F547058c Ec0c 472e 8bc8 789a99d1fcb1

: Pdf F547058C-Ec0C-472E-8Bc8-789A99D1Fcb1 f547058c-ec0c-472e-8bc8-789a99d1fcb1 4 2017 pdf

Open the PDF directly: View PDF .
Page Count: 12

Download
Open PDF In Browser	View PDF

TM

Extremity Solutions

Reaching Higher by Design

EARS
Y

AltiVate™ Anatomic

Discovery® Elbow

AltiVate Reverse®

AltiVate™ Match Point System®

Alians Proximal Humerus

Reaching higher by design…

		SO PATIENTS CAN, TOO.
At DJO Surgical, our end goal is to help patients reach their greatest altitudes. We strive to achieve
this through innovation, proven results, and clinical heritage. Our approach is to partner with surgeon
experts in the field to design systems that ultimately provide extremity solutions. DJO Surgical
Extremity Solutions are anatomic designs engineered to provide optimized function, enhanced fixation,
and flexibility and versatility to manage differing patient needs. Our aim is to reach new elevations by
providing clinicians solutions to help their patients reach higher.

AltiVate™ Reverse® Shoulder
The anatomically-based, data-driven AltiVate Reverse system incorporates enhanced fixation technologies and precision instrumentation for superior
fit in more of your patients.

Anatomic Design with Optimized Function
Elevating the 10-year clinical success of the RSP®, the first reverse shoulder design to successfully incorporate a center of rotation (COR) lateral to the
glenoid, DJO Surgical introduces its latest Extremity Solution. The AltiVate Reverse system incorporates an optimized stem design based on anatomic
studies with CT scans for determination of shell-to-stem position as well as the ability to best match patient anatomy for anatomic total and reverse
total shoulder constructs. An anatomic 135° humeral neck-shaft angle has shown through biomechanical testing to help reduce the potential for
inferior scapular notching.1 The system remains based on a lateralized center of rotation, and the premier offering is a glenosphere with the center of
rotation closest to the anatomic center.

Lateral COR

Medial COR

Larger Range of Motion

Smaller Range of Motion

A lateral COR maximizes range of
motion while reducing the potential
for inferior scapular notching.

Lateral COR

135o

A medial COR reduces range of
motion and creates the potential
for inferior scapular notching.
Inferior scapular notching has
been associated with poor
clinical outcomes.2

Enhanced Fixation Design and Technologies

Flexibility and Versatility

On both the glenoid and humeral side, expect improved short and long term fixation as a result of
stable initial fixation as well as ideal conditions for bony ingrowth.

Implants

4 Peripheral Screws
for resistance to shear and torsional forces.

A wide variety of intra-operative options help
to manage complex anatomies and to achieve
the best surgical outcomes. Indications include
anatomic total, anatomic hemi, reverse total,
hemi for fracture and reverse for fracture.

Contoured Surface
matches the shape of the glenoid.

COR 32N
COR 44+8
COR 32-4
COR 36N
COR 40N
COR 36-4
COR 40-4

Seven glenospheres with a
distinct center of rotation in
each size
P2 Porous Coating*
“Porous” porous coating that
aids in the apposition of bone for
superior in-growth results.

Suture Holes
Options for simplified
and enhanced tuberosity
reduction and fixation for
fracture cases.

6.5mm Lag Screw

2000N of compression
Micromotion < 150µm

Standard and +4mm socket
inserts are available in both
conventional polyethylene and
e+™ polyethylene. An 8mm
spacer is also an option.

e+ Liner
Highly crosslinked vitamin E polyethylene
formulated to maintain strength and
reduce wear rates.*

Instruments

Fins
For rotational stability and
tuberosity reconstruction.
Bone Graft Window
Increased press-fit and bony integration

*The baseplate is also available with 3DMatrix and HA coating

Stems available in
three lengths (108mm,
175mm and 220mm) and
diameters of 6mm-18mm.

Precision instrumentation caters to differing
surgeon preferences and results in a streamlined
technique. A metaphyseal-referenced approach
dictates stem position based on the fit in the
metaphysis while a diaphyseal-referenced
approach bases the stem position on the fit
in the canal. Osteotome slots and specialized
instrumentation allows for stem removal with
minimal bony disruption in a revision scenario.

AltiVate™ Anatomic Shoulder
Reaching Higher by Design

Instrumentation

The data-driven design of the AltiVate Anatomic Shoulder System
features a short P 2 coated humeral stem providing superior ingrowth
and a glenoid component with patent pending Drop-and-Go™
technology for immediate fixation. The result is a truly anatomic
reconstruction with fixation you can feel.
™

The AltiVate™ Anatomic instrumentation is designed to facilitate
accurate implant placement and increase visibility of the surgical site.

Lateral
Fins
Distal
Extension

Drop-and-Go™
Technology
Patent pending trilobe
design provides
enhanced fixation on
the peripheral pegs.*

Proximal Fins
Impart initial stability,
facilitate stem
alignment and include
suture hole options
for enhanced soft
tissue fixation.

Surface Finish
Optimized layout for
bone in-growth above
the metaphysealdiaphyseal junction and
smooth finish below
to discourage bone
on-growth.

The lateral fins and distal extension of the
humeral broach assist stem implant alignment

e+ Glenoid
Moderately crosslinked
vitamin E polyethylene
formulated to maintain
strength and reduce
wear rates.*

P2 Porous Coating
Aids in the apposition of bone
for superior in-growth results.*

Cannulated instruments provide increased
alignment during drilling and reaming of the glenoid

Innovative low profile designs and translucent materials increase function and visibility

Data-Driven Design
A comprehensive 3 dimensional CT database of humeral and glenoid
specimens was used to optimize implant design resulting in a truly
anatomic reconstruction.

Putting It All Together
DJO shoulder systems are designed to provide a complete and seamless
shoulder solutions platform. Conversion Modules minimize the potential
challenges of removing a well-fixed humeral stem by allowing conversion
of a primary total shoulder to a reverse shoulder and a reverse shoulder
to a hemi-arthroplasty prosthesis.

Turon Humeral
Neck Neutral

Turon Humeral Stems
(standard and long lengths).

Turon Conversion Shell Converts the
Turon stem to a Reverse® Prosthesis

Turon®
Keeled Glenoid

RSP® Monoblock
Hemi-Adapter

Turon
Pegged Glenoid

RSP Monoblock Humeral Stems (standard and long lengths)
AltiVate Reverse® Humeral Stems (standard and long lengths)

AltiVate Anatomic Neutral Humeral Heads
AltiVate Anatomic Offset Humeral Heads
Turon Neutral Humeral Heads
Turon Offset Humeral Heads

AltiVate Anatomic™
Pegged Glenoid

AltiVate Anatomic
Humeral Neck, Neutral

AltiVate Anatomic
Short Humeral Stems

AltiVate™ Match Point System®
Enabling surgeons to preoperatively and intraoperatively tailor shoulder arthroplasty to the patient’s unique anatomy, AltiVate Match Point System,
in conjunction with the AltiVate Reverse or Turon Anatomic shoulder implant system, allows surgeons to Aim at enhancing patient outcomes and Set
patients’ goals to Reach Higher by ensuring the surgical plan is Matched to the patient’s specific anatomy.
Aim
- at enhancing patient outcomes
•	 CT based 3D model
•	 Visualize unique anatomy
•	 Prepares surgeons preoperatively

Set
- patient goals to reach higher
•	 Virtually planned surgery
•	 Optimized implant position
•	 Based on entirety of anatomy not
visible in surgery

Matched
- to the patient’s specific anatomy
•	 Guide and model delivered to surgery
•	 Accurately reproduces plan intra operatively
•	 Reduces variability of conventional methods

Deviation from Plan3 (mean°)
12
10
Standard Inst

8

3D Plan + Standard Inst

6

3D Plan + Transfer Device
Match Point System

4
2
0
Version

Push Handle - gentle pressure
applied to the push handle
further stabilizes the guide while
drilling the pilot hole

Coracoid Clip - unique coracoid clip
securely attaches to the patient’s coracoid,
providing a stable and reproducible fit of the
guide to the patient‘s anatomy

Drill Cylinder - designed to replicate
the planned trajectory determined
by the surgeon through the preoperative planning process

Patient Identifier – unique
identification code specific for
each patient case links the guide
to the patient

Inclination

Position

AltiVate™ Discovery® Elbow System
Anatomic Design
The Discovery Elbow System is designed to reproduce the anatomy and restore the mechanics of the elbow.
With its user-friendly instrumentation and intra-operative assembly options, this implant is suitable for
surgeons of all experience levels.
Posterior Hinge Assembly
Allows for intraoperative assembly

23° Anterior Neck Angle
Recreates the anatomic center of rotation

Hemispheric Condyles
Spread the stress out through the entire
surface area of the poly, which reduces wear

Anatomic Bow
5° of internal rotation reduces the
stresses on the collateral ligaments

Lateral Bow
Follows the anatomy
of the ulna

Functional Laxity
7° of varus/valgus laxity
recreates trochlear function

Anterior Flange
Provides torsional stability and
removes need for bone graft

Flexibility and Versatility
Any size ulnar component can be paired with any size humeral component. The size 3 humeral component,
however, can only be paired with the size 2.5 ulnar component.

Alians Proximal Humerus
The Alians Proximal Humerus provides another fracture management option to the AltiVate™ Extremity
Solutions Portfolio. This fracture plate system features an anatomically contoured design with patented
polyaxial locking screw options and is paired with simple, streamlined instrumentation.

Anatomic Design

Anatomical
Contoured plate design

Flexibility and Versatility
Sits 1.5cm below
greater tuberosity
Minimizes conflict
with acromion
25°

Asymmetrical
Left and right designs

Patented Dualtec System I®
polyaxial locking fixation
•	 Variable angle technology for
25° (±12.5°)
•	 Allows for repeated insertion
and re-angulations of screw
without sacrificing its strength

Five unique suture holes
for soft tissue fixation
•	 Accessible even after plate
attachment, so pre-loading
sutures is not required

Spaded tip
Assists in preservation
of deltoid insertion
Straight edge lines up
with bicipital groove
Easy plate positioning

Optimized proximal screw hole placement
Divergent fixed angled screws placed in
inferior half of humeral head
•	 Targets location of most robust bone
•	 Blunt-tipped screws limit protrusion
through articular surface

Simple and streamlined instrumentation
•	 1 tray, 1 screw size, 1 drill bit, 1 driver

ALIANS AND DUALTEC SYSTEM I ARE
TRADEMARKS OF NEWCLIP USA.

Proven Results
The Turon shoulder is benchmarked off of the design and principles of the Charles Neer shoulder prosthesis; and RSP is one of the most, well-published
reverse shoulders on the market with over fifty peer reviewed journal publications.

Stephens BC, Simon P, Clark RE,
Christmas KN, Stone GP, Lorenzetti
AJ, Frankle MA. Revision for a
failed reverse: a 12-year review of a
lateralized implant. J Shoulder Elbow
Surg 2016. 25:e115-e124.
Levy JC, Ashukem MT, Formaini NT.
Factors predicting postoperative
range of motion for anatomic total
shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg 2016;25:55-60.
Levy JC. Observation of initial
postoperative radiolucent lines using
a modern pegged glenoid design. Int J
Shoulder Surg 2016;10(2) 67-71.
Formaini NT, Everding NG, Levy JC,
Rosas S. Tuberosity healing after
reverse shoulder arthroplasty for
acute proximal humerus fractures:
the ‘‘black and tan’’ technique. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 1-8.
Formaini NT, Everding NG, Levy JC,
Santoni BG, Nayak AN, Wilson C,
Cabezas AF. The effect of glenoid
bone loss on reverse shoulder
arthroplasty baseplate fixation. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015.
Triplet JJ, Everding NG, Levy JC, Moor
MA. Functional internal rotation after
shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison
of anatomic and reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2015; 24:867-874.
Cusick MC, Hussey MM, Steen
BM, Hartzler RU, Clark RE, Cuff DJ,
Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Frankle MA.
Glenosphere dissociation after reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2015 July; 24(7): 10611068.
Hussey MM, Steen BM, Cusick MC,
Cox JL, Marberry ST, Simon P, Cottrell
BJ, Santoni BG, Frankle MA. The
effects of glenoid wear patterns on
patients with osteoarthritis in total
shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment
of outcomes and value. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2015 May; 24(5):682-690.
Teusink MJ, Pappou IP, Schwartz
DG, Cottrell BJ, Frankle MA. Results

of closed management of acute
dislocation after reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2015 Apr; 24(4):621-627.
Simon P, Gupta A, Pappou I, Hussey
MM, Santoni BG, Inoue N, Frankle,
MA. Glenoid subchondral bone
density distribution in male total
shoulder arthroplasty subjects with
eccentric and concentric wear. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Mar;
24(3):416-424.

Hart ND, Clark JC, Krause W,
Kissenberth MJ, Bragg WE, Hawkins
RJ. Glenoid screw position in the
Encore reverse shoulder prosthesis:
an anatomic dissection study of
screw relationship to surrounding
structures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2013; 22:814-820.
Levy JC. Avoiding cement bone
necrosis effect on tuberosity healing:
the “black-and-tan” technique. Tech
Should Surg. 2013 Sep; 14(3):81-84.

Steen BM, Cabezas AS, Santoni BG,
Hussey MM, Cusick MC, Kumer AG,
Frankle MA. Outcome and value
of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
for treatment of glenohumeral
osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Mar.

Virani NA, Cabezas A, Gutiérrez
S, Santoni BG, Otto R, Frankle M.
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
components and surgical techniques
that restore glenohumeral motion.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;
22(2):179-87.

Levy JC, Everding NG, Frankle MA,
Keppler LJ. Accuracy of patientspecific guided glenoid baseplate
positioning for reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2014; 23:1563-1567.

Puskas B, Harreld K, Clark R, Downes
K, Virani NA, Frankle M. Isometric
strength, range of motion, and
impairment before and after total
and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan.

Schwarts DG, Cottrell BJ, Teusink MJ,
Clark RE, Downes KL, Tammembaum
RS, Frankle MA. Factors that predict
postoperative motion in patients
treated with reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2014 23:1289-1295.

Andersen JR, Williams CD, Cain R,
Mighell M, Frankle M. Surgically
treated humeral shaft fractures
following shoulder arthroplasty. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan; 95(1):918.

Levy JC, Everding NG, Gil CC Jr,
Stephens S, Giveans R. Speed of
recovery after shoulder arthroplasty:
a comparison of reverse and anatomic
total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2014; 23:1872-1881.

Affonso J, Nicholson GP, Frankle MA,
Walch G, Gerber C, Garzon-Muvdi J,
McFarland EG. Complications of the
reverse prosthesis: prevention and
treatment. Instr Course Lect. 2012;
61:157-68.

Teusink M, Otto R, Cottrell B,
Frankle, MA. What is the effect of
postoperative scapular fracture
on outcomes of reverse shoulder
arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2014 June; 23(6):782-790.

Cuff D, Clark R, Pupello D, Frankle M.
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the
treatment of rotator cuff deficiency:
a concise follow-up, at a minimum of
five years, of a previous report. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2012 Nov; 94(21):19962000.

Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. Comparison
of hemiarthroplasty and reverse
shoulder arthroplasty for the
treatment of proximal humeral
fractures in elderly patients. J Bone
Joint Surg. 2013; 95:2050-5.

Zavala JA, Clark JC, Kissenberth MJ,
Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ. Management
of deep infection after reverse total
shoulder arthroplasty: a case series.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;
21(10):1310-5.

Kwon YW, Pinto VJ, Yoon J, Frankle
MA, Dunning PE, Sheikhzadeh A.
Kinematic analysis of dynamic
shoulder motion in patients with
reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;
21(9):1184-90.
Willis M, Min W, Brooks JP, Mulieri
P, Walker M, Pupello D, Frankle M.
Proximal humeral malunion treated
with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Apr;
21(4):507-13.
Walker M, Willis MP, Brooks JP,
Pupello D, Mulieri PJ, Frankle MA.
The use of the reverse shoulder
arthroplasty for treatment of failed
total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2012 Apr; 21(4):514-22.
Clark JC, Ritchie J, Song FS,
Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hart ND,
Hawkins RJ. Complication rates,
dislocation, pain, and postoperative
range of motion after reverse
shoulder arthroplasty in patients
with and without repair of the
subscapularis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2012 Jan; 21(1):36-41.
Levy JC, Badman, B. Reverse shoulder
prosthesis for acute four-part
fracture: tuberosity fixation using a
horseshoe graft. J Orthop Trauma
2011; 25:318–324.
Walker M, Brooks J, Willis M, Frankle
M. How reverse shoulder arthroplasty
works. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011
Sep; 469(9):2440-51.
Cheung E, Willis M, Walker M, Clark R,
Frankle MA. Complications in reverse
total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad
Orthop Surg. 2011 Jul; 19(7):439-49.
Gutiérrez S, Walker M, Willis M,
Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Effects of
tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on
baseplate/bone interface forces in a
computational model, validated by a
mechanical model, of reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2011 Jul; 20(5):732-9.

References
1.	 Gutierrez S, Comiskey C, Lou Z,
Pupello D, Frankle M. Range of
Impingement-Free Abduction
and Adduction Deficit After
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hierarchy of Surgical and
Implant-Design-Related Factors.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008
Dec;90(12):2606-15.
2.	 Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA,
Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C.
Predictors of scapular notching
in patients managed with the
Delta III reverse total shoulder
replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2007 Mar;89(3):588-600.
3.	 Levy JC, Everding NG, Frankle
MA, Keppler LJ. Accuracy of
patient-specific guided glenoid
baseplate positioning for reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2014 Jan;23:15631567.

Proven Results - continued

Cuff D, Levy JC, Gutiérrez S, Frankle
MA. Torsional stability of modular
and non-modular reverse shoulder
humeral components in a proximal
humeral bone loss model. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun; 20(4):646-51.
Harreld KL, Puskas BL, Frankle M.
Massive rotator cuff tears without
arthropathy: when to consider
reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May 18;
93(10):973-84.
Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello
D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder
arthroplasty for the treatment of
irreparable rotator cuff tear without
glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2010 Nov; 92(15):2544-56.
Holcomb JO, Hebert DJ, Mighell
MA, Dunning PE, Pupello DR, Pliner
MD, Frankle MA. Reverse shoulder
arthroplasty in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow
Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1076-84.
Harreld KL, Puskas BL, Andersen
J, Frankle, MA. Reverse shoulder
arthroplasty in the management of
irreparable rotator cuff tears without
arthritis. JBJS Essential Surgical
Techniques, 2010 Sep; 1(2):e12 1-15.
Klein SM, Dunning P, Mulieri P,
Pupello D, Downes K, Frankle MA.
Effects of acquired glenoid bone
defects on surgical technique and
clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2010 May; 92(5):1144-54.
Frankle MA, Teramoto A, Luo ZP, Levy
JC, Pupello D. Glenoid morphology
in reverse shoulder arthroplasty:
classification and surgical
implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2009 Nov-Dec; 18(6):874-85.
Holcomb JO, Cuff D, Petersen SA,
Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Revision
reverse shoulder arthroplasty for
glenoid baseplate failure after primary
reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;
18(5):717-23.

Gutiérrez S, Luo ZP, Levy J, Frankle
MA. Arc of motion and socket depth
in reverse shoulder implants. Clin
Biomech. 2009 Jul; 24(6):473-9.
Chacon A, Virani N, Shannon R, Levy
JC, Pupello D, Frankle M. Revision
arthroplasty with use of a reverse
shoulder prosthesis-allograft
composite. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2009 Jan; 91(1):119-27.
Gutierrez S, Levy JC, Lee WE 3rd, Luo
ZP. Hierarchy of stability factors in
reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2008 466:670-676.
Cuff D, Pupello D, Virani N, Levy
J, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder
arthroplasty for the treatment of
rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint
Surg. 2008; 90:1244-1251.
Gutiérrez S, Comiskey CA 4th, Luo
ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Range
of impingement-free abduction
and adduction deficit after reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of
surgical and implant-design-related
factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008
Dec; 90(12):2606-15.
Gutiérrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA,
Cuff D, Keller TS, Pupello DR, Lee WE
3rd. Evaluation of abduction range
of motion and avoidance of inferior
scapular impingement in a reverse
shoulder model. J Shoulder Elbow
Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug; 17(4):608-15.
Virani NA, Harman M, Li K, Levy J,
Pupello DR, Frankle MA. In vitro and
finite element analysis of glenoid
bone/baseplate interaction in the
reverse shoulder design. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun; 17(3):50921.
Cuff DJ, Virani NA, Levy J, Frankle
MA, Derasari A, Hines B, Pupello
DR, Cancio M, Mighell M. The
treatment of deep shoulder infection
and glenohumeral instability with
debridement, reverse shoulder
arthroplasty and postoperative
antibiotics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008
Mar; 90(3):336-42.

Gutiérrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA,
Lee WE 3rd, Keller TS, Maitland ME.
Center of rotation affects abduction
range of motion of reverse shoulder
arthroplasty. Clin Orthop and Relat
Res. 2007.
Gutiérrez S, Greiwe RM, Frankle MA,
Siegal S, Lee WE 3rd. Biomechanical
comparison of component position
and hardware failure in the reverse
shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun; 16(3
Suppl):S9-S12.
Levy JC, Virani N, Pupello D, Frankle
M. Use of the reverse shoulder
prosthesis for the treatment of failed
hemiarthroplasty in patients with
glenohumeral arthritis and rotator
cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
2007 Feb; 89(2):189-95.
Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello
D. The use of the reverse shoulder
prosthesis for the treatment of
failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal
humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 2007 Feb; 89(2):292-300.
Frankle M, Levy JC, Pupello D, Siegal
S, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M.
The reverse shoulder prosthesis for
glenohumeral arthritis associated
with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a
minimum two-year follow-up study
of sixty patients surgical technique.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep; 88
Suppl 1 Pt 2:178-90.
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem
A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse
Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral
arthritis associated with severe
rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum
two-year follow-up study of sixty
patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005
Aug; 87(8):1697-705.
Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M,
Banks S. Initial glenoid component
fixation in “reverse” total shoulder
arthroplasty: a biomechanical
evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2005 Jan-Feb; 14(1 Suppl S):162S-167S.

* Data on file at DJO Surgical
CAUTION: Federal Law (USA) restricts this device to
sale by or on the order of a physician.
See package insert for a complete listing of indications,
contraindications, warnings, and precautions.
Copyright © 2016 by DJO, LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or
mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the
case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses
permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed
“Attention: IP Counsel,” at the address 1430 Decision St, Vista, CA 92081.

DJO Surgical I A DJO Global Company
T 800.456.8696
D 512.832.9500
F 512.834.6300
9800 Metric Blvd. I Austin, TX 78758 I U.S.A.
djosurgical.com

DJO Surgical™ is a manufacturer of orthopedic implants
and does not practice medicine. Only an orthopedic
surgeon can determine what treatment is appropriate.
Individual results of total joint replacement may vary.
The life of any implant will depend on the patient’s
weight, age, activity level, and other factors.

0030201-001 REV D 04/17



---

Source Exif Data:

File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.5
Linearized                      : Yes
Language                        : en-US
Tagged PDF                      : Yes
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.6-c137 79.159768, 2016/08/11-13:24:42
Create Date                     : 2017:04:21 11:08:09-07:00
Metadata Date                   : 2017:04:21 11:08:41-07:00
Modify Date                     : 2017:04:21 11:08:41-07:00
Creator Tool                    : Adobe InDesign CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Instance ID                     : uuid:b67a9967-2a96-5a49-b547-eb70117053bc
Original Document ID            : xmp.did:E5234DF74F2168118A6DAA394E896FA6
Document ID                     : xmp.id:a620b6cb-f10e-4a5c-9ce5-862b7c1d379b
Rendition Class                 : proof:pdf
Derived From Instance ID        : xmp.iid:81eb68ec-b3a0-4d9e-b008-1260fc665ea1
Derived From Document ID        : xmp.did:4d44f527-163e-4462-94a4-b65935ab9dd1
Derived From Original Document ID: xmp.did:E5234DF74F2168118A6DAA394E896FA6
Derived From Rendition Class    : default
History Action                  : converted
History Parameters              : from application/x-indesign to application/pdf
History Software Agent          : Adobe InDesign CC 2017 (Macintosh)
History Changed                 : /
History When                    : 2017:04:21 11:08:09-07:00
Format                          : application/pdf
Producer                        : Adobe PDF Library 15.0
Trapped                         : False
Page Count                      : 12
Creator                         : Adobe InDesign CC 2017 (Macintosh)

EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools