TRX Systems WT12-1000 Bluetooth Module User Manual SAR Report Rev 1

Download:
Mirror Download [FCC.gov]
Document ID	1926770
Application ID	/YXHcOH6KX93BMx/8LMN1A==
Document Description	SAR Report Rev 1
Short Term Confidential	No
Permanent Confidential	No
Supercede	No
Document Type	User Manual
Display Format	Adobe Acrobat PDF - pdf
Filesize	205.31kB (2566426 bits)
Date Submitted	2013-03-28 00:00:00
Date Available	2013-03-31 00:00:00
Creation Date	2017-10-28 01:14:43
Producing Software	GPL Ghostscript 9.18
Document Lastmod	2017-10-28 01:14:43
Document Title	SAR Report Rev 1
Document Creator	Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.6

PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
7185 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046 USA
Tel. +1.410.290.6652 / Fax +1.410.290.6654
http://www.pctestlab.com
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Applicant Name:
TRX Systems, Inc.
7500 Greenway Center Drive, Suite 420
Greenbelt, MD 20770
USA
Date of Testing:
05/22/2012
Test Site/Location:
PCTEST Lab, Columbia, MD, USA
Document Serial No.:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
FCC I D:
BXONEON-TU-1000
APPLI C A NT:
TRX SYSTEMS, INC.
DUT Type:
Application Type:
FCC Rule Part(s):
Model(s):
Test Device Serial No.:
Portable Device
Certification
CFR §2.1093
NEON-TU-1000
Pre-Production [S/N: RevC]
Equipment
Class
Band & Mode
DTS
DSS
2.4 GHz CSS
Bluetooth
Tx Frequency
2400 - 2483.5 MHz
2402 - 2480 MHz
Simultaneous SAR per KDB 690783 D01v01r02:
Measured
Conducted
Power [dBm]
19.33
3.46
SAR
1 gm Body
(W/kg)
0.12
N/A
0.25
Note: Powers in the above table represent output powers for the SAR test configurations and may not represent the highest output powers for all
configurations for each mode.
Note: This revised test report (S/N: 0Y1302070239-R1.BXO) supersedes and replaces the previously issued test report on the same subject DUT for
the same type of testing indicated. Please discard or destroy the previously issued test report(s) and dispose of accordingly.
This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled
environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement
procedures specified in Section 1.7 of this report; for North American frequency bands only.
I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all
persons taking them. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 1 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
T A B L E
O F
C O N T E N T S
DEVICE UNDER TEST ................................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 5
DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................ 6
RF EXPOSURE LIMITS .................................................................................................................. 7
RF CONDUCTED POWERS........................................................................................................... 8
SYSTEM VERIFICATION................................................................................................................ 9
SAR DATA SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 11
FCC MULTI-TX AND ANTENNA SAR CONSIDERATIONS......................................................... 12
SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY ........................................................................................... 13
10
EQUIPMENT LIST......................................................................................................................... 14
11
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ............................................................................................ 15
12
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 16
13
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 17
APPENDIX A:
SAR TEST PLOTS
APPENDIX B:
SAR DIPOLE VERIFICATION PLOTS
APPENDIX C:
PROBE AND DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
APPENDIX D:
SAR TISSUE SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX E:
SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION
APPENDIX F:
SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 2 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
1
DEVICE UNDER TEST
1.1
1.2
Device Overview
Band & Mode
Operating Modes
Tx Frequency
2.4 GHz CSS
Bluetooth
Data
Data
2400 - 2483.5 MHz
2402 - 2480 MHz
Nominal and Maximum Output Power Specifications
This device operates using the following nominal output power specifications. SAR values were scaled to
the maximum allowed power to determine compliance per KDB Publication 447498 D01v05.
Modulated Average
(dBm)
21.0
20.0
4.0
4.0
Mode / Band
2.4 GHz CSS
Bluetooth
1.3
Maximum
Nominal
Maximum
Nominal
DUT Antenna Locations
108 mm
Top Edge
2.4 GHz CSS
Tx/Rx Antenna #1
69 mm
2.4 GHz BT
Tx/Rx Antenna
Left
Edge
GPS Rx Only
Antenna
Front of Device
Right
Edge
125 kHz
LF Transceiver
2.4 GHz CSS
Tx/Rx Antenna #2
Bottom Edge
Note: Specific antenna dimensions and separation distances are shown in the antenna distance document.
