Manual
User Manual: Pdf
Open the PDF directly: View PDF 
.
Page Count: 40
| Download | |
| Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
cplint Manual
SWI-Prolog Version
Fabrizio Riguzzi
fabrizio.riguzzi@unife.it
January 20, 2018
1 Introduction
cplint is a suite of programs for reasoning with LPADs/CP-logic programs [23], [24],
[21], [22]. It contains modules for both inference and learning.
cplint is available in two versions, one for Yap Prolog and one for SWI-Prolog.
They differ slightly in the features offered. This manual is about the SWI-Prolog
version. You can find the manual for the Yap version at http://ds.ing.unife.it/
~friguzzi/software/cplint/manual.html.
2 Installation
cplint is distributed as a pack of SWI-Prolog. To install it, use
?- pack_install(cplint).
Moreover, in order to make sure you have a foreign library that matches your architecture, run
?- pack_rebuild(cplint).
3 Syntax
cplint permits the definition of discrete probability distributions and continuous
probaility densities.
3.1 Discrete Probability Distributions
LPAD and CP-logic programs consist of a set of annotated disjunctive clauses. Disjunction in the head is represented with a semicolon and atoms in the head are separated
from probabilities by a colon. For the rest, the usual syntax of Prolog is used. A
general CP-logic clause has the form
1
h1:p1 ; ... ; hn:pn :- Body.
where Body is a conjunction of goals as in Prolog. No parentheses are necessary. The
pi are numeric expressions. It is up to the user to ensure that the numeric expressions
are legal, i.e. that they sum up to less than one.
If the clause has an empty body, it can be represented like this
h1:p1 ; ... ; hn:pn.
If the clause has a single head with probability 1, the annotation can be omitted and
the clause takes the form of a normal prolog clause, i.e.
h1 :- Body.
stands for
h1:1 :- Body.
The coin example of [24] is represented as (file coin.pl)
heads(Coin):1/2 ; tails(Coin):1/2 :toss(Coin),\+biased(Coin).
heads(Coin):0.6 ; tails(Coin):0.4 :toss(Coin),biased(Coin).
fair(Coin):0.9 ; biased(Coin):0.1.
toss(coin).
The first clause states that if we toss a coin that is not biased it has equal probability
of landing heads and tails. The second states that if the coin is biased it has a
slightly higher probability of landing heads. The third states that the coin is fair with
probability 0.9 and biased with probability 0.1 and the last clause states that we toss
a coin with certainty.
Moreover, the bodies of rules may contain built-in predicates, predicates from the
libraries lists, apply and clpr/nf_r plus the predicate
average/2
that, given a list of numbers, computes its arithmetic mean.
The body of rules may also contain the predicate prob/2 that computes the probability of an atom, thus allowing nested probability computations. For example (meta.pl)
a:0.2:prob(b,P),
P>0.2.
is a valid rule.
Moreover, the probabilistic annotations can be variables, as in (flexprob.pl))
2
red(Prob):Prob.
draw_red(R, G):Prob is R/(R + G),
red(Prob).
Variables in probabilistic annotations must be ground when resolution reaches the end
of the body, otherwise an exception is raised.
Alternative ways of specifying probability distribution include
A:discrete(Var,D):-Body.
or
A:finite(Var,D):-Body.
where A is an atom containg variable Var and D is a list of couples Value:Prob assigning
probability Prob to Value. Moreover, you can use
A:uniform(Var,D):-Body.
where A is an atom containg variable Var and D is a list of values each taking the same
probability (1 over the length of D).
3.1.1 ProbLog Syntax
You can also use ProbLog [6] syntax, so a general clause takes the form
p1::h1 ; ... ; pn::hn :- Body
where the pi are numeric expressions.
3.1.2 PRISM Syntax
You can also use PRISM [19] syntax, so a program is composed of a set of regular
Prolog rules whose body may contain calls to the msw/2 predicate (multi-ary switch).
A call msw(term,value) means that a random variable associated to term assumes
value value. The admissible values for a discrete random variable are specified using
facts for the values/2 predicate of the form
values(T,L).
where T is a term (possibly containing variables) and L is a list of values. The distribution over values is specified using directives for set_sw/2 of the form
:- set_sw(T,LP).
where T is a term (possibly containing variables) and LP is a list of probability values.
Remember that in PRISM each call to msw/2 refers to a different random variable,
i.e., no memoing is performed, differently from the case of LPAD/CP-Logic/ProbLog.
For example, the coin example above in PRISM syntax becomes (coinmsw.pl)
3
values(throw(_),[heads,tails]).
:- set_sw(throw(fair),[0.5,0.5]).
:- set_sw(throw(biased),[0.6,0.4]).
values(fairness,[fair,biased]).
:- set_sw(fairness,[0.9,0.1]).
res(Coin,R):- toss(Coin),fairness(Coin,Fairness),msw(throw(Fairness),R).
fairness(_Coin,Fairness) :- msw(fairness,Fairness).
toss(coin).
3.2 Continuous Probability Densities
cplint handles continuous random variables as well with its sampling inference module. To specify a probability density on an argument Var of an atom A you can used
rules of the form
A:Density:- Body
where Density is a special atom identifying a probability density on variable Var and
Body (optional) is a regular clause body. Allowed Density atoms are
• uniform(Var,L,U): Var is uniformly distributed in [L, U ]
• gaussian(Var,Mean,Variance): Var follows a Gaussian distribution with mean
Mean and variance Variance. The distribution can be multivariate if Mean is a
list and Variance a list of lists representing the mean vector and the covariance
matrix. In this case the values of Var are lists of real values with the same length
as that of Mean
• dirichlet(Var,Par): Var is a list of real numbers following a Dirichlet distribution with α parameters specified by the list Par
• gamma(Var,Shape,Scale) Var follows a gamma distribution with shape parameter Shape and scale parameter Scale.
• beta(Var,Alpha,Beta) Var follows a beta distribution with parameters Alpha
and Beta.
• poisson(Var,Lambda) Var follows a Poisson distribution with parameter Lambda.
• binomial(Var,N,P) Var follows a binomial distribution with parameters N and
P.
• geometric(Var,P) Var follows a geometric distribution with parameter P.
For example
g(X): gaussian(X,0, 1).
states that argument X of g(X) follows a Gaussian distribution with mean 0 and
variance 1, while
4
g(X): gaussian(X,[0,0], [[1,0],[0,1]]).
states that argument X of g(X) follows a Gaussian multivariate distribution with mean
vector [0, 0] and covariance matrix
1 0
0 1
.
For example, gaussian mixture.pl defines a mixture of two Gaussians:
heads:0.6;tails:0.4.
g(X): gaussian(X,0, 1).
h(X): gaussian(X,5, 2).
mix(X) :- heads, g(X).
mix(X) :- tails, h(X).
The argument X of mix(X) follows a distribution that is a mixture of two Gaussian,
one with mean 0 and variance 1 with probability 0.6 and one with mean 5 and variance
2 with probability 0.4.
The parameters of the distribution atoms can be taken from the probabilistic atom,
the example gauss mean est.pl
value(I,X) :mean(M),
value(I,M,X).
mean(M): gaussian(M,1.0, 5.0).
value(_,M,X): gaussian(X,M, 2.0).
states that for an index I the continuous variable X is sampled from a Gaussian whose
variance is 2 and whose mean is sampled from a Guassian with mean 1 and variance
5.
Any operation is allowed on continuous random variables. The example below
(kalman filter.pl) encodes a Kalman filter:
kf(N,O, T) :init(S),
kf_part(0, N, S,O,T).
kf_part(I, N, S,[V|RO], T) :I < N,
NextI is I+1,
trans(S,I,NextS),
emit(NextS,I,V),
kf_part(NextI, N, NextS,RO, T).
kf_part(N, N, S, [],S).
trans(S,I,NextS) :{NextS =:= E + S},
trans_err(I,E).
5
emit(NextS,I,V) :{NextS =:= V+X},
obs_err(I,X).
init(S):gaussian(S,0,1).
trans_err(_,E):gaussian(E,0,2).
obs_err(_,E):gaussian(E,0,1).
Continuous random variables are involved in arithmetic expressions (in trans/3 and
emit/3). It is often convenient, as in this case, to use CLP(R) constraints (by including
the directive :- use_module(library(clpr)).) as in this way the expressions can be
used in multiple directions and the same clauses can be used both to sample and
to evaluate the weight the sample on the basis of evidence, otherwise different clauses
have to be written. In case random variables are not sufficiently instantiated to exploit
expressions for inferring the values of other variables, inference will return an error.
3.2.1 Distributional Clauses Syntax
You can also use the syntax of Distributional Clauses (DC) [13]. Continuous random
variables are represented in this case by term whose distribution can be specified with
density atoms as in
T~Density’ := Body.
Here := replaces the implication symbol, T is a term and Density’ is one of the density
atoms above witthout the Var argument, because T itself represents a random variables.
In the body of clauses you can use the infix operator ~= to equate a term representing
a random variable with a logical variable or a constant as in T ~= X. Internally cplint
transforms the terms representing random variables into atoms with an extra argument
for holding the variable. DC can be used to represent also discrete distributions using
T~uniform(L) := Body.
T~finite(D) := Body.
where L is a list of values and D is a list of couples P:V with P a probability and V
a value. If Body is empty, as in regular Prolog, the implication symbol := can be
omitted.
The Indian GPA problem from http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~fwood/anglican/
examples/viewer/?worksheet=indian-gpain distributional clauses syntax (https:
//github.com/davidenitti/DC/blob/master/examples/indian-gpa.pl) takes the
form (indian gpadc.pl):
is_density_A:0.95;is_discrete_A:0.05.
% the probability distribution of GPA scores for American students is
% continuous with probability 0.95 and discrete with probability 0.05
agpa(A): beta(A,8,2) :- is_density_A.
% the GPA of American students follows a beta distribution if the
6
% distribution is continuous
american_gpa(G) : finite(G,[4.0:0.85,0.0:0.15]) :- is_discrete_A.
% the GPA of American students is 4.0 with probability 0.85 and 0.0
% with
% probability 0.15 if the
% distribution is discrete
american_gpa(A):- agpa(A0), A is A0*4.0.
% the GPA of American students is obtained by rescaling the value of
% agpa
% to the (0.0,4.0) interval
is_density_I : 0.99; is_discrete_I:0.01.
% the probability distribution of GPA scores for Indian students is
% continuous with probability 0.99 and discrete with probability
% 0.01
igpa(I): beta(I,5,5) :- is_density_I.
% the GPA of Indian students follows a beta distribution if the
% distribution is continuous
indian_gpa(I): finite(I,[0.0:0.1,10.0:0.9]):- is_discrete_I.
% the GPA of Indian students is 10.0 with probability 0.9 and 0.0
% with
% probability 0.1 if the
% distribution is discrete
indian_gpa(I) :- igpa(I0), I is I0*10.0.
% the GPA of Indian students is obtained by rescaling the value
% of igpa
% to the (0.0,4.0) interval
nation(N) : finite(N,[a:0.25,i:0.75]).
% the nation is America with probability 0.25 and India with
% probability 0.75
student_gpa(G):- nation(a),american_gpa(G).
% the GPA of the student is given by american_gpa if the nation is
% America
student_gpa(G) :- nation(i),indian_gpa(G).
% the GPA of the student is given by indian_gpa if the nation
%is India
See
4 Semantics
The semantics of LPADs for the case of programs without functions symbols can
be given as follows. An LPAD defines a probability distribution over normal logic
programs called worlds. A world is obtained from an LPAD by first grounding it, by
selecting a single head atom for each ground clause and by including in the world the
7
clause with the selected head atom and the body. The probability of a world is the
product of the probabilities associated to the heads selected. The probability of a
ground atom (the query) is given by the sum of the probabilities of the worlds where
the query is true.
If the LPAD contains function symbols, the definition is more complex, see [15, 20,
17].
For the semantics of programs with continuous random variables, see [10] that defines the probability space for N continuous random variables by considering the Borel
σ-algebra over RN and defines a Lebesgue measure on this set as the probability measure. The probability space is lifted to cover the entire program using the least model
semantics of constraint logic programs. Alternatively, [13] defines the semantics of
distributional clauses by resorting to a stochastic T p operator. cplint allows more
freedom than distributional clauses in the use of continuous random variables in expressions, for example kalman filter.pl would not be allowed by distributional clauses.
5 Inference
cplint answers queries using the module pita or mcintyre. The first performs the
program transformation technique of [18]. Differently from that work, techniques
alternative to tabling and answer subsumption are used. The latter performs approximate inference by sampling using a different program transformation technique and
is described in [16]. Only mcintyre is able to handle continuous random variables.
For answering queries, you have to prepare a Prolog file where you first load the inference module (for example pita), initialize it with a directive (for example :- pita) and
then enclose the LPAD clauses in :-begin_lpad. or :-begin_plp. and :-end_lpad.
or :-end_plp. For example, the coin program above can be stored in coin.pl for
performing inference with pita as follows
:- use_module(library(pita)).
:- pita.
:- begin_lpad.
heads(Coin):1/2 ; tails(Coin):1/2:toss(Coin),\+biased(Coin).
heads(Coin):0.6 ; tails(Coin):0.4:toss(Coin),biased(Coin).
fair(Coin):0.9 ; biased(Coin):0.1.
toss(coin).
:- end_lpad.
The same program for mcintyre is
:- use_module(library(mcintyre)).
8
:- mc.
:- begin_lpad.
heads(Coin):1/2 ; tails(Coin):1/2:toss(Coin),\+biased(Coin).
heads(Coin):0.6 ; tails(Coin):0.4:toss(Coin),biased(Coin).
fair(Coin):0.9 ; biased(Coin):0.1.
toss(coin).
:- end_lpad.
You can have also (non-probabilistic) clauses outside :-begin/end_lpad. These are
considered as database clauses. In pita subgoals in the body of probabilistic clauses
can query them by enclosing the query in db/1. For example (testdb.pl)
:- use_module(library(pita)).
:- pita.
:- begin_lpad.
sampled_male(X):0.5:db(male(X)).
:- end_lpad.
male(john).
male(david).
You can also use findall/3 on subgoals defined by database clauses (persons.pl)
:- use_module(library(pita)).
:- pita.
:- begin_lpad.
male:M/P; female:F/P:findall(Male,male(Male),LM),
findall(Female,female(Female),LF),
length(LM,M),
length(LF,F),
P is F+M.
:- end_lpad.
male(john).
male(david).
female(anna).
female(elen).
female(cathy).
Aggregate predicates on probabilistic subgoals are not implemented due to their high
computational cost (if the aggregation is over n atoms, the values of the aggregation
are potentially 2n ). The Yap version of cplint includes reasoning algorithms that
9
allows aggregate predicates on probabilistic subgoals, see http://ds.ing.unife.it/
~friguzzi/software/cplint/manual.html.
In mcintyre you can query database clauses in the body of probabilistic clauses
without any special syntax. You can also use findall/3.
To run a query, you can simply load the Prolog file, for example coin.pl, as
?- [coin].
Note that supplying coin.pl as an argument to the swipl command currently returns
errors due to bad interaction between pita and the top-level. The program is loaded
correctly anyway but it is recommended to load it from the top-level to avoid these
errors.
5.1 Unconditional Queries
The unconditional probability of an atom can be asked using pita with the predicate
prob(:Query:atom,-Probability:float).
as in
?- prob(heads(coin),P).
If the query is non-ground, prob/2 returns in backtracking the succesful instantiations
together with their probability.
When using mcintyre, the predicate for querying is
mc_prob(:Query:atom,-Probability:float,+Options:list).
as in Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_prob/3:
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
?- mc_prob(heads(coin),P,[]).
With mcintyre, you can also take a given number of sample with
mc_sample(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,-Probability:float,Options:list).
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_sample/4:
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
as in (coinmc.pl)
?- mc_sample(heads(coin),1000,P,[successes(S),failures(F)]).
10
that samples heads(coin) 1000 times and returns in S the number of successes, in F
the number of failures and in P the estimated probability (S/1000).
Differently from exact inference, in approximate inference the query can be a conjunction of atoms.
If you are just interested in the probability, you can use
mc_sample(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,-Probability:float,Options:list)
as in (coinmc.pl)
?- mc_sample(heads(coin),1000,Prob,[]).
that samples heads(coin) 1000 times and returns the estimated probability that a
sample is true (i.e., that a sample succeeds).
Moreover, you can sample arguments of queries with
mc_sample_arg(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
The predicate samples Query a number of Samples times. Arg should be a variable
in Query. The predicate returns in Values a list of couples L-N where L is the list of
values of Arg for which Query succeeds in a world sampled at random and N is the
number of samples returning that list of values. If L is the empty list, it means that
for that sample the query failed. If L is a list with a single element, it means that for
that sample the query is determinate. If, in all couples L-N, L is a list with a single
element, it means that the clauses in the program are mutually exclusive, i.e., that in
every sample, only one clause for each subgoal has the body true. This is one of the
assumptions taken for programs of the PRISM system [20]. For example pcfglr.pl
and plcg.pl satisfy this constraint while markov chain.pl and var obj.pl don’t.
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_sample_arg/5:
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
An example of use of the above predicate is
?- mc_sample_arg(reach(s0,0,S),50,S,Values,[]).
of markov chain.pl that takes 50 samples of L in findall(S,(reach(s0,0,S),L).
You can sample arguments of queries also with
mc_sample_arg_raw(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list).
that samples Query a number of Samples times The predicate returns in Values a list
of values of Arg returned as the first answer by Query in a world sampled at random.
The value is failure if the query fails.
The predicate
11
mc_sample_arg_first(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
samples Query a number of Samples times and returns in Values a list of couples V-N
where V is the value of Arg returned as the first answer by Query in a world sampled
at random and N is the number of samples returning that value. V is failure if the
query fails. mc_sample_arg_first/5 differs from mc_sample_arg/5 because the first
just computes the first answer of the query for each sampled world.
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_sample_arg_first/5:
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
The predicate
mc_sample_arg_one(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list)
samples Query a number of Samples times and returns in Values a list of couples V-N
where V is a value sampled with uniform probability from those returned by Query in
a world sampled at random and N is the number of samples returning that value. V is
failure if the query fails.
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_sample_arg_one/5:
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
Finally, you can compute expectations with
mc_expectation(:Query:atom,+N:int,?Arg:var,-Exp:float).
that computes the expected value of Arg in Query by sampling. It takes N samples of
Query and sums up the value of Arg for each sample. The overall sum is divided by N
to give Exp.
An example of use of the above predicate is
?- mc_expectation(eventually(elect,T),1000,T,E).
of pctl slep.pl that returns in E the expected value of T by taking 1000 samples.
5.1.1 Drawing BDDs
With pita, you can obtain the BDD for a query with the predicates
bdd_dot_file(:Query:atom,+FileName:string,-Var:list)
bdd_dot_string(:Query:atom,-DotString:string,-Var:list)
The first write the BDD to a file, the latter returns it as a string. The BDD is
represented in the dot format of graphviz. Solid edges indicate 1-children, dashed
edges indicate 0-children and dotted edges indicate 0-children with negation applied
to the sub BDD. Each level of the BDD is associated to a variable of the form XI J
indicated on the left: I indicates the multivalued variable index and J the index of
12
the Boolean variable of rule I. The hexadecimal number in each node is part of its
address in memory and is not significant. The table Var contains the associations
between the rule groundings and the multivalued variables: the first column contains
contains the multivalued variable index, the second column contains the rule index,
corresponding to its position in the program, and the last column contains the list of
constants grounding the rule, each replacing a variable in the order of appearance in
the rule.
The BDD can be drawn in cplint on SWISH by using the graphviz renderer.
5.2 Conditional Queries on Discrete Variables
The conditional probability of an atom query given another atom evidence can be
asked using pita with the predicate
prob(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,-Probability:float).
as in
?- prob(heads(coin),biased(coin),P).
If the query/evidence are non-ground, prob/3 returns in backtracking ground instantiations together with their probability.
The query and the evidence can be conjunctions of literals (positive or negative).
When using mcintyre, you can ask conditional queries with rejection sampling or
with Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In rejection sampling [25], you
first query the evidence and, if the query is successful, query the goal in the same
sample, otherwise the sample is discarded. In Metropolis-Hastings MCMC, mcintyre
follows the algorithm proposed in [12] (the non adaptive version). A Markov chain is
built by building an initial sample and by generating successor samples.
The initial sample is built by randomly sampling choices so that the evidence is
true. This is done with a backtracking meta-interpreter that starts with the goal and
randomizes the order in which clauses are selected during the search so that the initial
sample is unbiased. Each time the meta-interpreter encounters a probabilistic choice,
it first checks whether a value has already been sampled, if not, it takes a sample and
records it. If a failure is obtained, the meta-interpreter backtracks to other clauses but
without deleting samples. Then the goal is queries using regular MCINTYRE.
A successor sample is obtained by deleting a fixed number (parameter Lag) of sampled probabilistic choices. Then the evidence is queried using regular MCINTYRE
starting with the undeleted choices. If the query succeeds, the goal is queried using
0
regular MCINTYRE. The sample is accepted with a probability of min{1, N
N1 } where
N0 is the number of choices sampled in the previous sample and N1 is the number of
choices sampled in the current sample. In [12] the lag is always 1 but the proof in [12]
that the above acceptance probability yields a valid Metropolis-Hastings algorithm
holds also when forgetting more than one sampled choice, so the lag is user defined in
cplint.
13
Then the number of successes of the query is increased by 1 if the query succeeded
in the last accepted sample. The final probability is given by the number of successes
over the total number of samples.
You can take a given number of sample with rejection sampling using
mc_rejection_sample(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+Samples:int,-Probability:float,+Options:list)
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_sample_arg/5:
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
as in (coinmc.pl)
?- mc_rejection_sample(heads(coin),biased(coin),1000,P,[successes(S),failures(F)]).
that takes 1000 samples where biased(coin) is true and returns in S the number of
samples where heads(coin) is true, in F the number of samples where heads(coin)
is false and in P the estimated probability (S/1000).
The query and the evidence can be conjunctions of literals.
You can take a given number of sample with Metropolis-Hastings MCMC using
mc_mh_sample(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+Samples:int,
-Probability:float,+Options:list).
where Lag (that is set with the options, default value 1) is the number of sampled
choices to forget before taking a new sample.
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_mh_sample/5:
• mix(+Mix:int) The first Mix samples are discarded (mixing time), default value
0
• lag(+Lag:int) lag between each sample, Lag sampled choices are forgotten,
default value 1
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
With Mix specified it takes Mix+Samples samples and discards the first Mix.
For example (arithm.pl)
?- mc_mh_sample(eval(2,4),eval(1,3),10000,P,[successes(T), failures(F)]).
takes 10000 accepted samples and returns in T the number of samples where eval(2,4)
is true, in F the number of samples where eval(2,4) is false and in P the estimated
probability (T/10000).
Moreover, you can sample arguments of queries with rejection sampling and MetropolisHastings MCMC using
14
mc_rejection_sample_arg(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,
+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_rejection_sample_arg/6:
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
mc_mh_sample_arg(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,
+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_mh_sample_arg/6:
• mix(+Mix:int) The first Mix samples are discarded (mixing time), default value
0
• lag(+Lag:int) lag between each sample, Lag sampled choices are forgotten,
default value 1
• successes(-Successes:int) Number of succeses
• failures(-Failures:int) Number of failueres
• bar(-BarChar:dict) BarChart is a dict for rendering with c3 as a bar chart
with a bar for the number of successes and a bar for the number of failures.
that return the distribution of values for Arg in Query in Samples of Query given that
Evidence is true. Mix indicates the number of mixing samples. The predicate returns
in Values a list of couples L-N where L is the list of values of Arg for which Query
succeeds in a world sampled at random where Evidence is true and N is the number
of samples returning that list of values.
An example of use of the above predicates is
?- mc_mh_sample_arg(eval(2,Y),eval(1,3),1000,Y,V,[]).
of arithm.pl.
Finally, you can compute expectations with
mc_expectation(:Query:atom,+N:int,?Arg:var,-Exp:float).
that computes the expected value of Arg in Query by sampling. It takes N samples of
Query and sums up the value of Arg for each sample. The overall sum is divided by N
to give Exp.
An example of use of the above predicate is
?- mc_expectation(eventually(elect,T),1000,T,E).
15
of pctl slep.pl that returns in E the expected value of T by taking 1000 samples.
To compute conditional expectations, use
mc_mh_expectation(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+N:int,
?Arg:var,-Exp:float,+Options:list).
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by mc_mh_expectation/6:
• mix(+Mix:int) The first Mix samples are discarded (mixing time), default value
0
• lag(+Lag:int) lag between each sample, Lag sampled choices are forgotten,
default value 1
mc_rejection_expectation(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+N:int,
?Arg:var,-Exp:float).
as in
?- mc_mh_expectation(eval(2,Y),eval(1,3),1000,Y,E,[]).
of arithm.pl that computes the expectation of argument Y of eval(2,Y) given that
eval(1,3) is true by taking 1000 samples using Metropolis-Hastings MCMC.
5.3 Conditional Queries on Continuous Variables
When you have continuous random variables, you may be interested in sampling arguments of goals representing continuous random variables. In this way you can build a
probability density of the sampled argument. When you do not have evidence or you
have evidence on atoms not depending on continuous random variables, you can use
the above predicates for sampling arguments.
For example
?- mc_sample_arg(value(0,X),1000,X,L,[]).
from (gauss mean est.pl)) samples 1000 values for X in value(0,X) and returns them
in L.
When you have evidence on ground atoms that have continuous values as arguments,
you cannot use rejection sampling or Metropolis-Hastings, as the probability of the
evidence is 0. For example, the probability of sampling a specific value from a Gaussian
is 0. Continuous variables have probability densities instead of distributions as discrete
variables. In this case, you can use likelihood weighting or particle filtering [9, 11, 13]
to obtain samples of continuous arguments of a goal.
For each sample to be taken, likelihood weighting uses a meta-interpreter to find a
sample where the goal is true, randomizing the choice of clauses when more than one
resolves with the goal in order to obtain an unbiased sample. This meta-interpreter is
similar to the one used to generate the first sample in Metropolis-Hastings.
Then a different meta-interpreter is used to evaluate the weight of the sample. This
meta-interpreter starts with the evidence as the query and a weight of 1. Each time the
16
meta-interpreter encounters a probabilistic choice over a continuous variable, it first
checks whether a value has already been sampled. If so, it computes the probability
density of the sampled value and multiplies the weight by it. If the value has not been
sampled, it takes a sample and records it, leaving the weight unchanged. In this way,
each sample in the result has a weight that is 1 for the prior distribution and that may
be different from the posterior distribution, reflecting the influence of evidence.
In particle filtering, the evidence is a list of atoms. Each sample is weighted by the
likelihood of an element of the evidence and constitutes a particle. After weighting,
particles are resampled and the next element of the evidence is considered.
The predicate
mc_lw_sample(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+Samples:int,-Prob:float)
samples Query a number of Samples times given that Evidence (a conjunction of
atoms is allowed here). is true. The predicate returns in Prob the probability that
the query is true. It performs likelihood weighting: each sample is weighted by the
likelihood of evidence in the sample. For example
?- mc_lw_sample(nation(a),student_gpa(4.0),1000,PPost).
from indian gpa.pl samples 1000 the query nation(a) given that student_gpa(4.0)
has been observed.
The predicate
mc_lw_sample_arg(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+N:int,?Arg:var,-ValList)
returns in ValList a list of couples V-W where V is a value of Arg for which Query
succeeds and W is the weight computed by likelihood weighting according to Evidence
(a conjunction of atoms is allowed here). For example
?- mc_lw_sample_arg(value(0,X),(value(1,9),value(2,8)),100,X,L).
from gauss mean est.pl samples 100 values for X in value(0,X) given that value(1,9)
and value(2,8) have been observed.
You can compute conditional expectations using likelihood weighting with
mc_lw_expectation(:Query:atom,Evidence:atom,+N:int,?Arg:var,-Exp:float).
that computes the expected value of Arg in Query given that Evidence is true. It takes
N samples of Arg in Query, weighting each according to the evidence, and returns their
weighted average.
The predicate
mc_particle_sample_arg(:Query:atom,+Evidence:list,
+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list)
samples argument Arg of Query using particle filtering given that Evidence is true.
Evidence is a list of goals and Query can be either a single goal or a list of goals. When
Query is a single goal, the predicate returns in Values a list of couples V-W where V is
17
a value of Arg for which Query succeeds in a particle in the last set of particles and W is
the weight of the particle. For each element of Evidence, the particles are obtained by
sampling Query in each current particle and weighting the particle by the likelihood
of the evidence element.
When Query is a list of goals, Arg is a list of variables, one for each query of Query
and Arg and Query must have the same length of Evidence. Values is then list of
the same length of Evidence and each of its elements is a list of couples V-W where V
is a value of the corresponding element of Arg for which the corresponding element of
Query succeeds in a particle and W is the weight of the particle. For each element of
Evidence, the particles are obtained by sampling the corresponding element of Query
in each current particle and weighting the particle by the likelihood of the evidence
element.
For example
?-[O1,O2,O3,O4]=[-0.133, -1.183, -3.212, -4.586],
mc_particle_sample_arg([kf_fin(1,T1),kf_fin(2,T2),kf_fin(3,T3),kf_fin(4,T4)],
[kf_o(1,O1),kf_o(2,O2),kf_o(3,O3),kf_o(4,O4)],100,[T1,T2,T3,T4],[F1,F2,F3,F4]).
from kalman filter.pl performs particle filtering for a Kalman filter with four observations. For each observation, the value of the state at the same time point is sampled.
The list of samples is returned in [F1,F2,F3,F4], with each element being the sample
for a time point.
The predicate
mc_particle_sample(:Query:atom,:Evidence:list,
+Samples:int,-Prob:float)
samples Query a number of Samples times given that Evidence is true using particle
filtering. Evidence is a list of goals. The predicate returns in Prob the probability
that the query is true.
You can compute conditional expectations using particle filtering with
mc_particle_expectation(:Query:atom,Evidence:atom,+N:int,?Arg:var,-Exp:float).
that computes the expected value of Arg in Query given that Evidence is true. It uses
N particles.
5.4 Causal Inference
pita and mcintyre support causal reasoning, i.e., computing the effect of actions using
the do-calculus [14].
Actions in this setting are represented as literals of action predicates, that must be
declared as such with the directive
:- action predicate1/arity1,...,predicaten/arityn.
18
When performing causal reasoning, action literals must be enclosed in the do/1 functor
and included in the evidence conjunction. More than one action can be included (each
with in a separate do/1 term) and actions and observations can be freely mixed. All
conditional inference goals can be used except those for particle filtering.
For example
?- prob(recovery,do(drug),P).
from simpson.swinb computes the probability of recovery of a patient given that the
action of administering a drug has been performed.
5.5 Graphing the Results
In cplint on SWISH you can draw graphs for visualizing the results either with C3.js
or with R. Similar predicates are avaiiable for the two methods. There are two types of
graphs: those that represent individual probability values with a bar chart and those
that visualize the results of sampling arguments.
5.5.1 Using C3.js
You can draw the probability of a query being true and being false as a bar chart with
prob_bar(:Query:atom,-Probability:dict) as in
?- prob_bar(heads(coin),P).
if you include
:- use_rendering(c3).
before :- pita. P will be instantiated with a dict for rendering with c3. It will be
shown as a bar chart with a bar for the probability of heads(coin) true and a bar for
the probability of heads(coin) false.
You can obtain the BDD for a query with the predicate
bdd_dot_string(:Query:atom,-DotString:string,-Var:list)
if you include
:- use_rendering(graphviz).
before :- pita. Solid edges indicate 1-children, dashed edges indicate 0-children and
dotted edges indicate 0-children with negation applied to the sub BDD. Each level of
the BDD is associated to a variable of the form XI J indicated on the left: I indicates
the multivalued variable index and J the index of the Boolean variable of rule I.
The hexadecimal number in each node is part of its address in memory and is not
significant. The table =Var= contains the associations between the rule groundings
and the multivalued variables.
For example (coin.pl)
?- bdd_dot_string(heads(coin),BDD,Var).
19
returns the BDD for the query heads(coin) and the list of associations between rule
groundings and multivalued variables.
When using mcintyre, you can use
mc_prob(:Query:atom,-Probability:dict,+Options:list).
as in
?- mc_prob(heads(coin),P,[bar(Chart)]).
to obtain a chart representation of the probability.
You can obtain a bar chart of the samples with
?- mc_sample(heads(coin),1000,P,[bar(Chart)]).
that returns in Chart a diagram with one bar for the number of successes and one bar
for the number of failures.
For visualizing the results of sampling arguments you can use
mc_sample(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,+Probability:float,+Options:list).
mc_sample_arg_first(:Query:atom,+Samples:int,?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
mc_rejection_sample_arg(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+Samples:int,
?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
mc_mh_sample_arg(:Query:atom,:Evidence:atom,+Samples:int,
?Arg:var,-Values:list,+Options:list).
with option bar(Chart) that return in Chart a bar chart with a bar for each possible
sampled value whose size is the number of samples returning that value.
An example is
?- mc_sample_arg(reach(s0,0,S),50,S,ValList,[bar(Chart)]).
of markov chain.pl.
Drawing a graph is particularly interesting when sampling values for continuous
arguments of goals. In this case, you can use the samples to draw the probability
density function of the argument. The predicate
histogram(+List:list,+NBins:int,-Chart:dict,+Options:list)
draws a histogram of the samples in List dividing the domain in NBins bins. List
must be a list of couples of the form [V]-W or V-W where V is a sampled value and W
is its weight. This is the format of the list of samples returned by argument sampling
predicates.
The predicate
density(+List:list,+NBins:int,-Chart:dict,+Options:list)
draws a line chart of the density the samples in List dividing the domain in NBins
bins. List must be as for histogram/4.
Options is a list of options, the following are recognised by density/4:
20
• min(+Min:float) the minimum value of domain, default value the minimum in
List
• max(+Max:float) the maximum value of domain, default value the maximum in
List
In this way you can specify the limits of the X axis.
The predicate
densities(+PriorList:list,+PostList:list,+NBins:int,-Chart:dict)
draws a line chart of the density of two sets of samples, usually prior and post observations. The samples in PriorList and PostList can be either couples [V]-W or V-W
where V is a value and W its weight. The lines are drawn dividing the domain in NBins
bins.
For example
?-
mc_sample_arg(value(0,X),1000,X,L0,[]),
histogram(L0,40,Chart,[]).
from gauss mean est.pl takes 1000 samples of argument X of value(0,X) and draws
the density of the samples using an histogram.
Instead
?- mc_sample_arg(value(0,Y),1000,Y,L0,[]),
mc_lw_sample_arg(value(0,X),
(value(1,9),value(2,8)),1000,X,L),
densities(L0,L,NBins,Chart).
from gauss mean est.pl takes 1000 amples of argument X of value(0,X) before and
after observing (value(1,9),value(2,8) and draws the prior and posterior densities
of the samples using a line chart.
5.5.2 Using R
You have to load library cplint r (a SWI-Prolog pack) with
:- use_module(library(cplint_r)).
Then you can use predicates
prob_bar_r/1, prob_bar_r/2
mc_prob_bar_r/3
mc_sample_bar_r/2
mc_sample_arg_bar_r/3
mc_sample_arg_first_bar_r/3
mc_rejection_sample_arg_bar_r/4
mc_mh_sample_arg_bar_r/5
mc_mh_sample_arg_bar_r/6
21
as direct analogues of those for C3.js.
You also have
histogram_r(+List:list,+NBins:int) is det
that works as histogram/3 but does not return the graph as an argument as the graph
is printed with a different mechanism.
density_r(+List:list) is det
is like density/3 but does not require the number of bins in input, they are determined
by R.
densities_r(+PriorList:list,+PostList:list) is det
is like densities/4 but does not require the number of bins in input.
See https://frnmst.github.io/cplint_r/cplint_r.html for a more detailed manual.
See gauss mean est R.pl for an example of use of these predicates.
ml
5.6 Parameters
The inference modules have a number of parameters in order to control their behavior.
They can be set with the directive
:- set_pita(,).
or
:- set_mc(,).
after initialization (:-pita. or :-mc.) but outside :-begin/end_lpad. The current
value can be read with
?- setting_pita(,Value).
or
?- setting_mc(,Value).
from the top-level. The available parameters common to both pita and mcintyre are:
• epsilon_parsing: if (1 - the sum of the probabilities of all the head atoms)
is larger than epsilon_parsing, then pita adds the null event to the head.
Default value 0.00001.
• single_var: determines how non ground clauses are treated: if true, a single
random variable is assigned to the whole non ground clause, if false, a different
random variable is assigned to every grounding of the clause. Default value
false.
22
Moreover, pita has the parameters
• depth_bound: if true, the depth of the derivation of the goal is limited to the
value of the depth parameter. Default value false.
• depth: maximum depth of derivations when depth_bound is set to true. Default
value 5.
If depth_bound is set to true, derivations are depth-bounded so you can query also
programs containing infinite loops, for example programs where queries have an infinite
number of explanations. However the probability that is returned is guaranteed only
to be a lower bound, see for example markov chaindb.pl
mcintyre has the parameters
• min_error: minimal width of the binomial proportion confidence interval for the
probability of the query. When the confidence interval for the probability of the
query is below min_error, the computation stops. Default value 0.01.
• k: the number of samples to take before checking whether the the binomial proportion confidence interval is below min_error. Default value 1000. max_samples:
the maximum number of samples to take. This is used when the probability of
the query is very close to 0 or 1. In fact mcintyre also checks for the validity of the the binomial proportion confidence interval: if less than 5 failures or
successes are sampled, even if the width of the confidence interval is less than
min_error, the computation continues. This would lead to non-termination in
cases where the probability is 0 or 1. max_samples ensures termination. Default
value 10e4.
The example markov chain.pl shows that mcintyre can perform inference in presence
of an infinite number of explanations for the goal. Differently from pita, no depth
bound is necessary, as the probability of selecting the infinite computation branch
is 0. However, also mcintyre may not terminate if loops not involving probabilistic
predicates are present.
If you want to set the seed of the random number generator, you can use SWI-Prolog
predicates setrand/1 and getrand/1, see SWI-Prolog manual.
5.7 Tabling
You can also use tabling in inference to speed up the computation and/or avoid loops,
see the SWI-Prolog manual.
To do so you have to use the tabling library module and declare some of the predicates as tabled. The tabling declarations go after the :-pita. or :- mc. directives.
For example, to compute the probability of paths in undirected graphs you can use
the program (path tabling.swinb)
:- use_module(library(pita)).
:- use_module(library(tabling)).
23
:- pita.
:- table path/2.
:- begin_lpad.
path(X,X).
path(X,Y):path(X,Z),edge(Z,Y).
edge(X,Y):-arc(X,Y).
edge(X,Y):-arc(Y,X).
arc(a,b):0.2.
arc(b,e):0.5.
arc(a,c):0.3.
arc(c,d):0.4.
arc(d,e):0.4.
arc(a,e):0.1.
:- end_lpad.
Then you can compute the probability that a and e are connected with
prob(path(a,e),Prob).
This programs has loops so if you run the above query without tabling pita would
loop forever.
You can use tabling with both pita and mcintyre.
6 Learning
The following learning algorithms are available:
• EMBLEM (EM over Bdds for probabilistic Logic programs Efficient Mining):
an implementation of EM for learning parameters that computes expectations
directly on BDDs [3], [1], [2]
• SLIPCOVER (Structure LearnIng of Probabilistic logic programs by searChing
OVER the clause space): an algorithm for learning the structure of programs by
searching the clause space and the theory space separately [4]
• LEMUR (LEarning with a Monte carlo Upgrade of tRee search): an algorithm
for learning the structure of programs by searching the clase space using MonteCarlo tree search [8]
6.1 Input
To execute the learning algorithms, prepare a Prolog file divided in five parts
• preamble
• background knowledge, i.e., knowledge valid for all interpretations
24
• LPAD/CPL-program for you which you want to learn the parameters (optional)
• language bias information
• example interpretations
The preamble must come first, the order of the other parts can be changed.
For example, consider the Bongard problems of [7]. bongard.pl and bongardkeys.pl
represent a Bongard problem for SLIPCOVER. bongard.pl and bongardkeys.pl represent a Bongard problem for LEMUR.
6.1.1 Preamble
In the preamble, the SLIPCOVER library is loaded with (see bongard.pl):
:- use_module(library(slipcover)).
Now you can initialize SLIPCOVER with
:- sc.
At this point you can start setting parameters for SLIPCOVER such as for example
::::-
set_sc(megaex_bottom,20).
set_sc(max_iter,2).
set_sc(max_iter_structure,5).
set_sc(verbosity,1).
We will see later the list of available parameters.
In the preamble, the LEMUR library is loaded with (see bongard.pl):
:- use_module(library(lemur)).
Now you can initialize LEMUR with
:- lemur.
At this point you can start setting parameters for LEMUR such as for example
:- set_lm(verbosity,1).
A parameter that is particularly important for both SLIPCOVER and LEMUR is
verbosity: if set to 1, nothing is printed and learning is fastest, if set to 3 much
information is printed and learning is slowest, 2 is in between. This ends the preamble.
25
6.1.2 Background and Initial LPAD/CPL-program
Now you can specify the background knowledge with a fact of the form
bg().
where the clauses must currently be deterministic. Alternatively, you can specify a set
of clauses by including them in a section between :- begin_bg. and :- end_bg. For
example
:- begin_bg.
replaceable(gear).
replaceable(wheel).
replaceable(chain).
not_replaceable(engine).
not_replaceable(control_unit).
component(C):replaceable(C).
component(C):not_replaceable(C).
:- end_bg.
from the mach.pl example. If you specify both a bg/1 fact and a section, the clauses
of the two will be combined.
Moreover, you can specify an initial program with a fact of the form
in().
The initial program is used in parameter learning for providing the structure. The
indicated parameters do not matter as they are first randomized. Remember to enclose
each clause in parentheses because :- has the highest precedence.
For example, bongard.pl has the initial program
in([(pos:0.197575 :circle(A),
in(B,A)),
(pos:0.000303421 :circle(A),
triangle(B)),
(pos:0.000448807 :triangle(A),
circle(B))]).
Alternatively, you can specify an input program in a section between :- begin_in.
and :- end_in., as for example
:- begin_in.
pos:0.197575 :-
26
circle(A),
in(B,A).
pos:0.000303421 :circle(A),
triangle(B).
pos:0.000448807 :triangle(A),
circle(B).
:- end_in.
If you specify both a in/1 fact and a section, the clauses of the two will be combined.
6.1.3 Language Bias
The language bias part contains the declarations of the input and output predicates.
Output predicates are declared as
output(/).
and indicate the predicate whose atoms you want to predict. Derivations for the atoms
for this predicates in the input data are built by the system. These are the predicates
for which new clauses are generated.
Input predicates are those whose atoms you are not interested in predicting. You
can declare closed world input predicates with
input_cw(/).
For these predicates, the only true atoms are those in the interpretations and those
derivable from them using the background knowledge, the clauses in the input/hypothesized
program are not used to derive atoms for these predicates. Moreover, clauses of the
background knowledge that define closed world input predicates and that call an output predicate in the body will not be used for deriving examples.
Open world input predicates are declared with
input(/).
In this case, if a subgoal for such a predicate is encountered when deriving a subgoal
for the output predicates, both the facts in the interpretations, those derivable from
them and the background knowledge, the background clauses and the clauses of the
input program are used.
Then, you have to specify the language bias by means of mode declarations in the
style of Progol.
modeh(,(,...)).
specifies the atoms that can appear in the head of clauses, while
modeb(,(,...)).
27
specifies the atoms that can appear in the body of clauses. can be an integer
or *. indicates how many atoms for the predicate specification are retained
in the bottom clause during a saturation step. * stands for all those that are found.
Otherwise the indicated number is randomly chosen.
For SLIPCOVER, two specialization modes are available: bottom and mode. In
the first, a bottom clause is built and the literals to be added during refinement are
taken from it. In the latter, no bottom clause is built and the literals to be added
during refinement are generated directly from the mode declarations. LEMUR has
only specialization mode.
Arguments of the form
+
specifies that the argument should be an input variable of type , i.e., a variable
replacing a + argument in the head or a - argument in a preceding literal
in the current hypothesized clause.
Another argument form is
-
for specifying that the argument should be a output variable of type . Any
variable can replace this argument, either input or output. The only constraint on
output variables is that those in the head of the current hypothesized clause must
appear as output variables in an atom of the body.
Other forms are
#
for specifying an argument which should be replaced by a constant of type in
the bottom clause but should not be used for replacing input variables of the following
literals when building the bottom clause or
-#
for specifying an argument which should be replaced by a constant of type in
the bottom clause and that should be used for replacing input variables of the following
literals when building the bottom clause.
for specifying a constant.
Note that arguments of the form # -# are not available in specialization mode mode, if you want constants to appear in the literals you have to indicate
them one by one in the mode declarations.
An example of language bias for the Bongard domain is
output(pos/0).
input_cw(triangle/1).
28
input_cw(square/1).
input_cw(circle/1).
input_cw(in/2).
input_cw(config/2).
modeh(*,pos).
modeb(*,triangle(-obj)).
modeb(*,square(-obj)).
modeb(*,circle(-obj)).
modeb(*,in(+obj,-obj)).
modeb(*,in(-obj,+obj)).
modeb(*,config(+obj,-#dir)).
SLIPCOVER and LEMUR also require facts for the determination/2 Aleph-style
predicate that indicate which predicates can appear in the body of clauses. For example
determination(pos/0,triangle/1).
determination(pos/0,square/1).
determination(pos/0,circle/1).
determination(pos/0,in/2).
determination(pos/0,config/2).
state that triangle/1 can appear in the body of clauses for pos/0.
SLIPCOVER and LEMUR also allow mode declarations of the form
modeh(,[,...,],[,...,],[,...,]).
These mode declarations are used to generate clauses with more than two head atoms.
In them, ,..., are schemas, ,..., are atoms such that is
obtained from by replacing placemarkers with variables, are the predicates admitted in the body. ,..., are used to indicate which variables
should be shared by the atoms in the head. An example of such a mode declaration
(from uwcselearn.pl) is
modeh(*,
[advisedby(+person,+person),tempadvisedby(+person,+person)],
[advisedby(A,B),tempadvisedby(A,B)],
[professor/1,student/1,hasposition/2,inphase/2,
publication/2,taughtby/3,ta/3,courselevel/2,yearsinprogram/2]).
If you want to specify negative literals for addition in the body of clauses, you should
define a new predicate in the background as in
not_worn(C):component(C),
\+ worn(C).
one_worn:worn(_).
29
none_worn:\+ one_worn.
from mach.pl and add the new predicate in a modeb/2 fact
modeb(*,not_worn(-comp)).
modeb(*,none_worn).
Note that successful negative literals do not instantiate the variables, so if you want a
variable appearing in a negative literal to be an output variable you must instantiate
before calling the negative literals. The new predicates must also be declared as input
input_cw(not_worn/1).
input_cw(none_worn/0).
Lookahead can also be specified with facts of the form
lookahead(,).
In this case when a literal matching is added to the body of clause during
refinement, then also the literals matching will be added. An
example of such declaration (from muta.pl) is
lookahead(logp(_),[(_=_))]).
Note that is copied with copy_term/2 before matching, so variables in common between and may not be in common
in the refined clause.
It is also possible to specify that a literal can only be added together with other
literals with facts of the form
lookahead_cons(,).
In this case is added to the body of clause during refinement only together
with literals matching . An example of such declaration is
lookahead_cons(logp(_),[(_=_))]).
Also here is copied with copy_term/2 before matching, so variables in common between and may not be in common
in the refined clause.
Moreover, we can specify lookahead with
lookahead_cons_var(,).
In this case is added to the body of clause during refinement only together
with literals matching and is not copied
before matching, so variables in common between and
are in common also in the refined clause. This is allowed only with specialization
set to bottom. An example of such declaration is
lookahead_cons_var(logp(B),[(B=_))]).
30
6.1.4 Example Interpretations
The last part of the file contains the data. You can specify data with two modalities:
models and keys. In the models type, you specify an example model (or interpretation
or megaexample) as a list of Prolog facts initiated by begin(model()). and
terminated by end(model()). as in
begin(model(2)).
pos.
triangle(o5).
config(o5,up).
square(o4).
in(o4,o5).
circle(o3).
triangle(o2).
config(o2,up).
in(o2,o3).
triangle(o1).
config(o1,up).
end(model(2)).
The interpretations may contain a fact of the form
prob(0.3).
assigning a probability (0.3 in this case) to the interpretations. If this is omitted,
the probability of each interpretation is considered equal to 1/n where n is the total
number of interpretations. prob/1 can be used to set a different multiplicity for the
interpretations.
The facts in the interpretation are loaded in SWI-Prolog database by adding an extra
initial argument equal to the name of the model. After each interpretation is loaded,
a fact of the form int() is asserted, where id is the name of the interpretation.
This can be used in order to retrieve the list of interpretations.
Alternatively, with the keys modality, you can directly write the facts and the first
argument will be interpreted as a model identifier. The above interpretation in the
keys modality is
pos(2).
triangle(2,o5).
config(2,o5,up).
square(2,o4).
in(2,o4,o5).
circle(2,o3).
triangle(2,o2).
config(2,o2,up).
in(2,o2,o3).
triangle(2,o1).
config(2,o1,up).
31
which is contained in the bongardkeys.pl This is also how model 2 above is stored
in SWI-Prolog database. The two modalities, models and keys, can be mixed in the
same file. Facts for int/1 are not asserted for interpretations in the key modality but
can be added by the user explicitly.
Note that you can add background knowledge that is not probabilistic directly to
the file writing the clauses taking into account the model argument. For example
(carc.pl) contains
connected(_M,Ring1,Ring2):Ring1 \= Ring2,
member(A,Ring1),
member(A,Ring2), !.
symbond(Mod,A,B,T):- bond(Mod,A,B,T).
symbond(Mod,A,B,T):- bond(Mod,B,A,T).
where the first argument of all the atoms is the model.
Example registration.pl contains for example
party(M,P):participant(M,_, _, P, _).
that defines intensionally the target predicate party/1. Here M is the model and
participant/4 is defined in the interpretations. You can also define intensionally the
negative examples with
neg(party(M,yes)):- party(M,no).
neg(party(M,no)):- party(M,yes).
Then you must indicate how the examples are divided in folds with facts of the form:
fold(,), as for example
fold(train,[2,3,...]).
fold(test,[490,491,...]).
As the input file is a Prolog program, you can define intensionally the folds as in
fold(all,F):findall(I,int(I),F).
fold/2 is dynamic so you can also write (registration.pl)
:- fold(all,F),
sample(4,F,FTr,FTe),
assert(fold(rand_train,FTr)),
assert(fold(rand_test,FTe)).
which however must be inserted after the input interpretations otherwise the facts for
int/1 will not be available and the fold all would be empty. This command uses
sample(N,List,Sampled,Rest) exported from slipcover that samples N elements
from List and returns the sampled elements in Sampled and the rest in Rest. If List
has N elements or less, Sampled is equal to List and Rest is empty.
32
6.2 Commands
6.2.1 Parameter Learning
To execute EMBLEM, prepare an input file in the editor panel as indicated above and
call
?- induce_par(,P).
where is a list of the folds for training and P will contain the input
program with updated parameters.
For example bongard.pl, you can perform parameter learning on the train fold
with
?- induce_par([train],P).
6.2.2 Structure Learning
To execute SLIPCOVER, prepare an input file in the editor panel as indicated above
and call
?- induce(,P).
where is a list of the folds for training and P will contain the learned
program.
For example bongard.pl, you can perform structure learning on the train fold with
?- induce([train],P).
A program can also be tested on a test set with test/7 or test_prob/6 as described
below.
Between two executions of induce/2 you should exit SWI-Prolog to have a clean
database.
To execute LEMUR, prepare an input file in the editor panel as indicated above and
call
?- induce_lm(,P).
where is a list of the folds for training and P will contain the learned
program.
For example bongard.pl, you can perform structure learning on the train fold with
?- induce_lm([train],P).
Between two executions of induce_lm/2 you should exit SWI-Prolog to have a clean
database.
33
6.2.3 Testing
A program can also be tested on a test set in SLIPCOVER and LEMUR with
?- test(,,LL,AUCROC,ROC,AUCPR,PR).
or
?- test_prob(,,NPos,NNeg,LL,ExampleList).
where is a list of terms representing clauses and is a list
of folds.
test/7 returns the log likelihood of the test examples in LL, the Area Under the ROC
curve in AUCROC, a dictionary containing the list of points (in the form of Prolog pairs
x-y) of the ROC curve in ROC, the Area Under the PR curve in AUCPR, a dictionary
containing the list of points of the PR curve in PR.
test_prob/6 returns the log likelihood of the test examples in LL, the numbers of
positive and negative examples in NPos and NNeg and the list ExampleList containing
couples Prob-Ex where Ex is a for a a positive example and \+(a) for a a negative
example and Prob is the probability of example a.
Then you can draw the curves in cplint on SWISH using C3.js using
compute_areas_diagrams(+ExampleList:list,-AUCROC:float,-ROC:dict,-AUCPR:float,-PR:dict) is de
(from pack auc) that takes as input a list ExampleList of pairs probability-literal of
the form that is returned by test_prob/6.
For example, to test on fold test the program learned on fold train you can run
the query
?- induce_par([train],P),
test(P,[test],LL,AUCROC,ROC,AUCPR,PR).
Or you can test the input program on the fold test with
?- in(P),
test(P,[test],LL,AUCROC,ROC,AUCPR,PR).
In cplint on SWISH, by including
:- use_rendering(c3).
:- use_rendering(lpad).
in the code before :- sc. the curves will be shown as graphs using C3.js and the
output program will be pretty printed.
You can also draw the curves in cplint on SWISH using R by loading library
cplint r with
:- use_module(library(cplint_r)).
and using
34
?- test_r(,,LL,AUCROC,AUCPR).
or predicate
compute_areas_diagrams_r(+ExampleList:list,-AUCROC:float,-AUCPR:float) is det
that takes as input a list ExampleList of pairs probability-literal of the form that is
returned by test_prob/6.
6.3 Parameters
Parameters are set with commands of the form
:- set_sc(,).
The available parameters are:
• specialization: (values: {bottom,mode}, default value: bottom, valid for
SLIPCOVER) specialization mode.
• depth_bound: (values: {true,false}, default value: true) if true, the depth
of the derivation of the goal is limited to the value of the depth parameter.
• depth (values: integer, default value: 2): depth of derivations if depth_bound is
set to true
• single_var (values: {true,false}, default value: false): if set to true, there
is a random variable for each clause, instead of a different random variable for
each grounding of each clause
• epsilon_em (values: real, default value: 0.1): if the difference in the log likelihood in two successive parameter EM iteration is smaller than epsilon_em, then
EM stops
• epsilon_em_fraction (values: real, default value: 0.01): if the difference in
the log likelihood in two successive parameter EM iteration is smaller than
epsilon_em_fraction*(-current log likelihood), then EM stops
• iter (values: integer, defualt value: 1): maximum number of iteration of EM
parameter learning. If set to -1, no maximum number of iterations is imposed
• iterREF (values: integer, defualt value: 1, valid for SLIPCOVER and LEMUR):
maximum number of iteration of EM parameter learning for refinements. If set
to -1, no maximum number of iterations is imposed.
• random_restarts_number (values: integer, default value: 1, valid for EMBLEM,
SLIPCOVER and LEMUR): number of random restarts of parameter EM learning
35
• random_restarts_REFnumber (values: integer, default value: 1, valid for SLIPCOVER and LEMUR): number of random restarts of parameter EM learning
for refinements
• seed (values: seed(integer) or seed(random), default value seed(3032)): seed
for the Prolog random functions, see SWI-Prolog manual
• c_seed (values: unsigned integer, default value 21344)): seed for the C random
functions
• logzero (values: negative real, default value log(0.000001)): value assigned to
log 0
• max_iter (values: integer, default value: 10, valid for SLIPCOVER): number of
interations of beam search
• max_var (values: integer, default value: 4, valid for SLIPCOVER and LEMUR):
maximum number of distinct variables in a clause
• beamsize (values: integer, default value: 100, valid for SLIPCOVER): size of
the beam
• megaex_bottom (values: integer, default value: 1, valid for SLIPCOVER): number of mega-examples on which to build the bottom clauses
• initial_clauses_per_megaex (values: integer, default value: 1, valid for SLIPCOVER): number of bottom clauses to build for each mega-example (or model
or interpretation)
• d (values: integer, default value: 1, valid for SLIPCOVER): number of saturation
steps when building the bottom clause
• mcts_beamsize (values: integer, default value: 3, valid for LEMUR): size of the
Monte-Carlo tree search beam
• mcts_visits (values: integer, default value: +1e20, valid for LEMUR): maximum number of visits
• max_iter_structure (values: integer, default value: 10000, valid for SLIPCOVER): maximum number of theory search iterations
• background_clauses (values: integer, default value: 50, valid for SLIPCOVER):
maximum numbers of background clauses
• maxdepth_var (values: integer, default value: 2, valid for SLIPCOVER and
LEMUR): maximum depth of variables in clauses (as defined in [5]).
• mcts_max_depth (values: integer, default value: 8, valid for LEMUR): maximum
depth of default policy search
36
• mcts_c (values: real, default value: 0.7, valid for LEMUR): value of parameter
C in the computation of UCT
• mcts_iter (values: integer, default value: 20, valid for LEMUR): number of
Monte-Carlo tree search iterations
• mcts_maxrestarts (values: integer, default value: 20, valid for LEMUR): maximum number of Monte-Carlo tree search restarts
• neg_ex (values: given, cw, default value: cw): if set to given, the negative
examples in testing are taken from the test folds interpretations, i.e., those examples ex stored as neg(ex); if set to cw, the negative examples are generated
according to the closed world assumption, i.e., all atoms for target predicates
that are not positive examples. The set of all atoms is obtained by collecting the
set of constants for each type of the arguments of the target predicate.
• verbosity (values: integer in [1,3], default value: 1): level of verbosity of the
algorithms.
6.4 Files
The pack/cplint/prolog/examples folder in SWI-Prolog home contains some example programs. The subfolder learning contains some learning examples. The
pack/cplint/doc folder in SWI-Prolog home contains this manual in latex, html and
pdf.
7 License
cplint follows the Artistic License 2.0 that you can find in cplint root folder. The
copyright is by Fabrizio Riguzzi.
The library CUDD for manipulating BDDs has the following license:
Copyright (c) 1995-2004, Regents of the University of Colorado
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification,
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
• Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list
of conditions and the following disclaimer.
• Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this
list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
materials provided with the distribution.
• Neither the name of the University of Colorado nor the names of its contributors
may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
specific prior written permission.
37
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ”AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF
USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
References
[1] Elena Bellodi and Fabrizio Riguzzi. EM over binary decision diagrams for probabilistic logic programs. In Proceedings of the 26th Italian Conference on Computational Logic (CILC2011), Pescara, Italy, 31 August 31-2 September, 2011,
2011.
[2] Elena Bellodi and Fabrizio Riguzzi. EM over binary decision diagrams for probabilistic logic programs. Technical Report CS-2011-01, Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Università di Ferrara, Italy, 2011.
[3] Elena Bellodi and Fabrizio Riguzzi. Expectation Maximization over binary
decision diagrams for probabilistic logic programs. Intelligent Data Analysis,
17(2):343–363, 2013.
[4] Elena Bellodi and Fabrizio Riguzzi. Structure learning of probabilistic logic programs by searching the clause space. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,
15(2):169–212, 2015.
[5] William W. Cohen. Pac-learning non-recursive prolog clauses. Artif. Intell.,
79(1):1–38, 1995.
[6] L. De Raedt, A. Kimmig, and H. Toivonen. ProbLog: A probabilistic Prolog and
its application in link discovery. In International Joint Conference on Artificial
Intelligence, pages 2462–2467, 2007.
[7] L. De Raedt and W. Van Laer. Inductive constraint logic. In Proceedings of
the 6th Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 1995), volume 997 of
LNAI, pages 80–94, Fukuoka, Japan, 1995. Springer.
38
[8] Nicola Di Mauro, Elena Bellodi, and Fabrizio Riguzzi. Bandit-based Monte-Carlo
structure learning of probabilistic logic programs. Mach. Learn., 100(1):127–156,
July 2015.
[9] Robert M Fung and Kuo-Chu Chang. Weighing and integrating evidence for
stochastic simulation in bayesian networks. In Fifth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 209–220. North-Holland Publishing Co.,
1990.
[10] Muhammad Asiful Islam, CR Ramakrishnan, and IV Ramakrishnan. Inference
in probabilistic logic programs with continuous random variables. 12:505–523, 7
2012.
[11] D. Koller and N. Friedman. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. Adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,
2009.
[12] Arun Nampally and CR Ramakrishnan. Adaptive mcmc-based inference in probabilistic logic programs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.6036, 2014.
[13] Davide Nitti, Tinne De Laet, and Luc De Raedt. Probabilistic logic programming
for hybrid relational domains. Mach. Learn., 103(3):407–449, 2016.
[14] J. Pearl. Causality. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[15] David Poole. The independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under
uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2):7–56, 1997.
[16] Fabrizio Riguzzi. MCINTYRE: A Monte Carlo system for probabilistic logic
programming. Fundamenta Informaticae, 124(4):521–541, 2013.
[17] Fabrizio Riguzzi. The distribution semantics is well-defined for all normal programs. In Fabrizio Riguzzi and Joost Vennekens, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd
International Workshop on Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP), volume 1413
of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pages 69–84, Aachen, Germany, 2015. Sun SITE
Central Europe.
[18] Fabrizio Riguzzi and Terrance Swift. Tabling and Answer Subsumption for Reasoning on Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions. In Technical Communications of the International Conference on Logic Programming, volume 7 of
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 162–171. Schloss
Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2010.
[19] Taisuke Sato and Yoshitaka Kameya. Prism: A language for symbolic-statistical
modeling. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1330–
1339, 1997.
[20] Taisuke Sato and Yoshitaka Kameya. Parameter learning of logic programs for
symbolic-statistical modeling. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 15:391–454, 2001.
39
[21] J. Vennekens, M. Denecker, and M. Bruynooghe. Representing causal information
about a probabilistic process. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on
Logics in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI. Springer, September 2006.
[22] J. Vennekens, Marc Denecker, and Maurice Bruynooghe. CP-logic: A language of
causal probabilistic events and its relation to logic programming. Theory Pract.
Log. Program., 9(3):245–308, 2009.
[23] J. Vennekens and S. Verbaeten. Logic programs with annotated disjunctions.
Technical Report CW386, K. U. Leuven, 2003.
[24] J. Vennekens, S. Verbaeten, and M. Bruynooghe. Logic programs with annotated
disjunctions. In International Conference on Logic Programming, volume 3131 of
LNCS, pages 195–209. Springer, 2004.
[25] John Von Neumann. Various techniques used in connection with random digits.
Nat. Bureau Stand. Appl. Math. Ser., 12:36–38, 1951.
40
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.5 Linearized : No Page Count : 40 Page Mode : UseOutlines Author : Title : Subject : Creator : LaTeX with hyperref package Producer : pdfTeX-1.40.16 Create Date : 2018:01:20 17:04:43+01:00 Modify Date : 2018:01:20 17:04:43+01:00 Trapped : False PTEX Fullbanner : This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian) kpathsea version 6.2.1EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools