6M 4089_Geometry_of_Magnetic_Memory_Elements_Jan56 4089 Geometry Of Magnetic Memory Elements Jan56

6M-4089_Geometry_of_Magnetic_Memory_Elements_Jan56 6M-4089_Geometry_of_Magnetic_Memory_Elements_Jan56

User Manual: 6M-4089_Geometry_of_Magnetic_Memory_Elements_Jan56

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 7

Download6M-4089_Geometry_of_Magnetic_Memory_Elements_Jan56 6M-4089 Geometry Of Magnetic Memory Elements Jan56
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
Memorandum

6M=4089

Page 1 of

7

Division 6 - Lincoln Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lexington 73, Massachusetts

'SUBJECT:

GEOMETRY OF MAGNETIC MEMORY ELEMENTS

To:

Group 63 ~ Staff

From:

James Do Childress

Abstractg

Two possible memory element geometries == the thin film
and the toroid == are considered o The calculations
show that under certain conditions the thin film geometry
may be preferable for use in a very high=speed memoryo

""

JDC/md
Distributiong

The following

~

to receive

~

complete

memorandum~

Best, Ro, B=131J) Papian',9 WoNo
Bradspiesj) So
Gurley.9 Bo
Brown, Do Ro
Childress~

JoDo

Davidson.9 Go
Ellis, Do Ho
Freeman.5l J o Re
Goodenough9 'J o Be
GuditZ9 EoAo
Mitchell.9 J o Lo
Menyuk.9 No
Olsen, KoHo
Pacl, RoAo
Sarles, F Wo
Smiths Do O~
ZopattiJ;l Ho
Other staff in Group 63 are to receive abstracts onlyo
0

This document is issued for internal distribution and use only by and for Lincoln Laboratory personnel. It should not be given or shown to any other individuals or groups without express authorization. It may not be reproduced
in whole or in part without permissioD in writing from Lincoln Laboratory.

The research reported in this document was supported
jointly by the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force
under Air Force Contract No. AF 19(122)-458.

Memorandum 6M-4089
Introduction:
The peak current and

Page 2 of 1

average power which the memor,r-plane

drivers must deliver can be reduced by decreasing the dimensions of
the magnetic memory elements o The following analysis indicates the
limits of size reduction and the results which such reductions may
yield 0
I.

Theoretical Ruminations
Ao

Possible Geometries
The two geometries to be considered and their dimensions

are shown in Fig. lA - Thin Film and Fig. IB - Toroid.

Fig. 1A - Thin Film

Fig. IB - Toroid

Memorandum 6M-4089

Page 3 of 7

B

Primary Limits on Geometry
The primary limits on geometry are (1) the peak voltage
signal V must be great enough to be sensed reliably and (2) the
p
.
switch time ~ must be suitable to the desired memor,y cycle time
s
(certainly less than half the cycle time).
The instantaneous output voltage for a one turn sense
winding is
-8 dB
v( t) = 10 A Cit •
0

Therefore

where V is in volts,~ in seconds, A in square centimeters, and B
p
s
m
(the maximum induction in the square hysteresis loop) in gauss. We
can express the requirement on A in terms of the material parameter B
m
and the memor,y limits Vp and ~ s as

(I)

c.

Cross-Sectional Areas

Thin Film
Let w = C t, where Cl is a constant determined by the
1
magnitude of the demagnetizing field tolerable for a square loop;
C is in the order of 103 0 The cross-sectional area is thus
l
1.

2

A

2.

=..!.
C
l

(2)

Toroid

Because about four mutually perpendicular wires of a~sumed
diameter d must pass through the toroidal memory element, the
w
inner diameter d. has a lower limit, d.> 2d ; also geometry dictates that
1

I

W

Memorandum 6M-4089

Page

4 of 7

the following assumptions be made:
(a)

do = C2 d i ; C2> 1

(b)

h

= C d ; C /1

3 i

3

The area is given as
k=C

41

Do

C -1

3

2

Ld
2
i

(3)

H-I Relationships:

Thin Film
In the calculation of the field between two sheets of
current, the following approximations are made:
10

(a)

(b)

The field inside a rectangular coil of length w
centimeters and of N turns is the same as for a
similar solenoid.
The current sheets above and below the thin film
can be created by overlapping the rectangular coil
as shown in Fig. 20

Figo 2 - Approximation of Current Sheets

Memorandum 6M-4089

Page

5 of 7

From this crude analysis we get
H~

4nN.

---2:.
law

4I

(4)

n

=

lOw

where I is the total current in amperes flowing in both sheets (split
equally between the two) and H is in oersteds.
2. Toroid
The field in a toroid is
H ~

8I

(5)

~ --IO---l(-d-+~d-.....
)

o

E.

~

Geometry Factor
We define a geometry factor F as
g

H
F g = -I

(6)

•

SUbstituting the cross-sectional area limit of Eq. (1)
into Eqs. (2) and (3) and these into Eqs. (4) and (5), respectively,
gives
F (thin film)
g

~

1

8n x 10-5

'fCi

vBm

\

p't s

and
(8)

F (toroid)
g

F.

Order-of - Magnitude Calculations
For purposes of comparison, the geometry factor of the

F397 toroid (d.=
54 mills, d0 = 80 mills, h = 22 mills) is 2.4.
~
We make the following general assumptions for both geometries:
(1) V ~ 10-2 volt (in present memory V ~ 10-1 volt)
p

(2)

't

s

~

p

10-7 second (present

't

s

is 10-6 second).

Page 6 of

Memorandum 6M-4089

7

With these assumptions, we get for thin films
F (thin film) ~ 16 oersted
g
ampere
where 01= 2 x 103 ; Bm= 8 x 103 gauss, typical for square loop metalso
For a toroid where 02= 1; 03= 2; Bm= 1~5 x.l0 3 gauss, typical for
ferrites,
. F (toroid) ~ 50 oersted
g
ampere
The next section indicates the relative difficulty of

obtaining the

above geometry factors o
IIo

Discussions and Conclusions:
The ease of fabrication is one factor governing the

practica:Lity of a given memory-element geometry. In the Fg .factors
'.
. -2,:1.;
above, the thin film would have the dimensions w = 7x lO'em by
t = 305 x 10 ....5 cm; the toroid, d. :;::: 3 x 10';"3 em, d = 6 x lO-3 cm, h =3xlO-3cm o
.

~

0

The thin film could be made by evaporation techniques with relative
ease; but the ultra-small toroid would .be

almost·~

impossi'ble to make.

A toroid a scale magnitude larger would be possible; this. gives Fg -:=.50
Also it must be remembered that a miniDllm of' three conductors each
capable of carrying milliampere currents must pass through the toroid 0
Thus fabrication difficulties seem to make the thin film
geometry more feasible o

other geometries may offer

mo~e ~han.the

thin

film so that a further study of geometry is worthwhile.
Changing geometry alone is not the answer to the very-fastmemory. problem.

In the preceding calculations it has been assumed that

magnetic materials and memory scheme exist such that a memory cycle time
2
of about 2 x 10 -7 second is possible and the V ~ 10- volts can be
p

sensed reliably.

In conclusion, a memory element can be reduoedin size
(1) yielding an improvement in the peak current-average power requirement
of the memory (2) at the expense of the peak signal voltage i f and only if

Memorandum 6M=4089

(3) a material and memory scheme exist such that
possible e

JDC/md

Page

't'

s

7

of

~ 10-7 second is

7



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.3
Linearized                      : No
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 4.2.1-c043 52.372728, 2009/01/18-15:56:37
Create Date                     : 2010:07:04 08:14:53-08:00
Modify Date                     : 2010:07:04 09:10:37-07:00
Metadata Date                   : 2010:07:04 09:10:37-07:00
Producer                        : Adobe Acrobat 9.32 Paper Capture Plug-in
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:30369ec3-b259-4a5d-81d9-1fbd002ab275
Instance ID                     : uuid:0fedd871-f4e4-4c2f-92de-cf96d07eaf1a
Page Layout                     : SinglePage
Page Mode                       : UseNone
Page Count                      : 7
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu