91014003 E _MICA_ EN55022&24 MICA

2016-04-06

: Pdf 91014003-E Mica En55022&24 91014003-E__MICA__EN55022&24 CertsReports 177597 ProductFiles

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 55

Download91014003-E _MICA_ EN55022&24  MICA
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
Report No.: 91014003-E

CE EMC
TEST REPORT
for
Scantech ID MICA M-9030 Laser Barcode Scanner
MODEL: MICA
Test Report Number:

91014003-E
Issued to:

Champtek Incorporated
5/F, No.2, Alley 2, Shih-Wei Lane Chung-Cheng Rd.,
Hsin-Tien City 231 Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Issued by:
Compliance Certification Services Inc.
Sindian BU.
No.163-1, Jhongsheng Rd., Sindian City,
Taipei County 23151, Taiwan
TEL: 886-2-22170894
FAX: 886-2-22171029
Issued Date: December 29, 2009

Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance
Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services Inc.
personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. The client should not use it to claim
product endorsement by TAF, A2LA, NIST or any government agencies. The test results in the report only
apply to the tested sample.

Page 1 / 55

Report No.: 91014003-E

Revision History

Rev.
00

Issue
Date
December 29, 2009

Revisions
Initial Issue

Effect
Page
ALL

Revised By
Eva Fan

Page 2
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
2
3
4
4.1.
4.2.
5
5.1.
5.2.
6
6.1.
6.2.
6.3.
7
7.1.
7.2.
7.3.
7.4.
7.5.
8
8.1.
8.2.
8.3.
8.4.
8.5.
8.6.
8.7.
8.8.
8.9.
9

TEST CERTIFICATION......................................................................................................4
TEST RESULT SUMMARY................................................................................................5
EUT DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................6
TEST METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................7
DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE ...................................................................................7
EUT SYSTEM OPERATION...............................................................................................7
SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST............................................................................8
DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ...............................................................................8
CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ................................................................8
FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS...............................................................................9
FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................9
ACCREDITATIONS............................................................................................................9
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY .....................................................................................9
EMISSION TEST..............................................................................................................10
CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT....................................................................10
CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT AT TELECOMMUNICATION PORTS.........14
RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ........................................................................17
HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT.....................................................................23
VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKER MEASUREMENT..........................................26
IMMUNITY TEST .............................................................................................................29
GENERAL DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................29
GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION .................................................30
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) ...........................................................................31
RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (RS) ..........................36
ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT (EFT) ..........................................................................39
SURGE IMMUNITY TEST ................................................................................................41
CONDUCTED RADIO FREQUENCY DISTURBANCES (CS) ..........................................43
POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD......................................................................46
VOLTAGE DIPS & VOLTAGE INTERRUPTIONS ............................................................48
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION.......................................................50

Page 3
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

1 TEST CERTIFICATION
Product: Scantech ID MICA M-9030 Laser Barcode Scanner
Model: MICA
Brand: SCANTECH ID
Applicant: Champtek Incorporated
5/F, No.2, Alley 2, Shih-Wei Lane Chung-Cheng Rd.,
Hsin-Tien City 231 Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Manufacturer: Champtek Incorporated
5/F, No.2, Alley 2, Shih-Wei Lane Chung-Cheng Rd.,
Hsin-Tien City 231 Taipei,Taiwan,R.O.C.
Tested: December 23, 2009 & December 25, 2009
Applicable EN 55022: 2006 + A1: 2007, Class B
Standards: EN 61000-3-2: 2006
EN 61000-3-3: 1995 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2005

EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003
IEC 61000-4-2: 1995 + A1: 1998 + A2: 2000
IEC 61000-4-3: 2006
IEC 61000-4-4: 2004
IEC 61000-4-5: 2005
IEC 61000-4-6: 2003 + A1: 2004 + A2: 2006
IEC 61000-4-8: 1993 + A1: 2000
IEC 61000-4-11: 2004

Deviation from Applicable Standard
None

The above equipment has been tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc., and found
compliance with the requirements set forth in the technical standards mentioned above. The results of
testing in this report apply only to the product/system, which was tested. Other similar equipment will
not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties.

Page 4
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

2 TEST RESULT SUMMARY
EMISSION
Item

Standard

Result

Remarks

Conducted (Power Port)

PASS

Meet Class A limit

Conducted (Telecom port)

N/A

Please see the page 16

Radiated

PASS

Meet Class A limit

EN 61000-3-2: 2006

Harmonic current emissions

N/A

Please see the page 25

EN 61000-3-3: 1995 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2005

Voltage fluctuations & flicker

PASS

Meets the requirements

EN 55022: 2006 + A1: 2007

IMMUNITY【 EN 55024 (1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003) 】
Standard
IEC 61000-4-2: 1995 + A1: 1998 +
A2: 2000

Item

Result

Remarks

ESD

PASS

Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-3: 2006

RS

PASS

Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-4: 2004

EFT

PASS

Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-5: 2005

Surge

PASS

Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A

CS

PASS

Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A

PFMF

N/A

IEC 61000-4-6: 2003 + A1: 2004 +
A2: 2006
IEC 61000-4-8:1993 + A1: 2000

IEC 61000-4-11: 2004

Voltage dips &
voltage
variations

PASS

Please see the page 47
Meets the requirements of
Voltage Dips:
1) >95% reduction Performance Criterion A
2) 30% reduction Performance Criterion A
Voltage Interruptions:
1) >95% reduction Performance Criterion C

Note:
1. The statements of test result on the above are decided by the request of test standard only; the
measurement uncertainties are not factored into this compliance determination.
2. The information of measurement uncertainty is available upon the customer’s request.

Page 5
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

3 EUT DESCRIPTION
Product

Scantech ID MICA M-9030 Laser Barcode Scanner

Brand Name

SCANTECH ID

Model

MICA

Applicant

Champtek Incorporated

Housing material

Plastic

Identify Number

91014003

Received Date

October 14, 2009

EUT Power Rating

5VDC from AC Adaptor

AC Power During Test

230VAC / 50Hz

AC Adaptor Manufacturer

SCANTECHID

AC Adaptor Model

SFP0502000P

AC Adaptor Power Rating

I/P: 100-240VAC, O/P: 5VDC

DC Power Cord Type

Unshielded, 2.5m (Non-detachable)
LAN to RS232: Shielded, 2.0m (Detachable)

EUT I/O Cable Type

LAN to PS/2: Shielded, 2.0m (Detachable)
USB: Shielded, 2.0m (Detachable)

I/O PORT
I/O PORT TYPES
1.

