Radial Approach International Perspective Syllabus

Radial Approach International Perspective Syllabus Radial_Approach_International_Perspective_Syllabus Radial_Approach_International_Perspective_Syllabus 6 2013 pdfdoc 258413772373414384 3:

2013-06-03

: Pdf Radial Approach International Perspective Syllabus Radial_Approach_International_Perspective_Syllabus 6 2013 pdf

Open the PDF directly: View PDF PDF.
Page Count: 51

DownloadRadial Approach International Perspective Syllabus
Open PDF In BrowserView PDF
6/1/2013

Balloon Assisted Tracking for Challenging
Anatomy
Tejas M. Patel, MD, DM, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
Chairman & Chief Interventional Cardiologist, Apex Heart Institute,
Professor & Head, Department of Cardiology, Sheth V. S. General Hospital,
Ahmedabad, India.
Professor of Medicine (Cardiology), Department of Internal Medicine,
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, USA.

Disclosure
• I have no relevant disclosure
related to this presentation

Balloon-assisted tracking of a guide catheter
through difficult radial anatomy: A technical
report

Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;81(5):E215-8.

1

6/1/2013

Balloon-assisted tracking: A must-known
technique to overcome difficult anatomy during
transradial approach
Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S, Rao S, Bertrand OF, Kwan T.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr 16. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24959. [press]

2

6/1/2013

Working through small RA & 7F guide

3

6/1/2013

Working through complex tortuosity of RA

4

6/1/2013

Another Example

5

6/1/2013

Perforation of RA & Subclavian tortuosity

6

6/1/2013

7

6/1/2013

8

6/1/2013

Another Example

9

6/1/2013

10

6/1/2013

Working through 360 degree loop

11

6/1/2013

Another Example

12

6/1/2013

Thank You
www.transradialworld.com

13

31.5.2013

Radial access for STEMI -

Case

Ivo Bernat MD, Ph.D.

University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Czech Republic

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

I, Ivo Bernat DO NOT have a financial
interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or
more organizations that could be perceived as a
real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of the subject of this presentation.

Primary PCI in Europe

Primary 22
PCI Centers - no thrombolysis in CZ …

Widimsky et al. Eur Heart J 2010; 31,943-957

1

31.5.2013

All Czech PCI centers (n=22) - 24/7 service for AMI since 2002

Trend in the use of radial approach in CZ (PCI)
60%

% of radial approach

50%
40%
30%

Stable CAD

20%

ACS – Non-STE

ACS – STEMI

10%

Others
0%

Total :

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6/2011

5%......10%....17%.....21%.....32%.....42%....50%...2012 >50%

Case from Sunday evening

- May 26, 2013

•
•
•
•
•

woman - 76 y.
treated hypertension - betabl. + ACEI
2 hours of chest pain
anterior STEMI
EMS: UFH 5000 IU i.v., clopidogrel 600 mg p.o., Aspegic
250 mg i.v.
• direct transport to our cathlab
• Our PCI center : 95% TRA incl. STEMI - 90% from the left

2

31.5.2013

ECG before pPCI

Left radial approach - 80% AS l.sin. stenosis

Question - go on from the left ?

3

31.5.2013

Angled hydrophilic wire 0.035 ….

CAG with 5F dg. Tiger catheter

Next step - 5F guiding XB 3,5, bolus GPI, coronary wire…

4

31.5.2013

… minimal predilatation (2,0/20mm with 4atm)

DES 3.0/16 implantation - 18 atm

After primary PCI …

5

31.5.2013

Next step - tight subclavian stenosis - to treat or not to treat
…..???

Stent 6,0/14mm (18 atm = 6,99mm) without
guiding catheter …

Final result of pPCI and subclavian stenting

6

31.5.2013

After primary PCI and subclavian stenting
(contrast 150 ml, skia 9.8 min)

• radial artery compression time - 100 min
• complications - 0
• echo next day - LVEF 45%
• ICU stay - 32 hours

(Sunday midnight - Tuesday morning)

Conclusion
•

Transradial primary PCI (in experience radial center) is the best way how to :

•
•

- minimize local bleeding
- increase patient comfort with soon mobilisation and earlier discharge

•
•

- reduce the cost
- also reduce mortality

Additional non coronary intervention in our case was safe and easy.

7

6/2/2013

Complex transradial LEFT MAIN PCI in
CARDiogenic shock
Olivier F. Bertrand, MD, PhD
Associate-Professor of Medicine, Laval University
Adjunct-Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McGill University
International Chair on Interventional
Cardiology and Transradial Approach

QuickTime™ and a
YUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

Quebec Heart-Lung Institute

VuMedi-June 3, 2013

Disclosures

•

Consultant: OPSENS

Case Scenario
•

57 y old man, crushing chest pain while working on his
roof

•

RF: Smoker

•

ECG in ambulance: Antero-Lateral STEMI

•

VF 2 episodes during transfert. Cardiogenic shock
upon arrival in cath lab

1

6/2/2013

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

2

6/2/2013

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

Key points
•

Radial access permits complex LM PCI

•

Having the groins prep during cardiogenic shock allows
quick access for LV support (BIA, ECMO, LVAD,
Impella) and PCMK

•

Biggest challenge remains to get the radial access
when faint/no pulse. Role for ultrasound guidance ?

3

6/2/2013

WWW.aimradial.org

4

01.06.2013

Radial Access for
Carotid Interventions
Sasko Kedev MD, PhD, FESC, FACC
University Clinic of Cardiology
Skopje, Macedonia

skedev@gmail.com

DISCLOSURE

 Nothing to disclose

Potential Vascular Complication
Femoral Approach


Hematoma-bleeding



Pseudoaneurysm



RetroPeritoneal Hemorrhage



AV fistula



Ischemia-Thrombosis-Emboli



Infection



Neuropathy

Skin
crease

CFA

1

01.06.2013

ACCESS SITE COMPLICATIONS

Vascular access is 1st reason of bleeding
complications & MACE after PCI
BLEEDING INCREASES MORTALITY ! ! !

Radial Artery Access

2

01.06.2013

FEMORAL APPROACH LIMITATIONS
for CAS
 Aorto-iliac disease or occlusion
 Previous surgical bypass at this level
 Diseased and Complex aortic arch with
 Tortuous SAA originating from elongated,
or type II, III, or bovine aortic arch

Aorto-iliac Disease or Occlusion

Tortuous SAA Originating from Elongated or
Bovine Aortic Arch

3

01.06.2013

ACCESS SITE COMPLICATIONS

The most common adverse event after CAS
from the femoral approach
MOST TECHNICAL FAILURES ARE
RELATED TO A COMPLEX ARCH

Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with
atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta

Karalis DG et al. Am Heart J. 1996 Jun;131(6):1149-55.

Alternatives to FA

 Brachial

 Radial / Ulnar
 Direct puncture

4

01.06.2013

Radial Access - Alternatives

 Right Radial Artery is
1st choice !
 Right Ulnar Artery
 Left Radial Artery
 Left Ulnar Artery

TRANSRADIAL CAS

IMPORTANCE OF EARLY AMBULATION
 Patient comfort and satisfaction
 Reduced nursing cost
 Reduced vagal reaction
 Reduced hypotensive response
 Reduced bleeding complications

5

01.06.2013

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Anchoring technique

 Telescopic approach

TRANSRADIAL CAS

Anchoring Technique
 SIM 1-3 in CCA
 Long hydrophilic GW in ECA
 Exchange with transfer catheter
 Exchange with extra stiff GW in ECA
 Advance 6F GS in CCA

TRA CAS of RICA in a patient with
Acute Carotid Syndrome

6

01.06.2013

Case 1.

Left ACC 100%

RICA

Terumo advantage wire in RECA

7

01.06.2013

Amplatz Stiff wire in RECA

Destination sheath 6Fr

Xact 8-6/40mm

8

01.06.2013

Final result

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Anchoring technique
 Telescopic approach

Case 2.

SIM 2 Cook into Shuttle Sheath

9

01.06.2013

Shuttle Sheath Positioning

LICA 95 %

Final Result

10

01.06.2013

Before / After

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Direct Cannulation
 Simple Loop Cannulation
 Deep Loop Retrograde Cannulation

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Direct Cannulation
 Simple Loop Cannulation

 Deep Loop Retrograde Cannulation

11

01.06.2013

Case 3.

CAS of RICA – Direct cannulation

CAS of RICA – Final Result

Before / After

12

01.06.2013

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Direct Cannulation
 Simple Loop Cannulation
 Deep Loop Retrograde Cannulation

Case 4.

CAS of LICA – Simple Loop Cannulation

CAS of LICA - Final Result

13

01.06.2013

Before / After

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Direct Cannulation
 Simple Loop Cannulation
 Deep Loop Retrograde Cannulation

Case 5.

TRA CAS of LICA – DLRC – Transfer
Catheter

14

01.06.2013

TRA CAS of LICA – DLRC – Transfer
Catheter

TRA CAS of LICA – DLRC – 5F JR GC

TRA CAS of LICA – DLRC – 7F MP GC

15

01.06.2013

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Right Wrist Access
 Left Wrist Access

Case 6.

Left TRA CAS of RICA – Simple Loop
Cannulation

Left TRA CAS of RICA – Final Result

16

01.06.2013

Before / After

TRANSRADIAL CAS

 Tortuous Internal Carotid Artery
 String Sign
 Contralateral Occlusion

Case 7.

Tortuous LICA Subocclusion in Octogenarian

17

01.06.2013

Stent: Precise 7.0/40mm

Final Result

Before / After

18

01.06.2013

Case 8.

LICA: String sign

Final result

Before / After

19

01.06.2013

Case 9.

TUA for CAS of LICA with
contralateral occlusion

Male
J. A.
66 y.o.

High Puncture of Ulnar Artery

High Puncture of Ulnar Artery:
High Take-off of Radial Artery

20

01.06.2013

RICA 100%

Destination sheath 6Fr

Final Result

21

01.06.2013

Final Result

Before / After

Case 10.

TRA CAS of LICA with
MoMa proximal protection

Male
M. D.
66 y.o.

22

01.06.2013

TRA

LICA 90%

23

01.06.2013

MOMA proximal protection device

Stent: Precise RX 8.0/30mm

Final result

24

01.06.2013

Before / After

Radial Approach - Hemostasis

Transradial CAS

ADVANTAGE
 Easy access in otherwise very complex aortic arcs
 Immediate patient mobilisation
 Reduced hypotensive response
 No bleeding
 Anticoagulation is not an issue
 Reduced nursing cost
 Outpatient performance in selected cases

25

01.06.2013

Transradial CAS

DISADVANTAGE
 Significant learning curve for new TRA operators
 Sometimes longer procedure for “easy case”

with type I aortic arch
 Proximal PD and larger devices could not

be used freely in all cases
 Radial artery occlusion ≈ 10 %

Transradial CAS

MISTAKE

 Perform TRA only when FA is not possible !!!

Conclusions I

 TRA & TUA CAS is feasible and safe when

performed by experienced TRA operator
 Easy access in difficult anatomies (bovine arch

LCCA)and most of the innominate artery take offs
 Severe angulations at the origin might be

negotiated safely and efficiently with DLRC as
alternative of Direct and Simple Loop
cannulation for CAS

26

01.06.2013

Conclusions II

 Allows early patient mobilization
 Eliminates bleeding complications
 Further studies are needed before

recommending wrist access (TRA or TUA) for
CAS as primary approach over femoral access

27



Source Exif Data:
File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.4
Linearized                      : No
Page Count                      : 51
Creator                         : PDFMerge! (http://www.pdfmerge.com)
Producer                        : iText® 5.4.1 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (ONLINE PDF SERVICES; licensed version)
Modify Date                     : 2013:06:03 00:50:16-04:00
Create Date                     : 2013:06:03 00:50:16-04:00
EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools

Navigation menu