T793 Camp Parks CSTC Dublin Crossing FOST 16SEP13

User Manual: T793

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 71

DownloadT793 Camp Parks CSTC Dublin Crossing FOST 16SEP13
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
DRAFT FINAL
FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER
(FOST)
United States Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks

Dublin Crossing Real Property Exchange Parcel

16 September 2013

FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER
(FOST)
United States Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks
Dublin Crossing Real Property Exchange Parcel
16 September 2013
1.0 PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Finding Of Suitability To Transfer (FOST) is to document the environmental
suitability of certain parcels or property at the United States Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks (Parks) for transfer to the Dublin Crossing CP, Limited Liability
Corporation, consistent with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 120(h) and Department of Defense (DOD) policy. In addition,
the FOST includes the CERCLA Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions and other Deed
Provisions and the Environmental Protection Provisions (EPPs) necessary to protect human
health or the environment after such transfer.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
The Property consists of approximately 171.6 acres, which includes 22 current buildings and no
acres of undeveloped land. The property was previously used as training facilities, vehicle repair
facilities, supply buildings and warehouses, medical training groups, medical facilities, fire and
police facilities, office and administrative buildings, recreational facilities, a parade ground, a
helicopter pad, infrastructure maintenance facilities, barracks, dining facilities, and a museum.
The property is intended to be transferred as a mixed-use master-planned community1 and is
consistent with the intended reuse of the property as set force in the Dublin Crossing Draft
Specific Plan (RBF, 2013) and Dublin Crossing Environmental Impact Report (RBF, 2013). A
site map of the property is attached (Enclosure 1). The proposed property to be transferred
excludes three interior parcels: The 8.5 acre National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) property and warehouse (Building 121), under control of the U. S. Air Force, the 3.98
acre Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (PRFTA) 2 site (also known as the Building 109
former incinerator site) and the 2.62 acre PRFTA-13 site (also known as the Former Fuel Storage
Area 761). The parcels have been surveyed and metes and bounds have been assigned. Transfer
of these inholdings will be covered by separate FOST documents.

1

The current proposed use is residential (14 % single family, 31 % townhomes), retail and multifamily (5%),
office/hotel (5%), civic (3%), open space (26%), school (4%), and infrastructure (11%)

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION.
A determination of the environmental condition of the property was made based upon the
Environmental Baseline Survey (USACHPPM, 2002e) and Environmental Condition of Property
(ECP) (USACHPPM 2011) and the ECP Recertification Memo (Parks CTSC, 2013). The
information provided is a result of a complete search of agency files during the development of
these environmental surveys.
A complete list of documents providing information on environmental conditions of the Property
is attached (Enclosure 2).
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF PROPERTY.
The DOD ECP categories for the Property are as follows:
ECP Category 1: F101-F105, F110-F112, F115, F140, F141, F152, F161, 162, 171, 180, 634,
F635, F725-F727, 730A, 730B, 730C, 713, F732, F735, F761, F785, F790, 791, T793, F793,
793, F794, F795, 796, F797, F798, F831, F832, F833, F850 – F857, F861-F865, 861, 862, F870F874, 880, 881, F880, F891-F897, F902-F905, F910, F911, F920-F923, Site 38, Site 39
ECP Category 2: F635, F732, and F761 (PRFTA 13); Trench 3, Site 36, and Site 39
ECP Category 3: F132, F151, F636, F781, F782, F783, F784, 791, 792, F888, Site 28, Site 37,
Site 40, Site 41
ECP Category 4: Buildings 130, 131, 150, 170, 730, 792, 860; Former RTS MED Motor
Pool; Former Building 926
A summary of the ECP Categories for specific buildings, parcels, or operable units and the ECP
category definitions is provided in Table 1 – Description of Property (Enclosure 3).
4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SITES.
There were eleven remediation sites located on the Property: A summary of the environmental
remediation sites on the property is as follows:
Building/Site1

Parcel
Number1

ECP
Area
Type

Environmental Concerns

130

5

4

LBP

131

6

4

Radionuclides, LBP

2

Current
Status
Sampling and remediation complete.
CDTSC has issued letter stating site is
suitable for unrestricted use.
Release of radionuclides and lead.
Remediation complete for both.
Closure granted for radionuclides.

Building/Site1

Parcel
Number1

ECP
Area
Type

150

9

4

170

12

4

730

17

2

792

26

4

860

31

2

Former RTS Med
Motor Pool

32

2

926

35

4

Site 36
36
2
Trench 3
2
1) As referenced in the June 2011 ECP Report.

Environmental Concerns

Current
Status

Release of lead to surface soil. CDTSC
has issued letter stating site is suitable
for unrestricted use.
Release of lead to surface soil;
remediation completed. CDTSC has
LBP
issued letter stating site is suitable for
unrestricted use.
Petroleum-related
Release of TPH-DRO to subsurface
compounds, VOCs, SVOCs, soil, remediation complete, closure
metals
granted.
Sampling complete, release of lead to
soil, remediation complete. CDTSC
LBP
has issued letter stating site is suitable
for unrestricted use.
Petroleum-related
Cleaned up at the time of the spill, noncompounds from < 5-gallon
reportable
spill
Petroleum-related
Sampled as part of SEQA, see below
compounds
Previous remediation for minor PCB
PCBs
spill. Additional sampling complete, no
release and no further action required.
Diesel & oil
20 cubic yards soil bioremediated onsite
Diesel & oil
20 cubic yards soil bioremediated onsite
LBP

All environmental soil and groundwater remediation activities on the property have been completed
or are in place and operating properly and successfully.

A summary of the environmental remediation sites is provided in Table 2 – Notification of
Hazardous Substance Storage, Release or Disposal (Enclosure 4).
[Author’s note: We will need closure, concurrence, or no further action memos from DTSC for
Trench 3, Site 36 (Category 2), Site 37 and Site 39 (Category 1)
[Author’s note: We may require a CERCLA Record of Decision for all ECP Category 3 and
Category 4 sites]

STORAGE, RELEASE, OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
Hazardous substances were stored for one year or more and released or disposed of on the
property in excess of reportable quantities specified in 40 CFR Part 373. All hazardous

3

substance storage operations have been terminated on the property. Hazardous substances were
released in excess of the 40 CFR 373 reportable quantities at the following sites 2
F132, F636, 730, F781-F784, 860, Southeast Quadrant Area, Former Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Area, 791/792 Fuel Storage Area
The release or disposal of these hazardous substances was remediated at the time of the release
or as part of the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). See Section 4.1 for additional
information. A summary of the buildings or areas in which hazardous substance activities
occurred is provided in Table 2 – Notification of Hazardous Substance Storage, Release, or
Disposal (Enclosure 4). The CERCLA 120(h)(3) Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions
(Enclosure 6) will be included in the Deed.
4.2 PETROLEUM AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.
4.2.1 Underground and Above Ground Storage Tanks (USTs/ASTs).
Current UST/AST Sites.
There are no underground and two above-ground petroleum storage tanks on the Property. There
is no evidence of petroleum releases from these sites.
Former UST/AST Sites.
There were eleven underground and four above-ground petroleum storage tanks on the property
that have been removed or closed in place. Petroleum product releases occurred at the following
sites:
Two of the ASTs were former USTs that were removed and subsequently used as ASTs at
PRFTA 13 (Former Fuel Storage Area/Area 761). Petroleum hydrocarbon releases occurred at
the following sites:
Former Building 732, and Former Building 888.
Former Building 732.
Former Building 732 was a fuel point constructed in 1942 and demolished in 1992. Two
underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed from the site in 1993. Petroleum hydrocarbons
and VOCs were detected in soil and groundwater at concentrations less than the ESL applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2002e). Site closure was granted by the Alameda County
Department of Public Health on 28 March 2001.

2

note that release of lead to soil from lead-based paint (LBP) on exterior building surfaces is not listed in this
section; see section 4.6

4

Former Building 888.
Building 888 was a gas station constructed in 1952, demolished in 1998, and located on 4th
Street between Monroe Avenue and Arnold Road. Two hydraulic lifts, one 10,000-gallon UST
formerly containing gasoline, one 10,000-gallon UST formerly containing diesel fuel, one 500gallon UST formerly containing waste oil, two pump dispensers and associated piping, and one
oil/water separator were located at the former gas station. The tanks were installed in the 1950s
(Tung, 2001; Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d). Woodward-Clyde Federal Services
removed three USTs in July 1996. In 1998, Cal, Inc. conducted limited over-excavation and
confirmatory soil and groundwater sampling near the former fuel dispenser island (Cal Inc.,
1998a). Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soils at concentrations greater than the ESL
applicable at the time of sampling. Approximately 20 cubic yards of soil were removed and
three soil samples were collected from the excavation. Metals, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (an
SVOC), and VOCs were detected in groundwater at concentrations less than, or greater than but
the same order of magnitude as, the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling (USACHPPM,
2009b). However, the CRWQCB determined the exceedences did not pose a threat to human
health or the environment and issued a No Further Action Letter on 17 April 2009 (D’Onofrio,
2009).
The release of these petroleum products was remediated at the time of the release or as part of
UST/AST closure. See (BSK and Associates, 1997) for additional information.
A summary of the UST/AST petroleum product activities is provided in Table 3- Notification of
Petroleum Products Storage, Release, or Disposal (Enclosure 5).
4.2.2 Non-UST/AST Storage, Release, or Disposal of Petroleum Products.
There was non-UST/AST storage of petroleum products in excess of 55 gallons for one year or more
on the property. The petroleum was used for the following types of activities: motor pool
operations, industrial operations, fire station.
All non-UST/AST petroleum product storage operations have been terminated on the property. There
was no evidence of petroleum releases in excess of 55 gallons as a result of these activities.
A summary of the non-UST/AST petroleum activities is provided in Table 3 – Notification of
Petroleum Products Storage, Release, or Disposal (Enclosure 5).

4.3 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs).
There is evidence of releases from the PCB-containing equipment at the following site: Former
Building 926 PG&E Substation. The PCBs were remediated at the time of the release or as part
of the installation restoration program. See (BSK and Associates, 1997) and (USACHPPM,
2004) for additional information. PG&E pole-mounted transformer at 4th & Davis: The PCBs
were remediated by PG&E (TES, 2001).
5

4.4 ASBESTOS.
There is asbestos-containing material (ACM) in the following buildings:

Building

Survey and Date

1988 Occusafe Survey
141

ACM Materials Identified
(>1.0 % asbestos)1
Friability
Materials
Cement panels
Non-friable
(interior and exterior)
Non-friable
Cement flue pipe
9” x 9” floor tiles

2

2002 HLA Survey

12” x 12” floor tiles
(below newer floor tiles and carpeting)
Concealed exterior cement panels

1988 Occusafe Survey
2002 HLA Survey

Cement panels
(exterior)
Sealant on asphalt sheet siding
(hidden behind cement panel siding))

Non-friable
Non-friable
Non-friable
Non-friable
Non-friable

Quantity
423 square
feet
15± square
feet
8,750 square
feet
8,622 square
feet
5,287 square
feet
3,000± square
feet
1,500 linear
feet
25± linear
feet
30± linear
feet

Friable
encapsulated
Friable
TSI on pipes of high-pressure steam lines
encapsulated
TSI on pipe fitting (joints and valves) of chilled
Friable
162
9/2005 fittings
water system
encapsulated
Non-friable 15/35 ± linear
Cement boiler flue
feet
Non-friable 200± square
Asbestos cement sheet siding
feet
Non-friable
49,900±
2002 HLA Survey
Tar finish over cork insulation
square feet
Non-friable 2,430± square
Wallboard compound
feet
Non-friable 7,200± square
Brown flooring
feet
1988 Occusafe Survey
Non-friable
400
±
square
180
Beige floor tile mastic6
feet
2002 HLA Survey
No additional material identified
None
1) Samples of roofing material were not collected in either survey. Roofing materials should be assumed to contain
ACM unless demonstrated otherwise.
2) HLA = Harding Lawson, Associates.
3) TSI = thermal system insulation.
5) Quantities indicate those estimated by Occusafe above slash and those estimated by HLA below slash.
6) Material not located in later survey by HLA.
TSI3 on pipes of chilled water system

6

The ACM includes: floor tiles, cement panels, pipe insulation, asphalt sheet siding. See (HLA,
1997a, 1997b) and (Harding ESE, 2001a, 2001b, 2002) for additional information. The ACM
does not currently pose a threat to human health or the environment because all friable asbestos
that posed an unacceptable risk to human health has been removed or encapsulated. The deed
will include an asbestos warning and covenant (Enclosure 6).

4.5 LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP).
The following buildings are known or presumed to contain lead-based paint (LBP):
Phase II
Lead > ESL1

Phase III
Lead > ESL1

Parks DPW XRF
Sampling and Soil
Removal

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Not sampled2

Yes

Yes

Not sampled3

No

No

Not sampled

No

150
Warehouse

Yes

Not sampled2

Yes

162
Warehouse

No

Not sampled

No

170
Warehouse

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Not sampled

No

Yes

No

No

Building still present.

Yes

No

No

Building still present.

No

Not sampled

No

Building still present. No further
action required.

Building
130
Warehouse
131
Warehouse
F132
Warehouse
141
Classrooms

171
Warehouse
180
Admin &
signal
equipment
790
Administrative
791
DPW
Maintenance
& Repair

Current Status
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
Building still present.
Risk Assessment completed. Property
closure granted.
Building still present. No further
action required.
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
Building still present. No further
action required.
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
Building still present. No further
action required.

Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
F796
No
Not sampled
No
Building demolished, 2004.
1) Yes means at least one sample from USACHPPM Phase II or Phase III studies contained lead at a concentration
greater than the environmental screening level (ESL) applicable at the time of sampling (200 mg/kg, current ESL is
792
Warehouse

Yes

Yes

Yes

7

150 mg/kg).
2) USACHPPM recommended additional sampling under different mechanism than the Phase III EBS.
3) Lead in soil assessed in conjunction with other sampling at the site. Analytical data indicate no release of lead to
soil.

See (USACHPPM 2002e, 2003, 2005) for additional information.
The property was not used for residential purposes and the transferee intends to convert the
property to residential use in the future. The deed will include a lead-based paint warning and
covenant (Enclosure 6).
4.6 INDOOR FIRING RANGES.
There are no indoor firing ranges on the property.
4.7 RADIOLOGICAL MATERIALS.
The following building was used for radiological activities: Building 130 and Building 131.
There was a release of radiological material at Building 131. The following actions were taken
to remediate the radiological material: Soil removal. All radiological materials have been
removed from the property.
On 29 April 2002 through 3 May 2002 the Army conducted a radiological site assessment of the
Property in compliance with the accepted protocol. The Radiological Site Assessment Report
[26 August 2002] found no evidence to suggest that any radiological commodities were
improperly managed at the site or that any residual radiological material is present at the site and
concluded that no further action is required with respect to the radioactive devices or materials
identified. On 30 August 2002 the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive
Medicine concluded the site is free of radiological concerns. See (USACHPPM, 2002b) for
additional information.
4.8 RADON.
Radon surveys were conducted in 19 buildings on the property. Radon was not detected at above the
EPA residential action level of 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) in these buildings.

4.9 MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN (MEC).
Based on a review of existing records and available information, there is no evidence that
Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) are present on the property. In addition, available
documentation indicates no areas within the proposed transfer area were ever used as ranges,
training areas, or for other purposes that might indicate MEC is present. The term “MEC” means
military munitions that may pose unique explosives safety risks, including: (A) unexploded
ordnance (UXO), as defined in 10 U.S.C. § 101(e)(5); (B) discarded military munitions (DMM),
8

as defined in 10 U.S.C. § 2710(e)(2); or (C) munitions constituents (e.g. TNT, RDX) as defined
in 10 U.S.C. § 2710(e)(3), present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard.
4.10 OTHER PROPERTY CONDITIONS.
There are no other known property conditions that pose an unacceptable risk to human health
and the environment.
5.0 ADJACENT PROPERTY CONDITIONS.
The following potentially hazardous conditions exist on adjacent property: PRFTA-02 (The
Former Building 109 Site). This Site is currently undergoing remediation involving removal of
soil and future groundwater monitoring for metals and dioxins. The presence of these hazards on
the cited adjacent property does not present an unacceptable risk to human health and the
environment because the site is currently undergoing remediation, or remediation has been
completed, and remedial efforts should eliminate all potential risk for that site and adjacent sites.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AGREEMENTS.
There are no environmental remediation orders or agreements applicable to the property being
transferred. The deed will include a provision reserving the Army’s right to conduct remediation
activities, if necessary, in the future (Enclosure 6).
7.0 REGULATORY AND PUBLIC COORDINATION.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9, the CDTSC, the CRWQCB, and the
public were notified of the initiation of this FOST.
[Reviewers Note: Action item to be done when report is final].
Regulatory/public comments received during the public comment period will be reviewed and
incorporated, as appropriate. A copy of the regulatory/public comments and the Army Responses
will be included at Enclosure 8 and Enclosure 9.
8.0 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) COMPLIANCE.
The environmental impacts associated with the proposed property transfer have been analyzed in
accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The results of this analysis are
documented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and ROD (signed on 28 October 2009)
(Department of the Army, 2009). The NEPA analysis identified several encumbrances. These
encumbrances and the corresponding mitigation and monitoring procedures, are presented in
Enclosure 10

9

9.0 FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER.
Based on the above information, I conclude that all removal or remedial actions necessary to
protect human health and the environment have been taken and the property is transferable under
CERCLA section 120(h)(3). In addition, all Department of Defense requirements to reach a
finding of suitability to transfer have been met, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
the attached Environmental Protection Provisions that shall be included in the deed for the
property (Enclosure 11). The deed will also include the CERCLA 120(h)(3) Notice, Covenant,
and Access Provisions and Other Deed Provisions. Finally, the hazardous substance notification
(Table 2) shall be included in the deed as required under the CERCLA Section 120(h) and DOD
FOST Guidance
[Author’s Note: Signature Authority Not Decided]

CHRISTOPHER P. GERDES
DATE
LTC, MP, U.S. Army
Commanding

10

10 Enclosures
Encl 1: Site Map of Property
Encl 2: Environmental Documentation and References
Encl 3: Table 1- Description of Property
Encl 4: Table 2. Notification of Hazardous Substance Storage, Release, or Disposal
Encl 5: Table 3. Notification of Petroleum Product Storage, Release, or Disposal
Encl 6: CERCLA Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions and Other Deed Provisions
Encl 7: Environmental Protection Provisions
Encl 8: Regulatory Agency/Public Comments (Final FOST)
Encl 9: Army Response to Comments (Final FOST)
Encl 10: ROD Encumbrances

E-1

ENCLOSURE 1
SITE MAP OF PROPERTY

2

3

ENCLOSURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND REFERENCES

E-4

ENCLOSURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND REFERENCES
Anonymous, 1945. Map of U.S. Construction Battalion Replacement Depot, Camp Parks,
California, Showing Conditions on 30 June 1945.
Anonymous, 1989. Annual Installation Utilization Survey Parks Reserve Forces Training Area,
March 1989.
Anonymous, 1993. Lead-Based Paint and Asbestos Survey for Building Demolition - Phase II,
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, California, April 1993.
Archaeological Resource Service, 1981. Cultural Resources Literature Search and Field
Reconnaissance of Camp Parks, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California, Report
prepared for Earth Metrics, Incorporated, Report Number ARS 81-82.
ASTM International, 2002. Standard Practice D 5746-98 (2002), Standard Classification of
Environmental Condition of Property Area Types for Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Facilities.
ASTM International, 2005a. Standard Practice D 6008-96 (2005), Standard Practice for
Conducting Environmental Baseline Surveys.
ASTM International, 2005b. Standard Practice E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental
Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.
Babcock, T., 2003. Letter Report From: Mr. Timothy Babcock, Hazardous Substances Removal
Incorporated, To: Mr. Timothy Schafstall, USACHPPM, Subject: Parks RFTA Documentation of Potholing Exploration Contract DABJ05-03-1419, 14 November 2003.
BSK and Associates, 1995, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Department of Military,
Camp Parks, Dublin, California
BSK and Associates, 1997. Supplemental Environmental Baseline Study, (Phase I Site
Assessment), Department of the Military, Camp Parks, 18 June 1997.
Cal Inc., 1998a. Final Closure Report Volume 1, Building 200 and Building 888, Contract No.
DACA05-97-D-0014, Task Order 007, Prepared on behalf of: U.S. Army Engineer District,
Sacramento, Corps of Engineers, December 1998.
Cal Inc, 1998b. Statement of Work, Closure of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel
Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Building 888, Contract Number DACA05-97-D0014,
Task Order No. 0007, CAL Inc, 26 February 1998.
E-5

Cal Inc, 1998c. Statement of Work, Closure of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel
Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Building 888, Contract Number DACA05-97-D0014,
Task Order No. 0007, 20 March 1998.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2008b. Groundwater Monitoring at PRFTA
13, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County,
California. .
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2009. Approval of Sampling and Analysis
Plan Addendum, Confirmation Soil Borings - PRFTA 13, U. S. Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County, California. Letter dated 17 February 2009
California Zone 7 Water Agency, undated. Groundwater Contour Map, Internet Website
http://www.zone7water.com/Layout-2.pdf
Camp Parks, Undated a. Historical real property records.
Camp Parks, Undated b. Statement of Work, Underground Storage Tank Investigation, Closure
of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Buildings
200 and 888.
Camp Parks, 2013, Recertification of Final Environmental Condition of Property Report No. 38Eh-3589-10 Dublin Crossing (Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area U.S. Army
Combat Support Training Center And Camp Parks
CH2MHill, 2005. Camp Parks Training Site Summary Report - Soil and Groundwater
Investigation of the Oakland Real Property Exchange (RPX) 32-Acre Parcel, Dublin, California.
Report prepared for Engineering and Environment, Inc., July 2005.
Department of the Army, 2009. Record of Decision for the real Property Master Plan and Real
Property Exchange at United States Army Garrison, Camp Parks, California. Department of the
Army, Installation Management Command.
Deputy of the Under Secretary of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. LeadBased Paint Guidelines for Disposal of Department of Defense Residential Real Property - A
Field Guide, Interim Final, December 1999.
http://www.denix.osd.mil/shf/upload/dod_leadpaintpolmemo_0.pdf
D’Onofrio, F, 2007, Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Mr. Paul Kot, Combat Support Training
Center Camp Parks. Final Summary Report, Removal of Oil Drainage Pit, Dublin Crossing,
Building 730, Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin, California May 22 2007
E-6

D’Onofrio, F, 2008a, Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal, Buildings 150,
130, 170 and 792, Camp Parks, Combat Support Training Center, Dublin, California October 1
2008
D ‘Onofrio, F, 2008b. Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Mr. Paul Kot, Engineering and
Environment, Incorporated. Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal,
Buildings 150, 130, 170, and 792, Camp Parks, Combat Support Training Center, Dublin,
California October 1 2008
D’Onofrio,F, 2009a, Final Groundwater Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8b-07, Southeast
Quadrant Area, U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
May 28 2009
D ‘Onofrio, F, 2009b. Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC John Cushman, Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No
38-EH-07A8a-07, Former Building 888, ULS (sic) Army Combat Support Training Center,
Camp Parks, Dublin California, April 17 2009
Eckardt, J, A., 1945. Map of U.S. Construction Battalion Replacement Depot, Camp Parks,
California.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc, 2010. The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck, Camp Parks
Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94566. EDR Inquiry Number 2686499.2s.
Environmental Chemical Corporation, 2006. Removal of Oil Drainage Pit, Dublin Crossing,
Building 730 – Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin, California. Report prepared for the United
States of Engineers, Sacramento District - Valley Resident Office, October 2006.
Environmental Science Associates, 1986. Structures Evaluation for National Register of Historic
Places for the Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Contra Costa and Alameda Counties,
California, Report prepared for the United States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Environmental Science Associates, 1990. 47-Acre Surplus Parcel at Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, Environmental Baseline Survey, September 1990.
Environmental Quality Management, Incorporated, 2008. Camp Parks Combat Support Training
Center (CTSC) Dublin, California Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal,
Buildings 150, 130, 170, and 792. Report prepared for the U. S. Army Engineering District,
Louisville, Contract Number W912QR-04-D-0036, Task Order 0010.

E-7

Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (Formerly PRGs)
Master Table, December 2009. Internet site:
http://www.epa.gov/region09/superfund/prg/index.html
Escarda, Terry, 2013, Letter from Terry Escarda, Hazardous Substances Scientist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC Christopher P Gerdes , Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Trench 3 and Site 36, Army Combat
Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin California {to be written prior to final FOST]
Escarda, Terry, 2013, Letter from Terry Escarda, Hazardous Substances Scientist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC Christopher P Gerdes , Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Site 37 and Site 39, Army Combat Support
Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin California [to be written prior to final FOST]
General Services Administration, undated. Public Buildings Service Pamphlet: Office of
Property Disposal, Title X: The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Act New Regulations.
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 1997. California Base Closure News, Newsletter
No. 18, August 1997.
Harding ESE, 2001a. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 141,USAR Center, Dublin, California.
Harding ESE, 2001b. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 162, General Purpose Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Harding ESE, 2002. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 170, USARC - Cold Storage Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1997a. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center
(USARC), Building 1141, 91 Division LDRACAD, Dublin, California.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1997b. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center
(USARC), Building 162, General Purpose Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Hart, 2011, No Further Action Concurrence, Former Building 636, U.S. Army Combat Support
Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County, July 14 2011
Hart, 2012, Final Environmental Condition of Property (ECP) Report, Dublin Crossing, Camp
Parks, Dublin, Alameda/Contra Costa Counties
HDR, 2012, Final Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, Report Submitted to the United States Army Corps of
Engineers Contract #W912DQ-06-D-0026, March 2012.
E-8

Jones and Stokes Associates, Inc. 1995. Inventory of Special-Status Plant and Wildlife Species
at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Report prepared for the United States of Engineers,
Sacramento District, Report Number JSA 93-240, 1995
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Inc., 1998a. Cultural Resources Inspection at the Proposed
Location of a New Front Gate at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Report prepared for the
United States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Inc., 1998b. Field Investigation of Previously Recorded Cultural
Resource Sites in Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Letter report prepared for the United
States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Incorporated, 1998c. Draft Parks Reserve Forces Training Area
Built Environment Inventory and Evaluation, Report prepared for the United States Army Corps
of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, undated. Geologic Map of Parks Reserve Forces Training Area.
Map prepared for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.
JRP Historical Consulting Services, 2002. Inventory and Evaluation of Previously Unevaluated
WWII and Cold War Era Buildings, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area. Report prepared for
the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento district.
Leyva, G, 2009. Letter from George Leyva, Project Manager, California Regional Water Quality
Control Board to Douglas Guenther, Compliance Manager, HQ, US Army Combat Support
Training Center, Fort Hunter Liggett, California. RE: Groundwater Monitoring at Building 791,
Former Fuel Storage Area, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin,
California, 12 March 2009.
RWQCB, 2010, Letter from George Leyva, Project Manager, California Regional Water Quality
Control Board to LTC Michael P Friend ,No Further Action, Building 791, Former Fuel Storage
Area, U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County
Mike Bobbitt and Associates, 2005. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for Underground
Storage Tanks at West Coast Garrison (Provisional), Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin,
California. Report prepared for the USACHPPM.
Mike Bobbitt and Associates, 2006. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for Underground
Storage Tanks at US Army, Combat Support Training Center and Camp Parks, Dublin,
California. Report prepared for the US Army, Combat Support Training Center.

E-9

Nelson, M. C., 1993. Memorandum From: Mark C. Nelson, LTC, EN Commanding, Parks
RFTA, For: Director of Engineering and Housing, ATTN: AFZH-DE (L.W. Burnett), HQ, I
Corps and Fort Lewis, Subject: Abandoned POL Farm at PRFTA, Date: 5 April 1993.
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, 2000. Memorandum From: Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense, For: Assistant Secretary of the Army, Assistant Secretary of the Navy,
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, Director, Defense Logistics Agency, Subject: Lead-Based
Paint Policy for Disposal of Residential Real Property, 07 Jan 2000.
http://www.denix.osd.mil/shf/upload/dod_leadpaintpolmemo_0.pdf
Rainie Rodgers Associates, 1986. A Cultural Resources Investigation of the Proposed Veterans
Administration, Northern California National Cemetery Sites at Santa Nella and Camp Parks,
Report prepared for Resource Assessment, Incorporated.
RBF Consulting, 2013, Dublin Crossing Draft Specific Plan, June 2013
http://www.dublincrossingca.com/specific-plan.pdf
RBF Consulting, 2013, Dublin Crossing Draft Environmental Impact Report, June 2013
http://www.dublincrossingca.com/EIR.pdf
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002a. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches and Stockpile, 8 January 2002.
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002b. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches, 23 October 2002.
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002c. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches and Stockpile, 8 January 2002.
Roy F. Weston, 2000, Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Including Work Plan, Polychlorinated
Biphenyl (PCB) Abatement, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California
Roy F. Weston, 2001a. Magnetometer Survey of the Tassajara Disposal Trenches and Bldg 109
Incinerator Areas, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, June 2001.
Roy F. Weston, 2001b. Field Summary Report, Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Analytical
Sample Review and Site Abatement at Buildings 331, 334, 730, and 792, 2 March 2001.
Roy F. Weston, 2002. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for the Presence of Underground
Storage Tanks at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California, 11 April 2002.
Sarmiento, R. A., 2006. Letter from Riz A. Sarmiento, Staff Toxicologist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Francesca D’Onofrio, California Department of
E-10

Toxic Substances Control, RE: Health Risk Assessment No. 39-DA-04GJb-06, Former Building
132 Site and Health Risk Assessment No. 39-DA-04GJa-06, Former Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Site, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 16 August 2006.
SCS Engineers, 2005. Temporary Well Installation and Groundwater Sampling Report, Camp
Parks Training Site, West Coast Garrison, Dublin, CA. Report prepared for FedSource, Brea,
California. Task Order Number LOS12970, Contract Number BPA-6551.
Sonoma State University, 2001. A Cultural Resources Overview of the United States Army
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Near Dublin, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties,
California, Report prepared for David Small, Director of Public Works, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, 7 September 2001.
Strope, W. E. 1961. U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, USNRDL Shelter Research
Program, Reviews and Lectures, No. 119, 21 August 1961.
Technial and Ecological Services, 2001, Remediation Activities for Polychlorinated Biphenyls at
Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 4th & Davis Street, Dublin, California, Report
#402.331-01.89
Tung, 2001. Correspondence From: Mee Ling Tung, Alameda County Health Care Services
Agency, Environmental Health Services, Environmental Protection; To: Mr. Marshall Marik,
Parks RFTA; Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certification (Enclosure: Case Closure
Summary), 28 March 2001.
United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM), 1998.
Relative Risk Site Evaluation 38-EH-8204-98, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, August
1998.
USACHPPM, 1999. Final Sampling Plan, Site Inspection No. 38-EH-8703-99, Parks Reserve
Forces Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002a. Phase II Site Inspection No. 38-EH-5027-02, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002b. Radiological Historical Site Assessment No. 26-MF-3589-H-02,
U. S. Army Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002c. Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring Report - First Quarter, Data for
Samples Collected During November 2001, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 18 January
2002.

E-11

USACHPPM, 2002d. Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring
Report for Second Quarter and Aquifer Hydraulic Conductivity Test Results, Data for Samples
Collected During February 2002, 19 April 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002e. Draft Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH-3589-02, 187-Acre Real
Property Exchange, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties), California, 22 April to 3 May 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002f. Site Inspection No. 38-EH-2938-02, Former Tank Farm (PRFTA13),
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin California, 15-21 May 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002g. Phase II Site Inspection No. 38-EH-6665-02, Former Tank Farm
(PRFTA13), Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California, 11-15 October 2002.
USACHPPM, 2003. Results of Environmental Sampling in the 187-Acre Real Property
Exchange, Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), California, USACHPPM
Project No. 38-EH-003K-04, October 2003.
USACHPPM, 2004. Results of Environmental Sampling in the 187-Acre Real Property
Exchange, Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), California, USACHPPM
Project No. 38-EH-003K-04, October 2003.
USACHPPM, 2005. Sampling Results, Phase III Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH003K-05, 187-Acre Real Property Exchange, Camp Parks, California, November 2004.
USACHPPM, 2006a. Final Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH-04HW-05, Building 121
(NASA Site), U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center – Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and
Contra Costa Counties), California.
USACHPPM, 2006b. Health Risk Assessment Study No. 39-DA-04GJ-06a, Building 132 Site,
Camp Parks, California, May 2006.
USACHPPM, 2006c. Ground-Water Sampling Results, Northern Cantonment Area (Former
Building 636), U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, 1 to 19 December
2005.
USACHPPM, 2006d. Soil Sampling Results No. 38-EH-04CS-06, Building 730 Drainage
Ditch, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
19 and 20 November 2005.
USACHPPM, 2006e. Soil and Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELb-06, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, 8 to 15 August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
E-12

USACHPPM, 2006f. Health Risk Assessment Study No. 39-DA-04GJ-06b, Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Site, Camp Parks, California, May 2006.
USACHPPM, 2007a. Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELa-06, Former Building
636, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 8 to 15
August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
USACHPPM, 2007b. Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELb-06, Former Building
791, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 8 to 15
August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
USACHPPM, 2008a. Final Soil Sampling Results No. 38-EH-04CU-06a, Former Building 132,
U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 1 to 19 December
2005.
USACHPPM, 2008b. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Former
Building 636, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
March 2008.
USACHPPM, 2008c. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, March 2007.
USACHPPM, 2008d. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8a-07, Southeastern
Quadrant Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
August 2007.
USACHPPM, 2009a. Draft Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study No. 38-EH-077T-07,
Former Building 109 Incinerator, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, April 2009.
USACHPPM, 2009b. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, March 2007
USACHPPM, 2009c. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8a-07, Former
Building 888, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
February 2009.
USACHPPM, 2010. Draft Environmental Condition of Property Report for the Dublin Crossing
(Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, January 2010.
E-13

USACHPPM, 2011. Final Environmental Condition of Property Report No. 38-EH-3589-10
Dublin Crossing (Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area, U.S Army Combat
Support Training Center and Camp Parks, Dublin, California, June 2011.
United States Army, 2005, Memorandum from Assistant Secretary of the Army Subject:
Transmittal of Model Language for Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) and Deeds
Pertaining to Army Real Estate, January 10 2005 with May 1 2013 update
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951a. Site Drawing 350102.2 (sheet 8 of 12), Bliss &
Hurt, Trudell & Berger Architects and Engineers, 25 August 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951b. Engineering Drawing No. 38 09 02.4, Sheet 15
of 18, Parks Air Force Base, Processing Building No. 2 (Building 870), Heating Plan,
28 November 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951c. Engineering Drawing No. 38 09 02.3, Sheet 16
of 18, Parks Air Force Base, Processing Building No. 2 (Building 870), Heating Details,
28 November 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1952. COE, San Francisco District, Engineering
Drawing Number 36 29 01, Sheet 9 of 10, Structural Fire Station Plumbing Plan, Building 636,
13 May 1952.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1954. Engineering Drawing: Modification of Building
151, 3275th Air Force Indoctrination Wing, Parks Air Force Base, 28 July 1954.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1955. Engineering Drawing, Rehabilitation of Quonset
Hut for Petroleum Offices, Site and Plot Plans, 6 January 1955.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1993. Building Demolition - Phase II, Photograph,
Floor Plan, and Record Data for Buildings 781, 782, and 783, Sheet C18, 20 of 21, File No. 38125-0022.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1994. Site Drawing 6402916, Upgrade Washrack,
Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Navy Public Works Center,
18 August 1994.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2003. Ordnance and Explosives Archives Search
Report, Conclusions and Recommendations, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin,
California, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District, Defense Environmental
Restoration Program.
E-14

United States Army Public Health Command, 2010. Monitoring Well Decommissioning Report
No. 38-EH-0CGV-10, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center (USACSTC), Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, 26 October - 10 November 2009.
URS, 2007, Final Historical Records Review, United States Army Combat Support Training
Center & Camp Parks, Dublin, California, Military Munitions Response Program
Wolfe, BH, 2010, No Further Action, Building 791, Former Fuel Storage Area, US Army
Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County
Wood, WS, 2006, Memorandum for Record Subject: Closure of Hazardous Waste Sites at Camp
Parks, May 16, 2006
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1993a. 47-Acre Surplus Parcel Preliminary Assessment
Screening, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, December 1993.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1993b. 12-Acre Proposed California National Guard
Armory Site Limited Preliminary Assessment Screening, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area,
27 December 1993.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994a. Preliminary Assessment for Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, 27 May 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994b. Site Characterization Work Plan Building 109 UST,
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 8 July 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d. Remedial Investigation Services for Suspected Soil
Contamination and UST Sites, 28 September 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994e. Tank 732-2: Subsurface Investigation at Building
732 - Final Report, Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Contract DACA05-92-D0032, 20
October 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1996b. Closure Report for Tanks at Bldgs 770, 1135, 1136,
and 1180, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 18 January 1996.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1996c. Letter Report From: William Loskutoff, To: Ms Eva
Chu, Hazardous Materials Specialist, Alameda County Health Care Services Agency, Subject:
Underground Storage Tank Removal Report, Parks RFTA, POL Point - Building 888, 22
November 1996.

E-15

E-16

ENCLOSURE 3
TABLE 1- DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

E-17

TABLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Building Number and
Parcel
Condition
Property Description Designation Category
F101
None
1
None
Confinement Facility
F102
None
1
None
Administrative Bldg
F103
None
1
None
Administrative Bldg
F104
None
1
None
Administrative Bldg
F105
None
1
None
Police Station
F110
None
1
None
Administrative Blvd
F111
Clothing & Equipment
None
1
None
Repair Shop
F112
2(3)
1
None
Flammable material storage
F115
Sewage pump house
3(3)
1
None
Flammable material storage
140
None
1
None
Sentry Hut
141
8(3)
1
None
Classrooms, Administrative
F152
None
1
None
Unknown
F161
None
1
None
Bakery
162
11(3)
1
None
Warehouse
171
13(3)
1
None
Warehouse
180
Administrative & signal
14(3)
1
None
equipment ops
634
None
1
None
Fire Dept Storage
F635
15(2)
1
None
10.0 Fire Dept Storage
F725
None
1
None
Warehouse
F726
None
1
None
Unknown
F727
None
1
None
Warehouse

E-18

Remedial Actions

Building Number and
Property Description
730A
Hazardous Waste Storage
730B
Hazardous Waste Storage
730C
Vehicle Washrack
731
Electronics repair,
Administrative
F732
Fuel Point
F735
Vehicle Storage
740
Sewer Screw
F770
Underground personnel
shelter
F785
Latrine
790
Administrative
791
DPW maintenance & repair
shop
T793
DSRSD Field Opns Center
F793
Facilities Engineering
793
Hazardous Waste Storage
F794
Small parts storage
F795
Administrative
796
Training aids workshop,
shipping & receiving,
museum
F797
Unknown
F797
Flammable Materials
Storage
F798
Storage
F831
Unknown
F832

Parcel
Condition
Designation Category

Remedial Actions

None

1

None

None

1

None

18(3)

1

None

None

1

None

19(2)

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

21(1)

1

None

None

1

None

23(3)

1

None

25(3)

1

(Wolfe, 2010)

None

1

None

None

1

None

27(3)

1

None

29(3)

1

None

None

1

None

30(3)

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

E-19

Building Number and
Property Description
Tool room, shop, bin
storage
F833
unknown
F850
Barn/small office area
F851
barracks
F852
Barracks
F853
Barracks
F854
Barracks
F855
Barracks
F856
Barracks
F857
Barracks
F860
Barracks
F861
Barracks
861
Warehouse
F862
Barracks
862
Vehicle Maintenance
F863

Barracks

F864
Barracks
F865
Unknown
F870
Personnel processing,
medical admin
F871
Barracks
F872
Barracks
F873
Barracks
F874
Barracks
880
Classrooms, administrative

Parcel
Condition
Designation Category

Remedial Actions

None

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

33(1)

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None

E-20

Building Number and
Property Description
F880
Gymnasium
881

Classrooms,
administrative

F891
Barracks
F892
Barracks
F893
Barracks
F894
Barracks
F895
Barracks
F896
Barracks
F897
Barracks
F902
Barracks
F903
Barracks
F904
Barracks
F905
Barracks
F910
Barracks
F911
Barracks
F920
Barracks
F921
Barracks
F922
Barracks
F923
Barracks
Potential Construction
Debris Dump Sites
Former Lumber Yards
Stockpiled Soils, East
Side of Fernandez Ave
730
Vehicle Maintenance
F132
Recycling Center
F151

Parcel
Condition
Designation Category
None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

None

1

36(1)

1

38(3)

1

39(2)

1

17(4)

2

7(3)

3

10(3)

3

Remedial Actions
None
None

None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Diesel release to soil, remediation complete, site closed (Wood, 2006)
Release of metals to soil. Risk assessment complete, no further action
required, closure granted (Sarmiento 2006)
Release of VOCs to soil. no further action required (Hart, 2012)

E-21

Building Number and
Property Description
Commissary
F781-F784
Self help complex
F636
Fire Station
Building 791-792 Fuel
Storage Area
319th Sig Battalion Yard
Area

Parcel
Condition
Designation Category

Remedial Actions
Release of petroleum, VOCs and metals to soil. Risk assessment
complete, no further action required, closure granted (Wood, 2006)
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater below regulatory
limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site closed. (Hart , 2011)
Release of diesel and metals to groundwater below regulatory limits,
monitoring wells destroyed, site closed (Hart, 2012)
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater below regulatory
limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)
Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory limits, monitoring
wells destroyed, site closed (D’Onofrio, 2009)
Release of pesticides to soil. Risk-based closure. Site closed.
(Sarmiento, 2006)
Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory limits, no
remediation required. Monitoring wells destroyed. Site closed.
(D’Onofrio 2009)
Herbicides, PCBs, SVOCs. Site closed (Escarda, 2013)
Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
Release of lead and radionuclides to soil. Remedy complete, site closed
(Hart, 2012)
Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)

22(3)

3

16(3)

3

24(3)

3

28(3)

3

40(3)

3

Former Hazardous Waste
41(3)
Accumulation Site

3

F888
Gasoline Station

34(3)

3

37(3)

3

5(4)

4

6(4)

4

9(4)

4

12(4)

4

Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)

26(4)

4

Lead in soil, cleanup complete. Cleaned to unrestricted use/unlimited
exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)

31(4)

4

Approximately 2 gallons of diesel fuel was reported to have spilled onto
the soil near the north gate of this facility in February 1994 (WoodwardClyde Federal Services, 1994a). The contaminated soil was excavated
and disposed in May 1994 (Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d).
(Hart, 2012)

32(4)

4

Sampled as part of Southeast Quadrant Area

35(4)

4

Soil removal for minor PCB release, no further action(Hart, 2012)

SEQA

Railroad spurs
130
Warehouse
131
Warehouse
150
Warehouse
170
Meat packing plant,
warehouse
792
Warehouse, vehicle
maintenance
860
RTS-MED Center
Former RTS Med Motor
Pool
926
PG&E Substation

Category 1: Areas where no release or disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum products
has occurred. (Including no migration of these substances from adjacent areas)
Category 2: Areas where only release or disposal of petroleum products has occurred
Category 3: Areas where release, disposal, and/or migration of hazardous substances has
occurred, but at concentrations that do not require a removal or remedial response.
Category 4: Areas where release, disposal, and/or migration of hazardous substances has
occurred, and all removal or remedial actions to protect human health and the environment have
been taken.
E-22

ENCLOSURE 4
TABLE 2. NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE, RELEASE, OR
DISPOSAL

E-23

Table 2. NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE, RELEASE OR
DISPOSAL
Building
Number
130
Warehouse
131
Warehouse

Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

Remedial Actions

Lead-based
paint (LBP)
LBP

1944-present

Metals

1944-1993

LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
Release of LBP and radionuclides to soil. Remedy
complete, site closed (Hart, 2012)
Chromium was released to soil adjacent to Former
Building 132, (USACHPPM, 2004; 2005; 2008a).
Although chromium was detected in soil at
concentrations greater than the environmental screening
level (ESL) applicable at the time of sampling, a human
health risk assessment concluded there was no risk to
human health (USACHPPM, 2006b). The California
Department of Toxic Substances Control (CDTSC)
concurred with this finding in a letter dated 16 August
2006 (Enclosure 4).

LBP

1944-present

VOCs

1944-unknown

LBP

1944-present

VOCs,
metals

1953-2005

1952-present

F132
Recycling
Center

150
Warehouse
F151
Commissary
170
Meat packing
plant,
warehouse

LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
Release of VOCs to soil. no further action required
(Hart, 2012)
LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
Metals and petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in
soil and groundwater samples at Former Building 636
(USACHPPM, 2006c; 2007a; 2008b). USACHPPM
conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring at this site
from September 2006 to March 2008. Some petroleum
hydrocarbon concentrations exceeded the ESLs
applicable at the time of sampling; however, the
exceedences were only slightly greater than the ESLs
and the CDTSC and CRWQCB has determined no
further action is required. (DTSC, July 14 2011)

F636
Fire Station

E-24

Building
Number

Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

Remedial Actions

VOCs,
SVOCs,
metals

1952-present

Building 730 is a vehicle repair facility that contains, or
formerly contained, three washracks, several oil/water
separators, two oil drainage pits, and five hydraulic lift
systems. The hydraulic lift systems are discussed
further in Section 4.4. Arsenic, petroleum hydrocarbons,
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were released
to soil in concentrations greater than the ESLs applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2002e; 2010).
Two of three washracks have been removed and the
third is currently in use. One oil drainage pit and
associated soil, concrete, and asphalt containing
petroleum hydrocarbons was removed and properly
disposed in May 2006 (Environmental Chemical
Corporation, 2006). The CDTSC issued a No Further
Action letter for the oil drainage pit removal on 22 May
2007 (Enclosure 4). The arsenic and VOC release
occurred in a drainage ditch adjacent the northern site
boundary. USACHPPM collected confirmatory samples
from this ditch in 2004. Arsenic and VOCs were not
detected at concentrations greater than ESLs applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2004; 2005). The
sampling was conducted with that for Former Buildings
781-784 (see below, this section; same drainage ditch).
The CRWQCB issued a No Further Action letter for the
drainage ditch on 4 May 2006 (Enclosure 4).

VOCs,
metals

1959-unknown

Chromium, lead, and petroleum hydrocarbons were
detected in soil samples from a drainage ditch adjacent
to these former buildings in 2003 and 2004
(USACHPPM, 2004; 2005). Some concentrations
exceeded the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling;
however, the exceedences were only slightly greater
than the ESLs and the CRWQCB issued a No Further
Action letter on 4 May 2006 (Enclosure 4).

metals

1952-unknown

Metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, and semivolatile
organic compounds (SVOCs) were detected in soil and
groundwater samples from a former fuel dispensing area
located between Buildings 791 and 792 (USACHPPM,
2004; 2005; 2006e; 2007b; 2008c). USACHPPM
conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring at this site
from September 2006 to March 2008. Some petroleum
hydrocarbon, SVOCs, and metals concentrations
exceeded the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling;
however, the exceedences were only slightly greater
than the ESLs and the CRWQCB issued a No Further
Action letter in January 2010 (Enclosure 4).

730
Vehicle
Maintenance

F781-F784
Self help
complex

Building 791792 Fuel
Storage Area

E-25

Building
Number
792
Warehouse,
vehicle
maintenance
860
RTS-MED
Center

F888
Gasoline
Station
926
PG&E
Substation
319th Sig
Battalion Yard
Area

Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

LBP

1953-present

LBP in soil, cleanup complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)

TPH-d

1993-present

Approximately 2 gallons of diesel fuel was reported to
have spilled onto the soil near the north gate of this
facility in February 1994 (Woodward-Clyde Federal
Services, 1994a). The contaminated soil was excavated
and disposed in May 1994 (Woodward-Clyde Federal
Services, 1994d).

VOCs,
metals

1952-1998

PCBs

Unknown

Metals

Unknown

Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)

VOCs,
metals

1942, 1952

Metals and petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in
groundwater at this site in 2003 at concentrations
exceeding the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling.
USACHPPM conducted quarterly groundwater sampling
at the site from November 2004 to August 2007. All
exceedences were within the same order of magnitude
as the ESLs and the CDTSC issued a No Further Action
letter for the SEQA on 28 May 2009 (Enclosure 4).

Pesticides,
herbicides,
metals

unknown

Barium, zinc, and pesticides were detected in soils at
this site and in an adjacent drainage ditch in 2004.
Subsequent sampling did not confirm the presence of
barium and zinc, but did confirm the presence of
pesticides at concentrations greater than the ESLs
applicable at the time of sampling (USACHPPM 2004;
2005). USACHPPM conducted a Risk Assessment for
the site in 2006 and concluded the site did not pose a
risk to potential residents, construction workers, or
wildlife receptors (USACHPPM, 2006f). The CDTSC
issued a letter concurring with USACHPPM findings on
16 August 2006 (Enclosure 4).

Herbicides,
PBCs,
SVOCs

unknown

Site closed (Escarda, 2013)

Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory
limits, no remediation required. Monitoring wells
destroyed. Site closed. (D’Onofrio 2009)
Soil removal for minor PCB release, no further
action(Hart, 2012)

SEQA

Former
Hazardous
Waste
Accumulation
Site

Site 37
Railroad spurs
•

Remedial Actions

The information contained in this notice is required under the authority of regulations promulgated under
section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Liability, and Compensation Act (CERCLA or

E-26

Building
Number

Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

Remedial Actions

‘Superfund”) 42 U.S.C. 9620(h). This table provides information on the storage of hazardous substances for
one year or more in quantities greater than or equal to 1,000 kilograms or the hazardous substance’s CERLCA
reportable quantity (whichever is greater). In addition, it provides information on the known release of
hazardous substances in quantities greater than or equal to the substances CERCLA reportable quantify. See
40 CFR Part 373

E-27

ENCLOSURE 5
NOTIFICATION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT STORAGE, RELEASE, OR DISPOSAL

E-28

Table 3. Notification of Petroleum Product Storage, Release, or Disposal.
Building
Number

Name of
Petroleum
Product(s)

F112
Flammable
Materials
Storage
F115
Flammable
Materials
Storage
180
Administrative
& supply
F635
Fire Dept
Storage
F636
Fire Station
730
Vehicle
maintenance
F732
Fuel point
F770
Underground
personnel
shelter
F781-784
Self help
complex
791/792
Fuel Storage
Area
793
Hazardous
Waste Storage
319th Sig Bn
Yard Area
Former RTS
Med Motor
Pool
F888
Gasoline
Station

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

Remedial Actions

Unknown - 1993

No release

1942-1994

No release

1952-present

500 gallon AST. No release

1953-2005

No release

Diesel

1953-2005

Diesel

1952-present

Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site
closed. (Hart , 2011)
Release of diesel to soil, remedy complete, site
closed. (Wood, 2006)

Diesel

1952-1993

No release

Diesel

1959-1994

700 gallon diesel UST. No release

Release of petroleum, VOCs and metals to soil. Risk
assessment complete, no further action required, closure
granted (Wood, 2006)
1,000 gallon AST. Release of diesel and metals to
groundwater below regulatory limits, monitoring wells
destroyed, site closed (Hart, 2012)
No release

1959-unknown

Diesel

1952-unknown

1998-present

Diesel

Unknown

Diesel

1993-unknown

Gasoline
Diesel
Waste Oil

1952-1998

Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)
< 5 gallons diesel
10,000 gallon gasoline UST, 10,000 gallon diesel UST,
500 gallon waste oil UST. Release of metals to
groundwater below regulatory limits, no remediation
required. Monitoring wells destroyed. Site closed.
(D’Onofrio 2009)

E-29

Building
Number

Name of
Petroleum
Product(s)

Site 40 / SEQA
Maintenance
Shops

Trench 3

Site 36

Probably
mineral-oil
based
hydraulic
fluid
Diesel

Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal

Remedial Actions

1942, 1952

No petroleum release, release of metals to groundwater
below regulatory limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site
closed (D’Onofrio, 2009)
Soil removal, composting/landfarming treatment, no
further action (Escarda, 2013)

Unknown

Unknown

Soil removal, composting/landfarming treatment, no
further action (Escarda, 2013)

E-30

ENCLOSURE6
CERCLA NOTICE, COVENANT, AND ACCESS PROVISIONS AND OTHER DEED
PROVISIONS

E-31

ENCLOSURE 6
CERCLA NOTICE, COVENANT, AND ACCESS PROVISIONS AND OTHER DEED
PROVISIONS
I.

Property Covered by Covenant and Access Rights Made Pursuant to Section
120(h)(4)(D) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (40 U.S.C. Section 9620(h)(4)(D)(i)):

For parcels in Phase 1A Planning Area 2C, Phase 1B Planning Area 4A, Phase 2 Planning Area
4A and Planning Area 8, Phase 3 Planning Area 5A and 5C and Phase 4 Planning Area 4B and 8
of the Property, the Grantor provides the following covenants and retains the following access
rights:
A. Covenant Pursuant to Section 120(h)(4)(D)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §
9620(h)(4)(D)(i)):
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(4)(D)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. § 9620(h)(4)(D)(i)), the United States
warrants that any response action or corrective action found to be necessary after the date of this
deed for contamination existing on the property prior to the date of this deed shall be conduced
by the United States.
B. Access Rights Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(iii) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C §9620(h)(3)(A)(iii):
The United States reserves a perpetual and assignable easement and right of access on, over,
and through the property, to enter upon the property in any case in which a remedial action or
corrective action is found to be necessary on the part of the United States, without regard to
whether such remedial action or corrective action is on the Property or on adjoining or nearby
lands. Such easement and right of access includes, without limitation, the right to perform any
environmental investigation, survey, monitoring, sampling, testing, drilling, boring, coring,
testpitting, installing monitoring or pumping wells or other treatment facilities, response action,
corrective action, or any other action necessary for the United States to meet its responsibilities
under applicable laws and as provided for in this instrument. Such easement and right of access
shall be binding on the Grantee and its successors and assigns and shall run with the land.
In exercising such easement and right of access, the United States shall provide the Grantee or
its successors or assigns, as the case may be, with reasonable notice of its intent to enter upon the
property and exercise its rights under this clause, which notice may be severely curtailed or even
eliminated in emergency situations. The United States shall use reasonable means to avoid and
to minimize interference with the Grantee’s and the Grantee’s successors’ and assigns’ quiet
enjoyment of the property. At the completion of work, the work site shall be reasonably
E-32

restored. Such easement and right of access includes the right to obtain and use utility services,
including water, gas, electricity, sewer, and communications services available on the property at
a reasonable charge to the United States. Excluding the reasonable charges for such utility
services, no fee, charge, or compensation will be due the Grantee, nor its successors and assigns,
for the exercise of the easement and right of access hereby retained by the United States.
In exercising such easement and right of access, neither the Grantee nor its successors and
assigns, as the case may be, shall have any claim at law or equity against the United States or any
officer or employee of the United States based on actions taken by the United States or its
officers, employees, agents, contractors of any tier, or servants pursuant to and in accordance
with this clause: Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be considered as a
waiver by the grantee and its successors, and assigns of any remedy available to them under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
II.

Property Covered by Notice, Description, Access Rights, and Covenants Made
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (40 U.S.C. Section 9620(h)(3)(A)):

For parcels in Phase 1A Planning Areas 6B, 6D, 6E, Phase 1B Planning Areas 6A, 6C, Phase 2
Planning Areas 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 7D, 7E, Phase 3 Planning Areas 2A, 3C, 3E, 5B, 7A, 7B, 8,
Phase 4 Planning Areas 1B, 3D, 4B and 8 and for Phase 5 of the Property, the Grantor provides
the following notice, description, and covenants and retains the following access rights:
A. Notices Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C.
§9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II)):
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(I)
and (II)), available information regarding the type, quantity, and location of hazardous
substances and the time at which such substances were stored, released, or disposed of, as
defined in section 120(h), is provided in Exhibit 1, [Insert the deed exhibit number for FOST
Table 2 – Hazardous Substance Storage, Release and Disposal, which will be included in the
deed as an exhibit], attached hereto and made a part hereof.
B. Description of Remedial Action Taken, if Any, Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(III) of
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(III)):
Pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(III) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(III)), a description of the
remedial action taken, if any, on the property is provided in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
E-33

C. Covenant Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C
§9620(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B)):
Pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C §9620(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B)), the United
States warrants that –
(a) All remedial action necessary to protect human health and the environment with respect to
any hazardous substance identified pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 remaining
on the property has been taken before the date of this deed, and
(b) Any additional remedial action found to be necessary after the date of this deed shall be
conducted by the United States.

D. Access Rights Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(iii) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C
§9620(h)(3)(A)(iii):
The United States reserves a perpetual and assignable easement and right of access on, over,
and through the property, to enter upon the property in any case in which a remedial action or
corrective action is found to be necessary on the part of the United States, without regard to
whether such remedial action or corrective action is on the Property or on adjoining or nearby
lands. Such easement and right of access includes, without limitation, the right to perform any
environmental investigation, survey, monitoring, sampling, testing, drilling, boring, coring,
testpitting, installing monitoring or pumping wells or other treatment facilities, response action,
corrective action, or any other action necessary for the United States to meet its responsibilities
under applicable laws and as provided for in this instrument. Such easement and right of access
shall be binding on the Grantee and its successors and assigns and shall run with the land.
In exercising such easement and right of access, the United States shall provide the Grantee or
its successors or assigns, as the case may be, with reasonable notice of its intent to enter upon the
property and exercise its rights under this clause, which notice may be severely curtailed or even
eliminated in emergency situations. The United States shall use reasonable means to avoid and
to minimize interference with the Grantee’s and the Grantee’s successors’ and assigns’ quiet
enjoyment of the property. At the completion of work, the work site shall be reasonably
restored. Such easement and right of access includes the right to obtain and use utility services,
including water, gas, electricity, sewer, and communications services available on the property at
a reasonable charge to the United States. Excluding the reasonable charges for such utility
E-34

services, no fee, charge, or compensation will be due the Grantee, nor its successors and assigns,
for the exercise of the easement and right of access hereby retained by the United States.
In exercising such easement and right of access, neither the Grantee nor its successors and
assigns, as the case may be, shall have any claim at law or equity against the United States or any
officer or employee of the United States based on actions taken by the United States or its
officers, employees, agents, contractors of any tier, or servants pursuant to and in accordance
with this clause: Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be considered as a
waiver by the grantee and its successors, and assigns of any remedy available to them under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
III. OTHER DEED PROVISIONS
A. "AS IS"

a. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to
inspect the Property and accepts the condition and state of repair of the subject Property.
The Grantee understands and agrees that the Property and any part thereof is offered "AS
IS" without any representation, warranty, or guaranty by the Grantor as to quantity, quality,
title, character, condition, size, or kind, or that the same is in condition or fit to be used for
the purpose(s) intended by the Grantee, and no claim for allowance or deduction upon such
grounds will be considered.
b. No warranties, either express or implied, are given with regard to the condition of
the Property, including, without limitation, whether the Property does or does not contain
asbestos or lead-based paint. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own
judgment in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including,
without limitation, any asbestos, lead-based paint, or other conditions on the Property. The
failure of the Grantee to inspect or to exercise due diligence to be fully informed as to the
condition of all or any portion of the Property offered, will not constitute grounds for any
claim or demand against the United States.
C. Nothing in this "As Is" provision will be construed to modify or negate the Grantor's
obligation under the CERCLA Covenant or any other statutory obligations.

B. HOLD HARMLESS
a. To the extent authorized by law, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, covenant and
agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Grantor, its officers, agents, and employees from (1) any
and all claims, damages, judgments, losses, and costs, including fines and penalties, arising out of
the violation of the NOTICES, USE RESTRICTIONS, AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS in this
Deed by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, and (2) any and all any and all claims, damages,

E-35

and judgments arising out of, or in any manner predicated upon, exposure to asbestos, lead-based
paint, or other condition on any portion of the Property after the date of conveyance.

b. The Grantee, its successors and assigns, covenant and agree that the Grantor shall not be
responsible for any costs associated with modification or termination of the NOTICES, USE
RESTRICTIONS, AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS in this Deed, including without limitation,
any costs associated with additional investigation or remediation of asbestos, lead-based paint, or
other condition on any portion of the Property.
c. Nothing in this Hold Harmless provision will be construed to modify or negate the Grantor's
obligation under the CERCLA Covenant or any other statutory obligations.

C. POST-TRANSFER DISCOVERY OF CONTAMINATION
a. If an actual or threatened release of a hazardous substance or petroleum product is
discovered on the Property after the date of conveyance, Grantee, its successors or assigns, shall be
responsible for such release or newly discovered substance unless Grantee is able to demonstrate
that such release or such newly discovered substance was due to Grantor's activities, use, or
ownership of the Property. If the Grantee, it successors or assigns believe the discovered
hazardous substance is due to Grantor's activities, use or ownership of the Property, Grantee will
immediately secure the site and notify the Grantor of the existence of the hazardous substances, and
Grantee will not further disturb such hazardous substances without the written permission of the
Grantor.
b. Grantee, its successors and assigns, as consideration for the conveyance of the Property,
agree to release Grantor from any liability or responsibility for any claims arising solely out of the
release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product on the Property occurring after the date of
the delivery and acceptance of this Deed, where such substance or product was placed on the
Property by the Grantee, or its successors, assigns, employees, invitees, agents or contractors, after
the conveyance. This paragraph shall not affect the Grantor's responsibilities to conduct response
actions or corrective actions that are required by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

D. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS
The Environmental Protection Provisions are at Exhibit 7, which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof. The Grantee shall neither transfer the property, lease the property, nor grant
any interest, privilege, or license whatsoever in connection with the property without the
inclusion of the Environmental Protection Provisions contained herein, and shall require
the inclusion of the Environmental Protection Provisions in all further deeds, easements,
transfers, leases, or grant of any interest, privilege, or license.

E-36

[Editorial note - The EPPs will be included as a deed exhibit in order to streamline the deed
language. It will not diminish the enforceability or legal significance of the EPPs.]

E-37

ENCLOSURE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS

E-38

ENCLOSURE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS

1. NOTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS AND COVENANT
A. The Grantee is hereby informed and does acknowledge that non-friable asbestos or asbestos
containing material (“ACM”) have been found on the Property. The Property may contain
improvements, such as buildings, facilities, equipment, and pipelines, above and below the
ground, that contain non-friable asbestos or ACM. The Occupational Health and Safety
Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency have determined that such
unprotected or unregulated exposure to airborne asbestos fibers increases the risk of asbestosrelated diseases, including certain cancers that can result in disability or death.
B. The Grantee covenants and agrees that its use and occupancy of the Property will be in
compliance with all applicable laws relating to asbestos. The Grantee agrees to be responsible
for any remediation or abatement of asbestos found to be necessary on the Property to include
ACM in or on buried pipelines that may be required under applicable law or regulation.
C. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to inspect the
Property as to its asbestos and ACM condition and any related hazardous or environmental
conditions relating thereto. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own
judgment in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including,
without limitation, any asbestos or ACM hazards or concerns.

2. NOTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) AND COVENANT
AGAINST THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE
A. The Grantee is hereby informed and does acknowledge that all buildings on the
Property, which were constructed or rehabilitated prior to 1978, are presumed to contain .leadbased paint. Lead from paint, paint chips, and dust can pose health hazards if not managed
properly. Every purchaser of any interest in Residential Real Property on which a residential
dwelling was built prior to 1978 is notified that there is a risk of exposure to lead from leadbased paint that may place young children at risk of developing lead poisoning.
B. The Grantee covenants and agrees that it will not permit the occupancy or use of any
buildings or structures on the Property as Residential Real Property as defined under 24 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 35, without complying with this section and all applicable federal, state,
and local laws and regulations pertaining to lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.
Prior to habitation, the Grantee specifically agrees to perform, at its sole expense, the Army’s
E-39

abatement requirements under Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992
(Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992).
C. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to inspect the
Property as to its lead-based paint content and condition and any hazardous or environmental
condition related thereto. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own judgment
in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including, without
limitation, any lead-based paint hazards or concerns.
3. PESTICIDE NOTICE AND COVENANT
The Grantee is hereby notified and acknowledges that registered pesticides have been applied
to the property conveyed herein and may continue to be present thereon. The Grantor and
Grantee know of no use of any registered pesticide in a manner (1) inconsistent with its labeling
or with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.)
and other applicable laws and regulations, or (2) not in accordance with its intended purpose.
The Grantee covenants and agrees that if the Grantee takes any action with regard to the
property, including demolition of structures or any disturbance or removal of soil that may
expose, or cause a release of , a threatened release of, or an exposure to, any such pesticide,
Grantee assumes all responsibility and liability therefor.

E-40

ENCLOSURE 8
REGULATORY AGENCY/PUBLIC COMMENTS
(Final Document Only)

E-41

E-42

ENCLOSURE 9
ARMY RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
(Final Document Only)

E-43

E-44

ENCLOSURE 10
EIS ROD ENCUMBRANCES

E-45

October 2009

Record Of Decision

8.0

MITIGATION AND MONITORING COMMITMENTS

The Army is committed to sustaining and preserving the environment at Camp Parks.
Appropriate mitigation and monitoring measures will be applied to mitigate the magnitude of
project impacts. A Mitigation and Monitoring Plan will be adopted for mitigation measures. As
part of the decision to implement the Proposed Action as part of Real Property Master Planning
and Land Exchange at U.S. Army Garrison, Camp Parks, the Army and the exchange partner
will enact the following environmental mitigations presented in the tables below. These
mitigation measures, which were identified as proposed mitigation measures in Chapter 4 of the
FE IS, will be implemented to reduce the severity and extent of potential impacts of this decision.
Some of these measures are covered by existing law or are already addressed in the mandates
of existing documents such as the installation's Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan
and Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan; they are therefore not discretionary.

24

Record Of Decision

October 2009

Army Mitigation and Monitoring Commitments

Air

Constructionrelated diesel
emissions

Construction

Army contractors involved with construction on Camp
Parks would develop and implement a Construction
Emission Mitigation Plan (CEMP) that would include a
Diesel Particulate Matter Plan (DPM) that may include
the use of low-sulfur fuels, idling diesel equipment
away from residential areas, trip minimization, and
tuning equipment to minimize emissions. Measures to
minimize particulate matter may include use of water
or dust palliative, wind fences, and low truck speeds.

Air

Operationrelated ROG,
PM10, and air
toxics
emissions

Site-specific
Planning/
Operations

Encourage the use of alternate modes such as
bicycling and walking by providing facilities (e.g.
bicycle lockers or racks) and connectivity of
bike/pedestrian paths, acquisition and use of zeroemissions vehicles for on-base travel, and use
landscaping to reduce heat-island effect.

Topography,
Geology,
Mineralogy and
Paleontology

Structures for
human
occupancy
near an active
fault

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Conduct geotechnical investigation to determine if
active fault trace crosses proposed building site.
Facilities should be designed to reduce risk of
earthquake ground failure and prevent buildings from
collapsing.
Buildings should be situated at least 50 feet from
active fault traces (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zone Act 1973).

I

Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils

Constructionsite erosion/
storm water
pollution
Urban storm
water pollution
Spills of
chemicals and
fuels

All Phases

Follow appropriate regulations for control of storm
water and proper use, storage, and disposal of
chemicals and fuels.

Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils

Construction
sites that
disturb greater
than one acre

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Obtain NPDES General Construction Permit for storm
water discharges from San Francisco Bay Regional
VIJater Quality Control Board (SFRWQ(;B)prior to
initiating construction activities. File notice of intent to
discharge storm water with SFRWQCB and develop
construction SWPPP that outlines the erosion and
sediment control BMPs to ensure that storm water
runoff from the site does not impair local water bodies.
Each site-specific SWPPP should consider on-post
and off-post drainage and water flow surrounding its
area of purview. BMPs should be properly installed
and maintained to reduce or eliminate impacts to
surface water. Hydromodification Management (HM)
Standard such that stormwater discharges from

I

25

October 2009

Record Of Decision

applicable new development and redevelopment
projects at Camp Parks and Dublin Crossing shall be
designed to incorporate appropriate measures to not
cause an increase in the erosion potential of the
receiving creek over the pre-project (existing)
condition.

Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils

Urban storm
water pollution

Reduce or eliminate pollution by using postconstruction, public education and public involvement
storm water BMPs.

Operation
and
Maintenance

•

•

Post-construction BMPs include use of vegetated
filter strips along edges of parking areas to filter
storm water or wet ponds to collect and treat
storm water through settling and algal uptake.
Public education BMPs include providing
handouts, posters, or presentations to community
groups on common practices (fertilizing a lawn;
disposing of used oil; properly storing chemicals
and paints; and cleaning up pet waste) can
improve the storm water runoff and help clean
local water bodies.

Public involvement BMPs include stenciling storm
drains, cleaning up streams, and maintaining
wetlands.

Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils

Potential
urban/
industrial
impacts to
surface water

Operation
and
Maintenance

Implement good housekeeping BMPs and a
chemical/fuel spill prevention plan with use, storage,
and disposal guidelines.

Hydrology

Potential
flooding

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Avoid construction in the 100-year floodplain of the
Chabot Canal whenever possible.
Provide adequate storm water drainage for the new
development.

Wetlands

Construction
within or
adjacent to
jurisdictional
wetlands
including
freshwater
marsh, vernal
pools, and
forest
vegetation
communities

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Avoid wetland disturbance and resulting need for
compensatory mitigation whenever possible by
relocating or reconfiguring proposed facilities. If
avoidance could norbeachieved, the folloWing
measures could apply after consultation with the
USACE prior to disturbance activities in jurisdictional
wetlands (Booz Allen 2004) to determine specific
mitigation measures and requirements:
•

•

26

Minimize unavoidable impacts by making the area
of impact as small as possible and mitigating
impact intensity.
Mitigation measures could include, but would not
be limited to, access limitations, use of buffer

October 2009

Record Of Decision

R~source

·~pactt

Area

Situatioo

~'

P,rojeet

Phase

~~

,,
~

~ fJii~igilti~f) a~d Monitol'ing'Comrnitmellt'
~
,
,,,,'>
~,~,,>,,~,:,~~:

~~~

~,~

~~

,,,,,,,~~,>~~

~,,~:

'~

,

<' •.

zones, formal SWPPP protocols, implementation
of BMPs, and wetland enhancement.
When wetlands could not be fully avoided and
mitigation was insufficient, compensation would be
used to restore or create wetlands in other locations.
Mitigation would be carried out before or in
conjunction with activities that adversely affect these
sensitive habitats.

Wetlands

Construction
adjacent to
jurisdictional
wetlands
including
freshwater
marsh, vernal
pools, and
forest
vegetation
communities

Operation

Camp Parks currently has a policy that designates
wetlands as "no digging," or "limited access" for
military training activities. This policy is documented
in the Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan
(INRMP; USAGE 2003) and stated during training
briefings. These policies would remain in effect under
all alternatives.

Wetlands

Construction
adjacent to
jurisdictional
wetlands
including
freshwater
marsh, vernal
pools, and
forest
vegetation
communities

All Phases

Establish buffer zones around adjacent wetlands,
drainages and riparian forest within which no activity
would be allowed. The buffer zones would be of
sufficient width to:

•
•

•

Use temporary fencing or other materials during
construction to divert surface water flow and silt from
drainages and associated vegetation. Buffer zones
width around individual wetlands would be established
on a case-by-case basis after consideration of terrain
and drainage patterns, type of disturbance, season
and anticipated length of disturbance, resources that
would be affected, and the likelihood that a Federally
listed speciesmi~ght~be found ~in~theweUand.

I
Wetlands

Surface water
runoff

I

I

Prevent incursion into protected area by
equipment and workers
Avoid construction runoff into the protected area
Prevent degradation of the wetland by providing
long-term protection of the watershed in its
immediate vicinity.

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Appropriately convey, capture, and treat stormwater
runoff.
In keeping with the principles of pollution prevention in
the installation's SWPPP (CSS 2003), develop and
implement construction site-specific SWPPPs
specifically
focused on redevelopment. These
1
SWPPPs would prescribe BMPs and compliance
monitoring to control erosion and contaminated runoff
from construction sites, and supplement BMPs
defined for specific industrial activities in the current
Camp Parks SWPPP.
1

27

October 2009

Record Of Decision

I Resource Area
..

lmp"ctl

Situation.
BMPs could include use of sediment trapping and
filtering systems, bioswales, storm drain inlet
protection, natural depressions, stormwater detention
or retention ponds, and sediment basins, in addition to
access restrictions and buffers. The following goals
would be part of the construction site specific
SWPPPs to control stormwater runoff during
construction at Camp Parks:
•

•

On site capture and treatment of 100 percent of
construction period runoff to prevent stormwater
pollution during this period.
Develop specific long-term stormwater control
measures such as vegetated swales and storm
drain inlet filters to capture and treat 80 to 90
percent of the site's runoff.

Develop setbacks from drainages and vegetate areas
to control stormwater.

Wetlands

Surface water
runoff

Vehicles and equipment are to use existing roads and
routes of travel to the greatest extent practicable.
Vehicles traveling off road at night within 100 feet of a
water body within the designated HMUs and
Tassajara Creek are to maintain a speed of 10 miles
per hour or less.

Operation
and
Maintenance

Continue Integrated Training Area Management
programs such as Land Rehabilitation and
Maintenance, which repair damaged areas and
minimize potential future damage. In addition, known
breeding ponds are marked as "no-go" areas using
Siebert stakes.
Current SWPPP would need to be modified to
address ongoing operations housed in new facilities
specifically designed for them and incorporating
containment mechanisms. Many sites specifically
addressed in the current SWPPP would change under
Master Plan implementation. Each activity would be
reviewed.astoits nature~ its.mat~rials and processes,
1
and its potential for storm water contamination before
a comprehensive list of BMPs was tailored to
individual building complexes. The BMPs would
include measures such as:
•
•
•
•
•

28

Good housekeeping
Preventive maintenance of oil-water separators
Minimize outdoor storage of materials
Use of dry sweep and drip pans
Use of pavement, small berms, or secondary
containment structures where needed.

October 2009

Record Of Decision

. .~e$ouree Area
:

l~pactt·
I

Sltllatibn

Pr9jeet
Phase···

: · ........ :• : . / .
.. :•· .. .
. .: . :·
.
. . Mitigation ~t:td Monitoring C()mmitment
.
·.: . ::. ::::•:
.:. •··.
.:
·.

••••••••

X

One difference between the current and proposed
situation under the Master Plan may be the installation
of more landscaped areas than currently exist.
Maintenance of such areas would employ the
following prescriptions within the SWPPP:

•

•
Fish and
Wildlife

Construction
adjacent to
ponds, wet
meadows,
riparian areas,
and grassland
vernal pools

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Avoid discharge of water used to irrigate
ornamental plants into nearby drainages because
this water likely contains chloramine (a residual
disinfectant) that could negatively impact aquatic
life
Control runoff from areas that are landscaped
and fertilized.

In the Training Area, continue existing buffer areas
around wetlands and riparian areas. Wherever
possible, ponds, wet meadows, riparian areas, and
grassland vernal pools at Camp Parks would be
avoided or protected as discussed above under
wetlands.
The following types of mitigation would be applied as
needed to avoid, minimize, or compensate for the
impacts discussed above:

•
•
•
•
Fish and
Wildlife

Redevelopme
nt construction
activity

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Buffer zones around aquatic or other sensitive
habitats
Preconstruction surveys to locate currently active
breeding sites for important vertebrate species so
they can be avoided
Implementation of construction BMPs
Creation/restoration/enhancement of wetlands

To minimize the potential for redevelopment actions to
increase erosion and sedimentation and disturb
sensitive wildlife species, BMPs would be
implemented such as:

•
•

•
•

•
•
•

•

29

Revision of the SWPPP prior to ground breaking;
implementation of erosion control measures.
RE;Iocation of ourrowingovyl§.
Control of domestic pets to avoid wildlife mortality
and harassment.
Reclamation and revegetation of habitat.
Ongoing wildlife surveys to keep the database on
Camp Parks wildlife populations and use areas
current.
Regular monitoring to identify/repair damaged or
eroded areas.
Revegetation methods using appropriate native
plants.
Prior to construction, an on-site construction

Record Of Decision

October 2009

.Impact/
Situation

Reso1.1tce .Area

Prqject
Phase·

;

..

.

I

•

•
•

•

,.
•
•

•
•
•
•

•
•
! Fish and

Encountering
special status
species

Wildlife

Ir

Operations

.

.

·.

..

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

. 1\i!itig~ti~n ·. aod. Nl~nitoring· Commitn1ept.

personnel briefing on environmentally sensitive
habitats and species and specific conservation
measures developed for each.
Containment and frequent disposal of garbage so
as not to attract wildlife.
Presence of biologist on installation during
construction activities.
Designate specific sites for vehicle parking,
storage of construction supplies, etc. in previously
disturbed locations that would minimize potential
effects to federally listed species.
Control dust, erosion, and sedimentation through
use of Best Available Control Technology (BACT),
for example, use of silt/wind fences, use of water
or chemical stabilizers for dust control, covering of
haul vehicles, and minimizing time graded areas
are exposed.
Implement BMPs such as a 20-mph vehicle speed
limit within the project area, covering or providing
escape ramps for trenches greater than two feet
deep, checking pipes or culverts that have a
diameter over four inches before moving them,
placing food-related trash in closed containers.
Rapidly rehabilitate disturbed areas to minimize
erosion and downstream flow of sediment.
Use well-maintained vehicles and defined
refueling and maintenance locations to minimize
uncontained petroleum leaks.
Minimize and define work area boundaries for
each construction site.
Conduct pre-construction briefings for
construction crews to review BMPs being
implemented during construction.
Vehicles and equipment are to use existing roads
and routes of travel to the greatest extent
practicable.
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by
surface water runoff, measures would be
implemented to appropriately convey, capture,
and treat stormwater runoff.
Existing BMPs defined for specific industrial
activities·inthecurrentCampParksSWPPP
would also be implemented (CSS 2003).
Establish, mark, and protect buffer areas around
wetlands adjacent to development areas.

If a special status species were encountered during
operations, activities in the area would cease and the
Camp Parks Environmental Office would be notified to
determine if any action needs to be taken. The Army
, will notify USFWS within 24-hours of finding an injured
! or dead listed species, or any unanticipated damage
I to lrsted species habrtat associated with project

30

····.

Record Of Decision

October 2009

f;mpactl

Sitqation  . ··•·.

· •··.· · ·. ·. ·. ··

NJiti~at!9n~ndftll."nitoril'lg·commitrn~nt

>

burrows in the immediate impact zones.

Fish and
Wildlife

San Joaquin
Kit Fox

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Conduct surveys, establish exclusion zones, and
conduct monitoring consistent with the USFWS
"Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the
San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground
Disturbance," dated June 1999. Negative survey
results would be reported as part of Camp Parks'
INRMP annual update. If kit foxes were observed
during surveys, then Camp Parks would contact
USFWS to coordinate construction activities, in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act.

Fish and
Wildlife

California Red
Legged Frog

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Conduct pre-activity surveys of wetland habitat within
200-feet of the construction site in accordance with
the field survey methodology outlined in the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Revised Guidance on Site
Assessments and Field Surveys for California Redlegged Frogs, August 2005 (USFWS 1997). Surveys
would typically consist of four night and two day
surveys. If California red-legged frogs are observed
within the project area and have the potential to be
harmed, they would be relocated from the site to an
area within one of the installation's HMUs. If they are
known or suspected to occur near a construction or
demolition site, silt fences or another similar barrier
around any adjacent wetlands that are within 200 feet
of construction would be installed to separate them
from the site and monitoring would occur as needed
for these species during construction. The barrier
would be inspected for integrity on a weekly basis
during construction and repaired as needed.

Fish and
Wildlife

California
Tiger
Salamander

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Cultural

National
Register of
Historic
Places
(NRHP)
Eligible Sites

All Phases

Conduct pre-activity surveys consisting of two nights
of burrow inspections within five days prior to the
initiation of construction or ground disturbance
activities. If California tiger salamanders are observed
within the project area, they would be relocated from
the site to a burrow near a known or potential
breeding pond. If they are known or suspected to
occur near a construction or demolition site, silt fences
or another similar barrier would be installed around
any adjacent wetlands that are within 200 feet of
construction to separate them from the site and
monitoring would occur as needed for these species
during construction. The barrier would be inspected
for integrity on a weekly basis during construction and
repaired as needed."

I

I

To minimize the potential for adverse effects, the
Camp Parks entrance sign would be treated and
managed in a manner that prevents the deterioration
or destruction of the character of the sign. The sign
should be regularly protected and maintained as
needed by methods identified and outlined in the

32

Record Of Decision

October 2009

(Camp Parks
entrance sign)

1

ICRMP.

Cultural

Eligible
Historic
Archeological
Sites

Operations
and
Maintenance

Methods would be developed to avoid or reduce
effects on the NRHP eligible historic period site
located in the Training Area. These methods (e.g.,
avoidance markers if appropriate, occasional
monitoring if intense training activity is planned near
the site, and coordinating with the DPT) would be
implemented to protect the sites from training-related
damage.

Cultural

Potential
Buried
Cultural
Resources or
Human
Remains

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

If previously undetected cultural resources or human
remains were unearthed during construction
excavations, the application of standard practices in
accordance with the Integrated Cultural Resources
Management Plan (ICRMP; Parsons 2001) would
mitigate potential adverse impacts. If buried cultural
resources, such as chipped or ground stone, historic
debris, building foundations, or human bone, are
inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing
activities, work would stop in that area and within 100
feet of the find. The Camp Parks Environmental
Office would be notified immediately and would guide
compliance with the ICRMP.

Cultural

Potential
Buried
Cultural
Resources or
Human
Remains

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Camp Parks will implement monitoring during grading,
excavation, and disturbance activities as outlined in
the Section 106 coordination letter and concurred with
by the SHPO on 1 June 2006.

Land Use

Considerable
change in land
ownership
uses in the
southern
Cantonment
Area

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

The proposed Dublin Crossing is compatible with the
City of Dublin's guiding policy for the Eastern
Extended Planning Area. However, the type and
intensity of land uses proposed in Dublin Crossing are
not consistent with the City of Dublin's current
designation of public and semi-public and would
require an amendment to its General Plan.

Land use

Land use
conflicts
identified in
tbe Training
Area (e.g.,
level of activity
and use of
artillery,
helicopters,
and demolition
in areas
adjacent to
residences)

All Phases

The potential for land use conflicts with neighboring
areas would continue to persist; however, mitigation
measures employed by the surrounding development
wovld.minimi:ze.the intensity of these conflicts.
Mitigation already proposed in existing EIRs would
minimize these land use conflicts.

Transportation

Traffic
improvements

I and Access

Site-Specific

I1 Planning/

1
1

Development of Dublin Crossing by private
developers could result in direct and indirect traffic

33

October 2009

Record Of Decision

lmp•:etl
$ttt~CJ~~qn
needed to
mitigate
decreased
LOS at
several major
intersections
in the local
transportation
network from
the proposed
Dublin
Crossing
development

,
t.n•tgat{On 'lridM9nttorlrigCom~itment,
,,

,

Proje:et
Ptlase
Construction

:

,

,

'

",

,

,

,

,,

,,

,

",

,,

,

",

'

impacts. Capacity improvements that may be required in
the future include: Dougherty Road/Central Parkway,
Arnold Road/Central Parkway, Dublin Boulevard/Iron
Horse, Hopyard Road/1-580 Eastbound off-ramp,
Westbound Hacienda Crossing at Hacienda Drive,
Dougherty Road/Amador Valley, Arnold Road/Dublin
Boulevard, and Hacienda Drive/1-580 Eastbound offramp.
Capacity improvements at Dublin
Boulevard/Dougherty Road are also recommended,
and signal operation mitigations should be considered
in the approaches to Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive
and Dougherty Road/Central Parkway intersections.
In addition to the intersection improvements, there is
the potential that street segment improvements may
also be necessary. This could include widening
Dougherty Road from four lanes to six lanes between
Houston Place and Amador Valley Boulevard, the
extension of Scarlett Drive from Houston Place to
Dublin Boulevard, and widening of Arnold Road from
two lanes to four lanes between Dublin Boulevard and
Central Parkway. Traffic impacts would be caused
primarily by redevelopment and mitigations for these
impacts would not be funded by the Army.

Noise

Potential
complaints
about future
noise

Operations
and
Maintenance

Camp Parks would continue to implement a program
of outreach to communities surrounding Camp Parks
to explain the types of military activities that generate
the noises and help alleviate their sense of
annoyance.

Visual and
Aesthetic
Resources

Removal of
features
important to
community's
visual
character
(e.g., mature
trees,
landscaping,
or historic
structures;
Disruption of
locally or
regionally
significant
views or views
from a
community
setting;
Placement of

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Mitigation measures could include, but are not limited
to, avoidance, screening, habitat restoration or
creation, view-compatible facility color schemes and
design, suitable landscaping, and implementation of
BMPs that could further protect quality visual and
aesthetic resources.
Be consistent with the visual character of the
established Camp Parks design theme (Nakata 2002)
in facility design and construction.
In Dublin Crossing, (i) Adhere to the City of Dublin
Development Elevation Cap at an elevation of 770
feet; and (ii) Develop property in a manner consistent
with other applicable Plan and policies.

providing

34

,,,,•,'

Record Of Decision

October 2009

undesirable
views or not
conforming to
city zoning
ordinances.

Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances

Demolition of
buildings

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Demolition of buildings that may contain asbestos
containing material or lead-based paint must be in
compliance with DoD policies, and state and Federal
regulations for prevention of air releases and worker
exposure, accurate characterization, and appropriate
disposal of debris and other wastes. Asbestos and
LBP abatement contractors must be authorized to
perform work in the State of California.

Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances

Demolition
and
construction

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Workers operating demolition or earthmoving
equipment, installing foundations or pipelines, or
performing other tasks that may involve excavation of,
or contact with, potentially contaminated soil, buried
fuel tanks, septic tanks, abandoned sewer or fuel
lines, or demolition debris must be trained in
hazardous substance site operations and supervised
as required by 29 CFR 1910.120. These workers
must also be provided adequate personal protective
equipment and repeatedly be informed of the known
and potential hazards during daily safety meetings.

Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances

Residual
hazardous
constituent
concentrations
in soil

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Before redevelopment contracts are finalized,
standards for allowable residual hazardous
constituent concentrations in soil at each location
must be established and the requirements to verify
compliance set and documented in consultation with
state and local officials. The Housing and
Recreational Land Use Categories should have the
most restrictive limits.

Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances

All demolition,
construction,
and
landscaping

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Strict dust control should be explicitly required for all
demolition, construction, and landscaping contracts,
especially where elevated arsenic and chromium are
found in the natural soil. In addition to wetting of dirt
roads and excavated soils, methods to minimize dust
from demolition of buildings and foundations, removal
of asphalt and concrete, and grading and landscaping
should be evaluated in consultation with local and
state·officia.rs·and·written·intoengineerihg plans· and
specifications.

Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances

Traffic impacts
or potential
hazardous
substance
releases or
exposure
incidents

Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction

Additional mitigation measures (e.g., secure
containment or covering of demolition debris,
contaminated soil, or wastes in truck beds) may be
required by city or county ordinances or other
regulations to prevent releases during transport.
Additional voluntary mitigation measures (e.g., such
as scheduling transport of demolition debris or other
wastes to offsite landfills outside of heavy traffic time
periods) should be considered to minimize traffic

I

35

I

Record Of Decision

October 2009

lm~ctl

Situation
impacts or potential hazardous substance releases or
exposure incidents.

In addition to the specific mitigation and monitoring commitments identified above, the following
activities would also be conducted:
•

Frequent monitoring of construction activities as well as sensitive resource locations by
the CSTC Environmental Office or consultants. Monitoring of the project sites should
occur at least once per month during construction and more frequently in areas that may
contain sensitive resources.

•

Monitoring activities should include, but not be limited to, the following:
o

Construction crews should be made aware of resources present on the project
site, locations of known areas that may require mitigation and monitoring, buffer
zones implemented around specific resources, and other necessary measures to
ensure resource protection.

o

A representative from the CSTC Environmental Office should attend construction
meetings regularly to ensure compliance with this Plan as well as address any
unanticipated issues.

o

The construction sites should be inspected at least once a week to ensure that
appropriate measures are in place, equipment is used and stored in appropriate
areas, and construction is not occurring in sensitive areas.

•

The construction contractor should be required to provide the following accommodations:
o

Designate an environmental engineer to provide construction contractor quality
control at project sites.

o

Comply with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws
and regulations.

36

Record Of Decision

o

October 2009

Comply with all specified DoD, Army, and CSTC regulations, including
environmental requirements.

•

Submit a preconstruction Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to the Contracting Officer
and the CSTC Environmental Office for review and approval. The EPP should include
some or all of the following components:
o

Erosion sedimentation and pollution control plan including monitoring and
reporting requirements

o

Recycling and waste minimization/management/disposal plan

o

Air pollution control plan

o

Contaminant prevention plan

o

Waste water management plan

o

Cultural and natural resources and wetlands plan

o

Pesticide application/management plan

o

Employee Environmental Training

o

Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC)

o

Spill Contingency Plan (SCP)

All practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the selected action have
been adopted, except as indicated otherwise above. The Army will also employ a monitoring
and enforcement program for the mitigations adopted in this decision.

37



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Create Date                     : 2013:09:20 10:41:48-07:00
Creator                         : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.8
Modify Date                     : 2013:09:20 10:42:46-07:00
Title                           : 
Tagged PDF                      : No
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.2-c001 63.139439, 2010/09/27-13:37:26
Metadata Date                   : 2013:09:20 10:42:46-07:00
Creator Tool                    : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.8
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:05271bd0-1210-42f3-8092-5f71f040b6a9
Instance ID                     : uuid:3e024318-616b-4960-a58e-42ca6bcb6526
Producer                        : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.8
Page Count                      : 71
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu