CE Report

2016-04-11

: Pdf Ce - Report CE_-__Report_ CertsReports 524179 ProductFiles

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 59

DownloadCE -  Report
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
Report No.:U10040802E-A01

EMC Test Report

eten Technologies Inc.

Applicant:

2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road,
Address of Applicant:

Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan,
R.O.C.

Equipment Under Test: 1 Port PoE Injector
Model Number:

PS-101

Series:

N/A

Matrix Test Laboratory
2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho Dist.,
New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.
TEL.:+886 2 2228-6610
FAX.:+886 2 2228-6580
CE EMC Testing Report

Page 1 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Contents
1

General Description

8

1.1

Description of EUT

8

1.2

Test Instruments

9

1.3

Auxiliary Equipments

11

1.4

Block Diagram

12

1.5

Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case )

12

1.6

Final Test Mode

12

1.7

Condition of Power Supply

12

1.8

EUT Configuration

13

1.9

Immunity Performance Classification

13

1.10

Test Facility

13

2

Conducted Emission Test(at Mains Terminal)

14

2.1

Test Instruments

14

2.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

14

2.3

Conducted Limit

15

2.4

Test Result

15

3

Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports)

18

3.1

Test Instruments

18

3.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

18

3.3

Conducted Limit

19

3.4

Test Result

19

4

Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz

21

4.1

Test Instruments

21

4.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

21

4.3

Test Limit

21

4.4

Test Result

21

5

Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz

24

5.1

Test Instruments

24

5.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

24

5.3

Test Limit

25

5.4

Test Result

25

6

Harmonic Current Emission Measurement

28

6.1

Test Instruments

28

6.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

28

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 2 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

6.3

EUT Operation Condition

28

6.4

Test Limit

28

6.5

Test Result

29

7

Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement

31

7.1

Test Instruments

31

7.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

31

7.3

EUT Operation Condition

31

7.4

Test Limit

31

7.5

Test Result

31

8

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test

33

8.1

Test Instruments

33

8.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

33

8.3

Test Result

34

9

Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test

35

9.1

Test Instruments

35

9.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

35

9.3

Test Result

36

10

Electrical Fast Transient Test

37

10.1

Test Instrument

37

10.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

37

10.3

Test Result

38

11

Surge Immunity Test

39

11.1

Test Instrument

39

11.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

39

11.3

Test Result

40

12

Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test

41

12.1

Test Instruments

41

12.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

41

12.3

Test Result

42

13

Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test

43

13.1

Test Instruments

43

13.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

43

13.3

Test Result

44

14

Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test

45

14.1

Test Instrument

45

14.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

45

14.3

Test Result

46

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 3 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15

Photographs of Test

47

15.1

Conducted Disturbance Test(at Mains Terminals)

47

15.2

Telecommunication Port Conducted Test

48

15.3

Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz

49

15.4

Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz

50

15.5

Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement

51

15.6

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test

51

15.7

Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test

52

15.8

Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test

52

15.9

Surge Immunity Test

53

15.10

Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test

53

15.11

Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test

54

15.12

Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test

54

16

Photographs of EUT

55

17

Photographs of ESD Test Points

58

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 4 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Verification
Applicant:

eten Techologies Inc.

Manufacturer:

eten Techologies Inc.

Equipment Under Test:

1 Port PoE Injector

Model Number:

PS-101

Series:

N/A

Sample Received Date:

2013-12-12 (for EMI reevaluation)

Test Standard:

Emission:

Immunity:

EN 55022:2010 Class A

EN 55024:2010

IEC 61000-3-2:2005

IEC 61000-4-2:2008

+A1:2008+A2:2009

IEC 61000-4-3:2006+A1:2007+A2:2010

IEC 61000-3-3:2008

IEC 61000-4-4:2004+A1:2010
IEC 61000-4-5:2005
IEC 61000-4-6:2008
IEC 61000-4-8:2009
IEC 61000-4-11:2004

Remark:
The original report No.U10040802E is replaced by report No.U10040802E-A01.This report details the
results of the test carried out on one sample. To fulfill the additional requirement on EN55022:2010, EMI
tests have been reevaluated on 2013-12-18. EMS tests, on the other hand, do not need to be reevaluated.
Therefore, original test result on U10040802E has been used. This report shows the EUT is technically
compliant with the EN 55022 and EN 55024 official requirements. This report applies to the above sample
only and shall not be reproduced in part without written approval of Matrix Test Laboratory.

Documented by:

Date:

2013-12-26

Date:

2013-12-18

Date:

2013-12-26

Jody Peng/ ADM. Dept Staff

Tested by:
Kidd Liao/ ENG. Dept. Staff

Approved by:
Peter Chin/ Head of Laboratory
CE EMC Testing Report

Page 5 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Summary of Test Result
Emission
Test Standard

Test Item

Test Result

Remark
Highest Emission

EN55022

Conducted

Class A

Emission

L:0.582MHz, Q.P.51.46dBuV, Margin -21.45 dB
Pass

A.V.51.09dBuV, Margin -8.82 dB
N:0.585MHz, Q.P.51.05dBuV, Margin -21.87 dB
A.V.43.40dBuV, Margin -16.52 dB

Conducted
EN55022
Class A

Highest Emission

Disturbance
(at

Pass

Voltage:2.931MHz, Q.P.62.05dBuV, Margin-15.32 dB
A.V.62.80dBuV, Margin -1.57 dB

Telecommunic
ation Ports)
Highest Emission

EN55022

Radiated

Class A

Emission

H: 222.060MHz, 53.48dBuV, Margin-4.22 dB
Pass

Antenna Height 3.36 m, Turntable Angle 318°
V: 182.290MHz, 51.91dBuV, Margin-6.53 dB
Antenna Height 1.99 m, Turntable Angle 70°
Highest Emission

Radiated
EN55022

Disturbance

Class A

Test

H: 1018.000MHz, 44.21dBuV, Margin-20.85dB
Pass

Antenna Height 2.34 m, Turntable Angle 121°
V: 1375.000MHz, 44.73dBuV, Margin-21.65 dB

(Above 1GHz)

Antenna Height 1.87 m, Turntable Angle 341°

EN61000-3-2

Harmonic

Pass

Refer to Page 30

EN61000-3-3

Flicker

Pass

Refer to Page 32

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 6 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Immunity

Test Standard

Test Item

Performance
Criteria

Observed
Result

Test Result

Class

IEC61000-4-2

Electrostatic Discharge

B

A

Pass

IEC61000-4-3

Radiated Susceptibility

A

A

Pass

IEC61000-4-4

Electrical Fast Transient

B

A

Pass

IEC61000-4-5

Surge

B

A

Pass

IEC61000-4-6

Conducted Susceptibility

A

A

Pass

IEC61000-4-8

Magnetic Field

A

A

Pass

Dips >95% B

A

Dips 30% C

A

IEC61000-4-11

Voltage Dips and Interruption

Interruptions
>95% C

CE EMC Testing Report

Pass

B

Page 7 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

1 General Description
1.1

Description of EUT

Equipment Under Test

: 1 Port PoE Injector

Model Number

: PS-101

Series

: N/A

Applicant

eten Technologies Inc.
: 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City

Address of Applicant
Manufacturer

231, Taiwan, R.O.C.
eten Technologies Inc.
: 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City

Address of Manufacturer

231, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Input: 110~240Vac, 60 / 50Hz

Power Supply

:

Data Cable

:

Output: 48Vdc
N/A
Dimensions : 120 mm (L) X 50 mm (W) X 35 mm (H)
Weight : 145 g

Description of EUT

: Highest Frequency of the Internal Source : Above 108MHz
Position :

Table-top /

Floor-standing

Intended Function : The EUT is a 1 Port PoE Injector.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 8 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

1.2

Test Instruments

Instruments Used for Emission Measurement
Calibration

Instrument

Manufacturer

Model

Serial No.

L.I.S.N.

Mess Tec

NNB-2/16Z

03/1006

2013-05-12 Conducted Emission

L.I.S.N.

EMCIS

LN2-16

LN04023

2013-02-08 Conducted Emission

Pulse Limiter

Mess Tec

PL10

N/A

2013-12-16 Conducted Emission

RF Cable

N/A

N/A

N/A

2013-05-11 Conducted Emission

EMI Receiver

R&S

ESCI

100615

2013-03-03

Bilog Antenna

Teseq GmbH

CBL6111D

25769

2013-03-03

Radiated Emission

Pre-Amplifier

Schaffner

CPA9231A

N/A

2013-07-20

Radiated Emission

Spectrum Analyzer

HP

8595E

3829A03763

2013-07-19

Radiated Emission

Spectrum Analyzer

R&S

FSL6

100564

2013-12-05

Radiated Emission

RF Cable

MIYAZAKI

8D-F8

N/A

2013-07-20

Radiated Emission

Chroma

6520

2048

2013-02-01

Harmonic, Flicker

Chroma

6630

0597

2013-02-01

Harmonic, Flicker

Programmable AC
Source
Universal Power
Analyzer

Date

Application

Conducted Emission
Radiated Emission

Note: The instruments listed above are within their calibration period of 1 year.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 9 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Instruments Used for Immunity Measurement
Calibration

Instrument

Manufacturer

Model

Serial No.

ESD Simulator

Noiseken

TC-815R

ESS0868491

2009-12-17

ESD Simulator

Noiseken

ESS-2002EX ESS0868406

2009-12-17

Antenna

FRANKONIA

BTA-H

030001H

2009-08-03

Radiated Immunity

Field Probe

EMCO

7201

N/A

2009-10-21

Radiated Immunity

Power Amplifier

IFI

CMX50

N/A

2009-10-21

Radiated Immunity

Signal Generator

R&S

SML03

103396

2010-01-29

Radiated Immunity

CDN

FRANKONIA

CDN M2+M3

A3011037

2010-03-03 Conducted Immunity

CDN

FRANKONIA

CDN M2+M3

A3011134

2010-03-03 Conducted Immunity

C.I. Test System

FRANKONIA

CIT-10/75

102C3208

2009-12-03 Conducted Immunity

Power Attenuator

FRANKONIA

75-A-FFN-06

0212

2009-12-03 Conducted Immunity

RF Cable

N/A

N/A

N/A

2009-05-07 Conducted Immunity

MF-1000-1

119

2009-11-04

Antenna

EMC
PARTNER

Date

Application
Electrostatic
Discharge
Electrostatic
Discharge

Magnetic Field
Disturbance
Electrostatic
Discharge,

Transient 2000

EMC
PARTNER

Fast Transient,
TRA-2000

449

2009-11-05

Surge,
Magnetic Field
Disturbance,
Dips & Interruptions

Note: The instruments listed above are within their calibration period of 1 year.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 10 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

1.3

Auxiliary Equipments

For Immunity test
Provided by Matrix Test Lab.
EMC
No.

Equipment

Model No.

Serial No.

Brand

Power Cord

Approved
1.

PC No.1

HP Pavilion A1510TW

CNX6290BWF

FCC, BSMI

HP

Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.5m

2.

PC No.2

HP Pavilion A1510TW

CNX6290BXQ

FCC, BSMI

HP

Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.5m

3.

Monitor No. 3

SDM-HS75P

1500379

4.

Monitor No. 5

VS11868

QRA074526459

FCC BSMI

SONY

CE FCC

VIEW

BSMI

SONIC

5.

PS2 Key Board No. 2

Y-SU61

BT911DG4374

CE, FCC

LOGITECH

6.

PS2 Key Board No. 5

Y-SU61

BT911DG4375

CE, FCC

LOGITECH

7.

PS2 Mouse No. 2

M-SBF96

HC9070E036B

CE FCC

LOGITECH

8.

PS2 Mouse No. 6

M-SBF96

HC9070E0343

CE, FCC

LOGITECH

9.

Printer No. 1

EPSON STYLUS C61

EK5Y014949

3912E328

EPSON

10.

Modem No. 1

1456VQE-C

1234A36998

3882B582

LEMEL

11.

Load 14Ω

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Model No.

Serial No.

VGA CABLE
Shielded, Detachable, 1.5m, With
Core
DVI CABLE
Shielded, Detachable, 1.5m, With
Core
VGA CABLE
Shielded, Detachable, 1.8m, With
Core
DVI CABLE
Shielded, Detachable, 1.8m, With
Core
PS2 CABLE
Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.7m,
Without Core
PS2 CABLE
Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.7m,
Without Core
PS2 CABLE
Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.8m,
Without Core
PS2 CABLE
Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.8m,
Without Core
PRINTER CABLE
Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.8M
RS-232 CABLE
Non-shielded, Detachable, 3M
N/A

For Emission test
Provided by Matrix Test Lab.
EMC
No.

Equipment

Brand

Power Cord

Approved

12.

Notebook

N61J

N61JV-021A520M

CE,FCC,
C-TICK
N13219,
BSMI
R31018

13.

Load 29Ω

N/A

N/A

N/A

Model No.

Serial No.

ASUS

N/A

Adapter to Notebook
Unshielded*1.8m
AC to Adapter Unshielded*1.8m
N/A

For Emission test
Provided by Manufacturer.
EMC
No.

Equipment

Brand

Power Cord

Approved
14.

Splitter

CE EMC Testing Report

PD-2024

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Page 11 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

1.4

Block Diagram

Emission Test

LAN

AC Power

Internet

EUT

LAN
LAN

EUT

Notebook
Load 29Ω

Immunity test

Monitor
PS2 K/B
PS2 Mouse

PC

LAN

Printer

Splitter
(Provided by the

LAN

EUT

AC Power

Manufacturer)

Modem
AC Power

Load 14Ω

LAN
PC System

1.5

Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case )
1. Operation Mode
Note: After pre-test, we identified that the Operation Mode (the worst case) was most likely to cause
maximum disturbance and most likely to be susceptible to disturbance. Therefore, the Final EMC
Assessment was performed for the worst case.

1.6

Final Test Mode
Operation Mode

1.7

Condition of Power Supply
AC 230V, 50Hz

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 12 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

1.8

EUT Configuration
1. Setup the EUT as shown in Sec.1.4 Block Diagram.
2. Turn on the power of all equipments.
3. Activate the selected Final Test Mode.

1.9

Immunity Performance Classification
Class

Class Criterion
The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No

A

degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
specified by the manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended.

B

C

After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator
intervention.
Lost of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable, or can be restored
by the operation of the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

1.10 Test Facility
All tests are completed by Matrix Test Laboratory. Radiated emission

Site Description

:

Name of Firm

: Matrix Test Laboratory

Site Location

:

1.10.1

is performed at HongAn’s open-site.

2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan,
R.O.C.

Test Methodology
All Emission Tests were performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55022. Radiated
Emission Test was performed at 10 m distance from antenna to EUT. All Immunity Tests were
performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 13 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

2 Conducted Emission Test(at Mains Terminal)
2.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

2.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table which was 80 cm above the horizontal coupling
plane. The rear of the EUT was 40 cm from the vertical coupling plane.



The excess interface cables were folded at the cable center into a bundle no longer than 40 cm, so
that the bundles were on the table.



The EUT was connected to the main power through a L.I.S.N. This set up provided 50 ohm / 50
H coupling impedance for the measuring equipment.



All auxiliary equipment received power from a second L.I.S.N.



The conducted emissions were measured between the Line Phase and the PE ground and
between the Neutral Phase and the PE ground using an EMI Receiver.



The values were recorded.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 14 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

2.3

Conducted Limit
EN 55022
Frequency (MHz)

Class A

Class B

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

0.15 ~ 0.50

79

66

66 to 56

56 to 46

0.50 ~ 5.0

73

60

56

46

5.0 ~ 30

73

60

60

50

The EMI Receiver bandwidth was set at 9 kHz.

2.4

Test Result
PASS
The final test data are shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 15 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Conducted Emission Test Data
Test Date

: 2013-12-18

Power Line :

Line

Temperature

: 22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 16 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Conducted Emission Test Data
Test Date

: 2013-12-18

Power Line :

Neutral

Temperature

: 22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 17 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

3 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports)
3.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

3.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the horizontal ground plane with EUT being connected to
the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network(LISN). All other support
equipments powered from additional LISN(s). The LISN provide 50 Ohm/50H of coupling
impedance for the measuring instrument.



Interconnecting cables that hang closer than 40cm to the ground plane shall be folded back and
forth in the center forming a bundle no longer than 40cm.



I/O cables that are not connected to a peripheral shall be bundled in the center. The end of the
cable may be terminated, if required, using the correct terminating impedance. The overall length
shall not exceed 1m.



ISN at least 80cm from nearest part of EUT chassis.



The communication function of EUT was executed and ISN was connected between EUT and
associated equipment and the ISN was connected directly to reference ground plane.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 18 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

3.3

Conducted Limit
Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in
the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class A equipment.
Frequency (MHz)

Voltage Limits dB(V)

Current Limits dB(A)

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

0.15 ~ 0.5

97 to 87

84 to 74

53 to 43

40 to 30

0.5 ~ 30

87

74

43

30

NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to
0.5MHz.
NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance
stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150
Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB)
Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in
the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class B equipment.
Frequency (MHz)

Voltage Limits dB(V)

Current Limits dB(A)

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

Q.P. (Quasi-Peak)

A.V. (Average)

0.15 ~ 0.5

84 to 74

74 to 64

40 to 30

30 to 20

0.5 ~ 30

74

64

30

20

NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to
0.5MHz.
NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance
stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150
Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB)

3.4

Test Result
PASS
The final test data are shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 19 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Conducted Disturbance Test Data
Test Date

: 2013-12-18

Measurement Method : Voltage

Temperature

: 22.7℃

Humidity

: 51%

Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 20 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz
4.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments.

4.2

Test Arrangement and Procedure

10 m

1~ 4 m

EUT

Pre-Amplifier

Turn Table

80 cm

Test Receiver

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80 cm above the
horizontal ground plane. The EUT was set 10 m away from the receiving antenna that
was mounted on a non-conductive mast.



Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet.
The mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane.



The antenna was adjusted between 1 m and 4 m in height above the ground plane and
the Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top
6 maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 3.3.



The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set
horizontally and vertically.



4.3

The values were recorded.

Test Limit
EN 55022
Frequency (MHz)

Class A

Class B

Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m)

Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m)

30 ~ 230

40.0

30.0

230 ~ 1000

47.0

37.0

The EMI test receiver bandwidth was set at 120 kHz.

4.4

Test Result
PASS
The final test data are shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 21 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Radiated Emission Test Data
Test Date

:

2013-12-18

Polarization :

Horizontal

Temperature

:

22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak values.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 22 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Radiated Emission Test Data
Test Date

:

2013-12-18

Polarization :

Vertical

Temperature

:

22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak values.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 23 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

5 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz
5.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments.

5.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

3m

1~ 4 m

EUT

Pre-Amplifier

Turn Table

80 cm

Test Receiver

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80cm above the horizontal
ground plane. The EUT was set 3m away from the receiving antenna that was mounted on
a non-conductive mast.



Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet. The
mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane.



The antenna was adjusted between 1m and 4m in height above the ground plane and the
Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top 6
maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 4.3.



The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set
horizontally and vertically.



The values were recorded.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 24 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

5.3

Test Limit
EN55022 Class A ITE at a measurement distance of 3m
Frequency

Average limit

Peak limit

GHz

dB(µV/m)

dB(µV/m)

1 to 3

56

76

3 to 6

60

80

NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency.
EN55022 Class B ITE at a measurement distance of 3m
Frequency

Average limit

Peak limit

GHz

dB(µV/m)

dB(µV/m)

1 to 3

50

70

3 to 6

54

74

NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency.

5.4

Test Result
PASS
The final tests data are shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 25 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Radiated Emission Test Data
Test Date

:

2013-12-18

Polarization :

Horizontal

Temperature

:

22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V.
reading was not measured.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 26 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Radiated Emission Test Data
Test Date

:

2012-12-18

Polarization :

Vertical

Temperature

:

22.7℃

Humidity

51%

:

Remark:All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V.
reading was not measured.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 27 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

6 Harmonic Current Emission Measurement
6.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

6.2



Test Configuration and Procedure

The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for
the measurement of harmonic currents.



The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was
programmed as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT.



Classify the EUT class in accordance with the IEC61000-3-2 for the purpose of harmonic
current limitation. The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The
test result was collected and analyzed by the computer.

6.3

EUT Operation Condition
Environment Condition

6.4

Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

22.7℃

51%RH

1019mbar

Test Limit
Class A Equipment
Harmonic Order (n)

Maximum permissible harmonic current (A)
Odd harmonics

3

2.30

5

1.14

7

0.77

9

0.40

11

0.33

13

0.21

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 28 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01
15 ≤ n ≤ 39

0.15 * 15 / n
Even harmonics

6.5

2

1.08

4

0.43

6

0.30

8 ≤ n ≤ 40

0.23 * 8 / n

Test Result
PASS
The measured result is shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 29 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Note: The EUT power level is below 75watts therefore has no defined limits.
CE EMC Testing Report

Page 30 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

7 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement
7.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

7.2



Test Configuration and Procedure

The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for the
measurement of Flicker Voltage.



The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was programmed
as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT.



The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The test result was collected
and analyzed by the computer.

7.3

EUT Operation Condition
Environment Condition

7.4

Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

22.7℃

51%RH

1019mbar

Test Item

Limit

Remark

Pst

1.0

Pst means short-term flicker indicator. Tp=10 min

Plt

0.65

Plt means long-term flicker indicator. Tp=2 hrs

dt (%)

3.3

For more than 500ms

4

dmax means relative maximum voltage change.

3.3

dc means relative steady-state voltage change.

Test Limit

dmax (%)
dc (%)

7.5

Test Result
PASS
The measured result is shown on the following page(s).

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 31 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 32 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

8 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test
8.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

8.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was located on a 0.8 m high wooden table standing on the ground reference
plane with a 1.6 * 0.8 m horizontal coupling plane on the top. The EUT and cables was
isolated from the coupling plane by an insulating support 0.5 mm thick.



In Contact Discharge, the EUT was exposed to minimum 200 discharges, 100 each at
negative and positive polarity on the selected test points ( the selected test points were
marked with red labels on the EUT )



In Air Discharge, the EUT exposed to minimum of 10 single discharges on the selected
test points.



The result was observed and analyzed.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 33 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

8.3

Test Result

8.3.1

8.3.2

Environment Condition
Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

21℃

48%RH

1022.1mbar

Observation of Direct Discharge
Test Points:

1. Junction of Case. 2. LED Indicator. 3. AC Jack. 4. LAN Jacks.
Test Specifications

Type of

Test

Discharge

Level

Air

2,4,8

Discharge

(kV)

Contact

2,4

Discharge

(kV)

Remarks

Polarity

Performance

Test

Number of

Required by

Observed

Point

Discharge

EN55024

Result

B

A

Pass

B

A

Pass

±

1~4

±

4

20/ per
point
50/ per
point

Verdict

1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout
the entire time interval of air discharge.
2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout
the entire time interval of contact discharge.

8.3.3

Observation of Indirect Discharge
Test Points:

1. Front Side. 2. Rear Side. 3. Left Side. 4. Right Side.
Test Specifications

Type of

Test

Discharge

Level

HCP

2,4

Application

(kV)

VCP

2,4

Application

(kV)

Remarks

Polarity

Performance

Test

Number of

Required by

Observed

Point

Discharge

EN55024

Result

B

A

Pass

B

A

Pass

±

1~4

±

1~4

50/ per
point
50/ per
point

Verdict

1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout
the entire time interval of HCP application.
2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout
the entire time interval of VCP application.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified
in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 34 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

9 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test
9.1

Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

9.2

Test Configuration and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The field calibration was executed to create a uniform field area (UFA), 3 m away from the
antenna, to ensure the validity of the test results.



The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table 0.8 m high in the UFA.



The EUT was then connected to power and signal wires according to relevant installation
instruction.



The EUT was positioned so that the four sides of the EUT were exposed to the
electromagnetic field in sequence. In each position, the performance of the EUT was
investigated and monitored by a CCD camera..

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 35 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

9.3

Test Result

9.3.1

Environment Condition

9.3.2

Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

21℃

48%RH

1022.1mbar

Observation of Test
Test Specifications
Type of

Field

Frequency

Modulation

Strength

Range

Amplitude

3V/m

Modulation
Remark

Modulation

80 to

80%, 1KHz,

1000MHz

sinusoidal

Performance
Required by

Observed

EN55024

Result

A

A

Verdict
Pass

No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 36 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

10 Electrical Fast Transient Test
10.1 Test Instrument
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

10.2 Test Configuration and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference
plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides.



The ground plane was connected to the protective earth.



The distance between the EUT and all other conductive structures, except the ground plane
beneath the EUT was more than 0.5 m.



The length of the signal and power lies between the coupling device and the EUT was 0.5 m.



All cables to the EUT were placed on the insulation support 0.1 m above the ground reference
plane.



The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly coupled
the EFT interference signal. Each of the Line, Neutral and Protective Earth conductors was
injected with burst for 1 minute. The test time was broken down into six 10 s bursts separated
by a 10 s pause for avoiding synchronization. Both voltage polarities were applied for each test
level.



Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 37 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

10.3 Test Result
10.3.1

Environment Condition
Temperature
21℃

10.3.2

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

48%RH

1022.1mbar

Observation of Power Supply Port
Test Specifications
Coupling

Voltage

Selection

(kV)

Test

Repetition

Duration

Rate

(Sec)

(kHz)

Performance
Tr/ Td

Required by

(nS)

EN 55024

Observed
Result

Verdict

L

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

N

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

PE

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

L+N

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

L + PE

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

N + PE

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

L + N +PE

±1

60

5

5/50

B

A

Pass

Remark

No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.

Note

Phase Shifting:0º,90º,180º,270º,360º

10.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m)
There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been
required.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 38 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

11 Surge Immunity Test
11.1 Test Instrument
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

11.2 Test Configuration and Procedure

EUT

TRANSIENT
2000(Surge)
Metallic Ground Plane

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference
plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides.



The ground plane was connected to the protective earth.



The length of power cord between the coupling device and the EUT is less than 2 m (provided
by the manufacturer).



The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly couples
the Surge interference signal. The surge noise was applied synchronized to the voltage phase
at the zero crossing and the peak value of the AC voltage wave (positive and negative).



The surges were applied line to line and line(s) to earth. When testing line to earth the test
voltage was applied successively between each of the lines and earth. Steps up to the test
level specified increased the test voltage. All lower levels including the selected test level were
tested. The polarity of each surge level included positive and negative test pulses.



Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 39 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

11.3 Test Result
11.3.1

11.3.2

Environment Condition
Temperature

Humidity

21℃

48%RH

Atmospheric Pressure
1022.1mbar

Observation of Power Supply Port
Test Specifications

Performance

Min. of Surge

Repetition

at Each

Rate

Polarity

(per min)

±0.5, 1

5

L ►PE

±0.5, 1,2

N ►PE

±0.5, 1,2

Coupling

Voltage

Selection

(kV)

L ►N

Remark

Required by

Observed

EN 55024

Result

1

B

A

Pass

5

1

B

A

Pass

5

1

B

A

Pass

Verdict

No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.

11.3.3

Observation of other supply/ signal lines: (Applicable only to ports which according to the
manufacturer’s specification may connect directly to outdoor cables)
N/A

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 40 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

12 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test
12.1 Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

12.2 Test Configuration and Procedure



The EUT was placed on an insulating support of 0.1 m height above a ground reference plane.
All cables exiting the EUT was supported at a height of 30 mm above the ground reference
plane.



The EUT was connected to the power mains through a Coupling and Decoupling Networks
(CDN).



The CDN was located 0.3 m from the EUT as indicated in the diagram above.



The test was performed with the test generator connected to each of the CDN in turn while the
other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling devices were terminated by a 50  terminator.



The conducted disturbance was applied on the EUT from 150 kHz to 80 MHz using the signal
levels established during the setting process. .



Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 41 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

12.3 Test Result
12.3.1

12.3.2

Environment Condition
Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

21℃

48%RH

1022.1mbar

Observation of Test
Test Specifications
Type of

Voltage Level

Frequency

Modulation

(emf) U0

Range

Amplitude
Modulation
Remark

3V/ 130dBμV

0.15 to
80MHz

Performance

Modulation

Required by

Observed

EN 55024

Result

A

A

Verdict

80%,
1kHz,

Pass

sinusoidal

No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.

Note

Phase Shifting:0º,90º,180º,270º,360º

12.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m)
There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been
required.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 42 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

13 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test
13.1 Test Instruments
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

13.2 Test Configuration and Procedure

Table-top Equipment


The EUT was placed on a non-magnetic metal ground plane of 0.25 mm thickness with the
interposition of a 0.1 m thickness insulating support. The ground plane was connected to the
protected earth.



The EUT was placed at the center of the 1 * 1 m induction coil with the test generator placed
within 3 m distance.



The test was operated by moving and shifting the induction coil to expose to the test field.



The operation condition was observed and analyzed.



The induction coil was then rotated by 90° to expose the EUT to the test field with different
orientations and the same procedure.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 43 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

13.3 Test Result
13.3.1

13.3.2

Environment Condition
Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

21℃

48%RH

1022.1mbar

Observation of Test
Level (A/m)
1
Remark

Frequency

Performance Required

Observed

(Hz)

by EN55024

Result

50

A

A

Verdict
Pass

No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed
throughout the entire test.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 44 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

14 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test
14.1 Test Instrument
Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments.

14.2 Test Configuration and Procedure

EUT

TRANSIENT
2000(Dips)
Metallic Ground Plane



The EUT was tested with (Ⅰ) >95% voltage dip of supplied voltage with a duration of 10 ms
(Ⅱ) 30% voltage dip of supplied voltage with duration 500 ms (Ⅲ) A 95% voltage interruption
of supplied voltage with duration of 5000 ms,



For each selected combination of test level and duration with a sequence of three dips /
interruptions with intervals of 10 s.



For Voltage Dips, changes in supply voltage occurred at zero crossings of the voltage.



For Short Interruptions, changes in supply voltage also occurred at zero crossings of the
voltage.



The performance of the EUT was monitored and recorded.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 45 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

14.3 Test Result
14.3.1

14.3.2

Environment Condition
Temperature

Humidity

Atmospheric Pressure

21℃

48%RH

1022.11mbar

Observation of Power Supply Port
Voltage Dips
Test Specifications
Voltage

Duration

No. of

Periods

Reductions

>95

0.5

3

30

25

3

Reduction
(%)

Performance

Interval between

Required by

Observed

EN 55024

Result

≥ 10

B

A

Pass

≥ 10

C

A

Pass

Each Duration
(sec.)

Verdict

Remarks 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.
2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the
entire test.
Voltage Interruptions
Test Specifications
Voltage
Reduction
(%)
>95

Duration
Periods

Performance

Interval between
No. of Reductions

250

Each Duration
(sec.)

3

Required by

Observed

EN 55024

Result

C

B

≥ 10

Verdict
Pass

Remark When testing Voltage Dip with 4% of the normal power supply voltage, the power
indicator went off. After testing, it self-recovered.

PASS
The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria
specified in EN 55024.

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 46 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15 Photographs of Test
15.1 Conducted Disturbance Test(at Mains Terminals)

Front View

Rear View

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 47 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.2 Telecommunication Port Conducted Test

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 48 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.3 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz

Front View

Rear View

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 49 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz

Front View

Rear View

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 50 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.5 Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement

15.6 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 51 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.7 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test

15.8 Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 52 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.9 Surge Immunity Test

15.10 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 53 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

15.11 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test

15.12 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 54 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

16 Photographs of EUT

Front View of the EUT

Rear View of the EUT

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 55 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Inside View of the EUT

Front View of the PCB

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 56 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

Rear View of the PCB

View of the Power Cable

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 57 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

17 Photographs of ESD Test Points

View of ESD Test Points

View of ESD Test Point

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 58 of 59

Report No.:U10040802E-A01

View of ESD Test Point

View of ESD Test Point

CE EMC Testing Report

Page 59 of 59



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : No
Encryption                      : Standard V4.4 (128-bit)
User Access                     : Print, Extract, Print high-res
Author                          : sales
Create Date                     : 2014:01:08 10:08:28+08:00
Modify Date                     : 2014:01:15 15:07:42+08:00
Has XFA                         : No
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03
Creator Tool                    : PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2
Metadata Date                   : 2014:01:15 15:07:42+08:00
Format                          : application/pdf
Title                           : Microsoft Word - CE - Test Report .doc
Creator                         : sales
Producer                        : Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)
Document ID                     : uuid:1a656b87-ca5c-49d4-af87-db0801924036
Instance ID                     : uuid:4c033bec-3c12-4190-b45b-feda93fbc32f
Page Count                      : 59
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu