GEMSS SINGLE S Guidance Ems Mass Incident Deployment

User Manual: GEMSS SINGLE

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 168 [warning: Documents this large are best viewed by clicking the View PDF Link!]

Operational Templates
and Guidance for EMS
Mass Incident Deployment
June 2012
U.S. Fire Administration
Mission Statement
We provide National leadership to foster a solid foundation for
our re and emergency services stakeholders in prevention,
preparedness, and response.
Developed for the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) under Funding Opportunity Number
DHS-10-USFA-105-000-04 by the National Emergency Medical Services Management Association.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
This page was intentionally left blank.
Acknowledgements i
Acknowledgements
The expert review panel for this publication was composed of senior Emergency Medical Service (EMS)
leadership from a broad domain of stakeholders. Each contributed time and expertise to ensure that the fi-
nal publication was useful to local level emergency planners in the EMS sector. Without their guidance and
commitment to developing a practical, accurate, and relevant set of tools, this document would not have
made it out of the planning stages. A special thank you goes out to Aarron Reinert, Steve Delahousey, and
Mike McAdams for preparing and presenting information of key interest during the meeting for this proj-
ect. Without the input and guidance from each stakeholder organization and their representatives on the
expert review panel, this document would not have come to fruition.
Finally, Federal partners Rick Patrick and Bill Troup provided background and guidance as the project pro-
gressed from idea to implementation.
Expert Review Panel
National EMS Management Association: Project Team
Skip Kirkwood, NEMSMA President/Chief, Wake County EMS
Sean Caffrey, Project Manager/EMS Operations Program Manager, CDPHE
Jim Buell, Editor in Chief and Subject Matter Expert/Managing Partner, MTOG LLC
Keith Hart, Subject Matter Expert/Senior Partner, MTOG LLC
Rosalind Cooper, Editor, Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Jeff Dyar, Meeting Facilitator, The Far View Group, LLC
American Ambulance Association
Steve Delahousey, Vice President, American Medical Response
Center for Leadership Innovation and Research in EMS
Gary Wingrove, Director of Strategic Affairs, Mayo Medical Transport
International Association of EMS Chiefs
James Robinson, Operations Chief, Denver Health Paramedic Division
National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians
Don Lundy, EMS Director, Charleston County, South Carolina
International Association of Fire Chiefs
John Sinclair, Fire Chief/Emergency Manager, Kittitas Valley Fire Rescue
International Association of Fire Fighters
Lori Moore-Merrill, Assistant to the General President
International Association of Flight Paramedics
T.J. Kennedy, Program Manager/Assistant Vice President, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
National Association of EMS Physicians
Dr. Kathy Rinnert, Director GEMSS/EMS Fellowship Programs, University of Texas Southwestern at Dallas
Dr. Brian Schwartz, Executive Lead, Sunnybrook-Osler Center for Prehospital Care
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
ii
National Association of State EMS Ofcials
Joe Schmider, EMS Director, State of Pennsylvania
National Fire Protection Association
Ken Holland, Public Fire Protection Programs
National Highway Trafc Safety Administration
Gamunu “Gam” Wijetunge Office of Emergency Medical Services
National Volunteer Fire Council
Ken Knipper, Chair/EMS Rescue Section
Subject Matter Experts
Mike McAdams, Assistant Chief of Operations, Montgomery County Fire Rescue
Aarron Reinert, National EMS Advisory Committee, Executive Director, Lakes Region EMS
Al Martin, Fire Chief, City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama
U.S. Fire Administration
Bill Troup, Project Officer
United States Department of Health and Human Services
Jack Beall, Director, National Disaster Medical System
United States Department of Homeland Security
Rick Patrick, Director, Medical First Response Coordination, Office of Health Affairs
Dr. Michael Zanker, MD, Senior Medical Officer, Office of Health Affairs
Table of Contents iii
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1
SECTION I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates ........................................................... 3
TEMPLATE 1: The Emergency Medical Services Emergency Operations Plan .............................................. 3
TEMPLATE 2: Basic Hazard Vulnerability Analysis ...................................................................................... 6
TEMPLATE 3: Incident and Event Plans ....................................................................................................... 9
TEMPLATE 4: Basic Incident Deployment Checklists ................................................................................. 14
SECTION II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit ........................................................................................ 19
Introduction to the Coordination Planning Toolkit .................................................................................... 19
High School Football Game .................................................................................................................. 20
Residential Medical Facility Evacuation ................................................................................................ 22
County Fair .......................................................................................................................................... 25
Marathon or Similar Running Events ................................................................................................... 27
Weather-Related Disaster Declaration ................................................................................................... 29
Large College Sporting Event ................................................................................................................ 31
Political Assembly ................................................................................................................................ 34
Auto Racing/Competition ..................................................................................................................... 36
Cancer Walk ......................................................................................................................................... 38
SECTION III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment ...................................................................... 41
Case 1: 2010 Bus Crash in Hartford, CT .................................................................................................... 41
Case 2: 2005 F3 Tornado in Marshall County, KY ..................................................................................... 43
Case 3: 2010 Veterans Administration Hospital Evacuation, Lebanon, PA .................................................. 46
Case 4: 2008 Imperial Sugar Dixie Crystal Plant Fire, Port Wentworth, GA .............................................. 49
Case 5: 2006 Woodward Dream Cruise, Berkley, MI ................................................................................. 52
Case 6: 2010 Ironman Triathlon Event, St. George, UT ............................................................................. 55
Case 7: 2004 Democratic National Convention, Boston, MA ..................................................................... 57
Case 8: Annual Creation Music Festival, Mount Union, PA ........................................................................ 60
SECTION IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events ..... 63
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 63
Relationship of Event Command to Responding Resources ........................................................................ 67
Communications ........................................................................................................................................ 68
Expanded Scope/Emerging Mass Casualty Incident Management Considerations ....................................... 68
Mass Casualty Incident Planning Checklist ................................................................................................. 71
Incident Action Plan Safety and Risk Analysis, ICS Form 215A ................................................................... 73
SECTION V: Policy Guidance for Emergency Medical Services Aspects of Mass Shelter and Feeding ....75
Emergency Medical Services Participation in Mass Shelter and Feeding ..................................................... 75
Key Functional Roles and Tasks ............................................................................................................ 76
SECTION VI: Local Mutual Aid ............................................................................................................... 81
TEMPLATE: Local, Regional, and State Mutual Aid .................................................................................... 81
TEMPLATE: Inter-Local Government Agreement–Mutual Aid ................................................................... 83
ANNEX I: Sample Mutual Aid Agreements ............................................................................................. 89
EXAMPLE: Single County Mutual Aid Agreement ...................................................................................... 89
EXAMPLE: Single State Mutual Aid Compact ............................................................................................. 93
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
iv
ANNEX II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools .....................................................................111
Sample EMS Operations Plan ..................................................................................................................... 113
Sample After Action Report .......................................................................................................................121
Sample Incident Action Plan ......................................................................................................................127
ANNEX III: Emergency Management Assistance Compact ................................................................... 135
EMAC Operational Considerations ............................................................................................................137
ANNEX IV: FEMA National Ambulance Contract ................................................................................. 141
FEMA National Ambulance Contract Operational Considerations .............................................................143
ANNEX V: Intrastate Mutual Aid System .............................................................................................. 145
ANNEX VI: National Disaster Medical System-Disaster Medical Assistance Teams ............................ 149
ANNEX VII: References ......................................................................................................................... 153
References and Reading List ..................................................................................................................... 153
Introduction 1
Introduction
Project Background
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies regardless of service delivery model have sought guidance on
how to better integrate their emergency preparedness and response activities into similar processes occur-
ring at the local, regional, State, tribal and Federal levels. The primary purpose of this project is to begin
the process of providing that guidance as it relates to mass care incident deployment.
The World Bank reported in 2005 that on aggregate, the reported number of natural disasters worldwide
has been rapidly increasing, from fewer than 100 in 1975 to more than 400 in 2005. Terrorism, pandemic
surge, and natural disasters have had a major impact on the science of planning for and responding to mass
care incidents and remain a significant threat to the homeland. From the attacks of September 11th, 2001,
the subsequent use of anthrax as a biological weapon, to the more recent surge concerns following the out-
break of H1N1 influenza, EMS have a real and immediate need for integration with the emergency manage-
ment process, and to coordinate efforts with partners across the spectrum of the response community.
The barriers identified from the literature review and interviews with national EMS leadership include:
• lack of access to emergency preparedness grant funding;
• underrepresentation on local, regional, and State level planning committees; and
• lack of systematic mandatory inclusion of all EMS provider types in State, regional, and local emer-
gencyplans.
In December 2004, New York University’s Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response held a nation-
al roundtable that included experts from major organizations representing the EMS system as a whole. The
report from that meeting concluded that:
EMS providers, such as fire departments and hospital-based, commercial, and air ambulance services, ensure that patients receive
the medical care they need during a terrorist attack. While EMS personnel, including Emergency Medical Technicians and para-
medics, represent roughly one-third of traditional first responders (which also include law enforcement and fire service personnel),
the EMS system receives only four percent of first responder funding. If EMS personnel are not prepared for a terrorist attack,
their ability to provide medical care and transport to victims of an attack will be compromised. There will be an inadequate
medical first response.
In 2007, the Institute of Medicine in its landmark report Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads issued a rec-
ommendation that stated:
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the Department of Homeland Security and the States should elevate
emergency and trauma care to a position of parity with other public safety entities in disaster planning and operations.
Since the time of these reports Federal progress to address these issues has included the creation of the Office
of Health Affairs (OHA) within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the creation of the Emergency
Care Coordination Center (ECCC) within HHS, and the creation of the Federal Interagency Committee on
EMS (FICEMS) Preparedness Committee. Outputs from these organizations that have contributed to a more
efficient and coordinated integration of EMS into preparedness activity are too numerous to recount here.
In an effort to increase the level of preparedness among EMS agencies, the National Emergency Medical Ser-
vices Management Association (NEMSMA) approached the DHS and OHA to engage them in a partnership
that would provide a greater understanding of the shortfalls in EMS emergency preparedness and provide
resources to fill those gaps.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
2
The primary objective of this project is to understand model policies and practices across a spectrum of
disciplines and provider types that will lead to a better prepared EMS deployment to mass care incidents.
While not a comprehensive guidance document, this project should serve as a foundation for further devel-
opment of EMS specific policies and templates that improve EMS readiness to manage the full spectrum of
hazards that face their communities.
Mass Care Incidents
“Mass Care incident” is defined for the purpose of this publication as any event; planned or unplanned that re-
sults in the need to provide medical care to patients outside of traditional hospital settings. Broadly, incidents
are divided into planned events (special events—like a sporting event or political protest) and unplanned inci-
dents (such as terrorism, earthquakes, natural disasters, or weather related triggering mechanisms).
Review of Model Policies and Protocols
The Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) requires that accredited agencies have
some form of policy to address mutual aid and mass casualty deployment. However, in examining several
example policies, the focus is on tactical definitions of mass casualty incidents, the number and type of per-
sonnel needed to manage those incidents, and boilerplate language regarding compliance with the National
Incident Management System (NIMS). Further research is needed to determine the elements of a success-
ful policy that most directly lead to quality management of mass care and mass casualty incidents. A cross
section of policies has been included to provide planners with a starting point to develop their own agency
level policies regarding mass care and mass incident deployment. These policies come from public and pri-
vate EMS agencies as well as State offices of EMS.
Document Format
The document provides guidance in the form of usable templates and examples. For the purpose of the doc-
ument, the term “template” is used both to mean documents that are intended to be filled in with the user’s
information, as well as a pattern for accomplishing a specific task (operational template). There are several
annexes to the document that describe key programs that foster EMS integration into the planning and re-
sponse process. Those include the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC), FEMA National
Ambulance Contract, and the Interstate Mutual Aid System. Finally the references and resources annex docu-
ments provide an excellent reading list as well as a roadmap to the scientific foundations of the document.
Incident Command System
Terminology and concepts of Incident Command are used throughout this document. Further information
on Incident Command System (ICS) concepts is available through courses developed by FEMA including:
ICS-100, Introduction to ICS for Operational First Responders
ICS-200, Basic NIMS ICS for Operational First Responders
ICS-300, Intermediate ICS for Expanding Incidents for Operational First Responders
ICS-400, Advanced ICS for Command and General Staff, Complex Incidents, and MACS
ICS-402, Incident Command System (ICS) Overview for Executives/Senior Officials
References
• Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response NYU. “Emergency Medical Services: The Forgotten
First Responder–A Report on the Critical Gaps in Organization and Deficits in Resources for America’s
Medical First Responders.” New York: New York University, 2005.
• Institute of Medicine. (2006). Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads. Retrieved from:
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2006/Emergecy-Medical-Services-At-the-Crossroads.aspx
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 3
SECTION I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates
TEMPLATE 1: The Emergency Medical Services Emergency Operations Plan
<EMS AGENCY> EOP Overview
The centerpiece of comprehensive emergency management is the emergency operations plan (EOP). The
<EMS AGENCY> EOP will make use of a variety of sources to ensure compliance with Federal, State, and
local planning guidance. The concepts and guidance within the National Incident Management System
(NIMS) will be used and referenced to ensure consistency with Incident Command System (ICS) principles
and practices. The <EMS AGENCY> will develop an EOP that defines the scope of preparedness and inci-
dent management activities needed to accomplish its assigned missions. The <EMS AGENCY> EOP:
• Assigns responsibility to carry out specific actions at projected times and places during an emergency
that exceeds the capability or routine responsibility of any one agency.
• Sets forth lines of authority and organizational relationships and shows how all actions will be coordinated.
• Describes how people and property are protected in emergencies and disasters.
• Identifies personnel, equipment, facilities, supplies, and other resources available–within the jurisdic-
tion or by agreement with other jurisdictions–for use during response and recovery operations.
• Reconciles requirements with other jurisdictions.
• Identifies steps to address mitigation concerns during response and recovery activities.
An EOP is flexible enough for use in all emergencies. A complete EOP describes the:
• purpose of the plan;
• situation;
• assumptions;
• concept of operations (CONOPS);
• organization and assignment of responsibilities;
• administration and logistics;
• plan development and maintenance; and
• authorities and references.
The EOP contains annexes and appendices appropriate to the <EMS
AGENCY>’s organization and operations. EOPs identify or designate
functional area representatives to the Incident Command, Unified
Command (UC), or multiagency coordination entity whenever pos-
sible to facilitate responsive and collaborative incident management.
An EOP also defines the scope of preparedness activities necessary to
make the EOP more than a mere paper plan. This is because the EOP
defines the requirements to effectively manage response. These re-
quirements are used to set training and exercise goals. Training helps
emergency personnel become familiar with their responsibilities and
acquire the skills necessary to perform assigned tasks. Exercises pro-Ambulances responded as part of the criti-
cal asset deployment for Hurricane Dean.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
4
vide a means to validate plans, checklists, and response procedures and evaluate the skills of personnel.
In addition, exercise can identify gaps in expected performance and outcomes that should be addressed
through a variety of mechanisms. Common mechanisms include additional training, updating or adding
equipment, incorporating technology, or enhancing existing agreements with response partners.
Adjusting an EOP after conducting training or exercises or responding to events also makes it practice-
based. The EOP facilitates response and short-term recovery (which set the stage for successful long-term
recovery). Response actions are time-sensitive. Some post disaster recovery issues, such as the rebuilding
and placement of temporary housing facilities, also must be addressed quickly. Advance planning makes
performing this task easier, especially when a changing environment requires midcourse corrections.
<EMS AGENCY> EOP Outline
Basic Plan
• promulgation document/signature page;
• approval and implementation;
• record of changes;
• table of contents;
• purpose, scope, authority, and analysis;
− purpose,
− scope,
− authority,
− hazard vulnerability analysis, and
− capability assessment;
• planning assumptions–employing The Planning P (See diagram on page 19.);
• concept of operations;
• organization and assignment of responsibilities;
• direction, control, and coordination;
• disaster intelligence;
• communications;
• administration, finance, and logistics;
• plan development and maintenance; and
• authorities and references.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 5
Response Partnerships
• fire;
• law enforcement;
• emergency medical services (EMS);
• emergency management;
• Federal agencies;
• hospitals;
• public health agencies;
• public works;
• mass shelter and feeding;
• veterinarians and animal sheltering groups; and
• volunteer and nongovernmental organizations.
Support Agencies
• Identify those agencies that have a support role during an emergency.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
6
TEMPLATE 2: Basic Hazard Vulnerability Analysis
Hazard Vulnerability Analysis for <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE>
<EMS AGENCY>
Introduction
Insert an introduction to the plan here that contains background and methods used to collect information
on the hazards present in the local community.
Geographic Characteristics
Geography
Describe any geographic features such as known fault lines, features that result in geographic isolation of
one or more parts of the jurisdiction (limited river crossings, mountain passes, etc.).
Climate
Describe the climate by season with a focus on climate conditions that have Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) implications such as heat waves, periods of extreme cold, snow, wind hazards, or other weather re-
lated data that poses a hazard to the public.
Demographic Characteristics
Economic Factors
Describe the economic situation in the community. Include average income, home prices, occupancy rates,
and unemployment at a minimum.
Crime Statistics
Describe the crime rate for crimes against persons and any other special criminal risks (gang activity, nar-
cotics trafficking, etc.) that pose special risk to the jurisdiction.
Specic Hazards
Summary
Summarize the type of hazards present in the jurisdiction. Describe the specific hazards found in the com-
munity, natural and/or manmade, using historical data for risk assessment.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 7
Potential Hazards for <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE>
<INSERT HAZARD TYPE HERE>
Describe the type of hazard in detail. Include specific examples of the hazard as it exists in the community.
Differentiate between threats and risks in accordance with risk assessment principles.
History
Describe any history of the incident type including the date, time, and recorded consequences of the event.
Potential Impact
Describe potential impacts to the jurisdiction if the incident type should occur. Focus on impacts on EMS
service, hospital surge, and need for mass shelter or feeding operations.
Vulnerability
Identify points of vulnerability that result in the potential impacts detailed in the paragraph above.
Probability
Estimate the probability of occurrence for this incident type.
Some common hazard types are listed below along with denitions
Dam Failure: Dam failure may be caused by flooding, earthquakes, poor construction, lack of maintenance
and repair, improper operation, or acts of vandalism or terrorism.
Drought: A drought is defined as “a period of abnormally dry weather sufficiently prolonged and severe
enough to reduce soil moisture, water and snow levels to drop below the minimum levels necessary to sus-
tain animal, plant and economic systems.”
Earthquakes: Earthquakes cause damage by strong ground shaking and by the secondary effects of ground
failures and tsunamis. The strength of ground shaking generally decreases with the distance from the
earthquake source. Shaking can be much higher when earthquake waves are intensified by bedrock and
then pass through softer earth materials such as sediment. Ground failures caused by earthquakes include
fault rupture, ground cracking, landslides, rock fall, liquefaction and uplift. Faults do not often rupture
through to the surface. Unstable ground is mostly at risk of the other effects. Any of these failures will af-
fect structures above or below them.
Epidemic: Epidemics are outbreaks of disease that affect, or threaten to affect, a significant portion of a
population in a relatively short period of time. Although usually referring to human contagious disease,
epidemics can also affect domestic and wild animals and crops. Epidemic diseases are usually introduced
into an area from remote regions and inflict devastation because there is no natural or induced immunity.
Forest Fires/Wildres: A forest fire is considered as any uncontrolled burning within a forested area and
uncontrolled and hard to extinguish burning in grassland, brush or woodland.
Flooding: Groundwater flooding occurs when the water table is high and there is persistent heavy rain.
Water collects in any natural depression when the soil can no longer absorb the water.
Hazardous Material: Chemical hazards are created when there is a release of toxic agents into the atmo-
sphere and environment that can harm population, animals, and food supplies.
Heat Waves: A heat wave is characterized by five or more consecutive days of unusually hot weather.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
8
Landslide/Erosion: The term landslide refers to the downward movement of a slope and masses of rock,
soil or other debris under the force of gravity. Slides range in size from thin masses of soil a few yards wide
to deep-seated bedrock slides. The form of initial failure commonly categorizes slides, but they may travel
in a variety of forms along their paths. This travel rate may range in velocity from a few inches per month
to many feet per second, depending largely on slope, material and water content.
Erosion refers to the gradual removal of soil through wind or water action. Erosion may be induced or in-
creased by failure to use ground covers to protect soil from wind or drainage systems to allow good disper-
sal of storm water. Slopes on waterfront can also be severely undercut by normal water flow, wave action or
large waves produced by storms.
Nuclear Incidents: Nuclear incidents result from a release of radioactive material into the atmosphere from
sources such as nuclear power facilities, military installations that house nuclear powered vessels, or nuclear
storage facilities.
Storm:
Destructive storms come in several forms: wind, rain, ice, snow, and a combination. Any winter
storm can pack high winds and heavy rain causing widespread damage. High winds of short duration, such as
tornadoes and strong gusts from thunderstorms, can also be destructive though generally not as widespread.
Terrorism: Terrorism is defined as the use of force or vio-
lence against persons or property violating the criminal laws
of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion,
or ransom. Terrorists often use threats to create fear among
the public for the purpose of influencing political process and
generate publicity. Terrorism can be broken down further
into chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive, and
cyber related forms of attack. Mass shooting incidents can
also be a form of terrorism based upon motivation and intent.
Tsunami/High Waves/Seiches:
Tsunamis are sea waves gen-
erated by seismic activity, underwater volcanic eruptions,
meteor impacts, or landslides.
Volcanoes/Ash Fall: Volcanic eruptions can cause damage through direct exposure to eruption materials
(lava, etc.) or by ash fall. The probability of ash fall depends on wind direction and the volcanic source of
the eruption causing the ash fall. Most of the dangers are to persons in the near vicinity of the volcano.
Other dangers, such as mudflows and ash fall, may exist miles downstream and down wind.
References
• Endsley, M.R. 1995. “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems.” The Journal of the Hu-
man Factors and Ergonomics Society 31 (1): 32-64.
• Woodbury, G.L. “Washington State Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment.” Washington
Emergency Management Division, (2005): 16-24.
Triage station near the sight of the World Trade Cen-
ter after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2011.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 9
TEMPLATE 3: Incident and Event Plans
All events and incidents <EMS AGENCY> participates in will have an Event Plan for planned events, an In-
cident Action Plan (IAP) for unplanned events, or both.
Event and Incident Planning Process
Refer to the chart below for information on the Command and General staff members’ responsibilities for
planning.
Incident
Commander
• Provides overall incident objectives and strategy.
• Establishes procedures for incident resource ordering.
• Establishes procedures for resource activation, mobilization, and employment.
• Approves completed IAP by signature.
• With Safety Officer:
− Reviews hazards associated with the incident and proposed tactical assignments.
− Assists in developing safe tactics.
− Develops safety message(s).
Operations
Section Chief
• Assists in identifying strategies.
• Determines tactics to achieve command objectives.
• Determines work assignments and resource requirements.
Planning
Section Chief
• Conducts the Planning Meeting.
• Coordinates preparation and documentation of the IAP.
Logistics
Section Chief
• Ensures that resource ordering procedures are communicated to appropriate
agency ordering points.
• Develops a transportation system to support operational needs.
• Ensures that the Logistics Section can support the IAP.
• Completes assigned portions of the written IAP.
• Places order(s) for resources.
• Ensures that responders receive operational medical care when needed.
Finance/Admin.
Section Chief
• Provides cost implications of incident objectives, as required.
• Ensures that the IAP is within the financial limits established by the Incident Com-
mander (IC).
• Evaluates facilities, transportation assets, and other contracted services to determine
if any special contract arrangements are needed.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
10
• Incident objectives should be developed that cover the entire course of the incident. For complex inci-
dents, it may take more than one operational period to accomplish the incident objectives.
• The cyclical planning process is designed to take the overall incident objectives and break them down
into tactical assignments for each operational period. It is important that this initial overall approach to
establishing incident objectives establish the course of the incident, rather than having incident objec-
tives only address a single operational period.
• The incident objectives must conform to the legal obligations and management objectives of all affected
agencies.
Sound, timely planning provides the foundation for effective incident management. The National Incident
Management System (NIMS) planning process represents a template for strategic, operational, and tactical
planning that includes all steps an IC and other members of the Command and General Staffs should take to
develop and disseminate an IAP. The planning process may begin with the scheduling of a planned event,
the identification of a credible threat, or with the initial response to an actual or impending event. The
process continues with the implementation of the formalized steps and staffing required in developing a
written IAP. A clear, concise IAP is essential to guide the initial incident management decision process and
the continuing collective planning activities of incident management teams. The planning process should
provide the following:
• current information that accurately describes and assesses the incident situation and resource status;
• predictions of the probable course of events;
• alternative strategies to attain critical incident objectives; and
• an accurate, realistic IAP for the next operational period.
The following five primary phases must be followed, in sequence, to ensure a comprehensive IAP:
1. Understand the situation.
2. Establish incident objectives and strategy.
3. Develop the IAP.
4. Prepare and disseminate the IAP.
5. Evaluate and revise the plan.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 11
Operational Planning Cycle
The IAP must provide clear strategic direction and include a comprehensive listing of the tactical objec-
tives, resources, reserves, and support required to accomplish each overarching incident objective. The
comprehensive IAP will state the sequence of events in a coordinated way for achieving multiple incident
objectives. However, the IAP is based on the best available information at the time of the planning meeting.
Planning meetings should not be delayed in anticipation of future information.
During the initial stages of incident management, planners must develop a simple plan that can be commu-
nicated through concise oral briefings. Frequently, this plan must be developed very quickly and with in-
complete situation information. As the incident management effort evolves over time, additional lead time,
staff, information systems, and technologies will enable more detailed planning and cataloging of events
and “lessons learned.”
The Planning “P”
Preparing for
the Planning
Meeting
IAP
Prep and
Approval
Operations
Briefing
New Start Ops
Period Begins
Execute Plan
and
Assess Progress
Planning
Meeting
Tactics
Meeting
IC/UC Sets
Objectives
Initial IC/UC
Meeting Operational
Period Planning
Cycle
Incident Briefing
ICS 201
Initial Response
and Assessment
Notification
Incident/Threat
The leg of the “P” describes the initial response period: Once the incident/threat begins, the steps are No-
tification, Initial Response and Assessment, Incident Briefing (ICS Form 201), and Initial Incident Command
and, if necessary, expansion to a Unified Command (UC) Meeting.
At the top of the leg of the “P” is the beginning of the first operational planning period cycle. In this circu-
lar sequence, the steps are: Incident Command/UC Sets the Incident Objectives, Tactics Meeting, Preparing
for the Planning Meeting, Planning Meeting, IAP Prep and Approval, and Operations Briefing.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
12
At this point, a new operations period begins. The next step is Execute Plan and Assess Progress, after
which the cycle begins anew with Incident Command/UC Sets Objectives.
Before each operational period begins, the incident objectives must be assessed and updated as needed. Ask
the following questions:
• Is the incident stable, or is it increasing in size and complexity?
• What are the current incident objectives, strategy, and tactics?
• Are there any safety issues?
• Are the objectives effective? Is a change of course needed?
• How long will it be until the objectives are completed?
• What is the current status of resources? Are resources in good condition? Are there sufficient resources?
Tactics Meetings
The purpose of the tactics meeting is to review the tactics developed by the Operations Section Chief.
This includes:
• Determining how the selected strategy will be accomplished in order to achieve the incident objectives.
• Assigning resources to implement the tactics.
• Identifying methods for monitoring tactics and resources to determine if adjustments are required (e.g.,
different tactics, different resources, or new strategy).
• The Operations Section Chief, Safety Officer, Planning Section Chief, Logistics Section Chief, and Re-
sources Unit Leader attend the tactics meeting.
• The Operations Section Chief leads the tactics meeting. The ICS Form 215, Operational Planning Work-
sheet, is used to document the tactics meeting.
Determining Tactics
Incident objectives state what is to be accomplished in the operational period. Make use of the SMART
objective development process:
S–Specic: Is the incident objective wording precise and unambiguous?
M–Measurable: How will achievements be measured?
A–Action Oriented: Is an action verb used to describe the expected accomplishments?
R–Realistic: Is the outcome achievable with give available resources?
T–Time Sensitive: What is the timeframe in which the activity is to occur?
Strategies establish the general plan or direction for accomplishing the incident objectives.
Tactics specify how the strategies will be executed.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 13
Developing Strategy
The Operational Section Chief generates alternative strategies to meet the incident objectives that:
• Are within acceptable safety norms.
• Make sense (is feasible, practical, and suitable).
• Are cost effective.
• Are consistent with sound environmental practices.
• Meet political considerations.
Tactical Direction
• Tactical direction describes what must be accomplished within the selected strategy or strategies in or-
der to achieve the incident objectives. Tactical direction is the responsibility of the IC or the Operations
Section Chief (if that position has been assigned by the IC).
• The IC or the Operations Section Chief gathers input from the Branch Directors and Division and/or Group
Supervisors on alternative tactics. Jointly developed tactics can ensure understanding and enhance com-
mitment.
• Tactical direction consists of the following steps:
−Establish Tactics: Determine the tactics needed to implement the selected strategy. Typically, tac-
tics are to be accomplished within an operational period. During more complex incidents, tactical
direction should be stated in terms of accomplishments that can realistically be achieved within the
timeframe currently being planned.
−Assign Resources: Determine and assign the kind and type of resources appropriate for the selected
tactics. Resource assignments will consist of the kind, type, and numbers of resources available and
needed to achieve the tactical operations desired for the operational period.
−Monitor Performance: Performance monitoring will determine if the tactics and resources selected
for the various strategies are both valid and adequate.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
14
TEMPLATE 4: Basic Incident Deployment Checklists
<EMS AGENCY> Basic Deployment Checklists
Accountability Procedures
RCheck-In.
All responders, regardless of agency affiliation, must check-in to verify their assignment. This can be
coordinated by using an Incident Check-In List (ICS Form 211).
RIncident Action Plan (IAP) Compliance.
<EMS AGENCY> incident/event operations must be directed and coordinated as outlined in the IAP.
Any deviation must be approved by the Operations Chief and communicated to and approved by the In-
cident Commander (IC). <EMS AGENCY> personnel accountability procedures should be documented
within the IAP.
RUnity of Command.
In order to prevent accountability breakdowns, each individual operating on behalf of <EMS AGENCY>
involved in incident management will be assigned to only one supervisor.
RSpan of Control.
Supervisors must be able to adequately supervise, communicate with, manage and control all personnel
under their supervision. Span of control may vary between 3 and 7 personnel per supervisor, with a
recommended ratio of 1 to 5.
RResource Tracking.
Supervisors must record resource status changes as they occur and report those changes to the Resources
Unit. Accountability is dependent upon the incident management organization having a standard re-
source tracking method.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 15
Common Responsibilities
The following checklist is applicable to all <EMS AGENCY> personnel operating in an Incident Command
System (ICS):
RUpon arrival at the incident, check-in at one of the following designated check-in locations:
• Incident Command Post (ICP);
• Base;
• Staging Areas; and
• Other area designated by the Incident Command.
Note: If instructed to report directly to a tactical assignment, check-in with the Division/Group Super-
visor or the Operations Section Chief in charge of the area of operations.
RReceive briefing from immediate supervisor and document briefing on a Unit Log (ICS Form 214).
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
16
RAcquire work materials.
RAbide by organizational code of ethics, policies, procedures, and applicable labor agreements.
RParticipate in Incident Management Team (IMT) meetings and briefings as appropriate.
REnsure compliance with all safety practices and procedures. Report unsafe conditions to the Safety
Officer (SO).
RSupervisors: Maintain accountability for assigned personnel with regard to exact location(s), personal
safety, and welfare at all times, especially when working in or around incident operations.
RSupervisors: Organize and brief subordinates.
RKnow the assigned communication methods and procedures for the Area of Responsibility (AOR) and
ensure that communications equipment is operating properly.
RUse plain language and ICS terminology (no codes) in all radio communications.
RComplete forms, reports, and ICS Form 214 that are required of the assigned position and ensure proper
disposition of incident documentation as directed by the Documentation Unit.
REnsure all equipment is operational prior to each work period.
RReport any signs/symptoms of extended incident stress, injury, fatigue, or illness to a supervisor.
RBrief shift replacement about ongoing operations when relieved at operational periods or during rotation.
RRespond to demobilization orders and brief subordinates regarding demobilization.
RPrepare personal belongings for demobilization.
RComplete demobilization check-out process before being released from the incident, including the re-
turn of all equipment.
RUpon demobilization, report estimated time of arrival (ETA) to home agency.
RParticipate in after-action activities as directed.
Leadership Responsibilities
In National Incident Management System (NIMS) ICS, a number of the leadership responsibilities are com-
mon to all functions within the ICS organization. Common responsibilities of Unit Leaders are listed below.
Medical Branch Director: The Medical Branch Director is responsible for the implementation of the IAP
within the Branch. This includes the direction and execution of branch planning for the assignment of re-
sources within the Branch. The Branch Director reports to the Operations Section Chief and supervises the
Triage, Treatment, and Patient Transportation Group Supervisors as well as the Medical Supply Coordinator.
The Medical Branch establishes command and controls the activities within the Medical Area in order to as-
sure the best possible emergency medical care to patients during a multicasualty incident.
RReview Common Responsibilities.
RReview Group/Division Assignments for effectiveness of current operations and modify as needed.
RProvide input to Operations Section Chief for the IAP.
RSupervise Branch activities.
RReport to Operations Section Chief on Branch activities.
RCoordinate with the agency’s Medical Director, if available.
RMaintain ICS Form 214.
RParticipate in the development of the IAP and review the general control objectives including alternate
strategies as appropriate.
RDesignate Group Supervisors and Treatment Area locations as appropriate.
Section I: Emergency Medical Services Deployment Templates 17
RRecommend Treatment Area locations as appropriate. Isolate Morgue (black) and Minor (green) Treat-
ment Areas away from Immediate (Red) and Delayed (Yellow) Treatment Areas.
RConsider use of a contaminated patient treatment area (Blue). Determine how to differentiate between
contaminated and decontaminated patients.
RRequest law enforcement/Medical Examiner involvement as needed.
RCollect, review, and compile casualty information.
RRecommend additional personnel and resources sufficient to handle the magnitude of the incident.
RDetermine amount and types of additional medical resources and supplies needed to handle the magni-
tude of the incident (medical caches, backboards, litters, cots).
REstablish communications and coordination with Patient Transportation Group Supervisor.
REnsure activation of hospital alert system, local EMS/health agencies.
RDirect and/or supervise on scene personnel from agencies such as Medical Examiner’s Office, Red Cross,
law enforcement, private ambulance companies, county health agencies, and hospital volunteers.
REnsure proper security, traffic control, and access for the area.
RDirect medically trained personnel in coordination with the appropriate Treatment Group Supervisor.
RMaintain ICS Form 214.
Triage Group Supervisor: The Triage Group Supervisor reports to the Medical Branch Director and super-
vises Triage Personnel/Litter Bearers and the Morgue Unit Leader. The Triage Group Supervisor assumes re-
sponsibility for providing triage management and movement of patients from the triage area. When triage
has been completed, the Group Supervisor may be reassigned as needed.
RReview Common Responsibilities.
RReview Group Supervisor Responsibilities.
RDevelop organization sufficient to handle assignment.
RInform Medical Branch Director of resource needs.
RImplement triage process.
RCoordinate movement of patients from the Triage Area (incident site) to the appropriate Treatment Area.
RGive periodic status reports to Medical Branch Director.
RMaintain security and control of the Triage Area.
REstablish Morgue with Medical Examiner personnel when possible.
REstablish area for contaminated casualties if necessary.
Treatment Group Supervisor: The Treatment Group Supervisor reports to the Medical Branch Director and
supervises the Treatment Unit Leaders and the Treatment Dispatch Unit Leader. The Treatment Group Su-
pervisor assumes responsibility for treatment, preparation for transport, and coordination of patient treat-
ment in the Treatment Areas and directs movement of patients to loading location(s).
RReview Common Responsibilities.
RReview Unit Leader Responsibilities.
RDevelop organization sufficient to handle assignment.
RDirect and supervise Treatment Dispatch, Immediate (Red), Delayed (Yellow), Minor (Green), Contami-
nated (Blue) Treatment Areas.
RCoordinate movement of patients from Triage Area to Treatment Areas with Triage Unit Leader.
RRequest sufficient medical caches and supplies as necessary.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
18
REstablish communications and coordination with Patient Transportation Group.
REnsure continual triage of patients throughout Treatment Areas.
RDirect movement of patients to ambulance loading area(s).
RGive periodic status reports to Medical Branch Director.
Patient Transportation Group Supervisor: Transportation Group Supervisor reports to the Medical Branch
Director and supervises the Medical Communications Coordinator and Air and Ground Ambulance Coor-
dinators. This supervisor is responsible for the coordination of patient transportation and maintenance of
records relating to patient identification, injuries, mode of off-incident transportation, and destination.
RReview Common Responsibilities.
REstablish communications with hospital(s).
RDesignate ambulance staging areas(s).
RDirect the transportation of patients as determined by Treatment Group Supervisor or Unit Leaders.
RAssure that patient information and destination is recorded.
REstablish communications with Ambulance Coordinator(s).
RRequest additional ambulances, as required.
RNotify Ambulance Coordinator(s) of ambulance requests.
RCoordinate requests for air ambulance transportation through the Air Operations Director.
REstablish air ambulance landing zone with the Medical Branch Director and Air Operations Director.
RMaintain ICS Form 214.
References
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. “ICS-300: Intermediate ICS for Expanding Incidents (EMI
Course Number: G300).” Emergency Management Institute, 2011.
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. “ICS All Hazards Core Competencies.” Emergency Manage-
ment Institute, 2011.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 19
SECTION II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit
Introduction to the Coordination Planning Toolkit
This collection of operational templates is intended to assist Emer-
gency Medical Services (EMS) personnel in planning for, responding
to, and recovering from a representative assortment of scenarios that
could impact their operations. An emphasis is placed on coordinat-
ing effectively with other agencies that may also be involved in the
response. This toolkit is intended as a starting point, is not compre-
hensive, and must be adjusted for geographical, logistical, and political
considerations.
Preestablished mutual aid agreements are considered essential for ef-
fective response to and recovery from EMS incidents. The following
scenarios will be used to illustrate various planning, response, and re-
covery situations:
• local high school football game;
• residential medical facility evacuation;
• county fair;
• large, participatory sporting event (marathon, ironman, etc.);
• weather-related disaster declaration;
• large college sporting event;
• political assembly;
• auto racing/competition; and
• cancer walk.
Ambulances are staged and ready to help
residents as a hurricane approaches.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
20
High School Football Game
Prepare
Preparing for a local, low-visibility sporting event such as a high school football game begins with collect-
ing information such as:
• requesting agency, point of contact, and contact information for follow-up;
• financial compensation information, if applicable;
• location of event(s) including intended staging location of ambulance and crew, ingress and egress
routes from field;
• contact information for the teams athletic trainer/sports medicine personnel if applicable;
• contact information for any security or event personnel involved; and
• anticipated/historical attendance numbers, issues.
When this information has been obtained, a very brief risk assessment should be performed (if one has not
already been done for this type of event). Contact should be made with any other involved medical person-
nel to coordinate operations:
• Athletic trainers
− Athletic trainers may be able to assist with injured players.
− Athletic trainers may be trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/automated external defi-
brillator (AED) and are likely to be first on scene if a player collapses.
− Can assist with removing protective equipment, such as helmets.
• Sports medicine staff
− Sports medicine staff will be able to assist with injured players.
− Sports medicine staff should be trained in CPR/AED and are likely to arrive before EMS.
• Security staff
− Security staff may have CPR/AED training and should know where AEDs are located at the event.
Security staff will be helpful in locating or moving ill or injured spectators.
− Security staff will also be able to help in guiding additional medical resources to the incident.
• Fire department or EMS agency (if different from your own) that has jurisdiction over the location of
the event.
− If your agency does not have jurisdiction, the agency with jurisdiction may choose to respond and
assume control of any incident that occurs.
Additional Resources:
• National Athletic Trainers’ Association.
• Your State’s Athletic Trainers’ Association.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 21
• American Medical Society for Sports Medicine.
• American College of Sports Medicine.
• National Academy of Sports Medicine.
• American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine.
• American Medical Athletic Association.
• County medical association.
• Local volunteer groups.
Forms:
• When coordinating planning with other agencies, an ICS Form 201 (Incident Briefing) should be sufficient.
• If ICS forms are going to address other disciplines such as security or logistics, add an ICS Form 206
(Medical Plan).
Respond
Responding to an emergency at any spectator sport will become a high-visibility event. Inevitably, photos
and video of the responding personnel will be available on the internet within minutes of the incident oc-
curring. A Public Information Officer (PIO) should be appointed.
If an event occurs in the stands, parking lot, or other areas, security and other event personnel might not be
aware of the emergency. This is where the EMS planning related to collection of contact information will
become useful. Communication personnel can use the contact information to notify event staff as well as
direct them to acquire an AED or other equipment if applicable.
For incidents involving multiple agencies, a copy of the completed ICS Form 201 can help to orient the Inci-
dent Commander (IC) to the area and resources available. Additional ICS forms may be used in the Incident
Action Plan (IAP) based on the type and scope of incident.
Recover
Recovery from this type of event should not be overly complex. Recovery will likely be limited to clean-
ing and restocking equipment according to standard operating procedures (SOPs). In instances involving
emotionally charged situations, such as unsuccessful resuscitation of a child, debriefing or Critical Incident
Stress Management (CISM) may be indicated. If issues arose during the response or patient treatment that
have attracted the attention of conventional or social media, a PIO needs to be appointed for the incident
and active management of the situation should begin.
If the incident involves numerous units or lasts several hours, demobilization procedures should be fol-
lowed and recorded on ICS Form 221 (Demobilization) to ensure that mutual aid and other resources are
properly accounted for and returned to service.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
22
Residential Medical Facility Evacuation
Prepare
Preparations for evacuation of a residential medical facility such as a
nursing home or senior-citizen center should be taken very seriously.
Any large evacuation of a vulnerable population such as this is likely
to result in some injuries or exacerbated illness. Responders are at
increased risk of injuries due to repetitive lifting in a high-stress situ-
ation. Residents are at risk of being injured during moves. The extra
activity and stress of an evacuation may result in respiratory, cardio-
vascular, or other medical complications.
A risk assessment should be performed for your community to deter-
mine which facilities are at highest risk for evacuation. This would in-
clude facilities vulnerable to wildfire, earthquake, flooding and other
weather-related threats. A majority of planning resources should be devoted to these facilities, although
evacuation due to fire or utility failure can occur anywhere.
Evacuation planning should be conducted in coordination with numerous agencies and individuals:
• Decisionmakers from the involved facility.
− Background information such as average census, location of the most vulnerable residents, etc.
− Information on what type of evacuation equipment might be available, such as stair chairs and
evacuation mattresses and where it is stored or obtained in an emergency.
− Responsible for securing receiving facilities for residents during a precautionary evacuation.
− Responsible for providing training to their staff on the evacuation procedures.
− Copies of the facility floor plan outlining exits and locations of emergency equipment.
• Fire department and police department.
− Fire department may provide additional personnel even if no immediate life-threats exist.
− Police department may assist with controlling traffic or provide additional personnel.
• Emergency management.
− Will likely provide the information that triggers decisionmakers at the involved facility to begin a
precautionary evacuation.
− In some situations, officials may order a mandatory evacuation.
− Able to coordinate resources to assist with the evacuation.
• Public health department.
− May be able to assist in coordination process.
− May have access to medical assets such as Medical Reserve Corps or Metropolitan Medical Response
System.
Ambulances await calls during an evacua-
tion of patients with special needs.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 23
• Decisionmakers from facilities that might be asked to receive residents from the evacuated facility.
− May have special restrictions or instructions for receiving residents.
• Mutual aid partners.
− Verify that your mutual aid partners will honor a request for aid if it involves a precautionary evacu-
ation, with no immediate emergency.
• Area EMS agencies.
− Determine type and number of resources that are likely to be available from each agency.
− Estimate time to respond based on location of base of operations.
• Transportation services.
− Wheelchair van services.
− School buses.
− Public buses.
− Taxi services.
• American Red Cross.
− May be involved in coordinating sheltering in the case of an emergency evacuation or if insufficient
receiving facilities can be identified for the evacuees.
• Salvation Army.
− May be involved in providing food or other assistance to temporary shelters.
• National Guard, Medical Reserve Corps, National Disaster Medical System, Metropolitan Medical Re-
sponse System.
− These assets are unlikely to be helpful due to time needed to respond but may be useful if advance
warning of an evacuation available.
Additional Resources:
• National Fire Protection Association–”Emergency Evacuation Planning Guide for People with Disabilities.”
• National Disaster Medical System personnel have extensive experience setting up temporary medical facilities.
• Department of Health and Human Services website is an excellent source of information pertaining to
facility evacuations.
An ICS Form 201 could be used to document planning for a facility evacuation, or a custom operations
template might be used. An ICS Form 215a (Incident Action Plan Safety and Risk Analysis) could be used to
document specific hazards within the building such as hazardous chemicals or bulk oxygen storage.
Respond
When requested to respond to a residential medical facility evacuation, it is important to clearly define roles
and responsibilities. Typically, facility staff are responsible for all activities within the facility such as obtain-
ing admission for the residents at another facility and determining which patients should be transported first
.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
24
Similarly, the EMS service with jurisdiction in the area typically is responsible for residents once they exit
the facility. This includes organizing the loading of buses, ambulances, and other forms of transportation.
However, in a precautionary evacuation situation, facility staff may take on responsibility for organizing
all transports if they have sufficient staff and resources. Regardless of how the incident is organized, EMS
personnel must work very closely with facility staff to ensure that each resident is transported safely to the
appropriate destination.
Additional complexities will be involved in an emergency evacuation. An emergency evacuation will likely
be very personnel intensive and physically demanding, especially in a facility with no or limited elevator
availability. Evacuations involving stairways are especially demanding and will require more personnel
than evacuations at a single-level facility.
A facility evacuation will likely attract the attention of media and will involve concerned family members.
Therefore, appointing a PIO is important.
An incident such as this will likely require ICS Forms 202 (Incident Objective), 203 (Organization Assign-
ment List), 204 (Assignment List), 205 (Incident Radio Communications Plan), and 206 (Medical Plan) as
part of the IAP.
Recover
Recovery from a facility evacuation may take many days. It is important for reimbursement purposes that
EMS personnel keep excellent records of every transport they provide and any costs associated with the inci-
dent. Transportation must be arranged for each resident back to the facility if the building is determined to
be safe to occupy. If the facility suffered sufficient damage, the residents may need to be relocated to more
permanent facilities while awaiting repair of their home.
For protracted or complex events, ICS Form 221 may be warranted.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 25
County Fair
Prepare
Planning for a county fair or similar outdoor event should begin well in advance and will require planners
to decide if the event will require fixed aid stations. Fixed aid stations may be used to provide simple first
aid supplies such as band aids, over the counter medications, and hydration drinks. It is important that
aid station personnel have protocols approved by their medical director that provide guidance on how to
handle nontransport situations that often occur with aid stations.
A simple risk assessment should be performed (if not already performed for this type of event) to determine
the likely emergencies responders will encounter.
Preparing for a local, medium-visibility event such as a county fair will require collecting information such as:
• requesting agency, point of contact, contact information for follow-up information;
• financial compensation information if applicable;
• location of event(s) including intended staging location of ambulance and crew, ingress and egress
routes;
• contact information for any security or event personnel involved; and
• anticipated/historical attendance numbers, issues.
When this information has been obtained, a very brief risk assessment should be performed (if one has not
already been done for this type of event).
• Decisionmakers from the event organizer.
− Background information such as average attendance, high-risk areas, etc.
− Responsible for providing training to their staff on the emergency procedures.
− A map or diagram showing how the event will be laid out, including exits and any obstacles to ac-
cess or egress.
− Coordinate location of aid stations.
• Fire department and police department.
− Fire department may be needed for extrication or rescue situations.
− Fire inspectors will be involved in ensuring safe conditions for the event participants.
• Event security personnel.
− Provide assistance locating 9-1-1 callers at the event.
− May have access to AEDs.
− Provide assistance directing other emergency crews into the event during an emergency.
• EMS service with jurisdiction if different.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
26
• Veterinarians.
− Ensure that EMS personnel know how to contact the veterinarian in an emergency.
− Injured animals may threaten the safety of EMS personnel as well as spectators.
• Mutual aid partners.
− Make sure mutual aid partners are aware of the event.
− Coordinate ingress and egress routes should a mutual aid response become necessary.
• Department of Public Health.
− May be able to assist in providing staff for aid stations.
− Will be involved in ensuring food safety and sanitation at the event.
The following information sources may be helpful during planning for these events:
• American Veterinary Medical Association.
• Department of Public Health–Food Safety.
At a minimum, ICS Forms 201 and 206 should be included in the IAP.
Respond
Events such as these can produce a broad range of injuries, from dehydration to animal bites. Use extreme
caution when operating near livestock or other animals. Sirens may provoke panic in some animals and en-
danger personnel and participants. Fairs are often spread out over a large area and may necessitate coordi-
nation with event personnel to ensure ambulances are parked as close as possible to the patient. In addition,
rough or muddy ground may necessitate alternative patient movement techniques.
Mass casualty situations occurring at events such as these can usually be handled with conventional pro-
cedures, using additional caution around livestock. As with all mass casualty events, media attention and
concerned family members will likely be present. Therefore, a PIO should be appointed.
Recover
Recovery from a mass casualty situation at an event such as this may necessitate extensive cleaning of equip-
ment soiled with dirt or mud. Other unique recovery steps are unlikely.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 27
Marathon or Similar Running Events
Road races such as marathons, half marathons, and shorter events often occur over a very large road course.
Although fixed aid stations may be required, means of responding to incidents on the course are also neces-
sary. Caution must be exercised during response to avoid injury to participants or spectators while attempt-
ing to respond alongside the runners or attempting to cross a closed course.
Please note that runners in a crowd may not notice an ambulance attempting to cross the course due to the
other runners in front of them blocking their vision and the loud background noises from cheering specta-
tors blocking their ability to hear warning devices.
A simple risk assessment should be performed (if not already performed for this type of event) to determine
the likely emergencies responders will encounter.
Prepare
• Event sponsor:
− Determine exact route of course, including road closures and potential emergency crossing points.
− Determine expected attendance for both participants and spectators. (Participants are much more
likely than spectators to request assistance during the event).
− Determine number and capabilities of medical aid stations for the event. EMS personnel may or
may not be involved in staffing/operating the aid stations.
− Determine the number and type of EMS resources needed.
− Determine number and qualifications of aid station personnel needed.
• Law enforcement:
− Coordinate ambulance ingress and egress routes to ensure timely responses and participant and
spectator safety.
− Frequent requestors of medical aid on behalf of spectators or participants. Officers should be pro-
vided instructions on what information dispatch requires in order to determine the patient’s priority.
• Aid station staff (if different agency providing):
− Coordinate ambulance ingress and egress.
− Discuss parameters by which patients will be treated at the aid station, and who will be transported
to a hospital.
− Discuss how to handle moving participants from the course to the aid station.
− Determine whether EMS will be responsible for providing any supplies to the aid station.
• Representative from local hospitals:
− Provide information to local hospitals so they can make informed staffing decisions for the day of
the race.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
28
• Mutual aid partners, local EMS agencies:
− Attempt to determine how many additional resources mutual aid partners and local EMS agencies
may be able to send in case of a mass care incident.
− Make sure mutual aid partners are aware of the race and how it will affect traffic/road closures.
− Events such as these often cross multiple jurisdictions, event planning should incorporate represen-
tatives from each jurisdiction, and Unified Command (UC) will likely be necessary.
Additional Resources:
• American Medical Athletic Association.
• American Road Race Medical Society.
• National Athletic Trainers’ Association.
• Your State’s Athletic Trainers’ Association.
• American Medical Society for Sports Medicine.
• American College of Sports Medicine.
• National Academy of Sports Medicine.
• American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine.
• American Medical Athletic Association.
• County/Local medical society.
• Local volunteer groups.
ICS Forms 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, and 214 (Unit Log) may all be necessary during planning or response
for this type of event. An alternative patient contact form may be considered for some units/situations.
Respond
Units responding to this type of event may be requested to stage a short distance away from the patient
while event personnel package and move the patient to the waiting ambulance by stretcher or specialty
golf-cart style vehicles. It is critical that all ambulances responding to an event such as this are provided
with SOPs guiding whether or not they are permitted to transport patients to the medical aid station.
Recover
Recovery from any mass casualty incident (MCI) is likely to generate a media response, but media will likely
already be on site due to their coverage of the event. Assigning a PIO early will help to manage this. If any
of the medical aid stations become involved in providing care during a mass casualty situation, it is likely
that some mixing of equipment and supplies may occur that needs to be addressed to return units to service.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 29
Weather-Related Disaster Declaration
Disaster declarations caused by weather events such as hurricanes, flooding, tornados, or snow and ice
storms require a few unique planning considerations. Weather events frequently affect your mutual aid
partners in the same way that your jurisdiction is being affected. Therefore, mutual aid assets that might be
available during a mass casualty situation may no longer be available or may not be able to respond to spe-
cific areas due to road conditions. This requires EMS services to ensure they have sufficient surge capacity
to deal with likely occurrences in their area of operation.
Prepositioning of supplies, personnel, and other resources may be necessary to avoid response interruptions
to areas that may be cut off by rising floodwaters, deep snow, or other weather-related barriers. Careful
coordination between adjacent municipalities will help to ensure resources are used efficiently.
An indepth risk assessment is critical to planning for these types of events. This risk assessment will require
coordination with area Emergency Management officials.
Prepare
Planning for such an extensive event may require coordination with:
• Emergency Management officials.
− Conduit to political leaders.
− Coordinate professional risk assessments.
− Establish an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during the event.
• Fire department and law enforcement agencies with jurisdiction.
− EMS ambulances may be stationed at fire stations or police stations to aid in coordination and pro-
vide for crew safety.
• Volunteer organizations such as American Red Cross, Salvation Army, etc.
− Feeding and sheltering of displaced residents likely to be accomplished by one of these two groups.
− EMS crews are often approached about how to find these shelters so they must have current contact
information and location of each shelter.
• Any groups or facilities establishing shelters.
• National Guard.
− May be a resource for disasters declared in advance of an approaching storm.
− May be able to provide assistance responding to requests in areas not accessible by ambulance.
• Animal shelter volunteers.
− Shelter for pets is important for the peace of mind of displaced residents.
• Public Health Department.
− May be able to provide information on vulnerable populations.
− May be able to provide access to additional medical personnel via Medical Reserve Corps or other
avenues.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
30
• Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC). (See Annex III for additional information.)
− If facility evacuations or other medical transportation issues exceed the capabilities of State resourc-
es, State officials will use EMAC agreements to request additional resources from other States.
• Off-road vehicle clubs.
− With careful management, volunteers with off-road capable vehicles may be useful for assisting in
transporting emergency personnel to scenes inaccessible to conventional response vehicles.
− Volunteers may be able to assist emergency responders that become stuck in snow or mud.
− Volunteers may be able to move equipment or personnel from site to site.
• Public Works Department.
− Public works personnel and equipment will be critical during and after weather-related events.
− Snow or debris removal, sandbagging operations, traffic barricades and signage for evacuations, etc.
ICS Forms 201, 202, 214 and 215a may be used during planning for such an incident.
Respond
During a weather-related disaster declaration, typical responses become more difficult and time consuming.
Therefore, prioritization of requests becomes critical. It is important that public safety answering points be
capable of providing medical instructions to callers.
A mass casualty situation during a weather-related disaster will be very challenging for the first EMS unit on
scene. Depending on road conditions, a single EMS unit may need to care for many patients for a significant
period of time while awaiting additional units. As with all MCIs, media attention and concerned family
members are very likely. Therefore, a PIO should be appointed.
Recover
Recovery from an event such as this depends primarily on the damage caused. Recovery may be as simple
as normal cleaning and restocking of units, or it may take months or years for a community to fully recover
when critical infrastructure is damaged or destroyed.
Careful tracking of expenses is necessary for an EMS agency to have any possibility of receiving disaster as-
sistance funds.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 31
Large College Sporting Event
Large college sporting events are similar to smaller sporting events, with an added layer of complexity and
visibility. Most of the same considerations apply, with a few additions.
Prepare
Preparing for a large college sporting event such as a football or basketball game begins with collecting in-
formation such as:
• requesting agency, point of contact, and contact information for follow-up;
• financial compensation information if applicable;
• location of event(s) including intended staging location of ambulance and crew, ingress and egress
routes from event;
• contact information for the teams athletic trainer/sports medicine personnel;
• contact information for any security or event personnel involved; and
• anticipated/historical attendance numbers, issues.
When this information has been obtained, a risk assessment should be performed (if one has not already
been done for this type of event). Contact should be made with any other involved medical personnel to
coordinate operations:
• Athletic trainers.
− Athletic trainers may be able to assist with injured players.
− Athletic trainers may be trained in CPR/AED and are likely to be first on scene if a player collapses.
• Sports medicine staff.
− Sports medicine staff will be able to assist with injured players.
− Sports medicine staff should be trained in CPR/AED and are likely to arrive before EMS.
• Security staff.
− Security staff may have CPR/AED training and should know where AEDs are located at the event.
Security staff will be helpful in locating or moving ill or injured spectators.
− Security staff will also be able to help in guiding additional medical resources to the incident.
• Fire department or EMS agency (if different from your own) that has jurisdiction over the location of
the event.
− If your agency does not have jurisdiction, the agency with jurisdiction may choose to respond and
assume control of any incident that occurs.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
32
Ten Largest U.S. Stadiums By Seating Capacity–College
Stadium Team City State Seats
Michigan Stadium University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 109,901
Beaver Stadium Penn State University University Park PA 107,282
Neyland Stadium University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 102,455
Ohio Stadium Ohio State University Columbus OH 102,329
Bryant-Denny Stadium University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL 101,821
Texas Memorial Stadium University of Texas Austin TX 100,119
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum University of Southern CA Los Angeles CA 93,607
Sanford Stadium University of Georgia Athens GA 92,746
Rose Bowl University of CA Los Angeles Pasadena CA 92,542
Tiger Stadium Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA 92,400
Ten Largest U.S. Stadiums By Seating Capacity–Professional
Stadium Team City State Seats
FedEx Field Washington Redskins Landover MD 91,704
New Meadowlands Stadium NY Giants/Jets East Rutherford NJ 82,566
Cowboys Stadium Dallas Cowboys Arlington TX 80,000
Arrowhead Stadium Kansas City Chiefs Kansas City MO 79,101
EverBank Field Jacksonville Jaguars Jacksonville FL 76,876
Invesco Field at Mile High Denver Broncos Denver CO 76,125
Sun Life Stadium Miami Dolphins Miami Gardens FL 74,916
Ralph Wilson Stadium Buffalo Bills Orchard Park NY 73,967
Bank of America Stadium Carolina Panthers Charlotte NC 73,298
Cleveland Browns Stadium Cleveland Browns Cleveland OH 73,200
Additional Resources:
• National Athletic Trainers’ Association.
• Your State’s Athletic Trainers’ Association.
• American Medical Society for Sports Medicine.
• American College of Sports Medicine.
• National Academy of Sports Medicine.
• American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine.
• American Medical Athletic Association.
• Local volunteer groups and county/local medical society.
Forms:
• ICS Forms 202, 204, 205, and 206 will likely be needed during planning for an event such as this.
• ICS Forms 207 (Incident Organization Chart) and 214 may be required as well.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 33
Respond
Responding to an emergency at any spectator sport will become a high-visibility event. Inevitably, photos
and video of the responding personnel will be available on the internet within minutes of the incident oc-
curring. If an event occurs in the stands, parking lot, or other areas, security and other event personnel
might not be aware of the emergency. This is where the EMS planning related to collection of contact infor-
mation will become useful. Communication personnel can use the contact information to notify event staff
as well as direct them to acquire an AED or other equipment if applicable.
If issues arose during the response or patient treatment that have attracted the attention of conventional or so-
cial media, a PIO needs to be appointed for the incident and active management of the situation should begin.
Recover
Recovery from this type of event should not be overly complex. Recovery will likely be limited to cleaning
and restocking equipment according to SOPs. In instances involving emotionally charged situations, such as
unsuccessful resuscitation of a child, debriefing or CISM may be indicated.
If the incident involved numerous units or lasted several hours, demobilization procedures should be fol-
lowed and recorded on ICS Form 221 to ensure that mutual aid and other resources are properly accounted
for and returned to service.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
34
Political Assembly
Political assemblies or rallies are often emotionally charged events involving groups with diametrically op-
posed viewpoints. Significant potential for conflict exists. Planning for political events will primarily be
handled by law enforcement or security services.
Most political events involve significant intelligence gathering and coordination. Security services and law
enforcement personnel will frequently be aware of and involved in discussions concerning sensitive infor-
mation, which if available publicly, could endanger lives and safety. A basic premise of information security
is to share information only with those that absolutely need to have access to the information. This means
that if a piece of information is relevant to a particular discipline, then that information should be shared,
but if the information will not change how EMS responds to or plans for an event, then there is no need to
share that information. EMS planners may feel put-off by being excluded from certain meetings and plan-
ning activities, but this is a normal part of information security and should not be taken personally.
If EMS planners want law enforcement and security services to include them in their planning process, they
must learn and respect the rules of information security. EMS planners that allow information to leak across
their organization or from their organization to the public are not only demonstrating that they cannot be
trusted with sensitive information, they are also endangering lives and safety.
Prepare
Information gathering may be more difficult or compressed chronologically due to information security
concerns. Close coordination with the following groups or individuals will help ensure that EMS planners
are properly informed and prepared for all likely scenarios.
• lead law enforcement agency;
• involved political officials;
• event organizers/planners;
• press agencies covering the event;
• State information fusion center;
• emergency management officials;
• public health department;
• representatives from area hospitals;
• EMAC (See Annex III for additional information);
• department of public works;
• State police;
• national disaster medical system; and
• national guard.
Additional Resources:
• National Tactical Officers Association.
• U.S. Secret Service.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 35
Forms:
ICS Forms 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 215a and 226 (Individual Performance Rating) may all be required dur-
ing event planning. ICS Forms 200, 204, 214 and 215 are likely to be used during the actual event.
Respond
Credentialing and entry control are critical parts of high-security events such as political assemblies. This
means that responding units may have their entry into certain areas delayed if proper security procedures
are not followed before and during these types of events. Mass casualty events occurring within or as a
result of political assemblies may require greater emphasis on personnel accountability and patient/victim
segregation and control. Any incident that could be the result of hostile action will require that law en-
forcement identify and question each patient/victim. Normally, permitting those with minor or no injuries
to leave the scene is an effective way to reduce the patient load, but law enforcement will likely detain and
question these individuals. This often results in either the individual or law enforcement requesting that
EMS personnel evaluate or treat these victims. Therefore, planning considerations should include more sub-
stantial staffing and focus on the green or minor patient treatment area.
Responders should be prepared to treat multiple patients exposed to riot control agents. Responders should
be prepared to protect themselves from these agents as well as provide effective mass decontamination. Re-
sponders should keep careful records of costs incurred for potential future reimbursement.
Demobilization from large incidents within these events may require use of ICS Form 221.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
36
Auto Racing/Competition
Automobile racing and other forms of automotive competition often involve very high speeds and signifi-
cant potential for injury to competitors and spectators alike. Some modern speedways are designed to pre-
vent out of control vehicles from endangering spectators, but even at these venues, there are numerous pit
crew and other event personnel that are not fully protected by these barricades. Therefore, the potential for
mass casualties with very significant injuries exists.
Automobile competition encompasses a wide range of different events and vehicles. From high speed NAS-
CAR events to low speed but high-energy truck pulls to off road racing, each type of event offers unique
challenges to EMS planners.
Prepare
As with all planning, gather critical background information:
• point of contact with event personnel;
• point of contact with event security personnel;
• expected attendance;
• details about safety equipment unique to event vehicles such as helmets, fuel and electrical cut-offs, or
HANS (Head And Neck Support) system devices;
• details about course access procedures, ingress and egress routes; and
• details about medical aid stations, if applicable.
When this information has been obtained, a very brief risk assessment should be performed (if one has not
already been done for this type of event). Contact should be made with any other involved personnel to
coordinate operations:
• Medical aid station personnel (if not from your service).
− Coordinate staffing and stocking of medical supplies and equipment.
• Rescue technicians responsible for extrication of drivers from vehicles.
− Coordinate precisely where areas of responsibility lie, such as provision of cervical immobilization
equipment or other medical equipment.
• Fire suppression personnel.
− Coordinate who is responsible for clearing EMS personnel to approach after a crash.
− Define hot, warm, and cold zones during extrication process.
• Any other medical personnel involved.
− Course/Event physicians.
− Helicopter pilots and personnel.
• Off-road vehicle clubs.
− For off-road vehicle races, access to the course can be extremely difficult. Off-road clubs may be
able to provide drivers and vehicles to transport EMS personnel out onto the course.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 37
• Amateur radio clubs.
− If radio coverage is an issue on a larger course, amateur radio clubs may be able to provide supple-
mental, long-range communication capabilities to rescue personnel.
Respond
EMS personnel must exercise extreme caution when operating on or near vehicle race tracks. Defined safety
procedures must be followed to ensure that drivers on the course are notified and reduce speed prior to any
personnel attempting to enter the area. EMS personnel must follow direction from course officials on when
to ingress or egress an area. Failure to follow directions could result in injuries not only to EMS personnel
but also could result in crashes and other injuries.
A mass casualty situation during this type of event could involve numerous hazards and significant mecha-
nism of injury. Careful coordination between involved agencies will be necessary to effectively manage this
type of event.
ICS Form 206 is likely the only ICS Form that EMS personnel may be responsible for during this type of
event. During the event, ICS Form 214 may be requested from medical personnel. Use caution when com-
pleting this form as it should not include any Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
protected information.
Recover
No unique recovery actions are likely. Due to media coverage, EMS public relations staff may wish to be-
come involved. Protracted or complicated events may require the use of ICS Form 221.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
38
Cancer Walk
These types of events usually involve thousands of participants walking from point to point during the day
and sleeping, eating, and showering in temporary facilities constructed for their use. These events usually
involve significant numbers of heat and other types of injuries. EMS resources may be requested to respond
anywhere along a 20 mile route or they may be requested to respond to the temporary “tent city” erected to
support the participants and staff. These events are dynamic and logistically complex. Careful coordination
with event organizers will be necessary to ensure EMS resources are in the right places at the right time, in
sufficient quantity.
These types of events create complex coordination issues due to their geographic scope. Simultaneously, the
tent city may be in one jurisdiction, many of the participants may be in another jurisdiction, and a few par-
ticipants may even be in a third jurisdiction. Careful coordination is necessary to ensure that all portions of
the event are appropriately covered.
Due to the fact that these events are rarely held in the same location year after year, it may be difficult for
an EMS agency to gain experience covering this type of event. This means that previous operational plans,
participant numbers, and response histories for the event may need to be acquired from other agencies in
order to form a clear picture of what to expect.
Prepare
This type of event will require careful coordination with the following groups or individuals:
• The event organizers.
− Event organizers may be contracting for medical services, or the event operations management firm
may be in charge of this.
− Financial compensation.
• The event operations management company.
− Clearly define who has authority for coordinating EMS response and management of multiple casu-
alty incidents.
− Define clear roles and responsibilities for EMS response to each area of the course, to the medical aid
stations on the course, and for staffing of medical aid stations.
− Determine communication methods and channels.
• Involved public health departments.
− Ensuring food safety and sanitation during event.
− May be involved in staffing or inspection of medical aid stations.
• Department of public works.
− Street closures, movable barricades, temporary signage, etc.
• All fire, police, and EMS agencies that will be impacted or involved in the event.
− Critical to define areas of responsibility.
− There may be jurisdiction issues if the event management company wants a single EMS agency to
oversee the entire event, when the event moves outside that agencies jurisdiction.
Section II: Mass Care Coordination Toolkit 39
• Representatives from impacted hospitals.
− Potential for increased load.
− Medical aid stations may be staffed by hospital nurses or physicians, affecting available staff on days
of the event.
• Aeromedical.
− If portions of the course are significant distance from level one or level two trauma centers, consider
scouting potential helicopter landing zones along those sections of the course.
Although the event operations management firm may choose to use ICS forms for documenting the event
operations plan, EMS planners will likely only be called upon to complete a 206 (Medical Plan). Alterna-
tively, the event 206 may be prepared by medical aid station or other personnel.
Respond
Although a lead EMS agency contracted by the event management firm may be able to gain permission to
respond to individual participants within another agency’s jurisdiction during the event, it is highly unlike-
ly that the same EMS agency will permit an outside agency to run a high-visibility MCI that occurs within
their jurisdiction. This has the potential to create enormous command and control issues during a mass
care incident. These issues must be anticipated and solutions agreed-upon by all involved.
Some areas of a course may be difficult to access by conventional ambulance, so alternative response ve-
hicles such as bikes, motorcycles, or golf carts may be required.
It is important to notify event operation personnel of emergencies at the event that are called into 9-1-1.
Operations personnel may not be immediately aware of these events but may have event personnel that can
help locate callers or provide first aid or CPR while awaiting EMS arrival.
Recover
Recovery from an MCI should require only minimal documentation and demobilization compared to nor-
mal restocking, cleaning, and documentation procedures. As with most mass casualty incidents, significant
media attention is likely, and therefore a public relations representative should be appointed.
Reimbursement for expenses during an incident might be obtainable from the event operations manage-
ment firm, but careful records will be critical as multiple agencies may attempt to recover expenses for
same or similar services.
For extremely protracted or involved incidents, an ICS Form 221 may be needed.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
40
This page was intentionally left blank.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 41
SECTION III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment
Case 1: 2010 Bus Crash in Hartford, CT
Introduction
This case illustrates the need for solid local mutual aid agreements and protocols between Emergency Medi-
cal Services (EMS) agencies. EMS personnel from four different agencies were required to adequately man-
age this incident. Planning and the use of agency-to-agency mutual aid agreements set the stage for success-
ful management of the incident.
Incident Summary
On Saturday, January 9, 2010, a school bus from the Greater Hartford Academy of Math and Science departed
from Hartford, CT, with 16 students and a teacher aboard to bring students to a high school. A collision oc-
curred between the bus and a Volvo station wagon as they were traveling on Interstate 84, causing the bus to
go off the highway and proceed down an embankment. The bus then came to rest approximately 50 feet be-
low the roadway. The students and the teacher on the bus suffered multiple injuries. A passer-by called 9-1-1.
Unified Command (UC) was established by the Hartford Fire Department (HFD). The first responding
Chief Officer established command, then took over the Operations Section Chief role once the second re-
sponding Chief Officer was briefed and took command of the fire response. The first responding EMS
supervisor assumed command of the EMS response and assigned personnel to triage and transport the pa-
tients. After an extensive rescue operation by the HFD, 17 patients were transported to local hospitals by
several private EMS agencies.
Key Response Partners
Fire Agencies (Emergency Support Function (ESF)-4)
Local Fire Department–Hartford Fire Department
EMS Agencies (ESF-8)
Local EMS Agency–AETNA
Local EMS Agency–AMR-Hartford
Regional Mutual Aid EMS Agency–AMR-Waterbury
Regional Mutual Aid EMS Agency–ASM
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Saint Francis Hospital
Hartford Hospital
Connecticut Children’s Medical Center
John Dempsey Hospital
Law Enforcement Agencies (ESF-13)
State Police–Connecticut State Police
Local Police–Hartford Police Department
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
42
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Fire Agency Role in Patient Triage
HFD established UC at the scene of this incident. Facing a complex rescue and extrication operation, the
bulk of HFD resources were focused on patient access. During that critical step, HFD supplied triage tags
to responding EMS resources to facilitate the patient triage process in addition to providing personnel to
directly triage patients in cooperation with EMS resources.
EMS Mutual Aid (Local and Regional)
The EMS response to this incident was achieved through the activation of regional agency-to-agency mutual
aid agreements. The first-arriving agency, AETNA, assumed command of EMS operations and requested 11
additional ambulances. Additional resources included five ambulances from AMR (Hartford), three ambu-
lances from AMR (Waterbury), and three ambulances from ASM.
In the After Action Report (AAR) of this incident, there was some confusion as to the precise position the
EMS supervisor occupied in the Incident Command System (ICS). EMS representative to the UC was one
option, while EMS Branch Director was the other. Agencies should ensure that they establish a clear posi-
tion in the ICS for EMS functions in coordination with response partners.
Law Enforcement Role in Patient Tracking and Flow
In this incident, the Connecticut State Police have statutory responsibility for the overall management of
interstate highway mishaps in Connecticut. As part of this responsibility, the patient tracking element nor-
mally located in ESF-8 was integrated with the ESF-13 function. This element was operationalized through
the deployment of State troopers to the hospitals to assist with management of patient flow in addition to
communication with transporting EMS resources at the scene to ensure a complete count of patients.
Reference
• City of Hartford After Action Report. Motor Vehicle/Bus Accident I84 Westbound, January 2010.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 43
Case 2: 2005 F3 Tornado in Marshall County, KY
Introduction
This case demonstrates how the number of casualties does not always dictate the scope and complexity of
the EMS response. EMS personnel from four agencies worked together to treat and transport 21 patients
in Marshall County, KY, during a rash of tornados that impacted a four county region and extended into
neighboring States. Although the initial response was local in nature, it quickly evolved to include response
partners at regional, statewide, and Federal levels.
Incident Summary
An F3 tornado struck portions of Marshall County, KY, on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, at approximately
2:15 p.m. The tornado caused minimal damage in the southwest corner of the county. The tornado then
cut a path of destruction for 10.8 miles toward the northeast. The width of the tornado was 475 to 500
yards in some locations. Over 120 residences were damaged, with 19 being totally destroyed. There were
113 camper trailers at a local campground and only 2 were left salvageable. There was 1 fatality at a mobile
home park and over 20 individuals were injured as a result of the event.
The ensuing response required a true multidisciplinary approach. Initial search and rescue efforts were
conducted by county volunteer fire agencies with support from Marshall County Rescue Squad. The EMS
command was established as part of the countywide unified command by Marshall County EMS personnel.
The coordinated mutual aid response was organized through the Marshall County Emergency Operations
Center (EOC). Initial actions were focused on providing rescue operations, emergency medical operations,
and management of mass shelter operations.
Key Response Partners
Transportation Agencies (ESF-1)
Kentucky Department of Transportation
Marshall County Road Department
Graves County Road Department
Livingston County Road Department
Communications Agencies (ESF-2)
Marshall County Amateur Radio Association
Marshall County 911
Public Works and Engineering Agencies (ESF-3)
West Kentucky Rural Telephone and Technology
West Kentucky Rural Electric
Fire Agencies (ESF-4)
Eleven Marshall County Volunteer Fire Departments
Emergency Management Agencies (ESF-5)
Kentucky Division of Emergency Management
Marshall County Emergency Management
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
44
Mass Care, Emergency Assistance Agencies (ESF-6)
Lakeland Red Cross
Mt. Carmel Methodist Church
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8)
Marshall County EMS
Mercy Regional EMS
Livingston County EMS
Calloway County EMS
Public Health Agencies (ESF-8)
Kentucky Department of Health
Marshall County Department of Health
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Marshall County Hospital
Search and Rescue Agency (ESF-9)
Marshall County Rescue Squad
Law Enforcement Agencies (ESF-13)
U.S. Coast Guard
Kentucky National Guard
Kentucky State Police
Kentucky Vehicle Enforcement
Marshall County Sheriff’s Office
Benton Police Department
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Overall Incident Complexity
This incident resulted in the disruption of public infrastructure including power outages, numerous blocked
roadways, and disruption in phone services. Responders mobilized local, regional, and State resources in an
organized and progressive manner. EMS operational goals and objectives centered on supporting rescue op-
erations to locate and extricate persons trapped in damaged structures, provision of emergency medical ser-
vices, and maintaining essential public services. Planning the integration of EMS operations into the overall
disaster response through coordination and structured agreements with the primary agencies responsible
for managing each Emergency Support Function that could be brought in to play in an incident such as this
enhances the efficiency, safety, and effectiveness of the response.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 45
Use of Satellite Phones
Satellite phones and computers provided by West Kentucky Rural Telephone in addition to satellite phones
equipped on the Marshall County Mobile Command Post were used to coordinate with Marshall County
Emergency Management and other response partners. The use of satellite phones is a viable alternative to
cellular communications in the event of network overload or outage. If satellite technology is included in the
communications plan within the jurisdiction, it is important to ensure that end user personnel are familiar
with the operation, limitations, and utility of the specific devices they will be using during a deployment.
References
• NOAA Forecast Office Paducha, KY. Damage Survey Results for Marshall County Kentucky, November 15, 2005.
• Marshall County Emergency Management. After Action Report, December 12, 2005.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
46
Case 3: 2010 Veterans Administration Hospital Evacuation, Lebanon, PA
Introduction
This incident demonstrates the importance of regional coordination of EMS transport assets. Pennsylva-
nia uses a regional model to coordinate EMS response to major incidents. Though this was primarily a
weather-related evacuation under controlled conditions, the initial responding agency recognized the need
for regional asset activation early on. The Lebanon County Emergency Management Agency managed the
requests for additional assets, and regional task force leadership ensured effective integration of assets into
the onscene ICS.
Incident Summary
In July 2010, south central Pennsylvania was in the midst of a heat wave. Temperatures were consistently
above 90 degrees. On July 21, 2010, a day where the heat index was 104 degrees, the Lebanon Pennsyl-
vania Veterans Administration Medical Center experienced an environmental emergency at their facility.
Temperatures in the hospital had become elevated due to problems with the air conditioning system in the
hospital. Due to concerns about patient safety, hospital administration made the decision to evacuate the
facility. The resulting EMS response lasted 26 hours during which 50 ambulances and wheelchair vans and
150 personnel were used to move 79 patients to several receiving facilities across two States.
Key Response Partners
Transportation Agencies (ESF-1)
Northern Lancaster County Transport
Lebanon Transit
Emergency Management Agencies (ESF-5)
Lancaster County Emergency Management Agency
Lebanon County Emergency Management Agency
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8)
Central Medical Ambulance
Cumberland Goodwill EMS
Duncannon EMS
First Aid and Safety Patrol
Life Team EMS
Manheim Township EMS
Northwest EMS
SCTF EMS Task Force 38 (Dauphin/Lebanon)
SCTF EMS Task Force 36 (Lancaster)
SCTF EMS Task Force 67 (York)
SCTF EMS Task Force 21 (Cumberland/Perry)
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 47
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8) (continued)
South Central EMS
Susquehanna Township EMS
Susquehanna Valley EMS
Upper Dauphin County EMS
Warwick Community Ambulance
West Shore EMS
White Rose Ambulance
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Altoona Veterans Administration Medical Center
Coatesville Veterans Medical Center
Good Samaritan Hospital, Lebanon
Heart of Lancaster Medical Center, Lancaster
Holy Spirit Hospital, Camp Hill
Horsham Clinic
Lancaster Hospice
Lebanon Veterans Administration Medical Center
Manor Care, York
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Philadelphia Veterans Medical Center
Philhaven
Reading Hospital
Wilmington (DE) Veterans Administration Medical Center
Wilkes-Barre Veterans Medical Center
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Regional Structure for Mass Incident Response
This incident made extensive use of regional EMS response teams. The South Central Task Force (SCTF)
is one of nine regional counter-terrorism task forces in Pennsylvania. SCTF encompasses an 8-county re-
gion, covering an area of approximately 5,200 square miles and a population of over 1.7 million. Within
the south central region, there are 312 municipalities. Over 90 percent of fire/rescue organizations are
volunteer-based, including the hazardous materials and Urban Search and Rescue (US&R)/technical rescue
units. There are 326 fire departments, 143 police departments, and 135 ambulance services in the region.
The efforts used to catalog and plan deployment of those resources proved invaluable during this incident.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
48
Participation in regional teams is voluntary. Funding for the program comes from Federal grants. SCTF
provides a common framework to coordinate operations, communications, and protocols during a mass
incident. In this case, teams activated through this mechanism arrived at the incident with transport ca-
pable ambulances and personnel. The teams did not bring the equipment and Incident Command Trailers
assigned to each team due to the nature of the incident. However, each task force has organic ICS capability.
Organizing EMS assets into regional task force elements provides an organized means to deploy assets dur-
ing an emergency.
References
• Noll, G. “Regional Response to All-Hazards Events: A Commonwealth Perspective.” Commonwealth,
Vol. 15-3, May 2009.
• South Central Task Force. Lebanon (PA) Veterans Administration Medical Center Evacuation-EMS Operations After Action
Report/Improvement Plan, November 2010.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 49
Case 4: 2008 Imperial Sugar Dixie Crystal Plant Fire, Port Wentworth, GA
Introduction
This incident occurred in a predominantly rural area in South Georgia. The explosion and fire resulted in
14 fatalities and triggered EMS and fire response stretching across 12 counties. The response was an exer-
cise in managed chaos in which incident managers throughout the ICS were challenged with communica-
tion, logistics, finances, and personnel accountability problems that stretched existing plans to the limit.
Incident Summary
At approximately 7:20 p.m. Thursday, February 7, 2008, a dust initiated explosion and fire occurred at the
872,000 square foot Imperial Sugar Dixie Crystal Plant in Port Wentworth, GA. The explosion destroyed
three large reinforced concrete sugar elevators and several buildings. The resulting fire spread throughout
the majority of the plant resulting in concentrated pools of molten burning sugar. At the time of the inci-
dent there were 121 employees and contractors. There were 36 people injured and transported to Memorial
hospital; of those, 14 were non-life-threatening injuries. Nineteen victims were transported to the Augusta
Burn Center. Over the following week, search efforts recovered the remains of eight missing workers from
the debris. Additional fatalities were recorded as patients succumbed to their injuries. The final (14th) fa-
tality occurred 200 days following the event.
This incident stimulated political debate at the State and Federal level culminating in legislation that is
aimed at preventing similar incidents.
Key Response Partners
Over 200 agencies participated in this incident. The following is a sampling identified in the AAR from the
incident.
Fire and EMS Agencies (ESF-4) (ESF-8)
Ft. Oglethorpe Fire Department
Garden City Fire Department
Port Wentworth Fire Department
Pooler Fire Department
Thuderbolt Fire Department
Savannah Fire Department
Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police
Bloomingdale Fire Department
Emergency Management Agencies (ESF-5)
Chatham County Emergency Management Agency (CEMA)
Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA)
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
50
Mass Care, Emergency Assistance Agencies (ESF-6)
Salvation Army
Savannah Chapter of American Red Cross
Low Country Health District, South Carolina
Search and Rescue (ESF-9)
Georgia Search and Rescue Team (GSAR)
Georgia Department of Corrections Canine Teams
Georgia Body Recovery Team
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Candler Hospital
Memorial Hospital
St. Joseph’s Hospital
Joseph M. Still Burn Center, Augusta, GA
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Effective Triage to Specialty Care Centers
The triage process identified 19 patients with significant burns that required specialty care. Patients were
triaged, and then transported to Memorial Hospital for stabilizing care. In the midst of a complex res-
cue, paramedics from the Savannah Fire Department and other agencies proactively identified patients that
would require specialty transport and communicated up through the ICS to ensure that appropriate air
medical and ground transport assets were allocated to transport the patients to the Joseph M. Still Burn Cen-
ter in Augusta. Though the AAR identifies several issues with the distribution of patients, particularly the
decision to not send patients to St. Joseph Hospital at all, and send just seven patients to Candler Hospital,
the overall triage system in this event correctly identified critical burn patients that required advanced spe-
cialized care and ensured that they were transported to a facility with adequate landing facilities that would
accommodate air medical evacuation assets. This identification expedited the process of acquiring specialty
care and ultimately saved lives.
Coordination with Federal Aviation Administration
The Incident Commander (IC) in cooperation with county and State emergency management agencies re-
quested that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) institute Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) that
ensured that only emergency flights would be authorized in the airspace surrounding the incident. When
requested, the FAA immediately instituted the requested flight restrictions. Exceptions to the TFR were co-
ordinated through the County Emergency Management Agency. EMS and incident planners should consider
working with emergency managers to institute flight restrictions for incidents where there will be significant
traffic due to the use of air medical assets, fire suppression assets, or aerial surveillance and survey platforms.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 51
Personnel Safety: Consultation with Structural Engineer
Due to the depth of the catalog of assets available to emergency managers at this incident, when it was
discovered that consultation with a structural engineer was needed to provide the safest possible operating
environment for rescue and triage personnel, the County Emergency Management Agency was able to locate
and mobilize a structural engineer within an hour of requesting the asset. Planners should identify struc-
tural engineers within their jurisdiction with the expertise and willingness to assist in an emergency situa-
tion, then equip and train those engineers to ensure a proper state of readiness to respond to an emergency.
Reference
• Chatham Emergency Management Agency. After Action Report: Imperial Sugar Dixie Crystal Plant, April 2008.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
52
Case 5: 2006 Woodward Dream Cruise, Berkley, MI
Introduction
This annual event emphasizes the importance of local coordination for multijurisdictional events. EMS is
provided for this event via a combination of traditional fire based systems, private ambulance services, and
public safety departments. Public safety departments fulfill law enforcement, fire, and EMS roles within
their local jurisdiction. Planning is accomplished through a multidisciplinary, multiagency group repre-
senting the full spectrum of public safety and public health services.
Incident Summary
The Woodward Dream Cruise is the world’s largest one-day automotive event, drawing about 1.5 million
people and 40,000 classic cars. This population is distributed along a 14 mile stretch of road running from
the city of Detroit to the City of Pontiac in southeast Michigan. The event involves participants driving a
circuit, and engaging in demonstrations that highlight the capability of muscle cars and other high perfor-
mance vehicles. The event is scheduled to occur on a single day, but in reality covers a three day opera-
tional period, resulting in multiple planning and logistical challenges for EMS planners. EMS volume results
from exacerbation of chronic illnesses among the spectators, and minor traumatic injuries. In 2006, the
event resulted in over 93 EMS transports to local hospitals and 328 patient contacts from EMS assets over a
24-hour operational period.
Key Response Partners
Communications (ESF-2)
Oakland County ARES/RACES
Fire Agencies (ESF-4)
Berkley Public Safety Department
Birmingham Fire Department
Bloomfield Hills Public Safety
Bloomfield Township Fire Department
Detroit Fire Department
Ferndale Fire Department
Huntington Woods Public Safety Department
Pontiac Fire Department
Royal Oak Fire Department
Emergency Management Agencies (ESF-5)
Oakland County Emergency Management
Public Health Agencies (ESF-8)
Oakland County Public Health
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 53
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8)
Alliance Mobile Health
Berkley Public Safety
Birmingham Fire Department EMS
Bloomfield Hills Public Safety
Bloomfield Township Fire Department
Detroit Fire Department EMS
Ferndale Fire Department EMS
Huntington Woods Public Safety
Pontiac Fire Department EMS
Royal Oak Fire Department EMS
Star EMS
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak
Doctors Hospital Pontiac
Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital
Providence Hospital Southfield
St. Joseph Medical Center
Law Enforcement (ESF-13)
Berkley Public Safety
Birmingham Police Department
Bloomfield Hills Public Safety
Bloomfield Township Police Department
Detroit Police Department
Ferndale Police Department
Huntington Woods Public Safety
Oakland County Sheriff Department
Pleasant Ridge Police Department
Michigan State Police
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
54
Law Enforcement (ESF-13) (Continued)
Pontiac Police Department
Royal Oak Police Department
Wayne County Sheriff Department
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Coordination Between Multiple Jurisdictions and Service Models
Oakland County, MI, provides EMS service via several models. During usual operations, EMS agencies of
different types do not ordinarily interact. This event stimulates interaction between the various delivery
models in the county, and takes advantage of formal mutual aid agreements between agencies. Due to traf-
fic congestion, EMS agencies respond across jurisdictions and operate in a cooperative manner throughout
the operational period. In addition, special event assets such as bike teams, and nontraditional EMS units
such as Gators and golf carts provide first response services across jurisdictions. Emergency planners that
have disparate EMS service models within their jurisdiction should collaborate to ensure seamless opera-
tional protocols in the event of a planned or unplanned mass incident.
Communications in a Multijurisdictional Incident
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Oakland County made the decision to implement a
countywide Internet Protocol (IP) based radio system titled Oakland County Wireless Integrated Network
(OakWIN). This system has the capability to coordinate communications across the entire public safety
spectrum including the use of common talk groups and talk paths that enable seamless communication
across political jurisdictions. The system is designed to support live patching so that users in one talk group
can be integrated into another talk group as needed. This facilitates communication between response en-
tities across disciplines. Communications is one of the most frequently cited areas of concern in incident
after action reviews. This system addresses many of those concerns and lessons learned from the imple-
mentation of this system could be useful to emergency planners.
References
• OCMCA. After Action Review: EMS at Woodward Dream Cruise, November 2006.
• CLEMIS. OAKWIN User Manual, October 2005.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 55
Case 6: 2010 Ironman Triathlon Event, St. George, UT
Introduction
Ironman St. George is a 140.6 mile triathlon (swim/bike/run) on the World Triathlon Corporation Iron-
man racing circuit. Casualties are common due to temperature and the sheer difficulty of the bike and run
courses. For the 2010 event, Utah Department of Health EMS Strike Team and Regional Strike Team estab-
lished a 100 bed medical station at the swim location.
Incident Summary
The Utah Department of Health, EMS Strike Team and Regional Strike Team (Southwest Regional Response
Team) supported the Ford Ironman St. George event, May 1, 2010. The Ironman event consisted of athletic
participation in three sequential stages—the swim (2.4 mile), bike (112 mile), and run (26.2 mile) event.
There are time cutoffs to complete each stage with an overall time not to exceed 17 hours. In this event
1,915 athletes started the race.
The Strike Teams’ role in the event was to establish four 25 bed BLU-MED tents at the swim venue to ensure
immediate access to care in the event of an emergency. Due to the low water temperature of 59 degrees,
and the extended period of immersion, 60 athletes presented to the tent with hypothermia. Advanced
treatment was required for 38 athletes who were so ill, they were not permitted to continue the race. Due
to the interventions of the Strike Teams, no athletes required transportation to the hospital.
Key Response Partners
Some event locations were staffed by Utah Homeland Security, local law enforcement, EMS, and fire depart-
ments not specifically enumerated in the AAR.
Fire Agencies (ESF-4)
Hurricane Fire Department
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8)
Hurricane Fire Department
Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Service
Southwest Regional Response Team
Public Health Agencies (ESF-8)
Southwest Utah Public Health Department
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Dixie Regional Medical Center
Salt Lake City Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VA)
External Affairs (ESF-15)
World Triathlon Association
Ford Ironman St. George Planning Committee
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
56
EMS Mass Incident Deployment Pearls
Prevention of Unnecessary Ambulance Transports
The presence of the Strike Teams and associated temporary medical facility prevented transfer of patients to
the hospital for simple hypothermia. This resulted in improved efficiency for the entire medical operation
at the event. Ambulances were not needed to move patients that essentially needed to be rewarmed. Treat-
ing patients that are safe to keep at the event site in lieu of transport also preserves emergency room (ER)
capacity for more serious events should they occur.
Use of Special Events as Opportunity to Exercise Capabilities
In addition to the primary provision of medical care, the Utah Department of Health Strike Team used the
Ironman St. George event as an opportunity to exercise their mobilization and demobilization procedures,
use of the ICS, and communications strategies under real world conditions. Planners should seek opportu-
nities to exercise capabilities at preplanned special events when appropriate.
Reference
• Utah Department of Public Health. Ford Ironman St. George Triathlon, May 2010.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 57
Case 7: 2004 Democratic National Convention, Boston, MA
Introduction
The 2004 Democratic National Convention (DNC) required the planning and execution of medical opera-
tions within a complex security environment. Boston Emergency Medical Services (Boston EMS) developed
a Medical Consequence Management Plan that serves as a model for the medical management of National
Special Security Events to this day. Though elements of the plan are not suitable for wide dissemination, the
following planning pearls are useful for the implementation of medical plans at virtually any larger venue.
Incident Summary
The 2004 DNC was designated a National Special Security Event (NSSE) by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). The U.S. Secret Service (USSS), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were responsible for interagency incident management coordina-
tion during the event. The USSS designated Boston EMS the lead agency for health and medical services
related to the Convention. Boston EMS Chief Richard Serino was appointed to the Executive Steering Com-
mittee. As a member of the Executive Steering Committee, Chief Serino coordinated the development of
the DNC Medical Consequence Management Plan.
The plan was formed through the combined effort of a panel representing 39 agencies. The resulting docu-
ment was produced in hard copy and as dynamically linked Adobe PDF files for electronic dissemination.
Distribution of the plan was limited to incident participants and those with a need to know. The plan
served as the tactical operations plan for the event and contained clear lines of responsibility for each ele-
ment of the medical community involved in the event.
In all, Boston EMS deployed to five zones spanning the scope of daily operations through protection of the
secured areas immediately surrounding the event. They accomplished this through mutual aid agreements
and contracts with other EMS agencies, while maintaining control of the system through the use of multiple
command posts throughout the city.
Key Response Partners
Several agencies provided services to this event. For example, over 70 agencies were involved in the provi-
sion of security alone. There were agencies responsible for virtually every ESF.
Fire Agencies (ESF-4)
Boston Fire Department
Emergency Management Agencies (ESF-5)
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency
Boston Emergency Management Agency
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8)
Boston Emergency Medical Services
American Medical Response
Armstrong Ambulance
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
58
Emergency Medical Services Agencies (ESF-8) (continued)
Eascare
Fallon Ambulance
Professional Ambulance
Hospitals (ESF-8)
Boston Medical Center
Conference of Boston Teaching Hospitals
New England Medical Center
Community Health Centers
Massachusetts General Hospital
Public Health Agencies (ESF-8)
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Boston Public Health Commission
Law Enforcement Agencies (ESF-13)
U.S. Secret Service (USSS)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Boston Police Department
Massachusetts State Police
EMS Mass Care Incident Deployment Pearls
DNC Medical Consequence Management Plan
The plan developed for this event is a model in terms of collaboration among a large network of partners
across the spectrum of ESF. It encompassed the FEMA planning principles, public health methodologies,
and covered every relevant element of preparation for an incident of this scope. The plan supported the
needs of security planners while maintaining the need to do the greatest good for the greatest number. The
plan remains a model to this day.
Preparing for and Managing Hospital Surge
The Medical Consequence Management Plan provided a template for managing a 500 patient surge due to
the DNC. The plan was comprehensive in its approach. Some highlights of key provisions in the surge plan
were:
• All major hospitals in Boston agreed to suspend ambulance diversion during the week of the DNC.
• Coalition Of Boston Teaching Hospitals (COBTH) agreed to reschedule most elective surgeries for the
week of the DNC.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 59
• COBTH facilities maintained a minimum of 500 free beds for the week.
• COBTH held frequent conference calls to determine total bed capacity for the City of Boston. The calls
gathered information on
− the number of intensive care and general hospitals beds available immediately; and
− additional beds that could be available within a reasonable time.
• COBTH facilities canceled all vacation time for the week of the DNC.
• COBTH facilities developed expanded staffing plans and physician recall plans to be implemented in
case of an emergency or a mass casualty incident (MCI).
• The American Red Cross (ARC) hosted a summer blood drive to increase regional capacity during the
DNC. The effort increased blood supplies by 111 percent.
• The Massachusetts Ambulance Association offered to transport blood and/or organ donations if needed.
Large Scale Mutual Aid
Boston EMS negotiated agreements with ambulance service providers whereby over 200 ambulances would
be available within 30 minutes or less. In addition, Boston EMS provided “mini-grants” to mutual aid
ambulance providers and fire departments to purchase common medical and communications equipment.
This promoted interoperability between Boston EMS, its mutual aid partners, and all public safety agencies
present at the DNC.
Medical Support to Law Enforcement Activities
The Medical Consequence Management Plan called for a number of Public Order Platoons (POPs) composed
of law enforcement officers, an emergency medical technician (EMT), and a paramedic to be deployed to
strategic locations. The plan also called for Boston EMS bike units to work alongside Boston Police Depart-
ment bike units to provide medical coverage and operational awareness for Boston EMS during the event.
The plan also designated specific facilities and pathways for care for injured public safety personnel, and ar-
restees/detainees from the event.
Reference
• Serino, R., Medical Consequence Management Plan for the 2004 Democratic National Convention, LLIS.gov, 2011.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
60
Case 8: Annual Creation Music Festival, Mount Union, PA
Introduction
Creation Festival is an annual, 4-day Christian music festival held in Mount Union, PA, at the Agape Farm.
The festival is the largest Christian music festival in the country. In addition to music performed live by
over 60 bands, the festival attracts leaders, speakers, and authors from multiple Christian denominations, a
stage especially for children, camping, and a petting zoo. Activities also include a wide variety of Christian
ceremonies including baptisms, communion, prayer group, and candle light services.
Incident Summary
This unique 4-day event is characterized by the influx of 45,000 to 108,000 people into a rural community.
The lead agency for preparing for the event is the Huntingdon County Emergency Management Agency
(EMA). The EMA ensures that there is a high level of coordination among the various departments and
agencies used throughout the event. Of particular note, the majority of responders at the event are volun-
teers. This high level of coordination coupled with management of volunteer resources and solid planning
has resulted in this event serving as a model for the management of planned patient surge.
Key Response Partners
Planning documents for this event name several specific agencies that span the EMS, fire, special response,
law enforcement, public health, and hospital resources available to the jurisdiction.
EMS Mass Incident Response Pearls
Management of Patient Surge
There were 593 medical patients in 2011 which were processed through on site first aid services.
However, in 2005 the event generated 946 patients over the course of four days. During that operational
period surge levels reached a maximum of 25 patients over a 5-minute period and 90 patients over an
hour period. The key to managing this level of surge was the level and detail of planning, placement of
the medical center in a strategic location with easy ingress and egress, and the thoughtful composition of
volunteer medical teams. Further, the event has cross-trained medical responders at the Emergency Medi-
cal Responder (EMR) level and above that can be diverted to medical tasks should surge conditions warrant.
Medical Center Placement and Logistics
The medical center consists of two main structures placed near the main arena and adjacent to the food
vendor’s area. The main building is a wooden-frame facility with three treatment rooms, two bath rooms
with showers, and one room with three beds for patient monitoring. Each treatment area can handle two-
to three-patients. The second building is a modular trailer unit equipped with a bathroom, two treatment
areas and can hold five patient beds for monitoring. The third building is the county emergency manage-
ment agency’s mobile medical treatment trailer. This trailer is equipped with a restroom, three treatment
rooms, examination space for five patients, medical administration space, and a platform lift for wheelchair
bound and immobilized patients. These facilities are air conditioned and have fresh running water, and
are covered by roofs. The medical center can handle most minor suturing and fluid resuscitation cases and
general complaints. Each treatment area is equipped with oxygen administration, bandaging supplies, and
wound care equipment. The medical center has one AED and has a suction unit and adjunct equipment for
basic airway control. During the event, there are two Advanced Life Support (ALS) units on site in which
their equipment is available for use in the medical center. Patients requiring more definitive care are re-
ferred for transport or additional care.
Section III: Case Studies in Mass Incident Deployment 61
Planning for a Mass Casualty Incident at a Mass Gathering Event
In the case of a large scale MCI (30> casualties), the EMA and festival staff employ a mass casualty response
trailer stationed at a strategic location. The cafeteria, which can be converted into a care center under emer-
gent need, can support the basic field medical care of 75 patients using the resources on site. The facility
is air conditioned and has both running water and restrooms. If additional space is necessary, adjoining
residential rooms can support the space for another 40 patients with limited resources.
A second mass casualty response trailer is staged off site and can be accessed within a short time of activation.
Establishing Field Triage as a Function of the Event Instead of a Reaction to an Incident
Planners instituted a field triage station to facilitate management of patients between the arena and the
medical center. This station is dedicated to the first aid needs of the main crowd at the arena. An additional
small-scale field triage station is placed strategically to meet the needs of attendees in the surrounding en-
tertainment areas.
Vignette from Adam Miller, Huntingdon County Emergency Management
During an evening concert at the main stage, the crowd engaged in heavy jumping and thrashing activity
due to a very popular band playing aggressive music. This type of behavior is uncommon at the main stage
arena. During this event, about 30 patients presented to main stage EMS personnel over a 5-minute period
with varying clinical complaints that included lacerations, serious respiratory difficulty, and traumatic inju-
ries. Historically, the event staffed two EMS personnel on each side of the main stage. Within moments it
was recognized the situation was becoming very serious and a surge force of medical personnel were sum-
moned to establish a field triage area to the right of the main stage.
Using ICS structure, field triage, transport, and treatment personnel were placed into service. Hospitality
tables and resources typically used as a picnic area were turned into patient care areas. Cots, blankets, and
atmospheric control devices were brought in and implemented to ensure that patient care could be provided
in the field in a safe and comfortable manner. Triage tracking tags were implemented to ensure patients
were accounted for and sorted properly. Onsite ambulances began transporting patients while the backfill
plan was activated to bring additional units to the site. Shuttle buses were called into a standby position to
prepare to transport additional patients if necessary. All personnel with emergency medical training in any
department were recalled and ordered to the field triage areas in order to assist with sorting and caring for
patients. Law enforcement and public safety personnel were used to control site access and ensure the traf-
fic corridors were secure. Within the first hour, 91 patients were triaged and treated. Of those 91 patients,
only 3 required transport to local hospitals. All other patients were addressed with onsite assets.
Lessons Learned
Have a plan to establish field triage sites near stages for concert events in the outdoors.
These should be shielded from outside environments as much as possible. For summer events such as we
experience, a few of the following items are very helpful to have on site at a field triage: ez up shelters, cots,
blankets, misting fans, ice, towels, common emergency medical treatment and transport supplies, oxygen
administration equipment, dedicated communication equipment with onsite first-aid headquarters, triage
tags, lighting, privacy gowns, emergency decontamination water flow preconnects.
Ensure that all staff regardless of discipline working for any event that has training and authorization to per-
form EMS treatments are preidentified and credentialed.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
62
Have a procedure and mechanisms to recall the staff quickly from any department including flexible staff-
ing, including on duty personnel of other disciplines.
Identify the personnel that will fill the roles of treatment, triage, and transport group supervisors, before an
incident occurs if possible. Better yet if this is done at the beginning of each shift.
Identify law enforcement officers to support the security of the field triage station(s) should additional secu-
rity be deemed necessary.
Establish a procedure to alert your closest hospital emergency facilities as to the status and nature of your
emerging event as quickly as possible.
Establish and map hot standby locations for each medical transport vehicle for each field triage station in the
planning phase.
Ensure that there is a clear line of communication, and prescript a procedure, to have producers stop the
event or pause, should medical (or other) conditions require the event to stop for the safety of the partici-
pants, including a pause period to establish situational awareness and conduct immediate surveillance of the
originating conditions leading to the presentation of patients.
Miscellaneous Pearls
• Use of a consistent medical director has led to consistency in clinical quality and management. The
current medical director has been the medical director for 23 years.
• Use of a consistent EMS Director has led to continuity in operational planning and a high level of re-
tained planning knowledge.
• Safesite all-hazard sensors are used during the event, and monitored on site with defined response
thresholds.
• The event uses back-up offsite operations, communications and staging areas and specifically designates
each in the planning phase.
• The event uses sheriff department Vehicular Tactical Network (VTAC) repeaters and integrates them into
the communications plan. Use of mobile repeaters greatly enhances radio coverage and system reliability.
• Multiple methods of communication with crowds are established, including use of jumbotrons and
American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters.
Reference
• Miller, A. Creation Music Festival: Chapter 1013 Special Events EMS. Huntingdon County Emergency Manage-
ment Agency, 2011.
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 63
SECTION IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency
Planning at Mass Gathering Events
Introduction
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) require careful advance planning to be managed effectively. Planning for a
mass gathering event (MGE) must also include some direction for an MCI occurring within the MGE. These
are extremely low frequency events but have significant impact on the Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
system and population as a whole when they do occur. Proper event planning and operation will greatly
enhance preparedness for MCI events.
MCI and Multi Casualty Incident are terms that are used interchangeably in the literature. For this publica-
tion, MCI refers to any event that produces a volume of ill or injured victims that cannot be handled by the
available responders.
Planning Considerations
STEP 1: MCI planning begins with some basic decisions concerning available time and resources. An MCI
plan that must be completed in a short timeframe with severely limited resources will, of course, be less
complete than a plan that can be formed over months and has sufficient resources. Planners must not only
analyze resources available for an actual MCI response, but analyze the resources available for use in the
planning process.
STEP 2: Planners should perform a risk analysis once resource availability questions have been answered.
The risk analysis is critical to focus limited resources on hazards and threats that are both likely and severe
before focusing on less likely and less severe hazards and threats.
STEP 3: When the risk analysis is completed, planners must determine which hazards and threats to plan
for and which will rely on existing standard operating procedures. Planners must be realistic when mak-
ing these decisions, as there is no point in preparing for an event that is completely outside the scope of
on-scene resources. Expected mutual aid resources must be involved in planning as early as practical to
maximize on scene coordination.
Plans for an MCI should be simple and straightforward. Experience demonstrates that the more complex a
plan is, the less likely responders are to follow it. A plan that asks responders to perform very differently
than their training risks irrelevance during a significant emergency.
Finally, the hazard and risk analysis should be conducted by per-
sonnel with specific training and experience in performing such
studies. Common steps in performing a risk analysis include but
are not limited to:
1. Create a comprehensive list of potential hazards at the event.
Consult other public safety agencies, public health, military,
relevant industry, businesses, as well as historical records
to help form this list. ICS Form 215a (Incident Action Plan
Safety and Risk Analysis) may be useful during this stage of
planning. Members of an area Emergency Medical Techni-
cian team undergo training required for certica-
tion as rescue (grey suits) and decontamination
(green suits) unit responders to hazardous mate-
rial and toxic contamination situations.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
64
2. For each hazard, identify vulnerable populations. Use maps to identify the geography affected, and
then research the population densities for those areas. Some hazards may not be able to be isolated to
particular areas, such as adverse weather. Other hazards, such as railroad tanker spills, can be easily
identified by proximity to railroad tracks.
3. For each vulnerable population, assess the population’s resiliency to these hazards. For instance, residents
of a trailer park with no emergency shelters nearby have poor resiliency against tornadoes compared to
a population living in well-constructed homes with basements. In addition, healthy adults have greater
resiliency to most diseases than the elderly and children, so daycare centers and senior homes would be
less resilient to a localized disease outbreak than apartments filled primarily with adults.
Create a table or chart similar to the one below.
Hazard Vulnerable
Population
Population
Resilience
Relative
Risk Mitigation
Tornado Mobile home parks
Outdoor venues
Low
Moderate
Low to
moderate
Early warning systems
Lightning
Strike
Outdoor populations Moderate Low Early warning systems
Heat Injuries Crowds
Outdoor populations
High for healthy
adults
Low for elderly
High in hot
weather
Hydration stations, misting stations, etc.
Crowd Surge
or Fights
Sporting events,
rock, rap, and hip-
hop concerts
Participants near
stage and exits
Moderate Moderate Careful layout of crowd barricades and
plentiful exit routes
Structural
Collapse
Participants under
or on structure
Low Low Careful inspection of structures
Risk Mitigation
Once the risks of a particular event are known and cataloged, planners should determine how to mitigate
those risks within practical constraints. For instance, if tornados are a known risk, careful weather moni-
toring and early warning systems may help avoid injuries due to this risk.
The largest risk during most outside events in the summer is the risk of heat injuries. This risk can be miti-
gated by making water and other hydration options readily available, using fans and misting systems, or
providing shade with tents or other temporary structures. It is usually much more cost-effective to mitigate
a risk than it is to respond to the risk once it has occurred.
Mitigation of risk should begin with high risk, high impact incidents first, then low risk high impact events,
followed by low risk low impact events if time and resources permit.
Catalog Threats
Once a risk analysis is complete, analyze each hazard and determine the following:
1. What agency or group would likely command the response to the threat?
2. What would the primary and secondary objectives for each threat be?
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 65
3. Who would handle the common command positions during the response to the threat?
4. At what threshold should an emergency be declared? A disaster?
5. At what threshold should mutual aid resources be requested?
6. Who would be responsible for declaring a disaster situation? How would you contact them?
When each hazard has been analyzed, organize the responses to the questions above into an easy to under-
stand reference document such as below.
Law Enforcement Fire/HazMat Technical Rescue Medical
Relative Risk High Low High Low High Low High Low
Risk Analysis Assaults Suicide
bombing,
homicide
Suspicious
odor inves-
tigation
Hazardous
material
release
None Building
collapse
Heat/Cold
Injuries
Mass
Food
Poisoning
Command State police Fire department Fire department Public health
Statutory
Authority
Local LE or State
Police
Local re department Regional Technical
Rescue Team
Public Health
Department
Command
Structure
IC with Fire/EMS
branch
UC with LE, EMS, Fire IC with EMS branch UC with public health,
hospitals, EMS
Primary
Objective
Contain, preserve
evidence, detain wit-
nesses
Evacuate, decon,
preserve evidence,
contain
Protect responders,
extricate, treat and
transport
Conduct intelligence
gathering, contain,
quarantine
Secondary
Objectives
Logistics Red Cross – Food,
Water
Shelter – Emergency
management
Red Cross – Food,
water, blankets,
shelter
Red Cross – Food,
water
Medical supplies –
EMS
CDC – Vaccines
Hospitals – Medical
supplies
Finance City accountant City accountant Budget ofce State nancial ofcer
Regional nancial
ofcers
Planning State police or local
LEO
Fire department or
HazMat rep
Technical rescue team
rep
Public health
Operations SP or LEO FD or Hazmat FD or Tech rescue Public health or EMS
Mutual Aid
Thresholds
5 fatalities or 25
injured – contact SP
2nd alarm >3 people trapped,
respond second team
> 1,000 cases, request
State assistance
Emergency
Declarations
LE decisions Working incident Working incident PH decision
Disaster
Declarations
>25 killed or injured 3rd alarm insufcient >3 rescue teams re-
quired to manage the
incident
>10,000 cases, hospi-
tals >105% capacity
Disaster
Declaration
Responsibility
Mayor or town
administrator
Mayor or town
administrator
Mayor or town
administrator
Mayor or town
administrator
Contact
Information
Note that the table above is a guideline only; it should not be seen as a barrier to alternative decisions made
by onscene command.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
66
Threat Decisions
Generally, planners should focus on events that are the most likely, and those that have the potential to have
the largest impact. Planning for events such as structural collapse or hazardous materials releases should
only be done if technical teams are involved in the planning and share responsibility for responding to the
incident (single all-hazard fire department or multiagency agreement for other EMS delivery models).
EMS mass gathering planners should create plans for threats over which EMS has authority. For instance,
if planning the medical aspects of a small concert, and a large fight breaks out, law enforcement will be in
charge of the incident. EMS planners should integrate the medical response into the overall law enforce-
ment response strategy.
Review a few of the most likely scenarios and tabletop exercise each scenario using the resources and re-
source placements chosen. Ask questions such as:
• Do onscene units have sufficient equipment and training to organize for this hazard?
• How many, what type of patients can be treated with resources on site?
• What offsite resources will need to be called in to handle this hazard?
• How do resource requests occur, whose approval is needed, and who will reimburse those resources for
their expenses?
• Will emergency operations impede evacuation if needed?
• How might high winds, temperature extremes, or rain affect the area?
• How will communication with responding units occur?
• Where will media personnel be directed? Concerned/Separated family members?
Schedule personnel needed and remember to allow sufficient time for mobilization, briefing, demobiliza-
tion, and debriefing (or “hotwash”). Have a backup plan if any key personnel become sick or unable to
fulfill their roles.
Action Plans
Once risk assessments are complete, planning can begin. Be sure to use existing MCI plans, National Inci-
dent Management System (NIMS) guidance, and information in the Emergency Support Function (ESF) an-
nexes to the National Response Plan (NRP) as a starting point for event-specific MCI plans. Excessive varia-
tion from the agency’s MCI plan and prevailing planning principles will create confusion and training issues.
Experience has demonstrated that plans will likely not be adhered to during an actual emergency unless
significant time and effort is spent on training personnel. Training on and exercising the plan requires
significant investment of time and resources and should be planned for while budgeting and developing
personnel management schemes.
To the greatest extent possible, operations plans should not deviate from normal operational procedures. In
an emergency, responders are more likely to rely on past training and skills than the guidance in the action
plan if the processes and procedures used in the plan vary significantly from normal operations. Lessons
learned from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrate the importance of aligning standard operat-
ing procedures with emergency action plans.
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 67
Role of Communications Center
• Call takers should carefully prioritize calls.
• Call takers should be familiar with venue landmarks that can be used by callers to identify their location.
• Call takers should identify patients that are ambulatory or have friends or family able to relocate the
patient.
• Event personnel should be directed to relocate patients to aid stations or prearranged meeting locations
whenever possible. Provide wheelchairs for this purpose whenever practical.
• Develop tools and techniques such as flags or strobe lights to help medical personnel find event person-
nel that are with a patient.
• Clearly mark aid stations and staging locations.
• EMS personnel should be trained and equipped to care for several patients at once, without other medi-
cal assistance.
• Avoid requesting transport when unnecessary. Victims of exhaustion should be provided with shelter,
hydration, and provided the opportunity to recover unless life-threatening signs and symptoms are
present.
• Have a plan for how mutual aid resources will be used if they are requested.
Relationship of Event Command to Responding Resources
When an MCI occurs at a mass gathering incident, additional local EMS, law enforcement, and fire suppres-
sion resources will be dispatched to the event. Unless carefully coordinated, these responding resources
are going to establish their own onscene command structure. Planning for a mass gathering must include
coordination of command contingencies in the event of an MCI at the event that are consistent with NIMS
principles. A Unified Command (UC) can help coordinate the actions of the various departments involved
and improve responder safety.
Resource Requests
It is important that onscene command personnel have access to event organizers and those with authority to
make decisions on behalf of event personnel. When resources are needed during an MCI, event personnel
should be notified when and where these resources will be arriving.
Involving event personnel in resource requests can prevent duplication of services and should make mobi-
lization of event personnel resources more efficient. If event decisionmakers are not present in a command
or operations area during the event, redundant communication with those individuals must be available.
Use of Mutual Aid
Mutual aid resources should be used in accordance with existing mutual aid plans. If an event results in the
need for additional resources that exceeds the scope of existing mutual aid agreements, planners should en-
gage additional mutual aid partners for the duration of the mass gathering. When assigning tasks or trans-
ports to mutual aid resources, attempt to assign them transports that will return them back to their area of
operations.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
68
Communications
Significant planning resources must be dedicated to creating communication plans that are sophisticated
enough to serve their purpose but simple enough to be usable and reliable. Planners should avoid using any
communication system that has not been tested in situ by actual event personnel.
Planners must consider the impact of environmental conditions such as background noise from crowds,
loud music, and interference from equipment on radio equipment. Providing the capability for person-
nel to transmit information accurately under noisy conditions is more challenging than equipping them to
receive information in noisy conditions. Special noise cancelling microphones, bone microphones, or la-
ryngophones (“throat mics”) may be needed to ensure rescuers are able to transmit in high-noise environ-
ments. Planners should consider the use of text paging or text messaging for low-priority communications
such as informational updates.
It is important to remember that as the number of radios with access to a channel or talk group increases,
the potential for that communication method to be rendered unusable increases as well. Even with trunked
radio systems, excessive radio traffic can disable other communications by monopolizing the bandwidth
available. One or more channels not accessible or used by most responders should be reserved for critical
communications between command personnel (i.e., a command net).
Text messaging, instant messaging, and direct connect technologies all use less cellular bandwidth than
conventional voice calls. This may be helpful when cellular networks are overloaded. EMS planners should
also determine if cellular priority services such as Government Emergency Telecommunications Service
(GETS) are available and/or necessary.
Consider the use of satellite phones if communication with offsite communication centers or individuals is
critical. Satellite phones will often provide voice, data, and text messaging capability when local cellular or
other networks are disabled. It is also important to consider spare batteries, chargers, and headsets in the
planning phase.
Amateur Radio
During emergency situations, most areas of the country have access to Amateur Radio Emergency Services
(ARES). These amateur radio enthusiasts volunteer their time, equipment, and expertise to establish emer-
gency communications if more conventional systems are not available. Such groups may also be willing to
assist during special events to help provide radio coverage over large event courses with poor conventional
radio coverage. Skill levels and sophistication of equipment varies widely and must be assessed before de-
termining whether this would be a good option.
Amateur radio operators may be able to provide voice, facsimile, and various forms of data communica-
tions. ARES groups are often able to erect their own antenna towers and provide their own electrical power
in remote areas.
Expanded Scope/Emerging Mass Casualty Incident Management Considerations
In the future, Advanced Practice Paramedics may be used on the scene of an MCI to provide a more thor-
ough assessment of ill or injured patients. This more thorough assessment could include abdominal ultra-
sounds and blood analysis to detect hidden hemorrhages. Such measures could be used to improve triage
accuracy during MCIs and provide reassurance to patients and responders that transport is unnecessary for
a particular patient. Such skills are normally the domain of doctors of medicine (MDs)/doctors of osteopa-
thy (DOs) and physicians assistants (PAs)/nurse-practitioners (NPs), and these providers would certainly be
helpful during MCIs if rapidly available and properly prepared to operate in the field.
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 69
Treat and Release protocols could be used to care for minor injuries on scene reducing hospital transports.
EMS professionals could provide wound care, breathing treatments, splinting, and printed instructions on
when to seek further medical assistance.
Alternative transport destinations are another emerging option for minor injuries and illnesses when local
hospitals are being overwhelmed by more serious cases. Spreading transports out to physician offices and
urgent care centers is an option that emergency planners should explore in cooperation with emergency
management and local medical direction.
Current EMS training and protocols encourage responders to provide care and transport for every individual
they encounter who exhibits a chief complaint or has a mechanism of injury. Examination of mass care
incidents reveals that resources are expended caring for “patients” who not only have no life threatening
injuries, but also often have no injuries at all. This practice inflates patient loads and results in the reloca-
tion of the disaster from the field environment to the hospital. Creating a clinically responsible system to
discourage the transport of citizens who are not injured or have clearly superficial injuries will limit the
impact of the MCI on hospitals and the EMS system as a whole.
Recognizing an MCI Situation
A well-established problem organizing and managing an MCI is recognition that one is occurring. For in-
stance, if a large number of people have been sitting in the sun at an athletic event and are on the verge of
heat exhaustion, responders will first respond with two or three calls for “diabetic” or “person fainted.”
Not until two teams are dispatched to different areas, and several more calls come in, does it become ap-
parent that a tightly packed crowd of people has turned into an MCI situation. The risk is that several teams
will be working individual calls without realizing that there is a larger problem.
Differentiating between a surge in patient volume and an actual MCI can be very challenging. Providing
operations personnel with preselected thresholds or trigger points for making these determinations can be
very helpful. These thresholds may be defined as a particular patient count in a specific period or as the oc-
currence of a specific event such as activation of mutual aid resources. It is critical that event organizers are
involved in these discussions and agree to cancel the event when specific thresholds are met.
Special Considerations
Active Shooter Situations
Active shooter situations are unique and complicated situations that should be planned for in careful coor-
dination with law enforcement entities within the event jurisdiction.
License Reciprocity Issues
License reciprocity issues should be considered based on local and State requirements and discussed with
competent medical-legal advisors, EMS regulatory agencies within the jurisdiction, and the State EMS Office
within the provider’s State.
EMS Equipment on MCI Scenes
EMS supervisors and managers spend a great deal of time and effort ensuring that their crews bring the
required equipment into each call they are dispatched on. Providers are often told they must bring their
stretcher, jump kit, oxygen, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor onto every call to ensure they have the
right equipment if a patient’s condition turns out to be different from that reported by the 9-1-1 caller. This
training may be problematic during an MCI situation.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
70
Ambulance stretchers, especially, should not be removed from an ambulance unless necessary. Ambu-
lance stretchers require two trained operators and are difficult to maneuver in buildings and across uneven
ground. In addition, significant delays can be caused when attempting to load patients into an ambulance
with a missing stretcher or a stretcher that doesn’t fit in the stretcher mounts. A better alternative is to use
pole stretchers, wheelchairs, or back boards to move nonambulatory patients.
Freelancing
Freelancing should not be tolerated during training or during actual incidents. Freelancing leads to con-
fusion, poor personnel accountability, and often leads to providers being injured because they are not
equipped or briefed for the hazards present on scene. Freelancers that arrive in vehicles also have effectively
placed a roadblock wherever they parked their vehicle. If a vehicle is left in a location which blocks emer-
gency vehicle ingress or egress, law enforcement should be prepared to have the vehicle towed as quickly as
possible. Security/Law enforcement personnel staffing the perimeter of an incident should be instructed to
direct any personnel attempting to enter the scene to the staging area. Law enforcement personnel should
be briefed on contingencies to deal with personnel who refuse to operate within established parameters and
interfere with emergency operations.
Trafc Flow
It is important that law enforcement, department of transportation, and/or public works agencies be en-
listed early during an incident to ensure that responding emergency vehicles have both ingress and egress
routes available to them, while all unnecessary vehicles and traffic be routed away from the area. If a ve-
hicle is left in a location which blocks emergency vehicle ingress or egress, law enforcement should be pre-
pared to have the vehicle towed as quickly as possible.
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 71
Mass Casualty Incident Planning Checklist
RGather all available historical records on the event
RComputer-aided dispatch (CAD) data
RAttendance data
RPrevious Operations (OPS) plans
RPrevious After Action Reports (AARs)
RList the stakeholders and make contact with them
RMeet with event organizers, schedule periodic updates
RDefine and map the event area of operations
RLocate evacuation points
RLocate emergency ingress and egress points
RLocate potential aid station locations
RLocate potential equipment caches
RIdentify highly visible landmarks that can be used by callers to identify their location
RIdentify potential areas for establishment of treatment and transportation areas
RDocument all ambulance providers’ (air and land) contact information and capabilities in area around
event
RPerform risk assessment
RDetermine level of security to use in planning and operations
RCreate threat-specific plans
RPossible command structure
RLikely resource requests
RDetermination as to whether incident will be commanded by onscene event staff or responding
resources
RCreate a generic plan for threats not addressed or anticipated
RCreate contact information cards
RFor command personnel
RFor security
RFor EMS personnel
RFor other event staff
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
72
RPerform a walk-through of the event location with event organizers. Update map locations as necessary
RTest radio communication equipment at the event location
RSearch for and document areas of poor reception
RTest every channel that will be used during event
RVerify interoperability of agency radios if this is important to your communication plan
RTest cell phone reception using provider-specific phones
RDetermine best location for event operations post, if applicable, based on following criteria
RCell phone reception
RAccess to landline telephones
RBroadband internet access—test with computers to be used during actual event
RRadio reception
RAccess to toilet facilities
RIsolation from high-noise environments
Section IV: Policy Guidance for Mass Casualty Contingency Planning at Mass Gathering Events 73
Incident Action Plan Safety and Risk Analysis, ICS Form 215A
INCIDENT ACTION PLAN
SAFETY ANALYSIS
1. Incident Name 2. Date 3. Time
Division or Group Potential Hazards
Mitigations
(e.g., PPE, buddy system, escape
routes)
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Type of Hazard:
Prepared by (Name and Position)
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
74
This page was intentionally left blank.
Section V: Policy Guidance for Emergency Medical Service Aspects of Mass Shelter and Feeding 75
SECTION V: Policy Guidance for Emergency Medical Services
Aspects of Mass Shelter and Feeding
Emergency Medical Services Participation in Mass Shelter and Feeding
Pearlington, MS, is a Census Designated Place with a base popula-
tion of 1,600 residents located on the border between Mississippi
and Louisiana. On August 29, 2005, at 10 a.m. Central Daylight
Time (CDT), Hurricane Katrina made landfall at Pearlington. The
storm surge, which measured between 12 and 20 feet, continued
4.5 miles inland. With the exception of two homes, every build-
ing in the community sustained severe structural damage or was
completely destroyed. With its infrastructure destroyed, the lo-
cal volunteer Fire Chief established a food and water distribution
point and a hasty outdoor camp to serve as a shelter. During the
first 5 days of the event, the facilities established by the Fire Chief
were the primary sources of food, water, and shelter in Pearl-
ington. A four soldier element of the Florida National Guard,
an engine company with four firefighters from Bradenton, FL, and an ambulance from Troy, MI, with two
Paramedics arrived to conduct search and rescue and provide support on September 1. On September 2, a
shelter was established at the elementary school that served a transient population of near 600 people. Fol-
low on support for the community continued to arrive over the next 10 days.
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies fill an important role in ensuring a safe and healthy environ-
ment for evacuees living in shelters as a result of a mass incident. A sampling of roles that EMS agencies
have fulfilled in mass shelter and feeding operations include:
• Identifying shelter sites in the community in cooperation with public health authorities.
• Providing onsite medical care and first aid at the shelter.
• Supplementing Federal Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT) or Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) as-
sets at an identified shelter.
• Managing shelter operations in cooperation with the American Red Cross (ARC), local emergency man-
agement, or local public health authorities.
• Responding to shelters to manage onsite medical emergencies that exceed the capabilities of shelter
medical staff.
National Response Framework
Mass care shelters are addressed in Emergency Support Function 6 (ESF-6)–Mass Care, Emergency Assis-
tance, Housing, and Human Services of the National Response Framework and in similar ESF guidance
within State emergency management plans.
Summary of Shelter Operations for Emergency Medical Services
Mass shelter operations are ideally organized under the same incident management principles found in the
National Incident Management System (NIMS). Using a scalable system, shelters will have need for plan-
ning and leadership within the functional roles of Administration, Finance, Logistics, and Operations at a
minimum. EMS leaders must understand how the classic Incident Command System (ICS) roles are adapted
within the mass shelter environment, particularly Administration, Logistics, and Operations.
Evacuees with health or medical problems are
examined in a triage area set up at a main stag-
ing site.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
76
Key Functional Roles and Tasks
Administration
• The Administration function at the shelter is responsible to:
• Monitor local media including radio, television, and official sources.
• Maintain close and ongoing contact with the local Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to ensure a re-
ciprocal sharing of planning information.
• Develop action plans based on the information above and from information gathered at planning meetings.
• Work with the shelter manager in planning for anticipated shelter needs and in planning for the next 24
to 48 hours of shelter activity.
• Plan staffing schedules and determining staffing rotations.
• Provide information on available recovery assistance (especially information on the availability of tem-
porary or long-term housing); keep information up-to-date and post in a visible place for shelter resi-
dents (e.g., bulletin boards).
• Keep a disaster activity log with detailed records of meetings, decisions, and actions (e.g., who made
what decisions).
• Record important interagency contacts and agreements. This is vital for after action reports and for fu-
ture planning.
• Support information needs related to helping reunite family members.
• Assist nonprofit and governmental agencies with the recruitment, placement, and management of spon-
taneous disaster volunteers.
• Identify Volunteer Organizations Active in Disasters (VOAD) agencies.
• Translate documents into other languages or to find bilingual individuals to communicate with non-
English speaking persons.
− Find trained Sign Language Interpreters to communicate with deaf persons.
• Coordinate demobilization activities at the conclusion of the deployment.
Logistics
The Logistics function at the shelter works in close coordination with the Logistics Section at the local EOC
to accomplish the following:
• Obtain all resources necessary to operate the shelter facility in coordination with the EOC Logistics Section.
− personnel;
− food;
− transportation;
− supplies and equipment;
Section V: Policy Guidance for Emergency Medical Service Aspects of Mass Shelter and Feeding 77
− communication resources; and
− all other personal services as applicable for shelter residents (health, mental health, translation, etc.).
• Work with the Finance Coordinator to set up vendor agreements with local businesses as necessary for
the purchase of supplies and equipment to operate the shelter.
Operations
The operations function in a mass shelter should work within the definitions provided for the Operations
role under NIMS. In addition, specific roles needed to operate a mass care shelter are described below.
Registration: The Registration function ensures that basic data identifying each shelter occupant is col-
lected upon admission to the shelter. A key function of this element is identification of shelter occupants
that may have special medical or dietary needs in addition to identifying any potential occupant that may
pose a security concern.
Dining Facility (DFAC): The Dining Facility function is responsible for planning, preparing, and distribut-
ing all meals provided to evacuees. EMS agencies are unlikely to fulfill this role but should be familiar with
the general principles and tasks associated with the role.
Bivouac/Barracks: The Bivouac/Barracks function is responsible for layout and management of the portion
of the shelter used for sleeping. This includes allocating adequate space for each resident. The formula used
by the ARC is to attempt to provide 40 square feet per person for the purpose of sleep quarters and neces-
sary personal items. Bivouac personnel must also remain alert for signs of illness among residents, suspi-
cious behavior, or hazards that may pose risk to the safety of shelter residents.
Health and Medical Services: This is the most likely role for EMS personnel in a mass shelter environment.
The Health and Medical Services function provides both primary first aid and emergency care as well as
disease prevention and surveillance within the shelter. This includes overseeing the medical needs of any
special needs residents and ensuring access to other health care services as needed.
Safety/Security Services: The Safety and Security Services function is responsible for safeguarding the
staff, ensuring orderly behavior among shelter residents, crime prevention, and crowd control among oth-
ers. This function is unlikely to be delegated to EMS personnel and is most commonly executed by law
enforcement or via contract with private security companies.
Transportation Services: The Transportation function is responsible for assisting residents of the area im-
pacted by the incident with basic transport needs including help with transportation to the shelter, transpor-
tation from the shelter to access services, and emergency transportation if needed. The transportation func-
tion will also assist with distribution of food and supplies in the community in coordination with the EOC.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
78
OPERATIONS BASIC TASK CHECKLIST: MASS SHELTER
GENERAL TASKS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Inspect the facility for safety hazards.
Restrict access to unsafe areas and any area that will not be in use.
Establish communication with EOC in the jurisdiction if not already in place.
Report shelter status, personnel, and equipment needs to Command.
Designate a staging area if not already in place.
Assign available staff to shelter operational roles.
Prepare or assign the preparation of briengs for each operational period.
Prepare or assign the preparation of relevant ICS Forms.
Monitor news outlets and ofcial sources for information relating to the incident.
REGISTRATION TASKS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Dene a space for registration.
Set up a registration table and chairs.
Post a sign directing evacuees to the registration area.
Post a sign prohibiting possession of weapons, alcohol, or illegal drugs at the shelter.
Post a sign prohibiting pets at the shelter if applicable.
Ensure adequate supply of registration forms.
Establish a log for residents to sign in and out of the shelter.
DINING FACILITY TASKS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Inspect the food preparation area at the shelter site.
Obtain access to food storage areas.
Determine if cooking equipment is still functioning and is safe to use.
Coordinate with Logistics or identied source to ensure food supplies.
Dene a system for managing food waste.
Dene a system for managing food spoilage.
Dene a system for ensuring sanitary food preparation guidelines are followed.
Establish a system for instituting multiple seating times if warranted by shelter size.
Identify any resident that has any special dietary needs (diabetic, gluten free diet, etc.).
Establish a dining area.
Post a sign designating meal times.
Recruit residents to prepare food if needed.
Establish a log of meals served.
Log all supplies and food ordered and used with applicable receipts.
Section V: Policy Guidance for Emergency Medical Service Aspects of Mass Shelter and Feeding 79
OPERATIONS BASIC TASK CHECKLIST: MASS SHELTER
BIVOUAC/BARRACKS TASKS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Inspect the Bivouac/Barracks area for hazards to shelter residents.
Coordinate with Logistics or identied source to ensure adequate sleeping/personal supplies.
Set up sleeping areas.
Distribute blankets, mats, and personal items as needed.
Ensure adequate ventilation.
Recruit residents to assist with routine cleaning and maintaining an orderly environment.
Post quiet/lights out hours and any other rules for the facility.
Monitor the Bivouac area for safety/security issues.
HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Inspect the Health and Medical Services area for hazards to shelter residents.
Coordinate with Logistics or identied source to ensure adequate medical supplies.
Set up seats and cots to facilitate patient treatment.
Ensure 24 hour availability of staff (schedule, onsite call, etc.).
Dene a system for recall of off duty on site personnel in the event of patient surge.
Dene how medical emergencies that require offsite care will be handled.
Document all care according to local rules and procedure.
Dene a system for notifying public health ofcials if a disease outbreak is identied.
Identify an area that could serve as an isolation ward should the need arise.
SAFETY/SECURITY SERVICES
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Conduct inspection of entire facility at least daily for hazards to shelter residents.
Ensures shelter is operated according to re code.
Maintains clear paths to all exits.
Ensures re extinguishers are present and operational.
Conducts patrol of shelter to reduce opportunity for criminal behavior.
Coordinates management of any criminal matters with EOC and law enforcement.
Maintains a log of any suspicious behavior or suspected criminal activity.
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Coordinate need for transportation services with emergency Operations Center.
Determine number and type of transportation resources needed.
Coordinate the request for resources with the Emergency Operations Center.
Log the number and type of resources requested on the appropriate ICS form.
Establish staging area for transportation resources.
Institute check in and check out procedures to ensure personnel accountability.
Create a log of all persons transported into or out of the shelter.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
80
Mass Shelter and Feeding Resources
California Emergency Medical
Services Authority http://www.emsa.ca.gov/disaster/default.asp
South Carolina Emergency
Management Division http://www.scemd.org/Prepare/index.html
State of Louisiana Governor’s
Ofce of Homeland Security
and Emergency Preparedness
http://gohsep.la.gov/
Florida Division of Emergency
Management http://www.oridadisaster.org/internet_library.htm#response
State of Washington Military
Department http://www.emd.wa.gov/
American Red Cross http://www.redcross.org/
National Volunteer
Organizations Active in Disaster http://www.nvoad.org/
National Organization on
Disability http://www.nod.org/research_publications/emergency_preparedness_materials/
The Salvation Army http://disaster.salvationarmyusa.org/
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 81
SECTION VI: Local Mutual Aid
TEMPLATE: Local, Regional, and State Mutual Aid
Introduction
Mutual aid agreements and memorandums of understanding (MOU) are written documents describing
how personnel, equipment, facilities, and/or supplies will be requested, made available, and used by or be-
tween organizations, agencies, or jurisdictions. These agreements are necessary due to the likelihood that
system volume from multiple responses or a single large scale emergency response will exceed the ability of
endogenous assets to meet the needs of the system. Examples of incidents that can cause system overload
include multiple-alarm fires, traffic accidents with injuries, and criminal acts including terrorism.
Mutual aid may also extend beyond local response. Several States have statewide mutual aid systems, ex-
amples include Washington and Oregon statewide mobilization programs. Mutual Aid Box Alarm System
(MABAS) is a regional mutual aid system, headquartered in Illinois, with 1,500 member fire departments in
Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Missouri. (See Annex V.)
Mutual aid may be planned so that it is triggered by a requesting agency at the time the system is over-
loaded. Mutual aid may also take the form of a standing agreement for cooperative emergency management
on a continuing basis. In that model, resource deployment is planned based on conditional variables, such
as ensuring that resources are dispatched from the nearest fire station, regardless of which side of a juris-
dictional boundary the incident is on. Agreements that send the closest resources are regularly referred to
as automatic aid agreements. Automatic aid agreements and mutual aid agreements are established through
legal covenants between jurisdictions.
The key difference between a mutual aid agreement and an MOU is that mutual aid agreements pledge
reciprocal assistance of a particular type and definition between two or more organizations, agencies, or
jurisdictions. An MOU can be reciprocal in nature, with parties agreeing to help one another under certain
terms, or an MOU can pledge assistance to an organization, agency, or jurisdiction without mutual benefit.
A plan to use external organizations, agencies, or jurisdictions is a routine part of Emergency Medical Ser-
vices (EMS) system planning and forms the basis of surge response strategy. To ensure that there is clear
understanding by all parties agreeing to provide mutual aid or external assistance in cooperation with out-
side agencies, a written mutual aid agreement or MOU should be executed by authorized representatives
from both the agency providing and the agency receiving the resources.
The following elements or provisions should be included in mutual aid agreements and MOUs.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
82
Local and Regional Mutual Aid Checklist
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Consistent with NIMS and State level Incident Management Systems.
Describes agency location.
Denitions of key terms used in the agreement.
Roles and responsibilities of individual parties.
Requires minimum levels of training based on roles.
Provides for recognition of qualications and certications.
Describes procedures for requesting and providing assistance.
Describes a system for mobilization and deployment of resources.
Describes resources available for daily mutual aid response by day and time.
Describes resources available for Mass Incident response by day and time.
Describes resources other than EMS agencies (Red Cross, bus system, etc.).
Dene a system for determining which resources will be used in which order.
Describes jurisdictional specics (demographics, resources, risks, etc.).
Describe seasonal and temporal factors that impact the agreement.
Addresses coverage of the assisting agency area while providing mutual aid.
Addresses communication between agencies while providing mutual aid.
Addresses personnel safety.
Addresses liability protection.
Addresses reimbursement for services.
Addresses protocol and clinical oversight if applicable.
Addresses post incident critical stress management.
Addresses the use of After Action Review to improve the plan.
Requires review of the plan annually or more often as needed.
Denes a method for updating the plan to maintain operational relevance.
Describes a method for communicating changes in the agreement.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 83
TEMPLATE: Inter-Local Government Agreement–Mutual Aid
<INSERT JURISDICTION HERE> Mutual Aid
Inter-Local Government Agreement (“Agreement”)
Recitals
WHEREAS
The counties, cities, towns, townships, fire protection <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE> and other rel-
evant entities (collectively referred to as “Signatories to this Agreement” or “Signatories”) of <INSERT
JURISDICTION HERE> desire to enter into this Agreement for the purposes of providing for mutual sup-
port, aid, and assistance between the signatories following the occurrence of a natural or manmade disaster
emergency and for conducting preparation activities including but not limited to planning, training, exer-
cises, response, grant applications, and other resource coordination.
Articles
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:
Article I: Denitions
Assisting Jurisdiction: A jurisdiction participating in the Agreement and providing emergency response
manpower, equipment, and resources to another jurisdiction that has requested assistance to confront an
emergency.
Authorized Representative: The chief executive of a participating jurisdiction, or his or her designee, who
has authorization to request, offer, or provide assistance under the terms of this Agreement.
Emergency Management Agency (EMA): The agency which manages emergency preparedness and re-
sponse on a countywide basis.
Director Emergency Management (DEM): The position that manages the emergency management agency
or his or her designee.
Emergency: Any occurrence, or threat thereof, whether natural or caused by man, in war or in peace,
which results or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population, substantial damage to or loss of
property, or substantial harm to the environment and is beyond the capacity of an individual jurisdiction to
effectively control.
Mutual Aid: A prearranged written agreement and plan whereby assistance is requested and provided be-
tween two or more jurisdictions during a designated emergency under terms of the Agreement.
Period of Assistance: The period of time beginning with the departure of any personnel and/or equip-
ment of the assisting jurisdiction from any point for the purpose of traveling to provide assistance exclu-
sively to the requesting jurisdiction, and ending on the return of all of the assisting jurisdiction’s personnel
and equipment to their regular place of work or assignment, or otherwise terminated through written or
verbal notice to the authorized representative of the requesting jurisdiction by the authorized representative
of the assisting jurisdiction.
Requesting Jurisdiction: A jurisdiction under an emergency condition that has requested assistance from
another jurisdiction participating in the Agreement.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
84
Staging Area: A location identified outside the immediate emergency area where emergency response
equipment and personnel assemble for briefing, assignment, and related matters.
Article II: Terms of the Agreement
Activation
1. The Signatories of <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE> [ ] agree that any assistance which may be fur-
nished under this Agreement from one party to the other shall not be regarded as “available assets” of
the requesting party for purposes of determining whether local assets are sufficient or insufficient to
respond to any natural or manmade emergency or disaster.
2. Each party agrees that in the event of an emergency situation, each other party to this Agreement will
furnish such personnel, equipment, facilities or services as are available, provided that such action
would not unreasonably diminish the capacity to provide basic services to its own jurisdiction.
3. The Signatories of <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE> [ ] agree that the senior officers (and their as-
sistants, or alternatives) of the entities that will provide direct assistance under this Agreement (i.e., fire
chief, sheriff, police chief, EMS provider, highway superintendent, Emergency Support Function (ESF)
Coordinator, etc.) shall be accorded the status of emergency management personnel for purposes of ad-
ministration of this Agreement. The senior officers in command of the units providing assistance under
this Agreement are required to promptly inform the DEM and the appropriate chief executive of their
respective unit of government that the assets have been sent out of the area. This step will allow the
DEM to keep track of assets remaining for response to other emergencies that might arise while mutual
aid assistance is being rendered.
4. The chief executive or his or her designee of each participating jurisdiction to this Agreement shall
act as the authorized representative of that jurisdiction. If the chief executive or his or her designee is
not available, the official next in the line of succession as defined by local or State statute shall assume
responsibilities of the authorized representative. The name, title, jurisdiction, county, and contact infor-
mation for each of the authorized representatives is attached to this Agreement and labeled Authorized
Representatives.
5. The Signatories of <INSERT JURISDICTION HERE> [ ] agree that their respective county EMAs
shall be the entities which are appropriate to administer and call into effect the activation terms of this
Agreement pursuant to the subsequent provisions.
6. To invoke assistance under the provisions of this Agreement, the authorized representative from the Re-
questing Jurisdiction shall be required to contact the DEM or his or her designee of the county in which
the requesting jurisdiction resides. This communication may be conducted by telephone, in writing, or
via email or other electronic communication.
7. Each request for assistance shall be accompanied by the following information, to the extent known:
• A general description of the damage or injury sustained or threatened;
• Identification of the emergency service function or functions for which assistance is needed (e.g.,
fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, search and rescue, transportation, communications, pub-
lic works and engineering, building, inspection, planning and information assistance, mass care, re-
source support, health and other medical services, etc.) and the particular type of assistance needed;
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 85
• The amount and type of personnel, equipment, materials, supplies, and/or facilities needed and a
reasonable estimate of the period of assistance that each will be needed;
• The location or locations to which the resources are to be dispatched and the specific time by which
the resources are needed; and
• The name and contact information of a representative of the Requesting Party to meet the personnel
and equipment of any Assisting Party at each location to which resources are dispatched.
This information may be provided on a form designed for this purpose or by any other available means.
8. The DEM shall forward the request for assistance to DEMs in the appropriate counties within the <IN-
SERT JURISDICTION HERE> based on the proximity and availability of the resources required by the
request. The DEMs who receive a request for assistance shall contact the Authorized Representatives of
the local jurisdictions within the county and submit the request for assistance.
9. A DEM who determines that his or her Assisting Jurisdictions have the available personnel, equipment,
or other resources, shall so notify the DEM of the Requesting Jurisdiction and provide the following
information, to the extent known:
• A complete description of the personnel and their expertise and capabilities, equipment, and other
resources to be furnished to the Requesting Party;
• The estimated period of assistance that the personnel, equipment, and other resources will be available;
• The name of the person or persons to be designated as supervisory personnel for the Assisting Juris-
diction; and
• The estimated time of arrival for the assistance to be provided at the designated location.
This information may be provided on a form designed for this purpose or by any other available means.
Incident Command
10. The parties shall use the Incident Command System (ICS) as developed by the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) as part of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to provide
structure for incident management so as to assure efficient use of resources and the safety of emergency
responders and the public.
11. During an emergency situation, all personnel from the Assisting Jurisdictions shall report to and work
under the direction of the designated Incident Commander (IC). Personnel from either the Requesting
or Assisting Jurisdiction may receive supervision from any command personnel from the combined
participating jurisdictions if authorized by the IC or her or his designee in the command structure.
Tactical teams shall operate under the direction of their tactical commander once they are authorized
to undertake assignments.
Liability
12. Pursuant to <INSERT STATE CODE HERE> the chief executive of the political subdivision which is the
Assisting Jurisdiction in this agreement may assign or make available for duty the appropriate emergen-
cy response personnel outside of the physical limits of their political subdivision; and pursuant to <IN-
SERT STATE CODE HERE>, when Homeland Security, Emergency Management, or Emergency Support
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
86
Functions are so ordered to render aid outside the physical limits of their political subdivision, they
will retain the same powers, duties, rights, privileges and immunities including any coverage under
the Worker’s Compensation Laws, that they receive when they are on duty in their home jurisdiction.
13. The party who requests mutual aid shall in no way be deemed liable or responsible for the personal
property of the members of the responding party which may be lost, stolen, or damaged while per-
forming their duties in responding under the terms of this Agreement.
14. The Assisting Jurisdictions under the terms of this Agreement shall assume no responsibility or liability
for property damaged or destroyed or bodily injury at the actual scene of any emergency due to ac-
tions which are required in responding under this Agreement; said liability and responsibility shall rest
solely with the jurisdiction requesting such aid and within whose boundaries the property exists or the
incident occurs.
15. Pursuant to <INSERT STATE CODE HERE> the political subdivision that constitutes the Requesting
Jurisdiction shall be responsible for any loss or damage to equipment used in the response and shall pay
any expense incurred in the operation and maintenance thereof as well as any expense incurred in the
provision of a service or other expenses in answering the request for assistance.
16. Each of the parties agree that each Assisting Jurisdiction shall provide for the payment of compensation
and benefits to:
• an injured member; and
• a representative of a deceased member
of the Assisting Jurisdiction’s emergency forces if the member is injured or killed while rendering as-
sistance under this Agreement in the same manner and on the same terms as if the injury or death were
sustained while the member was rendering assistance for or within the member’s own jurisdiction.
Expenses incurred for such compensation or benefits shall not be reimbursable pursuant to other provi-
sions in this Agreement.
17. Should there be any disagreement as to the nature and extent of any provision pertaining to liability,
these issues shall be submitted to binding arbitration with the American Arbitration Association or any
other arbitration association unanimously agreed to by the parties involved in the dispute.
18. The execution of this Agreement shall not give rise to any liability or responsibility for failure to re-
spond to any request for assistance made pursuant to this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be
construed as or deemed to be an Agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties, and no third
party or parties shall have any right of action whatsoever hereunder for any cause whatsoever.
Conditions of Participation
19. Interagency and interjurisdictional plans shall be developed as necessary and in compliance with State
and Federal mandates; they shall be updated on a regular basis by the parties hereto and are operative
among the parties in accordance with such plans.
20. The parties agree to meet on a regular basis to review all assistance plans and the provisions of this
Agreement.
21. This Agreement shall become effective when approved and executed by the lawful representative of
each participating party. This Agreement shall remain in effect as between and among each and every
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 87
party until participation in this Agreement is terminated by a party in writing. Termination of partici-
pation in this Agreement by a party shall not affect the continued operation of this Agreement between
and among the remaining parties. Any party to this Agreement may terminate participation in this
Agreement upon thirty (30) days’ written notice addressed to the fiscal agent for <INSERT JURISDIC-
TION HERE> [ ].
Reimbursement
22. An itemized claim for loss and damage to the responding party’s equipment at the response scene shall
be filed within thirty (30) days of such loss or damage occurring. (NOTE: Filing within thirty days
will help to ensure Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursement, if applicable.)
23. The political subdivision in which the requested party is located shall be responsible for labor and
equipment reimbursement as specified in item 25 in this Agreement.
24. The parties agree that, as specified in <INSERT STATE CODE HERE>, no claim for loss, damage, or
expense under this Agreement shall be allowed unless, within thirty (30) days after the same is sus-
tained or incurred, an itemized notice of such claim under oath is served by mail or otherwise upon
the Chief Fiscal Officer of such political subdivision where the equipment was used. Claims shall be
fully documented in order to obtain reimbursement for State and Federal DHS reimbursement funds
when and if available.
25. The parties agree that labor and equipment reimbursement rates shall be as follows:
• Labor rates:
− Straight time for force account labor shall be the normal pay rates for responding personnel.
− Overtime for force account labor shall be at 1 1/2 times the normal pay rates for responding
personnel if it is the normal practice to pay overtime at this rate.
− Volunteer Note: Under FEMA 9523.6 Section 7.B.3. “If the providing (Assisting Jurisdiction) en-
tity is staffed with volunteer labor, the value of the volunteer labor may be credited to the non-
Federal cost share in accordance with the provisions of the Donated Resources policy (#9525.2).
• Equipment reimbursement rates:
− Equipment reimbursement rates shall be at the FEMA standard for equipment reimbursement or
the State or local rate, whichever is lowest.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed and approved and is effective and opera-
tive as to each of the parties as herein provided as of the day and year written below.
[DATED, NAME, TITLE AND SIGNATURE OF EACH PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION]
Additional Sample Agreements
Additional sample mutual aid agreements are located in Annex I.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
88
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex I: Sample Mutual Aid Agreements 89
ANNEX I: Sample Mutual Aid Agreements
EXAMPLE: Single County Mutual Aid Agreement
Description
This sample mutual aid agreement from the State of Idaho is intended to improve coordination between
emergency responders across the public safety spectrum within a single county. Emergency Medical Ser-
vices (EMS) is addressed directly in the agreement.
MUTUAL AID AND CONTINGENCY AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG THE
MEMBERS OF THE XXXXXXXXXX COUNTY EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION
This agreement is made and entered into effective on the day of ,
20XX, by and among the Members of the XXXXXXXXXX County Emergency Medical
Services Association who have duly executed this Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Members of the XXXXXXXXXX County Emergency Medical Services As-
sociation recognize the necessity to cooperate and work together to provide for mutual
aid and contingency assistance; and
WHEREAS, the Members further recognize the need to provide for an organized means
of resolving conflicts, concerns, and questions between and among their respective
Members.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY AND AMONG THE MEMBERS WHO HAVE DULY
EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Denitions:
As used herein:
a. “Requesting Member” shall mean the Member requesting aid, and
b. “Responding Member” shall mean the Member affording or responding to a call for
aid.
SECTION 2. Mutual Aid and Contingency Agreement:
The Members of the XXXXXXXXXX County EMS Association mutually agree to provide
mutual aid and contingency service to each other.
SECTION 3. Authority to Respond to Provide Assistance:
a. The authority to make requests for assistance or to provide aid under this Agree-
ment shall reside with the requesting Member’s command personnel or the command
personnel’s designee. For purposes of this Agreement, the “requesting Member” shall
mean the incident commander or the incident commander’s designee asking for assis-
tance and the “responding Member” shall mean an officer/supervisor or designee send-
ing assistance. Any Member shall have the right to request assistance from the other
Member’s subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
90
b. The XXXXXXXXXX County Emergency Communications Center will page out the
next nearest Member if two consecutive pages go unanswered for any reason. Members
are empowered to set up automatic aid protocols in the Emergency Communications
Center for specific circumstances in their service areas.
SECTION 4. Requesting Assistance:
A Member may request assistance from any other Member when the requesting Mem-
ber has concluded that such assistance is essential to protect life.
SECTION 5. Responses to Request:
Upon request, a responding Member, upon determination that an emergency exists and
subject to the availability of human and equipment resources, shall dispatch EMS per-
sonnel and equipment to aid the requesting Member.
SECTION 6. Personnel and Equipment Provided:
The requesting Member shall include in its request for assistance the amount and type
of equipment, and shall specify the location where the personnel and equipment are
needed.
The final decision on the amount and type of equipment to be sent shall be solely that
of the responding Member. The responding Member shall be immune from any li-
ability in connection with all acts associated herewith provided that the final decision is
made with reasonable diligence.
No Member shall make any claim whatsoever against another Member for refusal to
send the requested personnel or equipment where such refusal is based on the judg-
ment of the responding Member that such personnel and equipment are either not
available or are needed to provide service in the Member’s response area.
SECTION 7. Command and Control at the Emergency Scene:
All Members have established Incident Command System (ICS) Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) and will implement them on all incidents involving mutual aid or
contingency responses.
The responding Member’s personnel shall report and the equipment shall be given to the
incident commander or other appropriate sector officer of the requesting Member. The
person in charge of the responding Member shall meet with the incident commander or
appropriate sector officer of the requesting Member for a briefing and assignment.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 91
The person in charge of the responding Member shall retain control of the responding
Member’s human and equipment resources and shall direct them to meet the needs and
tasks assigned by the incident commander or sector officer. The responding Member’s
personnel and equipment shall be released by the requesting Member when the services
of the responding Member are no longer required or when the responding Member’s
resources are needed in their primary response area. Responding Member personnel
and equipment may withdraw from the EMS scene upon giving notice to the incident
commander or appropriate sector officer that they are needed in the Member’s primary
response area. It is understood that the purpose of this section is to maintain order at
the emergency scene and shall not be construed to establish an employer/employee
relationship.
SECTION 8. Reporting and Recordkeeping:
The requesting Member shall maintain records regarding the frequency of the use of
this agreement and provide them to the Iowa Department of Public Health Bureau of
Emergency Medical Services upon request. Each Member shall maintain individual
patient care reports.
SECTION 9. No Reimbursement for Costs:
No Member shall be required to reimburse any other Member for the cost of providing
the services set forth in this Agreement for mutual aid services, except as provided in
Section 10 below. Each Member shall pay its own costs (i.e., salaries, repairs, materials,
compensation, etc.) for responding for requests for mutual aid or contingency response.
SECTION 10. Fees for EMS Agency:
Members providing ambulance transport or other services normally billed for will be
entitled to their normal fees for service and are responsible for their own billing, insur-
ance filing and collection activity. Requesting Members are responsible for payment of
fees for responding paramedic Members providing paramedic intercept services.
SECTION 11. Liability:
Each responding Member hereby waives all claims against each requesting Member for
compensation for any property loss or damage and/or personal injury or death occur-
ring as a consequence of the performance of this Agreement. A responding Member
assumes all liability and/or cost of damage to its equipment and the injury or death of
its personnel when responding or performing under this agreement.
SECTION 12. Insurance:
Each Member shall procure and maintain such insurance as is required by applicable
Federal and State law and as may be appropriate and reasonable to cover its staff, equip-
ment, vehicles, and property, including but not limited to liability insurance, workers’
compensation (if applicable), unemployment insurance, automobile liability, and prop-
erty damage. Members may self-insure when appropriate.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
92
SECTION 13. Conict Resolution:
From time to time, personnel from one Member or another may have some concerns or
questions regarding this Agreement or the working relationship of the parties. Should
any such issues arise, they should be dealt with by the Member’s chain of command to
provide answers or resolution.
SECTION 14. Term of Agreement:
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution by all Members hereto.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of 10 years unless cancelled by any
Member by giving 30 days written notice to the XXXXXXXXXX County EMS Associa-
tion. The Agreement may be amended by agreement of all of the Members.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the following Members have duly executed this Agreement:
Editor’s Note: Signatures deleted
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 93
EXAMPLE: Single State Mutual Aid Compact
Description
This sample mutual aid agreement from the State of Alabama is intended to improve coordination between
agencies across the healthcare spectrum and the Alabama Department of Public Health. EMS is included as
an “Other Healthcare Entity” within this agreement.
MUTUAL AID COMPACT
This Mutual Aid Compact (“Compact”) is made and entered into as of this day
of , 20 , by and between (“the Participating
Entity”) and the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) as compact coordinator.
The Compact will remain in effect indefinitely unless terminated by one of the signing
parties. The Participating Entity, Other Health Care Entities and Other Entities are col-
lectively referred to as the “Participating Entities.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, this Compact is a statement of principles and procedures which signify
the belief and commitment of the Participating Entities that in the event of a disaster as
herein below defined, the public health and medical needs of the citizens in Alabama
and contiguous States will be best met if the Participating Entities cooperate with one
another and coordinate their response efforts; and,
WHEREAS, by signing herein below, all parties understand and acknowledge that no
Participating Entity, other health care entity or other entity is bound to provide or accept
patients, staff, equipment or supplies; and,
WHEREAS, the terms of this compact apply only in the event and to the extent that
such parties utilize and coordinate through AIMS which provides the executing mecha-
nism for the compact; and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Entities desire to set forth the basic tenets of a cooperative
and coordinated response plan to facilitate the immediate sharing of regional resources
in the event of a disaster; and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Entities acknowledge that any Participating Entity may
from time to time find it necessary to evacuate and/or transfer and/or participate in the
evacuation or transfer of patients because of the occurrence of a disaster; and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Entities further acknowledge that any Participating Entity
may from time to time lack the staff, equipment, supplies and other essential services to
optimally meet the needs of patients because of the occurrence of a disaster; and,
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
94
WHEREAS, each Participating Entity acknowledges that at any time it may, as a result of
a disaster, (i) need assistance as an Affected Entity or (ii) be able to render aid as an As-
sisting Entity; and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Entities have determined that a Mutual Aid Compact,
developed prior to a sudden and immediate disaster, is needed to facilitate communi-
cation between the Participating Entities and to coordinate the transfer of patients and
the sharing of staff, equipment, supplies and other essential services in the event of a
disaster; and,
WHEREAS, Participating Entities recognize that a disaster may impact entities in both
Alabama and in contiguous States and may desire to extend the Mutual Aid Compact to
include entities in contiguous States that wish to participate in a coordinated response.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the Participating Entities
agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINED TERMS
1.1 The terms used throughout the Compact shall have the meaning set forth below:
a. ADPH Patient Transfer Center–The Alabama Department of Public Health,
along with coordinating representatives from the Alabama Hospital Association
and other organizations representing entities providing patient care, will staff
a patient transfer center during a public health emergency or mass casualty
disaster. The purpose of this center will be to coordinate efforts between hos-
pitals and other health care entities and the State Emergency Operations Center
to ensure appropriate transfer of patients and optimum utilization of health
care resources within the State. The primary tool for assessing the availability
of health care resources and coordinating transfers will be the AIMS system.
b. “Affected Entity” is a Participating Entity which is impacted by a Disaster.
c. “AIMS,” the Alabama Incident Management System, is a computer software
program that allows the Alabama Department of Public Health to monitor the
resources of hospitals, nursing homes, community health centers, and ambu-
lance companies during times of disasters.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 95
d. “Assisting Entity” is a Participating Entity party which is available upon re-
quest to assist an Affected Entity.
e. “Designated Representative” is the individual or position designated by each
Participating Entity to act as a liaison with ADPH during any revisions of the
Operating Procedures and to communicate with the Affected Entity and the
appropriate individuals within the representative’s own healthcare organiza-
tion in the event of a Disaster.
f. “Disaster” means a major incident occurring or imminent within a Participat-
ing Entity and/or in the surrounding community, that overwhelms its abil-
ity to function as a health care delivery organization and typically requires
the notification of the State emergency management agency, local emergency
response agencies, and the responsible Public Health Department. However,
activation of the Mutual Aid Compact is not dependent upon the proclamation
of a State of Emergency by the Governor of the State of Alabama under Chapter
16 of Title 31 of the Code of Ala.1975. Disasters include, but are not limited
to, natural disasters, such as hurricanes, and man-made disasters, such as acts
of terrorism. A Disaster may affect the entire facility or only a portion of the
facility or its health care staff.
g. “Evacuation” means the process of moving patients and staff from the Affect-
ed Entity due to a disaster that threatens life and/or the ability of the Affected
Entity to provide health care services.
h. “Operating Procedures” means the system for implementing this Compact
which includes, but is not limited to, the following: (i) a method for mak-
ing and responding to requests for the transfer of patients and/or the sharing
of staff, equipment, supplies and other essential services; (ii) an agreed-upon
technology to facilitate communication between the parties in the event of a
Disaster or Evacuation; (iii) the role of State, Federal and other aid agencies in
the event of a Disaster; (iv) the steps required when an Affected Entity and/or
an entire region experience a Disaster (v) the development and/or designation
of Public Health disease surveillance activities and systems for timely notifi-
cation of hospital capacity status; cases or suspect cases of diseases; unusual
outbreaks which may be associated with a terrorist attack; and identification of
credentialing, licensure, medical staff, and liability issues.
i. “Other Entity” any entity in a contiguous State that signs a similar Compact
compatible herewith.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
96
j. “Other Health Care Entity” is any health care organization such as communi-
ty health center, Indian Health Services clinic, physician practice group, medi-
cal needs shelter, ADPH-licensed EMS service provider, rescue squad, or mental
health hospital or clinic or ADPH licensed nursing home that has joined the
Compact by signing this agreement.
k. “Participating Entity” any Alabama entity/health system agency, entity, or
organization that transfers, or receives patients, or provides health or medi-
cal care or supplies or equipment, or any participating entity in a contiguous
State that signs a similar compact compatible herewith or any “Other Health
Care Entity.” This can include, but is not limited to: in-patient facilities such
as general or specialty hospitals; nursing homes; federally qualified health care
centers and other such clinics or health care centers; and emergency medical
service providers whether private or government owned.
l. “State ADPH Coordinator is the individual designated by ADPH as the person
with whom participating entities shall coordinate during an event.
ARTICLE II
OPERATING PROCEDURES
2.1 Participating Entities agree to identify a Designated Representative (liaison) and at
least two back-up individuals to participate in revisions, when needed, of Operat-
ing Procedures, attached as Exhibit B. The names and contact information for the
Participating Entity’s Designated Representative, back-up individuals, and other
key personnel are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Participating Entities agree to pro-
vide ADPH with timely updates (see Exhibit A) where available via AIMS.
2.2 The Designated Representative and/or back-up individuals shall attend meetings
and conferences scheduled by ADPH through the ADPH Center for Emergency
Preparedness to discuss issues related to this Compact and if needed, to revise the
Operating Procedures. The Designated Representative shall act as a liaison with
representatives of the ADPH Patient Transfer Center and the Affected Entity, in the
event of a Disaster.
2.3 In the event of any inconsistency between this Compact and the finalized Operat-
ing Procedures, the terms of the Operating Procedures shall govern.
2.4 The Participating Entities agree to participate as appropriate, in Public Health
disease surveillance activities and systems for timely notification of entity capacity
status, as set forth in the Operating Procedures.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 97
ARTICLE III
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PARTICIPATING ENTITIES
DURING A DISASTER
3.1 In the event of a Disaster, the Participating Entities agree to:
a. Communicate and coordinate their response efforts via their Designated
Representatives (Liaisons) in accordance with this Compact and the Operating
Procedures;
b. Logon to and activate the ability to receive and send information via AIMS, if
available, and to maintain such capability for the duration of the event.
c. Communicate, including receiving alert information, in accordance with the
Operating Procedures, by phone, fax, AIMS and/or email, 800 MHz radio,
HAM radio, or other means of communication, and to maintain radio capabil-
ity to communicate as a minimum back-up.
ARTICLE IV
TRANSFERS
4.1 Requirements regarding transferring and receiving patients apply only to Par-
ticipating Entities that are inpatient facilities. Other types of parties will comply
to the extent of their capability in the patient transfer process. The Participating
Entities agree to accept patients transferred by any Affected Entity under the terms
and conditions set forth in this Compact and in accordance with the Operating
Procedures.
4.2 The Participating Entities agree that in transferring patients from an Affected Entity
to an Assisting Entity, the Affected Entity shall contact the ADPH Patient Transfer
Center as soon as possible and shall enter the pertinent information regarding
the transfer in AIMS. If the Affected Entity cannot find an Assisting Entity, it may
request help from the ADPH Patient Transfer Center in doing so.
4.3 The Participating Entities agree that in accepting the transfer of patients from the Af-
fected Entity, the Assisting Entity will make reasonable efforts, whenever feasible, to:
a. Communicate with the Affected Entity regarding the numbers and types/acu-
ity of patients who may be transferred. This communication may be via any
communications system available including AIMS or any successor system.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
98
b. Accept all transfers from Affected Entity that are within the limitations commu-
nicated by the Designated Representative. Assisting Entity shall not be obligat-
ed to accept any patients that exceed its ability to assist herein, its capacity or its
staffing, which shall be determined at the Assisting Entity’s sole discretion.
4.4 The Participating Entities agree to cooperate with each other in billing and collect-
ing for services furnished to patients pursuant to this Compact and the Operating
Procedures attached hereto.
ARTICLE V
STAFF, SUPPLIES, AND EQUIPMENT
5.1 The Participating Entities agree, in the event of a Disaster, to use reasonable efforts
to make clinical staff, medical and general supplies, including pharmaceuticals,
and biomedical equipment (including, but not limited to ventilators, monitors,
and infusion pumps) available to each other in accordance with the Operating
Procedures. Each Participating Entity shall be entitled to use its reasonable judg-
ment regarding the type and amount of staff, supplies, and equipment it can pro-
vide without adversely affecting its own ability to provide services.
5.2 The Participating Entities agree to cooperate with each other to determine appro-
priate compensation for the use of staff, and for supplies and equipment shared in
accordance with the Operating Procedures.
ARTICLE VI
NON-EMPLOYED MEDICAL STAFF
6.1 In the event of a Disaster, the Participating Entities agree to inform their non-
employee medical staff members of any requests for assistance and offer them
the opportunity to volunteer their professional services. The Participating Entities
shall cooperate with each other to provide in a timely manner the information
necessary to verify employment status, licensure, training, and other information
necessary in order for such volunteers to receive emergency credentials.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 99
ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
7.1 This Compact, together with the attached exhibits, constitutes the entire compact
between the Participating Entities.
7.2 Amendments to this Compact must be in writing and signed by the Participating
Entities.
7.3 Nothing in this compact shall be construed as limiting the rights of the Participat-
ing Entities to affiliate or contract with any other entity operating an entity or other
health care facility on either a limited or general basis while this compact is in
effect. This Compact is not intended to supersede such agreements; neither is this
Compact intended to establish a preferred status for patients of any Affected Entity.
7.4 A Participating Entity may at anytime terminate its participation in the Compact by
providing sixty-day written notice to the ADPH Center for Emergency Preparedness.
However, if no such notice is given, the Compact remains in effect in perpetuity.
7.5 In the event that the Governor of the State of Alabama has proclaimed a State of
Emergency, all parties as entities and all individuals performing any functions
within the scope and line of their duties for or on behalf of any such party, per-
forming functions under the terms of this Compact are recognized by ADPH as
exercising the governmental powers and functions of the State of Alabama and
are considered by ADPH as emergency management workers or entities providing
resources to the State of Alabama as appropriate in fulfillment of immunity provi-
sions of Chapter 16 of Title 31 of the Code of Ala. 1975.
7.6 Any notices required or permitted hereunder shall be sufficiently given and
deemed received upon personal delivery, or upon the third business day following
deposit in the U.S. Mail, if sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, ad-
dressed, or delivered as follows:
Copies to:
Participating Entity:
Street Address:
City/State/Zip:
Alabama Department of Public Health
Center for Emergency Preparedness
RSA Tower, Suite 1310 Montgomery, Alabama 36130-3017
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
100
EDITOR’S NOTE: Signature page and Exhibit A-Agency listing were deleted.
EXHIBIT B
This Exhibit is intended to append to the ADPH Approved Mutual Aid Compact between
the parties to such Compact (The Compact) and to basically serve as a guideline for the
implementation of the compact, with the understanding that the terms set forth herein
may not be applicable in all situations. The terminology found in this appendix is de-
fined in the Compact.
1.00 Patient and Patient Transfer Responsibilities
Each Participating Entity, as appropriate, is willing to accept patients transferred by the
other party under the terms and conditions set forth in this Exhibit and as coordinated
through AIMS. Terms in this Exhibit are only applicable in the event the transfer of pa-
tients cannot be handled by the Participating Entity through local efforts.
1.1 Initiation of transfer. Only the Administrator or a designee from each Affected
Entity has the authority to initiate the evacuation, transfer, or receipt of person-
nel, material resources/supplies, or patients. If evacuation of patients is needed,
and the Participating Entity does not have an agreement with an Assisting Entity to
handle incoming patients, the administrator or designee of the Affected Entity will
notify local EMA and ADPH Patient Transfer Center through AIMS. After EMA/
ADPH instruction, the Affected Entity will notify emergency medical services of
needed assistance in handling transfers. It is assumed in disasters that affected en-
tities are already working closely with local public health and disaster/emergency
services.
1.2 Documentation: The Affected Entity and Assisting Entity are responsible where
practical for tracking the destination of all patients transferred through AIMS.
1.3 Transfer Responsibilities of Affected Entity. The parties agree that in the event
it becomes necessary to transfer patients from the Affected Entity to the Assisting
Entity, the Affected Entity shall after initial contact:
a. Contact the Designated Representative at the Assisting Entity as soon as the
Affected Entity becomes aware of the need to transfer patients. The request
for the transfer of patients initially can be made verbally. However, it must be
followed up with a written communication where practical prior to the actual
transferring of any patients;
b. Provide the number of patients needing to be transferred;
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 101
c. Comply with any limitations communicated to the Affected Entity regarding the
numbers and types/acuity of patients that the Assisting Entity is able to accept;
d. Identify type of specialized services required (e.g., ICU, ventilator, etc.). To the
extent practical and available, the Affected Entity is responsible for sending ex-
traordinary drugs or other special patient needs (e.g., specialized equipment,
blood products) along with the patient, if requested by the Assisting Entity.
e. Triage all patients prior to transfer to verify that the types and acuity of ser-
vices required are within the scope of services the Assisting Entity is able to
provide;
f. Arrange for the transport of each patient to the Assisting Entity, with the sup-
port of such medical personnel and equipment as is required by the patient’s
condition. The Affected Entity is responsible for coordinating and financing
the transportation of patients to the receiving facility and tracking costs related
to transport;
g. Once admitted, transferred patient(s) become the patient(s) of and are under
care of the Assisting Entity’s medical practitioner until discharged, transferred
or reassigned;
h. Deliver where practical to the Assisting Entity, with each patient transferred,
medical Records, or copies thereof, sufficient to indicate the patient’s diagno-
ses, condition, and treatment provided and planned; and
i. If feasible, inventory the patient’s personal effects and valuables transported
with the patient to the Assisting Entity. The Affected Entity shall deliver the
inventory and the patient’s valuables to the personnel transporting the patient,
and receive a receipt for such items from the Assisting Entity.
1.4 Transfer Responsibilities of Assisting Entity. The parties agree that in accepting
the transfer of patients from the Affected Entity, the Assisting Entity shall:
a. Have an Administrator or Designated Representative available 24 hours a day,
7 days a week to implement this Compact and to communicate with the Af-
fected Entity regarding the numbers and types/acuity of patients who may
be transferred.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
102
b. Accept all transfers from the Administrator or Affected Entity that are within
the limitations communicated by the Designated Representative of the Assist-
ing Entity. The Assisting Entity shall not be obligated to accept any patients
which exceed its ability to assist herein, its capacity or staffing, which shall be
determined in the Assisting Entity’s sole discretion.
c. Record in the clinical records of each transferred patient notations of the con-
dition of the patient upon arrival at the Assisting Entity.
d. If personal effects and valuables of the patient are transported with the patient,
check those items against the inventory prepared by the Affected Entity, and
issue a receipt for such items as are received by the Assisting Entity to the per-
sonnel transporting the patient.
e. Designate, upon arrival or as soon as practical, the admitting service and an
admitting medical practitioner for each transferred patient.
1.5 Discharge of Patients. If a transferred patient is discharged by the Assisting Entity,
the Assisting Entity will return to the Affected Entity any original medical records,
including x-ray films, transferred with the patient. If the Affected Entity is not
then able to receive the returned medical records, the Assisting Entity will retain
the records in the Assisting Entity’s records department until requested by the Af-
fected Entity.
1.6 Charges for Services. All charges for services provided at the Affected Entity or
at the Assisting Entity for patients transferred pursuant to this Compact shall be
collected by the party providing such services directly from the patient, third party
payer or other source normally billed by the party. The parties agree to cooperate
with each other in billing and collecting for services furnished to patients pursu-
ant to this Compact. The billing and collection of charges for transportation of the
patient from the Affected Entity to the Assisting Entity (and to return the patient
to the Affected Entity) shall be the responsibility of the Affected Entity, and the
transporting medium.
1.7 Notications. In routing patients from an Affected Entity to an Assisting Entity,
and in accordance with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, the
Affected Entity may inform ADPH and other appropriate governmental agency(ies)
as soon as they are aware of the need to transfer patients, informing the
agency(ies) of the number of patients needing transfer, the type of care they will
require, and their acuity level. The Affected Entity is also responsible where practi-
cal for notifying both the patient’s family or guardian and the patient’s attending
or personal physician of the situation. The Assisting Entity may assist in notifying
the patient’s family and personal physician.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 103
2.00 Supplies, Equipment and Pharmaceuticals
Each party agrees to use its commercially reasonable efforts to make general and medi-
cal equipment and supplies (i.e., infusion pumps, pharmaceuticals, monitors, ventila-
tors, laboratory supplies) available to each other under this Exhibit in the event of a
disaster, upon request. Supplies may be requested to address the needs of transferred
patients or may be requested to address disasters that require additional supplies with-
out movement of patients. The Assisting Entity shall be entitled to use its own reason-
able judgment regarding the type and amount of supplies that it can provide. The
Affected Entity that receives the supplies will reimburse the Assisting Entity based on the
actual cost of those supplies as herein below specified.
2.1 Equipment. Each party agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to make
biomedical equipment, including, but not limited to ventilators, monitors and
infusion pumps, available to an Affected Entity in the event of a disaster, upon
request. The Assisting Entity shall be entitled to use its own reasonable judgment
regarding the equipment that it can provide without adversely affecting its own
ability to provide services.
2.2 Communication of Request. Initial communications of need shall be made
through the local EMA, ADPH and, then to the Assisting Entity in accordance with
EMA guidelines. Affected Entity’s request to Assisting Entities for transfer of sup-
plies or equipment initially may be made verbally. The request, however, must be
followed up with written communication such as HEICS 201. The written re-
quest must be submitted to the Assisting Entity prior to the receipt of any material
resources at the Affected Entity. The Affected Entity will identify to the Assisting
Entity the following:
a. Indicate the quantity and exact type of resources;
b. Estimate how quickly the request must be filled;
c. Note the time period for which the resources will be needed; and
d. Specify the location where the resources should be delivered.
2.3 Supply of Equipment and Supplies. The Assisting Entity will supply a copy of its
standard accounting record such as HEICS Form 3-10 and other required copies
of paperwork to the Affected Entity for all equipment loaned. The Assisting Entity
will identify how long it will take it to fill the requests, as rapid response is a key
component.
2.4 Documentation. Parties have an obligation to document the quantity and condi-
tion of any equipment and supplies that are exchanged during a disaster. Both
parties to a transaction should be able to document the quantity and condition of
equipment loaned, the receipt and return (including condition) of any equipment.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
104
2.5 Supervision. The Affected Entity is responsible for appropriate use and mainte-
nance of all borrowed supplies or equipment.
2.6 Transportation. When feasible, the Affected Entity will be responsible for trans-
porting the loaned equipment. If the Affected Entity is unable to transport the
Equipment, the Assisting Entity will arrange for shipping/ transportation of the
loaned equipment to and from the Affected Entity. All expenses of shipping/trans-
port shall be the responsibility of the Affected Entity.
2.7 Risk of Loss. The Affected Entity assumes the risk of loss or damage to equipment
while in its possession or in transit. The Affected Entity will promptly notify the
Assisting Entity if damage or loss of equipment occurs.
2.8 Return of Equipment. The Affected Entity shall use reasonable care under the
circumstances in the operation and control of all materials and supplies used by
them during the period of assistance. Unused supplies may be returned, provided
that they are unopened and in good and usable condition. The Affected Entity will
promptly return equipment to the Assisting Entity upon request, unless return
of the equipment would be life-threatening to a patient at the Affected Entity or
would otherwise significantly compromise the health or safety of a patient. If
return of equipment is not feasible, arrangements for compensation will be made
between the entities as herein below specified.
2.9 Compensation. Entities operating under a signed mutual aid compact may receive
reimbursement to cover their expenses should such reimbursement become available.
2.10 Repair and Maintenance of Equipment. The Affected Entity shall pay for all re-
pairs to borrowed equipment as determined necessary by its on-site supervisor(s)
to maintain such equipment in safe and operational condition.
3.00 Personnel
The Administrator or designee of an Affected Entity as assisted if necessary by the Medi-
cal Staff Director, in conjunction with the departmental directors of affected services, will
make a determination as to whether medical staff and other personnel will be needed
at their facility. Personnel may be out-stationed or dispatched as herein below specified.
While providing services to the Affected Entity, employees of the Assisting Entity shall
remain as employees of their respective Entity while responding to, or performing an
emergency mutual aid function hereunder and until which time the employee is relieved
of further emergency mutual aid responsibility by a duly authorized official.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 105
3.1 Requesting Procedure. The Affected Entity requests personnel by notifying the
local EMA and ADPH via AIMS and subsequently the Assisting Entity of a need for
assistance, in accordance with EMA guidelines. After EMA/ADPH instruction, the
Administrator or designee of the Affected Entity will coordinate directly with the
Administrator or designee of the Assisting Entity for this assistance. The request
for the transfer of personnel made by the Affected Entity may initially be made
verbally. The request, however, must be followed up with written documentation.
This should occur prior to the arrival of personnel at the Affected Entity. The Af-
fected Entity will specify the following to the donor facility:
a. Type and number of personnel needed;
b. Estimate of how quickly the resources are needed;
c. Location where they are to report; and
d. Estimate of how long the personnel will be needed.
3.2 Credentialing of Physician Personnel. All party entities will put into place in
their entity policies provisions compliant with JCAHO, or CMS as appropriate,
requirements for temporary credentialing or privileging of received physician
personnel as dispatched by Assisting Entities.
3.3 Dispatching Volunteer Personnel. Hospital Volunteer Personnel dispatched from
Assisting Entities should be limited to staff that are fully accredited or credentialed
in the Assisting Entity. No resident physicians, medical/nursing students, or in-
training persons will be volunteered by the Assisting Entity. If in-training persons
wish to volunteer directly to the affected facility, they may do so, through ADPH Vol-
unteer Network. They could also volunteer to work at alternate care or triage sites.
3.4 Receiving of volunteer personnel. The Affected Entity will accept the profession-
al licenses, credentialing and approval of Assisting Entities in compliance with this
Exhibit. The Affected Entity will be responsible for the following:
a. Meet the arriving personnel (usually done by Affected Entity’s security depart-
ment or another designated employee);
b. Ask arriving personnel to present their Entity identification at the site desig-
nated by the Affected Entity’s emergency command center;
c. Copy or scan the person’s identification card to verify the volunteer’s status
and keep same in an appropriate file for location or audit purposes.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
106
3.5 Supervision of Personnel by Affected Entity. The Affected Entity’s Administrator
or designee identifies where and to whom the dispatched personnel should report.
Professional staff from the Affected Entity shall be assigned to supervise volunteer
personnel. The supervisor will meet with dispatched professionals as soon as pos-
sible after arrival and brief them of the incident status and their assignments. The
emergency staffing rules of the Affected Entity will govern assigned shifts.
3.6 Housing/Meals: The Affected Entity is responsible for securing housing and
meals for volunteer healthcare personnel sent by Assisting Entity.
3.7 Financial Responsibilities and Payments to Dispatched Staff. Dispatched pro-
fessional staff shall continue to be employees of their dispatching institution and
received salary and benefits, employee pensions and other benefits, and worker’s
compensation insurance from the dispatching facility; however, the Affected Entity
will reimburse the Assisting Entity for all such costs related to dispatched staff.
These costs include receiving wages and benefits from their Assisting Entity as the
donated personnel would normally receive, including shift differentials and over-
time pay. Costs also include the pro-rata share of worker’s compensation coverage
premiums as determined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
The Affected Entity will reimburse the Assisting Entity within 90 days following
receipt of the invoice.
3.8 Non-Employed Medical Staff. The Assisting Hospital shall inform its non-
employee medical staff members of the request for assistance and offer them the
opportunity to participate in the Assisting Hospital’s response as is appropriate
in the judgment of the Assisting Hospital. The Assisting Hospital shall cooper-
ate with the Affected Hospital to provide promptly the information necessary to
verify employment status, licensure and training necessary to perform the proce-
dures requiring assistance of volunteer non-employee medical staff members. To
the extent necessary or desirable, the Assisting Hospital will provide the Affected
Hospital with copies of the relevant medical staff credentialing files to support the
grant of emergency staff privileges.
3.9 Patient Care Staff. The parties agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts
to make clinical staff available to an Affected Entity in the event of a disaster, upon
request. The Assisting Entity shall be entitled to use its own reasonable judgment
regarding the clinical staff it can provide without adversely affecting its own abil-
ity to provide services. Clinical staff subject to this Compact shall be limited to
staff employed by the Assisting Entity except that Non-Employed Medical Staff
may be considered as employed for these purposes.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 107
3.10 Responsibility for Personnel. The parties agree that the personnel made available
to the Affected Entity shall be under the supervision and control of the Affected
Entity while performing any actions in response to the Affected Entity’s request for
personnel.
3.11 Personnel Files. The Assisting Entity shall, upon request, provide to the Affected
Entity copies of personnel files sufficient to document the licensure, training and
competence of the dispatched staff. The Assisting Entity shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts to ensure that such records comply with licensure and accredita-
tion requirements applicable to the Assisting Entity.
3.12 Recall of Staff. The Assisting Entity may recall its clinical staff at any time within
its sole discretion. Parties will make every effort to provide adequate notice so as
to allow the Affected Entity to arrange staffing from other facilities or agencies.
3.13 Non-Dispatched Volunteer Personnel. Volunteers who are not dispatched by an
Assisting Entity will not be reimbursed for labor performed while participating
under this Compact, nor may Assisting Entities claim reimbursement for such.
4.00 Ancillary Services
4.1 Ancillary Services. The parties agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts
to make essential ancillary services, including, but not limited to, clinical laboratory
and dietary services, available to an Affected Entity in the event of a disaster, upon
request. When feasible, the Affected Entity will be responsible for all transportation
and delivery services associated with the ancillary services, such as the delivery of
laboratory specimens and the pick up and delivery of dietary supplies. If the Af-
fected Entity is unable to provide transportation/delivery, the Assisting Entity will
arrange for transportation/delivery to and from the Affected Entity. All expenses of
shipping/transport shall be the responsibility of the Affected Entity. The Affected
Entity will compensate the Assisting Entity at cost to the Assisting Entity.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
108
5.00 Liability and Insurance
Each party shall throughout the term of the Compact to which the Exhibit is appended,
maintain comprehensive general liability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance,
property insurance, professional liability (malpractice) insurance, and other insurances
as required by the laws of the State of Alabama or by Federal law as herein below speci-
fied. General and professional liability insurance coverage shall be maintained in the
minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $3,000,000.00 annual aggre-
gate. Upon request, parties shall provide to the other party certificates evidencing the
existence of such insurance coverage. Each party may at its option satisfy its obligations
under this section through self-insurance programs and protections deemed by it to be
comparable to the insurance coverage described herein, and upon request, provide to
the other party information showing that the self-insurance programs offer such com-
parable protection.
5.1 Workers’ Compensation, Liability, and Directors’ and Ofcers’ Coverage.
a. Worker’s Compensation Coverage. Each party is responsible for complying
with the State of Alabama’s Workers’ Compensation Act. Each party should un-
derstand that workers’ compensation coverage does not automatically extend
to volunteers.
b. Automobile Liability Coverage: Each party is responsible for insuring that it is
in compliance with the State of Alabama’s motor vehicle financial responsibil-
ity laws.
c. Director’s and Officers’ Coverage. Each party agrees to have in force or obtain
director’s and officers’ liability coverage.
6.00 Relationship of Parties
6.1 Relationship of Parties to Each Other. None of the provisions of the Compact
to which this Exhibit is appended are intended to create nor shall be deemed or
construed to create a partnership, joint venture, employee/employer relationship
or any relationship between the parties, other than that of independent entities
contracting with each other hereunder solely for the purpose of effecting the pro-
visions of this Compact.
Section VI: Local Mutual Aid 109
6.2 Relationship to the State of Alabama. It is the intent of the Compact to which
this Exhibit is appended that when the Governor of the State of Alabama has pro-
claimed a State of emergency for the purposes of Title 31, Code of Alabama 1975, the
parties hereto when performing pursuant to such proclamation, are to be consid-
ered to the extent allowable by law as performing State or State-directed functions
under ‘31-9-17, Code of Ala. 1975 and should be entitled to immunities granted
under that Section. Likewise, the officers, agents, servants and employees of par-
ties when performing under such a proclaimed State of emergency should be
considered “emergency management workers” as defined by ‘31-9-16, Code of Ala.
1975 and should be entitled to immunities granted under that Section.
6.3 Department’s Role in Coordinating Governmental Reimbursement. Nothing in
this Compact or the Attachments to it is to be construed as being contingent upon
the availability or reimbursement of funds from any Federal source and the par-
ties herein shall fully comply with the terms herein without regard to such reim-
bursement issues. To the extent that Title 31 has been invoked and reimbursement
is available from any governmental or other private sources other than as herein
above provided, the Department will serve as a facilitator and coordinator for the
collection and proper routing of reimbursement funds.
6.4 Relationships with and Afliation with Other Facilities. Nothing in the Com-
pact to which this Exhibit is appended shall be construed as limiting the right
of the parties to affiliate or contract with any other entity operating an entity or
other health care facility on either a limited or general basis while the Compact
is in effect. Each party acknowledges that, in the event of a large scale disaster,
the ability of the Assisting Entity to accept patients from the Affected Entity will
be affected by the receipt of patients from other sources, including direct admis-
sions from the community, transfers of patients from other facilities, or patient
assignment through NDMS. The Compact to which this Exhibit is appended is
not intended to establish a preferred status for patients of the Affected Entities. All
decisions regarding allocation of available facilities will be made by the Assisting
Entity using its best judgment about the needs of its community.
6.5 Relationship to the Public. Each facility is responsible for developing and co-
ordinating internally, and locally, with appropriate organizations, especially the
media, on how each party will coordinate communication in a disaster. A Joint
Information Center (JIC) is an ideal structure for coordinating information releas-
es. Designating a Public Information Officer (PIO) in each facility helps coordi-
nate communication via the JIC to the public. PIOs normally work with Com-
mand Staff to develop a facility response to cover its most likely events. Parties
are encouraged to have their PIO work with other party PIOs to familiarize one
another with each other’s protocols for addressing the media, and to practice JIC
to JIC coordination.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
110
6.6 Relationship to NDMS. Nothing in the Compact to which this Exhibit is append-
ed is intended to in any way supersede or interfere with standing Compacts that
any of the parties may have with the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS.)
However, it is expected that in a disaster, the State Health Officer or representatives
from the Patient Transfer Center will be in constant contact with the State’s NDMS
representative to ensure optimal coordination of Statewide health care services and
the best use of available health system resources.
6.7 Assignment. This Compact and the rights of the parties hereunder, may not be as-
signed by any party, without the prior written consent of the other parties.
6.8 No Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any provision of this Compact shall be con-
strued to be a waiver of any breach of any other provision of this Compact or of
any succeeding breach of the same provision.
6.9 Relationship to the Public in General. The execution of this Compact shall not
give rise to any liability or responsibility for failure to respond to any request for
assistance, lack of speed in answering such a request, inadequacy of equipment, or
abilities of the responding personnel.
7.00 Mobilization and Demobilization Procedures
7.1 Mobilization Plan. Each party shall develop and update on a regular basis a plan
providing for the effective mobilization of its resources and facilities.
7.2 Demobilization. Parties hereto will provide and coordinate any necessary demo-
bilization procedures and post-event stress debriefing.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 111
ANNEX II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools
Introduction
The following sample documentation is intended to provide one possible method for documenting the
planning and response to a mass gathering incident.
Use of Fictional Location: “Townville”
Townville is a fictional city used for illustrative purposes. Names of past Presidents of the United States
were used to illustrate key positions within the Incident Command System (ICS). Any similarity to an ac-
tual city or location is coincidental.
Demographics of “Townville”
Townville is a city covering 60 square miles and home to over 200,000 residents. The median income for a
family is just under $40,000 annually. Per capita income is just over $20,000. A breakdown of population
age groups can be seen in the table below.
Age Percent Population
<18 22%
18 to 24 13%
25 to 44 32%
45 to 64 20%
65+ 11%
Townville is home to 5 different Fortune 500 companies, a half dozen medium-sized sports venues includ-
ing a 13,000 seat baseball park and a 12,000 seat multipurpose arena. A large public university occupies
much of the city’s downtown real estate. A much smaller private university also resides in Townville. There
are three high schools and a dozen middle and elementary schools within the city.
Townville is home to a level-one trauma center and two other medium-sized hospitals with specialties in
stroke and cardiology. Four other hospitals are within easy reach of the city’s Emergency Medical Services
(EMS). There are six nursing homes and numerous group homes within the city.
EMS in Townville is supported by 18 full-time Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulances and 2 ALS nonsuper-
visor nontransport units, and 12 Basic Life Support (BLS) first responder engine companies. Mutual aid EMS
is provided by 3 adjoining municipalities in Wayne County with a total of 14 ALS and 24 BLS ambulances.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
112
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 113
Sample EMS Operations Plan
Townville Marathon
September 29, 2011
Table of Contents
Event Background ....................................................................................................................................114
Potential Impact ......................................................................................................................................114
Key Contact Information .........................................................................................................................115
Command Structure ................................................................................................................................116
Resource Listing .......................................................................................................................................117
Personnel Rehabilitation .........................................................................................................................117
Course Treatment Facilities ....................................................................................................................117
Mutual Aid Response ...............................................................................................................................118
Communications .....................................................................................................................................118
MCI Response ......................................................................................................................................... 120
MEDEVACs .............................................................................................................................................. 120
Other Contingencies ............................................................................................................................... 120
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
114
Event Background
The Townville Marathon will take place on September 29, 2011. The event actually includes the following
races: the Shriners 8k Race, Whole Foods Half Marathon, and the 1st National Townville Marathon.
Duration: The first race (8k) will begin at 0700, the half marathon will begin at 0730, and the full marathon
will begin at 0800. Projected completion time is 1500 hours. Runners are limited to a 7-hour maximum.
Course: The course is a 26.2-mile race, covering most of the city. The start line is at 12th and Broad, and
the finish line is at 1st and Main.
Expected Attendance: There are 15,000 people registered as participants, and 20,000 spectators are possible.
Weather Forecast: It is predicted to be partly cloudy, high of 68 °F, low of 36 °F with a 20 percent chance
of precipitation (as of 9-20-11).
Sponsoring Organization: The organization sponsoring the event is the Townville Sports Group, located at
1234 Presidents Avenue, Townville, MI 48125. Their main phone number is 313-123-4567.
Potential Impact
The most significant impact will be on EMS at the event itself. There are 15,000 potential participants of
widely varying levels of fitness competing in a 5.0, 13.1, and 26.2-mile running race, combined with 20,000
possible spectators. Based on last year’s event data, 0.8 percent of all participants sought medical attention.
If this ratio holds true this year, onsite medical services could experience 123 or more medical requests and
9 EMS transports from the event.
EMS operations outside of the actual event will also be impacted. Travel throughout the city will be im-
peded for 7 hours or more during the busiest part of the day. Communication officers and field units alike
must plan for this and route accordingly.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 115
Key Contact Information
Emergency Medical Services
Townville EMS (TEMS) Agency Townville Fire Department (TFD)
EMS Communications
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Capt. James Polk (Unit 100)
EMS Operations (Unied Command)
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Sgt. Martin Buren
Bike Team Leader
(XXX)-XXX-XXXX
FD Communications
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Battalion Chief Chester Arthur
EMS Operations (Unied Command)
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Townville Police Department (TPD) Sports Group
PD Communications
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Lt. Warren Harding (Unied Command)
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
John Tyler (Unied Command)
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
James Buchanan
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) Resources Aeromedical Resources
State EOC
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Townville Medical Center MCI Line
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Wayne County Communications
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Monroe County Communications
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Townville Medight
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Townville Life Flight
(XXX) XXX-XXXX
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
116
Command Structure
The following initial command structure will be in place for the event. This structure may be expanded as
necessary in accordance with ICS principles.
Unified Command
TPD Warren Harding
TEMS James Polk
TFD Chester Arthur
Onsite Communications
Franklin Pierce
Onsite Medical Group Supervisor
Dr. Grant
EMS Group Supervisor
Sgt. Martin Buren
Nursing Staff
TEMS Ambulances
Wayne Ambulance
Monroe Ambulance
TEMS Bike Teams
Townville Fire Bike Team
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 117
Resource Listing
The following EMS resources will be available on scene:
Personnel Vehicles Equipment/Supplies
TEMS Communication: 1 ALS Ambulance: 5 In Type II ambulance:
1 extra stretcher
2 extra drug boxes
2 extra jump kits
2 extra Reeves sleeves
1 extra ECG monitor
Extra blankets
Extra towels
Command laptop and binder
6 portable oxygen tanks
6 oxygen regulators
2 spare UHF radios
1 spare 800 MHz radio
Large cooler with ice
3 cases IV uids
TEMS BLS: 6 ALS Bike Team: 3
TEMS ALS: 6 BLS Bike Team: 1
TFD BLS: 2 Type II ambulance: 1
(As a logistics support vehicle)
Monroe ALS: 2 Unit 30 (in quarters)
Monroe BLS: 1 MCI-1 at TEMS HQ
Wayne ALS: 2 Resource 2 at TEMS HQ
Physicians: 2 Ancillary staff: Unknown
Nurses: 5-7
Personnel Rehabilitation
Each TEMS ambulance will carry extra water and sports drinks for bike teams. Rehabilitation for EMS person-
nel will also be available at multiple points along the course. Designated rehabilitation areas are as follows:
• Public parking area at 10th and Main.
• Mile 6 water stop near Grover Avenue and Massachusetts Road.
• Mile 12 water stop near Tower Drive and Huntington Avenue.
• Mile 20 water stop near Forest Avenue and Henry Road.
Course Treatment Facilities
Two course treatment facilities will be available. The primary medical treatment facility is located at 20th
and Main in a parking garage on the NE corner. This facility will be equipped with 45 cots, IV therapy sup-
plies, oxygen, and basic medical supplies. This facility will be staffed by a sports medicine physician (Dr.
Grant), several Registered Nurses (RNs), and additional ancillary staff.
The secondary treatment facility will be located at Forest Avenue and Tree Road (Marathon mile 21/Half
Marathon mile 8). This facility will be very minimally equipped with a single physician, an RN, and a
sports trainer.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
118
Mutual Aid Response
Prior to the race, surrounding jurisdictions have been polled as to what mutual aid resources will be avail-
able if the need arises. Resources available include:
Wayne County
ALS Ambulances: 4
BLS Ambulances: 2
EMS Officers: 1
Support Units: 0
Monroe County
ALS Ambulances: 6
BLS Ambulances: 4
EMS Officers: 2
Support Units: 1
Transit Authority
Buses: 6
Any responding mutual aid units will provide care according to their own approved local protocols. Com-
munications will be handled by field communications on site on predetermined talk-groups.
Communications
Onsite EMS communications will be handled over our standard ultrahigh frequency (UHF) radio system,
with the 800 MHz system as a backup. Communications between field communications and the TEMS
communication center will be handled by cellular phone and over the UHF radio system. Communications
between event staff and EMS will be handled over their UHF radio system. Primary zones and channels are
outlined below.
Use System Zone Channel/Frequency
Event EMS Communications UHF N/A TEMS EMS 3 or TEMSPD on 800 MHz system
Mutual Aid EMS Communications 800 MHz 1 3 (TAC 1)
Field Comm to Comm Center UHF N/A 2 (TEMS EMS 2)
Field to Incoming TEMS Units UHF N/A 3 (TEMS EMS 3)
Event Staff to EMS UHF N/A 2 (SB Medcomm)
Field Comm to Hospital (MCI Plan) UHF N/A 14 (MED 9)
Field Comm to Medevac VHF N/A 155.205 (EMS Statewide)
Call taking and response plans are outlined below:
For calls received from standby units at the event or event staff:
Units staffing the event are to report all patients to field communications. Units calling in patient contacts
need to report:
• Location;
• Bib Number;
• Complaint;
• Triage Status (Red, Yellow, Green); and
• Need for transport unit.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 119
If no transport is needed, field communications will keep track of the incident and times for later quality
assurance (QA)/quality improvement (QI). No involvement with the communications center is needed.
If the unit on scene determines a transport unit is needed, the field communications officer will report the
location, unit on scene, and priority of the incident to the communications center over EMS channel 2. Pri-
ority will be determined as follows:
• Red Triage Status = Priority 1;
• Yellow Triage Status = Priority 2; and
• Green Triage Status = Priority 3.
Field communications will also advise the communications center of an evacuation point for the transport
unit to respond to. The communications center will then dispatch a unit to the evacuation point based on
the priority advised by field communications. Both the responding ambulance and the standby unit on
scene will be logged to the call for timekeeping purposes.
If the incident is called in by the event staff, field communications will dispatch the closest standby unit to
the incident; it is at the field communications officer’s discretion whether or not a transport unit is initially
dispatched. If a transport unit is needed, dispatch procedures outlined above will be used.
For calls received by 9-1-1 line from the event:
For calls received by the communications center via 9-1-1, the communications officers will take the call
in accordance with normal Director Emergency Management (DEM) procedures. After the call is received,
the communications center will advise field communications of the location, nature, and priority of the
incident. After eld communications acknowledges receipt of the call, the communications center will
cancel the call for computer-aided design (CAD) purposes. Field communications will then dispatch
the closest available standby unit to respond to the incident. If a transport unit is required, field commu-
nications will then advise the communications center of an evacuation point for the system ambulance to
respond to.
NO STANDBY UNITS ON SCENE ARE TO CONTACT
THE COMMUNICATIONS CENTER DIRECTLY EXCEPT IN CASE OF EMERGENCY.
ALL RESPONDING TEMS TRANSPORT UNITS WILL SWITCH TO EMS-3
AFTER DISPATCH AND BE HANDED OFF TO FIELD COMMUNICATIONS FOR
THE DURATION OF THE INCIDENT.
Hospital Assignment Guidelines:
On the morning prior to race start, field communications will poll area facilities for their capabilities and
the number of patients they can accept for each triage status. Field communications will assign transport
units to facilities to evenly distribute patient load.
Patients transported from the north side of Martin Luther King Avenue/Franklin Street will be assigned to either:
• Medical Center Hospital;
• Oakwood Hospital; or
• Henry Ford Medical Center.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
120
Patients transported from the south side of Martin Luther King Avenue/Franklin Street will be assigned to either:
• St. Mary’s Medical Center;
• Providence Medical Center; or
• Annapolis Hospital.
Hospital assignments can be altered based on specialty resource needs. Field communications will docu-
ment the destination of any participants transported.
MCI Response
In the event of an MCI, triage, treatment, and transportation will be handled in accordance with the County
MCI plan, as well as local policy and protocol. Unified Command (UC) will expand the ICS structure as
necessary, and establish triage and treatment areas for use by the operations section. The communications
center will also dedicate an Emergency Communications Officer to the operation.
Medic Center must be immediately notified of the declaration of an MCI by phone at 313-123-4567.
MEDEVACs
If, due to patient condition, working MCI, or other contin-
gency, a MEDEVAC is required, the following landing zones
have been identified for MEDEVAC operations.
• Medical center helipad
− Lat: 12°34’56” Lon: 67°89’10”
• Public soccer field
− Lat: 12°34’56” Lon: 67°89’10”
• Baseball diamond
− Lat: 12°34’56” Lon: 67°89’10”
Other Contingencies
Other contingencies encountered during the event are to be handled in accordance with TEMS standard
operating procedures and policies and at the direction of UC.
Emergency workers begin moving a rescued evacuee
to the medical triage area after being rescued by a
medevac helicopter.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 121
Sample After Action Report
Townville Marathon
September 29, 2011
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 122
Event Details ........................................................................................................................................... 122
Background ...............................................................................................................................................122
Medical Support ........................................................................................................................................122
Command and Control .............................................................................................................................122
Incident and Patient Statistics ................................................................................................................... 123
Overall Patient Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 123
Patient Breakdown by Complaint ....................................................................................................... 123
Patient Breakdown by Event ............................................................................................................... 123
Response Missions and Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 124
Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 126
Attachments ............................................................................................................................................ 127
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
122
Executive Summary
The 30th running of the Townville Marathon occurred on September 29, 2011. Every year, this event poses
unique challenges for the Townville EMS (TEMS) system, ranging from logistics to status planning to com-
munications. This year, our personnel applied new ideas in the planning and execution of our response to
this event, with mainly positive results.
The event consisted of separate races, the Shriners 8k run and the Townville Marathon. The event had a
record attendance of 11,742 participants, with another 30,000 spectators estimated to have attended. A total
of 96 people requested medical assistance, with 7 patients requiring transport.
Our response to the event highlighted improvements in command, control, and communications (C3) for
special events. The use of a custom C3 application and special radio interoperability equipment enhanced
situational awareness for both command elements and line personnel. Field data collection has provided a
means for enhanced after-action analysis and reporting.
No response, however, is perfect. Several areas requiring improvement were identified, some within our
control and some not. These areas include increasing the involvement of event organizers in preplanning
and enhancing communications with other responding agencies, such as the Police Department.
Event Details
Background
The 2011 Townville Marathon drew a higher participant and spectator base due, in part, to the 30th an-
niversary celebrations going on at various parts of the course. There were approximately five “party stops”
along the course, providing live music, food, and beverages to spectators, along with large “party areas” at
the start and finish lines.
Specific information on the event is as follows:
Race Length: 26.2 miles
Registered Participants: 11,742
Spectators: 30,000 (estimated)
Weather at Start: Cloudy, 36 °F, with N winds at 16MPH.
Weather at Finish: Sunny, 50 °F, with N winds at 10MPH.
Medical Support
Medical support was provided by TEMS agency personnel and Wayne Ambulance personnel, as well as per-
sonnel from area hospitals. Four ALS ambulances, three ALS bike teams, and one ALS Echo Unit were pres-
ent along the course, along with two fixed medical facilities provided by Henry Ford Medical Center.
All ambulances and bike teams were staffed to the Paramedic level and were sufficiently equipped to pro-
vide ALS care. The fixed medical facilities were staffed by a mix of physicians, registered nurses, athletic
trainers, and medical students and were also equipped to provide high-level ALS care.
Command and Control
Command and Control was accomplished via a field command and communications center set up at the
main medical facility. This facility included laptops with mobile data connectivity, radio interoperability
equipment, maps, cellular phones, and radios.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 123
Radio interoperability was achieved by using the Incident Commander’s Radio Interface (ICRI), manufac-
tured by Communications-Applied Technology (C-AT). The ICRI used was provided by C-AT as a demon-
stration unit, to evaluate its efficacy in our operational environment.
Command of the incident was functionally handled by Battalion Chief Chester Arthur, with Captain James
Polk present to provide senior-level operational guidance and to liaise with other responding agencies.
Incident and Patient Statistics
Overall Patient Statistics
# Patients by EMS # Patients by Med Facility # Patients Transported
17 79 7
Avg. Patient Age # Male Patients # Female Patients
34 42 (43.75%) 54 (56.25%)
Age Youngest Patient Age Oldest Patient Average EMS Response Time
8 60 4.8 Min
Patient Breakdown by Complaint
Abdominal Pain: 2 2.0%
Breathing Problem: 4 4.2%
Chest Pain: 4 4.2%
Heart Problem: 2 2.0%
Sick Person: 48 50.0%
Traumatic Injury: 27 28.1%
Unconscious/Syncope: 9 9.4%
Patient Breakdown by Event
Percentage of Participants Requiring Care 0.8%
Percentage of Patients Requiring Transport 7.3%
Number of Transports to Number of Attendees 1:5,963
Percentage of Daily Transports* from Event 6.8%
Percentage of System Transports During Event** 13.2%
Calls per Standby Unit 1.9
* Total system transports for 24-hour period.
** Event period from 0700 thru 1500 hours.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
124
Response Missions and Outcomes
TEMS personnel had several missions for the planning and execution of our response to this event. The fol-
lowing missions were identified:
1. Create a solid operations plan for the event, addressing most likely risks.
2. Staff the event to a level that permits continued compliance with response time standards.
3. Minimize event impact on the overall Townville EMS system.
4. Establish an effective command, control, and communications infrastructure.
5. Provide exceptional clinical care to event participants.
6. Provide for the rapid evacuation of casualties requiring transport.
An analysis of each mission and its outcome follows, along with recommendations for improvement.
Mission 1: Create a solid operations plan for the event, addressing most likely risks.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: Approximately one month pre-event, Captain James Polk, Martin Buren, and Chester Arthur
began the preplanning process for the event. An online project management application, known as Base-
camp, was used with great success. The application allowed the planners, who all worked different shifts
on different days, to collaborate effectively during the planning phase of the operation.
The plan was authored primarily by Chester Arthur, with input from Captain Polk and Sgt. Buren. The plan
was designed to address most contingencies encountered during the response to past events, as well as ones
not previously encountered or planned for. The plan addressed everything from the initial command struc-
ture, to a preplanned MCI response, to MEDEVAC landing zones.
Sports Group personnel stated they were unfamiliar with the ICS used during the event and wished to learn
more about it.
Recommendations for Improvement: Provide training to senior-level personnel at Townville Sports Group
in the ICS and how to function as part of a UC. Also, insist on more involvement on the part of the Sports
Group in the planning phase of our operations.
Mission 2: Staff the event to a level that permits continued compliance with response time standards.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: Townville Sports Group requested and paid for a total of six units (three Ambulances and three
Bike Teams) from the TEMS agency to provide EMS services during the event. The TEMS provided these
resources, staffed to the ALS level. Augmenting these resources was an ALS ambulance provided by the
Wayne Ambulance.
Staffing for this year’s event appeared to be appropriate; standby units averaged 1.9 calls per unit, with an
average response time of 4.8 minutes. There are, however, anecdotal reports that this year’s patient volume
was lighter than usual; some long-time staff report that volume was up to one half of what has been expe-
rienced in the past.
Recommendations for Improvement: Continue to collect patient volume data from future events to im-
prove our planning capabilities.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 125
Mission 3: Minimize event impact on the overall TEMS system.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: The impact on the TEMS system as a whole appeared to be moderate. The only resources re-
quired from the system were used to transport patients from the event; these transports accounted for more
than 13 percent of all transports during the event period and almost 7 percent of total transports for the day.
Recommendations for Improvement: Increase system staffing during future events by 1 or 2 units.
Mission 4: Establish an effective command, control, and communications infrastructure.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: A C3 facility was established on site, with all event communications going through that facil-
ity. This facility was established at the main medical facility and included mobile data connectivity, radio
interoperability equipment, maps, cellular telephones, and a variety of radio equipment.
C3 personnel’s situational awareness was enhanced by a custom incident management application designed,
coded, and deployed by Chester Arthur. This application tracked units, unit status, times, patient contacts,
and logged events. This approach has proven effective during both past events and the Marathon. Because
of its proven efficacy, further development of this application is warranted.
Radio interoperability was achieved by use of the ICRI, manufactured by C-AT. C-AT provided a demon-
stration unit for us to test and evaluate during this event, and it performed flawlessly. Using the ICRI, units
from TEMS, Monroe, and Sports Group were able to communicate seamlessly.
One problem encountered from a C3 standpoint was communications between EMS Operations and Police
Operations. Information had to be relayed through Captain Polk, resulting in delays in essential informa-
tion getting to the appropriate resources.
Another problem encountered during the event involved Sports Group personnel not knowing how or
where to request medical resources. Sports Group personnel were apparently given multiple phone num-
bers to call, often resulting in requests being delayed.
Radio communications and data connectivity were hampered by the location of the C3 facility. Because the
facility was located inside a concrete parking structure, intermittent outages in radio and data communica-
tions were experienced. While inconvenient, it posed no significant problems in C3 activities.
Recommendations for Improvement: Support further development of an incident management applica-
tion for use during emergencies and special events. Explore the acquisition of one or more ICRI units for
special events and disaster preparedness. Ensure that EMS personnel are involved in the briefing of Sports
Group personnel, so that appropriate contact information and procedures are relayed. Ensure that future C3
facilities are located in an area that minimizes radio and cellular interference.
Mission 5: Provide exceptional clinical care to event participants.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: Henry Ford Medical Center provided a significant number of medical providers and equipment
for the establishment of onsite treatment facilities. These facilities were staffed with high-level providers,
including Physicians and Nurse Practitioners. Sufficient bed space was available in these facilities, with no
more than 50 percent of bed space being occupied at one time.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
126
One problem encountered during the event was a lack of some durable medical equipment, such as cardiac
monitors. Some equipment had to be taken from the standby units, which would have prevented the onsite
medical staff from using that equipment if the standby unit needed to transport a patient.
Recommendations for Improvement: Continue to work with Henry Ford Medical Center personnel to fur-
ther enhance onsite treatment facilities. Ensure that sufficient durable equipment is available for future events.
Mission 6: Provide for the rapid evacuation of casualties requiring transport.
General Outcome: Success.
Discussion: The location and configuration of the medical sites, along with on-the-fly coordination with
Police units allowed for easy ingress and egress of transporting units. While not used, preplanned landing
zones for MEDEVAC assets were identified and forwarded to area aeromedical units. No significant delays in
patient transportation were noted.
Recommendations for Improvement: Continue to work closely with local Police and aeromedical resourc-
es to ensure timely transport of casualties from the event.
Conclusions
While opportunities for improvement are apparent, the operation can be considered an overall success.
TEMS personnel should continue to research, develop, and deploy new methods and technologies to en-
hance our response to not only future Marathons, but to any large-scale special event or emergency.
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 127
Attachments—Sample Incident Action Plan
Townville Marathon
September 29, 2011
INCIDENT OBJECTIVES (ICS FORM 202)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Operational Period: Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 0600 Time To: 1600
3. Objective(s):
Reduce the risk of injuries or illnesses occurring as a result of the upcoming marathon.
Provide clear information to attendees and participants on how to obtain assistance if they encounter an ill-
ness or injury.
Establish methods for attendees and event workers to communicate with onscene medical personnel.
Respond to requests for assistance in a safe and appropriate manner.
4. Operational Period Command Emphasis:
Encourage each other to drink plenty of fluids, stay in the shade when possible, use all available personal pro-
tective equipment. Be extremely cautious of pedestrians when operating motor vehicles in or around crowds.
Absolutely no backing without a spotter while on the course.
General Situational Awareness
Weather Update: Winds 5 mph WSW, humidity 80-85%, temperature 90 °F, sunny, 20% chance of precipita-
tion. No storms predicted.
5. Site Safety Plan Required? Yes R No X
Approved Site Safety Plan(s) Located at:
6. Incident Action Plan (the items checked below are included in this Incident Action Plan):
X ICS 203 X ICS 207 Other Attachments:
X ICS 204 R ICS 208 R _______________________________
X ICS 205 R Map/Chart R _______________________________
R ICS 205A R Weather Forecast/Tides/Currents R _______________________________
X ICS 206 R _______________________________
7. Prepared by: Name: William Taft Position/Title: Planning Section Chief Signature:
8. Approved by Incident Commander: Name: Zachary Taylor Signature: ____________________________
ICS 202 IAP Page __1___ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800 __________________________
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
128
ORGANIZATION ASSIGNMENT LIST (ICS FORM 203)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Operational Period: Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 0600 Time To: 1600
3. Incident Commander(s) and Command Staff: 7. Operations Section:
IC/UCs Wayne Harding Chief James Polk
Deputy
Deputy Staging Area
Safety Officer James Buchanan Group EMS
Public Info. Officer Benjamin Harrison Group Supervisor Sgt. Martin Buren
Liaison Officer Franklin Pierce Deputy
4. Agency/Organization Representatives: Division/Group Townville EMS
Agency/Organization Name Division/Group Monroe EMS
Townville EMS Agency James Polk Division/Group Wayne EMS
Monroe EMS William McKinley Division/Group TEMS Bike Team
Wayne EMS Millard Fillmore Division/Group TFD Bike Team
Group Onsite Medical
Group Supervisor Dr. Grant
Deputy
5. Planning Section: Division/Group Nursing Staff
Chief Bill Taft Division/Group Sports Trainers
Deputy Division/Group Ancillary Staff
Resources Unit Division/Group
Situation Unit Division/Group
Documentation Unit Group
Demobilization Unit Group Supervisor
Technical Specialists Deputy
Division/Group
Division/Group
6. Logistics Section: Division/Group
Chief Division/Group
Deputy Air Operations Branch
Support Branch Air Ops Branch Dir.
Director
Supply Unit
Facilities Unit 8. Finance/Administration Section:
Ground Support Unit Chief
Service Branch Deputy
Director Time Unit
Communications Unit
Procurement Unit
Medical Unit Comp/Claims Unit
Food Unit Cost Unit
9. Prepared by: Name: William Taft Position/Title: Planning Section Chief Signature: _______________________
ICS 203 IAP Page __2___ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800 __________________________________
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 129
ASSIGNMENT LIST (ICS FORM 204)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Operational Period:
Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 0600 Time To: 1600
3.
Branch:
Division:
Group: EMS
Staging Area:
4. Operations Personnel: Name Contact Number(s)
Operations Section Chief: James Polk _________________________ xxx-xxx-xxxx
Branch Director: __________________________________ xxx-xxx-xxxx
Division/Group Supervisor: Martin Buren __________________________________
5. Resources Assigned:
# of
Persons
Contact (e.g., phone, pager,
radio frequency, etc.)
Reporting Location, Special
Equipment and Supplies,
Remarks, Notes, InformationResource Identifier Leader
TEMS Amb 1 JH 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
TEMS Amb 2 TY 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
Wayne Amb RF 3 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
Monroe Amb DJ 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
TEMS Bike Team 1 IP 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
TEMS Bike Team 2 YM 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
TFD Bike Team 3 HN 2 TEMS_EMS3 TEMS HQ/0600
6. Work Assignments:
Bike team leaders must ensure all equipment is checked and loaded into assigned ambulance no later than 0615
7. Special Instructions:
Use extreme caution near race course; participants may not notice emergency vehicles due to loud background noise and
visual distractions.
8. Communications (radio and/or phone contact numbers needed for this assignment):
Name/Function Primary Contact: indicate cell, pager, or radio (frequency/system/channel)
/
/
/
/
9. Prepared by: Name: William Taft Position/Title: Planning Sec Chief Signature: _________________________
ICS 204 IAP Page __3___ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800 ___________________________
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
130
ASSIGNMENT LIST (ICS FORM 204)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Operational Period:
Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 0600 Time To: 1400
3.
Branch:
Division: 1
Group: On-Site Medical
Staging Area: Parking
Structure
4. Operations Personnel: Name Contact Number(s)
Operations Section Chief: James Polk __________________________ xxx-xxx-xxxx
Branch Director: __________________________________ xxx-xxx-xxxx
Division/Group Supervisor: Dr. Grant ____________________________ xxx-xxx-xxx
5. Resources Assigned:
# of
Persons
Contact (e.g., phone, pager,
radio frequency, etc.)
Reporting Location, Special
Equipment and Supplies,
Remarks, Notes, InformationResource Identifier Leader
Medical Tent Dr. Carter 8 TEMS_EMS2 TEMS HQ / 0600
Mobile Medical Dr. Johnson 2 TEMS_EMS2 TEMS HQ / 0600
6. Work Assignments:
Medical team leaders must ensure all equipment is checked and loaded into assigned ambulance no later than 0615
7. Special Instructions:
Use care setting up medical area to avoid trip and electrical hazards. Store oxygen tanks in a safe location.
Use extreme caution near race course, participants may not notice emergency vehicles due to loud background noise and
visual distractions.
8. Communications (radio and/or phone contact numbers needed for this assignment):
Name/Function Primary Contact: indicate cell, pager, or radio (frequency/system/channel)
/
/
/
/
9. Prepared by: Name: William Taft Position/Title: Planning Sec Chief Signature: _________________________
ICS 204 IAP Page __3A__ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800 ___________________________
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 131
INCIDENT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PLAN (ICS FORM 205)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Date/Time Prepared:
Date: 7/29/11
Time: 0800
3. Operational Period:
Date Form: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time Form: 0600 Time To: 1600
4. Basic Radio Channel Use:
Zone
Grp.
Ch
#Function
Channel
Name/Trunked Radio
System Talkgroup
Assignment RX Freq
N or W
RX
Tone/NAC
TX Freq
N or W
TX
Tone/NAC
Mode
(A, D, or M) Remarks
A 3 Command TEMS_EMS3 Branch 1,
Group A N/A A
A 1 Support TAC_1 Branch 1,
Group A N/A M
N/A 9 MCI Comms MED_9 Command
Only A
5. Special Instructions:
Hospital assignments for transport units will occur through operations.
6. Prepared by (Communications Unit Leader): Name: James Polk __________________________ Signature: _________________________________________
ICS 205 IAP Page ____4____ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800 ____________________________________________________
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
132
MEDICAL PLAN (ICS FORM 206)
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
2. Operational Period: Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 0600 Time To: 1600
3. Medical Aid Stations:
Name Location Contact
Number(s)/Frequency
Paramedics
on Site?
Primary Treatment 20th and Main xxx-xxx-xxxx R Yes X No
Secondary Treatment xxx-xxx-xxxx R Yes X No
R Yes R No
R Yes R No
4. Transportation (indicate air or ground):
Ambulance Service Location
Contact
Number(s)/Frequency Level of Service
Townville EMS 123 Main St., Townville, MI xxx-xxxx X ALS R BLS
Monroe EMS 45 Michigan Ave., Warren, MI xxx-xxxx X ALS R BLS
Wayne EMS 23900 Ford Rd., Dearborn, MI xxx-xxxx X ALS R BLS
R ALS R BLS
5. Hospitals:
Hospital Name
Address,
Latitude and Longitude
if Helipad
Contact
Number(s)/
Frequency
Travel Time Trauma
Center
Burn
Center Helipad
Air Ground
Medical Center
Hospital 20m 15m X Yes
Level: __I__
X Yes
R No
X Yes
R No
Oakwood Hospital 20m 25m R Ye s
Level: _____
R Yes
X No
X Yes
R No
Henry Ford
Medical Center 25m 30m X Yes
Level: __I__
R Ye s
X No
X Yes
R No
R Ye s
Level: _____
R Ye s
R No
R Yes
R No
R Ye s
Level: _____
R Ye s
R No
R Yes
R No
6. Special Medical Emergency Procedures:
Ambulances are not permitted to transport patients from a scene to onsite Primary Treatment area. If transported, these pa-
tients must be transported to a full-service hospital.
R Check box if aviation assets are utilized for rescue. If assets are used, coordinate with Air Operations.
7. Prepared by (Medical Unit Leader): Name: Dr. Grant Signature: __________________________________
8. Approved by (Safety Officer): Name: Grover Cleveland Signature: ___________________________________
ICS 206 IAP Page ___5___ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800
Annex II: Sample Mass Gathering Event Planning Tools 133
INCIDENT ORGANIZATION CHART (ICS FORM 207)
2. Operational Period: Date From: 9/29/11 Date To: 9/29/11
Time From: 06:00 Time To: 14:00
3. Organization Chart
4. Prepared by: Name: William Taft Position/Title: Planning Signature: _________________ Date/Time: 7/29/11 0800
1. Incident Name:
Townville Marathon
IAP Page __6___ICS 207
Incident Commander(s)
Warren Harding
Liaison Officer
Franklin Pierce
Safety Officer
James Buchanan
Public Information Officer
Benjamin Harrison
Planning Section Chief
William Taft
Logistics
Section Chief
Finance/Admin
Section Chief
Operations Section Chief
James Polk
Staging Area Manager
EMS Group
Sgt. Martin Buren
Onsite
Medical Group
Dr. Grant
Support Branch Dir.
Supply Unit Ldr.
Facilities Unit Ldr.
Ground Spt.
Unit Ldr.
Service Branch Dir.
Comms Unit Ldr.
Medical Unit Ldr.
Food Unit Ldr.
Resources Unit Ldr.
Situation Unit Ldr.
Documentation
Unit Ldr.
Demobilization
Unit Ldr.
Time Unit Ldr.
Procurement
Unit Ldr.
Comp./Claims
Unit Ldr.
Cost Unit Ldr.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
134
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex III: Emergency Management Assistance Compact 135
ANNEX III: Emergency Management Assistance Compact
Description
Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) is a national interstate mutual aid agreement that
enables States to share resources during times of disaster. Since the 104th Congress ratified the compact,
EMAC has grown to become the Nation’s system for providing mutual aid through operational procedures
and protocols that have been validated through experience. EMAC is administered by the National Emer-
gency Management Association (NEMA).
EMAC Fast Facts
• EMAC acts as a complement to the Federal disaster response system.
• EMAC can be used either in lieu of Federal assistance or in conjunction with Federal assistance.
• EMAC ensures appropriate use of resources within member States.
• EMAC has been adopted by all 50 States, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.
• EMAC has been ratified by Congress (PL-104-321).
Process for EMS Agency Participation
The process for participation in EMAC is governed by the specific legislation in each State that authorized
entry of the State into the compact. In general terms, an agency must enter into a contract with the agen-
cy’s State. The contract should contain specific elements that improve coordination of resources including
the process for deployment, communications during the deployment, worker safety, demobilization pro-
cedures, and reimbursement. Obtaining competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with State level
contracting, particularly contracting that involves emergency operations is important.
The contract must be in line with State legislation. The contract should be executed prior to deployment to
avoid any delay in deploying while the contracting process takes place. Components of a State Agency con-
tract are included in the following checklist.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
136
EMAC CONTRACTING CHECKLIST
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Name of Agency
Name of State Agency
Purpose and Goal
Authority in State Law
Points of Contact
Denitions
Resource Typing
Credentialing
Agency Licensure and/or Certication
Medical Direction and Protocols
Mobilization Notication and Authority
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Mobilization Time
Deployment Duration
Stafng Standards Based on Resource Typing
Equipment
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Training Requirements
Communications Requirements
Physical/Medical Requirements and Immunizations
REIMBURSEMENT
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Language Specifying Reimbursement is “Portal to Portal”
Labor (Including Overtime)
Labor Replacement Costs (Backll)
Travel and Lodging
Fuel
Supplies
Food
Equipment Rental
Repairs
Consider Using Mission Packaging Approach that Establishes an All-Inclusive Hourly/Daily Rate Per
Unit for Known Expenses Based on Resource Type
OTHER PROVISIONS
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Dispute Resolution
Immunity, Limited Liability, and Hold Harmless
Death Benets
Workers’ Compensation
Length of Deployment
Replacement
Demobilization Authority and Responsibilities
Documentation Requirements
Annex III: Emergency Management Assistance Compact 137
EMAC Operational Considerations
Credentialing
EMAC uses the legislative framework and the compact itself to provide a form of temporary recognition for
licensees from one State rendering requested aid in another State. The specific language used in Article V of
the Articles of Agreement is in part:
Whenever any person holds a license, certificate, or other permit issued by any State party to the compact evidencing the meeting
of qualifications for professional, mechanical, or other skills, and when such assistance is requested by the receiving party State,
such person shall be deemed licensed, certified, or permitted by the State requesting assistance to render aid involving such skill
to meet a declared emergency or disaster, subject to such limitations and conditions as the governor of the requesting State may
prescribe by executive order or otherwise.
Deployment Process
As an appointed EMAC Authorized Representative, a State’s highest ranking emergency management of-
ficer (most often a Director or Chief of Emergency Management) is empowered to request assistance under
EMAC on behalf of the State. The process, once the authorized representative makes a request under EMAC,
is outlined below.
State Emergency
Management
Agency
Resource Provider:
Agency, Department,
Local, County,
City, etc.
State Emergency
Management
Agency
Resource Provider:
Agency, Department,
Local, County,
City, etc.
Requesting State
Resource Movement
Assisting State
EMAC does not “own” resources. It is the system to move the resources.
EMAC
Authorized Representative confirms declaration of emergency by the Governor.
• State assesses needs for resources.
• State determines best source of resources (EMAC, Federal, private sector).
• Requests for resources may occur by one or all of the following methodologies:
− Direct contact with a State that has a known needed resource;
− EMAC Emergency Operations System (EOS); and
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
138
− States may request broadcast by region (FEMA regions):
− May request up to 3 FEMA regions,
− Broadcast to an individual State,
− Directed to an individual EMAC Authorized Representative within a State,
− Directed to an EMAC Designated Contact within a State.
• The EMAC REQ-A Form is completed by the EMAC Authorized Representatives in both the Requesting
State and the Assisting State.
• Resources are mobilized from the Assisting State to the Requesting State.
• Resources check in at State staging areas. Deployment locations and missions are confirmed.
• Resources complete mission–relaying any issues back to their home State emergency management agency.
• Resources are demobilized.
• Assisting States complete reimbursement request, and after internal audit, send to the Requesting State.
• Requesting State reimburses the Assisting State.
EMAC Operational Levels
Level 3–The lowest level of EMAC activation involves the activation of the Assisting State, the National Co-
ordination Group (NCG), and the NEMA EMAC Coordinator. The Assisting State is using their internal State
A-Team to request resources.
Level 2–A level 2 operation may involve a single-State or multiple States and deployment of an A-Team is
requested by one or more affected States.
Level 1–The highest level of EMAC activation is in effect whenever a single-State or multiple States within
single or multiple regions have suffered a major disaster requiring resources. A-Teams have been requested
by one or more affected States and DHS/FEMA Headquarters has requested that an EMAC National Coordi-
nating Team (NCT) and/or an EMAC Regional Coordinating Team (RCT) be deployed to appropriate loca-
tions to coordinate resource needs with Federal and State counterparts.
Reimbursement
Article IX of the EMAC Articles of Agreement provides the basis for reimbursement of services provided be-
tween States following an activation of the agreement. Article IX states in part:
Any party State rendering aid in another State pursuant to this compact shall be reimbursed by the party State receiving such aid
for any loss or damage to or expense incurred in the operation of any equipment and the provision of any service in answering a
request for aid and for the costs incurred in connection with such requests; provided, that any aiding party State may assume in
whole or in part such loss, damage, expense, or other cost, or may loan such equipment or donate such services to the receiving
party State without charge or cost; and provided further, that any two or more party States may enter into supplementary agree-
ments establishing a different allocation of costs among those States.
Recordkeeping and other requirements to document expenses at the agency level vary from State to State. This
underscores the necessity of having clear language in the contract between the EMS agency and the State so that
terms and requirements for reimbursement are clear. Of particular note is the requirement for original receipts
to validate claimed expenses, and a clear timeline for reimbursement between the State and the EMS agency.
Annex III: Emergency Management Assistance Compact 139
Liability Protections
EMAC has standard language contained in Article VI of the Articles of Agreement that describes the limits
on liability agreed to by each member State. In addition, each State may have liability limitations built into
the EMAC authorizing legislation, or contained within the State’s general emergency management legisla-
tion. In addition to the language in Article VI and any legislative protections, EMS agencies should include
specific indemnity and liability protection language in their individual contract with the State. The liability
language from Article VI states in part:
Officers or employees of a party State rendering aid in another State pursuant to this compact shall be considered agents of the
requesting State for tort liability and immunity purposes; and no party State or its officers or employees rendering aid in another
State pursuant to this compact shall be liable on account of any act or omission in good faith on the part of such forces while so
engaged or on account of the maintenance or use of any equipment or supplies in connection therewith. Good faith in this article
shall not include willful misconduct, gross negligence, or recklessness.
EMAC Resources
• GAO Report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Emergency
Management Assistance Compact: Enhancing EMAC’s Collaborative and Administrative Capacity Should Improve National Disaster
Response. June 2007.
• Emergency Management Assistance Compact. 2005 Hurricane Season Response After Action Report. Titan-L3.
September 2006.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
140
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex IV: FEMA National Ambulance Contract 141
ANNEX IV: FEMA National Ambulance Contract
Description
Following the catastrophic 2005 hurricane season, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) sought
to implement a plan to establish a comprehensive Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response to federally
declared disasters. The government solicited proposals and on August 1, 2007, FEMA named American
Medical Response (AMR) as the provider recipient of this contract, which provides a full array of ground
ambulance, air ambulance, and paratransit services to supplement the Federal and military response to a
disaster, act of terrorism, or other public health emergency. This national contract covers the 48 contiguous
United States which are divided into 4 FEMA zones.
FEMA National Ambulance Contract Fast Facts
• Contracted services provided in this agreement include:
− patient triage, treatment, and transport;
− hazard recognition;
− symptom surveillance and reporting;
− onscene medical standby;
− redistribution of patients to increase hospital bed space;
− provide immunizations;
− staffing for shelters and hospital emergency departments;
− set up mobile medical clinics;
− tactical management functions; and
− oversight and management of Federal EMS and paratransit resources.
Deployment Capabilities and Contract Requirements
• Maximum deployment for a single FEMA zone includes:
− 300 ground ambulances;
− 25 air ambulances; and
− enough paratransit vehicles to transport 3,500 people.
• Combined four-zone maximum deployment includes:
− 1,200 ground ambulances;
− 100 air ambulances;
− 14,000 paratransit seats; and
− simultaneous response from multiple zones for catastrophic disasters may be required under this
national contract.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
142
List of Deployments
• FEMA Contract, South Louisiana, 2006.
• FEMA deployment Hurricane Dean, 2007.
• FEMA deployment Hurricane Gustav, 2008.
• FEMA deployment Hurricane Ike, 2008.
• FEMA deployment Presidential Inauguration, 2009.
Process for EMS Agency Participation
EMS agencies choosing to participate in the FEMA National Ambulance Contract must apply to become a
subcontractor through the AMR Disaster Response Team. Agencies must be able to articulate which types of
resources they can supply for deployment in addition to other terms and conditions. A checklist of prelimi-
nary information that the agency must have at the time of application is located below:
FEMA NATIONAL AMBULANCE CONTRACT CHECKLIST
COMPLETE ELEMENT
Organization Name
Complete Business Address
Name and Title of the Primary Point of Contact
Business, 24/7 Available, and Fax Phone Numbers
Primary and Secondary Email Address
States the Agency is Licensed
Services Provided: ALS Ground Ambulance Service
Services Provided: BLS Ground Ambulance
Services Provided: Air Ambulance
Services Provided: Paratransit
Type of Service (Fire EMS, Government, Hospital Based, Private, PUM, Volunteer, Other)
Determine Small Business Status (fewer than 500 employees)
Does Agency Have an Equal Opportunity Employment Plan?
Agency Registered as Woman Owned with the Small Business Administration?
Agency Registered as Veteran Owned with the Small Business Administration?
Agency Registered as Disabled Veteran Owned with the Small Business Administration?
Agency Registered as HUB Zone Business with Small Business Administration?
Agency Registered as Disadvantaged with Small Business Administration?
National Accreditation Status and Name of Accrediting Body
No ofcers or owners are prohibited from participating in any Federal program
Agency can label internal resources according to FEMA type denitions
Jurisdiction
The National Response Framework (NRF) identifies FEMA as the Federal lead agency during an Incident of
National Significance. Emergency Support Function-8 (ESF-8)—Public Health and Medical Services Annex—
is the mechanism for coordinated Federal assistance to supplement State and local resources in response to
the public health and medical care needs of potential or actual federally declared disasters and/or during
a developing potential health and medical situation. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS) is the coordinating lead agency for the Federal Government on public health and medical services.
Annex IV: FEMA National Ambulance Contract 143
The FEMA national ambulance contract may be activated to provide supplemental EMS support when local
and State resources are overwhelmed. FEMA and DHHS will coordinate the Federal EMS response. AMR
will provide tactical command and oversight of resources deployed pursuant to the national contract. EMS
providers are regulated by local or State agencies and may have restrictions when it comes to responding
to out-of-area disasters. The EMS needs of local communities are primary and participation in the national
ambulance contract is not intended to undermine those obligations.
Relationship between FEMA National Ambulance Contract and EMAC
States may have Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) agreements with EMS agencies. The
FEMA National Ambulance Contract will not utilize assets that are committed under EMAC.
FEMA National Ambulance Contract Operational Considerations
Dening Resources and Job Titles
The FEMA Typed Resources Definitions, Emergency Medical Services Resources are used as a guideline for
EMS responders. The applicable EMS job titles listed in FEMA’s National Emergency Responder Credential-
ing document are used to determine the required and recommended training and certification. Both Ad-
vanced Life Support (ALS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) services are used. EMS personnel are required to
maintain current credentials in their home State to practice at the required skill level.
Integration of the FEMA National Ambulance Contract with NIMS and the NRF
The National Incident Management System (NIMS) establishes standard incident management processes,
protocols, and procedures to ensure that all responders work together more effectively. NIMS works hand-
in-hand with the NRF. NIMS provides the template for the management of incidents, while the NRF pro-
vides the structure and mechanisms for national-level policy and incident management. The role of the
FEMA National Ambulance Contract is to fulfill elements of ESF-8 within the NRF and integrate contracted
assets into the overall incident management system employed to manage an event of national significance.
Standard of Care and Scope of Practice
For EMS deployments pursuant to the FEMA Contract, the National EMS Core Content will be used to define
the domain of out-of-hospital care. The scope of practice for the FEMA Contract shall be the National EMS
Scope of Practice Model.
FEMA National Ambulance Contract Resources
• AMR/FEMA/DHHS Paratransit Resource Utilization Guide.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
144
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex V: Intrastate Mutual Aid System 145
ANNEX V: Intrastate Mutual Aid System
Description
This Intrastate Mutual Aid System (IMAS) is provided only as an example of how mutual aid across State
lines is addressed in one specific instance. Each State is unique and this example may not be applicable to
all jurisdictions.
Under the IMAS, member jurisdictions may request assistance from other member jurisdictions to prevent,
mitigate, respond to, or recover from an emergency or disaster; or in concert with drills or exercises. Any
resource (personnel, assets, and equipment) of a member jurisdiction may be made available to another
member jurisdiction.
The goal of a national fire service mutual aid system is to create a venue in each of the 50 States that
would ensure a comprehensive, coordinated response to any incident within, or immediately adjacent to,
its borders. Creating and implementing such a response system, with an understanding of resources and
capabilities, paves the way for a more integrated and efficient response in the event of a national disaster.
Specifically, it ensures that the local fire service brings its exceptional skills, unique knowledge, and tactical
resources to the table to support national strategies such as National Incident Management System (NIMS)
and State-based efforts, such as Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC). Further, its goal is:
• to formalize IMAS concepts into detailed, comprehensive and exercised mutual aid systems;
• provide an efficient and coordinated response in an all-hazards environment;
• prepare for responding to large-scale or concurrent events; and
• provide assistance in addressing budget shortfalls and initiating concepts central to interoperability.
Pursuant to the Intrastate Mutual Aid Act, IMAS is composed of and may be described as:
• guidelines and procedures for implementing mutual aid across State boundaries;
• actions taken in requesting aid for an emergency or disaster;
• actions taken in responding to a request for aid; and
• the committee and actions taken by the committee.
Funding
The IMAS program is funded by a $700,000 Cooperative Agreement from the National Integration Center with-
in the Department of Homeland Security. The performance period is from March 1 to February 28 annually.
Process for Participation
Pursuant to the Intrastate Mutual Aid Act, every political subdivision of the State is automatically part of the
IMAS. Participation in the system does not preclude member jurisdictions from entering into other agree-
ments with other political subdivisions or Indian nations to the extent provided by law. Participation does not
supersede nor affect any other agreement to which a political subdivision is a party or may become a party.
Participation becomes official upon receipt of a copy of the resolution by the authority responsible for the
execution of the agreement (most often the State Office of Emergency Management). Member jurisdictions
may elect to withdraw from or not participate in the system, but only by adopting a resolution or ordinance
declaring these intentions. Withdrawal becomes official upon receipt of a copy of the resolution or ordi-
nance by the State executing authority.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
146
Steps for Participation and State Plan Development
• Plan Development (approximately 4 months).
− plan created including Functional Components with buy-in from identified stakeholders in the State;
− regional Coordinators identified by State;
− appendices created; and
− support from technical experts and International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) staff.
• Marketing and Training (approximately 6–9 months).
− field guide development; and
− training and scripted tabletop exercise.
• Full-Scale Tabletop Exercise (approximately 12–14 months).
− field guides (following plan development);
− template review;
− quick reference guide for Incident Commanders (ICs); and
− useful grass roots marketing and training tool.
Lessons Learned from Successful Implementation of IMAS
• Importance of having emergency management within the IMAS State program (State and Local).
• Marketing of plan to all stakeholders.
• Clearly defined roles and responsibilities.
• Clearly defined reporting structure.
• Communications plan.
• Efficient operations between Emergency Support Functions (ESFs).
• Succession planning.
• Use of standardized tracking system(s).
Note Regarding Self-Deployment
The IMAS provides no immunity, rights, or privileges to individuals who respond to an emergency who are
not requested and authorized to respond by member jurisdictions, in accordance with the Act.
Automatic Mutual Aid: Mutual Aid Box Alarm System (MABAS)
MABAS is an intrastate and interstate system used to provide automatic mutual aid across both the State of
Illinois and the signed jurisdictions in the neighboring States of Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, and Iowa.
During both day-to-day operations and during disasters, MABAS uses a system of protocols to initiate re-
sponse of mutual aid assets in response to conditional criteria within the requesting jurisdiction.
Annex V: Intrastate Mutual Aid System 147
MABAS has a response capability that includes almost 1,500 member fire departments and other agencies
organized into 63 response divisions and 79 response units (engines, ladder trucks, ambulances, heavy
and light rescue squads, water tankers, hazardous materials teams, underwater rescue and recovery teams,
trench, building collapse, technical rescue teams, and certified fire investigators) that are resource typed and
available upon request (Box Alarm Level I, Box Alarm Level II, Level III, task force, ambulance task force,
etc.) via MABAS dispatch. Initial response is within the MABAS member response division, but additional
resources can be obtained through neighboring divisions as well as through the Illinois Emergency Opera-
tions Plan. Resources through the Illinois Emergency Operations Plan require a disaster declaration while
other day-to-day surge issues, such as mass gatherings or a mass casualty incident that does not reach the
threshold where State involvement would be necessary, automatically occur within and across divisions
through predetermined response protocols. Joining MABAS requires signing the same contract as other
member organizations and agreeing to certain safety practices, standards of operation, onscene terminology
incident command, equipment staffing, and conducting operations on common communications channels.
Over 850 MABAS extra alarm incidents occur annually through MABAS divisions. The MABAS parent or-
ganization support is cooperative. In addition to these other roles, MABAS trains 42 strategically placed
hazardous materials response teams and 41 technical rescue teams across the State. Team members agree to
become part of the team for five years, and the parent organization agrees to pay for member training costs,
backfill, and overtime costs.
IMAS Resources
Resource Name Website
IMAS Website www.iafc.org/Programs/content.cfm?ItemNumber=1176
Model Agreements www.iafc.org/Programs/content.cfm?ItemNumber=1157&navItemNumber=573
MABAS www.mabas-il.org/Pages/WelcomeToMABAS.aspx
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
148
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex VI: National Disaster Medical System-Disaster Medical Assistance Teams 149
ANNEX VI: National Disaster Medical System-Disaster Medical
Assistance Teams
Description
The National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) is a federally coordinated system that augments the Nation’s
medical response capability. The overall purpose of the NDMS is to supplement an integrated national
medical response capability for assisting State and local authorities in dealing with the medical impacts of
major peacetime disasters and to provide support to the military and the Department of Veterans Affairs
medical systems in caring for casualties evacuated back to the United States from overseas armed conven-
tional conflicts.
The National Response Framework (NRF) uses the NDMS, as part of the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of Preparedness and Response, under Emergency Support Function-8 (ESF-8), Health and
Medical Services, to support Federal agencies in the management and coordination of the Federal medical
response to major emergencies and federally declared disasters. Its components include:
• Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMAT);
• Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Teams (DMORT);
• National Veterinary Response Team (NVRT); and
• National Medical Response Team (NMRT).
Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMAT)
Description
A DMAT is composed of professional and paraprofessional medical personnel (supported by a cadre of logis-
tical and administrative staff) designed to provide emergency medical care during a disaster or other event.
In mass casualty incidents (MCIs), their responsibilities include triaging patients, providing austere medical
care, and preparing patients for evacuation. In other situations, DMATs may provide primary health care or
augment overloaded health care staffs.
Organization
There are 55 DMATs organized by State. Each is staffed by local groups of health care providers and support
personnel that receive funding from the Federal government and other sources such as States, counties, and
private donors. Under the NRF, DMATs are defined according to their level of capability and experience.
The typical DMAT is composed of physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, pharmacists, re-
spiratory therapists, paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), and a variety of other health and logis-
tical personnel. DMATs typically have 50–125 total members, from which the Team Leader chooses 35 to de-
ploy on most missions. A typical deployment might be composed of the following roles and specialty positions:
• 9 Nonclinical Positions
− 2 DMAT Leaders;
− 1 Safety Officer;
− 1 Administrative/Finance Chief;
− 1 Administrative Assistant;
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
150
− 1 Logistics Chief;
− 1 Equipment Specialist; and
− 2 Communications Officers.
• 21 Clinical Positions
− 3 Medical Officers;
− 1 Pharmacist;
− 1 Pharmacy Assistant;
− 2 Supervisory Nurse Specialists;
− 6 Staff Nurses;
− 4 Nurse Practitioners or Physician Assistants; and
− 4 Paramedics.
• 6 Other Positions
− 5 other positions, determined by DMAT; and
− 1 Home Base Support Person (activated, not deployed).
Although a standard deployment consists of approximately 35 positions, each particular team may consist
of more than three times that number to provide some redundancy for each job role on the DMAT in the
event a key person is unavailable at the time of deployment. Each DMAT is composed of members with a
variety of health or medical skills. Included among the ranks of a team are many support personnel such as
communications, logistics, maintenance, and security. Many teams also maintain a Critical Incident Stress
Management (CISM) subunit.
DMAT Levels and Capabilities
For any DMAT, capability is designated within the name of the team. For instance, the Michigan DMAT team
headquartered at Selfridge Air National Guard base is designated MI-1 DMAT defining it as a Level 1 team.
Level-1 ready to deploy within 8 hours of notification and then remain self-sufficient for 72 hours with
enough food, water, shelter, and medical supplies to treat about 250 patients per day.
Level-2 ready to deploy and replace a Level-1 team using and supplementing their equipment which is left on site.
Level-3 teams in various stages of development.
Employment Status and Protections
DMAT members are defined as “intermittent” Federal employees, and once activated by Federal order, their
status changes to that of an active Federal employee and follows the General Schedule (GS) pay scale. Feder-
ally activated DMAT members are protected from tort liability while in operation and are also protected by
the provisions of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), which af-
fords the same protections extended to National Guard and active duty military personnel in that when they
deploy, their full-time jobs are not placed in jeopardy.
Annex VI: National Disaster Medical System-Disaster Medical Assistance Teams 151
Process for Participation
Individual providers may apply for a position on a DMAT team through the administrative contact for a
DMAT organization or through the NDMS website. The three-phase application process is described below.
PHASE 1:
• Applicant completes application for Federal employment through systems established by the Office of
Personnel Management.
• Applicant must fill out NDMS Member Information form.
• Applicant provides true copies of education degrees and licenses for medical positions.
• Applicant provides true copies of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Certificates of Com-
pletion for IS-100.b, IS-200.b, IS-700 and IS-800.b.
• Applicant completes the Direct Deposit Form and attaches a voided check.
• Applicant mails (or scans) all completed forms to DMAT team administrative officer contact.
PHASE 2:
• Local DMAT team and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) approve items from Phase 1.
• Applicant is fingerprinted and completes the Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Form.
• Applicant will receive an email from psc.hhs.gov to complete Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations
Processing (e-QIP), the automated system for processing Federal applicant suitability investigations.
− Applicants have 5 days to respond.
− Applicant must follow all instructions regarding computer settings to complete this online process.
− Applicants that do not complete the e-QIP process within two attempts will be required to reapply
to NDMS as a NEW Applicant.
− Three (3) e-QIP Signatory Forms must be completed (titled in lower right hand corner of each form).
− Document type CER
− Document type REL
− Document type MEL
• Applicant completes and signs DHHS Credit Release Form.
• Applicant completes and signs Declaration of Federal Employment (Option Form 306).
PHASE 3:
• DMAT team receives confirmation that applicant’s background check has been approved.
• E-Induction: Applicant is notified by email to complete the Online Induction process.
• Applicant completes required employment paperwork including letter of appointment.
• Applicant receives appointment as a member of DMAT.
DMAT RESOURCES
• NDMS/OEP. National Disaster Medical System. www.ndms.dhhs.gov (Retrieved July 3, 2011).
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
152
This page was intentionally left blank.
Annex VII: References 153
ANNEX VII: References
References and Reading List
Ablah, E., Konda, K.S., Konda, K., Melbourne, M., Ingoglia, J.N., and Gebbie, K.M. “Emergency Prepared-
ness Training and Response among Community Health Centers and Local Health Departments: Results
from a Multi-State Survey.” Journal of Community Health 35, No. 3 (2010): 285-293.
AMR/FEMA/DHHS Paratransit Resource Utilization Guide.
Andreatta, P.B., Maslowski, E., Petty, S., Shim, W., Marsh, M., Hall, T., Stern, S., and Frankel, J. “Virtual Re-
ality Triage Training Provides a Viable Solution for Disaster-Preparedness.” Academic Emergency Medicine:
Official Journal Of The Society For Academic Emergency Medicine 17, No. 8 (2010): 870-876.
Ariely, G. “Learning to digest during fighting–Real time knowledge management,” http://www.
instituteforcounterterrorism.org/apage/7572.php.
Barnes, M.D., Hanson, C.L., Novilla, L.M., Meacham, A.T., McIntyre, E., and Erickson, B.C. “Analysis of Me-
dia Agenda Setting During and after Hurricane Katrina: Implications for Emergency Preparedness, Disaster
Response, and Disaster Policy.” American Journal of Public Health 98, No. 4 (2008): 604-610.
“Catastrophic Disasters: Enhanced Leadership, Capabilities, and Accountability Controls Will Improve the
Effectiveness of the Nation’s Preparedness, Response, and Recovery System: Gao-06-618.” GAO Reports,
(2006): 1.
“Catastrophic Disasters: Gao-08-22.” GAO Reports, (2008): 1.
Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response NYU. “Emergency Medical Services: The Forgotten First
Responder–A Report on the Critical Gaps in Organization and Deficits in Resources for America’s Medical
First Responders.” New York: New York University, 2005.
Chatham Emergency Management Agency. After Action Report: Imperial Sugar Dixie Crystal Plant, April 2008.
Cherry, R.A., and Trainer, M. “The Current Crisis in Emergency Care and the Impact on Disaster Prepared-
ness.” BMC Emergency Medicine 8, (2008): 1-7.
Chhabra, V. “Connecting Care Competencies and Culture During Disasters.” Journal of Emergencies, Trau-
ma & Shock 2, No. 2 (2009): 95-98.
City of Hartford After Action Report. Motor Vehicle/Bus Accident I84 Westbound, January 2010.
CLEMIS. OAKWIN User Manual, October 2005.
Collier, R. “Demystifying Radiation Disaster Preparedness.” CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal =
Journal De L’association Medicale Canadienne 183, No. 9 (2011): 1002-1003.
Courtney, B. “Five Legal Preparedness Challenges for Responding to Future Public Health Emergencies.”
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2011): 60-64.
Czerwinski, T. Coping with the Bounds: Speculations on Nonlinearity in Military Affairs (Washington, DC: DoD Com-
mand and Control Research Program, 1997), pp. 8-9.
Daughtery, L.G., and Blome, W.W. “Planning to Plan: A Process to Involve Child Welfare Agencies in Disas-
ter Preparedness Planning.” Journal of Community Practice 17, No. 4 (2009): 483-501.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
154
Davies, K. “Disaster Management. Disaster Preparedness and Response: More Than Major Incident Initia-
tion.” British Journal of Nursing (BJN) 14, No. 16 (2005): 868-871.
de Hoop, T., and Ruben, R. “Insuring against Earthquakes: Simulating the Cost-Effectiveness of Disaster
Preparedness.” Disasters 34, No. 2 (2010): 509-523.
DHS (U.S. Department of Homeland Security). 2004. National Response Plan. Department of Homeland Secu-
rity, Washington, DC.
. 2008a. National Response Framework. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC. Accessed at
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf on July 30, 2010.
. 2008b. Mass Care, Emergency Assistance, Housing, and Human Services, ESF 6. Department of Homeland Secu-
rity, Washington, DC. Accessed at http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-esf-06.pdf on July 30, 2010.
Dietrich, D. (1997). The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations. Rita and Robert Kimber,
Trans. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Books.
Duggan, S.P., Deeny, R.S., and Vitale, C.T. “Perceptions of Older People on Disaster Response and Prepared-
ness.” International Journal of Older People Nursing 5, No. 1 (2010): 71-76.
Edwards, J.C., Kang, J., and Silenas, R. “Promoting Regional Disaster Preparedness among Rural Hospitals.”
The Journal Of Rural Health: Official Journal Of The American Rural Health Association And The National
Rural Health Care Association 24, No. 3 (2008): 321-325.
Emergency Management Assistance Compact. 2005 Hurricane Season Response After Action Report. Titan-L3. Sep-
tember 2006.
Endsley, M.R. 1995. “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems.” The Journal of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society 31 (1): 32-64.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Developing and Sustaining an Effective MMRS Regional System
Hampton Roads, Virginia,” FEMA Smart Practices Spotlight, October 15, 2003 (accessed April 27, 2011).
. “ICS-300: Intermediate ICS for Expanding Incidents (EMI Course Number: G300).” Emergency
Management Institute, 2011.
. “ICS All Hazards Core Competencies.” Emergency Management Institute, 2011.
Fox, M.H., White, G.W., Rooney, C., and Rowland, J.L. “Disaster Preparedness and Response for Persons
with Mobility Impairments.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 17, No. 4 (2007): 196-205.
GAO Report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Emergency Man-
agement Assistance Compact: Enhancing EMAC’s Collaborative and Administrative Capacity Should Improve National Disaster Response.
June 2007.
GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2003. Geographic Information Systems. Government Accountabil-
ity Office, Washington, DC.
. 2005. Results-Oriented Government: Practices That Can Help and Sustain Collaboration Among Federal Agencies. Gov-
ernment Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2006. Hurricane Katrina: Better Plans and Exercises Needed to Guide the Military’s Response to Natural Disasters. Gov-
ernment Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
Annex VII: References 155
. 2007a. Critical Infrastructure Protection: Progress Coordinating Government and Private Sector Efforts Varies by Sectors’
Characteristics. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2007b. Homeland Security: Preliminary Information on Federal Actions to Address Challenges Faced by State and Local
Information Fusion Centers. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2007c. Homeland Security: Observations on DHS and FEMA Efforts to Prepare for and Respond to Major and Catastrophic
Disasters and Address Related Recommendations and Legislation. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2008a. Emergency Management: Observations on DHS’s Preparedness for Catastrophic Disasters. Government Ac-
countability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2008b. National Disaster Response: FEMA Should Take Action to Improve Capacity and Coordination between Govern-
ment and Voluntary Sectors. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2008c. Homeland Security: First Responders’ Ability to Detect and Model Hazardous Releases in Urban Areas Is Signifi-
cantly Limited. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009a. Emergency Communication: Vulnerabilities Remain and Limited Collaboration and Monitoring Hamper Federal
Efforts. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009b. Urban Area Security Initiative: FEMA Lacks Measures to Assess How Regional Collaboration Efforts Build Pre-
paredness Capabilities. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009c. Information Sharing: Federal Agencies Are Sharing Border and Terrorism Information with Local and Tribal Law
Enforcement Agencies, but Additional Efforts Are Needed. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009d. Biosurveillance: Developing a Collaboration Strategy Is Essential to Fostering Interagency Data and Resource Shar-
ing. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009e. Emergency Management: Actions to Implement Select Provisions of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Re-
form Act. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009f. Vulnerabilities Remain and Limited Collaboration and Monitoring Hamper Federal Efforts. Government Ac-
countability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2009g. Emergency Communications: National Communications System Provides Programs for Priority Calling, but Plan-
ning for New Initiatives and Performance Measurement Could Be Strengthened. Government Accountability Office, Wash-
ington, DC.
. 2009h. Wildland Fire Management: Federal Agencies Have Taken Important Steps Forward, but Additional, Strategic Ac-
tion Is Needed to Capitalize on Those Steps. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2010a. Cybersecurity: Continued Efforts Are Still Needed to Protect Infrastructure. Government Accountability
Office, Washington, DC.
. 2010b. Combatting Nuclear Terrorism: Actions Needed to Better Prepare to Recover from Possible Attacks Using Radiologi-
cal or Nuclear Materials. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2010c. Homeland Defense: Planning, Resourcing, and Training Issues Challenge DOD’s Response to Domestic Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High-Yield Explosive Incidents. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
. 2010d. Cybersecurity: Progress Made but Challenges Remain in Defining and Coordinating the Comprehensive Initiative.
Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
156
Gomez, D., Haas, B., Ahmed, N., Tien, H., and Nathens, A. “Disaster Preparedness of Canadian Trauma
Centres: The Perspective of Medical Directors of Trauma.” Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal Canadien
De Chirurgie 54, No. 1 (2011): 9-16.
Gorman J.C., Cooke, N.J., and Winner, J.L. 2006. “Measuring Team Situational Awareness in Decentralized
Command and Control Environments.” Ergonomics 49 (12 and 13): 1312-1325.
“Healthcare Executives’ Role in Emergency Preparedness.” Healthcare Executive 25, No. 5 (2010): 104-105.
Hense, K.A., Wyler, B.D., and Kaufmann, G. “Preparedness Versus Reactiveness: An Approach to Pre-Crisis
Disaster Planning.” Journal of Homeland Security & Emergency Management 7, No. 1 (2010): 1-11.
Herbold, J. “Introduction to Public Health Preparedness.” Texas Public Health Journal 61, No. 4 (2009): 15-21.
Hochstein, C., Arnesen, S., Goshorn, J., and Szczur, M. “Selected Resources for Emergency and Disaster Pre-
paredness and Response from the United States National Library of Medicine.” Medical Reference Services
Quarterly 27, No. 1 (2008): 1-20.
Holland, J.H. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publish-
ing Co, 1995, p. 55.
. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Pub-
lishing Co.
Horan, J., Ritchie, L.A., Meinhold, S., Gill, D.A., Houghton, B.F., Gregg, C.E., Matheson, T., Paton, D., and
Johnston, D. “Evaluating Disaster Education: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Tsu-
namiready™ Community Program and Risk Awareness Education Efforts in New Hanover County, North
Carolina.” New Directions for Evaluation, No. 126 (2010): 79-93.
Hossain, L., and Kuti, M. “Disaster Response Preparedness Coordination through Social Networks.” Disas-
ters 34, No. 3 (2010): 755-786.
IEG World Bank. (2007). Development actions and the rising incidence of disasters. Evaluation Brief 4. Re-
trieved from: http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/docs/developing_actions.pdf
Institute of Medicine. (2006). Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads. Retrieved from: http://www.iom.edu/
Reports/2006/Emergecy-Medical-Services-At-the-Crossroads.aspx
International Association of Fire Chiefs, “National Fire Service Mutual Aid System Task Force,” IMAS Develop-
ment Plan, http://www.iafc.org/associations/4685/files/downloads/MASTF/mtlAid_IMASdevelopmentPlan.pdf
(accessed February 12, 2011).
James, E. “Getting Ahead of the Next Disaster: Recent Preparedness Efforts in Indonesia.” Development in
Practice 18, No. 3 (2008): 424-429.
James, J.J., Subbarao, I., and Lanier, W.L. “Improving the Art and Science of Disaster Medicine and Public
Health Preparedness.” Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Mayo Clinic 83, No. 5 (2008): 559-562.
Joshi, A.J., and Rys, M.J. “Study on the Effect of Different Arrival Patterns on an Emergency Department’s Capac-
ity Using Discrete Event Simulation.” International Journal of Industrial Engineering 18, No. 1 (2011): 40-50.
Kapucu, N. “Collaborative Emergency Management: Better Community Organizing, Better Public Pre-
paredness and Response.” Disasters 32, No. 2 (2008): 239-262.
Annex VII: References 157
Krajewski, M.J., Sztajnkrycer, M., and Báez, A.A. “Hospital Disaster Preparedness in the United States: New
Issues, New Challenges.” Internet Journal of Rescue & Disaster Medicine 4, No. 2 (2005): 32-40.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Kumar, A., Srivastava, J.P., Bhardwaj, P., and Gupta, P. “Disaster Management: A Method of Easy Survival.”
Internet Journal of Rescue & Disaster Medicine 8, No. 2 (2009): 1-4.
Kuntz, S.W., Frable, P., Qureshi, K., and Strong, L.L. “Association of Community Health Nursing Educators:
Disaster Preparedness White Paper for Community/Public Health Nursing Educators.” Public Health Nurs-
ing 25, No. 4 (2008): 362-369.
Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 4th ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Luck, G. “Insights on Joint Operations: The Art and Science.” The Joint Warfighting Center, U.S. Joint
Forces Command (September 2006), pp. 3, 12, and 22.
. (2006, September). “Insights on Joint Operations: The Art and Science.” The Joint Warfighting
Center, U.S. Joint Forces Command. (Available at https://unifiedquest.army.mil/)
Manoj, B.S., and Baker, A.H. 2007. “Communications Challenges in Emergency Response.” Communications
of the ACM 50 (3): 51-53.
Marshall County Emergency Management. After Action Report, December 12, 2005.
Mayer, B.W., Moss, J., and Dale, K. “Disaster and Preparedness: Lessons from Hurricane Rita.” Journal of
Contingencies & Crisis Management 16, No. 1 (2008): 14-23.
McAlister, V.C. “Drills and Exercises: The Way to Disaster Preparedness.” Canadian Journal of Surgery.
Journal Canadien De Chirurgie 54, No. 1 (2011): 7-8.
McShane, S.L., and Von Glinow, M.A. 2000. Organizational Behavior: Emerging Realities for the Workplace Revolution.
Richard D. Irwin, Inc., New York, New York.
Miller, A. Creation Music Festival: Chapter 1013 Special Events EMS. Huntingdon County Emergency Management
Age nc y, 2011.
Mishra, S., Suar, D., and Paton, D. “Is Externality a Mediator of Experience–Behavior and Information–Ac-
tion Hypothesis in Disaster Preparedness?” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 3, No. 1 (2009): 11-19.
Montealegre, J.R., Koers, E.M., Bryson, R.S., and Murray, K.O. “An Innovative Public Health Prepared-
ness Training Program for Graduate Students.” Public Health Reports (Washington, DC: 1974) 126, No. 3
(2011): 441-446.
Morrison, A.M., and Catanzaro, A.M. “High-Fidelity Simulation and Emergency Preparedness.” Public
Health Nursing 27, No. 2 (2010): 164-173.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. “Interim Planning Guidance for Preparedness and Re-
sponse to a Mass Casualty Event Resulting from Terrorist Use of Explosives.” Atlanta, GA: Centers for Dis-
ease Control and Prevention, 2010
NDMS/OEP. National Disaster Medical System. www.ndms.dhhs.gov (Retrieved July 3, 2011).
Neustadt, R.E., and May, E.R. Thinking In Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers (New York: The Free Press,
1986), pp. 34-57.
Operational Templates and Guidance for EMS Mass Incident Deployment
158
NOAA Forecast Office Paducha, KY. Damage Survey Results for Marshall County Kentucky, November 15, 2005.
Noll, G. “Regional Response to All-Hazards Events: A Commonwealth Perspective.” Commonwealth, Vol.
15-3, May 2009.
OCMCA. After Action Review: EMS at Woodward Dream Cruise, November 2006.
Patterson, E.S., Roth, E.M., Woods, D.D., Chow, R., and Gomes, J.O. 2004. “Handoff Strategies in Setting
with High Consequences for Failure: Lessons for Health Care Operations.” International Journal for Quality in
Health Care 16 (2): 125-132.
Poulsen K. October 23, 2007. “First Hand Reports from California Wildfires Pour Through Twitter.” Threat
Level. Accessed at http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/10/firsthand-repor/ on July 30, 2010.
Ritchie, L.A., and MacDonald, W. “Enhancing Disaster and Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recov-
ery through Evaluation.” New Directions for Evaluation, No. 126 (2010): 3-7.
Rittel, H. “On the Planning Crisis: Systems Analysis of the ‘First and Second Generations.’” Bedriftsøkonomen
8 (1972), pp. 392-393.
Rittel, H., and Webber, M.M. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sciences 4 (1973), pp. 161-167.
Rivers, F., Speraw, S., Phillips, K.D., and Lee, J. “A Review of Nurses in Disaster Preparedness and Response:
Military and Civilian Collaboration.” Journal of Homeland Security & Emergency Management 7, No. 1
(2010): 1-18.
Rodes, C.E., Pellizzari, E.D., Dellarco, M.J., Erickson, M.D., Vallero, D.A., Reissman, D.B., Lioy, P.J., Lippmann,
M., Burke, T.A., and Goldstein, B.A. “Isea2007 Panel: Integration of Better Exposure Characterizations into
Disaster Preparedness for Responders and the Public.” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epide-
miology 18, No. 6 (2008): 541-550.
Schmitt, J.F. “A Systemic Concept for Operational Design.” www.mcwl.usmc.mil/concepts/home.cfm, pp. 9-12.
Schön, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions (San Fran-
cisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987), pp. 18-19 and 41-42.
Scott, L.A., Carson, D.S., and Greenwell, I.B. “Disaster 101: A Novel Approach to Disaster Medicine Train-
ing for Health Professionals.” Journal of Emergency Medicine 39, No. 2 (2010): 220-226.
Seale, G.S. “Emergency Preparedness as a Continuous Improvement Cycle: Perspectives from a Postacute
Rehabilitation Facility.” Rehabilitation Psychology 55, No. 3 (2010): 247-254.
Serino, R., Medical Consequence Management Plan for the 2004 Democratic National Convention, LLIS.gov, 2011.
Shear, W.B. “Small Business Administration: Additional Steps Needed to Enhance Agency Preparedness for
Future Disasters: Gao-07-114.” GAO Reports, (2007): 1.
“Small Business Administration: Response to the Gulf Coast Hurricanes Highlights Need for Enhanced Di-
saster Preparedness: Gao-07-484t.” GAO Reports, (2007): 1.
Sorrells, W.T., Downing, G.R., Blakesley, P., Pendall, D.W., Walk, J.K., and Wallwork, R.D. (2005). Systemic
Operational Design: An Introduction. School of Advanced Military Studies, U.S. Army Command and General Staff
College. (Available at http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/contentdm/home.htm).
Annex VII: References 159
South Central Task Force. Lebanon (PA) Veterans Administration Medical Center Evacuation-EMS Operations After Action Re-
port/Improvement Plan, November 2010.
Staudenherz, A., and Leitha, T. “Medical Preparedness in Radiation Accidents: A Matter of Logistics and
Communication Not Treatment!” International Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2, No.
3 (2011): 133-142.
Strange, J. (2002). Centers of Gravity and Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All
Speak the Same Language. 2nd ed. Quantico, Virginia: Marine Corps University.
Swienton, R.E., Subbarao, I., and Coule, P.L. “Healthcare Disasters: Local Preparedness, Global Response!”
Strengthening National Public Health Preparedness and Response to Chemical, Biological and Radiological
Agent Threats 20, No. 1 (2007): 11-14.
Thomas K., Hallock, K., and Bergethon, P.R. 2008. “The Need for Cross Discipline Awareness and Interop-
erability in the First Responder and Emergency Management Communities.” In proceedings of The Cornwallis
Group XIII: Analysis of Societal Conflict and Counter Insurgency. Cornwallis Park, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Top, M., Gider, O., and Tas, Y. “An Investigation of Hospital Disaster Preparedness in Turkey.” Journal of
Homeland Security & Emergency Management 7, No. 1 (2010): 1-19.
Utah Department of Public Health. Ford Ironman St. George Triathlon, May 2010.
van Wyk, E., Bean, W.L., and Yadavalli, V.S.S. “Modeling of Uncertainty in Minimizing the Cost of Inven-
tory for Disaster Relief.” South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 22, No. 1 (2011): 1-11.
Walker, D.M. “Hurricane Katrina: Gao’s Preliminary Observations Regarding Preparedness, Response, and
Recovery: Gao-06-442t.” GAO Reports, (2006): 1.
Woodbury, G.L. “Washington State Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment.” Washington
Emergency Management Division, (2005): 16-24.
U.S. Fire Administration
16825 S. Seton Ave.
Emmitsburg, MD 21727
www.usfa.fema.gov
June 2012

Navigation menu