CE Report
2016-04-12
: Pdf Ce - Report CE_-__Report CertsReports 561105 ProductFiles
Open the PDF directly: View PDF 
.
Page Count: 62
| Download | |
| Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
Report No.:R13111404E EMC Test Report eten Technologies Inc. Applicant： 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Address of Applicant： Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. 24-Port 10/100/1000Base-T + 2-Port 10G Equipment Under Test： SFP+ Stackable Layer 2+ Full Management High Power PoE Switch Model Number： PSG-6526XS Series： PSG-6528, PSG-652Y(Y=0~9) Matrix Test Laboratory 2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho District, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEL.：+886 2 2228-6610 FAX.：+886 2 2228-6580 CE EMC Testing Report Page 1 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Contents 1 General Description 8 1.1 Description of Equipment Under Test (EUT) 8 1.2 Test Facility 9 1.3 Test Instruments 9 1.4 Test Methodology 10 1.5 Auxiliary Equipments 11 1.6 Block Diagram 11 1.7 Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case ) 11 1.8 Final Test Mode 11 1.9 Condition of Power Supply 12 1.10 EUT Configuration 12 1.11 Immunity Performance Classification 12 2 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Mains Terminal) 13 2.1 Test Instruments 13 2.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 13 2.3 Test Limit 14 2.4 Test Result 14 3 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports) 17 3.1 Test Instruments 17 3.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 17 3.3 Conducted Limit 18 3.4 Test Result 18 4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 20 4.1 Test Instruments 20 4.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 20 4.3 Test Limit 20 4.4 Test Result 20 5 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 23 5.1 Test Instruments 23 5.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 23 5.3 Test Limit 24 5.4 Test Result 24 6 6.1 Harmonic Current Emission Measurement Test Instruments CE EMC Testing Report 27 27 Page 2 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 6.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 27 6.3 EUT Operation Condition 27 6.4 Test Limit 28 6.5 Test Result 28 7 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 30 7.1 Test Instruments 30 7.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 30 7.3 EUT Operation Condition 30 7.4 Test Limit 30 7.5 Test Result 30 8 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 32 8.1 Test Instruments 32 8.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 32 8.3 Test Result 33 9 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 34 9.1 Test Instruments 34 9.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 34 9.3 Test Result 35 10 Electrical Fast Transient Test 36 10.1 Test Instrument 36 10.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 36 10.3 Test Result 37 11 Surge Immunity Test 38 11.1 Test Instrument 38 11.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 38 11.3 Test Result 39 12 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 40 12.1 Test Instruments 40 12.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 40 12.3 Test Result 41 13 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 42 13.1 Test Instruments 42 13.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 42 13.3 Test Result 43 14 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 44 14.1 Test Instrument 44 14.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 44 CE EMC Testing Report Page 3 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 14.3 15 Test Result Photographs of Test 45 46 15.1 Conducted Disturbance Test(at Mains Terminals) 46 15.2 Telecommunication Port Conducted Test 47 15.3 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 48 15.4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 49 15.5 Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 50 15.6 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 50 15.7 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 51 15.8 Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test 51 15.9 Surge Immunity Test 52 15.10 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 52 15.11 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 53 15.12 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 53 16 Photographs of EUT 54 17 Photographs of ESD Test Points 61 CE EMC Testing Report Page 4 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Verification Applicant： eten Technologies Inc. Manufacturer： eten Technologies Inc. 24-Port 10/100/1000Base-T + 2-Port 10G SFP+ Stackable Layer 2+ Full Management High Power Equipment Under Test： PoE Switch Model Number： PSG-6526XS Series： PSG-6528, PSG-652Y(Y=0~9) Sample Received Date： 2013-11-14 Test Standard： Emission: Immunity: EN 55022:2010 Class A EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-3-2:2005 IEC 61000-4-2:2008 +A1:2008+A2:2009 IEC 61000-3-3:2008 IEC 61000-4-3:2006+A1:2007+A2:2010 IEC 61000-4-4:2004+A1:2010 IEC 61000-4-5:2005 IEC 61000-4-6:2008 IEC 61000-4-8:2009 IEC 61000-4-11:2004 Remark: This report details the results of the test carried out on one sample. This report shows the EUT is technically compliant with the EN 55022 and EN 55024 official requirements. This report applies to the above sample only and shall not be reproduced in part without written approval of Matrix Test Laboratory. Documented by: Date: 2013-11-25 Date: 2013-11-22 Date: 2013-11-25 Jody Peng/ ADM. Dept Staff Tested by: George Hsu/ ENG. Dept. Staff Approved by: Peter Chin/ Head of Laboratory CE EMC Testing Report Page 5 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Summary of Test Result – Emission Test Standard Test Item Test Result Remark Conducted Highest Emission Disturbance EN55022 Pass Test Class A L: 1.725MHz, Q.P.56.79dBuV, Margin -16.07 dB N: 1.725MHz, Q.P.55.68dBuV, Margin -17.20 dB (at Mains Terminal) Conducted Highest Emission Disturbance EN55022 Pass (at Class A Voltage: 2.931MHz, Q.P.63.11dBuV, Margin -14.26 dB A.V.63.25dBuV, Margin -1.12 dB Telecommunic ation Ports) Highest Emission Radiated EN55022 Disturbance Class A Test H: 253.100MHz, 60.17dBuV, Margin-1.43 dB Pass V: 127.000MHz, 53.11dBuV, Margin-2.88 dB (Below 1GHz) Antenna Height 1 m, Turntable Angle 335° Highest Emission Radiated EN55022 Disturbance Class A Test Antenna Height 2.15 m, Turntable Angle 148° H: 1035.000MHz, 53.16dBuV, Margin-11.97 dB Pass Antenna Height 3.85 m, Turntable Angle 222° V: 1500.000MHz, 60.23dBuV, Margin-6.57 dB (Above 1GHz) Antenna Height 1.99 m, Turntable Angle 347° IEC61000-3-2 Harmonic Pass Refer to Page 27 IEC61000-3-3 Flicker Pass Refer to Page 30 Measurement Uncertainty – Emission The following measurement uncertainty has been calculated for Emission Tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: Test Item Uncertainty Conducted Emission ± 3.61dB Radiated Emission Below 1GHz ± 5.04dB Above 1GHz ± 4.97dB This reported expanded uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor of k = 2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%. CE EMC Testing Report Page 6 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Summary of Test Result – Immunity Test Standard Test Item Performance Criteria Observed Result Test Result Class IEC61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge B A Pass IEC61000-4-3 Radiated Susceptibility A A Pass IEC61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transient B A Pass IEC61000-4-5 Surge B A Pass IEC61000-4-6 Conducted Susceptibility A A Pass IEC61000-4-8 Magnetic Field A A Pass Dips >95% B A Dips 30% C A IEC61000-4-11 Voltage Dips and Interruption Interruptions >95% C Pass B Measurement Uncertainty – Immunity It has been demonstrated that the test equipments for the above Immunity Tests meet the specified requirements in the standard with at least a 95% confidence. CE EMC Testing Report Page 7 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 1 General Description 1.1 Description of Equipment Under Test (EUT) 24-Port 10/100/1000Base-T + 2-Port 10G SFP+ Stackable Layer 2+ Equipment Under Test : Model Number : PSG-6526XS Series : PSG-6528, PSG-652Y(Y=0~9) Applicant Address of Applicant Manufacturer Address of Manufacturer Full Management High Power PoE Switch eten Technologies Inc. : 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. eten Technologies Inc. : 2F, No.6, Lane 497, Zhongzheng Road, Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan, R.O.C. Input: 100-240Vac, 60 / 50Hz Power Supply : Data Cable : Output: 56Vdc, 4.46A, Max. 500W N/A Dimensions : 44 cm (L) X 33 cm (W) X 4.5 cm (H) Weight : 4.8 Kg Highest Frequency of the Internal Source : 125 MHz Position : Table-top / Floor-standing Intended Function : The EUT is a 24-Port 10/100/1000Base-T + Description of EUT : 2-Port 10G SFP+ Stackable Layer 2+ Full Management High Power PoE Switch. Product Variance : The manufacturer declares that the series products share the identical circuit design with the main test sample. The main test sample is the most sophisticated product with full functions. The series products have less function than the main test sample. Matrix only takes the responsibility to the main test sample. CE EMC Testing Report Page 8 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 1.2 Test Facility Conducted Emission, Harmonic, Flicker, Electrostatic Discharge, Electrical Fast Transient, Surge, Conducted Susceptibility, Voltage Dips and Interruptions Tests are performed at 2F, No.146, Jian Yi Rd., Chung-Ho District, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Radiated Emission, Radiated Susceptibility, Magnetic Field Tests are performed at No. 15-1, Cweishuh Keng, Cweipin Village, Linkou, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. 1.3 Test Instruments Instruments Used for Emission Measurement Calibration Instrument Manufacturer Model Serial No. L.I.S.N. Mess Tec NNB-2/16Z 03/1006 2013-05-12 L.I.S.N. EMCIS LN2-16 LN04023 2013-02-13 Pulse Limiter Mess Tec PL10 N/A 2012-11-30 RF Cable N/A N/A N/A 2013-10-05 SCHAFFNER ISN T400 16832 2013-10-08 FCC F-33-4 53 2013-05-16 Coupling AND Decoupling Network RF Current Probe Date Application Conducted Disturbance Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Port Conducted Disturbance EMI Receiver R&S ESCI 100615 2013-02-13 Radiated Disturbance (Below 1GHz) Bilog Antenna Teseq GmbH CBL6111D 25769 2013-02-06 Pre-Amplifier WIRELESS FPA-6592G 60009 2013-07-08 Radiated Disturbance Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSL6 100564 2013-06-15 (Below 1GHz) RF Cable MIYAZAKI 8D-F8 N/A 2013-02-08 EMCO 3115 9912-5992 2013-05-14 Preamplifier HD HD17187 004 2013-08-02 Radiated Disturbance Spectrum Analyzer ADVANTEST R3172 101202158 2013-06-23 (Above 1GHz) HUBER SUCOFLEX SUHNER 104 197541/4 2013-08-02 Chroma 6520 2048 2013-01-31 Double-Ridged Waveguide Horn Coaxial Cable Programmable AC Source Universal Power Analyzer CE EMC Testing Report Harmonic, Flicker Chroma 6630 0597 2013-01-31 Page 9 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Instruments Used for Immunity Measurement Manufacturer Model ESD Simulator Noiseken TC-815R ESS0868491 2012-12-14 Electrostatic ESD Simulator Noiseken ESS-2002EX ESS0868406 2012-12-14 Discharge Antenna EMCO 3142 9710-1221 Power Amplifier IFI CMX50 N/A Signal Generator R&S SML03 103396 2013-02-01 CDN FRANKONIA CDN M2+M3 A3011037 2013-07-08 C.I. Test System FRANKONIA CIT-10/75 102C3208 2012-12-27 Conducted 75-A-FFN-06 0212 2012-12-27 Immunity Power Attenuator FRANKONIA Serial No. Calibration Instrument Date 2013-02-11 2013-02-07 Radiated Immunity RF Cable N/A N/A N/A 2012-11-30 Antenna FCC F-1000-4-8/9/10-L-1M 9953 2013-03-02 Magnetic Field Advanced EMC Immunity Test Application KEYTEK EMC PRO 0002255 2013-03-02 Disturbance System Electrostatic Transient 2000 EMC PARTNER Discharge, TRA-2000 449 2013-11-09 Fast Transient, Surge, Dips & Interruptions Note: The instruments listed above are within their calibration period of 1 year. 1.4 Test Methodology All Emission Tests were performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55022. All Immunity Tests were performed according to the procedures specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 10 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 1.5 Auxiliary Equipments Provided by Matrix Test Lab. EMC No. Equipment Model No. Serial No. Brand Power Cord Approved 1 Notebook N61J N61JV-021A520M CE,FCC, C-TICK N13219, BSMI R31018 2 SFP-SX JS-S430LX JS129190003 N/A JUMBO-SUN N/A 3 SFP-SX JS-S430LX JS129190004 N/A JUMBO-SUN N/A 1.6 ASUS N/A Block Diagram AC Power Internet Notebook EUT SFP-SX SFP-SX 1.7 LAN Cable*24 Identifying the Final Test Mode ( Worst Case ) 1. Operation Mode : Run Ping IP testing program Note: After pre-test, we identified that the Operation Mode (the worst case) was most likely to cause maximum disturbance and most likely to be susceptible to disturbance. Therefore, the Final EMC Assessment was performed for the worst case. 1.8 Final Test Mode Operation Mode CE EMC Testing Report Page 11 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 1.9 Condition of Power Supply AC 230V, 50Hz 1.10 EUT Configuration 1. Setup the EUT as shown in Sec.1.6 Block Diagram. 2. Turn on the power of all equipments. 3. Activate the selected Final Test Mode. 1.11 Immunity Performance Classification Class Class Criterion The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No A degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. B C After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. Lost of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. CE EMC Testing Report Page 12 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 2 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Mains Terminal) 2.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 2.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table which was 80 cm above the horizontal coupling plane. The rear of the EUT was 40 cm from the vertical coupling plane. The excess interface cables were folded at the cable center into a bundle no longer than 40 cm, so that the bundles were on the table. The EUT was connected to the main power through a L.I.S.N. This set up provided 50 ohm / 50 H coupling impedance for the measuring equipment. All auxiliary equipment received power from a second L.I.S.N. The conducted emissions were measured between the Line Phase and the PE ground and between the Neutral Phase and the PE ground using an EMI Receiver. The values were recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 13 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 2.3 Test Limit EN 55022 Frequency (MHz) Class A Class B Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.50 79 66 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.50 ~ 5.0 73 60 56 46 5.0 ~ 30 73 60 60 50 The EMI Receiver bandwidth was set at 9 kHz. 2.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s) CE EMC Testing Report Page 14 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Conducted Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Power Line : Line Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 15 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Conducted Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Power Line : Neutral Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 16 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 3 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Telecommunication Ports) 3.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.2 Test Instruments. 3.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the horizontal ground plane with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network(LISN). All other support equipments powered from additional LISN(s). The LISN provide 50 Ohm/50H of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. Interconnecting cables that hang closer than 40cm to the ground plane shall be folded back and forth in the center forming a bundle no longer than 40cm. I/O cables that are not connected to a peripheral shall be bundled in the center. The end of the cable may be terminated, if required, using the correct terminating impedance. The overall length shall not exceed 1m. ISN at least 80cm from nearest part of EUT chassis. The communication function of EUT was executed and ISN was connected between EUT and associated equipment and the ISN was connected directly to reference ground plane. CE EMC Testing Report Page 17 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 3.3 Conducted Limit Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class A equipment. Frequency (MHz) Voltage Limits dB(V) Current Limits dB(A) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.5 97 to 87 84 to 74 53 to 43 40 to 30 0.5 ~ 30 87 74 43 30 NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to 0.5MHz. NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150 Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB) Limits of conducted common mode (asymmetric mode) disturbance at telecommunication ports in the frequency range 0.15MHz to 30MHz for class B equipment. Frequency (MHz) Voltage Limits dB(V) Current Limits dB(A) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) Q.P. (Quasi-Peak) A.V. (Average) 0.15 ~ 0.5 84 to 74 74 to 64 40 to 30 30 to 20 0.5 ~ 30 74 64 30 20 NOTE1: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15MHz to 0.5MHz. NOTE2: The current and voltage disturbance limits are derived for use with an impedance stabilization network (ISN) which presents a common mode (asymmetric mode) impedance of 150 Ω to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 log10 150/I=44dB) 3.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 18 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Conducted Disturbance Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Measurement Method : Voltage Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity : 37％ Remark：All readings are Quasi-Peak and Average values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 19 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz 4.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 4.2 Test Arrangement and Procedure 10 m 1~ 4 m EUT Pre-Amplifier Turn Table 80 cm Test Receiver Table-top Equipment The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80 cm above the horizontal ground plane. The EUT was set 10 m away from the receiving antenna that was mounted on a non-conductive mast. Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet. The mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane. The antenna was adjusted between 1 m and 4 m in height above the ground plane and the Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top 6 maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 3.3. The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set horizontally and vertically. 4.3 The values were recorded. Test Limit EN 55022 Frequency (MHz) Class A Class B Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) 30 ~ 230 40.0 30.0 230 ~ 1000 47.0 37.0 The EMI test receiver bandwidth was set at 120 kHz. 4.4 Test Result PASS The final test data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 20 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Polarization : Horizontal Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Quasi-Peak values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 21 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Polarization : Vertical Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Quasi-Peak values. CE EMC Testing Report Page 22 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 5 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz 5.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 5.2 Test Configuration and Procedure 3m 1~ 4 m EUT Pre-Amplifier Turn Table 80 cm Test Receiver Table-top Equipment The EUT was place on a non-conductive turntable which was 80cm above the horizontal ground plane. The EUT was set 3m away from the receiving antenna that was mounted on a non-conductive mast. Main cables draped to the ground plane and were routed to the mains power outlet. The mains power outlet was bonded to and did not protrude above the ground plane. The antenna was adjusted between 1m and 4m in height above the ground plane and the Antenna-to-EUT azimuth was also varied during the measurements to find the top 6 maximum meter readings within the frequency range limit as indicated in Sec 4.3. The radiated emissions were measured when the Antenna-to-EUT polarization was set horizontally and vertically. The values were recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 23 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 5.3 Test Limit EN55022 Class A ITE at a measurement distance of 3m Frequency Average limit Peak limit GHz dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) 1 to 3 56 76 3 to 6 60 80 NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency. EN55022 Class B ITE at a measurement distance of 3m Frequency Average limit Peak limit GHz dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) 1 to 3 50 70 3 to 6 54 74 NOTE The lower limit applies at the transition frequency. 5.4 Test Result PASS The final tests data are shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 24 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Polarization : Horizontal Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V. reading was not measured. CE EMC Testing Report Page 25 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Radiated Emission Test Data Test Date : 2013-11-18 Polarization : Vertical Temperature : 24.1℃ Humidity 37％ : Remark：All readings are Peak values. None of the peak value reading exceeds the A.V. limit. Hence, A.V. reading was not measured. CE EMC Testing Report Page 26 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 6 Harmonic Current Emission Measurement 6.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 6.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for the measurement of harmonic currents. The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was programmed as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT. Classify the EUT class in accordance with the IEC61000-3-2 for the purpose of harmonic current limitation. The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The test result was collected and analyzed by the computer. 6.3 EUT Operation Condition Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar CE EMC Testing Report Page 27 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 6.4 Test Limit Class A Equipment Harmonic Order (n) Maximum permissible harmonic current (A) Odd harmonics 3 2.30 5 1.14 7 0.77 9 0.40 11 0.33 13 0.21 15 ≤ n ≤ 39 0.15 * 15 / n Even harmonics 6.5 2 1.08 4 0.43 6 0.30 8 ≤ n ≤ 40 0.23 * 8 / n Test Result PASS The measured result is shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 28 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Note: The EUT power level is below 75watts therefore has no defined limits. CE EMC Testing Report Page 29 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 7 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 7.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 7.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was set in series with the Power Analyzer through an Impedance Network for the measurement of Flicker Voltage. The supply voltage and frequency setting on the Programmable AC Source was programmed as the rated voltage and frequency of the EUT. The measurement was automatically performed by test software. The test result was collected and analyzed by the computer. 7.3 EUT Operation Condition Environment Condition 7.4 Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Test Item Limit Remark Pst 1.0 Pst means short-term flicker indicator. Tp=10 min Plt 0.65 Plt means long-term flicker indicator. Tp=2 hrs dt (%) 3.3 For more than 500ms 4 dmax means relative maximum voltage change. 3.3 dc means relative steady-state voltage change. Test Limit dmax (%) dc (%) 7.5 Test Result PASS The measured result is shown on the following page(s). CE EMC Testing Report Page 30 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E CE EMC Testing Report Page 31 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 8 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test 8.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 8.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was located on a 0.8 m high wooden table standing on the ground reference plane with a 1.6 * 0.8 m horizontal coupling plane on the top. The EUT and cables was isolated from the coupling plane by an insulating support 0.5 mm thick. In Contact Discharge, the EUT was exposed to minimum 200 discharges, 100 each at negative and positive polarity on the selected test points ( the selected test points were marked with red labels on the EUT ) In Air Discharge, the EUT exposed to minimum of 10 single discharges on the selected test points. The result was observed and analyzed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 32 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 8.3 8.3.1 8.3.2 Test Result Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Observation of Direct Discharge Test Points: 1. Surface of Case. 2. Junction of Case. 3. PoE Ports. 4. SFP-SX Ports. 5. Screws. 6. AC Power Port. 7. LED Indicators. 8. Digital Display. Test Specifications Type of Test Discharge Level Air 2,4,8 Discharge (kV) Contact 2,4 Discharge (kV) Remarks: Polarity Performance Test Number of Required by Observed Point Discharge EN55024 Result B A Pass B A Pass ± 1~8 ± 1~5 20/ per point 50/ per point Verdict 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of air discharge. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of contact discharge. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. 8.3.3 Observation of Indirect Discharge Test Points: 1. Front Side. 2. Rear Side. 3. Left Side. 4. Right Side. Test Specifications Type of Test Discharge Level HCP 2,4 Application (kV) VCP 2,4 Application (kV) Remarks: Polarity Performance Test Number of Required by Observed Point Discharge EN55024 Result B A Pass B A Pass ± 1~4 ± 1~4 50/ per point 50/ per point Verdict 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of HCP application. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire time interval of VCP application. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 33 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 9 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 9.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 9.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The field calibration was executed to create a uniform field area (UFA), 3 m away from the antenna, to ensure the validity of the test results. The EUT was placed on a non-conductive table 0.8 m high in the UFA. The EUT was then connected to power and signal wires according to relevant installation instruction. The EUT was positioned so that the four sides of the EUT were exposed to the electromagnetic field in sequence. In each position, the performance of the EUT was investigated and monitored by a CCD camera.. CE EMC Testing Report Page 34 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 9.3 9.3.1 9.3.2 Test Result Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Observation of Test Test Specifications Type of Field Frequency Modulation Strength Range Amplitude 3V/m Modulation Remark: Modulation 80 to 80%, 1KHz, 1000MHz sinusoidal Performance Required by Observed EN55024 Result A A Verdict Pass No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 35 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 10 Electrical Fast Transient Test 10.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 10.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The ground plane was connected to the protective earth. The distance between the EUT and all other conductive structures, except the ground plane beneath the EUT was more than 0.5 m. The length of the signal and power lies between the coupling device and the EUT was 0.5 m. All cables to the EUT were placed on the insulation support 0.1 m above the ground reference plane. The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly coupled the EFT interference signal. Each of the Line, Neutral and Protective Earth conductors was injected with burst for 1 minute. The test time was broken down into six 10 s bursts separated by a 10 s pause for avoiding synchronization. Both voltage polarities were applied for each test level. Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 36 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 10.3 Test Result 10.3.1 10.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Test Specifications Coupling Voltage Selection (kV) Test Repetition Duration Rate (Sec) (kHz) Performance Tr/ Td Required by (nS) EN 55024 Observed Result Verdict L ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass N ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L+N ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L + PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass N + PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass L + N +PE ±1 60 5 5/50 B A Pass Remark: No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. 10.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m) There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been required. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 37 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 11 Surge Immunity Test 11.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 11.2 Test Configuration and Procedure EUT TRANSIENT 2000(Surge) Metallic Ground Plane Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a table of 0.8 m height above the 1 * 1 m metallic ground reference plane, which projected beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The ground plane was connected to the protective earth. The length of power cord between the coupling device and the EUT is less than 2 m (provided by the manufacturer). The EUT was connected to the power mains through a coupling device that directly couples the Surge interference signal. The surge noise was applied synchronized to the voltage phase at the zero crossing and the peak value of the AC voltage wave (positive and negative). The surges were applied line to line and line(s) to earth. When testing line to earth the test voltage was applied successively between each of the lines and earth. Steps up to the test level specified increased the test voltage. All lower levels including the selected test level were tested. The polarity of each surge level included positive and negative test pulses. Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 38 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 11.3 Test Result 11.3.1 11.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity 24.1℃ 37％RH Atmospheric Pressure 1017mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Test Specifications Performance Min. of Surge Repetition at Each Rate Polarity (per min) ±0.5, 1 5 L ►PE ±0.5, 1,2 N ►PE ±0.5, 1,2 Coupling Voltage Selection (kV) L ►N Remark: Required by Observed EN 55024 Result 1 B A Pass 5 1 B A Pass 5 1 B A Pass Verdict No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. Note Phase Shifting:0º,90º,180º,270º,360º The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. 11.3.3 Observation of other supply/ signal lines: (Applicable only to ports which according to the manufacturer’s specification may connect directly to outdoor cables) N/A PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 39 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 12 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test 12.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 12.2 Test Configuration and Procedure The EUT was placed on an insulating support of 0.1 m height above a ground reference plane. All cables exiting the EUT was supported at a height of 30 mm above the ground reference plane. The EUT was connected to the power mains through a Coupling and Decoupling Networks (CDN). The CDN was located 0.3 m from the EUT as indicated in the diagram above. The test was performed with the test generator connected to each of the CDN in turn while the other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling devices were terminated by a 50 terminator. The conducted disturbance was applied on the EUT from 150 kHz to 80 MHz using the signal levels established during the setting process. . Operating condition was shown on the monitor and observed. CE EMC Testing Report Page 40 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 12.3 Test Result 12.3.1 12.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Observation of Test Test Specifications Type of Voltage Level Frequency Modulation (emf) U0 Range Amplitude Modulation Remark: 3V/ 130dBμV 0.15 to 80MHz Performance Modulation Required by Observed EN 55024 Result A A Verdict 80%, 1kHz, Pass sinusoidal No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. 12.3.3 Observation of I/O, communication ports (Applicable only to cable length >3m) There was no I/O and communication cable longer than 3 meter; therefore, no test has been required. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 41 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 13 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 13.1 Test Instruments Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 13.2 Test Configuration and Procedure Table-top Equipment The EUT was placed on a non-magnetic metal ground plane of 0.25 mm thickness with the interposition of a 0.1 m thickness insulating support. The ground plane was connected to the protected earth. The EUT was placed at the center of the 1 * 1 m induction coil with the test generator placed within 3 m distance. The test was operated by moving and shifting the induction coil to expose to the test field. The operation condition was observed and analyzed. The induction coil was then rotated by 90˚ to expose the EUT to the test field with different orientations and the same procedure. CE EMC Testing Report Page 42 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 13.3 Test Result 13.3.1 13.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 21.5℃ 40％RH 1019mbar Observation of Test Level (A/m) 1 Remark: Frequency Performance Required Observed (Hz) by EN55024 Result 50 A A Verdict Pass No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 43 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 14 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test 14.1 Test Instrument Refer to Sec. 1.3 Test Instruments. 14.2 Test Configuration and Procedure EUT TRANSIENT 2000(Dips) Metallic Ground Plane The EUT was tested with (Ⅰ) >95% voltage dip of supplied voltage with a duration of 10 ms (Ⅱ) 30% voltage dip of supplied voltage with duration 500 ms (Ⅲ) A 95% voltage interruption of supplied voltage with duration of 5000 ms, For each selected combination of test level and duration with a sequence of three dips / interruptions with intervals of 10 s. For Voltage Dips, changes in supply voltage occurred at zero crossings of the voltage. For Short Interruptions, changes in supply voltage also occurred at zero crossings of the voltage. The performance of the EUT was monitored and recorded. CE EMC Testing Report Page 44 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 14.3 Test Result 14.3.1 14.3.2 Environment Condition Temperature Humidity Atmospheric Pressure 24.1℃ 37％RH 1017mbar Observation of Power Supply Port Voltage Dips Test Specifications Voltage Duration No. of Periods Reductions >95 0.5 3 30 25 3 Reduction (%) Performance Interval between Required by Observed EN 55024 Result ≥ 10 B A Pass ≥ 10 C A Pass Each Duration (sec.) Verdict Remarks: 1. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. 2. No temporary degradation or loss of function has been observed throughout the entire test. Note Phase Shifting:0º,180º, 360º Voltage Interruptions Test Specifications Voltage Reduction (%) >95 Duration Periods Performance Interval between No. of Reductions 250 Each Duration (sec.) 3 ≥ 10 Required by Observed EN 55024 Result C B Verdict Pass Remark: When testing Voltage Dip with residual voltage 4% of normal power supply, the EUT shut down automatically. After testing, the EUT recovered its function. Note Phase Shifting:0º,180º, 360º The Performance Requirement Class Criterion is defined in Sec. 1.11. PASS The test result shows that the EUT is in compliance with the test performance criteria specified in EN 55024. CE EMC Testing Report Page 45 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15 Photographs of Test 15.1 Conducted Disturbance Test (at Mains Terminals) Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 46 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.2 Telecommunication Port Conducted Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 47 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.3 Radiated Disturbance Test – Below 1 GHz Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 48 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.4 Radiated Disturbance Test – Above 1 GHz Front View Rear View CE EMC Testing Report Page 49 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.5 Harmonic Current & Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Measurement 15.6 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 50 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.7 Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test 15.8 Electrical Fast Transient / Burst Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 51 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.9 Surge Immunity Test 15.10 Radio-frequency, Conducted Disturbances Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 52 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 15.11 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test 15.12 Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions Immunity Test CE EMC Testing Report Page 53 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 16 Photographs of EUT Front View of the EUT Rear View of the EUT CE EMC Testing Report Page 54 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Inside View of the EUT Front View of the PCB 1 CE EMC Testing Report Page 55 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Rear View of the PCB 1 Front View of the PCB 2 CE EMC Testing Report Page 56 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Rear View of the PCB 2 Front View of the PCB 3 CE EMC Testing Report Page 57 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Rear View of the PCB 3 Front View of the PCB 4 CE EMC Testing Report Page 58 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E Rear View of the PCB 4 View of the Power Supply CE EMC Testing Report Page 59 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E View of the Power Cable CE EMC Testing Report Page 60 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E 17 Photographs of ESD Test Points View of ESD Test Points View of ESD Test Points CE EMC Testing Report Page 61 of 62 Report No.:R13111404E View of ESD Test Points View of ESD Test Points CE EMC Testing Report Page 62 of 62
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.6 Linearized : No Encryption : Standard V4.4 (128-bit) User Access : Print, Extract, Print high-res Author : Administrator Create Date : 2013:12:12 16:00:18+08:00 Modify Date : 2013:12:13 16:03:23+08:00 Has XFA : No XMP Toolkit : Adobe XMP Core 5.4-c005 78.147326, 2012/08/23-13:03:03 Creator Tool : PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2 Metadata Date : 2013:12:13 16:03:23+08:00 Producer : Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows) Format : application/pdf Title : Microsoft Word - CE - Test Report.doc Creator : Administrator Document ID : uuid:6c5fbc7e-9cf2-45ce-80a4-ec87725a2f1d Instance ID : uuid:71bc0fc2-b75c-4871-9d0e-e87ddb9d361a Page Count : 62EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools