175555 EMC Report

175517 Emc Report 175517_EMC__Report 175517_EMC__Report CertsReports 175517 ProductFiles assets.mhint

175548 Emc Report 175548_EMC__Report 175548_EMC__Report CertsReports 175548 ProductFiles assets.mhint

2016-04-05

: Pdf 175555 Emc Report 175555_EMC__Report CertsReports 175555 ProductFiles

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 24

Download175555 EMC  Report
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

EMC COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT
for

HEADPHONE

Trade Name
Model Number
Serial Number
Report Number
Date
Regulations

:
:
:
:
:
:

QUEEN
OV2009MV, OV510MV, OV740MV

N/A
SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008
See below

Standards

EN55022:2006
EN55024:1998+A1:2001+A2:2003
-EN61000-4-2:1995+A1:1998+A2:2001
-EN61000-4-3:2006

Results (Pass/Fail)
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS

Prepared for:
LUNA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD
TANGXIA INDUSTRIAL ZONE, HUIYANG DISTRICT,
HUIZHOU CITY, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA

Prepared by:
SEC ENGINEERING SERVICES CO., LTD.
21A BLDG C, SHENNAN GARDEN, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
PARK, NANSHAN, SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, CHINA
TEL: 86-755-8611-0163
FAX: 86-755-8611-0248

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page1 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1

VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE.......................................................................................................... 3

2

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................. 4

3

PRODUCT INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4

4

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............................................................................................................................... 4

5

TEST FACILITY ............................................................................................................................................ 5

6

TEST EQUIPMENT LIST............................................................................................................................. 6

7

TEST RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................. 8
7.1
7.2
7. 3
7. 4

8

LINE CONDUCTED MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE .............................................................. 8
RADIATED MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE............................................................................ 10
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE................................................................................................... 15
RADIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD................................................................................. 18

PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................................................................................................................... 21
8.1
8.2

PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP............................................................................................... 21
PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT.............................................................................................................. 23

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page2 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

1

VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE

Equipment Under Test:

HEADPHONE

Trade Name:

QUEEN

Model Number:

OV2009MV, OV510MV, OV740MV

Serial Number:

N/A

EUT Powered during test:

5V from PC

Applicant:

LUNA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD
TANGXIA INDUSTRIAL ZONE, HUIYANG DISTRICT, HUIZHOU CITY,
GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA
LUNA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD
TANGXIA INDUSTRIAL ZONE, HUIYANG DISTRICT, HUIZHOU CITY,
GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA

Manufacturer:

Type of Test:
Technical Standards:

EMC Directive 2004/108/EC for CE Marking

File Number:

SZ0801001-E

Deviation:

None

Condition of Test Sample:

Normal

EN55022:1998+A1:2000+A2:2003
EN55024:1998+A1:2001+A2:2003
(EN61000-4-2:1995+A1:1998+A2:2001; EN61000-4-3:2002+A1:2002)

The above equipment was tested by SEC Engineering Services Co., Ltd. for compliance with the
requirements set forth in Directive 2004/108/EC and the Technical Standards mentioned above. This said
equipment in the configuration described in this report shows the maximum emission levels emanating from
equipment and the level of the immunity endurance of the equipment are within the compliance
requirements.
This report is an additional report from SZ0801001-E, just change the applicant to LUNA INDUSTRIAL CO.,
LTD and the model no., the model OV2009MV, OV510MV, OV740MV are identical to MSX8PRO in the report of
SZ0801001-E. just difference in the appearance.
The test results of this report relate only to the tested sample identified in this report.

Approved by Authorized Signatory:
Jack Wang/ Manager
SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page3 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

2

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

EUT Test Program:
1. PC MIC was connected to NOTEBOOK PC via sound card port;
2. Other related support units worked as usual;
3. NOTEBOOK PC was loaded and executed in windows XP mode;
4. Keep the EUT working during test.

3

PRODUCT INFORMATION

Housing Type:
EUT Power Rating:
Power during test:

Plastic
5v from PC
5v from PC

I/O Port of EUT:

1)

I/O Port Type

Q’TY

Tested with

Audio output port

2

2

4 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
No.

Equipment

Model #

Serial #

Trade Name

Data
Cable

Power
Cord

1)

NOTEBOOK PC

VECTRA
VL420MT

CN15100363

HP

N/A

Unshielded
1.8m

**Note: All the above equipment/cables were placed in worse case positions to maximize emission signals during emission
test.
Grounding: Grounding was in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and conditions for the intended use.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page4 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

5

TEST FACILITY

Location:

No.1 Workshop, M-10, Middle Section, Science& Technology Park,
Shenzhen, China

Site Accreditation:

VCCI:
The 3m Semi-anechoic chamber and Shielded Room (7.5m×4.0m×3.0m)
have been registered in Accordance with the Regulations for Voluntary
Control Measure with Registration No.: R-2197 and C-2383 respectively.
Date of Registration: September 29, 2005. Valid until September 28, 2008.
FCC-Registration No.: 556682
Registered and fully described in a report filed with the (FCC) Federal
Communications Commission. The acceptance letter from the FCC is
maintained in our files. Registration 556682, Aug. 04, 2005.
Industry Canada (IC)
The 3m Semi-anechoic chamber has been registered by Certification and Engineering
Bureau of Industry Canada for radio equipment testing with Registration No.: 6002

Instrument Tolerance:

All measuring equipment is in accord with ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22
requirements that meet industry regulatory agency and accreditation agency
requirement.

Ground Plane: Two conductive reference ground planes were used during the Line Conducted Emission,
one in vertical and the other in horizontal. The dimensions of these ground planes are as below. The
vertical ground plane was placed distancing 40 cm to the rear of the wooden test table on where the EUT and
the support equipment were placed during test. The horizontal ground plane projected 50 cm beyond the
footprint of the EUT system and distanced 80 cm to the wooden test table. For Radiated Emission Test, one
horizontal conductive ground plane extended at least 1m beyond the periphery of the EUT and the largest
measuring antenna, and covered the entire area between the EUT and the antenna. It has no holes or gaps
having longitudinal dimensions larger than one-tenth of a wavelength at the highest frequency of
measurement up to 1GHz.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page5 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

6

TEST EQUIPMENT LIST

Instrumentation: The equipment conforms to the CISPR 16-1 / ANSI C63.2-1988 Specifications for
Electromagnetic Interference and Field Strength Instrumentation from 10 kHz to 1.0 GHz or above.
Equipment used during the tests:
For Conducted Emission Test
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1

L.I.S.N.

ETS-LINDGREN

00033512

27-06-2008

26-06-2009

2

EMI Test Receiver

Rohde& Schwarz

10019

27-06-2008

26-06-2009

3

Shielding Room

ZhongYu Electron

SEL0042

N/A

N/A

4

Coaxial Cable

SGS

SEL0024

01-06-2008

30-05-2009

For Radiated Emission Test
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1

EMI Test Receiver

Rohde& Schwarz

100249

14-12-2008

13-12-2009

2

BiConiLog Antenna

ETS-LINDGREN

00042673

03-08-2008

02-08-2009

3

Double-ridged horn

ETS-LINDGREN

00035926

25-12-2008

24-12-2009

4

Amplifier

Agilent Technologies

2944A10861

27-06-2008

26-06-2009

For Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1.

ESD Simulator

SCHAFFNER

414

14-06-2008

13-06-2009

ESD Ground Plane

SGS(3m*3m)

SEL0004

N/A

N/A

For Conducted Immunity Test
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1.

RF-Generator

SCHAFFNER

1114

06-09-2008

15-09-2009

2.

Coupling/Decoupling
Network

SCHAFFNER

21243

03-09-2008

02-09-2009

SCHAFFNER

21029

03-09-2008

02-09-2009

3.

EM CLAMP

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page6 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

For RF Strength Susceptibility Test
Item

Equipment

3m Semi-Anechoic
Chamber
2.
Signal Generator
3.
Amplifier 30M-1GHz
Amplifier 0.8-3.0GHz
4.
Power Meter
5
Power Sensor
6
Power Sensor
7
8 Dual Directional Coupler
9 Dual Directional Coupler
Software EMC32
10
Log-periodic Antenna
11
Antenna Tripod
12
1.

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

ETS-LINDGREN

N/A

16-06-2008

Rohde& Schwarz
Amplifier Research
Amplifier Research
Rohde& Schwarz
Rohde& Schwarz
Rohde& Schwarz
Amplifier Research
Amplifier Research
Rohde& Schwarz
Amplifier Research
Amplifier Research

102319
312698
312667
101287
100247
100248
80M-1GHz
0.8-4.2GHz
SEL0082
311820
312383

27-06-2008
03-05-2008
03-05-2008
27-06-2008
27-06-2008
27-06-2008
05-08-2008
05-08-2008
N/A
N/A
N/A

Cal. Interval
15-06-2009
26-06-2009

02-05-2009
02-05-2009
26-06-2009
26-06-2009
26-06-2009
14-08-2009
14-08-2009
N/A
N/A
N/A

For Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity, Surge, Voltage dips and Interruptions Test
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1.

ProPLUS System

Thermo ELECTRON

0412194

09-08-2008

08-08-2009

2

ProPLUS Capacitive
Clamp

Thermo ELECTRON

0501362

11-08-2008

10-08-2009

For General Used Equipment
Item

Equipment

Manufacturer

Serial No.

Last Cal.

Cal. Interval

1.

Temperature, Humidity
& Barometer

OREGON/VAISALA/
TESTO/
ANDTEK

EMC0001 TO
EMC0004

30-08-2008

29-08-2009

2.

DMM

Mastech

SEL0044

20-09-2008

19-09-2009

3.

Audio

Rohde& Schwarz

100855

20-10-2008

19-10-2009

The calibrations of the measuring instruments, including any accessories that may effect such calibration,
are checked frequently to assure their accuracy. Adjustments are made and correction factors applied in
accordance with instructions contained in the manual for the measuring instrument.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page7 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7
7.1
7.1.1

TEST RESULTS

LINE CONDUCTED MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARY LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST

1) The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the
EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per
EN55022 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it
is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.

2) Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per EN55022.
3) All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per EN55022.
4) The EUT received power from PC, and PC received AC230V/50Hz power through a Line Impedance Stabilization
Network (LISN) which supplied power source and was grounded to the ground plane.

5) All support equipments received power from a second LISN supplying power of AC 230V/50Hz, if any.
6) The EUT test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum
Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot
Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2
connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the
Analyzer / Receiver.

7) Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes.
8) During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation.
9) The following test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test:

Preliminary Conducted Emission Test
Frequency Range Investigated
Mode of operation

150KHz TO 30 MHz
Date

Data Report No.

Worst Mode

Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of final
testing.
Note: According to this case, this test item needs not to be carried out.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page8 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.1.2

FINAL LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST

1) EUT and support equipment was set up on the test bench as per step 9 of the preliminary test.
2) A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency
and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and
compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the
emission signal was re-checked using an Average detector.
3) The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.


LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION LIMIT
Frequency

Maximum RF Line Voltage
Q.P.

AVERAGE

150kHz-500kHz

66-56dBuV

56-46dBuV

500kHz-5MHz

56dBuV

46dBuV

5MHz-30MHz

60dBuV

50dBuV

**Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page9 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.2

RADIATED MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE

7.2.1

PRELIMINARY RADIATED EMISSION TEST

1) The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the
EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden turntable with a height of 0.8 meters is used which is placed on the ground plane as
per EN 55022 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used).When the EUT is a floor-standing
equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the
ground plane.
2) Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per EN55022.
3) All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per EN55022.
4) The EUT received DC power from PC, and PC received AC 230V/50Hz through the outlet socket under the turntable. All
support equipments received AC 230V/50Hz power from socket under the turntable, if any.
5) The antenna was placed at 3 meter away from the EUT as stated in EN55022. The antenna connected to the Analyzer
via a cable and at times a pre-amplifier would be used.
6) The Analyzer / Receiver quickly scanned from 30MHz to 1000MHz. The EUT test program was started. Emissions
were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground
plane, in both the vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
7)

The following test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test:

Preliminary Radiated Emission Test
Frequency Range Investigated

30 MHz TO 1000 MHz

Mode of operation

Date

Data Report No.

Working

01/07/2008

MSX8PRO _0(V,H)

Worst Mode

Then, the EUT and cable configuration, antenna position, polarization and turntable position of the above highest
emission level were recorded for final testing.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page10 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.2.2

FINAL RADIATED EMISSION TEST

1) EUT and support equipment were set up on the turntable as per step 7 of the preliminary test.
2) The Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 30MHz to 1000MHz. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT
to 360 degrees, varying cable placement and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the
vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
3) Recorded at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency, amplitude, antenna position, polarization and turntable
position were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare
reading to the applicable limit and Q.P./Peak reading is presented.
4) The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.

RADIATED EMISSION LIMIT
Frequency
(MHz)

Distance
(m)

Maximum Field Strength Limit
(dBuV/m/ Q.P.)

30-230

3

40

230-1000

3

47

**Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page11 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.2.3

BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP

EUT

: HEADPHONE

Trade Name : NGS
Model Number : MSX8PRO

NOTEBOOK PC

HEADPHONE
(EUT)

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page12 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.2.4

SUMMARY DATA (RADIATED EMISSION TEST)
Model Number: MSX8PRO

Location: Chamber

Tested by: Rocky

Polar: Vertical

Test Mode: Connect to PC

Detector Function: Peak/QP

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page13 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

Model Number: MSX8PRO

Location: Chamber

Tested by: Rocky

Polar: Horizontal

Test Mode: Connect to PC

Detector Function: Peak/QP

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page14 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7. 3
7.3.1

ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) IMMUNITY TEST

Port
Basic Standard
Test Level

:
:
:

Performance Criteria
Tester
Temperature
Humidity

:
:
:
:

7.3.2

Enclosure
EN61000-4-2
± 8 kV (Air Discharge)
± 4 kV (Contact Discharge)
± 4 kV (Indirect Discharge)
A ( Standard require )
Rocky
23oC
50%

Block Diagram of Test Setup

( The 470 k ohm resistors are installed per standard requirement )

VCP

EUT
&
Support Units

Support units

HCP

>1m

Wooden Table

0.8m

Ground Reference Plane

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page15 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.3.3

Test Procedure:

1. The EUT was located 0.1 m minimum from all side of the HCP.
2. Set up the EUT with the support equipment.
3. EUT was loaded and executed in windows XP mode..
4. As per the requirement of EN55024; applying direct contact discharge at the sides other than front of EUT at minimum 50
discharges (25 positive and 25 negative) if applicable, can’t be applied direct contact discharge side of EUT then the indirect
discharge shall be applied. One of the test points shall be subjected to at least 50 indirect discharge (contact) to the front
edge of horizontal coupling plane.
5. Other parts of EUT where it is not possible to perform contact discharge then selecting appropriate points of EUT for air
discharge, a minimum of 10 single air discharges shall be applied.
6. The application of ESD to the contact of open connectors is not required.
7. Putting a mark on EUT to show tested points. The following test condition was followed during the tests.
Note: As per the A2 to EN61000-4-2, a bleed resistor cable is connected between the EUT and HCP

during the test.
The electrostatic discharges were applied as follows:
Amount of Discharges

Voltage

Coupling

Result (Pass/Fail)

Mini 25 /Point

±4kV

Contact Discharge

Pass

Mini 25 /Point

±4kV

Indirect Discharge HCP (Front)

Pass

Mini 25 /Point

±4kV

Indirect Discharge VCP (Left)

Pass

Mini 25 /Point

±4kV

Indirect Discharge VCP (Back)

Pass

Mini 25 /Point

±4kV

Indirect Discharge VCP (Right)

Pass

Mini 10 /Point

±8kV

Air Discharge

Pass

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page16 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.3.4

V

Performance & Result:
Criteria A:

The apparatus continues to operate as intended. No degradation of performance or loss of function is
allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as
intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance.

Criteria B:

The apparatus continues to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss
of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is
used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance. During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed.

Criteria C:

Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the functions self recoverable or can be restored by the
operation of controls.

V PASS

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

FAILED

Page17 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7. 4

RADIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD

7.4.1 RADIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST
Port
Basic Standard
Requirements
Performance Criteria
Tester
Temperature
Humidity

7.4.2

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Enclosure
EN61000-4-3
3 V/m with 80% AM. 1kHz Modulation.
A ( Standard require )
Rocky
23oC
50%

Block Diagram of Test Setup:
3 meter

9X6X6 Chamber
EUT

&

Support Units

1.5 meter

0.8m

Power Amp

Signal
Generator

EUT Monitoring by using a
camera

PC Controller to control
S.G. & PA as well as
forward power

Control Room

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page18 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.4.3

Test Procedure:

1. The EUT was located at the edge of supporting table keep 3 meter away from transmitting antenna, it just the calibrated
square area of field uniformity. The support units were located outside of the uniformity area, but the cable(s) connected
with EUT were exposed to the calibrated field as per EN61000-4-3.
2. EUT was loaded and executed in windows XP mode.
3. Setting the testing parameters of RS test software per EN61000-4-3.
4. Performing the pre-test at each side of with double specified level (6V/m) at 4% steps.
5. From the result of pre-test in step 4, choose the worst side of EUT for final test from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz at 1% steps.
6. Recording the test result in following table.
7. It is not necessary to perform test as per annex A of EN 55024 if the EUT doesn’t belong to TTE product.
Preliminary test conditions:
Test level
: 6V/m
Steps
: 4 % of fundamental
Dwell Time
: 1 sec
Range (MHz)

Field

Modulation

Polarity

Position (°)

Result (Pass/Fail)

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

H

Front

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

V

Front

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

H

Right

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

V

Right

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

H

Back

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

V

Back

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

H

Left

Pass

80-1000

6V/m

Yes

V

Left

Pass

Final test conditions:
Test level
Steps
Dwell Time

: 3V/m
: 1 % of fundamental
: 1 sec

Range (MHz)

Field

Modulation

Polarity

Position (°)

Result (Pass/Fail)

80-1000

3V/m

Yes

H

Right

Pass

80-1000

3V/m

Yes

V

Right

Pass

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page19 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

7.4.4

V

Performance & Result

Criteria A:

The apparatus continues to operate as intended. No degradation of performance or loss of function is
allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as
intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance.

Criteria B:

The apparatus continues to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss
of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is
used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance. During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed.

Criteria C:

Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the functions self-recoverable or can be restored by the
operation of controls.

V PASS

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

FAILED

Page20 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

8
8.1

PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP
RADIATED EMISSION TEST (EN 55022)

ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE TEST (EN 61000-4-2)

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page21 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

RADIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (EN 61000-4-3)

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page22 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

8.2

PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page23 of 24

Report Number: SZ0801001-E
May 12, 2008

SEC Engineering Service Co., Ltd.

Page24 of 24



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.5
Linearized                      : Yes
Encryption                      : Standard V2.3 (128-bit)
User Access                     : (none)
Page Count                      : 24
XMP Toolkit                     : XMP toolkit 2.9.1-13, framework 1.6
About                           : uuid:dc45349a-a2e8-4193-b566-8ed2dbc6942d
Producer                        : Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)
Modify Date                     : 2009:04:20 11:46:34+08:00
Create Date                     : 2009:04:20 11:40:37+08:00
Metadata Date                   : 2009:04:20 11:46:34+08:00
Document ID                     : uuid:fefe3c11-2c26-4696-a164-b72bf93c0ca9
Format                          : application/pdf
Title                           : untitled
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu