T793 Camp Parks CSTC Dublin Crossing FOST 16SEP13

User Manual: T793

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 71

DRAFT FINAL
FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER
(FOST)
United States Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks
Dublin Crossing Real Property Exchange Parcel
16 September 2013
FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER
(FOST)
United States Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks
Dublin Crossing Real Property Exchange Parcel
16 September 2013
1.0 PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Finding Of Suitability To Transfer (FOST) is to document the environmental
suitability of certain parcels or property at the United States Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks (Parks) for transfer to the Dublin Crossing CP, Limited Liability
Corporation, consistent with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 120(h) and Department of Defense (DOD) policy. In addition,
the FOST includes the CERCLA Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions and other Deed
Provisions and the Environmental Protection Provisions (EPPs) necessary to protect human
health or the environment after such transfer.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
The Property consists of approximately 171.6 acres, which includes 22 current buildings and no
acres of undeveloped land. The property was previously used as training facilities, vehicle repair
facilities, supply buildings and warehouses, medical training groups, medical facilities, fire and
police facilities, office and administrative buildings, recreational facilities, a parade ground, a
helicopter pad, infrastructure maintenance facilities, barracks, dining facilities, and a museum.
The property is intended to be transferred as a mixed-use master-planned community1 and is
consistent with the intended reuse of the property as set force in the Dublin Crossing Draft
Specific Plan (RBF, 2013) and Dublin Crossing Environmental Impact Report (RBF, 2013). A
site map of the property is attached (Enclosure 1). The proposed property to be transferred
excludes three interior parcels: The 8.5 acre National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) property and warehouse (Building 121), under control of the U. S. Air Force, the 3.98
acre Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (PRFTA) 2 site (also known as the Building 109
former incinerator site) and the 2.62 acre PRFTA-13 site (also known as the Former Fuel Storage
Area 761). The parcels have been surveyed and metes and bounds have been assigned. Transfer
of these inholdings will be covered by separate FOST documents.
1 The current proposed use is residential (14 % single family, 31 % townhomes), retail and multifamily (5%),
office/hotel (5%), civic (3%), open space (26%), school (4%), and infrastructure (11%)
2
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION.
A determination of the environmental condition of the property was made based upon the
Environmental Baseline Survey (USACHPPM, 2002e) and Environmental Condition of Property
(ECP) (USACHPPM 2011) and the ECP Recertification Memo (Parks CTSC, 2013). The
information provided is a result of a complete search of agency files during the development of
these environmental surveys.
A complete list of documents providing information on environmental conditions of the Property
is attached (Enclosure 2).
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF PROPERTY.
The DOD ECP categories for the Property are as follows:
ECP Category 1: F101-F105, F110-F112, F115, F140, F141, F152, F161, 162, 171, 180, 634,
F635, F725-F727, 730A, 730B, 730C, 713, F732, F735, F761, F785, F790, 791, T793, F793,
793, F794, F795, 796, F797, F798, F831, F832, F833, F850 – F857, F861-F865, 861, 862, F870-
F874, 880, 881, F880, F891-F897, F902-F905, F910, F911, F920-F923, Site 38, Site 39
ECP Category 2: F635, F732, and F761 (PRFTA 13); Trench 3, Site 36, and Site 39
ECP Category 3: F132, F151, F636, F781, F782, F783, F784, 791, 792, F888, Site 28, Site 37,
Site 40, Site 41
ECP Category 4: Buildings 130, 131, 150, 170, 730, 792, 860; Former RTS MED Motor
Pool; Former Building 926
A summary of the ECP Categories for specific buildings, parcels, or operable units and the ECP
category definitions is provided in Table 1 – Description of Property (Enclosure 3).
4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SITES.
There were eleven remediation sites located on the Property: A summary of the environmental
remediation sites on the property is as follows:
Building/Site1 Parcel
Number1
ECP
Area
Type
Environmental Concerns Current
Status
130 5 4 LBP
Sampling and remediation complete.
CDTSC has issued letter stating site is
suitable for unrestricted use.
131 6 4 Radionuclides, LBP
Release of radionuclides and lead.
Remediation complete for both.
Closure granted for radionuclides.
3
Building/Site1 Parcel
Number1
ECP
Area
Type
Environmental Concerns Current
Status
150 9 4 LBP
Release of lead to surface soil. CDTSC
has issued letter stating site is suitable
for unrestricted use.
170 12 4 LBP
Release of lead to surface soil;
remediation completed. CDTSC has
issued letter stating site is suitable
for
unrestricted use.
730 17 2
Petroleum-related
compounds, VOCs, SVOCs,
metals
Release of TPH-DRO to subsurface
soil, remediation complete, closure
granted.
792 26 4 LBP
Sampling complete, release of lead to
soil, remediation complete. CDTSC
has
issued letter stating site is suitable
for unrestricted use.
860 31 2
Petroleum-related
compounds from < 5-gallon
spill
Cleaned up at the time of the spill, non
-
reportable
Former RTS Med
Motor Pool
32 2
Petroleum-related
compounds
Sampled as part of
SEQA, see below
926 35 4 PCBs
Previous remediation for minor PCB
spill. Additional sampling complete, no
release and no further action required.
Site 36
36
2
Diesel & oil
20 cubic yards soil bioremediated onsite
Trench 3
2
Diesel & oil
20 cubic yards soil bioremediated onsite
1) As referenced in the June 2011 ECP Report.
All environmental soil and groundwater remediation activities on the property have been completed
or are in place and operating properly and successfully.
A summary of the environmental remediation sites is provided in Table 2 – Notification of
Hazardous Substance Storage, Release or Disposal (Enclosure 4).
[Author’s note: We will need closure, concurrence, or no further action memos from DTSC for
Trench 3, Site 36 (Category 2), Site 37 and Site 39 (Category 1)
[Author’s note: We may require a CERCLA Record of Decision for all ECP Category 3 and
Category 4 sites]
STORAGE, RELEASE, OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
Hazardous substances were stored for one year or more and released or disposed of on the
property in excess of reportable quantities specified in 40 CFR Part 373. All hazardous
4
substance storage operations have been terminated on the property. Hazardous substances were
released in excess of the 40 CFR 373 reportable quantities at the following sites2
F132, F636, 730, F781-F784, 860, Southeast Quadrant Area, Former Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Area, 791/792 Fuel Storage Area
The release or disposal of these hazardous substances was remediated at the time of the release
or as part of the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). See Section 4.1 for additional
information. A summary of the buildings or areas in which hazardous substance activities
occurred is provided in Table 2 – Notification of Hazardous Substance Storage, Release, or
Disposal (Enclosure 4). The CERCLA 120(h)(3) Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions
(Enclosure 6) will be included in the Deed.
4.2 PETROLEUM AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.
4.2.1 Underground and Above Ground Storage Tanks (USTs/ASTs).
Current UST/AST Sites.
There are no underground and two above-ground petroleum storage tanks on the Property. There
is no evidence of petroleum releases from these sites.
Former UST/AST Sites.
There were eleven underground and four above-ground petroleum storage tanks on the property
that have been removed or closed in place. Petroleum product releases occurred at the following
sites:
Two of the ASTs were former USTs that were removed and subsequently used as ASTs at
PRFTA 13 (Former Fuel Storage Area/Area 761). Petroleum hydrocarbon releases occurred at
the following sites:
Former Building 732, and Former Building 888.
Former Building 732.
Former Building 732 was a fuel point constructed in 1942 and demolished in 1992. Two
underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed from the site in 1993. Petroleum hydrocarbons
and VOCs were detected in soil and groundwater at concentrations less than the ESL applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2002e). Site closure was granted by the Alameda County
Department of Public Health on 28 March 2001.
2 note that release of lead to soil from lead-based paint (LBP) on exterior building surfaces is not listed in this
section; see section 4.6
5
Former Building 888.
Building 888 was a gas station constructed in 1952, demolished in 1998, and located on 4th
Street between Monroe Avenue and Arnold Road. Two hydraulic lifts, one 10,000-gallon UST
formerly containing gasoline, one 10,000-gallon UST formerly containing diesel fuel, one 500-
gallon UST formerly containing waste oil, two pump dispensers and associated piping, and one
oil/water separator were located at the former gas station. The tanks were installed in the 1950s
(Tung, 2001; Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d). Woodward-Clyde Federal Services
removed three USTs in July 1996. In 1998, Cal, Inc. conducted limited over-excavation and
confirmatory soil and groundwater sampling near the former fuel dispenser island (Cal Inc.,
1998a). Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soils at concentrations greater than the ESL
applicable at the time of sampling. Approximately 20 cubic yards of soil were removed and
three soil samples were collected from the excavation. Metals, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (an
SVOC), and VOCs were detected in groundwater at concentrations less than, or greater than but
the same order of magnitude as, the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling (USACHPPM,
2009b). However, the CRWQCB determined the exceedences did not pose a threat to human
health or the environment and issued a No Further Action Letter on 17 April 2009 (D’Onofrio,
2009).
The release of these petroleum products was remediated at the time of the release or as part of
UST/AST closure. See (BSK and Associates, 1997) for additional information.
A summary of the UST/AST petroleum product activities is provided in Table 3- Notification of
Petroleum Products Storage, Release, or Disposal (Enclosure 5).
4.2.2 Non-UST/AST Storage, Release, or Disposal of Petroleum Products.
There was non-UST/AST storage of petroleum products in excess of 55 gallons for one year or more
on the property. The petroleum was used for the following types of activities: motor pool
operations, industrial operations, fire station.
All non-UST/AST petroleum product storage operations have been terminated on the property. There
was no evidence of petroleum releases in excess of 55 gallons as a result of these activities.
A summary of the non-UST/AST petroleum activities is provided in Table 3 – Notification of
Petroleum Products Storage, Release, or Disposal (Enclosure 5).
4.3 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs).
There is evidence of releases from the PCB-containing equipment at the following site: Former
Building 926 PG&E Substation. The PCBs were remediated at the time of the release or as part
of the installation restoration program. See (BSK and Associates, 1997) and (USACHPPM,
2004) for additional information. PG&E pole-mounted transformer at 4th & Davis: The PCBs
were remediated by PG&E (TES, 2001).
6
4.4 ASBESTOS.
There is asbestos-containing material (ACM) in the following buildings:
Building
Survey and Date
ACM Materials Identified
(>1.0 % asbestos)
1
Materials
Friability
Quantity
141
1988 Occusafe Survey
Cement panels
(interior and exterior)
Non-friable
423 square
feet
Cement flue pipe
Non-friable
15± square
feet
9” x 9” floor tiles
Non-friable
8,750 square
feet
2002 HLA2 Survey
12” x 12” floor tiles
(below newer floor tiles and carpeting)
Non-friable
8,622 square
feet
Concealed exterior cement panels
Non-friable
5,287 square
feet
162
1988 Occusafe Survey
Cement panels
(exterior)
Non-friable
3,000± square
feet
2002 HLA Survey
Sealant on asphalt sheet siding
(hidden behind cement panel siding))
Non-friable
1,500 linear
feet
TSI3 on pipes of chilled water system
Friable
encapsulated
25± linear
feet
TSI on pipes of high-pressure steam lines
Friable
encapsulated
30± linear
feet
TSI on pipe fitting (joints and valves) of chilled
water system
Friable
encapsulated
9/2005 fittings
Cement boiler flue
Non-friable
15/35 ± linear
feet
2002 HLA Survey
Asbestos cement sheet siding
Non-friable
200± square
feet
Tar finish over cork insulation
Non-friable
49,900±
square feet
Wallboard compound
Non-friable
2,430± square
feet
180 1988 Occusafe Survey Brown flooring
Non-friable
7,200± square
feet
Beige floor tile mastic6
Non-friable
400 ± square
feet
2002 HLA Survey
No additional material identified
None
1) Samples of roofing material were not collected in either survey. Roofing materials should be assumed to contain
ACM unless demonstrated otherwise.
2) HLA = Harding Lawson, Associates.
3) TSI = thermal system insulation.
5) Quantities indicate those estimated by Occusafe above slash and those estimated by HLA below slash.
6) Material not located in later survey by HLA.
7
The ACM includes: floor tiles, cement panels, pipe insulation, asphalt sheet siding. See (HLA,
1997a, 1997b) and (Harding ESE, 2001a, 2001b, 2002) for additional information. The ACM
does not currently pose a threat to human health or the environment because all friable asbestos
that posed an unacceptable risk to human health has been removed or encapsulated. The deed
will include an asbestos warning and covenant (Enclosure 6).
4.5 LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP).
The following buildings are known or presumed to contain lead-based paint (LBP):
Building
Phase II
Lead > ESL
1 Phase III
Lead > ESL
1
Parks DPW XRF
Sampling and Soil
Removal
Current Status
130
Warehouse Yes Yes Yes
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
131
Warehouse
Yes Not sampled2 Yes Building still present.
F132
Warehouse
Yes Not sampled3 No
Risk Assessment completed. Property
closure granted.
141
Classrooms
No Not sampled No
Building still present. No further
action required.
150
Warehouse Yes Not sampled2 Yes
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
162
Warehouse
No Not sampled No
Building still present. No further
action required.
170
Warehouse Yes Yes Yes
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
171
Warehouse
No Not sampled No
Building still present. No further
action required.
180
Admin &
signal
equipment
Yes No No Building still present.
790
Administrative
Yes No No Building still present.
791
DPW
Maintenance
& Repair
No Not sampled No Building still present. No further
action required.
792
Warehouse Yes Yes Yes
Building still present. DTSC
issued concurrence letter
1 October 2008.
F796
No
Not sampled
No
Building demolished, 2004.
1) Yes means at least one sample from USACHPPM Phase II or Phase III studies contained lead at a concentration
greater than the environmental screening level (ESL) applicable at the time of sampling (200 mg/kg, current ESL is
8
150 mg/kg).
2) USACHPPM recommended additional sampling under different mechanism than the Phase III EBS.
3) Lead in soil assessed in conjunction with other sampling at the site. Analytical data indicate no release of lead to
soil.
See (USACHPPM 2002e, 2003, 2005) for additional information.
The property was not used for residential purposes and the transferee intends to convert the
property to residential use in the future. The deed will include a lead-based paint warning and
covenant (Enclosure 6).
4.6 INDOOR FIRING RANGES.
There are no indoor firing ranges on the property.
4.7 RADIOLOGICAL MATERIALS.
The following building was used for radiological activities: Building 130 and Building 131.
There was a release of radiological material at Building 131. The following actions were taken
to remediate the radiological material: Soil removal. All radiological materials have been
removed from the property.
On 29 April 2002 through 3 May 2002 the Army conducted a radiological site assessment of the
Property in compliance with the accepted protocol. The Radiological Site Assessment Report
[26 August 2002] found no evidence to suggest that any radiological commodities were
improperly managed at the site or that any residual radiological material is present at the site and
concluded that no further action is required with respect to the radioactive devices or materials
identified. On 30 August 2002 the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive
Medicine concluded the site is free of radiological concerns. See (USACHPPM, 2002b) for
additional information.
4.8 RADON.
Radon surveys were conducted in 19 buildings on the property. Radon was not detected at above the
EPA residential action level of 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) in these buildings.
4.9 MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN (MEC).
Based on a review of existing records and available information, there is no evidence that
Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) are present on the property. In addition, available
documentation indicates no areas within the proposed transfer area were ever used as ranges,
training areas, or for other purposes that might indicate MEC is present. The termMEC” means
military munitions that may pose unique explosives safety risks, including: (A) unexploded
ordnance (UXO), as defined in 10 U.S.C. § 101(e)(5); (B) discarded military munitions (DMM),
9
as defined in 10 U.S.C. § 2710(e)(2); or (C) munitions constituents (e.g. TNT, RDX) as defined
in 10 U.S.C. § 2710(e)(3), present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard.
4.10 OTHER PROPERTY CONDITIONS.
There are no other known property conditions that pose an unacceptable risk to human health
and the environment.
5.0 ADJACENT PROPERTY CONDITIONS.
The following potentially hazardous conditions exist on adjacent property: PRFTA-02 (The
Former Building 109 Site). This Site is currently undergoing remediation involving removal of
soil and future groundwater monitoring for metals and dioxins. The presence of these hazards on
the cited adjacent property does not present an unacceptable risk to human health and the
environment because the site is currently undergoing remediation, or remediation has been
completed, and remedial efforts should eliminate all potential risk for that site and adjacent sites.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AGREEMENTS.
There are no environmental remediation orders or agreements applicable to the property being
transferred. The deed will include a provision reserving the Army’s right to conduct remediation
activities, if necessary, in the future (Enclosure 6).
7.0 REGULATORY AND PUBLIC COORDINATION.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9, the CDTSC, the CRWQCB, and the
public were notified of the initiation of this FOST.
[Reviewers Note: Action item to be done when report is final].
Regulatory/public comments received during the public comment period will be reviewed and
incorporated, as appropriate. A copy of the regulatory/public comments and the Army Responses
will be included at Enclosure 8 and Enclosure 9.
8.0 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) COMPLIANCE.
The environmental impacts associated with the proposed property transfer have been analyzed in
accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The results of this analysis are
documented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and ROD (signed on 28 October 2009)
(Department of the Army, 2009). The NEPA analysis identified several encumbrances. These
encumbrances and the corresponding mitigation and monitoring procedures, are presented in
Enclosure 10
10
9.0 FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER.
Based on the above information, I conclude that all removal or remedial actions necessary to
protect human health and the environment have been taken and the property is transferable under
CERCLA section 120(h)(3). In addition, all Department of Defense requirements to reach a
finding of suitability to transfer have been met, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
the attached Environmental Protection Provisions that shall be included in the deed for the
property (Enclosure 11). The deed will also include the CERCLA 120(h)(3) Notice, Covenant,
and Access Provisions and Other Deed Provisions. Finally, the hazardous substance notification
(Table 2) shall be included in the deed as required under the CERCLA Section 120(h) and DOD
FOST Guidance
[Author’s Note: Signature Authority Not Decided]
CHRISTOPHER P. GERDES
DATE
LTC, MP, U.S. Army
Commanding
E-1
10 Enclosures
Encl 1: Site Map of Property
Encl 2: Environmental Documentation and References
Encl 3: Table 1- Description of Property
Encl 4: Table 2. Notification of Hazardous Substance Storage, Release, or Disposal
Encl 5: Table 3. Notification of Petroleum Product Storage, Release, or Disposal
Encl 6: CERCLA Notice, Covenant, and Access Provisions and Other Deed Provisions
Encl 7: Environmental Protection Provisions
Encl 8: Regulatory Agency/Public Comments (Final FOST)
Encl 9: Army Response to Comments (Final FOST)
Encl 10: ROD Encumbrances
2
ENCLOSURE 1
SITE MAP OF PROPERTY
3
E-4
ENCLOSURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND REFERENCES
E-5
ENCLOSURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND REFERENCES
Anonymous, 1945. Map of U.S. Construction Battalion Replacement Depot, Camp Parks,
California, Showing Conditions on 30 June 1945.
Anonymous, 1989. Annual Installation Utilization Survey Parks Reserve Forces Training Area,
March 1989.
Anonymous, 1993. Lead-Based Paint and Asbestos Survey for Building Demolition - Phase II,
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, California, April 1993.
Archaeological Resource Service, 1981. Cultural Resources Literature Search and Field
Reconnaissance of Camp Parks, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California, Report
prepared for Earth Metrics, Incorporated, Report Number ARS 81-82.
ASTM International, 2002. Standard Practice D 5746-98 (2002), Standard Classification of
Environmental Condition of Property Area Types for Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Facilities.
ASTM International, 2005a. Standard Practice D 6008-96 (2005), Standard Practice for
Conducting Environmental Baseline Surveys.
ASTM International, 2005b. Standard Practice E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental
Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.
Babcock, T., 2003. Letter Report From: Mr. Timothy Babcock, Hazardous Substances Removal
Incorporated, To: Mr. Timothy Schafstall, USACHPPM, Subject: Parks RFTA -
Documentation of Potholing Exploration Contract DABJ05-03-1419, 14 November 2003.
BSK and Associates, 1995, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Department of Military,
Camp Parks, Dublin, California
BSK and Associates, 1997. Supplemental Environmental Baseline Study, (Phase I Site
Assessment), Department of the Military, Camp Parks, 18 June 1997.
Cal Inc., 1998a. Final Closure Report Volume 1, Building 200 and Building 888, Contract No.
DACA05-97-D-0014, Task Order 007, Prepared on behalf of: U.S. Army Engineer District,
Sacramento, Corps of Engineers, December 1998.
Cal Inc, 1998b. Statement of Work, Closure of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel
Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Building 888, Contract Number DACA05-97-D0014,
Task Order No. 0007, CAL Inc, 26 February 1998.
E-6
Cal Inc, 1998c. Statement of Work, Closure of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel
Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Building 888, Contract Number DACA05-97-D0014,
Task Order No. 0007, 20 March 1998.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2008b. Groundwater Monitoring at PRFTA
13, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County,
California. .
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2009. Approval of Sampling and Analysis
Plan Addendum, Confirmation Soil Borings - PRFTA 13, U. S. Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County, California. Letter dated 17 February 2009
California Zone 7 Water Agency, undated. Groundwater Contour Map, Internet Website
http://www.zone7water.com/Layout-2.pdf
Camp Parks, Undated a. Historical real property records.
Camp Parks, Undated b. Statement of Work, Underground Storage Tank Investigation, Closure
of Oil Water Separator and Removal of Fuel Dispensing Islands, Camp Parks RFTA - Buildings
200 and 888.
Camp Parks, 2013, Recertification of Final Environmental Condition of Property Report No. 38-
Eh-3589-10 Dublin Crossing (Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area U.S. Army
Combat Support Training Center And Camp Parks
CH2MHill, 2005. Camp Parks Training Site Summary Report - Soil and Groundwater
Investigation of the Oakland Real Property Exchange (RPX) 32-Acre Parcel, Dublin, California.
Report prepared for Engineering and Environment, Inc., July 2005.
Department of the Army, 2009. Record of Decision for the real Property Master Plan and Real
Property Exchange at United States Army Garrison, Camp Parks, California. Department of the
Army, Installation Management Command.
Deputy of the Under Secretary of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. Lead-
Based Paint Guidelines for Disposal of Department of Defense Residential Real Property - A
Field Guide, Interim Final, December 1999.
http://www.denix.osd.mil/shf/upload/dod_leadpaintpolmemo_0.pdf
D’Onofrio, F, 2007, Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Mr. Paul Kot, Combat Support Training
Center Camp Parks. Final Summary Report, Removal of Oil Drainage Pit, Dublin Crossing,
Building 730, Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin, California May 22 2007
E-7
D’Onofrio, F, 2008a, Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal, Buildings 150,
130, 170 and 792, Camp Parks, Combat Support Training Center, Dublin, California October 1
2008
D ‘Onofrio, F, 2008b. Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Mr. Paul Kot, Engineering and
Environment, Incorporated. Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal,
Buildings 150, 130, 170, and 792, Camp Parks, Combat Support Training Center, Dublin,
California October 1 2008
D’Onofrio,F, 2009a, Final Groundwater Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8b-07, Southeast
Quadrant Area, U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
May 28 2009
D ‘Onofrio, F, 2009b. Letter from Francesca D’Onofrio, Hazardous Substances Scientist,
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC John Cushman, Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No
38-EH-07A8a-07, Former Building 888, ULS (sic) Army Combat Support Training Center,
Camp Parks, Dublin California, April 17 2009
Eckardt, J, A., 1945. Map of U.S. Construction Battalion Replacement Depot, Camp Parks,
California.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc, 2010. The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck, Camp Parks
Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94566. EDR Inquiry Number 2686499.2s.
Environmental Chemical Corporation, 2006. Removal of Oil Drainage Pit, Dublin Crossing,
Building 730 – Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin, California. Report prepared for the United
States of Engineers, Sacramento District - Valley Resident Office, October 2006.
Environmental Science Associates, 1986. Structures Evaluation for National Register of Historic
Places for the Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Contra Costa and Alameda Counties,
California, Report prepared for the United States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Environmental Science Associates, 1990. 47-Acre Surplus Parcel at Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, Environmental Baseline Survey, September 1990.
Environmental Quality Management, Incorporated, 2008. Camp Parks Combat Support Training
Center (CTSC) Dublin, California Final Summary Report, Lead-Contaminated Soil Removal,
Buildings 150, 130, 170, and 792. Report prepared for the U. S. Army Engineering District,
Louisville, Contract Number W912QR-04-D-0036, Task Order 0010.
E-8
Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (Formerly PRGs)
Master Table, December 2009. Internet site:
http://www.epa.gov/region09/superfund/prg/index.html
Escarda, Terry, 2013, Letter from Terry Escarda, Hazardous Substances Scientist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC Christopher P Gerdes , Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Trench 3 and Site 36, Army Combat
Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin California {to be written prior to final FOST]
Escarda, Terry, 2013, Letter from Terry Escarda, Hazardous Substances Scientist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to LTC Christopher P Gerdes , Commander, U.S.
Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Site 37 and Site 39, Army Combat Support
Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin California [to be written prior to final FOST]
General Services Administration, undated. Public Buildings Service Pamphlet: Office of
Property Disposal, Title X: The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Act New Regulations.
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 1997. California Base Closure News, Newsletter
No. 18, August 1997.
Harding ESE, 2001a. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 141,USAR Center, Dublin, California.
Harding ESE, 2001b. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 162, General Purpose Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Harding ESE, 2002. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC),
Building 170, USARC - Cold Storage Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1997a. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center
(USARC), Building 1141, 91 Division LDRACAD, Dublin, California.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1997b. Asbestos Survey, Camp Parks U.S. Army Reserve Center
(USARC), Building 162, General Purpose Warehouse, Dublin, California.
Hart, 2011, No Further Action Concurrence, Former Building 636, U.S. Army Combat Support
Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County, July 14 2011
Hart, 2012, Final Environmental Condition of Property (ECP) Report, Dublin Crossing, Camp
Parks, Dublin, Alameda/Contra Costa Counties
HDR, 2012, Final Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, Report Submitted to the United States Army Corps of
Engineers Contract #W912DQ-06-D-0026, March 2012.
E-9
Jones and Stokes Associates, Inc. 1995. Inventory of Special-Status Plant and Wildlife Species
at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Report prepared for the United States of Engineers,
Sacramento District, Report Number JSA 93-240, 1995
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Inc., 1998a. Cultural Resources Inspection at the Proposed
Location of a New Front Gate at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Report prepared for the
United States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Inc., 1998b. Field Investigation of Previously Recorded Cultural
Resource Sites in Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Letter report prepared for the United
States of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, Incorporated, 1998c. Draft Parks Reserve Forces Training Area
Built Environment Inventory and Evaluation, Report prepared for the United States Army Corps
of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Jones and Stokes, Associates, undated. Geologic Map of Parks Reserve Forces Training Area.
Map prepared for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.
JRP Historical Consulting Services, 2002. Inventory and Evaluation of Previously Unevaluated
WWII and Cold War Era Buildings, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area. Report prepared for
the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento district.
Leyva, G, 2009. Letter from George Leyva, Project Manager, California Regional Water Quality
Control Board to Douglas Guenther, Compliance Manager, HQ, US Army Combat Support
Training Center, Fort Hunter Liggett, California. RE: Groundwater Monitoring at Building 791,
Former Fuel Storage Area, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin,
California, 12 March 2009.
RWQCB, 2010, Letter from George Leyva, Project Manager, California Regional Water Quality
Control Board to LTC Michael P Friend ,No Further Action, Building 791, Former Fuel Storage
Area, U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County
Mike Bobbitt and Associates, 2005. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for Underground
Storage Tanks at West Coast Garrison (Provisional), Camp Parks Training Site, Dublin,
California. Report prepared for the USACHPPM.
Mike Bobbitt and Associates, 2006. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for Underground
Storage Tanks at US Army, Combat Support Training Center and Camp Parks, Dublin,
California. Report prepared for the US Army, Combat Support Training Center.
E-10
Nelson, M. C., 1993. Memorandum From: Mark C. Nelson, LTC, EN Commanding, Parks
RFTA, For: Director of Engineering and Housing, ATTN: AFZH-DE (L.W. Burnett), HQ, I
Corps and Fort Lewis, Subject: Abandoned POL Farm at PRFTA, Date: 5 April 1993.
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, 2000. Memorandum From: Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense, For: Assistant Secretary of the Army, Assistant Secretary of the Navy,
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, Director, Defense Logistics Agency, Subject: Lead-Based
Paint Policy for Disposal of Residential Real Property, 07 Jan 2000.
http://www.denix.osd.mil/shf/upload/dod_leadpaintpolmemo_0.pdf
Rainie Rodgers Associates, 1986. A Cultural Resources Investigation of the Proposed Veterans
Administration, Northern California National Cemetery Sites at Santa Nella and Camp Parks,
Report prepared for Resource Assessment, Incorporated.
RBF Consulting, 2013, Dublin Crossing Draft Specific Plan, June 2013
http://www.dublincrossingca.com/specific-plan.pdf
RBF Consulting, 2013, Dublin Crossing Draft Environmental Impact Report, June 2013
http://www.dublincrossingca.com/EIR.pdf
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002a. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches and Stockpile, 8 January 2002.
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002b. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches, 23 October 2002.
Rothwell Consulting, Inc., 2002c. Letter Report From: Eric Rothwell, To: Mr. Manual Cunha,
Subject: Soil Sampling and Analysis in Sewer Trenches and Stockpile, 8 January 2002.
Roy F. Weston, 2000, Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Including Work Plan, Polychlorinated
Biphenyl (PCB) Abatement, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California
Roy F. Weston, 2001a. Magnetometer Survey of the Tassajara Disposal Trenches and Bldg 109
Incinerator Areas, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, June 2001.
Roy F. Weston, 2001b. Field Summary Report, Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Analytical
Sample Review and Site Abatement at Buildings 331, 334, 730, and 792, 2 March 2001.
Roy F. Weston, 2002. Comprehensive Magnetometer Survey for the Presence of Underground
Storage Tanks at Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California, 11 April 2002.
Sarmiento, R. A., 2006. Letter from Riz A. Sarmiento, Staff Toxicologist, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control, to Francesca D’Onofrio, California Department of
E-11
Toxic Substances Control, RE: Health Risk Assessment No. 39-DA-04GJb-06, Former Building
132 Site and Health Risk Assessment No. 39-DA-04GJa-06, Former Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Site, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 16 August 2006.
SCS Engineers, 2005. Temporary Well Installation and Groundwater Sampling Report, Camp
Parks Training Site, West Coast Garrison, Dublin, CA. Report prepared for FedSource, Brea,
California. Task Order Number LOS12970, Contract Number BPA-6551.
Sonoma State University, 2001. A Cultural Resources Overview of the United States Army
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Near Dublin, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties,
California, Report prepared for David Small, Director of Public Works, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, 7 September 2001.
Strope, W. E. 1961. U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, USNRDL Shelter Research
Program, Reviews and Lectures, No. 119, 21 August 1961.
Technial and Ecological Services, 2001, Remediation Activities for Polychlorinated Biphenyls at
Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 4th & Davis Street, Dublin, California, Report
#402.331-01.89
Tung, 2001. Correspondence From: Mee Ling Tung, Alameda County Health Care Services
Agency, Environmental Health Services, Environmental Protection; To: Mr. Marshall Marik,
Parks RFTA; Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certification (Enclosure: Case Closure
Summary), 28 March 2001.
United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM), 1998.
Relative Risk Site Evaluation 38-EH-8204-98, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, August
1998.
USACHPPM, 1999. Final Sampling Plan, Site Inspection No. 38-EH-8703-99, Parks Reserve
Forces Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002a. Phase II Site Inspection No. 38-EH-5027-02, Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002b. Radiological Historical Site Assessment No. 26-MF-3589-H-02,
U. S. Army Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California.
USACHPPM, 2002c. Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring Report - First Quarter, Data for
Samples Collected During November 2001, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 18 January
2002.
E-12
USACHPPM, 2002d. Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring
Report for Second Quarter and Aquifer Hydraulic Conductivity Test Results, Data for Samples
Collected During February 2002, 19 April 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002e. Draft Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH-3589-02, 187-Acre Real
Property Exchange, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties), California, 22 April to 3 May 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002f. Site Inspection No. 38-EH-2938-02, Former Tank Farm (PRFTA13),
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin California, 15-21 May 2002.
USACHPPM, 2002g. Phase II Site Inspection No. 38-EH-6665-02, Former Tank Farm
(PRFTA13), Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin, California, 11-15 October 2002.
USACHPPM, 2003. Results of Environmental Sampling in the 187-Acre Real Property
Exchange, Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), California, USACHPPM
Project No. 38-EH-003K-04, October 2003.
USACHPPM, 2004. Results of Environmental Sampling in the 187-Acre Real Property
Exchange, Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), California, USACHPPM
Project No. 38-EH-003K-04, October 2003.
USACHPPM, 2005. Sampling Results, Phase III Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH-
003K-05, 187-Acre Real Property Exchange, Camp Parks, California, November 2004.
USACHPPM, 2006a. Final Environmental Baseline Survey No. 38-EH-04HW-05, Building 121
(NASA Site), U.S. Army Combat Support Training Center – Camp Parks, Dublin (Alameda and
Contra Costa Counties), California.
USACHPPM, 2006b. Health Risk Assessment Study No. 39-DA-04GJ-06a, Building 132 Site,
Camp Parks, California, May 2006.
USACHPPM, 2006c. Ground-Water Sampling Results, Northern Cantonment Area (Former
Building 636), U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, 1 to 19 December
2005.
USACHPPM, 2006d. Soil Sampling Results No. 38-EH-04CS-06, Building 730 Drainage
Ditch, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
19 and 20 November 2005.
USACHPPM, 2006e. Soil and Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELb-06, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, 8 to 15 August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
E-13
USACHPPM, 2006f. Health Risk Assessment Study No. 39-DA-04GJ-06b, Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Site, Camp Parks, California, May 2006.
USACHPPM, 2007a. Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELa-06, Former Building
636, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 8 to 15
August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
USACHPPM, 2007b. Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-05ELb-06, Former Building
791, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 8 to 15
August and 9 to 26 September 2006.
USACHPPM, 2008a. Final Soil Sampling Results No. 38-EH-04CU-06a, Former Building 132,
U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, 1 to 19 December
2005.
USACHPPM, 2008b. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Former
Building 636, U. S. Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
March 2008.
USACHPPM, 2008c. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, March 2007.
USACHPPM, 2008d. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8a-07, Southeastern
Quadrant Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
August 2007.
USACHPPM, 2009a. Draft Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study No. 38-EH-077T-07,
Former Building 109 Incinerator, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, April 2009.
USACHPPM, 2009b. Final Ground-Water Sampling Results No. 38-EH-07A7-07, Building
791, Former Fuel Storage Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, March 2007
USACHPPM, 2009c. Final Ground-Water Sampling Report No. 38-EH-07A8a-07, Former
Building 888, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California,
February 2009.
USACHPPM, 2010. Draft Environmental Condition of Property Report for the Dublin Crossing
(Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area, U.S Army Combat Support Training
Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, California, January 2010.
E-14
USACHPPM, 2011. Final Environmental Condition of Property Report No. 38-EH-3589-10
Dublin Crossing (Formerly the 180-Acre) Real Property Exchange Area, U.S Army Combat
Support Training Center and Camp Parks, Dublin, California, June 2011.
United States Army, 2005, Memorandum from Assistant Secretary of the Army Subject:
Transmittal of Model Language for Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) and Deeds
Pertaining to Army Real Estate, January 10 2005 with May 1 2013 update
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951a. Site Drawing 350102.2 (sheet 8 of 12), Bliss &
Hurt, Trudell & Berger Architects and Engineers, 25 August 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951b. Engineering Drawing No. 38 09 02.4, Sheet 15
of 18, Parks Air Force Base, Processing Building No. 2 (Building 870), Heating Plan,
28 November 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1951c. Engineering Drawing No. 38 09 02.3, Sheet 16
of 18, Parks Air Force Base, Processing Building No. 2 (Building 870), Heating Details,
28 November 1951.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1952. COE, San Francisco District, Engineering
Drawing Number 36 29 01, Sheet 9 of 10, Structural Fire Station Plumbing Plan, Building 636,
13 May 1952.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1954. Engineering Drawing: Modification of Building
151, 3275th Air Force Indoctrination Wing, Parks Air Force Base, 28 July 1954.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1955. Engineering Drawing, Rehabilitation of Quonset
Hut for Petroleum Offices, Site and Plot Plans, 6 January 1955.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1993. Building Demolition - Phase II, Photograph,
Floor Plan, and Record Data for Buildings 781, 782, and 783, Sheet C18, 20 of 21, File No. 381-
25-0022.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1994. Site Drawing 6402916, Upgrade Washrack,
Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Navy Public Works Center,
18 August 1994.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2003. Ordnance and Explosives Archives Search
Report, Conclusions and Recommendations, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Dublin,
California, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District, Defense Environmental
Restoration Program.
E-15
United States Army Public Health Command, 2010. Monitoring Well Decommissioning Report
No. 38-EH-0CGV-10, U.S Army Combat Support Training Center (USACSTC), Camp Parks,
Dublin, California, 26 October - 10 November 2009.
URS, 2007, Final Historical Records Review, United States Army Combat Support Training
Center & Camp Parks, Dublin, California, Military Munitions Response Program
Wolfe, BH, 2010, No Further Action, Building 791, Former Fuel Storage Area, US Army
Combat Support Training Center, Camp Parks, Dublin, Alameda County
Wood, WS, 2006, Memorandum for Record Subject: Closure of Hazardous Waste Sites at Camp
Parks, May 16, 2006
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1993a. 47-Acre Surplus Parcel Preliminary Assessment
Screening, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, December 1993.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1993b. 12-Acre Proposed California National Guard
Armory Site Limited Preliminary Assessment Screening, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area,
27 December 1993.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994a. Preliminary Assessment for Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area, Dublin, California, 27 May 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994b. Site Characterization Work Plan Building 109 UST,
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 8 July 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d. Remedial Investigation Services for Suspected Soil
Contamination and UST Sites, 28 September 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1994e. Tank 732-2: Subsurface Investigation at Building
732 - Final Report, Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, Contract DACA05-92-D0032, 20
October 1994.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1996b. Closure Report for Tanks at Bldgs 770, 1135, 1136,
and 1180, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, 18 January 1996.
Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, 1996c. Letter Report From: William Loskutoff, To: Ms Eva
Chu, Hazardous Materials Specialist, Alameda County Health Care Services Agency, Subject:
Underground Storage Tank Removal Report, Parks RFTA, POL Point - Building 888, 22
November 1996.
E-16
E-17
ENCLOSURE 3
TABLE 1- DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
E-18
TABLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Building Number and
Property Description
Parcel
Designation
Condition
Category
Remedial Actions
F101
Confinement Facility
None
1
None
F102
Administrative Bldg
None
1
None
F103
Administrative Bldg
None
1
None
F104
Administrative Bldg
None
1
None
F105
Police Station
None
1
None
F110
Administrative Blvd
None
1
None
F111
Clothing & Equipment
Repair Shop
None
1
None
F112
Flammable material storage
2(
3)
1
None
F115
Sewage pump house
Flammable material storage
3(
3)
1
None
140
Sentry Hut
None
1
None
141
Classrooms, Administrative
8(
3)
1
None
F152
Unknown
None
1
None
F161
Bakery
None
1
None
162
Warehouse
11(
3)
1
None
171
Warehouse
13(
3)
1
None
180
Administrative & signal
equipment ops
14(
3)
1
None
634
Fire Dept Storage
None
1
None
F635
10.0 Fire Dept Storage
15(
2)
1
None
F725
Warehouse
None
1
None
F726
Unknown
None
1
None
F727
Warehouse
None
1
None
E-19
Building Number and
Property Description
Parcel
Designation
Condition
Category
Remedial Actions
730A
Hazardous Waste Storage
None
1
None
730B
Hazardous Waste Storage
None
1
None
730C
Vehicle Washrack
18
(3)
1
None
731
Electronics repair,
Administrative
None
1
None
F732
Fuel Point
19(
2)
1
None
F735
Vehicle Storage
None
1
None
740
Sewer Screw
None
1
None
F770
Underground personnel
shelter
21(1)
1
None
F785
Latrine
None
1
None
790
Administrative
23(
3)
1
None
791
DPW maintenance & repair
shop
25(
3)
1
(Wolfe, 2010)
T793
DSRSD Field Opns Center
None
1
None
F793
Facilities Engineering
None
1
None
793
Hazardous Waste Storage
27(
3)
1
None
F794
Small parts storage
29(
3)
1
None
F795
Administrative
None
1
None
796
Training aids workshop,
shipping & receiving,
museum
30(
3)
1
None
F797
Unknown
None
1
None
F797
Flammable Materials
Storage
None
1
None
F798
Storage
None
1
None
F831
Unknown
None
1
None
F832
None
1
None
E-20
Building Number and
Property Description
Parcel
Designation
Condition
Category
Remedial Actions
Tool room, shop, bin
storage
F833
unknown
None
1
None
F850
Barn/small office area
None
1
None
F851
barracks
None
1
None
F852
Barracks
None
1
None
F853
Barracks
None
1
None
F854
Barracks
None
1
None
F855
Barracks
None
1
None
F856
Barracks
None
1
None
F857
Barracks
None
1
None
F860
Barracks
None
1
None
F861
Barracks
None
1
None
861
Warehouse
None
1
None
F862
Barracks
None
1
None
862
Vehicle Maintenance
None
1
None
F863
Barracks
None
1
None
F864
Barracks
None
1
None
F865
Unknown
None
1
None
F870
Personnel processing,
medical admin
33(1)
1
None
F871
Barracks
None
1
None
F872
Barracks
None
1
None
F873
Barracks
None
1
None
F874
Barracks
None
1
None
880
Classrooms, administrative
None
1
None
E-21
Building Number and
Property Description
Parcel
Designation
Condition
Category
Remedial Actions
F880
Gymnasium
None
1
None
881
Classrooms,
administrative
None
1
None
F891
Barracks
None
1
None
F892
Barracks
None
1
None
F893
Barracks
None
1
None
F894
Barracks
None
1
None
F895
Barracks
None
1
None
F896
Barracks
None
1
None
F897
Barracks
None
1
None
F902
Barracks
None
1
None
F903
Barracks
None
1
None
F904
Barracks
None
1
None
F905
Barracks
None
1
None
F910
Barracks
None
1
None
F911
Barracks
None
1
None
F920
Barracks
None
1
None
F921
Barracks
None
1
None
F922
Barracks
None
1
None
F923
Barracks
None
1
None
Potential Construction
Debris Dump Sites
36(1)
1
None
Former Lumber Yards
38(3)
1
None
Stockpiled Soils, East
Side of Fernandez Ave
39(
2)
1
None
730
Vehicle Maintenance
17(
4)
2
Diesel release to soil, remediation complete, site closed (Wood, 2006)
F132
Recycling Center
7(3)
3
Release of metals to soil. Risk assessment complete, no further action
required, closure granted (Sarmiento 2006)
F151
10(3)
3
Release of VOCs to soil. no further action required (Hart, 2012)
E-22
Building Number and
Property Description
Parcel
Designation
Condition
Category
Remedial Actions
Commissary
F781-F784
Self help complex
22(3)
3
Release of petroleum, VOCs and metals to soil. Risk assessment
complete, no further action required, closure granted (Wood, 2006)
F636
Fire Station
16(3)
3
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater below regulatory
limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site closed. (Hart , 2011)
Building 791-792 Fuel
Storage Area
24(3)
3
Release of diesel and metals to groundwater below regulatory limits,
monitoring wells destroyed, site closed (Hart, 2012)
319th Sig Battalion Yard
Area
28(3)
3
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater below regulatory
limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)
SEQA
40(3)
3
Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory limits, monitoring
wells destroyed, site closed (D’Onofrio, 2009)
Former Hazardous Waste
Accumulation Site
41(3)
3
Release of pesticides to soil. Risk-based closure. Site closed.
(Sarmiento, 2006)
F888
Gasoline Station
34(3)
3
Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory limits, no
remediation required. Monitoring wells destroyed. Site closed.
(D’Onofrio 2009)
Railroad spurs
37(3)
3
Herbicides, PCBs, SVOCs. Site closed (Escarda, 2013)
130
Warehouse
5(4)
4
Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
131
Warehouse
6(4)
4
Release of lead and radionuclides to soil. Remedy complete, site closed
(Hart, 2012)
150
Warehouse
9(4)
4
Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
170
Meat packing plant,
warehouse
12(4)
4
Lead in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
792
Warehouse, vehicle
maintenance
26(4)
4
Lead in soil, cleanup complete. Cleaned to unrestricted use/unlimited
exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
860
RTS
-MED Center
31(4)
4
Approximately 2 gallons of diesel fuel was reported to have spilled onto
the soil near the
north gate of this facility in February 1994 (Woodward-
Clyde Federal Services, 1994a). The contaminated soil was excavated
and disposed in May 1994 (Woodward
-Clyde Federal Services, 1994d).
(Hart, 2012)
Former RTS Med Motor
Pool
32(4)
4
Sampled as part of Southeast Qu
adrant Area
926
PG&E Substation
35(4)
4
Soil removal for minor PCB release, no further action(Hart, 2012)
Category 1: Areas where no release or disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum products
has occurred. (Including no migration of these substances from adjacent areas)
Category 2: Areas where only release or disposal of petroleum products has occurred
Category 3: Areas where release, disposal, and/or migration of hazardous substances has
occurred, but at concentrations that do not require a removal or remedial response.
Category 4: Areas where release, disposal, and/or migration of hazardous substances has
occurred, and all removal or remedial actions to protect human health and the environment have
been taken.
E-23
ENCLOSURE 4
TABLE 2. NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE, RELEASE, OR
DISPOSAL
E-24
Table 2. NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE, RELEASE OR
DISPOSAL
Building
Number
Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
130
Warehouse
Lead-based
paint (LBP)
1944-present
LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
131
Warehouse
LBP
1952-present
Release of LBP and radionuclides to soil. Remedy
complete, site closed (Hart, 2012)
F132
Recycling
Center
Metals
1944-1993
Chromium was released to soil adjacent to Former
Building 132, (USACHPPM, 2004; 2005; 2008a).
Although chromium was detected in soil at
concentrations greater than the environmental screening
level (ESL) applicable at the time of sampling, a human
health risk assessment concluded there was no risk to
human health (USACHPPM, 2006b). The California
Department of Toxic Substances Control (CDTSC)
concurred with this finding in a letter dated 16 August
2006 (Enclosure 4).
150
Warehouse
LBP
1944-present
LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
F151
Commissary
VOCs
1944-unknown
Release of VOCs to soil. no further action required
(Hart, 2012)
170
Meat packing
plant,
warehouse
LBP
1944-present
LBP in soil. Remediation complete. Cleaned to
unrestricted use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
F636
Fire Station
VOCs,
metals
1953-2005
Metals and petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in
soil and groundwater samples at Former Building 636
(USACHPPM, 2006c; 2007a; 2008b). USACHPPM
conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring at this site
from September 2006 to March 2008. Some petroleum
hydrocarbon concentrations exceeded the ESLs
applicable at the time of sampling; however, the
exceedences were only slightly greater than the ESLs
and the CDTSC and CRWQCB has determined no
further action is required. (DTSC, July 14 2011)
E-25
Building
Number
Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
730
Vehicle
Maintenance
VOCs,
SVOCs,
metals
1952-present
Building 730 is a vehicle repair facility that contains, or
formerly contained, three washracks, several oil/water
separators, two oil drainage pits, and five hydraulic lift
systems. The hydraulic lift systems are discussed
further in Section 4.4. Arsenic, petroleum hydrocarbons,
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were released
to soil in concentrations greater than the ESLs applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2002e; 2010).
Two of three washracks have been removed and the
third is currently in use. One oil drainage pit and
associated soil, concrete, and asphalt containing
petroleum hydrocarbons was removed and properly
disposed in May 2006 (Environmental Chemical
Corporation, 2006). The CDTSC issued a No Further
Action letter for the oil drainage pit removal on 22 May
2007 (Enclosure 4). The arsenic and VOC release
occurred in a drainage ditch adjacent the northern site
boundary. USACHPPM collected confirmatory samples
from this ditch in 2004. Arsenic and VOCs were not
detected at concentrations greater than ESLs applicable
at the time of sampling (USACHPPM, 2004; 2005). The
sampling was conducted with that for Former Buildings
781-784 (see below, this section; same drainage ditch).
The CRWQCB issued a No Further Action letter for the
drainage ditch on 4 May 2006 (Enclosure 4).
F781-F784
Self help
complex
VOCs,
metals
1959-unknown
Chromium, lead, and petroleum hydrocarbons were
detected in soil samples from a drainage ditch adjacent
to these former buildings in 2003 and 2004
(USACHPPM, 2004; 2005). Some concentrations
exceeded the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling;
however, the exceedences were only slightly greater
than the ESLs and the CRWQCB issued a No Further
Action letter on 4 May 2006 (Enclosure 4).
Building 791-
792 Fuel
Storage Area
metals
1952-unknown
Metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, and semivolatile
organic compounds (SVOCs) were detected in soil and
groundwater samples from a former fuel dispensing area
located between Buildings 791 and 792 (USACHPPM,
2004; 2005; 2006e; 2007b; 2008c). USACHPPM
conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring at this site
from September 2006 to March 2008. Some petroleum
hydrocarbon, SVOCs, and metals concentrations
exceeded the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling;
however, the exceedences were only slightly greater
than the ESLs and the CRWQCB issued a No Further
Action letter in January 2010 (Enclosure 4).
E-26
Building
Number
Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
792
Warehouse,
vehicle
maintenance
LBP
1953-present
LBP in soil, cleanup complete. Cleaned to unrestricted
use/unlimited exposure (D’Onofrio, 2008)
860
RTS-MED
Center
TPH-d
1993-present
Approximately 2 gallons of diesel fuel was reported to
have spilled onto the soil near the north gate of this
facility in February 1994 (Woodward-Clyde Federal
Services, 1994a). The contaminated soil was excavated
and disposed in May 1994 (Woodward-Clyde Federal
Services, 1994d).
F888
Gasoline
Station
VOCs,
metals
1952-1998
Release of metals to groundwater below regulatory
limits, no remediation required. Monitoring wells
destroyed. Site closed. (D’Onofrio 2009)
926
PG&E
Substation
PCBs
Unknown
Soil removal for minor PCB release, no further
action(Hart, 2012)
319th Sig
Battalion
Yard
Area
Metals
Unknown
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)
SEQA
VOCs,
metals
1942, 1952
Metals and petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in
groundwater at this site in 2003 at concentrations
exceeding the ESLs applicable at the time of sampling.
USACHPPM conducted quarterly groundwater sampling
at the site from November 2004 to August 2007. All
exceedences were within the same order of magnitude
as the ESLs and the CDTSC issued a No Further Action
letter for the SEQA on 28 May 2009 (Enclosure 4).
Former
Hazardous
Waste
Accumulation
Site
Pesticides,
herbicides,
metals
unknown
Barium, zinc, and pesticides were detected in soils at
this site and in an adjacent drainage ditch in 2004.
Subsequent sampling did not confirm the presence of
barium and zinc, but did confirm the presence of
pesticides at concentrations greater than the ESLs
applicable at the time of sampling (USACHPPM 2004;
2005). USACHPPM conducted a Risk Assessment for
the site in 2006 and concluded the site did not pose a
risk to potential residents, construction workers, or
wildlife receptors (USACHPPM, 2006f). The CDTSC
issued a letter concurring with USACHPPM findings on
16 August 2006 (Enclosure 4).
Site 37
Railroad spurs
Herbicides,
PBCs,
SVOCs
unknown
Site closed (Escarda, 2013)
The information contained in this notice is required under the authority of regulations promulgated under
section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Liability, and Compensation Act (CERCLA or
E-27
Building
Number
Name of
Hazardous
Substance(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
‘Superfund”) 42 U.S.C. 9620(h). This table provides information on the storage of hazardous substances for
one year or more in quantities greater than or equal to 1,000 kilograms or the hazardous substance’s CERLCA
reportable quantity (whichever is greater). In addition, it provides information on the known release of
hazardous substances in quantities greater than or equal to the substances CERCLA reportable quantify. See
40 CFR Part 373
E-28
ENCLOSURE 5
NOTIFICATION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT STORAGE, RELEASE, OR DISPOSAL
E-29
Table 3. Notification of Petroleum Product Storage, Release, or Disposal.
Building
Number
Name of
Petroleum
Product(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
F112
Flammable
Materials
Storage
Unknown - 1993
No release
F115
Flammable
Materials
Storage
1942-1994
No release
180
Administrative
& supply
1952-present
500 gallon AST. No release
F635
Fire Dept
Storage
1953-2005
No release
F636
Fire Station
Diesel
1953-2005
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site
closed. (Hart , 2011)
730
Vehicle
maintenance
Diesel
1952-present
Release of diesel to soil, remedy complete, site
closed. (Wood, 2006)
F732
Fuel point
Diesel
1952-1993
No release
F770
Underground
personnel
shelter
Diesel
1959-1994
700 gallon diesel UST. No release
F781-784
Self help
complex
1959-unknown
Release of petroleum, VOCs and metals to soil. Risk
assessment complete, no further action required, closure
granted (Wood, 2006)
791/792
Fuel Storage
Area
Diesel
1952-unknown
1,000 gallon AST. Release of diesel and metals to
groundwater below regulatory limits, monitoring wells
destroyed, site closed (Hart, 2012)
793
Hazardous
Waste Storage
1998-present
No release
319th Sig Bn
Yard Area
Diesel
Unknown
Release of diesel and metals to soil and groundwater
below regulatory limits, site closed (Hart, 2012)
Former RTS
Med Motor
Pool
Diesel
1993-unknown
< 5 gallons diesel
F888
Gasoline
Station
Gasoline
Diesel
Waste Oil
1952-1998
10,000 gallon gasoline UST, 10,000 gallon diesel UST,
500 gallon waste oil UST. Release of metals to
groundwater below regulatory limits, no remediation
required. Monitoring wells destroyed. Site closed.
(D’Onofrio 2009)
E-30
Building
Number
Name of
Petroleum
Product(s)
Date of Storage, Release, or
Disposal
Remedial Actions
Site 40 / SEQA
Maintenance
Shops
1942, 1952
No petroleum release, release of metals to groundwater
below regulatory limits, monitoring wells destroyed, site
closed (D’Onofrio, 2009)
Trench 3
Probably
mineral-oil
based
hydraulic
fluid
Unknown
Soil removal, composting/landfarming treatment, no
further action (Escarda, 2013)
Site 36
Diesel
Unknown
Soil removal, composting/landfarming treatment, no
further action (Escarda, 2013)
E-31
ENCLOSURE6
CERCLA NOTICE, COVENANT, AND ACCESS PROVISIONS AND OTHER DEED
PROVISIONS
E-32
ENCLOSURE 6
CERCLA NOTICE, COVENANT, AND ACCESS PROVISIONS AND OTHER DEED
PROVISIONS
I. Property Covered by Covenant and Access Rights Made Pursuant to Section
120(h)(4)(D) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (40 U.S.C. Section 9620(h)(4)(D)(i)):
For parcels in Phase 1A Planning Area 2C, Phase 1B Planning Area 4A, Phase 2 Planning Area
4A and Planning Area 8, Phase 3 Planning Area 5A and 5C and Phase 4 Planning Area 4B and 8
of the Property, the Grantor provides the following covenants and retains the following access
rights:
A. Covenant Pursuant to Section 120(h)(4)(D)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §
9620(h)(4)(D)(i)):
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(4)(D)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. § 9620(h)(4)(D)(i)), the United States
warrants that any response action or corrective action found to be necessary after the date of this
deed for contamination existing on the property prior to the date of this deed shall be conduced
by the United States.
B. Access Rights Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(iii) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C §9620(h)(3)(A)(iii):
The United States reserves a perpetual and assignable easement and right of access on, over,
and through the property, to enter upon the property in any case in which a remedial action or
corrective action is found to be necessary on the part of the United States, without regard to
whether such remedial action or corrective action is on the Property or on adjoining or nearby
lands. Such easement and right of access includes, without limitation, the right to perform any
environmental investigation, survey, monitoring, sampling, testing, drilling, boring, coring,
testpitting, installing monitoring or pumping wells or other treatment facilities, response action,
corrective action, or any other action necessary for the United States to meet its responsibilities
under applicable laws and as provided for in this instrument. Such easement and right of access
shall be binding on the Grantee and its successors and assigns and shall run with the land.
In exercising such easement and right of access, the United States shall provide the Grantee or
its successors or assigns, as the case may be, with reasonable notice of its intent to enter upon the
property and exercise its rights under this clause, which notice may be severely curtailed or even
eliminated in emergency situations. The United States shall use reasonable means to avoid and
to minimize interference with the Grantee’s and the Grantee’s successors’ and assigns’ quiet
enjoyment of the property. At the completion of work, the work site shall be reasonably
E-33
restored. Such easement and right of access includes the right to obtain and use utility services,
including water, gas, electricity, sewer, and communications services available on the property at
a reasonable charge to the United States. Excluding the reasonable charges for such utility
services, no fee, charge, or compensation will be due the Grantee, nor its successors and assigns,
for the exercise of the easement and right of access hereby retained by the United States.
In exercising such easement and right of access, neither the Grantee nor its successors and
assigns, as the case may be, shall have any claim at law or equity against the United States or any
officer or employee of the United States based on actions taken by the United States or its
officers, employees, agents, contractors of any tier, or servants pursuant to and in accordance
with this clause: Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be considered as a
waiver by the grantee and its successors, and assigns of any remedy available to them under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
II. Property Covered by Notice, Description, Access Rights, and Covenants Made
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (40 U.S.C. Section 9620(h)(3)(A)):
For parcels in Phase 1A Planning Areas 6B, 6D, 6E, Phase 1B Planning Areas 6A, 6C, Phase 2
Planning Areas 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 7D, 7E, Phase 3 Planning Areas 2A, 3C, 3E, 5B, 7A, 7B, 8,
Phase 4 Planning Areas 1B, 3D, 4B and 8 and for Phase 5 of the Property, the Grantor provides
the following notice, description, and covenants and retains the following access rights:
A. Notices Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C.
§9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II)):
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (II) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(I)
and (II)), available information regarding the type, quantity, and location of hazardous
substances and the time at which such substances were stored, released, or disposed of, as
defined in section 120(h), is provided in Exhibit 1, [Insert the deed exhibit number for FOST
Table 2 – Hazardous Substance Storage, Release and Disposal, which will be included in the
deed as an exhibit], attached hereto and made a part hereof.
B. Description of Remedial Action Taken, if Any, Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(III) of
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(III)):
Pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(III) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. §9620(h)(3)(A)(i)(III)), a description of the
remedial action taken, if any, on the property is provided in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
E-34
C. Covenant Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C
§9620(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B)):
Pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C §9620(h)(3)(A)(ii) and (B)), the United
States warrants that
(a) All remedial action necessary to protect human health and the environment with respect to
any hazardous substance identified pursuant to section 120(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 remaining
on the property has been taken before the date of this deed, and
(b) Any additional remedial action found to be necessary after the date of this deed shall be
conducted by the United States.
D. Access Rights Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3)(A)(iii) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C
§9620(h)(3)(A)(iii):
The United States reserves a perpetual and assignable easement and right of access on, over,
and through the property, to enter upon the property in any case in which a remedial action or
corrective action is found to be necessary on the part of the United States, without regard to
whether such remedial action or corrective action is on the Property or on adjoining or nearby
lands. Such easement and right of access includes, without limitation, the right to perform any
environmental investigation, survey, monitoring, sampling, testing, drilling, boring, coring,
testpitting, installing monitoring or pumping wells or other treatment facilities, response action,
corrective action, or any other action necessary for the United States to meet its responsibilities
under applicable laws and as provided for in this instrument. Such easement and right of access
shall be binding on the Grantee and its successors and assigns and shall run with the land.
In exercising such easement and right of access, the United States shall provide the Grantee or
its successors or assigns, as the case may be, with reasonable notice of its intent to enter upon the
property and exercise its rights under this clause, which notice may be severely curtailed or even
eliminated in emergency situations. The United States shall use reasonable means to avoid and
to minimize interference with the Grantee’s and the Grantee’s successors’ and assigns’ quiet
enjoyment of the property. At the completion of work, the work site shall be reasonably
restored. Such easement and right of access includes the right to obtain and use utility services,
including water, gas, electricity, sewer, and communications services available on the property at
a reasonable charge to the United States. Excluding the reasonable charges for such utility
E-35
services, no fee, charge, or compensation will be due the Grantee, nor its successors and assigns,
for the exercise of the easement and right of access hereby retained by the United States.
In exercising such easement and right of access, neither the Grantee nor its successors and
assigns, as the case may be, shall have any claim at law or equity against the United States or any
officer or employee of the United States based on actions taken by the United States or its
officers, employees, agents, contractors of any tier, or servants pursuant to and in accordance
with this clause: Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be considered as a
waiver by the grantee and its successors, and assigns of any remedy available to them under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
III. OTHER DEED PROVISIONS
A. "AS
IS"
a. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to
inspect
the
Property and accepts the condition and state of repair of the subject Property.
The
Grantee
understands and agrees that the Property and any part thereof is offered "AS
IS" without
any
representation, warranty, or guaranty by the Grantor as to quantity, quality,
title,
character, condition,
size, or kind, or that the same is in condition or fit to be used for
the purpose(s)
intended
by the Grantee, and no claim for allowance or deduction upon such
grounds will be
considered.
b. No warranties, either express or implied, are given with regard to the condition of
the
Property, including, without limitation, whether the Property does or does not contain
asbestos
or
lead-based paint. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own
judgment
in
assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including,
without
limitation,
any asbestos, lead-based paint, or other conditions on the Property. The
failure of the Grantee
to
inspect or to exercise due diligence to be fully informed as to the
condition of all or any portion
of
the Property offered, will not constitute grounds for any
claim or demand against the United
States.
C. Nothing in this "As Is" provision will be
construed
to modify or negate the
Grantor's
obligation
under the
CERCLA
Covenant or any other
statutory obligations.
B. HOLD
HARMLESS
a. To the extent
authorized
by law, the Grantee, its
successors
and assigns,
covenant and
agree to indemnify and hold harmless the
Grantor,
its
officers,
agents, and
employees
from (1)
any
and all claims,
damages, judgments,
losses, and costs,
including
fines and penalties, arising out
of
the
violation of the
NOTICES,
USE
RESTRICTIONS,
AND
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
in
this
Deed by the Grantee, its
successors
and assigns, and (2) any and all any and all claims,
damages,
E-36
and
judgments
arising out of, or in any manner
predicated
upon,
exposure
to
asbestos, lead-based
paint, or other condition on any portion of the Property after the date of
conveyance.
b. The Grantee, its
successors
and assigns,
covenant
and agree that the
Grantor
shall not
be
responsible
for any costs
associated
with
modification
or
termination
of the
NOTICES, USE
RESTRICTIONS,
AND
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
in this Deed, including
without limitation,
any costs associated with additional
investigation
or
remediation
of asbestos,
lead-based
paint,
or
other
condition
on any portion of the
Property.
c. Nothing in this Hold
Harmless provision
will be
construed
to modify or negate
the
Grantor's
obligation under the CERCLA
Covenant
or any other statutory
obligations.
C.
POST-TRANSFER
DISCOVERY OF
CONTAMINATION
a. If an actual or
threatened
release of a
hazardous substance
or petroleum
product is
discovered
on the Property after the date of
conveyance, Grantee,
its successors or
assigns,
shall
be
responsible
for such release or newly
discovered substance
unless Grantee is able to
demonstrate
that
such release or such newly
discovered substance
was due to
Grantor's activities,
use,
or
ownership
of the
Property. If the
Grantee, it
successors
or assigns believe the
discovered
hazardous substance
is due to
Grantor's activities,
use or
ownership
of the Property, Grantee will
immediately
secure the site and notify the Grantor of the
existence
of the
hazardous substances,
and
Grantee will
not further disturb such
hazardous substances
without the written
permission
of the
Grantor.
b. Grantee, its
successors
and assigns, as
consideration
for the
conveyance
of the
Property,
agree to release Grantor from any liability or
responsibility
for any claims arising solely out of
the
release of any
hazardous substance
or
petroleum
product on the Property
occurring
after the date
of
the delivery and
acceptance
of this Deed, where such
substance
or product was placed on
the
Property
by the Grantee, or its
successors,
assigns,
employees,
invitees, agents or
contractors, after
the
conveyance.
This
paragraph
shall not affect the
Grantor's responsibilities
to conduct
response
actions or
corrective
actions that are required by
applicable
laws, rules and
regulations.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
PROVISIONS
The Environmental Protection Provisions are at Exhibit 7, which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof. The Grantee shall neither transfer the property, lease the property, nor grant
any
interest, privilege, or license whatsoever in connection with the property without the
inclusion
of
the Environmental Protection Provisions contained herein, and shall require
the inclusion of
the
Environmental Protection Provisions in all further deeds, easements,
transfers, leases, or grant
of
any interest, privilege, or
license.
E-37
[Editorial note - The EPPs will be included as a deed exhibit in order to streamline the deed
language. It will not diminish the enforceability or legal significance of the EPPs.]
E-38
ENCLOSURE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS
E-39
ENCLOSURE 7
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS
1. NOTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS AND COVENANT
A. The Grantee is hereby informed and does acknowledge that non-friable asbestos or asbestos
containing material (ACM) have been found on the Property. The Property may contain
improvements, such as buildings, facilities, equipment, and pipelines, above and below the
ground, that contain non-friable asbestos or ACM. The Occupational Health and Safety
Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency have determined that such
unprotected or unregulated exposure to airborne asbestos fibers increases the risk of asbestos-
related diseases, including certain cancers that can result in disability or death.
B. The Grantee covenants and agrees that its use and occupancy of the Property will be in
compliance with all applicable laws relating to asbestos. The Grantee agrees to be responsible
for any remediation or abatement of asbestos found to be necessary on the Property to include
ACM in or on buried pipelines that may be required under applicable law or regulation.
C. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to inspect the
Property as to its asbestos and ACM condition and any related hazardous or environmental
conditions relating thereto. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own
judgment in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including,
without limitation, any asbestos or ACM hazards or concerns.
2. NOTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) AND COVENANT
AGAINST THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE
A. The Grantee is hereby informed and does acknowledge that all buildings on the
Property, which were constructed or rehabilitated prior to 1978, are presumed to contain .lead-
based paint. Lead from paint, paint chips, and dust can pose health hazards if not managed
properly. Every purchaser of any interest in Residential Real Property on which a residential
dwelling was built prior to 1978 is notified that there is a risk of exposure to lead from lead-
based paint that may place young children at risk of developing lead poisoning.
B. The Grantee covenants and agrees that it will not permit the occupancy or use of any
buildings or structures on the Property as Residential Real Property as defined under 24 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 35, without complying with this section and all applicable federal, state,
and local laws and regulations pertaining to lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.
Prior to habitation, the Grantee specifically agrees to perform, at its sole expense, the Army’s
E-40
abatement requirements under Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992
(Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992).
C. The Grantee acknowledges that it has inspected or has had the opportunity to inspect the
Property as to its lead-based paint content and condition and any hazardous or environmental
condition related thereto. The Grantee shall be deemed to have relied solely on its own judgment
in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the Property, including, without
limitation, any lead-based paint hazards or concerns.
3. PESTICIDE NOTICE AND COVENANT
The Grantee is hereby notified and acknowledges that registered pesticides have been applied
to the property conveyed herein and may continue to be present thereon. The Grantor and
Grantee know of no use of any registered pesticide in a manner (1) inconsistent with its labeling
or with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.)
and other applicable laws and regulations, or (2) not in accordance with its intended purpose.
The Grantee covenants and agrees that if the Grantee takes any action with regard to the
property, including demolition of structures or any disturbance or removal of soil that may
expose, or cause a release of , a threatened release of, or an exposure to, any such pesticide,
Grantee assumes all responsibility and liability therefor.
E-41
ENCLOSURE 8
REGULATORY AGENCY/PUBLIC COMMENTS
(Final Document Only)
E-42
E-43
ENCLOSURE 9
ARMY RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
(Final Document Only)
E-44
E-45
ENCLOSURE 10
EIS ROD ENCUMBRANCES
Record
Of
Decision
October 2009
8.0 MITIGATION AND MONITORING COMMITMENTS
The Army is committed to sustaining and preserving the environment at Camp Parks.
Appropriate mitigation and monitoring measures will be applied to mitigate the magnitude
of
project impacts. A Mitigation and Monitoring Plan will be adopted for mitigation measures. As
part
of
the decision to implement the Proposed Action as part
of
Real Property Master Planning
and Land Exchange at U.S. Army Garrison, Camp Parks, the Army and the exchange partner
will enact the following environmental mitigations presented in the tables below. These
mitigation measures, which were identified as proposed mitigation measures in Chapter 4
of
the
FE IS, will be implemented to reduce the severity and extent
of
potential impacts
of
this decision.
Some
of
these measures are covered by existing law or are already addressed
in
the mandates
of
existing documents such as the installation's Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan
and Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan; they are therefore not discretionary.
24
I
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
Army
Mitigation
and
Monitoring
Commitments
Air Construction- Construction Army contractors involved with construction on Camp
Air
Topography,
Geology,
Mineralogy and
Paleontology
Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils
Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils
related diesel Parks would develop and implement a Construction
emissions Emission Mitigation Plan (CEMP) that would include a
Diesel Particulate Matter Plan (DPM) that may include
the use
of
low-sulfur fuels, idling diesel equipment
away from residential areas, trip minimization, and
tuning equipment to minimize emissions. Measures to
minimize particulate matter may include use
of
water
or dust palliative, wind fences, and low truck speeds.
Operation- Site-specific
related ROG, Planning/
PM10, and air Operations
toxics
emissions
Structures for Site-Specific
human Planning/
occupancy Construction
near
an
active
fault
Construction- All Phases
site erosion/
storm water
pollution
Urban storm
water pollution
Spills
of
chemicals and
fuels
Construction
sites that
disturb greater
than one acre
I
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Encourage the use
of
alternate modes such as
bicycling and walking by providing facilities (e.g.
bicycle lockers or racks) and connectivity
of
bike/pedestrian paths, acquisition and use
of
zero-
emissions vehicles for on-base travel, and use
landscaping to reduce heat-island effect.
Conduct geotechnical investigation to determine
if
active fault trace crosses proposed building site.
Facilities should
be
designed to reduce risk
of
earthquake ground failure and prevent buildings from
collapsing.
Buildings should be situated at least
50
feet from
active fault traces (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zone Act 1973).
Follow appropriate regulations for control
of
storm
water and proper use, storage, and disposal
of
chemicals and fuels.
Obtain NPDES General Construction Permit for storm
water discharges from San Francisco Bay Regional
VIJater
Quality Control Board (SFRWQ(;B)prior to
initiating construction activities. File notice
of
intent to
discharge storm water with SFRWQCB and develop
construction SWPPP that outlines the erosion and
sediment control BMPs to ensure that storm water
runoff from the site does not impair local water bodies.
Each site-specific SWPPP should consider on-post
and off-post drainage and water flow surrounding its
area
of
purview. BMPs should
be
properly installed
and maintained to reduce
or
eliminate impacts to
surface water. Hydromodification Management (HM)
Standard such that stormwater discharges from
25
Record
Of
Decision
Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils
Hydrology,
Groundwater
and Soils
Hydrology
Wetlands
Urban storm
water pollution
Potential
urban/
industrial
impacts to
surface water
Potential
flooding
Construction
within or
adjacent to
jurisdictional
wetlands
including
freshwater
marsh, vernal
pools, and
forest
vegetation
communities
Operation
and
Maintenance
Operation
and
Maintenance
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
October 2009
applicable new development and redevelopment
projects at Camp Parks and Dublin Crossing shall be
designed to incorporate appropriate measures to
not
cause an increase
in
the erosion potential
of
the
receiving creek over the pre-project (existing)
condition.
Reduce
or
eliminate pollution by using post-
construction, public education and public involvement
storm water BMPs.
Post-construction BMPs include use
of
vegetated
filter strips along edges
of
parking areas to filter
storm water or wet ponds to collect and treat
storm water through settling and algal uptake.
Public education BMPs include providing
handouts, posters,
or
presentations to community
groups on common practices (fertilizing a lawn;
disposing
of
used oil; properly storing chemicals
and paints; and cleaning up pet waste) can
improve the storm water runoff and help clean
local water bodies.
Public involvement BMPs include stenciling storm
drains, cleaning up streams, and maintaining
wetlands.
Implement good housekeeping BMPs and a
chemical/fuel spill prevention plan with use, storage,
and disposal guidelines.
Avoid construction
in
the 1 00-year floodplain
of
the
Chabot Canal whenever possible.
Provide adequate storm water drainage for the new
development.
Avoid wetland disturbance and resulting need for
compensatory mitigation whenever possible by
relocating
or
reconfiguring proposed facilities.
If
avoidance
could
norbeachieved,
the
folloWing
measures could apply after consultation with the
USACE prior to disturbance activities
in
jurisdictional
wetlands (Booz Allen 2004) to determine specific
mitigation measures and requirements:
26
Minimize unavoidable impacts by making the area
of
impact as small as possible and mitigating
impact intensity.
Mitigation measures could include, but would not
be limited
to,
access limitations, use
of
buffer
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
R~source
Area
·~pactt
~'
P,rojeet
~
fJii~igilti~f)
a~d
Monitol'ing'Comrnitmellt'
~
,
<'
..
Situatioo
Phase
~~
,,
~
~,~,,>,,~,:,~~:
~~~
~,~
~~
,,
,,,,,,,~~,>~~
,,,,'>
~,,~:
'~
zones, formal SWPPP protocols, implementation
of
BMPs, and wetland enhancement.
When wetlands could not be fully avoided and
mitigation was insufficient, compensation would be
used to restore
or
create wetlands in other locations.
Mitigation would be carried out before
or
in
conjunction with activities that adversely affect these
sensitive habitats.
Wetlands Construction Operation Camp Parks currently has a policy that designates
adjacent to wetlands as "no digging,"
or
"limited access" for
jurisdictional military training activities. This policy is documented
wetlands
in
the Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan
including (INRMP; USAGE 2003) and stated during training
freshwater briefings. These policies would remain
in
effect under
marsh, vernal all alternatives.
pools, and
forest
vegetation
communities
Wetlands Construction All Phases Establish buffer zones around adjacent wetlands,
adjacent to drainages and riparian forest within which no activity
jurisdictional would be allowed. The buffer zones would be
of
wetlands sufficient width to:
including
freshwater Prevent incursion into protected area by
marsh, vernal equipment and workers
pools, and Avoid construction runoff into the protected area
forest Prevent degradation
of
the wetland by providing
vegetation long-term protection of the watershed in its
communities immediate vicinity.
Use temporary fencing or other materials during
construction to divert surface water flow and silt from
drainages and associated vegetation. Buffer zones
width around individual wetlands would be established
on a case-by-case basis after consideration
of
terrain
and drainage patterns, type
of
disturbance, season
and anticipated length
of
disturbance, resources that
I would be affected, and the likelihood that a Federally
listed
speciesmi~ght~be
found
~in~theweUand.
Wetlands Surface water Site-Specific Appropriately convey, capture, and treat stormwater
runoff Planning/ runoff.
Construction
In
keeping with the principles
of
pollution prevention in
the installation's SWPPP (CSS 2003), develop and
I implement construction site-specific SWPPPs
1 specifically focused on redevelopment. These
SWPPPs would prescribe BMPs and compliance
monitoring to control erosion and contaminated runoff
from construction sites, and supplement BMPs
I defined for specific industrial activities in the current
1 Camp Parks SWPPP.
27
Record
Of
Decision
Resource
Area
I
..
Wetlands
lmp"ctl
Situation.
Surface water
runoff Operation
and
Maintenance
October
2009
BMPs could include use
of
sediment trapping and
filtering systems, bioswales, storm drain inlet
protection, natural depressions, stormwater detention
or
retention ponds, and sediment basins,
in
addition to
access restrictions and buffers. The following goals
would be part
of
the construction site specific
SWPPPs to control stormwater runoff during
construction at Camp Parks:
On site capture and treatment
of
1 00 percent
of
construction period runoff to prevent stormwater
pollution during this period.
Develop specific long-term stormwater control
measures such as vegetated swales and storm
drain inlet filters to capture and treat 80 to 90
percent
of
the site's runoff.
Develop setbacks from drainages and vegetate areas
to control stormwater.
Vehicles and equipment are to use existing roads and
routes
of
travel to the greatest extent practicable.
Vehicles traveling off road at night within 100 feet
of
a
water body within the designated HMUs and
Tassajara Creek are to maintain a speed
of
10 miles
per hour
or
less.
Continue Integrated Training Area Management
programs such as Land Rehabilitation and
Maintenance, which repair damaged areas and
minimize potential future damage.
In
addition, known
breeding ponds are marked as "no-go" areas using
Siebert stakes.
Current SWPPP would need to be modified to
address ongoing operations housed
in
new facilities
specifically designed for them and incorporating
containment mechanisms. Many sites specifically
addressed
in
the current SWPPP would change under
Master Plan implementation. Each activity would be
reviewed.astoits
nature~
its.mat~rials
and processes,
1
and
its potential for storm
water
contamination before
a comprehensive list
of
BMPs was tailored to
individual building complexes. The BMPs would
include measures such as:
28
Good housekeeping
Preventive maintenance
of
oil-water separators
Minimize outdoor storage
of
materials
Use
of
dry sweep and drip pans
Use
of
pavement, small berms, or secondary
containment structures where needed.
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
..
.
~e$ouree
Area
l~pactt·
Pr9jeet : ·
........
:•
: .
/.
..
:•·
..
. . .: . .
X
I Sltllatibn Phase···
••••••••
.
..
Mitigation
~t:td
Monitoring C()mmitment
:
..
·.: .
::
..
::::•:
·.
.:.
•··.
.:
One difference between the current and proposed
situation under the Master Plan may be the installation
of
more landscaped areas than currently exist.
Maintenance
of
such areas would employ the
following prescriptions within the SWPPP:
Avoid discharge
of
water used to irrigate
ornamental plants into nearby drainages because
this water likely contains chloramine (a residual
disinfectant) that could negatively impact aquatic
life
Control runoff from areas that are landscaped
and fertilized.
Fish and Construction Site-Specific
In
the Training Area, continue existing buffer areas
Wildlife adjacent to Planning/ around wetlands and riparian areas. Wherever
ponds, wet Construction possible, ponds, wet meadows, riparian areas, and
meadows, grassland vernal pools at Camp Parks would be
riparian areas, avoided
or
protected as discussed above under
and grassland wetlands.
vernal pools The following types
of
mitigation would be applied as
needed to avoid, minimize,
or
compensate for the
impacts discussed above:
Buffer zones around aquatic or other sensitive
habitats
Preconstruction surveys to locate currently active
breeding sites for important vertebrate species so
they can be avoided
Implementation
of
construction BMPs
Creation/restoration/enhancement
of
wetlands
Fish and Redevelopme Site-Specific To minimize the potential for redevelopment actions to
Wildlife nt construction Planning/ increase erosion and sedimentation and disturb
activity Construction sensitive wildlife species, BMPs would be
implemented such as:
Revision
of
the SWPPP prior to ground breaking;
implementation
of
erosion control measures.
RE;Iocation
of
ourrowingovyl§ .
Control
of
domestic pets to avoid wildlife mortality
and harassment.
Reclamation and revegetation
of
habitat.
Ongoing wildlife surveys to keep the database on
Camp Parks wildlife populations and use areas
current.
Regular monitoring to identify/repair damaged or
eroded areas.
Revegetation methods using appropriate native
plants.
Prior to construction,
an
on-site construction
29
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
Reso1.1tce
.Area
. Impact/
Prqject
;
..
I . . .
·.
..
.
..
. . . . .
····
.
Situation
Phase·
.
1\i!itig~ti~n
·.
aod.
Nl~nitoring·
Commitn1ept.
personnel briefing on environmentally sensitive
habitats and species and specific conservation
measures developed for each.
Containment and frequent disposal
of
garbage so
as not to attract wildlife.
Presence
of
biologist on installation during
construction activities.
Designate specific sites for vehicle parking,
storage
of
construction supplies, etc.
in
previously
disturbed locations that would minimize potential
effects to federally listed species.
Control dust, erosion, and sedimentation through
use
of
Best Available Control Technology (BACT),
for example, use
of
silt/wind fences, use
of
water
or
chemical stabilizers for dust control, covering
of
haul vehicles, and minimizing time graded areas
are exposed.
,.
Implement BMPs such as a 20-mph vehicle speed
limit within the project area, covering or providing
escape ramps for trenches greater than two feet
deep, checking pipes
or
culverts that have a
diameter over four inches before moving them,
placing food-related trash
in
closed containers.
Rapidly rehabilitate disturbed areas to minimize
erosion and downstream flow
of
sediment.
Use well-maintained vehicles and defined
refueling and maintenance locations to minimize
uncontained petroleum leaks.
Minimize and define work area boundaries for
each construction site.
Conduct pre-construction briefings for
construction crews to review BMPs being
implemented during construction.
Vehicles and equipment are to use existing roads
and routes
of
travel to the greatest extent
practicable.
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by
surface water runoff, measures would be
implemented to appropriately convey, capture,
and treat stormwater runoff.
Existing BMPs defined for specific industrial
activities·inthecurrentCampParksSWPPP
would also be implemented (CSS 2003).
Establish, mark, and protect buffer areas around
wetlands adjacent to development areas.
!
Fish
and
Encountering Operations If a special status species were encountered during
Wildlife special status operations, activities
in
the area would cease and the
species Camp Parks Environmental Office would be notified to
determine
if
any action needs to be taken. The Army
, will notify USFWS within 24-hours
of
finding
an
injured
I ! or dead listed species, or any unanticipated damage
r I to lrsted species habrtat associated with project
30
Record
Of
Decision
Fish and
Wildlife
Fish and
·Wildlife
Fish and
Wildlife
f;mpactl
Sitqation
</··
Raptor Nests
Raptor Nests
Western
Burrowing Owl
All Phases
All Phases
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
31
October 2009
activities. Camp Parks would also submit any survey
results to the CNDDB and include them
in
the
installation's
annuaiiNRMP
update.
Whenever possible, impacts to larger trees that occur
in
the Training Area riparian habitats
or
in
the
Cantonment Area would be avoided.
Prior to construction
or
intensive training activity, a
biologist would conduct site-specific surveys for active
raptor nests
in
the area during the appropriate nesting
period for these raptors (typically March through
August). Surveys would be conducted for each
specific activity or annually across the post so that
potentially disturbing activities would be avoided
or
minimized within 1/8 mile
of
active nests between
February 1 and August
15.
If
a previously active nest
is not occupied by May 15, the buffer may be
suspended for that breeding year.
The mitigation goal for the burrowing owl is to
compensate for the anticipated impact by replacing
or
providing substitute resources
or
environments
elsewhere on Camp Parks according to
recommended guidelines published
in
the California
Department
of
Fish and Game Staff Report
on
Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 1995). Before
initiating ground-disturbing activities
in
grassland
habitats, preconstruction surveys for burrowing owls
would be conducted by a qualified biologist within 150
meters (approx.
500ft.)
of
construction areas.
Surveys would be conducted no more than 90 days
before ground disturbance.
If
burrowing owls were
found, the burrow site would be avoided,
if
possible,
and given at least a 50 meter ( approx. 160 ft.) buffer.
If
the burrow cannot be avoided, the biologist would
determine whether eggs
or
young were present
in
the
nest.
If
eggs
or
young were present, no disturbance
would occur within 50 meters
of
the nest site until the
young had fledged.
If
no young were present
or
if
young had fledged, burrowing owls would be
passively relocated to other nearby areas
of
suitable
habitat on Camp Parks.
Owls would be excluded from burrows
in
the
immediate impact zone and within a 50 meter buffer
zone by installing one-way doors
in
burrow entrances.
One-way doors (e.g. modified dryer vents) should be
left
in
place 48 hours to ensure owls have left the
burrow before excavation. Two artificial burrows would
be provided for each burrow
in
the project area that
will be rendered biologically unsuitable.
The project area would be monitored daily for one
week to confirm owl use
of
burrows before excavating
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
frnpactl
c I Project<
···
•.
/
/\
··.
•·····
·•.·.
•·•·.·
>
..
··•·.
··
•··.·
·
·.
·.
·.
··
Rt:t~our¢~Area
Situation
.......
Pha$~
.•.
···•·••·
.
NJiti~at!9n~ndftll."nitoril'lg·commitrn~nt
>
burrows
in
the immediate impact zones.
Fish and San Joaquin Site-Specific Conduct surveys, establish exclusion zones, and
Wildlife Kit Fox Planning/ conduct monitoring consistent with the USFWS
Construction "Standardized Recommendations for Protection
of
the
San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to
or
During Ground
Disturbance," dated June 1999. Negative survey
results would be reported as part
of
Camp Parks'
INRMP annual update.
If
kit foxes were observed
during surveys, then Camp Parks would contact
USFWS to coordinate construction activities,
in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act.
Fish and California Red Site-Specific Conduct pre-activity surveys
of
wetland habitat within
Wildlife Legged Frog Planning/ 200-feet
of
the construction site in accordance with
Construction the field survey methodology outlined
in
the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Revised Guidance on Site
Assessments
and
Field Surveys for California Red-
legged Frogs, August 2005 (USFWS 1997). Surveys
would typically consist
of
four night and two day
surveys.
If
California red-legged frogs are observed
within the project area and have the potential to be
harmed, they would be relocated from the site to an
area within one
of
the installation's HMUs.
If
they are
known
or
suspected to occur near a construction
or
demolition site, silt fences
or
another similar barrier
around any adjacent wetlands that are within 200 feet
of
construction would be installed to separate them
from the site and monitoring would occur as needed
for these species during construction. The barrier
would be inspected for integrity on a weekly basis
during construction and repaired as needed.
Conduct pre-activity surveys consisting
of
two nights
Fish and California Site-Specific
of
burrow inspections within five days prior to the
Wildlife Tiger Planning/ initiation
of
construction
or
ground disturbance
Salamander Construction activities.
If
California tiger salamanders are observed
within the project area, they would be relocated from
the site to a burrow near a known
or
potential
breeding pond.
If
they are known
or
suspected to
occur near a construction
or
demolition site, silt fences
or another similar barrier would be installed around
any adjacent wetlands that are within 200 feet
of
I construction to separate
them
from
the
site
and
monitoring would occur as needed for these species
during construction. The barrier would be inspected
for integrity on a weekly basis during construction and
repaired as needed."
Cultural National All Phases To minimize the potential for adverse effects, the
Register
of
Camp Parks entrance sign would be treated and
Historic managed
in
a manner that prevents the deterioration
Places
or
destruction
of
the character
of
the sign. The sign
I (NRHP) should be regularly protected and maintained as
Eligible Sites needed by methods identified and outlined
in
the
32
Record
Of
Decision
Cultural
Cultural
Cultural
Land Use
Land use
1 Transportation
I and Access
October 2009
(Camp Parks ICRMP.
entrance sign)
Eligible
Historic
Archeological
Sites
Potential
Buried
Cultural
Resources
or
Human
Remains
Potential
Buried
Cultural
Resources or
Human
Remains
Considerable
change
in
land
ownership
uses
in
the
southern
Cantonment
Area
Land use
conflicts
identified
in
tbe Training
Area (e.g.,
level
of
activity
and use
of
artillery,
helicopters,
and demolition
in
areas
adjacent to
residences)
Operations
and
Maintenance
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
All Phases
Traffic 1 Site-Specific
improvements I Planning/
Methods would
be
developed to avoid or reduce
effects
on
the NRHP eligible historic period site
located
in
the Training Area. These methods (e.g.,
avoidance markers if appropriate, occasional
monitoring if intense training activity is planned near
the site, and coordinating with the DPT) would be
implemented to protect the sites from training-related
damage.
If
previously undetected cultural resources or human
remains were unearthed during construction
excavations, the application
of
standard practices
in
accordance with the Integrated Cultural Resources
Management Plan (ICRMP; Parsons 2001) would
mitigate potential adverse impacts. If buried cultural
resources, such as chipped
or
ground stone, historic
debris, building foundations,
or
human bone, are
inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing
activities, work would stop
in
that area and within 100
feet
of
the find. The Camp Parks Environmental
Office would be notified immediately and would guide
compliance with the ICRMP.
Camp Parks will implement monitoring during grading,
excavation, and disturbance activities as outlined
in
the Section 1 06 coordination letter and concurred with
by the SHPO
on
1 June 2006.
The proposed Dublin Crossing is compatible with the
City
of
Dublin's guiding policy for the Eastern
Extended Planning Area. However, the type and
intensity
of
land uses proposed
in
Dublin Crossing are
not consistent with the City
of
Dublin's current
designation
of
public and semi-public and would
require an amendment to its General Plan.
The potential for land use conflicts with neighboring
areas would continue to persist; however, mitigation
measures employed by the surrounding development
wovld.minimi:ze.the intensity
of
these conflicts.
Mitigation already proposed
in
existing EIRs would
minimize these land use conflicts.
1 Development of Dublin Crossing by private
1 developers could result
in
direct and indirect traffic
33
Record
Of
Decision
Noise
Visual and
Aesthetic
Resources
lmp•:etl
$ttt~CJ~~qn
needed to
mitigate
decreased
LOS at
several major
intersections
in
the local
transportation
network from
the proposed
Dublin
Crossing
development
Potential
complaints
about future
noise
Removal
of
features
important to
community's
visual
character
(e.g., mature
trees,
landscaping,
or
historic
structures;
Disruption
of
locally or
regionally
significant
views
or
views
from a
community
setting;
Placement
of
providing
Proje:et
Ptlase
Construction
Operations
and
Maintenance
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
October 2009
,
,,
' ,
",
,,
,
t.n•tgat{On
'lridM9nttorlrigCom~itment,
,,,,•,
: , , , , ,
,,
",
,,
, ", ' '
impacts. Capacity improvements that may be required
in
the future include: Dougherty Road/Central Parkway,
Arnold Road/Central Parkway, Dublin Boulevard/Iron
Horse, Hopyard Road/1-580 Eastbound off-ramp,
Westbound Hacienda Crossing at Hacienda Drive,
Dougherty Road/Amador Valley, Arnold Road/Dublin
Boulevard, and Hacienda Drive/1-580 Eastbound off-
ramp.
Capacity improvements at Dublin
Boulevard/Dougherty Road are also recommended,
and signal operation mitigations should be considered
in
the approaches to Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive
and Dougherty Road/Central Parkway intersections.
In
addition to the intersection improvements, there is
the potential that street segment improvements may
also be necessary. This could include widening
Dougherty Road from four lanes to six lanes between
Houston Place and Amador Valley Boulevard, the
extension
of
Scarlett Drive from Houston Place to
Dublin Boulevard, and widening
of
Arnold Road from
two lanes to four lanes between Dublin Boulevard and
Central Parkway. Traffic impacts would be caused
primarily by redevelopment and mitigations for these
impacts would not be funded by the Army.
Camp Parks would continue to implement a program
of
outreach to communities surrounding Camp Parks
to explain the types
of
military activities that generate
the noises and help alleviate their sense
of
annoyance.
Mitigation measures could include, but are not limited
to, avoidance, screening, habitat restoration or
creation, view-compatible facility color schemes and
design, suitable landscaping, and implementation
of
BMPs that could further protect quality visual and
aesthetic resources.
Be consistent with the visual character
of
the
established Camp Parks design theme (Nakata 2002)
in
facility design and construction.
In
Dublin Crossing, (i) Adhere to the City
of
Dublin
Development Elevation Cap at an elevation
of
770
feet; and (ii) Develop property
in
a manner consistent
with other applicable Plan and policies.
34
Record
Of
Decision
Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances
Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances
Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances
Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances
Health/Safety
and Hazardous
Substances
undesirable
views
or
not
conforming to
city zoning
ordinances.
Demolition
of
buildings
Demolition
and
construction
Residual
hazardous
constituent
concentrations
in
soil
All demolition,
construction,
and
landscaping
Traffic impacts
or
potential
hazardous
substance
releases or
exposure
incidents
I
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
Site-Specific
Planning/
Construction
October 2009
Demolition
of
buildings that may contain asbestos
containing material
or
lead-based paint must be
in
compliance with DoD policies, and state and Federal
regulations for prevention
of
air releases and worker
exposure, accurate characterization, and appropriate
disposal
of
debris and other wastes. Asbestos and
LBP abatement contractors must be authorized to
perform work
in
the State
of
California.
Workers operating demolition
or
earthmoving
equipment, installing foundations or pipelines,
or
performing other tasks that may involve excavation of,
or
contact with, potentially contaminated soil, buried
fuel tanks, septic tanks, abandoned sewer
or
fuel
lines,
or
demolition debris must be trained
in
hazardous substance site operations and supervised
as required by 29 CFR 1910.120. These workers
must also be provided adequate personal protective
equipment and repeatedly be informed of the known
and potential hazards during daily safety meetings.
Before redevelopment contracts are finalized,
standards for allowable residual hazardous
constituent concentrations
in
soil at each location
must be established and the requirements to verify
compliance set and documented
in
consultation with
state and local officials. The Housing and
Recreational Land Use Categories should have the
most restrictive limits.
Strict dust control should be explicitly required for all
demolition, construction, and landscaping contracts,
especially where elevated arsenic and chromium are
found
in
the natural soil. In addition to wetting
of
dirt
roads and excavated soils, methods to minimize dust
from demolition
of
buildings and foundations, removal
of
asphalt and concrete, and grading and landscaping
should be evaluated
in
consultation with local and
state·officia.rs·and·written·intoengineerihg plans· and
specifications.
Additional mitigation measures (e.g., secure
containment
or
covering
of
demolition debris,
contaminated soil, or wastes
in
truck beds) may be
required by city
or
county ordinances
or
other
regulations to prevent releases during transport.
Additional voluntary mitigation measures (e.g., such
as scheduling transport
of
demolition debris
or
other
wastes to offsite landfills outside
of
heavy traffic time
periods) should be considered to minimize traffic
35
I
Record
Of
Decision
lm~ctl
Situation
October
2009
impacts
or
potential
hazardous
substance
releases
or
exposure
incidents.
In addition to the specific mitigation and monitoring commitments identified above, the following
activities would also be conducted:
Frequent monitoring
of
construction activities as well as sensitive resource locations by
the CSTC Environmental Office or consultants. Monitoring of the project sites should
occur at least once per month during construction and more frequently
in
areas that may
contain sensitive resources.
Monitoring activities should include, but not be limited to, the following:
o Construction crews should be made aware of resources present on the project
site, locations of known areas that may require mitigation and monitoring, buffer
zones implemented around specific resources, and other necessary measures to
ensure resource protection.
o A representative from the CSTC Environmental Office should attend construction
meetings regularly to ensure compliance with this Plan as well as address any
unanticipated issues.
o The construction sites should be inspected at least once a week to ensure that
appropriate measures are
in
place, equipment is used and stored
in
appropriate
areas, and construction
is
not occurring
in
sensitive areas.
The construction contractor should
be
required to provide the following accommodations:
o Designate an environmental engineer to provide construction contractor quality
control at project sites.
o Comply with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws
and regulations.
36
Record
Of
Decision October 2009
o Comply with all specified DoD, Army, and CSTC regulations, including
environmental requirements.
Submit a preconstruction Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to the Contracting Officer
and the CSTC Environmental Office for review and approval. The EPP should include
some or all of the following components:
o Erosion sedimentation and pollution control plan including monitoring and
reporting requirements
o Recycling and waste minimization/management/disposal plan
o Air pollution control plan
o Contaminant prevention plan
o Waste water management plan
o Cultural and natural resources and wetlands plan
o Pesticide application/management plan
o Employee Environmental Training
o Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC)
o Spill Contingency Plan (SCP)
All practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the selected action have
been adopted, except as indicated otherwise above. The Army will also employ a monitoring
and enforcement program for the mitigations adopted
in
this decision.
37

Navigation menu