and constructed to avoid afflux or cause the redirection of uncontrolled surface water flows, including stormwater flows, outside of worksites. Yes Contractors continue to consider this condition in their site planning and design. 18. Erosion and sediment control - Provisions for erosion and sediment control must be consistent with the
Cross River Rail Project Monthly Environmental Report April 2020 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................3 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................7 1.1 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................... 7 2. COMPLIANCE REVIEW .....................................................................................................................11 2.1 RELEVANT PROJECT WORKS ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Vibration ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Water Quality .............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.5 Erosion and Sediment Control ................................................................................................. 13 2.3 COMPLAINTS ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 NEW UPCOMING PROJECT WORKS ..................................................................................................... 14 2.5 MONTHLY ENVIRONMENT REPORT ENDORSEMENT ............................................................................ 14 2.6 NON-COMPLIANCE EVENTS ................................................................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A RIS MONTHLY REPORT ................................................................................................17 APPENDIX B TSD MONTHLY REPORT...............................................................................................18 APPENDIX C NON-COMPLIANCE EVENT REPORTS.......................................................................19 2 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Executive Summary This monthly report has been produced for Project Works undertaken on site for April 2020 for the Rail, Integration and Systems (RIS), and Tunnel, Stations and Development (TSD) packages. The report addresses the obligations outlined in the Coordinator-General's change report condition change (hours of works) 2019 (CGCR, October 2019) and the individual contractor's Construction Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs) which have been developed generally in accordance with the Project's Outline Environmental Management Plan. The Delivery Authority, as the Proponent of the Cross River Rail Project, is required to submit a monthly report to the Coordinator-General to demonstrate compliance with the imposed conditions. Section 1 of this report provides a background to the project and the Coordinator-General's conditions. Section 2 provides a review of the contractor's reports contained in Appendix A (Rail, Integration and Systems) and Appendix B (Tunnel, Stations and Development). Non-Compliance Event Reports submitted in April are attached in Appendix C. The Environmental Monitor has reviewed and endorsed this Monthly. This endorsement follows ongoing and new document reviews, and surveillance across the construction sites (from late April taken place through surveillance officers designated to single sites in response to the COVID-19 restrictions). The CEMPs prepared by both Unity Alliance (RIS Contractor) and CBGU JV (TSD Contractor) for their Relevant Project Works were endorsed by the Environmental Monitor (EM) and submitted to the Coordinator-General in accordance with Condition 4 (a) and 4 (b) respectively. The table below presents a summary of compliance status against each condition with a short comment against each condition: CG Requirement Summary Condition Compliance Met (Yes/No/NA) Comment General conditions compliance with 1. the Project Changes relevant to the Yes Contractor's scope The CEMP and site plans are in accordance with the Project Changes. Outline Environmental Management Plan timely submission to the 2. Yes Coordinator-General including required sub plans This has been submitted to the CoordinatorGeneral and the project is working under the currently approved version. Following any future Requests for Project Change (RfPC), this document will be updated and resubmitted. Design - achievement of the 3. NA Environmental Design Requirements Documents continue to be reviewed related to compliance with the environmental deisgn standards. Construction Environmental 4. Management Plan all relating to Yes Relevant Project Works TSD - CEMP Rev 3 became effective on 11 February, a further revision is going through the final stages of review and endorsement, RIS - CEMP endorsed for Enabling and Advanced Works on 23 August 2019. CEMP for upcoming Northern Portal (Stage 1) works is being developed for submission to the CG. 3 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 CG Requirement Summary Condition Compliance Met (Yes/No/NA) Comment Compliance and Incident management 5. - Non-compliance events, notifications Yes and reporting Refer to section 2.6 of this report. Reporting Monthly and Annual 6. No reporting TSD - Reporting continues to be refined in consultation with the Office of CoordinatorGeneral (OCG), EM and Contractors to ensure all requirements are adequalty addressed. To make sure this has been captured formally, this has been raised an as NCE (CRRDA-005-TSD-004) and will be closed out with the May report. Environmental Monitor - engaged and 7. Yes functions resumed Ongoing Community Relations Monitor - 8. Yes engaged and functions resumed Ongoing Community engagement plan - 9. developed and endorsed by Yes Environmental Monitor CEMP's endorsed with Community Engagement Plan Hours of work works undertaken 10. Yes during approved hours This has been achieved through standard working hours, Extended work hours and Managed Work. Noise Work must aim to achieve internal noise goals for human health and Yes well-being 11. Vibration - Works must aim to achieve vibration goals for cosmetic damage, Yes human comfort and sensitive building contents. TSD - Refer to Appendix B (Table 2). RIS Noise monitoring was not triggered under the CEMP for works in April. TSD - Refer to Appendix B (Table 1). RIS - Vibration monitoring was not triggered under the CEMP for works in April. Property damage relating to ground 12. Yes movement TSD - ongoing vibration modeling has been prepared and, where required, building condition survey reports completed. RIS - No specific management plan required due to low risk construction works. Air quality - Works must aim to achieve 13. air quality goals for human health and Yes nuisance. Refer to Appendix A (Table 2) and Appendix B (Table 3). Traffic and transport - Works must 14. minimise adverse impacts on road safety Yes and traffic flow. TSD - Traffic Management Plan covered in the CEMP and sub plans reviewed by the Environment Monitor.. 4 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 CG Requirement Summary Condition Compliance Met (Yes/No/NA) Comment Water quality - Works must not discharge surface water and groundwater 15. from the construction site above the Yes relevant environmental values and water quality objectives. No discharges of surface water or groundwater occurred in April. Post rain monitoring was not triggered. Water resources evaluate potential impact, plan works, implement controls 16. Yes and monitor inflow of groundwater associated with drawdown Ongoing Surface water - Must be designed to avoid inundation from stormwater due to a 2-year (6hr) ARI rainfall event and flood waters due to a 5-year ARI rainfall event 17. Yes and constructed to avoid afflux or cause the redirection of uncontrolled surface water flows, including stormwater flows, outside of worksites. Contractors continue to consider this condition in their site planning and design. Erosion and sediment control - Provisions for erosion and sediment control must be consistent with the Guidelines for Best Practice Erosion and 18. Yes Sediment Control (International Erosion Control Association, 2008) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads' Technical Standard MRTS52. TSD - Site specific ESC plans for all active work sites were in the process of being provided to the Environmental Monitor for review during April and implemented on site. Monitoring is undertaken in site inspections. NCE reference CRRDA-002-TSD-001 and CRRDA-003-TSD-002 details the measures being taken. This will be closed out in the May report. RIS - Site specific ESC plans have been certified and implemented for all active worksites. Acid sulfate soils managed as per the 19. Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Yes Manual. TSD - CEMP covers Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan RIS - Not applicable for Relevant Project Works. Landscape and open space general requirement to minimise impacts on 20. landscapes and open space values and Yes specific requirements around Victoria Park RIS - Site Environmental Plan prepared and implemented for Victoria Park Access Road works. Worksite rehabilitation worksites rehabilitated as soon as practicable upon 21. completion of works or commissioning, NA and in consultation with Brisbane City Council. 5 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Non-Compliance Events The five non-compliance events raised on 31 March 2020 were investigated and the 14-day NCE Reports submitted to the Coordinator-General within April. The reports are provided in Appendix C and have been uploaded to the Cross River Rail website, with a summary provided in section 2.6. 6 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Definitions Acronym Definition ARI CEMP CG CGCR Community Relations Monitor Contractor Coordinator-General CRR EIS Environmental Monitor ESC Imposed condition/s MRTS52 NCE OEMP Project Project Works Proponent QR RfPC RIS SDPWO Act Sub-plan The Delivery Authority TSD Average Recurrence Interval - The average or expected value of the periods between exceedances of a given rainfall total accumulated over a given duration. Construction Environmental Management Plan Coordinator-General Coordinator-General's Change Report The Community Relations Monitor engaged in accordance with Imposed Condition 8 The Contractors appointed to design, construct and commission the Project The corporation sole preserved, continued and constituted under section 8 of the SDPWO Act Cross River Rail Environmental Impact Statement The Environmental Monitor engaged in accordance with Imposed Condition 7 Erosion and sediment control A condition/s imposed by the Coordinator-General under section 54B of the SDPWO Act for the Project Transport and Main Roads Specifications MRTS52 Erosion and Sediment Control Non-Compliance Event Outline Environmental Management Plan The Cross River Rail Project As defined in the Imposed Conditions The Cross River Rail Delivery Authority Queensland Rail Request for Project Change Rail, Integration and Systems State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 Any sub-plan of the CEMP The Cross River Rail Delivery Authority Tunnel, Stations and Development 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The Cross River Rail Project (the Project) is a declared coordinated project under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 (SDPWO Act). The CRR Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was evaluated by the Coordinator-General who recommended the Project proceed, 7 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 subject to Imposed Conditions and recommendations. Since the evaluation of the EIS, six Requests for Project Change (RfPCs) have been evaluated by the Coordinator-General, at the time of writing this report. The Coordinator-General has imposed conditions on the Project that apply throughout the design, construction and commissioning phases. These are referred to as the Imposed Conditions. In addition, the Coordinator-General has approved the Project's Outline Environmental Management Plan (OEMP) which outlines the environmental management framework for the Project. The OEMP includes environmental outcomes and performance criteria which must be achieved for the Project. Imposed Conditions 5 and 6 nominate the compliance and reporting requirements for the Project. This monthly report addresses these requirements. 1.2 Project Delivery The Delivery Authority is responsible for planning and delivering the Project. During initial Project Delivery phase, the Project established environmental management plans and secured some of the secondary environmental approvals in addition to enabling works. The two main delivery packages which require reporting under the Coordinator-General's imposed conditions are: Tunnel, Stations and Development (TSD) being delivered by CBGU JV; and Rail, Integration and Systems (RIS) being delivered by Unity Alliance. The Project is geographically divided into four areas: Mayne Area Northern Area Central Area Southern Area These are shown in the figures 1 and 2 overleaf. 8 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 9 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 10 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 1.3 Reporting Framework This report has been prepared for the month of April to comply with Conditions 6 and 7 of the Coordinator-General Change Report (CGCR) and includes: Monitoring data and associated interpretation of the results required by the imposed conditions and Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); Details of any Non-Compliance Event (NCE), including incidents, corrective actions and preventative actions; and Details of any complaints, including description, responses and corrective actions. Reporting on environmental elements captured in each monthly environmental report, including the annual environmental report, will be reviewed and endorsed by the Environmental Monitor. 2.Compliance Review This Monthly Report has been reviewed and endorsed by Environmental Monitor as per Condition 7 of the Coordinator-General Change Report (CGCR). 2.1 Relevant Project Works The following Project Works were undertaken in April 2020: Area Mayne Area Project Works Demolition and removal of redundant infrastructure such as fences, pits, service, overhead line equipment (OHLE) foundations and asbestos, drainage culverts completed; completed geotechnical earthworks / preloading operations; and settlement monitoring of localised Mayne Yard surcharge area. Northern Area Demolition and removal of redundant pits, services, OHLE foundations in the northern rail corridor; finalisation of access road in Victoria Park with asphalting of shared user path and main access; and site establishment of site office at Herston and RNA Showgrounds. Roma Street - Continued demolition of the Brisbane Transit Centre and Hotel Jen; acoustic shed construction; shaft excavation; and site establishment work across the site. Central Area Albert Street - Piling and site establishment; shaft excavation; and acoustic shed construction. Woolloongabba - Piling; site establishment; decline and shaft excavation Boggo Road Piling and site establishment Southern Area OHLE works scheduled during Easter rail possession at Fairfield and Yeronga was cancelled. 2.2 Key Environmental Elements 2.2.1 Noise Noise monitoring was not triggered under the RIS CEMP for works during April (refer to Attachment 4 Construction Environmental Monitoring Program of the RIS CEMP). TSD undertook noise monitoring on 69 occasions during April as summarised in the graph below and detailed in Appendix B. Compliance monitoring was completed at the Albert Street, Boggo Road, Roma 11 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Street and Woolloongabba worksites as well as Dutton Park Station. It should be noted that the noise goals have been nominated as internal levels. Where internal monitoring has not been possible for the contractors, they have undertaken external monitoring at nominated locations pending their work activities. The contractors noise consultants have then nominated suitable façade attenuation corrections, considering receiver property type, to determine compliance against the project's noise goals and to provide further calibration of the completed modelled predictions. The contractors have reported that the project noise goals have been met during this reporting month. Nos of monitoring events Noise compliance measurements (15 min sessions) April 2020 35 30 4 2 25 20 15 27 2 Night 10 7 17 Evening 5 Day 2 5 2 0 1 CRR Work site 2.2.2 Vibration Vibration monitoring was not triggered under the CEMP for RIS works in April (refer to Attachment 4 Construction Environmental Monitoring Program of the RIS CEMP). TSD undertook vibration monitoring on three occasions at the Boggo Road precinct, twice to verify the predictive modelling and once for compliance monitoring. The contractor reported the results were within the project's nominated goals on each occasion. 2.2.3 Air Quality The Delivery Authority has received additional information from the Contractor relating to air quality monitoring information as raised in the March report for earthworks in the Northern Area and at Mayne Yard. The predictive air quality assessment undertaken for these works prior to commencement did not predict any exceedances at nearby sensitive receivers. Based on the findings of the predictive model, and in accordance with Attachment 4 Construction Environmental Monitoring Program of the RIS CEMP, air quality monitoring or any additional mitigation measures were not triggered. On this basis, the earthworks conducted at these worksites in March were considered low risk and compliant with the endorsed CEMP. No visible dust was noted during site inspections conducted for the works. There were no complaints received during earthworks at these sites. 12 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 2.2.3.1 Dust Deposition Dust deposition monitoring was conducted at Mayne Yard, RNA Showgrounds, Northern Corridor, Albert Street, Boggo Road, Roma Street and Woolloongabba precinct sites during the month. Monitoring results showed all levels were within the project's air quality goals except for a Northern Corridor dust deposition gauge near The Centenary Pool. Further investigation revealed that the exceedance was not associated with the project works (Section 4.1.2 of Appendix A). 2.2.3.2 Particulate Matter (PM10) Particulate Matter (PM10) monitoring was not triggered under the CEMP for RIS works in April (refer to Attachment 4 Construction Environmental Monitoring Program of the RIS CEMP). New monitoring stations for PM10 were installed at Mayne Yard and in the Northern Corridor for upcoming high-risk activities. Whilst dispersion modelling for the TSD packages does not indicate any exceedances of PM10 at any TSD worksite for the current works, monitoring of PM10 was undertaken at the Woolloongabba site throughout the reporting period. The contractors noted no exceedances of the air quality goals. The Contractors also reviewed air quality results for PM10 from the DES monitoring stations in Brisbane CBD, South Brisbane and Woolloongabba, and Transurban monitoring stations at Victoria Park (E1) and The Centenary Pool (E2). No exceedances were identified. 2.2.3.3 Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) monitoring was not triggered under the CEMP for RIS works in April (refer to Attachment 4 Construction Environmental Monitoring Program of the RIS CEMP). New monitoring stations for TSP were installed at Mayne Yard and in the Northern Corridor for upcoming high-risk activities. TSD undertook TSP monitoring adjacent to the Woolloongabba site throughout the month of April and no exceedances were recorded. 2.2.4 Water Quality No post rainfall monitoring events were triggered during the reporting month. Two rounds of routine surface water quality monitoring were conducted in April at Breakfast Creek, York's Hollow, Moolabin Creek, Rocky Water Holes Creek and Stable Swamp Creek for RIS works. For the TSD package, one round of surface water quality monitoring was conducted in April. This included five locations upstream and downstream from all TSD worksite discharge points. As there were no discharge events recorded from any active worksite, any changes to the surrounding water quality were not related to the project and served as good baseline monitoring data. 2.2.5 Erosion and Sediment Control Site specific Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plans have been prepared and continue to be updated for the changing TSD sites at Roma Street, Albert Street, Woolloongabba, and Boggo Road. 2.3 Complaints Management No complaints were recorded during the reporting month for RIS works. The TSD contractors report (Appendix B) notes 14 noise complaints reported in April. Of these, eight complaints related to work in the evening and out of hours and six (6) complaints were related to works undertaken during standard work hours. However, 21 complaints have been confirmed by Pulse relating to the project. An updated Appendix B will be provided in due course. 13 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Where attended noise monitoring was in response to a complaint, the contractor confirmed that the works undertaken at the time of the complaint adhered to project requirements. The TSD contractor also stated that for all scheduled Out of Hours works being undertaken, community notification had been provided. All complaints were closed out by the TSD contractor. 2.4 New Upcoming Project Works The key new planned Project Works for the coming months include: Area Mayne Area New planned works in the coming months Removal of three radio towers and crane pad construction. Re-decking of the existing shunting bridge over Breakfast Creek as an alternative construction access into Mayne Yard. Commence earthworks formation. Commence drainage works. Northern Area Complete Victoria Park access road works and concrete driveway at Gregory Terrace. Commence signalised interchange on Gregory Terrace. RNA site establishment, removal of vegetation and redundant structures. Commence pre-planning and mobilisation activities for stormwater drainage works. Temporary protection of existing sewer and demolition of eastern section of pedestrian underpass for temporary access south of the land bridge. Lighting tower removals. Lanham Street Brisbane City Council yard relocation. Central Area Roma Street Works in the rail corridor to be carried out in mid-June and coach deck demolition in late May. Albert Street Test blasting in the Lot 2 shaft to commence in June and excavation of station box on Lot 1 to start in late June. Woolloongabba Test blasting in station box to commence in June cavern excavation and spoil shed construction to occur in July. Boggo Road Traffic realignment to commence in June and station box excavation to occur until August. Construction works of OHLE masts and portals at Yeronga and Fairfield. Southern Relocation of heritage shade structure at Fairfield station. Area Commence Fairfield to Salisbury station upgrade works. 2.5 Monthly Environment Report Endorsement This Monthly Report has been endorsed by the Environment Monitor and this has been provided to the Coordinator-General. 2.6 Non-Compliance Events Five 14-day Non-Compliance Event Reports were submitted to the Coordinator- General in April. The summary of Non-Compliance Events is shown in the table below: 14 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 A summary of the five open NCE's is shown in the table below with the close-out requirements due in May: 15 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 NCE Ref. NCE Description CRRDA-002TSD-001 Woolloongabba Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan not developed and implemented in accordance with approved CEMP Close-out Requirements (as per NCE) Site ESC plan to be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure all changes to site conditions have been captured and suitable erosion and sediment controls nominated. Site supervisor to be fully briefed on the ESC Plan and ESC design detail. Site supervisor to perform daily checks of vulnerable areas for ESC maintenance (i.e. especially around stormwater drains) and ensure best practice ESC is implemented. The Delivery Authority will encourage the Contractor to carry out Lessons Learned toolbox talks to Environmental Advisors and Site Supervisors across the project worksites and to include in daily site briefings, especially during wet weather. Close out statement: To be completed by end of May 2020. NCE closeout status: pending. CRRDA-003TSD-002 Boggo Road worksite ESC not developed and implemented in accordance with approved CEMP Site ESC plan to be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure all changes to site conditions have been captured and suitable ESC nominated. Certified Professional in ESC sign off required. Site supervisor to be fully briefed on the ESC Plan and ESC design detail. Site supervisor to perform daily checks of vulnerable areas for ESC maintenance (i.e. especially around stormwater drains) and ensure the ESC design is implemented. The Delivery Authority will encourage the Contractor to carry out Lessons Learned toolbox talks to Environmental Advisors and Site Supervisors across the project worksites and to include in daily site briefings, especially during wet weather. CRRDA-004TSD-003 Boggo Road worksite deliveries arriving at site in lockout hours Close out statement: To be completed by end of May 2020. NCE closeout status: pending. Corrective action advice to be documented in a corrective action register (consistent with OEMP) and implemented and communicated consistent with the endorsed CEMP Rev3. Spoil haulage and materials/equipment delivery restricted hours to be clearly communicated to suppliers. CRRDA-005TSD-004 Monthly Reporting an interpretation of monitoring results, required under the CEMP, has not been provided to support statements that noise monitoring adheres to project requirements. CRRDA-006TSD-005 All TSD worksites - air quality monitoring equipment not installed in accordance with CEMP Delivery order forms to state the restricted delivery hours Close out statement: To be completed by end of May 2020. NCE closeout status: pending. Workshop between Pulse, the Delivery Authority, and the Environmental Monitor to confirm reporting obligation in accordance with the endorsed CEMP Rev 3, the imposed conditions and the approved OEMP. Review of the draft monthly report by the Delivery Authority, Department Transport and Main Roads and the Environmental Monitor prior to formal issue to the Delivery Authority. Issues raised are to be provided to the Project Contractors in a timely manner to allow them to update their report prior to formal submission to the Delivery Authority (used to support the projects monthly submission to the office of the Coordinator-General. Close out statement: To be completed by end of May 2020. NCE closeout status: pending. Contractor to establish air quality monitoring stations at each worksite to meet the obligations under Condition 13 and the endorsed CEMP. Close out statement: To be completed by end of May 2020. NCE closeout status: pending. 16 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Appendix A RIS Monthly Report 17 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Monthly CGCR Report April 2020 Cross River Rail Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance Table of Contents 1 Progress Summary.................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Summary of Project Works ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Progress Photos ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Complaints ..............................................................................................................................................4 3 Environmental Monitoring Results.......................................................................................................5 3.1 Acoustics.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Water Quality Surface Water .............................................................................................................................. 12 4 Compliance Review..............................................................................................................................16 4.1 Non-Compliance Events ........................................................................................................................................ 16 4.2 C-EMP Compliance ............................................................................................................................................... 19 5 Good News Stories...............................................................................................................................21 Attachment 1 CGCR Non-Compliance Event Report (if required).........................................................22 Attachment 2 Monitoring Locations Noise ...........................................................................................23 Attachment 3 Monitoring Locations Vibration .....................................................................................24 Attachment 4 Monitoring Locations Air Quality...................................................................................25 Attachment 5 Monitoring Locations Surface Water.............................................................................27 CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 2 of 29 1 Progress Summary 1.1 Summary of Project Works The following Project Works continued in April 2020 · Site establishment of the Main Site Office at Herston, which is nearing completion · Finalisation of the Access Road in Victoria Park with Asphalting of Shared User Path and Main Access The following Project Works started in April 2020 · Site establishment of the Ancillary Site Office at RNA Showgrounds 1.2 Progress Photos Nil for the reporting period CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 3 of 29 2 Complaints The below section summarises the complaints relating to the Project Works to be reported in accordance with condition 6(b)(iii) of the CGCR. Table 1: Summary of Complaints Date Location None for this reporting period Issue CGCR Non-Compliance Status CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 4 of 29 3 Environmental Monitoring Results The below section summarises the monitoring results to be reported in accordance condition 6(b)(i) of the CGCR. 3.1 Acoustics Condition 11(b) of the CGCR requires that during construction, monitoring and reporting on noise and vibration in accordance with the Noise and Vibration Management Plan, a sub-plan of the Construction Environmental Management Plan occurs. 3.1.1 Noise Monitoring There were no noise intensive activities during the month of April that triggered the need to undertake noise monitoring. Noise monitoring because of complaints was not triggered. No complaints related to noise occurred during the Month. 3.1.2 Noise monitoring Results Nil for the reporting period. 3.1.3 Vibration Monitoring There were no vibration intensive activities during the month of April that triggered the need to undertake noise monitoring. Vibration monitoring because of complaints was not triggered. No complaints related to vibration occurred during the Month. 3.1.4 Vibration Monitoring Results Nil for the reporting period. 3.1.5 Interpretation 3.1.5.1 Noise Monitoring The RIS scope of works is achieving the outcomes set out by the CGCR and OEMP. 3.1.5.2 Vibration Monitoring The RIS scope of works is achieving the outcomes set out by the CGCR and OEMP. 3.2 Air Quality Condition 13(b) of the CGCR requires that during construction, monitoring and reporting on air quality in accordance with the Air Quality Management Plan, a sub-plan of the Construction Environmental Management Plan occurs. Visual Monitoring was undertaken during routine environmental inspections. A total of nine (9) inspections were undertaken. No issues related to air quality were identified that required corrective actions to be raised. There were no high risk activities with regards to Air Quality during the month of April that triggered particulate monitoring. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 5 of 29 It is however noted that UNITY has installed the following Air Quality Monitoring devices, therefore data collected from these devices, when active, is reported on in the monthly report regardless of the Project Works occurring. Monitoring Device Installed by UNITY Dust Deposition Gauge Dust Deposition Gauge Dust Deposition Gauge Area Mayne Yard (Eastern Air Shed) Mayne Yard (Western Air Shed) RNA Showgrounds Name AQ-04 AQ-05 AQ-01 Dust Deposition Gauge Northern Corridor (near BGGS) AQ-02 Dust Deposition Gauge TSP / PM10 Monitor Northern Corridor (near Centenary Pool) Mayne Yard (Eastern Air Shed) AQ-03 Unit324 TSP / PM10 Monitor Northern Corridor (Eastern Unit327 Air Shed) Date Installed 13 February 2020 13 February 2020 13 December 2019 13 December 2019 13 January 2020 23 April 2020 23 April 2020 Status for the Month of April Active Active Active Active Active Not fully operational K factor calibration occurred between 23 and 29 April Not fully operational K factor calibration occurred between 23 and 29 April 3.2.1 Dust results Since passive dust deposition gauges are analysed on a monthly basis, results span from 13 March 2020 to 14 April 2020. The dust deposition gauges result for the reporting period are detailed below and complied with Condition 13(b) of the CGCR. Table 2: 13 March 2020 to 14 April 2020 CGCR Goal (mg/m2/day) AQ-01 Results RNA Showgrounds (mg/m2/day) 120 Total Rainfall during Period 10 8.6mm AQ-02 Results - BGGS (mg/m2/day) 47 8.6mm AQ-03 Centenary Pool (mg/m2/day) 176 8.6mm AQ-04 Abbotsford Rd (E Mayne) (mg/m2/day) AQ-05 Cartwright St (W Mayne) (mg/m2/day) 53 6.4mm 73 6.4mm CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 6 of 29 3.2.2 Interpretation Please refer to section 4.1.2 for a detailed discussion on the exceedance of the deposited dust air quality goal at AQ-03. Visual monitoring during routine inspections during the month of April did not identify any issues it is therefore intimated standard dust mitigation measures were effective at managing dust during the inspections. 3.2.3 Particulates results Transurban Queensland operates the Legacy Way tunnel in accordance with conditions established by the Queensland Co-ordinator General. Transurban has engaged third parties to establish External Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations along their footprint. Two of the monitoring stations are located near the Northern Corridor Area, within 1km from where the works occurred. They are · East Victoria Park (E1) which is located approximately 300m due north from the northern corridor, and · Eastern Centenary Pool (E2) which is located approximately 150m due east from the northern corridor. External Ambient Air Quality data is collected for Carbon monoxide (CO), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Particulate matter less than 10 m (PM10), and Particulate matter less than 2.5 m (PM2.5). PM10 is one of the indicators for which the Coordinator General has imposed a goal of 50 g/m3 (over an averaging period of 24 hours) the project must aim to achieve under Condition 13(a) of the CGCR. The same goal has been imposed on the Cross-River Rail Project. Validated air quality data for the Legacy Way tunnel is shown below. The information has been sourced from the Legacy Way website. The data used on this webpage is collected by third parties using equipment which CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 7 of 29 is not controlled by Transurban Queensland and as such may be subject to faults or errors by third parties, external weather or environmental events, or server access issues. There were no exceedances recorded for the reporting period for PM10 near the northern corridor. Figure 1: PM10 Monitoring for the Northern Corridor - April 20 Results reproduced from Legacy Way Air Monitoring report accessed 18 May 2020 3.2.4 Interpretation There were no exceedances recorded for the reporting period for PM10 near the northern corridor. Unity also reviewed the DES air quality results for PM10 from other stations in Brisbane for the reporting period. The results were as follows: · Brisbane CBD: PM10 - No exceedances of the 50 µg/m3 (24hr avg) were reported for the month of April. ( https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/airquality/chart/?station=cbd¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month) · South Brisbane (Woolloongabba): PM10 - No exceedances of the 50 µg/m3 (24hr avg) were reported for the month of April. ( https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/airquality/chart/?station=sbr¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month ) · Rocklea: PM10 - No exceedances of the 50 µg/m3 (24hr avg) were reported for the month of April. ( https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/airquality/chart/?station=roc¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month ) CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 8 of 29 The graphical representation of the DES air quality data is presented in the below charts. Figure 2: Brisbane CBD DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed 18 May 2020) CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 9 of 29 Figure 3: South Brisbane DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed 18 May 2020) CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 10 of 29 Figure 4: Rocklea DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed 18 May 2020) The C-EMP and the AQMP recognise that particulate matter monitoring can be a lag indicator. Therefore, the monitoring regime detailed in the C-EMP consists of a combination of surveillance regimes via inspections at the time the works are occurring and particulate matter monitoring to support the surveillance regime findings and response to potential complaints. There were limited works during the month of April with the earthworks associated with the surcharge works at Mayne Yard North having been completed on 30 March 2020. There were no complaints relating to dust and all site inspections confirmed that · There was no visible dust leaving the site boundaries, · Stabilised egress was in place and in functioning order at each access point The RIS scope of works therefore achieved the outcomes set out by the CGCR and OEMP. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 11 of 29 3.3 Water Quality Surface Water Condition 15(a) requires that discharges of surface water and groundwater from Project Works must comply with the Brisbane River Estuary environmental values and water quality objectives (Basin no.143 midestuary) in the Environment Protection (Water) Policy 2009. Water Quality monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Condition 15(a) was not triggered. There were no surface water discharges either active (e.g. dewatering through pumping, sediment basin release) or visibly passive (through temporary or permanent stormwater drainage) from site. There were no groundwater discharges. Condition 15(b) of the CGCR requires that during construction, monitoring and reporting on water quality in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan, a sub-plan of the Construction Environmental Management Plan occurs. During April 2020, Unity undertook two (2) surface water monitoring events which both consisted of baseline monitoring. The event planned for March 2020 was postponed to 01 April 2020 and as such the results of the monitoring round are contained within this report. There were no post rainfall monitoring events triggered with a maximum monthly rain record of 4.2mm recorded at the Mayne Yard weather stations. 3.3.1 Rainfall Records 3.3.2 Discharge Monitoring Nil for this reporting period. 3.3.3 C-EMP Monitoring The following sections summarise the findings of the surface water monitoring undertaken in April 2020. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 12 of 29 As identified in previous reports, Imposed Condition 15a references WQOs for mid-estuary receivers despite four out of the five waterways / surface water bodies near, or being intersected by, the Project footprint being lowland freshwaters. Were alternative Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) contained in the relevant Environmental Protection Policy (Water and Wetland Biodiversity) 201 (EPP Water) documents exist, they have been referenced. 3.3.3.1 Breakfast Creek The below table summarises the in-situ records collected during two rounds of routine surface water monitoring at Breakfast Creek, the relevant surface water receiver for Mayne Yard. Results highlighted in yellow exceed / do not meet the WQOs referenced in imposed Condition 15a. Date Tide Sampling Purpose 01/04/2020 Rising Background 27/04/2020 Rising Background SW 1 Upstream of Mayne Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8 TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% saturation 7 <5 49 17 16 33 EC (µS/cm) pH 7.08.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) 28,640 6.81 Base Flow Brown, Murky, no sheen, mangrove odour, bats - water column ca. 5m deep 33,261 7.07 Base Flow No visible sheen, no odour, no litter, slight turbidity. Slow moving water Date Tide Sampling Purpose SW2 Adjacent to Mayne Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% saturation EC (µS/cm) pH 7.08.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) 01/04/2020 Rising Background 26 18 71 37,900 7.44 Base Flow Brown / cloudy , estuarine odour 27/04/2020 Rising Background 20 24 78 38,199 6.95 Base Flow Slight sheen close to bank, visibly turbid, minor leaf litter Date Tide Sampling Purpose SW3 Downstream of Mayne Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% saturation 01/04/2020 Rising Background 11.2 25 71.2 EC (µS/cm) pH 7.08.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) 37,900 7.44 Base Flow minimal debris on surface, light brown colour. 27/04/2020 Rising Background 27.4 28 88 41200 7.56 Base Flow No sheen, litter and foam present CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 13 of 29 3.3.3.2 York's Hollow The below table summarises the in-situ records collected during two rounds of routine surface water monitoring at York's Hollow, the potential surface water receiver for the Northern Corridor. Results highlighted in yellow exceed / do not meet the WQOs referenced in imposed Condition 15a. Date Sampling Purpose SW4 Downstream of the Northern Corridor Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC (µS/cm) pH Flow (NF / LF / 7.0-8.4 BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) Alternative WQOs 50 NTU 6 mg/L 85-110% 600 6.5-8.0 01/04/2020 Background 4.45 <5 40 649 7.18 No Flow Clear brown, muddy odour, no sheen, ca. 4m deep, fish and birds observed 27/04/2020 Background 4.7 <5 61 Algal blooms, no 28 7.83 No Flow - pond odour, no sheen, no litter. Clear to green in colour 3.3.3.3 Moolabin Creek, Rocky Water Holes Creek and Stable Swamp Creek The below table summarises the in-situ records collected during two rounds of routine surface water monitoring at Moolabin Creek, Rocky Water Holes Creek and Stable Swamp Creek, the relevant surface water receivers for the Southern Corridor (F2S). Results highlighted in yellow exceed / do not meet the WQOs referenced in imposed Condition 15a. Date Sampling Purpose Alternative WQOs Moolabin Creek - SW5 Upstream of the rail corridor Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC (µS/cm) pH 7.0-8.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) 50 NTU 6 mg/L 85-110% - 6.5-8.0 01/04/2020 Background 3.28 6 35 547 6.71 Low Flow 27/04/2020 Background 13.3 <5 95 1425 7.06 Low Flow Visual (sheen / odour / litter) clear brown, no odour, no sheen, 0.3m deep, light grey deposit on base of concrete culver resembling concrete slurry Iron mottling, no odour, no sheen, very low flow Date Sampling Purpose Moolabin Creek SW6 Downstream of the rail corridor / Clapham Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC (µS/cm) pH 7.0-8.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) Alternative WQOs 01/04/2020 Background 27/04/2020 Background 50 NTU 6 mg/L 85-110% - 6.5-8.0 5.69 16 7.4 538 6.6 Low Flow 12.8 <5 Low Flow 75 1,220 7.3 Murky brown, no odour, small amount of sheen, additional new sediments deposits since last sampling event, ca. 0.4m deep Iron bacteria sheen, iron mottling, low water flow, stagnant odour CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 14 of 29 Date Sampling Purpose Alternative WQOs 01/04/2020 Background 27/04/2020 Background Rocky Water Holes Creek SW7 Upstream of the rail corridor / Clapham Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC (µS/cm) pH Flow (NF / LF / Visual (sheen / 7.0-8.4 BF / FF) odour / litter) 50 NTU 3.6 6 mg/L 85-110% <5 21 - 6.5-8.0 507 6.6 Low Flow 3.9 <5 92 663 7.6 Low Flow brown, clear, fish, no sheen, ca 0.6 m deep Green algal bloom, no sheen, odour or litter Date Sampling Purpose Alternative WQOs 01/04/2020 Background 27/04/2020 Background Rocky Water Holes Creek SW8 Downstream of the rail corridor / Clapham Yard Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC (µS/cm) pH 7.0-8.4 Flow (NF / LF / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) 50 NTU 6 mg/L 85-110% - 6.5-8.0 brown, clear, scum on 3.5 5 37 505 6.8 Low Flow surface, some bacterial sheen, ca 0.4m deep, bubbles on surface water 7.9 <5 67 676 7.5 Low Flow Highly vegetated, no sheen, no odour Date Sampling Purpose Alternative WQOs 01/04/2020 Background 27/04/2020 Background Stable Swamp Creek SW9 Downstream of Salisbury Station Turbidity (NTU) 8NTU TSS (mg/L) 20 DO (%) 85 105% EC pH Flow (NF / LF (µS/cm) 7.0-8.4 / BF / FF) Visual (sheen / odour / litter) 50 NTU 6 mg/L 85-110% - 6.5-8.0 1.4 <5 32 490 6.4 Low Flow 3.1 <5 64 858 7.5 Low Flow brown / clear, no odour, no sheen, ca 0.8 m deep No sheen, odour or litter, tilapia spotted, green in colour 3.3.4 Interpretation The RIS scope of works is achieving the outcomes set out by the CGCR and OEMP. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 15 of 29 4 Compliance Review 4.1 Non-Compliance Events The below section summarises the events to be reported in accordance with condition 5 and condition 6(b)(ii) of the CGCR. A Non-Compliance Event is defined as Project Works that do not comply with the Imposed Conditions. 4.1.1 Non - Compliance Events Summary Table 3: Summary of Non-Compliance Events Event Title Location, Date and time of event None for this reporting period Date the Event was Formally Notified to CG/IEM Conditions Affected Date the Event Report Status of Formally Sent to CG/IEM Event 4.1.2 Review of Air Quality Data 4.1.2.1 Issues Summary As presented in Section 3.2 the dust deposition results at AQ-03 (Centenary Pool) located near the northern corridor exceeded the CGCR Air Quality Objective of 120 mg/m2/day. Since the dust deposition results span the period of 13 March 2020 to 14 April 2020, UNITY reviewed the following information to ascertain whether the exceedance of the CG Air Quality Goal for Deposited Dust (Nuisance) is likely related to UNITY's Project Works: · Location of the gauges and compliance with AS3580.10.1 · Main potential contributing activities that were likely to generate dust (e.g. earthworks), inclusive of duration and location of the works, during the monitoring period · Prevalent wind conditions during the aforementioned activities · Field observation for visible dust during routine surveillance undertaken during the monitoring period. · Complaints (residents, workers, Victoria Park users) related to air quality during the monitoring period. · Other monitoring data available (PM10, other dust deposition gauge data) 4.1.2.2 Findings The findings of the review as per the below · Location of the gauges and compliance with AS3580.10.1 AQ-03 (Centenary pool) was sited in accordance with AS3580.10.1 AQ-04 (Brisbane Girls Grammar School) was sited in accordance with AS3580.10.1 · Potential contributing activities during the monitoring period: Earthworks activities which consisted of gaining suitable fill material in an area of the northern corridor located between the edge of Brisbane Girls Grammar School occurred between 16 March and 30 March 2020 (week ends excluded) Excavation and Haulage of material typically occurred between 7 am and 5 pm each day for a total of 10 days out of the 30 days of monitoring No other activities undertaken by UNITY in the northern corridor area were identified as potential contributing activities CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 16 of 29 · The prevalent wind conditions between 16 March and 30 March 2020 are presented in Plate 1 and summarised on Figure 5. The winds were predominantly from the North-Eastern quadrant in the mornings, meaning AQ-02 dust deposition gauge was Upwind of the earthworks. The winds were predominantly from the North Western quadrant in the afternoons meaning AQ-02 dust deposition gauge was downwind of the haulage but not from the earthworks AQ-03 dust deposition gauge was downwind of the earthworks All the winds were deemed a light breeze under the Beaufort Scale. Northern Corridor Predominant Winds Production Days - 16 to 30 March (excl. Week Ends) NNW NW WNW W N 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% WSW NNE NE ENE 3 - Gentle Breeze (12-19 km/hr) E 2 - Light Breeze (6-11 km/hr) 1 - Light Air (2-5km/hr) ESE SW SE SSW SSE S Plate 1: Prevalent Wind Conditions CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 17 of 29 Figure 5: Prevalent Winds - Northern Corridor · Field observations for visible dust during routine surveillance did not record visible dust beyond the project boundaries · There were nil complaints related to air quality within the Northern Corridor Air Shed during the monitoring period. · Other available data were The results from the dust deposition gauge AQ-02, the closest to the works and typically downwind of the earthworks in the afternoons, did not exceed the Deposited Dust Air Quality Goal (120 mg/m2/day) with a reading of 47 mg/m2/day. There was no recorded exceedance of the daily PM10 Air Quality Goal during the days of earthworks. The highest PM10 results were recorded when no earthworks activities were being undertaken The results have been reproduced below in Figure 6. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 18 of 29 Figure 6: PM10 Results 4.1.2.3 Conclusion Based on the review of the findings presented in the previous section, the exceedance of the deposited dust air quality goal at the one dust deposition gauge located near Centenary Pool cannot be associated with UNITY's Project Works. On this basis there is no Non-Compliance Event with Imposed Condition 13a. Unity however identified, as an outcome of the review, that the location is of the dust deposition gauge may be · an easy target for tampering and · influenced by external sources such as maintenance works around the pool and the park. This Dust Deposition Hauge was therefore relocated at a more secure location on 13 May 2020,at the same location as the recently installed DustMasterPro 7000 (which monitors PM10 and TSP). 4.2 C-EMP Compliance The below table summarise compliance status with the C-EMP and relevant Subplans monitoring requirements for the reporting period. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 19 of 29 Table 4: C-EMP and relevant Subplans monitoring requirements Compliance Status for the reporting period Aspect Monitoring requirement Activities Monitoring undertaken Risk profile Compliance status with CEMP / CEMP Subplan Effect of the noncompliance Air Quality Visual monitoring program + Low Additional particulate monitoring as required based on the outcomes of the predictive assessment / risk profile Yes visual monitoring undertaken as part of routine inspections Additional monitoring for PM10 and Deposited Dust also undertaken despite not required for low risk activities Compliant Not Applicable Noise Buffer Distance Tests based on Low the outcomes of the predictive assessment based / risk profile of activities Not required Compliant Not Applicable Noise Plant Noise Audits for Noisy Low Plant to validate models input as required Not required Compliant Not Applicable Noise Complaints response - Not triggered no complaints Compliant Not Applicable Vibration Buffer Distance Tests based on Low the outcomes of the predictive assessment based / risk profile of activities Not required Compliant Not Applicable Vibration Complaints response - Not triggered no complaints Compliant Not Applicable Water Quality Monthly monitoring Low Yes Compliant Not Applicable Water Quality Post Rainfall - Not triggered -rainfall did Compliant Not not exceed the 20-25mm / Applicable 24 hr threshold Water Quality Dewatering - Not triggered no Compliant Not dewatering to receiving Applicable water systems CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 20 of 29 5 Good News Stories No Non-Compliance events occurred during the reporting period. There were no complaints recorded associated with the Project Works. This is the fifth month in a row. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 21 of 29 Attachment 1 CGCR Non-Compliance Event Report (if required) None for this reporting period. CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 22 of 29 Attachment 2 Monitoring Locations Noise Not applicable for the reporting period CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 23 of 29 Attachment 3 Monitoring Locations Vibration Not applicable for the reporting period CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 24 of 29 Attachment 4 Monitoring Locations Air Quality CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 25 of 29 (when printed A3) LEGEND Air Quality Monitoring DDG PM10 & DDG DCBD_10May20 Rail Stations Railway_stations_and_sidings Rail Network Rail_network Data Sources DES Qld Government UNITY Alliance Google Satellite Imagery CROSS RIVER RAIL Air Quality Monitoring Locations Figure 01 April 2020 Project ID: Q01080 Created By: KG Last Modified: 04-June-20 Version: 00 Attachment 5 Monitoring Locations Surface Water CROSS RIVER RAIL | Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance RIS-UNA-ENV-MRP-06607 | Monthly CGCR report April 2020 Page 27 of 29 I2 Legend ED Surface Water Monitoring Locations QR Railway Stations Site Location Map Mayne Yard Northern Corridor RNA Showgrounds SW01 Breakfast Creek Name BCC Grid Easting BCC Grid Northing SW01 52085.8135 161813.4781 SW02 53918.5282 162744.8414 SW03 54172.6273 162352.6884 SW04 52240.7394 160443.5064 ED ED SW04 Exhibition Northern Corridor 2I 2I Roma Street RNA Showgrounds m 0 100 200 400 600 Scale 1 : 12,000 cm 1 Overview Map 17/09/2019 J Perry Rev De s cr ip tio n Date Approved Status Issued for Information Original Siz e A3 Dra wn GIS Coo rdi nat e System Height Dat um GDA 1994 BCSG02 AHD Designed Date Printed J Clothier 2/13/2020 Filename: Surface_Water_Northern_Area_Map.mxd ± ED SW02 SW03 Mayne Yard ED Project Wide Surface Water Investigation Figure 1 - Surface Water Monitoring Locations Project Number Discipline ENV Document Document Number Rev PL 002 1 Legend ED Surface Water Monitoring Locations 2I QR Railway Stations Wa te rc ou rs e Site Location Map Clapham Yard F2S SW06 SW05 Moolabin Creek ED ED Clapham Yard Moorooka 2I Name BCC Grid Easting BCC Grid Northing SW05 51419.5537 151932.6245 SW06 51224.4775 151954.6331 SW07 51234.4814 150778.1744 SW08 51136.4432 150856.2048 SW09 51927.0826 149476.7325 SW08 ED SW07 ED Rocklea 2I Rocky Creek Stable Swamp Creek m 0 100 200 400 600 Scale 1 : 12,000 cm 1 Southern Overview Map 17/09/2019 J Perry Rev De s cr ip tio n Date Approved SW09 ED Salisbury 2I Status Issued for Information Original Siz e A3 Dra wn GIS Coo rdi nat e System Height Dat um GDA 1994 BCSG02 AHD Designed Date Printed J Clothier 2/13/2020 Filename: Surface_Water_Southern_Area_Map.mxd ± Project Wide Surface Water Investigation Figure 2 - Surface Water Monitoring Locations Project Number Discipline ENV Document Document Number Rev PL 002 1 Appendix B TSD Monthly Report 18 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 April 2020 Monthly Report Summary Monitoring Summary It is the project's intent to aim for the Goals and Objectives relevant to vibration, noise, air quality and water monitoring within the practical extent of delivering the project. Vibration monitoring was conducted on three (3) occasions, and noise monitoring was conducted on sixty-nine (69) occasions during April 2020. Each vibration and noise monitoring event confirmed project requirements were adhered to. Ambient air quality monitoring was conducted at the Roma Street, Albert St, Woolloongabba and Boggo Rd precinct sites during April 2020. Air quality monitoring confirmed project requirements were adhered to. One (1) round of surface water quality monitoring was also conducted that confirmed no project impacts. Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 1 Environmental Monitoring Results Monitoring data is provided below in accordance with Condition 6(b)(i) of the Coordinator-General Change Report. Vibration Vibration monitoring was conducted during April 2020. All vibration monitoring adhered to project requirements and is detailed in the table below. Table 1: Vibration Monitoring Data Start Date Time Finish Date Location Average Vibration levels Max Vibration Level Purpose of Monitoring (mm/s) (mm/s) Adhered to Project Requirements (Yes / No) 16/04/2020 10:54:00 AM 17/04/2020 Boggo Road Model Verification 0.2 (Boggo Road Precinct) 1.66 Yes 20/04/2020 8:50:00 AM 21/04/2020 Boggo Road Model Verification 0.11 (Boggo Road Precinct) 0.45 Yes 22/04/2020 12:08:00 PM 22/04/2020 Boggo Road Construction Monitoring 0.15 (Boggo Road Precinct) at Sensitive Places 0.35 Yes Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 2 Noise Attended noise monitoring was conducted during April 2020. All noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements and is provided in the table below. Table 2: Noise Monitoring Data Date Time Location Purpose of Monitoring Activity Noise level Noise level LA10[1] LAeq[2] 1/04/2020 11:41:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 69.5 67.2 2/04/2020 8:14:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 68.8 65.9 2/04/2020 8:44:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 67.9 64.5 3/04/2020 10:32:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 73 71.1 3/04/2020 10:55:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 72.4 69.4 3/04/2020 1:10:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 61.8 67.9 4/04/2020 8:40:00 AM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 64.4 61.9 4/04/2020 9:00:00 AM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 68 66.6 6/04/2020 9:38:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 67.9 64.6 Adhered to Project Requirements (Yes / No) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 3 6/04/2020 10:00:00 PM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 66.2 64.3 6/04/2020 10:18:00 PM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 64 62.6 6/04/2020 9:30:00 AM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Site Establishment and Piling 72.1 69.5 6/04/2020 12:15:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 61.8 60.1 6/04/2020 12:41:00 PM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 72.9 69.1 7/04/2020 8:30:00 AM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Site Establishment and Piling 78.2 75.1 7/04/2020 9:10:00 AM Elliot Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 69.6 64.5 7/04/2020 9:30:00 AM Elliot Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 60.8 58.4 8/04/2020 10:16:00 AM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 70.7 67.2 8/04/2020 10:49:00 AM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 69.9 66.5 8/04/2020 11:12:00 AM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 70.5 67.3 8/04/2020 11:34:00 AM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 75.3 75 10/04/2020 7:53:00 AM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Tunnel Construction 64.3 64.8 Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 10/04/2020 8:15:00 AM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 9:13:00 AM Herschel Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 9:51:00 AM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 1:00:00 PM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 1:22:00 PM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 8:00:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 8:22:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 8:49:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 9:21:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 1:41:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 10/04/2020 11:40:00 AM Vulture Street (Woolloongabba Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 14/04/2020 9:48:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places 15/04/2020 10:12:00 PM Vulture Street (Woolloongabba Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report Tunnel Construction Tunnel Construction Tunnel Construction Tunnel Construction Tunnel Construction Construction Stage 1 Construction Stage 1 Construction Stage 1 Construction Stage 1 Construction Stage 1 Site establishment Construction Stage 1 Site Establishment 59.1 58.9 62.2 68.6 64.7 62.9 62.2 59.5 67.5 65 70.5 68.6 68 66.2 60.4 58.9 66.7 63.8 68.8 65.5 70.7 66.6 81.5 75.7 69.4 65.3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 15/04/2020 4:05:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 65.3 63.1 15/04/2020 3:40:00 PM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 60.8 57.8 16/04/2020 12:45:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 66 63.4 16/04/2020 11:45:00 AM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 65 63.1 17/04/2020 9:07:00 PM Reid Street (Woolloongabba Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Site Establishment 55.2 56.5 20/04/2020 3:00:00 PM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Complaint response Demolition 70.2 67.1 20/04/2020 3:18:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demolition 74.6 71.2 20/04/2020 6:32:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Model Verification Construction Stage 1 66.5 65.9 20/04/2020 7:08:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Model Verification Construction Stage 1 70.9 69.1 20/04/2020 7:58:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Model Verification Construction Stage 1 73.5 70.5 20/04/2020 8:33:00 PM Mary Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Construction Stage 1 41.3 40 20/04/2020 12:06:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 62.4 64.2 20/04/2020 12:30:00 PM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 68 65.1 Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 22/04/2020 9:54:00 PM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demoliton and Tunnel Construction 64.7 62.4 22/04/2020 10:17:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Demoliton and Tunnel Construction 63.4 60.9 22/04/2020 11:13:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 65.7 62.5 23/04/2020 12:30:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 67.8 65.1 23/04/2020 12:50:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 70 67.4 24/04/2020 1:30:00 PM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 73.4 70.1 24/04/2020 1:49:00 PM Roma Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 74.7 71.5 24/04/2020 2:06:00 PM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 69.3 65.8 24/04/2020 2:00:00 PM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 63.8 61.7 24/04/2020 2:20:00 PM Joe Baker Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 62.3 59.6 27/04/2020 9:04:00 AM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 77.7 75.3 27/04/2020 9:22:00 AM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 73 69.5 27/04/2020 9:43:00 AM Herschel Sreet (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring Stage 2 Demoliton and Tunnel at Sensitive Places Construction 71.3 68.4 Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 27/04/2020 9:24:00 AM George Street (Roma Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Site Establishment 73.6 75.1 Yes 27/04/2020 8:45:00 PM Vulture Street (Woolloongabba Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Construction Stage 1 43.9 42.9 Yes 27/04/2020 9:11:00 PM Mary Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Construction Stage 1 51.8 51.2 Yes 29/04/2020 4:10:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Construction Stage 1 70 66.9 Yes 29/04/2020 4:26:00 AM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Construction Stage 1 71.6 68.8 Yes 29/04/2020 6:40:00 PM Albert Street (Albert Street Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 58.2 54.8 Yes 29/04/2020 7:30:00 PM Elliot Street (Woolloongabba Precinct) Model Verification Site Establishment and Piling 59 60.5 Yes 30/04/2020 10:27:00 AM Peter Doherty Street (Boggo Road Precinct) Construction Monitoring at Sensitive Places Site Establishment 72.4 69.2 Yes - [1] Intermittent noise goal (LA10) - [2] Continuous noise goal (LAeq) Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 8 Air Quality Deposited Dust Results Air quality monitoring for deposited dust was performed during April 2020. The dust deposition gauges result for the reporting period are detailed below, and all monitoring data adhered to project requirements and is provided in the table below. Table 3: Air Quality Monitoring Deposited Dust Data Project Wide Air Quality Criteria & Goals[1] Location Air Quality Monitoring results Criterion Goal Indicator Comments Roma Street Precinct/ Northern Portal 33.3 mg/m2/day Albert Street Precinct Woolloongabba Precinct Nuisance Deposited dust 120 mg/m2/day 23.3 mg/m2/day 33.3 mg/m2/day 16.67 mg/m2/day Air quality monitoring was performed during the reporting period. All results adhered to project requirements. Boggo Roadd Precinct/ Southern Portal 13.3 mg/m2/day 23.3 mg/m2/day [1] Project works must aim to achieve construction air quality goals. The Coordinator-General Change Report Whole of Project Refinements 2019 acknowledges instances exist that these goals may not be achieved. Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 9 Particulates and Ambient Air Quality Results Air quality monitoring for Total Suspended Particules (TSP) and particulate matter less than 10 m (PM10) was performed at the Woolloongabba site during April 2020. TSP and PM10 monitoring data adhered to project requirements and is provided in the table below. Table 4: Air Quality Monitoring Total Suspended Particles and PM10 Data Date Total Suspended Particles (µg/m3/24 hr) PM10 (µg/m3/24 hr) 01-Apr-20 7.1 7.0 02-Apr-20 8.3 8.3 03-Apr-20 11.8 11.8 04-Apr-20 6.4 6.2 05-Apr-20 11.7 11.5 06-Apr-20 7.6 7.5 07-Apr-20 4.7 4.6 08-Apr-20 2.8 2.7 09-Apr-20 4.0 3.9 10-Apr-20 3.4 3.3 11-Apr-20 6.5 6.3 12-Apr-20 5.0 4.9 13-Apr-20 7.2 7.1 14-Apr-20 8.0 8.0 Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 10 15-Apr-20 7.8 16-Apr-20 7.2 17-Apr-20 18-Apr-20 19-Apr-20 20-Apr-20 NA[1] NA[1] NA[1] NA[1] 21-Apr-20 9.1 22-Apr-20 17.8 23-Apr-20 11.1 24-Apr-20 16.9 25-Apr-20 15.9 26-Apr-20 12.3 27-Apr-20 10.0 28-Apr-20 6.2 29-Apr-20 5.7 30-Apr-20 12.3 [1] As a result of air quality monitoring equipment being vandalised, monitoring data was not captured between the 17th April 2020 to the 20th April 2020. 7.8 7.2 NA[1] NA[1] NA[1] NA[1] 8.9 17.4 10.9 16.8 15.9 12.3 9.9 6.1 5.7 12.2 Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 11 CBGU JV also reviewed the DES air quality results for PM10 from nearby air quality stations during the reporting period. The results were as follows: · Brisbane CBD: PM10 daily Maximum average: 39.5 µg/m3 (https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/air- quality/chart/?station=cbd¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month) · South Brisbane: PM10 daily Maximum average: 39.1 µg/m3 (https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/air- quality/chart/?station=sbr¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month) · Woolloongabba: PM10 daily Maximum average: 38.0 µg/m3 (https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/air- quality/chart/?station=woo¶meter=18&date=1/04/2020&timeframe=month) The graphical representation of the DES air quality data is presented in the below charts (refer to Figure 1-3). There were no exceedances of the PM10 daily criterion recorded at the Brisbane CBD, Woolloongabba and Boggo Rd worksites. Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 12 Figure 1: Brisbane CBD DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed May 2020) Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 13 Figure 2: South Brisbane DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed May 2020) Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 14 Figure 3: Woolloongabba DES Station - PM10 graph for April 2020 (reproduction from the DES website accessed May 2020) Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 15 Water Quality Discharge Water Quality monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Condition 15(a) was not triggered. There were no active discharge of site water during April 2020. Water Quality Surface Water During April 2020, CBGU JV undertook one (1) round of surface water sampling at five (5) locations (upstream and downstream). The monitoring locations are representative of the broader catchment, and since no significant offsite discharges were occurring at the time of monitoring, no results are attributed to the project. Table 5: Offsite Upstream & Downstream Water Quality Data Location Date Purpose of Monitoring Turbidity (NTU) Suspended solids (mg/L) EC (µS/cm) Dissolved oxygen (%) pH Adhered to Project Requirements (Yes / No) Roma Street - Upstream 17/04/2020 Monthly 16.52 16 >3999 84.72 7.83 Yes Roma Street - Downstream 17/04/2020 Monthly 16.87 13 >3999 85.93 7.86 Yes Gabba - Upstream 17/04/2020 Monthly 21.2 24 >3999 85.58 7.68 Yes Gabba - Downstream 17/04/2020 Monthly 26.3 41 >3999 87.93 7.79 Yes Boggo Road* 17/04/2020 Monthly 5.63 <5 >3999 35.17 7.25 Yes Albert Street - Upstream 21/04/2020 Monthly 15.18 18 >3999 85.51 7.81 Yes Albert Street - Downstream 21/04/2020 Monthly 27.4 30 >3999 82.89 7.77 Yes * Monitoring at the Boggo Rd site occurs at a pipe outlet at the beginning of the surface catchment. There is no upstream/downstream monitoring point as such. The pipe outlet receives water released from the site, as well as a broader stormwater catchment. Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 16 Non-Compliances A Non-Compliance Event is defined as Project Works that do not comply with the Imposed Conditions. Nil non-compliances occurred during the monitoring period. Non- Compliance Events Summary Table 6: Non-Compliance Events Event Title Location, Date and time of the event Date the Event was Formally Notified to CG/IEM Conditions Affected Date the Event Report Formally Sent Status of to CG/IEM Event Nil for this reporting period Complaints The below section summarises the complaints to be reported in accordance with Condition 6(b)(iii) of the CGCR. Table 7: Summary of Complaints Date Location Issue CGCR Non-Compliance Status of Event Herschel Street 06/04/2020 (Roma Street Precinct) Herschel Street 08/04/2020 (Roma Street Precinct) Herschel Street 08/04/2020 (Roma Street Precinct) Noise Noise Noise A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during standard hours. Attended noise monitoring confirmed that works adhered to project requirements. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. Closed Closed Closed Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 17 Date Location Mary Street 09/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Mary Street 11/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Albert Street 15/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Mary Street 17/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Herschel Street 20/04/2020 (Roma Street Precinct) Mary Street 21/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Mary Street 22/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) Roma Street 22/04/2020 (Roma Street Precinct) Issue Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise CGCR Non-Compliance Status of Event A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was received as a result of project works during standard hours. Monitoring was conducted, which concluded works were in accordance with project conditions. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was raised regarding project works undertaken during night hours. Scheduled Out of Hours Work was being undertaken and community notification had been provided. A complaint was received as a result of project works during standard hours. Monitoring was conducted, which concluded works were in accordance with project conditions. Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 18 Date 22/04/2020 Location Herschel Street (Roma Street) Albert Street 27/04/2020 (Albert Street Precinct) 30/04/2020 Boggo Rd (Boggo Road Precinct) Issue Noise Noise Noise CGCR Non-Compliance A complaint was received as a result of project works during standard hours. Monitoring was conducted, which concluded works were in accordance with project conditions. A complaint was received as a result of project works during standard hours. Monitoring was conducted, which concluded works were in accordance with project conditions. A complaint was received as a result of project works during standard hours. Monitoring was conducted, which concluded works were in accordance with project conditions. Status of Event Closed Closed Closed Cross River Rail Tunnels and Stations Development Monthly Report 19 Appendix C Non-Compliance Event Reports No Non-Compliance Events were raised in April; however, five 14-day reports that were submitted in April are provided in this Appendix. 19 Monthly Environment Report - April 2020 Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report In accordance with Condition 5 (c) of the Coordinator General Change Report (CGCR) this report provides written advice to the Environmental Monitor and the Coordinator-General, within 14 days of the 48-hour NCE notification. NCE Ref Reported by Date, time and location of event Short description of the Event Circumstances under which the non-compliance event occurred (include activity being undertaken, predictive modelling, monitoring etc) CRRDA-NCE-TSD -001 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-002 Delivery Authority Date Reported to CG 21 April 2020 (note: a 7-day extension was agreed to by the Coordinator-General) Inspections completed at the Woolloongabba worksite on 19 February 2020 and 27 March 2020. NCE Notification 31 March 2020. The relevant project works for the Woolloongabba worksite are operating under a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) (Rev 3) and sub-plans which included an Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Sub-plan. In accordance with Imposed Condition 18, this subplan must also be consistent with the Guidelines for Best Practice Erosion and Sediment Control (International Erosion and Sediment Control Association, 2008) (IECA, 2008). These management plans have been reviewed and endorsed by the Project's approved Environmental Monitor (EM). In accordance with IECA, 2008, the ESC requires that site specific ESC designs must be prepared for each phase of construction works to manage site runoff from changing groundcover, landform, gradients and site drainage. During a site inspection of the Woolloongabba worksite completed by the Environmental Monitor the following observations were made: 1) Based on evidence of site scouring, it was identified that overland flow had left the site through a damaged erosion and sediment control device, earth-bund, and entered a stormwater inlet. 2) Following review of the ESC design (Site Establishment Works and Piling Pad 22.2.2020) prepared as part of the ESC sub-plan, it was identified that even though the earth-bund control had been constructed it was not included on the ESC design drawing. The Woolloongabba worksite has been undergoing regular change in type of groundcover, landform, gradients and site drainage as a result of ongoing civil works within the site. During a site inspection completed by the Environmental Monitor on 19/02/202, he observed through site scouring, that overland flow had left the site through a damaged erosion and sediment control (earth-bund) and entered into a stormwater inlet. Refer to photos below captured on the day of the inspection which formed part of the Environmental Monitor Inspection Record (19/02/2020). 19 February 2020 - Environmental Monitor Inspection Report. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 1 of 3 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD -001 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-002 Following the 19.02.2020 site inspection by the Environmental Monitor, he conducted a document review of the site-specific ESC design (Site Establishment Works and Piling Pad 22.2.2020) prepared for this phase of works and identified the following: · Diversion of site `dirty water' in the form of an earth-bund was not indicated on the ESC design drawing. Consultation with DAP's (if applicable) Description of the non-compliance event Not applicable. This event has resulted in non-compliance with the following CG imposed conditions: Activities on site relating to erosion and sediment control are non-compliant with the following: · Imposed Condition 4 Construction Environmental Management Plan: Site ESC controls have been not been implemented in accordance with the CEMP for the duration of works. Details of any complaints in relation to this incident Nil. The NCE was initiated as a result from the Environmental Monitor inspection dated 19.02.2020 and subsequent document review of the ESC design drawing (Site Establishment and Piling Pad). CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 2 of 3 NCE Ref Root cause of non-compliance Description of environmental effects and impacts Was sampling or monitoring performed in relation to this event? (if so attach results) Actions already undertaken to mitigation environmental effects of this NCE Additional actions to be undertaken (and timeframes for completion) CRRDA-NCE-TSD -001 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-002 · The erosion and sediment controls not properly maintained which allowed site water to travel to open drain. · The ESC design drawing had not captured all latest site conditions and had not nominated an erosion and sediment control for this location within the worksite. Site water (unknown quality) entered stormwater inlet on site during a rain event breaking through bunding that wasn't repaired following the disturbance from plant and equipment moving along the haul road. No. Visual observation by the Environmental Monitor only. Update of ESC design drawing to reflect site condition and inclusion of additional erosion and sediment control for this location, i.e. earth-bund. . The Delivery Authority will continue to work with the Contractor to seek the following outcomes: · Site Erosion and Sediment Control design to be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure all changes to site conditions have been captured and suitable erosion and sediment controls nominated. · Site supervisor to be fully briefed on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and ESC design. · Site supervisor to perform daily checks of vulnerable areas for ESC maintenance (i.e. especially around stormwater drains) and ensure the ESC design is implemented. Proposed actions to prevent reoccurrence of the NCE (include responsibility and timeframes Report completed by Completion statement Completed actions by 29.05.2020 · Provision of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) which reflects the current site conditions and has been certified by a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC). · Confirmation has been received that the nominated erosion and sediment controls are implemented on site. Preventative Actions · The Delivery Authority will encourage the Contractor to carry out Lessons Learned toolbox talks to other Environmental Advisors and Site Supervisors across the project worksites and to include in daily site briefings, especially during wet weather. The Delivery Authority with advice from the Environment Monitor Erosion and sediment control plans finalised with nominated erosion and sediment controls in place. NCE closed. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 3 of 3 Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report In accordance with Condition 5 (c) of the Coordinator General Change Report (CGCR) this report provides written advice to the Environmental Monitor and the Coordinator-General, within 14 days of the 48-hour NCE notification. NCE Ref Reported by Date, time and location of event Short description of the Event CRRDA-NCE-TSD -002 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-003 Delivery Authority Date Reported to CG 21 April 2020 (note: a 7-day extension was agreed to by the Coordinator-General) Inspection completed at the Boggo Road worksite on 19 February 2020 and 27 March 2020. NCE Notification 31 March 2020. The relevant project works for the Boggo Road worksite are operating under a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) (Rev 3) and sub-plans which included an Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Sub-plan. In accordance with Imposed Condition 18, this sub-plan must also be consistent with the Guidelines for Best practice Erosion and Sediment Control (International Erosion and Sediment Control Association, 2008) (IECA, 2008). These management plans have been reviewed and endorsed by the Project's approved Environmental Monitor (EM). In accordance with IECA, 2008, site specific ESC design (Site Establishment Works and Piling Works 8.01.2020) was prepared for this phase of construction works to manage site runoff from changing groundcover, landform, gradients and site drainage. During a site inspection (Site Inspection Record 19/02/2020) of the Boggo Road worksite completed by the Environmental Monitor the following observations were made: 1) Main drainage channel immediately above flume pipe appeared not to be in accordance with the ESC design drawing (Site Establishment Works and Piling Works 8.01.2020) 2) The installed flume pipe diameter size was not nominated on the ESC design drawing. 3) The installed flume pipe was covered and occluded by rip rap rock, thereby preventing adequate flow through to the stormwater inlet. Circumstances under which the noncompliance event occurred (include activity being undertaken, predictive modelling, monitoring etc) The Boggo Road site inspection completed by the Environmental Monitor on 19 February identified that: · Main drainage channel immediately above flume pipe appeared not to be in accordance with the ESC design drawing (Site Establishment Works and Piling Works 8.01.2020) · The installed flume pipe diameter size was not nominated on the ESC design drawing. · The installed flume pipe was covered and occluded by rip rap rock, thereby preventing adequate flow through to the stormwater inlet. Refer to photos below captured on the day of the inspection which formed part of the Environmental Monitor Inspection Record (19/02/2020). CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 1 of 5 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD -002 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-003 CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 2 of 5 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD -002 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-003 Consultation with DAP's (if applicable) Description of the noncompliance event As part of the investigation into the failing of the erosion and sediment controls on the site a number of minor errors in the RUSLE calculations (such as gradient of the site) were also identified which led to incorrect outputs and nomination of controls. These design calculations have been revised and included in the next ESC design drawings. Not applicable. This event has resulted in non-compliance with the following CG imposed conditions: Activities on site relating to erosion and sediment control are non-compliant with the following: · Imposed Condition 4 Construction Environmental Management Plan: Site ESC controls have been not been implemented in accordance with the CEMP for the duration of works. Details of any complaints in relation to this incident Nil. NCE generated as a result of Environmental Monitor inspections only. Root cause of noncompliance The erosion and sediment controls not constructed in accordance with IECA. Description of environmental effects and impacts ESC not constructed in accordance with the IECA (as required by the CEMP) leading to a potential risk that it will not perform in accordance with required standard. Was sampling No. or monitoring performed in relation to this event? (if so attach results) Actions already undertaken to mitigation environmental effects of this NCE When the ESC issues were observed by the Environment Monitor on the site inspection the site team were alerted to the issues and the repairs were undertaken including an additional flume pipe, correctly installing the required drain with a vehicle crossing (refer to photos below). CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 3 of 5 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD -002 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-003 Additional actions to be undertaken (and timeframes for completion) Rectification work was undertaken, refer to site photos below. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 4 of 5 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD -002 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-003 In addition to the above measures, the site is still changing as the construction program progresses. The Delivery Authority has requested that the Contractor undertake regular reviews at a frequency to ensure changes to site conditions can be captured and suitable controls installed as more areas become hard standing, slope changes and other opportunities arise to minimise clean water entering site (such as rainwater runoff from the site office roofs and hard standing areas). · Site Erosion and Sediment Control design to be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure all changes to site conditions have been captured and suitable erosion and sediment controls nominated. · Site supervisor to be fully briefed on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and ESC design. · Site supervisor to perform daily checks of vulnerable areas for ESC maintenance (i.e. especially around stormwater drains) and ensure the ESC design is implemented. Actions completed by 29.05.2020 · Provision of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) which reflects the current site conditions and has been certified by a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC). · Confirmation that the nominated erosion and sediment controls are implemented on site. Proposed actions to prevent reoccurrence of the NCE (include responsibility and timeframes Preventative Actions · The Delivery Authority will encourage the Contractor to carry out Lessons Learned toolbox talks to other Environmental Advisors and Site Supervisors across the project worksites and to include in daily site briefings, especially during wet weather. Report completed by The Delivery Authority with advice from the Environment Monitor Completion statement Erosion and Sediment Control plan finalised with nominated sediment controls implemented. NCE closed. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 5 of 5 Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report In accordance with Condition 5 (c) of the Coordinator General Change Report (CGCR) this report provides written advice to the Environmental Monitor and the Coordinator-General, within 14 days of the 48-hour NCE notification. NCE Ref Reported by Date, time and location of event Short description of the Event Circumstances under which the noncompliance event occurred (include activity being undertaken, predictive modelling, monitoring etc) CRRDA-NCE-TSD -003 Delivery Authority NCE Ref (DA) Date Reported to CG 17 February - 8:30am, 3:00pm and 3:09pm (approx.) 24 February 7:36am - 8:42am (approx.) NCE Notification to Coordinator-General 31 March 2020. Deliveries arriving at site outside of approved hours. CRRDA-004 21 April 2020 (note: a 7-day extension was agreed to by the Coordinator-General) The Environmental Monitor has provided Environmental Monitor Inspection Report 2020 Boggo to the Delivery Authority which noted the following observations: Monday 17 February 2020 Boggo Road worksite precinct: 1. During the morning drop-off time (approximately 8:30am - (outside permitted hours) a truck was observed making a delivery to the Boggo Road Site (off Boggo Road), which was carrying reinforcing mesh. 2. During the afternoon pick-up time (approximately 3pm) a number of concrete trucks were observed making deliveries to the Boggo Road Site off Joe Baker Road. 3. One of these concrete trucks was observed travelling on the wrong side of the road (and traffic island) to avoid the traffic associated with the school pick-up. 4. A second concrete truck was observed at 3.09pm in the same queue. The Environmental Monitor provided advice that this constitutes a non-compliance event in relation to Imposed Condition 10 (spoil haulage and materials/equipment delivery Boggo Road) This was formally reported to the contractor via Project Independent Certifier PIC on 21 February 2020. The Environmental Monitor, in an Environmental Monitor Non-Compliance Notification of 24 Feb 2020 noted the following observations: Monday 24 February 2020 Boggo Road worksite precinct: 1. 1 x large skip truck at 7;36am 2. 1 x cement truck at 7:59am 3. 1 x B-double haulage truck at 8:42am The Environmental Monitor advised that this constitutes a non-compliance event in relation to Imposed Condition 10 (spoil haulage and materials/equipment delivery Boggo Road). This was formally communicated to the contractor via the Project Independent Certifier on 25 February 2020. Consultation with DAP's (if applicable) Not applicable. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 1 of 2 NCE Ref Details of any complaints in relation to this incident CRRDA-NCE-TSD -003 None received. NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-004 Root cause of noncompliance The sub-contractor was interpreting the imposed conditions to allow spoil haulage and materials/equipment delivery to be conducted as managed works. The contractor has advised the Delivery Authority that there have been a series of discussions with the sub-contractor and the EM to resolve the issue. Description of environmental effects and impacts Heavy vehicle movements safety during the heavy vehicle lockout period. Was sampling or monitoring performed in relation to this event? (if so attach results) No, sampling and monitoring not required. Actions already undertaken to mitigation environmental effects of this NCE The Contractor has advised that it has applied the following actions [relevant to Condition 10]: · Project compliance requirements have been communicated clearly to suppliers through contracts, delivery instructions and project inductions. Whereby, delivery order forms to suppliers clearly state, "strictly no deliveries between the hours of 7:30am to 9:00am and 2:30pm to 4:30pm". · The contractor has undertaken regular driver-specific inductions for concrete truck drivers which emphasise the safety standard required by all personnel who work on the project. Additional actions to be undertaken (and timeframes for completion) Actions completed by 29.05.2020 · Relevant teams have been toolbox talked on site. · External contractors have been contacted and the contractor comms team are in regular contact with Dutton Park State School. · Project compliance requirements have been communicated clearly to suppliers through contracts. · The contractor has undertaken regular driver-specific inductions for concrete truck drivers which emphasise the safety standard required by all personnel who work on the project. Proposed actions to prevent reoccurrence of the NCE (include responsibility and timeframes Preventative Actions · The Delivery Authority will request that any deliveries that do occur out of approved hours will be immediately raised as an internal incident in accordance with the requirements of endorsed CEMP R3 section 6, followed by the identification and implementation of corrective actions in accordance with section 7.4 of the endorsed CEMP R3. Corrective action advice is to be documented in a corrective actions register (consistent with OEMP section 7.4) and implemented and communicated consistent with section 7.4 of the endorsed CEMP R3. Responsibility: Delivery Authority: Friday 24 April 2020. · The Delivery Authority will request that a copy of an updated Site Environment Plan be provided to the Environment Monitor with evidence that the SEP has been communicated to the Boggo Road site team). Responsibility: Delivery Authority by Friday 24 April 2020. Report completed by The Delivery Authority with advice from the Environment Monitor Completion statement All relevant site and external party briefing, advice and training regarding hours of delivery and traffic management complete. NCE closed. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 2 of 2 Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report In accordance with Condition 5 (c) of the Coordinator General Change Report (CGCR) this report provides written advice to the Environmental Monitor and the Coordinator-General, within 14 days of the 48- hour NCE notification. NCE Ref Reported by Date, time and location of event Short description of the Event Circumstances under which the noncompliance event occurred (include activity being undertaken, predictive modelling, monitoring etc) CRRDA-NCE-TSD-004 Delivery Authority NCE Ref (DA) Date Reported to CG 27 March 2020; Location not applicable. CRRDA-005 21 April 2020 (note: a 7-day extension was agreed to by the Coordinator-General) An interpretation of monitoring results, required under Endorsed CEMP R3 S7.5, has not been provided to support the statement provided in Monthly Report February 2020 that "all noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements" Endorsed CEMP R3, at section 7.5 (Reporting) provides that: To ensure compliance with Coordinator-General Condition 6 and where relevant the OEMP, [the Contractor] will prepare and submit a monthly report within 6 weeks from the end of the month to the Delivery Authority, which includes the following information: · Monitoring data required by the Imposed Conditions or CEMP undertaken for the period and, where required, an interpretation of the results; · A schedule of all validated monitoring results. · Validated monitoring results must be produced for the preceding month's monitoring programme (OEMP p 33); Imposed Condition 11(a) requires that Project Works must "aim to achieve the project noise goals for human health and well-being presented in Table 2". Imposed Condition 11(b) requires that during construction, [the contractor must] "monitor and report on noise and vibration in accordance with the Noise and Vibration Management Plan." The Noise and Vibration Management Plan within endorsed CEMP R3 states that `based on modelling data without mitigation, for site establishment and phase 2 works, a number of properties in the Roma Street, Albert Street, Woolloongabba, and Boggo Road/Southern Portal precincts would experience potential noise exceedances'. The endorsed CEMP R3, section 7.5 refers to OEMP requirements. The OEMP, at Noise and Vibration Management Plan section 5.4.5, provides for monitoring requirements that include: · "Monitoring must be conducted in locations where predictive modelling indicates exceedances of either the noise or vibration goals are likely to occur, or where verified noise and/or vibration complaints have occurred"; and, · "The results of noise and vibration monitoring must be reported in the monthly environment report, along with details of any incidents or complaints relating to noise and vibration management" As an example, the February 2020 Monthly report for Tunnels and Stations Development provides a tabularisation of attended noise monitoring conducted during February 2020. The tabularised results provide a statement that "all noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements". The entry for 19/02/2020, Albert Street, provides monitoring results for LA10 and LAeq of 83 dBA and 78.7 dBA respectively. These monitored results are above the noise goals provided for in Condition 11 (a) Table 2. The report does not include an interpretation of the results as required under Endorsed CEMP R3 section 7.5 to address CEMP R3 section 4.6.5.2 (Environmental Outcomes), 4.6.5.3 (Performance Criteria), 4.6.5.5 (Mitigation Measures). The report does not include interpretation details against the CEMP R3 requirements support the statement "all noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements". In December 2019 and January 2020, the Delivery Authority formally provided information and guidance to assist with the preparation of future monthly reports. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 1 of 3 NCE Ref CRRDA-NCE-TSD-004 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-005 On this basis, the Environmental Monitor has advised the Delivery Authority and the contractor that there is insufficient information provided to support these statements and as a consequence, a non-compliance event has occurred. Consultation with DAP's (if applicable) Details of any complaints in relation to this incident Not applicable. None received. Root cause of noncompliance The February 2020 Monthly report for Tunnels and Stations Development provides a tabularisation of attended noise monitoring conducted during February 2020. The tabularised results provide a statement that "all noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements". The report does not include an interpretation of the results as required under Endorsed CEMP R3 section 7.5. Specifically, the report does not include interpretation details that demonstrate consideration of the Condition 11 (a) noise goals to support the statement "all noise monitoring data adhered to project requirements". Description of environmental effects and impacts No environmental effects/impacts identified. Was sampling or monitoring performed in relation to this event? (if so attach results) No additional monitoring was required relevant to this event. Actions already undertaken to mitigation environmental effects of this NCE During December 2019 and January 2020, the Delivery Authority has provided formal correspondence and guidance to assist Project contractors satisfy Imposed Condition requirements related to monthly reporting. Additional actions to be undertaken (and timeframes for completion) The Delivery Authority will seek to undertake a workshop with the Environmental Monitor and project contractors to confirm reporting obligations in accordance with the endorsed CEMP, Imposed Conditions and the approved Outline Environmental Management Plan. Actions completed by 29.05.2020 · Agreed monthly reporting content and level of interpretation. · Agreement in principle has been reached that the monthly report will be updated. After receiving the formal comments/recommendations from the OCG, dated 29/05/2020, it has been agreed further review will be completed to ensure all items are addressed. This will be managed outside of the NCE 004 process. Proposed actions to prevent reoccurrence of the NCE (include responsibility and timeframes) Review of Draft monthly report by the Cross River Rail Delivery Authority, Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) and the Environmental Monitor prior to formal issue to the Delivery Authority. Any comments raised during this review are to be provided to project contractors in a timely manner to allow them to update their report prior to formal submission to the Cross River Rail Delivery Authority which is required to support the Project's monthly submission to the Office of Coordinator-General. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 2 of 3 NCE Ref Report completed by Completion statement CRRDA-NCE-TSD-004 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-005 The Delivery Authority with advice from the Environment Monitor Monthly reporting content and level of interpretation has been reviewed and requirements for future monthly reports agreed. NCE closed. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 3 of 3 Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report In accordance with Condition 5 (c) of the Coordinator General Change Report (CGCR) this report provides written advice to the Environmental Monitor and the Coordinator-General, within 14 days of the 48- hour NCE notification. NCE Ref Reported by Date, time and location of event Short description of the Event CRRDA-NCE-TSD-005 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-006 Delivery Authority Date of 14-day Investigation Report 21 April 2020 (note: a 7-day extension was agreed to by the Coordinator-General) Boggo Road Worksite, Woolloongabba Worksite, Albert Street Worksite and Roma Street Worksite (worksites). 31 March 2020. Coordinator-General's change report conditions change (hours of work) 2019 Annex 1, Part C, Condition 4(d) and 13. Circumstances under which the noncompliance event occurred (include activity being undertaken, predictive modelling, monitoring etc) Consultation with DAP's (if applicable) Details of any complaints in relation to this incident Based on the information provided to the CRRDA from the Environmental Monitor, the contractor has not installed the required air quality monitoring equipment to be able to fully monitor compliance with Imposed Condition 13 relating to construction emissions including total suspended particulates (TSP), particulate matter (PM10) and deposited dust. During a site inspection undertaken by the Environmental Monitor and upon review of monthly reports, it was confirmed that neither dust deposition gauges nor calibrated weather stations were installed at the worksites. It was also noted that none of the worksites are currently measuring PM10 or TSP in accordance with the Environmental Monitor endorsed CEMP. Only the Woolloongabba worksite is measuring PM10 using the nearby DES air quality monitoring station (which is directly north of the site) with no other monitoring of PM10 at the south of the site. The other worksites are relying on DES or Eastern Centenary Pool monitoring stations which are up to 1.5km away from the worksites. · Boggo Road recently established dust deposition monitoring at the western site boundary and to the east of the site. No PM10 or TSP monitoring occurring on site or close to the boundary, · Woolloongabba Relies on the DES monitoring station directly north of the site for PM10 and dust deposition. No monitoring is undertaken on site or south of the site and no TSP monitoring is undertaken at all, · Albert Street - recently established dust deposition monitoring at the southern site boundary. No PM10 or TSP monitoring occurring on site or close to the boundary, · Roma Street No monitoring is taking place on site or close by. The contractors are referring to the Eastern Centenary Pool monitoring over 1km away for dust deposition. Nil, although in response to complaints from adjacent residents the contractor has described dust management measures being implemented on site. There have been a total of nine complaints relating to dust across the worksites. Root cause of noncompliance Based on the information available to CRRDA, there has been no establishment of worksite specific air quality monitoring stations in accordance with Imposed Condition 13 and endorsed CEMP. Description of environmental effects and impacts Was sampling or monitoring performed in relation to this Construction activities have the potential to generate dust with potential impacts to the surrounding environment and residents. Without local, site specific monitoring, compliance with the conditions cannot be determined and complaints cannot be verified. Not applicable CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 1 of 2 NCE Ref event? (if so attach results) CRRDA-NCE-TSD-005 NCE Ref (DA) CRRDA-006 Actions already undertaken to mitigate environmental effects of this NCE An investigation has been undertaken by the Environmental Monitor in consultation with the contractor. Additional actions to be undertaken (and timeframes for completion) Actions completed by 29.05.2020 The contractor has confirmed there is suitable monitoring equipment available on the project to sample air quality at each site. This includes a dust deposition gauge @ Roma Street site, Albert St site, Boggo Road site and the Woolloongabba site. These gauges are collected monthly in accordance with the Australian Standard. The contractor currently also has two mobile low volume TSP & PM10 air quality sampling units that are operated in addition to existing (DES) air quality stations. The mobile units are rotated around each site to collect the required data. Timing and location of each unit is dictated by type of activity being undertaken at each site. The contractor has also confirmed two additional low volume TSP & PM10 air quality sampling units have been ordered for the project to supplement the current monitoring program. The technical units are sourced from overseas and delivery has been delayed due to the current Covid-19. Proposed actions to prevent reoccurrence of the NCE (include responsibility and timeframes The Delivery Authority has been advised by the Environmental Monitor that he has requested the contractor to establish air quality monitoring stations at each worksite to meet the obligations under condition 13 and endorsed CEMP Report completed by The Delivery Authority with advice from the Environment Monitor. Completion statement Suitable air quality monitoring equipment for the project is available to sample air quality at each relevant worksite. NCE closed. CROSS RIVER RAIL DELIVERY AUTHORITY Non-Compliance Event 14-day Report Page 2 of 2Foxit PhantomPDF Printer Version 9.3.0.1233