LAN Port

Q’TY

TESTED WITH

1

1

Note: Client consigns only one model sample to test (Model Number: MICA).

Page 6
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

4 TEST METHODOLOGY
4.1. DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE
The EUT was tested together with the above additional components, and a
configuration, which produced the worst emission levels, was selected and recorded
in this report.
The test configuration/ modes are as the following:
Modes:
1
2
3

RS232 Mode
PS/2 Mode
USB Mode

Conduction: Mode 1
Radiation: Mode 1

4.2. EUT SYSTEM OPERATION
1. Windows XP boots system.
2. Run Emctest.exe to activate all peripherals and display “H” pattern on monitor
screen.
3. Run Hypertrm.exe and operate the EUT to scan the bar code.
Note: Test program is self-repeating throughout the test.

Page 7
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

5 SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST
5.1. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS
The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or
support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test
configuration during the tests.

Peripherals Devices:
No.

Equipment

Model No.

Serial No.

FCC ID / BSMI ID

Trade Name

Data Cable

Power Cord

1

USB Mouse

MOC5UO

H1606PRO

DoC
BSMI: R41108

Dell

Shielded, 1.8m

N/A

2

USB Keyboard

SK-8115

N/A

DoC
BSMI: T3A002

Dell

Shielded, 1.8m
with a core

N/A

3

Printer

C60

DR3K039402

BSMI ID: 3902E006 EPSON

Shielded, 1.8m

Unshielded,
1.8m

4

Monitor

710V

GS17H9NXA05855D

DoC
BSMI: R33475

SAMSUNG

Shielded, 1.8m
with two cores

Unshielded,
1.8m

5

Host PC

DCSM

CGN4Z1S

DoC
BSMI: R33002

DELL

Shielded, 2.0m

Unshielded,
1.8m

Note:
1) All the equipment/cables were placed in the worst-case configuration to maximize the emission during the
test.
2) Grounding was established in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and conditions for the
intended use.

5.2. CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST

1

3

4

2

EUT

5

Adaptor

Page 8
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

6 FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS
6.1. FACILITIES
All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at CCS Taiwan Sindian
BU. at No.163-1, Jhongsheng Rd., Sindian City, Taipei County 23151, Taiwan.
The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR
Publication 22. All receiving equipment conforms to CISPR 16-1-1, CISPR 16-1-2, CISPR 16-1-3,
CISPR 16-1-4 and CISPR 16-1-5.

6.2. ACCREDITATIONS
Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following accreditation body according to
ISO/IEC 17025.
Taiwan
USA

TAF
A2LA

The measuring facility of laboratories has been authorized or registered by the following approval
agencies.
Canada
Germany
Japan
Taiwan
USA

Industry Canada
TUV Rheinland
VCCI
BSMI
FCC

Copies of granted accreditation certificates are available for downloading from our web site,
http:///www.ccsrf.com

6.3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests
performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:
Measurement

Frequency

Uncertainty

Conducted emissions

0.15MHz~30MHz

± 1.7366

30MHz ~ 200MHz

± 3.8792

200MHz ~1000MHz

± 3.8914

Radiated emissions

This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95%
confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.
Consistent with industry standard (e.g. CISPR 22: 2005, clause 11, Measurement Uncertainty)
determining compliance with the limits shall be base on the results of the compliance
measurement. Consequently the measure emissions being less than the maximum allowed
emission result in this be a compliant test or passing test.
The acceptable measurement uncertainty value without requiring revision of the compliance
statement is base on conducted and radiated emissions being less than UCISPR which is 3.6dB
and 5.2dB respectively. CCS values (called ULab in CISPR 16-4-2) is less than UCISPR as shown
in the table above. Therefore, MU need not be considered for compliance.

Page 9
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7 EMISSION TEST
7.1. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
7.1.1. LIMITS
FREQUENCY (MHz)

Class A (dBuV)

Class B (dBuV)

Quasi-peak

Average

Quasi-peak

Average

0.15 - 0.5

79

66

66 - 56

56 - 46

0.50 - 5.0

73

60

56

46

5.0 - 30.0

73

60

60

50

Note:
1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz.
3. All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and
apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above.

7.1.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
Conducted Emission room # B
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

TEST RECEIVER

R&S

ESHS10

843743/015

03/29/2010

LISN (EUT)

FCC

FCC-LISN-50-32-2

08009

03/29/2010

LISN

EMCO

3825/2

1382

01/05/2010

BNC CABLE

Huber+Suhner

RG 223/U

BNC B2

01/12/2010

Pulse Limiter

R&S

ESH3-Z2

100374

08/23/2010

THERMOHYGRO METER

TOP

HA-202

9303-3

02/04/2010

Test S/W

EMI 32.exe

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R. = No Calibration Request.

Page 10
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.1.3. TEST PROCEDURES (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-031)
Procedure of Preliminary Test

The EUT and Support equipment, if needed, was set up as per the test configuration to
simulate typical usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a
wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as
per EN 55022 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the
EUT is a floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane, which has a 15 cm
non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.
All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per EN 55022.
The test equipment EUT installed received AC main power, through a Line Impedance
Stabilization Network (LISN), which supplied power source and was grounded to the
ground plane.
All support equipment power received from a second LISN.
The EUT test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current
carrying line of the EUT using an EMI Test Receiver connected to the LISN powering the
EUT.
The Receiver scanned from 150kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes.
During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation.
The test mode(s) described in Item 4.1 were scanned during the preliminary test.
After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 4.1 producing the
highest emission level.
The EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission levels
were recorded for reference of the final test.
Procedure of Final Test
EUT and support equipment were set up on the test bench as per the configuration with
highest emission level in the preliminary test.
A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six
highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer
in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare
reading to the applicable limit.
The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded.

Page 11
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.1.4. TEST SETUP
Vert. reference plane
EMI receiver

40cm
EUT

80cm

LISN

Reference ground plane

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
7.1.5. DATA SAMPLE
Freq.
(MHz)

Read
Level
(dBuV)

Factor
(dB)

Level
(dBuV)

Limit
Line
(dBuV)

Over
Limit
(dB)

Remark
(P/Q/A)

Line
(L1/L2)

x.xx

42.95

0.55

43.50

56

-12.50

Q

L1

Freq.
Read Level
Factor
Level
Limit Line
Over Limit
P
Q
A
L1
L2

= Emission frequency in MHz
= Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading
= Insertion loss of LISN + Cable Loss
= Read Level + Factor
= Limit stated in standard
= Reading in reference to limit
= Peak Reading
= Quasi-peak Reading
= Average Reading
= Hot side
= Neutral side

Calculation Formula
Over Limit (dB) = Level (dBuV) – Limit Line (dBuV)

Page 12
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.1.6. TEST RESULTS
Model No.

MICA

6dB Bandwidth 10 kHz

Environmental
Conditions

20deg.C, 55% RH, 1010hPa

Test Mode

Tested by

Benson Yang

Mode 1

(The chart below shows the highest readings taken from the final data.)

Six Highest Conducted Emission Readings
Frequency Range Investigated
Read
Freq.
Factor
Level
Level
(MHz)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
0.150
48.96
11.35
60.31
0.150
6.57
11.35
17.92
0.199
48.68
10.97
59.65
0.199
15.04
10.97
26.00
0.413
41.37
10.59
51.96
0.413
17.55
10.59
28.14
0.486
38.86
10.58
49.44
0.486
16.32
10.58
26.90
0.206
47.69
10.62
58.31
0.206
17.98
10.62
28.60
0.402
40.78
10.28
51.06
0.402
15.91
10.28
26.19

Limit
Line
(dBuV)
66.00
56.00
63.67
53.67
57.59
47.59
56.23
46.23
63.36
53.36
57.81
47.81

150 kHz to 30 MHz
Over
Remark
Limit
(P/Q/A)
(dB)
-5.69
P
-38.08
A
-4.02
P
-27.66
A
-5.64
P
-19.46
A
-6.80
P
-19.34
A
-5.05
P
-24.76
A
-6.75
P
-21.62
A

Line
(L1/L2)
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L2
L2
L2
L2

Notes: 1. L1 = Line One (Live Line) / L2 = Line Two (Neutral Line).
2. Those frequencies only show peak emission level because that was below the Average limit, so
no need to check average anymore.

Page 13
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.2. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT AT
TELECOMMUNICATION PORTS
7.2.1. LIMITS
For Class A Equipment
FREQUENCY (MHz)

Voltage Limit (dBuV)

Current Limit (dBuA)

Quasi-peak

Average

Quasi-peak

Average

0.15 ~ 0.5

97 ~ 87

84 ~ 74

53 ~ 43

40 ~ 30

0.5 ~ 30.0

87

74

43

30

Note: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz.

For Class B Equipment
FREQUENCY (MHz)

Voltage Limit (dBuV)

Current Limit (dBuA)

Quasi-peak

Average

Quasi-peak

Average

0.15 - 0.5

84 ~ 74

74 ~ 64

40 ~ 30

30 ~ 20

0.5 - 30.0

74

64

30

20

Note: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz.

7.2.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
Conducted Emission room #
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request.

Page 14
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.2.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-031)
Selecting ISN for unscreened cable or a current probe for screened cable to take
measurement.
The port of the EUT was connected to the remote side support equipment through the
ISN/Current Probe and communication in normal condition.
Making a overall range scan by using the test receiver controlled by controller and
record at least six highest emissions for showing in the test report.
Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction
factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable
limit.
In case of measuring on the screened cable, the current limit shall be applied; otherwise
the voltage limit should be applied.
The following test modes are scanned during the preliminary test:
N/A
After the preliminary scan, we found the following test mode(s) producing the highest
emission level and test data of the worst case was recorded.
N/A

7.2.4. TEST SETUP

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Page 15
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.2.5. DATA SAMPLE
Freq.
(MHz)

Read
Level
(dBuV)

Factor
(dB)

Level
(dBuV)

Limit
Line
(dBuV)

Over
Limit
(dB)

Remark
(P/Q/A)

x.xx

62.95

0.55

63.50

87

-23.50

Q

Freq.
Read Level
Factor
Level
Limit Line
Over Limit
P
Q
A

= Emission frequency in MHz
= Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading
= Insertion loss of ISN + Cable Loss
= Read Level + Factor
= Limit stated in standard
= Reading in reference to limit
= Peak Reading
= Quasi-peak Reading
= Average Reading

Calculation Formula
Over Limit (dB) = Level (dBuV) – Limit (dBuV)

7.2.6. TEST RESULTS
Model No.

N/A

6dB Bandwidth

N/A

Environmental
Conditions

N/A

Test Mode

N/A

Tested by

N/A

NOTE: No applicable, the EUT doesn’t have LAN Port or Modem port.

Page 16
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.3. RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
7.3.1. LIMITS
Below 1GHz
dBuV/m (At 10m)

FREQUENCY (MHz)

Class A

Class B

30 ~ 230

40

30

230 ~ 1000

47

37

Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.

Above 1GHz
Class A (dBuV/m) (At 3m)

Class B (dBuV/m) (At 3m)

Average

Peak

Average

Peak

1000 ~ 3000

56

76

50

70

3000 ~ 6000

60

80

54

74

FREQUENCY (MHz)

Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.

According to EN55022: 2006 + A1: 2007 clause 6.2, the measurement frequency range shown in
the following table:
Highest frequency generated or used within the EUT
or on which the EUT operates or tunes (MHz)

Upper frequency of measurement range
(MHz)

Less than 108

1000

108-500

2000

500-1000

5000
5 times of the highest frequency or 6GHz,

Above 1000

whichever is less

Page 17
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.3.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
Open Area Test Site # I
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

MEASURE RECEIVER

SCHAFFNER

SCR3501

338

07/07/2010

SPECTRUM ANALYZER

ADVANTEST

R3132

120900008

No Calibration
Required

ANTENNA

SCHAFFNER

CBL 6112B

2809

09/06/2010

AMPLIFIER

SCHAFFNER

CPA9231A

3626

10/11/2010

CABLE

BELDEN

9913

N-TYPE #I2

02/22/2010

THERMOHYGRO METER

TECPEL

DTM-303

090639

05/24/2010

Test S/W

Lab VIEW 7.1

NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request.

7.3.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-031)
Procedure of Preliminary Test

The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical usage per the
user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden turntable with a height of
0.8 meters is used which is placed on the ground plane. When the EUT is a floor
standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 15 cm non-conductive
covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.
Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per EN 55022.
All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical usage as per EN 55022.
The EUT received AC power source from the outlet socket under the turntable. All
support equipment power received from another socket under the turntable.
The antenna was placed at 3 or 10 meter away from the EUT as stated in EN 55022.
The antenna connected to the Spectrum Analyzer via a cable and at times a
pre-amplifier would be used.
The Analyzer / Receiver quickly scanned from 30MHz to 6000MHz. The EUT test
program was started. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360
degrees and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the
vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
The test mode(s) described in Item 4.1 were scanned during the preliminary test:
After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 4.1 producing the
highest emission level.
The EUT and cable configuration, antenna position, polarization and turntable position
of the above highest emission level were recorded for the final test.

Page 18
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

Procedure of Final Test

EUT and support equipment were set up on the turntable as per the configuration with
highest emission level in the preliminary test.
The Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 30MHz to 6000MHz. Emissions were scanned
and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees, varying cable placement and
positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the vertical and
the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
Recorded at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency, amplitude, antenna
position, polarization and turntable position were recorded into a computer in which
correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the
applicable limit. Below 1GHz the Q.P. reading and above 1GHz the Peak and Average
reading are presented.
The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded.

7.3.4. TEST SETUP

Test table &
Turntable
1m ~ 4m
EUT

Coaxial
Cable

Power
Cable

0.8 m

3 or 10 m
Filter

Ground Plane

To Power

EMI
Receiver

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Page 19
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.3.5. DATA SAMPLE
Below 1GHz
Freq.
(MHz)

Reading
(dBuV/m)

Factor
(dB)

Result
(dBuV/m)

Limit
(dBuV/m)

Margin
(dB)

Detector
(P/Q)

Pol.
(H/V)

x.xx

14.0

12.2

26.2

30

-3.8

Q

H

Freq.
(MHz)

Reading
(dBuV/m)

Factor
(dB)

x.xx

42.95

0.55

Above 1GHz

Freq.
Reading
Factor
Result
Limit
Margin
P
Q
A
H
V

Result
Limit
(dBuV/m) (dBuV/m)
43.50

54

Margin
(dB)

Detector
(P/A)

Pol.
(H/V)

-10.50

A

H

= Emission frequency in MHz
= Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading
= Antenna Factor + Cable Loss - Amplifier Gain
= Reading + Factor
= Limit stated in standard
= Reading in reference to limit
= Peak Reading
= Quasi-peak Reading
= Average Reading
= Antenna Polarization: Horizontal
= Antenna Polarization: Vertical

Calculation Formula
Margin (dB) = Result (dBuV/m) – Limit (dBuV/m)

Page 20
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.3.6. TEST RESULTS
Below 1GHz
Model No.

MICA

Test Mode

Environmental
Conditions

20deg.C, 50% RH, 1008hPa 6dB Bandwidth

Antenna Pole

Vertical / Horizontal

Mode 1
120 kHz

Antenna Distance 10m

Detector Function Quasi-peak.

Tested by

Benson Yang

(The chart below shows the highest readings taken from the final data.)

Six Highest Radiated Emission Readings
Frequency Range Investigated

30 MHz to 1000 MHz at 10m

Freq.
(MHz)

Reading
(dBuV/m)

Factor
(dB)

Result
(dBuV/m)

Limit
(dBuV/m)

Margin
(dB)

Detector
(P/Q)

Pol.
(H/V)

125.020
225.020
375.040
400.050
725.040
775.060

38.80
44.00
38.90
34.80
34.40
33.50

-16.18
-17.44
-11.20
-10.56
-5.03
-4.49

22.62
26.56
27.70
24.24
29.37
29.01

30.00
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00

-7.38
-3.44
-9.30
-12.76
-7.63
-7.99

Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q

V
V
V
V
V
V

(The chart below shows the highest readings taken from the final data.)

Six Highest Radiated Emission Readings
Frequency Range Investigated

30 MHz to 1000 MHz at 10m

Freq.
(MHz)

Reading
(dBuV/m)

Factor
(dB)

Result
(dBuV/m)

Limit
(dBuV/m)

Margin
(dB)

Detector
(P/Q)

Pol.
(H/V)

125.020
225.010
375.010
400.020
499.720
749.400

38.10
41.30
40.30
38.60
33.90
36.40

-16.18
-17.44
-11.20
-10.56
-7.98
-4.63

21.92
23.86
29.10
28.04
25.92
31.77

30.00
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00

-8.08
-6.14
-7.90
-8.96
-11.08
-5.23

Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q

H
H
H
H
H
H

Notes: 1. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
2. P= Peak Reading; Q= Quasi-peak Reading.

Page 21
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

Above 1000MHz
Model No.

N/A

Test Mode

N/A

Environmental
Conditions

N/A

6dB Bandwidth

N/A

Antenna Pole

N/A

Antenna Distance

N/A

Highest frequency
25MHz
generated or used

Upper frequency

See Note

Detector Function

Tested by

N/A

N/A

Note: No applicable, when the highest frequency of the internal sources of the EUT is less than 108MHz,
the measurement shall only be made up to 1 GHz.

Page 22
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.4. HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
7.4.1. LIMITS OF HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
Limits for Class A equipment
Harmonics
Max. permissible
Order
harmonics current
n
A
Odd harmonics
3
2.30
5
1.14
7
0.77
9
0.40
11
0.33
13
0.21
15<=n<=39 0.15x15/n
Even harmonics
2
1.08
4
0.43
6
0.30
8<=n<=40
0.23x8/n

Limits for Class D equipment
Harmonics
Order
n

Max. permissible
harmonics current
A

Max. permissible harmonics
current per watt mA/W
Odd Harmonics only

3
5
7
9
11
13
15<=n<=39

3.4
1.9
1.0
0.5
0.35
0.30
3.85/n

2.30
1.14
0.77
0.40
0.33
0.21
0.15x15/n

Note:
1. Class A and Class D are classified according to item 7.4.3.
2. According to section 7 of EN 61000-3-2, the above limits for all equipment except for lighting
equipment having an active input power > 75 W and no limits apply for equipment with an active
input power up to and including 75 W.

7.4.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

Signal Conditioning Unit

Schaffner

CCN 1000-1

72122

11/23/2010

5KVA AC Power Source

Schaffner

NSG 1007

55131

11/23/2010

Software

Win2100V3.exe

Note: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to
NML/ROC and NIST/USA.

Page 23
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.4.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-029)
The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground and
operated to produce the maximum harmonic components under normal operating
conditions for each successive harmonic component in turn.
The classification of EUT is according to section 5 of EN 61000-3-2.
The EUT is classified as follows:
Class A: Balanced three-phase equipment, Household appliances excluding equipment as
Class D, Tools excluding portable tools, Dimmers for incandescent lamps, audio
equipment, equipment not specified in one of the three other classes.
Class B: Portable tools; Arc welding equipment which is not professional equipment.
Class C: Lighting equipment.
Class D: Equipment having a specified power less than or equal to 600 W of the following types:
Personal computers and personal computer monitors and television receivers.

The correspondent test program of test instrument to measure the current harmonics
emanated from EUT is chosen. The measure time shall be not less than the time
necessary for the EUT to be exercised.
7.4.4. TEST SETUP

Harmonics &
Flicker
Analyzer
+
Power Source

Power

EUT

Support
Units

0.8m

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Page 24
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.4.5. TEST RESULTS
Power Consumption

2.0W

Environmental Conditions 20°C, 50% RH, 1010mbar

Test Mode

Operating

Tested by

John Yen

Note: 1. Limits classified according to item 7.4.3.
2. According to clause 7 of EN 61000-3-2: 2006, equipment with a rated power of 75W or less, no limits
apply. The test result is only for reference.

Test result of EN 61000-3-2
Highest parameter values during test:
V_RMS (Volts): 230.04

Frequency(Hz):

I_Peak (Amps): 0.340

I_RMS (Amps):

0.031

I_Fund (Amps): 0.009

Crest Factor:

11.389

Power (Watts):

Power Factor:

0.287

2.0

50.00

Page 25
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.5. VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKER MEASUREMENT
7.5.1. LIMITS OF VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKER MEASUREMENT
TEST ITEM

LIMIT

REMARK

Pst

1.0

Pst means short-term flicker indicator.

Plt

0.65

Plt means long-term flicker indicator.

Tdt (ms)

500

Tdt means maximum time that dt exceeds 3 %.

dmax (%)

4%

dmax means maximum relative voltage change.

dc (%)

3.3%

dc means relative steady-state voltage change

7.5.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
IMMUNITY SHIELDED ROOM
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

Signal Conditioning Unit

Schaffner

CCN 1000-1

72122

11/23/2010

5KVA AC Power Source

Schaffner

NSG 1007

55131

11/23/2010

Software

Win2100V3.exe

Note: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to
NML/ROC and NIST/USA.

7.5.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-030)
The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground and
operated to produce the most unfavorable sequence of voltage changes under normal
operating conditions.
During the flick measurement, the measure time shall include that part of whole
operation cycle in which the EUT produce the most unfavorable sequence of voltage
changes. The observation period for short-term flicker indicator is 10 minutes and the
observation period for long-term flicker indicator is 2 hours.

Page 26
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

7.5.4. TEST SETUP
Harmonics &
Flicker
Analyzer
+
Power Source

Power

Support
Units

EUT

0.8m

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

7.5.5. TEST RESULTS
Observation Period (Tp)

Test Mode

10mins

Environmental Conditions 20°C, 50% RH, 1010mbar Tested by

Operating
Benson Yang

TEST PARAMETER

MEASUREMENT
VALUE

LIMIT

REMARK

Pst

0.359

1.0

PASS

Plt

0.215

0.65

PASS

Tdt (ms)

0

500

PASS

dmax (%)

-0.16

4%

PASS

dc (%)

-0.12

3.3%

PASS

Note: None.

Page 27
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

Test result of EN 61000-3-3
Test Result: Pass

Status: Test Completed

Psti and limit line

European Limits

Pst

0.75
0.50

11:03:52

10:53:52

10:43:52

Plt and limit line

0.6

Plt

0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
11:03:52

Parameter values recorded during the test:
Vrms at the end of test (Volt): 230.06
Highest dt (%):
-0.19
Time(mS) > dt:
0.0
Highest dc (%):
-0.12
Highest dmax (%):
-0.16
Highest Pst (10 min. period):
0.359
Highest Plt (2 hr. period):
0.215

Test limit (%):
Test limit (mS):
Test limit (%):
Test limit (%):
Test limit:
Test limit:

3.14
500.0
3.14
3.80
0.950
0.617

Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass

Page 28
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8 IMMUNITY TEST
8.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Product Standard

EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003
Test Type

Minimum Requirement
Electrostatic Discharge – ESD:

IEC 61000-4-2

8KV air discharge, 4kV Contact discharge,
Performance Criterion B

IEC 61000-4-3

Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field
Susceptibility Test – RS:
80 ~1000 MHz, 3V/m, 80% AM(1kHz),
Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-4

Electrical Fast Transient/Burst - EFT,
AC Power Port: 1kV
DC Power Port: 0.5kV
Signal Ports and Telecommunication Ports: 0.5kV
Performance Criterion B

Basic Standard,
Specification, and IEC 61000-4-5
Performance
Criterion required

Surge Immunity Test:
1.2/50 µs Open Circuit Voltage,
8/20 µs Short Circuit Current,
AC Power Port ~ line to line: 1kV,
line to earth (ground): 2kV
DC Power Port ~ line to earth: 0.5kV
Signal and Telecommunication Ports ~ line to ground: 1kV
Performance Criterion B

IEC 61000-4-6

Conducted Radio Frequency Disturbances Test –CS:
0.15 ~ 80 MHz, 3Vrms, 80% AM, 1kHz,
Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-8

Power frequency magnetic field immunity test
50 Hz, 1A/m
Performance Criterion A

IEC 61000-4-11

Voltage Dips:
i) >95% reduction for 0.5 periods,
Performance Criterion B
ii) 30% reduction for 25 periods,
Performance Criterion C
Voltage Interruptions:
>95% reduction for 250 periods
Performance Criterion C

Page 29
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.2. GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION

Criteria A:

The apparatus shell continues to operate as intended without operator
intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below
a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used
as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance. If the manufacturer does not specify the minimum performance
level or the permissible performance loss, then either of these may be derived
from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may
reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended.
After test, the apparatus shell continues to operate as intended without operator
intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed, after
the application of the phenomenon below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level
may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance.

Criteria B:

Criteria C:

During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed. However, no
change of operating state if stored data is allowed to persist after the test. If the
manufacturer does not specify the minimum performance level or the permissible
performance loss, then either of these may be derived from the product
description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect
from the equipment if used as intended.
Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the functions is self-recoverable
or can be restored by the operation of controls by the user in accordance with the
manufacturer instructions.
Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or protected by a
battery backup, shall not be lost.

Page 30
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.3. ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD)
8.3.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Discharge Impedance:
Discharge Voltage:
Polarity:
Number of Discharge:
Discharge Mode:

IEC 61000-4-2
330 ohm / 150 pF
Air Discharge: 2 ; 4 ; 8 kV (Direct)
Contact Discharge: 2 ; 4 kV (Direct/Indirect)
Positive & Negative
Air Discharge: min. 10 times at each test point for each polarity
Contact Discharge: min. 200 times in total
Single Discharge
1 second minimum

8.3.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
IMMUNITY SHIELDED ROOM
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

ESD Simulator

Schaffner

NSG 438

170

08/20/2010

Thermo-Hygro meter

TECPEL

DTM-303

080269

05/03/2010

Note: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to
NML/ROC and NIST/USA.

Page 31
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.3.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-022)
The discharges shall be applied in two ways:
a) Contact discharges to the conductive surfaces and coupling planes:
The EUT shall be exposed to at least 200 discharges, 100 each at negative and positive polarity,
at a minimum of four test points. One of the test points shall be subjected to at least 50 indirect
discharges to the center of the front edge of the Horizontal Coupling Plane (HCP). The
remaining three test points shall each receive at least 50 direct contact discharges. If no direct
contact test points are available, then at least 200 indirect discharges shall be applied in the
indirect mode. Test shall be performed at a maximum repetition rate of one discharge per
second.
b) Air discharges at slots and apertures and insulating surfaces:
On those parts of the EUT where it is not possible to perform contact discharge testing, the
equipment should be investigated to identify user accessible points where breakdown may
occur. Such points are tested using the air discharge method. This investigation should be
restricted to those area normally handled by the user. A minimum of 10 single air discharges
shall be applied to the selected test point for each such area.
The basic test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-2:
a) The EUT was located 0.1 m minimum from all side of the HCP (dimensions 1.6m x 0.8m).
b) The support units were located another table 30 cm away from the EUT, but direct support unit
was/were located at same location as EUT on the HCP and keep at a distance of 10 cm with
EUT.
c) The time interval between two successive single discharges was at least 1 second.
d) Contact discharges were applied to the non-insulating coating, with the pointed tip of the
generator penetrating the coating and contacting the conducting substrate.
e) Air discharges were applied with the round discharge tip of the discharge electrode approaching
the EUT as fast as possible (without causing mechanical damage) to touch the EUT. After each
discharge, the ESD generator was removed from the EUT and re-triggered for a new single
discharge. The test was repeated until all discharges were complete.
f) At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied at the front edge of
each HCP opposite the center point of each unit of the EUT and 0.1 meters from the front of the
EUT. The long axis of the discharge electrode was in the plane of the HCP and perpendicular to
its front edge during the discharge.
g) At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the center of one
vertical edge of the Vertical Coupling Plane (VCP) in sufficiently different positions that the four
faces of the EUT were completely illuminated. The VCP (dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m) was placed
vertically to and 0.1 meters from the EUT.

Page 32
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.3.4. TEST SETUP

10 cm

Support
units

0.5 mm Thick
Insulator

EUT

VCP

470 kΩ

30 cm

Wooden Table
470 kΩ

HCP Wooden Table

470 kΩ

0.8 m

Ground Reference Plane
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Note:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table 0.8 meters high standing on the Ground Reference Plane.
The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5 meters square connected to
the protective grounding system. A Horizontal Coupling Plane (1.6m x 0.8m) was placed on the table
and attached to the GRP by means of a cable with 940k total impedance. The equipment under test,
was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-2, and its cables were
placed on the HCP and isolated by an insulating support of 0.5mm thickness. A distance of 1-meter
minimum was provided between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory and any other metallic
structure.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment under test was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC
61000-4-2, and its cables were isolated from the Ground Reference Plane by an insulating support of
0.1-meter thickness. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum that is at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5
meters square connected to the protective grounding system and extended at least 0.5 meters from the
EUT on all sides.

Page 33
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.3.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing Performance

Criterion B

Air Discharge
Test Points

Test Levels
± 2 KV

± 4 KV

Results

± 8 KV

Pass

Fail

Front
Back
Left
Right
Top
Bottom

Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B

Observation
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note

1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2

Contact Discharge
Test Levels

Test Points

Results

Performance
Fail
± 2 KV ± 4 KV ± 8 KV Pass
Criterion
A
B
Back
Please refer to ESD test photo on next page for detail discharge point

Side of EUT

Note

1

2

Discharge To Horizontal Coupling Plane
Test Levels
Results
± 2 KV

± 4 KV

± 8 KV

Pass

Fail

Front
Back
Left
Right

Side of EUT

Observation

Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B

Observation
Note
Note
Note
Note

1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2

Discharge To Vertical Coupling Plane
Test Levels
Results
± 2 KV

± 4 KV

± 8 KV

Pass

Front
Back
Left
Right

Fail

Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B

Observation
Note
Note
Note
Note

1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2

Note: 1. There was no change compared with initial operation during the test.
2. No discharge point.

Page 34
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

The Photo for Discharge Points of EUT
Back

RedRed
DotDot
—Air
—Air
Discharged
Discharged
Blue
Blue
DotDot
—Contact
—Contact
Discharged
Discharged
Page 35
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.4. RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (RS)
8.4.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Polarity of Antenna:
Test Distance:
Antenna Height:

IEC 61000-4-3
80 MHz ~1000 MHz
3 V/m
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Horizontal and Vertical
3m
1.5m

8.4.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Name of Equipment

733 RS Chamber
Manufacturer
Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

Calibration of Field

N/A

Chamber#RS

Ver(Hor)-200805

06/16/2010

Signal Generator

Agilent

E4421B

MY43350597

05/21/2010

Electric Field Probe

AR

FP6001

305650

06/02/2010

RF Power Meter

Boonton

4231A

39601

08/16/2010

Amplifier

AR

100W1000M1

17564

No Calibration
Required

Direction Coupler

AR

DC6180A

312189

No Calibration
Required

Broadband Antenna

AR

AT1080

311819

No Calibration
Required

Thermo-Hygro meter

TFA

N/A

NO.6

11/10/2010

Software

SW1005 Release 1.4.exe

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

8.4.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-023)
The test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-3
a) The testing was performed in a fully anechoic chamber. The transmit antenna was located at a
distance of 3 meters from the EUT.
b) The frequency range is swept from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz, with the signal 80% amplitude
modulated with a 1kHz sine-wave. The rate of sweep did not exceed 1.5 x 10 -3 decade/s, where
the frequency range is swept incrementally, the step size was 1% of preceding frequency value.
c) The dwell time at each frequency shall be not less than the time necessary for the EUT to be
able to respond.
e) The test was performed with the EUT exposed to both vertically and horizontally polarized fields
on each of the four sides.

Page 36
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.4.4. TEST SETUP

3 meter

RS Chamber

EUT & Support
Units

1.5 meter
0.8m

Power Amp

Signal
Generator

PC Controller to
control S.G. & PA as
well as forward
power

EUT Monitoring by
using a camera

Control Room

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Note:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on a
non-conductive table 0.8 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and signal
wire according to relevant installation instructions.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on a
non-conductive wood support 0.1 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and
signal wire according to relevant installation instructions.

Page 37
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.4.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Dwell Time

3 sec.

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing Performance Criterion A

Frequency
(MHz)

Polarity

Azimuth

Field
Strength
(V/m)

80 ~ 1000

V&H

0

3

A

80 ~ 1000

V&H

90

3

80 ~ 1000

V&H

180

80 ~ 1000

V&H

270

Performance
Criterion

Observation

Result

B

Note

PASS

A

B

Note

PASS

3

A

B

Note

PASS

3

A

B

Note

PASS

Note: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.

Page 38
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.5. ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT (EFT)
8.5.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:

IEC 61000-4-4

Test Voltage:

AC Power Port: 1kV

Polarity:

Positive & Negative

Impulse Frequency:
Impulse Wave-shape:
Burst Duration:
Burst Period:
Test Duration:

5 kHz
5/50 ns
15 ms
300 ms
Not less than 1 min.

8.5.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Immunity Shield Room
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

EFT-Surge-Dip Grnerator

EMC-Partner

TRANSIENT-2000IN6

904

07/01/2010

Capacitive Clamp

EMC-Partner

CN-EFT1000

589

No Calibration
Required

Software

WinBest.exe

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

8.5.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-024)
a) Both positive and negative polarity discharges were applied.
b) The length of the “hot wire” from the coaxial output of the EFT generator to the terminals on
the EUT should not exceed 0.5 meter.
c) The duration time of each test sequential was 1 minute.
d) The transient/burst waveform was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-4, 5/50ns.

Page 39
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.5.4. TEST SETUP
This length should be 0.5m + 0.05m
AC Line

EFT/Burst
Generator

EUT

Controller Computer

GRP

Support

0.1m

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

Note:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table (0.1m high) standing on the Ground Reference Plane. The
GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum (at least 0.25mm thick and 2.5m square) connected to the
protective grounding system. A minimum distance of 0.5m was provided between the EUT and the walls of
the laboratory or any other metallic structure.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-4 and its cables,
were isolated from the Ground Reference Plane by an insulating support that is 0.1-meter thick. The GRP
consisted of a sheet of aluminum (at least 0.25mm thick and 2.5m square) connected to the protective
grounding system.

8.5.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing Performance

Test Point

Polarity

L
N
L–N

+/+/+/-

Criterion B

Test Level Performance
(kV)
Criterion
A
B
1
A
B
1
1

A

B

Observation

Result

Note
Note

1
1

2
2

PASS
PASS

Note

1

2

PASS

Note: There was no change compared with initial operation during the test.

Page 40
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.6. SURGE IMMUNITY TEST
8.6.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard: IEC 61000-4-5
Wave-Shape: Combination Wave
1.2/50 µs Open Circuit Voltage
8/20 µs Short Circuit Current
Test Voltage: AC Power Port~ line to line: 1kV
Surge Input/Output: AC Power Line: L-N
Generator Source Impedance: 2 ohm between networks
12 ohm between network and ground
Polarity: Positive/Negative
Phase Angle: 0° / 90° / 180° / 270°
Pulse Repetition Rate: 1 time / min. (maximum)
Number of Tests: 5 positive and 5 negative at selected points

8.6.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Immunity Shield Room
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

EFT-Surge-Dip Grnerator

EMC-Partner

TRANSIENT-2000IN6

904

07/01/2010

Signal and Data
Lines Coupling Network

Schaffner

CDN118

19328

No Calibration
Required

Software

WinBest.exe

Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable
to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

8.6.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-025)
a) For EUT power supply:
The surge is applied to the EUT power supply terminals via the capacitive coupling network.
Decoupling networks are required in order to avoid possible adverse effects on equipment not
under test that may be powered by the same lines, and to provide sufficient decoupling
impedance to the surge wave. The power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling
networks was shorter than 2 meters in length.
b) For test applied to unshielded un-symmetrically operated interconnection lines of EUT:
The surge was applied to the lines via the capacitive coupling. The coupling / decoupling
networks didn’t influence the specified functional conditions of the EUT. The interconnection line
between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks was shorter than 2 meters in length.
c) For test applied to unshielded symmetrically operated interconnection / telecommunication lines
of EUT:
The surge was applied to the lines via gas arrestors coupling. Test levels below the ignition
point of the coupling arrestor were not specified. The interconnection line between the EUT and
the coupling/decoupling networks was shorter than 2 meters in length.

Page 41
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.6.4. TEST SETUP

To AC
Source

EUT
&
Support Units

Surge Immunity
Test

0.8m

Controller Computer

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

8.6.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing Performance

Criterion B

Test Point

Polarity

Test Level
(kV)

L-N

+/-

1

Performance
Criterion
A

B

Observation
Note

1

Result
2

PASS

Note: 1. There was no change compared with initial operation during the test.

Page 42
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.7. CONDUCTED RADIO FREQUENCY DISTURBANCES (CS)
8.7.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Coupled cable:
Coupling device:

IEC 61000-4-6
0.15 MHz ~ 80 MHz
3 Vrms
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Power Mains, Unshielded
CDN-M2 (2 wires)

8.7.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
CS Room
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

CWS Generator

EM Test

CWS 500N1

V0395105080

09/28/2010

CDN

Schaffner

CDN M316

19600

07/29/2010

CDN

Schaffner

CDN M216

19294

07/29/2010

EM Clamp

Schaffner

KEMZ 801

19227

03/03/2010

CDN

Schaffner

CDN T002

15881

01/07/2010

CDN

Teseq

CDN T400A

25674

01/07/2010

CDN

Teseq

CDN T800

26155

01/07/2010

Attenuator

EMCI

SA3NL

10006F

No Calibration
Required

Software

Win2070.exe

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

Page 43
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.7.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-026)
The EUT shall be tested within its intended operating and climatic conditions.
The test shell performed with the test generator connected to each of the coupling and decoupling
devices in turn, while the other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling devices are terminated by
a 50-ohm load resistor.
The frequency range was swept from 150 kHz to 80 MHz, using the signal level established during
the setting process and with a disturbance signal of 80 % amplitude. The signal was modulated with
a 1 kHz sine wave, pausing to adjust the RF signal level or the switch coupling devices as
necessary. The sweep rate was 1.5 x 10-3 decades/s. Where the frequency range is swept
incrementally, the step size was 1 % of preceding frequency value from 150 kHz to 80 MHz.
The dwell time at each frequency was less than the time necessary for the EUT to be exercised,
and able to respond. Sensitive frequencies such as clock frequency(ies) and harmonics or
frequencies of dominant interest, was analyzed separately.
Attempts were made to fully exercise the EUT during testing, and to fully interrogate all exercise
modes selected for susceptibility.

8.7.4. TEST SETUP

Note: 1. The EUT is setup 0.1m above Ground Reference Plane
2. The CDNs and / or EM clamp used for real test depend on ports and cables configuration of EUT.

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Note:
TABLETOP AND FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment to be tested is placed on an insulating support of 0.1 meters height above a ground reference
plane. All relevant cables shall be provided with the appropriate coupling and decoupling devices at a
distance between 0.1 meters and 0.3 meters from the projected geometry of the EUT on the ground reference
plane.

Page 44
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.7.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing Performance
Field
Frequency
Strength
Band (MHz)
(Vrms)
0.15 ~ 80

3

Criterion A

Cable

Injection
Method

AC Power Line
(0.3m)

CDN-M2

Performance
Criterion
A

B

Result

Observation
Note

1

2

PASS

Note: There was no change compared with initial operation during the test.

Page 45
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.8. POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD
8.8.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:

IEC 61000-4-8

Frequency Range:

50Hz

Field Strength:

1 A/m

Observation Time:

1 minute

Inductance Coil:

Rectangular type, 1mx1m

8.8.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Immunity Shield Room
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Serial Number

Calibration Due

Induction Coil Interface

Schaffner

INA 21141

6009

No Calibration
Required

5KVA AC Power Source

Schaffner

NSG 1007

55131

No Calibration
Required

TRMS Clamp Meter

CHY

932C

995000273

06/14/2010

Magnetic Field Meter

Sypris

4080

0247

03/11/2010

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

8.8.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-027)
a) The equipment is configured and connected to satisfy its functional requirements. It shall be
placed on the GRP with the interposition of a 0.1m-thick insulating support.
b) The equipment cabinets shall be connected to the safety earth directly on the GRP via the earth
terminal of the EUT.
c) The power supply, input and output circuits shall be connected to the sources of power supply,
control and signal.
d) The cables supplied or recommended by the equipment manufacturer shall be used. 1 meter of
all cables used shall be exposed to the magnetic field.

Page 46
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.8.4. TEST SETUP

Induction
Coil
1/2 Dimension
of EUT

EUT

Signal
Generator
To
Earth Ground

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Note:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using the induction coil of standard dimension
(1 m x 1 m). The induction coil shall then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the EUT to the test field
with different orientations.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using induction coils of suitable dimensions.
The test shall be repeated by moving and shifting the induction coils, in order to test the whole volume of the
EUT for each orthogonal direction. The test shall be repeated with the coil shifted to different positions along
the side of the EUT, in steps corresponding to 50 % of the shortest side of the coil. The induction coil shall
then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the EUT to the test field with different orientations.

8.8.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
N/A
Pressure
N/A
Required Passing Performance
DIRECTION
X
Y
Z
Note:

Field Strength
(A/m)
1
1
1

Humidity
Tested By

Performance
Criterion
A
A
A

N/A
N/A
Criterion A
OBSERVATION

RESULTS

Note
Note
Note

N/A
N/A
N/A

The EUT is not containing any component that is susceptible to a 50 Hz or 60 Hz magnetic field.
Therefore, this requirement is not applicable to the EUT.

Page 47
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.9. VOLTAGE DIPS & VOLTAGE INTERRUPTIONS
8.9.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard: IEC 61000-4-11
Test duration time: Minimum three test events in sequence
Interval between event: Minimum 10 seconds
Phase Angle: 0o / 45o / 90o / 135o / 180o / 225o / 270o / 315o / 360o
Test cycle: 3 times

8.9.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Immunity shielded room
Name of Equipment

Manufacturer

Model

Signal Conditioning Unit

Schaffner

CCN 1000-1

72122

11/23/2010

5KVA AC Power Source

Schaffner

NSG 1007

55131

11/23/2010

Software

Serial Number Calibration Due

Win2100V3.exe

Note:
1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required

8.9.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-028)
a) The EUT and support units were located on a wooden table, 0.8 m away from ground floor.
b) Setting the parameter of tests and then perform the test software of test simulator.
c) Conditions changes to occur at 0 degree crossover point of the voltage waveform.
d) Recording the test result in test record form.

Page 48
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

8.9.4. TEST SETUP

To AC
Source

Dips/Interruption
and Variations
Simulator

EUT
&
Support Units

0.8m

Controller Computer

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.

8.9.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature

20oC

Humidity

50% RH

Pressure

1010mbar

Tested By

Kaka Huang

Required Passing
Performance

Criterion B: >95% reduction 0.5 periods
Criterion C: 30% reduction 25 periods & >95% reduction 250 periods

Test Power: 230Vac, 50Hz
Voltage
(% Reduction)

Duration
(Period)

>95

0.5

A

B

C

Note

1

2

PASS

30

25

A

B

C

Note

1

2

PASS

>95

250

A

B

C

Note

1

2

PASS

Performance
Criterion

Observation

Test Result

Note:
1. There was no change compared with initial operation during and after the test. No unintentional
response was found during the test.
2. EUT shut down, it could not become normal except reinstalled by operator.

Page 49
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

9 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION
CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST

Page 50
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

RADIATED EMISSION TEST

Page 51
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

HARMONIC & FLICKER TEST

ESD TEST

Page 52
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

RS TEST

EFT TEST

Page 53
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

SURGE TEST

CS TEST

Page 54
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: 91014003-E

VOLTAGE DIPS / INTERRUPTIONS TEST

Page 55
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.4
Linearized                      : Yes
Encryption                      : Standard V1.2 (40-bit)
User Access                     : Print, Fill forms, Extract, Assemble, Print high-res
Create Date                     : 2010:01:11 03:33:14Z
Modify Date                     : 2010:03:10 10:57:47+08:00
Page Count                      : 55
Creation Date                   : 2010:01:11 03:33:14Z
Mod Date                        : 2010:03:10 10:57:47+08:00
Producer                        : Acrobat Distiller 5.0.5 (Windows)
Author                          : eva.fan
Metadata Date                   : 2010:03:10 10:57:47+08:00
Creator                         : eva.fan
Title                           : Microsoft Word - 91014003-E _MICA_ EN55022&24.doc
Has XFA                         : No
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu