FCC 报告 凱昱 150958 REPORT

150248 Fcc Report 150248_FCC_REPORT 150248_FCC_REPORT CertsReports 150248 ProductFiles assets.mhint

: Pdf 150958 Fcc Report 150958__FCC_REPORT CertsReports 150958 ProductFiles

Open the PDF directly: View PDF .
Page Count: 18

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co. Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 1 of 18

FCC Verification

TEST REPORT

Prepared For : Dongguan KaiWin Electronics Co,.Ltd

Add: Nanfang lndustrial Zone, Beizha, Humen Town, Dongguan City,

Guangdong Province, P.R. China

Product Name: USB 2.0 extended cable

Trade Name N.A.

Model : KWUU001

Prepared By : Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd

Add: 17L, Jinfenghaoting Building, Qianjin Road, Baoan 26 District ,

Shenzhen City, 518101, P. R. China

Test Date: April 25, 2014 – April 28, 2014

Date of Report : April 28, 2014

Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Shenzhen SIT

Testing Technology Co., Ltd. This document may be altered or revised by Shenzhen SIT Testing

Technology Co., Ltd, personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. The test

results in the report only apply to the tested sample.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 2 of 18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 3

2EUT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 4

3TEST METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 5

3.1 DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE ......................................................................................................... 5

3.2EUT SYSTEM OPERATION .................................................................................................................... 5

4SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST ................................................................................... 6

4.1DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ..................................................................................................... 6

4.2CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ..................................................................................... 6

5FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS ...................................................................................... 7

5.1 FACILITIES .............................................................................................................................................. 7

5.2 ACCREDITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 7

5.3 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ........................................................................................................... 7

6 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ............................................................................. 8

6.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ........................................................................ 8

6.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 8

6.3 TEST PROCEDURES .............................................................................................................................. 9

6.4 TEST SETUP ......................................................................................................................................... 10

6.5 TEST RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 10

7 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ............................................................................... 11

7.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ........................................................................... 11

7.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 11

7.3 TEST PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................ 12

7.4 TEST SETUP ......................................................................................................................................... 14

7.5 TEST RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 14

8PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION .............................................................. 17

9 PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT ....................................................................................................... 18

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 4 of 18

2 2BEUT DESCRIPTION

Product USB 2.0 extended cable

Model KWUU001

Trade Mark N.A.

Applicant Dongguan KaiWin Electronics Co,.Ltd

Housing material Plastic

EUT Type Engineering Sample. Product Sample,

Mass Product Sample.

Serial Number N/A

Power Rating DC5V supplied by PC

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 5 of 18

3 2BTEST METHODOLOGY

3.1 9BDECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE

The EUT was tested together with the thereinafter additional components, and a

configuration, which produced the worst emission levels, was selected and recorded

in this report.

The following test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test:

Pre-Test Mode

Mode

Emission Radiated Emission Mode : Normal working

After the preliminary scan, the following test mode was found to produce the highest

emission level.

The Worst Test Mode

Mode

Emission Radiated Emission Mode : Normal working

Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission

mode was chosen for all final test items.

3.2 10BEUT SYSTEM OPERATION

1. Set up EUT with the relative support equipments.

2. Make sure the EUT worked normally during the test.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 6 of 18

4 3BSETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST

4.1 11BDESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS

The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary

accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form

a representative test configuration during the tests.

No. Equipment Model No. Serial No. FCC ID Trade Name Data Cable Power Cord

N/A / / / / / / /

Note:

1) All the equipment/cables were placed in the worst-case configuration to maximize the emission during the

test.

2) Grounding was established in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and conditions for the

intended use.

4.2 12BCONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST

（EUT: USB 2.0 extended cable）

EUT

Computer Load

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 7 of 18

5 4BFACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS

5.1 13BFACILITIES

All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at SIT LAB.

The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR

Publication 22. All receiving equipment conforms to CISPR Publication 16-1, “Radio

Interference Measuring Apparatus and Measurement Methods.”

5.2 14BACCREDITATIONS

Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following approval agencies according

to ISO/IEC 17025.

Copies of granted accreditation certificates are available for downloading from our web site,

http:// www.sit-cert.com

USA FCC

TIMCO

Germany TUV

EMCC

Japan VCCI

Canada INDUSTRY CANADA

5.3 15BMEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for

tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:

Measurement Frequency Uncertainty

Conducted emissions 9kHz~30MHz +/- 3.59dB

Radiated emissions

Horizontal 30MHz ~ 200MHz +/- 4.77dB

200MHz ~1000MHz +/- 4.93dB

Vertical 30MHz ~ 200MHz +/- 5.04dB

200MHz ~1000MHz +/- 4.93dB

This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the

95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 8 of 18

5B6 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT

16B6.1. LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT

FREQUENCY (MHz) Class A (dBuV) Class B (dBuV)

Quasi-peak Average Quasi-peak Average

0.15 - 0.5 79 66 66 - 56 56 - 46

0.50 - 5.0 73 60 56 46

5.0 - 30.0 73 60 60 50

NOTE:

(1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.

(2) The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz.

(3) All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and

apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above.

17B6.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS

Conducted Emission Shielding Room Test Site 743

Name of Equipment Manufacturer Model Serial Number Calibration Due

EMI Test Receiver ROHDE&SCHWARZ ESCI 100005 10/24/2014

LISN AFJ LS16 16010222119 10/29/2014

LISN Meestec AN3016 04/10040 10/28/2014

NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable

to International system of unit (SI).

2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 9 of 18

18B6.3 TEST PROCEDURES

26BProcedure of Preliminary Test

The EUT and Support equipment, if needed, was set up as per the test configuration to

simulate typical usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a

wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as

per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When

the EUT is a floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane, which has a 3-12

mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.

All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4.

All support equipment power received from a second LISN.

The EUT test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current

carrying line of the EUT using an EMI Test Receiver connected to the LISN powering the

EUT.

The Receiver scanned from 9 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes.

During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation.

The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test.

After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing the

highest emission level.

The EUT configuration and worse cable configuration of the above highest emission

levels were recorded for reference of the final test.

27BProcedure of Final Test

EUT and support equipment were set up on the test bench as per the configuration with

highest emission level in the preliminary test.

A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six

highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer

in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare

reading to the applicable limit.

The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 10 of 18

19B6.4.TEST SETUP

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the

Test Configuration.

20B6.5. TEST RESULTS

Model No. KWUU001 6dB

Bandwidth 10 KHz

Environmental

Conditions 26C, 60% RH Test Mode Normal working

Detector Function Peak / Quasi-peak/AV Test Result N.A.

Test By DebeYu

NOTE: 1. L1 = Line One (Live Line) / L2 = Line Two (Neutral Line).

2. “---” denotes the emission level was or more than 2dB below the Average limit,

so no re-check anymore.

Freq. = Emission frequency in MHz

Reading level(dBuV) = Receiver reading

Corr. Factor (dB) = Attenuator Factor+ Cable loss

Level (dBuV) = Reading level(dBuV) + Corr. Factor (dB)

Limit (dBuV) = Limit stated in standard

Margin (dB) = Level (dBuV) – Limits (dBuV)

Q.P.=Quasi-Peak

EUT

LISN

EMI receive

r

Reference ground plane

Vert. reference plane

40cm

80cm

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 11 of 18

6B7 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT

21B7.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Maximum permissible level of Radiated Emission measured at 3 meter

FREQUENCY (MHz) dBuV/m (At 3m)

Class B

30~88 40.00

88~216 43.50

216~960 46.00

960~1000 54.00

NOTE: (1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.

(2) Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m).

7.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS

Radiated Emission Test Site 966

Name of Equipment Manufacturer Model Serial Number Calibration Due

EMI Test Receiver ROHDE&SCHWARZ ESCI 100005 10/24/2014

Pre Amplifier H.P. HP8447E 2945A02715 10/24/2014

Bilog Antenna SUNOL Sciences JB3 A021907 10/10/2014

Cable TIME MICROWAVE LMR-400 N-TYPE04 10/09/2014

System-Controller CCS N/A N/A N.C.R

Turn Table CCS N/A N/A N.C.R

Antenna Tower CCS N/A N/A N.C.R

NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to

International system of unit (SI).

2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 12 of 18

23B7.3 TEST PROCEDURES

28BProcedure of Preliminary Test

The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical usage per the

user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden turntable with a height of

0.8 meters is used which is placed on the ground plane. When the EUT is a floor

standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm

non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.

Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4.

All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical usage as per ANSI C63.4.

Mains cables, telephone lines or other connections to auxiliary equipment located

outside the test are shall drape to the floor, be fitted with ferrite clamps or ferrite tubes

placed on the floor at the point where the cable reaches the floor and then routed to the

place where they leave the turntable. No extension cords shall be used to mains

receptacle.

The antenna was placed at 3 meter away from the EUT as stated in ANSI C63.4. The

antenna connected to the Spectrum Analyzer via a cable and at times a pre-amplifier

would be used.

The Analyzer / Receiver quickly scanned from 30MHz to 1000MHz. The EUT test

program was started. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360

degrees and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the

vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.

The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test:

After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing the

highest emission level.

The EUT and worse cable configuration, antenna position, polarization and turntable

position of the above highest emission level were recorded for the final test.

When measuring emissions above 1GHz, the frequencies of maximum emission shall be

determined by manually positioning the antenna close to the EUT and by moving the

antenna over all sides of the EUT while observing a spectral display. It will be advantageous

to have prior knowledge of the frequencies of emissions above 1GHz.If the EUT is a device

with dimensions approximately equal to that of the measurement antenna beam width, the

measurement antenna shall be aligned with the EUT.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 13 of 18

Procedure of Final Test

EUT and support equipment were set up on the turntable as per the configuration with

highest emission level in the preliminary test.

The Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 30MHz to 1000MHz. Emissions were scanned

and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees, varying cable placement and positioning

the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the vertical and the horizontal

polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.

Recorded at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency, amplitude, antenna

position, polarization and turntable position were recorded into a computer in which

correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the

applicable limit and only Q.P. reading is presented.

For the measurement above 1GHz, use the cable, EUT arrangement, and mode of

operation determined in the exploratory testing to produce the emission that has the highest

amplitude relative to the limit.

Place the measurement antenna away from each area of the EUT determined to be a

source of emissions at the specified measurement distance, while keeping the antenna in

the “cone of radiation” from that area and pointed at the area both in azimuth and elevation,

with polarization oriented for maximum response.

The antenna may have to be higher or lower than the EUT, depending on the EUT’s size

and mounting height, but the antenna should be restricted to a range of height of from 1m to

4m above the ground or reference ground plane.

If the transmission line for the measurement antenna restricts its range of height and

polarization, the steps needed to ensure the correct measurement of the maximum

emissions, shall be described in detail in the report of the measurements.

1) using the procedures above to measure with peak detector function, if the result comply

with the average limit specified by the appropriate regulation, record the EUT

arrangement, mode of operation, and cable positions used for final radiated emission

measurement , this can be done with either diagrams or photographs.

2) Set the detector function of the measuring instrument to average mode, using the

procedures above and remeasure only those emissions that complied with the peak

limits but exceeded the average limits.

Recorded at least the six highest emissions.

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 14 of 18

Filter

Filter

Filter To Powe

r

EUT

Ground Plane

3 m

0.8 m

Coaxial Cable

Test table & Turntable

1m ~ 4m

Powe

r

Cable

EMI

Receive

r

Filte

r

7.4 24BTEST SETUP

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test

Configuration.

7.5 25BTEST RESULTS

Model No. KWUU001 Test Mode Normal working

Environmental

Conditions 26C, 60% RH 6dB

Bandwidth 120 KHz

Antenna Pole Vertical / Horizontal Antenna Distance 3m

Detector Function Peak / Quasi-peak Test Result Pass

Freq. = Emission frequency in MHz

Reading level (dBuV) = Receiver reading

Corr. Factor (dB) = Antenna factor + Cable loss

Measurement (dBuV) = Reading level (dBuV) + Corr. Factor (dB)

Limit (dBuV) = Limit stated in standard

Margin (dB) = Measurement (dBuV) – Limits (dBuV)

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 15 of 18

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 16 of 18

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 17 of 18

8 7BPHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION

Shenzhen SIT Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Report No.: SIT140428814FR

Page 18 of 18

9 PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT

※※※※※END OF REPORT※※※※※