Lead Management Syllabus
2013-07-08
: Pdf Lead Management Syllabus Lead_Management_Syllabus 7 2013 pdf
Open the PDF directly: View PDF .
Page Count: 40
Download | ![]() |
Open PDF In Browser | View PDF |
Optimal Lead Selection: An Extractor’s Guide to Lead Choice and Implant Technique Charles J. Love, MD FACC FAHA FHRS CCDS Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiac Rhythm Device Services Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University Columbus, OH USA President, International Board of Heart Rhythm Examiners Disclosures Honoraria, research support and/or consulting with: Boston Scientific Cook Medical Leadexx Lake Region Medical No off label uses of devices or drugs will be part of this Medtronic presentation. Spectranetics St. Jude Medical Extraction “Experts” Have Learned! Those that do a lot of extraction begin to think! What causes the problems to arise that result in a need for an extraction How to modify our implant techniques and device choices Avoid increased risk of mechanical, vascular and infectious complications. What hardware might result in an easier and safer extraction experience (for patient AND doctor). 1 Many choices for many issues First, understand where and how complications occur This will affect Implant site Access Techniques Lead choice Pocket tissue plane Venous Lead Crush Lead Crush 2 Fixation – Active versus Passive Active Fixation Passive Fixation Lead Choice Fixation Passive Tine Length • Longer tines are more difficult to extract Tined leads in general more difficult to extract due to fibrosis around tines! LV Lead Designs 3 Lead Choice Active Retractable Helix Tissue may grow into the fixation mechanism Fixed Helix 4195 “Starfix” * Note active fixation is NOT necessarily isodiametric in all cases Fixation: Active – Extendible/Retractable Helix Helix deploys with rotation of terminal pin Fixation: Active – Fixed Helix Design Attribute • Helix fixed to lead body Extraction Considerations Ex. Fixed Helix • BSC FINELINE®* • BSC THINLINE®* • BSC SWEET TIP® * - coradial 4 4195 Starfix Starfix Extraction Starfix Extraction Courtesy Dr. Laurence Epstein 5 4195 Starfix Connector IS-1 / DF-1 Has a “yoke” around which tissue grows and has to be dissected before the lead can be pulled through the tissues IS-4/DF-4 Eliminates yoke and reduces need for more extensive dissection of the lead from the pocket Lead Length Leads that are longer than necessary create a “plate of spaghetti” in the pocket. Leads that are just the right length need much less work to free them from the fibrous pocket tissue. Excess lead also causes additional pressure points and may lead to “Cold Flow” 6 Silicone Failure: Mechanical Abrasion: 11 Months Abrasion: 4 years Wear comes from contact with other leads, yoke, device Cold Flow: 1 year Cold Flow comes from repetitive forces or pressure Lead Mounted Sensors Sensors (such as pressure and oxygen saturation) are being mounted onto the lead body. Typically NOT isodiametric get hung up on fibrous sheath around lead in vasculature preventing removal my simple traction May ICD Leads Single vs Dual Coil 2nd coil typically positioned at most vulnerable spots in the venous system Curve from inominate into the SVC of RA and SVC Junction Coils are the site of most aggressive fibrotic ingrowth; why add more ‘trouble” Proximal coil may “jam” in the sheath, preventing forward or reverse movement 7 ICD Coil Attachment to the Venous System Medtronic 6949 “Fidelis” Lead Construction and Reliability Lead integrity General reliability (chronic lead surveillance) Some models inherently more robust Have high tensile strength pull apart into components easily Tips don’t pop off from crimp/weld easily Don’t Medical Adhesive Backfilled Coils (ICD) ePTFE coated Coils (ICD) 8 Tissue In-growth Tissue In-Growth Solutions Flatwire Design + Backfill e-PTFE Covering Sleeve Extraction Considerations • Non-backfilled coils may have more tissue ingrowth possibly resulting in snowplowing of tissue: Try upsizing extraction sheath Lead Construction and Reliability General construction Unipolar Bipolar Multipolar Conductor construction Coil Coradial vs Coaxial Cable 9 Lead Body Design: MultiLumen Design Design Attribute • ICD leads have multiple lumens for High Voltage Cables, Electrode conductors and Crush lumens Extraction Integrated bipolar uses RV coil as anode for P/S Guidant BSX Considerations • Strip back insulation to verify distal electrode conductor lumen insert lead locking device for Lead Locking Deployment. MDT STJ Ellenbogen, Kenneth A., et al. “Engineering and Clinical Aspects of Defibrillation Leads.” Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation, 2 nd Ed. 151-165. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia 2000. Insulation Silicone Polyurethane Hybrids New compounds Optim ® performance (as of Q1 2010) Optim® Effects on SJM Tachy Lead Abrasion (Kaplan-Meier Analysis of US Data) Abrasion Failure Probability After 38 Months of Implant 0.0020 0.00191 0.0015 ® Optim Provides a Significant Reduction in Abrasion Risk (p<0.0001 by log-rank test) 0.0010 0.0005 0.00016 >90% Reduction 0.0000 SILICONE Tachy Leads (Riata 8F & Riata ST) OPTIM® Tachy Leads (Riata ST Optim & Durata) Courtesy Dr. Mark Carlson 10 Sterile Technique Meticulous attention to Sterile Technique All involved in the lab or admitted to the lab during the operation should be thoroughly educated in sterile technique This is NOT Cathlab sterile technique, it is Operating Room sterile technique Minimize personnel traffic in and out of the room, as well as number of people in the room Sterile Technique Proper use of prophylactic antibiotics Type Time of administration Irrigation Not clear whether this helps or not Every person on the jury during your malpractice trial will know you were an idiot for not irrigating with antibiotic solution TyRx antibiotic pouch However: Conclusion Planning prospectively for an extraction can make the subsequent operation more rapid and safe, and may reduce the need for counter-traction and cutting sheaths Lessons learned from why leads fail can lead to lead choices and implant techniques that reduce the need for subsequent lead extraction 11 7/1/2013 Early Lead Failures and Recalls Andrew E. Epstein, MD Professor of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division University of Pennsylvania Chief, Cardiology Section Philadelphia VA Medical Center Philadelphia, PA • In response to a FDA RFP, registry founded in 1974 by Drs. Bilitch, Parsonnet and Furman. • Maintained data on devices, leads and programmers. • Funding ceased 1981. • Registry continued at USC, NBIMC, and Montefiore. • Dr. Bilitch died in 1987. • Registry ceased in 1994. Major CRM Lead Advisories / Recalls Manufacturer Lead / Lead Family Issue Medtronic 6972 Family 80A Poly U Leads 4002 Family 80A Poly U Leads 4012 Family 80A Poly U Leads 4004 Family 80A Poly U Leads 4504 & 4504M / 4582 Poly U CapSure / Target Tip Tined Atrial J Leads 80A Poly U degradation 80A Poly U degradation 80A Poly U degradation 80A Poly U degradation 80A Poly U degradation St Jude Med. 1016 & 1026 Pacing Leads 55D Poly U (very thin) inner insulation degradation Telectronics AccuFix & Encor “J” lead Family (The “801” lead) J shape retention wire extruded thru insulation Medtronic Transvene ICD family leads 80A Poly U degradation BSI Endotak DSP Family ICD Leads IS-1 connector failures Medtronic Fidelis Family ICD Leads Pace-sense & high V cables and coil fractures St Jude Med. Riata & Riata ST silicone ICD leads Inside-out silicone abrasion externalized cables St Jude Med. QuickSite & QuickFlex Bipolar Lds Inside-out silicone abrasion externalized cables (distal) Courtesy of Mr. John Helland 1 7/1/2013 Polyurethane Failure Mechanisms External Surface Contacts blood / tissue Environmental Stress Cracking (ESC) Internal Surface Contacts metal conductors Metal-Ion Induced Oxidation (MIO) 80A Polyurethane 2 year explant MDT 4058M Courtesy of Mr. John Helland MDT 4004 Pellethane 80A MDT CRM Product Performance Report, 2006. Telectronics AccuFix Lead • Recalled in November 1994 after 2 deaths, 2 non-fatal injuries • 45,000 worldwide implants • Risk of wire fracture/protrusion • Issue: More deaths documented due to extraction than lead malfunction 2 7/1/2013 260 40 Kay GN, et al. Circulation 1999;100:2344-2352. Event-free Lead Function (n=990) Kleemann T, et al. Circulation 2007;115:2474-2480. Transvene ICD Lead Medtronic Product Performance Report, 2012. 3 7/1/2013 Sprint Fidelis ICD Leads • • • • • 6930, 6931, 6948, and 6949 Market released in 2004 Smaller than previous ICD leads 268,000 implanted worldwide 172,000 implanted in the US October 15, 2007 Voluntary suspension of distribution of Sprint Fidelis leads High incidence of conductor fractures 90%: Low voltage conductor • Distal portion of the lead, affecting the anode (ring electrode) • Near anchoring sleeve, primarily affecting the cathode (tip/helix electrode) 10%: High voltage conductor Sprint Fidelis versus 4004 Fidelis 4004 Medtronic Product Performance Reports Risk of Model 6949 Lead Failure Farwell D, et al. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:1375-1379. 4 7/1/2013 0.47% silicone abrasion over 9 years Approximately 10% were inside-out 0.47% (abrasion) x 10% (externalization) = 0.047% Riata leads show externalized conductors • • • • • Usual monitoring Lead parameters Provocative testing: maneuvers, possibly fluoroscopy Remote monitoring Not prophylactic explant St Jude Medical November 28, 2011. 5 7/1/2013 Analysis of OPTIMUM, SCORE, and SJ4 Registries of Patients with Durata and Riata ST Optim ICD Leads Parameter OPTIMUM SCORE SJ4 TOTAL Enrollment years 2006-2009 2007-2012 2009-2010 — Enrolled (n) 5929 3357 1534 10 820 Unique leads (n) 6016 3416 1573 11 005 3.5 2.3 2.7 3.0 Median follow-up (y) Cairns J, et al. HRS LBCTs, May 9, 3013. PHRI Analysis of St Jude Medical Registries of Patients with Optiminsulated ICD Leads Failure Rate (%) Freedom from Failure at 5 y (%) All-cause mechanical failure 0.35 99.4 Conductor fracture 0.22 99.6 Insulation abrasion 0.07 99.9 0 100 End point Externalized conductor Cairns J, et al. HRS LBCTs, May 9, 3013. Risk of Overreaction: Complications Associated with ICD Replacement in Response to Advisories • 17 Canadian centers, 2915 recalled devices • 533 (18.3%) replaced • 66% primary prevention • Complications in 43 pts (8.1%) • Major requiring reoperation: 31 pts (5.8%) • Death: 2 pts • Minor complications: 12 pts (2.3%) • Of explanted devices, 3 (0.1%) had malfunction (early battery depletion), none with clinical consequence Gould PA, et al. JAMA 2006;295:1907-1911. 6 7/1/2013 Lessons Learned • All leads have a finite failure rate. • Goal of zero failure rate is unattainable. • Resolution is in how failures are managed. • Need post-marketing surveillance, not absence of approval of new technology by requiring longterm follow-up before approval. • Our responsibilities are to weigh the evidence and make judgments of risk benefit ratios. This requires data and understanding. 7 7/5/2013 Techniques for Lead Extraction Oussama M. Wazni Cardiac Electrophysiology Cleveland Clinic Scope 250,000-275,000 ICD devices are implanted yearly throughout the world. Up to 10% of all leads implanted may require removal. EPS: A growing demand 3 million implanted ICDs 180,000 pacing systems Increasing indications Aging population 1 7/5/2013 Complications of Implantable Cardiac Devices Non infectious – Hematoma (5%) – Lead dislodgement (2%) – Pacing threshold evaluation (1%) – Lead fracture (<1%) Infectious – Erosion or incipient erosion (0.75 per 100 pts) – All other infections (0.7 per 100 pts) Klug et al Circulation 2007;116 Infection Infection 2 7/5/2013 Lead Fracture Technique Failure Venous Occlusion 3 7/5/2013 Bilateral Occlusion Poor Judgment Fibrotic Attachments 4 7/5/2013 Tissue Ingrowth Extraction Risks Lead extraction risks: – Rupture of SVC – Perforation (with tamponade) of SVC with new lead placement – Cardiac tamponade – Failure to extract an infected lead – Low cardiac output – Lead breakage and migration – Avulsion of veins and myocardial tissue – Death 5 7/5/2013 Tensile Strength Locking Stylets Apply Suture Connect suture from lead outer insulation to closest LLD loop. Example: 0 Ethibond tied with 2 “throws” for low profile 6 7/5/2013 Prepare the Target Lead(s) Exposing the inner coil – Bipolar lead: must remove outer insulation, outer coil, and inner insulation to expose inner coil Inner Coil One Tie 7 7/5/2013 Bull Dog Liberator™ Wilkoff & Spectranetics Lead Locking Devices Wilkoff™ Locking Stylet 0.17” – 0.19” Lead Locking Device® or LLD2 8 7/5/2013 Lead Locking Device® (LLD) Provides stable traction by locking along the entire contacted lead lumen Can be unlocked and repositioned Locked Unlocked Tensile Strength 9 7/5/2013 Countertraction Sheaths Counter Pressure Push Encapsulating Tissue Vein Lead Sheaths Pull Locking Stylet Lead Counter Traction Locking Stylet (Pull) Lead Body Counteraction Sheath (Push) Inverted Tined Lead Tip Being Extracted 10 7/5/2013 Counter-Traction SLS II Outer Sheath Target Lead Scar Tissue Scar Tissue Using SLS II Alone Using the Outer Sheath Lead Extraction Tools Locking Stylets – Cook Locking Stylet – 1989 – Liberator Locking Stylet - 2000 Mechanical sheaths – Mechanical Sheaths Polypropylene (1989) Teflon (1990) Steel (1992) Byrd Femoral Workstation – 1990 – Dotter Basket/Tip Deflecting Guidewire -1990 – Needles-Eye-Snare - 1996 Evolution – 2006 One tie Bull dog 11 7/5/2013 Powered Lead Removal Technologies 12F - Excimer Laser – 1994 (Clinical Trial) 12F – Excimer Laser – 1997 (FDA approval) Lead Locking Device (LLD™) –1999 14F & 16F Excimer Laser Electrosurgical Dissection Sheaths - 2001 SLSII – 12F, 14F, 16F – 2003 Locking Stylet™ by COOK® CVX-300® Excimer Laser Generates light at 308 nm wavelength in the ultraviolet spectrum Excimer laser enables photoablation of lipids and proteins Laser Medium = XeCI gas 12 7/5/2013 Mechanisms of Action Photochemica Photothermal l Photomechanica l Dissolving molecular bonds Creating kinetic energy Produces photothermal energy SLS II and Outer Sheath Options 12 Fr 14 Fr Teflon outer sheath offers blunt and beveled ends 16 Fr Electrosurgical Dissection System sheath 13 7/5/2013 Electrosurgical Dissection System sheath Evolution Evolution 14 7/5/2013 Evolution Evolution Evolution 15 7/5/2013 16 7/5/2013 17 7/5/2013 18 7/5/2013 19 7/5/2013 20 7/5/2013 21 7/5/2013 Conclusion In the right patients if you know what you are doing extraction is useful and safe 22
Source Exif Data:
File Type : PDF File Type Extension : pdf MIME Type : application/pdf PDF Version : 1.4 Linearized : No Page Count : 40 Creator : PDFMerge! (http://www.pdfmerge.com) Producer : iText® 5.4.1 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (ONLINE PDF SERVICES; licensed version) Modify Date : 2013:07:08 19:25:57-04:00 Create Date : 2013:07:08 19:25:57-04:00EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools