN Decade and Africa Action Plans and goals Effective high impact road safety interventions implemented Indicators Three countries adopt strategies that are revised to reflect the Africa Plan of Action Five countries report actions on high impact road safety interventions Means of Verification Country reports Risks and Mitigation Risk: Country road safety strategy cycles are different. Some may be current for most of DP3 period. Mitigation: SSATP will recommend that such strategies be reviewed to confirm that they are well aligned. Outputs Existing countries’ policies and strategies reviewed and required changes identified to better align them with Decade of Action Road safety capacity and institutional assessed and needs for policy and strategy development identified in selected cities to advance urban road safety strategies Road safety capacity for policy and strategy development strengthened in cities Indicators Three countries/cities have prepared road safety strategies Guidelines for road safety policy in urban areas Means of Verification SSATP quarterly reports Strategy reports from participating countries/cities Guidelines published by SSATP Risks and Mitigation Risk: There may not be adequate resources to include three additional countries Cities may not have the capacity to prepare road safety strategies Mitigation: Capacity development and knowledge sharing work to be initiated by SSATP 33 Objective / Outcome Stimulate good practice in Road Safety Management (Pillar one of UN Decade of Action) by promoting systematic implementation of the Africa Plan of Action Indicators Increase in the number of SubSaharan African countries with fully empowered cross-sectoral lead agencies Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation SSATP report that shows the baseline and end of DP3 headcount of number and types of lead agencies in Sub-Saharan Africa Risk: Countries and RECs may be slow or resist adoption of policy changes. Mitigation: SSATP to work with AUC and to use country data and decisions of African Ministers of Transport to urge countries to act. Intermediate Outcome Countries create road safety lead agencies where none existed before Countries raise profile of existing lead agencies from one sector focused agencies to cross-sectoral status Countries improve financing of lead agencies REC’s decision to create regional organizations to lead agencies Indicators Three new countries decide to create lead agencies Three countries decide to raise profile of lead agencies Ten countries improve funding arrangements for lead agencies Organization of lead agencies created in one region Means of Verification Government decisions Stakeholder conferences and workshops SSATP quarterly reports Procedures are adopted Funding plans exit Risks and Mitigation Risk: Decision making process is outside of the control of SSATP Mitigation: SSATP will play its advocacy role Outputs Operational guidelines for road safety lead agencies including review of the status on the creation of road safety lead agencies by African countries and criteria for gauging their effectiveness Capacity development plan prepared for road safety lead agencies Policy notes on the creation of lead agencies and on raising profile of lead agencies and funding lead agencies Guidance note on the creation of a regional organization of lead agencies Indicators Guidelines produced Capacity development plan prepared for three agencies Policy notes prepared Capacity assessment done to identify three candidate countries with potential to raise profile of their lead agencies Identification of one secretariat for a regional organization of lead agencies 34 Means of Verification Country reports Stakeholder conferences and workshops SSATP reports Risks and Mitigation Risk: Advancement from identification of secretariat to creation of a regional organization will take a long time Mitigation: SSATP will plat its advocacy role Objective / Outcome Better integration of road safety policy and pillar-based interventions in locally and externally funded road developments Indicators Effective use by development partners, road funds and municipalities of guidelines to improve effectiveness of their support towards road safety Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Field visits of projects funded by development partners, by road funds and by municipalities Risk: This is an added function for the SSATP that could be pushed back or just ignored. Mitigation: SSATP will demonstrate the effects of past interventions with poor articulation of road safety components Intermediate Outcome Capacity of development partners, road funds and municipalities strengthened to improve effectiveness of their support towards road safety Indicators Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Use of SSATP guidelines confirmed in projects prepared by development partners, three road funds and two municipalities Road safety aspects in project documents of development partners, road funds and municipalities Risk: SSATP has no control over decisions taken by the funding institutions Mitigation: SSATP to escalate matter to AUC if necessary Outputs Guidelines on how development partners can improve support towards road safety through investments, how local funding of road safety could be made more effective and how to mainstream road safety in urban road projects Indicators Guidelines prepared Means of Verification Risks and Mitigation Guidelines published by SSATP 35 Annex E. List of Participants to the Urban Mobility Workshop Country First Name Last Name Title / Organisation Burkina Faso Serge Peghwende Bela Burkina Faso Traore Ibrahima Burundi Edouard Nyandwi Cameroon Central African Republic Zacharie Paul Ngoumbe Gondamovo Chad Noitora Francis Chad Ahmat Nene Tassy China Cornie Huizenga Comoros Said Housseini Aboubakar Côte D’Ivoire Yao Godefroy Konan Côte D’Ivoire Côte D’Ivoire Romain Kouakou Cisse Kouakou Yssoufou Côte D’Ivoire Bi Nagone Zoro DRC Roger Te-Biasu Ethiopia Ethiopia Tilahun Yimer Ato Robel Tassew Meseret Gambia Ramatoulie Ceesay Ghana Ghana Daniel Randolf Essel Wilson Ghana Samson Nketia Gyamera Kenya Kenya Lesotho Lesotho Christine Adongo Risper Awiti Lehlomela Karabo Thomas Ogut Orero Mahlaha Marite Madagascar Camille Anasyle Tovondrazane Secrétaire Permanent - Ministère des Infrastructures, du Désenclavement et des Transports Directeur des études et de la législation Ministère des Infrastructures, du Désenclavement et des Transports Road Transport Advisor - Ministry of Transport, Public Works Inspector General – Ministry of Transport Inspecteur Central en matière des transports de surface - Ministre des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile DG Adjoint des Transports de Surface - Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile Expert - Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile Secretary Manager – Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport (SLoCaT) Directeur Général des Routes et des Transports Routiers - Vice-Présidence en charge du Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire, des Infrastructures, de l'Urbanisme et de l'Habitat Directeur des Etudes et de la Prospective Agence des Transports Urbains Expert - Ministère des Transports Civil Engineer – Transport Economist – African Association of Public Transports (UATP) Secretary General - African Association of Public Transports (UATP) Expert - Ministre des Transports et Voies de Communication Expert – Ministry of Transport Strategic Planning and Managing Expert – Ministry of Transport Expert - Ministry of Transport, Works and Infrastructure Ministry of Transport Head of Transport Department - Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development Manager - Nairobi City Council Senior Lecturer - Kenya Methodist University Senior Planner – Maseru City council Director of Planning - Ministry of Public Works and Transport Expert - Ministry of Transport and Meteorology 37 Malawi James Chakwera Mozambique Pedro Miguel Murerua Nigeria Violet Ngozi Republic of Congo Placide Emeka Aneke Mpan Republic of Congo Gabriel Tsemi Goma Senegal Thierno Birahim Aw Senegal Allioune Thiam South Africa Daisy Dwango South Sudan Milla Switzerland Switzerland Tanzania Emmanuel Roy Longo Mattia Stefano Martin Ismail Mbwana Tanzania Tanzania Camilla Asteria Leon Lema Mlambo Tanzania David Alfred Mfinanga Tunisia Samir Salem Abid Uganda Benon Mwebaze Kajuna Uganda Uganda Peter Mubiru Andrew Kabanda Kitaka Uganda Rogers Kisambira United States United States United States United States United States Roger Jean-Noel Inje Justin Zeina Gorham Guillossou Oueslati Runji Samara United States Zimbabwe Kavita Simbarashe Sethi Gomo Zimbabwe M.H. Ruwende 38 Celio Stucki Kassim Expert - Ministry of Transport and Public Works National Director of Transport and Logistics Ministry of Transport and Communications Deputy Director Mass Transit – Federal Ministry of Transport Director General of Land Transport - Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Advisor in Charge of Land Transport – Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Expert - Ministère des Infrastructures des Transports Terrestres et du Désenclavement General Manager – Urban Transport Development Center Expert – City of Johannesburg – Transport Department Expert - Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges Program Manager - SECO TRANSITEC Ingénieurs-Conseils Assistant to Deputy Minister – Ministry of Transport SSATP Consultant Executive Director – DART Rapid Transit Agency University of Dar es Salaam; Department of Transportation and Geotechnical Engineering In charge of DG of Policies, Institutions and Public Enterprises – Ministry of Transport Commissioner – Policy and Planning – Ministry of Works and Transport Expert – Ministry of Transport Director Engineering and Technical Services - Kampala Capital City Authority BRTCoordinator / PMU Member – Ministry of works and Transport Transport Economist - World Bank SSATP Program Manager SSATP Program Assistant Sr. Transport Specialist – World Bank SSATP Trust Fund Administrator - World Bank Senior Transport Economist - World Bank Provincial Roads Engineer - Ministry of Transport and Infrastructural Development Ministry of Transport and Infrastructural Development Annex F. List of Participants to the REC-TCC Meeting Country First Name Last Name Title / Organization Benin Benin Benin Cote d’Ivôire Edy Kokouvi Idrissa Jules Venance Stefan Anthony Kone Kouassi Atchia Djibouti Azhari Gabon Kenya Jean-Paul Momboyo Kukuta Justin Baya Donat Mugangu Aloys Rusagara Fadol Abdelkarim Libebele Transport Specialist - ALCO Executive Secretary - ALCO Environmental Specialist - ALCO Principal Transport Policy Specialist – African Development Bank Acting Program Manager for Transport - IGAD Kenya Mathieu Bizimana Kenya Daniel Antony Murithi Kenya Franklin Mziray Kenya Eric Sirali South Africa Barney Curtis Tanzania Tanzania Peter Hosea Yimbo Masi Nyangweso United States Zimbabwe Olivier Emmanuel Mukuka Hartmann Mutale Ghana Kenya Bayili Bagula Bayiro Chef de Service Infrastructures - CEEAC Executive Secretary – Borderless Alliance Executive Secretary - Northern Corridor-Transit Transport Coordination Authority ( NCTTCA) Head of Program, Transport Policy and Planning Northern Corridor-Transit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Federation of East African Freight Forwarders Associations (FEAFFA) Consultant - Northern Corridor-Transit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Secretary General - Port Management Association of Eastern & Southern Africa (PMAESA) IT Specialist - Northern Corridor-Transit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Executive Director - Federation of East and Southern African Road Transport Associations (FESARTA) Executive Director – Dar es Salaam Corridor Principal Civil Engineer – East African Community (EAC) Senior Trade Facilitation Specialist – World Bank Vice President – Federation of clearing & Forwarding Associations of Southern Africa (FCFASA) 39 Annex G. List of Participants to the SSATP General Assembly Country First Name Last Name Title / Organisation Belgium Paolo Ciccarelli Belgium Marc Stalmans Burkina Faso Serge Peghwende Bela Burundi Virginie Ciza Burundi Edouard Nyandwi Cameroon Zacharie Ngoumbe Head of Unit Infrastructure and Networks – European Commission - EuropeAid Program Manager for Transport– European Commission - EuropeAid Secrétaire Permanent - Ministère des Infrastructures, du Désenclavement et des Transports Minister - Ministry of Transport, Public Works Road Transport Advisor - Ministry of Transport, Public Works Inspector General – Ministry of Transport Central African Republic Paul Gondamovo Chad Haoua Acyl Chad Noitora Francis Chad Ahmat Nene Tassy Comoros Said Housseini Aboubakar Côte D’Ivoire Stefan Atchia Côte D’Ivoire Côte D’Ivoire Jean Kizito Tapio Kabanguka Naula Côte D’Ivoire Côte D’Ivoire Romain Kouakou Cisse Kouakou Yssoufou DRC Roger Te-Biasu Ethiopia Ethiopia Ato Getachew Ato Robel Mengistie Meseret Ethiopia France Tilahun Yimer Arnaud Tassew Desmarchelier Gabon Jean-Paul Momboyo Kukuta Nicolai Libebele Germany Bader Inspecteur Central en matière des transports de surface - Ministre des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile Secrétaire d’Etat - Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile DG Adjoint des Transports de Surface Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile Expert - Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports et de l'Aviation Civile Directeur Général des Routes et des Transports Routiers - Vice-Présidence en charge du Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire, des Infrastructures, de l'Urbanisme et de l'Habitat Principal Transport Policy Specialist – African Development Bank Head of Unit - African Development Bank Specialist in Transport Facilitation Trade African Development Bank Expert - Ministère des Transports Civil Engineer – Transport Economist African Association of Public Transports (UATP) Expert - Ministre des Transports et Voies de Communication Minister - Ministry of Transport Strategic Planning and Managing Expert – Ministry of Transport Expert – Ministry of Transport Senior Engineer – Agence Française de Développement Chef de Service Infrastructures - CEEAC Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 41 Germany Armin Wagner Ghana Kenya Daniel Donat Mugangu Essel Bagula Kenya Aloys Rusagara Bayiro Kenya Debashish Bhuttarchajee Kenya Kenya Rob Michael S. M. De Jong Kamau Kenya Nduva Muli Lesotho Lebesa Maloi Lesotho Karabo Thomas Marite Madagascar Camille Anasyle Tovondrazane Malawi James Chakwera Malawi Francis Kasaila Mozambique Pedro Miguel Murerua Mozambique Manuela Joaquim Rebelo Nigeria Violet Ngozi Republic of Congo Republic of Congo Rodolphe Emeka Aneke Adada Gabriel Tsemi Goma Republic of Congo Placide Mpan Republic of Congo Vivien Nyanga Senegal Thierno Birahim Aw Senegal Marieme Ndoye Decraene South Africa Barney Curtis 42 Team Leader - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Expert - Ministry of Transport Executive Secretary - Northern CorridorTransit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Head of Program, Transport Policy and Planning - Northern Corridor-Transit Transport Coordination Authority (NCTTCA) Human Settlements Officer, Lead Urban Mobility - UN Habitat Head Transport Unit - UNEP Minister – Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure Principal Secretary - Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure Minister - Ministry of Public Works and Transport Director of Planning - Ministry of Public Works and Transport Expert - Ministry of Transport and Meteorology Expert - Ministry of Transport and Public Works Minister - Ministry of Transport and Public Works National Director of Transport and Logistics - Ministry of Transport and Communications Deputy Minister - Ministry of Transport and Communications Deputy Director Mass Transit - Federal Ministry of Transport Minister – Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Advisor in charge of Land Transport Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Director General of Land Transport – Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Attaché to the Office of the Senior Minister - Ministry of Transport, Civil Aviation and Merchant Marine Expert - Ministère des Infrastructures, des Transports Terrestres et du Désenclavement Directeur des Routes - Ministère des Infrastructures des Transports Terrestres et du Désenclavement Executive Director - Federation of East and Southern African Road Transport Associations (FESARTA) South Sudan Kwong Dhier Gatluak South Sudan Milla Switzerland Switzerland Tanzania Emmanuel Roy Longo Mattia Stefano Martin Ismail Mbwana Tanzania Tanzania Tunisia Camilla Charles John Samir Salem Lema Tizeba Abid Uganda Benon Mwebaze Kajuna Uganda Uganda Peter Rogers Kabanda Kisambira United States United States United States Roger Jean-Noel Olivier Gorham Guillossou Hartmann United States United States United States United States Jose Luis Inje Justin Zeina Irigoyen Oueslati Runji Samara United States Supee Teravaninthorn Zimbabwe Simbarashe Gomo Zimbabwe M.H. Ruwende Celio Stucki Kassim Minister - Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges Expert - Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges Program Manager - SECO TRANSITEC Ingénieurs-Conseils Assistant to Deputy Minister – Ministry of Transport SSATP Consultant Deputy Minister – Ministry of Transport In charge of DG of Policies, Institutions and Public Enterprises – Ministry of Transport Commissioner – Policy and Planning – Ministry of Works and Transport Expert – Ministry of Transport BRT Coordinator / PMU Member – Ministry of works and Transport Transport Economist - World Bank SSATP Program Manager Senior Trade Facilitation Specialist – World Bank Director, Transport and ICT– World Bank SSATP Program Assistant Sr. Transport Specialist – World Bank SSATP Trust Fund Administrator - World Bank Practice Manager, Transport and ICT– World Bank Provincial Roads Engineer - Ministry of Transport and Infrastructural Development Ministry of Transport and Infrastructural Development 43
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.6 Linearized : Yes Author : Jean-Noel Guillossou Company : The World Bank Group Create Date : 2015:01:28 11:53:30-05:00 Modify Date : 2015:01:29 16:35:17-05:00 Source Modified : D:20150128164542 Has XFA : No Language : EN-US Tagged PDF : No XMP Toolkit : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03 Metadata Date : 2015:01:29 16:35:17-05:00 Creator Tool : Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word Document ID : uuid:97464994-04bf-457a-a802-3ad8d911d8e8 Instance ID : uuid:881462fc-09ec-44b6-b4ab-a062d0ceafba Subject : 15 Format : application/pdf Creator : Jean-Noel Guillossou Producer : Adobe PDF Library 11.0 Page Layout : SinglePage Page Mode : UseOutlines Page Count : 53EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools