FLIR Systems FLIRT5590 Infrared Camera User Manual Part 4
FLIR Systems AB Infrared Camera Part 4
Contents
- 1. User Manual Part 1
- 2. User Manual Part 2
- 3. User Manual Part 4
- 4. User Manual Part 3
User Manual Part 4
28 Application examples 28.3 Oxidized socket 28.3.1 General Depending on the type of socket and the environment in which the socket is installed, oxides may occur on the socket's contact surfaces. These oxides can lead to locally increased resistance when the socket is loaded, which can be seen in an infrared image as local temperature increase. A socket’s construction may differ dramatically from one manufacturer to another. For this reason, different faults in a socket can lead to the same typical appearance in an infrared image. Local temperature increase can also result from improper contact between a wire and socket, or from difference in load. 28.3.2 Figure The image below shows a series of fuses where one fuse has a raised temperature on the contact surfaces against the fuse holder. Because of the fuse holder’s blank metal, the temperature increase is not visible there, while it is visible on the fuse’s ceramic material. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 459 28 Application examples 28.4 Insulation deficiencies 28.4.1 General Insulation deficiencies may result from insulation losing volume over the course of time and thereby not entirely filling the cavity in a frame wall. An infrared camera allows you to see these insulation deficiencies because they either have a different heat conduction property than sections with correctly installed insulation, and/or show the area where air is penetrating the frame of the building. When you are inspecting a building, the temperature difference between the inside and outside should be at least 10°C (18°F). Studs, water pipes, concrete columns, and similar components may resemble an insulation deficiency in an infrared image. Minor differences may also occur naturally. 28.4.2 Figure In the image below, insulation in the roof framing is lacking. Due to the absence of insulation, air has forced its way into the roof structure, which thus takes on a different characteristic appearance in the infrared image. 28.5 Draft 28.5.1 General Draft can be found under baseboards, around door and window casings, and above ceiling trim. This type of draft is often possible to see with an infrared camera, as a cooler airstream cools down the surrounding surface. When you are investigating draft in a house, there should be sub-atmospheric pressure in the house. Close all doors, windows, and ventilation ducts, and allow the kitchen fan to run for a while before you take the infrared images. An infrared image of draft often shows a typical stream pattern. You can see this stream pattern clearly in the picture below. Also keep in mind that drafts can be concealed by heat from floor heating circuits. 28.5.2 Figure The image below shows a ceiling hatch where faulty installation has resulted in a strong draft. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 460 28 Application examples #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 461 29 About FLIR Systems FLIR Systems was established in 1978 to pioneer the development of high-performance infrared imaging systems, and is the world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of thermal imaging systems for a wide variety of commercial, industrial, and government applications. Today, FLIR Systems embraces five major companies with outstanding achievements in infrared technology since 1958—the Swedish AGEMA Infrared Systems (formerly AGA Infrared Systems), the three United States companies Indigo Systems, FSI, and Inframetrics, and the French company Cedip. Since 2007, FLIR Systems has acquired several companies with world-leading expertise in sensor technologies: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Extech Instruments (2007) Ifara Tecnologías (2008) Salvador Imaging (2009) OmniTech Partners (2009) Directed Perception (2009) Raymarine (2010) ICx Technologies (2010) TackTick Marine Digital Instruments (2011) Aerius Photonics (2011) Lorex Technology (2012) Traficon (2012) MARSS (2013) DigitalOptics micro-optics business (2013) DVTEL (2015) Point Grey Research (2016) Prox Dynamics (2016) Figure 29.1 Patent documents from the early 1960s FLIR Systems has three manufacturing plants in the United States (Portland, OR, Boston, MA, Santa Barbara, CA) and one in Sweden (Stockholm). Since 2007 there is also a manufacturing plant in Tallinn, Estonia. Direct sales offices in Belgium, Brazil, China, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the USA —together with a worldwide network of agents and distributors—support our international customer base. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 462 29 About FLIR Systems FLIR Systems is at the forefront of innovation in the infrared camera industry. We anticipate market demand by constantly improving our existing cameras and developing new ones. The company has set milestones in product design and development such as the introduction of the first battery-operated portable camera for industrial inspections, and the first uncooled infrared camera, to mention just two innovations. Figure 29.2 1969: Thermovision Model 661. The camera weighed approximately 25 kg (55 lb.), the oscilloscope 20 kg (44 lb.), and the tripod 15 kg (33 lb.). The operator also needed a 220 VAC generator set, and a 10 L (2.6 US gallon) jar with liquid nitrogen. To the left of the oscilloscope the Polaroid attachment (6 kg (13 lb.)) can be seen. Figure 29.3 2015: FLIR One, an accessory to iPhone and Android mobile phones. Weight: 90 g (3.2 oz.). FLIR Systems manufactures all vital mechanical and electronic components of the camera systems itself. From detector design and manufacturing, to lenses and system electronics, to final testing and calibration, all production steps are carried out and supervised by our own engineers. The in-depth expertise of these infrared specialists ensures the accuracy and reliability of all vital components that are assembled into your infrared camera. 29.1 More than just an infrared camera At FLIR Systems we recognize that our job is to go beyond just producing the best infrared camera systems. We are committed to enabling all users of our infrared camera systems to work more productively by providing them with the most powerful camera– software combination. Especially tailored software for predictive maintenance, R & D, and process monitoring is developed in-house. Most software is available in a wide variety of languages. We support all our infrared cameras with a wide variety of accessories to adapt your equipment to the most demanding infrared applications. 29.2 Sharing our knowledge Although our cameras are designed to be very user-friendly, there is a lot more to thermography than just knowing how to handle a camera. Therefore, FLIR Systems has founded the Infrared Training Center (ITC), a separate business unit, that provides certified training courses. Attending one of the ITC courses will give you a truly hands-on learning experience. The staff of the ITC are also there to provide you with any application support you may need in putting infrared theory into practice. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 463 29 About FLIR Systems 29.3 Supporting our customers FLIR Systems operates a worldwide service network to keep your camera running at all times. If you discover a problem with your camera, local service centers have all the equipment and expertise to solve it within the shortest possible time. Therefore, there is no need to send your camera to the other side of the world or to talk to someone who does not speak your language. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 464 30 Terms, laws, and definitions Term Definition Absorption and emission2 The capacity or ability of an object to absorb incident radiated energy is always the same as the capacity to emit its own energy as radiation Apparent temperature uncompensated reading from an infrared instrument, containing all radiation incident on the instrument, regardless of its sources3 Color palette assigns different colors to indicate specific levels of apparent temperature. Palettes can provide high or low contrast, depending on the colors used in them Conduction direct transfer of thermal energy from molecule to molecule, caused by collisions between the molecules Convection heat transfer mode where a fluid is brought into motion, either by gravity or another force, thereby transferring heat from one place to another Diagnostics examination of symptoms and syndromes to determine the nature of faults or failures4 Direction of heat transfer5 Heat will spontaneously flow from hotter to colder, thereby transferring thermal energy from one place to another6 Emissivity ratio of the power radiated by real bodies to the power that is radiated by a blackbody at the same temperature and at the same wavelength7 Energy conservation8 The sum of the total energy contents in a closed system is constant Exitant radiation radiation that leaves the surface of an object, regardless of its original sources Heat thermal energy that is transferred between two objects (systems) due to their difference in temperature Heat transfer rate9 The heat transfer rate under steady state conditions is directly proportional to the thermal conductivity of the object, the cross-sectional area of the object through which the heat flows, and the temperature difference between the two ends of the object. It is inversely proportional to the length, or thickness, of the object10 Incident radiation radiation that strikes an object from its surroundings IR thermography process of acquisition and analysis of thermal information from non-contact thermal imaging devices Isotherm replaces certain colors in the scale with a contrasting color. It marks an interval of equal apparent temperature11 Qualitative thermography thermography that relies on the analysis of thermal patterns to reveal the existence of and to locate the position of anomalies12 Quantitative thermography thermography that uses temperature measurement to determine the seriousness of an anomaly, in order to establish repair priorities12 2. Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation. 3. Based on ISO 18434-1:2008 (en). 4. Based on ISO 13372:2004 (en). 5. 2nd law of thermodynamics. 6. This is a consequence of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, the law itself is more complicated. 7. Based on ISO 16714-3:2016 (en). 8. 1st law of thermodynamics. 9. Fourier’s law. 10. This is the one-dimensional form of Fourier’s law, valid for steady-state conditions. 11. Based on ISO 18434-1:2008 (en) 12. Based on ISO 10878-2013 (en). #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 465 30 Terms, laws, and definitions Term Definition Radiative heat transfer Heat transfer by the emission and absorption of thermal radiation Reflected apparent temperature apparent temperature of the environment that is reflected by the target into the IR camera13 Spatial resolution ability of an IR camera to resolve small objects or details Temperature measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules and atoms that make up the substance Thermal energy total kinetic energy of the molecules that make up the object14 Thermal gradient gradual change in temperature over distance13 Thermal tuning process of putting the colors of the image on the object of analysis, in order to maximize contrast 13. Based on ISO 16714-3:2016 (en). 14. Thermal energy is part of the internal energy of an object. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 466 31 Thermographic measurement techniques 31.1 Introduction An infrared camera measures and images the emitted infrared radiation from an object. The fact that radiation is a function of object surface temperature makes it possible for the camera to calculate and display this temperature. However, the radiation measured by the camera does not only depend on the temperature of the object but is also a function of the emissivity. Radiation also originates from the surroundings and is reflected in the object. The radiation from the object and the reflected radiation will also be influenced by the absorption of the atmosphere. To measure temperature accurately, it is therefore necessary to compensate for the effects of a number of different radiation sources. This is done on-line automatically by the camera. The following object parameters must, however, be supplied for the camera: • • • • • The emissivity of the object The reflected apparent temperature The distance between the object and the camera The relative humidity Temperature of the atmosphere 31.2 Emissivity The most important object parameter to set correctly is the emissivity which, in short, is a measure of how much radiation is emitted from the object, compared to that from a perfect blackbody of the same temperature. Normally, object materials and surface treatments exhibit emissivity ranging from approximately 0.1 to 0.95. A highly polished (mirror) surface falls below 0.1, while an oxidized or painted surface has a higher emissivity. Oil-based paint, regardless of color in the visible spectrum, has an emissivity over 0.9 in the infrared. Human skin exhibits an emissivity 0.97 to 0.98. Non-oxidized metals represent an extreme case of perfect opacity and high reflexivity, which does not vary greatly with wavelength. Consequently, the emissivity of metals is low – only increasing with temperature. For non-metals, emissivity tends to be high, and decreases with temperature. 31.2.1 31.2.1.1 Finding the emissivity of a sample Step 1: Determining reflected apparent temperature Use one of the following two methods to determine reflected apparent temperature: #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 467 31 Thermographic measurement techniques 31.2.1.1.1 Method 1: Direct method Follow this procedure: 1. Look for possible reflection sources, considering that the incident angle = reflection angle (a = b). Figure 31.1 1 = Reflection source 2. If the reflection source is a spot source, modify the source by obstructing it using a piece if cardboard. Figure 31.2 1 = Reflection source #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 468 31 Thermographic measurement techniques 3. Measure the radiation intensity (= apparent temperature) from the reflection source using the following settings: • Emissivity: 1.0 • Dobj: 0 You can measure the radiation intensity using one of the following two methods: Figure 31.3 1 = Reflection source Figure 31.4 1 = Reflection source You can not use a thermocouple to measure reflected apparent temperature, because a thermocouple measures temperature, but apparent temperatrure is radiation intensity. 31.2.1.1.2 Method 2: Reflector method Follow this procedure: 1. Crumble up a large piece of aluminum foil. 2. Uncrumble the aluminum foil and attach it to a piece of cardboard of the same size. 3. Put the piece of cardboard in front of the object you want to measure. Make sure that the side with aluminum foil points to the camera. 4. Set the emissivity to 1.0. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 469 31 Thermographic measurement techniques 5. Measure the apparent temperature of the aluminum foil and write it down. The foil is considered a perfect reflector, so its apparent temperature equals the reflected apparent temperature from the surroundings. Figure 31.5 Measuring the apparent temperature of the aluminum foil. 31.2.1.2 Step 2: Determining the emissivity Follow this procedure: 1. Select a place to put the sample. 2. Determine and set reflected apparent temperature according to the previous procedure. 3. Put a piece of electrical tape with known high emissivity on the sample. 4. Heat the sample at least 20 K above room temperature. Heating must be reasonably even. 5. Focus and auto-adjust the camera, and freeze the image. 6. Adjust Level and Span for best image brightness and contrast. 7. Set emissivity to that of the tape (usually 0.97). 8. Measure the temperature of the tape using one of the following measurement functions: • Isotherm (helps you to determine both the temperature and how evenly you have heated the sample) • Spot (simpler) • Box Avg (good for surfaces with varying emissivity). 9. Write down the temperature. 10. Move your measurement function to the sample surface. 11. Change the emissivity setting until you read the same temperature as your previous measurement. 12. Write down the emissivity. Note • Avoid forced convection • Look for a thermally stable surrounding that will not generate spot reflections • Use high quality tape that you know is not transparent, and has a high emissivity you are certain of • This method assumes that the temperature of your tape and the sample surface are the same. If they are not, your emissivity measurement will be wrong. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 470 31 Thermographic measurement techniques 31.3 Reflected apparent temperature This parameter is used to compensate for the radiation reflected in the object. If the emissivity is low and the object temperature relatively far from that of the reflected it will be important to set and compensate for the reflected apparent temperature correctly. 31.4 Distance The distance is the distance between the object and the front lens of the camera. This parameter is used to compensate for the following two facts: • That radiation from the target is absorbed by the atmosphere between the object and the camera. • That radiation from the atmosphere itself is detected by the camera. 31.5 Relative humidity The camera can also compensate for the fact that the transmittance is also dependent on the relative humidity of the atmosphere. To do this set the relative humidity to the correct value. For short distances and normal humidity the relative humidity can normally be left at a default value of 50%. 31.6 Other parameters In addition, some cameras and analysis programs from FLIR Systems allow you to compensate for the following parameters: • Atmospheric temperature – i.e. the temperature of the atmosphere between the camera and the target • External optics temperature – i.e. the temperature of any external lenses or windows used in front of the camera • External optics transmittance – i.e. the transmission of any external lenses or windows used in front of the camera #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 471 32 History of infrared technology Before the year 1800, the existence of the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum wasn't even suspected. The original significance of the infrared spectrum, or simply ‘the infrared’ as it is often called, as a form of heat radiation is perhaps less obvious today than it was at the time of its discovery by Herschel in 1800. Figure 32.1 Sir William Herschel (1738–1822) The discovery was made accidentally during the search for a new optical material. Sir William Herschel – Royal Astronomer to King George III of England, and already famous for his discovery of the planet Uranus – was searching for an optical filter material to reduce the brightness of the sun’s image in telescopes during solar observations. While testing different samples of colored glass which gave similar reductions in brightness he was intrigued to find that some of the samples passed very little of the sun’s heat, while others passed so much heat that he risked eye damage after only a few seconds’ observation. Herschel was soon convinced of the necessity of setting up a systematic experiment, with the objective of finding a single material that would give the desired reduction in brightness as well as the maximum reduction in heat. He began the experiment by actually repeating Newton’s prism experiment, but looking for the heating effect rather than the visual distribution of intensity in the spectrum. He first blackened the bulb of a sensitive mercury-in-glass thermometer with ink, and with this as his radiation detector he proceeded to test the heating effect of the various colors of the spectrum formed on the top of a table by passing sunlight through a glass prism. Other thermometers, placed outside the sun’s rays, served as controls. As the blackened thermometer was moved slowly along the colors of the spectrum, the temperature readings showed a steady increase from the violet end to the red end. This was not entirely unexpected, since the Italian researcher, Landriani, in a similar experiment in 1777 had observed much the same effect. It was Herschel, however, who was the first to recognize that there must be a point where the heating effect reaches a maximum, and that measurements confined to the visible portion of the spectrum failed to locate this point. Figure 32.2 Marsilio Landriani (1746–1815) Moving the thermometer into the dark region beyond the red end of the spectrum, Herschel confirmed that the heating continued to increase. The maximum point, when he found it, lay well beyond the red end – in what is known today as the ‘infrared wavelengths’. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 472 32 History of infrared technology When Herschel revealed his discovery, he referred to this new portion of the electromagnetic spectrum as the ‘thermometrical spectrum’. The radiation itself he sometimes referred to as ‘dark heat’, or simply ‘the invisible rays’. Ironically, and contrary to popular opinion, it wasn't Herschel who originated the term ‘infrared’. The word only began to appear in print around 75 years later, and it is still unclear who should receive credit as the originator. Herschel’s use of glass in the prism of his original experiment led to some early controversies with his contemporaries about the actual existence of the infrared wavelengths. Different investigators, in attempting to confirm his work, used various types of glass indiscriminately, having different transparencies in the infrared. Through his later experiments, Herschel was aware of the limited transparency of glass to the newly-discovered thermal radiation, and he was forced to conclude that optics for the infrared would probably be doomed to the use of reflective elements exclusively (i.e. plane and curved mirrors). Fortunately, this proved to be true only until 1830, when the Italian investigator, Melloni, made his great discovery that naturally occurring rock salt (NaCl) – which was available in large enough natural crystals to be made into lenses and prisms – is remarkably transparent to the infrared. The result was that rock salt became the principal infrared optical material, and remained so for the next hundred years, until the art of synthetic crystal growing was mastered in the 1930’s. Figure 32.3 Macedonio Melloni (1798–1854) Thermometers, as radiation detectors, remained unchallenged until 1829, the year Nobili invented the thermocouple. (Herschel’s own thermometer could be read to 0.2 °C (0.036 °F), and later models were able to be read to 0.05 °C (0.09 °F)). Then a breakthrough occurred; Melloni connected a number of thermocouples in series to form the first thermopile. The new device was at least 40 times as sensitive as the best thermometer of the day for detecting heat radiation – capable of detecting the heat from a person standing three meters away. The first so-called ‘heat-picture’ became possible in 1840, the result of work by Sir John Herschel, son of the discoverer of the infrared and a famous astronomer in his own right. Based upon the differential evaporation of a thin film of oil when exposed to a heat pattern focused upon it, the thermal image could be seen by reflected light where the interference effects of the oil film made the image visible to the eye. Sir John also managed to obtain a primitive record of the thermal image on paper, which he called a ‘thermograph’. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 473 32 History of infrared technology Figure 32.4 Samuel P. Langley (1834–1906) The improvement of infrared-detector sensitivity progressed slowly. Another major breakthrough, made by Langley in 1880, was the invention of the bolometer. This consisted of a thin blackened strip of platinum connected in one arm of a Wheatstone bridge circuit upon which the infrared radiation was focused and to which a sensitive galvanometer responded. This instrument is said to have been able to detect the heat from a cow at a distance of 400 meters. An English scientist, Sir James Dewar, first introduced the use of liquefied gases as cooling agents (such as liquid nitrogen with a temperature of –196°C (–320.8°F)) in low temperature research. In 1892 he invented a unique vacuum insulating container in which it is possible to store liquefied gases for entire days. The common ‘thermos bottle’, used for storing hot and cold drinks, is based upon his invention. Between the years 1900 and 1920, the inventors of the world ‘discovered’ the infrared. Many patents were issued for devices to detect personnel, artillery, aircraft, ships – and even icebergs. The first operating systems, in the modern sense, began to be developed during the 1914–18 war, when both sides had research programs devoted to the military exploitation of the infrared. These programs included experimental systems for enemy intrusion/detection, remote temperature sensing, secure communications, and ‘flying torpedo’ guidance. An infrared search system tested during this period was able to detect an approaching airplane at a distance of 1.5 km (0.94 miles), or a person more than 300 meters (984 ft.) away. The most sensitive systems up to this time were all based upon variations of the bolometer idea, but the period between the two wars saw the development of two revolutionary new infrared detectors: the image converter and the photon detector. At first, the image converter received the greatest attention by the military, because it enabled an observer for the first time in history to literally ‘see in the dark’. However, the sensitivity of the image converter was limited to the near infrared wavelengths, and the most interesting military targets (i.e. enemy soldiers) had to be illuminated by infrared search beams. Since this involved the risk of giving away the observer’s position to a similarly-equipped enemy observer, it is understandable that military interest in the image converter eventually faded. The tactical military disadvantages of so-called 'active’ (i.e. search beam-equipped) thermal imaging systems provided impetus following the 1939–45 war for extensive secret military infrared-research programs into the possibilities of developing ‘passive’ (no search beam) systems around the extremely sensitive photon detector. During this period, military secrecy regulations completely prevented disclosure of the status of infraredimaging technology. This secrecy only began to be lifted in the middle of the 1950’s, and from that time adequate thermal-imaging devices finally began to be available to civilian science and industry. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 474 33 Theory of thermography 33.1 Introduction The subjects of infrared radiation and the related technique of thermography are still new to many who will use an infrared camera. In this section the theory behind thermography will be given. 33.2 The electromagnetic spectrum The electromagnetic spectrum is divided arbitrarily into a number of wavelength regions, called bands, distinguished by the methods used to produce and detect the radiation. There is no fundamental difference between radiation in the different bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. They are all governed by the same laws and the only differences are those due to differences in wavelength. Figure 33.1 The electromagnetic spectrum. 1: X-ray; 2: UV; 3: Visible; 4: IR; 5: Microwaves; 6: Radiowaves. Thermography makes use of the infrared spectral band. At the short-wavelength end the boundary lies at the limit of visual perception, in the deep red. At the long-wavelength end it merges with the microwave radio wavelengths, in the millimeter range. The infrared band is often further subdivided into four smaller bands, the boundaries of which are also arbitrarily chosen. They include: the near infrared (0.75–3 μm), the middle infrared (3–6 μm), the far infrared (6–15 μm) and the extreme infrared (15–100 μm). Although the wavelengths are given in μm (micrometers), other units are often still used to measure wavelength in this spectral region, e.g. nanometer (nm) and Ångström (Å). The relationships between the different wavelength measurements is: 33.3 Blackbody radiation A blackbody is defined as an object which absorbs all radiation that impinges on it at any wavelength. The apparent misnomer black relating to an object emitting radiation is explained by Kirchhoff’s Law (after Gustav Robert Kirchhoff, 1824–1887), which states that a body capable of absorbing all radiation at any wavelength is equally capable in the emission of radiation. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 475 33 Theory of thermography Figure 33.2 Gustav Robert Kirchhoff (1824–1887) The construction of a blackbody source is, in principle, very simple. The radiation characteristics of an aperture in an isotherm cavity made of an opaque absorbing material represents almost exactly the properties of a blackbody. A practical application of the principle to the construction of a perfect absorber of radiation consists of a box that is light tight except for an aperture in one of the sides. Any radiation which then enters the hole is scattered and absorbed by repeated reflections so only an infinitesimal fraction can possibly escape. The blackness which is obtained at the aperture is nearly equal to a blackbody and almost perfect for all wavelengths. By providing such an isothermal cavity with a suitable heater it becomes what is termed a cavity radiator. An isothermal cavity heated to a uniform temperature generates blackbody radiation, the characteristics of which are determined solely by the temperature of the cavity. Such cavity radiators are commonly used as sources of radiation in temperature reference standards in the laboratory for calibrating thermographic instruments, such as a FLIR Systems camera for example. If the temperature of blackbody radiation increases to more than 525°C (977°F), the source begins to be visible so that it appears to the eye no longer black. This is the incipient red heat temperature of the radiator, which then becomes orange or yellow as the temperature increases further. In fact, the definition of the so-called color temperature of an object is the temperature to which a blackbody would have to be heated to have the same appearance. Now consider three expressions that describe the radiation emitted from a blackbody. 33.3.1 Planck’s law Figure 33.3 Max Planck (1858–1947) Max Planck (1858–1947) was able to describe the spectral distribution of the radiation from a blackbody by means of the following formula: #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 476 33 Theory of thermography where: Wλb Blackbody spectral radiant emittance at wavelength λ. Velocity of light = 3 × 108 m/s Planck’s constant = 6.6 × 10-34 Joule sec. Boltzmann’s constant = 1.4 × 10-23 Joule/K. Absolute temperature (K) of a blackbody. λ Wavelength (μm). Note The factor 10-6 is used since spectral emittance in the curves is expressed in Watt/m2, μm. Planck’s formula, when plotted graphically for various temperatures, produces a family of curves. Following any particular Planck curve, the spectral emittance is zero at λ = 0, then increases rapidly to a maximum at a wavelength λmax and after passing it approaches zero again at very long wavelengths. The higher the temperature, the shorter the wavelength at which maximum occurs. Figure 33.4 Blackbody spectral radiant emittance according to Planck’s law, plotted for various absolute temperatures. 1: Spectral radiant emittance (W/cm2 × 103(μm)); 2: Wavelength (μm) 33.3.2 Wien’s displacement law By differentiating Planck’s formula with respect to λ, and finding the maximum, we have: This is Wien’s formula (after Wilhelm Wien, 1864–1928), which expresses mathematically the common observation that colors vary from red to orange or yellow as the temperature of a thermal radiator increases. The wavelength of the color is the same as the wavelength calculated for λmax. A good approximation of the value of λmax for a given blackbody temperature is obtained by applying the rule-of-thumb 3 000/T μm. Thus, a very hot star such as Sirius (11 000 K), emitting bluish-white light, radiates with the peak of spectral radiant emittance occurring within the invisible ultraviolet spectrum, at wavelength 0.27 μm. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 477 33 Theory of thermography Figure 33.5 Wilhelm Wien (1864–1928) The sun (approx. 6 000 K) emits yellow light, peaking at about 0.5 μm in the middle of the visible light spectrum. At room temperature (300 K) the peak of radiant emittance lies at 9.7 μm, in the far infrared, while at the temperature of liquid nitrogen (77 K) the maximum of the almost insignificant amount of radiant emittance occurs at 38 μm, in the extreme infrared wavelengths. Figure 33.6 Planckian curves plotted on semi-log scales from 100 K to 1000 K. The dotted line represents the locus of maximum radiant emittance at each temperature as described by Wien's displacement law. 1: Spectral radiant emittance (W/cm2 (μm)); 2: Wavelength (μm). 33.3.3 Stefan-Boltzmann's law By integrating Planck’s formula from λ = 0 to λ = ∞, we obtain the total radiant emittance (Wb) of a blackbody: This is the Stefan-Boltzmann formula (after Josef Stefan, 1835–1893, and Ludwig Boltzmann, 1844–1906), which states that the total emissive power of a blackbody is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature. Graphically, Wb represents the area below the Planck curve for a particular temperature. It can be shown that the radiant emittance in the interval λ = 0 to λmax is only 25% of the total, which represents about the amount of the sun’s radiation which lies inside the visible light spectrum. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 478 33 Theory of thermography Figure 33.7 Josef Stefan (1835–1893), and Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906) Using the Stefan-Boltzmann formula to calculate the power radiated by the human body, at a temperature of 300 K and an external surface area of approx. 2 m2, we obtain 1 kW. This power loss could not be sustained if it were not for the compensating absorption of radiation from surrounding surfaces, at room temperatures which do not vary too drastically from the temperature of the body – or, of course, the addition of clothing. 33.3.4 Non-blackbody emitters So far, only blackbody radiators and blackbody radiation have been discussed. However, real objects almost never comply with these laws over an extended wavelength region – although they may approach the blackbody behavior in certain spectral intervals. For example, a certain type of white paint may appear perfectly white in the visible light spectrum, but becomes distinctly gray at about 2 μm, and beyond 3 μm it is almost black. There are three processes which can occur that prevent a real object from acting like a blackbody: a fraction of the incident radiation α may be absorbed, a fraction ρ may be reflected, and a fraction τ may be transmitted. Since all of these factors are more or less wavelength dependent, the subscript λ is used to imply the spectral dependence of their definitions. Thus: • The spectral absorptance αλ= the ratio of the spectral radiant power absorbed by an object to that incident upon it. • The spectral reflectance ρλ = the ratio of the spectral radiant power reflected by an object to that incident upon it. • The spectral transmittance τλ = the ratio of the spectral radiant power transmitted through an object to that incident upon it. The sum of these three factors must always add up to the whole at any wavelength, so we have the relation: For opaque materials τλ = 0 and the relation simplifies to: Another factor, called the emissivity, is required to describe the fraction ε of the radiant emittance of a blackbody produced by an object at a specific temperature. Thus, we have the definition: The spectral emissivity ελ= the ratio of the spectral radiant power from an object to that from a blackbody at the same temperature and wavelength. Expressed mathematically, this can be written as the ratio of the spectral emittance of the object to that of a blackbody as follows: Generally speaking, there are three types of radiation source, distinguished by the ways in which the spectral emittance of each varies with wavelength. • A blackbody, for which ελ = ε = 1 • A graybody, for which ελ = ε = constant less than 1 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 479 33 Theory of thermography • A selective radiator, for which ε varies with wavelength According to Kirchhoff’s law, for any material the spectral emissivity and spectral absorptance of a body are equal at any specified temperature and wavelength. That is: From this we obtain, for an opaque material (since αλ + ρλ = 1): For highly polished materials ελ approaches zero, so that for a perfectly reflecting material (i.e. a perfect mirror) we have: For a graybody radiator, the Stefan-Boltzmann formula becomes: This states that the total emissive power of a graybody is the same as a blackbody at the same temperature reduced in proportion to the value of ε from the graybody. Figure 33.8 Spectral radiant emittance of three types of radiators. 1: Spectral radiant emittance; 2: Wavelength; 3: Blackbody; 4: Selective radiator; 5: Graybody. Figure 33.9 Spectral emissivity of three types of radiators. 1: Spectral emissivity; 2: Wavelength; 3: Blackbody; 4: Graybody; 5: Selective radiator. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 480 33 Theory of thermography 33.4 Infrared semi-transparent materials Consider now a non-metallic, semi-transparent body – let us say, in the form of a thick flat plate of plastic material. When the plate is heated, radiation generated within its volume must work its way toward the surfaces through the material in which it is partially absorbed. Moreover, when it arrives at the surface, some of it is reflected back into the interior. The back-reflected radiation is again partially absorbed, but some of it arrives at the other surface, through which most of it escapes; part of it is reflected back again. Although the progressive reflections become weaker and weaker they must all be added up when the total emittance of the plate is sought. When the resulting geometrical series is summed, the effective emissivity of a semi-transparent plate is obtained as: When the plate becomes opaque this formula is reduced to the single formula: This last relation is a particularly convenient one, because it is often easier to measure reflectance than to measure emissivity directly. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 481 34 The measurement formula As already mentioned, when viewing an object, the camera receives radiation not only from the object itself. It also collects radiation from the surroundings reflected via the object surface. Both these radiation contributions become attenuated to some extent by the atmosphere in the measurement path. To this comes a third radiation contribution from the atmosphere itself. This description of the measurement situation, as illustrated in the figure below, is so far a fairly true description of the real conditions. What has been neglected could for instance be sun light scattering in the atmosphere or stray radiation from intense radiation sources outside the field of view. Such disturbances are difficult to quantify, however, in most cases they are fortunately small enough to be neglected. In case they are not negligible, the measurement configuration is likely to be such that the risk for disturbance is obvious, at least to a trained operator. It is then his responsibility to modify the measurement situation to avoid the disturbance e.g. by changing the viewing direction, shielding off intense radiation sources etc. Accepting the description above, we can use the figure below to derive a formula for the calculation of the object temperature from the calibrated camera output. Figure 34.1 A schematic representation of the general thermographic measurement situation.1: Surroundings; 2: Object; 3: Atmosphere; 4: Camera Assume that the received radiation power W from a blackbody source of temperature Tsource on short distance generates a camera output signal Usource that is proportional to the power input (power linear camera). We can then write (Equation 1): or, with simplified notation: where C is a constant. Should the source be a graybody with emittance ε, the received radiation would consequently be εWsource. We are now ready to write the three collected radiation power terms: 1. Emission from the object = ετWobj, where ε is the emittance of the object and τ is the transmittance of the atmosphere. The object temperature is Tobj. #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 482 34 The measurement formula 2. Reflected emission from ambient sources = (1 – ε)τWrefl, where (1 – ε) is the reflectance of the object. The ambient sources have the temperature Trefl. It has here been assumed that the temperature Trefl is the same for all emitting surfaces within the halfsphere seen from a point on the object surface. This is of course sometimes a simplification of the true situation. It is, however, a necessary simplification in order to derive a workable formula, and Trefl can – at least theoretically – be given a value that represents an efficient temperature of a complex surrounding. Note also that we have assumed that the emittance for the surroundings = 1. This is correct in accordance with Kirchhoff’s law: All radiation impinging on the surrounding surfaces will eventually be absorbed by the same surfaces. Thus the emittance = 1. (Note though that the latest discussion requires the complete sphere around the object to be considered.) 3. Emission from the atmosphere = (1 – τ)τWatm, where (1 – τ) is the emittance of the atmosphere. The temperature of the atmosphere is Tatm. The total received radiation power can now be written (Equation 2): We multiply each term by the constant C of Equation 1 and replace the CW products by the corresponding U according to the same equation, and get (Equation 3): Solve Equation 3 for Uobj (Equation 4): This is the general measurement formula used in all the FLIR Systems thermographic equipment. The voltages of the formula are: Table 34.1 Voltages Uobj Calculated camera output voltage for a blackbody of temperature Tobj i.e. a voltage that can be directly converted into true requested object temperature. Utot Measured camera output voltage for the actual case. Urefl Theoretical camera output voltage for a blackbody of temperature Trefl according to the calibration. Uatm Theoretical camera output voltage for a blackbody of temperature Tatm according to the calibration. The operator has to supply a number of parameter values for the calculation: • • • • • the object emittance ε, the relative humidity, Tatm object distance (Dobj) the (effective) temperature of the object surroundings, or the reflected ambient temperature Trefl, and • the temperature of the atmosphere Tatm This task could sometimes be a heavy burden for the operator since there are normally no easy ways to find accurate values of emittance and atmospheric transmittance for the actual case. The two temperatures are normally less of a problem provided the surroundings do not contain large and intense radiation sources. A natural question in this connection is: How important is it to know the right values of these parameters? It could though be of interest to get a feeling for this problem already here by looking into some different measurement cases and compare the relative #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 483 34 The measurement formula magnitudes of the three radiation terms. This will give indications about when it is important to use correct values of which parameters. The figures below illustrates the relative magnitudes of the three radiation contributions for three different object temperatures, two emittances, and two spectral ranges: SW and LW. Remaining parameters have the following fixed values: • τ = 0.88 • Trefl = +20°C (+68°F) • Tatm = +20°C (+68°F) It is obvious that measurement of low object temperatures are more critical than measuring high temperatures since the ‘disturbing’ radiation sources are relatively much stronger in the first case. Should also the object emittance be low, the situation would be still more difficult. We have finally to answer a question about the importance of being allowed to use the calibration curve above the highest calibration point, what we call extrapolation. Imagine that we in a certain case measure Utot = 4.5 volts. The highest calibration point for the camera was in the order of 4.1 volts, a value unknown to the operator. Thus, even if the object happened to be a blackbody, i.e. Uobj = Utot, we are actually performing extrapolation of the calibration curve when converting 4.5 volts into temperature. Let us now assume that the object is not black, it has an emittance of 0.75, and the transmittance is 0.92. We also assume that the two second terms of Equation 4 amount to 0.5 volts together. Computation of Uobj by means of Equation 4 then results in Uobj = 4.5 / 0.75 / 0.92 – 0.5 = 6.0. This is a rather extreme extrapolation, particularly when considering that the video amplifier might limit the output to 5 volts! Note, though, that the application of the calibration curve is a theoretical procedure where no electronic or other limitations exist. We trust that if there had been no signal limitations in the camera, and if it had been calibrated far beyond 5 volts, the resulting curve would have been very much the same as our real curve extrapolated beyond 4.1 volts, provided the calibration algorithm is based on radiation physics, like the FLIR Systems algorithm. Of course there must be a limit to such extrapolations. Figure 34.2 Relative magnitudes of radiation sources under varying measurement conditions (SW camera). 1: Object temperature; 2: Emittance; Obj: Object radiation; Refl: Reflected radiation; Atm: atmosphere radiation. Fixed parameters: τ = 0.88; Trefl = 20°C (+68°F); Tatm = 20°C (+68°F). #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 484 34 The measurement formula Figure 34.3 Relative magnitudes of radiation sources under varying measurement conditions (LW camera). 1: Object temperature; 2: Emittance; Obj: Object radiation; Refl: Reflected radiation; Atm: atmosphere radiation. Fixed parameters: τ = 0.88; Trefl = 20°C (+68°F); Tatm = 20°C (+68°F). #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 485 35 Emissivity tables This section presents a compilation of emissivity data from the infrared literature and measurements made by FLIR Systems. 35.1 References 1. Mikaél A. Bramson: Infrared Radiation, A Handbook for Applications, Plenum press, N.Y. 2. William L. Wolfe, George J. Zissis: The Infrared Handbook, Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy, Washington, D.C. 3. Madding, R. P.: Thermographic Instruments and systems. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin – Extension, Department of Engineering and Applied Science. 4. William L. Wolfe: Handbook of Military Infrared Technology, Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy, Washington, D.C. 5. Jones, Smith, Probert: External thermography of buildings..., Proc. of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol.110, Industrial and Civil Applications of Infrared Technology, June 1977 London. 6. Paljak, Pettersson: Thermography of Buildings, Swedish Building Research Institute, Stockholm 1972. 7. Vlcek, J: Determination of emissivity with imaging radiometers and some emissivities at λ = 5 µm. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 8. Kern: Evaluation of infrared emission of clouds and ground as measured by weather satellites, Defence Documentation Center, AD 617 417. 9. Öhman, Claes: Emittansmätningar med AGEMA E-Box. Teknisk rapport, AGEMA 1999. (Emittance measurements using AGEMA E-Box. Technical report, AGEMA 1999.) 10. Matteï, S., Tang-Kwor, E: Emissivity measurements for Nextel Velvet coating 811-21 between –36°C AND 82°C. 11. Lohrengel & Todtenhaupt (1996) 12. ITC Technical publication 32. 13. ITC Technical publication 29. 14. Schuster, Norbert and Kolobrodov, Valentin G. Infrarotthermographie. Berlin: WileyVCH, 2000. Note The emissivity values in the table below are recorded using a shortwave (SW) camera. The values should be regarded as recommendations only and used with caution. 35.2 Tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference 3M type 35 Vinyl electrical tape (several colors) < 80 LW ≈ 0.96 13 3M type 88 Black vinyl electrical tape < 105 LW ≈ 0.96 13 3M type 88 Black vinyl electrical tape < 105 MW < 0.96 13 3M type Super 33 Black vinyl electrical tape < 80 LW ≈ 0.96 13 Aluminum anodized sheet 100 0.55 Aluminum anodized, black, dull 70 SW 0.67 Aluminum anodized, black, dull 70 LW 0.95 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 486 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Aluminum anodized, light gray, dull 70 SW 0.61 Aluminum anodized, light gray, dull 70 LW 0.97 Aluminum as received, plate 100 0.09 Aluminum as received, sheet 100 0.09 Aluminum cast, blast cleaned 70 SW 0.47 Aluminum cast, blast cleaned 70 LW 0.46 Aluminum dipped in HNO3, plate 100 0.05 Aluminum foil 27 10 µm 0.04 Aluminum foil 27 3 µm 0.09 Aluminum oxidized, strongly 50–500 0.2–0.3 Aluminum polished 50–100 0.04–0.06 Aluminum polished plate 100 0.05 Aluminum polished, sheet 100 0.05 Aluminum rough surface 20–50 0.06–0.07 Aluminum roughened 27 10 µm 0.18 Aluminum roughened 27 3 µm 0.28 Aluminum sheet, 4 samples differently scratched 70 SW 0.05–0.08 Aluminum sheet, 4 samples differently scratched 70 LW 0.03–0.06 Aluminum vacuum deposited 20 0.04 Aluminum weathered, heavily 17 SW 0.83–0.94 20 0.60 Aluminum bronze Aluminum hydroxide powder 0.28 Aluminum oxide activated, powder 0.46 Aluminum oxide pure, powder (alumina) 0.16 Asbestos board 0.96 Asbestos fabric 0.78 Asbestos floor tile 35 SW 0.94 Asbestos paper 40–400 0.93–0.95 Asbestos powder 0.40–0.60 Asbestos slate 20 0.96 LLW 0.967 Asphalt paving 20 Brass dull, tarnished 20–350 0.22 Brass oxidized 100 0.61 Brass oxidized 70 SW 0.04–0.09 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 487 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Brass oxidized 70 LW 0.03–0.07 Brass oxidized at 600°C 200–600 0.59–0.61 Brass polished 200 0.03 Brass polished, highly 100 0.03 Brass rubbed with 80grit emery 20 0.20 Brass sheet, rolled 20 0.06 Brass sheet, worked with emery 20 0.2 Brick alumina 17 SW 0.68 Brick common 17 SW 0.86–0.81 Brick Dinas silica, glazed, rough 1100 0.85 Brick Dinas silica, refractory 1000 0.66 Brick Dinas silica, unglazed, rough 1000 0.80 Brick firebrick 17 SW 0.68 Brick fireclay 1000 0.75 Brick fireclay 1200 0.59 Brick fireclay 20 0.85 Brick masonry 35 SW 0.94 Brick masonry, plastered 20 0.94 Brick red, common 20 0.93 Brick red, rough 20 0.88–0.93 Brick refractory, corundum 1000 0.46 Brick refractory, magnesite 1000–1300 0.38 Brick refractory, strongly radiating 500–1000 0.8–0.9 Brick refractory, weakly radiating 500–1000 0.65–0.75 Brick silica, 95% SiO2 1230 0.66 Brick sillimanite, 33% SiO2, 64% Al2O3 1500 0.29 Brick waterproof 17 SW 0.87 Bronze phosphor bronze 70 SW 0.08 Bronze phosphor bronze 70 LW 0.06 Bronze polished 50 0.1 Bronze porous, rough 50–150 0.55 Bronze powder 0.76–0.80 Carbon candle soot 0.95 Carbon charcoal powder 0.96 Carbon graphite powder 0.97 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 20 488 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Carbon graphite, filed surface 20 0.98 Carbon lampblack 20–400 0.95–0.97 Chipboard untreated 20 SW 0.90 Chromium polished 50 0.10 Chromium polished 500–1000 0.28–0.38 Clay fired 70 0.91 Cloth black 20 0.98 20 0.92 Concrete Concrete dry 36 SW 0.95 Concrete rough 17 SW 0.97 Concrete walkway LLW 0.974 Copper commercial, burnished 20 0.07 Copper electrolytic, carefully polished 80 0.018 Copper electrolytic, polished –34 0.006 Copper molten 1100–1300 0.13–0.15 Copper oxidized 50 0.6–0.7 Copper oxidized to blackness 0.88 Copper oxidized, black 27 0.78 Copper oxidized, heavily 20 0.78 Copper polished 50–100 0.02 Copper polished 100 0.03 Copper polished, commercial 27 0.03 Copper polished, mechanical 22 0.015 Copper pure, carefully prepared surface 22 0.008 Copper scraped 27 0.07 Copper dioxide powder 0.84 Copper oxide red, powder 0.70 0.89 80 0.85 20 0.9 Ebonite Emery coarse Enamel Enamel lacquer 20 0.85–0.95 Fiber board hard, untreated 20 SW 0.85 Fiber board masonite 70 SW 0.75 Fiber board masonite 70 LW 0.88 Fiber board particle board 70 SW 0.77 Fiber board particle board 70 LW 0.89 Fiber board porous, untreated 20 SW 0.85 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 489 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Glass pane (float glass) non-coated 20 LW 0.97 14 Gold polished 130 0.018 Gold polished, carefully 200–600 0.02–0.03 Gold polished, highly 100 0.02 Granite polished 20 LLW 0.849 Granite rough 21 LLW 0.879 Granite rough, 4 different samples 70 SW 0.95–0.97 Granite rough, 4 different samples 70 LW 0.77–0.87 20 0.8–0.9 Gypsum Ice: See Water Iron and steel cold rolled 70 SW 0.20 Iron and steel cold rolled 70 LW 0.09 Iron and steel covered with red rust 20 0.61–0.85 Iron and steel electrolytic 100 0.05 Iron and steel electrolytic 22 0.05 Iron and steel electrolytic 260 0.07 Iron and steel electrolytic, carefully polished 175–225 0.05–0.06 Iron and steel freshly worked with emery 20 0.24 Iron and steel ground sheet 950–1100 0.55–0.61 Iron and steel heavily rusted sheet 20 0.69 Iron and steel hot rolled 130 0.60 Iron and steel hot rolled 20 0.77 Iron and steel oxidized 100 0.74 Iron and steel oxidized 100 0.74 Iron and steel oxidized 1227 0.89 Iron and steel oxidized 125–525 0.78–0.82 Iron and steel oxidized 200 0.79 Iron and steel oxidized 200–600 0.80 Iron and steel oxidized strongly 50 0.88 Iron and steel oxidized strongly 500 0.98 Iron and steel polished 100 0.07 Iron and steel polished 400–1000 0.14–0.38 Iron and steel polished sheet 750–1050 0.52–0.56 Iron and steel rolled sheet 50 0.56 Iron and steel rolled, freshly 20 0.24 Iron and steel rough, plane surface 50 0.95–0.98 Iron and steel rusted red, sheet 22 0.69 Iron and steel rusted, heavily 17 SW 0.96 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 490 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Iron and steel rusty, red 20 0.69 Iron and steel shiny oxide layer, sheet, 20 0.82 Iron and steel shiny, etched 150 0.16 Iron and steel wrought, carefully polished 40–250 0.28 Iron galvanized heavily oxidized 70 SW 0.64 Iron galvanized heavily oxidized 70 LW 0.85 Iron galvanized sheet 92 0.07 Iron galvanized sheet, burnished 30 0.23 Iron galvanized sheet, oxidized 20 0.28 Iron tinned sheet 24 0.064 Iron, cast casting 50 0.81 Iron, cast ingots 1000 0.95 Iron, cast liquid 1300 0.28 Iron, cast machined 800–1000 0.60–0.70 Iron, cast oxidized 100 0.64 Iron, cast oxidized 260 0.66 Iron, cast oxidized 38 0.63 Iron, cast oxidized 538 0.76 Iron, cast oxidized at 600°C 200–600 0.64–0.78 Iron, cast polished 200 0.21 Iron, cast polished 38 0.21 Iron, cast polished 40 0.21 Iron, cast unworked 900–1100 0.87–0.95 Krylon Ultra-flat black 1602 Flat black Room temperature up to 175 LW ≈ 0.96 12 Krylon Ultra-flat black 1602 Flat black Room temperature up to 175 MW ≈ 0.97 12 Lacquer 3 colors sprayed on Aluminum 70 SW 0.50–0.53 Lacquer 3 colors sprayed on Aluminum 70 LW 0.92–0.94 Lacquer Aluminum on rough surface 20 0.4 Lacquer bakelite 80 0.83 Lacquer black, dull 40–100 0.96–0.98 Lacquer black, matte 100 0.97 Lacquer black, shiny, sprayed on iron 20 0.87 Lacquer heat–resistant 100 0.92 Lacquer white 100 0.92 Lacquer white 40–100 0.8–0.95 Lead oxidized at 200°C 200 0.63 Lead oxidized, gray 20 0.28 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 491 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Lead oxidized, gray 22 0.28 Lead shiny 250 0.08 Lead unoxidized, polished 100 0.05 100 0.93 100 0.93 0.75–0.80 Lead red Lead red, powder Leather tanned Lime 0.3–0.4 Magnesium 22 0.07 Magnesium 260 0.13 538 0.18 20 0.07 0.86 1500–2200 0.19–0.26 600–1000 0.08–0.13 700–2500 0.1–0.3 17 SW 0.87 Magnesium Magnesium polished Magnesium powder Molybdenum Molybdenum Molybdenum filament Mortar Mortar dry 36 SW 0.94 Nextel Velvet 811-21 Black Flat black –60–150 LW > 0.97 10 and 11 Nichrome rolled 700 0.25 Nichrome sandblasted 700 0.70 Nichrome wire, clean 50 0.65 Nichrome wire, clean 500–1000 0.71–0.79 Nichrome wire, oxidized 50–500 0.95–0.98 Nickel bright matte 122 0.041 Nickel commercially pure, polished 100 0.045 Nickel commercially pure, polished 200–400 0.07–0.09 Nickel electrolytic 22 0.04 Nickel electrolytic 260 0.07 Nickel electrolytic 38 0.06 Nickel electrolytic 538 0.10 Nickel electroplated on iron, polished 22 0.045 Nickel electroplated on iron, unpolished 20 0.11–0.40 Nickel electroplated on iron, unpolished 22 0.11 Nickel electroplated, polished 20 0.05 Nickel oxidized 1227 0.85 Nickel oxidized 200 0.37 Nickel oxidized 227 0.37 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 492 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Nickel oxidized at 600°C 200–600 0.37–0.48 Nickel polished 122 0.045 Nickel wire 200–1000 0.1–0.2 1000–1250 0.75–0.86 Nickel oxide Nickel oxide 500–650 0.52–0.59 Oil, lubricating 0.025 mm film 20 0.27 Oil, lubricating 0.050 mm film 20 0.46 Oil, lubricating 0.125 mm film 20 0.72 Oil, lubricating film on Ni base: Ni base only 20 0.05 Oil, lubricating thick coating 20 0.82 Paint 8 different colors and qualities 70 SW 0.88–0.96 Paint 8 different colors and qualities 70 LW 0.92–0.94 Paint Aluminum, various ages 50–100 0.27–0.67 Paint cadmium yellow 0.28–0.33 Paint chrome green 0.65–0.70 Paint cobalt blue 0.7–0.8 Paint oil 17 SW 0.87 Paint oil based, average of 16 colors 100 0.94 Paint oil, black flat 20 SW 0.94 Paint oil, black gloss 20 SW 0.92 Paint oil, gray flat 20 SW 0.97 Paint oil, gray gloss 20 SW 0.96 Paint oil, various colors 100 0.92–0.96 Paint plastic, black 20 SW 0.95 Paint plastic, white 20 SW 0.84 Paper 4 different colors 70 SW 0.68–0.74 Paper 4 different colors 70 LW 0.92–0.94 Paper black 0.90 Paper black, dull 0.94 Paper black, dull 70 SW 0.86 Paper black, dull 70 LW 0.89 Paper blue, dark 0.84 Paper coated with black lacquer 0.93 Paper green 0.85 Paper red 0.76 Paper white 20 0.7–0.9 Paper white bond 20 0.93 Paper white, 3 different glosses 70 SW 0.76–0.78 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 493 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Paper white, 3 different glosses 70 LW 0.88–0.90 Paper yellow 0.72 17 SW 0.86 Plaster plasterboard, untreated 20 SW 0.90 Plaster rough coat 20 0.91 Plastic glass fibre laminate (printed circ. board) 70 SW 0.94 Plastic glass fibre laminate (printed circ. board) 70 LW 0.91 Plastic polyurethane isolation board 70 LW 0.55 Plastic polyurethane isolation board 70 SW 0.29 Plastic PVC, plastic floor, dull, structured 70 SW 0.94 Plastic PVC, plastic floor, dull, structured 70 LW 0.93 Platinum 100 0.05 Platinum 1000–1500 0.14–0.18 Platinum 1094 0.18 Platinum 17 0.016 Platinum 22 0.03 Platinum 260 0.06 Platinum 538 0.10 Plaster Platinum pure, polished 200–600 0.05–0.10 Platinum ribbon 900–1100 0.12–0.17 Platinum wire 1400 0.18 Platinum wire 500–1000 0.10–0.16 Platinum wire 50–200 0.06–0.07 Porcelain glazed 20 0.92 Porcelain white, shiny 0.70–0.75 Rubber hard 20 0.95 Rubber soft, gray, rough 20 0.95 Sand Sand 0.60 20 0.90 Sandstone polished 19 LLW 0.909 Sandstone rough 19 LLW 0.935 Silver polished 100 0.03 Silver pure, polished 200–600 0.02–0.03 Skin human 32 0.98 Slag boiler 0–100 0.97–0.93 Slag boiler 1400–1800 0.69–0.67 Slag boiler 200–500 0.89–0.78 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 494 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Slag boiler 600–1200 0.76–0.70 Soil dry 20 0.92 Soil saturated with water 20 0.95 Stainless steel alloy, 8% Ni, 18% Cr 500 0.35 Stainless steel rolled 700 0.45 Stainless steel sandblasted 700 0.70 Stainless steel sheet, polished 70 SW 0.18 Stainless steel sheet, polished 70 LW 0.14 Stainless steel sheet, untreated, somewhat scratched 70 SW 0.30 Stainless steel sheet, untreated, somewhat scratched 70 LW 0.28 Stainless steel type 18-8, buffed 20 0.16 Stainless steel type 18-8, oxidized at 800°C 60 0.85 Stucco rough, lime 10–90 0.91 Styrofoam insulation 37 SW 0.60 0.79–0.84 Tar paper 20 0.91–0.93 Tile glazed 17 SW 0.94 Tin burnished 20–50 0.04–0.06 Tin tin–plated sheet iron 100 0.07 Titanium oxidized at 540°C 1000 0.60 Titanium oxidized at 540°C 200 0.40 Titanium oxidized at 540°C 500 0.50 Titanium polished 1000 0.36 Titanium polished 200 0.15 Titanium polished 500 0.20 Tungsten 1500–2200 0.24–0.31 Tungsten 200 0.05 Tungsten 600–1000 0.1–0.16 Snow: See Water Tar Tungsten filament 3300 0.39 Varnish flat 20 SW 0.93 Varnish on oak parquet floor 70 SW 0.90 Varnish on oak parquet floor 70 LW 0.90–0.93 Wallpaper slight pattern, light gray 20 SW 0.85 Wallpaper slight pattern, red 20 SW 0.90 Water distilled 20 0.96 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 495 35 Emissivity tables Table 35.1 T: Total spectrum; SW: 2–5 µm; LW: 8–14 µm, LLW: 6.5–20 µm; 1: Material; 2: Specification; 3:Temperature in °C; 4: Spectrum; 5: Emissivity: 6:Reference (continued) Water frost crystals –10 0.98 Water ice, covered with heavy frost 0.98 Water ice, smooth 0.97 Water ice, smooth –10 0.96 Water layer >0.1 mm thick 0–100 0.95–0.98 Water snow 0.8 Water snow –10 0.85 Wood 17 SW 0.98 Wood 19 LLW 0.962 0.5–0.7 Wood ground Wood pine, 4 different samples 70 SW 0.67–0.75 Wood pine, 4 different samples 70 LW 0.81–0.89 Wood planed 20 0.8–0.9 Wood planed oak 20 0.90 Wood planed oak 70 SW 0.77 Wood planed oak 70 LW 0.88 Wood plywood, smooth, dry 36 SW 0.82 Wood plywood, untreated 20 SW 0.83 Wood white, damp 20 0.7–0.8 Zinc oxidized at 400°C 400 0.11 Zinc oxidized surface 1000–1200 0.50–0.60 Zinc polished 200–300 0.04–0.05 Zinc sheet 50 0.20 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 496 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 497 A note on the technical production of this publication This publication was produced using XML — the eXtensible Markup Language. For more information about XML, please visit http://www.w3.org/XML/ A note on the typeface used in this publication This publication was typeset using Linotype Helvetica™ World. Helvetica™ was designed by Max Miedinger (1910–1980) LOEF (List Of Effective Files) T501011.xml; en-US; AL; 45866; 2017-10-18 T505552.xml; en-US; 9599; 2013-11-05 T505469.xml; en-US; 39689; 2017-01-25 T505013.xml; en-US; 39689; 2017-01-25 T505652.xml; en-US; 39869; 2017-01-31 T505192.xml; en-US; 39872; 2017-01-31 T505193.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505194.xml; en-US; 39872; 2017-01-31 T505653.xml; en-US; 39869; 2017-01-31 T505422.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505654.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505664.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505655.xml; en-US; 39872; 2017-01-31 T505656.xml; en-US; 39869; 2017-01-31 T505657.xml; en-US; 39867; 2017-01-31 T505658.xml; en-US; 41842; 2017-04-03 T505411.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505659.xml; en-US; 39867; 2017-01-31 T505660.xml; en-US; 39571; 2017-01-20 T505661.xml; en-US; 39867; 2017-01-31 T505662.xml; en-US; 39867; 2017-01-31 T505765.xml; en-US; 39867; 2017-01-31 T505663.xml; en-US; 39869; 2017-01-31 T505789.xml; en-US; 39871; 2017-01-31 T505476.xml; en-US; 39581; 2017-01-20 T505012.xml; en-US; 41563; 2017-03-23 T505007.xml; en-US; 42810; 2017-05-23 T506125.xml; en-US; 40753; 2017-03-02 T505000.xml; en-US; 39687; 2017-01-25 T505005.xml; en-US; 43349; 2017-06-14 T505001.xml; en-US; 41563; 2017-03-23 T505006.xml; en-US; 41563; 2017-03-23 T505002.xml; en-US; 39512; 2017-01-18 #T559880; r. AL/45866/46124; en-US 498 Website last page http://www.flir.com Customer support http://support.flir.com Copyright © 2017, FLIR Systems, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. Disclaimer Specifications subject to change without further notice. Models and accessories subject to regional market considerations. License procedures may apply. Products described herein may be subject to US Export Regulations. Please refer to exportquestions@flir.com with any questions. Publ. No.: Release: Commit: Head: Language: Modified: Formatted: T559880 AL 45866 46124 en-US 2017-10-18 2017-10-31
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf Linearized : No PDF Version : 1.7 Page Count : 42 Page Layout : SinglePage Page Mode : UseOutlines Language : en-us Flir Scms Spath : 140 Flir Scms Xtitle : Applies to: T600, T600bx, T610, T620, T620bx, T630, T630sc, T640, T640bx, T650sc, T660. Flir Scms Type : Flir Scms Title : Manual: FLIR T6xx series Flir Scms Swver : Flir Scms Snappl : Flir Scms Release : AL Flir Scms Publno : T559880 Flir Scms Pnappl : Applies to: 55903-1015, 55903-0922, 55903-1016, 55903-1022, 55903-1007, 55903-1008, 55903-1017, 55903-1522, 55903-2823, 55903-2822, 55903-2923, 55903-2922, 55903-8022, 55903-3922, 55903-4022, 55903-5023, 55903-5022, 55903-5125, 55903-5122, 55903-5123, 55903-5124, 55903-5223, 55903-5222, 55903-5623, 55903-5622, 55903-5723, 55903-5722, 55903-5823, 55903-5822, 55904-6222, 55904-6322, 55904-6422, 55904-8023, 55904-8123, 55904- 8124, 55904-8223, 55904-6823, 55904-6822, 55904-6925, 55904-6922, 55904-6923, 55904-6924, 55904-7023, 55904-7022, 55904-7423, 55904-7422, 55904-7523, 55904-7522, 55904-7623, 55904-7622, 55904-7723, 55904-7823, 55904-7824, 55904-7825, 55904-7923, 55904-8423, 55904-8422, 55904-8523, 55904-8522, 55904-8524, 55904-8525, 55904-8623, 55904-8622. Flir Scms Modified : 2017-10-18 12:48 Flir Scms Lang : en-US Flir Scms Head : 46124 Flir Scms Commit : 45866 Config File : C:\Program Files\PTC\Arbortext PE 6.1\app\standard.appcf Stylesheet : C:\Program Files\PTC\Arbortext PE 6.1/application/se.simonsoft.flir/doctypes/FLIR/flir.style PTC Arbortext Build : R61M030-219 Keywords : Support:, http://support.flir.com, —, Training:, http://www.infraredtraining.com Subject : Corporate website: http://www.flir.com Author : Copyright 2017, FLIR Systems, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. EP Sprocessor : PStill version 1.84.36 Print Engine : Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 11.0.3257/W Library-x64 Creator : PDFsam Basic v3.3.2 Create Date : 2017:10:31 13:02:37+01:00 Modify Date : 2017:11:21 13:46:00+01:00 Producer : SAMBox 1.1.6 (www.sejda.org)EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools