Torch Igniter Simulator Readiness Review 102212 Oxy Pfbc
User Manual: 102212
Open the PDF directly: View PDF 
.
Page Count: 37
| Download | |
| Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
Oxy-fired Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor (Oxy-PFBC) DE-FE0009448 Kickoff Meeting Morgantown, WV October 22, 2012 EAR 99 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 2 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 3 PFBC-102212 Oxy-fired Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor (Oxy-PFBC) Overview Goals and Objective Description and Impacts 1.Goals •Phase 1 Description •Validate the Oxy-PFBC process with specific process performance and economic models developed by NETL •Budget: $1.267M ($1.0M DOE funding) •Impacts •Enable production of electricity from coal with near zero emissions •Captured CO2 may be sequestered at dedicated sites or oilfields for enhanced oil recovery • Capture >90% of CO2 with no more than 35% increase in cost of electricity 2.Overall Objectives • Enable direct capture of all emissions, including CO2 • Verify economic feasibility of Oxy-PFBC • Mature to TRL 6 3.Phase I Objectives • Validate performance and plant economics with NETL guidelines • Identify technology gaps that need to be closed to reach TRL 6 Commercialization path • Proof of concept testing / studies (~2 years) • Pilot plant ( ~2 years) • Demo Plant (~4 years) • Commercial Plant Demo (5-10 years) Novel Technologies - Pressurized combustion with O2 enables: • High efficiency through staged combustion and reduced O2 use • Heat recovery from exhaust H2O vapor for higher efficiency • Economical carbon capture due to pure pressurized CO2 exhaust stream ready for sequestration Team members & roles • Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne – Lead, PFBC technology • Linde, LLC – Gas supply, CPU technology, HEX design, EPC • Pennsylvania State University – Sorbent reaction risk mitigation, fluidized bed design support • Electric Power Research Institute – End user insight, technology gap assessment, cost modeling • Jamestown Board of Public Utilities – End user insight, demo site Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Schedule Tasks Q1 ATP Q2 GFY 2013 Q3 Q4 Interim Brfg Program Mgt Design Interim Report System Design and Analysis Technology Gap Analysis Tech Gaps Identified Mitigations Defined Application Complete Phase II Application Prep Page 4 PFBC-102212 Final report ZEPSTM Powerplant Concept Pressurized combustion enables heat capture from water vapor Oxy-combustion eliminates N2 from exhaust for economical CO2 capture Staged combustion improves efficiency and reduces O2 demand This program’s focus Enhanced efficiency and zero emissions • Program focused on Oxy-PFBC with steam-Rankine cycle • Supercritical CO2 Brayton can be utilized for added efficiency Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 5 PFBC-102212 Oxy-PFBC Layout Steam Headers O2/Recycle CO2 Inlet Flue Gas Outlet Convective HEX Bed Fill Combustion Wall HEX Coal/ Limestone Injection Stages In-Bed HEX In-Bed Heat Exchanger In-Bed HX External manifolding for maintainability Bed Drain Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 6 PFBC-102212 Oxy-PFBC Predicted Performance Air-Fired SCPC Heat Input, MWth Gross Power, Steam Turbine, MW Total Auxiliary Loads, MWe Net Power Output, MWe Net HHV Efficiency, % Carbon capture (>90% is DOE Objective) Oxy-Fired without CO2 Capture Atmospheric SCPC 1,396 1,878 PWR Oxy-PFBC 1,662 580 787 739 30 550 39.4 232 555 29.5 189 550 33.1 0% 90% 98% Baseline 50% 30% DOE/NETL-2007/1291 Case 1 DOE/NETL-2007/1291 Case 5a Increase in COE relative to SCPC w/o carbon capture (<35% is DOE Objective) • PWR Oxy-PFBC preliminary performance predicted to exceed DOE objectives • Provides 98% carbon capture (goal of >90%) • LCOE increased by less than 30% (goal of <35%) • Phase I objective includes validation with NETL guidelines Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 7 PFBC-102212 Oxy-PFBC Key Features Booster Compressor CO2 Product 3 1 1 Baghouse 2 2 ASU Flue-gas Heat Recovery 3 Recycled Flue Gas CO2 Purification & Compression Cyclone Flue Gas Coal Liquid Separator Limestone Reheat Steam HP Steam Steam Power Cycle Waste Water Waste Solids To Cooling Steam Turbine Block Combustor Cooling Waste Solids 275 MWe Net 12PD-137-010 Efficiency Enhancement • Staged combustion with elutriation – Reduces O2 consumption, with high sulfur capture • Oxy combustion – Reduces energy required for CO2 purification • Pressurized – Reduces CO2 compression required for sequestration Cost Reductions • PFBC – More compact combustor with lower Capex • Simpler, lower-cost CPU • Elimination of FGD (Potentially) Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 8 PFBC-102212 Changes Since Proposal • Pilot Size reduced from 4-6 MWth to 1MWth • Specific testing identified for Penn State • Address new risk item (below) with testing and analysis • New Risk Identified • Re-evaluated In-bed Heat Exchanger (IHX) risk • Initiated discussions with additional partners for Phase II • Consol (Pilot Testing) • Tata Power (Commercialization) • Others Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 9 PFBC-102212 Commercialization Plan Duty Size 1 MWth 1.2’ ∅ 100MWth 10’ ∅ 275 MWe 24’ ∅ Cold Flow Tests • Lateral Mixing • Bubble Control • Elutriated Flow Hindering • Superficial Velocity Range Materials Tests • Corrosion/Erosion in Rel. Environment for >1000 hrs • Orientation effects • Studding effects • Shielding effects BOP Systems Pilot Plant 2000 hrs Demonstrates: • Staged Combustion • Combustion/Sulfur Capture • Heat transfer • Lateral Mixing • Injection Component Performance • Corrosion/Erosion • Klinker/deposit formation • Upset Condition effects Efficiency & Cost Improvements DemoPlant 3+ years Demonstrates: • Operation at scale • Component Life estimates • Develop Operating Parameters • Overall System Experience • Maintenance Issues Commercial Demonstration 5-10 years Demonstrates: • System Efficiency • O&M Costs • Establish Life Warranties 12PD-137-006 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 10 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 11 PFBC-102212 Oxy-PFBC Layout Steam Headers O2/Recycle CO2 Inlet Flue Gas Outlet Convective HEX Bed Fill Combustion Wall HEX Coal/ Limestone Injection Stages In-Bed HEX In-Bed Heat Exchanger In-Bed HX External manifolding for maintainability Bed Drain Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 12 PFBC-102212 Phase 1 Objectives • • • • • Validate System Performance of Oxy-PFBC with steam-Rankine system using standardized tools (ASPEN) and specified guidelines • Baseline Performance – DOE/NETL-2010/1397, Rev 2 • Process Simulation – DOE/NETL-341/081911 • Feedstock Baseline – DOE/NETL-341/011812 • CO2 Impurity Baseline – DOE/NETL-341/011212 Validate plant economics of Oxy-PFBC system using standardized tools and compare with established baseline • Baseline Costs – DOE/NETL-2010/1397, Rev 2 & 341/082312 • Cost Methodology – DOE/NETL-2011/1455 Perform Technology Risk Assessment per Attachment E of DEFE0000636 • Identify Technology Gaps • Plan/execute near term risk mitigation Finalize business agreements with team members Complete Phase II application Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 13 PFBC-102212 Phase 1 Tasks WBS # WBS Level WBS Title 1.0 Task Project Management and Planning 1.1 Subtask Project Monitoring and Control 1.2 Subtask NEPA Documentation 1.3 Subtask Briefings, Periodic Reports and Conference Attendance 2.0 Task System Design and Analysis 2.1 Subtask Design Basis Definition 2.2 Subtask System Performance Analysis 2.3 Subtask Economic Performance Analysis 3.0 Task 3.1 Subtask Technology Gap Identification 3.2 Subtask Risk Mitigation and Pilot Plant Planning 4.0 Task 4.1 Subtask Technical Narrative 4.2 Subtask Budget Justification 4.3 Subtask Partner and Subcontractor Support Project Management Plan (and updates) Phase 1 Topical Report Technology Engineering Design Basis Report Technology Engineering Design Interim Report Final Phase 1 Technology Engineering Design and Economic Analysis Report Final Phase 1 Technology Gap Analysis Technology Gap Analysis Phase II Application Preparation Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY Phase 1 Deliverables EAR99 Phase II Application Page 14 PFBC-102212 Task 1.0 – Project Mgt and Planning • Ensure coordination and planning of the project with DOE/NETL and other project participants, including the monitoring and controlling of project scope, cost, schedule, and risk, and the submission and approval of required NEPA documentation. • Maintain and revise the Project Management Plan, and provide periodic reports on activities in accordance with the Federal Assistance reporting Checklist attached to the plan. • Prepare detailed briefings for presentation to the Project Officer at the Project Officer’s facility located in Pittsburgh, PA or Morgantown, WV • Project kick-off meeting held within 45 days of project start date • Project status briefing held no more than 30 days before submittal of the final report • Provide Interim Report 6 months after award • Complete one presentation at a National Conference - TBD Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 15 PFBC-102212 Task 2.0 – System Design and Analysis • Due End of October • Due 6/29/13 Develop a Design Basis Document that describes the approach to be taken to perform the system study, including definition of the cases to be studied and the assumptions to be made for the process and economic performance analyses. Two cases are included in the proposal baseline - 275MWe New Supercritical Steam plant, and a >275MWe steam plant retrofit. Complete Configuration Definition and System Performance analysis for the cases identified in the Design Basis Document using AspenPlus per NETL report, “QGESS: Process Modeling Design Parameters”, and complete Economic performance analysis per NETL report, “QGESS: Cost Estimation Methodology for NETL Assessments of Power Plant Performance”. Document results in an Interim and a Final Design and Economic report per FOA DEFE0000636 Attachment A requirements. Deliver all process simulations and economic models with brief descriptions of modeling approaches to DOE. Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 16 PFBC-102212 Task 3.0 – Technology Gap Analysis • Due 6/29/13 Complete an analysis of the current state of development of all the major/critical process components for the proposed technology, identify the research needs required to fully develop the technology to commercialization, and show how the proposed Phase II efforts along with any research and development efforts required (or ongoing) outside of the Phase II proposal will aid in the development of the proposed technology. Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 17 PFBC-102212 Task 4.0 – Phase II Application Preparation • Deliver a Phase II project application per the requirements of DEFE0000636 Attachment F that proposes efforts focused on the development and testing of: • Novel process components at the laboratory/bench/pilot scale prior to scale up to a fully integrated system • Bench/pilot scale integrated systems Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 18 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 19 PFBC-102212 Team Members & Responsibilities Organization Role/Responsibility Project lead & PFBC technology Process & system engineering Risk mitigation & pilot test planning Gas supply and clean-up systems PFBC Heat exchanger design support Fluidized bed design support Sorbent reaction risk mitigation Field demonstration unit site Engineering support & review Voice of the end-user Review of process and cost modeling Lead - x Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 20 PFBC-102212 PWR • Roles and Responsibilities • Overall project lead • PFBC technology provider • Lead for System Design and Analysis, Phase II Application • Previous Experience • Operational H2 generator field demonstration unit (Current) • Fluidized bed and chemical looping operating above atmospheric pressure, and experience with oxy-fired systems • PWR’s Compact Gasifier System, and the Dry Solids Pump programs supported by PWR, federal and state/provincial governments and private sectors (Current) • Fluidized bed design, analyses, and qualifying components (e.g., In-bed Heat Exchangers) for commercial operation through a DOE-sponsored test program (1980 -1989) • Strategic Fit • The Oxy-PFBC fits within PWR’s 50 year legacy of advanced energy production systems and supports PWR’s continued thrust in the clean fossil energy sector • Unique qualifications • 50 years experience in advanced technology development for energy and propulsion • Relevant core capabilities: Advanced combustion with oxygen, fluidized beds, coal combustion, heat exchangers, sophisticated analysis and design, advanced technology development Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 21 PFBC-102212 The Linde Group • Roles and Responsibilities • Jointly define design basis of the proposed oxyfuel system • Lead economic analysis and support the integrated system performance, with a focus on: • Flue gas processing (with Linde’s LiCONOx® technology) • Heat exchanger (HEX) design support (i.e. condensing HEX based on Linde’s Coil Wound technology) • Oxygen supply and optimization/integration of air separation unit (ASU) • Critically review technical gaps based on EPC experiences • Jointly prepare for Phase II pilot project application • Previous Experience • Commercial scale aMDEA based CO2 capture from natural gas, Hammerfest, Norway • Pilot scale CO2 processing and DeNOx system for Oxyfuel, Schwarze Pumpe, DE • Pilot scale advanced solvent based PCC demo, Niederaussem, DE • Ongoing DOE sponsored pilot scale PCC demo, Wilsonville, AL • Development of novel integrated oxygen supply technology for oxyfuel (DOE funded project) • Strategic Fit • Leading industrial gas supplier and engineering firm with global footprint • Strong corporate commitment to Clean Energy technology development and commercialization • Unique qualifications • Over 130 years of experiences in engineering and technology innovation • Unique combination of industrial gas supply business and engineering capability Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 22 PFBC-102212 The Pennsylvania State University • Roles and Responsibilities • Sorbent reaction risk mitigation • Review literature and identify technology gaps • Develop a technology maturation roadmap to close identified gaps. • Conduct necessary early analyses and/or tests, if feasible during Phase I that may be further refined during Phase 2. • Support in Fluidized bed Design • Previous Experience • PSU conducted the largest and most extensive study in a laboratory and at a full scale operating CFB boiler in identifying factors that control sulfur capture characteristics of limestones and dolostones in1990s and worked with several industries in this area. • Produced more than half a dozen theses (PH.D. and M.S.) in the area of sulfur capture and attrition mechanisms of limestones in CFB boilers including a study on sulfur capture by limestones at high pressures. • Strategic Fit • Sorbent performance is a key component in the demonstration and development of Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne's (PWR's) Pressurized Fluidized bed Combustor (PFBC) concept. • Unique qualifications • With PSU’s proven record with several scientific papers in this area and current activity understanding of the mechanisms and models, it is uniquely positioned in this partnership Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 23 PFBC-102212 Electric Power Research Institute • Roles and Responsibilities • Voice of the end-user • Review of process and cost modeling • Technology gap analysis • Previous Experience • Extensive utility-scale fluidized bed boiler field monitoring experience – bubbling and circulating beds. • Monitoring and operations of a pressurized coal combustor/gasifier at the US Department of Energyfunded Pressurized Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Alabama. • Numerous engineering and economic evaluations of utility power plant efficiency improvement technologies. • EPRI and PWR have ongoing projects since 2010 on ZEPS related R&D • Strategic Fit • EPRI has routine dealings with electric utilities who are candidates for deploying pressurized oxy-coal technology and can bring the technology to these utilities. • EPRI personnel bring unique field experience with utility-scale fluidized bed combustion at both atmospheric pressure and elevated pressure. • Unique qualifications • Significant direct experience in coal-fired power plant operations and maintenance. • On-going access to domestic US and worldwide coal-burning electric utilities and those contemplating coal-fired power plants. • Operations and monitoring at the AEP Tidd PFBC project in the 1990s; experience directly relevant to PWR’s pressurized oxy-FBC technology. Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 24 PFBC-102212 Jamestown BPU • Roles and Responsibilities • Planned host site for the Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PFBC technology • Predict the economic feasibility of the project as it relates to a power producer Company logo here • Previous Experience • Have operated coal-fired power plants for nearly 100 years • Have operated natural gas combined cycle power plant for nearly 15 years • Participated in CCP I-3 in pursuing a 50MWe Oxy-Coal CFB Project • Strategic Fit • The Oxy-Fired PFBC fits within Jamestown Board of Public Utilities needs as an alternative 15-25 MW power producing facility • Plan for initiating 15-25 MWe retrofit by 2015 with operation beginning no later than 2019 • Unique qualifications • Local Business Foundation, Political, and Customer support for advanced clean coal technology project to be implemented within its community • Municipal Utility with electric generation experience; coal and natural gas power plant currently in operation Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 25 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 26 PFBC-102212 Risk Mitigation- Relevant Experience Materials Tests • Baseline Corrosion rates in relevant environments Proved Heat Exchanger Design, Hanger & Supports Design and Heat Transfer 24”x24” Combustor 3-250 hr tests Determined Dynamic Stresses Identified Corrosion mechanism and material susceptibility Optimized Injection Bed Design, Bubble Control, injection Layout Battelle Columbus Labs Rocketdyne 6’x6’ Combustor 1980 hrs 18”x18” Combustor (IR&D) Demonstrated: • Injector Layout • Start Transient IHX Load Following AFB and BOP System Design, Construction Demonstrates: • Corrosion/Erosion • Bed Operation • Heat Transfer • IHX manifolding & Support • No Klinker/Deposits Material Evaluation: Heat exchanger, supports, cooled/uncooled, ox-rich/lean environments 12PD-137-008 Atmospheric Fluidized Bed (AFB) Project Provided Evaluation of IHX materials & Fluidized Bed Combustor Design Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 27 PFBC-102212 Risk Mitigation- Relevant Experience 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Proof of Concept Tests Pilot Tests Hot Fixed Bed Test Demonstrated Chemistry Demonstrated elutriated solids hydrodynamic characteristics and baffle design Pilot Plant Cold Flow Test 12PD-137-011 Hydrogen Generator Broke Ground on Elutriated Bubbling Bed Operation and Identified Design Parameters Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 28 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 29 PFBC-102212 Phase 1 Schedule Start Date End Date PredeTotal cessor Cost Tasks O N D J F GFY-2013 M A Phase I Kick-Off Briefing Phase I ATP M J Phase I Interim Briefing J A S GFY 2014 Phase II NEPA ATP Approval GFY 2015 GFY 2016 Pilot Plant Commissioned Project Milestones Project Management Plan Design Basis Report Design Interim Report Design and Economic Analysis Final Report Technology Gap Analysis Phase I Topical Report Phase II Application Phase 1 Deliverables 1.0 Project Management and Planning 1.1 Project Monitoring and Control 10/1/12 9/30/16 $114K 7/1/13 3/31/14 1.2 NEPA Documentation $9K 3.2 10/1/12 9/30/16 $65K 1.3 Briefings, Reports & Conferences 2.0 System Design and Analysis 10/1/12 10/31/12 $467K 2.1 Design Basis Definition 2.2 System Performance Analysis 11/1/12 6/30/13 $133K 2.1 11/1/12 6/30/13 $36K 2.1 2.3 Economic Performance Analysis Future Phases 3.0 Technology Gap Analysis 3.1 Technology Gap Identification 11/1/12 3/31/13 $156K 2.1 1/1/13 6/30/13 $97K 3.1 3.2 Risk Mitigation &Pilot Plant Planning 2.2,2.3, 4.0 Phase II Application Preparation 4/1/13 6/30/13 $97K 3.2 10/1/13 9/30/14 tbd 3.2, 4.0 6.0 Pilot Plant 7/1/14 9/30/16 tbd 5.0 7.0 Field Demonstration Planning 4/1/15 9/30/16 tbd 5.0 8.0 Commercialization Plan 4/1/14 9/30/16 tbd 3.2 5.0 Component Risk Mitigation Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY Phase 1 EAR99 Page 30 PFBC-102212 Phase II Topical Report Phase 1 Deliverables • Technology Engineering Design Basis Report (due October 31, 2012) • Technology Engineering Design Interim Report (due March 31, 2013) • Final Phase I Technology Engineering Design and Economic Analysis Report (due with Phase II application by June 29, 2013) • Final Phase I Technology Gap Analysis (due with Phase II application by June 29, 2013) • Quarterly Progress reports (December 31, 2012; March 31, 2013;June 30, 2013) • Final report (9/30/2013) Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 31 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 32 PFBC-102212 Budget Spend Plan 1.4 Cum Spending ($ - millions) 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 33 PFBC-102212 Cost Share Plan Cost share funding Government Quarter Funding ($) Total 1 2 3 4 1,000,000 249,456 340,485 354,189 55,870 Total 267,070 66,622 90,933 94,593 14,921 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY PWR 171,891 42,834 57,629 61,289 10,138 EAR99 Linde EPRI JBPU 62,654 12,500 7,500 15,663 3,125 1,875 21,929 4,375 2,625 21,929 4,375 2,625 3,133 625 375 Penn State 12,525 3,125 4,375 4,375 650 Page 34 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 35 PFBC-102212 Summary • Power generation based on Oxy-PFBC technology shows significant potential to meet DOE goals for CO2 capture and LCOE • CO2 Capture: 98% (vs. 90% DOE goal) • LCOE increase: <30% (vs. <35% DOE goal) • PWR Team has the breadth of capabilities to assess and mature technology during Phase 1 and beyond • Multiple commercialization opportunities being defined • Team has initiated Phase 1 work with updates to technology and gaps based on insights from operating air-fired PFBC plants • Discussions initiated with Consol towards Phase 2 efforts • Team looks forward to continued partnership with DOE upon validating Oxy-PFBC performance and economics Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 36 PFBC-102212 Agenda 1:00 Introductions by NETL Fout 1:15 Project Overview Subbaraman 1:30 Phase I Objectives & Tasks Mays 1:50 Team Members & Responsibilities Mays (Lead) 2:10 Risks & Mitigation Mays 2:25 Phase I Schedule & Deliverables Follett 2:30 Phase I Budget & Spend Plan Follett 2:35 Summary Subbaraman 2:40 Discussions/Action Items All 3:00 Adjourn Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne PROPRIETARY EAR99 Page 37 PFBC-102212
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.5 Linearized : No Page Count : 37 Language : en-US Title : Torch Igniter Simulator Test Readiness Review Author : Tom Walczuk Create Date : 2012:11:29 17:06:39 Modify Date : 2012:11:29 17:06:39 Producer : Microsoft® Office PowerPoint® 2007 Creator : Microsoft® Office PowerPoint® 2007EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools