LIWC2015 Language Manual

User Manual: Pdf

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 26

TheDevelopmentandPsychometric
PropertiesofLIWC2015
JamesW.Pennebaker,RyanL.Boyd,
KaylaJordan,andKateBlackburn
TheUniversityofTexasatAustin
CorrespondenceshouldbesenttoJamesW.Pennebaker,DepartmentofPsychology,The
UniversityofTexasatAustin,108E.DeanKeetonStopA8000,Austin,TX787121043.The
LIWC2015programisacommercialproductdistributedbyPennebakerConglomeratesfor
researchpurposesandbyReceptiviti,Incforcommercialpurposes.AllprofitstoPennebakerfor
theresearchbasedversionaredonatedtotheDepartmentofPsychology,UniversityofTexasat
Austin.
Theofficialreferencetothispaperis:
Pennebaker,J.W.,Boyd,R.L.,Jordan,K.,&Blackburn,K.(2015).Thedevelopmentand
psychometricpropertiesofLIWC2015
.Austin,TX:UniversityofTexasatAustin.
 
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page1
TheDevelopmentandPsychometricPropertiesof
LIWC2015
Thewayspeopleusewordsintheirdailylivescanproviderichinformationabouttheirbeliefs,
fears,thinkingpatterns,socialrelationships,andpersonalities.FromthetimeofFreud’swritings
aboutslipsofthetonguetotheearlydaysofcomputerbasedtextanalysis,researchersbegan
amassingincreasinglycompellingevidencethatthewordsweusehavetremendous
psychologicalvalue(Gottschalk&Glaser,1969;Stone,Dunphy,Smith,&Ogilvie,1966;
Weintraub,1989).
Althoughpromising,theearlycomputermethodsflounderedbecauseofthesheercomplexityof
thetask.Extensivesamplesoftextwerenotdigitized,computerswereslowandunwieldy,and
therewaslittleagreementaboutwhichfeaturesofnaturallanguageweremostrelatedto
psychologicalstates.Everythingchangedinthe1990swiththeadventofefficientdesktop
computers,improveddatastoragetechnology,andtheexplosionoftheinternet.Thesefactors
allowedfortheeasycollectionoflargestoresofbooks,conversations,andotherdigitizedtext
samples.
Inordertoprovideanefficientandeffectivemethodforstudyingthevariousemotional,
cognitive,andstructuralcomponentspresentinindividuals’verbalandwrittenspeechsamples,
weoriginallydevelopedatextanalysisapplicationcalledLinguisticInquiryandWordCount,or
LIWC.ThefirstLIWCapplicationwasdevelopedaspartofanexploratorystudyoflanguage
anddisclosure(Francis,1993;Pennebaker,1993).Thesecond(LIWC2001)andthird
(LIWC2007)versionsupdatedtheoriginalapplicationwithanexpandeddictionaryandamore
modernsoftwaredesign(Pennebaker,Francis,&Booth,2001;Pennebaker,Booth,&Francis,
2007).
Themostrecentevolution,LIWC2015(Pennebaker,Booth,Boyd,&Francis,2015),has
significantlyalteredboththedictionaryandthesoftwareoptions.Importantly,theLIWC2015
softwareanddictionaryarenew,ratherthanabasicupdatetopreviousversionsofLIWC.As
withpreviousversions,however,theprogramisdesignedtoanalyzeindividualormultiple
languagefilesquicklyandefficiently.Atthesametime,theprogramattemptstobetransparent
andflexibleinitsoperation,allowingtheusertoexploreworduseinmultipleways.
TheLIWC2015Framework
BoththestandarddownloadableandwebbasedversionsoftheLIWC2015applicationrelyon
aninternaldefaultdictionarythatdefineswhichwordsshouldbecountedinthetargettextfiles.
NotethattheLIWC2015processorisanexecutablefileandcannotbereadoropened.Toavoid
confusioninthesubsequentdiscussion,wordscontainedintextsthatarereadandanalyzedby
LIWC2015arereferredtoastargetwords
.WordsintheLIWC2015dictionaryfilewillbe
referredtoasdictionarywords
.Groupsofdictionarywordsthattapaparticulardomain(e.g.,
negativeemotionwords)arevariouslyreferredtoassubdictionariesorwordcategories.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page2
TheLIWC2015MainTextProcessingModule
Becausethesoftwareapplicationiswritteninacrossplatformlanguage,itrunsidenticallyon
PCandMaccomputersviatheJavaVirtualMachine.LIWC2015isdesignedtoacceptwrittenor
transcribedverbaltextwhichhasbeenstoredasadigital,machinereadablefileinoneof
multipleformats,includingplaintext,PDF,RTF,orstandardMicrosoftWordfiles(i.e.,.docand
.docx).Unlikepreviousversions,thesoftwarecannowprocesstextonalinebylinebasiswithin
andacrosscolumnsinsideofmultiplespreadsheetformats,includingthosesavedas.xls,.xlsx,
and.csvfiles.
Duringoperation,LIWC2015accessesasingletextfile,agroupoffiles,ortextswithina
spreadsheetandanalyzeseachsequentially.Foreachfile,LIWC2015readsonetargetwordata
time.Aseachtargetwordisprocessed,thedictionaryfileissearched,lookingforadictionary
matchwiththecurrenttargetword.Ifthetargetwordismatchedwithadictionaryword,the
appropriatewordcategoryscale(orscales)forthatwordisincremented.Asthetargettextfileis
beingprocessed,countsforvariousstructuralcompositionelements(e.g.,wordcountand
sentencepunctuation)arealsoincremented.
Foreachtextfile,approximately90outputvariablesarewrittenasonelineofdatatoanoutput
file.Thisdatarecordincludesthefilenameandwordcount,4summarylanguagevariables
(analyticalthinking,clout,authenticity,andemotionaltone),3generaldescriptorcategories
(wordspersentence,percentoftargetwordscapturedbythedictionary,andpercentofwordsin
thetextthatarelongerthansixletters),21standardlinguisticdimensions(e.g.,percentageof
wordsinthetextthatarepronouns,articles,auxiliaryverbs,etc.),41wordcategoriestapping
psychologicalconstructs(e.g.,affect,cognition,biologicalprocesses,drives),6personalconcern
categories(e.g.,work,home,leisureactivities),5informallanguagemarkers(assents,fillers,
swearwords,netspeak),and12punctuationcategories(periods,commas,etc).Acompletelistof
thestandardLIWC2015scalesisincludedinTable1.
TheDefaultLIWC2015Dictionary
TheLIWC2015Dictionaryistheheartofthetextanalysisstrategy.ThedefaultLIWC2015
Dictionaryiscomposedofalmost6,400words,wordstems,andselectemoticons.Each
dictionaryentryadditionallydefinesoneormorewordcategoriesorsubdictionaries.For
example,thewordcried
ispartoffivewordcategories:sadness,negativeemotion,overallaffect,
verbs,andpastfocus.Hence,ifthewordcried
isfoundinthetargettext,eachofthesefive
subdictionaryscalescoreswillbeincremented.Asinthisexample,manyoftheLIWC2015
categoriesarearrangedhierarchically.Allsadnesswords,bydefinition,belongtothebroader
“negativeemotion”category,aswellasthe“overallaffectwords”category.Notetoothatword
stemscanbecapturedbytheLIWC2015system.Forexample,thedictionaryincludesthestem
hungr*
whichallowsforanytargetwordthatmatchesthefirstfiveletterstobecountedasan
ingestionword(includinghungry,hungrier,hungriest).Theasterisk,then,denotesthe
acceptanceofallletters,hyphens,ornumbersfollowingitsappearance.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page3
EachofthedefaultLIWC2015categoriesiscomposedofalistofdictionarywordsthatdefine
thatscale.Table1providesacomprehensivelistofthedefaultLIWC2015dictionarycategories,
scales,samplescalewords,andrelevantscalewordcounts.
Table1.LIWC2015OutputVariableInformation
Category
Abbrev
Examples
Wordsin
category
Internal
Consistency
(Uncorrectedα)
Internal
Consistency
(Correctedα)
Wordcount
WC
SummaryLanguageVariables
Analyticalthinking
Analytic
Clout
Clout
Authentic
Authentic
Emotionaltone
Tone
Words/sentence
WPS
Words>6letters
Sixltr
Dictionarywords
Dic
LinguisticDimensions
Totalfunctionwords
funct
it,to,no,very
491
.05
.24
Totalpronouns
pronoun
I,them,itself
153
.25
.67
Personalpronouns
ppron
I,them,her
93
.20
.61
1stperssingular
i
I,me,mine
24
.41
.81
1stpersplural
we
we,us,our
12
.43
.82
2ndperson
you
you,your,thou
30
.28
.70
3rdperssingular
shehe
she,her,him
17
.49
.85
3rdpersplural
they
they,their,they’d
11
.37
.78
Impersonalpronouns
ipron
it,it’s,those
59
.28
.71
Articles
article
a,an,the
3
.05
.23
Prepositions
prep
to,with,above
74
.04
.18
Auxiliaryverbs
auxverb
am,will,have
141
.16
.54
CommonAdverbs
adverb
very,really
140
.43
.82
Conjunctions
conj
and,but,whereas
43
.14
.50
Negations
negate
no,not,never
62
.29
.71
OtherGrammar
Commonverbs
verb
eat,come,carry
1000
.05
.23
Commonadjectives
adj
free,happy,long
764
.04
.19
Comparisons
compare
greater,best,after
317
.08
.35
Interrogatives
interrog
how,when,what
48
.18
.57
Numbers
number
second,thousand
36
.45
.83
Quantifiers
quant
few,many,much
77
.23
.64
PsychologicalProcesses
Affectiveprocesses
affect
happy,cried
1393
.18
.57
Positiveemotion
posemo
love,nice,sweet
620
.23
.64
Negativeemotion
negemo
hurt,ugly,nasty
744
.17
.55
Anxiety
anx
worried,fearful
116
.31
.73
Anger
anger
hate,kill,annoyed
230
.16
.53
Sadness
sad
crying,grief,sad
136
.28
.70
Socialprocesses
social
mate,talk,they
756
.51
.86
Family
family
daughter,dad,aunt
118
.55
.88
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page4
Category
Abbrev
Examples
Wordsin
category
Internal
Consistency
(Uncorrectedα)
Internal
Consistency
(Correctedα)
Friends
friend
buddy,neighbor
95
.20
.60
Femalereferences
female
girl,her,mom
124
.53
.87
Malereferences
male
boy,his,dad
116
.52
.87
Cognitiveprocesses
cogproc
cause,know,ought
797
.65
.92
Insight
insight
think,know
259
.47
.84
Causation
cause
because,effect
135
.26
.67
Discrepancy
discrep
should,would
83
.34
.76
Tentative
tentat
maybe,perhaps
178
.44
.83
Certainty
certain
always,never
113
.31
.73
Differentiation
differ
hasn’t,but,else
81
.38
.78
Perceptualprocesses
percept
look,heard,feeling
436
.17
.55
See
see
view,saw,seen
126
.46
.84
Hear
hear
listen,hearing
93
.27
.69
Feel
feel
feels,touch
128
.24
.65
Biologicalprocesses
bio
eat,blood,pain
748
.29
.71
Body
body
cheek,hands,spit
215
.52
.87
Health
health
clinic,flu,pill
294
.09
.37
Sexual
sexual
horny,love,incest
131
.37
.78
Ingestion
ingest
dish,eat,pizza
184
.67
.92
Drives
drives
1103
.39
.80
Affiliation
affiliation
ally,friend,social
248
.40
.80
Achievement
achieve
win,success,better
213
.41
.81
Power
power
superior,bully
518
.35
.76
Reward
reward
take,prize,benefit
120
.27
.69
Risk
risk
danger,doubt
103
.26
.68
Timeorientations
TimeOrient
Pastfocus
focuspast
ago,did,talked
341
.23
.64
Presentfocus
focuspresent
today,is,now
424
.24
.66
Futurefocus
focusfuture
may,will,soon
97
.26
.68
Relativity
relativ
area,bend,exit
974
.50
.86
Motion
motion
arrive,car,go
325
.36
.77
Space
space
down,in,thin
360
.45
.83
Time
time
end,until,season
310
.39
.79
Personalconcerns
Work
work
job,majors,xerox
444
.69
.93
Leisure
leisure
cook,chat,movie
296
.50
.86
Home
home
kitchen,landlord
100
.46
.83
Money
money
audit,cash,owe
226
.60
.90
Religion
relig
altar,church
174
.64
.91
Death
death
bury,coffin,kill
74
.39
.79
Informallanguage
informal
380
.46
.84
Swearwords
swear
fuck,damn,shit
131
.45
.83
Netspeak
netspeak
btw,lol,thx
209
.42
.82
Assent
assent
agree,OK,yes
36
.10
.39
Nonfluencies
nonflu
er,hm,umm
19
.27
.69
Fillers
filler
Imean,youknow
14
.06
.27
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page5
“Wordsincategory”referstothenumberofdifferentdictionarywordsandstemsthatmakeupthevariable
category.Allalphaswerecomputedonasampleof~181,000textfilesfromseveralofourlanguagecorpora(see
Table2).UncorrectedinternalconsistencyalphasarebasedonCronbachestimates;correctedalphasarebasedon
SpearmanBrown.SeetheReliabilityandValiditysectionbelow.NotethattheLIWC2015dictionarygenerally
arrangescategorieshierarchically.Therearesomeexceptionstothehierarchyrules.Forexample,Socialprocesses
includealargegroupofwordsthatdenotesocialprocesses,includingallnonfirstpersonsingularpersonal
pronounsaswellasverbsthatsuggesthumaninteraction(talking,sharing)manyofthesewordsdonotbelongto
anyoftheSocialprocesses
subcategories.AnotherexampleisRelativity
,whichincludesalargenumberofwords
thatcannotbefoundinanyofitssubcategories.
LIWC2015DictionaryDevelopment
TheselectionofwordsdefiningtheLIWC2015categoriesinvolvedmultiplestepsoverseveral
years.Originally,theideawastoidentifyagroupofwordsthattappedbasicemotionaland
cognitivedimensionsoftenstudiedinsocial,health,andpersonalitypsychology.Withtime,the
domainofwordcategoriesexpandedconsiderably.
Themostrecentversionofthedictionary,LIWC2015,isacompletelynewversioncomparedto
earlierones.Dictionariescannowaccommodatenumbers,punctuation,andevenshortphrases.
Theseadditionsallowtheusertoread"netspeak"languagethatiscommoninTwitterand
Facebookposts,aswellasSMS(shortmessagingservice,a.k.a.“textmessaging”)andSMSlike
modesofcommunication(e.g.,Snapchat,instantmessaging).Forexample,"b4"iscodedasa
prepositionand":)"iscodedasapositiveemotionword.
Ahandfulofnewcategorieshavebeenaddedandasmallnumberhavebeenremoved.Withthe
adventofmorepowerfulanalyticmethodsandmorediverselanguagesamples,wehavebeen
abletobuildmoreinternallyconsistentlanguagedictionaries.Thismeansthatmanyofthe
dictionariesinpreviousLIWCversionsmayhavethesamename,butthewordsmakingupthe
dictionarieshavebeenaltered(categoriessubjectedtomajorchangesarepresentedbelow).We
presenthereacompleteoverviewoftheprocessusedtocreatetheLIWC2015dictionary.
Step1.WordCollection.
InthedesignanddevelopmentoftheLIWCcategoryscales,setsof
wordswerefirstgeneratedforeachconceptualdimension,usingtheLIWC2007dictionaryasa
startingpoint.WithinthePsychologicalProcessescategory,forexample,theemotion
subdictionarieswerebasedonwordsfromseveralsources,includingpreviousversionsofthe
LIWCdictionary.Wedrewoncommonemotionratingscales,suchasthePANAS(Watson,
Clark,&Tellegen,1988),Roget’sThesaurus,andstandardEnglishdictionaries.Followingthe
creationofpreliminarycategorywordlists,26judgesindividuallygeneratedwordlistsforeach
category,thengroupbrainstormingsessionsamong48judgeswereheldinwhichwords
relevanttothevariousscalesweregeneratedandaddedtotheinitialscalelists.Similarschemes
wereusedfortheothersubjectivedictionarycategories.
Step2.JudgeRatingPhase.
Oncethegrandlistofwordswasamassed,eachwordinthe
dictionarywasexaminedbyagroupof48judgesandqualitativelyratedintermsof“goodness
offit”foreachcategory.Inorderforawordtoremaininagivencategory,amajorityofjudges
hadtoagreeonitsinclusion.Incasesofdisputes,severalcorporaandonlinesourceswere
referencedtodetermineaword’scommonuse,inflection,andmeaning.Wordsforwhichjudges
couldnotdecideonappropriatecategoryplacementwereremovedfromthedictionary.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page6
Step3.BaseRateAnalyses.
Onceaworkingversionofthedictionarywasconstructedfrom
judges’ratings,textsfromseveralsourceswereanalyzedusingtheMeaningExtractionHelper
(MEH;Boyd,2015)todeterminehowfrequentlydictionarywordswereusedinvarious
contexts.Thesesourcesincludedblogposts,spokenlanguagestudies,Twitter,Facebook,novels,
studentwritings,andseveralothers.Dictionarywordsthatdidnotoccuratleastonceinmultiple
corporawereomittedfromthedictionary.
Step4.CandidateWordListGeneration.
Inordertoexpandthedictionary,weexploredseveral
sourcesoflanguageforhighfrequencywordsthathadnotbeenaddedbyjudges.UsingMEH,
highfrequencywordswerequantifiedasapercentageoftotalwordsforhundredsofthousands
oftextfilesfrommultiplestudiesandsources.Forseverallinguisticcategories(e.g.,verbs,
adjectives),theStanfordNaturalLanguageToolkit(NLTK;Toutanova,Klein,Manning,&
Singer,2003)wasusedinconjunctionwithMEHtoidentifycommonwords.Allcandidate
wordswerethencorrelatedwithalldictionarycategoriesinordertodetectcommonwordsthat
werenotyetincludedinthedictionary.Wordsthatcorrelatedpositivelywithdictionary
categorieswereaddedtoalistofcandidatewordsforpossibleinclusion.Followingthis,48
judgesreviewedthecandidatelistandvotedon1)whetherwordsshouldbeincludedinthe
dictionaryand2)whetherwordswereasoundconceptualfitforspecificdictionarycategories.
Judges’ratingprocedureswereparalleltothoseoutlinedinStep2
.
Step5.PsychometricEvaluation.
Followingallpreviouslydescribedsteps,eachlanguage
categorywasseparatedintoitsconstituentwords.Eachwordwasthenquantifiedasapercentage
oftotalwordsfor~181,000textfileshailingfrom5corpora,totalling~231,000,000words(see
Table2).Allwordsforeachcategoryweretreatedasa“response”andusedtocomputeinternal
consistencystatisticsforeachlanguagecategoryasawhole.Wordsthatweredetrimentaltothe
internalconsistencyoftheiroverarchinglanguagecategorywereaddedtoacandidatelistof
wordsforomissionfromthefinaldictionary.Agroupof28judgesthenreviewedthelistof
candidatewordsandvotedonwhetherwordsshouldberetained.Wordsforwhichnomajority
couldbeestablishedwereomitted.Severallinguisticcategories,suchaspronouns
andadverbs
,
constituteestablishedlinguisticconstructsandwerethereforenotapartoftheomissionprocess.
Wediscussthepsychometricevaluationproceduresinextensivedetailinthenextsection.
Step6.RefinementPhase.
AfterSteps1through5werecomplete,theywererepeatedintheir
entirety.Thiswasdonetocatchanypossiblemistakes/oversightsthatmighthaveoccurred
throughoutthedictionarycreationprocess.Notethatthepsychometricsofeachlanguage
categorychangednegligiblyduringeachrefinementphase.Duringthelaststageofthefinal
refinementphase,twojudgesreviewedthedictionaryformistakes.
Step7.AdditionofSummaryVariables.
AmajorchangefromearlierversionsofLIWCistheinclusionoffournewsummaryvariables:
analyticalthinking(Pennebakeretal.,2014),clout(Kacewiczetal.,2012),authenticity
(Newmanetal.,2003),andemotionaltone(Cohnetal.,2004).Eachsummaryvariablewas
derivedfrompreviouslypublishedfindingsfromourlabandconvertedtopercentilesbasedon
standardizedscoresfromlargecomparisonsamples.Itmustbeemphasizedthatthesummary
variablesaretheonlynontransparentdimensionsintheLIWC2015output.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page7
ANoteabouttheLIWC2015LanguageCategories
ForthosewhoarefamiliarwithLIWC2007,someoftheLIWC2015categoriesandresultswill
beabitjarring.Someoftheoriginalcategorieshavebeenremoved,largelyduetotheir
consistentlylowbaserates,lowinternalreliability,ortheirinfrequentusebyresearchers:
Pasttenseverbs
Presenttenseverbs
Futuretenseverbs
Humanwords
Inhibitionwords
Inclusives
Exclusives
Thefollowingisalistofcategoriesthatareeithera)newtoLIWC2015,orb)substantially
differentfromtheircounterpartsinpreviousversions.WhileotherLIWC2015categoriesmay
alsobeslightlydifferentfromthoseinpreviousversions,categoriesfrompreviousversionsof
LIWCthatarepresentedinthelistbelowhaveundergonesubstantialrevision.
Commonverbs
Commonadjectives
Commoncomparison
words
Interrogatives
Femalereferences
Malereferences
Cognitiveprocesses
Differentiationwords
Drives
Affiliationwords
Achievementwords
Powerwords
Riskwords
Rewardwords
Pastfocuswords
Presentfocuswords
Futurefocuswords
Informallanguage
Netspeakwords
Quantifiers
NotethattheLIWC2015applicationcomeswiththeoriginalinternaldictionariesforboth
LIWC2001andLIWC2007forthosewhowanttorelyonolderversionsofthedictionaryaswell
astocompareLIWC2015analyseswiththoseprovidedbyolderversionsofthesoftware.
LIWC2015:InternalReliabilityandExternalValidity
Assessingthereliabilityandvalidityoftextanalysisprogramsisatrickybusiness.Onthe
surface,onewouldthinkthatyoucoulddeterminetheinternalreliabilityofaLIWCscalethe
samewayitisdonewithaquestionnaire.Withaquestionnairethattapsangeroraggression,for
example,participantscompleteaselfreportaskinganumberofquestionsabouttheirfeelingsor
behaviorsrelatedtoanger.Reliabilitycoefficientsarecomputedbycorrelatingpeople’s
responsestothevariousquestions.Themorehighlytheycorrelate,thereasoninggoes,themore
thequestionnaireitemsallmeasurethesamething.Voila!Thescaleisdeemedinternally
consistent.
Asimilarstrategycanbeusedwithwords.Butbewarned:thepsychometricsofnaturallanguage
usearenotasstraightforwardaswithquestionnaires.Thereasonisobviousonceyouthink
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page8
aboutit.Onceyousaysomething,yougenerallydon’tneedtosayitagaininthesameparagraph
oressay.Thenatureofdiscourse,then,isweusuallysaysomethingandthenmoveontothenext
topic.Repeatingthesameideaoverandoveragainisgenerallybadforminlanguage,yetthisis
astapleofselfreportquestionnairedesign.Itisimportant,then,tounderstandthatacceptable
boundariesfornaturallanguagereliabilitycoefficientsarelowerthanthosecommonlyseen
elsewhereinpsychologicaltests.
TheLIWCAngerscale,forexample,ismadeupof230angerrelatedwordsandwordstems.In
theory,themorethatpeopleuseonetypeofangerwordinagiventext,themoretheyshoulduse
otherangerwordsinthesametext.Totestthisidea,wecandeterminethedegreetowhich
peopleuseeachofthe230angerwordsacrossaselectgroupoftextfilesandthencalculatethe
intercorrelationsoftheworduse.Indeed,inTable1,weincludetheseinternalreliability
statistics,includingthoseofAngerwherethealphareliabilitiesrangebetween.52(corrected)
and.07(uncorrected)dependingonhowitiscomputed.Inordertocalculatethesestatistics,each
dictionarywordwasmeasuredasapercentageoftotalwordspertext.Thesescoreswerethen
enteredasan“item”inastandardCronbach’salphacalculation,providingrawalphascoresfor
eachwordcategory,separatelyforeachcorpora.UncorrectedalphasinTable1areaveragesof
eachcorpora’salphascore.Importantly,theuncorrectedmethodtendstogrosslyunderestimate
reliabilityinlanguagecategoriesduethehighlyvariablebaseratesofwordusagewithinany
givencategory.CorrectedalphaswerecomputedusingtheSpearmanBrownpredictionformula
(Brown,1910;Spearman,1910),andaregenerallyamoreaccurateapproximationofeach
category’s“true”internalconsistency.
Issuesofvalidityarealsoabittricky.Wecanhavepeoplecompleteaquestionnairethatassesses
theirgeneralmoodsandthenhavethemwriteanessaywhichwethensubjecttotheLIWC
program.Wecanalsohavejudgesevaluatetheessayforitsemotionalcontent.Inotherwords,
wecangetselfreported,judged,andLIWCnumbersthatallreflectaparticipant’sanger.
OneofthefirsttestsofthevalidityoftheLIWCscaleswasundertakenbyPennebakerand
Francis(1996)aspartofanexperimentinwhichfirstyearcollegestudentswroteaboutthe
experienceofcomingtocollege.Duringthewritingphaseofthestudy,72Introductory
Psychologystudentsmetasagrouponthreeconsecutivedaystowriteontheirassignedtopics.
Participantsintheexperimentalcondition(n=35)wereinstructedtowriteabouttheirdeepest
thoughtsandfeelingsconcerningtheexperienceofcomingtocollege.Thoseinthecontrol
condition(n=37)wereaskedtodescribeanyparticularobjectoreventoftheirchoosinginan
unemotionalway.Afterthewritingphaseofthestudywascompleted,fourjudgesratedthe
participants’essaysonvariousemotional,cognitive,content,andcompositiondimensions
designedtocorrespondtoselectedLIWCDictionaryscales.UsingLIWCoutputandjudges’
ratings,PearsoncorrelationalanalyseswereperformedtotestLIWC’sexternalvalidity.The
findingssuggestedthatLIWCsuccessfullymeasurespositiveandnegativeemotions,anumber
ofcognitivestrategies,severaltypesofthematiccontent,andvariouslanguagecomposition
elements.Thelevelofagreementbetweenjudges’ratingsandLIWC’sobjectivewordcount
strategyprovidessupportforLIWC’sexternalvalidity.
SincethefirstversionofLIWC,hundredsofstudieshavefoundtheLIWCcategoriestobevalid
acrossdozensofpsychologicaldomains.Asastartingpointforexploringthisbodyofliterature,
werecommendaclosereadingofTausczikandPennebaker(2010).
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page9
BaseRatesofWordUsage
Inevaluatinganytextanalysisprogram,itishelpfultogetasenseofthedegreetowhich
languagevariesacrosssettings.Since1986,wehavebeencollectingtextsamplesfromavariety
ofstudies–bothfromourownlabaswellasfromdozensofothersintheUnitedStates,
England,Canada,NewZealand,andAustralia.Forpurposesofcomparison,textfromseveral
dozensofstudieshavebeenanalyzedusingtheupdatedLIWC2015dictionary.Ascanbeseenin
Table2,theseanalysesreflecttheutterancesofover80,000writersorspeakerstotalingover231
millionwords.Weprovideabriefdescriptionofeachdatasetbelow.
Table2.SummaryInformationforLIWC2015Statistics
Blogs
Novels
Natural
Speech
NYTimes
Twitter
Totalfiles
37,295
875
3,232
34,929
35,269
Totalauthors
37,295
441
2,174
Unknown
35,269
Totalwords
119,449,058
57,467,183
2,566,446
26,007,632
23,172,994
Note:Alltextsforallcorporarequiredaminimumof25wordsforinclusioninouranalyses.Alltextswithfewer
than25wordswereomittedforallstatisticsreportedinthisdocument.
Blogs
.ThisisanexpandedversionofthecorpusdescribedinSchler,Koppel,Argamon,and
Pennebaker(2006).Allblogpostsweremergedbyindividualpriortoanalysis,reflectingthe
entiretyofeachperson’sblog.
Expressivewriting
.Thisdatasetconsistsof29samplesfromexperimentswherepeoplewere
randomlyassignedtowriteeitheraboutdeeplyemotionaltopics(emotionalwriting)orabout
relativelytrivialtopicssuchasplansfortheday(controlwriting).Individualsfromallwalksof
life–rangingfromcollegestudentstopsychiatricprisonerstoelderlyandevenelementaryaged
individuals–arerepresentedinthesestudies.Onlytheemotionalwritingtopicswereincludedin
thecurrentanalyses.
Novels
.ThisisasampleofnovelsacquiredfromProjectGutenberg(http://www.gutenberg.org/)
thathadbeentaggedas“literature”.AllnovelswerewrittenintheEnglishlanguagebyauthors
wholivedbetweenapproximately1660and2008.ThenumberofauthorspresentedinTable2
reflectsonlyknownauthorsoftheworksanalyzedworksforwhichtheauthorwasunknown
werenotincludedinthisfigure,butincludedinanalyses.
Naturalspeech
.Thespeechsamplesincludeddiversetranscriptsfrommultiplecontexts,
includingpeoplewearingaudiorecordersoverdaysorweeks,strangersinteractinginawaiting
room,couplestalkingaboutproblems,andopenairtaperecordingsofpeopleinpublicspaces.
NewYorkTimes
.AcollectionofarticlespublishedonlineattheNewYorkTimeswebsite
(http://www.nytimes.com).ArticleswerecollectedfromtheNewYorkTimesinternetarchives
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page10
andincludevarioustypesofwork,includingeditorials,features,U.S.andworldnews,lettersto
theeditor,andsoon.AllarticleswerepublishedbetweenJanuaryandJulyof2014.Author
informationwasnotpreservedforthisdataset,sothetruenumberofauthorsisunknown.
Twitter
.IndividualTwitterposts(i.e.,“tweets”)werecollectedfromthepublicprofilesofusers
whosenameswereenteredintotheAnalyzeWordswebpage(http://analyzewords.com).Each
user’stweetswerecombinedintoasingleunitofobservationforanalysis.
AscanbeseeninTable3,theLIWC2015versioncaptures,onaverage,over86percentofthe
wordspeopleuseinwritingandspeech.Notethatexceptfortotalwordcountandwordsper
sentenceandthefoursummaryvariables(Analytic,Clout,Authentic,andTone),allmeansin
Table3areexpressedaspercentageoftotalwordsusedinanygivenlanguagesample.Simple
statisticaltestsindicatethatnearlyalllanguagecategoriesdiffersignificantlybetweencontexts.
Table3.LIWC2015OutputVariableInformation
Category
Blogs
Expressive
writing
Novels
Natural
Speech
NY
Times
Twitter
Grand
Means
Mean
SDs
LinguisticProcesses
Wordcount(mean)
3206.45
408.94
65716.49
794.17
744.62
660.24
11921.82
10274.32
Analytic
49.89
44.88
70.33
18.43
92.57
61.94
56.34
17.58
Clout
47.87
37.02
75.37
56.27
68.17
63.02
57.95
17.51
Authentic
60.93
76.01
21.56
61.32
24.84
50.39
49.17
20.92
Tone
54.50
38.60
37.06
79.29
43.61
72.24
54.22
23.27
Words/sentence
*
18.40
18.42
16.13

21.94
12.10
17.40
16.38
Words>6letters
14.38
13.62
16.30
10.42
23.58
15.31
15.60
3.76
Dictionarywords
85.79
91.93
84.52
91.60
74.62
82.60
85.18
5.36
Totalfunctionwords
53.10
58.27
54.51
56.86
42.39
46.08
51.87
5.13
Totalpronouns
16.20
18.03
15.15
20.92
7.41
13.62
15.22
3.61
Personalpronouns
10.66
12.74
10.35
13.37
3.56
9.02
9.95
3.02
1stperssingular
6.26
8.66
2.63
7.03
0.63
4.75
4.99
2.46
1stpersplural
0.91
0.81
0.61
0.87
0.38
0.74
0.72
0.83
2ndperson
1.32
0.68
1.39
4.04
0.34
2.41
1.70
1.35
3rdperssingular
1.50
2.01
4.80
0.77
1.53
0.64
1.88
1.53
3rdpersplural
0.68
0.57
0.92
0.65
0.68
0.47
0.66
0.60
Impersonalpronouns
5.53
5.28
4.79
7.53
3.84
4.60
5.26
1.62
Articles
6.00
5.70
8.35
4.34
9.08
5.58
6.51
1.79
Prepositions
12.60
14.27
14.27
10.29
14.27
11.88
12.93
2.11
Auxiliaryverbs
8.75
9.25
7.77
12.03
5.11
8.27
8.53
2.04
Adverbs
5.88
6.02
4.17
7.67
2.76
5.13
5.27
1.61
Conjunctions
6.43
7.46
6.28
6.21
4.85
4.19
5.90
1.57
Negations
1.81
1.69
1.68
2.42
0.62
1.74
1.66
0.86
OtherGrammar
Commonverbs
17.03
18.63
15.42
21.01
10.23
16.33
16.44
2.93
Commonadjectives
4.53
4.52
4.36
4.13
4.52
4.89
4.49
1.30
Comparisons
2.17
2.42
2.13
2.35
2.39
1.89
2.23
0.95
Interrogatives
1.51
1.49
1.53
2.44
1.26
1.43
1.61
0.76
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page11
Number
1.89
1.87
1.23
2.19
3.55
1.98
2.12
2.07
Quantifiers
2.27
2.35
1.80
1.93
1.94
1.85
2.02
0.83
PsychologicalProcesses
Affectiveprocesses
5.79
4.77
4.81
6.54
3.82
7.67
5.57
1.99
Positiveemotion
3.66
2.57
2.67
5.31
2.32
5.48
3.67
1.63
Negativeemotion
2.06
2.12
2.08
1.19
1.45
2.14
1.84
1.09
Anxiety
0.27
0.50
0.44
0.14
0.25
0.24
0.31
0.32
Anger
0.68
0.49
0.51
0.36
0.47
0.75
0.54
0.59
Sadness
0.44
0.50
0.55
0.23
0.29
0.43
0.41
0.40
Socialprocesses
b
8.95
8.69
12.26
10.42
7.62
10.47
9.74
3.38
Family
0.46
0.77
0.39
0.31
0.33
0.36
0.44
0.63
Friends
0.40
0.55
0.25
0.37
0.18
0.43
0.36
0.40
Femalereferences
0.91
1.37
1.88
0.55
0.62
0.54
0.98
1.26
Malereferences
1.31
1.47
4.09
0.80
1.38
0.84
1.65
1.34
Cognitiveprocesses
11.58
12.52
9.84
12.27
7.52
9.96
10.61
3.02
Insight
2.28
2.66
2.11
2.46
1.54
1.92
2.16
1.08
Causation
1.46
1.65
1.03
1.45
1.42
1.41
1.40
0.73
Discrepancy
1.56
1.74
1.48
1.45
0.89
1.54
1.44
0.80
Tentative
2.82
2.89
2.27
3.06
1.74
2.35
2.52
1.09
Certainty
1.56
1.51
1.45
1.38
0.76
1.43
1.35
0.70
Differentiation
3.31
3.40
2.82
3.73
2.03
2.62
2.99
1.18
Perceptualprocesses
2.58
2.38
3.74
2.11
2.42
2.96
2.70
1.20
See
1.04
0.80
1.58
0.78
0.88
1.39
1.08
0.78
Hear
0.75
0.48
1.26
0.63
1.06
0.82
0.83
0.62
Feel
0.64
0.92
0.76
0.61
0.35
0.56
0.64
0.52
Biologicalprocesses
2.16
2.59
2.17
1.23
1.44
2.60
2.03
1.39
Body
0.74
0.69
1.24
0.31
0.41
0.77
0.69
0.64
Health
0.61
0.93
0.48
0.38
0.57
0.54
0.59
0.65
Sexual
0.17
0.09
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.24
0.13
0.30
Ingestion
0.54
0.86
0.39
0.35
0.41
0.86
0.57
0.83
Drives
6.87
7.35
5.84
6.39
7.60
7.50
6.93
2.03
Affiliation
2.20
2.45
1.39
2.06
1.69
2.53
2.05
1.28
Achievement
1.27
1.37
0.91
0.99
1.82
1.45
1.30
0.82
Power
2.07
2.02
2.46
1.72
3.62
2.17
2.35
1.12
Reward
1.49
1.56
1.04
1.73
1.07
1.86
1.46
0.81
Risk
0.46
0.54
0.53
0.30
0.56
0.46
0.47
0.41
Timeorientations
Pastfocus
4.25
5.83
7.06
3.78
4.09
2.81
4.64
2.06
Presentfocus
10.95
10.45
6.21
15.28
5.14
11.74
9.96
2.80
Futurefocus
1.60
1.85
1.19
1.45
0.80
1.60
1.42
0.90
Relativity
14.23
16.19
14.56
12.12
14.47
13.99
14.26
3.18
Motion
2.15
2.58
2.34
2.20
1.70
1.94
2.15
1.03
Space
6.43
6.96
7.82
5.86
7.76
6.51
6.89
1.96
Time
5.86
7.01
4.71
4.28
5.17
5.75
5.46
1.81
PersonalConcerns
Work
2.04
2.64
1.20
2.87
4.49
2.16
2.56
1.81
Leisure
1.50
1.17
0.56
1.11
1.67
2.11
1.35
1.08
Home
0.49
0.99
0.56
0.34
0.47
0.43
0.55
0.63
Money
0.59
0.41
0.45
0.44
1.47
0.74
0.68
0.83
Religion
0.39
0.20
0.34
0.14
0.25
0.35
0.28
0.57
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page12
Death
0.15
0.12
0.26
0.04
0.22
0.19
0.16
0.29
InformalLanguage
2.09
0.45
0.53
7.10
0.29
4.68
2.52
1.65
Swearwords
0.35
0.09
0.05
0.25
0.02
0.49
0.21
0.37
Netspeak
0.92
0.05
0.10
1.35
0.16
3.23
0.97
1.17
Assent
0.33
0.10
0.14
3.29
0.05
1.82
0.95
0.72
Nonfluencies
0.42
0.17
0.24
1.96
0.07
0.39
0.54
0.49
Fillers
0.11
0.04
0.01
0.46
0.00
0.04
0.11
0.27
Punctuation
*
TotalPunctuation
24.18
12.41
23.68
19.02
27.46
21.35
9.01
Periods
10.29
6.17
6.04
5.88
9.07
7.49
3.76
Commas
4.15
3.17
7.09
6.60
2.76
4.75
1.94
Colons
0.43
0.21
0.12
0.27
2.15
0.64
0.85
Semicolons
0.10
0.04
0.53
0.17
0.67
0.30
0.53
Questionmarks
0.59
0.15
0.60
0.15
1.40
0.58
1.00
Exclamationmarks
1.16
0.12
0.49
0.02
3.21
1.00
1.35
Dashes
0.99
0.39
2.14
1.23
1.21
1.19
1.38
Quotationmarks
0.71
0.22
3.90
2.23
1.30
1.67
1.36
Apostrophes
3.85
1.40
2.19
1.56
3.32
2.46
4.94
Parentheses
0.90
0.32
0.06
0.54
0.81
0.53
0.87
Otherpunctuation
1.00
0.23
0.52
0.36
1.56
0.73
1.70
Notes:GrandMeansaretheunweightedmeansofthesixgenres;MeanSDsrefertotheunweightedmeanofthe
standarddeviationsacrossthesixgenrecategories.
*Incalculatinggrandmeansandstandarddeviationsforthewordspersentence(WPS)andpunctuationcategories,
thenaturalspeechcorpuswasexcludedduetodifferingtranscriptionrulesacrossdocuments.
Inmanyways,Table3pointstotheimportantrolethatcontextplaysinpeople’suseof
language.Notsurprisingly,thetopicsofwriting–asreflectedinthecurrentconcernscategory–
varysubstantiallyasafunctionofgenre.Morestriking,however,arethelargedifferencesin
people’suseoffunctionwordsaswellaspunctuationfromgenretogenre(cf.,Biber,1988).
ComparingLIWC2015withLIWC2007
ForusersofLIWC2007,aneweditionofLIWCthatusesadifferentdictionarycanbean
unsettlingexperience.Mostoftheolderdictionarieshavebeenslightlychanged,somehavebeen
substantiallyreworked(e.g.,socialwords,cognitiveprocesswords),andseveralothershave
beenremovedoradded.ToassistinthetransitiontothenewversionofLIWC,weincludeTable
4whichliststhemeans,standarddeviations,andcorrelationsbetweenthetwodictionary
versions.TheseanalysesarebasedonthecorporadetailedinTables2and3.Allnumbers
presentedinTable4aretheaverageresultsfromallsixcorpora.
TogetasenseofhowmuchadictionaryhaschangedfromtheLIWC2007totheLIWC2015
versions,lookattheLIWC2015/2007Correlationcolumn.Thelowerthecorrelation,themore
changeacrossthetwoversions.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page13
Table4.ComparisonsBetweenLIWC2015andLIWC2007:Means,StandardDeviations,
andCorrelations
LIWCDimension
OutputLabel
LIWC2015mean
LIWC2007mean
LIWC2015/2007
Correlation
1
Wordcount
WC
11,921.82
11,852.99
1.00
SummaryVariables
Analyticalthinking
Analytic
56.34
Clout
Clout
57.95
Authentic
Authentic
49.17
Emotionaltone
Tone
54.22
LanguageMetrics
Wordspersentence
*
WPS
17.40
25.07
0.74
Words>6letters
Sixltr
15.60
15.89
0.98
Dictionarywords
Dic
85.18
83.95
0.94
FunctionWords
function
51.87
54.29
0.95
Totalpronouns
pronoun
15.22
14.99
0.99
Personalpronouns
ppron
9.95
9.83
0.99
1stperssingular
i
4.99
4.97
1.00
1stpersplural
we
0.72
0.72
1.00
2ndperson
you
1.70
1.61
0.98
3rdperssingular
shehe
1.88
1.87
1.00
3rdpersplural
they
0.66
0.66
0.99
Impersonalpronouns
ipron
5.26
5.17
0.99
Articles
article
6.51
6.53
0.99
Prepositions
prep
12.93
12.59
0.96
Auxiliaryverbs
auxverb
8.53
8.82
0.96
Commonadverbs
adverb
5.27
4.83
0.97
Conjunctions
conj
5.90
5.87
0.99
Negations
negate
1.66
1.72
0.96
OtherGrammar
Regularverbs
verb
16.44
15.26
0.72
Adjectives
adj
4.49
Comparatives
compare
2.23
Interrogatives
interrog
1.61
Numbers
number
2.12
1.98
0.98
Quantifiers
quant
2.02
2.48
0.88
AffectWords
affect
5.57
5.63
0.96
Positiveemotion
posemo
3.67
3.75
0.96
Negativeemotion
negemo
1.84
1.83
0.96
Anxiety
anx
0.31
0.33
0.94
Anger
anger
0.54
0.6
0.97
Sadness
sad
0.41
0.39
0.92
SocialWords
social
9.74
9.36
0.96
Family
family
0.44
0.38
0.94
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page14
Friends
friend
0.36
0.23
0.78
Femalereferents
female
0.98
Malereferents
male
1.65
CognitiveProcesses
2
cogproc
10.61
14.99
0.84
Insight
insight
2.16
2.13
0.98
Cause
cause
1.40
1.41
0.97
Discrepancies
discrep
1.44
1.45
0.99
Tentativeness
tentat
2.52
2.42
0.98
Certainty
certain
1.35
1.27
0.92
Differentiation
3
differ
2.99
2.48
0.85
PerceptualProcesses
percept
2.70
2.36
0.92
Seeing
see
1.08
0.87
0.88
Hearing
hear
0.83
0.73
0.94
Feeling
feel
0.64
0.62
0.92
BiologicalProcesses
bio
2.03
1.88
0.94
Body
body
0.69
0.68
0.96
Health/illness
health
0.59
0.53
0.87
Sexuality
sexual
0.13
0.28
0.76
Ingesting
ingest
0.57
0.46
0.94
DrivesandNeeds
drives
6.93
Affiliation
affiliation
2.05
Achievement
achieve
1.30
1.56
0.93
Power
power
2.35
Rewardfocus
reward
1.46
Riskfocus
risk
0.47
TimeOrientations
4
Pastfocus
focuspast
4.64
4.14
0.97
Presentfocus
focuspresent
9.96
8.1
0.92
Futurefocus
focusfuture
1.42
1.00
0.63
Relativity
relativ
14.26
13.87
0.98
Motion
motion
2.15
2.06
0.93
Space
space
6.89
6.17
0.96
Time
time
5.46
5.79
0.94
PersonalConcerns
Work
work
2.56
2.27
0.97
Leisure
leisure
1.35
1.37
0.95
Home
home
0.55
0.56
0.99
Money
money
0.68
0.70
0.97
Religion
relig
0.28
0.32
0.96
Death
death
0.16
0.16
0.96
InformalSpeech
informal
2.52
Swearwords
swear
0.21
0.17
0.89
Netspeak
netspeak
0.97
Assent
assent
0.95
1.11
0.68
Nonfluencies
nonfl
0.54
0.30
0.84
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page15
Fillers
filler
0.11
0.40
0.29
AllPunctuation
*
Allpunc
21.35
21.65
0.98
Periods
Period
7.49
7.56
0.98
Commas
Comma
4.75
4.75
1.00
Colons
Colon
0.64
0.73
0.98
Semicolons
SemiC
0.3
0.29
0.97
Questionmarks
QMark
0.58
0.58
1.00
Exclamationmarks
Exclam
1.00
1.00
1.00
Dashes
Dash
1.19
1.21
0.98
Quotationmarks
Quote
1.67
1.64
0.93
Apostrophes
Apostro
2.46
2.52
0.94
Parentheses(pairs)
Parenth
0.53
0.63
0.90
Otherpunctuation
OtherP
0.73
0.72
0.95
*
Duetodifferencesinpunctuationrulesfortranscriptions,thenaturallanguagecorpuswasexcludedwhen
computingmeansandcorrelationsforpunctuationcategoriesaswellaswordspersentence.
1
Correlationistheaveragecorrelationbetweenthe2007and2015dictionariesacrosssixcorpora.Lowcorrelations
(<.80)aretobeexpectedduetothelargecategorydifferencesbetweenthetwoversions.
2
CognitiveprocessesisconceptuallysimilartothecognitivemechanismsLIWC2007category.Thenewercognitive
processdimensionrestrictsconstituentwordstotruemarkersofcognitiveactivity.
3
Differentiationisconceptuallysimilartothe2007exclusivecategory.
4
TimeOrientationcategoriesaresimilartothe2007categoriespast,present,andfuturebutaremoreunifiedto
reflectageneraltimeorientationinsteadofjustverbtenseusage.
LIWCDictionaryTranslations
TheLIWCdictionarieshavebeentranslatedintoseverallanguages,includingSpanish,German,
Dutch,Norwegian,Italian,Portuguese.Severalotherlanguagetranslationsareunderway,
includingArabic,Korean,Turkish,andChinese.Todate,thesetranslationshavereliedonthe
LIWC2001orLIWC2007dictionariesratherthanLIWC2015.
UnlikepreviousversionsofLIWC,thecurrentversionisbundledexclusivelywiththeoriginal
Englishdictionaryversions.LIWCdictionarytranslations,aswellasotherpublished
dictionaries,willbemadeavailableattheofficialLIWCdictionaryrepository
(http://www.liwc.net/dictionaries).IfyouwouldliketobuildanonEnglishLIWC2015
dictionaryorifyouhavebuiltoneindependentlywouldliketoaddittotherepository,contact
thefirstauthoratpennebaker@mail.utexas.edu.
HelpfulReferences
Argamon,S.,Koppel,M.,Fine,J.,&Shimoni,A.R.(2003).Gender,genre,andwritingstylein
formalwrittentexts.Text
,23,32346.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page16
Argamon,S.,Koppel,M.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Schler,J.(2009).Automaticallyprofilingthe
authorofananonymoustext.CommunicationsoftheAssociationforComputing
Machinery(CACM)
,52,119123.
Baayen,R.H.,Piepenbrock,R.,&Bulickers,L.(1995).TheCELEXLexicalDatabase(Release
I)[CDROM].Philadelphia:LinguisticDataConsortium,UniversityofPennsylvania.
Back,M.D.,Küfner,A.C.,&Egloff,B.(2011).“Automaticorthepeople?”Angeron
September11,2001,andlessonslearnedfortheanalysisoflargedigitaldatasets.
Psychologicalscience
,22
,837838.
Baddeley,J.L.,Daniel,G.R.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2015).HowHenryHellyer’suseof
languageforetoldhissuicide.Crisis,32
,288292.
Bazarova,N.N.,Taft,J.G.,Choi,Y.H.,&Cosley,D.(2012).Managingimpressionsand
relationshipsonFacebook:Selfpresentationalandrelationalconcernsrevealedthrough
theanalysisoflanguagestyle.JournalofLanguageandSocialPsychology,32
,
121141.
Biber,D.(1988).Variationacrossspeechandwriting.
Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Boroditsky,L.(2001).Doeslanguageshapethought?MandarinandEnglishspeakers’
conceptionoftime.CognitivePsychology,43,
122.
Bosson,J.K.,Swann,W.B.,Jr.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2000).Stalkingtheperfectmeasureof
implicitselfesteem:Theblindmenandtheelephantrevisited?JournalofPersonality
andSocialPsychology,79,
631643.
Boyd,R.L.(2015).MEH:MeaningExtractionHelper[Software].Availablefrom
http://meh.ryanb.cc
Boyd,R.L.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2015).DidShakespearewriteDoubleFalsehood
?Identifying
individualsbycreatingpsychologicalsignatureswithtextanalysis.Psychological
science
,26,
570582.
Brewer,M.B.,&Gardner,W.(1996).Whoisthis“We”?Levelsofcollectiveidentityandself
representations.JournalofPersonality&SocialPsychology,71,
8393.
Brown,R.(1968).Wordsandthings:Anintroductiontolanguage
.NY:FreePress.
Bruner,J.S.(1973).Beyondtheinformationgiven:Studiesinthepsychologyofknowing.
London:W.W.Norton.
Bucci,W.(1995).Thepowerofthenarrative:amultiplecodeaccount.InJ.W.Pennebaker
(Ed.),Emotion,Disclosure,andHealth
(pp.93122).
Washington,DC:American
PsychologicalAssociation.
Buchanan,L.,Westbury,C.,&Burgess,C.(2001).Characterizingsemanticspace:
Neighborhoodeffectsinwordrecognition.PsychonomicBulletin&Review
,8
,
531544.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page17
Carey,A.L.,Brucks,M.S.,Küfner,A.C.P.,Holtzman,N.S.,Deters,F.G.,Back,M.D.,
Donnellan,M.B.,etal.(2015).Narcissismandtheuserofpersonalpronounsrevisited.
JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,109
,115.
Campbell,R.S.&Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Thesecretlifeofpronouns:Flexibilityinwriting
styleandphysicalhealth.Psychologicalscience,14
,6065.
Chambers,J.K.,Trudgill,P.,&SchillingEstes,N.,(2004).Thehandbookoflanguagevariation
andchange.
London:Blackwell.
Chung,C.K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2013).Usingcomputerizedtextanalysistotracksocial
processes.InT.Holtgraves(Ed.),Handbookoflanguageandsocialpsychology
(pp.
21923).NewYork,NY:Oxford.
Chung,C.K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2012).Linguisticinquiryandwordcount(LIWC):
Pronounced“Luke,”...andotherusefulfacts.InP.M.McCarthy&C.Boonthum
Denecke(Eds.),Appliednaturallanguageprocessing:Identification,investigationand
resolution
(pp.206229).Hershey,PA:IGIGlobal.
Chung,C.K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2005).Assessingqualityoflifethroughnaturallanguage
use:Implicationsofcomputerizedtextanalysis.InW.R.LenderkingandD.A.Revicki
(eds.),Advancinghealthoutcomesresearchmethodsandclinicalapplications
(pp.
7994).Washington,DC:DegnonAssociates.
Chung,C.K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2007).Thepsychologicalfunctionsoffunctionwords.InK.
Fiedler(Ed.),Socialcommunication
(pp.343359).NewYork,NY:PsychologyPress.
Chung,C.K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2008).Revealingdimensionsofthinkinginopenended
selfdescriptions:Anautomatedmeaningextractionmethodfornaturallanguage.
JournalofResearchinPersonality,42,
96132.
Cohn,M.A.,Mehl,M.R.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2004).Linguisticmarkersofpsychological
changesurroundingSeptember11,2001.Psychologicalscience,15,
68793.
Crammer,K.&Singer,Y.(2003).Ultraconservativeonlinealgorithmsformulticlassproblems.
JournalofMachineLearningResearch
,3
,951991.
Damasio,A.R.(1995).Descartes'error:Emotion,reasonandthehumanbrain.
NY:Harper
Collins.
Davison,K.P,&Pennebaker,J.W.,&Dickerson,S.S.(2000).Whotalks?Thesocial
psychologyofillnesssupportgroups.AmericanPsychologist
,55
,205217.
DeChoudhury,M.,Counts,S.,&Horvitz,E.(2013,April).Predictingpostpartumchangesin
emotionandbehaviorviasocialmedia.InProceedingsoftheSIGCHIConferenceon
HumanFactorsinComputingSystems
(pp.32673276).ACM.
Feixas,G.,Geldschlager,H.,&Neimeyer,R.A.(2002).Contentanalysisofpersonal
constructs.JournalofConstructivistPsychology,15,
119.
Fiedler,K.,&Semin,G.R.(1992).Attributionandlanguageasasociocognitiveenvironment.
InG.R.Semin,andK.Fiedler(Eds.),Language,Interaction,andSocialCognition(
pp.
5878.)ThousandOaks,CA:SagePublications,Inc.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page18
Fitzsimmons,G.M.,&Kay,A.C.(2004).Languageandinterpersonalcognition:Causaleffects
ofvariationsinpronounusageonperceptionsofcloseness.PersonalityandSocial
PsychologyBulletin,5,
547557.
Foltz,P.W.(1996).Latentsemanticanalysisfortextbasedresearch.BehaviorResearch
Methods,Instruments&Computers,28,
197202.
Francis,W.N.,&Kucera,H.(1982).FrequencyanalysesofEnglishusage:Lexiconand
grammar
.MA:HoughtonMifflin.
Gazzaniga,M.S.(2005).Theethicalbrain.
NY:DanaPress.
Genkin,A.,Lewis,D.D.,andMadigan,D.(2006).LargescaleBayesianlogisticregressionfor
textcategorization.Technometrics,49
,291304.
Gill,A.(2003).Personalityandlanguage.Theprojectionandperceptionofpersonalityin
computermediatedcommunication.Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation.Universityof
Edinburgh,Scotland.
Gill,A.J.,Oberlander,J.,&Austin,E.(2006).Theperceptionofemailpersonalityat
zeroacquaintace.PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,40,
497507.
Gortner,E.M.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Theanatomyofadisaster:Mediacoverageand
communitywidehealtheffectsoftheTexasA&MBonfiretragedy.JournalofSocial
andClinicalPsychology,22,
580603.
Gottschalk,L.A.(1997).Theunobtrusivemeasurementofpsychologicalstatesandtraits.InC.
W.Roberts(Ed.)Textanalysisforthesocialsciences:Methodsfordrawingstatistical
inferencesfromtextsandtranscripts(
pp.117129).
Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
Gottschalk,L.A.,&Gleser,G.C.(1969).Themeasurementofpsychologicalstatesthroughthe
contentanalysisofverbalbehavior
.CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Graesser,A.C.,Gernsbacher,M.A.,&Goldman,S.R.(2003).IntroductiontotheHandbookof
DiscourseProcesses.InA.C.Graesser,M.A.Gernsbacher,andS.R.Goldman,
Handbookofdiscourseprocesses
(pp.123).Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaum
Associates.
Graesser,A.C.,Lu,S.,Jackson,G.T.,Mitchell,H.,Ventura,M.,Olney,A.,&Louwerse,M.
M.(2004).AutoTutor:Atutorwithdialogueinnaturallanguage.Behavioral
ResearchMethods,Instruments,andComputers,36,
180193.
Graesser,A.C.,McNamara,D.S.,Louwerse,M.M.,&Cai,Z.(2004).CohMetrix:Analysisof
textoncohesionandlanguage.BehaviorResearchMethods,Instruments&
Computers,36,
193202.
Graham,L.E.,Scherwitz,L.,&Brand,R.(1989).Selfreferenceandcoronaryheartdisease
incidencentheWesternCollaborativeGroupStudy.PsychosomaticMedicine,51,
137144.
Graybeal,A.,Seagal,J.D.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).Theroleofstorymakingindisclosure
writing:Thepsychometricsofnarrative.PsychologyandHealth,17
,571581.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page19
Groom,C.J.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2005).Thelanguageoflove:Sex,sexualorientation,and
languageuseinonlinepersonaladvertisements.SexRoles,52
,447461.
Groom,C.J.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Words.JournalofResearchinPersonality,36
,
615621.
Hajek,C.,&Giles,H.(2003).Newdirectionsininterculturalcommunicationcompetence.InJ.
O.GreeneandB.R.Burleson(Eds.),Handbookofcommunicationandsocial
interactionskills(
pp.935957).Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates,
Publishers.
Halliday,M.A.K.,&Matthiessen,C.(2004).Anintroductiontofunctionalgrammar
(3rded.).
London:Arnold.
Hart,R.P.,Jarvis,S.E.,Jennings,W.P.,&SmithHowell,D.(2005).Politicalkeywords:Using
languagethatusesus
.NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
Hartley,J.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Fox,C.(2003).Usingnewtechnologytoassesstheacademic
writingstylesofmaleandfemalepairsandindividuals.JournalofTechnicalWriting
andCommunication,33
,243261.
Hartley,J.,SottoE.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Speakingversustyping:Acasestudyofthe
effectsofusingvoicerecognitionsoftwareonacademiccorrespondence.British
JournalofEducationalTechnology,34
,516.
Hartley,J.,Sotto,E.andPennebaker,J.W.(2002).Styleandsubstanceinpsychology:Are
influentialarticlesmorereadablethanlessinfluentialones.SocialStudiesofScience,
32
,321334.
Heberlein,A.S.,Adolphs,R.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Tranel,D.(2003).Effectsofdamageto
righthemispherebrainstructuresonspontaneousemotionalandsocialjudgments.
PoliticalPsychology,24,
705726.
Holtgraves,T.(2011).Textmessaging,personality,andthesocialcontext.JournalofResearch
inPersonality
,45
,9299.
Holtzman,N.S.,Vazire,S.,&Mehl,M.R.(2010).Soundslikeanarcissist:Behavioral
manifestationsofnarcissismineverydaylife.JournalofResearchinPersonality
,44
,
478484.
Ireland,M.E.,&Henderson,M.D.(2014).Languagestylematching,engagement,andimpasse
innegotiations.Negotiationandconflictmanagementresearch
,7
,116.
Ireland,M.E.,Slatcher,R.B.,Eastwick,P.W.,Scissors,L.E.,Finkel,E.J.,&Pennebaker,J.
W.(2011).Languagestylematchingpredictsrelationshipinitiationandstability.
Psychologicalscience,22
,3944.
Kacewicz,E.,Pennebaker,J.W.,Davis,M.,Jeon,M.,&Graesser,A.C.(2013).Pronounuse
reflectsstandingsinsocialhierarchies.JournalofLanguageandSocialPsychology
,33,
125143.
Kanagawa,C.,Cross,S.E.,&Markus,H.R.(2001)."WhoamI?"Theculturalpsychologyof
theconceptualself.PersonalityandSocialPsychologyBulletin,27,
90103.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page20
Kashima,E.S.,&Kashima,Y.(1998).Cultureandlanguage:Thecaseofculturaldimensions
andpersonalpronounuse.JournalofCrossCulturalPsychology,29,
461486.
Kashima,E.S.,&Kashima,Y.(2005).ErratumtoKashimaandKashima(1998)andreiteration.
JournalofCrossCulturalPsychology,36,
396400.
Koppel,M.,Schler,J.,&Zigdon,K.(2005,August).Determininganauthor'snativelanguageby
miningatextforerrors.InProceedingsoftheeleventhACMSIGKDDinternational
conferenceonKnowledgediscoveryindatamining
(pp.624628).ACM.
Koppel,M.,Schler,J.,Argamon,S.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2006).Effectsofageandgenderon
blogging.PresentedatAAAI2006SpringSymposiumonComputationalApproachesto
AnalysingWeblogs
,Stanford,CA,March2006.
Lee,ChangH.,Nam,K.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2004).Iswritingasmuchphonologicalas
speaking?Homophoneusageacrossspeakingandwriting.Psychologia:An
InternationalJournalofPsychologyintheOrient,47
,19.
Lepore,S.J.,&Smyth,J.M.(2002).Thewritingcure:Howexpressivewritingpromoteshealth
andemotionalwellbeing.
Washington:AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.
Li,J.,Zheng,R.,&Chen,H.(2006).Fromfingerprinttowriteprint.Communicationsofthe
ACM
,49
,7682.
Liehr,P.,Mehl,M.R.,Summers,L.C.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2004).Connectingwithothersin
themidstofastressfulupheavalonSeptember11,2001.AppliedNursingResearch,17
,
29.
Liehr,P.,Takahashi,R.,Nishimura,C.,Frazier,L.,Kuwajima,I.&Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).
Embodiedlanguage:Comparisonofthecardiacandstrokehealthexperiencefor
Japaneseelders.JournalofNursingScholarship,34
,2732
Lyons,E.J.,Mehl,M.R.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2006).Linguisticselfpresentationinanorexia:
Differencesbetweenproanorexiaandrecoveringanorexiainternetlanguageuse.
JournalofPsychosomaticResearch,60,
253256.
Markus,H.R.,&Kitayama,S.(1991).Cultureandtheself:Implicationsforcognition,emotion,
andmotivation.PsychologicalReview,98,
224253.
McAdams,D.P.(2001).Thepsychologyoflifestories.ReviewofGeneralPsychology,5,
100122.
Mehl,M.R.,Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Thesocialdynamicsofaculturalupheaval:Social
interactionssurroundingSeptember11,2001.PsychologicalScience,14,
57985.
Mehl,M.R.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2003).Thesoundsofsociallife:Apsychometricanalysisof
students’dailysocialenvironmentsandconversations.JournalofPersonalityand
SocialPsychololgy,84
,857870.
Mehl,M.R.,Robbins,M.L.,&Holleran,S.E.(2012).Howtakingawordforawordcanbe
problematic:Contextdependentlinguisticmarkersofextraversionandneuroticism.
JournalofMethodsandMeasurementintheSocialSciences
,3
,3050.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page21
Miller,G.A.(1995).TheScienceofWords.
NY:ScientificAmericanLibrary.
Mitchell,T.(1999).MachineLearning
.NY:McGrawHill.
Newman,M.L.,Groom,C.J.,Handelman,L.D.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2008).Gender
differencesinlanguageuse:Ananalysisof14,000textsamples.DiscourseProcesses
,
45
,211236.
Newman,M.L.,Pennebaker,J.W.,Berry,D.S.,&Richards,J.M.(2003).Lying
words:Predictingdeceptionfromlinguisticstyle.PersonalityandSocialPsychology
Bulletin,29,
665675.
Niederhoffer,K.G.&Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).Linguisticstylematchinginsocialinteraction.
JournalofLanguageandSocialPsychology,21,
337360.
Nisbett,R.E.(2003).Thegeographyofthought:HowAsiansandWesternersthinkdifferently.
NY:FreePress.
Oberlander,J.,&Gill,A.J.(2006).Languagewithcharacter:Astratifiedcorpuscomparisonof
individualdifferencesinemailcommunication.DiscourseProcesses,42,
239270.
Peng,K.,&Nisbett,R.E.(1999).Culture,dialectics,andreasoningaboutcontradiction.
AmericanPsychologist,54,
741754.
Pennebaker,J.W.(1997).Writingaboutemotionalexperiencesasatherapeuticprocess.
PsychologicalScience,8
,162166.
Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).Whatourwordscansayaboutus:Towardsabroaderlanguage
psychology.PsychologicalScienceAgenda,15
,89.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Booth,R.J.,&Francis,M.E.(2007).LinguisticInquiryandWordCount
(LIWC):LIWC2007
.Austin,TX:LIWC.net.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Booth,R.J.,Boyd,R.L.,&Francis,M.E.(2015).LinguisticInquiryand
WordCount:LIWC2015
.Austin,TX:PennebakerConglomerates(www.LIWC.net).
Pennebaker,J.W.&Campbell,R.S.(2000).Theeffectsofwritingabouttraumaticexperience.
ClinicalQuarterly,9
,1721.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Chung,C.K.,Frazee,J.,Lavergne,G.M.,&Beaver,D.I.(2014).When
smallwordsforetellacademicsuccess:Thecaseofcollegeadmissionsessays.PloS
One
,9
,110.
Pennebaker,J.W.&Chung,C.K.(2005).Trackingthesocialdynamicsofresponsesto
terrorism:Language,behavior,andtheInternet.InS.WesselyandV.N.Krasnov
(Eds.),Psychologicalresponsestothenewterrorism:ANATORussiadialogue
(pp.
159170).Holland,Amsterdam:ISOPress.
Pennebaker,J.W.&Graybeal,A.(2001).Patternsofnaturallanguageuse:Disclosure,
personality,andsocialintegration.CurrentDirectionsinPsychologicalScience,10,
9093.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page22
Pennebaker,J.W.&Lee,ChangH.(2002).Thepowerofwordsinsocial,clinical,and
personalitypsychology.TheKoreanJournalofThinkingandProblemSolving,12
,
3543.
Pennebaker,J.W.,&Francis,M.E.(1996).Cognitive,emotional,andlanguageprocessesin
disclosure.CognitionandEmotion,10
,601626.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Francis,M.E.,&Booth,R.J.(2001).LinguisticInquiryandWordCount
(LIWC):LIWC2001.
Mahwah:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Groom,C.J.,Loew,D.,&Dabbs,J.M.(2004).Testosteroneasasocial
inhibitor:Twocasestudiesoftheeffectoftestosteronetreatmentonlanguage.Journal
ofAbnormalPsychology,113
,172175.
Pennebaker,J.W.,&Ireland,M.(2008).Analyzingwordstounderstandliterature.InW.van
PeerandJ.Auracher(Eds.),Newbeginningsforthestudyofliterature
(pp.2448).
Cambridge,UK:CambridgeScholarsPublishing.
Pennebaker,J.W.,&Ireland,M.E.(2011).Usingliteraturetounderstandauthors:Thecasefor
computerizedtextanalysis.ScientificStudyofLiterature
,1
,3448.
Pennebaker,J.W.,&King,L.A.(1999).Linguisticstyles:Languageuseasanindividual
difference.JournalofPersonality&SocialPsychology,77,
12961312.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Mayne,T.,&Francis,M.E.(1997).Linguisticpredictorsofadaptive
bereavement.JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,72
,863871.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Mehl,M.R.,&Niederhoffer,K.(2003).Psychologicalaspectsofnatural
languageuse:Ourwords,ourselves.AnnualReviewofPsychology,54,
547577.
Pennebaker,J.W.,Slatcher,R.B.,&Chung,C.K.(2005).Linguisticmarkersofpsychological
statethroughmediainterviews:JohnKerryandJohnEdwardsin2004,AlGorein
2000.AnalysisofSocialandPublicPolicy,5
,19.
Pennebaker,J.W.,&Stone,L.D.(2003).Wordsofwisdom:Languageuseoverthelifespan.
JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,85,
291301.
RamirezEsparza,N.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2006).Dogoodstoriesproducegoodhealth?
Exploringwords,language,andculture.NarrativeInquiry,16
,211219.
RamirezEsparza,N.,Pennebaker,J.W.,Garcia,F.A.,&Suria,R.(2007).Lapsychologíadel
usodelaspalabras:UnprogramadecomutadoraqueanalizatextosenEspañol(The
psychologyofworduse:AcomputerprogramthatanalyzestextsinSpanish).Revista
MexicanadePsicología,24
,8599.
Robinson,R.L.,Navea,R.,&Ickes,W.(2013).Predictingfinalcourseperformancefrom
students’writtenselfintroductions:ALIWCanalysis.JournalofLanguageandSocial
Psychology
,32,469479.
Rochon,E.,&Saffran,E.M.,Berndt,R.S.,&Schwartz,M.F.(2000).Quantitativeanalysisof
aphasicsentenceproduction:Furtherdevelopmentandnewdata.BrainandLanguage,
72,
193218.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page23
Rosenberg,S.D.&Tucker,G.J.(1978).Verbalbehaviorandschizophrenia:Thesemantic
dimension.ArchivesofGeneralPsychiatry,36
,13311337.
Rude,S.S.,Gortner,E.M.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2004).Languageuseofdepressedand
depressionvulnerablecollegestudents.Cognition&Emotion,18,
11211133.
Sbarra,D.A.,Smith,H.L.,&Mehl,M.R.(2012).Whenleavingyourex,loveyourself
observationalratingsofselfcompassionpredictthecourseofemotionalrecovery
followingmaritalseparation.PsychologicalScience
,23
,261269.
Scherwitz,L.,Berton,K.,&Leventhal,H.(1978).TypeAbehavior,selfinvolvement,and
cardiovascularresponse.PsychosomaticMedicine,40,
593609.
Schiller,R.,Tellegen,A.,&Evens,J.(1995).Anidiogrpahicandnomotheticstudyof
personalitydescription.InJ.N.ButcherandC.D.Spielberger(Eds.),Advancesin
personalityassessment
(pp.123).Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates,Inc.
Schultheiss,O.C.,&Brunstein,J.C.(2001).Assessmentofimplicitmotiveswitharesearch
versionoftheTAT:Pictureprofiles,genderdifferences,andrelationstoother
personalitymeasures.JournalofPersonalityAssessment,77,Specialissue:Moredata
onthecurrentRorschachcontroversy,
7186.
Scott,M.(1996).WordSmith.
NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
Sebastiani,F.(2002).Machinelearninginautomatedtextcategorization.ACMComputing
Surveys
,34
,147.
Semin,G.R.,Rubini,M.,&Fiedler,K.(1995).Theanswerisinthequestion:Theeffectofverb
causalityonthelocusofexplanation.Personality&SocialPsychologyBulletin,21,
834841.
Skoyen,J.A.,Randall,A.K.,Mehl,M.R.,&Butler,E.A.(2014).“We”overeat,but“I”can
staythin:Pronounuseandbodyweightincoupleswhoeattoregulateemotion.Journal
ofSocialandClinicalPsychology
,33
,743766.
Slatcher,R.B.&Pennebaker,J.W.(2006).HowdoIlovethee?Letmecountthewords:The
socialeffectsofexpressivewriting.PsychologicalScience,17
,660664.
Slatcher,R.B.,Chung,C.K.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Stone,L.D.(2007).Winningwords:
IndividualdifferencesinlinguisticstyleamongU.S.presidentialandvicepresidential
candidates.JournalofResearchinPersonality,41
,6375.
Slobin,D.(1996).From“thought”and“language”to“thinking”for“speaking”.FromJ.J.
GumperzandS.J.Levinson(Eds.),Rethinkinglinguisticrelativity
(pp.7096).New
York,NY:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Stiles,W.B.(1992).Describingtalk:Ataxonomyofverbalresponsemodes
.California:Sage.
Stirman,S.W.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2001).Worduseinthepoetryofsuicidalandnonsuicidal
poets.PsychosomaticMedicine,63,
517522.
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page24
Stone,L.D.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).Traumainrealtime:Talkingandavoidingonline
conversationsaboutthedeathofPrincessDiana.Basic&AppliedSocialPsychology,
24,
172182.
Stone,L.D.&Pennebaker,J.W.(2002).Traumainrealtime:Talkingandavoidingonline
conversationsaboutthedeathofPrincessDiana.BasicandAppliedSocialPsychology,
24
,172182.
Stone,P.J.,Dunphy,D.C.,&Smith,M.S.(1966).TheGeneralInquirer:AComputer
ApproachtoContentAnalysis.
Cambridge:MITPress.
Tannen,D.(1993).Framingindiscourse.
London:OxfordUniversityPress.
Tausczik,Y.R.,&Pennebaker,J.W.(2010).Thepsychologicalmeaningofwords:LIWCand
computerizedtextanalysismethods.Journaloflanguageandsocialpsychology
,29
,
2454.
Tausczik,Y.,Faasse,K.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Petrie,K.J.(2012).Publicanxietyand
informationseekingfollowingtheH1N1outbreak:blogs,newspaperarticles,and
Wikipediavisits.HealthCommunication
,27
,179185.
Toma,C.L.,&Hancock,J.T.(2010,February).Readingbetweenthelines:linguisticcuesto
deceptioninonlinedatingprofiles.InProceedingsofthe2010ACMconferenceon
Computersupportedcooperativework
(pp.58).ACM.
Tumasjan,A.,Sprenger,T.O.,Sandner,P.G.,&Welpe,I.M.(2010).Predictingelectionswith
twitter:What140charactersrevealaboutpoliticalsentiment.ICWSM
,10
,178185.
VanPetten,C.,&Kutas,M.(1991).Influencesofsemanticandsyntacticcontextonopenand
closedclasswords.Memory&Cognition,19,
95112.
VanSwol,L.M.,&Carlson,C.L.(2015).Languageuseandinfluenceamongminority,
majority,andhomogeneousgroupmembers.CommunicationResearch,43,118
.
Väyrynen,J.,&Honkela,T.(2005).Comparisonofindependentcomponentanalysisand
singularvaluedecompositioninwordcontextanalysis.ProceedingsofAKRR
,5
,
135140.
Watson,D.,Clark,L.A.,&Tellegen,A.(1988).Developmentandvalidationofbriefmeasures
ofpositiveandnegativeaffect:ThePANASscales.JournalofPersonalityandSocial
Psychology,54
,10631070.
WeberFox,C.,&NevilleH.J.(2001).Sensitiveperiodsdifferentiateprocessingofopenand
closedclasswords:Aneventrelatedbrainpotentialstudyofbilinguals.Journalof
Speech,Language,andHearingResearch,44,
13381353.
Weintraub,W.(1989).Verbalbehaviorineverydaylife.
NY:Springer.
Williams-Baucom,K.J.,Atkins,D.C.,Sevier,M.,Eldridge,K.A.,&Christensen,A.(2010).
“You”and“I”needtotalkabout“us”:Linguisticpatternsinmaritalinteractions.
PersonalRelationships
,17
,4156.
Winter,D.G.,&McClelland,D.C.(1978).Thematicanalysis:Anempiricallyderivedmeasure
LIWC2015DevelopmentManual Page25
oftheeffectsofliberalartseducation.JournalofEducationalPsychology,70,
816.
Wolf,M.,Horn,A.B.,Mehl,M.R.,Haug,S.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Kordy,H.(2008).
ComputergestütztequantitativeTextanalyse:ÄquivalenzundRobustheitderdeutschen
VersiondesLinguisticInquiryandWordCount.Diagnostica
,54
,8598.
Zijlstra,H.,VanMeerveld,T.,VanMiddendorp,H.,Pennebaker,J.W.,&Geenen,R.(2004).
DeNederlandseversievande‘linguisticinquiryandwordcount’(LIWC).Gedrag&
gezondheid
,32
,271281.
PortionsoftheresearchreportedinthismanualweremadepossiblebygrantsfromtheNational
InstitutesofHealth(MH52391),NationalScienceFoundation(IIS1344257),theArmyResearch
Institute(W5J9CQ12C0043),andtheTempletonFoundation.SpecialthanksgotoCindyChung.
Cindy’smasteryoflanguage,thoughtfulfeedback,andvaluableinsightshavebeenvitaltothe
ongoinglongevityoftheLIWCproject.Wearealsodeeplyindebtedtoanumberofpeoplewho
havehelpedwithdifferentphasesofLIWC,including:MarthaFrancis,LauraKing,YitaiSeah,
JennaBaddelley,MollyIreland,YlaTausczik,MatthiasMehl,RichardSlatcher,JasonFerrell,
SamGosling,andGabriellaHarari.WeareparticularlyindebtedtotheLIWC2015
DevelopmentTeamofKikiAdams,JenniferCaplan,ZacharyReese,CourtneyWang,andNick
Abbs.

Navigation menu