QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL

QUALITY%20SYSTEM%20MANUAL

User Manual:

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 32

EPATHUSA
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL
(QSM/ EPATHUSA /01)
Issue No: 01 Date: September 15, 2017
Revision: 01 Date: September 15, 2017
Prepared By
Issued & Controlled By
Approved By
Designation
Process expert team
Hari
Anitha
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 REVISION HISTORY 3
2.0 INTRODUCTION & SCOPE 3
2.1 INTRODUCTION 3
2.2 EPATHUSA IT CORPORATE PROFILE 3
2.3 SCOPE 4
2.4 EXCLUSIONS 4
3.0. TERMS & DEFINITIONS 5
4.0. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 7
4.1 GENERAL 7
4.1.1 SEQUENCES OF INTERACTION OF IDENTIFIED PROCESSES 7
4.2 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 8
4.2.1 GENERAL 8
4.2.3 CONTROL OF DOCUMENTS 9
PROJECT/ FUNCTIONAL DOCUMENT AND DATA CONTROL 9
4.2.4 CONTROL OF QUALITY RECORDS 10
5.0. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY 11
5.1 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT 11
5.2 CUSTOMER FOCUS 11
5.3 QUALITY POLICY 12
5.4 PLANNING 13
5.4.1 QUALITY OBJECTIVES 13
5.4.2 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING 13
5.5 RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION 14
5.5.1 RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY 14
5.5.2 MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE 15
5.5.3 INTERNAL COMMUNICATION 15
5.6 MANAGEMENT REVIEW 16
5.6.1 MANAGEMENT REVIEW MEETINGS 16
5.6.2 REVIEW INPUT (AGENDA) 16
5.6.3 REVIEW OUTPUT 16
6.0. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 17
6.1 PROVISION OF RESOURCES 17
6.2 HUMAN RESOURCES 17
6.2.1 GENERAL 17
6.2.2 COMPETENCE, TRAINING AND AWARENESS 17
6.3 INFRASTRUCTURE 17
6.4 WORK ENVIRONMENT 17
7.0. PRODUCT REALIZATION 18
7.1 PLANNING OF REALIZATION 18
7.2 CUSTOMER RELATED PROCESSES 18
7.2.1 DETERMINATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT 18
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 2 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.2.2 REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT 19
7.2.3 CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION 19
7.3 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 19
7.4 PURCHASING 20
7.4.1 PURCHASING PROCESS 20
7.4.2 PURCHASING INFORMATION 20
7.4.3 VERIFICATION OF THE PURCHASED PRODUCT 21
7.5 PRODUCTION AND SERVICE PROVISION 21
7.5.1 CONTROL OF PRODUCTION & SERVICE PROVISION 21
7.5.2 VALIDATION OF PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION & SERVICE PROVISION 21
7.5.3 IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY 21
7.5.4 CUSTOMER PROPERTY 22
7.5.5 PRESERVATION OF PRODUCT 22
7.6 CONTROLLING OF MEASURING & MONITORING EQUIPMENTS 22
8.0. MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT 23
8.1 GENERAL 23
8.2 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT 23
8.2.1 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION 23
8.2.2 INTERNAL AUDIT 23
8.2.3 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF PROCESSES 24
8.2.4 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCT 24
8.3 CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING PRODUCT 24
8.4 ANALYSIS OF DATA 25
8.5 IMPROVEMENT 25
8.5.1 CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT 25
8.5.2 CORRECTIVE ACTION 25
8.5.3 PREVENTIVE ACTION 26
ANNEXURE I - SEQUENCE AND INTERACTION OF PROCESS 27
ANNEXURE II ORGANIZATION CHART 28
ANNEXURE III REFERENCES 30
ANNEXURE IV - QUALITY OBJECTIVES 31
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 3 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
1.0 REVISION HISTORY
Date
Nature of Change
Brief Reason for Change
New
Revision
No
15/sep/2017
Baseline document
1.0
2.0 INTRODUCTION & SCOPE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The Organization’s Quality Management System Manual describes its unique and specific conformance
to the requirements of 9001, Quality Management Systems - Requirements. Each section represents
organization’s vision of quality as seen through the requirements of the standard, needs of customers
and internally defined quality goals and objectives.
2.2 EPATHUSA IT CORPORATE PROFILE
Attach Corporate Profile
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 4 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
2.3 SCOPE
SCOPE OF ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFICATION IS
IT Application support and staffing services
2.4 EXCLUSIONS
NIL
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 5 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
3.0. TERMS & DEFINITIONS
Term
Definition
Acceptance
Criteria
Defined limits based on characteristics, materials, products or services
Audit
A systematic and independent examination to determine whether quality
activities and related results comply with planned arrangements and whether
these arrangements are implemented effectively and are suitable to achieve
objectives.
Conformance
Compliance with specified requirements.
Control
To exercise authority over and regulate.
Control Feature
A Documented activity to ensure conformance with specific requirements.
Corrective
Action
Measures taken to rectify conditions adverse to quality and to minimize
recurrence
CAPA
A form used to document corrective, preventive and improvements plans.
Effect
The Non fulfillment of intended requirements.
Documentation
Recorded Information
Failure
Any condition which prevents the product or service from meeting
Specification
Finding
Objective evidence that a control feature of the approved quality program was
not implemented
Testing
Activities such as measuring, examining, testing. Gauging one or more
characteristics of a product or service and comparing these with specified
requirements to determine conformity.
Non Conformity
The non fulfillment requirements
Observation
Evidence that a survey able/ auditable element exists which is not contrary to
documented requirements but may warrant further qualification or
improvement.
System
Procedure
A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be performed. It
may include methods to be used, equipment to be used and sequence of
operations
Quality
Conformance to requirements.
Quality
Assurance
All those Planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate
confidence that a product or service will satisfy given requirements for quality
Quality Control
The operational Techniques and activities that are used to fulfill requirements
for quality.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 6 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
Quality System
The Organizational structure, responsibilities, procedures, process and
resources for implementing the total management system
Quality System
Review
Top management performs a formal evaluation of the status and adequacy of
the quality system in relation to the quality policy and new objectives resulting
from changing circumstances
Specification
A document that prescribes the requirements with which the product or service
has to conform
Traceability
The Ability to trace the history, application or location of an item or activity, or
similar items or activities, by means of recorded identification
Verify
To determine conformance to specified requirements.
ABBREVIATIONS:
BD
Business Development
DOC
Document
HOD
Head Of The Department
HR
Human Resource Development
IA
Internal Audit
MR
Management Representative
MRM
Management Review Meeting
PROJ
Projects
PUR
Purchase
QA
Quality Assurance
QF
Quality Format
QMS
Quality Management System
QSM
Quality System Manual
QSP
Quality System Procedure
EPATHUSA
EPATHUSA
N&S
Network and System Administration
Admin
Administration
MD
Director
PL
Project Leader
SDH
Solution Delivery Head
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 7 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
4.0. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
4.1 GENERAL
EPATHUSA has established documented and implemented a quality management system, maintains the
same and continually improves its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015.
Following general requirements have been taken care of:
Processes needed for the quality management system and their application throughout the organization
have been determined.
Sequences of interaction of these processes have been determined.
Criteria and methods needed have been determined to ensure that both the operations and control of
these processes are effective.
The top management ensures the availability of resources and information necessary to support the
operation and monitoring of these processes
The organization monitors, measures and analyzes these processes.
Actions necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of these processes are
implemented
Processes needed for the quality management system as determined are managed by the organization in
accordance with the applicable appropriate requirements of ISO 9001:2015.
Quality System in EPATHUSA covers the processes in the following sections:
Top Management
Business Development
Projects
Quality Assurance (Testing)
Network & Administration
HR
Support Services (Purchase)
Internal Audit
Management Review
Corrective and Preventive Action
4.1.1 SEQUENCES OF INTERACTION OF IDENTIFIED PROCESSES
Refer Annexure I
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 8 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
4.2 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
4.2.1 GENERAL
The EPATHUSA Quality Management System has been defined in three levels.
Level 1 is the EPATHUSA Quality Management System Manual (this document). This Manual
documents the company policies and provides the relationship of the organization’s Quality Management
System to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015.
Level 2 is the Process Manual contains quality system standard operating procedures (SOPs), work
instructions / guidelines that may be issued as required.
Level 3 is various records used in the system that may be maintained as required.
The depth and detail required for the documentation is determined by Management and is dependent
upon the complexity and interaction of the processes and the skills and training needed by personnel
performing the activity.
ISO 9001 Documentation Hierarchy
QUALITY MANUAL
PROCESS MANUAL
(Procedures, guidelines and
Forms & Formats)
RECORDS
1ST Level
3rd Level
2nd Level
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 9 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
4.2.2 QUALITY MANUAL
EPATHUSA has established and maintains a quality System manual (this manual of which this portion
is a part), which includes;
Scope of the quality management system, including details of and justification for any exclusions
(see Section-2)
The system procedures for the quality management system as required by ISO 9001:2015.
A description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management system (see
chapter 4.1.1)
4.2.3 CONTROL OF DOCUMENTS
Management Representative controls the preparation, revision, review, approval and release of the QMS
documents.
All QMS documents, new and revised are reviewed and approved prior to release. Director authorizes the
all level of QMS documents
A new version of QMS Documents is released afresh after changes have been identified. MR controls the
distribution and issue of QMS documents and ensures that the pertinent versions of the documents are
available for use and obsolete documents are withdrawn from copyholders and dispose them as
documented in procedure for control of documents
Project/ Functional Document and Data Control
Project/ Functional documents are reviewed by a designated reviewer and approved by the Functional
Heads. The approved documents are released after authorization by the Functional head.
Documents are released afresh after a practical number of changes have been made. The nature of
changes is identified using a revision list, where practicable.
The MR/ Functional heads are responsible for the control, distribution and issue of documents and to
ensure that:
The pertinent versions of the documents are available for use
Obsolete documents are withdrawn
The Master List of project documents is available for reference
Document and data changes
System Administration Department looks after data security and safety aspects. Backups are taken at
regular intervals to provide safety in the event of any untoward incident or calamity. The group ensures
access to confidential information, files and directories on the network based on appropriate access
authority.
MR / Director/ Functional heads decide the permissions for access to all project/ departmental related
documents/ data and intimate the N&A group.
Reference: QSP for Control of Documents - Process Manual MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 10 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
4.2.4 CONTROL OF QUALITY RECORDS
Quality records established to prove evidence of conformity to requirements and of the effective
operation of the quality management system shall be controlled.
Project Quality Records are created and maintained by the Solution Delivery Head/TL while the project is
in progress. After the completion of the project, SDH maintains the archives of the project records
For an ongoing maintenance project, the Technical Leader maintains Quality Records related to
maintenance requests for the period specified in “Document & Data Control Process” after acceptance of
the completion by the client.
Following the completion of all contractual obligations, the organization retains project Quality Records
for a minimum period of 1 Year along with all other Project assets before they are disposed off.
The MR maintains internal audit plans and records for a period of three years
QMS Documents, QMS Review Records are retained till next version released
The respective Functional Head maintains Quality Records generated by the functions. The period of
retention is specified in the Document “Master List of Quality Records” maintained by the MR.
All records should be legible and protected from loss or damage. Access to Project Quality Records
during their retention period is granted to the client, if the Contract provides for such access.
Reference: QSP for Control of Records - QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/02 in Process Manual MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 11 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.0. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
5.1 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
Top management has been actively involved in implementing the quality management system (QMS). It has
provided the vision and strategic direction for the growth of the QMS, and established quality objectives and
the quality policy.
To continue to provide leadership and show commitment to the improvement of the QMS, management will
do the following.
Communicate the importance of meeting customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements
Establish quality objectives
Establish the quality policy
Conduct periodical management reviews, and
Ensure the availability of resources.
5.2 CUSTOMER FOCUS
The organization ensures that customer satisfaction requirements are determined and are met with the aim of
enhancing customer satisfaction (see 7.2.1 and 8.2.1). The Organization focusing on customer by identifying
their needs and requirements through customer satisfaction survey reports collected frequently. Currently the
organizations identifies customer needs as below based on past experience,
In time delivery
Best Service and Support
Error/ Bug free applications.
The customer needs are reviewed frequently, normally in every management review meetings or after
periodical meetings with customer by top management.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 12 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.3 QUALITY POLICY
EPATHUSA management has established the following quality policy, ensuring that it provides a
framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives.
Vision:
To be the most reliable outsourcing partner in the world
Mission:
To help customers in effectively outsourcing their services to India by making deliveries on time,
within budget, exceeding quality goals and totally customized to the IT & Business requirements of our
customers
Quality Policy:
To be competitive and flexible in providing services by continually striving to exceed customer
expectations
Objectives:
Meet and exceed customer expectations
Continuously develop the competence of the associates
Continuously measure process performance and initiate improvements
Deliver services on time & with in budget
Ensuring and enhancing customer satisfaction
Rev.: 1.0 Director
Date: March 21, 2018 EPATHUSA
EPATHUSA management ensures that the quality policy is communicated and understood by all employees
and that the policy is implemented throughout the company. Quality Policy is communicated to employees
through the New Employee Orientation Program, the Quality Management System Manual and posters located
throughout the organization premises. The Quality Policy is reviewed for continued suitability at Management
Review Meetings.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 13 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.4 PLANNING
5.4.1 QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The organization ensures that quality objectives, including those needed to meet requirements for [see
7.1], are established at relevant functions and levels within the organization. The quality objectives are
required to be measurable and consistent with the quality policy. The management review committee or
the Director will identifies relevant functions and levels and establish measurable objectives for them
within the overall framework of the quality policy.
Refer: Quality Objectives Annexure IV
5.4.2 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING
Organization ensures that
Planning of Quality Management System is carried out in order to meet the requirements given in
4.1 as well as the quality objectives.
The integrity of quality management system is maintained when changes to the QMS are planned
and implemented
Quality planning within EPATHUSA is an integral part of several Quality Procedures
culminating in establishing the Quality Objectives.
Data presented in management review meetings is used to provide input for quality planning and
continual improvement. Quality planning may include
o Quality objectives
o The process of the quality management system
o The resources needed
o Continual improvement of the system
Reference:
QSP for Management Review (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/03) Given in Process Manual - MR
QSP for Corrective and Preventive Action QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/05 Given in Process Manual - MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 14 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.5 RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION
5.5.1 RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY
The organization has defined the responsibilities, authorities and their interrelationship in this QSM and
communicated the same within the organization through this manual.
Organization chart and roles & responsibilities refer annexure II
INTER RELATIONSHIP MATRIX
Description
ISO Cl Ref.
No
Top
Mgmt
MR
Projects
BD
QA
Admin
N& A
HR
Control of documents and Records
4.2.3, 4.2.4
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
Define Quality Policy & Objectives
5.3, 5.4.1
P
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
Responsibility Assignment
5.5.1
P
Nomination of the Management
representative
5.5.2
P
Internal Communication
5.5.3
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
Management Review
5.6
P
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
Provision of resources
6.1
P
S
Competence, training and awareness
6.2.2
S
P
Infrastructure
6.3
S
S
P
Work Environment
6.4
P
P
S
S
S
S
S
Customer Related Process
7.2
S
S
P
Design and Development
7.3
P
S
Purchasing
7.4
P
Control of Production and Service
75.1
P
S
Process Validation
7.5.2
Excluded From The System
Product Identification and Traceability
7.5.3
P
S
S
Handling & Customer Property
7.5.4
P
S
Handling, Storage and Preservation of
Product / Goods
7.5.5
P
P
Instrument Calibration
7.6
Excluded From The System
Customer Satisfaction
8.2.1
S
P
S
Internal Audit
8.2.2
P
Measurement of Process
8.2.3
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Measurement of Product
8.2.4
S
P
Control of non conforming product
8.3
S
P
P
Data Analysis
8.4
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Corrective and Preventive action
8.5.2, 8.5.3
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P: Primary S: Support
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 15 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.5.2 MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE
(She is authorized to nominate officers to assist him in this job from amongst the officers of the
company. These appointees shall carry out the assigned responsibilities under his direction and
guidance)
Sayed Naved is hereby appointed as the Management Representative for the quality management system
covered under this manual and its associated documents. The authority and responsibility of the MR is
defined in the Responsibility & Authority section (See sec. 5.5.1 of this QSM). The duties of MR can be
summarized under the following statements of responsibility:
Ensuring that processes needed for the quality management system are established, implemented
and maintained
Reporting to top management on the performance of the quality management system and any need
for improvement
Ensuring the promotion of awareness of customer requirements throughout the organization.
Interacting with external parties (certification body and the consultant) on matters relating to
quality management system.
5.5.3 INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
The organization has ensured that appropriate communication processes have been established within the
organization and that communication takes place regarding the effectiveness of quality management
system (Refer Table given below).
There are other communication forums and means available like internal mailing, various management
meetings, team briefings and use of circulars, notice board etc.
COMMUNICATION MATRIX
Information to communicate
Top
Mgmt
MR
Projects
BD
QA
Admin
N& A
HR
Internal Audit Plan and Schedule
A
O
I
I
I
I
I
MRM Minutes
A
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
Customer Complaints
I
NR
I
O
D
NR
NR
NR
Training Intimation
A
A
O
I
I
I
I
O
Project Conformation
A
NR
D
O
I
NR
I
NR
Project Planning
A
NR
O D
I
I
NR
I
NR
A - Approved O Origin D Destination I- Information NR Not Required
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 16 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
5.6 MANAGEMENT REVIEW
5.6.1 MANAGEMENT REVIEW MEETINGS
Management review meetings are conducted at least once in every 6 months at the end of each internal
audit, or more frequently when required by the Director involving all functional heads responsible for
quality management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality
management system. The main purpose of conducting the reviews of the quality management system is
to assess opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system,
including the quality policy and quality objectives. Records of management review are maintained.
5.6.2 REVIEW INPUT (Agenda)
Follow-up actions from previous management reviews.
Results of internal/external audits.
Customer feedback (including grievances/complaints)
Performance of Suppliers
Process performance and conformity
Status of corrective and preventive actions
Changes that could affect the quality management system, and
Recommendations for improvement.
Any other agenda with the consent of the Director / Participants
Resource Needs
Quality Policy Suitability
Quality Objective Analysis
Trainings Records
Note:
Meeting points discussed in periodic other meetings (such as performance review and Team meetings
conducted by Director are considered as having been discussed in the MR. Meeting. The records of such
meeting are considered part of the management review records.
5.6.3 REVIEW OUTPUT
The output from the management review and other meetings, which is recorded as minutes, includes any
decisions and actions related to;
Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and it’s processes,
Improvement of related to customer requirements, and
Resource needs.
Training Needs
Reference:
QSP for Management Review (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/03) in Process Manual MR
QSP for Corrective and Preventive Action (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/05) in Process Manual MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 17 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
6.0. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
6.1 PROVISION OF RESOURCES
The organization has determined and provided the resources, which includes people, infrastructure, work
environment, information, suppliers, material and financial resources needed for implementing and
maintaining the quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness and enhancing
customer satisfaction by meeting customer requirements.
6.2 HUMAN RESOURCES
6.2.1 GENERAL
All employees, including members of management, performing work that affects the quality of any
service related to the organizations are hired on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills and
experience.
Appropriate procedures have been established for the recruitment of permanent and temporary staff.
Verification of candidate qualifications and/or experience normally precedes confirmation of an
appointment. Staff orientation, appraisal, training and development are carried out and recorded in
accordance with documented procedures to ensure that the Organization:
Employs staff with relevant qualifications and experience;
Enhances and up-dates the skills of its staff;
6.2.2 COMPETENCE, TRAINING AND AWARENESS
a) Determine the necessary competence for personnel performing work affecting conformity to product
requirements
b) Provide training or take other action to achieve the necessary competence.
The Head HR with the help of other respective department heads, Determines the necessary competence
for personnel performing work affecting product quality,
Provides training or take other actions to satisfy these needs,
Ensures effectiveness of the action taken
Ensures that its personnel are aware of the operation and importance of their activities and how they
contribute to the achievement of quality objectives, and
Maintains appropriate records of education, training skills and experience.
Reference: Reference: Process Manual Human Resources
6.3 INFRASTRUCTURE
The organization has determined, provided and maintains the infrastructure needed to achieve conformity to
product requirements. This includes:
a) Buildings, work space and associated utilities,
b) Process equipment (both hardware and software), and
c) Supporting services such as transport, communication or information systems (EPBX, PHONES etc).
Reference: Reference: Process Manual Network & Administration
6.4 WORK ENVIRONMENT
The human and physical factors of the work environment needed to achieving conformity to product
requirements are determined and managed. Consideration of such factors includes health and safety conditions,
work methods, handling methods, and ambient working conditions and other factors (such as noise,
temperature, and humidity, lighting or weather). These considerations are also reviewed during Management
Review Meetings
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 18 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.0. PRODUCT REALIZATION
7.1 PLANNING OF REALIZATION
The planning for realization is accomplished by implementing quality standards during contract review,
purchasing, project Development, testing and delivery in accordance with established procedures and
guidelines
These activities include the following to achieve the required level of quality:
Determining Quality objectives
Review/acceptance criteria for customer orders, tender submittals and contracts,
The need to establish processes and documents and to provide resources specific to product
Required verification, validation, monitoring, measurement inspection and test activities specific
to the product and the criteria for product acceptance
Identification, control, and calibration of process and test equipment,
Establishment of product identification and traceability,
Identification of handling, storage, packaging and shipping requirements,
Assignment and training of qualified personnel, and
Identification and preparation of quality records.
The quality management system documented in this QSM and referred documents represent the Quality Plan
for realization of the service presently provided by the organization. Important processes of this plan have
been listed in chapter 4 of this manual and described in this manual or it’s associated documents
appropriately. As and when new activities or services are added, either this documentation shall be updated,
or specific quality plan shall be prepared specifying the processes and the resources to be applied if the
present documentation is not found sufficient to that end.
References: (Following documents represent output of the planning for the current activities)
This QSM of which this chapter is a part
Quality System Procedures & Guidelines
Quality Records
7.2 CUSTOMER RELATED PROCESSES
7.2.1 DETERMINATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT
All enquiry / order received, or lead generated by BD personnel; they meet MD to determine the
requirements specified by the customer
In this meeting the following points are taken as input,
Requirements specified by the customer, including the requirements of delivery and post-delivery
activities include, for example, action under warranty provisions, contractual obligations such
maintenance services, and supplementary services as recycling or final disposal,
Requirements not stated by the customer but necessary for specified use or known intended use (from
past experience with the customers),
Statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the product (from governmental requirements and
applicable Standards), and
Any additional requirements considered necessary by the organization.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 19 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.2.2 REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT
The Organization reviews the requirements related to projects and service before submitting the proposal
or accepting the order or changes or amendments to the orders.
The MD / SDH reviews the requirements to ensure that:
Project requirements / deliverables are clearly defined,
Contract or order requirements differing from those previously expressed are resolved, and
The organization has the ability to meet defined requirements.
Changes to product requirements have to be in writing and the same shall be communicated to concern
departmental heads
7.2.3 CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION
The Director / Business Development Personnel / Projects Team communicate with the customer
organization regarding;
a) Enquiries, contracts or order handling, including amendments, and
b) Clarifications regarding project during development
c) Customer feedback including customer complaints
Refer: Reference: Process Manual Business Development
7.3 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
7.3.1 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
Once project confirmation received from business development, project team prepares project planning in
which detailed scheduling is done for design and development
Project Manager in consulting with SDH identifies the team.
In the course of addressing technical, logistical/managerial and financial concerns that impact project
design-process activities, the organization consistently exercises its organizational interfaces.
7.3.2 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT INPUT
The design input is collected from the specification provided by client or from the output of the study
made by the Project Team. The Software Requirement Specification (SRS) is prepared which is reviewed
and approved by the SDH.
SRS forms the basis for the subsequent design and construction phases. The SDH effects any changes to
approved SRS, only after due impact analysis is done and approval of the changes.
7.3.3 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT
Organization captures design-output data in design review minutes and customer reviews, as needed.
These reviews are performed specifically to verify that design-output meets or exceeds design-input
requirements. The design document is prepared by Project Leader (PL) in which design output, pseudo
code is documented.
Design document is approved by SDH and same is forwarded to customer for review revision history is
maintained for any changes made after approval.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 20 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.3.4 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Design document is reviewed by customer. During periodical review meetings SDH reviews the project
status to conform whether the output is meeting the design requirements
Follow up actions are identified and initiated against the review output and the action plan is
communicated to team members by internal email/Team meetings. Records of these reviews are
maintained by team leader
7.3.5 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT VERIFICATION
Design is verified during testing of project by QA team, test reports are prepared and if any failed cases
found the same shall be handled by project team.
Test reports / bug reports are reviewed by SDH Periodically to ensure that bugs are handled properly.
7.3.6 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT VALIDATION
Testing the project as per test plan prepared during project management plan validates design. Testing
team tests the project thoroughly and raises the failed cases in design and performance of the project.
Design and development team handles the errors raised by test team. Until testing team gives clearance
the project is not delivered to customer.
7.3.7 CONTROL OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES
All design changes either initiated by organization or requested by the customer are reviewed and
implemented. The review of design changes includes evaluation of the changes on project performance
and function. The SDH is authorized to approve the design changes.
Reference: QSP Project Execution (QSP/ EPATHUSA/PR/02) in Process Manual PROJECTS
7.4 PURCHASING
7.4.1 PURCHASING PROCESS
Organization’s purchasing processes are defined and controlled. Admin department makes efforts to
obtain high quality systems or peripherals on time by ensuring that the required technical specifications
defined in the purchasing documents provided to suppliers.
All suppliers are evaluated periodically for their ability to deliver quality products on a time. Suppliers
who cannot meet the contractual requirements for quality and delivery may be removed from the
Approved Suppliers List. Records of the results of evaluation and subsequent action arising from such
evaluation shall be maintained.
7.4.2 PURCHASING INFORMATION
Purchasing information describes that are to be purchased, including where appropriate;
Requirement for approval of product, procedures, processes and
Quality management system requirements
The organization ensures the adequacy of specified requirements prior to their communication to the
supplier.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 21 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.4.3 VERIFICATION OF THE PURCHASED PRODUCT
The inspection and other activities to ensure that the purchased product meets specified technical
requirements are carried out.
Where applicable, the verification is done at supplier’s premises by the organization which is intimated to
the supplier in the purchasing information along with the method of release.
Reference: Process Manual Purchase
7.5 PRODUCTION AND SERVICE PROVISION
7.5.1 CONTROL OF PRODUCTION & SERVICE PROVISION
The Organization plans and executes the activities under controlled conditions.
These conditions include, as applicable or necessary:
Information describing requirements of the project
Guidelines and templates where necessary
Reviewing the project status periodically
Evaluating competence of the team and provide trainings for skill up gradation
Preparing Test plan and testing the project as per plan
Release, delivery and post delivery activities
Reference: Process Manual Projects
7.5.2 VALIDATION OF PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION & SERVICE PROVISION
This clause is excluded from system. Refer section 2.4 for details
7.5.3 IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY
The organization shall identify the product status with respect to monitoring and measuring requirements
throughout product realization.
Where traceability is a requirement, the organization shall control the unique identification of the product
and maintain records (see 4.2.4)
Identification of Assets (Computers, Network Components, ACs etc)
Each equipment in the organization is identified with unique number and same is dEPATHUSAayed on
the asset / equipment
Project Codification
Once the contract is signed or order received from customer, SDH allocates project code to the project
and the same code is used in all relevant records. This project code is referred in all correspondences with
customer regarding this project as well in internal communications and mails
The following format is used to codify the each project
AAAA-BBB-CCC-MON-YY
AAAA- Customer Short Name
BBB- Project Number
CCC- Project Short Name
MON-Month
YY- Year
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 22 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
7.5.4 CUSTOMER PROPERTY
Customer supplied products (Could be Hardware, Software, Tools, Documents and intellectual property if
any) are inspected for suitability and functionality by the SDH/ Project Manager before use and those
found unsuitable for use are recorded and reported to the client for suitable action. The SDH maintains
the records of all customer-supplied products being used in the project. On completion of the project,
client-supplied products are returned to the client or disposed of as mutually agreed upon.
7.5.5 PRESERVATION OF PRODUCT
The process for handling, packaging, storage, preservation and delivery have been established and
maintained to prevent damage, deterioration or unintended use during internal processing and delivery of
product.
Hardware Peripherals
Hardware peripherals are stored in identified locations and controlled by administration department.
Original Software CDs
Original software such as operating systems and other languages are maintained and controlled by SDH /
N&A team. The CDs are properly labeled for easy identification and stored in secured racks and while
deciding storage location it is ensured that the location is waterproof and shock proof etc. List of software
available is maintained by N&A personnel for information
Project Backups
N&A personnel control the project backup CDs with proper labeling. Director / SDH takes decision to
dispose the OLD backup CDs. Once in a month the full project backup is taken and the CD is stored in
safe place to protect the data from any damage
Reference: Process Manual Network & Administration
Process Manual Project Execution
7.6 CONTROLLING OF MEASURING & MONITORING EQUIPMENTS
This clause is excluded from QMS. Ref Sec 2.4 for Details
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 23 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
8.0. MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT
8.1 GENERAL
The organization plans and implements the monitoring, measurement, analysis and improvement processes
needed;
To demonstrate the conformity of the product,
To ensure conformity of the quality management system, and
To continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system.
This includes determination of applicable methods including statistical techniques and extent of their use.
8.2 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
8.2.1 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
As one of the measurements of performance of the quality management system, the organization monitors
information relating to customer perception as to whether the organization has fulfilled customer
requirements.
Once in 3 months/after completion of project Customer Satisfaction Survey (CSS) report is received,
SDH analyze the rating given by client. If rating is below satisfaction level, the issue is discussed in
management review meeting and corrective actions are initiated.
Reference. : Process Manual Business Development
8.2.2 INTERNAL AUDIT
The organization conducts internal audits once in 6 months to determine whether the quality management
system;
a) Conforms to the planned arrangements, to the requirements of this International standard and to the
quality management system requirements established by the organization, and
b) Is effectively implemented and maintained.
An audit program is planned, taking into consideration the status and importance of the processes and
areas to be audited, as well as results of previous audits. The audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods
are defined. Selection of auditors and conduct of audits ensures objectivity and impartiality of the audit
process. Auditors do not audit their own work.
The responsibilities and requirements for planning and conducting audits, and for reporting results and
maintaining records are defined in a documented procedure.
The management responsible for the area being audited ensures that actions are taken without unjustified
delay to eliminate detected nonconformities and their causes.
Follow-up activities include the verification of the actions taken and the reporting of verification results.
Reference: QSP for Internal Audit QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/04 in Process Manual -MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 24 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
8.2.3 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF PROCESSES
The organization has applied suitable methods for monitoring, and where applicable, measurement of the
quality management system processes. These methods demonstrate the ability of the processes to achieve
planned results. When planned results are not achieved, correction and corrective actions are taken, as
appropriate to ensure conformity of the product.
Following Quality management system processes have been identified for monitoring and measurement
as appropriate:
o Customer Satisfaction
o Internal Audit of Quality Management System
o Project Analysis
o Supplier Performance
o Process Measurements as given in individual department process maps
8.2.4 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCT
The organization’s quality assurance team (testing team) test the project before delivery to client or
intermediate stages of development based on test plan prepared while design planning.
The QA team gives the detailed report on project and design and development team handle the bugs and
again re-build is submitted to testing team for final conformation.
Product/ project is not released for delivery or further processing until all planned arrangements (see 7.1)
have been satisfactorily completed, unless otherwise approved by a relevant authority, and where
applicable, by the customer.
8.3 CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING PRODUCT
Non-conformance reported in products / projects is documented.
The software items that are impacted by the non-conformances are identified. If required, persons using the
product are notified.
The impact of the non-conformances is evaluated. If required, access to the non-conforming software items
is restricted and they are prevented from further use. The non-conforming product is disposed of, in one of
the following ways-
o Reworking and correcting the defect
o Deferring it to a further release
o Obtaining a concession from the client or as provided in the contract
o Rejecting the existing product and redeveloping it afresh
a) By taking action to eliminate the detected nonconformity,
b) By authorizing its use, release or acceptance under concession by appropriate authority and,
when applicable, by the customer,
c)By taking action to preclude its original intended use or application.
Non-conformity with QMS/ Project Management Plans
Non-conformities are raised during Internal Audits, Surprise Audits, and External Audits or on occurrence of
difference in the QMS processes and implementation.
The SDH/Project Manager where the non-conformity Report (NCR) is raised identifies the corrective and
preventive action. MR tracks to closure all NCR's raised and ensures effective implementation of corrective
and preventive actions agreed.
The NCR trends and analysis is presented in the Management Review meeting for review and organization
level action required if any.
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 25 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
Reference:
QSP for Purchase
QSP for Network & System Administration
QSP for Testing
8.4 ANALYSIS OF DATA
The organization determines, collects and analyzes appropriate data to demonstrate the suitability and
effectiveness of the quality management system and to evaluate where continual improvement of the quality
management system can be made. This includes data generated as a result of monitoring and measurement
and from other relevant sources.
The analysis of data provides information relating to;
Customer satisfaction,(see 8.2.1)
Conformance to requirements, (see 8.2.4)
Characteristics and trends of processes and products including opportunities for preventive
actions, and
Against Process Measurements given in Annexure II, the trends are prepared either in tabular or graphical
format periodically, preferably before each round of Internal Audit and HoDs submit the data in MRM for
review
Internal Audits
Internal Audit Summary Reports is prepared by MR after each round of Internal Audit and submits in
Management Review.
Supplier performance (7.4)
Reference:
QSP for Management Review (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/03) in Process Manual MR
QSP for Corrective and Preventive Action (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/05) in Process Manual MR
8.5 IMPROVEMENT
8.5.1 CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
The organization continually improves the effectiveness of the quality management system through the
use of quality policy, quality objectives, and audit results, analysis of data, corrective and preventive
actions and management review.
8.5.2 CORRECTIVE ACTION
The organization takes corrective actions to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in order to prevent
recurrence. Corrective actions taken are appropriate to the effects of nonconformities encountered.
A documented procedure has been established to define requirements for;
a. Reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints)
b. Determining cause of nonconformities,
c. Evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur,
d. Determining and implementing action needed,
e. Records of the actions taken (see 4.2.4), and
f. Review of the effectiveness corrective actions taken
Reference:
QSP for Corrective & Preventive Action (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/05) in Process Manual MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 26 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
8.5.3 PREVENTIVE ACTION
The organization determines action to eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities in order to
prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions taken are appropriate to the effects of potential problems.
A documented procedure has been established to define requirements for;
a. Determining potential nonconformities and their causes,
b. Evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities,
c. Determining and implementing action needed,
d. Records of results of actions taken (see 4.2.4), and
e. Review of the effectiveness preventive actions taken
Reference:
QSP for Corrective & Preventive Action (QSP/ EPATHUSA/MR/05) in Process Manual MR
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 27 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
ANNEXURE I - SEQUENCE AND INTERACTION OF PROCESS
CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY(Management Review)
Business
Development
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Project
management
Testing
Delivery /
Uploading
Network
Administration
Purchase
HR
Contract Review,
Complaints
Handling &
Collecting
Feedback
Review Customer
Requirements and
project planning
Project Execution
(Coding, Database
Design and Unit
Testing)
Testing by
manual testing
Network Support
& Systems
Maintenance
Recruitment
Training
Purchasing
Against
Indents from
N & A and
Projects depts.
PRODUCT REALIZATION
MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT
Review PPI
Review PPI
Review PPI
Review PPI
Review PPI and
Supp
Performance
Review PPI and
Training
Effectiveness
INTERNAL AUDIT
CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 28 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
ANNEXURE II ORGANIZATION CHART
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 29 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
Responsibilities & Authorities
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 30 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
ANNEXURE III REFERENCES
Sl. No
Document Name
Document Number
1.
QSP for Control of Documents
QSP/EPATHUSA/MR/01
2.
QSP for Control of Records
QSP/EPATHUSA/MR/02
3.
QSP for Management Review
QSP/EPATHUSA/MR/03
4.
Process Manual HR (QSP for HR)
QSP/EPATHUSA/HR/01
5.
Process Manual Business Development
QSP/EPATHUSA/BD/01
6.
Process Manual Purchase (QSP for Purchase)
QSP/EPATHUSA/PUR/01
7.
Process Manual Projects
NA
8.
Process Manual Network & Administration(QSP for
Network &System Administration)
QSP/EPATHUSA/N&A/01
9.
QSP for Internal Audit
QSP/EPATHUSA/MR/04
10.
QSP for Corrective & Preventive Action
QSP/EPATHUSA/MR/05
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL (QSM/ ePATHUSA/01)
Page 31 of 32 Rev.:1.0, Dt: March 15, 2018
ANNEXURE IV - QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Organizational Objectives
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
Customer satisfaction
90%
1 Year
Customer satisfaction Survey
reports
Customer complaints
Nil
1Year
Customer complaints register
reports
Delivery schedule adhence
80%
1Year
Daily work report
New technology
Departmental Objectives
Marketing
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
Customer satisfaction
90%
1 Year
Customer satisfaction Survey
reports
Number of customer to be
added
5
1 Year
Customer list
Production
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
Delivery schedule adhence
80%
1Year
Daily work report
Maintenance
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
Break down Hour
2% of total working hours
1Year
Break down register
HR
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
To Provide trainings to
employees
At least 4 Hours Qtr for
each staff member
6 months
Training register
MR
OBJECTIVE
GOAL
TIME FRAME
RECORDS TO REFER
Internal Audit Effectiveness
Number of Repeated
(Same Nature) NC to be
minimized
1Year
Internal audit report
Document Control
Effectiveness
Number of NCs on
Document control in
external / internal audits
Max 1
1Year
Internal audit report

Navigation menu