Figure 1-1
DUT Antenna Locations
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 3 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
1.4
Simultaneous Transmission Capabilities
According to FCC KDB Publication 447498 D05v01, transmitters are considered to be transmitting
simultaneously when there is overlapping transmission, with the exception of transmissions during
network hand-offs with maximum hand-off duration less than 30 seconds. Possible transmission paths for
the DUT are shown in Figure 1-2 and are color-coded to indicate communication modes which share the
same path. Modes which share the same transmission path cannot transmit simultaneously with one
another.
Path 1
Path 2
2.4 GHz CSS
Bluetooth
Figure 1-2
Simultaneous Transmission Paths
This device contains multiple transmitters that may operate simultaneously, and therefore requires a
simultaneous transmission analysis according to FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v05 3) procedures.
Table 1-1
Simultaneous Transmission Scenarios
ody
No.
apable Transmit onfigurations
.4
1.5
z SS + .4
z luetooth
44 4
Yes
SAR Test Exclusions Applied
Per FCC KDB 447498 D01 v05, the SAR exclusion threshold for distances <50mm is defined by the
following equation:
Based on the maximum conducted power of Bluetooth and the antenna to use separation distance,
Bluetooth SAR was not required; [(3/5)* √2.441] = 0.9 < 3.0.
The 125 kHz LF Transceiver is a Part 15.209 transmitter which is exempt from RF Exposure evaluation
per CFR 2.1093. The 125 kHz LF Transmitter can not co-transmit.
1.6
Power Reduction for SAR
There is no power reduction for any band/mode implemented in this device for SAR purposes.
1.7


Guidance Applied
FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v05 (Portable Devices)
FCC KDB Publication 865664 DR01 (SAR Measurements up to 6 GHz)
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 4 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
2
INTRODUCTION
The FCC and Industry Canada have adopted the guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of
radio frequency (RF) radiation in ET Docket 93-62 on Aug. 6, 1996 and Health Canada Safety Code 6 to
protect the public and workers from the potential hazards of RF emissions due to FCC-regulated portable
devices. [1]
The safety limits used for the environmental evaluation measurements are based on the criteria published
by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) in
IEEE/ANSI C95.1-1992 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency
Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz [3] and Health Canada RF Exposure Guidelines Safety Code 6
[24]. The measurement procedure described in IEEE/ANSI C95.3-2002 Recommended Practice for the
Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave [4] is used for
guidance in measuring the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) due to the RF radiation exposure from the
Equipment Under Test (EUT). These criteria for SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the
International Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in Biological Effects and
Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,” Report No. Vol 74. SAR is a measure of
the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source. SAR values have been
related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards.
2.1
SAR Definition
Specific Absorption Rate is defined as the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dU) absorbed
by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dV) of a given density (). It
is also defined as the rate of RF energy absorption per unit mass at a point in an absorbing body (see
Equation 2-1).
Equation 2-1
SAR Mathematical Equation
SAR 
dt
 dU  d  dU 




 dm  dt   dv 
SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg).
SAR 
  E2

where:
 = conductivity of the tissue-simulating material (S/m)
 = mass density of the tissue-simulating material (kg/m3)
E = Total RMS electric field strength (V/m)
NOTE: The primary factors that control rate of energy absorption were found to be the wavelength of the incident field in relation to
the dimensions and geometry of the irradiated organism, the orientation of the organism in relation to the polarity of field vectors, the
presence of reflecting surfaces, and whether conductive contact is made by the organism with a ground plane.[6]
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 5 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
3
DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT
3.1
Measurement Procedure
The evaluation was performed using the following procedure:
1.
The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head or body
was measured at a distance no greater than 5.0 mm from the
inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension
of the device-head and body interface and the horizontal grid
resolution was determined per FCC KDB Publication 865664
DR01 (See Table 3-1).
2.
The point SAR measurement was taken at the maximum SAR
region determined from Step 1 to enable the monitoring of SAR
fluctuations/drifts during the 1g/10g cube evaluation. SAR at this
fixed point was measured and used as a reference value.
3.
Figure 3-1
Sample SAR Area Scan
Based on the area scan data, the peak of the region with maximum SAR was determined by
spline interpolation. Around this point, a volume was assessed according to the measurement
resolution and volume size requirements of FCC KDB Publication 865664 DR01 (See Table 3-1).
On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated with the following
procedure (see references or the DASY manual online for more details):
a.
The data was extrapolated to the surface of the outer-shell of the phantom. The
combined distance extrapolated was the combined distance from the center of the dipoles 2.7mm
away from the tip of the probe housing plus the 1.2 mm distance between the surface and the
lowest measuring point. The extrapolation was based on a least-squares algorithm. A polynomial
of the fourth order was calculated through the points in the z-axis (normal to the phantom shell).
b.
After the maximum interpolated values were calculated between the points in the cube,
the SAR was averaged over the spatial volume (1g or 10g) using a 3D-Spline interpolation
algorithm. The 3D-spline is composed of three one-dimensional splines with the “Not a knot”
condition (in x, y, and z directions). The volume was then integrated with the trapezoidal
algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were obtained through interpolation, in order to
calculate the averaged SAR.
c.
All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher
average value was found.
4.
The SAR reference value, at the same location as step 2, was re-measured after the zoom scan
was complete to calculate the SAR drift. If the drift deviated by more than 5%, the SAR test and
drift measurements were repeated.
Table 3-1
Area and Zoom Scan Resolutions per FCC KDB Publication 865664 DR01
Frequency
Maximum Area Scan Maximum Zoom Scan
Resolution (mm)
Resolution (mm)
(∆xzoom, ∆yzoom)
(∆xarea, ∆yarea)
Maximum Zoom Scan Spatial
Resolution (mm)
Uniform Grid
∆zzoom(n)
Graded Grid
∆zzoom(1)*
Minimum Zoom Scan
Volume (mm)
(x,y,z)
∆zzoom(n>1)*
2 GHz
15
1.5*∆zzoom(n‐1)
30
2‐3 GHz
12
1.5*∆zzoom(n‐1)
30
3‐4 GHz
12
1.5*∆zzoom(n‐1)
28
4‐5 GHz
10
2.5
1.5*∆zzoom(n‐1)
25
5‐6 GHz
10
1.5*∆zzoom(n‐1)
22
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 6 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
4
RF EXPOSURE LIMITS
4.1
Uncontrolled Environment
UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals
who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits
are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are
exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for
exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come
under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless
transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity.
4.2
Controlled Environment
CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred
by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). In
general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed
as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure
and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the
exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels
may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of
the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by
some other appropriate means.
Table 4-1
SAR Human Exposure Specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and Health Canada Safety Code 6
1. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube)
and over the appropriate averaging time.
2. The Spatial Average value of the SAR averaged over the whole body.
3. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a
cube) and over the appropriate averaging time.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 7 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
5
RF CONDUCTED POWERS
5.1
CSS Conducted Powers
Table 5-1
Average RF Conducted Power
Mode
Freq.
[MHz]
Bandwidth
[MHz]
Antenna
Conducted
Power [dBm]
CSS
CSS
2441.75
2441.75
80
80
19.33
19.33
Note: The DUT was configured to transmit continuously during conducted power measurement.
Power Meter
RF Connector
Wireless
Device
Figure 5-1
Power Measurement Setup
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 8 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
6
SYSTEM VERIFICATION
6.1
Tissue Verification
Table 6-1
Measured Tissue Properties
Calibrated for
Tissue Temp
Tissue
During Calibration
Tests
Type
(C˚)
Performed on:
5/22/2012
2450B
23.0
Measured
Frequency
(MHz)
2401
2450
2499
Measured
Conductivity,
σ (S/m)
1.979
2.043
2.112
Measured
Dielectric
Constant, ε
TARGET
Conductivity,
σ (S/m)
TARGET
Dielectric
Constant, ε
% dev σ
% dev ε
54.91
54.77
54.53
1.903
1.950
2.019
52.765
52.700
52.638
3.99%
4.77%
4.61%
4.07%
3.93%
3.59%
The above measured tissue parameters were used in the DASY software. The DASY software was used
to perform interpolation to determine the dielectric parameters at the SAR test device frequencies (per
IEEE 1528 6.6.1.2). The tissue parameters listed in the SAR test plots may slightly differ from the table
above due to significant digit rounding in the software.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 9 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
6.2
Test System Verification
Prior to SAR assessment, the system is verified to ±10% of the SAR measurement on the reference dipole at the time
of calibration by the calibration facility.
Table 6-3
System Verification Results
System Verification
TARGET & MEASURED
Tissue
Tissue
Frequency
Type
(MHz)
2450
Body
Input
Amb.
Liquid
Power
Temp (°C) Temp (°C)
(W)
Date:
05/22/2012
23.8
22.3
0.040
Dipole Probe
SN
SN
719
3022
Measured 1 W Target
SAR1g
SAR1g
(W/kg)
(W/kg)
1.97
51.300
1W
Deviation
Normalized
(%)
SAR1g (W/kg)
49.250
-4.00%
Note: Full system validation status and results can be found in Appendix E.
Figure 6-2
System Verification Setup Photo
Figure 6-1
System Verification Setup Diagram
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 10 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
7
SAR DATA SUMMARY
7.1
Standalone Body SAR Data
Table 7-1
Standalone Body SAR
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
FREQUENCY
Mode
MHz
2441.75
2441.75
Maximum Allowed
Power [dBm]
Conducted
Power Drift
Power
[dB]
[dBm]
Spacing
Side
SAR (1g) Scaling
Factor
(W/kg)
Scaled SAR
(1g)
Plot #
(W/kg)
CSS
21.0
19.33
-0.01
0 mm
back
1:1
0.082
1.469
0.120
A1
CSS
21.0
19.33
-0.07
0 mm
back
1:1
0.016
1.469
0.023
A3
ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMIT
Spatial Peak
Uncontrolled Exposure/General Population
7.2
Duty
Cycle
Body
1.6 W/kg (mW/g)
averaged over 1 gram
SAR Test Notes
General Notes:
1. The test data reported are the worst-case SAR values according to test procedures specified in
FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v05.
2. Batteries are fully charged at the beginning of the SAR measurements. The standard battery was
used for all SAR measurements and will be the only battery available with this DUT.
3. Liquid tissue depth was at least 15.0 cm for all frequencies.
4. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical
and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units.
5. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC
KDB Publication 447498 D01v05.
6. Per FCC KDB 865664 DR01, variability SAR tests were performed when the measured SAR
results for a frequency band were greater than 0.8 W/kg. Repeated SAR measurements are
highlighted in the tables above for clarity. Please see Section 9 for variability analysis.
7. A Z-axis plot for worst case configuration was included in Appendix A to confirm 15cm depth as
well as the first 2 measurements are within 1cm of the surface.
8. DASY4 applies a boundary effect compensation algorithm during SAR evaluation.
9. Software provided by the manufacturer was used to configure device during SAR tests. A
spectrum analyzer was used to verify 2.4 GHz CSS transmission.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 11 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
8
FCC MULTI-TX AND ANTENNA SAR CONSIDERATIONS
8.1
Introduction
The following procedures adopted from FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v05 are applicable to handsets
with built-in unlicensed transmitters such as 802.11a/b/g/n and Bluetooth devices which may
simultaneously transmit with the another transmitter.
8.2
Simultaneous Transmission Procedures
This device contains transmitters that may operate simultaneously. Therefore simultaneous transmission
analysis is required. Per FCC KDB 447498 D01v05 IV.C.1.iii, simultaneous transmission SAR test
exclusion may be applied when the sum of the 1-g SAR for all the simultaneous transmitting antennas in
a specific a physical test configuration is ≤1.6 W/kg. When standalone SAR is not required to be
measured, per FCC KDB 447498 D01v05 4.3.2 2), the following equation must be used to estimate the
standalone 1g SAR for simultaneous transmission assessment involving that transmitter.
Table 8-1
Estimated SAR
Mode
Bluetooth
8.3
Frequency
Maximum Separation Estimated
Allowed
Distance
SAR
Power
(Body)
(Body)
[MHz]
[dBm]
[mm]
[W/kg]
2441
4.00
0.125
Body SAR Simultaneous Transmission Analysis
Table 8-2
Simultaneous Transmission Scenario with 2.4 GHz Bluetooth
8.3
Configuration
CSS SAR
(W/kg)
Bluetooth
SAR
(W/kg)
Σ SAR
(W/kg)
Back Side
0.120
0.125
0.245
Simultaneous Transmission Conclusion
The above numerical summed SAR results for all the worst-case simultaneous transmission conditions
were below the SAR limit. Therefore, the above analysis is sufficient to determine that simultaneous
transmission cases will not exceed the SAR limit and therefore no measured volumetric simultaneous
SAR summation is required per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01_v05.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 12 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
9
SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY
9.1
Measurement Variability
Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 DR01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency
band, which was determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for
the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media were required for SAR
measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures were applied to the tissue
medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissueequivalent medium. These additional measurements were repeated after the completion of all
measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test
device was returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged
before it was re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any
unexpected variations in the repeated results.
SAR Measurement Variability was assessed using the following procedures for each frequency band:
1) When the original highest measured SAR is ≥ 0.80 W/kg, the measurement was repeated once.
2) A second repeated measurement was preformed only if the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the
original and first repeated measurements was > 1.20 or when the original or repeated
measurement was ≥ 1.45 W/kg (~ 10% from the 1-g SAR limit).
3) A third repeated measurement was performed only if the original, first or second repeated
measurement was ≥ 1.5 W/kg and the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original, first and
second repeated measurements is > 1.20.
4) Repeated measurements are not required when the original highest measured SAR is < 0.80 W/kg.
Since the highest measured SAR for this device was < 0.8 W/kg, measurement variability was not
assessed.
9.2
Measurement Uncertainty
The measured SAR was <1.5 W/kg for all frequency bands. Therefore, per KDB Publication 865664
DR01, the extended measurement uncertainty analysis per IEEE 1528-2003 was not required.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 13 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
10
EQUIPMENT LIST
Manufacturer
Model
Description
Cal Date
Cal Interval
Cal Due
Agilent
8594A
(9kHz-2.9GHz) Spectrum Analyzer
N/A
N/A
N/A
Serial Number
3051A00187
Agilent
8648D
(9kHz-4GHz) Signal Generator
10/10/2011
Annual
10/10/2012
3613A00315
JP38020182
Agilent
8753E
(30kHz-6GHz) Network Analyzer
4/4/2012
Annual
4/4/2013
Gigatronics
80701A
(0.05-18GHz) Power Sensor
10/12/2011
Annual
10/12/2012
1833460
Gigatronics
8651A
Universal Power Meter
10/12/2011
Annual
10/12/2012
8650319
Pasternack
PE2208-6
Bidirectional Coupler
6/3/2011
Annual
6/3/2012
N/A
Pasternack
PE2209-10
Bidirectional Coupler
6/3/2011
Annual
6/3/2012
N/A
Rohde & Schwarz
NRVD
Dual Channel Power Meter
4/8/2011
Biennial
4/8/2013
101695
SPEAG
D2450V2
2450 MHz SAR Dipole
8/19/2011
Annual
8/19/2012
719
SPEAG
DAE4
Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics
4/19/2012
Annual
4/19/2013
665
SPEAG
ES3DV2
SAR Probe
8/25/2011
Annual
8/25/2012
3022
Anritsu
MA2481A
Power Sensor
2/14/2012
Annual
2/14/2013
5318
Anritsu
MA2481A
Power Sensor
2/14/2012
Annual
2/14/2013
5442
Anritsu
ML2438A
Power Meter
10/13/2011
Annual
10/13/2012
1070030
Anritsu
MA2481A
Power Sensor
2/14/2012
Annual
2/14/2013
2400
Anritsu
MA2411B
Pulse Sensor
10/13/2011
Annual
10/13/2012
1027293
Anritsu
ML2495A
Power Meter
10/13/2011
Annual
10/13/2012
1039008
Amplifier Research
5S1G4
5W, 800MHz-4.2GHz
CBT
N/A
CBT
21910
Mini-Circuits
BW-N20W5+
DC to 18 GHz Precision Fixed 20 dB Attenuator
CBT
N/A
CBT
N/A
Control Company
61220-416
Long-Stem Thermometer
2/15/2011
Biennial
2/15/2013
111331322
VWR
36934-158
Wall-Mounted Thermometer
1/21/2011
Biennial
1/21/2013
111286454
MiniCircuits
SLP-2400+
Low Pass Filter
CBT
N/A
CBT
R8979500903
Narda
4772-3
Attenuator (3dB)
CBT
N/A
CBT
9406
Narda
BW-S3W2
Attenuator (3dB)
CBT
N/A
CBT
120
Mini-Circuits
NLP-2950+
Low Pass Filter DC to 2700 MHz
CBT
N/A
CBT
N/A
Agilent
85070E
Dielectric Probe Kit
3/8/2012
Annual
3/8/2013
MY44300633
Seekonk
NC-100
Torque Wrench (8" lb)
11/29/2011
Triennial
11/29/2014
21053
Speag
DAK-3.5
Dielectric Assessment Kit
12/1/2011
Annual
12/1/2012
1031
Narda
4014C-6
4 - 8 GHz SMA 6 dB Directional Coupler
CBT
N/A
CBT
N/A
MCL
BW-N6W5+
6dB Attenuator
CBT
N/A
CBT
1139
Intelligent Weigh
PD-3000
Electronic Balance
3/27/2012
Annual
3/27/2013
11081534
Control Company
36934-158
Wall-Mounted Thermometer
1/4/2012
Biennial
1/4/2014
122014488
Control Company
61220-416
Long-Stem Thermometer
10/12/2011
Biennial
10/12/2013
111860820
Seekonk
NC-100
Torque Wrench (8" lb)
3/5/2012
Triennial
3/5/2015
N/A
Seekonk
NC-100
Torque Wrench (8" lb)
3/5/2012
Triennial
3/5/2015
N/A
COMTECH
AR85729-5/5759B
Solid State Amplifier
CBT
N/A
CBT
M3W1A00-1002
Note: CBT (Calibrated Before Testing). Prior to testing, the measurement paths containing a cable, amplifier, attenuator, coupler or filter were
connected to a calibrated source (i.e. a signal generator) to determine the losses of the measurement path. The power meter offset was then adjusted
to compensate for the measurement system losses. This level offset is stored within the power meter before measurements are made. This calibration
verification procedure applies to the system verification and output power measurements. The calibrated reading is then taken directly from the power
meter after compensation of the losses for all final power measurements.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 14 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
11
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES
e=
f(d,k)
IEEE
1528
Sec.
Uncertainty
Component
Tol.
Prob.
(± %)
Dist.
Div.
h=
i=
c x f/e
c x g/e
ci
ci
1gm
10gms
1gm
10 gms
ui
ui
(± %)
(± %)
vi
Measurement System
∞
Probe Calibration
E.2.1
6.0
1.0
1.0
6.0
6.0
Axial Isotropy
E.2.2
0.25
0.7
0.7
0.2
0.2
∞
Hemishperical Isotropy
E.2.2
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
∞
Boundary Effect
E.2.3
0.4
1.0
1.0
0.4
0.4
∞
Linearity
E.2.4
0.3
1.0
1.0
0.3
0.3
∞
System Detection Limits
E.2.5
5.1
1.0
1.0
5.1
5.1
∞
Readout Electronics
E.2.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
∞
Response Time
E.2.7
0.8
1.73
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
∞
Integration Time
E.2.8
2.6
1.73
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
∞
RF Ambient Conditions
E.6.1
3.0
1.73
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.7
∞
Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance
E.6.2
0.4
1.73
1.0
1.0
0.2
0.2
∞
Probe Positioning w/ respect to Phantom
E.6.3
2.9
1.73
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.7
∞
E.5
1.0
1.73
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.6
∞
Test Sample Positioning
E.4.2
6.0
1.0
1.0
6.0
6.0
287
Device Holder Uncertainty
Output Power Variation - SAR drift measurement
E.4.1
6.6.2
3.32
5.0
1.73
1.73
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.9
2.9
1.9
2.9
∞
∞
Phantom Uncertainty (Shape & Thickness tolerances)
E.3.1
4.0
1.73
1.0
1.0
2.3
2.3
∞
Liquid Conductivity - deviation from target values
E.3.2
5.0
1.73
0.64
0.43
1.8
1.2
∞
Liquid Conductivity - measurement uncertainty
E.3.3
3.8
0.64
0.43
2.4
1.6
Liquid Permittivity - deviation from target values
E.3.2
5.0
1.73
0.60
0.49
1.7
1.4
∞
Liquid Permittivity - measurement uncertainty
E.3.3
4.5
0.60
0.49
2.7
2.2
299
Extrapolation, Interpolation & Integration algorithms for
Max. SAR Evaluation
Test Sample Related
Phantom & Tissue Parameters
Combined Standard Uncertainty (k=1)
RSS
12.1
11.7
Expanded Uncertainty
k=2
24.2
23.5
(95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL)
The above measurement uncertainties are according to IEEE Std. 1528-2003
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 15 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
12
CONCLUSION
12.1
Measurement Conclusion
The SAR evaluation indicates that the DUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and
Industry Canada, with respect to all parameters subject to this test. These measurements were taken to
simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were
taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the item(s) tested.
Please note that the absorption and distribution of electromagnetic energy in the body are very complex
phenomena that depend on the mass, shape, and size of the body, the orientation of the body with
respect to the field vectors, and the electrical properties of both the body and the environment. Other
variables that may play a substantial role in possible biological effects are those that characterize the
environment (e.g. ambient temperature, air velocity, relative humidity, and body insulation) and those that
characterize the individual (e.g. age, gender, activity level, debilitation, or disease). Because various
factors may interact with one another to vary the specific biological outcome of an exposure to
electromagnetic fields, any protection guide should consider maximal amplification of biological effects as
a result of field-body interactions, environmental conditions, and physiological variables. [3]
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 16 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
13
REFERENCES
[1]
Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation, Aug. 1996.
[2]
ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio
frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006.
[3]
ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio
frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992.
[4]
ANSI/IEEE C95.3-2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous
Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE, December 2002.
[5]
Federal Communications Commission, OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97-01), Supplement C (Edition 01-01),
Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,
June 2001.
[6]
IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 34 – IEEE Std. 1528-2003, Recommended Practice for Determining
the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Body Due to Wireless Communications
Devices.
[7]
NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria
for RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995.
[8]
T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE
Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113.
[9]
K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating
liquids at mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. -124.
[10] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids,
Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175.
[11] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2.
[12] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon
Human Modeling at 900 MHz, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct.
1996, pp. 1865-1873.
[13] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole
antennas above 300MHz, IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23.
[14] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation
Absorption Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectromagnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36.
[15] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable
Cellular Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995.
[16] W. Gander, Computermathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992.
[17] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific
Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 17 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
[18] Federal Communications Commission, OET Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human
Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Supplement C, Dec. 1997.
[19] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known
precision, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652.
[20] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
High-frequency: 10kHz-300GHz, Jan. 1995.
[21] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hoschschule Zürich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the
Cellular Phone.
[22] IEC 62209-1, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless
communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 1: Procedure to determine the
specific absorption rate (SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300
MHz to 3 GHz), Feb. 2005.
[23] Industry Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All
Frequency Bands) Issue 4, March 2010.
[24] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the
Frequency Range from 3 kHz – 300 GHz, 2009
[25] FCC Public Notice DA-02-1438. Office of Engineering and Technology Announces a Transition Period for the
Phantom Requirements of Supplement C to OET Bulletin 65, June 19, 2002
[26] FCC SAR Test Procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Devices KDB Publications 941225,
D01-D07
[27] SAR Measurement procedures for IEEE 802.11a/b/g KDB Publication 248227 D01v01r02
[28] FCC SAR Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas, KDB Publications 648474
D02-D04
[29] FCC SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers, FCC KDB
Publication 616217 D04
[30] FCC SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100MHz – 6 GHz, KDB Publications 865664 DR01
[31] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR Procedures for Dongles, KDB Publication 447498, D01-D02
[32] Anexo à Resolução No. 533, de 10 de Septembro de 2009.
[33] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless
communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 2: Procedure to determine the
specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body
(frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz), Mar. 2010.
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
0Y1302070239-R1.BXO
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Page 18 of 18
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
APPENDIX A: SAR TEST DATA
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
DUT: BXONEON-TU-1000; Type: Portable Device; Serial: RevC
Communication System: CSS; Frequency: 24
DUT: BXONEON-TU-1000; Type: Portable Device; Serial: RevC
Communication System: CSS; Frequency: 2441.75 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441.75 MHz; σ = 2.026 S/m; εr = 54.807; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm
Test Date: 05-22-2012; Ambient Temp: 23.8°C; Tissue Temp: 22.3°C
Probe: ES3DV2 - SN3022; ConvF(4.01, 4.01, 4.01); Calibrated: 8/25/2011;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
Electronics: DAE4 Sn665; Calibrated: 4/19/2012
Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: SAM; Serial: TP1375
Measurement SW: DASY4, Version 4.7 (80); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.4 (4989)
Mode: CSS, Body SAR, Back Side, Antenna #1
Area Scan (10x13x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm
Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 6.627 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.1430
SAR(1 g) = 0.082 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.047 W/kg
A2
PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
DUT: BXONEON-TU-1000; Type: Portable Device; Serial: RevC
Communication System: CSS; Frequency: 24
APPENDIX B: SYSTEM VERIFICATION
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
DUT: SAR Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 719
Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 2.043 mho/m; r = 54.77; = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm
Test Date: 05-22-2012; Ambient Temp: 23.8°C; Tissue Temp: 22.3°C
Probe: ES3DV2 - SN3022; ConvF(4.01, 4.01, 4.01); Calibrated: 8/25/2011
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
Electronics: DAE4 Sn665; Calibrated: 4/19/2012
Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: SAM; Serial: TP1375
Measurement SW: DASY4, Version 4.7 (80); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.4 (4989)
2450MHz System Verification
Area Scan (5x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm
Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Input Power = 16 dBm (40 mW)
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 4.06 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 1.97 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.920 mW/g
Deviation = -4.00 %
0 dB = 2.53mW/g
B1
APPENDIX C: PROBE CALIBRATION
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
APPENDIX D: SAR TISSUE SPECIFICATIONS
Measurement Procedure for Tissue verification:
1) The network analyzer and probe system was configured and calibrated.
2) The probe was immersed in the tissue. The tissue was placed in a nonmetallic container.
Trapped air bubbles beneath the flange were minimized by placing the probe at a slight
angle.
3) The complex admittance with respect to the probe aperture was measured
4) The complex relative permittivity ε’ can be calculated from the below equation
(Pournaropoulos and Misra):
j 2 r  0
Y
lnb a 2
  



exp  jr (  0 r'  0 )1 / 2
cos  
d d d
where Y is the admittance of the probe in contact with the sample, the primed and unprimed coordinates
refer to source and observation points, respectively, r 2   2   2  2   cos   ,  is the angular frequency,
and j   1 .
Table D-I
Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter
Frequency (MHz)
Tissue
2450
Body
Ingredients (% by weight)
26.7
0.1
73.2
DGBE
NaCl
Water
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Appendix D
Page 1 of 1
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
APPENDIX E: SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION
Per FCC KDB 865664 DR01, SAR system validation status should be documented to confirm
measurement accuracy. The SAR systems (including SAR probes, system components and software
versions) used for this device were validated against its performance specifications prior to the SAR
measurements. Reference dipoles were used with the required tissue- equivalent media for system
validation, according to the procedures outlined in IEEE 1528-2003 and FCC KDB 865664 DR01. Since
SAR probe calibrations are frequency dependent, each probe calibration point was validated at a
frequency within the valid frequency range of the probe calibration point, using the system that normally
operates with the probe for routine SAR measurements and according to the required tissue-equivalent
media.
A tabulated summary of the system validation status including the validation date(s), measurement
frequencies, SAR probes and tissue dielectric parameters has been included.
Table E-I
SAR System Validation Summary – KDB 865664 DR01
SAR
SYSTEM
FREQ.
[MHz]
DATE
2450
5/22/2012
PROBE
SN
PROBE
TYPE
3022
ES3DV2
PERM.
(σ)
(εr)
SENSITIVITY
PROBE
LINEARITY
PROBE
ISOTROPY
2.043
54.77
PASS
PASS
PASS
PROBE CAL. POINT
2450
Body
CW VALIDATION
COND.
Table E-2
SAR System Validation Summary – IEEE 1528-2003
SAR
SYSTEM
FREQ.
[MHz]
DATE
2450
5/22/2012
PROBE
SN
PROBE
TYPE
3022
ES3DV2
2450
Body
CW VALIDATION
COND.
PERM.
(σ)
(εr)
SENSITIVITY
2.043
54.77
PASS
PROBE CAL. POINT
MOD. VALIDATION
EXTRAPO PROBE
SYSTEM
PROBE
DUTY
LATION LINEARITY OFFSET ISOTROPY FACTOR
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
0.1
PAR
PASS
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Appendix E
Page 1 of 1
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
APPENDIX F: SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Appendix F
Page 1 of 2
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013
SAR Test Setup Photo 1 – Back Side at 0.0 cm
Reviewed by:
FCC ID: BXONEON-TU-1000
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
05/22/2012
Portable Device
© 2013 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.
Appendix F
Page 2 of 2
REV 12.2 M
12/17/2013

---

Source Exif Data:

File Type                       : PDF
File Type Extension             : pdf
MIME Type                       : application/pdf
PDF Version                     : 1.6
Linearized                      : Yes
Encryption                      : Standard V4.4 (128-bit)
User Access                     : Extract
Create Date                     : 2013:03:14 17:16:55-04:00
Creator                         : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.6
Modify Date                     : 2013:03:14 17:16:55-04:00
Title                           : 
Has XFA                         : No
XMP Toolkit                     : Adobe XMP Core 5.2-c001 63.139439, 2010/09/27-13:37:26
Metadata Date                   : 2013:03:14 17:16:55-04:00
Creator Tool                    : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.6
Format                          : application/pdf
Document ID                     : uuid:2af89c9b-f703-40c7-8fb1-5866a8cf5073
Instance ID                     : uuid:e9bea74f-68e1-46c2-9bb1-e2d4478009f6
Producer                        : Adobe Acrobat Pro 10.1.6
Page Count                      : 50

EXIF Metadata provided by EXIF.tools