CE Report
2016-04-11
: Pdf Ce - Report CE_-__Report_ CertsReports 524179 ProductFiles
Open the PDF directly: View PDF
.
Page Count: 59
| Download | |
| Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
Report No.:U10040802E-A01 EMC Test Report eten Technologies Inc. Applicant: 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Address of Applicant: Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. Equipment Under Test: 1 Port PoE Injector Model Number: PS-101 Series: N/A Matrix Test Laboratory 2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEL.:+886 2 2228-6610 FAX.:+886 2 2228-6580 CE EMC Testing Report Page 1 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Contents 1 General Description 8 1.1 Description of EUT 8 1.2 Test Instruments 9 1.3 Auxiliary Equipments 11 1.4 Block Diagram 12 1.5 Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case ) 12 1.6 Final Test Mode 12 1.7 Condition of Power Supply 12 1.8 EUT Configuration 13 1.9 Immunity Performance Classification 13 1.10 Test Facility 13 2 Conducted Emission Test(at Mains Terminal) 14 2.1 Test Instruments 14 2.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 14 2.3 Conducted Limit 15 2.4 Test Result 15 3 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports) 18 3.1 Test Instruments 18 3.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 18 3.3 Conducted Limit 19 3.4 Test Result 19 4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 21 4.1 Test Instruments 21 4.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 21 4.3 Test Limit 21 4.4 Test Result 21 5 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 24 5.1 Test Instruments 24 5.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 24 5.3 Test Limit 25 5.4 Test Result 25 6 Harmonic Current Emission Measurement 28 6.1 Test Instruments 28 6.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 28 CE EMC Testing Report Page 2 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 6.3 EUT Operation Condition 28 6.4 Test Limit 28 6.5 Test Result 29 7 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 31 7.1 Test Instruments 31 7.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 31 7.3 EUT Operation Condition 31 7.4 Test Limit 31 7.5 Test Result 31 8 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 33 8.1 Test Instruments 33 8.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 33 8.3 Test Result 34 9 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 35 9.1 Test Instruments 35 9.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 35 9.3 Test Result 36 10 Electrical Fast Transient Test 37 10.1 Test Instrument 37 10.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 37 10.3 Test Result 38 11 Surge Immunity Test 39 11.1 Test Instrument 39 11.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 39 11.3 Test Result 40 12 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 41 12.1 Test Instruments 41 12.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 41 12.3 Test Result 42 13 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 43 13.1 Test Instruments 43 13.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 43 13.3 Test Result 44 14 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 45 14.1 Test Instrument 45 14.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 45 14.3 Test Result 46 CE EMC Testing Report Page 3 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15 Photographs of Test 47 15.1 Conducted Disturbance Test(at Mains Terminals) 47 15.2 Telecommunication Port Conducted Test 48 15.3 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 49 15.4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 50 15.5 Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 51 15.6 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 51 15.7 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 52 15.8 Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test 52 15.9 Surge Immunity Test 53 15.10 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 53 15.11 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 54 15.12 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 54 16 Photographs of EUT 55 17 Photographs of ESD Test Points 58 CE EMC Testing Report Page 4 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Verification Applicant: eten Techologies Inc. Manufacturer: eten Techologies Inc. Equipment Under Test: 1 Port PoE Injector Model Number: PS-101 Series: N/A Sample Received Date: 2013-12-12 (for EMI reevaluation) Test Standard: Emission: Immunity: EN 55022:2010 Class A EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-3-2:2005 IEC 61000-4-2:2008 +A1:2008+A2:2009 IEC 61000-4-3:2006+A1:2007+A2:2010 IEC 61000-3-3:2008 IEC 61000-4-4:2004+A1:2010 IEC 61000-4-5:2005 IEC 61000-4-6:2008 IEC 61000-4-8:2009 IEC 61000-4-11:2004 Remark: The original report No.U10040802E is replaced by report No.U10040802E-A01.This report details the results of the test carried out on one sample. To fulfill the additional requirement on EN55022:2010, EMI tests have been reevaluated on 2013-12-18. EMS tests, on the other hand, do not need to be reevaluated. Therefore, original test result on U10040802E has been used. This report shows the EUT is technically compliant with the EN 55022 and EN 55024 official requirements. This report applies to the above sample only and shall not be reproduced in part without written approval of Matrix Test Laboratory. Documented by: Date: 2013-12-26 Date: 2013-12-18 Date: 2013-12-26 Jody Peng/ ADM. Dept Staff Tested by: Kidd Liao/ ENG. Dept. Staff Approved by: Peter Chin/ Head of Laboratory CE EMC Testing Report Page 5 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Summary of Test Result Emission Test Standard Test Item Test Result Remark Highest Emission EN55022 Conducted Class A Emission L:0.582MHz, Q.P.51.46dBuV, Margin -21.45 dB Pass A.V.51.09dBuV, Margin -8.82 dB N:0.585MHz, Q.P.51.05dBuV, Margin -21.87 dB A.V.43.40dBuV, Margin -16.52 dB Conducted EN55022 Class A Highest Emission Disturbance (at Pass Voltage:2.931MHz, Q.P.62.05dBuV, Margin-15.32 dB A.V.62.80dBuV, Margin -1.57 dB Telecommunic ation Ports) Highest Emission EN55022 Radiated Class A Emission H: 222.060MHz, 53.48dBuV, Margin-4.22 dB Pass Antenna Height 3.36 m, Turntable Angle 318° V: 182.290MHz, 51.91dBuV, Margin-6.53 dB Antenna Height 1.99 m, Turntable Angle 70° Highest Emission Radiated EN55022 Disturbance Class A Test H: 1018.000MHz, 44.21dBuV, Margin-20.85dB Pass Antenna Height 2.34 m, Turntable Angle 121° V: 1375.000MHz, 44.73dBuV, Margin-21.65 dB (Above 1GHz) Antenna Height 1.87 m, Turntable Angle 341° EN61000-3-2 Harmonic Pass Refer to Page 30 EN61000-3-3 Flicker Pass Refer to Page 32 CE EMC Testing Report Page 6 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Immunity Test Standard Test Item Performance Criteria Observed Result Test Result Class IEC61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge B A Pass IEC61000-4-3 Radiated Susceptibility A A Pass IEC61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transient B A Pass IEC61000-4-5 Surge B A Pass IEC61000-4-6 Conducted Susceptibility A A Pass IEC61000-4-8 Magnetic Field A A Pass Dips >95% B A Dips 30% C A IEC61000-4-11 Voltage Dips and Interruption Interruptions >95% C CE EMC Testing Report Pass B Page 7 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 1 General Description 1.1 Description of EUT Equipment Under Test : 1 Port PoE Injector Model Number : PS-101 Series : N/A Applicant eten Technologies Inc. : 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City Address of Applicant Manufacturer 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. eten Technologies Inc. : 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City Address of Manufacturer 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. Input: 110~240Vac, 60 / 50Hz Power Supply : Data Cable : Output: 48Vdc N/A Dimensions : 120 mm (L) X 50 mm (W) X 35 mm (H) Weight : 145 g Description of EUT : Highest Frequency of the Internal Source : Above 108MHz Position : Table-top / Floor-standing Intended Function : The EUT is a 1 Port PoE Injector. CE EMC Testing Report Page 8 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 1.2 Test Instruments Instruments Used for Emission Measurement Calibration Instrument Manufacturer Model Serial No. L.I.S.N. Mess Tec NNB-2/16Z 03/1006 2013-05-12 Conducted Emission L.I.S.N. EMCIS LN2-16 LN04023 2013-02-08 Conducted Emission Pulse Limiter Mess Tec PL10 N/A 2013-12-16 Conducted Emission RF Cable N/A N/A N/A 2013-05-11 Conducted Emission EMI Receiver R&S ESCI 100615 2013-03-03 Bilog Antenna Teseq GmbH CBL6111D 25769 2013-03-03 Radiated Emission Pre-Amplifier Schaffner CPA9231A N/A 2013-07-20 Radiated Emission Spectrum Analyzer HP 8595E 3829A03763 2013-07-19 Radiated Emission Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSL6 100564 2013-12-05 Radiated Emission RF Cable MIYAZAKI 8D-F8 N/A 2013-07-20 Radiated Emission Chroma 6520 2048 2013-02-01 Harmonic, Flicker Chroma 6630 0597 2013-02-01 Harmonic, Flicker Programmable AC Source Universal Power Analyzer Date Application Conducted Emission Radiated Emission Note: The instruments listed above are within their calibration period of 1 year. CE EMC Testing Report Page 9 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Instruments Used for Immunity Measurement Calibration Instrument Manufacturer Model Serial No. ESD Simulator Noiseken TC-815R ESS0868491 2009-12-17 ESD Simulator Noiseken ESS-2002EX ESS0868406 2009-12-17 Antenna FRANKONIA BTA-H 030001H 2009-08-03 Radiated Immunity Field Probe EMCO 7201 N/A 2009-10-21 Radiated Immunity Power Amplifier IFI CMX50 N/A 2009-10-21 Radiated Immunity Signal Generator R&S SML03 103396 2010-01-29 Radiated Immunity CDN FRANKONIA CDN M2+M3 A3011037 2010-03-03 Conducted Immunity CDN FRANKONIA CDN M2+M3 A3011134 2010-03-03 Conducted Immunity C.I. Test System FRANKONIA CIT-10/75 102C3208 2009-12-03 Conducted Immunity Power Attenuator FRANKONIA 75-A-FFN-06 0212 2009-12-03 Conducted Immunity RF Cable N/A N/A N/A 2009-05-07 Conducted Immunity MF-1000-1 119 2009-11-04 Antenna EMC PARTNER Date Application Electrostatic Discharge Electrostatic Discharge Magnetic Field Disturbance Electrostatic Discharge, Transient 2000 EMC PARTNER Fast Transient, TRA-2000 449 2009-11-05 Surge, Magnetic Field Disturbance, Dips & Interruptions Note: The instruments listed above are within their calibration period of 1 year. CE EMC Testing Report Page 10 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 1.3 Auxiliary Equipments For Immunity test Provided by Matrix Test Lab. EMC No. Equipment Model No. Serial No. Brand Power Cord Approved 1. PC No.1 HP Pavilion A1510TW CNX6290BWF FCC, BSMI HP Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.5m 2. PC No.2 HP Pavilion A1510TW CNX6290BXQ FCC, BSMI HP Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.5m 3. Monitor No. 3 SDM-HS75P 1500379 4. Monitor No. 5 VS11868 QRA074526459 FCC BSMI SONY CE FCC VIEW BSMI SONIC 5. PS2 Key Board No. 2 Y-SU61 BT911DG4374 CE, FCC LOGITECH 6. PS2 Key Board No. 5 Y-SU61 BT911DG4375 CE, FCC LOGITECH 7. PS2 Mouse No. 2 M-SBF96 HC9070E036B CE FCC LOGITECH 8. PS2 Mouse No. 6 M-SBF96 HC9070E0343 CE, FCC LOGITECH 9. Printer No. 1 EPSON STYLUS C61 EK5Y014949 3912E328 EPSON 10. Modem No. 1 1456VQE-C 1234A36998 3882B582 LEMEL 11. Load 14Ω N/A N/A N/A N/A Model No. Serial No. VGA CABLE Shielded, Detachable, 1.5m, With Core DVI CABLE Shielded, Detachable, 1.5m, With Core VGA CABLE Shielded, Detachable, 1.8m, With Core DVI CABLE Shielded, Detachable, 1.8m, With Core PS2 CABLE Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.7m, Without Core PS2 CABLE Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.7m, Without Core PS2 CABLE Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.8m, Without Core PS2 CABLE Non-shielded, Un-detachable, 1.8m, Without Core PRINTER CABLE Non-shielded, Detachable, 1.8M RS-232 CABLE Non-shielded, Detachable, 3M N/A For Emission test Provided by Matrix Test Lab. EMC No. Equipment Brand Power Cord Approved 12. Notebook N61J N61JV-021A520M CE,FCC, C-TICK N13219, BSMI R31018 13. Load 29Ω N/A N/A N/A Model No. Serial No. ASUS N/A Adapter to Notebook Unshielded*1.8m AC to Adapter Unshielded*1.8m N/A For Emission test Provided by Manufacturer. EMC No. Equipment Brand Power Cord Approved 14. Splitter CE EMC Testing Report PD-2024 N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 11 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 1.4 Block Diagram Emission Test LAN AC Power Internet EUT LAN LAN EUT Notebook Load 29Ω Immunity test Monitor PS2 K/B PS2 Mouse PC LAN Printer Splitter (Provided by the LAN EUT AC Power Manufacturer) Modem AC Power Load 14Ω LAN PC System 1.5 Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case ) 1. Operation Mode Note: After pre-test, we identified that the Operation Mode (the worst case) was most likely to cause maximum disturbance and most likely to be susceptible to disturbance. Therefore, the Final EMC Assessment was performed for the worst case. 1.6 Final Test Mode Operation Mode 1.7 Condition of Power Supply AC 230V, 50Hz CE EMC Testing Report Page 12 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 1.8 EUT Configuration 1. Setup the EUT as shown in Sec.1.4 Block Diagram. 2. Turn on the power of all equipments. 3. Activate the selected Final Test Mode. 1.9 Immunity Performance Classification Class Class Criterion The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No A degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. B C After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. Lost of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. 1.10 Test Facility All tests are completed by Matrix Test Laboratory. Radiated emission Site Description : Name of Firm : Matrix Test Laboratory Site Location : 1.10.1 is performed at HongAn’s open-site. 2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Methodology All Emission Tests were performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55022. Radiated Emission Test was performed at 10 m distance from antenna to EUT. All Immunity Tests were performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 13 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 2 Conducted Emission Test(at Mains Terminal) 2.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 2.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table which was 80 cm above the horizontal coupling plane. The rear of the EUT was 40 cm from the vertical coupling plane. The excess interface cables were folded at the cable center into a bundle no longer than 40 cm, so that the bundles were on the table. The EUT was connected to the main power through a L.I.S.N. This set up provided 50 ohm / 50 H coupling impedance for the measuring equipment. All auxiliary equipment received power from a second L.I.S.N. The conducted emissions were measured between the Line Phase and the PE ground and between the Neutral Phase and the PE ground using an EMI Receiver. The values were recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 14 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 2.3 Conducted Limit EN 55022 Frequency (MHz) Class A Class B Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.50 79 66 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.50 ~ 5.0 73 60 56 46 5.0 ~ 30 73 60 60 50 The EMI Receiver bandwidth was set at 9 kHz. 2.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 15 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Conducted Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Power Line : Line Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 16 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Conducted Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Power Line : Neutral Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 17 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 3 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports) 3.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 3.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the horizontal ground plane with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network(LISN). All other support equipments powered from additional LISN(s). The LISN provide 50 Ohm/50H of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. Interconnecting cables that hang closer than 40cm to the ground plane shall be folded back and forth in the center forming a bundle no longer than 40cm. I/O cables that are not connected to a peripheral shall be bundled in the center. The end of the cable may be terminated, if required, using the correct terminating impedance. The overall length shall not exceed 1m. ISN at least 80cm from nearest part of EUT chassis. The communication function of EUT was executed and ISN was connected between EUT and associated equipment and the ISN was connected directly to reference ground plane. CE EMC Testing Report Page 18 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 3.3 Conducted Limit Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class A equipment. Frequency (MHz) Voltage Limits dB(V) Current Limits dB(A) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.5 97 to 87 84 to 74 53 to 43 40 to 30 0.5 ~ 30 87 74 43 30 NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to 0.5MHz. NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150 Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB) Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class B equipment. Frequency (MHz) Voltage Limits dB(V) Current Limits dB(A) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.5 84 to 74 74 to 64 40 to 30 30 to 20 0.5 ~ 30 74 64 30 20 NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to 0.5MHz. NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150 Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB) 3.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 19 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Conducted Disturbance Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Measurement Method : Voltage Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity : 51% Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 20 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 4.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 4.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 10 m 1~ 4 m EUT Pre-Amplifier Turn Table 80 cm Test Receiver Table-top Equipment The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80 cm above the horizontal ground plane. The EUT was set 10 m away from the receiving antenna that was mounted on a non-conductive mast. Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet. The mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane. The antenna was adjusted between 1 m and 4 m in height above the ground plane and the Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top 6 maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 3.3. The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set horizontally and vertically. 4.3 The values were recorded. Test Limit EN 55022 Frequency (MHz) Class A Class B Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) 30 ~ 230 40.0 30.0 230 ~ 1000 47.0 37.0 The EMI test receiver bandwidth was set at 120 kHz. 4.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 21 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Polarization : Horizontal Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 22 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Polarization : Vertical Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Quasi-Peak values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 23 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 5 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 5.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 5.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 3m 1~ 4 m EUT Pre-Amplifier Turn Table 80 cm Test Receiver Table-top Equipment The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80cm above the horizontal ground plane. The EUT was set 3m away from the receiving antenna that was mounted on a non-conductive mast. Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet. The mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane. The antenna was adjusted between 1m and 4m in height above the ground plane and the Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top 6 maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 4.3. The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set horizontally and vertically. The values were recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 24 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 5.3 Test Limit EN55022 Class A ITE at a measurement distance of 3m Frequency Average limit Peak limit GHz dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) 1 to 3 56 76 3 to 6 60 80 NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency. EN55022 Class B ITE at a measurement distance of 3m Frequency Average limit Peak limit GHz dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) 1 to 3 50 70 3 to 6 54 74 NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency. 5.4 Test Result PASS The final tests data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 25 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-12-18 Polarization : Horizontal Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V. reading was not measured. CE EMC Testing Report Page 26 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2012-12-18 Polarization : Vertical Temperature : 22.7℃ Humidity 51% : Remark:All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V. reading was not measured. CE EMC Testing Report Page 27 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 6 Harmonic Current Emission Measurement 6.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 6.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for the measurement of harmonic currents. The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was programmed as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT. Classify the EUT class in accordance with the IEC61000-3-2 for the purpose of harmonic current limitation. The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The test result was collected and analyzed by the computer. 6.3 EUT Operation Condition Environment Condition 6.4 Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 22.7℃ 51%RH 1019mbar Test Limit Class A Equipment Harmonic Order (n) Maximum permissible harmonic current (A) Odd harmonics 3 2.30 5 1.14 7 0.77 9 0.40 11 0.33 13 0.21 CE EMC Testing Report Page 28 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15 ≤ n ≤ 39 0.15 * 15 / n Even harmonics 6.5 2 1.08 4 0.43 6 0.30 8 ≤ n ≤ 40 0.23 * 8 / n Test Result PASS The measured result is shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 29 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Note: The EUT power level is below 75watts therefore has no defined limits. CE EMC Testing Report Page 30 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 7 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 7.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 7.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for the measurement of Flicker Voltage. The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was programmed as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT. The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The test result was collected and analyzed by the computer. 7.3 EUT Operation Condition Environment Condition 7.4 Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 22.7℃ 51%RH 1019mbar Test Item Limit Remark Pst 1.0 Pst means short-term flicker indicator. Tp=10 min Plt 0.65 Plt means long-term flicker indicator. Tp=2 hrs dt (%) 3.3 For more than 500ms 4 dmax means relative maximum voltage change. 3.3 dc means relative steady-state voltage change. Test Limit dmax (%) dc (%) 7.5 Test Result PASS The measured result is shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 31 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 CE EMC Testing Report Page 32 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 8 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 8.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 8.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was located on a 0.8 m high wooden table standing on the ground reference plane with a 1.6 * 0.8 m horizontal coupling plane on the top. The EUT and cables was isolated from the coupling plane by an insulating support 0.5 mm thick. In Contact Discharge, the EUT was exposed to minimum 200 discharges, 100 each at negative and positive polarity on the selected test points ( the selected test points were marked with red labels on the EUT ) In Air Discharge, the EUT exposed to minimum of 10 single discharges on the selected test points. The result was observed and analyzed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 33 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 8.3 Test Result 8.3.1 8.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21℃ 48%RH 1022.1mbar Observation of Direct Discharge Test Points: 1. Junction of Case. 2. LED Indicator. 3. AC Jack. 4. LAN Jacks. Test Specifications Type of Test Discharge Level Air 2,4,8 Discharge (kV) Contact 2,4 Discharge (kV) Remarks Polarity Performance Test Number of Required by Observed Point Discharge EN55024 Result B A Pass B A Pass ± 1~4 ± 4 20/ per point 50/ per point Verdict 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of air discharge. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of contact discharge. 8.3.3 Observation of Indirect Discharge Test Points: 1. Front Side. 2. Rear Side. 3. Left Side. 4. Right Side. Test Specifications Type of Test Discharge Level HCP 2,4 Application (kV) VCP 2,4 Application (kV) Remarks Polarity Performance Test Number of Required by Observed Point Discharge EN55024 Result B A Pass B A Pass ± 1~4 ± 1~4 50/ per point 50/ per point Verdict 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of HCP application. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of VCP application. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 34 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 9 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 9.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 9.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The field calibration was executed to create a uniform field area (UFA), 3 m away from the antenna, to ensure the validity of the test results. The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table 0.8 m high in the UFA. The EUT was then connected to power and signal wires according to relevant installation instruction. The EUT was positioned so that the four sides of the EUT were exposed to the electromagnetic field in sequence. In each position, the performance of the EUT was investigated and monitored by a CCD camera.. CE EMC Testing Report Page 35 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 9.3 Test Result 9.3.1 Environment Condition 9.3.2 Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21℃ 48%RH 1022.1mbar Observation of Test Test Specifications Type of Field Frequency Modulation Strength Range Amplitude 3V/m Modulation Remark Modulation 80 to 80%, 1KHz, 1000MHz sinusoidal Performance Required by Observed EN55024 Result A A Verdict Pass No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 36 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 10 Electrical Fast Transient Test 10.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 10.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The ground plane was connected to the protective earth. The distance between the EUT and all other conductive structures, except the ground plane beneath the EUT was more than 0.5 m. The length of the signal and power lies between the coupling device and the EUT was 0.5 m. All cables to the EUT were placed on the insulation support 0.1 m above the ground reference plane. The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly coupled the EFT interference signal. Each of the Line, Neutral and Protective Earth conductors was injected with burst for 1 minute. The test time was broken down into six 10 s bursts separated by a 10 s pause for avoiding synchronization. Both voltage polarities were applied for each test level. Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 37 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 10.3 Test Result 10.3.1 Environment Condition Temperature 21℃ 10.3.2 Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 48%RH 1022.1mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Test Specifications Coupling Voltage Selection (kV) Test Repetition Duration Rate (Sec) (kHz) Performance Tr/ Td Required by (nS) EN 55024 Observed Result Verdict L ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass N ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L+N ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L + PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass N + PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L + N +PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass Remark No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. Note Phase Shifting:0º,90º,180º,270º,360º 10.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m) There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been required. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 38 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 11 Surge Immunity Test 11.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 11.2 Test Configuration and Procedure EUT TRANSIENT 2000(Surge) Metallic Ground Plane Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The ground plane was connected to the protective earth. The length of power cord between the coupling device and the EUT is less than 2 m (provided by the manufacturer). The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly couples the Surge interference signal. The surge noise was applied synchronized to the voltage phase at the zero crossing and the peak value of the AC voltage wave (positive and negative). The surges were applied line to line and line(s) to earth. When testing line to earth the test voltage was applied successively between each of the lines and earth. Steps up to the test level specified increased the test voltage. All lower levels including the selected test level were tested. The polarity of each surge level included positive and negative test pulses. Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 39 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 11.3 Test Result 11.3.1 11.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity 21℃ 48%RH Atmospheric Pressure 1022.1mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Test Specifications Performance Min. of Surge Repetition at Each Rate Polarity (per min) ±0.5, 1 5 L ►PE ±0.5, 1,2 N ►PE ±0.5, 1,2 Coupling Voltage Selection (kV) L ►N Remark Required by Observed EN 55024 Result 1 B A Pass 5 1 B A Pass 5 1 B A Pass Verdict No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. 11.3.3 Observation of other supply/ signal lines: (Applicable only to ports which according to the manufacturer’s specification may connect directly to outdoor cables) N/A PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 40 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 12 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 12.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 12.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was placed on an insulating support of 0.1 m height above a ground reference plane. All cables exiting the EUT was supported at a height of 30 mm above the ground reference plane. The EUT was connected to the power mains through a Coupling and Decoupling Networks (CDN). The CDN was located 0.3 m from the EUT as indicated in the diagram above. The test was performed with the test generator connected to each of the CDN in turn while the other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling devices were terminated by a 50 terminator. The conducted disturbance was applied on the EUT from 150 kHz to 80 MHz using the signal levels established during the setting process. . Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 41 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 12.3 Test Result 12.3.1 12.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21℃ 48%RH 1022.1mbar Observation of Test Test Specifications Type of Voltage Level Frequency Modulation (emf) U0 Range Amplitude Modulation Remark 3V/ 130dBμV 0.15 to 80MHz Performance Modulation Required by Observed EN 55024 Result A A Verdict 80%, 1kHz, Pass sinusoidal No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. Note Phase Shifting:0º,90º,180º,270º,360º 12.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m) There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been required. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 42 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 13 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 13.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 13.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a non-magnetic metal ground plane of 0.25 mm thickness with the interposition of a 0.1 m thickness insulating support. The ground plane was connected to the protected earth. The EUT was placed at the center of the 1 * 1 m induction coil with the test generator placed within 3 m distance. The test was operated by moving and shifting the induction coil to expose to the test field. The operation condition was observed and analyzed. The induction coil was then rotated by 90° to expose the EUT to the test field with different orientations and the same procedure. CE EMC Testing Report Page 43 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 13.3 Test Result 13.3.1 13.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21℃ 48%RH 1022.1mbar Observation of Test Level (A/m) 1 Remark Frequency Performance Required Observed (Hz) by EN55024 Result 50 A A Verdict Pass No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 44 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 14 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 14.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 14.2 Test Configuration and Procedure EUT TRANSIENT 2000(Dips) Metallic Ground Plane The EUT was tested with (Ⅰ) >95% voltage dip of supplied voltage with a duration of 10 ms (Ⅱ) 30% voltage dip of supplied voltage with duration 500 ms (Ⅲ) A 95% voltage interruption of supplied voltage with duration of 5000 ms, For each selected combination of test level and duration with a sequence of three dips / interruptions with intervals of 10 s. For Voltage Dips, changes in supply voltage occurred at zero crossings of the voltage. For Short Interruptions, changes in supply voltage also occurred at zero crossings of the voltage. The performance of the EUT was monitored and recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 45 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 14.3 Test Result 14.3.1 14.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21℃ 48%RH 1022.11mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Voltage Dips Test Specifications Voltage Duration No. of Periods Reductions >95 0.5 3 30 25 3 Reduction (%) Performance Interval between Required by Observed EN 55024 Result ≥ 10 B A Pass ≥ 10 C A Pass Each Duration (sec.) Verdict Remarks 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. Voltage Interruptions Test Specifications Voltage Reduction (%) >95 Duration Periods Performance Interval between No. of Reductions 250 Each Duration (sec.) 3 Required by Observed EN 55024 Result C B ≥ 10 Verdict Pass Remark When testing Voltage Dip with 4% of the normal power supply voltage, the power indicator went off. After testing, it self-recovered. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 46 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15 Photographs of Test 15.1 Conducted Disturbance Test(at Mains Terminals) Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 47 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.2 Telecommunication Port Conducted Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 48 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.3 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 49 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 50 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.5 Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 15.6 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 51 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.7 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 15.8 Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 52 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.9 Surge Immunity Test 15.10 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 53 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 15.11 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 15.12 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 54 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 16 Photographs of EUT Front View of the EUT Rear View of the EUT CE EMC Testing Report Page 55 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Inside View of the EUT Front View of the PCB CE EMC Testing Report Page 56 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 Rear View of the PCB View of the Power Cable CE EMC Testing Report Page 57 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 17 Photographs of ESD Test Points View of ESD Test Points View of ESD Test Point CE EMC Testing Report Page 58 of 59 Report No.:U10040802E-A01 View of ESD Test Point View of ESD Test Point CE EMC Testing Report Page 59 of 59
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.6 Linearized : No Encryption : Standard V4.4 (128-bit) User Access : Print, Extract, Print high-res Author : sales Create Date : 2014:01:08 10:08:28+08:00 Modify Date : 2014:01:15 15:07:42+08:00 Has XFA : No XMP Toolkit : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03 Creator Tool : PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2 Metadata Date : 2014:01:15 15:07:42+08:00 Format : application/pdf Title : Microsoft Word - CE - Test Report .doc Creator : sales Producer : Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows) Document ID : uuid:1a656b87-ca5c-49d4-af87-db0801924036 Instance ID : uuid:4c033bec-3c12-4190-b45b-feda93fbc32f Page Count : 59EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools